Next Article in Journal
One-Step Synthesis of Ag@TiO2 Nanoparticles for Enhanced Photocatalytic Performance
Previous Article in Journal
Significant Influence of a Single Atom Change in Auxiliary Acceptor on Photovoltaic Properties of Porphyrin-Based Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nanomaterials
Volume 8
Issue 12
10.3390/nano8121031
nanomaterials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Nanoscale Ring-Shaped Conduction Channels with Memristive Behavior in BiFeO3 Nanodots

by
Zhongwen Li
1,2,3,
Zhen Fan
1,2,* and
Guofu Zhou
2,4,5,6
1
Institute for Advanced Materials, South China Academy of Advanced Optoelectronics, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510006, China
2
Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Optical Information Materials and Technology, South China Academy of Advanced Optoelectronics, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510006, China
3
Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Huaiyin Institute of Technology, Huai’an 223003, China
4
National Center for International Research on Green Optoelectronics, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510006, China
5
Shenzhen Guohua Optoelectronics Tech. Co. Ltd., Shenzhen 518110, China
6
Academy of Shenzhen Guohua Optoelectronics, Shenzhen 518110, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2018, 8(12), 1031; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano8121031
Submission received: 26 November 2018 / Revised: 8 December 2018 / Accepted: 10 December 2018 / Published: 11 December 2018
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Nanoscale ring-shaped conduction channels with memristive behavior have been observed in the BiFeO3 (BFO) nanodots prepared by the ion beam etching. At the hillside of each individual nanodot, a ring-shaped conduction channel is formed. Furthermore, the conduction channels exhibit memristive behavior, i.e., their resistances can be continuously tuned by the applied voltages. More specifically, a positive (negative) applied voltage reduces (increases) the resistance, and the resistance continuously varies as the repetition number of voltage scan increases. It is proposed that the surface defects distributed at the hillsides of nanodots may lower the Schottky barriers at the Pt tip/BFO interfaces, thus leading to the formation of ring-shaped conduction channels. The surface defects are formed due to the etching and they may be temporarily stabilized by the topological domain structures of BFO nanodots. In addition, the electron trapping/detrapping at the surface defects may be responsible for the memristive behavior, which is supported by the surface potential measurements. These nanoscale ring-shaped conduction channels with memristive behavior may have potential applications in high-density, low-power memory devices.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Nanoscale conduction channels with ring-like shapes are of particular interest in nanoscience owing to their broad application prospects. For example, they may be used to carry persistent currents [1,2]. In addition, when the ring-shaped conduction channels are made of magnetic materials, they may be used for constructing magnetic tunnel junctions with reduced power consumption and enhanced thermal stability [3,4]. Another appealing example is the metal oxides-based ring-shaped conduction channel, which shows excellent gas sensing properties due to a large surface-area-to-volume ratio [5,6]. Clearly, the ring-shaped conduction channels possess a vast number of functionalities, but their memristive properties seem to remain almost unexplored.
The memristive behavior manifests itself as a continuous change in resistance with the amount of charge flown across the device (i.e., the memristor). Therefore, multiple resistance states could be achieved by varying the amplitude and duration of applied voltage in a memristor, which is different from the conventional resistive switching between only two bi-stable resistance states. Nanoscale memristors can be used as synapses in brain-mimicking neuromorphic computational architectures. While most previous memristors were based on the planar capacitor structures [7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14], those based on new structures may yield opportunities to create new functionalities or improve the existing performance. For example, the memristors based on the above-mentioned ring-shaped conduction channels may consume less power compared with those based on the planar capacitor structures because of the smaller effective area for the charge flow (assuming that the power density is uniform along the in-plane direction). Thus, we aim to achieve such kind of nanoscale conduction channels possessing both ring-like shapes and memristive properties, which may have potential applications in high-density, low-power memory devices.
In terms of the material selection, we use BiFeO3 (BFO), which is a prototype multiferroic material. It exhibits a large polarization of ~60 µC/cm2 along the [001] direction [15,16], weak magnetism [17,18], and a rich palette of crystalline phases [19,20,21] and domain structures [22,23,24]. In recent years many intriguing properties have been discovered in BFO, particularly the domain wall conduction [25,26]. We previously found that BFO nanodots could exhibit unique topological domain structures, and thus novel conduction properties in association with the domain structures may be expected [27]. Herein, we report the observation of ring-shaped conduction channels with memristive behavior in BFO nanodots. Each ring-shaped conduction channel is formed at the hillside of each individual nanodot, and the resistance of the conduction channel can be continuously tuned by the applied voltage. The origins of the formation of ring-shaped conduction channels and their memristor behavior will be analyzed in relation to the surface defects, which are formed due to the etching and temporarily stabilized by the topological domain structures of BFO nanodots.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials Preparation

Epitaxial BFO films (~100 nm in thickness) with ~50 nm SrRuO3 (SRO) buffer layers were grown on (001)-oriented SrTiO3 (STO) substrates by using pulsed laser deposition (PLD). During the deposition of BFO films, the temperature was kept at 600 °C, and the oxygen pressure was fixed at 2–3 Pa. Then, a ~300-nm-thick anodic aluminum oxide (AAO) membrane mask was transferred onto the BFO film, followed by the Ar+ ion beam etching. Finally, the AAO mask was removed mechanically and the BFO nanodot arrays were obtained. The resultant BFO nanodots were free from the contaminations from residual AAO mask (see Figure S1 for evidence).

2.2. Characterization

Nanoscale electrical characterizations based on scanning probe microscopy (SPM), including conductive atomic force microscopy (C-AFM) and scanning Kelvin probe microscopy (SKPM), were performed using an integrated SPM system (Asylum Cypher, Oxford Instruments, Abingdon, UK) equipped with conductive Pt-coated silicon probes (EFM Arrow, Nanoworld, Neuchâtel, Switzerland). The C-AFM and SKPM were used to characterize the current and surface potential, respectively. In the C-AFM measurement, voltages of ±1 V were used for the current mapping while voltages up to ±10 V were applied for measuring I-V characteristics. In the SKPM measurement, the tip was lifted 50 nm above the sample surface and an AC drive amplitude of 1 V was used. All the SPM-based studies were conducted in the ambient circumstance.

3. Results and Discussion

The structural characterizations of the BFO nanodots can be found in our previous work [27], while this work mainly deals with the electrical characterizations. The applied voltage is termed as positive if a positive bias is applied to the Pt tip, and the current flowing from the tip to the bottom electrode is defined as a positive current. Figure 1a presents the topography of a specific area containing both the BFO nanodots and the unetched BFO film. It is seen that the BFO nanodots have relatively uniform sizes, with an average height of ~25 nm and an average diameter of ~60 nm. The current map measured by a +1 V scan (Figure 1b) shows that there is no measurable current in the region of unetched film, whereas the ring-shaped conduction channels are distributed in the region of BFO nanodots. The conduction channels are at the hillsides of the nanodots, which exhibit large currents of ~80 pA (Figure 1c). However, the peaks of the nanodots are much less conductive, with currents of below ~1 pA (Figure 1c). The direct formation of ring-shaped conduction channels in the BFO nanodots circumvents the need for the fabrication of BFO nanorings, which simplifies the fabrication procedure and saves cost. We note that similar ring-shaped conduction channels were also observed in GeSi nanodots [28,29].
Turning to the origins of the formation of ring-shaped conduction channels in our BFO nanodots, we mainly consider two factors as follows:
(1) From a BFO film to the nanodots, the surface of the BFO film is subject to etching. This creates abundant surface defects, e.g., oxygen vacancies [30], which can lower the Schottky barrier at the Pt tip/BFO interface. We argue that the Pt/BFO Schottky barrier is mainly controlling the current flow in the Pt/BFO/SRO nanodevices for the following reasons. First, the BFO/SRO barrier is ruled out as the current-limiting barrier; otherwise, the BFO nanodots and the unetched film would have similar conductance, which is in contradiction with our observation (Figure 1b). Second, the bulk resistance of the BFO nanodot is also not the main factor limiting the current; otherwise, the currents measured with the positive and negative applied voltages would be similar in magnitude. However, it is clearly seen from Figure 2b,c that the currents at +1 V are higher than those at −1 V. We therefore deduce that the Pt/BFO Schottky barrier is mainly controlling the current flow. The +1 V and −1 V correspond to the forward and reverse bias conditions, resulting in asymmetric conductance. In addition, because the hillsides of the nanodots are etched more severely than the peaks, a larger number of surface defects are thus distributed at the hillsides, making the Schottky barriers there much lower. This seems to be the main factor leading to the formation of ring-shaped conduction channels.
(2) We speculate that the center-convergent-type topological domain structures of the as-etched BFO nanodots (Figure 2a and Figure S2) may temporarily stabilize the surface defects at the hillsides. More specifically, the negative polarization charges near the surfaces of hillsides may help to stabilize the positively charged oxygen vacancies, preventing them from diffusing away or interacting with the atmosphere [31,32]. This speculation is supported by the following experiment. A region of the film was fully etched without covering the AAO mask, and then the current map was measured. Interestingly, negligible currents are observed in this region (Figure S3), despite the fact that the amount of etching-induced surface defects is also large. To understand this, we checked the domain structures in the fully etched region. It is found that in this region almost all the domains are pointing upward (Figure S3). The positive polarization charges near the film surface may disfavor the positively charged oxygen vacancies. As a result, the oxygen vacancies may either diffuse away or be compensated by the trapped electrons from the atmosphere [33]. Therefore, the lowering of the Schottky barrier induced by the oxygen vacancies is ineffective in the fully etched film. The difference in conductance between the fully etched film and the nanodots thus suggests that center-convergent-type topological domain structures of the nanodots may temporarily stabilize the surface defects, contributing to the formation of ring-shaped conduction channels. In addition, the observation of negligible currents in the fully etched film indicates again that the thickness of the film (i.e., the bulk resistance of the film) is not a major factor in influencing the current.
Then, we proceed to investigate the modulation of ring-shaped conduction channels by the applied voltages. The BFO nanodots were first electrically written with large applied voltages of ±6 V; the resultant domain structures and current maps are shown in Figure 2d–i. As can be seen from Figure 2d,g and Figure S2, the applied voltages of +6 V and −6 V can lead to the formation of center-divergent and center-convergent domains, respectively (see our previous work [27] for details). Under small reading voltages (both +1 V and −1 V), the ring-shaped conduction channels in the +6 V-written region are still observable, while those in the −6 V-written region become less conductive or even disappear (Figure 2e,f,h,i). Moreover, the surface potential images (Figure 2k,l) show that the +6 V-written region has a higher surface potential than the −6 V-written region.
To interpret the above results, it is crucial to determine the electrical processes which occur during the ±6 V writing. It was suggested that high-voltage writing could induce not only the domain switching but also the charge injection/extraction [34,35] and the filaments’ formation/rupture [36,37]. The filamentary mechanism is not suitable for the observed resistive switching, because the conduction channels have a quite uniform distribution and no forming step is required to initiate the resistive switching.
We thus turn to the charge injection/extraction, an area-type resistive switching. More specifically, during the −6 V writing, abundant electrons may be injected from the Pt tip and subsequently trapped at the surface defects, which could compensate or even over-compensate for the positive charges of oxygen vacancies (Figure 3a,b). In contrast, during the +6 V writing, the reverse scenario, i.e., electron detrapping, may occur, making the oxygen vacancies uncompensated or less compensated for (Figure 3a,c). Because the surface potential is influenced by all the charged species near the surface, including the polarization, oxygen vacancies, and trapped electrons [38], it is deducible that the surface potential of the +6 V-written region is higher than that of the −6 V-written region, consistent with our observation (Figure 2k,l). In addition, a higher surface potential indicates a lower Schottky barrier for the electron transport [39], as schematically shown in Figure 3b,c. This therefore explains the observation that the BFO nanodots in the +6 V-written region exhibit larger currents than those in the −6 V-written region (Figure 2e,f,h,i).
Moreover, we also observe the memristive behavior of the ring-shaped conduction channels in our BFO nanodots. Multiple voltage scans with the small voltages of ±1 V were applied to the region which was initially written with +6 V(outer)/−6 V(inner), and for each voltage scan a current map was recorded. Figure 4a shows that as the number of −1 V scan increases, the conduction channels in the +6 V-written region become less conductive while the currents in the −6 V-written region remain almost zero. However, as the number of +1 V scan increases, the currents in the +6 V-written region become larger while the conduction channels start to emerge in the −6 V-written region (Figure 4c). These results demonstrate that the conduction channels exhibit the memristive behavior which can be operated under small applied voltages of ±1 V.
The memristive behavior may be related to electron trapping/detrapping, as supported by the surface potential measurements. As shown in Figure 4b, the surface potential becomes successively lower by increasing the number of −1 V scans. However, the converse change in surface potential is observed in the case of +1 V scan (Figure 4d). These results suggest that electron trapping (detrapping) may occur during each −1 V (+1 V) scan, thus lowering (enhancing) the surface potential. As a result, the Schottky barrier at the Pt tip/BFO interface may become higher (lower), reducing (increasing) the conductance of the conduction channel (see Figure 3d–g). Also note that the voltage scans with ±1 V can hardly induce the domain switching (see Figure S4 for evidence). Therefore, the electron trapping/detrapping, which may even occur under small applied voltages, appears to be the origin of the memristive behavior.
Besides the current mapping, the current–voltage (I-V) measurements were also conducted to study the memristive properties of individual conduction channels. Figure 5a shows the hysteretic I-V characteristics measured by placing the tip at the hillside of a randomly-selected nanodot. As the voltage scans from 0 to +10 V, the conduction channel exhibits a transition from high resistance state (HRS) to low resistance state (LRS) at ~+8 V. The conduction channel remains in the LRS during the voltage scan of +10 V → −8 V. When the voltage exceeds ~−8 V, the conduction channel is turned to the HRS, and this HRS is maintained until the voltage goes back to 0. These features of I-V characteristics indicate that the bipolar-type resistive switching occurs in the conduction channels.
We further measured the I-V characteristics by applying unipolar positive and negative voltages. It is seen from Figure 5b that the resistance continues to increase as the number of negative voltage scans (0 → −5 V → 0) increases. For example, the absolute value of current read at −2 V in the 1st cycle is 0.68 nA, and it decreases to 0.14, 0.13, and 0.07 nA in the 2nd, 3rd and 4th cycles, respectively. On the contrary, as shown in Figure 5c, the resistance continues to decrease as the number of positive voltage scans (0 → 5 V → 0) increases. For example, the absolute value of current read at 2 V in the 1st cycle is 0.41 nA, and it increases to 0.60, 0.68, and 1.55 nA in the 2nd, 3rd and 4th cycles, respectively. These results demonstrate that the individual conduction channels exhibit memristive behavior, consistent with the results of current mapping.

4. Conclusions

In summary, we have observed nanoscale ring-shaped conduction channels with memristive behavior in BFO nanodots prepared by ion beam etching. The conduction channels are located at the hillsides of the nanodots. Furthermore, the conduction channels exhibit memristive behavior, i.e., their resistances can be increased (decreased) successively by increasing the number of negative (positive) voltage scans. We propose that the surface defects distributed at the hillsides of nanodots may lower the Schottky barriers at the Pt tip/BFO interfaces, thus leading to formation of ring-shaped conduction channels. The surface defects are formed due to the etching and they may be temporarily stabilized by the topological domain structures of BFO nanodots. In addition, the memristive behavior may originate from the electron trapping/detrapping, which is supported by the surface potential measurements. These nanoscale ring-shaped conduction channels with memristive behavior may have potential applications in high-density, low-power memory devices.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2079-4991/8/12/1031/s1. Figure S1: (a) Top-view SEM image, and (b) EDS spectra of BFO nanodots. Figure S2: PFM vertical phase images, lateral phase images, and corresponding domain structures of (a) as-etched and −6 V-written, and (b) +6 V-written BFO nanodots. Figure S3: (a) Topography and (b) current images of a specific area containing both BFO nanodots and fully-etched film. (c) Height and current profiles along the section lines in a and b, respectively. (d) PFM phase image taken in a fully-etched region with the middle region written by +6 V. Figure S4: PFM phase images (a) before and (b) after multiple ±1 V scans.

Author Contributions

Z.L. carried out the experiments and collected the data. Z.F. designed and supervised the research. All authors wrote and approved the manuscript.

Funding

This work is supported by the National Key Research Program of China (No. 2016YFA0201002), National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 51602110, 51561135014), Program for Chang Jiang Scholars and Innovative Research Teams in Universities (No. IRT_17R40) and Guangdong Innovative Research Team Program (No. 2013C102), Science and Technology Project of Shenzhen Municipal Science and Technology Innovation Committee (GQYCZZ20150721150406), Science and Technology Project of Guangdong Province (Nos. 2016B090918083, 2017B030301007) and financial supports from Guangdong Provincial Engineering Technology Research Center for Transparent Conductive Materials, MOE International Laboratory for Optical Information Technologies and the 111 Project.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lévy, L.P.; Dolan, G.; Dunsmuir, J.; Bouchiat, H. Magnetization of mesoscopic copper rings: Evidence for persistent currents. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1990, 64, 2074–2077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Lévy, L.P. Persistent currents in mesoscopic copper rings. Physica B 1991, 169, 245–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Han, X.; Wei, H.; Peng, Z.; Yang, H.; Feng, J.; Du, G.; Sun, Z.; Jiang, L.; Ma, M.; Wang, Y.; et al. A novel design and fabrication of magnetic random access memory based on nano-ring-type magnetic tunnel junctions. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2007, 23, 304–306. [Google Scholar]
  4. Han, X.; Wen, Z.; Wei, H. Nanoring magnetic tunnel junction and its application in magnetic random access memory demo devices with spin-polarized current switching (invited). J. Appl. Phys. 2008, 103, 07E933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Hu, X.L.; Yu, J.C.; Gong, J.M.; Li, Q.; Li, G.S. α-Fe2O3 nanorings prepared by a microwave-assisted hydrothermal process and their sensing properties. Adv. Mater. 2007, 19, 2324–2329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Gou, X.; Wang, G.; Yang, J.; Park, J.; Wexler, D. Chemical synthesis, characterisation and gas sensing performance of copper oxide nanoribbons. J. Mater. Chem. 2008, 18, 965–969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Jo, S.H.; Chang, T.; Ebong, I.; Bhadviya, B.B.; Mazumder, P.; Lu, W. Nanoscale memristor device as synapse in neuromorphic systems. Nano Lett. 2010, 10, 1297–1301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Indiveri, G.; Linares-Barranco, B.; Legenstein, R.; Deligeorgis, G.; Prodromakis, T. Integration of nanoscale memristor synapses in neuromorphic computing architectures. Nanotechnology 2013, 24, 384010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Wang, Z.; Joshi, S.; Savel’ev, S.E.; Jiang, H.; Midya, R.; Lin, P.; Hu, M.; Ge, N.; Strachan, J.P.; Li, Z.; et al. Memristors with diffusive dynamics as synaptic emulators for neuromorphic computing. Nat. Mater. 2017, 16, 101–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kim, D.J.; Lu, H.; Ryu, S.; Bark, C.-W.; Eom, C.-B.; Tsymbal, E.Y.; Gruverman, A. Ferroelectric tunnel memristor. Nano Lett. 2012, 12, 5697–5702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chanthbouala, A.; Garcia, V.; Cherifi, R.O.; Bouzehouane, K.; Fusil, S.; Moya, X.; Xavier, S.; Yamada, H.; Deranlot, C.; Mathur, N.D.; et al. A ferroelectric memristor. Nat. Mater. 2012, 11, 860–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Celano, U. Metrology and Physical Mechanisms in New Generation Ionic Devices. Ph.D. Thesis, The KU Leuven and IMEC, Leuven, Belgium, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  13. Waser, R.; Dittmann, R.; Staikov, G.; Szot, K. Redox-based resistive switching memories—Nanoionic mechanisms, prospects, and challenges. Adv. Mater. 2009, 21, 2632–2663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Fan, Z.; Fan, H.; Yang, L.; Li, P.; Lu, Z.; Tian, G.; Huang, Z.; Li, Z.; Yao, J.; Luo, Q.; et al. Resistive switching induced by charge trapping/detrapping: A unified mechanism for colossal electroresistance in certain Nb: SrTiO3-based heterojunctions. J. Mater. Chem. C 2017, 5, 7317–7327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wang, J.; Neaton, J.B.; Zheng, H.; Nagarajan, V.; Ogale, S.B.; Liu, B.; Viehland, D.; Vaithyanathan, V.; Schlom, D.G.; Waghmare, U.V.; et al. Epitaxial BiFeO3 multiferroic thin film heterostructures. Science 2003, 299, 1719–1722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Neaton, J.B.; Ederer, C.; Waghmare, U.V.; Spaldin, N.A.; Rabe, K.M. First-principles study of spontaneous polarization in multiferroic BiFeO3. Phys. Rev. B 2005, 71, 014113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Li, Y.W.; Sun, J.L.; Chen, J.; Meng, X.J.; Chu, J.H. Structural ferroelectric dielectric and magnetic properties of BiFeO3/Pb(Zr0.5,Ti0.5)O3 multilayer films derived by chemical solution deposition. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2005, 87, 182902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Qi, X.; Dho, J.; Blamire, M.; Jia, Q.; Lee, J.-S.; Foltyn, S.; MacManus-Driscoll, J.L. Epitaxial growth of BiFeO3 thin films by LPE and sol-gel method. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2004, 283, 415–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kubel, F.; Schmid, H. Structure of a ferroelectric and ferroelastic monodomain crystal of the perovskite BiFeO3. Acta Cryst. B 1990, 46, 698–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhang, J.X.; Xiang, B.; He, Q.; Seidel, J.; Zeches, R.J.; Yu, P.; Yang, S.Y.; Wang, C.H.; Chu, Y.H.; Martin, L.W.; et al. Large field-induced strains in a lead-free piezoelectric material. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2011, 6, 98–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Kim, K.E.; Jang, B.K.; Heo, Y.; Lee, J.H.; Jeong, M.; Lee, J.Y.; Seidel, J.; Yang, C.H. Electric control of straight stripe conductive mixed-phase nanostructures in La-doped BiFeO3. NPG Asia. Mater. 2014, 6, e81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zavaliche, F.; Das, R.R.; Kim, D.M.; Eom, C.B.; Yang, S.Y.; Shafer, P.; Ramesh, R. Ferroelectric domain structure in epitaxial BiFeO3 films. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2005, 87, 182912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zavaliche, F.; Shafer, P.; Ramesh, R.; Cruz, M.P.; Das, R.R.; Kim, D.M.; Eom, C.B. Polarization switching in epitaxial BiFeO3 films. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2005, 87, 252902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Chu, Y.H.; Zhan, Q.; Martin, L.W.; Cruz, M.P.; Yang, P.L.; Pabst, G.W.; Zavaliche, F.; Yang, S.Y.; Zhang, J.X.; Chen, L.Q.; et al. Nanoscale domain control in multiferroic BiFeO3 thin films. Adv. Mater. 2006, 18, 2307–2311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Seidel, J.; Martin, L.W.; He, Q.; Zhan, Q.; Chu, Y.H.; Rother, A.; Hawkridge, M.E.; Maksymovych, P.; Yu, P.; Gajek, M.; et al. Conduction at domain walls in oxide multiferroics. Nat. Mater. 2009, 8, 229–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Maksymovych, P.; Seidel, J.; Chu, Y.H.; Wu, P.; Baddorf, A.P.; Chen, L.-Q.; Kalinin, S.V.; Ramesh, R. Dynamic conductivity of ferroelectric domain walls in BiFeO3. Nano Lett. 2011, 11, 1906–1912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Li, Z.; Wang, Y.; Tian, G.; Li, P.; Zhao, L.; Zhang, F.; Yao, J.; Fan, H.; Song, X.; Chen, D.; et al. High-density array of ferroelectric nanodots with robust and reversibly switchable topological domain states. Sci. Adv. 2017, 3, e1700919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Zhang, S.L.; Xue, F.; Wu, R.; Cui, J.; Jiang, Z.M.; Yang, X.J. Conductive atomic force microscopy studies on the transformation of GeSi quantum dots to quantum rings. Nanotechnology 2009, 20, 135703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Wang, C.; Ke, S.Y.; Yang, J.; Hu, W.D.; Qiu, F.; Wang, R.F.; Yang, Y. Electronic properties of single Ge/Si quantum dot grown by ion beam sputtering deposition. Nanotechnology 2015, 26, 105201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Ou, X.; Shuai, Y.; Luo, W.B.; Siles, P.F.; Koegler, R.; Fiedler, J.; Reuther, H.; Zhou, S.Q.; Huebner, R.; Facsko, S.; et al. Forming-free resistive switching in multiferroic BiFeO3 thin films with enhanced nanoscale shunts. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2013, 5, 12764–12771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Kalinin, S.V.; Jesse, S.; Tselev, A.; Baddorf, A.P.; Balke, N. The role of electrochemical phenomena in scanning probe microscopy of ferroelectric thin films. ACS Nano 2011, 5, 5683–5691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Farokhipoora, S.; Nohedab, B. Screening effects in ferroelectric resistive switching of BiFeO3 thin films. APL Mater. 2014, 2, 056102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Tan, Z.W.; Tian, J.J.; Fan, Z.; Lu, Z.X.; Zhang, L.Y.; Zheng, D.F.; Wang, Y.D.; Chen, D.Y.; Qin, M.H.; Zeng, M.; et al. Polarization imprint effects on the photovoltaic effect in Pb(Zr,Ti)O3 thin films. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2018, 112, 152905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Son, J.Y.; Bang, S.H.; Cho, J.H. Kelvin probe force microscopy study of and thin films for SrBi2Ta2O9 and PbZr0.53Ti0.47O3 high-density nonvolatile storage devices. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2003, 82, 3505–3507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kim, Y.; Bae, C.; Ryu, K.; Ko, H.; Kim, Y.K.; Hong, S.; Shin, H. Origin of surface potential change during ferroelectric switching in epitaxial thin films studied by scanning force microscopy. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2009, 94, 032907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Muenstermann, R.; Menke, T.; Dittmann, R.; Mi, S.; Jia, C.-L.; Park, D.; Mayer, J. Correlation between growth kinetics and nanoscale resistive switching properties of SrTiO3 thin films. J. Appl. Phys. 2010, 108, 124504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Celano, U.; Goux, L.; Degraeve, R.; Fantini, A.; Richard, O.; Bender, H.; Jurczak, M.; Vandervorst, W. Imaging the three-dimensional conductive channel in filamentary-based oxide resistive switching memory. Nano Lett. 2015, 15, 7970–7975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kalinin, S.V.; Bonnell, D.A. Imaging mechanism of piezoresponse force microscopy of ferroelectric surfaces. Phys. Rev. B 2001, 65, 125411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Fan, Z.; Fan, H.; Lu, Z.; Li, P.; Huang, Z.; Tian, G.; Yang, L.; Yao, J.; Chen, C.; Chen, D.; et al. Ferroelectric diodes with charge injection and trapping. Phys. Rev. Appl. 2017, 7, 014020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Nanomaterials 08 01031 g001 550
Figure 1. Comparison of topography and current response between BiFeO3 (BFO) nanodots and unetched film. (a) Topography and (b) current map (scanned with +1 V) of BFO nanodots and unetched film. In the current map, the nanodots show ring-shaped conduction channels (white color), while the unetched film shows negligible current (black color). (c) Height and current profiles along the section lines in a and b, respectively.
Figure 1. Comparison of topography and current response between BiFeO3 (BFO) nanodots and unetched film. (a) Topography and (b) current map (scanned with +1 V) of BFO nanodots and unetched film. In the current map, the nanodots show ring-shaped conduction channels (white color), while the unetched film shows negligible current (black color). (c) Height and current profiles along the section lines in a and b, respectively.
Nanomaterials 08 01031 g001
Nanomaterials 08 01031 g002 550
Figure 2. Domain structures, current maps and surface potential images before and after electrical writing. (a,d,g) Domain structures, and current maps scanned with (b,e,h) −1 V and (c,f,i) +1 V for the BFO nanodots: (a,b,c) in the as-etched state, (d,e,f) after writing with −6 V (outer)/+6 V (inner), and (g,h,i) after writing with +6 V (outer)/−6 V (inner). (j) Topography image of the BFO nanodots. Surface potential images taken after writing with (k) −6 V (outer)/+6 V (inner) and (l) +6 V (outer)/−6 V (inner). Insets at the bottom show the height, current and surface potential profiles along the section lines.
Figure 2. Domain structures, current maps and surface potential images before and after electrical writing. (a,d,g) Domain structures, and current maps scanned with (b,e,h) −1 V and (c,f,i) +1 V for the BFO nanodots: (a,b,c) in the as-etched state, (d,e,f) after writing with −6 V (outer)/+6 V (inner), and (g,h,i) after writing with +6 V (outer)/−6 V (inner). (j) Topography image of the BFO nanodots. Surface potential images taken after writing with (k) −6 V (outer)/+6 V (inner) and (l) +6 V (outer)/−6 V (inner). Insets at the bottom show the height, current and surface potential profiles along the section lines.
Nanomaterials 08 01031 g002
Nanomaterials 08 01031 g003 550
Figure 3. Schematic energy band diagrams in different states. Schematic energy band diagrams at the Pt tip/BFO interface of (a) as-etched, (b) −6 V-written, and (c) +6 V-written states. Inset on the top of Panel a indicates the actual interface between the Pt tip and the BFO nanodot. The Schottky barrier in the −6 V-written state further modified by the (d) −1 V and (e) +1 V scans, and that in the +6 V-written state further modified by the (f) −1 V and (g) +1 V scans.
Figure 3. Schematic energy band diagrams in different states. Schematic energy band diagrams at the Pt tip/BFO interface of (a) as-etched, (b) −6 V-written, and (c) +6 V-written states. Inset on the top of Panel a indicates the actual interface between the Pt tip and the BFO nanodot. The Schottky barrier in the −6 V-written state further modified by the (d) −1 V and (e) +1 V scans, and that in the +6 V-written state further modified by the (f) −1 V and (g) +1 V scans.
Nanomaterials 08 01031 g003
Nanomaterials 08 01031 g004 550
Figure 4. Current maps and surface potential images after multiple ±1 V scans. Current maps scanned with (a) −1 V and (c) +1 V four times (I–IV) in a region initially written with +6 V (outer)/−6 V (inner). Surface potential images taken right after the (b) −1 V and (d) +1 V scans (I–IV). Insets at the bottom show the current and surface potential profiles along the section lines.
Figure 4. Current maps and surface potential images after multiple ±1 V scans. Current maps scanned with (a) −1 V and (c) +1 V four times (I–IV) in a region initially written with +6 V (outer)/−6 V (inner). Surface potential images taken right after the (b) −1 V and (d) +1 V scans (I–IV). Insets at the bottom show the current and surface potential profiles along the section lines.
Nanomaterials 08 01031 g004
Nanomaterials 08 01031 g005 550
Figure 5. Memristive properties of individual conduction channels. Typical current–voltage (I-V) characteristics measured under (a) a bipolar voltage scan of 0 → +10 V → 0 → −10 V → 0, and unipolar voltage scans of (b) 0 → −5 V → 0 and (c) 0 → +5 V → 0.
Figure 5. Memristive properties of individual conduction channels. Typical current–voltage (I-V) characteristics measured under (a) a bipolar voltage scan of 0 → +10 V → 0 → −10 V → 0, and unipolar voltage scans of (b) 0 → −5 V → 0 and (c) 0 → +5 V → 0.
Nanomaterials 08 01031 g005

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, Z.; Fan, Z.; Zhou, G. Nanoscale Ring-Shaped Conduction Channels with Memristive Behavior in BiFeO3 Nanodots. Nanomaterials 2018, 8, 1031. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano8121031

AMA Style

Li Z, Fan Z, Zhou G. Nanoscale Ring-Shaped Conduction Channels with Memristive Behavior in BiFeO3 Nanodots. Nanomaterials. 2018; 8(12):1031. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano8121031

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Zhongwen, Zhen Fan, and Guofu Zhou. 2018. "Nanoscale Ring-Shaped Conduction Channels with Memristive Behavior in BiFeO3 Nanodots" Nanomaterials 8, no. 12: 1031. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano8121031

APA Style

Li, Z., Fan, Z., & Zhou, G. (2018). Nanoscale Ring-Shaped Conduction Channels with Memristive Behavior in BiFeO3 Nanodots. Nanomaterials, 8(12), 1031. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano8121031

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop