Next Article in Journal
First-Principles Study on Strain-Induced Modulation of Electronic Properties in Indium Phosphide
Previous Article in Journal
A Review on Recently Developed Antibacterial Composites of Inorganic Nanoparticles and Non-Hydrogel Polymers for Biomedical Applications
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nanomaterials
Volume 14
Issue 21
10.3390/nano14211755
nanomaterials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Investigation of Microstructure and Physical Characteristics of Eco-Friendly Piezoelectric Composite Thin Films Based on Chitosan and Ln2O3-Doped Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3-BaTiO3 Nanoparticles

by
Jacem Zidani
1,2,*,
Moneim Zannen
2,
Antonio Da Costa
3,
Oumayma Mlida
3,
Arash Jamali
4,
Mustapha Majdoub
2,
Mimoun El Marssi
1,
Anthony Ferri
3 and
Abdelilah Lahmar
1,*
1
Laboratoire de Physique de la Matière Condensée (LPMC), Université de Picardie Jules Verne, 33 rue Saint-Leu, 80039 Amiens, CEDEX 1, France
2
Laboratory of Interfaces and Advanced Materials (LIMA), Faculty of Sciences of Monastir, University of Monastir, Bd. of the Environment, Monastir 5019, Tunisia
3
University of Artois, CNRS, UMR 8181—UCCS—Unité de Catalyse et Chimie du Solide, 62300 Lens, France
4
Plateforme de Microscopie Électronique (PME), Hub de l’Energie, Université de Picardie Jules Verne, 15 rue Baudelocque, 80039 Amiens, France
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2024, 14(21), 1755; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14211755
Submission received: 21 September 2024 / Revised: 14 October 2024 / Accepted: 29 October 2024 / Published: 31 October 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nanoscale Ferroelectric, Piezoelectric, and Multiferroic Materials and Their Novel Applications)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
This paper investigates the synthesis and characterization of eco-friendly piezoelectric composite thin films composed of chitosan and Ln2O3-doped Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3-BaTiO3 (NBT-BT) nanoparticles. The films were fabricated using a solution-casting technique, successfully embedding the particles into the chitosan matrix, which resulted in enhanced piezoelectric properties compared to pure chitosan. Characterization methods, such as photoluminescence spectroscopy and piezo-response force microscopy (PFM) which revealed strong electromechanical responses, with notable improvements in piezoelectric performance due to the inclusion of NBT-BT nanoparticles. X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis revealed a pure perovskite phase with the space group R3c for NBT-BT and NBT-BT-Ln particles. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images showed a non-uniform distribution of NBT-BT particles within the chitosan matrix. The results also suggest that the incorporation of rare earth elements further enhances the electrical and piezoelectric properties of the composites, highlighting their potential in flexible and smart device applications. Overall, these findings underscore the potential of chitosan-based composites in addressing environmental concerns while offering effective solutions for energy harvesting and biomedical applications.

1. Introduction

In recent years, heightened concerns over global warming and the energy crisis have intensified the need for innovative energy systems that encompass conversion, storage, and harvesting [1,2]. Energy harvesting, a pivotal solution to the energy predicament, involves absorbing energy from diverse sources and storing it, also known as power harvesting or energy saving. This approach converts mechanical, thermal, and solar energies into electrical power, eliminating the reliance on external sources [3]. The surge in interest in energy harvesting systems, featuring piezoelectric materials, is fueled by the widespread use of portable electronic devices and wireless sensors [4]. Concurrently, global industrialization and economic development have exacerbated fossil fuel scarcity and environmental pollution, particularly the issue of plastic waste [5,6]. Addressing the global energy deficit requires improved energy utilization efficiency and advancements in energy technologies. While renewable sources such as solar, wind, and biomass energy are actively explored, their efficacy in mitigating the energy shortfall remains limited by inherent discontinuity and instability [7,8].
Piezoelectric generators hold significant promise for powering portable devices and establishing autonomous electronic systems by extracting mechanical energy. The advantages of the piezoelectric mechanism, compared to other conversion techniques, stem from its scalability and high energy density across diverse size ranges. Piezoelectric materials uniquely combine mechanical and electrical effects, where mechanical deformation induces electrical polarization (direct piezoelectric effect), and electric fields produce mechanical stress (converse piezoelectric effect). These devices have considerable technological relevance, with applications in sensors, actuators, and energy harvesting systems [9], as well as in biomedicine [10]. Advancements in piezoelectric nanostructures have expanded their use in nanocomposite materials, enhancing mechanical properties [11] and electroactive surface areas for biological scaffolds [10,12].
Polymer-based composites with enhanced electrical characteristics are being explored for their applications in capacitors, static-charge dissipation, and photovoltaic devices [13,14,15]. Their mechanical flexibility and adaptability to complex configurations make them appealing for both compact electronics and larger, geometrically specialized electrical devices [16,17]. Polymers like polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) are commonly used in capacitors due to their high electric breakdown strength [18,19,20]. PVDF is recognized as a prominent piezoelectric polymer in biomedical applications, attributed to its high piezoelectric constant and crystalline structure [21]. Although its piezoelectric response is notable among polymers, it remains lower than that of ceramics, with typical d33 values ranging from 13 to 28 pC/N [22]. Moreover, PVDF faces challenges in terms of adhesion, stability, and the production of uniform films [21].
Most commercially available piezoelectric generators rely on lead-based materials, particularly lead zirconate titanate (PZT), which offers enhanced piezoelectric performance in various applications [23,24]. However, the environmental and health concerns associated with these materials have intensified efforts to develop lead-free alternatives that provide comparable piezoelectric properties [25].
Recently, there has been growing interest in biomaterials as sustainable alternatives for synthesizing piezoelectric materials. The degradation of PVDF can produce toxic HF, posing risks to both the environment and human health [26]. In bioelectronics, where safety and compatibility with biological systems are crucial, traditional piezoelectric materials present significant limitations. Developing biodegradable materials that undergo natural degradation by living organisms is essential, as this reduces the need for surgical removal and enhances biocompatibility [27,28,29]. The focus on creating new piezoelectric materials with optimal biodegradability aligns with the next generation of wearable and implantable bioelectronics.
Biomaterials such as amino acids, protein-based polymers (e.g., collagen), and polysaccharides (e.g., chitin) form fibrous structures that exhibit interesting piezoelectric properties. These materials degrade into simple molecules under safe biological conditions, making them suitable for bioelectronics despite their lower piezoelectric response compared to standard materials. Optimizing their orientation and polarization can significantly improve electromechanical coupling, expanding their use in biodegradable wearable devices [30,31,32]. Substantial research has been directed at exploring biomaterials derived from biopolymers like chitin and chitosan for piezoelectric applications.
Chitosan (CS), derived from chitin, features a linear structure with β (1–4) linked D-glucosamine and demonstrates remarkable bioactivity and biodegradability. It is commonly found in the exoskeletons of crustaceans, fungi, and mushrooms [33,34]. The structural depiction of chitosan is illustrated in Figure 1. Approved as a food additive, chitosan has shown non-toxicity when administered orally and has proven effective in activating macrophages and attracting neutrophils [35]. Its solubility in acidic solutions and positive charge density enable interactions with a variety of anionic polymers, making it suitable for drug delivery and tissue engineering [36]. The structural similarity of chitosan to human glycosaminoglycans enhances its reactivity for biological modifications, contributing to its antibacterial and hemostatic properties, particularly in wound healing [37,38,39].
Chitosan’s mucoadhesive properties and interaction with mucous membranes have made it a key component in developing bioadhesive drug and vaccine delivery systems [40]. Its versatility in forming gels, microspheres, and nanofibers, along with its pH sensitivity and biocompatibility, positions it as a promising candidate for tissue engineering and drug delivery applications. Additionally, chitosan’s ability to form DNA complexes has driven its use in non-viral gene delivery research, emphasizing its potential in tissue engineering for skin, cartilage, and bone [41,42,43].
Integrating biopolymers like chitosan into piezoelectric systems enhances their functionality for smart devices [44,45]. Although research into chitosan’s piezoelectric applications is still developing, studies suggest that its performance rivals that of PVDF in some contexts [34,46]. This innovation aligns with sustainable development goals by offering eco-friendly alternatives to traditional energy solutions, particularly for applications in the Internet of Things (IoT) [47]. In this present investigation, we detail the fabrication of flexible nanocomposite films derived from bio-based materials by integrating Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3-BaTiO3 -lanthanides (NBT-BT-Ln) within a chitosan polymer matrix through a solution-casting method. The Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3-BaTiO3 (NBT-BT) system has garnered significant attention due to the presence of a morphotropic phase boundary (MPB) between the two phases, rhombohedral and tetragonal, particularly near x = 0.06. The introduction of BT to NBT at the MPB leads to a significant reduction in coercive fields and a noteworthy improvement in piezoelectric characteristics compared to the NBT system [48]. Recent investigations have demonstrated that the addition of rare earth (RE3+) elements into the 0.94NBT-0.06BT system may enhance characteristics associated with the specific rare earth element employed [49,50]. Adding Ln2O3 into BNT-BT ceramics enhances both their ferroelectric and piezoelectric properties while also heightening their fluorescence intensity, suggesting potential applications in fluorescent light-emitting devices.

2. Materials and Methods

The synthesis of 0.94Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3-0.06BaTiO3 powder, doped with lanthanides (Ln = Pr, Nd, and Dy), followed the conventional solid-state method using high-purity precursors: Sodium carbonate (Na2CO3, 99%), Bismuth oxide (Bi2O3, 99%), Titanium dioxide (TiO2, 99.9%), Barium carbonate (BaCO3, 99.9%), Lanthanide oxides: Praseodymium oxide (Pr2O3, 99%), Neodymium oxide (Nd2O3, 99%), and Dysprosium oxide (Dy2O3, 99%). All precursors were sourced from Alfa Aesar (Karlsruhe, Germany).
The procedure of preparing the powder, the polymer, and the nanocomposite [51,52], as well as the characterizations [53,54], are provided in the Supplementary Information. Figure 2 shows the steps of synthesis of our composite films.

3. Results

3.1. X-Ray Diffraction and Structural Analysis

Figure 3 depicts the results of X-ray diffraction patterns for the composite membranes. All composite membranes demonstrate a singular perovskite phase associated to the ceramic particles and without any indication of secondary phase presence, as illustrated in Figure 3. The NBT-BT-Ln powder in the rhombohedral phase is classified with the space group R3c [55]. The determination of the NBT-BT-Ln crystallite size was carried out via the Debye–Scherrer formula, utilizing the Full Width at Half Maximum (FWHM) of the observed peaks, yielding a size of 19.2 nm (1) [56].
D = k   λ β cos ⁡ θ
Considering the variables: D represents the average crystallite size, with k fixed at 0.9 as Scherrer’s constant; λ (CuKα) = 1.5406 Å indicates the wavelength of the radiation used; β signifies the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the peak; and θ represents the Bragg angle of the most intense diffraction peak.
The distinctive CS membrane peak, evident around 2θ = 20°, is attributed to the semi-crystalline structure characteristic of chitosan [57,58]. Chitosan’s semi-crystalline characteristics arise from the dense arrangement of polymeric chains and the existence of strong intermolecular hydrogen bonds [59]. It is well-established that the structural attributes of chitosan are significantly influenced by processing treatments, including dissolving, precipitation, and drying, as well as intrinsic features such as origin, degree of deacetylation, and molecular weight. Nevertheless, the film preparation process did not notably impact the crystalline structure of chitosan, as discerned from the XRD patterns.
The additional diffraction peaks of 10%NBT-BT-Ln composite membranes become more evident, with the compositions containing Ln3+ situated in 22.85°, 32.52°, 40.15°, 46.69°, 52.60°, and 58.15°. These diffraction peaks were attributed to the (012), (110)(104), (113)(006)(202), (224), (122)(116), and (018)(214) planes of rhombohedral NBT-BT [60].
Nanomaterials 14 01755 g003
Figure 3. XRD of nanocomposite films chitosan, 10%/NBT-BT, and 10%/NBT-BT-Ln.
Figure 3. XRD of nanocomposite films chitosan, 10%/NBT-BT, and 10%/NBT-BT-Ln.
Nanomaterials 14 01755 g003

3.2. FT-IR

The infrared spectra of chitosan with a degree of deacetylation of 87.9% [34], modified with NBT-BT and NBT-BT-Ln, are illustrated in Figure 4. In this figure, the distinctive band around 559 cm−1 is attributed to Ti–O vibrations, characteristic of BaTiO3 ceramics [61]. The broadband observed at 3300 cm−1 in the infrared spectra of modified chitosan indicates the stretching vibrational modes of functional groups, including N–H and O–H, present in the chitosan polymer. Additionally, the bands at 2872 cm−1 and 2928 cm−1 represent the asymmetric and symmetric stretching vibrational modes of the C–H groups within the chitosan polymer chain, respectively, which are typical features of polysaccharides [62,63,64]. The presence of remaining N-acetyl functional groups is evidenced by the distinctive spectral bands at 1643 cm−1 (C=O stretching vibrations of amide I) and 1319 cm−1 (C–N stretching vibrations of amide III) [65,66]. Furthermore, a band near 1553 cm−1 is attributed to the N–H bending vibrations of the primary amine [67,68]. These observations align well with previous studies [69,70].
The presence of the characteristic peak of NBT-BT in all chitosan spectra suggests the formation of coordination bonds among different functional groups of chitosan and NBT-BT. This suggests that NBT-BT particles are situated between polymer chains linked through functional groups, suggesting successful incorporation of NBT-BT onto the chitosan polymer surface. FT-IR spectral bands and associated molecular vibrations are inputted in Table 1.

3.3. Raman Spectroscopy

The structure of chitosan, 10%NBT-BT, and 10%NBT-BT-Ln nanocomposites was evaluated by Raman Spectroscopy, as presented in Figure 5. The assignments obtained coincide with those reported in the literature [34,71,72]. The prominent Raman vibrations of chitosan can be assigned at 2900 cm−1, which were assigned to the aliphatic vibrations νCH [73,74,75].
Numerous investigations into ceramic systems [76] have studied the characteristics of the low-frequency vibrational mode to understand the influence of BaTiO3 doping on the NBT system; yet, despite its clear importance, several studies analyzing NBT Raman spectra have disregarded this particular frequency component [52,77].
The spectra exhibit features consistent with previously reported findings [60]. In the spectrum, different vibrational modes are observed, which aligns with observations made in other studies [78,79]. The vibrational mode at 134 cm−1 corresponds to the excitation of Na–O bonds at the A-site of the perovskite structure (ABO3). A subsequent peak at 279 cm−1, commonly found in various perovskites, is associated with the excitation of the TiO₆ octahedra [79]. Modes occurring within the 450 to 650 cm−1 range are indicative of oxygen atom displacements [76,77], while those at 765 and 842 cm−1 are linked to the presence of oxygen vacancies [78,79].
The cited modes, primarily involving oxygen atom displacements in perovskites while the cations remain relatively fixed, are commonly referred to [80]. All modes are wider due to increased structural disorder caused by the incorporation of Ba into NBT, with further disorder introduced by the inclusion of Lanthanide elements [81,82]. Notably, in the present study, the addition of NBT-BT and NBT-BT-Ln to the polymer CS does not lead to discernible frequency variability.

3.4. SEM

Scanning electron microscope images of the surfaces of CS/NBT-BT and CS/NBT-BT-Ln composites are depicted in Figure 6a–d. It is evident that NBT-BT and NBT-BT-Ln particles are randomly distributed and intertwined with each other, forming interconnected grains with numerous gaps in between. Although some clustering of particles can be observed on the surface, there are no obvious voids or gaps within the samples’ matrix or at the interfaces between the particles and polymer, consistent with prior literature [51,83,84]. Figure 6a–d reveals two distinct zones: one exhibiting a dark appearance and the other a light tone. The lighter particles correspond to NBT-BT-Ln particles, while the darker region represents the CS matrix. A representative cross-section of the 10%NBT-BT-Dy film is displayed in Figure 6e, revealing a uniform thickness of approximately 45 µm. The consistent thickness is confirmed by measurements taken in two different regions, demonstrating the high quality of the synthesized film. However, the surface of the film does not appear homogeneous or smooth, which is likely due to the cutting process during measurement, making it challenging to observe particles on the surface clearly.

3.5. Dielectric Studies

Polymers exhibit a low permittivity (low-K) characteristic. Enhancing the dielectric properties of a polymer entails incorporation of a high permittivity (high-K) ceramic substance to produce a composite. These high-K composites manifest considerable utility across diverse electronic domains, including transducers, piezo-sensors, and hydrophones [85,86]. Several literature reviews elucidating the electrical properties of various ferroelectric ceramic/polymer composites have been disseminated [87,88].
Recent attention has been directed towards high-K composite materials as prospective candidates for incorporation into high-frequency electronic systems. Emerging electronic applications like rapid computing or high-frequency telecommunication systems necessitate the integration of decoupling low-impedance power and capacitors planes directly into the packaging of integrated circuits. This necessitates the advancement of high-K materials that are compatible with circuit processing technologies [89]. The dielectric characteristics of particular synthetic polymer composites have not received much attention [90].
In this work, Figure 7 depicts the measured permittivity values of chitosan/NBT-BT and chitosan/NBT-BT-Ln films at ambient temperature, encompassing a frequency spectrum ranging from 102 Hz to 106 Hz. Each composite film exhibited an augmented dielectric permittivity compared to the pure chitosan film [34,91]. The inclusion of perovskite particles led to an enhancement in permittivity values attributed to the concomitant augmentation in interfacial space polarization within the composite materials.
However, For CS/NP, a subsequent rise across a frequency range of 100 Hz to 105 Hz causes a pronounced decline in the permittivity, indicative of a relaxation phenomenon linked with the diminishing polarization stemming from the shift ranging from low-frequency to high-frequency dipolar polarization. With increasing frequency, the molecular dipoles encounter limitations in their ability to reorient swiftly enough, leading to a reduction in the permittivity [92,93]. The permittivity of the NP/CS elevates in comparison to pure CS polymer, owing to the heightened permittivity of NBT-BT [94], consequently resulting an average enhancement in electric field within the polymer nanocomposites [95].
This phenomenon can be described as follows: Upon the application of an electric field, charges accumulate at the interface between the nanoparticles (NP) and chitosan (CS) matrix. Consequently, a field is generated, polarizing the adjacent polymer matrix and giving rise to an electrical double layer around each nanoparticle. Consequently, the interfacial polarization encompassing the NP–CS hetero-interface contributes to the augmentation of the dielectric constant in the nanocomposites [96].
As depicted in Figure 7, the 10%NBT-BT-Pr composite exhibits the highest dielectric constant, approximately 100 at low frequencies, which subsequently decreases to around 60 at high frequencies. Following this, the 10%NBT-BT-Dy, 10%NBT-BT-Nd, and 10%NBT-BT composites display lower permittivity values, approximately 55, 50, and 38, respectively, at high frequencies. Additionally, chitosan exhibits a dielectric permittivity around 25 at 100 Hz, which decreases at higher frequencies, reaching a value of about 10.
Dielectric measurements show that the introduction of rare earth elements into nanocomposite films increases the dielectric constant, particularly at low frequencies, due to the presence of space charges that are highly active in these conditions. Space charges arise from processes like absorption of charged species, thermal ionization, and defect migration, with charge accumulation influenced by the interfaces between the crystalline and polymer matrix, which act as trapping sites. The addition of nanofillers enhances these interfaces, modifying the distribution of trapping sites. While all films have similar thickness and geometry, minor variations in the dielectric constant could be due to measurement conditions or differences in nanofiller distribution.
The dielectric characterization of chitosan (CS) and its nanocomposites serves as a potent tool for probing their molecular behavior, opening up possibilities for their potential applications across various fields, such as the packaging industry, fuel cells, and next-generation actuator and sensor technologies. Furthermore, by optimizing the dielectric properties of flexible films and bio-films, they could be utilized as artificial muscles in future medical treatments and play a crucial role in the development of “smart skins” for medical applications [89,97].

3.6. Optical Investigations

Figure 8 depicts the characterization of total transmittance (T), reflectance (R), and absorbance spectrum, respectively, for various samples. These samples demonstrate the anticipated behavior typical of these composites, with a thickness approximate to 45 µm [34,98]. Notably, the composites’ spectra display a marked decrease near 350 nm, indicative of the NBT-BT band gap, as documented in the literature [99].
The transmittance of 10%NBT-BT and 10%NBT-BT-Ln films, as illustrated in Figure 8a, exhibits a substantial rise with increasing wavelength within the UV range, plateauing at a consistent maximum value in the visible spectrum. The examination of this spectrum reveals two discernible regions: (1) a transparent domain for wavelengths higher than 450 nm and (2) an absorption domain situated around 350 nm, attributed with the presence of carbonyl groups within chitosan [100,101].
Figure 8b reveals a noticeable impact of adding the NP into the CS matrix on the reflectance of the fabricated films. The reflectance of CS/NP exhibits high values in the visible range compared to the blank CS [102].
Comparatively, the transmittance of the CS/NP films decrease subsequent to the addition of NP when contrasted with the transparency of pure CS observed in previous studies [34,102]. This reduction in transparency primarily stems from light scattering by larger aggregates formed within the 10%NBT-BT films, particularly affecting shorter wavelengths.
The chitosan polymer is recognized for its capacity to absorb within the UV-visible regions, with a broad peak typically centered around 290–300 nm [100]. Figure 8c illustrates the absorbance spectrum, depicting strong UV absorption in CS/NP films, with absorption enhancement upon the incorporation of nanoparticles within the chitosan matrix [103]. The graphical representation illustrates the highest absorption occurring within the UV range, with the composite containing 10%NBT-BT-Nd exhibiting the most significant absorption in both UV and visible ranges.
The increase in optical transmittance and consequent rise in absorption levels resulting from the incorporation of nanoparticles (NP) into the chitosan (CS) matrix is ascribed to heightened defect formation. This phenomenon leads to a reduction in the optical band gap of the CS/NP, as illustrated in Figure 9 [104]. Utilizing Tauc’s equation (Equation (2)), the direct and indirect optical band gaps (Eg dir./Eg ind.) of both the unaltered and CS/NP films have been determined from the curves of (αhν)2 and (αhν)0.5 plotted against photon energy (hν), respectively, as depicted in Figure 9a,b.
( α h ν ) n = k ( h ν − E g )
Here, hν represents the photon energy, where h is Plank’s constant, α signifies the absorption coefficient, Eg refers to the optical energy gap, k is a constant, and for direct transitions n = 2, while for indirect transitions n = 0.5.
Nanomaterials 14 01755 g009
Figure 9. Plots of the optical bandgap illustrating (a) direct and (b) indirect status in the nanocomposites.
Figure 9. Plots of the optical bandgap illustrating (a) direct and (b) indirect status in the nanocomposites.
Nanomaterials 14 01755 g009
The x-axis intercepts of the extrapolated linear segments of these curves to hν = 0 correspond to Eg values, as tabulated in Table 2. The Eg values obtained for direct transitions and indirect transitions of the unmodified CS film in our earlier study are 5.81 eV and 4.94 eV, respectively [34]. These values exhibited a decrease following the introduction of nanoparticles (NBT-BT and NBT-BT-Ln), consistent with previously reported findings [34,105,106]. The narrowing of Eg primarily arises from localized states and defects formed between both (HOMO), the highest occupied molecular orbital, and (LUMO), the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital, of the CS/NP composite due to nanoparticles doping.
Figure 10 illustrates the emission spectra of 10%NBT-BT-Dy at room temperature, and the 10%NBT-BT-Nd and 10%NBT-BT-Pr compounds are presented in (Figure S1), obtained through ultraviolet excitation at 360 nm. Three distinct emission bands within the visible region (VR) are discerned, with central wavelengths at 504 nm, 608 nm, and 695 nm. They correspond to transitions between 4f-4f levels in Dy3+ Lanthanide, specifically (4F9/2 → 6H15/2), (4F9/2 → 6H13/2), and (4F9/2 → 6H11/2), as indicated [107]. Comparative analysis with our prior research [94,108] reveals similarities in emission bands with slight wavelength shifts, potentially attributable to the polymer matrix. In numerous luminescent organic materials, including rare earth complexes, emission spectra undergo shifts based on concentration and the polymer matrix in which they are dispersed. The polymer matrix can alter the local environment and interactions surrounding rare earth ions, thereby influencing their energy levels and resultant emission wavelengths [109].
The vibrational motions of the disordered polymer host material surrounding the optically active rare earth ions can induce vibrationally-assisted electronic transitions, known as vibronic transitions. These interactions may cause shifts in the emission spectra compared to rare earth ions in a more ordered, non-polymer matrix [110]. Even though doping rare earth ions like Eu2+ and Dy3+ into a polymer matrix may not disrupt the crystal structure of the host material, the polymer environment can still affect the local coordination and interactions surrounding the rare earth ions. Consequently, this can lead to alterations in their emission properties compared to the same rare earth ions in a non-polymer matrix.
The mixture of the first emissions, blue and yellow, is recognized for producing white light in materials doped with the Dy3+ element, rendering it highly compelling as an activator in the fabrication of light-emitting diode (LED) systems [111]. We observed in our study the peak intensity in the yellow emission is centered at 608 nm, predominantly controlled by forced electronic dipole transitions. Notably, such transitions are permitted solely in materials characterized by polar space groups and lower symmetries [112,113]. Moreover, the strength of this emission is notably influenced by the coordination and crystal structure. Our findings reveal a solo peak at 608 nm, affirming the incorporation of Dy3+ ions within the A site. Conversely, the blue emission detected at 504 nm results from magnetic dipole transitions, which are comparatively less affected by the coordination environment. Leveraging these major emissions, blue and yellow, it is plausible to envision that Dy-doped CS/NBT-BT holds promise for diverse technological applications, including telecommunications, bio-labeling, medical applications, and barcode readers [114]. Additionally, its potential extends to serving in the near-infrared (NIR) regions as a solid-state laser, owing to its red emission properties.

3.7. Local Piezoelectric Responses

The morphological and electroactive properties of the chitosan/NBT-BT and chitosan/NBT-BT-Dy samples were probed at the nanoscale by the PFM technique, and the results simultaneously recorded over a 5 × 5 µm2 scan area are presented in Figure 11 and Figure 12, respectively. On both films, a rough surface is observed (Figure 11a and Figure 12a), in agreement with the composite polymer/ceramic nature of the studied system.
Figure 11b,c reveals the out-of-plane amplitude and out-of-plane phase of the detected PFM signal simultaneously recorded over the chitosan/NBT-BT film surface, respectively. These images represent the as-grown response of the sample under various AC electrical excitations. As schematically illustrated in Figure 11d, the PFM signal was recorded by scanning the surface from bottom to top, applying an increasing AC driving voltage from 2 V up to 10 V in 2 V increments every 1 µm. First, we observed strong PFM amplitude contrasts (blue contrasts) amid weaker responses (brown background), as highlighted by the yellow-dotted square in Figure 11b from a VAC value of 6 V. The corresponding PFM phase signals are also contrasted (purple color) compared to the background of the image (yellow color). This particular behavior suggests the presence of piezoelectric perovskite particles embedded in the polymer matrix. To confirm this hypothesis, we performed spectroscopic PFM experiments, consisting of precisely positioning the AFM tip on these specific areas and then recording local piezoelectric hysteresis loops. The typical local piezo loops are shown in Figure 11e, where 180° for phase difference in phase signal and butterfly-shaped behavior for amplitude response are systematically detected, in accordance with both the switching process of the dipole moments and the piezoelectric deformation of the region probed beneath the AFM tip, respectively. In addition, an abrupt polarization reversal associated to a relatively small coercive voltage (ca. 2.7 V) is determined from the phase loops, which unambiguously evidence the nanoscale piezo-/ferroelectricity behavior of the electroactive ceramic particles. As a remark, the eventual crosstalk effect during scanning can be ruled out to explain the highly active regions in PFM images since no correlation exists between AFM morphology and piezo responses, as highlighted by the detected contrasts in yellow-dotted squares (Figure 11a–c). Now, by focusing on the background amplitude response in Figure 11b, it is noted that the deformation increases with the driving voltage, particularly from 6 V, where the contrasts gradually shift from brown to blue. Indeed, even though some highly piezo-active areas correspond to the previously identified NBT-BT particles (dark blue spots), large surrounding regions brighten and then turn blue, particularly from VAC = 8 V upwards, consistent with an increase in the piezoelectric response detected by the tip, according to the associated color scale. This electrical behavior is attributed to the polymer matrix, suggesting that chitosan exhibits piezoelectric properties. This conclusion is reinforced by the fact that the matrix requires higher excitation (at least 8 V) for significant piezoelectric activity to be detected, whereas ceramic particles exhibit a piezoelectric response as early as 4–6 V. Moreover, even at voltages as high as 10 V, the chitosan matrix does not deform as much as the NBT-BT excited at 6–8 V. These results are in perfect agreement with the polymeric nature of chitosan on one hand and the perovskite nature of NBT-BT on the other, as it is well known that inorganic materials exhibit much higher piezoelectric coefficients than their organic counterparts [54]. On the other hand, the local piezoelectric behavior of the chitosan compound was already reported in the literature by using PFM analysis [115,116]. The indirect visualization of NBT-BT particles by PFM will facilitate the precise assessment of their contribution to the macroscopic performance of future composite-based electromechanical systems.
The electroactive behavior of the chitosan/NBT-BT-Ln films was also investigated at the nanoscale. The PFM results obtained over the surface of the chitosan/NBT-BT-Dy composite are presented in Figure 12. In this case, we decided to focus more on the matrix, initially performing the same kind of PFM experiment as for the chitosan/NBT-BT film, namely recording the spontaneous piezo response of the film while gradually increasing the driving voltage (from top to bottom). Then, we rescanned the same area immediately afterward under the same increasing excitation voltage (from +2 V up to +10 V), but this time from the bottom to the top of the image. These experimental conditions are schematically illustrated in Figure 12d,e, and the obtained PFM results are shown in Figure 12b,c. First, as already observed in the case of the chitosan/NBT-BT film, highly piezo-active regions (marked by yellow-dotted squares) emerge as early as 4 V of excitation, surrounded by areas with weaker response (brown regions). These regions are attributed to the NBT-BT-Dy particles, as discussed above. Moreover, specific areas with geometric shapes, suggesting the presence of particles, are observed in the PFM images, such as the one highlighted by the pink-dotted square in Figure 12c. Here, the threshold voltage required for the detection of NBT-BT is higher (approximately +8 V), which can be explained by the varying depths at which the particles are embedded in the polymer matrix Then, from the initial surface scan shown in Figure 12b, a similar behavior is observed in the matrix. Specifically, the matrix exhibits weak activity and requires a higher excitation voltage (ca. 8 V) to make the deformation under the AFM tip clearly visible (blue contrasts). When considering the results from the second scan shown in Figure 12c, we again observe a PFM signal associated with the chitosan matrix, which increases linearly as a function of the applied driving voltage. In addition, we note that the mechanical behavior of the matrix under electrical stimulus is independent of both the scanning direction and the probed region. All these results confirm the piezoelectric nature of the chitosan matrix used in this study and reveal a rather homogeneous behavior.

4. Conclusions

The investigation into eco-friendly piezoelectric composite thin films based on chitosan and Ln2O3-doped Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3-BaTiO3 nanoparticles yielded promising results across various aspects. The study confirmed the successful incorporation of NBT-BT nanoparticles into the chitosan matrix, as evidenced by FT-IR and RAMAN analysis. Scanning electron microscopy (MEB) revealed a random distribution of nanoparticles with a thickness around 45 µm for 10%NBT-BT-Dy as an example, enhancing interfacial interactions and contributing to improved dielectric and piezoelectric properties. Dielectric studies demonstrated that the composite films exhibited enhanced permittivity compared to pure chitosan (e.g., the 10%NBT-BT-Pr composite demonstrated a dielectric constant of approximately 100 at low frequencies), indicating the effectiveness of incorporating high-K ceramic materials to improve electrical characteristics.
The emission spectra of 10%NBT-BT-Dy composite show notable features with strong emissions in the blue and yellow regions, highlighting the impact of Dy doping on improving the optical properties. These characteristics make the composites promising for various applications, such as telecommunications, bio-labeling, medical devices, and barcode readers. Additionally, their red emission properties suggest potential use in near-infrared (NIR) solid-state lasers, broadening their scope for advanced optical technologies.
Moreover, the piezoelectric properties were analyzed using advanced techniques, showing that the chitosan matrix required higher excitation voltages (at least 8 V) to produce noticeable responses. In contrast, the NBT-BT nanoparticles exhibited piezoelectric activity at lower voltages (4–6 V). This distinction emphasizes the intrinsic characteristics of the organic and inorganic components, with the NBT-BT perovskite displaying higher piezoelectric coefficients compared to the chitosan matrix. These results offer the potential of these composites for applications in flexible electronics and energy harvesting systems. Overall, the piezoelectric capability of our chitosan/NBT-BT-Ln composites was evidenced at the nanoscale, allowing applications in electroactive devices.

Supplementary Materials

The supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/nano14211755/s1, Materials and Methods: The procedure of preparing the powder, the polymer, the nanocomposite, and the characterizations. Figure S1: Emission spectra of 10%NBT-BT-Nd and 10%NBT-BT-Pr composites. Refs. [34,51,52,53,54] are cited in Supplementary Materials.

Author Contributions

J.Z.: Investigation, data curation, writing—original draft; M.Z.: visualization, review and editing, validation. A.D.C.: data curation, investigation, review and editing; O.M.: Investigation, data curation; A.J.: investigation, data curation; M.M.: validation, supervision; M.E.M.: visualization, validation; A.F.: writing—review and editing, visualization, validation; A.L.: conceptualization, writing—review and editing, validation, supervision. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Financial support by the project PHC UTIQUE 2022 N° 47593XH and by the NAP project in the framework of CPER Manifest 2021–2027 are gratefully acknowledged. A.D.C. and A.F. thank the Region Hauts-de-France and FEDER (PO 2007-2013) for funding the MFP-3D microscope under Program “Chemistry and Materials for a Sustainable Growth”.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that this study received funding from PHC UTIQUE 2022 N° 47593XH. The funder was not involved in the study design, collection, analysis, interpretation of data, the writing of this article, or the decision to submit it for publication.

References

  1. Ali, H.M. An experimental study for thermal management using hybrid heat sinks based on organic phase change material, copper foam and heat pipe. J. Energy Storage 2022, 53, 105185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ebrahimnataj, M.R.; Tiji, A.E.; Eisapour, M.; Ali, H.M.; Talebizadehsardari, P.; Ehteram, M.A.; Abdolmaleki, S. The effect of soot accumulation and backpressure of an integrated after-treatment system on diesel engine performance. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2021, 147, 8435–8443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Shi, Q.; He, T.; Lee, C. More than energy harvesting—Combining triboelectric nanogenerator and flexible electronics technology for enabling novel micro-/nano-systems. Nano Energy 2019, 57, 851–871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Gholikhani, M.; Shirazi, S.Y.B.; Mabrouk, G.M.; Dessouky, S. Dual electromagnetic energy harvesting technology for sustainable transportation systems. Energy Convers. Manag. 2021, 230, 113804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Su, G.; Ong, H.C.; Mofijur, M.; Mahlia, T.I.; Ok, Y.S. Pyrolysis of waste oils for the production of biofuels: A critical review. J. Hazard. Mater. 2022, 424, 127396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Jambeck, J.R.; Geyer, R.; Wilcox, C.; Siegler, T.R.; Perryman, M.; Andrady, A.; Narayan, R.; Law, K.L. Plastic waste inputs from land into the ocean. Science 2015, 347, 768–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Chu, S.; Majumdar, A. Opportunities and challenges for a sustainable energy future. Nature 2012, 488, 294–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Said, Z.; Ghodbane, M.; Sundar, L.S.; Tiwari, A.K.; Sheikholeslami, M.; Boumeddane, B. Heat transfer, entropy generation, economic and environmental analyses of linear fresnel reflector using novel rGO-Co3O4 hybrid nanofluids. Renew. Energy 2021, 165, 420–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Li, H.; Tian, C.; Deng, Z.D. Energy harvesting from low frequency applications using piezoelectric materials. Appl. Phys. Rev. 2014, 1, 041301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Magnani, A.; Capaccioli, S.; Azimi, B.; Danti, S.; Labardi, M. Local Piezoelectric Response of Polymer/Ceramic Nanocomposite Fibers. Polymers 2022, 14, 5379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chen, Q.; Sun, Y.; Wang, Y.; Cheng, H.; Wang, Q.-M. ZnO nanowires–polyimide nanocomposite piezoresistive strain sensor. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2013, 190, 161–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Chowdhury, A.R.; Jaksik, J.; Hussain, I.; Tran, P.; Danti, S.; Uddin, M.J. Surface-Modified Nanostructured Piezoelectric Device as a Cost-Effective Transducer for Energy and Biomedicine. Energy Technol. 2019, 7, 1800767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Lai, M.; Yu, S.; Sun, R.; Zeng, X.; Luo, S.; Wong, C.-P. Effects and mechanism of graft modification on the dielectric performance of polymer–matrix composites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2013, 89, 127–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Polizos, G.; Tomer, V.; Manias, E.; Randall, C.A. Epoxy-based nanocomposites for electrical energy storage. II: Nanocomposites with nanofillers of reactive montmorillonite covalently-bonded with barium titanate. J. Appl. Phys. 2010, 108, 074117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Nguyen, H.; Navid, A.; Pilon, L. Pyroelectric energy converter using co-polymer P(VDF-TrFE) and Olsen cycle for waste heat energy harvesting. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2010, 30, 2127–2137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Xia, W.; Xu, Z.; Wen, F.; Zhang, Z. Electrical energy density and dielectric properties of poly(vinylidene fluoride-chlorotrifluoroethylene)/BaSrTiO3 nanocomposites. Ceram. Int. 2012, 38, 1071–1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wu, W.; Huang, X.; Li, S.; Jiang, P.; Toshikatsu, T. Novel Three-Dimensional Zinc Oxide Superstructures for High Dielectric Constant Polymer Composites Capable of Withstanding High Electric Field. J. Phys. Chem. C 2012, 116, 24887–24895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Rabuffi, M.; Picci, G. Status quo and future prospects for metallized polypropylene energy storage capacitors. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 2002, 30, 1939–1942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhang, Q.M.; Li, H.; Poh, M.; Xia, F.; Cheng, Z.-Y.; Xu, H.; Huang, C. An all-organic composite actuator material with a high dielectric constant. Nature 2002, 419, 284–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Li, J.; Seok, S.I.; Chu, B.; Dogan, F.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, Q. Nanocomposites of Ferroelectric Polymers with TiO2 Nanoparticles Exhibiting Significantly Enhanced Electrical Energy Density. Adv. Mater. 2009, 21, 217–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hazmi, A.T.; Ahmad, F.B.; Akmal, M.M.; Ralib, A.A.M.; Ali, F.B. Fungal chitosan for potential application in piezoelectric energy harvesting: Review on experimental procedure of chitosan extraction. Alex. Eng. J. 2023, 67, 105–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kaczmarek, H.; Królikowski, B.; Klimiec, E.; Chylińska, M.; Bajer, D. Advances in the study of piezoelectric polymers. Russ. Chem. Rev. 2019, 88, 749–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hilczer, B.; Kułek, J.; Markiewicz, E.; Kosec, M.; Malič, B. Dielectric relaxation in ferroelectric PZT–PVDF nanocomposites. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2002, 305, 167–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Lu, Y.; Chen, J.; Cheng, Z.; Zhang, S. The PZT/Ni unimorph magnetoelectric energy harvester for wireless sensing applications. Energy Convers. Manag. 2019, 200, 112084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Rödel, J.; Webber, K.G.; Dittmer, R.; Jo, W.; Kimura, M.; Damjanovic, D. Transferring lead-free piezoelectric ceramics into application. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2015, 35, 1659–1681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Liu, F.; Hashim, N.A.; Liu, Y.; Moghareh Abed, M.R.; Li, K. Progress in the production and modification of PVDF membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 375, 1–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Middleton, J.C.; Tipton, A.J. Synthetic biodegradable polymers as orthopedic devices. Biomaterials 2000, 21, 2335–2346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Tan, M.J.; Owh, C.; Chee, P.L.; Kyaw, A.K.K.; Kai, D.; Loh, X.J. Biodegradable electronics: Cornerstone for sustainable electronics and transient applications. J. Mater. Chem. C 2016, 4, 5531–5558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Nair, L.S.; Laurencin, C.T. Biodegradable polymers as biomaterials. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2007, 32, 762–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ghosh, S.K.; Mandal, D. Bio-assembled, piezoelectric prawn shell made self-powered wearable sensor for non-invasive physiological signal monitoring. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2017, 110, 123701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Jacob, J.; More, N.; Kalia, K.; Kapusetti, G. Piezoelectric smart biomaterials for bone and cartilage tissue engineering. Inflamm. Regen. 2018, 38, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Akmal, M.H.M.; Ahmad, F.B. Bionanomaterial Thin Film for Piezoelectric Applications. In Advances in Nanotechnology and Its Applications; Jameel, A.T., Yaser, A.Z., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2020; pp. 63–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zamli, M.I.; Ahmad, F.B.; Akmal, M.H.M. Extraction of microbial chitosan for piezoelectric application. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2021, 1045, 012037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zidani, J.; Hassine, K.; Zannen, M.; Zeinert, A.; Da Costa, A.; Ferri, A.; Belhadi, J.; Majdoub, M.; El Marssi, M.; Lahmar, A. Synthesis, Structural, Optical, and Electrical Characterization of Biochitosan/Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3 Composite Thin-Film Materials. Micromachines 2023, 14, 1841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Suh, J.-K.F.; Matthew, H.W.T. Application of chitosan-based polysaccharide biomaterials in cartilage tissue engineering: A review. Biomaterials 2000, 21, 2589–2598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Khor, E.; Lim, L.Y. Implantable applications of chitin and chitosan. Biomaterials 2003, 24, 2339–2349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Jayakumar, R.; Nwe, N.; Tokura, S.; Tamura, H. Sulfated chitin and chitosan as novel biomaterials. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2007, 40, 175–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Burkatovskaya, M.; Tegos, G.P.; Swietlik, E.; Demidova, T.N.; Castano, A.P.; Hamblin, M.R. Use of chitosan bandage to prevent fatal infections developing from highly contaminated wounds in mice. Biomaterials 2006, 27, 4157–4164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Stone, C.A.; Wright, H.; Devaraj, V.S.; Clarke, T.; Powell, R. Healing at skin graft donor sites dressed with chitosan. Br. J. Plast. Surg. 2000, 53, 601–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Martinac, A.; Filipović-Grčić, J.; Voinovich, D.; Perissutti, B.; Franceschinis, E. Development and bioadhesive properties of chitosan-ethylcellulose microspheres for nasal delivery. Int. J. Pharm. 2005, 291, 69–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Shi, C.; Zhu, Y.; Ran, X.; Wang, M.; Su, Y.; Cheng, T. Therapeutic Potential of Chitosan and Its Derivatives in Regenerative Medicine. J. Surg. Res. 2006, 133, 185–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Illum, L.; Jabbal-Gill, I.; Hinchcliffe, M.; Fisher, A.; Davis, S. Chitosan as a novel nasal delivery system for vaccines. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2001, 51, 81–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Nair, L.S.; Starnes, T.; Ko, J.-W.K.; Laurencin, C.T. Development of Injectable Thermogelling Chitosan–Inorganic Phosphate Solutions for Biomedical Applications. Biomacromolecules 2007, 8, 3779–3785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Ruel-Gariépy, E.; Shive, M.; Bichara, A.; Berrada, M.; Le Garrec, D.; Chenite, A.; Leroux, J.-C. A thermosensitive chitosan-based hydrogel for the local delivery of paclitaxel. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2004, 57, 53–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Onishi, H.; Takahashi, H.; Yoshiyasu, M.; Machida, Y. Preparation and In Vitro Properties of N-Succinylchitosan– or Carboxymethylchitin–Mitomycin C Conjugate Microparticles with Specified Size. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 2001, 27, 659–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Praveen, E.; Murugan, S.; Jayakumar, K. Investigations on the existence of piezoelectric property of a bio-polymer—Chitosan and its application in vibration sensors. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 35490–35495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Maksimovic, M. The Role of Green Internet of Things (G-IoT) and Big Data in Making Cities Smarter, Safer and More Sustainable. Int. J. Comput. Digit. Syst. 2017, 6, 175–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Chu, B.-J.; Chen, D.-R.; Li, G.-R.; Yin, Q.-R. Electrical properties of Na1/2Bi1/2TiO3–BaTiO3 ceramics. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2002, 22, 2115–2121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zhi-Hui, C.; Jian-Ning, D.; Lin, M.; Ning-Yi, Y.; Yuan-Yuan, Z. Piezoelectric and dielectric properties of Dy2O3-doped (Bi0.5Na0.5)0.94Ba0.06TiO3 lead-free ceramics. J. Alloys Compd. 2011, 509, 482–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Sankaran, S.S.; Kumar, B.; Ma, V. Study on growth, optical and dielectric properties of ‘Nd’ DOPED NBT-BT (0.94(Na0.5Bi0.5tio3)-0.06batio3) relaxor ferroelectric single crystals. J. Electroceramics 2022, 48, 143–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Khalil, K.D.; Riyadh, S.M.; Gomha, S.M.; Ali, I. Synthesis, characterization and application of copper oxide chitosan nanocomposite for green regioselective synthesis of [1,2,3]triazoles. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 130, 928–937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Raj, N.P.M.J.; Ks, A.; Khandelwal, G.; Alluri, N.R.; Kim, S.-J. A lead-free ferroelectric Bi0.5Na0.5TiO3 based flexible, lightweight nanogenerator for motion monitoring applications. Sustain. Energy Fuels 2020, 4, 5636–5644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Rodriguez, B.J.; Callahan, C.; Kalinin, S.V.; Proksch, R. Dual-frequency resonance-tracking atomic force microscopy. Nanotechnology 2007, 18, 475504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Ferri, A.; Barrau, S.; Bourez, R.; Da Costa, A.; Chambrier, M.-H.; Marin, A.; Defebvin, J.; Lefebvre, J.; Desfeux, R. Probing the local piezoelectric behavior in stretched barium titanate/poly(vinylidene fluoride) nanocomposites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2020, 186, 107914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Sekhar, K.C.; Mahesh, M.; Krishna, Y.R.; Mouli, K.C.; Kiran, R.R.; Tirupathi, P. Structural Evolution and Enhanced Energy Density, Ferroelectric Property Investigation in Gd Substituted NBT—BT Lead Free Ferroelectric Ceramics. Adv. Mater. Lett. 2021, 12, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Langford, J.I.; Wilson, A.J.C. Scherrer after sixty years: A survey and some new results in the determination of crystallite size. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 1978, 11, 102–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Rhim, J.-W.; Hong, S.-I.; Park, H.-M.; Ng, P.K.W. Preparation and Characterization of Chitosan-Based Nanocomposite Films with Antimicrobial Activity. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2006, 54, 5814–5822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Tian, L.; Singh, A.; Singh, A.V. Synthesis and characterization of pectin-chitosan conjugate for biomedical application. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 153, 533–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Pawlak, A.; Mucha, M. Thermogravimetric and FTIR studies of chitosan blends. Thermochim. Acta 2003, 396, 153–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Sekhar, K.S.K.R.C.; Banerjee, K.; Asthana, S.; Patri, T.; Mouli, K.C. Observation of diffuse relaxor activity and normal thermal stability in Ho—Modified NBT—BT lead free ceramics. Ferroelectrics 2020, 568, 161–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Devi, C.S.; Kumar, G.; Prasad, G. Control of ferroelectric phase transition in nano particulate NBT–BT based ceramics. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 2013, 178, 283–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Melo-Silveira, R.F.; Fidelis, G.P.; Costa, M.S.S.P.; Telles, C.B.S.; Dantas-Santos, N.; Elias, S.d.O.; Ribeiro, V.B.; Barth, A.L.; Macedo, A.J.; Leite, E.L.; et al. In Vitro Antioxidant, Anticoagulant and Antimicrobial Activity and in Inhibition of Cancer Cell Proliferation by Xylan Extracted from Corn Cobs. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2011, 13, 409–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Rubilar, J.F.; Cruz, R.M.S.; Silva, H.D.; Vicente, A.A.; Khmelinskii, I.; Vieira, M.C. Physico-mechanical properties of chitosan films with carvacrol and grape seed extract. J. Food Eng. 2013, 115, 466–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Wolkers, W.F.; Oliver, A.E.; Tablin, F.; Crowe, J.H. A Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy study of sugar glasses. Carbohydr. Res. 2004, 339, 1077–1085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Tantala, J.; Rachtanapun, C.; Tongdeesoontorn, W.; Jantanasakulwong, K.; Rachtanapun, P. Moisture Sorption Isotherms and Prediction Models of Carboxymethyl Chitosan Films from Different Sources with Various Plasticizers. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2019, 2019, 4082439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Fernandes Queiroz, M.; Melo, K.R.T.; Sabry, D.A.; Sassaki, G.L.; Rocha, H.A.O. Does the Use of Chitosan Contribute to Oxalate Kidney Stone Formation? Mar. Drugs 2014, 13, 141–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Suriyatem, R.; Auras, R.A.; Rachtanapun, C.; Rachtanapun, P. Biodegradable Rice Starch/Carboxymethyl Chitosan Films with Added Propolis Extract for Potential Use as Active Food Packaging. Polymers 2018, 10, 954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Lim, S.-H.; Hudson, S.M. Synthesis and antimicrobial activity of a water-soluble chitosan derivative with a fiber-reactive group. Carbohydr. Res. 2004, 339, 313–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Rachtanapun, P.; Klunklin, W.; Jantrawut, P.; Jantanasakulwong, K.; Phimolsiripol, Y.; Seesuriyachan, P.; Leksawasdi, N.; Chaiyaso, T.; Ruksiriwanich, W.; Phongthai, S.; et al. Characterization of Chitosan Film Incorporated with Curcumin Extract. Polymers 2021, 13, 963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Song, C.; Yu, H.; Zhang, M.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, G. Physicochemical properties and antioxidant activity of chitosan from the blowfly Chrysomya megacephala larvae. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2013, 60, 347–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Zając, A.; Hanuza, J.; Wandas, M.; Dymińska, L. Determination of N-acetylation degree in chitosan using Raman spectroscopy. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2015, 134, 114–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Turki, O.; Slimani, A.; Seveyrat, L.; Sassi, Z.; Khemakhem, H.; Lebrun, L. Enhancement of dielectric, piezoelectric, ferroelectric, and electrocaloric properties in slightly doped (Na0.5Bi0.5)0.94Ba0.06TiO3 ceramic by samarium. J. Appl. Phys. 2019, 125, 174103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Kim, D.S.; Dhand, V.; Rhee, K.Y.; Park, S.-J. Study on the Effect of Silanization and Improvement in the Tensile Behavior of Graphene-Chitosan-Composite. Polymers 2015, 7, 527–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Nirmala, R.; Il, B.W.; Navamathavan, R.; El-Newehy, M.H.; Kim, H.Y. Preparation and characterizations of anisotropic chitosan nanofibers via electrospinning. Macromol. Res. 2011, 19, 345–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Alvarez-Figueroa, M.J.; Narváez-Araya, D.; Armijo-Escalona, N.; Carrasco-Flores, E.A.; González-Aramundiz, J.V. Design of Chitosan Nanocapsules with Compritol 888 ATO® for Imiquimod Transdermal Administration. Evaluation of Their Skin Absorption by Raman Microscopy. Pharm. Res. 2020, 37, 195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Roukos, R.; Zaiter, N.; Chaumont, D. Relaxor behaviour and phase transition of perovskite ferroelectrics-type complex oxides (1–x)Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3–xCaTiO3 system. J. Adv. Ceram. 2018, 7, 124–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Kreisel, J.; Glazer, A.M.; Jones, G.; A Thomas, P.; Abello, L.; Lucazeau, G. An x-ray diffraction and Raman spectroscopy investigation of A-site substituted perovskite compounds: The (Na1-xKx)0.5Bi0.5TiO3(0lexle1) solid solution. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2000, 12, 3267–3280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Rubio-Marcos, F.; Del Campo, A.; Marchet, P.; Fernández, J.F. Ferroelectric domain wall motion induced by polarized light. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 6594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Difeo, M.; Rubio-Marcos, F.; Del Campo, A.; Castro, M.; Ramajo, L. A suitable approach to achieve functional (Bi, Na)TiO3-based lead-free piezoceramics via compositional design for energy storage applications. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2023, 34, 1962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Rout, D.; Subramanian, V.; Hariharan, K.; Murthy, V.R.K.; Sivasubramanian, V. Raman spectroscopic study of (Pb1−xBax)(Yb1∕2Ta1∕2)O3 ceramics. J. Appl. Phys. 2005, 98, 103503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Xu, C.; Lin, D.; Kwok, K. Structure, electrical properties and depolarization temperature of (Bi0.5Na0.5)TiO3–BaTiO3 lead-free piezoelectric ceramics. Solid State Sci. 2008, 10, 934–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Selvamani, R.; Singh, G.; Sathe, V.; Tiwari, V.S.; Gupta, P.K. Dielectric, structural and Raman studies on (Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3)(1 −x)(BiCrO3)xceramic. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2011, 23, 055901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Khalil, K.D.; Ibrahim, E.I.; Al-Sagheer, F.A. A novel, efficient, and recyclable biocatalyst for Michael addition reactions and its iron(III) complex as promoter for alkyl oxidation reactions. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2016, 6, 1410–1416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Li, L.-H.; Deng, J.-C.; Deng, H.-R.; Liu, Z.-L.; Xin, L. Synthesis and characterization of chitosan/ZnO nanoparticle composite membranes. Carbohydr. Res. 2010, 345, 994–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Tressler, J.F.; Alkoy, S.; Newnham, R.E. Piezoelectric Sensors and Sensor Materials. J. Electroceramics 1998, 2, 257–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Lynn, S.Y.; Newnham, R.E.; Klicker, K.A.; Rittenmyer, K.; Safari, A.; Schulze, W.A. Ferroelectric composites for hydrophones. Ferroelectrics 1981, 38, 955–958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Dias, C.; Das Gupta, D. Piezo- and Pyroelectricity in Ferroelectric Ceramic-Polymer Composites. Key Eng. Mater. 1994, 92–93, 217–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Newnham, R.E. Composite electroceramics. Ferroelectrics 1986, 68, 1–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Chiang, C.K.; Popielarz, R. Polymer Composites with High Dielectric Constant. Ferroelectrics 2002, 275, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Qureshi, A.; Mergen, A.; Eroğlu, M.S.; Singh, N.L.; Güllüoğlu, A. Dielectric Properties of Polymer Composites Filled with Different Metals. J. Macromol. Sci. Part A 2008, 45, 462–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Ibrahim, I.D.; Jamiru, T.; Sadiku, E.R.; Hamam, Y.; Alayli, Y.; Eze, A.A. Application of nanoparticles and composite materials for energy generation and storage. IET Nanodielectrics 2019, 2, 115–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Fu, J.; Hou, Y.; Zheng, M.; Wei, Q.; Zhu, M.; Yan, H. Improving Dielectric Properties of PVDF Composites by Employing Surface Modified Strong Polarized BaTiO3 Particles Derived by Molten Salt Method. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 24480–24491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Prateek; Singh, D.; Singh, N.; Garg, A.; Gupta, R.K. Engineered thiol anchored Au-BaTiO3/PVDF polymer nanocomposite as efficient dielectric for electronic applications. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2019, 174, 158–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Alaoui, I.H.; Moussa, M.; Lemée, N.; Le Marrec, F.; Cantaluppi, A.; Favry, D.; Lahmar, A. Influence of the Addition of Rare Earth Elements on the Energy Storage and Optical Properties of Bi0.5Na0.5TiO3–0.06BaTiO3 Polycrystalline Thin Films. Materials 2023, 16, 2197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Yang, K.; Huang, X.; Huang, Y.; Xie, L.; Jiang, P. Fluoro-Polymer@BaTiO3 Hybrid Nanoparticles Prepared via RAFT Polymerization: Toward Ferroelectric Polymer Nanocomposites with High Dielectric Constant and Low Dielectric Loss for Energy Storage Application. Chem. Mater. 2013, 25, 2327–2338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Luo, S.; Yu, S.; Sun, R.; Wong, C.-P. Nano Ag-Deposited BaTiO3 Hybrid Particles as Fillers for Polymeric Dielectric Composites: Toward High Dielectric Constant and Suppressed Loss. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 176–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Devi, P.I.; Ramachandran, K. Dielectric studies on hybridised PVDF–ZnO nanocomposites. J. Exp. Nanosci. 2011, 6, 281–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Zaki, A.A.; Khalafalla, M.; Alharbi, K.H.; Khalil, K.D. Synthesis, characterization and optical properties of chitosan–La2O3 nanocomposite. Bull. Mater. Sci. 2022, 45, 128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Swain, S.; Kar, S.K.; Kumar, P. Dielectric, optical, piezoelectric and ferroelectric studies of NBT–BT ceramics near MPB. Ceram. Int. 2015, 41, 10710–10717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Andrady, A.L.; Torikai, A.; Kobatake, T. Spectral sensitivity of chitosan photodegradation. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1996, 62, 1465–1471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Domínguez-Gómez, A.; Mauricio-Sánchez, R.; Mendoza-Galván, A. Extinction coefficient of free-standing chitosan films determined from partially coherent transmittance spectra. Opt. Mater. 2018, 84, 564–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Hassanien, A.M.; A Atta, A.; A Ward, A.; A Ahmed, E.M.; Alsubaie, A.; El-Nahass, M.; Altalhi, T. Investigation of structural, electrical and optical properties of chitosan/fullerene composites. Mater. Res. Express 2019, 6, 125304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Khalil, K.D.; Bashal, A.H.; Khalafalla, M.; Zaki, A.A. Synthesis, structural, dielectric and optical properties of chitosan-MgO nanocomposite. J. Taibah Univ. Sci. 2020, 14, 975–983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Alharthi, S.S.; Badawi, A. Modification of the Structure and Linear/Nonlinear Optical Characteristics of PVA/Chitosan Blend through CuO Doping for Eco-Friendly Applications. Polymers 2023, 15, 2391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Heiba, Z.K.; Mohamed, M.B.; Badawi, A.; Alhazime, A.A. The role of Cd0.9Mg0.1S nanofillers on the structural, optical, and dielectric properties of PVA/CMC polymeric blend. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2021, 770, 138460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Al-Hakimi, A.N.; Asnag, G.M.; Alminderej, F.; Alhagri, I.A.; Al-Hazmy, S.M.; Qahtan, T.F. Enhancing the Structural, Optical, Thermal, and Electrical Properties of PVA Filled with Mixed Nanoparticles (TiO2/Cu). Crystals 2023, 13, 135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Kuzman, S.; Medić, M.; Đorđević, V.; Zeković, I.; Ristić, Z.; Far, L.Đ.; Dramićanin, M.D. Luminescence Thermometry Using Dy3+-Activated Na0.25K0.25Bi0.5TiO3 Powders. J. Electron. Mater. 2020, 49, 4002–4009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Zidani, J.; Alaoui, I.H.; Zannen, M.; Birks, E.; Chchiyai, Z.; Majdoub, M.; Manoun, B.; El Marssi, M.; Lahmar, A. On the Lanthanide Effect on Functional Properties of 0.94Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3-0.06BaTiO3 Ceramic. Materials 2024, 17, 1783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Reisfeld, R. Spectra and Energy Transfer of Rare Earths in Inorganic Glasses. In Rare Earths; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1973; pp. 53–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Ge, M.; Guo, X.; Yan, Y. Preparation and study on the structure and properties of rare-earth luminescent fiber. Text. Res. J. 2012, 82, 677–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Yu, R.; Shin, D.S.; Jang, K.; Guo, Y.; Noh, H.M.; Moon, B.K.; Choi, B.C.; Jeong, J.H.; Yi, S.S. Photoluminescence Properties of Novel Host-Sensitized Y6WO12:Dy3+ Phosphors. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2014, 97, 2170–2176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Praveena, R.; Vijaya, R.; Jayasankar, C. Photoluminescence and energy transfer studies of Dy3+-doped fluorophosphate glasses. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2008, 70, 577–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Narukawa, Y.; Narita, J.; Sakamoto, T.; Deguchi, K.; Yamada, T.; Mukai, T. Ultra-High Efficiency White Light Emitting Diodes. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2006, 45, L1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Sailaja, P.; Mahamuda, S.; Talewar, R.A.; Swapna, K.; Rao, A. Spectroscopic investigations of dysprosium ions doped oxy chloro boro tellurite glasses for visible photonic device applications. J. Alloys Compd. 2019, 789, 744–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. De Marzo, G.; Mastronardi, V.M.; Algieri, L.; Vergari, F.; Pisano, F.; Fachechi, L.; Marras, S.; Natta, L.; Spagnolo, B.; Brunetti, V.; et al. Sustainable, Flexible, and Biocompatible Enhanced Piezoelectric Chitosan Thin Film for Compliant Piezosensors for Human Health. Adv. Electron. Mater. 2023, 9, 2200069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Toalá, C.U.; Prokhorov, E.; Barcenas, G.L.; Landaverde, M.H.; Limón, J.Y.; Gervacio-Arciniega, J.; de Fuentes, O.A.; Tapia, A.G. Electrostrictive and piezoelectrical properties of chitosan-poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) blend films. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 250, 126251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Nanomaterials 14 01755 g001
Figure 1. Structure of (a) chitin and (b) chitosan drawn with ChemDraw Ultra, version: 12.0.2.1076.
Figure 1. Structure of (a) chitin and (b) chitosan drawn with ChemDraw Ultra, version: 12.0.2.1076.
Nanomaterials 14 01755 g001
Nanomaterials 14 01755 g002
Figure 2. Synthesis of chitosan/NBT-BT and chitosan/NBT-BT-Ln films.
Figure 2. Synthesis of chitosan/NBT-BT and chitosan/NBT-BT-Ln films.
Nanomaterials 14 01755 g002
Nanomaterials 14 01755 g004
Figure 4. FT-IR spectra of chitosan, 10%NBT-BT, and 10%NBT-BT-Ln nanocomposites.
Figure 4. FT-IR spectra of chitosan, 10%NBT-BT, and 10%NBT-BT-Ln nanocomposites.
Nanomaterials 14 01755 g004
Nanomaterials 14 01755 g005
Figure 5. Raman of chitosan, 10%NBT-BT, and 10%NBT-BT-Ln nanocomposites.
Figure 5. Raman of chitosan, 10%NBT-BT, and 10%NBT-BT-Ln nanocomposites.
Nanomaterials 14 01755 g005
Nanomaterials 14 01755 g006
Figure 6. (a–d) SEM images of 10%NBT-BT and 10%NBT-BT-Ln nanocomposites and (e) example of cross-section of 10%NBT-BT-Dy film.
Figure 6. (a–d) SEM images of 10%NBT-BT and 10%NBT-BT-Ln nanocomposites and (e) example of cross-section of 10%NBT-BT-Dy film.
Nanomaterials 14 01755 g006
Nanomaterials 14 01755 g007
Figure 7. Variation of dielectric constant of chitosan, 10%NBT-BT, and 10%NBT-BT-Ln nanocomposites.
Figure 7. Variation of dielectric constant of chitosan, 10%NBT-BT, and 10%NBT-BT-Ln nanocomposites.
Nanomaterials 14 01755 g007
Nanomaterials 14 01755 g008
Figure 8. Optical response of nanocomposites: (a) Transmittance, (b) Reflectance, and (c) Absorbance.
Figure 8. Optical response of nanocomposites: (a) Transmittance, (b) Reflectance, and (c) Absorbance.
Nanomaterials 14 01755 g008
Nanomaterials 14 01755 g010
Figure 10. Example of emission spectra of 10%NBT-BT-Dy film.
Figure 10. Example of emission spectra of 10%NBT-BT-Dy film.
Nanomaterials 14 01755 g010
Nanomaterials 14 01755 g011
Figure 11. Local piezoelectric activity of the chitosan/NBT-BT composite. Images of the (a) AFM morphology, (b) PFM amplitude, and (c) PFM phase simultaneously recorded over the surface of the film. (d) Schematic representation of the PFM imaging experiments. (e) Representative amplitude and phase PFM loops simultaneously measured in areas marked by the yellow-dotted squares in (a–c).
Figure 11. Local piezoelectric activity of the chitosan/NBT-BT composite. Images of the (a) AFM morphology, (b) PFM amplitude, and (c) PFM phase simultaneously recorded over the surface of the film. (d) Schematic representation of the PFM imaging experiments. (e) Representative amplitude and phase PFM loops simultaneously measured in areas marked by the yellow-dotted squares in (a–c).
Nanomaterials 14 01755 g011
Nanomaterials 14 01755 g012
Figure 12. Local piezoelectric activity of the chitosan/NBT-BT-Dy composite. Images of the (a) AFM morphology, and (b,c) PFM amplitude recorded over the surface of the film. (d,e) Schematic representations of the PFM imaging experiments associated to the images shown in (b,c), respectively.
Figure 12. Local piezoelectric activity of the chitosan/NBT-BT-Dy composite. Images of the (a) AFM morphology, and (b,c) PFM amplitude recorded over the surface of the film. (d,e) Schematic representations of the PFM imaging experiments associated to the images shown in (b,c), respectively.
Nanomaterials 14 01755 g012
Table 1. FT-IR bands of nanocomposites.
Table 1. FT-IR bands of nanocomposites.
Wavenumber (cm−1)Band Vibration
3352O–H stretching
3266N–H stretching
2928C–H symmetric
2872C–H asymmetric stretching
1643C=O stretching
1553N–H bending
1319C–N stretching
559Ti–O stretching
Table 2. Direct/indirect bandgap of 10%NBT-BT and 10%NBT-BT-Ln.
Table 2. Direct/indirect bandgap of 10%NBT-BT and 10%NBT-BT-Ln.
CompositesEg dir. (eV)Eg dir. (eV)
10%NBT-BT-Dy5.604.83
10%NBT-BT-Pr5.654.89
10%NBT-BT-Nd5.534.70
10%NBT-BT5.564.79
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zidani, J.; Zannen, M.; Da Costa, A.; Mlida, O.; Jamali, A.; Majdoub, M.; El Marssi, M.; Ferri, A.; Lahmar, A. Investigation of Microstructure and Physical Characteristics of Eco-Friendly Piezoelectric Composite Thin Films Based on Chitosan and Ln2O3-Doped Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3-BaTiO3 Nanoparticles. Nanomaterials 2024, 14, 1755. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14211755

AMA Style

Zidani J, Zannen M, Da Costa A, Mlida O, Jamali A, Majdoub M, El Marssi M, Ferri A, Lahmar A. Investigation of Microstructure and Physical Characteristics of Eco-Friendly Piezoelectric Composite Thin Films Based on Chitosan and Ln2O3-Doped Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3-BaTiO3 Nanoparticles. Nanomaterials. 2024; 14(21):1755. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14211755

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zidani, Jacem, Moneim Zannen, Antonio Da Costa, Oumayma Mlida, Arash Jamali, Mustapha Majdoub, Mimoun El Marssi, Anthony Ferri, and Abdelilah Lahmar. 2024. "Investigation of Microstructure and Physical Characteristics of Eco-Friendly Piezoelectric Composite Thin Films Based on Chitosan and Ln2O3-Doped Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3-BaTiO3 Nanoparticles" Nanomaterials 14, no. 21: 1755. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14211755

APA Style

Zidani, J., Zannen, M., Da Costa, A., Mlida, O., Jamali, A., Majdoub, M., El Marssi, M., Ferri, A., & Lahmar, A. (2024). Investigation of Microstructure and Physical Characteristics of Eco-Friendly Piezoelectric Composite Thin Films Based on Chitosan and Ln2O3-Doped Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3-BaTiO3 Nanoparticles. Nanomaterials, 14(21), 1755. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14211755

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop