1. Introduction
Digital light processing (DLP) 3D printing is a process that polymerizes a surface through a chemical reaction, by irradiating UV light on photocurable resins. The core of DLP 3D printing lies in the development of optimal resins, along with the processing equipment (printer). A photocurable ceramic slurry is prepared by mixing a monomer, ceramic powder, and a photoinitiator (PI). The properties of the reactive monomer and ceramic powder determine the physical and curing properties of the ceramic polymer composite slurry [
1,
2,
3]. In addition, it affects the physical properties and characteristics of the printing object after curing. Therefore, the selection of the monomer and ceramic powder should be based on the field of application. After that, the mixing ratio of the monomer and ceramic powder, the type and concentration of PI, and additional additive composition are determined.
Many studies report and generalize the effect of powder properties on a slurry, green body, and sintered body in conventional ceramic processing [
4,
5,
6,
7], but in the case of the 3D printing photocuring process, which received attention recently, studies on the composition of the ceramic polymer composite and process conditions are being conducted [
8,
9,
10]. In general, the effect of ceramic powder on the composite slurry and curing properties increases at a higher solid content. The solid content is the most important factor in determining the viscosity of the photocurable slurry, whereas an increase in powder content decreases transmittance and curing efficiency [
11,
12,
13]. Particle size also acts as a major factor. As the particle size increases, the viscosity decreases; however, over time, sedimentation occurs, and, hence, sub-micron-sized powder is used. Meanwhile, if the particle size is too small, scattering increases, resulting in the adverse effect of lowering the curing degree.
Although the photocurable ceramic/polymer composite is widely applied to industrial materials, the effect of the filler size on the photocuring process and mechanical and optical properties after curing is not clearly defined. In this study, ceramic polymer composite slurries were prepared using nano- and micro- sized Al2O3, in order to analyze rheological properties, sedimentation behavior, and curing behavior. In addition, the slurries with different PI concentrations for each Al2O3 particle size were prepared, and subjected to different exposure times to prepare a printing object. From the above results, the correlation between slurry composition (Al2O3 and PI), properties (viscosity, precipitation behavior, and photocurability), and printing results was determined. Accordingly, the range of photocurable slurry composition and processing conditions to be considered according to the particle size of the powder were discussed for successful 3D printing.
2. Materials & Methods
2.1. Materials
In this experiment, three alumina powders with different average particle sizes were used: 100 nm (26N-0811UPA, Inframat Advanced Materials, Manchester, CT, USA), 500 nm (AES-11H, Sumitomo, Tokyo, Japan), and 2 μm (AES-23, Sumitomo). Reported properties of alumina powders are summarized in
Table 1. Methyl alcohol (CH
3OH, Extra pure, DEAJUNG, Siheung-si, Korea) was used as a solvent. The silane coupling agent was 3-trimethoxy-silylpropane-1-thiol (MPTMS), with an average molecular weight of Mw = 196.34 g/mol (Product No. KBM 503, Shin-Etsu Chemicals Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). The monomer was trimethylolpropane triacrylate (TMPTA), with an average molecular weight of Mw = 296.32 g/mol. As a PI, phenylbis (2,4,6-trimethyl benzoyl) phosphine oxide (Irgacure 819) was purchased from Sigma Aldrich.
2.2. Al2O3 Acrylate Composite Slurry Preparation
Methyl alcohol and Al2O3 were mixed in a ratio of 6:4, and ball-milled for 24 h. A total of 20 wt.% of MPTMS with respect to Al2O3 was added, and linked to the Al2O3 surface by hydrolysis and condensation reaction through heating at 50 °C for 24 h, using a heating mantle. TMPTA was added to the MPTMS-modified Al2O3 slurry, and, subsequently, a chain polymerization reaction between MPTMS and TMPTA was induced at room temperature for 12 h. The solvent was evaporated at 50 °C using a vacuum evaporator (N-1200A, EYELA, Tokyo, Japan) to obtain a solvent-free slurry. Then, the PI was mixed for 24 h to prepare a solvent-free Al2O3 acrylate composite slurry. The final solid content of the slurry was 60 wt.% (29.5 vol.%).
2.3. Characterizations
The rheological behavior of the slurry was analyzed using a rheometer (HAAKE MARS III, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Braunschweig, Germany). The experiment was conducted at a constant temperature of 25 °C by a cup and bob (Coaxial Cylinders)-type measuring system. Viscosity was measured in a shear rate range of ~10−4–103 s−1 in a steady-state mode. Oscillation sweep (frequency and amplitude oscillation sweep) was used to evaluate the deformation behavior and viscoelastic properties of the slurry. The frequency oscillation sweep was performed at an angular frequency of 0.1–100 rad/s within the linear viscoelastic range (LVR) of the slurry, determined through the amplitude oscillation sweep measurement.
For dispersion stability analysis, a sedimentation test was performed on the slurry using a Turbiscan LAB stability analyzer (Formulaction SA, Toulouse, France). The measurement used a cylindrical glass cell and a single wavelength near-infrared laser at 880 nm as a light source. Among the measurement methods of transmission (%) and backscattering (%), the backscattering (%) profile by the scattered light was used. Backscattering value (ΔBS) depicts destabilization phenomena. Destabilization phenomena include particle migration (creaming or sedimentation) and particle size variation (flocculation or coalescence).
The curing behavior of the slurries was analyzed using a photo–differential scanning calorimeter (DSC 204 F1 phoenix, Netzsch, Selb, Germany). The specimens were placed in an aluminum crucible with a pierced lid and measured at the same temperature (25 °C), light source (405 nm), light intensity (5.4 W/cm
2), and exposure time (20 s). The curing conversion rate was calculated based on the curing enthalpy (ΔH) from photo–DSC [
14].
The printing behavior of the solvent-free Al2O3 acrylate composite slurry was determined using a DLP 3D printer (IM96, Carima, Korea). The light intensity of UV LED was 7.8 mW/cm2, and the wavelength was 405 nm. A disk-shaped specimen (diameter = 10 mm, thickness = 2 mm) was printed, and the dimensions of the object were measured using a vernier caliper to confirm a deviation from the designed values. The initial exposure time during printing was 20 s, while the basic exposure time for printing was changed to the following durations: 1.2, 2.4, 4.8, 9.6, and 19.2 s. Here, the initial exposure time refers to the time until the slurry is cured and adhered to a build platform, which refers to the 10-step process in the entire printing process (204 steps), while the basic exposure time refers to the exposure time for all subsequent stages after the initial exposure time.
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Rheological Behavior
Figure 1 shows the rheological behavior of the Al
2O
3 acrylate composite slurry according to particle size. The viscosity of all slurries decreases with increasing shear rate, and it increases with decreasing particle size at the same shear rate. When the particle size decreases, the surface area of the Al
2O
3 particles increases relatively at the same solid content, so interparticle interaction increases significantly and the viscosity increases [
15]. All slurries exhibit Newtonian behavior at low shear rates, and they then show shear-thinning behavior, characterized by a decreasing viscosity at higher shear rates. This is because the particles in the slurry establish a directional arrangement at higher shear rates, decreasing interparticle interaction and viscosity [
15,
16,
17]. This rheological property is desirable for 3D-printing slurries, owing to the low viscosity even under the stress generated during printing.
To analyze the deformation behavior and viscoelastic properties of the slurry, oscillatory shear measurement was performed (
Figure 2). The 100 nm Al
2O
3 slurry shows a liquid-like behavior (G″ > G′) at a low frequency, and then a solid-like behavior (G″ < G′) from 40 Hz after intersection. This phenomenon means that the slurry has a more sol-like state. The 500 nm and 2 μm Al
2O
3 slurries exhibit solid-like behavior within the measured frequency range. In addition, both G′ and G″ tend to increase with frequency, indicating a typical gel-like slurry.
Figure 3 shows the change in loss tangent (tan δ) with respect to frequency. The loss tangent reflects the ratio of viscosity to elasticity (energy loss to energy stored) and the damping (attenuation) of the Al
2O
3 slurry [
16,
17,
18,
19,
20]. As the particle size increases, the loss tangent tends to decrease. The 100 nm Al
2O
3 slurry shows a significant decrease in loss tangent at higher frequencies. This is because small particles in the slurry are weakly agglomerated, and behave similar to irregular single particles that easily roll or slip during shear deformation, resulting in a high viscosity in comparison with their elasticity [
18,
19].
3.2. Sedimentation Behavior
The sedimentation behavior of Al
2O
3 acrylate composite slurry was observed for 24 h to determine the change in dispersion stability (
Figure 4). Unlike other ceramic processing technologies, the 3D printing process repeatedly stacks layers with thicknesses in the range of several tens of microns, and requires a relatively long process time. Therefore, maintaining the uniformity of the slurry during forming can act as a factor that directly affects the quality of the object.
The glass cell with specimen was divided into a top, middle, and bottom layer according to height, and the dispersion stability of the slurry was confirmed based on the change in the backscattering profile of each layer. Rayleigh diffusion is observed in the upper layer of the 100 nm Al
2O
3 slurry, confirming a clarification zone in which backscattering sharply increases. Rayleigh diffusion occurs when the particle size is smaller than the wavelength of the light source (<0.5 μm); as the distance between small particles becomes narrow, the scattering probability between light and particles increases, resulting in an increase in backscattering (%) [
21,
22]. A slight increase in backscattering over time in the middle and bottom layers indicates relatively weak aggregation and sedimentation.
In the case of 500 nm and 2 μm Al
2O
3 slurries, a clarification with reduced backscattering is observed in the top layer. When the particle size is larger than the wavelength of light used as a light source (>0.5 μm), Mie diffusion occurs, and as the particle size increases, the average interparticle distance also increases, resulting in fewer scattering events between light and particles [
21,
22,
23]. As a result, the backscattering (%) value of the 2 μm Al
2O
3 acrylate composite slurry with the largest particle size is further reduced.
The Turbiscan Stability Index (TSI) and peak thickness of the slurry were measured, and are shown in
Figure 5. The TSI is an accumulation of the variations in the dispersion stability over time with the integrated backscattering profile area. It always appears as an absolute value and increases to a (+) value. That is, as the TSI value increases, the dispersion stability worsens. The TSI value increases sharply with increasing particle size, indicating that sedimentation occurs rapidly at larger particle sizes. The 100 nm Al
2O
3 slurry was observed for 24 h and has almost no sedimentation.
Peak thickness is expressed by quantifying the phase thickness separated by particle migration such as sedimentation. In other words, the larger the peak thickness, the thicker the sedimentation layer, due to agglomeration. The thickness of the 100 nm Al2O3 slurry is about 0.25 mm at 0–20 h; it then becomes steady, and decreases again to 0 mm from 20 h onward. Meanwhile, the peak thicknesses of the 500 nm and 2 μm Al2O3 slurries show no change in the beginning; they then tend to increase over time. In the case of the 500 nm Al2O3 slurry, the thickness is approximately 1.0 mm after 24 h, while in the case of the 2 μm Al2O3 slurry, the thickness starts to increase rapidly from 8 h onward, and reaches a high value of approximately 2.0 mm after 24 h. Thus, it is confirmed that the sedimentation layer increases proportionally with Al2O3 particle size.
3.3. Curing Behavior
The curing behavior of Al
2O
3 acrylate composite slurry is summarized in
Table 2 and
Figure 6. Photo–DSC measurements were conducted in an isothermal mode using an exposure time of 20 s, the same as the basic exposure time used during printing. When the Al
2O
3 particle size decreases, the exothermic peak also decreases. In the 100 nm Al
2O
3 slurry with the smallest particle size, the dispersed particles cause UV light scattering and absorption during photopolymerization, resulting in a shorter cure depth [
13]. As a result, the value of the maximum heat flow (ΔQ_max) decreases. In other words, the photon transport mean free path decreases with Al
2O
3 particle size, resulting in a proportional decrease in the maximum heat flow (ΔQ_max).
When comparing the curing enthalpy according to particle size, the 2 µm Al2O3 slurry shows the highest value, and, contrary to expectations, the 100 nm Al2O3 slurry shows higher values than those for the 500 nm Al2O3 slurry. These results might be due to the difference in curing time. The 100 nm Al2O3 slurry with a relatively broad heat flow takes approximately two minutes to complete curing (at the point where the heat flow becomes zero). On the other hand, the curing of the 500 nm Al2O3 slurry is achieved in less than one minute. Thus, the curing enthalpy value represented by the area in the time vs. heat flow graph is higher for the 100 nm Al2O3 slurry with a larger area.
For the 500 nm and 2 μm Al
2O
3 slurries, the values of maximum heat flow, curing enthalpy, and conversion % are high according to PI concentration, in the order of 1.0 > 0.1 > 3.0 wt.%. The PI irradiated with UV light absorbs photons and is excited to a higher energy state, resulting in high chemical reactivity (sensitivity) with the monomer [
14]. As the PI concentration exceeds the appropriate amount (~1 wt.%), the damping coefficient increases based on the Beer–Lambert law and, consequently, affects the reactivity of the slurry. Therefore, it is determined that the values of maximum heat flow, curing enthalpy, and conversion % decrease when the PI concentration exceeds 1 wt.%.
Using the measured curing enthalpy (ΔH), the curing conversion rate according to particle size and PI concentration was calculated, and is shown in
Table 2 and in the right graph of
Figure 6. As the particle size increases, the difference in conversion rate according to PI concentration is found to be significant. This means that as the particle size increases for the same solid content, the distance between particles becomes wider, and the concentration of PIs between them relatively increases, leading to an increase in photopolymerization reactivity. On the other hand, when the particle size in the slurry is small, the reactivity decreases, owing to an increase in diffraction, scattering, and absorption of the light. Thus, the difference in photocuring conversion rate according to particle size and PI concentration is small [
14,
20,
24].
3.4. Printing Behavior
Table 3 and
Figure 7 summarize the effects of Al
2O
3 particle size and PI concentration on the printing results. As the Al
2O
3 particle size increases, the range of exposure time viable for printing, and the dimension conformity of the printed specimen with the design file, improves. The optimum printing results are achieved at a PI concentration of 1 wt.%. However, the dimensions of the printed specimen are confirmed to significantly deviate from the design file as exposure time increases at the same PI concentration.
In the case of the 100 nm Al2O3 slurry, the printing fails, as the printed object detaches from the build platform at the initial stage under all exposure time conditions. It can be concluded that the scattering and absorption of UV light by Al2O3 particles occurs rigorously during printing, decreasing the curing rate and affecting the printing behavior. As the particle size increases, the range of exposure time viable for printing the Al2O3 acrylate composite slurry and the conformity improves. After printing, the 500 nm Al2O3 slurry has the highest degree of conformity (105.2, 102%) at the exposure time of 2.4 s, while the 2 μm Al2O3 slurry shows the best conformity (101.7, 101.2%) at 1.2 s.
The range of exposure time viable for printing is the widest at a PI concentration of 1.0 wt.%, yielding the highest maximum heat flow value and curing enthalpy, followed by 0.1 wt.% PI concentration. The slurries containing 3.0 wt.% PI concentration, with a relatively low maximum heat flow and curing enthalpy, mostly fail to print Al2O3 acrylate composites. From the analysis of the relationship between the curing properties of the slurry and the printing result, the maximum heat flow exhibits a higher probability as an index for predicting the success of printing in comparison with the curing enthalpy and conversion % of the slurry.
The conformity of the printed specimen as a function of exposure time is lower for the 1.0 wt.% slurry compared to that of the slurry with a 0.1 wt.% PI concentration. Photocurable slurries with a high PI concentration undergo very intense photo-polymerization when exposed to UV for a long time. The curing range of the ceramic slurry can be explained by the Gaussian beam model, where the curing depth increases at a higher curing rate, consequently increasing the curing width (WGauss) [
25]. Therefore, when a slurry with a high PI concentration is exposed to UV for a long time, the precision of the printed object deteriorates.
To define the correlation between curing and printing behavior of slurries with different particle sizes and PI concentrations, the X-axis in
Figure 8 is set as the PI concentration, the Y-axis as the Al
2O
3 particle size, and the Z-axis as the maximum heat flow (ΔQmax), to indicate the viable and non-viable area for printing. When the Al
2O
3 particle size increases, or the PI concentration decreases, the ΔQmax value tends to increase, indicating the viable area for printing. The highest maximum heat flow (6.72 mw/mg) is achieved at the Al
2O
3 particle size of 2 μm and PI concentration of 1.0 wt.%, and in this vicinity, excellent printing properties are exhibited.
4. Conclusions
In this study, the effect of Al2O3 particle size (100 nm, 500 nm, and 2 μm) on the properties of ceramic polymer composite slurries and 3D printing results was determined. Steady-state mode analysis confirms that all slurries exhibit a shear-thinning behavior. The 100 nm Al2O3 slurry appears to be more sol-like, while the 500 nm and 2 μm Al2O3 slurries have a gel-like structure. With increasing Al2O3 particle size, the thickness of the sedimentation layer increases, owing to rapid sedimentation, but the effect on printing within 8 h is concluded to be negligible. The distance between particles increases with Al2O3 particle size, resulting in a longer photon transport mean free path and a photocurability improvement. Consequently, the range of exposure time viable for printing, and the dimension conformity of the printed specimen with the design file, improves when the Al2O3 particle size increases. For the 500 nm and 2 μm Al2O3 slurries, the values of maximum heat flow, curing enthalpy, and conversion rate are high according to the photoinitiator concentration, in the order of 1.0 > 0.1 > 3.0 wt.%. When the concentration of the photoinitiator exceeds the appropriate amount of 1 wt.%, the damping coefficient increases, according to the Beer–Lambert law, and affects the reactivity of the slurry.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, U.K. and J.C.; methodology, K.R. and J.C.; formal analysis, K.R. and J.K.; investigation, K.R.; resources, J.K. and J.C.; data curation, K.R.; writing—original draft preparation, K.R. and U.K.; writing—review and editing, K.R. and U.K.; supervision, U.K.; project administration, U.K.; funding acquisition, J.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by the Technology Innovation Program (20010483, Key technology development of porcelain ceramic with high energy efficiency) funded by the Ministry of Trade, Industry, and Energy.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Zakeri, S.; Vippola, M.; Levänen, E. A comprehensive review of the photopolymerization of ceramic resins used in stereolithography. Addit. Manuf. 2020, 35, 101177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Z.; Li, J.; Liu, C.; Liu, Y.; Zhu, J.; Lao, C. Preparation of high solid loading and low viscosity ceramic slurries for photopolymerization-based 3D printing. Ceram. Int. 2019, 45, 11549–11557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- de Camargo, I.L.; Morais, M.M.; Fortulan, C.A.; Branciforti, M.C. A review on the rheological behavior and formulations of ceramic suspensions for vat photopolymerization. Ceram. Int. 2021, 47, 11906–11921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Franks, G.V.; Tallon, C.; Studart, A.R.; Sesso, M.L.; Leo, S. Colloidal processing: Enabling complex shaped ceramics with unique multiscale structures. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2017, 100, 458–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jennifer, A.L. Collooidal processing of ceramics. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2000, 83, 2341–2359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moreno, R. Better ceramics through colloid chemistry. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2020, 40, 559–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pugh, R.J.; Bergstrom, L. Surface and Colloid Chemistry in Advanced Ceramics Processing (Surfactant Science Book 51); Marcel Dekker: New York, NY, USA, 1994; ISBN 978-0824790981. [Google Scholar]
- Halloran, J.W. Ceramic lithography: Additive manufacturing for ceramics by photopolymerization. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 2016, 45, 19–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schwentenwein, M.; Homa, J. Additive manufacturing of dense alumina ceramics. Int. J. Appl. Ceram. Technol. 2015, 12, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Z.; Sun, X.; Shang, Y.; Xiong, K.; Xu, Z.; Guo, R.; Cai, S.; Zheng, C. Dense ceramics with complex shape fabricated by 3D printing: A review. J. Adv. Ceram. 2021, 10, 195–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tomeckova, V.; Halloran, J.W. Flow behavior of polymerizable ceramic suspensions as function of ceramic volume fraction and temperature. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2011, 31, 2535–2542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Badev, A.; Abouliatim, Y.; Chartier, T.; Lecamp, L.; Lebaudy, P.; Chaput, C.; Delage, C. Photopolymerization kinetics of a polyether acrylate in the presence of ceramic fillers used in stereolithography. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2011, 222, 117–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deckers, J.; Vleugels, J.; Kruth, J.P. Additive Manufacturing of Ceramics: A Review. J. Ceram. Sci. Technol. 2014, 5, 245–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stanko, M.; Stommel, M. Kinetic prediction of fast curing polyurehane resins by model-free isoconversional methods. Polymers 2018, 10, 698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Renger, C.; Kuschel, P.; Kristoffersson, A.; Clauss, B.; Oppermann, W.; Sigmund, W. Rheology studies on highly filled nano-ziconia slurrys. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2007, 27, 2361–2367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mezger, T.G. The Rheology Handbook, 4th ed.; Vicentz Network: Hanover, Germany, 2014; ISBN 978-3866308428. [Google Scholar]
- Reed, J.S. Principles of Ceramic Processing, 2nd ed.; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 1995; ISBN 978-0471597216. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, I.B.; Son, H.H.; Um, C.M. Rheologic properties of flowable, conventional hybrid, and condensable composite resins. Dent. Mater. 2003, 19, 298–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, I.B.; Lee, J.H.; Cho, B.H.; Son, H.H.; Lee, S.T.; Um, C.M. Rheological properties of resin composites according to the change of monomer and filler compositions. J. Korea Acad. Conserv. Dent. 2004, 29, 520–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mewis, J.; Wagner, N.J. Colloidal Suspension Rheology; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2012; ISBN 978-0511977978. [Google Scholar]
- Mengual, O.; Meunier, G.; Cayre, I.; Puech, K.; Snabre, P. Characterisation of instability of concentrated dispersions by a new optical analyser: The turbiscan MA 1000. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 1999, 152, 111–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kang, W.; Xu, B.; Wang, Y.; Li, Y.; Shan, X.; An, F.; Liu, J. Stability mechanism of W/O crude oil emulsion stabilized by polymer and surfactant. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2011, 384, 555–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mengual, O.; Meunier, G.; Cayre, I.; Puech, K.; Snabre, P. Turbiscan MA 2000: Multiple light scattering measurement for concentrated emulation and suspension instability analysis. Talanta 1999, 50, 445–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rusu, M.C.; Block, C.; Assche, G.V.; Mele, B.V. Influence of temperature and UV intensity on photo-polymerization reaction studied by photo-DSC. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2012, 110, 287–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, K.; Xie, C.; Wang, G.; He, R.; Ding, G.; Wang, M.; Dai, D.; Fang, D. High solid loading, low viscosity photosensitive Al2O3 slurry for stereolithography based additive manufacturing. Ceram. Int. 2019, 45, 203–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
| Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).