Next Article in Journal
Synthesis of Pt–Pd Bimetallic Porous Nanostructures as Electrocatalysts for the Methanol Oxidation Reaction
Next Article in Special Issue
Electrochemically-Driven Insertion of Biological Nanodiscs into Solid State Membrane Pores as a Basis for “Pore-In-Pore” Membranes
Previous Article in Journal
Fabrication and Characterization of Aligned Flexible Lead-Free Piezoelectric Nanofibers for Wearable Device Applications
Previous Article in Special Issue
Nanotransition Materials (NTMs): Photocatalysis, Validated High Effective Sorbent Models Study for Organic Dye Degradation and Precise Mathematical Data’s at Standardized Level
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nanomaterials
Volume 8
Issue 4
10.3390/nano8040207
nanomaterials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Few-Layer MoS2 Nanodomains Decorating TiO2 Nanoparticles: A Case Study for the Photodegradation of Carbamazepine

by
Sara Cravanzola
,
Marco Sarro
,
Federico Cesano
*,
Paola Calza
* and
Domenica Scarano
Department of Chemistry, NIS (Nanostructured Interfaces and Surfaces) Inter-Departmental Centre and INSTM Centro di Riferimento, University of Torino, Via P. Giuria, 7, 10125 Torino, Italy
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2018, 8(4), 207; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano8040207
Submission received: 28 February 2018 / Revised: 24 March 2018 / Accepted: 27 March 2018 / Published: 29 March 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Hybrid Nanomaterials for Future Technologies)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
S-doped TiO2 and hybrid MoS2/TiO2 systems have been synthesized, via the sulfidation with H2S of the bare TiO2 and of MoOx supported on TiO2 systems, with the aim of enhancing the photocatalytic properties of TiO2 for the degradation of carbamazepine, an anticonvulsant drug, whose residues and metabolites are usually inefficiently removed in wastewater treatment plants. The focus of this study is to find a relationship between the morphology/structure/surface properties and photoactivity. The full characterization of samples reveals the strong effects of the H2S action on the properties of TiO2, with the formation of defects at the surface, as shown by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and infrared spectroscopy (IR), while also the optical properties are strongly affected by the sulfidation treatment, with changes in the electronic states of TiO2. Meanwhile, the formation of small and thin few-layer MoS2 domains, decorating the TiO2 surface, is evidenced by both high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) and UV-Vis/Raman spectroscopies, while Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectra give insights into the nature of Ti and Mo surface sites. The most interesting findings of our research are the enhanced photoactivity of the MoS2/TiO2 hybrid photocatalyst toward the carbamazepine mineralization. Surprisingly, the formation of hazardous compounds (i.e., acridine derivatives), usually obtained from carbamazepine, is precluded when treated with MoS2/TiO2 systems.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Nowadays, titanium dioxide (TiO2) is a well-known material, whose characteristics, i.e., non-toxicity, excellent chemical stability and low cost [1,2] make its applications in the photocatalysis field highly widespread, also in industries. For these reasons, the interest of scientific research is strongly focused on studying and enhancing the properties of such a material, with the aim to improve its performances.
As a matter of fact, a huge variety of works reported in the scientific literature deals with TiO2-based materials for photocatalytic applications [3]. In particular, the modification of titania and the tunneling of its characteristics are still considered challenging objectives, because TiO2, despite its amazing properties, only absorbs a small part of the solar spectrum in the UV range [4]. Therefore, the engineering of its band gap can help in shifting its absorption to the visible light region, in such a way as to improve the potentialities of its applications. An additional drawback of titania is the fast charge recombination, which involves the electron/hole pairs [5], even though it is not an easy issue to clarify the relationship between the photocatalytic activity of a metal oxide and its morphological and electronic properties [6].
However, in order to overcome these difficulties and enhance TiO2 performances, many methods have been proposed.
Beyond the development of TiO2-based materials with a variety of morphologies [4,7,8,9,10], doping is undoubtedly an effective way to modify the absorption band gap of a semiconductor, tailoring its properties according to the required final performances [3]. Among the suitable dopants, able to introduce the desired band gap, both metals and non-metals (nitrogen [10,11,12], iodine [13,14], fluorine [15,16] and carbon [17,18,19]) have been widely studied [20,21]. In particular, among non-metals [22], sulfur is considered a promising candidate for the tuning the band gap in TiO2 [23,24]. Different from other heteroatomic counterparts, sulfur is for a fact isoelectronic to oxygen and can replace it without altering the electroneutrality of the solid [3]. It has been proven that the treatment of a TiO2 surface under H2S atmosphere can induce a modification of the titania electronic structure, causing a red shift of its absorption edge [25]. Some articles [26,27,28] suggest that MoS2/TiO2 composites are good photocatalysts, thanks to the efficient charge-carrier separation [29]. Along with this line of thinking, H2S, S, CS2, etc., have been used to create hybrid heterojunctions. In fact, the 2D layered MoS2, a well-known transition metal dichalcogenide whose band gap increases, decreasing its layer number, provides effective electron transfer [30].
For this reason, MoS2/TiO2 systems are widely studied in photocatalysis, with applications in different fields, from the production of lithium-ion batteries [31,32,33], to H2 generation [3,34,35], hydrodesulfurization (HDS) [28] and degradation of organic dyes [4,36,37].
As far as the field of photocatalysis is concerned, much attention has been given to the use of TiO2 for the degradation of pharmaceutical residues and their metabolites, as nowadays, the production, synthesis and use of drugs is under continuous development. These pollutants mainly come from pharmaceutical industries and medical excretory products, and their presence in both surface and drinking water is a growing environmental concern. Moreover, they are often inefficiently removed in wastewater treatment plants. For these reasons, the studies concerning water treatments for the degradation of pharmaceuticals, by taking advantage of the photocatalytic properties of TiO2, is very rich [38,39,40].
Carbamazepine (CBZ) is an anticonvulsant drug used for the treatment of epilepsy, bipolar disorder and trigeminal neuralgia [41], and its occurrence in surface waters has frequently been reported [42,43,44,45].
To the best of our knowledge, there is a gap in the literature concerning the use of TiO2 based on hybrid interfaces with MoS2 for CBZ photodegradation applications.
Following this line, in this work, the performances in the photocatalytic degradation of carbamazepine for sulfided TiO2 and MoS2/TiO2, both obtained by a thermal treatment under H2S atmosphere, are compared with the benchmark TiO2 P25. The transformation products formed along with CBZ degradation and the total organic carbon (TOC) are also evaluated and reveal the absence of hazardous compounds (i.e., acridine derivatives) that usually are obtained when carbamazepine is degraded by traditional TiO2 materials.
The different catalysts are characterized by transmission electron microscopy (TEM), Raman, UV-visible and Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopies.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Carbamazepine (CBZ) analytical standard (purity ≥99%), HPLC-grade acetonitrile (purity ≥99.9%), formic acid (purity ≥85%) and phosphoric acid (purity ≥85%) were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (Milan, Italy) and used as received. All solutions and eluents were prepared with ultrapure water Millipore Milli-Q™ (Millipore Co., Bedford, MA, USA) (TOC < 2 ppb, conductivity ≥18 MΩ cm).

2.1.1. Synthesis of MoOx/TiO2 Samples

A water solution of ammonium heptamolybdate (AHM, Merck, Milan, Italy), 0.066 g in 1 mL of water solution, was added drop by drop to 2 g TiO2 (P25, Evonik, Pandino, Italy), by following a wet impregnation method. In order to remove the solvent, the impregnated powder was then dried in air overnight. The final concentration of molybdenum was about 3 wt %. In order to decompose the AHM and to remove ammonia and water, the obtained MoOx samples followed a preliminary air thermal treatment into a muffle furnace at 673 K for 12 h.

2.1.2. Samples Activation and Sulfidation

MoOx/TiO2 (P25) samples, in the form of pellets, were activated under dynamic vacuum at 673 K for 30 min and then oxidized in an oxygen (40 Torr) atmosphere at the same temperature for 30 min, twice. By keeping the temperature at 673 K, the oxidized samples were sulfided in a H2S (30 Torr) atmosphere for 1 h, then outgassed. The samples were successively further sulfided, following the same procedure, in such a way so as to obtain a MoS2/TiO2 sample. Pure TiO2 was also sulfided following the same procedure.

2.2. Methods

Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images were acquired with a JEOL 3010-UHR instrument (JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) operating at 300 kV, equipped with a 2 k × 2 k pixel Gatan US1000 CCD camera.
Raman spectra were recorded by using a Renishaw Raman InVia Reflex spectrophotometer (Renishaw plc, Wotton-Under-Edge, UK) equipped with an Ar+ laser emitting at 442 nm, using both static and rotating configurations.
X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were collected by means of a diffractometer (PANalytical PW3050/60 X’Pert PRO MPD, PANalytical, Almelo, The Netherlands) with a Ni-filtered Cu anode, working with a reflectance Bragg–Brentano geometry, by using the spinner mode.
UV-Vis spectra on samples were collected by using a Varian DRUV Cary 5000 spectrometer (Varian Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA), equipped with a diffuse reflectance sphere. Due to their strong optical absorption, the samples were diluted in BaSO4 powder. FTIR spectra of CO (70 Torr) adsorbed at 77 K on TiO2 and MoS2/TiO2 at decreasing coverages were obtained in an IR cell designed for liquid nitrogen flowing and were recorded by means of a Bruker IFS-28 spectrometer (Bruker Optics, Karlsruhe, Germany), equipped with a mercury cadmium telluride (MCT) cryogenic detector, with a resolution of 4 cm−1 (64 interferograms were averaged for each spectrum). The spectra were acquired in the 4000–400-cm−1 interval, where the fundamental vibration modes are observed. N2 adsorption-desorption experiments have been carried out at 77 K (Micromeritics ASAP 2020 instrument, Micromeritics, Norcross, GA, USA) to determine the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) surface area. The surface area of the samples was determined after outgassing at RT, overnight.

2.2.1. Carbamazepine Photodegradation Tests

Irradiation Procedures

The photocatalytic performance of the catalysts was assessed through the photocatalytic degradation of carbamazepine (CBZ). Experiments have been carried out in air-saturated Pyrex glass cells, filled with 5 mL of CBZ (10 mg/L) and the catalyst (500 mg/L). Irradiations were performed using a Philips TLK/05 lamp (Monza, Italy) of 40 Watts with maximum emission at 360 nm. Samples were subjected to different irradiation times (times ranging from 5 min to 3 h) and then filtered through 0.45-µm Millipore disks to remove catalyst particles.

Analytical Procedures

The degradation of CBZ was monitored by using a Merck-Hitachi liquid chromatographer (Merck-Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a Rheodyne injector L-6200 and L-6200A pumps for high-pressure gradients, an L-4200 UV-Vis detector (the detection wavelength was set at 210 nm) and a column LiChrocart RP-C18 (Merck, 12.5 cm × 0.4 cm). Isocratic elution (1 mL/min flow rate) was carried out with 45% of phosphate buffer 1 × 10−2 M at pH 2.8 and 55% acetonitrile; in these conditions, the retention time for CBZ was 3.56 min.
Transformation products were identified by using high performance liquid chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry (HPLC/HRMS). The chromatographic separations were achieved with a Phenomenex Luna 150 mm × 2.1 mm, 3 µm, using an Ultimate 3000 HPLC instrument (Thermo Scientific, Milan, Italy). The injection volume was set at 20 µL and the flow rate at 0.2 mL/min. A gradient mobile phase composition was adopted: 5/95–95/5 for 45 min in acetonitrile/formic acid 0.05% in water. A LTQ Orbitrap mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific, Bremen, Germany) equipped with an atmospheric pressure interface and an ESI ion source was used. All samples were analyzed in ESI positive mode. The LC column effluent was delivered into the ion source using nitrogen as both the sheath and auxiliary gas. The tuning parameters adopted for the ESI source were: capillary voltage 31.00 V, tube lens 135 V. The source voltage was set to 4.5 kV. The heated capillary temperature was maintained at 270 °C. Analyses were run using full mass (50–1000 m/z) range with a resolution of 30,000 in FTMS mode. Xcalibur (Thermo Scientific, Bremen, Germany) software was used both for acquisition and for elaboration.
Total organic carbon (TOC) was measured on filtered suspensions using a Shimadzu TOC-5000 analyzer (catalytic oxidation on Pt at 680 °C). The calibration was performed using standards of potassium phthalate.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Morphology and Structure of Samples

High-resolution TEM images of TiO2 P25, sulfided TiO2 and MoS2/TiO2 are shown in Figure 1.
From Figure 1a, it can be observed that the native TiO2 particles show a well-defined structure and shape, with extended faces, highly regular terminations, sharp corners and edges (see also [46]). From the comparison of Figure 1b (sulfided TiO2) and Figure 1c, d (MoS2/TiO2) with that of pure TiO2 P25 (Figure 1a), it is clear that the action of H2S at 400 °C gives rise to the formation of a TiO2 defective surface, where the presence of rounded terminations, due to the formation of local defective regions, can be highlighted. In particular, the anatase particle, exposing (101) faces (Figure 1b), shows local erosions at the atomic level (i.e., indented borders, corners and sensitively smoothed edges).
Similar TiO2 morphologies are also observed on the MoS2/TiO2 sample, together with the presence of curved and differently-oriented few-layer-thick MoS2 nanosheets, from 1 to 3 layers in thickness, decorating the TiO2 particles and showing (200) lattice fringes, thus indicating the interaction between the MoS2 nanosheets and the support (inset in Figure 1c,d). A more detailed discussion on the morphology of the few-layer MoS2 nanosheets (i.e., curvature, surface detects, decoration of nanoparticles, etc.), as a result of the interaction of MoS2 with the support, is beyond the scope of this work and can be found elsewhere, but we shall return later to the MoS2/support interaction (see the FTIR section).
In Figure 2, the Raman spectra, recorded with a 442-nm laser line, of sulfided TiO2 (blue line) and MoS2/TiO2 (red line) samples are compared with pure TiO2 P25 (black line), used as a reference material.
Concerning the spectrum of pure TiO2 in the 750–350-cm−1 range (Figure 2, black curve), the bands at 144 cm−1, 396 cm−1, 514 cm−1 and 636 cm−1 are assigned, respectively, to the typical Eg, B1g, A1g and Eg Raman active modes, respectively, of the anatase phase, as well described in literature, while the shoulder at 608 cm−1 and the very small peak at 444 cm−1 (highlighted by asterisks) are ascribed to the A1g and Eg modes of the rutile phase [8,25,27].
These typical TiO2 fingerprints are also clearly present in the sulfided sample (blue line), while further new modes are not observed after the sulfidation step.
On the other hand, on the MoS2/TiO2 sample (red line), besides the Raman modes of TiO2 previously described, it can be observed that the feature centered at 396 cm−1, assigned to TiO2 anatase phase, is split into two components at 405 cm−1 and at 384 cm−1, which can be ascribed to the A1g and E12g first-order Raman active modes of MoS2. As well reported in the literature, the difference of the frequency values between A1g and E12g modes is indicative of the thickness of the MoS2 particles. In particular, a stacking number of 2 ± 1 layers, calculated from Δ = 21 ± 1 cm−1 [26], confirms the results obtained by TEM images. Furthermore, the presence of very thin MoS2 nanosheets (mainly mono-, bi- and few-stacked layers) has been confirmed by XRD analyses (Figure S1, Supplementary Materials). Going into detail, the XRD pattern of MoS2/TiO2 (red pattern) shows also two minor diffraction peaks (marked with asterisks in the inset) at 2θ = 31.2° and 2θ = 59.0° assigned to the (100) and (110) diffraction planes of the hexagonal MoS2. The presence of these two features together with the absence in the low angles region (2θ ≈ 14°) of the diffraction planes along the c-axis (i.e., 002) that are associated with the stacking of the MoS2 layers means that very thin MoS2 slabs, too thin to be detected by XRD, are formed.

3.2. Optical and Surface Properties of Samples

The optical properties of the samples were investigated by comparing the UV-Vis spectra of MoS2/TiO2, sulfided TiO2 and pure TiO2, as shown in Figure 3 (red, blue and black curves, respectively). From the comparison of the spectra of TiO2 before and after the sulfidation treatment (black and blue curves, respectively), a clear band gap shift of the sulfided TiO2 sample, well shown by a Tauc plot in [25], together with an additional broad absorption in the 390–600-nm range are detectable. As well described in the literature [47] and in our previous work [25], these phenomena can be ascribed to a change in TiO2 electronic structure. In fact, the mixing of 3p atomic orbitals of S species, due to a S → O exchange at the surface of TiO2 during the sulfidation step, as well discussed in the following paragraphs, leads to the formation, above the valence band, of new electronic states [3,25,47].
Besides, when the MoS2/TiO2 spectrum is considered, the presence of MoS2 gives rise to some new features in the visible-light region, specifically in the 400–450 nm and 500–690 nm ranges.
Going into detail, the modes at about 680 nm and at 600 nm have been ascribed to the typical MoS2 A and B excitonic transitions, respectively, whose separation in energy can be related to the spin-orbit splitting at the top of the valence band at the K point of the Brillouin zone [30]. Furthermore, the wide band in the 400–450 interval, can be explained as an envelope due to other excitonic transitions of MoS2, named as C and D, in this case strongly affected by the absorption edge of TiO2 [30].
FTIR spectra of 70 Torr CO adsorbed at 77 K on TiO2, sulfided TiO2 and MoS2/TiO2 are compared in Figure 4 (black, blue and red curves, respectively), aiming to investigate the effects of the sulfidation step and of the presence of MoS2 on the surface properties of TiO2.
For a clear understanding of the IR features of the synthesized sample, a brief analysis of the pure TiO2 spectrum (black curve) has to be done. First of all, the main features are due to the typical adsorptions of CO on the different Ti sites of the TiO2 surface. Specifically, the intense main peak centered at 2178 cm−1 can be explained with the building up of parallel CO oscillators interacting with five-fold coordinated Ti5c4+ sites located on flat (101) surfaces [48], while the one at 2155 cm−1 is explained with hydrogen interactions of CO with residual OH groups, even present after the thermal treatment [25,27,48]. It is noteworthy that, even if not reported in Figure 4, for the sake of simplicity, the previously discussed 2178-cm−1 band shifts to higher frequencies, when CO pressure is decreased, due to the changes of the lateral interactions between adjacent CO molecules on the surface of TiO2. This phenomenon is indicative of a highly extended and regular face [25].
Moving to the sharp band at 2140 cm−1, it is assigned to CO in a “liquid-like” state, caused by liquid nitrogen temperature and physically adsorbed as a multilayer surface [25,27], while the one at 2146 cm−1 is due to CO adsorbed on facelets of the rutile phase.
The feature at 2166 cm−1 is due to CO interacting with Ti Lewis centers on flat (001) faces, where Ti centers along Ti-O rows are strongly bonded to two O anions [49], causing at these sites a more screened electronic potential and therefore a reduced acidity.
Finally, the weak band at 2208 cm−1 is assigned to CO adsorbed on Ti Lewis acidic defective sites, such as steps, corners and edges, with higher coordinative unsaturations [48].
Along with TiO2 after H2S dosage (blue curve), it is worth noticing that all the observed features are indicative of a more disordered system. In particular, the wider full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the 2179 cm−1 band (as well shown in the inset of Figure 4) can be explained with the presence of S species that interrupt the regularity of the TiO2 (101) extended faces. H2S dosage also affects the 2166 cm−1 band, previously described, showing now an increased intensity due to a higher acidity, which has been explained with the O → S exchange reaction during the sulfidation treatment [25]. Moreover, the band at 2208 cm−1 is now higher in intensity, plausibly due to the presence of defective sites, such as large S atoms that, replacing the smaller O anions, favor the formation of corners, steps and edges [25].
In point of fact, a dissociative adsorption of H2S molecules takes place on the TiO2 surfaces via two main competitive routes, to produce H2O and oxygen vacancies or H2. According to some authors, in the first case, S may move into the O vacancy, giving rise to the S-doped TiO2 surface, whereas in the latter case, S-adatoms are formed [50,51].
Moreover, high-resolution X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) spectra showed the presence of Si–Ti–O bonds, although the exact form of the S-doped structure (i.e., S-substitution or S-adatom) until now is not well understood. Conversely, on the basis of density functional theory (DFT) calculations [50,51] and even confirmed by IR data [52], it results that H2S adsorbed on TiO2 can be converted into S and H2O at a temperature above 473 K. Since in our case the samples are sulfided at 673 K, we can state that the O → S exchange is occurring, giving rise to S-substituted O2c vacancies. Hence, it is expected that under the adopted synthesis parameters (i.e., 673 K, under vacuum), the MoS2 slabs lose sulfur, giving rise to vacancies formed at the most exposed sites, where sulfur anions show the lowest coordination, even if sulfur vacancies also on a flat surface are not excluded (vide infra).
Moving to the interaction of CO with the MoS2/TiO2 surface (red curve), the general decrease in intensity can be associated with the presence of new Mox+ species, masking the Ti4+ sites, which are no longer available for interactions with CO. The formation of new bands in the 2130–2000-cm−1 interval can confirm the presence of the aforementioned Mox+ species (x < 4) [27]. Notice that both the 2109-cm−1 and the 2066-cm−1 bands are assigned to CO interacting with defective sites on edges and corners of MoS2 slabs. In particular, the band at 2109 cm−1 has been assigned to Mox+ located on edges, including Mo oxysulfide species (MoOxSy phase), while the one at 2066 cm−1 is due to reduced Mox+ species associated with surface sulfur vacancies on very exposed sites [26].
It is worth noticing that the band at 2208 cm−1, due to the presence of defective sites, although still present, is now considerably decreasing its intensity, thus restoring a situation similar to the pure TiO2. It can be hypothesized that the sulfur sites responsible for the increased disorder, and then for the increased intensity of the 2208 cm−1 band in the sulfided TiO2 sample, are now involved in the formation of MoS2 domains with Mo cations. Therefore, the sulfur sites are now masked by Mox+ species, making them no more available for the interaction with CO. In the same way, the 2166-cm−1 band, already assigned to CO interacting with TiO2 (100) faces, is also decreasing in intensity, if compared to the same feature on sulfided TiO2, thus being now more similar to the TiO2 one. As explained before, this could be due to the involvement of S anions in the formation of MoS2 domains, thus restoring the initial acidic TiO2 conditions.
Coming back to the exact form of the S-doped structure (i.e., S-substitution or S-adatom), the role played by the support can be highlighted. As a matter of fact, from previous FTIR investigations of CO molecules interacting with different supports: MoS2/SiO2, γ-Al2O3 and MgO, it turns out that the sulfidation process has an influence on the support matrix. In fact, MgO incorporates sulfur in the structure; γ-Al2O3 shows a surface reactivity; while SiO2 does not show reactivity at all [26]. Some more incorporation of S2− ions on the surface of the support, in turn, influences the MoS2/support interaction, which means that the interaction between MoS2 and the support, “acting as a chemical ligand”, increases by moving from SiO2, to γ-Al2O3, to MgO [26].
As for the MoS2/TiO2 interaction, we can find only a surface reactivity, because no formation of metal sulfide has been observed (as shown for MgO with the formation of crystalline MgS).
This remark is also in agreement with the moderate curvature observed for the few-layer MoS2 nanosheets, following the profile of the support particles (insert in Figure 1c,d). A more detailed discussion of this topic is beyond the scope of this work and can be found elsewhere [26].

3.3. Photocatalytic Activity

The photocatalytic performance of the synthetized materials was tested on the abatement of carbamazepine (CBZ). Preliminarily, adsorption in the dark and direct photolysis for CBZ were investigated, and they were negligible in the considered time window (3 h) (Figure 5).
The disappearance profiles for CBZ over time are shown in top panel of Figure 5 and followed the order: MoS2/TiO2 > TiO2 P25 > sulfided TiO2. These results evidenced that starting from TiO2 P25, the photoactivity decreased during the treatment with H2S (the pseudo-first order kinetic constants decreased from 0.382 min−1 to 0.096 min−1), while the addition of MoS2 led to an enhancement of the photocatalytic activity (0.470 min−1).
The same trend was also maintained when analyzing the TOC disappearance profiles (Figure 5, bottom). In the presence of MoS2/TiO2, the complete mineralization was achieved within 3 h of irradiation; at that time, 20% and 5% of TOC are still present with the sulfided TiO2 and TiO2 P25 samples, respectively.

Carbamazepine Transformation Products’ Investigation

The transformation products (TPs) formed along with CBZ degradation are collected in Table 1, and their structures are shown in Figure 6.
Some peculiar differences arose for the three catalysts. Even if hydroxylation (and further oxidation of hydroxyl group(s)) seemed to be the favorite transformation pathway and all materials led to the formation of several (poly)hydroxylated and (poly)hydroxylated/oxidized derivatives (253.0977, 251.0891, 269.0935, 267.0786 and 271.1081 m/z), the largest number of hydroxylated products is formed with TiO2 P25. These transformation products were already detected and characterized during photocatalytic treatment of CBZ [53] and in river waters [42]. Analyzing sulfided TiO2, the TPs are formed to a lesser extent and with minor isobaric species compared to MoS2/TiO2 and TiO2 P25.
Two TPs were formed in the presence of TiO2 P25 only at 224.0710 and 223.1039 m/z, while their formation was precluded with MoS2/TiO2 and sulfided TiO2 samples. The one at 224 is a hydroxylated acridine-9-carboxaldehyde [54] whose formation involved the 7C ring CBZ contraction with the formation of a 6C ring.
It is well known that TiO2 P25, thanks to its excellent performance, is widely used as a reference material in photocatalysis. It is noteworthy that the decreased CBZ photodegradation ability of the sulfided TiO2 could be affected in part by the interruption of the regularity and order of the strongly active TiO2 faces, as previously demonstrated by FTIR investigation. The increment of disorder caused by the formation of defects, such as edges and corners, after the treatment with H2S, does not play a positive role in improving the photocatalytic properties of TiO2, rather causing a worsening of the performances of the material. Conversely, the improvement of the photodegradation properties has been observed for the MoS2/TiO2 sample. Among the reasons for such higher photoactivity, the masking effect of the defective S sites by Mox+ species can be assumed firstly. Secondly, the intimate phase junction between MoS2 and TiO2 nanoparticles goes here beyond the simple physical contact (i.e., reduction of the electron-hole recombination, electrons/holes mobility across heterojunctions) [3]. The role played by the second semiconductor, composed of very small and thin MoS2 slabs dispersed on the surface of TiO2 nanoparticles, could be here viewed as that of a photosensitizer (i.e., charge injection of excited MoS2 and improved efficiency of electron transfer from the sensitized MoS2 to TiO2 nanoparticles) [55,56]. Lastly, it can be hypothesized that the proven presence of Mox+ (x < 4) centers, on the slabs with their semiconductor nature, play a key role in the enhancement of the results, notwithstanding the specific surface area (Table 2). In this regard, the decreased surface area of sulfided TiO2 and MoS2/TiO2, compared to TiO2 P25, can find an explanation in the moderate sintering effect caused by the annealing conditions obtained during the treatments with H2S at high temperature. Even so, the variations of the surface area do not seem to follow and affect the trend obtained for the abatement of CBZ.
It is worth noticing that these systems have been also tested for the photodegradation of methylene blue (MB) in water solution, under a solar light simulating irradiation. The results (see Supplementary Materials, Figure S2) show the same trend obtained for the abatement of CBZ, making the MoS2/TiO2 sample a versatile material for applications in the field of photodegradation of organic pollutants in water.

4. Conclusions

In this work, S-doped TiO2 and MoS2/TiO2 hybrid systems have been synthesized and fully characterized, with the aim to enhance the well-known photocatalytic properties of P25 TiO2 and tested for the photodegradation of carbamazepine. The investigations performed by HRTEM clearly showed the morphology of TiO2 particles, on which the action of H2S gave rise to surface defects. However, the formation of MoS2 slabs, 1–3 layers in thickness, decorating the planes of TiO2, has been highlighted. FTIR results gave a further demonstration of the severe action of H2S, with changes in the relative intensity of all the peaks of the S-TiO2 sample, if compared to pure TiO2, and the formation of new features assigned to the formation of defective sites. However, the disorder degree seems to decrease for the hybrid MoS2/TiO2 sample, thus hypothesizing that the sulfur defective sites have a role in the formation of MoS2 with Mo cations.
Finally, the strong effects of H2S treatment have been also attested by UV-Vis spectra, which show how the sulfiding agent can affect the TiO2 electronic structure, with a shift of its band gap and, then, the appearance of the typical MoS2 excitonic modes.
As for the photocatalytic properties of the samples for the degradation of CBZ, the photoactivity decreased for the sulfided TiO2, while an enhancement has been shown by MoS2/TiO2, when compared to the benchmark TiO2. The same trend was observed when analyzing the TOC disappearance profiles.
Results highlighted that, even if all materials lead to the formation of transformation products, the largest number of hydroxylated products is formed with pure TiO2. As opposed to pure TiO2, only hybrid MoS2/TiO2 and sulfided TiO2 precluded the formation of acridine derivatives, representing an important improvement for the treatment of CBZ.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2079-4991/8/4/207/s1, Figure S1: XRD patterns of samples; Figure S2: Evolution of UV-Vis spectra of MB in water exposed under visible light.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by MIUR (Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca), INSTM Consorzio and NIS (Nanostructured Interfaces and Surfaces) interdepartmental centre of University of Torino. The authors thank the vibrational Raman spectroscopy laboratory of Chemistry Department and in particular Dr. Alessandro Damin, for the precious support in Raman experiments.

Author Contributions

S.C., M.S. and F.C. conceived of, designed and performed the experiments and characterizations, as well as analyzed the data. S.C., F.C., P.C. and D.S. wrote the paper. All authors read and approved the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Li, J.; Yu, M. Hierarchical photocatalysis. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2016, 45, 2603–2636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Sajan, C.P.; Wageh, S.; Al-Ghamdi, A.A.; Yu, J.; Cao, S. TiO2 nanosheets with exposed (001) facets for photocatalytic applications. Nano Res. 2016, 9, 3–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Puga, A. Photocatalytic production of hydrogen from biomass-derived feedstocks. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2016, 315, 1–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Cravanzola, S.; Muscuso, L.; Cesano, F.; Agostini, G.; Damin, A.; Scarano, D.; Zecchina, A. MoS2 nanoparticles decorating titanate-nanotube surfaces: Combined microscopy, spectroscopy, and catalytic studies. Langmuir 2015, 31, 5469–5478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Sachs, M.; Pastor, E.; Kafizas, A.; Durrant, J.R. Evaluation of surface state mediated charge recombination in anatase and rutile tio2. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2016, 7, 3742–3746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Patrocinio, A.O.T.; Schneider, J.; França, M.D.; Santos, L.M.; Caixeta, B.P.; Machado, A.E.H.; Bahnemann, D.W. Charge carrier dynamics and photocatalytic behavior of TiO2 nanopowders submitted to hydrothermal or conventional heat treatment. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 70536–70545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Cesano, F.; Agostini, G.; Scarano, D. Nanocrystalline TiO2 micropillar arrays grafted on conductive glass supports: Microscopic and spectroscopic studies. Thin Solid Film 2015, 590, 200–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Cesano, F.; Bertarione, S.; Damin, A.; Agostini, G.; Usseglio, S.; Vitillo, J.G.; Lamberti, C.; Spoto, G.; Scarano, D.; Zecchina, A. Oriented TiO2 nanostructured pillar arrays: Synthesis and characterization. Adv. Mater. 2008, 20, 3342–3348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Cesano, F.; Pellerej, D.; Scarano, D.; Ricchiardi, G.; Zecchina, A. Radially organized pillars of TiO2 nanoparticles: Synthesis, characterization and photocatalytic tests. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A 2012, 242, 51–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wu, X.; Fang, S.; Zheng, Y.; Sun, J.; Lv, K. Thiourea-modified TiO2 nanorods with enhanced photocatalytic activity. Molecules 2016, 21, 181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Ansari, S.A.; Khan, M.M.; Ansaric, M.O.; Cho, M.H. Nitrogen-doped titanium dioxide (n-doped TiO2) for visible light photocatalysis. New J. Chem. 2016, 40, 3000–3009. [Google Scholar]
  12. Asahi, R.; Morikawa, T.; Ohwaki, T.; Aoki, K.; Taga, Y. Visible-light photocatalysis in nitrogen-doped titanium oxides. Science 2001, 293, 269–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Barkul, R.P.; Patil, M.K.; Patil, S.M.; Shevale, V.B.; Delekar, S.D. Sunlight-assisted photocatalytic degradation of textile effluent and rhodamine b by using iodine doped TiO2 nanoparticles. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A 2017, 349, 138–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Hong, X.; Wang, Z.; Cai, W.; Lu, F.; Zhang, J.; Yang, Y.; Ma, N.; Liu, Y. Visible-light-activated nanoparticle photocatalyst of iodine-doped titanium dioxide. Chem. Mater. 2005, 17, 1548–1552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Dozzi, M.V.; D’Andrea, C.; Ohtani, B.; Valentini, G.; Selli, E. Fluorine-doped TiO2 materials: Photocatalytic activity vs time-resolved photoluminescence. J. Phys. Chem. C 2013, 117, 25586–25595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Li, C.; Sun, Z.; Ma, R.; Xue, Y.; Zheng, S. Fluorine doped anatase tio2 with exposed reactive (001) facets supported on porous diatomite for enhanced visible-light photocatalytic activity. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2017, 243, 281–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Cravanzola, S.; Jain, S.M.; Cesano, F.; Damin, A.; Scarano, D. Development of a multifunctional TiO2/MWCNT hybrid composite grafted on a stainless steel grating. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 103255–103264. [Google Scholar]
  18. Rasoulnezhad, H.; Kavei, G.; Ahmadi, K.; Rahimipour, M.R. Combined sonochemical/CVD method for preparation of nanostructured carbon-doped TiO2 thin film. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 408, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Shao, J.; Sheng, W.; Wang, M.; Li, S.; Chen, J.; Zhang, Y.; Cao, S. In situ synthesis of carbon-doped TiO2 single-crystal nanorods with a remarkably photocatalytic efficiency. Appl. Catal. B 2017, 209, 311–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Roose, B.; Pathak, S.; Steiner, U. Doping of TiO2 for sensitized solar cells. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 8326–8349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Zaleska, A. Doped-TiO2: A review. Recent Pat. Eng. 2008, 2, 157–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Uddin, M.J.; Daramola, D.E.; Velasquez, E.; Dickens, T.J.; Yan, J.; Hammel, E.; Okoli, O.I. A high efficiency 3D photovoltaic microwire with carbon nanotubes (CNT)-quantum dot (QD) hybrid interface. PSS-RRL 2014, 8, 898–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Liu, G.; Sun, C.; Smith, S.C.; Wang, L.; Lu, G.Q.; Cheng, H.-M. Sulfur doped anatase TiO2 single crystals with a high percentage of {0 0 1} facets. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2010, 349, 477–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. McManamon, C.; O’Connell, J.; Delaney, P.; Rasappa, S.; Holmes, J.D.; Morris, M.A. A facile route to synthesis of s-doped TiO2 nanoparticles for photocatalytic activity. J. Mol. Catal. A 2015, 406, 51–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Cravanzola, S.; Cesano, F.; Gaziano, F.; Scarano, D. Sulfur-doped TiO2: Structure and surface properties. Catalysts 2017, 7, 214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Cesano, F.; Bertarione, S.; Piovano, A.; Agostini, G.; Rahman, M.M.; Groppo, E.; Bonino, F.; Scarano, D.; Lamberti, C.; Bordiga, S.; et al. Model oxide supported MoS2 HDS catalysts: Structure and surface properties. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2011, 1, 123–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Cravanzola, S.; Cesano, F.; Gaziano, F.; Scarano, D. Carbon domains on MoS2/TiO2 system via catalytic acetylene oligomerization: Synthesis, structure, and surface properties. Front. Chem. 2017, 5, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Tapoda, H.; Thampi, R.; Gratzel, M. Reduction of carbon oxides using supported molibdenum sulphide catalysts. In Recent Developments in Catalysis: Theory and Practice; Viswanathan, B., Pillai, C.N., Eds.; Narosa Publishing House: New Delhi, India, 1991; Volume 22, pp. 244–251. [Google Scholar]
  29. Sabarinathan, M.; Harish, S.; Archana, J.; Navaneethan, M.; Ikeda, H.; Hayakawa, Y. Highly efficient visible-light photocatalytic activity of MoS2–TiO2 mixtures hybrid photocatalyst and functional properties. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 24754–24763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Muscuso, L.; Cravanzola, S.; Cesano, F.; Scarano, D.; Zecchina, A. Optical, vibrational, and structural properties of MoS2 nanoparticles obtained by exfoliation and fragmentation via ultrasound cavitation in isopropyl alcohol. J. Phys. Chem. C 2015, 119, 3791–3801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Chen, B.; Zhao, N.; Wei, C.; Zhou, J.; He, F.; Shi, C.; He, C.; Liu, E. Multi-functional integration of pore P25@C@MoS2 core-double shell nanostructures as robust ternary anodes with enhanced lithium storage properties. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 401, 232–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Xu, W.; Wang, T.; Yu, Y.; Wang, S. Synthesis of core-shell TiO2@MoS2 composites for lithium-ion battery anodes. J. Alloys Compd. 2016, 689, 460–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zhu, X.; Yang, C.; Xiao, F.; Wang, J.; Su, X. Synthesis of nano-TiO2-decorated MoS2 nanosheets for lithium ion batteries. New J. Chem. 2015, 39, 683–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zhou, W.; Yin, Z.; Du, Y.; Huang, X.; Zeng, Z.; Fan, Z.; Liu, H.; Wang, J.; Zhang, H. Synthesis of few-layer MoS2 nanosheet-coated TiO2 nanobelt heterostructures for enhanced photocatalytic activities. Small 2013, 9, 140–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Zhu, Y.; Ling, Q.; Liu, Y.; Wang, H.; Zhu, Y. Photocatalytic h2 evolution on MoS2–TiO2 catalysts synthesized via mechanochemistry. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2015, 17, 933–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Hu, K.H.; Hu, X.G.; Xu, Y.F.; Sun, J.D. Synthesis of nano-MoS2/TiO2 composite and its catalytic degradation effect on methyl orange. J. Mater. Sci. 2010, 45, 2640–2648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhang, J.; Huang, L.; Lu, Z.; Jin, Z.; Wang, X.; Xu, G.; Zhang, E.; Wang, H.; Kong, Z.; Xi, J.; et al. Crystal face regulating MoS2/TiO2 (001) heterostructure for high photocatalytic activity. J. Alloys Compd. 2016, 688, 840–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Gavrilescu, M.; Demnerová, K.; Aamand, J.; Agathos, S.; Fava, F. Emerging pollutants in the environment: Present and future challenges in biomonitoring, ecological risks and bioremediation. New Biotechnol. 2015, 32, 147–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Luo, Y.; Guo, W.; Ngo, H.H.; Nghiem, L.D.; Hai, F.I.; Zhang, J.; Liang, S.; Wang, X.C. A review on the occurrence of micropollutants in the aquatic environment and their fate and removal during wastewater treatment. Sci. Total Environ. 2014, 473–474, 619–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Pal, A.; Gin, K.Y.-H.; Lin, A.Y.-C.; Reinhard, M. Impacts of emerging organic contaminants on freshwater resources: Review of recent occurrences, sources, fate and effects. Sci. Total Environ. 2010, 408, 6062–6069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Achilleos, A.; Hapeshi, E.; Xekoukoulotakis, N.P.; Mantzavinos, D.; Fatta-Kassinos, D. Uv-a and solar photodegradation of ibuprofen and carbamazepine catalyzed by Tio2. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2010, 45, 1564–1570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Calza, P.; Medana, C.; Padovano, E.; Giancotti, V.; Minero, C. Fate of selected pharmaceuticals in river waters. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2013, 20, 2262–2270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Mohapatra, D.P.; Brar, S.K.; Daghrir, R.; Tyagi, R.D.; Picard, P.; Surampalli, R.Y.; Drogui, P. Photocatalytic degradation of carbamazepine in wastewater by using a new class of whey-stabilized nanocrystalline TiO2 and ZnO. Sci. Total Environ. 2014, 485–486, 263–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Pereira, A.M.P.T.; Silva, L.J.G.; Laranjeiro, C.S.M.; Meisel, L.M.; Lino, C.M.; Pena, A. Human pharmaceuticals in portuguese rivers: The impact of water scarcity in the environmental risk. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 609, 1182–1191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Rivera-Jaimes, J.A.; Postigo, C.; Melgoza-Alemán, R.M.; Jaume Aceña, J.; Barceló, D.; López de Alda, M. Study of pharmaceuticals in surface and wastewater from cuernavaca, morelos, Mexico: Occurrence and environmental risk assessment. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 613–614, 1263–1274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Deiana, C.; Minella, M.; Tabacchi, G.; Maurino, V.; Fois, E.; Martra, G. Shape-controlled tio2 nanoparticles and TiO2 P25 interacting with co and H2O2 molecular probes: A synergic approach for surface structure recognition and physico-chemical understanding. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2013, 15, 307–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Li, N.; Zhang, X.; Zhou, W.; Liu, Z.; Xie, G.; Wang, Y.; Du, Y. High quality sulfur-doped titanium dioxide nanocatalysts with visible light photocatalytic activity from non-hydrolytic thermolysis synthesis. Inorg. Chem. Front. 2014, 1, 521–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Deiana, C.; Fois, E.; Martra, G.; Narbey, S.; Pellegrino, F.; Tabacchi, G. On the simple complexity of carbon monoxide on oxide surfaces: Facet-specific donation and backdonation effects revealed on TiO2 anatase nanoparticles. ChemPhysChem 2016, 17, 1956–1960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Liao, L.F.; Lien, C.F.; Shieh, D.L.; Chen, M.T.; Lin, J.L. Ftir study of adsorption and photoassisted oxygen isotopic exchange of carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, carbonate, and formate on TiO2. J. Phys. Chem. B 2002, 106, 11240–11245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Huang, W.-F.; Chen, H.-T.; Lin, M.C. Density functional theory study of the adsorption and reaction of H2S on TiO2 rutile (110) and anatase (101) surface. J. Phys. Chem. C 2009, 113, 20411–20420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Junkaew, A.; Maitarad, P.; Arróyave, R.; Kungwan, N.; Zhang, D.; Shi, L.; Namuangruk, S. The complete reaction mechanism of H2S desulfurization on an anatase TiO2 (001) surface: A density functional theory investigation. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2017, 7, 356–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Yanxin, C.; Yi, J.; Wenzhao, L.; Rongchao, J.; Shaozhen, T.; Wenbin, H. Adsorption and interaction of H2S/SO2 on TiO2. Catal. Today 1999, 50, 39–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Calza, P.; Medana, C.; Padovano, E.; Giancotti, V.; Baiocchi, C. Identification of the unknown transformation products derivedfrom Clarithromycin and carbamazepine using liquidchromatography/high-resolution mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2012, 26, 1687–1704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Vogna, D.; Marotta, R.; Andreozzi, R.; Napolitano, A.; d’Ischia, M. Kinetic and chemical assessment of the UV/H2O2 treatment of antiepileptic drug carbamazepine. Chemosphere 2004, 54, 497–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Leung, D.Y.; Fu, X.; Wang, C.; Ni, M.; Leung, M.K.; Wang, X.; Fu, X. Hydrogen production over titania-based photocatalysts. ChemSusChem 2010, 3, 681–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Ho, W.; Yu, J.C.; Lin, J.; Yu, J.; Li, P. Preparation and photocatalytic behavior of MoS2 and WS2 nanocluster sensitized TiO2. Langmuir 2004, 20, 5865–5869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Nanomaterials 08 00207 g001 550
Figure 1. HRTEM images of (a) TiO2 P25, (b) sulfided-TiO2 and (c, d) MoS2/TiO2 (Mo 3 wt %). The arrows in (c) indicate local erosions on TiO2 particles.
Figure 1. HRTEM images of (a) TiO2 P25, (b) sulfided-TiO2 and (c, d) MoS2/TiO2 (Mo 3 wt %). The arrows in (c) indicate local erosions on TiO2 particles.
Nanomaterials 08 00207 g001
Nanomaterials 08 00207 g002 550
Figure 2. Raman spectra, acquired with a 442-nm laser line, of: TiO2 used as a reference material (black line), sulfided TiO2 (blue line) and MoS2/TiO2 (red line) samples. Raman fingerprints of rutile are marked by asterisks.
Figure 2. Raman spectra, acquired with a 442-nm laser line, of: TiO2 used as a reference material (black line), sulfided TiO2 (blue line) and MoS2/TiO2 (red line) samples. Raman fingerprints of rutile are marked by asterisks.
Nanomaterials 08 00207 g002
Nanomaterials 08 00207 g003 550
Figure 3. UV-Vis spectra of MoS2/TiO2 (red curve), sulfided-TiO2 (blue curve) and pure TiO2 used as a reference (black curve).
Figure 3. UV-Vis spectra of MoS2/TiO2 (red curve), sulfided-TiO2 (blue curve) and pure TiO2 used as a reference (black curve).
Nanomaterials 08 00207 g003
Nanomaterials 08 00207 g004 550
Figure 4. IR spectra at the maximum coverage of CO, adsorbed at the surface at 77 K of MoS2/TiO2 (red curve), TiO2 P25 (black curve) and sulfided-TiO2 (blue curve). In the insert, an exploded view of the main feature centered at 2178 cm−1.
Figure 4. IR spectra at the maximum coverage of CO, adsorbed at the surface at 77 K of MoS2/TiO2 (red curve), TiO2 P25 (black curve) and sulfided-TiO2 (blue curve). In the insert, an exploded view of the main feature centered at 2178 cm−1.
Nanomaterials 08 00207 g004
Nanomaterials 08 00207 g005 550
Figure 5. Carbamazepine (CBZ) degradation profiles (expressed as the ration between CBZ concentration after irradiation and CBZ at Time 0) (top) and TOC curves abatement (bottom, expressed as the ration between TOC after irradiation and TOC at Time 0).
Figure 5. Carbamazepine (CBZ) degradation profiles (expressed as the ration between CBZ concentration after irradiation and CBZ at Time 0) (top) and TOC curves abatement (bottom, expressed as the ration between TOC after irradiation and TOC at Time 0).
Nanomaterials 08 00207 g005
Nanomaterials 08 00207 g006 550
Figure 6. TPs identified during the degradation of CBZ. In black, TPs formed with all materials; in red, TPs characteristic of the TiO2 P25 degradation pathway; in blue, detected only with MoS2/TiO2 and/or sulfided TiO2 samples.
Figure 6. TPs identified during the degradation of CBZ. In black, TPs formed with all materials; in red, TPs characteristic of the TiO2 P25 degradation pathway; in blue, detected only with MoS2/TiO2 and/or sulfided TiO2 samples.
Nanomaterials 08 00207 g006
Table
Table 1. CBZ and transformation products (TPs) identified during the photocatalytic experiments with the three materials (area detected after 15 min of irradiation).
Table 1. CBZ and transformation products (TPs) identified during the photocatalytic experiments with the three materials (area detected after 15 min of irradiation).
[M + H]+Name tR (min)TiO2 P25 (Area)Sulfided-TiO2 (Area)MoS2/TiO2 (Area)
237.1025CBZ21.331.07 × 1091.17 × 1098.71 × 108
253.0977253-A14.778.39 × 106n.d.n.d.
253.0977253-B17.305.37 × 1072.89 × 1075.51 × 107
253.0977253-C18.345.41 × 1073.01 × 1075.22 × 107
253.0977253-D19.086.98 × 1062.19 × 1063.60 × 106
251.089125116.956.26 × 1073.16 × 1078.90 × 107
269.0935269-A15.57n.d.n.d.3.51 × 106
269.0935269-B16.795.15 × 106n.d.5.02 × 106
267.0786267-A15.251.28 × 1066.26 × 1052.29 × 106
267.0786267-B16.491.36 × 1061.98 × 1063.37 × 106
267.0786267-C18.516.24 × 105n.d.n.d.
271.108127114.776.62 × 106n.d.n.d.
224.071022422.408.19 × 106n.d.n.d.
Table
Table 2. Surface area properties.
Table 2. Surface area properties.
SampleSBET (m2/g)
TiO255
sulfided TiO238
MoS2/TiO237

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cravanzola, S.; Sarro, M.; Cesano, F.; Calza, P.; Scarano, D. Few-Layer MoS2 Nanodomains Decorating TiO2 Nanoparticles: A Case Study for the Photodegradation of Carbamazepine. Nanomaterials 2018, 8, 207. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano8040207

AMA Style

Cravanzola S, Sarro M, Cesano F, Calza P, Scarano D. Few-Layer MoS2 Nanodomains Decorating TiO2 Nanoparticles: A Case Study for the Photodegradation of Carbamazepine. Nanomaterials. 2018; 8(4):207. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano8040207

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cravanzola, Sara, Marco Sarro, Federico Cesano, Paola Calza, and Domenica Scarano. 2018. "Few-Layer MoS2 Nanodomains Decorating TiO2 Nanoparticles: A Case Study for the Photodegradation of Carbamazepine" Nanomaterials 8, no. 4: 207. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano8040207

APA Style

Cravanzola, S., Sarro, M., Cesano, F., Calza, P., & Scarano, D. (2018). Few-Layer MoS2 Nanodomains Decorating TiO2 Nanoparticles: A Case Study for the Photodegradation of Carbamazepine. Nanomaterials, 8(4), 207. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano8040207

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop