Next Article in Journal
Radiation-Stimulated Formation of Two-Dimensional Structures Based on Calcium Silicide
Next Article in Special Issue
Degradable Self-Destructive Redox-Responsive System Based on Mesoporous Organosilica Nano-Vehicles for Smart Delivery of Fungicide
Previous Article in Journal
Thermophysical Properties of Vegetable Oil-Based Hybrid Nanofluids Containing Al2O3-TiO2 Nanoparticles as Insulation Oil for Power Transformers
Previous Article in Special Issue
Nanoencapsulation of Acetamiprid by Sodium Alginate and Polyethylene Glycol Enhanced Its Insecticidal Efficiency
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Zeolitic Imidazole Framework-90-Based Pesticide Smart-Delivery System with Enhanced Antimicrobial Performance

1
Co-Innovation Center for Modern Production Technology of Grain Crop/Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China
2
Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps Key Laboratory of Protection and Utilization of Biological Resources in Tarim Basin, Tarim University, Alaer 843300, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2022, 12(20), 3622; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12203622
Submission received: 14 September 2022 / Revised: 11 October 2022 / Accepted: 12 October 2022 / Published: 15 October 2022

Abstract

:
Multimodal antimicrobial technology is regarded as a promising strategy for controlling plant diseases because it enhances antimicrobial efficacy by blocking multiple pesticide-resistance pathways. In this work, a pH-responsive multimodal antimicrobial system was constructed based on ZIF-90 for the controlled release of kasugamycin (KSM). A series of physicochemical characterizations confirmed the successful fabrication of ZIF-90-KSM. The results indicated that the loading capacity of ZIF-90-KSM for KSM was approximately 6.7% and that the ZIF-90 nanocarriers could protect KSM against photodegradation effectively. The acid pH at the site of disease not only decompose the Schiff base bonds between KSM and ZIF-90, but also completely dissolved the nanocarriers. The simultaneous release of KSM and Zn2+ ions was able to achieve multimodal antimicrobial functions during disease occurs. A bioactivity survey indicated that ZIF-90-KSM had superior fungicidal activity and longer duration against Magnaporthe oryzae than KSM aqueous solution. In addition, the phytotoxicity assessment of ZIF-90-KSM on rice plants did not reveal any adverse effects. Therefore, ZIF-90-KSM prepared by Schiff base reaction has great potential for achieving synergistic antifungal functions and provides an eco-friendly approach to manage rice diseases.

1. Introduction

Pesticides, one of the effective methods to reduce the damage caused by pathogens, insects, and weeds, play a crucial role in improving crop productivity and quality [1]. However, only 0.1% of the active ingredients actually reach the target pests, and more than 90% of the applied conventional pesticide formulations are lost into the surrounding environment through runoff, migration spray drift, decomposition, and leaching [2,3,4]. The poor utilization of active ingredients results in frequent application of traditional pesticide formulations to achieve a satisfactory control effect [5,6]. The unreasonable and excessive use of pesticides not only leads to the resistance of pests and waste of resources but also causes the destruction of soil biodiversity and eutrophication of water [7,8]. Therefore, it is very urgent to develop a sustainable strategy for prolonging the effective duration, improving the utilization efficiency, and reducing the nontarget toxicity of pesticides.
In recent years, stimuli-responsive pesticide delivery systems based on nanocarriers have attracted widespread attention due to their ability to control pesticide release, improve target activity, and minimize the adverse effects on the environment [9,10,11,12]. Among various nanocarriers explored, Zn-based metal–organic frameworks (ZIF-90) as pesticide carriers for stimuli-responsive pesticide delivery systems have a number of unique advantages, such as facile synthesis route, high porosity, abundant aldehyde groups, outstanding biocompatibility, and being environmentally friendly [13,14,15,16]. In addition, the Zn2+ ions released from ZIF-90 have obvious antimicrobial properties against various pathogens (such as Gram-negative Escherichia coli and Gram-positive Staphylococcus aureus) [17,18,19]. More importantly, the highly reactive-free aldehyde groups of ZIF-90 can be covalently conjugated with the amino groups in drug molecules via a Schiff base reaction [20,21]. The resulting ZIF-90-based nanomaterials can be rapidly degraded under acidic conditions to simultaneously release Zn2+ ions and active ingredients on demand for synergistic antimicrobial effects [22].
As an aminoglycoside antibiotic isolated from Streptomyces kasugaensis, kasugamycin (KSM) has excellent antimicrobial activity against Erwinia amylovora, Aciovorax citrulli, Didymella segeticola, Rhizoctonia solani, Cercospora janseana, and Magnaporthe oryzae [23,24,25,26,27]. Application of KSM before disease occurrence is an effective method to avoid the outbreak of plant diseases in the field. However, KSM is sensitive to sunlight and ultraviolet light, which results in its low utilization efficacy and short duration [28]. To overcome this problem, KSM incorporation into stable and biocompatible nanoparticles can enhance photostability and prolong the effective duration of active ingredients [29]. Unfortunately, in situ capture or postsynthesis adsorption via porous nanomaterials can lead to the instability of pesticide controlled-release systems due to aspecific release during delivery, which limits its wide application in the field of agriculture [30].
Rice (Oryza sativa L.) is an important food crop that feeds more than 3.5 billion people worldwide [31]. However, as a recognized cancer of rice, rice blast disease caused by Magnaporthe oryzae has a serious adverse impact on rice production every year, resulting in an annual yield loss of 10–35%, and even over 50% during disease epidemics the disease [32]. Previous researches have reported that Magnaporthe oryzae can manipulate the pH of host cells by secreting organic acids to affect the virulence of pathogens [33,34]. Therefore, pH is an efficient stimulus response factor of pesticide controlled-release system, which can achieve rapid targeted release of active ingredients and control plant diseases in timely fashion. In this study, an acid pH-stimuli responsive pesticide delivery system was constructed by introducing Schiff base bonds between ZIF-90 and KSM. The acid environment caused by Magnaporthe oryzae infection triggered degradation of ZIF-90-KSM. The KSM and Zn2+ ions released from ZIF-90-KSM induced the death of Magnaporthe oryzae. The characterization, light stability, release profiles, fungicidal activities, and safety of the prepared ZIF-90-KSM were fully evaluated.

2. Experimental

2.1. Materials

Kasugamycin (KSM; purity 80%) was purchased from Hubei Jiufenglong Chemical Co., Ltd. (Wuhan, China). KSM aqueous solution (6%) was purchased from Shanxi Xinyuan Huakang Chemical Co., Ltd (Shanxi, China). Imidazole-2-carboxaldehyde (ICA), sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), zinc nitrate hexahydrate, cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB), polyvinylpyrrolidone K30 (PVP), tert-butanol, tris(hydroxymethyl) aminomethane (Tris), and hydrochloric acid (HCl) were purchased from Shanghai Aladdin Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Citric acid, sodium citrate, sodium hydroxide, acetic acid, ethanol, and chromatographic grade methanol were acquired from Adamas Beta Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Deionized water and ultrapure water were prepared by a Milli-Q water purification system (Millipore, Milford, MA, USA).

2.2. Synthesis of ZIF-90-KSM

2.2.1. Synthesis of ZIF-90

The ZIF-90 was synthesized by a water–alcohol-based method [35]. Briefly, 371.25 mg of zinc nitrate hexahydrate and 4.0 mg of CTAB were dissolved in the mixture of 20 mL H2O/tert-butanol (1: 1, v/v) as a triggered solvent. Then, 480.0 mg of ICA and 50.0 mg of PVP were dissolved in the mixture of 20 mL H2O/tert-butanol (1: 1, v/v) as a modifier. After that, the triggered solvent was poured into the modifier and continuously stirred for 5 min at room temperature. Finally, a pale-yellow precipitate was formed. The ZIF-90 solid product was obtained by centrifugation (13,000 rpm, 10 min), washed with excess ethanol, and vacuum-dried at 60 °C for 12 h.

2.2.2. Synthesis of KSM-linked ZIF-90 (ZIF-90-KSM)

The KSM was covalently linked to the ZIF-90 through Schiff base reaction [36]. Firstly, 100 mg of KSM was dissolved in 3 mL of Tris-HCl buffer (0.2 M, pH 8.0) at room temperature. Then, 50 mg of the prepared ZIF-90 was dispersed in 3 mL of Tris-HCl buffer (0.2 M, pH 8.0) by an ultrasonic cleaner. This solution was added to the flask containing KSM solution dropwise with constant stirring in the dark at room temperature for 24 h. Finally, the products were collected by centrifugation and washed with deionized water several times to remove unreacted KSM molecules. The precipitate was dried in a vacuum for further treatment.

2.3. Characterization

The morphologies of ZIF-90 and ZIF-90-KSM were acquired using a FEI Tecnai™ 12 transmission electron microscope (TEM) (Philips, Eindhoven, Netherlands) at an acceleration voltage of 120 kV. The crystalline phases were carried out by powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) performed on a Bruker D8 (Bruker Co. Ltd., Karlsruhe, Germany) Advance system using Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.5418 Å). The chemical functional groups of ZIF-90 and ZIF-90-KSM were determined by a Nicolet iS20 Fourier-transform spectrophotometer (FTIR) (Thermo-Fisher, Waltham, USA) in transmission mode using the KBr pellet technique. The zeta potential of the samples was performed with a Nano-zs90 Nanosizer (Malvern Instruments, Malvern, UK). The content of KSM in ZIF-90-KSM was estimated by an SDT-Q600 thermogravimetric analyzer (TA Instruments-Waters LLC, New Castle, USA) under a nitrogen atmosphere with continuous heating from ambient temperature to 600 °C at a heating rate 10 °C/min. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) of the samples was performed on a Thermo ESCALAB 250Xi (Thermo-Fisher, Waltham, USA). The specific surface areas of the samples were determined by Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) nitrogen adsorption at 77 K using ASAP 2020 analyzer (Micromeritics, Norcross, USA).
The concentration of KSM released from the samples was determined by a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) system from Waters (Milford, MA, USA). The system consists of a Waters Alliance e2695 separations module equipped with a Waters 2487 dual λ absorbance detector and a 250 mm × 4.6 mm InertSustain C18 column (particle size 5 µm, GL Sciences Inc., Tokyo, Japan). The column compartment was kept at 35 °C. The mobile phase for KSM detection was consisted of 0.1% acetic acid and 0.1% SDS (aqueous phase A) in ultrapure water and chromatographic grade methanol (organic phase B). Separation was performed with an isocratic elution at a volume ratio of 40:60 (A:B). The flow rate was maintained at 1 mL/min and the injection volume was 20 μL. The ultraviolet detector for KSM was set at 210 nm. All mobile phases and samples used for HPLC analysis were filtered using a 0.45 μm membrane filter.

2.4. Controlled-Release Kinetics

The pesticide release behavior was investigated in citric acid–sodium citrate buffer solution with different pH values (pH 4.0, 5.5, and 7.0) by a dialysis method [37]. Briefly, 2 mL of ZIF-90-KSM dispersion (20 mg/mL) was transferred into a dialysis bag (molecular weight cutoff: 3500 Da). Then, the bag was submerged in 38 mL of citric acid–sodium citrate under slow magnetic stirring at room temperature. At predetermined time intervals, aliquots of the sample from the respective buffers were collected and the same volume of fresh citric acid–sodium citrate buffer solution was replenished. The content of KSM released from ZIF-90-KSM was analyzed by the HPLC system. All the release points for the experiments were measured in triplicate. The release behaviors of KSM from ZIF-90-KSM were evaluated by zero-order, first-order, Higuchi, Ritger–Peppas, and Hixson–Crow models.
Zero-order   model :   M t M z = k t
First-order   model :   M t M z = 1 e k t
Higuchi   model :   M t M z = k t 1 2
Ritger–Peppas   model :   M t M z = k t n
Hixson–Crowell   model :   ( 1 M t M z ) 1 3 = k t
where Mt/Mz represents the amount of KSM released at time t; k is the kinetic constant that depends on incorporate characteristics of KSM and ZIF-90 system; and n is the diffusional exponent that characterizes the mechanism of KSM release.

2.5. Light Stability of ZIF-90-KSM

To evaluate the light stability of KSM, KSM aqueous solution and ZIF-90-KSM under ultraviolet light irradiation, the same concentration of samples was exposed to a 32 W ultraviolet lamp (254 nm) with a distance of 20 cm. Approximately 0.75 mL of the solution containing KSM from the respective samples was taken out at regular intervals, the residual amount of the samples was measured by the HPLC system. The degradation efficiency of KSM in the samples was calculated by the following equation:
Degradation   efficiency   ( % ) = C 0 C t C 0 × 100
The photodegradation of KSM in the samples was fitted using pseudo-first-order kinetics, as given by the following equation:
ln C t C 0 = k t
where Ct is the concentration of KSM at irradiation time t, C0 is the initial concentration of KSM, and k is the rate constant.

2.6. Antifungal Assays

The mycelium growth rate method was used to evaluate the antifungal activity of ZIF-90-KSM. A certain amount of ZIF-90-KSM was poured into molten potato dextrose agar (PDA, pH 5.7) medium, where all the concentrations were determined by the concentration of KSM. Then, 20 mL of the medium containing different concentrations of pesticide (1.5, 3.0, 6.0, 12.0, and 24.0 mg/L) was poured into each sterilized petri dish (9 cm in diameter). After solidification for 2 h, a mycelium plug (6 mm in diameter) taken from the 10-day-old culture of Magnaporthe oryzae was aseptically transferred to the center of the above PDA plates supplemented with ZIF-90-KSM. After culturing at 25 °C for 14 days in the dark, the colony diameter was measured three times in different perpendicular directions. To make a comparison, KSM aqueous solution and blank ZIF-90 were used as controls.
Mycelium   growth   inhibition   rate   ( % ) = D c D t D c × 100
where Dc is the colony diameter of control at day 14, Dt is the colony diameter of treatment at day 14.

2.7. Phytotoxicity of ZIF-90-KSM

Rice seeds (Oryza sativa L. cv Xiangliangyou 900) were surface sterilized with 75% ethanol (v/v) for 5 min, then treated with 5% sodium hypochlorite for 5 min and washed with deionized water several times. After soaking for 48 h in ultrapure water, the germinated seeds were transferred to plastic pots (9.2 cm × 9.2 cm × 8.5 cm) containing nutrient soil (15 plants per container). Plants were cultivated for two weeks in a growth chamber at a 26 °C/20 °C (day/night) cycle. The plants were treated with different concentrations of KSM aqueous solution and ZIF-90-KSM (0, 50, 100, and 200 mg/L), where all the concentrations were determined by the mass of KSM. Fourteen days after treatment, the shoot height, shoot fresh weight, shoot dry weight of rice, and the relative content of chlorophyll in plant leaves (expressed as SPAD index) were measured. All treatments were performed in triplicate.

2.8. Data Analysis

All statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS 23.0 statistical analysis software (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). The diameter of the nanomaterials was quantified by analyzing the TEM images using ImageJ software. The data were analyzed by Duncan multiple range test (p < 0.05) and presented as the mean ± standard error (SE). Origin 2022b (learning edition) was used to plot the graphs. All experiments were performed at least three times.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Preparation and Characterization of ZIF-90-KSM

Herein, ZIF-90-KSM with acid-triggered release properties was successfully constructed. The synthetic process and release mechanism of ZIF-90-KSM are summarized in Figure 1A. ZIF-90 was self-assembled from the linkage of ICA and Zn2+ ions in a water–alcohol-based system. Then, KSM was introduced into ZIF-90 via the Schiff base reaction of the aldehyde group in ICA and the amino group in KSM, forming acid-responsive ZIF-90-KSM.
As depicted in Figure 2A,B, the synthesized ZIF-90 had good dispersibility and regular granatohedron structures with a diameter of around 100–200 nm. After KSM modification, the morphology of ZIF-90-KSM had a slight change compared to that of ZIF-90, and the original cubic structure became indistinct (Figure 2C,D). To qualitatively verify the formation processes of ZIF-90-KSM, the samples were analyzed by zeta potential measurement. As shown in Figure 3A, ZIF-90 had a zeta potential of 8.8 ± 2.1 mV derived from the positive charge of CATB, which was consistent with a previous report [38]. When the active ingredients were grafted on the ZIF-90, the zeta potential of ZIF-90-KSM shifted to −9.6 ± 1.5 mV. The reversed zeta potential attributed to the negative charge of KSM shielded the positively charged of the CTAB-capped ZIF-90 in the water.
The crystal structure changes of ZIF-90 after loading of KSM were monitored using XRD analysis. As shown in Figure 3B, the simulated XRD patterns of ZIF-90 exhibited six characteristic diffraction peaks at 5.03°, 8.36°, and 8.96°, which were assigned to the crystalline plane of (011), (200), (112), (022), (013), and (222), respectively [39,40]. According to the X-ray single crystal data, the characteristic peaks of the prepared ZIF-90 showed a good correlation with the simulated pattern of ZIF-90, indicating the successful coordination of the Zn2+ ions and ICA. After modification with KSM, the obtained ZIF-90-KSM had similar characteristic peaks but with lower intensity, indicating that KSM loading could destroy the framework integrity of ZIF-90. These findings were consistent with TEM observations of ZIF-90-KSM.
The compositions of KSM, ZIF-90, and ZIF-90-KSM were characterized by FTIR spectra (Figure 3C). For KSM, the peak at 1697 cm−1 was attributed to the C=O stretching vibration of the carbonyl group, while peaks at 1660 and 1520 cm−1 were assigned to the vibration of the amide I (N-H, stretching) and amide II (N-H, bending). The characteristic absorption bands of KSM are consistent with previous studies [41,42]. In the FTIR spectra for ZIF-90, the peak at 1675 cm−1 was attributed to C=O stretching vibration of the aldehyde groups in ICA ligand. Moreover, the peaks appeared at 1456 cm−1, 1364 cm−1, 1166 cm−1, 956 cm−1, and 792 cm−1 were belonged to the characteristic absorption of imidazole moieties in ZIF-90. After the reaction with KSM by Schiff base reaction, two new adsorption peaks assigned to the bending vibration of C=N and –NHCO– were observed at 1642 and 1540 cm−1, indicating the successful conjugation of KSM to ZIF-90. The results of FTIR spectra were consistent with the previous studies related to modifying ZIF-90 via Schiff base bonds [43,44].
The thermal stability of KSM, ZIF-90, and ZIF-90-KSM was investigated using thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). As shown in Figure 3D, the original weight loss in the temperature range of 35–223 °C that might be attributed to the removal of free and bound water molecules from the samples. The TGA curve of KSM reveals that the weight loss from 223 °C to 400 °C could be caused by the deformation of KSM hydrochloride [45]. In the case of ZIF-90, 26.0% weight loss at 223–600 °C is mainly due to the decomposition of the ICA linker present in ZIF-90. After functionalization with KSM, ZIF-90-KSM showed a more obvious weight loss (32.7%) in the temperature range of 223–600 °C, which could be due to the decomposition of the ZIF-90-KSM framework. From the results of TGA analyses, the KSM weight in ZIF-90-KSM was estimated to be 6.7%.
For further verification of the successful covalent-bonded immobilization of the KSM, the surface compositions were explored by XPS analyses. As shown in Figure S1A, the XPS survey spectra for ZIF-90 and ZIF-90-KSM confirmed the existence of Zn, O, N, and C elements. To further determine the binding states of O in ZIF-90 and ZIF-90-KSM, high-resolution XPS was used (Figure S1B,C). The O 1s spectrum of ZIF-90 was resolved into three distinct subpeaks at binding energy of 535.2 eV, 531.8 eV, and 531.1 eV, which were arisen from H2O, -CHO, and Zn-OH (Figure S1A) [46,47]. After the formation of ZIF-90-KSM, the peaks belonging to ZIF-90 disappeared and three new peaks attributed to C-OH, C-O, and C=O appeared at 533.2 eV, 532.4 eV, and 531.6 eV respectively, confirming that KSM successfully reacted with the aldehyde groups of ZIF-90 [48,49].
The surface area and porosity of the samples were investigated by nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherms. As depicted in Figure S1D, the adsorption isotherm of ZIF-90 displayed typical type I and IV isotherm with an H4 hysteresis loop in the IUPAC classification, which indicates that there were a large number of micropores and mesopores inside it. The specific surface area was 553.26 m2/g, the pore volume was 0.27 cm3/g, and the average pore size was 2.00 nm. After modification with KSM, type IV adsorption isotherms with hysteresis loops at high pressure appeared, indicating that its micropores were greatly reduced relative to ZIF-90, with the mesopores and macropores dominating (96.60 m2/g for specific surface area, 0.06 cm3 g−1 for total pore volume, and 2.43 nm for average pore size) (Table S1). This was likely due to the loaded KSM blocking the pore structure of ZIF-90. According to the adsorption isotherm and pore size data in Table S1, the introduction of KSM might break the Zn-N coordination bonds in ZIF-90, leading to the collapse of the ZIF-90 structure [46]. As a result, the collapse of micropores reduced the specific surface area and increased the pore size.

3.2. Light Stability of ZIF-90-KSM

As shown in Figure 4A, KSM aqueous solution and KSM dispersing in deionized water decomposed rapidly after being exposed to ultraviolet irradiation. After 48 h irradiation, the retention of KSM aqueous solution and KSM were only 6.58 ± 1.06% and 5.94 ± 1.30 respectively, which means that the aqueous solution had no protection for KSM. In contrast, after the KSM covalently cross-linked with the ZIF-90 via Schiff base reaction, the ZIF-90-KSM exhibited better light stability, and the retention of the active ingredients was 41.43 ± 1.88% after being exposed for 48 h. The degradation kinetics of the samples were well fitted with first-order decay equations ((ln Ct/C0 = −kt) (Figure 4B and Table 1). According to the initial rate constant (k), the half-lives (DT50) of KSM, KSM aqueous solution, and ZIF-90-KSM were 11.92, 12.85, and 37.46 h, respectively. The overall comparison of various carriers used to protect active ingredients from photolysis is given in Table S2. For instance, KSM-loaded silica nanospheres exhibited a fourfold decrease in the photodegradation of the active ingredients compared with KSM after 72 h of UV irradiation. In this study, the half-life of ZIF-90-KSM was 3.1 times that of KSM. Compared with other reported carriers, ZIF-90 carriers could not only reduce the photolysis of the active ingredients, but also release Zn2+ ions to achieve a synergistic antimicrobial effect with KSM. Therefore, the ZIF-90-KSM provided a promising strategy for controlling plant diseases in modern agriculture.

3.3. Pesticide Loading and Controlled-Release Kinetics

The mechanism of KSM triggered release from ZIF-90-KSM is illustrated in Figure 1B. When the pathogens infect rice plants, the invasive hyphae of Magnaporthe oryzae could induce acidification of host cells, resulting in the cleavage of acid-sensitive Schiff base bonds, leading to the release of KSM on demand.
Figure 5 shows the release profile KSM from ZIF-90-KSM at different pH values (4.0, 5.5, and 7.0). The ZIF-90-KSM displayed significantly pH-responsive properties, and the release of KSM molecules showed an increase in a typical pH-dependent manner. At pH 7.0, merely 5.67 ± 0.53% of KSM was released from ZIF-90-KSM after continuous incubation for 96 h, suggesting the excellent stability of the nanoparticles under neutral condition. By contrast, the released amount of KSM reached up to 45.53 ± 2.18% at pH 6.0, and 93.21 ± 1.39% at pH 4.5 within a period of 96 h, respectively. The faster release rate under acidic conditions was probably due to the fracture of the acid-responsive imine bond in ZIF-90-KSM, resulting in the release of KSM on-demand, which is advantageous for prolonging their effective duration.
To further investigate the release kinetics of KSM from ZIF-90, the data were fitted to five different kinetic models. The fitted parameter values were presented in Table 2. For the effects of pH values, the controlled-release kinetics of KSM best fitted with the Higuchi model. Thus, the release of KSM was governed by Fickian diffusion.

3.4. Fungicidal Activity

The fungicidal activities of ZIF-90, KSM aqueous solution, and ZIF-90-KSM against Magnaporthe oryzae were determined by the mycelium growth rate method. As shown in Figure 6, the growth inhibition rates of Magnaporthe oryzae colony were affected by KSM aqueous solution and ZIF-90-KSM in a typical dose-dependent manner. These results are in agreement with those reported by other researchers for nano-fungicides [25,50]. The toxicity regression equations, EC50 values, 95% confidence interval, and correlation coefficients (r) of the samples are listed in Table S3. The EC50 values of the KSM aqueous solution and ZIF-90-KSM were 4.54 and 2.33 mg/L, indicating that the fungicidal activity of ZIF-90-KSM was approximately two times higher than that of the KSM aqueous solution. Additionally, according to the results of mycelial growth diameter, the blank ZIF-90 vector also had antifungal activity at high concentration (Figure S2), which is mainly attributed to the antifungal effect of Zn2+ ions released from ZIF-90. The antimicrobial activities differences between ZIF-90-KSM and KSM aqueous solution can be explained as follows: the nanosized ZIF-90-KSM can facilitate the delivery at the target site, especially under the acidic conditions of pathogenic infection, the Schiff base bond cleavage facilitates the rapid release of KSM and zinc ions in ZIF-90-KSM, which can achieve a synergistic antifungal effect. Several studies have also reported that Zn2+ ions released from zinc-based metal–organic frameworks inhibited the growth of pathogens and achieve synergistic treatment with antibiotic fungicides [51,52,53]. Therefore, ZIF-90 would be a desirable carrier that can evidently enhance the antimicrobial activity of the loaded active ingredients.

3.5. Safety Assay

Phenotypic observations of rice shoot height, shoot fresh weight, shoot dry weight, and leaf chlorophyll content (SPAD value) were used to evaluate the phytotoxicity of ZIF-90-KSM [54,55,56]. As shown in Figure 7A–D, the shoot height, shoot fresh weight, shoot dry weight, and leaf SPAD value of rice plants were not significantly affected by different concentrations of ZIF-90-KSM treatments compared to that of KSM aqueous solution treatments. Therefore, the ZIF-90-KSM prepared by Schiff base reaction has great potential for achieving synergistic antifungal functions and provides an eco-friendly approach to manage rice diseases.

4. Conclusions

In summary, ZIF-90-KSM was synthesized by conjugating ZIF-90 and KSM via an acid-cleavable Schiff base bond. The prepared ZIF-90-KSM had good dispersibility and regular granatohedron structures with a diameter of around 100–200 nm. The KSM loading capacity of ZIF-90-KSM was approximately 6.7%. The KSM conjugated with ZIF-90 improved the light stability of the active ingredients under sunlight. In addition, ZIF-90-KSM exhibited excellent pH stimuli-response performance, which synchronously released Zn2+ ions and KSM in acidic conditions. Bioactivity experiments showed that ZIF-90-KSM had strong fungicidal activity and long-term efficacy against Magnaporthe oryzae. More importantly, ZIF-90-KSM showed satisfactory safety during the growth of rice plants. Thus, the pH-responsive ZIF-90-KSM provides a new strategy for management of plant diseases and has bright prospects for controlling the release of pesticides.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/nano12203622/s1, Figure S1: Broad range XPS spectra of ZIF-90 and ZIF-90- KSM (A). Deconvolution of the high-resolution scan of O1s spectra of ZIF-90 (B) and ZIF-90-KSM (C). N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms of ZIF-90 and ZIF-90-KSM (D). Figure S2: Images of the fungicidal activity of ZIF-90 against Magnaporthe oryzae. Table S1: Surface and porosity properties of the samples. Table S2: Comparison of various carriers used to protect KSM from photolysis. Table S3: Fungicidal activity of KSM formulations as KSM aqueous solution and ZIF-90-KSM against Magnaporthe oryzae. References [29,41,42] were cited in the Supplementary Materials.

Author Contributions

Y.L.: data curation, writing—original draft, funding acquisition. S.W.: investigation, data curation. H.D.: funding acquisition. S.Y.: visualization. H.J.: writing—review and editing. J.W.: writing—review and editing. Y.Y.: formal analysis. Y.W.: validation. J.S.: investigation. Z.H.: supervision, funding acquisition, project administration. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors acknowledge financial support of this work by the Bintuan Science and Technology Program (2021CB011), the Postdoctoral Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (2021K279B), the Jiangsu Provincial Key Research and Development Program (BE2020319), the Carbon Peak Carbon Neutral Science and Technology Innovation Special Fund of Jiangsu Province (BE2022424), the Jiangsu Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Fund (CX [20]1012 and CX(22)1001), the Jiangsu Modern Agricultural Machinery Equipment and Technology Demonstration and Promotion Project (NJ2020-58), and the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD).

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge Weichen Wang and Dongya Li for the XPS measurements and useful analysis.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ben Mrid, R.; Benmrid, B.; Hafsa, J.; Boukcim, H.; Sobeh, M.; Yasri, A. Secondary metabolites as biostimulant and bioprotectant agents: A review. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 777, 146204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Hofmann, T.; Lowry, G.V.; Ghoshal, S.; Tufenkji, N.; Brambilla, D.; Dutcher, J.R.; Gilbertson, L.M.; Giraldo, J.P.; Kinsella, J.M.; Landry, M.P.; et al. Technology readiness and overcoming barriers to sustainably implement nanotechnology-enabled plant agriculture. Nat. Food 2020, 1, 416–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Katzman, D.; Bohbot-Raviv, Y.; Dubowski, Y. Does polyacrylamide-based adjuvant actually reduce primary drift of airborne pesticides? Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 775, 145816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Singh, A.; Kar, A.K.; Singh, D.; Verma, R.; Shraogi, N.; Zehra, A.; Gautam, K.; Anbumani, S.; Ghosh, D.; Patnaik, S. pH-responsive eco-friendly chitosan modified cenosphere/alginate composite hydrogel beads as carrier for controlled release of Imidacloprid towards sustainable pest control. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 427, 131215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Singh, A.; Dhiman, N.; Kar, A.K.; Singh, D.; Purohit, M.P.; Ghosh, D.; Patnaik, S. Advances in controlled release pesticide formulations: Prospects to safer integrated pest management and sustainable agriculture. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 385, 121525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Tleuova, A.B.; Wielogorska, E.; Talluri, V.S.S.L.P.; Štěpánek, F.; Elliott, C.T.; Grigoriev, D.O. Recent advances and remaining barriers to producing novel formulations of fungicides for safe and sustainable agriculture. J. Control. Release 2020, 326, 468–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Rai, P.K.; Kumar, V.; Lee, S.; Raza, N.; Kim, K.-H.; Ok, Y.S.; Tsang, D.C.W. Nanoparticle-plant interaction: Implications in energy, environment, and agriculture. Environ. Int. 2018, 119, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Stubenrauch, J.; Ekardt, F.; Heyl, K.; Garske, B.; Schott, V.L.; Ober, S. How to legally overcome the distinction between organic and conventional farming—Governance approaches for sustainable farming on 100% of the land. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2021, 28, 716–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Liang, Y.; Gao, Y.; Wang, W.; Dong, H.; Tang, R.; Yang, J.; Niu, J.; Zhou, Z.; Jiang, N.; Cao, Y. Fabrication of smart stimuli-responsive mesoporous organosilica nano-vehicles for targeted pesticide delivery. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 389, 122075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Xu, C.; Cao, L.; Bilal, M.; Cao, C.; Zhao, P.; Zhang, H.; Huang, Q. Multifunctional manganese-based carboxymethyl chitosan hydrogels for pH-triggered pesticide release and enhanced fungicidal activity. Carbohydr. Polym. 2021, 262, 117933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Liang, Y.; Wang, S.; Jia, H.; Yao, Y.; Song, J.; Dong, H.; Cao, Y.; Zhu, F.; Huo, Z. Pectin functionalized metal-organic frameworks as dual-stimuli-responsive carriers to improve the pesticide targeting and reduce environmental risks. Colloids Surf. B 2022, 219, 112796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Zhang, X.; Tang, X.; Zhao, C.; Yuan, Z.; Zhang, D.; Zhao, H.; Yang, N.; Guo, K.; He, Y.; He, Y.; et al. A pH-responsive MOF for site-specific delivery of fungicide to control citrus disease of Botrytis cinerea. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 431, 133351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhang, F.-M.; Dong, H.; Zhang, X.; Sun, X.-J.; Liu, M.; Yang, D.-D.; Liu, X.; Wei, J.-Z. Postsynthetic modification of ZIF-90 for potential targeted codelivery of two anticancer drugs. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 27332–27337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Raju, P.; Mohammed, M.A.; Ravichandran, R.A.; Archunan, G.; Prabhu, N.m.; Pugazhendhi, A. Ecofriendly one pot fabrication of methyl gallate@ZIF-L nanoscale hybrid as pH responsive drug delivery system for lung cancer therapy. Process Biochem. 2019, 84, 39–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Shen, J.; Yu, H.; Shu, Y.; Ma, M.; Chen, H. A robust ROS generation strategy for enhanced chemodynamic/photodynamic therapy via H2O2/O2 self-supply and Ca2+ overloading. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2021, 31, 2106106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Shen, J.; Ma, M.; Zhang, H.; Yu, H.; Xue, F.; Hao, N.; Chen, H. Microfluidics-assisted Surface trifunctionalization of a zeolitic Imidazolate framework nanocarrier for targeted and controllable multitherapies of tumors. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 45838–45849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Samantaray, P.K.; Madras, G.; Bose, S. The key role of modifications in biointerfaces toward rendering antibacterial and antifouling properties in polymeric membranes for water remediation: A critical assessment. Adv. Sustain. Syst. 2019, 3, 1900017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Mei, D.; Liu, L.; Li, H.; Wang, Y.; Ma, F.; Zhang, C.; Dong, H. Efficient uranium adsorbent with antimicrobial function constructed by grafting amidoxime groups on ZIF-90 via malononitrile intermediate. J. Hazard. Mater. 2022, 422, 126872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Liu, X.; Sun, X.; Peng, Y.; Wang, Y.; Xu, D.; Chen, W.; Wang, W.; Yan, X.; Ma, X. Intrinsic properties enabled metal organic framework micromotors for highly efficient self-propulsion and enhanced antibacterial therapy. ACS Nano 2022, 16, 14666–14678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lei, Z.; Shen, J.; Wang, J.; Qiu, Q.; Zhang, G.; Chi, S.-S.; Xu, H.; Li, S.; Zhang, W.; Zhao, Y.; et al. Composite polymer electrolytes with uniform distribution of ionic liquid-grafted ZIF-90 nanofillers for high-performance solid-state Li batteries. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 412, 128733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Pei, X.; Tian, C.; Wang, Y.; Li, Z.; Xiong, Z.; Wang, H.; Ma, X.; Cao, X.; Li, Z. CO2-Driven reversible transfer of amine-functionalized ZIF-90 between organic and aqueous phases. Chem. Commun. 2022, 58, 10372–10375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Sahajpal, K.; Shekhar, S.; Kumar, A.; Sharma, B.; Meena, M.K.; Bhagi, A.K.; Sharma, S. Dynamic protein and polypeptide hydrogels based on Schiff base co-assembly for biomedicine. J. Mater. Chem. B 2022, 10, 3173–3198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Tancos, K.A.; Villani, S.; Kuehne, S.; Borejsza-Wysocka, E.; Breth, D.; Carol, J.; Aldwinckle, H.S.; Cox, K.D. Prevalence of streptomycin-resistant Erwinia amylovora in New York apple orchards. Plant Dis. 2016, 100, 802–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Uppala, S.; Zhou, X.G. Field efficacy of fungicides for management of sheath blight and narrow brown leaf spot of rice. Crop Prot. 2018, 104, 72–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Liang, Y.; Duan, Y.; Fan, C.; Dong, H.; Yang, J.; Tang, J.; Tang, G.; Wang, W.; Jiang, N.; Cao, Y. Preparation of kasugamycin conjugation based on ZnO quantum dots for improving its effective utilization. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 361, 671–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Jiang, X.; Jiang, S.; Huang, H.; Li, D.; Yang, R.; Yang, Y.; Wang, D.; Song, B.; Chen, Z. Multi-omics analysis reveals that the antimicrobial kasugamycin potential targets nitrate reductase in Didymella segeticola to achieve control of tea leaf spot. Phytopathology 2022, 112, 1894–1906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Liu, W.; Wang, J.; Li, S.; Zhang, H.; Meng, L.; Liu, L.; Du, C.; Ping, W. Genomic and biocontrol potential of the crude lipopeptide by Streptomyces bikiniensis HD-087 against Magnaporthe oryzae. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 888645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Slack, S.M.; Walters, K.J.; Outwater, C.A.; Sundin, G.W. Effect of kasugamycin, oxytetracycline, and streptomycin on in-orchard population dynamics of Erwinia amylovora on apple flower stigmas. Plant Dis. 2020, 105, 1843–1850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Fan, C.; Guo, M.; Liang, Y.; Dong, H.; Ding, G.; Zhang, W.; Tang, G.; Yang, J.; Kong, D.; Cao, Y. Pectin-conjugated silica microcapsules as dual-responsive carriers for increasing the stability and antimicrobial efficacy of kasugamycin. Carbohydr. Polym. 2017, 172, 322–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Sun, Y.; Zheng, L.; Yang, Y.; Qian, X.; Fu, T.; Li, X.; Yang, Z.; Yan, H.; Cui, C.; Tan, W. Metal–organic framework nanocarriers for drug delivery in biomedical applications. Nano-Micro Lett. 2020, 12, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wang, Y.; Deng, C.; Rawat, S.; Cota-Ruiz, K.; Medina-Velo, I.; Gardea-Torresdey, J.L. Evaluation of the effects of nanomaterials on rice (Oryza sativa L.) responses: Underlining the benefits of nanotechnology for agricultural applications. ACS Agric. Sci. Technol. 2021, 1, 44–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Yang, N.; Qian, Y.; EL-Mesery, H.S.; Zhang, R.; Wang, A.; Tang, J. Rapid detection of rice disease using microscopy image identification based on the synergistic judgment of texture and shape features and decision tree–confusion matrix method. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2019, 99, 6589–6600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Gao, Y.; Liu, Y.; Qin, X.; Guo, Z.; Li, D.; Li, C.; Wan, H.; Zhu, F.; Li, J.; Zhang, Z.; et al. Dual stimuli-responsive fungicide carrier based on hollow mesoporous silica/hydroxypropyl cellulose hybrid nanoparticles. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 414, 125513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Li, B.; Chen, Y.; Tian, S. Function of pH-dependent transcription factor PacC in regulating development, pathogenicity, and mycotoxin biosynthesis of phytopathogenic fungi. FEBS J. 2022, 289, 1723–1730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Yen, C.-I.; Liu, S.-M.; Lo, W.-S.; Wu, J.-W.; Liu, Y.-H.; Chein, R.-J.; Yang, R.; Wu, K.C.-W.; Hwu, J.R.; Ma, N.; et al. Cytotoxicity of postmodified zeolitic imidazolate framework-90 (ZIF-90) nanocrystals: Correlation between functionality and toxicity. Chem. Eur. J. 2016, 22, 2925–2929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Zhang, L.; Yan, P.; Li, Y.; He, X.; Dai, Y.; Tan, Z. Preparation and antibacterial activity of a cellulose-based Schiff base derived from dialdehyde cellulose and L-lysine. Ind. Crops Prod. 2020, 145, 112126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Shim, M.K.; Na, J.; Cho, I.K.; Jang, E.H.; Park, J.; Lee, S.; Kim, J.-H. Targeting of claudin-4 by Clostridium perfringens enterotoxin-conjugated polysialic acid nanoparticles for pancreatic cancer therapy. J. Control. Release 2021, 331, 434–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Xiao, X.; Liang, S.; Zhao, Y.; Huang, D.; Xing, B.; Cheng, Z.; Lin, J. Core–shell structured 5-FU@ZIF-90@ZnO as a biodegradable nanoplatform for synergistic cancer therapy. Nanoscale 2020, 12, 3846–3854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Taghizadeh, T.; Ameri, A.; Talebian-Kiakalaieh, A.; Mojtabavi, S.; Ameri, A.; Forootanfar, H.; Tarighi, S.; Faramarzi, M.A. Lipase@zeolitic imidazolate framework ZIF-90: A highly stable and recyclable biocatalyst for the synthesis of fruity banana flavour. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 166, 1301–1311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Cao, X.-X.; Liu, S.-L.; Lu, J.-S.; Zhang, Z.-W.; Wang, G.; Chen, Q.; Lin, N. Chitosan coated biocompatible zeolitic imidazolate framework ZIF-90 for targeted delivery of anticancer drug methotrexate. J. Solid State Chem. 2021, 300, 122259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Liu, Y.; Sun, Y.; Ding, G.; Geng, Q.; Zhu, J.; Guo, M.; Duan, Y.; Wang, B.; Cao, Y. Synthesis, characterization, and application of microbe-triggered controlled-release kasugamycin–pectin conjugate. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2015, 63, 4263–4268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Ding, G.; Li, D.; Liu, Y.; Guo, M.; Duan, Y.; Li, J.; Cao, Y. Preparation and characterization of kasuga-silica-conjugated nanospheres for sustained antimicrobial activity. J. Nanopart. Res. 2014, 16, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Garzón-Tovar, L.; Rodríguez-Hermida, S.; Imaz, I. Maspoch, Spray drying for making covalent chemistry: Postsynthetic modification of metal–organic frameworks. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 897–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Huang, A.; Wang, N.; Kong, C.; Caro, J. Organosilica-functionalized zeolitic imidazolate framework ZIF-90 membrane with high gas-separation performance. Angew. Chem. 2012, 124, 10703–10707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Lo, C.-C.; Hsiao, Y.-M. High-performance capillary electrophoretic method for the determination of antibiotic fungicide kasugamycin in formulated products. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1996, 44, 2231–2234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Mao, Y.; Cheng, J.; Guo, H.; Shao, Y.; Qian, L.; Yang, W. Sulfamic acid–modified zeolitic imidazolate framework (ZIF-90) with synergetic Lewis and Brønsted acid sites for microalgal biodiesel production. Fuel 2023, 331, 125795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Induvesa, P.; Ratanatawanate, C.; Wongrueng, A.; Punyapalakul, P. Adsorption of iodinated trihalomethanes onto thiol functionalized ZIF-8s: Active adsorption sites, adsorptive mechanisms, and dehalogenation by-products. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 754, 142376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Chuang, C.-H.; Ray, S.C.; Mazumder, D.; Sharma, S.; Ganguly, A.; Papakonstantinou, P.; Chiou, J.-W.; Tsai, H.-M.; Shiu, H.-W.; Chen, C.-H.; et al. Chemical modification of graphene oxide by nitrogenation: An X-ray absorption and emission spectroscopy study. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 42235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. Huang, Z.; Huang, Z.; Feng, L.; Luo, X.; Wu, P.; Cui, L.; Mao, X. Modified cellulose by polyethyleneimine and ethylenediamine with induced Cu(II) and Pb(II) adsorption potentialities. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018, 202, 470–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Liang, W.; Cheng, J.; Zhang, J.; Xiong, Q.; Jin, M.; Zhao, J. pH-Responsive on-demand alkaloids release from core–shell ZnO@ZIF-8 nanosphere for synergistic control of bacterial wilt disease. ACS Nano 2022, 16, 2762–2773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Maleki, A.; Shahbazi, M.-A.; Alinezhad, V.; Santos, H.A. The progress and prospect of zeolitic imidazolate frameworks in cancer therapy, antibacterial activity, and biomineralization. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2020, 9, 2000248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Yang, J.; Yang, Y.-W. Metal–organic frameworks for biomedical applications. Small 2020, 16, 1906846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Tian, Y.-C.; Jiao, C.-C.; Wang, S.; Cong, H.-L.; Shen, Y.-Q.; Yu, B. Agar-based ZIF-90 antibacterial hydrogels for biomedical applications. Ferroelectrics 2020, 563, 12–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Sharma, D.; Afzal, S.; Singh, N.K. Nanopriming with phytosynthesized zinc oxide nanoparticles for promoting germination and starch metabolism in rice seeds. J. Biotechnol. 2021, 336, 64–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Luo, H.; Xing, P.; Liu, J.; Pan, S.; Tang, X.; Duan, M. Selenium improved antioxidant response and photosynthesis in fragrant rice (Oryza sativa L.) seedlings during drought stress. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants 2021, 27, 2849–2858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Kurt-Celebi, A.; Colak, N.; Torun, H.; Dosedělová, V.; Tarkowski, P.; Ayaz, F.A. Exogenous melatonin ameliorates ionizing radiation-induced damage by modulating growth, osmotic adjustment and photosynthetic capacity in wheat seedlings. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2022, 187, 67–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. The mechanism for preparation of the ZIF-90-KSM (A). The triggered-release mechanism of KSM from ZIF-90-KSM (B).
Figure 1. The mechanism for preparation of the ZIF-90-KSM (A). The triggered-release mechanism of KSM from ZIF-90-KSM (B).
Nanomaterials 12 03622 g001
Figure 2. TEM images of ZIF-90 (A) ZIF-90-KSM (C). The images of (B,D) are higher magnification of TEM images of (A,C).
Figure 2. TEM images of ZIF-90 (A) ZIF-90-KSM (C). The images of (B,D) are higher magnification of TEM images of (A,C).
Nanomaterials 12 03622 g002
Figure 3. Zeta potential of ZIF-90 and ZIF-90-KSM (A), XRD patterns of KSM, ZIF-90 and ZIF-90-KSM (B), FTIR spectra of KSM, ZIF-90 and ZIF-90-KSM (C), and TGA curves of KSM, ZIF-90 and ZIF-90-KSM (D).
Figure 3. Zeta potential of ZIF-90 and ZIF-90-KSM (A), XRD patterns of KSM, ZIF-90 and ZIF-90-KSM (B), FTIR spectra of KSM, ZIF-90 and ZIF-90-KSM (C), and TGA curves of KSM, ZIF-90 and ZIF-90-KSM (D).
Nanomaterials 12 03622 g003
Figure 4. Stability of KSM, KSM aqueous solution and ZIF-90-KSM under ultraviolet radiation (A). Pseudo-first-order models of KSM photodegradation for KSM, KSM aqueous solution and ZIF-90-KSM (B).
Figure 4. Stability of KSM, KSM aqueous solution and ZIF-90-KSM under ultraviolet radiation (A). Pseudo-first-order models of KSM photodegradation for KSM, KSM aqueous solution and ZIF-90-KSM (B).
Nanomaterials 12 03622 g004
Figure 5. Effects of pH values on the release performances of KSM from ZIF-90-KSM.
Figure 5. Effects of pH values on the release performances of KSM from ZIF-90-KSM.
Nanomaterials 12 03622 g005
Figure 6. Images of the fungicidal activity of KSM aqueous solution and ZIF-90-KSM against Magnaporthe oryzae.
Figure 6. Images of the fungicidal activity of KSM aqueous solution and ZIF-90-KSM against Magnaporthe oryzae.
Nanomaterials 12 03622 g006
Figure 7. Influences of foliar application of KSM aqueous solution and ZIF-90-KSM on shoot height (A), leaf SPAD value (B), shoot fresh weight (C), and shoot dry weight (D) of rice plants. Different letters represent a statistically significant difference on Duncan’s multiple range test (p < 0.05).
Figure 7. Influences of foliar application of KSM aqueous solution and ZIF-90-KSM on shoot height (A), leaf SPAD value (B), shoot fresh weight (C), and shoot dry weight (D) of rice plants. Different letters represent a statistically significant difference on Duncan’s multiple range test (p < 0.05).
Nanomaterials 12 03622 g007
Table 1. Modeling parameters for photodegradation of KSM, KSM aqueous solution and ZIF-90-KSM under ultraviolet radiation.
Table 1. Modeling parameters for photodegradation of KSM, KSM aqueous solution and ZIF-90-KSM under ultraviolet radiation.
ParameterPseudo-First-Order Kinetics
KSMKSM Aqueous SolutionZIF-90-KSM
k (h−1)0.0580.0540.018
Relative index (r2) 0.9980.9950.992
DT50 (h) a11.9212.8537.46
aDT50 = dissipation half-life of KSM.
Table 2. Determined parameters of KSM released from ZIF-90-KSM by fitting several kinetic equations.
Table 2. Determined parameters of KSM released from ZIF-90-KSM by fitting several kinetic equations.
ConditionKinetic Modelk(×10−2)nr2
pH 4.0Zero-order1.380.6204
First-order3.850.7420
Higuchi13.150.8469
Ritger–Peppas45.430.190.7334
Hixson–Crowell0.190.3548
pH 5.5Zero-order0.580.8568
First-order0.750.8963
Higuchi5.090.9836
Ritger-Peppas6.860.430.9578
Hixson-Crowell0.140.8231
pH 7.0Zero-order0.080.7164
First-order0.080.7188
Higuchi0.750.9136
Ritger-Peppas1.490.330.8689
Hixson-Crowell0.020.5381
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liang, Y.; Wang, S.; Dong, H.; Yu, S.; Jia, H.; Wang, J.; Yao, Y.; Wang, Y.; Song, J.; Huo, Z. Zeolitic Imidazole Framework-90-Based Pesticide Smart-Delivery System with Enhanced Antimicrobial Performance. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 3622. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12203622

AMA Style

Liang Y, Wang S, Dong H, Yu S, Jia H, Wang J, Yao Y, Wang Y, Song J, Huo Z. Zeolitic Imidazole Framework-90-Based Pesticide Smart-Delivery System with Enhanced Antimicrobial Performance. Nanomaterials. 2022; 12(20):3622. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12203622

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liang, You, Sijin Wang, Hongqiang Dong, Siwen Yu, Huijuan Jia, Jin Wang, Yijia Yao, Yuanfeng Wang, Jiehui Song, and Zhongyang Huo. 2022. "Zeolitic Imidazole Framework-90-Based Pesticide Smart-Delivery System with Enhanced Antimicrobial Performance" Nanomaterials 12, no. 20: 3622. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12203622

APA Style

Liang, Y., Wang, S., Dong, H., Yu, S., Jia, H., Wang, J., Yao, Y., Wang, Y., Song, J., & Huo, Z. (2022). Zeolitic Imidazole Framework-90-Based Pesticide Smart-Delivery System with Enhanced Antimicrobial Performance. Nanomaterials, 12(20), 3622. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12203622

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop