Next Article in Journal
Optical Processes behind Plasmonic Applications
Next Article in Special Issue
Enhancement of Structural, Optical and Photoelectrochemical Properties of n−Cu2O Thin Films with K Ions Doping toward Biosensor and Solar Cell Applications
Previous Article in Journal
Advanced Carbon Nanostructures: Synthesis, Properties, and Applications
Previous Article in Special Issue
Dandelion-Like CuCo2O4@ NiMn LDH Core/Shell Nanoflowers for Excellent Battery-Type Supercapacitor
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Luminescent Amorphous Silicon Oxynitride Systems: High Quantum Efficiencies in the Visible Range

1
College of Electronic and Information Engineering, Jinling Institute of Technology, Nanjing 211169, China
2
Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Microstructures, National Laboratory of Solid-State Microstructures, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China
3
College of Science, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2023, 13(7), 1269; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13071269
Submission received: 27 February 2023 / Revised: 27 March 2023 / Accepted: 2 April 2023 / Published: 3 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nanostructured Thin Films: From Synthesis to Application)

Abstract

:
In recent years, researchers have placed great importance on the use of silicon (Si)-related materials as efficient light sources for the purpose of realizing Si-based monolithic optoelectronic integration. Previous works were mostly focused on Si nanostructured materials, and, so far, exciting results from Si-based compounds are still lacking. In this paper, we have systematically demonstrated the high photoluminescence external quantum efficiency (PL EQE) and internal quantum efficiency (PL IQE) of amorphous silicon oxynitride (a-SiNxOy) systems. Within an integration sphere, we directly measured the PL EQE values of a-SiNxOy, which ranged from approximately 2% to 10% in the visible range at room temperature. Then, we calculated the related PL IQE through temperature-dependent PL measurements. The obtained PL IQE values (~84% at 480 nm emission peak wavelength) were very high compared with those of reported Si-based luminescent thin films. We also calculated the temperature-dependent PL EQE values of a-SiNxOy systems, and discussed the related PL mechanisms.

1. Introduction

With the development of information technology, the communication industry urgently needs higher speeds, higher capacities, and lower power waste information transmission and processing. Since most current integrated circuits are manufactured on Si substrates, one of the proposed solutions is to combine the sophisticated microelectronics with optoelectronics technologies to achieve Si-based single-chip photoelectric integration circuits with photons as information carriers. Many other processes in Si-based monolithic optoelectronic integration are more mature [1,2,3,4,5], and the greatest limitation is the lack of suitable light sources.
However, Si itself is an indirect band gap semiconductor that cannot be used as an efficient luminescent material directly. In 2000, Pavesi et al. first reported on the nc-Si optical gain and stimulated emission at room temperature, and it is expected to become an efficient luminescent material [6]. Obtaining more suitable Si-based luminescent materials and improving the related fluorescence quantum efficiency has been one of the most difficult tasks in this field for more than two decades [7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42].
In recent years, the research on Si-based luminescent materials has been extensive, effectively improving the fluorescence quantum efficiency values. Negro et al. and Atwater et al. obtained up to 7% PL EQE and 59% PL IQE in nc-Si-embedded Si nitride and Si oxide films, respectively [17,18]. In 2014, Zacharias et al. systematically studied the PL properties of nc-Si-embedded SiNxOy/SiO2 multilayer films, and obtained a PL absolute quantum yield (PL QY, or PL EQE) value of up to 19% at room temperature when the SiO2 layer was 2 nm thick [26]. However, the current values for the PL QEs of Si-based materials are still low, indicating that they are still far from practical application. Additionally, most of the previous research works focused on Si-based nanostructure materials, while quantum efficiency studies of non-crystalline Si-based compounds are less frequently reported. As a potentially high-efficiency luminescence material in the integration of silicon-based optoelectronics, there has been a great deal of interest in the luminescence properties of a-SiNxOy systems and they have been studied in detail [13,14,21,22,23]. However, so far, exciting results from this type of Si-based compound are still lacking.
Based on our previous research [31,32,33,34], in this paper, we systematically demonstrate the high photoluminescence quantum efficiency of a-SiNxOy systems in detail. First, we measured the PL absolute quantum yields directly using a calibrated integration sphere at room temperature. Secondly, we used the temperature-dependent PL (TD-PL) spectra of a-SiNxOy films for the purpose of estimating the PL IQE values at different temperatures relative to the lowest temperatures. The experimental results showed that the a-SiNxOy films had high PL IQE values (~84% at 480 nm emission peak wavelength), compared with those of reported Si-based luminescent thin films. Finally, we also calculated the temperature-dependent PL QYs of a-SiNxOy systems, and the related PL mechanisms were discussed.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Material Fabrication

The a-SiNxOy films (~300 nm) were deposited on polished and roughened Si or quartz substrates in a plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD, OXFORD Plasmalab 80Plus, Oxford, UK) system with a silane, ammonia, and nitrogen gas mixture (flow ratio R = NH3/SiH4) [33]. The fabrication flow ratios and related parameters are listed in Table 1. After fabrication, the samples were subsequently oxidized in situ via oxygen plasma treatment. To obtain high light extraction factors and effectively perform PL EQE measurements, the Si or quartz substrates were roughened using electrostatic sands (particle size range approximately 1–10 μm) before fabrication. To eliminate the light-induced degradation and the PL self-restoring characteristics, post-treatments including improving the density and eliminating weak bonds were carried out on the a-SiNxOy films by combining thermal annealing with pulsed laser annealing [34], thus obtaining high performance regarding luminescent stability in a-SiNxOy systems.

2.2. Characterization of A-SiNxOy Thin Films

The films were structurally characterized with a Thermo ESCALAB 250 X-ray photoelectron spectrometer (XPS) with an excitation source of monochromatic Al K-alpha rays (1486.6 eV). The Tauc’s optical gap (Eopt) under different R conditions was obtained from transmittance measurements at room temperature, which were performed using a Shimadzu UV-3600 spectrophotometer. The steady-state TD-PL properties were measured with a Fluorolo-3 system (Jobin Yvon) and a HP4284 LCR meter in a computer-controlled Delta 9023 oven, using a 75 W Xe lamp (excitation wavelength λexc = 250–800 nm) and a He–Cd laser (λexc = 325 nm, output power 30 mW) as light sources. As comparative references, controlled a-SiNx films with different flow ratios R were also prepared and the corresponding characteristics were measured under the same conditions. Before we performed all the measurements, we carefully checked and corrected the intensity of the light source, the response of the detector, the influencing factors of sample holders, and the sample’s morphology. All the recorded PL spectra were background-corrected.

2.3. PL EQE (PL QY) Measurement Methods

The PL EQE (PL QY) measurements were determined using a calibrated integrating sphere (Jobin Yvon quantum-φ) with a Xe lamp (Xenon short ARC), which was used to excite samples under the excitation wavelength of 375 nm at room temperature. The excited and emission photons were collected by a 1-mm-diameter optical fiber (ocean optics) and detected using a Fluoromax-4 system (Jobin Yvon).
Generally, the PL absolute quantum yield (PL QY) is defined as PL   QY   = ϕ emission/ψabsorption. Here, ϕemission and ψabsorption are the number of photons emitted from the samples and the number of absorbed photons at the excitation wavelength, respectively.
In this work, we directly measured the PL QY values of a-SiNxOy thin films for different R in the calibration integrating sphere. The optical paths of emitted photons from the excitation light source and the a-SiNxOy films in the integrating sphere are schematically shown in Figure 1.
The detailed PL QY measurement processes are described as follows:
(a)
We directly measured the total incident excitation photons ψ0 in the integration sphere (schematic diagram in Figure 1a);
(b)
When the excitation source was shone directly onto samples, we directly measured the unabsorbed excitation photons ψ1 and corresponding emitted photons ϕ1 (schematic diagram in Figure 1b);
(c)
When the excitation source was shone indirectly onto samples, we directly measured the unabsorbed excitation photons ψ2 and corresponding emitted photons ϕ2 (schematic diagram in Figure 1c).
The PL QY can be given by
PL   QY = ϕ emission ψ absorption = ϕ 1 1 A × ϕ 2 ψ 0 × A = ϕ 1 ψ 2 ψ 1 ϕ 2 ψ 0 × ψ 2 ψ 1 ,   and   A = 1 ψ 1 ψ 2
where A is the film absorbance when the excitation light is directly shone onto the sample.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. X-Ray Photoelectron Spectrum (XPS)

We analyzed the chemical composition ratio and bonding configuration of a-SiNxOy films under different R by using XPS spectroscopy. Figure 2 represents the XPS spectra of Si 2p of both a-SiNxOy under different R and the controlled a-SiNx films, respectively. Before measurement, all sample surfaces were etched for 15 min using an Ar+ beam (Ar+ energy 2000 eV, etch depth ~90 nm). From Figure 2, one can see that the Si 2p peak positions of a-SiNxOy films were between the Si 2p peak position of the standard proportion Si3N4 (102 eV) and SiO2 (103.4 eV), which indicated the existence of the N-Si-O bonding configurations in a-SiNxOy films [15,16]. We adopted four typical N-Si-O bonding configurations to decompose the XPS spectra of Si 2p, whose binding energies peaked around 101.2 eV (Si–Si2ON), 102.35 eV (Si–N3O), 102.65 eV (Si–O2N2), and 102.95 eV (Si–O3N) [15,16], and the F.W.H.M. of these sub-peaks were consistent, as shown in Figure 2.
From the N 1s spectra in Figure 3, we can also observe similar rules. For a-SiNxOy films with different R, the binding energies of the N 1s peaks were located between the N 1s peak position of the standard proportion Si3N4 (397.5 eV) and the N-Si2O bonding configuration (399.7 eV), respectively, in correspondence with the binding energies: three types of bonding configuration [15,16], namely N3-Si-O (397.9 eV), N2-Si-O2 (398.5 eV), and N-Si-O3 (399 eV).
Therefore, from the variation characteristics of the Si 2p and N 1s binding energy of the XPS spectrum of a-SiNxOy films, there was indeed an arbitrary mixed bond configuration of Si, N, and O atoms in the a-SiNxOy films: the N-Si-O bonding configuration. We calculated the incorporation concentration of O from the measured Si 2p, N 1s, and O 1s energy peaks, and its value was stable in the range of 2~6% under different R conditions.

3.2. PL Emission and Excitation (PLE) Characteristics

To investigate the fluorescence properties of the a-SiNxOy films, the PL emission and excitation (PLE) characteristics were measured. Figure 4 shows the normalized PL spectra of the a-SiNxOy films for various R under the excitation wavelength of 325 nm at 8 K. It was notable that, by adjusting the NH3/SiH4 flow ratio, bright tunable light emissions in the visible range from the a-SiNxOy samples were achieved and were perceptible by the naked eye. One can see that, with the increasing R values from 0.3 to 5, the PL peaks (EPL) showed a blue shift from 582 to 411 nm.
Figure 5a,b show the PL and PLE spectra of a-SiNxOy films and a-SiNx films at room temperature when R = 0.3 and R = 1, respectively. Under the excitation of a 325 nm He–Cd laser, the PL intensities from a-SiNxOy films were significantly enhanced with the incorporation of O, with slightly blue-shifted PL peak positions, compared with those of controlled a-SiNx films for the same R. For a-SiNxOy and a-SiNx films, the Eopt as well as EPL of the a-SiNxOy films could be controlled by the reaction gas with different R. The detailed Eopt and EPL values for various R are listed in Table 1. As the flow ratio R increased, we found that both EPL and Eopt first monolithically increased (blue-shifted) and then became saturated.
However, from the PL emission spectra, the difference in the structure of the a-SiNx thin films before and after the incorporation of O atoms could not be directly or clearly distinguished. Therefore, we went on to study the PLE spectra of both types of samples. As we can see from Figure 5a,b, both types of films had excitation state band tail structures, but the width of the conduction band tail (EU) was different when R was the same. Compared with the controlled a-SiNx films, the Urbach tail energy (EU edge, or conduction band tail, ECB tail) of a-SiNxOy films shrank towards the high energy level, and this represented the lessening of EU with the same R. This was mainly because the Si-O bonds formed in the a-SiNxOy film could release more internal stress in the film after the incorporation of O atoms [14], resulting in structural disorder in the a-SiNxOy films, which was manifested as a decrease in the band tail width EU and formed a luminescent N-Si-O defect center in the excited state [33]. We measured the luminescence characteristics of other assembled samples under different R and obtained similar results.

3.3. The Doping Effect of O Atoms on the Luminescence Characteristics

To further understand the luminescence characteristics of the a-SiNxOy films before and after the incorporation of O atoms, we extensively investigated the varied relationships of EPL with the Urbach tail edge (ECB tail) and the PL Full Width Half Maximum (F.W.H.M.) with the Urbach tail width (EU), respectively.
The typical PLE spectra exhibited the density distribution of luminescent excited states. For the amorphous semiconductor materials, it included extended and localized band tail states, as shown in Figure 5. According to the definition, the Urbach energy edge (Urbach tail edge or conductive band tail edge, EU edge or ECB tail) is approximately equal to the PLE threshold energy (the onset portion of the PLE spectrum). The Urbach tail width (EU) can be calculated from the equation of demarcation energy (EC or Eopt) minus ECB tail (EU = Eopt − ECB tail). The detailed optical parameters of the ECB tail and EU of the a-SiNxOy films for various R are listed in Table 1. For comparison, the optical parameters of three controlled a-SiNx samples were also summarized and calculated.
From Figure 6a, for both types of films, EPL was proportional to ECB tail, whose level direction shrank when the N content increased. For a-SiNx films, EPL was relatively close to ECB tail (the slope was close to 1), and the straight line of the function between the two nearly passed the origin of the coordinate axes, indicating a typical band-tail-related PL mechanism, whose variation tendencies were similar to previously reported results [8]. However, for a-SiNxOy films, we noticed that there was a Stokes shift between EPL and ECB tail (ΔEstokes defined as ΔEstokes = EU edge − EPL). As shown in Figure 6b, the EPL positions of a-SiNxOy films were fixed at a nearly constant value of approximately 0.8 eV below the conduction band tail level (from 0.75 eV when R = 0.3 to 0.84 eV when R = 5), indicating the PL generated from oxygen-induced localized luminescent defect states, which was pinned under EU edge for various Eopt. This PL phenomenon is completely different from the previously reported luminescence mechanism of a-SiNxOy with oxygen doping greater than 10% [14,21]. For comparison, the a-SiNx films had a ΔEstokes value from 0.03 eV to 0.14 eV for various R, which is also related to the typical band tail PL in a-SiNx systems.
From Figure 6b, we also can see that the relationship between the PL F.W.H.M. and EU is different for both types of materials. The PL F.W.H.M. of a-SiNx thin films is proportional to EU, and the function line moves nearly straight past the origin of the coordinate axes. However, for a-SiNxOy films, the PL F.W.H.M. has an average width of 0.7 ± 0.1 eV. We further measured the PL behavior of a-SiNxOy films at different excited photon energies (Eexc), and we found that the spectral profile and luminescence peak of the PL spectrum did not change with the change in Eexc. These are typical defect-state luminescence characteristics. Therefore, we believe that O atoms are incorporated to form defect states in the films, and the PL of a-SiNxOy films arises from the luminescent N-Si-O defect centers.

3.4. The Absolute PL Quantum Yield Measurements

We directly measured the PL QY values of a-SiNxOy samples by using a calibrated integrating sphere under the excitation wavelength of 375 nm at room temperature. It is worth mentioning that when the excitation light does not shine directly on the sample, but on the integrating sphere wall, the sample also absorbs some of the excitation photons diffusely reflected by the integrating sphere wall, as shown in Figure 1c. Thus, the measured total number of excitation photons absorbed by the sample becomes larger, and we should consider the effect of scattered light on the sample and correct the resulting PL QY values directly obtained from the integrating sphere.
Figure 7 shows the light absorption spectra of the excitation light source and the PL emission spectra of the a-SiNxOy films with R = 0.5, 1, 1.5 [33], and 2.5, respectively, both of which are parts of the PL QY measurement processes. By using Equation (1), for the PL peak range of 2.06–2.95 eV, the a-SiNxOy films were found to have PL QY values ranging from approximately 2% to 10% in the visible range at room temperature, as listed in Table 2. The PL QY of 10.08% ± 0.95 has been achieved at EPL = 2.6 eV, which is higher than those of reported nc-Si-embedded Si-based thin films [17], a-SiNxOy films [32], and a-SiCxOy films [36].

3.5. The Temperature-Dependent PL Internal Quantum Efficiencies

Temperature-dependent steady-state photoluminescence spectroscopy (TD-SSPL) is usually used to determine and verify the photoluminescence radiation recombination mechanism, and the PL internal quantum efficiencies of the samples can also be studied and estimated from the TD-SSPL measurements. In general, radiation recombination at low temperatures dominates the recombination processes, which means that the PL internal quantum efficiency is close to 100% [8,17,20]. The samples were placed in a Dewar apparatus and heated by precisely controlling the compressed air cooling and heating power supply to achieve different test temperatures. Figure 8 shows the TD-SSPL spectra of a-SiNxOy thin films with R = 2 under variable temperatures (temperature range from 8 K to 300 K). Before measurement, the sample surfaces were etched in situ via Ar+ sputtering with different etch times, as shown in Figure 8a,b (etch depths are 30 nm and 90 nm, respectively). One can see that, at different temperatures, the PL curve shapes and the PL peak positions do not change significantly, indicating that the PL arises from the luminescent defect centers, and the radiation recombination processes are different from the recombination mechanism through the band-tailed states.
In this work, we used the thermal ionization models [17] to simulate and estimate the PL internal quantum efficiency under different temperatures I P L T = I P L T 0 1 + τ e x p E A / k T . Here, IPL(T0) and IPL(T) are the integrated PL intensities of the samples at low temperature range T0 and at a specific test temperature T; τ is inversely proportional to the radiation recombination rate, and EA is the activation barrier energy. Since electron–hole pairs dominate in radiative recombination at low temperatures, after normalizing the TD-SSPL spectra, the IPL(T) curves and the PL IQE at any given temperature can be well fitted according to the thermal ionization model, as shown in Figure 8. From the fitted IPL(T), τ ≈ 10 and EA ≈ 62 meV are obtained, which are similar to previously reported results [17]. Notably, we found that the PL intensities of all samples did not change before 80 K. After 120 K, there was significant thermal quenching, indicating an increase in the non-radiative compounding factors.
At the same time, we found an interesting phenomenon wherein the IPL(T) of the sample after in situ etching at a 30 nm depth had significant thermal quenching after 120 K, while, when etching at a 90 nm depth, the inflection point of the IPL(T) was advanced, and the IPL(T) began to decrease significantly at 90 K. The reason is that oxygen is mainly doped and distributed on the surfaces of a-SiNxOy samples as an impurity [34]. On one hand, the N-Si-O bonding phase is more stable than the N-Si bonding; the PL attenuation phenomenon of the sample after in situ etching at a 30 nm depth is improved compared to that of 90 nm samples. On the other hand, due to the luminescence of a-SiNxOy film samples, mainly derived from the luminescent defect center related to N-Si-O, with the increase in the etching time, the concentration of N-Si-O defect states decreases and the PL light efficiencies decrease slightly. Therefore, this phenomenon further confirms, from another perspective, that the formation of the N-Si-O bonding configuration can not only improve the luminescent stability, but also improve the luminescent efficiency.
We also measured the TD-SSPL properties of a-SiNxOy films with different R ratios (R = 0.3, 1, 1.5, 5); the related PL IQE values are listed in Table 2. For a-SiNxOy with R = 1.5, the PL IQE values at room temperature fitted from TD-SSPL measurements are approximately 84.1%, which are consistent with the calculated PL IQE (ε ~ 83.6%) obtained from the direct measurement of PL QYs, and much higher than those of reported nc-Si-embedded Si-based thin films [17,18], a-SiNxOy films. [20,21,22,23,32], and a-SiCxOy films [36].

3.6. The Temperature-Dependent PL External Quantum Efficiencies

Finally, we studied the temperature-dependent PL external quantum efficiencies (PL QY) of a-SiNxOy samples with various R. Combined with the PL QY values directly measured from the integrating sphere at room temperature (for each PL QY with various R measured at RT, we should take the average value before calculation), and the PL integrated intensities under different measurement temperatures obtained from TD-SSPL measurements, we could directly calculate the PLQY values of a-SiNxOy samples with various R under different temperatures by using the formula η T = I P L T I P L 300   K   η 300   K . Here, IPL(T) and IPL(300 K) represent the PL-integrated intensities at a specific temperature T and room temperature, respectively. η(T) and η(300 K) represent the PL QY values of a-SiNxOy samples at the specific temperature T and room temperature, respectively.
Figure 9 shows the PL QY values of a-SiNxOy samples with various R under different measurement temperatures (8 K, 60 K, 120 K, 180 K, 240 K, and RT, respectively). The detailed temperature-dependent PL QY values for various R are listed in Table 2. One can see that, for various R, the variation tendency of the PL QY values was consistent with the variation tendency of Nx defect densities [32], indicating that luminescent Nx defects were responsible for the high PL internal quantum efficiencies in our a-SiNxOy systems. The a-SiNxOy samples with R = 1 had a PL QY value of approximately 14.23% ± 0.15% at the lowest temperature range (~8 K), as shown in Figure 9f.

4. Conclusions

In this study, we systematically researched the PL quantum efficiencies of luminescent a-SiNxOy systems at different temperatures in the visible range. From a calibrated integration sphere, we directly measured the PL QYs of a-SiNxOy and they ranged from approximately 2% to 10% at room temperature. Then, we calculated the PL IQE values by using temperature-dependent PL spectra, and obtained that the a-SiNxOy films had high PL IQE values (~84% at 480 nm emission peak wavelength) compared to those of reported Si-based luminescent thin films. We found that the formation of the N-Si-O bonding configuration can not only improve the luminescent stability, but also improve the luminescent efficiency. Lastly, we also calculated the temperature-dependent PL QYs of the a-SiNxOy systems.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.Z. (Leng Zhang) and F.L.; methodology, D.W. and L.Z. (Ling Zhang); software, F.L. and K.W.; validation, S.W.; writing—original draft preparation, P.Z.; writing—review and editing, F.L. and S.W.; project administration, C.T.; funding acquisition, P.Z. All authors contributed to the analyzed data. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Academic Top-Notch Talent Training Project Foundation of Jinling Institute of Technology (No. 202008) and the Open Project Foundation of the National Laboratory of Solid-State Microstructures (No. M34010).

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Xuefeng Ge from Nanjing Normal University for supporting the PL QY measurements.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Toshishige, Y.; Ekaterina, P.D.; Soroush, G.; Cesar, B.P.; Ahmed, S.M.; Hilal, C.; Yang, G.; Ahasan, A.; Wang, S.Y.; Islam, M.S. Modeling of nanohole silicon pin/nip photodetectors: Steady state and transient characteristics. Nanotechnology 2021, 32, 365201. [Google Scholar]
  2. Yannick, M.; Santiago, B.; Adam, H.; Essam, B.; Olivier, C.; Imitiaz, A.; Mdsamiul, A.; Eslam, E.F.; David, V.P. Standalone. CMOS-based Faraday rotation in a silicon photonic waveguide. Opt. Express 2022, 30, 24602–24610. [Google Scholar]
  3. Anita, S.A.; Falah, A.H.M. The role of various etching time in Si nanostructures for ultra-high sensitivity photodetector. Optik 2022, 265, 169427. [Google Scholar]
  4. Perez, D.O.; Gonzalez, F.A.A.; Aceves, M.M. Study of silicon rich oxide light emitter capacitors using textured substrates by metal assisted chemical etching. J. Lumin. 2022, 250, 119054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Deng, M.; Samiul, A.; Mahdi, P.; Eslam, E.F.; Ahmad, A.; Naim, B.H.; David, V.P. Design, analysis, and characterization of a compact silicon photonic modulator with meandered phase shifters. Opt. Express 2022, 30, 32990–33002. [Google Scholar]
  6. Pavesi, L.; Negro, L.D.; Mazzoleni, C.; Franzo, G.; Priolo, F. Optical gain in silicon nanocrystals. Nature 2000, 408, 440–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Chen, K.J.; Huang, X.F.; Xu, J.; Feng, D. Visible photoluminescence in crystallized amorphous Si:H/SiNx:H multiquantum-well structures. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1992, 61, 2069–2071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wilson, W.L.; Szajowski, P.F.; Brus, L.E. Quantum confinement in size-selected, surface-oxidized silicon nanocrystals. Science 1993, 262, 1242–1244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Habraken, F.H.P.M.; Kuiper, A.E.T. Silicon nitride and oxynitride films. Mater. Sci. Eng. R 1994, 12, 123–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Garcia, S.; Bravo, D.; Fernandez, M.; Martil, I.; Lopez, F.J. Role of oxygen on the dangling bond configuration of low oxygen content SiNx:H films deposited at room temperature. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1995, 67, 3263–3265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Cros, Y.; Krautwurm, J. Structural identification of point defects in amorphous silicon oxynitrides. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 1995, 187, 385–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Warren, W.L.; Kanicki, J.; Poindexter, E.H. Paramagnetic point defects in silicon nitride and silicon oxynitride thin films on silicon. Colloids Surf. A-Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 1996, 115, 311–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kato, H.; Masuzawa, A.; Noma, T.; Seol, K.S.; Ohki, Y. Thermally induced photoluminescence quenching center in hydrogenated amorphous silicon oxynitride. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2001, 13, 6541–6549. [Google Scholar]
  14. Kato, H.; Kashio, N.; Ohki, Y.; Seol, K.S.; Noma, T. Band-tail photoluminescence in hydrogenated amorphous silicon oxynitride and silicon nitride films. J. Appl. Phys. 2003, 93, 239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Naskar, S.; Wolter, S.D.; Bower, C.A.; Stoner, B.R.; Glass, J.T. Verification of the O–Si–N complex in plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition silicon oxynitride films. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2005, 87, 261907. [Google Scholar]
  16. Cova, P.; Poulin, S.; Grenier, O.; Masut, R.A. A method for the analysis of multiphase bonding structures in amorphous SiOxNy films. J. Appl. Phys. 2005, 97, 073518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Negro, L.D.; Yi, J.H.; Michel, J.; Kimerling, L.C.; Chang, T.F.; Sukhovatkin, V.; Sargent, E.H. Light emission efficiency and dynamics in silicon-rich silicon nitride Films. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2006, 88, 233109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Walters, R.J.; Kalkman, J.; Polman, A.; Atwater, H.A.; Dood, M.J.A. Photoluminescence quantum efficiency of dense silicon nanocrystal ensembles in SiO2. Phys. Rev. B 2006, 73, 132302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Canham, L.T. Invited talk on luminescent nanoscale silicon. In Proceedings of the Applied Physics Letters 50th Anniversary Reception and Symposium in MRS Fall Meeting (MA), Boston, MA, USA, 25–30 November 2012; pp. 1–27. [Google Scholar]
  20. Mastronardi, M.L.; Flaig, F.M.; Faulkner, D.E.; Henderson, J.; Kübel, C.; Lemmer, U.; Ozin, G.A. Size-dependent absolute quantum yields for size-separated colloidally-stable silicon nanocrystals. Nano Lett. 2012, 12, 337–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Nguyen, P.D.; Kepaptsoglou, D.M.; Ramasse, Q.M.; Sunding, M.F.; Vestland, L.O.; Finstad, T.G.; Olsen, A. Impact of oxygen bonding on the atomic structure and photoluminescence properties of Si-rich silicon nitride thin films. J. Appl. Phys. 2012, 112, 073514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ruggeri, R.; Neri, F.; Sciuto, A.; Privitera, V.; Spinella, C.; Mannino, G. Luminescence properties of SiOxNy irradiated by IR laser 808 nm: The role of Si quantum dots and Si chemical environment. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2012, 100, 042104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Jou, S.K.; Liaw, I.C.; Cheng, Y.C.; Li, C.H. Light emission of silicon oxynitride films prepared by reactive sputtering of silicon. J. Lumin. 2013, 134, 853–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Lin, K.H.; Liou, S.C.; Chen, W.L.; Wu, C.L.; Lin, G.R.; Chang, Y.M. Tunable and stable UV-NIR photoluminescence from annealed SiOx with Si nanoparticles. Opt. Express 2013, 21, 23416–23424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Kistner, J.; Schubert, M.B. Impact of the hydrogen content on the photoluminescence efficiency of amorphous silicon alloys. J. Appl. Phys. 2013, 114, 213515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Valenta, J.; Greben, M.; Gutsch, S.; Hiller, D.; Zacharias, M. Effects of inter-nanocrystal distance on luminescence quantum yield in ensembles of Si nanocrystals. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2014, 105, 243107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Reyes, G.B.D.L.; Dasog, M.; Na, M.X.; Titova, L.V.; Veinot, J.G.C.; Hegmann, F.A. Charge transfer state emission dynamics in blue-emitting functionalized silicon nanocrystals. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2015, 17, 30125–30133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Li, Q.; Luo, T.Y.; Zhou, M.; Abroshan, H.; Huang, J.C.; Kim, H.J.; Rosi, N.L.; Shao, Z.Z.; Jin, R.C. Silicon nanoparticles with surface nitrogen: 90% quantum yield with narrow luminescence bandwidth and the ligand structure-based energy law. ACS Nano 2016, 10, 8385–8393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Liu, X.K.; Zhao, S.Y.; Gu, W.; Zhang, Y.T.; Qiao, X.S.; Ni, Z.Y.; Pi, X.D.; Yang, D.R. Light-emitting diodes based on colloidal silicon quantum dots with octyl and phenylpropyl ligands. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 5959–5966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhang, Y.X.; Wu, W.S.; Hao, H.L.; Shen, W.Z. Femtosecond laser-induced size reduction and emission quantum yield enhancement of colloidal silicon nanocrystals: Effect of laser ablation time. Nanotechnology 2018, 29, 365706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhang, P.Z.; Chen, K.J.; Dong, H.P.; Zhang, P.; Fang, Z.H.; Li, W.; Xu, J.; Huang, X.F. Higher than 60% internal quantum efficiency of photoluminescence from amorphous silicon oxynitride thin films at wavelength of 470 nm. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2014, 105, 011113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhang, P.Z.; Zhang, L.; Wang, S.K.; Ge, X.F. Tunable Luminescent A-SiNxOy Films with High Internal Quantum Efficiency and Fast Radiative Recombination Rates. Materials 2018, 11, 2494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Zhang, P.Z.; Zhang, L.; Wu, Y.Z.; Wang, S.K.; Ge, X.F. High photoluminescence quantum yields generated from N-Si-O bonding states in amorphous silicon oxynitride films. Opt. Express 2018, 26, 31617–31624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zhang, P.Z.; Wang, S.K.; Chen, K.J.; Wu, X.L. Investigation on the luminescent stability in amorphous silicon oxynitride systems. Eur. Phys. J. Appl. Phys. 2020, 89, 10304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Elham, M.T.F.; Alain, D.; Jens, R.S.; Dorian, Z.; Erik, P.A.M.B. Direct-bandgap emission from hexagonal Ge and SiGe alloys. Nature 2020, 580, 205–209. [Google Scholar]
  36. Coyopol, A.; Vasquez, A.M.A.; Garcia, S.G.; Lopez, R.R.; Romano, T.R.; Jimenez, V.M.R.; Rosendo, E.; Morales, C.; Galeazzi, R.; Perez, G.S.A. Effect of carbon concentration on optical and structural properties in the transition from Silicon Rich Oxide to SiCxOy films formation. J. Lumin. 2022, 246, 118851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhang, P.; Hong, J.; Wen, H.M.; Wei, H.; Liu, J.Q.; Yue, F.Y.; Dan, Y.P. Fluorescence optimization and ratio metric thermometry of near-infrared emission in erbium/oxygen-doped crystalline silicon. J. Lumin. 2022, 250, 119035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Basak, K.F.; Kayahan, E. White, blue and cyan luminescence from thermally oxidized porous silicon coated by green synthesized carbon nanostructures. Opt. Mater. 2022, 124, 111990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Yamada, H.; Watanabe, J.; Nemoto, K.; Sun, H.T.; Shirahata, N. Postproduction Approach to Enhance the External Quantum Efficiency for Red Light-Emitting Diodes Based on Silicon Nanocrystals. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 4314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Dutta, S.; Verbiest, J.G. Fabry-Perot resonant avalanche-mode silicon LEDs for tunable narrow band emission. Opt. Express 2022, 30, 42323–42335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Alex, E.K.; Spyros, G. Polarization-dependent photoluminescence properties of fab-compatible nanowire-based nanophotonic structures. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2022, 120, 231104. [Google Scholar]
  42. Xia, C.T.; Chen, J.X.; Zhao, T.; Fan, L.L.; Yang, D.R.; Ma, X.Y. Electroluminescence from Silicon-Based Light-Emitting Devices with Erbium-Doped ZnO Films: Strong Enhancement Effect of Titanium Co doping. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14, 44498–44505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. A diagrammatic presentation of the optical paths of the emitted photons from the excitation light source and the a-SiNxOy films in the integrating sphere during PL QY measurement processes. (a) No a-SiNxOy samples; (b) the excitation light shines directly onto a-SiNxOy samples; (c) the excitation light shines onto a-SiNxOy samples indirectly.
Figure 1. A diagrammatic presentation of the optical paths of the emitted photons from the excitation light source and the a-SiNxOy films in the integrating sphere during PL QY measurement processes. (a) No a-SiNxOy samples; (b) the excitation light shines directly onto a-SiNxOy samples; (c) the excitation light shines onto a-SiNxOy samples indirectly.
Nanomaterials 13 01269 g001
Figure 2. XPS spectra of Si 2p of both a-SiNxOy with (a) R = 0.3; (b) R = 1; (c) R = 5, and the controlled a-SiNx films with (d) R = 5, which was measured after Ar ion beam sputtering at 90 nm depth. For a-SiNxOy films with different R, the Voigt peak fitting results are also shown as a solid line.
Figure 2. XPS spectra of Si 2p of both a-SiNxOy with (a) R = 0.3; (b) R = 1; (c) R = 5, and the controlled a-SiNx films with (d) R = 5, which was measured after Ar ion beam sputtering at 90 nm depth. For a-SiNxOy films with different R, the Voigt peak fitting results are also shown as a solid line.
Nanomaterials 13 01269 g002
Figure 3. XPS spectra of N 1s of both a-SiNxOy with (a) R = 0.3; (b) R = 1; (c) R = 5, and the controlled a-SiNx films with (d) R = 5, which was measured after Ar ion beam sputtering at 90 nm depth. For a-SiNxOy films with different R, the Voigt peak fitting results are also shown as a solid line.
Figure 3. XPS spectra of N 1s of both a-SiNxOy with (a) R = 0.3; (b) R = 1; (c) R = 5, and the controlled a-SiNx films with (d) R = 5, which was measured after Ar ion beam sputtering at 90 nm depth. For a-SiNxOy films with different R, the Voigt peak fitting results are also shown as a solid line.
Nanomaterials 13 01269 g003
Figure 4. Normalized PL spectra of the a-SiNxOy films for various R under the excitation wavelength of 325 nm at 8 K.
Figure 4. Normalized PL spectra of the a-SiNxOy films for various R under the excitation wavelength of 325 nm at 8 K.
Nanomaterials 13 01269 g004
Figure 5. PL and PLE spectra of a-SiNxOy and a-SiNx films with (a) R = 0.3 and (b) R = 1 at room temperature.
Figure 5. PL and PLE spectra of a-SiNxOy and a-SiNx films with (a) R = 0.3 and (b) R = 1 at room temperature.
Nanomaterials 13 01269 g005
Figure 6. The measured (a) EPL vs. ECB tail; (b) PL F.W.H.M. and ΔEstokes vs. EU of a-SiNxOy and a-SiNx films, respectively.
Figure 6. The measured (a) EPL vs. ECB tail; (b) PL F.W.H.M. and ΔEstokes vs. EU of a-SiNxOy and a-SiNx films, respectively.
Nanomaterials 13 01269 g006
Figure 7. The PL QY measurement processes of the a-SiNxOy films with (a) R = 0.5; (b) R = 1; (c) R = 1.5 (Reprinted from ref. [33]); (d) R = 2.5. Black line: the total incident excitation photons (left). Red line: the unabsorbed excitation photons (left) and corresponding emitted photons (right) when the excitation source is directly shone onto samples. Blue line: the unabsorbed excitation photons (left) and corresponding emitted photons (right) when the excitation source is indirectly shone onto samples.
Figure 7. The PL QY measurement processes of the a-SiNxOy films with (a) R = 0.5; (b) R = 1; (c) R = 1.5 (Reprinted from ref. [33]); (d) R = 2.5. Black line: the total incident excitation photons (left). Red line: the unabsorbed excitation photons (left) and corresponding emitted photons (right) when the excitation source is directly shone onto samples. Blue line: the unabsorbed excitation photons (left) and corresponding emitted photons (right) when the excitation source is indirectly shone onto samples.
Nanomaterials 13 01269 g007
Figure 8. Normalized integrated TD-SSPL intensities of a-SiNxOy thin films (R = 2) with surface etch depths (a) 30 nm and (b) 90 nm, respectively. Red line: Theoretical fitting results of the TD-SSPL intensities of a-SiNxOy thin films; Blue line: The temperature inflection points of luminescence thermal quenching. The inset shows the related measured TD-SSPL spectra.
Figure 8. Normalized integrated TD-SSPL intensities of a-SiNxOy thin films (R = 2) with surface etch depths (a) 30 nm and (b) 90 nm, respectively. Red line: Theoretical fitting results of the TD-SSPL intensities of a-SiNxOy thin films; Blue line: The temperature inflection points of luminescence thermal quenching. The inset shows the related measured TD-SSPL spectra.
Nanomaterials 13 01269 g008
Figure 9. The PL QY of a-SiNxOy samples with various R under measurement temperatures of (a) RT; (b) 240 K; (c) 180 K; (d) 120 K; (e) 60 K; (f) 8 K. Red and blue lines show the error bars of the temperature-dependent PL QY values.
Figure 9. The PL QY of a-SiNxOy samples with various R under measurement temperatures of (a) RT; (b) 240 K; (c) 180 K; (d) 120 K; (e) 60 K; (f) 8 K. Red and blue lines show the error bars of the temperature-dependent PL QY values.
Nanomaterials 13 01269 g009
Table 1. Summary of the fabrication parameters, Eopt, EPL, EU, ECB tail, F.W.H.M., and ΔEstokes of a-SiNxOy systems at room temperature.
Table 1. Summary of the fabrication parameters, Eopt, EPL, EU, ECB tail, F.W.H.M., and ΔEstokes of a-SiNxOy systems at room temperature.
RSiH4:N2
(5%:95%)
(SCCM)
NH3
(SCCM)
Eopt
(eV)
EPL
(eV)
EU
(eV)
ECB tail
(eV)
F.W.H.M.
(eV)
ΔEstokes
(eV)
0.38012.932.060.072.860.590.8
0.58023.152.230.133.020.620.79
18043.52.360.363.140.690.78
1.58063.982.590.63.380.740.79
2.580104.462.830.83.660.80.83
580204.622.950.873.750.820.81
Table 2. Summary of the PL IQE values (average) at room temperature and the temperature-dependent PL QY values (average) of a-SiNxOy systems.
Table 2. Summary of the PL IQE values (average) at room temperature and the temperature-dependent PL QY values (average) of a-SiNxOy systems.
RPL IQE (%) (RT)PL QY (%)
RT (Measured)240 K180 K120 K60 K8 K
0.325.51.952.022.573.033.353.44
0.542.14.535.476.417.237.998.31
172.78.4610.1011.9213.2113.8114.23
1.584.110.0811.1612.8113.5113.6113.79
2.545.65.786.908.168.989.8910.25
535.44.695.696.487.137.778.09
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, P.; Zhang, L.; Lyu, F.; Wang, D.; Zhang, L.; Wu, K.; Wang, S.; Tang, C. Luminescent Amorphous Silicon Oxynitride Systems: High Quantum Efficiencies in the Visible Range. Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 1269. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13071269

AMA Style

Zhang P, Zhang L, Lyu F, Wang D, Zhang L, Wu K, Wang S, Tang C. Luminescent Amorphous Silicon Oxynitride Systems: High Quantum Efficiencies in the Visible Range. Nanomaterials. 2023; 13(7):1269. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13071269

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Pengzhan, Leng Zhang, Fei Lyu, Danbei Wang, Ling Zhang, Kongpin Wu, Sake Wang, and Chunmei Tang. 2023. "Luminescent Amorphous Silicon Oxynitride Systems: High Quantum Efficiencies in the Visible Range" Nanomaterials 13, no. 7: 1269. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13071269

APA Style

Zhang, P., Zhang, L., Lyu, F., Wang, D., Zhang, L., Wu, K., Wang, S., & Tang, C. (2023). Luminescent Amorphous Silicon Oxynitride Systems: High Quantum Efficiencies in the Visible Range. Nanomaterials, 13(7), 1269. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13071269

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop