2. Investigation and Discussion
The schematic diagram of our on-chip photon angular momentum absolute measurement detector is shown in
Figure 1. In our detector, orthogonal nano slit pairs arranged according to specific rule are etched on the thin gold film deposited on the silicon dioxide substrate. The input beam with different SAM and OAM illuminates the structure normally from the substrate side. Via the coupling of the input light and the nano slits pairs, the SPPs can be excited, which will propagate on the surface of gold film [
23]. The SPPs distribution on the gold film surface can be controlled by adjusting the spatial distribution of the nano slits. Via properly designing the arrangement rule of the nano slit pairs, it can be realized that a beam with a specific OAM and SAM can excite two SPPs’ intensity spots. The two blue and red peaks in
Figure 1a represent the two SPPs’ intensity spots excited by two OAM beams with different SAM respectively. Similarly, the two blue dots surrounded by blue dashed lines represent the two SPPs’ intensity spots excited by right-handed circularly polarization (RCP) OAM beam, and the two red dots surrounded by red dashed lines represent the two SPPs’ intensity spots excited by left-handed circularly polarization (LCP) OAM beam. The angle between the connecting line of the two excited SPPs’ intensity spots and
x-axis is represented by
, where the superscript −/+ indicates that the input polarization is RCP/LCP, and the subscript
l indicates the order, i.e., the topological charge of the input OAM beam
, where
is the azimuth angle of the polar coordinate system shown in
Figure 2.
In our design, when the polarization of the OAM beam is RCP, the two SPPs’ intensity spots are, respectively, located in the second and fourth quadrants of the rectangular coordinate system, and when the polarization is LCP, the two SPPs’ intensity spots are, respectively, located in the first and third quadrants. Hence, the SAM of the input beam can be first distinguished according to the location sides of the SPPs’ intensity spots. Then, when the light OAM varies, the positions of the SPPs’ intensity spots will shift, which leads to the change of the angle . Therefore, the OAM can be next determined by measuring . As is the angle relative to x-axis, it can realize absolute measurement of the OAM without any additional reference beam, and the measurement result will not be affected by the amplification factor of the light intensity measurement system.
To show the details of our design, we first introduce the result of [
20], where orthogonal nano slit pairs arranged in semi-annular array are used for simultaneous detection of light SAM and OAM.
Figure 2 gives the details of the arrangement of orthogonal nano slit pairs in semi-annular array, in which the green dotted line is an annular baseline, the red and blue arrows indicate the propagation direction of the SPPs’ wave converging toward the center, the nano slit pairs are arranged along the baseline,
s is the interval between the center points of the two slits of a pair,
d is the interval between the baseline and the center point of inside slit (close to coordinate center),
θo is the angles between the outside slit (far away from coordinate center) of the pair and the radial direction, and
is the azimuth angle of the polar coordinate system. When this semi-annular nano slit array structure is excited by the input beam, at the position of the baseline, the complex amplitude of the SPPs contributed from the inside slit and the outside slit of a pair located at azimuth angle
can be expressed as
respectively, where
is wave vector with
λspp being the wavelength of the SPPs wave,
is the phase distribution of the input beam (if the input beam is
l order OAM beam, we have
, and superscript −/+ indicates that input polarization is RCP/LCP. Hence, under the case of
s =
λspp/2, the total complex amplitude of the SPPs is
In Equation (2), the
and
d dependent phase profile of
is given by
It can be seen that the phase profile of the SPPs’ wave at the baseline can be controlled by controlling
and
, which can be realized by designing the parameters
d and
θo of each nano slit pairs precisely. Then SAM dependent wavefront control of the SPPs’ wave at the annular baseline can be achieved. If the phase distribution of
is designed so that the phase difference between the SPPs’ waves excited from each slit pair is zero when they propagate to the point (
,
), the SPPs’ waves will focus to this point, i.e., the semi-annular nano slit array structure will generate a SPPs’ intensity spot at (
,
) when the input polarization is LCP. Similarly, if the phase distribution of
is designed so that the phase difference between the SPPs’ waves excited from each slit pair is zero when they propagate to the point (
,
), the semi-annular nano slit array structure will generate an SPP intensity spot at (
,
) when the input polarization is RCP. Moreover, it is found that if the OAM of the incident beam varies, the positions of the two SPPs’ intensity spots will shift. Hence, the location of the SPPs intensity spots can be used to distinguish the incident polarization, and the shift of the intensity spots can be used to measure the OAM [
20]. To show this more clearly, we design appropriate phase profiles of
and
, and then perform some finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) simulations to calculate the SPPs intensity distributions.
The phase profiles shown in
Figure 3 are designed to achieve (
,
) = (−2.3 μm, 2.5 μm) and (
,
) = (2.3 μm, 2.5 μm) for incident wavelength of
λ0 = 980 nm, which determines
λspp = λ00.5 = 970 nm and
s = 485 nm, where
is the real part of the relative permittivity of the gold and
is the relative permittivity of air. In a real nano slit array structure, generating continuous phase profiles of
and
shown in
Figure 3 is not achievable, and one slit pair can only control the phase of one sampling point on the phase profiles. Therefore, we build our FDTD simulation model (using Lumerical FDTD Solutions) to simulate the SPPs intensity distribution via evenly sampling 40 sampling points on the phase profiles as shown by the red and blue dots in
Figure 3. The simulation results are shown in
Figure 4, where
Figure 4a,b are the normalized intensity of SPP fields excited by RCP and LCP incidence light respectively, and
Figure 4c shows the shift of the SPPs’ intensity spots when the incidence light has RCP and different OAM. It should be noted that throughout this paper, the radius of the baseline, the thickness of the gold film, and the length, width, and depth of the nano slits are set to be 10 um, 150 nm, 400 nm, 100 nm, and 150 nm, respectively.
From the results, it can be seen clearly that a semi-annular nano slit array structure can generate an SPP intensity spot at (−2.3 μm, 2.5 μm) when the input polarization is RCP and an SPP intensity spot at (2.3 μm, 2.5 μm) when the input polarization is LCP. When the incidence light possesses OAM, the SPPs’ intensity spots will shift as the OAM varies.
Figure 5 further gives the horizontal positions, i.e., the
x-axis coordinate value of the SPPs intensity spots when the incidence light has RCP and different OAM. In the figure, the blue circular markers are the FDTD simulation results, and the green solid line is the fitted curve of the simulation results. The function of the fitted curve is
D = −0.1861
l − 2.294, which implies that the SPPs intensity spot will shift a lateral displacement of about 0.19 μm when the change of the topological charge is 1.
The results of
Figure 4 and
Figure 5 show clearly that simultaneous detection of light SAM and OAM can be achieved by designing a semi-annular nano slit array. This is the main result of [
20]. However, in this semi-annular nano slit array structure, only one SPP intensity spot located in the second quadrant is excited when the input polarization is RCP, and only one SPP intensity spot in the first quadrant is excited when the input polarization is LCP. In this case, due to the lack of additional reference points, absolute measurement of the OAM is not achievable. To measure a target OAM beam, an additional reference point should be provided by using the SPP’s intensity spot excited by the 0th order OAM beam, and then the target OAM is determined by the interval between the two SPPs’ intensity spots excited by the 0th and target order OAM beams, whose accurate measurement relies on the accurate calibration of the scale amplification factor of the microscopic imaging system, which will increase the complexity and difficulty of practical applications. In spite of this, the results of [
20] inspired our absolute measurement scheme. If we design a symmetrical semi-annular nano slit array structure below the
x-axis, we believe that the expected function of the absolute measurement detector can be realized, i.e., when exciting the total structure (the final annular nano slit array structure) by a beam with specific OAM and SAM, two SPP intensity spots can be generated, and the two SPPs’ intensity spots are, respectively, located in the second and fourth quadrants when the polarization is RCP, and the two SPP intensity spots are, respectively, located in the first and third quadrants when the polarization is LCP. This is the major ideal of this paper. In the following, we demonstrate that the expected function is achievable on the symmetrical annular nano slit array structure by FDTD simulation, and show that it can be used to realize absolute measurement in details.
Figure 6 and
Figure 7 are the simulated normalized SPP intensity distributions under
l = −5, −3, −1, 1, 3, and 5 when the incidence polarization is RCP and LCP, respectively. In the simulation, the semi-annular nano slit arrays above and below the
x-axis are symmetrical, and the other simulation parameters are same as that used in
Figure 4. From the figures, as expected, it is clear that two SPP intensity spots are generated and located in the second and fourth quadrants, respectively, when the polarization is RCP, and two SPP intensity spots are generated and located in the first and third quadrants, respectively, when the polarization is LCP. Moreover, with the increase of
l, when the polarization is RCP, the SPP intensity spot in the second quadrant will shift along the negative direction of
x-axis and the SPP intensity spot in the fourth quadrant will shift along the positive direction of
x-axis, which causes the decrease of
. The simulated
for
l = −5, −3, −1, 1, 3, and 5 are 58.2 deg, 53.3 deg, 50.8 deg, 45.8 deg, 43.5 deg, and 39.0 deg, respectively. These results and their fitted curve are shown in
Figure 8a. The function of the fitted curve is
= −1.863
l + 48.43, implying the change of
is about 1.86 deg when the change of the topological charge is l. Similarly, with the increase of
l, when the polarization is LCP, the SPP intensity spot in the first quadrant will shift along the negative direction of
x-axis and the SPP intensity spot in the third quadrant will shift along the positive direction of
x-axis, which causes the decrease of
. The simulated
for
l = −5, −3, −1, 1, 3, and 5 are 38.9 deg, 43.2 deg, 45.6 deg, 50.6 deg, 53.0 deg, and 58.2 deg, respectively. These results and their fitted curve are shown in
Figure 8b. The function of the fitted curve is
= 1.87
l + 48.25, implying the change of
is about 1.87 deg when the change of the topological charge is l. Obviously, the SAM of the input beam can be distinguished according to the quadrants that the SPPs’ intensity spots locate in and the OAM can be determined by measuring
. It should be noted that when |
l| > 5, the SPP intensity spot will show crescent-shaped distribution which will affect the precise determination of its position. Hence, the actual effective detection range of the OAM is |
l| ≤ 5.
In above discussions, we have shown that the designed annular nano slit array structure can realize absolute measurement of the angular momentum of a beam possessing single order of OAM by angle measurement. In the following, we will numerically demonstrate that our detector can be further expanded to realize angular momentum detection of mixed light with different SAM and OAM.
Figure 9 shows the simulation results of the SPPs intensity distributions under exciting by different mixed light with different SAM and OAM, in which the two inserts above each intensity distribution are phase maps of the OAM beams mixed in the input light, the rings with arrow surrounding the phase maps indicate the polarizations of the corresponding OAM beams, and ×
m represents that the relative amplitude of the corresponding OAM beam is
m.
Figure 9a is the SPP intensity distribution excited by mixed light including +1 order RCP OAM beam and −1 order LCP OAM beam with equal amplitude. The angles extracted from
Figure 9a are
= 45.6 deg and
= 45.9 deg.
Figure 9b is the SPPs intensity distribution excited by mixed light including +3 order RCP OAM beam and −1 order LCP OAM beam with equal amplitude. The angles extracted from
Figure 9b are
= 43.6 deg and
= 46 deg.
Figure 9c is the SPP intensity distribution excited by mixed light including +1 order RCP OAM beam with relative amplitude of 1.5 and −1 order LCP OAM beam with relative amplitude of 1. The angles extracted from
Figure 9c are
= 45.6 deg and
= 45.6 deg. Compared to the results of
Figure 6 and
Figure 7, the extracted angles from
Figure 9a–c exhibit an error value Δ
≤ 0.4 deg, which may cause by two reasons: one is the error introduced in locating the position of the SPP intensity spots manually when we measure the angles, and the other one is that the presence of the other OAM beam will slightly affect the field distribution of the SPP intensity spots of the target OAM beam. In spite of this, the slight error value does not affect our correct identification of the OAM since it is significantly less than the angle change corresponding to the topological charge change of l. Therefore, our detector can achieve detection of SAM and OAM both when the input light possesses single order of OAM and when the input light is mixed light with different SAM and OAM. Further, comparing the results of
Figure 9a–c, it can be found that the position of the SPPs’ intensity spots can be controlled by controlling the order of the input OAM beam, and the intensity of the SPPs’ intensity spots can be controlled by controlling the amplitude of the input OAM beam. Hence, beside measuring angular momentum, our detector can also be used for controlling the position and intensity of the SPPs’ intensity spots, which may have potential applications in optical manipulation.