Next Article in Journal
Tuning the Magnetic Properties of Cr2TiC2Tx through Surface Terminations: A Theoretical Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Magnetic Nanoclusters Stabilized with Poly[3,4-Dihydroxybenzhydrazide] as Efficient Therapeutic Agents for Cancer Cells Destruction
Previous Article in Journal
First-Principles Molecular Dynamics Simulations on Water–Solid Interface Behavior of H2O-Based Atomic Layer Deposition of Zirconium Dioxide
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Trophic Transfer of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes at the Base of the Food Chain and Toxicological Response

Nanomaterials 2022, 12(24), 4363; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12244363
by Majed Al-Shaeri 1,2, Lynn Paterson 3, Margret Stobie 1, Paul Cyphus 1 and Mark G. J. Hartl 1,*
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Nanomaterials 2022, 12(24), 4363; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12244363
Submission received: 20 September 2022 / Revised: 20 November 2022 / Accepted: 23 November 2022 / Published: 7 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Toxicity of Nanoparticles in Organisms)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Some small corrections are indicated in the manuscript

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Dear Reviewer, Response to Reviewer 1 Comments: Point 1: I found that in the abstract and as per your valuable comments it has been changed to (Mussels fed with algae) Point 2: In section 2.3, as per your valuable comments, the sentence was amended to (The highest concentration was used...etc).

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Authors conducted interesting experimental studies on CNT's toxicity propagated along the food chain. They studied the CNT-algae interaction and the CNT-containing algae fed to mussel. Overall, this is an interesting study that raises the concern about the safety of CNT. I recommend its publication after authors improve the quality of figures (especially #4 and #6).

Author Response

Response to Reviewer 2 Comments, Many thanks for your valuable comments.

Point 1: The quality of figures were improved (especially #4 and #6).

 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

The paper is well structured and writen. The experimental design is experimentally sound and the objectives clearly formulated.

As for specific aspects it should be noted that in section 2.12.4 Data Analysis the software package used to conduct the analysis should be included as well as its citation in a suitable format. Furthermore, in 3. Results & Discussion section whenever statistical  results are referred to (either significant or non significant) the statistical method used, the value of the test, its degrees of freedom and p-value should be presented (e.g. ANOVA: F=2.71, dfnum=3, dfden=27, p=0.02) as presenting the p-value is not enough to the reader to assess the validity of the statistical results.

Author Response

Response to Reviewer 1 Comments:

Dear Reviewer, 

Thank you for your valuable comments.  We added the F and df under and p value in each figure as your valuable requested. 

Kind Regards

Majed

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop