Next Article in Journal
UV/Ozone-Treated and Sol–Gel-Processed Y2O3 Insulators Prepared Using Gelation-Delaying Precursors
Previous Article in Journal
Simultaneous Detection of Carbon Quantum Dots as Tracers for Interwell Connectivity Evaluation in a Pattern with Two Injection Wells
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Klein Tunneling in β12 Borophene

1
School of Materials and Energy, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China
2
Institute of Materials Science, Technology University of Darmstadt, 64287 Darmstadt, Germany
3
Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Information Photonics Technology, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2024, 14(9), 790; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14090790
Submission received: 20 March 2024 / Revised: 20 April 2024 / Accepted: 28 April 2024 / Published: 1 May 2024

Abstract

:
Motivated by the recent observation of Klein tunneling in 8-Pmmn borophene, we delve into the phenomenon in β12 borophene by employing tight-binding approximation theory to establish a theoretical mode. The tight-binding model is a semi-empirical method for establishing the Hamiltonian based on atomic orbitals. A single cell of β12 borophene contains five atoms and multiple central bonds, so it creates the complexity of the tight-binding model Hamiltonian of β12 borophene. We investigate transmission across one potential barrier and two potential barriers by changing the width and height of barriers and the distance between two potential barriers. Regardless of the change in the barrier heights and widths, we find the interface to be perfectly transparent for normal incidence. For other angles of incidence, perfect transmission at certain angles can also be observed. Furthermore, perfect and all-angle transmission across a potential barrier takes place when the incident energy approaches the Dirac point. This is analogous to the “super”, all-angle transmission reported for the dice lattice for Klein tunneling across a potential barrier. These findings highlight the significance of our theoretical model in understanding the complex dynamics of Klein tunneling in borophene structures.

1. Introduction

Two-dimensional (2D) materials have attracted intense research interests owning to their unique physicochemical properties and potential applications in electronics [1,2], sensors [3,4], energy storage [5,6], optoelectronics [7,8], biomedicine [9,10], etc. The intense studies on 2D materials have begun with graphene [11] and extended to other group IV monolayer materials, such as germanene [12,13], silicene [14,15], and stanene [16,17]. Furthermore, a large number of other elemental 2D materials including phosphorene [18,19], arsenene [20,21], and tellurium [22] have been successfully produced. In addition, other new nanostructures and complex structures have also been reported, such as indium oxide in two-dimensional structures [23] and silicon cages in metal encapsulation [24]. Until now, the search for 2D materials has been extended to a wide range, and many novel 2D materials, such as the transition metal dichalcogenides [25], noble metal dichalcogenides [26], MXenes [27], and hexanol boron nitride [28], have been synthesized.
Recently, borophene, a monolayer of boron atoms arranged in a honeycomb-like lattice, has attracted a lot of attention [29,30]. Borophene was first theoretically predicted in the mid-1990s [31]; however, the realization of monoatomic-layer borophene was reported in 2005 to 2016 [32,33,34,35,36,37]. A large variety of monolayer boron structures, such as the α sheet, β sheet, and χ sheets have been proposed theoretically [33,34,38,39,40,41]. The α, β, and χ phases of borophene have been experimentally realized on Ag(111) under ultrahigh-vacuum conditions [42,43,44,45,46]. It was predicted in the previous experimental studies [36,37,44] that the most stable allotrope of borophene is β12 borophene, because β12 borophene has a flat structure that weakly interacts with the Ag(111) substrate. Thanks to the inherent stability of β12 borophene’s structure, its distinctive electronic properties and electron transport characteristics are assured [47]. Borophene has recently attracted a lot of attention due to its promising electronic properties. Borophene exhibits metallic properties [32,48], and ohmic contacts to conventional semiconductors can be realized, which leads to a significant improvement in the performance of electronic devices [49]. In the design of high-capacity and lightweight ion batteries, borophene is a promising anode material [50,51], and it is predicted that borophene with β12 phase and χ3 phase may have applications in Li- and Na-ion batteries [52].
Due to the unique physics of relativistic Dirac fermions, Dirac materials have attracted great attention [53,54]. The Dirac fermions in β12 borophene have been predicted in first-principles calculations [55,56] and observed by angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy in the experimental studies [55]. One of the most important ultrarelativistic phenomena of Dirac fermions is Klein tunneling, which describes a perfect transmission of Dirac fermions at the normal incidence irrespective of the barrier height and width. Although Klein tunneling was proposed in 1929 [57], its experimental observation has only become possible since the discovery of monolayer graphene in 2004 [11]. In 2006, Katsnelson predicted Klein tunneling in graphene by designing an n-p-n junction, which has attracted a lot of experimental studies [58,59,60].
In the present work, we investigate theoretically the transport properties of Dirac electrons in β12 borophene based on the tight-binding model. Klein tunneling has been predicted in 8-Pmmn borophene in several studies [61,62], but work has rarely been done in β12 borophene due to the complexity of its tight-binding Hamiltonian. The non-equilibrium Green’s function (NEGF) was developed to study electron transport in bulk borophene, which is not limited to low-energy excitation. This method can be used in the studies of quantum transport in bulk graphene-like materials and provides accurate results without the low-energy limitation.
In Figure 1a, we show the crystal structure of β12 borophene. There are five atoms in a unit cell, as illustrated in Figure 1b, and the motion of electrons in borophene can be described by a five-band tight-binding Hamiltonian. Due to the perfect planar structure of β12 borophene, the electronic properties are well described by the tight-binding Hamiltonian in terms of pz orbitals only [55]. The tight-binding Hamiltonian of β12 borophene with an external potential can be written as [55,63]
H = i ε i c i + c i + i j n . n . t i j c i + c j + U ( x )
where c i + ( c i ) is the creation (annihilation) operator. The first term denotes the onsite energies for the five sites in a primitive cell, which is given by
ε a = ε e = 0.196   eV ,   ε b = ε d = 0.058   eV , ε c = 0.845   eV ,
The second term denotes the nearest neighbor hopping in the lattice of β12 borophene, and the hopping energies are summarized as
t a b = t d e = 2.04   eV ,   t a c = t c e = 1.79   eV , t a e = 2.12   eV , t b c = t c d = 1.84   eV , t b d = 1.91   eV ,
In this study, we investigate the transport properties of bulk β12 borophene, so the Bloch theorem is imposed along the transverse direction (see Figure 1c). Due to the periodic boundary conditions, the hopping between atoms a and e is modified to t a e * = e i k y W , where e i k y W is the Bloch phase factor. In the present theoretical model shown in Figure 1c, the periodicity is W = 3a. In Figure 1d, we show the definition of the incident angle θ = arctan ( k y / k x ) . When electrons incident into the scattering region (region II), different scattering processes such as Klein tunneling can be found, which can be revealed by the transmission probability of electrons. The transmission probability of electrons can be given by the non-equilibrium Green’s function (NEGF). The non-equilibrium Green’s function has a great advantage in dealing with the transmission probability of electrons passing through the potential barrier. By adopting the NEGF framework, we seamlessly integrate electron–electron interactions and non-equilibrium conditions, thereby achieving a comprehensive understanding of the transport phenomena within our system. Moreover, the NEGF approach empowers us to compute the retarded Green’s function, an indispensable tool for determining transmission probabilities throughout the system. Employing periodic boundary conditions for the scattering region Hamiltonian, alongside incorporating self-energy contributions from the leads, ensures the precise modeling of the system’s transport properties. So, the transmission probability of electrons can be given:
T ( E , k y ) = T r Γ R ( E , k y ) G r ( E , k y ) Γ L ( E , k y ) G a ( E , k y )
where Γ L ( R ) is the level-broadening matrix, which is calculated from the lead self-energies as Γ L ( R ) = i [ Σ L ( R ) r Σ L ( R ) a ] , and G r ( a ) is the retarded (advanced) Green’s function, which can be obtained by
G r ( a ) = E I H Σ L r ( a ) Σ R r ( a ) 1
where H is the Hamiltonian with periodic boundary conditions for the scattering region, and Σ L r ( a ) ( Σ R r ( a ) ) is the self-energy due to the interaction with the left (right) lead. The conductance at zero temperature can be obtained from the Landauer–Buttiker formalism as [64,65]
G P / A P ( E F ) = 4 e 2 h E F E F T P / A P ( E F , k y ) d k y 2 π / L y
where G 0   = 2 e 2 L y / π h with L y are the transverse length of the sample.

2. Results and Discussion

The band structure of bulk borophene for k y = 0 is shown in Figure 2a. In a unit cell, we have five boron atoms, so we notice that there are five bands in the band structure for the periodical structure with k y = 0 . In this study, we mainly focus on the quantum transport in low energy, so we zoom in on the low energy range (see the red rectangular section).
The enlargement of the red rectangular part of Figure 2a is shown in Figure 2b. We can see that the band structure is similar to graphene, in which two conically shaped valleys are formed by the valence and conduction bands. The valley degree of freedom in borophene may also be used to carry information for valleytronics [66,67], which is saved for future studies. There are two gapless Dirac points, K and K’, in the Brillouin zone; however, we note that the Dirac points are 0.1937eV above the Femi energy EF, which is different from graphene. Correspondingly, the relevant parameters of the system are defined and marked in Figure 2c, e.g., the energy E is the value above the Dirac points. The definition of the momentum k x is presented in Figure 2d. For a given energy E and k y , we can calculate k x from the periodic Hamiltonian, and the incident angle of electrons can be obtained θ = arctan ( k y / k x ) .
In Figure 3, we show the polar plots of the transmission probability for a single potential barrier. We fix the energy at E = 80 meV and change the ratio of E/V to check the transmission properties, where four different widths of the potential barrier, D = 80 nm, 110 nm, 140 nm, and 170 nm are considered. It is clear that the potential barrier becomes totally transparent ( T ( θ = 0 ) = 1 ) for normally incident electrons. Even when the barrier heights and widths are changed, normally incident electrons can still propagate with 100% efficiency. This unique feature is a manifestation of the Dirac fermions, which is related to Klein tunneling. Klein tunneling is a phenomenon that cannot be observed in nonrelativistic electrons, and it has been explored and explained in graphene. It is obvious that such a phenomenon driven by the Dirac fermions can also be observed in β12 borophene.
In Figure 3a, we present the transmission probability for three E/V ratios with the barrier width D fixed to be 80 nm. For the large E/V ratio, we only have nonzero transmission in a small angle region. This feature can also be observed in Figure 3b–d, where a larger width of the barrier is considered. Such a feature can be used to control the guiding of electrons by the gate, which may find applications in electronic fiber or electron waveguides. We also note that the barrier can be perfectly transparent ( T ( θ ) = 1 ) at some other incident angles, for example, the transmission is 100% at θ = 30 ° and 62 ° in Figure 3a. These transmission peaks are caused by the Fabry–Perot resonances in the barrier, which occur due to the interference of electron waves that are reflected back and forth inside the barrier. Since the transmission peaks are caused by the interference of the electron waves, the number of the transmission peaks depends on the barrier width strongly. Comparing the above four pictures, we can see that the number of transmission peaks increases as the width of the barrier increases.
We proceed with the investigation of a single potential barrier and a double potential barrier, aiming to compare their distinctions. Figure 4 illustrates the transmission probability’s dependence on the Fermi energy and the incident angle. To examine the transmission properties, we maintain the barrier height at V = 200 meV while varying the Fermi energy and the incident angle. In Figure 4a–c, we explore three distinct widths of the single potential barrier, namely, D = 30 nm, 40 nm, and 50 nm, respectively. Additionally, we create two potential barriers using a barrier width of 40 nm and a barrier height of V = 200 meV, varying the width of separation between the two barriers (L = 40 nm, 80 nm, and 120 nm) in Figure 4d–f. Notably, both the single and double potential barriers exhibit total transparency ( T ( θ = 0 ) = 1 ) when electrons are incident normally, indicating the presence of Klein tunneling in both cases.
Examining the results further, we observe transmission resonances (Fabry–Perot resonances) at specific Fermi energies for a fixed incident angle, and these resonant positions shift when altering the incident angle, as shown in Figure 4a. The same phenomenon is observable in Figure 4b,c, where larger barrier widths are considered. It is also worth noting that the number of resonances increases with an increase in barrier thickness, as evident in Figure 4a–c. Furthermore, in Figure 4d–f, apart from the barrier resonances, additional resonances arise due to wave reflections between barriers. These can be distinguished from the former resonances by comparing them with Figure 4b, which corresponds to a single barrier with a width of 110 nm. Notably, a pronounced dependence of transmission probability on the incident angle is observed around 270~300 meV, with peaks separated by regions of zero transmission occurring at large incident angles. The number of resonances increases as the distance between two potential barriers widens in Figure 4d–f.
Despite the distinct resonant behavior in the single and double potential barriers, both cases result from the interference of electron waves. Given the similarity in energy band structures between graphene and β12 boronene, these resonances may also be observed in graphene.
In Figure 5a, we present the transmission probability as a function of the Fermi energy and the incident angle. By maintaining the barrier height at V = 200 meV and the barrier width at 158 nm, we explore the transmission properties across varying incidence angles and energies. Notably, the transmission resonances’ branching behavior becomes inwardly concave with an increase in the Fermi energy. Moreover, when the incident electron energy is low, we observe an intriguing phenomenon wherein the axis of the resonant branch, parallel to the angle of incidence, can be represented by the white line in Figure 5a. This specific situation is further illustrated in Figure 5b.
In Figure 5b, we notice a nearly perfect transmission ( T ( θ ) = 1 ) for all incidence angles, resembling the concept of “super” transmission. This high transmission efficiency remains significant for all angles except those close to 90 degrees, where the perfect transmission ( T ( θ ) = 1 ) slightly diminishes. This unique characteristic is referred to as “super-Klein tunneling”, a phenomenon observed in both the Lieb and Dice lattice models as described in publication [64]. It is worth noting that the super-Klein tunneling in β12 borophene occurs at incident energies near the Dirac points, adding to its distinctive properties.
In Figure 6, we present the conductance G/G0 as a function of the width of the potential barriers D, considering various ratios of E/V. The energy is kept fixed at E = 80 meV, and we modify the E/V ratio to investigate the conductance properties. The E/V ratio signifies the relationship between the incident electron energy and the barrier height. Notably, the conductance shows a clear decrease as the width of the potential barriers D increases. This behavior can be attributed to a reduction in the total number of electrons passing through the barriers as the barrier widths widen, resulting in a lower conductance.
For cases with small E/V ratios, a noticeable oscillatory behavior is observed in the conductance. These oscillations are regular within a specific range of small barrier widths but become irregular in the range of large barrier widths. This oscillatory pattern is related to Fabry–Perot resonances, where the incident electrons undergo multiple reflections between the barriers, leading to constructive and destructive interference effects on the transmission. On the other hand, when the E/V ratio is large, no oscillations are present in the conductance. This is due to the fact that only a small angular region exhibits nonzero transmission, which results in the absence of oscillations in the conductance.
Overall, the conductance behavior in Figure 6 is intricately linked to the width of the potential barriers, the E/V ratio, and the occurrence of Fabry–Perot resonances, providing valuable insights into the electron transport properties within the system.

3. Conclusions

In our investigation of β12 borophene, we have thoroughly explored the transmission properties across both a single potential barrier and two potential barriers. Remarkably, when electrons are incident perpendicular to the interface, we have observed that the potential barriers exhibit total transparency, regardless of variations in their heights and widths. Interestingly, at specific values of incident energy and barrier width, we have noticed a fascinating phenomenon wherein the transmission rate becomes independent of the incident angle. This characteristic closely resembles the concept of “super transmission” previously reported for the dice lattice.
Moreover, in scenarios with large E/V ratios, we have identified nonzero transmission occurring within a small angle region. This intriguing feature could have practical applications in electronic fiber or electron waveguide systems. For cases with small E/V ratios, we have observed the presence of Fabry–Perot resonances in β12 borophene, akin to what is seen in graphene and the dice lattice. Notably, by examining the resonant behavior in both the single and double potential barrier configurations, we have been able to distinguish between resonance phenomena associated with a single barrier and those arising from interactions between two barriers.
These discoveries significantly contribute to our understanding of electron transmission properties in β12 borophene and offer valuable insights into potential applications in nanoelectronics and waveguide technologies.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Q.Z.; Methodology, J.L.; Software, F.L. and H.Z.; Formal analysis, L.W.; Writing—original draft, L.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC, Grant Nos. 11704078), Guangdong University of Technology One-Hundred Young Talents Program (Project No. 220413143).

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zhao, C.; Tan, C.; Lien, D.-H.; Song, X.; Amani, M.; Hettick, M.; Nyein, H.Y.Y.; Yuan, Z.; Li, L.; Scott, M.C.; et al. Evaporated tellurium thin films for p-type field-effect transistors and circuits. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2020, 15, 53–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Koman, V.B.; Liu, P.; Kozawa, D.; Liu, A.T.; Cottrill, A.L.; Son, Y.; Lebron, J.A.; Strano, M.S. Colloidal nanoelectronic state machines based on 2D materials for aerosolizable electronics. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2018, 13, 819–827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Yang, S.; Jiang, C.; Wei, S.H. Gas sensing in 2D materials. Appl. Phys. Rev. 2017, 4, 021304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Meng, Z.; Stolz, R.M.; Mendecki, L.; Mirica, K.A. Electrically-transduced chemical sensors based on two-dimensional nanomaterials. Chem. Rev. 2019, 119, 478–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Pomerantseva, E.; Gogotsi, Y. Two-dimensional heterostructures for energy storage. Nat. Energy 2017, 2, 17089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Yun, Q.; Li, L.; Hu, Z.; Lu, Q.; Chen, B.; Zhang, H. Layered transition metal dichalcogenide-based nanomaterials for electrochemical energy storage. Adv. Mater. 2020, 32, 1903826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Mak, K.F.; Shan, J. Photonics and optoelectronics of 2D semiconductor transition metal dichalcogenides. Nat. Photonics 2016, 10, 216–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Cheng, Z.; Cao, R.; Wei, K.; Yao, Y.; Liu, X.; Kang, J.; Dong, J.; Shi, Z.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, X. 2D materials enabled next-generation integrated optoelectronics: From fabrication to applications. Adv. Sci. 2021, 8, 2003834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Kostarelos, K. Translating graphene and 2D materials into medicine. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2016, 1, 16084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Cheng, L.; Wang, X.; Gong, F.; Liu, T.; Liu, Z. 2D nanomaterials for cancer theranostic applications. Adv. Mater. 2020, 32, 1902333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Novoselov, K.S.; Geim, A.K.S.; Morozov, V.; Jiang, D.; Zhang, Y.S.; Dubonos, V.; Grigorieva, I.V.; Firsov, A.A. Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films. Science 2004, 306, 666–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Derivaz, M.; Dentel, D.; Stephan, R.; Hanf, M.C.; Mehdaoui, A.; Sonnet, P.; Pirri, C. Continuous germanene layer on Al (111). Nano Lett. 2015, 15, 2510–2516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Li, L.; Lu, S.Z.; Pan, J.; Qin, Z.; Wang, Y.Q.; Wang, Y.; Cao, G.Y.; Du, S.; Gao, H.J. Buckled germanene formation on Pt (111). Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 4820–4824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Vogt, P.; Padova, P.D.; Quaresima, C.; Avila, J.; Frantzeskakis, E.; Asensio, M.C.; Resta, A.; Ealet, B.; Lay, G.L. Silicene: Compelling experimental evidence for graphenelike two-dimensional silicon. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2012, 108, 155501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Feng, B.; Ding, Z.J.; Meng, S.; Yao, Y.G.; He, X.Y.; Cheng, P.; Chen, L.; Wu, K.H. Evidence of silicene in honeycomb structures of silicon on Ag (111). Nano Lett. 2012, 12, 3507–3511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Zhu, F.; Chen, W.; Xu, Y.; Gao, C.; Guan, D.; Liu, C.; Qian, D.; Zhang, S.C.; Jia, J. Epitaxial growth of two-dimensional stanene. Nat. Mater. 2015, 14, 1020–1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Xu, Y.; Yan, B.; Zhang, H.J.; Wang, J.; Xu, G.; Tang, P.; Duan, W.; Zhang, S.C. Large-gap quantum spin Hall insulators in tin films. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2013, 111, 136804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Xia, F.; Wang, H.; Jia, Y. Rediscovering black phosphorus as an anisotropic layered material for optoelectronics and electronics. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 4458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Li, L.; Yu, Y.; Ye, G.J.; Ge, Q.; Ou, X.; Wu, H.; Feng, D.; Chen, X.H.; Zhang, Y. Black phosphorus field-effect transistors. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2014, 9, 372–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhang, Z.; Yan, Z.; Li, Y.; Chen, Z.; Zeng, H. Atomically thin arsenene and antimonene: Semimetal–semiconductor and indirect–direct band-gap transitions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 3112–3115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kamal, C.; Ezawa, M. Two-dimensional buckled and puckered honeycomb arsenic systems. Phys. Rev. B 2015, 91, 085423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhu, Z.; Cai, X.L.; Yi, S.H.; Chen, J.L.; Dai, Y.W.; Niu, C.Y.; Guo, Z.X.; Xie, M.H.; Liu, F.; Cho, J.H.; et al. Multivalency-Driven Formation of Te-Based Monolayer Materials: A Combined First-Principles and Experimental study. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2017, 119, 106101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. dos Santos, R.B.; Rivelino, R.; Gueorguiev, G.K.; Kakanakova-Georgieva, A. Exploring 2D structures of indium oxide of different stoichiometry. CrystEngComm 2021, 23, 6661–6667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Oliveira, M.J.; Medeiros, P.V.; Sousa, J.R.; Nogueira, F.; Gueorguiev, G.K. Optical and magnetic excitations of metal-encapsulating Si cages: A systematic study by time-dependent density functional theory. J. Phys. Chem. C 2014, 118, 11377–11384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Manzeli, S.; Ovchinnikov, D.; Pasquier, D.; Yazyev, O.V.; Kis, A. 2D transition metal dichalcogenides. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2017, 2, 17033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Miró, P.; Ghorbani-As, M.l.; Heine, T. Two dimensional materials beyond MoS2: Noble-transition-metal dichalcogenides. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 3015–3018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Naguib, M.; Mochalin, V.N.; Barsoum, M.W.; Gogotsi, Y. 25th anniversary article: MXenes: A new family of two-dimensional materials. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 992–1005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhang, J.; Tan, B.; Zhang, X.; Gao, F.; Hu, Y.; Wang, L.; Duan, X.; Yang, Z.; Hu, P. Atomically thin hexagonal boron nitride and its heterostructures. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, 2000769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhang, Z.; Penev, E.S.; Yakobson, B.I. Two-dimensional boron: Structures, properties and applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 6746–6763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kondo, T. Recent progress in boron nanomaterials. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 2017, 18, 780–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Boustani, I. New quasi-planar surfaces of bare boron. Surf. Sci. 1997, 370, 355–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Evans, M.H.; Joannopoulos, J.D.; Pantelides, S.T. Electronic and mechanical properties of planar and tubular boron structures. Phys. Rev. B 2005, 72, 045434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wu, X.; Dai, J.; Zhao, Y.; Zhuo, Z.; Yang, J.; Zeng, X.C. Two-dimensional boron monolayer sheets. ACS Nano 2012, 6, 7443–7453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Penev, E.S.; Bhowmick, S.; Sadrzadeh, A.; Yakobson, B.I. Polymorphism of two-dimensional boron. Nano Lett. 2012, 12, 2441–2445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Liu, H.; Gao, J.; Zhao, J. From boron cluster to two-dimensional boron sheet on Cu (111) surface: Growth mechanism and hole formation. Sci. Rep. 2013, 3, 3238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Liu, Y.; Penev, E.S.; Yakobson, B.I. Probing the synthesis of two-dimensional boron by first-principles computations. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 3156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Zhang, Z.; Yang, Y.; Gao, G.; Yakobson, B.I. Tw-dimensional boron monolayers mediated by metal substrates. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 13214–13218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Tang, H.; Ismail-Beigi, S. First-principles study of boron sheets and nanotubes. Phys. Rev. B 2010, 82, 115412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Tang, H.; Ismail-Beigi, S. Novel precursors for boron nanotubes: The competition of two-center and three-center bonding in boron sheets. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2007, 99, 115501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Lopez-Bezanilla, A.; Littlewood, P.B. Electronic properties of 8–Pmmn borophene. Phys. Rev. B 2016, 93, 241405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Piazza, Z.A.; Hu, H.S.; Li, W.L.; Zhao, Y.F.; Li, J.; Wang, L.S. Planar hexagonal B36 as a potential basis for extended single-atom layer boron sheets. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 3113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Mannix, A.J.; Zhou, X.F.; Kiraly, B.; Wood, J.D.; Alducin, D.; Myers, B.D.; Liu, X.; Fisher, B.L.; Santiago, U.; Guest, J.R.; et al. Synthesis of borophenes: Anisotropic, two-dimensional boron polymorphs. Science 2015, 350, 1513–1516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Zhang, Z.; Penev, E.S.; Yakobson, B.I. Polyphony in B flat. Nat. Chem. 2016, 8, 525–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Feng, B.; Zhang, J.; Zhong, Q.; Li, W.; Li, S.; Li, H.; Cheng, P.; Meng, S.; Chen, L.; Wu, K. Experimental realization of two-dimensional boron sheets. Nat. Chem. 2016, 8, 563–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Feng, B.; Zhang, J.; Liu, R.Y.; Takushi, I.; Lian, C.; Chen, L.; Wu, K.; Li, H.; Meng, S.; Komori, F.; et al. Realization of metallic boron in monolayer structures. Phys. Rev. B 2016, 94, 041408. [Google Scholar]
  46. Li, W.; Kong, L.; Chen, C.; Gou, J.; Sheng, S.; Zhang, W.; Li, H.; Chen, L.; Cheng, P.; Wu, K. Experimental realization of honeycomb borophene. Sci. Bull. 2018, 63, 282–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Sun, X.; Liu, X.; Yin, J.; Yu, J.; Li, Y.; Hang, Y.; Zhou, X.; Yu, M.; Li, J.; Tai, G.; et al. Two-dimensional boron crystals: Structural stability, tunable properties, fabrications and applications. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2017, 27, 1603300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Tang, H.; Ismail-Beigi, S. Self-doping in boron sheets from first principles: A route to structural design of metal boride nanostructures. Phys. Rev. B 2009, 80, 134113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Liu, L.Z.; Xiong, S.J.; Wu, X.L. Monolayer borophene electrode for effective elimination of both the Schottky barrier and strong electric field effect. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2016, 109, 061601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Mortazavi, B.; Rahaman, O.; Ahzi, S.; Rabczuk, T. Flat borophene films as anode materials for Mg, Na or Li-ion batteries with ultra high capacities: A first-principles study. Appl. Mater. Today 2017, 8, 60–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Mortazavi, B.; Dianat, A.; Rahaman, O.; Cuniberti, G.; Rabczuk, T. Borophene as an anode material for Ca, Mg, Na or Li ion storage: A first-principle study. J. Power Sources 2016, 329, 456–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Zhang, X.; Hu, J.; Cheng, Y.; Yang, H.Y.; Yao, Y.; Yang, S.A. Borophene as an extremely high capacity electrode material for Li-ion and Na-ion batteries. Nanoscale 2016, 8, 15340–15347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Wang, J.; Deng, S.; Liu, Z.; Liu, Z. The rare two-dimensional materials with Dirac cones. Natl. Sci. Rev. 2015, 2, 22–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. van Miert, G.; Smith, C.M. Dirac cones beyond the honeycomb lattice: A symmetry-based approach. Phys. Rev. B 2016, 93, 035401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Feng, B.; Sugino, O.; Liu, R.Y.; Zhang, J.; Yukawa, R.; Kawamura, M.; Iimori, T.; Kim, H.; Hasegawa, Y. Dirac fermions in borophene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2017, 118, 096401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Ezawa, M. Electrically tunable conductance and edge modes in topological crystalline insulator thin films: Minimal tight-binding model analysis. New J. Phys. 2014, 16, 115004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Klein, O. Die Reflexion von Elektronen an einem Potentialsprung nach der relativistischen Dynamik von Dirac. Z. Phys. 1929, 53, 157–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Stander, N.; Huard, B.; Goldhaber-Gordon, D. Conductance of pnp graphene structures with “air-bridge” top gates. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009, 102, 026807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Gorbachev, R.V.; Mayorov, A.S.; Savchenko, A.K.; Horsell, D.W.; Guinea, F. Conductance of p-n-p graphene structures with “air-bridge” top gates. Nano Lett. 2008, 8, 1995–1999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Young, A.F.; Kim, P. Quantum interference and carrier collimation in graphene heterojunctions. Nat. Phys. 2009, 5, 222–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Zhang, S.H.; Yang, W. Oblique Klein tunneling in 8–Pmmn borophene pn junctions. Phys. Rev. B 2018, 97, 235440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Zhou, X. Valley-dependent electron retroreflection and anomalous Klein tunneling in an 8–Pmmn borophene-based npn junction. Phys. Rev. B 2019, 100, 195139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Ezawa, M. Triplet fermions and Dirac fermions in borophene. Phys. Rev. B 2017, 96, 035425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Büttiker, M. Four-terminal phase-coherent conductance. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1986, 57, 1761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Zhai, F.; Chang, K. Theory of huge tunneling magnetoresistance in graphene. Phys. Rev. B 2008, 77, 113409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Wang, J.; Liu, J.F. Super-Klein tunneling and electron-beam collimation in the honeycomb superlattice. Phys. Rev. B 2022, 105, 035402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Schaibley, J.; Yu, H.; Clark, G.; Rivera, P.; Ross, J.S.; Seyler, K.L.; Yao, W. Valleytronics in 2D materials. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2016, 1, 16055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) The lattice structure of β12 borophene. The unit cell is indicated by a purple dashed rectangle. (b) The unit cell contains five atoms, which are labeled as a, b, c, d, and e. (c) A minimum tight-binding model with periodic boundary conditions for bulk borophene. The hopping between atoms a and e is modified and indicated as t a e * , where e i k y W is the Bloch factor with W = 3a. (d) Schematic of the scattering of electrons by a potential barrier and the definition of the incident angle.
Figure 1. (a) The lattice structure of β12 borophene. The unit cell is indicated by a purple dashed rectangle. (b) The unit cell contains five atoms, which are labeled as a, b, c, d, and e. (c) A minimum tight-binding model with periodic boundary conditions for bulk borophene. The hopping between atoms a and e is modified and indicated as t a e * , where e i k y W is the Bloch factor with W = 3a. (d) Schematic of the scattering of electrons by a potential barrier and the definition of the incident angle.
Nanomaterials 14 00790 g001
Figure 2. (a) The band structures of bulk borophene with k y = 0 . (b) An enlarged schematic of the red rectangular part of (a); two gapless Dirac points, K and K’, are indicated. (c) Schematic illustrations of the n-p-n junction. The definition of the incident energy E and the height of the potential barrier V are marked. (d) The definition of the momentum k x .
Figure 2. (a) The band structures of bulk borophene with k y = 0 . (b) An enlarged schematic of the red rectangular part of (a); two gapless Dirac points, K and K’, are indicated. (c) Schematic illustrations of the n-p-n junction. The definition of the incident energy E and the height of the potential barrier V are marked. (d) The definition of the momentum k x .
Nanomaterials 14 00790 g002
Figure 3. Polar plots of the transmission probability for a potential barrier. The widths of the potential barriers in panels (ad) are D = 80 nm, 110 nm, 140 nm, and 170 nm, respectively. The energy is chosen to be E = 80 meV, and three cases with E/V = 0.5 (green), 0.75 (red), and 0.95 (blue) are considered.
Figure 3. Polar plots of the transmission probability for a potential barrier. The widths of the potential barriers in panels (ad) are D = 80 nm, 110 nm, 140 nm, and 170 nm, respectively. The energy is chosen to be E = 80 meV, and three cases with E/V = 0.5 (green), 0.75 (red), and 0.95 (blue) are considered.
Nanomaterials 14 00790 g003
Figure 4. Contour plots of the transmission probability as a function of incidence angle and energy. Panels (ac) are the transmission of borophene with a single potential barrier with the barrier height of V = 200 meV, and the barrier width from top to bottom: D = 30 nm, 40 nm, 50 nm. Panels (df) are the transmission of borophene with double potential barriers, and the height and width of barriers are 200 meV and D = 40 nm, respectively. The separation between the two barriers from top to bottom: L = 40 nm, 80 nm, and 120 nm.
Figure 4. Contour plots of the transmission probability as a function of incidence angle and energy. Panels (ac) are the transmission of borophene with a single potential barrier with the barrier height of V = 200 meV, and the barrier width from top to bottom: D = 30 nm, 40 nm, 50 nm. Panels (df) are the transmission of borophene with double potential barriers, and the height and width of barriers are 200 meV and D = 40 nm, respectively. The separation between the two barriers from top to bottom: L = 40 nm, 80 nm, and 120 nm.
Nanomaterials 14 00790 g004
Figure 5. (a) Contour plots of the transmission probability as a function of incidence angle and energy. The height and the width of the potential barriers are 200 meV and D = 158 nm, respectively. (b) When the Fermi energy is 200 meV, the transmission probability depends on the angle of incidence as indicated by the white dashed line in (a).
Figure 5. (a) Contour plots of the transmission probability as a function of incidence angle and energy. The height and the width of the potential barriers are 200 meV and D = 158 nm, respectively. (b) When the Fermi energy is 200 meV, the transmission probability depends on the angle of incidence as indicated by the white dashed line in (a).
Nanomaterials 14 00790 g005
Figure 6. The conductance G/G0 as a function of the width of the potential barriers D. The energy is chosen to be E = 80 meV, and three cases, with E/V = 0.3 (black), E/V = 0.4 (red), and E/V = 0.9 (blue) are considered.
Figure 6. The conductance G/G0 as a function of the width of the potential barriers D. The energy is chosen to be E = 80 meV, and three cases, with E/V = 0.3 (black), E/V = 0.4 (red), and E/V = 0.9 (blue) are considered.
Nanomaterials 14 00790 g006
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lai, J.; Wang, L.; Li, F.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, Q. Klein Tunneling in β12 Borophene. Nanomaterials 2024, 14, 790. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14090790

AMA Style

Lai J, Wang L, Li F, Zhang H, Zhang Q. Klein Tunneling in β12 Borophene. Nanomaterials. 2024; 14(9):790. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14090790

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lai, Jinhao, Lekang Wang, Fu Li, Hongbin Zhang, and Qingtian Zhang. 2024. "Klein Tunneling in β12 Borophene" Nanomaterials 14, no. 9: 790. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14090790

APA Style

Lai, J., Wang, L., Li, F., Zhang, H., & Zhang, Q. (2024). Klein Tunneling in β12 Borophene. Nanomaterials, 14(9), 790. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14090790

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop