Next Article in Journal
Lanthanide-Doped Ceria Nanoparticles as Backside Coaters to Improve Silicon Solar Cell Efficiency
Next Article in Special Issue
Functionalization Effect on Polymer Nanocomposite Coatings Based on TiO2–SiO2 Nanoparticles with Superhydrophilic Properties
Previous Article in Journal
Properties of Ferrite Garnet (Bi, Lu, Y)3(Fe, Ga)5O12 Thin Film Materials Prepared by RF Magnetron Sputtering
Previous Article in Special Issue
Periodontal Tissues, Maxillary Jaw Bone, and Tooth Regeneration Approaches: From Animal Models Analyses to Clinical Applications
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Impact of Hybrid Compositional Film/Structure on Organic–Inorganic Perovskite Solar Cells

1
Department of Physics, Chongqing University, No. 55, University City South Rd., Chongqing 401331, China
2
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Full Spectral Solar Electricity Generation (FSSEG), Southern University of Science and Technology, No. 1088, Xueyuan Rd., Shenzhen 518055, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2018, 8(6), 356; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano8060356
Submission received: 25 April 2018 / Revised: 17 May 2018 / Accepted: 18 May 2018 / Published: 23 May 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Preparation and Application of Hybrid Nanomaterials)

Abstract

:
Perovskite solar cells (PSCs) have been intensively investigated over the last several years. Unprecedented progress has been made in improving their power conversion efficiency; however, the stability of perovskite materials and devices remains a major obstacle for the future commercialization of PSCs. In this review, recent progress in PSCs is summarized in terms of the hybridization of compositions and device architectures for PSCs, with special attention paid to device stability. A brief history of the development of PSCs is given, and their chemical structures, optoelectronic properties, and the different types of device architectures are discussed. Then, perovskite composition engineering is reviewed in detail, with particular emphasis on the cationic components and their impact on film morphology, the optoelectronic properties, device performance, and stability. In addition, the impact of two-dimensional and/or one-dimensional and nanostructured perovskites on structural and device stability is surveyed. Finally, a future outlook is proposed for potential resolutions to overcome the current issues.

1. Introduction

Perovskite solar cells (PSCs) have attracted immense research attention. They show unique properties such as a direct band gap, high absorption coefficient, and long carrier diffusion lengths [1,2]. The physical properties of the hybrid perovskites that are used in photo voltaic devices have been extensively studied, and are reviewed by Huang et al. in ref. [3]. Since the first report on dye-sensitized solar cells using a perovskite as the dye with an efficiency of 3.8% was published in 2009 [4], there has been a rapid increase in the number of publications in this area, as well as a rapid increase in the reported efficiencies. The evolution of the highest power conversion efficiencie (PCE) reported for PSCs over the years is depicted in Figure 1a [4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11]. A PCE of 22.1% was recently reached by Yang et al. [5]. Up to now, the highest reported efficiency of a perovskite solar cell was recorded at 22.7% by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) [12]. The material used was an inorganic-organic hybrid material with a perovskite (ABX3) structure (A: methylammonium (CH3NH3+, MA), formamidinium (HC(NH2)2+, FA), Cs, Rb; B = Pb, Sn; X = halogen anion (Cl, Br and I), (SCN)) [13,14,15,16,17]. Despite rapid developments in the performance of perovskite solar cells, there have been concerns about several issues such as the photocurrent hysteresis, device stability, and scaling issues that are able to affect the measurement accuracy and/or practical applications of these devices. In addition, there are possible environmental effects related to the use of lead-based perovskite materials [18,19,20].
In order to overcome the issues mentioned above, researchers have developed various strategies, such as hybrid components and nanostructures (Figure 1b). In this review, we briefly discuss the development of two main strategies for improving the stability of PSCs. Firstly, we will discuss hybrid materials combining alkali cations (i.e., Cs+) with organic cations. The incorporation of Cs+ can reduce the defect density and charge recombination rate, and enhance the ultraviolet and moisture resistance, thus improving the stability of PSCs [5,19,21,22,23]. Secondly, the development of multidimensional (3-D/2-D/1-D) perovskites to improve their structural stability will be discussed. A two-dimensional (2-D) perovskite film has higher stability and superior and controllable exciton properties, but the intense excitons greatly weaken its photoelectric properties [24,25]. Pure 2-D perovskite-based PSCs usually have low efficiencies due to the large insulating organic cations weakening the charge transport [26]. Using composites of 2-D layered perovskites and three-dimensional (3-D) hybrid perovskites is an effective strategy to improve device stability while maintaining high efficiency [27,28,29,30,31,32,33]. In addition, this review will also summarize the progress made with hybrid solar cells using polymers, metal oxides, Cs cation, and nanostructured perovskites, and the impact of these materials on PSCs’ efficiency and stability [34,35,36,37]. Finally, future developments that may solve the stability issues are presented.

2. Organic–Inorganic Hybrid Perovskites

In this section, we will discuss the properties of perovskites, including their physical properties and the effects of mixed ions.

2.1. Chemical Structures of Perovskites

In general, the structure of a perovskite is ABX3. The name derives from CaTiO3, which was first reported in the 1920s by Goldschmidt et al. [38]. A and B are cations of different sizes, and X is the anion that balances the charges of both cations. The ideal structure of a perovskite is cubic. It is composed of a framework of corner-shared BX6 octahedra with 12 coordinated A cations, where the A-site cations sit on the corners of the cube, the B-site cation is located at the center of the octahedron (BX6), and the X ions are located on the surfaces of the cube, as shown in Figure 2a. Due to ion permutations and other factors, the crystal structure may be distorted. The structural transformations from orthorhombic to tetragonal and then to cubic perovskite take place at different temperatures [39]. The orthorhombic, tetragonal, and cubic structures are illustrated schematically in Figure 2c. The Goldschmidt tolerance factor is usually used to describe whether the crystals have an ABX6 structure [15,40]. In the perovskite structure, the ionic radii and the tolerance factor (t) follow the relationship: t = R A + R B 2 ( R A + R B ) , where RA, RB, and Rx are the ionic radii of the A-site cation, B-site cation, and X-site anion, respectively [41]. In an ideal structure, t is ~1. When 0.75 < t < 1.05, a distorted perovskite structure can normally be stabilized; when t < 0.75, the structure is that of ferrotitanium; and t > 1.1 is found in calcite or stone-type structures. The correlation between the perovskite structure and the tolerance factor is shown in Figure 2b,c [41,42]. To maintain the ABX3 structure in perovskites, it is necessary to match the radii of the A, B, and X ions.

2.2. Tuning Photoelectric Properties with Hybrid Cations and Anions in Perovskites

The selection of the A-cation plays an important role in the regulation of the photoelectric properties of ABX3 perovskites. At present, the cations FA+, MA+, Cs+ and Rb+ are commonly used in perovskite structures. These cations can be ordered by size as follows: FA+ > MA+ > Cs+ > Rb+ [15]. The band gaps of some typical perovskites are shown in Figure 3 [43,44,45,46,47,48]. In theory, when the ionic radius increases, the cell expands, the forbidden band is narrowed, and the absorption spectrum is red-shifted. In contrast, when the ion radius decreases, the cell shrinks, the forbidden band is widened, and the absorption spectrum is blue-shifted.
Changing the size of the X anion can also tune the band gap of the perovskite. In the case of halogen anions, the lattice constant of ABX3 can be increased by substituting I for Cl, thus increasing the ionic radius, and the absorption spectrum of the perovskite film will be red-shifted [49]. Perovskites with mixed X anions have been reported in the literature, with studies of the average grain size, root mean square (RMS) roughness, grain boundaries, conductivity, and other properties [50]. The addition of Br and Cl can play a regulating role. Studies have shown that the addition of Cl promotes non-uniform nucleation at different positions, improves the morphology of the film, and thus facilitates carrier transport and reduces carrier recombination [10,51,52,53,54]. The addition of Br improves the charge transfer performance and device stability while enhancing the band gap [55,56,57,58]. Too many Br and Cl ions can increase the width of the forbidden band of the perovskite film, while decreasing the absorption and crystallinity. Reasonable regulation of the content of different halogen elements in perovskite materials can adjust their morphology and photoelectric properties. This method forms a stable cubic phase and inhibits non-radiative recombination by adjusting the A, B, and X ions. In the process of preparing different perovskite films, researchers have explored and optimized different combinations and proportions of cations and halides [59].

3. Solar Cells Based on Hybrid Perovskites

In the following section, we will discuss the properties of PSCs.

3.1. A Brief Summary of Key Parameters for Perovskite Solar Cells

The detailed principles of solar cells have been explained by Nelson et al. in ref. [60]. In brief, the equivalent circuit diagram of a solar cell is displayed in Figure 4a. The equivalent circuit parameters are the series resistance, shunt resistance, and load [61]. When light is irradiating the device (Figure 4b), the voltage across the device is biased with the load. Therefore, the characteristics of perovskite solar cells are determined by measuring the current density. The PCE is evaluated from the short-circuit density (Jsc) and the open-circuit voltage (Voc) using the following equation [62]: P C E = J S C V O C R s o l a r F F , where Pmax and FF are the incident power from the solar irradiation and fill factor, respectively. The value of the FF is the ratio of Pmax (JmaxVmax) to the product of Jsc and Voc. It should be noted that these important parameters have provided great guidance for evaluating PSCs [63].
The series resistance (Rs) is real, and is defined as the sum of the resistances at the interface of each layer of the perovskite solar cell. The series resistance does not affect the open-circuit voltage of a PSC. However, it does affect the rate at which the voltage decreases with increasing current. For instance, a higher series resistance leads to a more rapid decrease of output voltage with increasing current. In addition, a higher series resistance leads to a lower fill factor and a reduced short-circuit current density of the perovskite solar cell [15]. The shunt resistance (Rsh) is a parameter that describes resistance due to the recombination of charge carriers. The shunt resistance mainly affects the rate of change of the current with voltage. A lower shunt resistance can cause the internal circuit current to increase, and the external circuit current to decrease. The shunt resistance has a limited impact on the short-circuit current density of perovskite solar cells, but a too small shunt resistance will affect the open-circuit voltage [15]. In general, it is necessary to reduce the series resistance and increase the shunt resistance to improve the performance of perovskite solar cells.

3.2. Hybrid Architectures in PSCs

Figure 5a,b shows the common architectures of perovskite solar cells, including p-i-n and n-i-p structures. PSCs can also be fabricated in two major types: planar and mesoporous structures, which are also shown in Figure 5. The architectures of p-i-n and n-i-p mesoporous structures are shown in Figure 5c,d. Guo et al. in 2013 designed the first p-i-n type perovskite solar cell consisting of an ITO/PEDOT:PSS/MAPbI3/PCBM/BCP/Al structure, and achieved a PCE of 3.9% [64]. Here, the poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) polystyrene sulfonate (PEDOT:PSS) served as a p-type layer and fullerene-based molecules served as the n-type layer to form the first p-i-n type perovskite solar cell. Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) polystyrene sulfonate (PEDOT:PSS) [65,66,67] and transition metal oxides such as NiOx [68,69,70,71,72], CuOx [73,74,75], CrOx [76,77], and V2O5 [78,79], have been widely employed as hole-transporting materials in perovskite solar cells, demonstrating the importance of the hole-transporting layer (HTL) in PSCs. The HTL is usually spin-coated onto the fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO) or tin-doped indium oxide (ITO) substrate before annealing, and serves to extract holes from the perovskite and then transfer them into the electrode. An n-type electron transporting layer (ETL), usually a metal oxide, such as TiO2 [8,80,81], SnO2 [21,82,83,84,85,86,87], or ZnO [88,89,90], can be used in PSCs. In addition, organic ETLs, such as [6,6]-phenyl-C61-butyric acid methyl ester (PCBM) [72,91], and C60 [92,93], have also been applied to PSCs. The ETL serves a similar function as the HTL, except that the charge carriers are electrons. In the above planar-layered architectures, the FTO or ITO and perovskite layers avoid direct contact. In contrast, in mesoporous PSCs, the mesoporous film serves not only as a transport layer, but also as a scaffold layer. Meanwhile, the creation of mesoporous oxide films, such as TiO2 [94,95,96], Al2O3 [10,97,98], and ZrO2 [99,100], have also been extensively investigated. A p-type hole-transporting material, such as polytriarylamine (PTAA) [101,102,103,104] or 2,2′,7,7′-tetrakis-(N,N-di-p-methoxyphenylamine)9,9′-spirobifluorene (spiro-OMeTAD) [105,106], is commonly used as the HTL in PSCs. The ETL/HTL must have a CB (conduction band)/VB (valence band) that is compatible with that of the perovskite that is used in planar/mesoporous perovskite solar cells. In consequence, the designs and material properties of the ETL/HTL are crucial for PSC performance.

4. Hybrid Cations in Perovskites for Improvements in PSC Stability

The significant degradation of organic perovskites after prolonged aging at high temperature and humidity continues to pose a challenge [107,108]. All-inorganic perovskites of the CsPbX3 form have attracted a lot of research attention due to their reduced volatility compared with organic hybrid halide perovskites. However, CsPbI3 devices have demonstrated poor efficiencies. This is because the black perovskite phase requires a high annealing temperature of over 300 °C in bulk [109,110], while at room temperature, a yellow orthorhombic phase with a wide band gap (1.73 eV) may exist [111]. This band gap is not suitable for high-efficiency solar cells. Therefore, the organic cation is an essential component in high-efficiency metal halide perovskite solar cells. As mentioned above, the different sizes of the A cation can expand or contract the lattice. Therefore, changing the size of the A cation can lead to changes in the B–X bond length in the ABX3 structure, which has been shown to influence the optical properties, i.e., the band gap [13,111]. In contrast to MA+, which has a large dipole moment, Cs+ cations have no dipole moment [112]. Both MA+ and FA+ cations have a larger tolerance factor for tuning the Cs-based perovskite system [41,42]. Therefore, through a combination of organic and inorganic cations with various ratios, hybrid cation-based perovskites show tremendous potential for improving the structural stability and manipulating the morphology and optoelectronic properties of perovskites, and thus enhancing the final device performance. In order to achieve better efficiency and stability, researchers have conducted extensive device optimization studies, focusing on the perovskite layer.

4.1. Cs-MA Hybrid Cation PSCs

The progress on Cs-MA cation perovskite systems is summarized in Table 1. Choi et al. reported the first CsxMA1−xPbI3-based devices in 2014 [113]. The short-circuit current and open-circuit voltage of the perovskite/fullerene PSCs was improved by using the Cs-doped perovskite. Moreover, the absorption spectrum of the perovskite film could be changed by adjusting the doping ratio of Cs. Such an optimization of perovskite films not only improves the surface morphology, it also increases the band gap between the VB of the perovskite and the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital level of PCBM. Niemann et al. [114] and Niu et al. [115] improved the PCE by optimizing the optical and electronic properties with an appropriate composition ratio of Cs+ and MA+ cations. The introduction of Cs+ into the precursor solution by one-step spin-coating would inevitably accelerate the film deposition rate, leading to a smaller grain size. In addition to Cs+, Niu et al. [116] and Zhang et al. [117] also incorporated Br into the perovskite layer. In this way, Niu et al. were able to control the orientation ((112)/(200)) of the pure tetragonal phase of (MAPbI3)1−x(CsPbBr3)x. In this oriented film, the charge transfer was improved and trap states were suppressed, resulting in an enhanced PCE. Meanwhile, the incorporation of Cs+ and Br caused the unit cell to contract, also improving the resistance of the perovskite layer to moisture. Zhang et al. used CsBr for doping, and discovered the expansion of crystal grains and the enhancement of optical absorption due to the replacement of I by Br forming bonds with Pb2+. These results suggest that a better PCE can be achieved by hybrid perovskites doped with both Cs+ and Br ions, than with PSCs doped with ether Br or Cs+.
In addition to the traditional solution-processed method, other approaches to achieve the large-scale deposition of hybrid perovskite films have also been attempted. Chang et al. [118] applied the MA gas healing method to Cs-containing perovskite films. In this case, a certain amount of Cs cations were able to enter the crystal lattice and greatly enhanced the interactions between the inorganic framework and the more symmetrical PbI6 octahedra. Consequently, the humidity stability under continuous illumination was significantly improved. Sedighi et al. [119] utilized an atmospheric pressure vapor-assisted solution method to fabricate pinhole-free CsxMA1−xPbI3 films. These Cs-doped films showed an increased open-circuit voltage due to their higher recombination resistance, and an enhanced optical absorption in the visible and near infrared region due to the increased grain size, as compared with MAPbI3 films.
All of these attempts to optimize Cs-doped perovskite films for PSCs suggest the importance of hybrid Cs+ cations. Cs doping can reduce the charge recombination process, and enhance the Voc, as well as improve the PCE and stability of PSCs.

4.2. Cs-FA Hybrid Cation PSCs

Cs-FA cation hybrid perovskites have also been extensively studied and optimized, and a brief summary is given in Table 2 [13,14,120,121,122]. In all of these studies, Cs-FA cation perovskite systems with Cs quantities from 0.1 to 0.2 displayed improvements in PCE, because the Cs-FA cation hybrid perovskites are more phase-stable. In order to obtain a better understanding, these hybrid perovskites have been examined via theoretical and experimental studies [123,124,125]. In particular, the CB minimum and VB maximum of CsxFA1−xPbI3 have been evaluated [126].
Lee et al. found that the partial substitution of FA+ by Cs+ achieved better moisture stability than pure FAPbI3 perovskites [127], and an average PCE performance of 16.5% was realized. The high PCE was due to the suppression of charge recombination, which was attributed to the reduced trap density near the VB maximum. This led to an increase in the shunt resistance, open-circuit voltage, and fill factor. In the work by Li et al. [41], the tolerance factors of perovskite films with different Cs/FA ratios were estimated, suggesting that the tuning of the tolerance factor is a crucial step to stabilize the perovskite structure. This was achieved by the microstructure-mediated δ→α phase transformation, and the α phase was stabilized in the Cs-FA cation system at an annealing temperature lower than 150 °C. The best PCE of 17.2% was achieved with the hybrid Cs0.15FA0.85 perovskites in the α phase. In other articles, this phase transformation has been further studied in detail [121,124,128,135,136].
A better understanding of the phase transition in Cs-FA cation perovskite films can guide the optimization of PSC performance. There are various ways to control the phase of perovskites. Kim et al. reduced the defect density by an amide-catalyzed phase-selective crystallization process, thus enhancing the PCE of Cs-FA hybrid PSCs [130]. The optimized PSCs exhibited remarkably improved performance: a high Voc of 1.23 V, Jsc of 18.34 mA·cm−2, an FF of 0.79, and a PCE of 17.8%. The high open-circuit voltage and stability of the PSCs were realized by controlling the film crystallization. Formamide (CH3NO) was introduced into the precursor solution as a highly polar additive, increasing the solubility of the Cs salt. In this way, the formation of the yellow phase was inhibited, and the ideal black phase was directly crystallized, reducing the defect density in the perovskite film. After 60 h of thermal stress, 85% of the initial film absorption was sustained. Among these perovskites, FA0.83Cs0.17Pb(I0.5Br0.5)3 showed the highest thermal resistance. The phase control of Cs-FA hybrid perovskites may also improve other factors in PSCs. Luo et al. fabricated CsxFA1−xPbI3 films by Formamidinium iodide (FAI)gas phase-assisted compositional modulation, resulting in efficient and stable PSCs [132]. Wu et al. improved the carrier collection to enhance the PCE of Cs-FA double-cation PSCs by heterojunction engineering [120]. Conings et al. reported a DMSO-PbX2 “complex-assisted gas quenching” solution deposition method to fabricate pinhole-free perovskite layers [133]. Yu et al. prepared perovskite films with larger grains, resulting in enhanced carrier lifetimes, using an optimal 0.5 mol % Pb(SCN)2 additive, which made up for drawbacks caused by Cs substitutions (e.g., smaller grain sizes and shorter carrier lifetimes), and resulted in a noticeable improvement in fill factor [129]. The replacement of iodide with a limited amount of bromide was also reportedly used to obtain a high PCE, and the CsxFA1−xPb(I1−yBry)3 film was found to possess a much higher stability due to the substitutions of Cs for FA, and Br for I [128].
At present, the solution spin-coating method is widely used to prepare perovskite thin films in the laboratory [102,137]. However, the PCE of PSCs made in this way decreases when the effective area of the PSCs is increased. Jiang et al. proposed a new method to solve this problem [126]. In their approach, FAPbI3 perovskite films were first prepared by a hybrid chemical vapor deposition process; then, the FAPbI3 was transformed into the more stable CsxFA1−xPbI3 by a cation exchange method. The conversion process is very simple and fast, and can be completed in a few seconds. Among these CsxFA1−xPbI3 films, the PSCs using Cs0.07FA0.93PbI3 showed the highest PCE, and accordingly, the device stability was significantly improved. The PCE of PSCs prepared by this method reached 14.6% with an effective area of 12.0 cm2. After 1200 min of continuous sun exposure and simultaneous load, the device performance showed no attenuation. Furthermore, while the effective cell area was dramatically increased, the PCE of the PSCs prepared in this way was not significantly decreased. Wide band gap (FA-Cs)Pb(I-Br)3 hybrid perovskites are promising materials for tandem solar cells. Great progress has been made in tandem solar cells in the form of perovskite-perovskite and perovskite-silicon tandem solar cells [125,131,138,139]. In such cells, the energy gap (Eg) of a Cs-FA hybrid perovskite is adjusted close to 1.75 eV, the optimal Eg of the top cell material, to match that of the bottom C–Si cell. Tandem solar cells can better absorb the full solar spectrum, making these PSCs closer to commercialization.
These results showed that the addition of Cs+ and Br is conducive to the stability of the cubic phase. It not only improves the photoelectric properties of the PSCs, but also enhances the charge extraction. In addition to the improved PCE, it also significantly improves the thermal stability and phase stability of the PSCs, providing new guidance for the design of perovskite materials.

4.3. Multication Hybridization for PSCs

Compared with the above binary hybridizations, Cs/FA/MA cation hybrid PSCs have also been attempted, showing greatly improved optical and electrical properties; accordingly, these devices have shown excellent reproducibility. Moreover, the band gap energy can be tuned in a wide range to meet the demands of a highly efficient solar cell. Theoretical investigations have demonstrated that these multication hybrids can greatly improve the stability and moisture resistance of PSCs [19,140,141,142,143].
Saliba et al. first reported Cs, FA, and MA triple-cation perovskites [144]. A stabilized power output of 21.1% with a Jsc of 23.5 mA·cm−2, a Voc of 1.07 V, and a FF of 0.74 was achieved. After 250 h in a nitrogen atmosphere held at room temperature, the PCE remained at ~18%. A ratio of 5% CsI was found to be best when incorporated into the (FAPbI3)0.83(MAPbBr3)0.17 hybrid cation perovskite. The incorporation of Cs+ suppressed the non-perovskite phase and enhanced the crystallization process. Although the PCE can be improved by changing the chemical composition and the tunable band gap, the performance of PSCs is limited by non-radiative losses. In the continuously tunable band gap perovskite, photoinduced ion segregation leads to the instability of the band gap. For better optimization, Mojtaba et al. made a series of glass passivated triple-cationic perovskite films in 2018 [22]. They noticed that the standard triple-cationic precursor solution had a slight halogen defect, so they used a precursor solution diluted with potassium iodide. The introduction of potassium iodide led to a slight excess of halide in the sample and a very small change in the I/Br ratio. The resulting perovskite films consisted of uniformly filled grains, each of which was ~200–400 nm. The absorption and photoluminescence spectra showed that with the addition of potassium iodide, the optical band gap of the perovskite film decreased. The non-radiative dissipation and photoinduced ionic migration in the perovskite films and at the interfaces were greatly alleviated by using a passivated potassium halide layer at the surface and grain boundaries.
At the same time, the addition of Rb has also been attempted. It led to an enhanced charge carrier mobility, but little improvement in the defects in the perovskite layer [145]. The efficiency of the device was slightly increased and the current voltage hysteresis effect was reduced. In contrast, the incorporation of cesium can reduce the defect density and charge recombination rate. By combining both Cs+ and Rb+ cations, the researchers observed the highest level of photoelectric charge mobility and the lowest defect density, which gave the solar cells the highest stable output power. Therefore, the bottleneck limiting the PCE of PSCs is mainly the number and nature of the defect states rather than the carrier mobility of the perovskite layer.
The application of multiplecation (Cs/FA/MA/Rb) systems has become a good strategy for developing stable, high-efficiency perovskite solar cells. The reported performances of some high-efficiency PSCs are summarized in Table 3 in detail. These works demonstrate that the multication hybrid perovskite is an effective approach for preparing stable, high-efficiency PSCs at a low temperature. This also shows the great potential of the perovskite solar cell for commercial applications.

5. Hybrid-Dimension Perovskite-Based PSCs

The long-term stability issues preventing the use of 3-D perovskites in industrial applications are more outstanding in ambient air for the following reasons. First, lead in the perovskite can easily be oxidized and volatilized. Second, water in the air can easily break down perovskite materials. Third, ion migration and thermal decomposition also lead to instability. To overcome these issues, low-dimensional perovskite materials have been introduced by the replacement of MA/FA with large organic amines, including phenylethylammonium (PEA) [27,154,155], poly(ethyleneimine) (PEI) [156], butylamine (BA) [26,157], cyclopropylamine (CA) [31], and cyclohexylammonium iodide (CHMA) [158]. Low-dimensional structures are formed from alternating organic amine layers and inorganic layers. In consequence, the smaller the number of octahedral layers, the closer the perovskite is to a two-dimensional layer.
Compared with traditional 3-D perovskite structures, low-dimensional perovskite materials have certain advantages for PSCs. The introduction of large organic amines greatly enhances moisture resistance and photothermal stability. In addition, the modulation of optical and electrical properties can be realized by changing the type of the organic amine. However, low-dimensional perovskites have a large optical band gap, and the introduction of an organic amine reduces the carrier mobility. As a result, the measured efficiencies of low-dimensional PSCs have been significantly lower than those of the 3-D PSCs [24,25,26,159]. Therefore, combining the merits of both 3-D and low-dimensional perovskites has become an attractive research goal. In this way, enhancements in both efficiency and stability may be realized. Solar cells based on such dimensional hybrid perovskites with different-sized cations have been studied. In the following section, some facile methods for maintaining efficiency while solving the stability problem are reviewed.

5.1. Hybrid 1-D/2-D/3-D Structured PSCs

To improve stability, one-dimensional (1-D) and two-dimensional perovskites can be incorporated to the precursor solution and dispersed into a perovskite film (as seen in Table 4). The aim is to achieve highly efficient and stable PSCs by adjusting the morphology, grain size, band gap, carrier mobility, and other properties. In traditional 3-D perovskite films, the incorporation of a 2-D perovskite material is a reasonable strategy to achieve higher stability while maintaining the high efficiency.
Koh et al. used the immersion method to prepare dimensional hybrid PSCs, which were more than 9% efficient [160]. The two-dimensional perovskite thin films were immersed in a solution of organic small molecule amine (MAI). By adjusting the soaking time (1–5 min), various dimensional hybrid perovskites could be obtained. In addition, the films obtained by the immersion method still maintained a very good moisture resistance. Grancini et al. found a way to overcome the instability of PSCs by designing a 2-D/3-D (HOOC(CH2)4NH3)2PbI4/CH3NH3PbI3 perovskite junction [161]. In addition to the enhanced stability, these PSCs can effectively absorb light over the entire visible spectrum and transmit electric charge. The efficiencies of their PCS were 12.7% (carbon-based structure) and 14.6% (standard mesoporous solar cells), respectively. A PCE of 11.2% was realized using a fully printable process at the industrial scale. Device performance was maintained for more than 10,000 h under standard conditions. Wang et al. fabricated bulk heterojunctions by mixing a perovskite with the fullerene derivative A10C60 by solution-processing [162]. The composite was formed from an ethanol solution consisting of CH3NH3PbI3 and A10C60, with a large interfacial area between them. The goal here is to balance the charge extraction efficiencies by making up for the different diffusion lengths of holes and electrons, thus enhancing the PCE. Wang et al. produced PSCs with both high efficiency (20.6%) and stability by incorporating butylammonium in the Cs-FA cation perovskite to form 2-D/3-D heterostructures [163]. In this case, the 2-D perovskite was distributed among the highly oriented 3-D perovskite grains. This inhibited non-radiative charge recombination by reducing the hysteresis, enhancing the efficiency, and improving the stability. The relationship between composition, crystal orientation, and device performance was also investigated. The PSCs with optimal butylammonium content showed an average stable PCE of 17.5 ± 1.3% with a 1.61-eV band gap and a PCE of 15.8 ± 0.8% with a 1.72-eV band gap, respectively. The device stability under light was also improved. After 1000 h of illumination in air, 80% of the initial efficiency remained, even after an illumination time close to 4000 h in a sealed environment.
Other approaches to achieve 2-D/3-D heterostructures have also been extensively applied. Zhang et al. used bifunctional 5-aminovaleric acid (Ava, NH2C4H9COOH) in MAPbBr3 perovskite precursor solutions, and obtained a cross-linked 2-D/3-D Ava(MAPbBr3)n structure as confirmed by Raman spectra [164]. They also reported the high phase stability of α-CsPbI3 by introducing ethylenediamine cations (EDA2+) [30]. The devices based on CsPbI3·0.025EDAPbI4 perovskite films showed a PCE of 11.86%, with a Voc of 1.15 V, a FF of 0.71, and a Jsc of 14.53 mA·cm−2. The 2-D EDAPbI4 not only disperses into the 3-D CsPbI3 film to form a 2-D/3-D heterostructure, it also acts as a blocking layer. Low-toxicity Bi-based 2-D perovskites with small cations have also been adopted to form 2-D/3-D structures. Hu et al. used the addition of highly air-stable MA3Bi2I9 to form a special structure of 2-D platelets/3-D perovskite films [165]. In these films, 2-D MA3Bi2I9 has been observed to be uniformly distributed among 3-D MAPbI3 grains. It not only inhibits the non-radiative recombination of charges, but also greatly improves the tolerance of the film to air moisture. After optimization, these PSCs with optimal MA3Bi2I9 content showed a PCE of up to 18.97%.
Considering the health and environmental hazards posed by Pb, the development of non-lead PSCs is of great importance. However, in the case of Sn-based perovskites, it is more difficult to control the crystallization properties, film morphology, and defects. Defects are an important factor that can lead to the failure of the device; therefore, developing methods of preparing high-quality and low-defect non-lead perovskite (tin-based) films is critical. Ran et al. developed a bilateral interfacial method to fabricate efficient Sn-based PSCs (Pb-free) by steaming and spin-coating [166]. Using this method, high-quality 2-D/3-D non-lead perovskite films and high-efficiency and high-stability PSCs were realized. PCE of up to 6.98% were observed. Shao et al. reported a new record PCE of 9% for Sn-based PSCs [27]. Highly crystalline films were obtained from 0.08-M layered (2-D) Sn perovskite and 0.92-M (3-D) FASnI3 solutions. The high PCE results from the reduction in trap-assisted recombination events, the low shunt loss of the charge carriers, and the efficient charge collection. Therefore, a hybrid 2-D/3-D tin perovskite is a good way to overcome the bottleneck in tin perovskite PSCs. Sn-based PSCs provide a great opportunity to change the industry and make a significant contribution to future clean and sustainable energy sources by designing solar cells with a perovskite material that is more capable of maintaining thermal electrons.
In perovskites, the metal halide octahedra are connected in a one-dimensional chain [167,168]. By adjusting the composition of the metals, halides, and organic cations, various combinations can yield different structures [169,170]. Unlike the 2-D materials that have been extensively studied, the investigation of combinations of 1-D and 3-D perovskites has just begun. The application of 1-D/3-D perovskites was first reported by Fan et al. [29]. In this work, 2-(1H-pyrazol-1-yl)pyridine (PZPY) was introduced into lead halide 3-D perovskites, and a 1-D/3-D composite perovskite structure was obtained by in situ growth. The formation of a 1-D perovskite chain [PbX6]4− (X is I or Br) is due to its thermodynamic stability and structural flexibility. In consequence, the introduction of 1-D perovskite materials may even block the negative transfer channel formed by A site ions in 3-D perovskites. This suppresses the irreversible degradation of the perovskite, which is mainly the result of the large-scale migration of A site ions, and enables the thermodynamic self-healing of the device. The 1-D/3-D PSCs exhibited a high PCE of 18.10%, a Jsc of 21.70 mA cm−2, a Voc of 1.08 V, and an FF of 0.77. After aging in an environment with 55% relative humidity at 85 °C for 15 h, the efficiency of the PSCs could be restored to 95% of the initial efficiency with a 25 min recovery process. After five such aging cycles, the retention rate of the PCE was over 90%. Thus, the stability of these PSCs was improved significantly, as compared with traditional 3-D PSCs.
In summary, the construction of unique heterogeneous perovskite films by hybridization with different low-dimensional materials is a feasible way to prepare high-efficiency and stable perovskite solar cells. The mixed dimensions can be stacked in different degrees due to the various dimensions of the perovskite layer. This reduces the band gap, which is enlarged by the introduction of organic amine ions. The electron and hole defect densities of the film are reduced by the heterogeneous interface of the perovskite. At the same time, the increase of the depletion region accelerates the transmission of charge carriers and reduces carrier recombination. Extensive studies have demonstrated that the thermal stability of PSCs can be effectively improved, providing new ideas and methods for the preparation of highly efficient and stable PSCs, which can help to promote the industrialization of the technology.

5.2. Graded-Dimension Perovskite-Based PSCs

As mentioned above, 2-D structured perovskite materials usually contain large alkyl ammonium cations (such as PEA +, EDA, etc.). However, these large organic groups can easily act as impurities in the film to affect electron transport and increase electron recombination, thus ultimately affecting the photovoltaic performance of the device. Another way to create 2-D structures is to deposit a thin layer on the top of a 3-D perovskite. The results of selected studies are summarized below (as well as in Table 5).
Bai et al. adopted a method similar to in situ growth. An appropriate amount of phenylethylamine in toluene is dissolved in the precursor solution, and spin-coated to form 3-D/2-D graded MAPbI3 perovskite films [173]. The 3-D perovskite is first crystallized on the substrate, and then the 2-D perovskite is induced to crystallize on top, forming an ultrathin film. It was observed that the PEI solution in toluene did not affect the quality of perovskite crystallization; instead, the film grains became larger, and defects were cleared away. Yang et al. performed density functional theory (DFT) calculations to understand the role of the hydrophobic layer (tetramethylammonium (TMA), tetraethylammonium (TEA)) [174], and found that the surface functionalization technique incorporated hydrophobic molecules as water-resisting layers on the surface of the perovskite by blocking hydrogen and ionic bonds. Their devices showed almost no loss in PCE when kept in a high relative humidity of 90 ± 5% for more than 30 days. Ma et al. proposed CA2PbI4/MAPbIxCl3−x perovskite hybrids [31]. These films also act as light absorbers for PSCs. In this way, the CA2PbI4/MAPbIxCl3−x hybrid perovskite PSC (PCE: 13.86%, Jsc = 19.29 mA·cm−2, Voc = 0.92 V, FF = 0.77) was found to be comparable to the 3-D perovskite (PCE: 13.12%, Jsc = 18.50 mA·cm−2, Voc = 0.92 V, FF = 0.76) at the same conditions. After 220 h, 54% of the initial PCE (CA2PbI4/MAPbIxCl3−x) remained, while the 3-D perovskite device lost all its efficiency within only 50 h. After 40 days, the CA2PbI4/MAPbIxCl3−x film still had not degraded. Chen et al. eliminated excess PbI2 by spin-coating a 5-AvaI solution onto a perovskite (FAPbI3)0.88(CsPbBr3)0.12 film with HI, and significantly reduced the hysteresis [175]. This was attributed to the improved interfacial charge extraction. After 63 days of moisture exposure (~10% humidity), the device retained 98% of its initial PCE. Chen et al. used a PEA2PbI4 capping layer on top of a Cs0.05(FA0.83MA0.17)0.95Pb(I0.83Br0.17)3 perovskite film, and the best device that was made in this way showed a Voc of 1.11 V, a FF of 0.73, and a Jsc of 22.89 mA·cm−2 [176]. The reason for the high Voc exhibited by these devices is the induced larger Fermi-level splitting, reduced non-radiative recombination, and optimized energy band alignment. Lin et al. reported 2-D/3-D stacking structures by the reaction of a 3-D perovskite with n-butylamine (BA), resulting in enhanced device efficiency due to passivation and self-healing effects. Cho et al. improved the stability and efficiency of PSCs by growing low-dimensional (2-D) PEA2PbI4 films on top of 3-D perovskites [177]. The wide band gap of PEA2PbI4 can block the transfer of excited electrons to the HTM layer. The film also reduced the charge recombination, improving the efficiency of the device.
Inorganic perovskite materials tend to have a large band gap and narrow absorption range, which limit their photoelectric conversion efficiency. At the same time, in the traditional perovskite cell structure, due to the heavy doping effect of the electron transport layer titanium oxide, the p-n junction in the device is close to the interface between the perovskite and the HTL, leading to the recombination of holes in the transmission process. Zhang et al. formed 0-D/2-D/3-D heterogeneous hybrid perovskites by spin-coating perovskite quantum dots on top of 2-D/3-D structures, greatly enhancing the hole mobility. These PSCs achieved a Voc as high as 1.19 V, a Jsc of 12.93 mA·cm−2, an FF of 80.5%, and a PCE of 12.39%. This is currently recognized as the highest reported efficiency for CsPbBrI2 perovskite solar cells [178]. Such gradient dimension materials can effectively increase the electric field in the system, and improve the hole transmission rate.
Two-dimensional (2-D) perovskite layers using smaller organic cations (FA or MA) have also been attempted. Lee et al. introduced a thin MAPbI3 layer on the top of FAPbI3 layers to increase the utilization of light at long wavelengths. An average PCE of 15.56% was obtained in 2014 [179]. Taek et al. achieved a high efficiency of 21.3% by spin-coating FABr on the top of a (FAPbI3)0.85(MAPbBr3)0.15 film, where a non-stoichiometric ratio of FAPbBr3−xIx acted as a passivation layer to reduce charge carrier recombination, and as an electron-blocking layer to improve the Voc without a conspicuous drop in the Jsc [180].
In short, the introduction of a low-dimensional structure changes the interface energy level and weakens the charge recombination between the perovskite and the ETL. In addition, humidity resistance and thermal stability are improved, resulting in a higher PCE. It has been found that layered hybrid structures can effectively increase the internal electric field and increase the hole transmission rate. At the same time, the hydrophobicity of perovskite films is increased after modification by low-dimensional materials, also leading to enhanced device stability.

6. Other Hybrid PSCs

Each layer in a hybrid PSC has a significant impact on the performance of the device. In the perovskite layer, most of the defects exist at the grains’ boundaries, where carrier recombination and material degradation often occur. Consequently, the stability and efficiency of the device are seriously limited. In order to improve the efficiency and stability of PSCs, the size of the perovskite particles need to be enlarged, or the surface needs to be passivated.
A mesoporous structure is also a kind of hybrid-structured perovskite system. Since perovskite materials have good electron transport properties, large band-gap oxides such as Al2O3 and ZrO2 can also be used to make a porous layer in a perovskite solar cell. Mesoporous TiO2 has a large specific surface area, allowing for the maximum adsorption of perovskite materials, and providing a space for the perovskite film to be oriented [98,100,181]. In addition, mesoporous TiO2 can be fully exposed to perovskite materials to ensure the maximum amount of photo-induced charge separation and injection. Some oxide nanorods can be used to increase the specific surface area [35,182]. This indicates that oxide nanorods are an effective charge collection system in PSCs.
It has been found that the addition of polymer materials in the precursor solution can improve the morphology and crystallinity of perovskite films. At the same time, the long chain of a polymer can form a mesh that insulates the perovskite from water and oxygen (as seen in Table 6) [36,183,184,185,186,187,188]. Zhao et al. designed a new structure of PSCs, introducing the long-chain hygroscopic polyethylene glycol (PEG) molecule into the perovskite layer as a polymer skeleton by spin-coating. The film quality of the perovskite showed a significant improvement. The efficiency and reproducibility of the resulting PSCs were significantly better, and the maximum efficiency reached 16%. Moreover, these perovskite films could be prepared at 100 °C by a simple and easy method [184]. PCBM has been observed to have a better impact than PEG. Huang et al. used PCBM as a receptor molecule to fill the voids and grain boundaries of perovskite films. In this way, particles in the thin-film device are larger, reducing the grain boundaries and subsequently achieving a higher conversion efficiency and higher fill factor [185]. From another perspective, Zhang et al. noted that the introduction of α-bis-PCBM could reduce water intrusion, thus preventing erosion of the interface. It also reduced the gap of and/or pinholes in the HTL, increased the efficiency of electron extraction, promoted the crystallization of the perovskite, and improved the stability of the PSCs [183]. This promising approach provides a simple route for the manufacture of highly efficient, stable, heterogeneous PSCs. However, there are still issues: is there really significant charge transfer at the perovskite/polymer interfaces? Is it really beneficial for device performance? In 2018, Jiang et al. systematically investigated polymer hybrid PSCs [189]. In this study, a variety of polymers were used in the hybrid perovskites. It was found that all polymers can effectively passivate perovskites, independent of the band gap of the polymer. Using polymer-doped devices can increase the efficiency from 17.43% to 19.19%, while the device stability was also improved.
Hybrids combining nanostructures, such as carbon nanoparticles, graphene oxide, and graphene [34,190,191], with perovskites have also achieved some interesting results. With the addition of nanostructured materials, the resulting perovskite films contain larger grains due to the slowing down of the crystallization process. This leads to better charge mobility and separation, as well as improved thermal stability. However, too much of the hybrid component may destroy the structure of the perovskite and affect its light absorption. Due to strong optical absorption, superfast charge transfer, and high near-infrared response, these hybrid perovskites have potential applications in photodetectors, optical transistors, and other devices [192,193].

7. Conclusions

In order to solve the stability issue of PSCs, the best approach is from the perspective of material design. Based on the tolerance factor, a more suitable hybrid combination should be selected to make the final structure of the perovskite lattice more stable, thus improving the stability of the PSCs. By hybridizing various organic cations, metal cations, or halogen anions in an ABX3 compound, the band gap and absorption spectra can be adjusted. The optimization of the crystallinity, morphology, and interface in a PSC can improve carrier mobility, reduce series resistance, and greatly improve the photoelectric current.
As mentioned above, the hybridization of perovskites using Cs+ cations, metal halides, low-dimensional perovskites, and polymers has driven rapid progress in PSCs. These hybrid perovskite devices show not only significantly increased PCE but also substantially improved stability, due to the favorable energy level alignment with the ETL and HTL. Hybridization can also reduce the trap state density, promote passivation effects, and eliminate the hysteresis in the J-V response, in addition to improving stability. This approach has brought PSCs one step closer to industrialization. However, before mass producing real and usable devices, a thorough understanding of the mechanisms governing hybridized perovskite films is still needed.

Author Contributions

Y.W. and R.L. contribute to the literature search, data collection, figure production and wrote the paper; Z.H. provided ideas and suggestions for the structure, contents; W.C., G.C. and L.L. gave many valuable revision suggestions for the contents of this review.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11474345, No. 11674043, No. 11604030, No. 61775091), the National Key Research Project MOST (No. 2016YFA0202400), Natural Science Foundation of Shenzhen Innovation Committee (No. JCYJ20150529152146471), and the Shenzhen Key Laboratory Project (No. ZDSYS201602261933302).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviation

0-Dzero-dimensional
1-Done-dimensional
2-Dtwo-dimensional
3-Dthree-dimensional
4-ABPAClbutylphosphonic acid 4-ammonium chloride
α-bis-PCBMα bis (1-[3-(methoxycarbonyl) propyl]-1-phenyl)-[6.6] M
BCPbathocuproine
BEIButylamine iodide
BLblocking layer
BAbutylamine
CsCesium
CBconduction band
C60SAMC60self-assembled monolayer
CAcyclopropylamine
CHMAcyclohexylammonium iodide
DFTdensity functional theory
ETLelectron transporting layer
ETMelectron transporting material
EDAethylenediamine
FTOfluorine-doped tin oxide
FAFormamidinium
FAIFormamidinium iodide
FFfill factor
HTMhole transport material
HTLhole transporting layer
ITOindium tin oxide
LUMOlowest unoccupied molecular orbital
MAmethylammonium
MPmesoporous
NERLNational renewable energy laboratory
PCBM[6,6]-phenyl-C61-butyric acid methyl ester
PC61BM[6,6]-phenyl-C61-butyric acid methyl ester
PSCsperovskite solar cells
PCEpower conversion efficiency
PEDOT:PSSpoly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) poly(styrenesulfonate)
PFNBrpoly9,9-bis6-(N,N,N-trimethylammonium)hexylfluorene-alt-co-phenylenebromide
PTAApolytriarylamine
PMMAPolymethyl methacrylate polymer
PTAApoly-(3-thiopheneaceticacid)
PEGpolyethylene glycol
PEAIphenylethylammonium iodide
PZPY3-(2-pyridyl)-pyrazol-1-yl
PEAphenylethylammonium
PEIpoly(ethyleneimine)
PC71BM[6,6]-phenyl C71butyric acid methyl-ester
PBDB-Tpoly[(2,6-(4,8-bis(5-(2-ethylhexyl)thiophen-2-yl)benzo[1,2-b:4,5-b′]dithiophene)-co-(1,3-di(5-thiophene-2-yl)-5,7-bis(2-ethylhexyl)benzo[1,2-c:4,5-c′]dithiophene-4,8-dione)]
PdPlumbum
RbRubidium
RMSroot mean square
SnStannum
SCNthiocyanate
spiro-OMeTAD2,2′,7,7′-tetrakis-(N,N-di-p-methoxyphenylamine)9,9′-spirobifluorene
TBP4-tert-butylpyridine
TMAtetramethylammonium
TEAtetra-ethyl ammonium
VBvalence band

References

  1. Qiu, X.; Cao, B.; Yuan, S.; Chen, X.; Qiu, Z.; Jiang, Y.; Ye, Q.; Wang, H.; Zeng, H.; Liu, J.; et al. From unstable CsSnI3 to air-stable Cs2SnI6: A lead-free perovskite solar cell light absorber with bandgap of 1.48 eV and high absorption coefficient. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2017, 159, 227–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. D’Innocenzo, V.; Srimath Kandada, A.R.; De Bastiani, M.; Gandini, M.; Petrozza, A. Tuning the Light Emission Properties by Band Gap Engineering in Hybrid Lead Halide Perovskite. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 17730–17733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Huang, J.; Yuan, Y.; Shao, Y.; Yan, Y. Understanding the physical properties of hybrid perovskites for photovoltaic applications. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2017, 2, 17042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kojima, A.; Teshima, K.; Shirai, Y.; Miyasaka, T. Organometal Halide Perovskites as Visible-Light Sensitizers for Photovoltaic Cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 6050–6051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Yang, W.S.; Park, B.-W.; Jung, E.H.; Jeon, N.J.; Kim, Y.C.; Lee, D.U.; Shin, S.S.; Seo, J.; Kim, E.K.; Noh, J.H.; et al. Iodide management in formamidinium-lead-halide–based perovskite layers for efficient solar cells. Science 2017, 356, 1376–1379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Saliba, M.; Matsui, T.; Domanski, K.; Seo, J.-Y.; Ummadisingu, A.; Zakeeruddin, S.M.; Correa-Baena, J.-P.; Tress, W.R.; Abate, A.; Hagfeldt, A.; et al. Incorporation of rubidium cations into perovskite solar cells improves photovoltaic performance. Science 2016, 354, 206–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Yang, W.S.; Noh, J.H.; Jeon, N.J.; Kim, Y.C.; Ryu, S.; Seo, J.; Seok, S.I. High-performance photovoltaic perovskite layers fabricated through intramolecular exchange. Science 2015, 348, 1234–1237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Zhou, H.P.; Chen, Q.; Li, G.; Luo, S.; Song, T.B.; Duan, H.S.; Hong, Z.R.; You, J.B.; Liu, Y.S.; Yang, Y. Interface engineering of highly efficient perovskite solar cells. Science 2014, 345, 542–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Burschka, J.; Pellet, N.; Moon, S.-J.; Humphry-Baker, R.; Gao, P.; Nazeeruddin, M.K.; Grätzel, M. Sequential deposition as a route to high-performance perovskite-sensitized solar cells. Nature 2013, 499, 316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Lee, M.M.; Teuscher, J.; Miyasaka, T.; Murakami, T.N.; Snaith, H.J. Efficient Hybrid Solar Cells Based on Meso-Superstructured Organometal Halide Perovskites. Science 2012, 338, 643–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Im, J.-H.; Lee, C.-R.; Lee, J.-W.; Park, S.-W.; Park, N.-G. 6.5% efficient perovskite quantum-dot-sensitized solar cell. Nanoscale 2011, 3, 4088–4093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. National Renewable Energy Laboratory. Available online: https://www.nrel.gov/pv/assets/images/efficiency-chart.jpg (accessed on May 2018).
  13. Xu, F.; Zhang, T.; Li, G.; Zhao, Y. Mixed cation hybrid lead halide perovskites with enhanced performance and stability. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 11450–11461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ono, L.K.; Juarez-Perez, E.J.; Qi, Y. Progress on Perovskite Materials and Solar Cells with Mixed Cations and Halide Anions. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 30197–30246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Correa-Baena, J.-P.; Abate, A.; Saliba, M.; Tress, W.; Jesper Jacobsson, T.; Gratzel, M.; Hagfeldt, A. The rapid evolution of highly efficient perovskite solar cells. Energy Environ. Sci. 2017, 10, 710–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhou, Y.; Zhang, Z.B.; Cai, Y.Y.; Liu, H.; Qin, Q.Q.; Tai, Q.D.; Lu, X.B.; Gao, X.S.; Shui, L.L.; Wu, S.J.; et al. High performance planar perovskite solar cells based on CH3NH3PbI3-x(SCN)(x) perovskite film and SnO2 electron transport layer prepared in ambient air with 70% humility. Electrochim. Acta 2018, 260, 468–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Cheng, X.F.; Hou, X.; Zhou, J.; Gao, B.J.; He, J.H.; Li, H.; Xu, Q.F.; Li, N.J.; Chen, D.Y.; Lu, J.M. Pseudohalide-Induced 2D (CH3NH3)2PbI2(SCN)2 Perovskite for Ternary Resistive Memory with High Performance. Small 2018, 14, 1703667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Li, T.; Pan, Y.; Wang, Z.; Xia, Y.; Chen, Y.; Huang, W. Additive engineering for highly efficient organic-inorganic halide perovskite solar cells: Recent advances and perspectives. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 12602–12652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Tress, W.; Yavari, M.; Domanski, K.; Yadav, P.; Niesen, B.; Correa Baena, J.P.; Hagfeldt, A.; Graetzel, M. Interpretation and evolution of open-circuit voltage, recombination, ideality factor and subgap defect states during reversible light-soaking and irreversible degradation of perovskite solar cells. Energy Environ. Sci. 2018, 11, 151–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Djurisic, A.B.; Liu, F.Z.; Tam, H.W.; Wong, M.K.; Ng, A.; Surya, C.; Chen, W.; He, Z.B. Perovskite solar cells—An overview of critical issues. Prog. Quantum Electron. 2017, 53, 1–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yu, H.; Yeom, H.I.; Lee, J.W.; Lee, K.; Hwang, D.; Yun, J.; Ryu, J.; Lee, J.; Bae, S.; Kim, S.K.; et al. Superfast Room-Temperature Activation of SnO2 Thin Films via Atmospheric Plasma Oxidation and their Application in Planar Perovskite Photovoltaics. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1704825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Abdi-Jalebi, M.; Andaji-Garmaroudi, Z.; Cacovich, S.; Stavrakas, C.; Philippe, B.; Richter, J.M.; Alsari, M.; Booker, E.P.; Hutter, E.M.; Pearson, A.J.; et al. Maximizing and stabilizing luminescence from halide perovskites with potassium passivation. Nature 2018, 555, 497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Li, Y.; Liu, F.Z.; Waqas, M.; Leung, T.L.; Tam, H.W.; Lan, X.Q.; Tu, B.; Chen, W.; Djurišić, A.B.; He, Z.B. Formamidinium-Based Lead Halide Perovskites: Structure, Properties, and Fabrication Methodologies. Small Methods 2018, 1700387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Cao, D.H.; Stoumpos, C.C.; Farha, O.K.; Hupp, J.T.; Kanatzidis, M.G. 2D Homologous Perovskites as Light-Absorbing Materials for Solar Cell Applications. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 7843–7850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Smith, I.C.; Hoke, E.T.; Solis-Ibarra, D.; McGehee, M.D.; Karunadasa, H.I. A Layered Hybrid Perovskite Solar-Cell Absorber with Enhanced Moisture Stability. Angew. Chem. 2014, 126, 11414–11417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Tsai, H.; Nie, W.; Blancon, J.-C.; Stoumpos, C.C.; Asadpour, R.; Harutyunyan, B.; Neukirch, A.J.; Verduzco, R.; Crochet, J.J.; Tretiak, S.; et al. High-efficiency two-dimensional Ruddlesden–Popper perovskite solar cells. Nature 2016, 536, 312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Shao, S.; Liu, J.; Portale, G.; Fang, H.-H.; Blake, G.R.; ten Brink, G.H.; Koster, L.J.A.; Loi, M.A. Highly Reproducible Sn-Based Hybrid Perovskite Solar Cells with 9% Efficiency. Adv. Energy Mater. 2018, 8, 1702019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lin, Y.; Bai, Y.; Fang, Y.; Chen, Z.; Yang, S.; Zheng, X.; Tang, S.; Liu, Y.; Zhao, J.; Huang, J. Enhanced Thermal Stability in Perovskite Solar Cells by Assembling 2D/3D Stacking Structures. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2018, 9, 654–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Fan, J.; Ma, Y.; Zhang, C.; Liu, C.; Li, W.; Schropp, R.E.I.; Mai, Y. Thermodynamically Self-Healing 1D–3D Hybrid Perovskite Solar Cells. Adv. Energy Mater. 2018, 1703421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhang, T.; Dar, M.I.; Li, G.; Xu, F.; Guo, N.; Grätzel, M.; Zhao, Y. Bication lead iodide 2D perovskite component to stabilize inorganic α-CsPbI3 perovskite phase for high-efficiency solar cells. Sci. Adv. 2017, 3, e1700841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Ma, C.; Leng, C.; Ji, Y.; Wei, X.; Sun, K.; Tang, L.; Yang, J.; Luo, W.; Li, C.; Deng, Y.; et al. 2D/3D perovskite hybrids as moisture-tolerant and efficient light absorbers for solar cells. Nanoscale 2016, 8, 18309–18314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Asghar, M.I.; Zhang, J.; Wang, H.; Lund, P.D. Device stability of perovskite solar cells—A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 77, 131–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Mesquita, I.; Andrade, L.; Mendes, A. Perovskite solar cells: Materials, configurations and stability. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 82, 2471–2489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Yavari, M.; Mazloum-Ardakani, M.; Gholipour, S.; Marinova, N.; Delgado, J.L.; Turren-Cruz, S.H.; Domanski, K.; Taghavinia, N.; Saliba, M.; Grätzel, M.; et al. Carbon Nanoparticles in High-Performance Perovskite Solar Cells. Adv. Energy Mater. 2018, 1702719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Son, D.-Y.; Im, J.-H.; Kim, H.-S.; Park, N.-G. 11% Efficient Perovskite Solar Cell Based on ZnO Nanorods: An Effective Charge Collection System. J. Phys. Chem. C 2014, 118, 16567–16573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Abrusci, A.; Stranks, S.D.; Docampo, P.; Yip, H.-L.; Jen, A.K.Y.; Snaith, H.J. High-Performance Perovskite-Polymer Hybrid Solar Cells via Electronic Coupling with Fullerene Monolayers. Nano Lett. 2013, 13, 3124–3128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Qin, P.-L.; Yang, G.; Ren, Z.-W.; Cheung, S.H.; So, S.K.; Chen, L.; Hao, J.; Hou, J.; Li, G. Stable and Efficient Organo-Metal Halide Hybrid Perovskite Solar Cells via π-Conjugated Lewis Base Polymer Induced Trap Passivation and Charge Extraction. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1706126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Goldschmidt, V.M. Die Gesetze der Krystallochemie. Sci. Nat. 1926, 14, 477–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Brivio, F.; Frost, J.M.; Skelton, J.M.; Jackson, A.J.; Weber, O.J.; Weller, M.T.; Goni, A.R.; Leguy, A.M.A.; Barnes, P.R.F.; Walsh, A. Lattice dynamics and vibrational spectra of the orthorhombic, tetragonal, and cubic phases of methylammonium lead iodide. Phys. Rev. B 2015, 92, 144308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ian, M.R.; Enrico, L.C.; Nava, S. Dielectric and Structural Characteristics of Ba- and Sr-based Complex Perovskites as a Function of Tolerance Factor. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 1994, 33, 3984. [Google Scholar]
  41. Li, Z.; Yang, M.; Park, J.-S.; Wei, S.-H.; Berry, J.J.; Zhu, K. Stabilizing Perovskite Structures by Tuning Tolerance Factor: Formation of Formamidinium and Cesium Lead Iodide Solid-State Alloys. Chem. Mater. 2016, 28, 284–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Travis, W.; Glover, E.N.K.; Bronstein, H.; Scanlon, D.O.; Palgrave, R.G. On the application of the tolerance factor to inorganic and hybrid halide perovskites: A revised system. Chem. Sci. 2016, 7, 4548–4556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ng, C.H.; Ripolles, T.S.; Hamada, K.; Teo, S.H.; Lim, H.N.; Bisquert, J.; Hayase, S. Tunable Open Circuit Voltage by Engineering Inorganic Cesium Lead Bromide/Iodide Perovskite Solar Cells. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 2482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. An, H.; Kim, W.K.; Wu, C.; Kim, T.W. Highly-stable memristive devices based on poly(methylmethacrylate): CsPbCl3 perovskite quantum dot hybrid nanocomposites. Org. Electron. 2018, 56, 41–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Haque, M.A.; Sheikh, A.D.; Guan, X.W.; Wu, T. Metal Oxides as Efficient Charge Transporters in Perovskite Solar Cells. Adv. Energy Mater. 2017, 7, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Da, P.M.; Zheng, G.F. Tailoring interface of lead-halide perovskite solar cells. Nano Res. 2017, 10, 1471–1497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Wang, J.; Peng, J.; Sun, Y.; Liu, X.; Chen, Y.; Liang, Z. FAPbCl3 Perovskite as Alternative Interfacial Layer for Highly Efficient and Stable Polymer Solar Cells. Adv. Electron. Mater. 2016, 2, 1600329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Li, G.; Rivarola, F.W.R.; Davis, N.J.L.K.; Bai, S.; Jellicoe, T.C.; Peña, F.d.l.; Hou, S.; Ducati, C.; Gao, F.; Friend, R.H.; et al. Highly Efficient Perovskite Nanocrystal Light-Emitting Diodes Enabled by a Universal Crosslinking Method. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 3528–3534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Yin, W.-J.; Yan, Y.; Wei, S.-H. Anomalous Alloy Properties in Mixed Halide Perovskites. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2014, 5, 3625–3631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Zeng, W.J.; Liu, X.M.; Guo, X.R.; Niu, Q.L.; Yi, J.P.; Xia, R.D.; Min, Y. Morphology Analysis and Optimization: Crucial Factor Determining the Performance of Perovskite Solar Cells. Molecules 2017, 22, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Eperon, G.E.; Burlakov, V.M.; Docampo, P.; Goriely, A.; Snaith, H.J. Morphological Control for High Performance, Solution-Processed Planar Heterojunction Perovskite Solar Cells. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2014, 24, 151–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Stranks, S.D.; Eperon, G.E.; Grancini, G.; Menelaou, C.; Alcocer, M.J.P.; Leijtens, T.; Herz, L.M.; Petrozza, A.; Snaith, H.J. Electron-Hole Diffusion Lengths Exceeding 1 Micrometer in an Organometal Trihalide Perovskite Absorber. Science 2013, 342, 341–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Liu, M.; Johnston, M.B.; Snaith, H.J. Efficient planar heterojunction perovskite solar cells by vapour deposition. Nature 2013, 501, 395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Ball, J.M.; Lee, M.M.; Hey, A.; Snaith, H.J. Low-temperature processed meso-superstructured to thin-film perovskite solar cells. Energy Environ. Sci. 2013, 6, 1739–1743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Yang, X.; Yan, X.; Wang, W.; Zhu, X.; Li, H.; Ma, W.; Sheng, C. Light induced metastable modification of optical properties in CH3NH3PbI3−xBrx perovskite films: Two-step mechanism. Org. Electron. 2016, 34, 79–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Sutton, R.J.; Eperon, G.E.; Miranda, L.; Parrott, E.S.; Kamino, B.A.; Patel, J.B.; Hörantner, M.T.; Johnston, M.B.; Haghighirad, A.A.; Moore, D.T.; et al. Bandgap-Tunable Cesium Lead Halide Perovskites with High Thermal Stability for Efficient Solar Cells. Adv. Energy Mater. 2016, 6, 1502458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Rehman, W.; Milot, R.L.; Eperon, G.E.; Wehrenfennig, C.; Boland, J.L.; Snaith, H.J.; Johnston, M.B.; Herz, L.M. Charge-Carrier Dynamics and Mobilities in Formamidinium Lead Mixed-Halide Perovskites. Adv. Mater. 2015, 27, 7938–7944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Sadhanala, A.; Deschler, F.; Thomas, T.H.; Dutton, S.E.; Goedel, K.C.; Hanusch, F.C.; Lai, M.L.; Steiner, U.; Bein, T.; Docampo, P.; et al. Preparation of Single-Phase Films of CH3NH3Pb(I1–xBrx)3 with Sharp Optical Band Edges. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2014, 5, 2501–2505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Tang, S.; Deng, Y.; Zheng, X.; Bai, Y.; Fang, Y.; Dong, Q.; Wei, H.; Huang, J. Composition Engineering in Doctor-Blading of Perovskite Solar Cells. Adv. Energy Mater. 2017, 7, 1700302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Nelson, J. The Physics of Solar Cells; Imperial College Press: London, UK, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  61. Yoo, S.; Domercq, B.; Kippelen, B. Intensity-dependent equivalent circuit parameters of organic solar cells based on pentacene and C60. J. Appl. Phys. 2005, 97, 103706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Yan, J.; Saunders, B.R. Third-generation solar cells: A review and comparison of polymer: Fullerene, hybrid polymer and perovskite solar cells. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 43286–43314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Ravishankar, S.; Gharibzadeh, S.; Roldán-Carmona, C.; Grancini, G.; Lee, Y.; Ralaiarisoa, M.; Asiri, A.M.; Koch, N.; Bisquert, J.; Nazeeruddin, M.K. Influence of Charge Transport Layers on Open-Circuit Voltage and Hysteresis in Perovskite Solar Cells. Joule 2018, 2, 788–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Jeng, J.Y.; Chiang, Y.F.; Lee, M.H.; Peng, S.R.; Guo, T.F.; Chen, P.; Wen, T.C. CH3NH3PbI3 Perovskite/Fullerene Planar-Heterojunction Hybrid Solar Cells. Adv. Mater. 2013, 25, 3727–3732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Chen, W.; Li, K.; Wang, Y.; Feng, X.; Liao, Z.; Su, Q.; Lin, X.; He, Z. Black Phosphorus Quantum Dots for Hole Extraction of Typical Planar Hybrid Perovskite Solar Cells. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2017, 8, 591–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Chen, W.; Xu, L.; Feng, X.; Jie, J.; He, Z. Metal Acetylacetonate Series in Interface Engineering for Full Low-Temperature-Processed, High-Performance, and Stable Planar Perovskite Solar Cells with Conversion Efficiency over 16% on 1 cm2 Scale. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1603923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Chen, W.; Zhu, Y.; Yu, Y.; Xu, L.; Zhang, G.; He, Z. Low Cost and Solution Processed Interfacial Layer Based on Poly(2-ethyl-2-oxazoline) Nanodots for Inverted Perovskite Solar Cells. Chem. Mater. 2016, 28, 4879–4883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Chen, W.; Wu, Y.Z.; Yue, Y.F.; Liu, J.; Zhang, W.J.; Yang, X.D.; Chen, H.; Bi, E.B.; Ashraful, I.; Gratzel, M.; et al. Efficient and stable large-area perovskite solar cells with inorganic charge extraction layers. Science 2015, 350, 944–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Nie, W.; Tsai, H.; Blancon, J.-C.; Liu, F.; Stoumpos, C.C.; Traore, B.; Kepenekian, M.; Durand, O.; Katan, C.; Tretiak, S.; et al. Critical Role of Interface and Crystallinity on the Performance and Photostability of Perovskite Solar Cell on Nickel Oxide. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1703879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Chen, W.; Zhou, Y.; Wang, L.; Wu, Y.; Tu, B.; Yu, B.; Liu, F.; Tam, H.W.; Wang, G.; Djurišić, A.B.; et al. Molecule-Doped Nickel Oxide: Verified Charge Transfer and Planar Inverted Mixed Cation Perovskite Solar Cell. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, e1800515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Chen, W.; Wu, Y.; Fan, J.; Djurišić, A.B.; Liu, F.; Tam, H.W.; Ng, A.; Surya, C.; Chan, W.K.; Wang, D.; et al. Understanding the Doping Effect on NiO: Toward High-Performance Inverted Perovskite Solar Cells. Adv. Energy Mater. 2018, 1703519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Chen, W.; Zhang, G.-N.; Xu, L.-M.; Gu, R.; Xu, Z.-H.; Wang, H.-J.; He, Z.-B. Low temperature processed, high-performance and stable NiOx based inverted planar perovskite solar cells via a poly(2-ethyl-2-oxazoline) nanodots cathode electron-extraction layer. Mater. Today Energy 2016, 1–2, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Nejand, B.A.; Ahmadi, V.; Gharibzadeh, S.; Shahverdi, H.R. Cuprous Oxide as a Potential Low-Cost Hole-Transport Material for Stable Perovskite Solar Cells. ChemSusChem 2016, 9, 302–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Rao, H.; Ye, S.; Sun, W.; Yan, W.; Li, Y.; Peng, H.; Liu, Z.; Bian, Z.; Li, Y.; Huang, C. A 19.0% efficiency achieved in CuOx-based inverted CH3NH3PbI3−xClx solar cells by an effective Cl doping method. Nano Energy 2016, 27, 51–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Zuo, C.; Ding, L. Solution-Processed Cu2O and CuO as Hole Transport Materials for Efficient Perovskite Solar Cells. Small 2015, 11, 5528–5532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Qin, P.; He, Q.; Yang, G.; Yu, X.; Xiong, L.; Fang, G. Metal ions diffusion at heterojunction chromium Oxide/CH3NH3PbI3 interface on the stability of perovskite solar cells. Surf. Interfaces 2018, 10, 93–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Qin, P.L.; Lei, H.W.; Zheng, X.L.; Liu, Q.; Tao, H.; Yang, G.; Ke, W.J.; Xiong, L.B.; Qin, M.C.; Zhao, X.Z.; et al. Copper-Doped Chromium Oxide Hole-Transporting Layer for Perovskite Solar Cells: Interface Engineering and Performance Improvement. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 3, 1500799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Wang, D.; Elumalai, N.K.; Mahmud, M.A.; Wright, M.; Upama, M.B.; Chan, K.H.; Xu, C.; Haque, F.; Conibeer, G.; Uddin, A. V2O5-PEDOT: PSS bilayer as hole transport layer for highly efficient and stable perovskite solar cells. Org. Electron. 2018, 53, 66–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Yao, X.; Qi, J.; Xu, W.; Jiang, X.; Gong, X.; Cao, Y. Cesium-Doped Vanadium Oxide as the Hole Extraction Layer for Efficient Perovskite Solar Cells. ACS Omega 2018, 3, 1117–1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Byranvand, M.M.; Kim, T.; Song, S.; Kang, G.; Ryu, S.U.; Park, T. p-Type CuI Islands on TiO2 Electron Transport Layer for a Highly Efficient Planar-Perovskite Solar Cell with Negligible Hysteresis. Adv. Energy Mater. 2018, 8, 1702235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Tan, H.; Jain, A.; Voznyy, O.; Lan, X.; Garcia de Arquer, F.P.; Fan, J.Z.; Quintero-Bermudez, R.; Yuan, M.; Zhang, B.; Zhao, Y.; et al. Efficient and stable solution-processed planar perovskite solar cells via contact passivation. Science 2017, 355, 722–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Duan, J.; Xiong, Q.; Feng, B.; Xu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Wang, H. Low-temperature processed SnO2 compact layer for efficient mesostructure perovskite solar cells. CA-Cancer J. Clin. 2016, 391, 677–683. [Google Scholar]
  83. Jiang, Q.; Zhang, L.; Wang, H.; Yang, X.; Meng, J.; Liu, H.; Yin, Z.; Wu, J.; Zhang, X.; You, J. Enhanced electron extraction using SnO2 for high-efficiency planar-structure HC(NH2)2PbI3-based perovskite solar cells. Nat. Energy 2016, 1, 16177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Ke, W.; Fang, G.; Liu, Q.; Xiong, L.; Qin, P.; Tao, H.; Wang, J.; Lei, H.; Li, B.; Wan, J.; et al. Low-temperature solution-processed tin oxide as an alternative electron transporting layer for efficient perovskite solar cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 6730–6733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Ke, W.; Zhao, D.; Cimaroli, A.J.; Grice, C.R.; Qin, P.; Liu, Q.; Xiong, L.; Yan, Y.; Fang, G. Effects of annealing temperature of tin oxide electron selective layers on the performance of perovskite solar cells. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 24163–24168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Ren, X.; Yang, D.; Yang, Z.; Feng, J.; Zhu, X.; Niu, J.; Liu, Y.; Zhao, W.; Liu, S.F. Solution-Processed Nb:SnO2 Electron Transport Layer for Efficient Planar Perovskite Solar Cells. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 2421–2429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Xie, J.; Huang, K.; Yu, X.; Yang, Z.; Xiao, K.; Qiang, Y.; Zhu, X.; Xu, L.; Wang, P.; Cui, C.; et al. Enhanced Electronic Properties of SnO2 via Electron Transfer from Graphene Quantum Dots for Efficient Perovskite Solar Cells. ACS Nano 2017, 11, 9176–9182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Liu, D.; Kelly, T.L. Perovskite solar cells with a planar heterojunction structure prepared using room-temperature solution processing techniques. Nat. Photonics 2013, 8, 133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Cao, J.; Wu, B.; Chen, R.; Wu, Y.; Hui, Y.; Mao, B.W.; Zheng, N. Efficient, Hysteresis-Free, and Stable Perovskite Solar Cells with ZnO as Electron-Transport Layer: Effect of Surface Passivation. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1705596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Zhang, P.; Wu, J.; Zhang, T.; Wang, Y.; Liu, D.; Chen, H.; Ji, L.; Liu, C.; Ahmad, W.; Chen, Z.D.; et al. Perovskite Solar Cells with ZnO Electron-Transporting Materials. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1703737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Zhang, J.; Tan, C.H.; Du, T.; Morbidoni, M.; Lin, C.-T.; Xu, S.; Durrant, J.R.; McLachlan, M.A. ZnO-PCBM bilayers as electron transport layers in low-temperature processed perovskite solar cells. Sci. Bull. 2018, 63, 343–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Bowring, A.R.; Bertoluzzi, L.; O’Regan, B.C.; McGehee, M.D. Reverse Bias Behavior of Halide Perovskite Solar Cells. Adv. Energy Mater. 2018, 8, 1702365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Tian, C.; Castro, E.; Betancourt-Solis, G.; Nan, Z.; Fernandez-Delgado, O.; Jankuru, S.; Echegoyen, L. Fullerene derivative with a branched alkyl chain exhibits enhanced charge extraction and stability in inverted planar perovskite solar cells. New J. Chem. 2018, 42, 2896–2902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Wang, Z.; Fang, J.; Mi, Y.; Zhu, X.; Ren, H.; Liu, X.; Yan, Y. Enhanced performance of perovskite solar cells by ultraviolet-ozone treatment of mesoporous TiO2. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 436, 596–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Seo, J.Y.; Uchida, R.; Kim, H.S.; Saygili, Y.; Luo, J.; Moore, C.; Kerrod, J.; Wagstaff, A.; Eklund, M.; McIntyre, R.; et al. Boosting the Efficiency of Perovskite Solar Cells with CsBr-Modified Mesoporous TiO2 Beads as Electron-Selective Contact. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 28, 1705763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Jeon, N.J.; Noh, J.H.; Yang, W.S.; Kim, Y.C.; Ryu, S.; Seo, J.; Seok, S.I. Compositional engineering of perovskite materials for high-performance solar cells. Nature 2015, 517, 476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Guarnera, S.; Abate, A.; Zhang, W.; Foster, J.M.; Richardson, G.; Petrozza, A.; Snaith, H.J. Improving the Long-Term Stability of Perovskite Solar Cells with a Porous Al2O3 Buffer Layer. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2015, 6, 432–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  98. Pearson, A.J.; Eperon, G.E.; Hopkinson, P.E.; Habisreutinger, S.N.; Wang, J.T.W.; Snaith, H.J.; Greenham, N.C. Oxygen Degradation in Mesoporous Al2O3/CH3NH3PbI3−xClx Perovskite Solar Cells: Kinetics and Mechanisms. Adv. Energy Mater. 2016, 6, 1600014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Hu, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Mei, A.; Jiang, Y.; Hou, X.; Wang, Q.; Du, K.; Rong, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Xu, G.; et al. Improved Performance of Printable Perovskite Solar Cells with Bifunctional Conjugated Organic Molecule. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1705786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Mejía Escobar, M.A.; Pathak, S.; Liu, J.; Snaith, H.J.; Jaramillo, F. ZrO2/TiO2 Electron Collection Layer for Efficient Meso-Superstructured Hybrid Perovskite Solar Cells. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 2342–2349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Shin, S.S.; Yeom, E.J.; Yang, W.S.; Hur, S.; Kim, M.G.; Im, J.; Seo, J.; Noh, J.H.; Seok, S.I. Colloidally prepared La-doped BaSnO3 electrodes for efficient, photostable perovskite solar cells. Science 2017, 356, 167–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Jeon, N.J.; Noh, J.H.; Kim, Y.C.; Yang, W.S.; Ryu, S.; Seok, S.I. Solvent engineering for high-performance inorganic–organic hybrid perovskite solar cells. Nat. Mater. 2014, 13, 897–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Ko, Y.; Kim, Y.; Lee, C.; Kim, Y.; Jun, Y. Investigation of Hole-Transporting Poly(triarylamine) on Aggregation and Charge Transport for Hysteresisless Scalable Planar Perovskite Solar Cells. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 11633–11641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Heo, J.H.; Im, S.H.; Noh, J.H.; Mandal, T.N.; Lim, C.-S.; Chang, J.A.; Lee, Y.H.; Kim, H.-J.; Sarkar, A.; Nazeeruddin, M.K.; et al. Efficient inorganic–organic hybrid heterojunction solar cells containing perovskite compound and polymeric hole conductors. Nat. Photonics 2013, 7, 486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Christians, J.A.; Schulz, P.; Tinkham, J.S.; Schloemer, T.H.; Harvey, S.P.; Tremolet de Villers, B.J.; Sellinger, A.; Berry, J.J.; Luther, J.M. Tailored interfaces of unencapsulated perovskite solar cells for >1000 hour operational stability. Nat. Energy 2018, 3, 68–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Turren-Cruz, S.-H.; Saliba, M.; Mayer, M.T.; Juarez-Santiesteban, H.; Mathew, X.; Nienhaus, L.; Tress, W.; Erodici, M.P.; Sher, M.-J.; Bawendi, M.G.; et al. Enhanced charge carrier mobility and lifetime suppress hysteresis and improve efficiency in planar perovskite solar cells. Energy Environ. Sci. 2018, 11, 78–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Han, Y.; Meyer, S.; Dkhissi, Y.; Weber, K.; Pringle, J.M.; Bach, U.; Spiccia, L.; Cheng, Y.-B. Degradation observations of encapsulated planar CH3NH3PbI3 perovskite solar cells at high temperatures and humidity. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 8139–8147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Berhe, T.A.; Su, W.-N.; Chen, C.-H.; Pan, C.-J.; Cheng, J.-H.; Chen, H.-M.; Tsai, M.-C.; Chen, L.-Y.; Dubale, A.A.; Hwang, B.-J. Organometal halide perovskite solar cells: Degradation and stability. Energy Environ. Sci. 2016, 9, 323–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Eperon, G.E.; Paterno, G.M.; Sutton, R.J.; Zampetti, A.; Haghighirad, A.A.; Cacialli, F.; Snaith, H.J. Inorganic caesium lead iodide perovskite solar cells. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 19688–19695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Stoumpos, C.C.; Malliakas, C.D.; Kanatzidis, M.G. Semiconducting Tin and Lead Iodide Perovskites with Organic Cations: Phase Transitions, High Mobilities, and Near-Infrared Photoluminescent Properties. Inorg. Chem. 2013, 52, 9019–9038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Eperon, G.E.; Stranks, S.D.; Menelaou, C.; Johnston, M.B.; Herz, L.M.; Snaith, H.J. Formamidinium lead trihalide: A broadly tunable perovskite for efficient planar heterojunction solar cells. Energy Environ. Sci. 2014, 7, 982–988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Giorgi, G.; Yamashita, K. Zero-dipole molecular organic cations in mixed organic-inorganic halide perovskites: Possible chemical solution for the reported anomalous hysteresis in the current-voltage curve measurements. Nanotechnology 2015, 26, 442001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Choi, H.; Jeong, J.; Kim, H.-B.; Kim, S.; Walker, B.; Kim, G.-H.; Kim, J.Y. Cesium-doped methylammonium lead iodide perovskite light absorber for hybrid solar cells. Nano Energy 2014, 7, 80–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Niemann, R.G.; Gouda, L.; Hu, J.G.; Tirosh, S.; Gottesman, R.; Cameron, P.J.; Zaban, A. Cs+ incorporation into CH3NH3PbI3 perovskite: Substitution limit and stability enhancement. J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4, 17819–17827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Niu, G.; Li, W.; Li, J.; Liang, X.; Wang, L. Enhancement of thermal stability for perovskite solar cells through cesium doping. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 17473–17479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Niu, G.; Yu, H.; Li, J.; Wang, D.; Wang, L. Controlled orientation of perovskite films through mixed cations toward high performance perovskite solar cells. Nano Energy 2016, 27, 87–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Zhang, L.Y.; Zhang, Y.; Guan, W.B.; Wang, K.F.; Cheng, Z.X.; Wang, Y.X. Large enhanced conversion efficiency of perovskite solar cells by CsBr doping. J. Mater. Sci. 2017, 52, 13203–13211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Chang, Y.; Wang, L.; Zhang, J.; Zhou, Z.; Li, C.; Chen, B.; Etgar, L.; Cui, G.; Pang, S. CH3NH2 gas induced (110) preferred cesium-containing perovskite films with reduced PbI6 octahedron distortion and enhanced moisture stability. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 4803–4808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Sedighi, R.; Tajabadi, F.; Taghavinia, N. Vapor assisted deposition of alkaline doped perovskites: Pure phase formation of CsxMA1−xPbI3. Electrochim. Acta 2018, 259, 485–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Wu, Y.; Wang, P.; Wang, S.; Wang, Z.; Cai, B.; Zheng, X.; Chen, Y.; Yuan, N.; Ding, J.; Zhang, W.H. Heterojunction Engineering for High Efficiency Cesium Formamidinium Double-Cation Lead Halide Perovskite Solar Cells. ChemSusChem 2018, 11, 837–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Huang, J.; Xu, P.; Liu, J.; You, X.Z. Sequential Introduction of Cations Deriving Large-Grain CsxFA1−xPbI3 Thin Film for Planar Hybrid Solar Cells: Insight into Phase-Segregation and Thermal-Healing Behavior. Small 2017, 13, 1603225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Xu, X.; Ma, C.; Xie, Y.; Cheng, Y.; Tian, Y.; Li, M.; Ma, Y.; Lee, C.-S.; Tsang, S.W. Air-Processed Mixed-Cation Cs0.15FA0.85PbI3 Planar Perovskite Solar Cells Derived from PbI2-CsI-FAI Intermediate Complex. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 7731–7740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Rehman, W.; McMeekin, D.P.; Patel, J.B.; Milot, R.L.; Johnston, M.B.; Snaith, H.J.; Herz, L.M. Photovoltaic mixed-cation lead mixed-halide perovskites: Links between crystallinity, photo-stability and electronic properties. Energy Environ. Sci. 2017, 10, 361–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Zhou, Y.Y.; Kwun, J.; Garces, H.F.; Pang, S.P.; Padture, N.P. Observation of phase-retention behavior of the HC(NH2)(2)PbI3 black perovskite polymorph upon mesoporous TiO2 scaffolds. Chem. Commun. 2016, 52, 7273–7275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Zhang, L.; Tian, F.; Xie, Z.; Qin, G. Efficiency evaluation on Csx[NH2CH = NH2]1−xPb(I1−yBry)3/crystalline silicon tandem solar cells. Sol. Energy 2017, 147, 432–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Jiang, Y.; Leyden, M.R.; Qiu, L.; Wang, S.; Ono, L.K.; Wu, Z.; Juarez-Perez, E.J.; Qi, Y. Combination of Hybrid CVD and Cation Exchange for Upscaling Cs-Substituted Mixed Cation Perovskite Solar Cells with High Efficiency and Stability. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 28, 1703835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Lee, J.W.; Kim, D.H.; Kim, H.S.; Seo, S.W.; Cho, S.M.; Park, N.G. Formamidinium and Cesium Hybridization for Photo- and Moisture-Stable Perovskite Solar Cell. Adv. Energy Mater. 2015, 5, 1501310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Yi, C.; Luo, J.; Meloni, S.; Boziki, A.; Ashari-Astani, N.; Grätzel, C.; Zakeeruddin, S.M.; Röthlisberger, U.; Grätzel, M. FA CS PB BR IEntropic stabilization of mixed A-cation ABX3 metal halide perovskites for high performance perovskite solar cells. Energy Environ. Sci. 2016, 9, 656–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Yu, Y.; Wang, C.; Grice, C.R.; Shrestha, N.; Chen, J.; Zhao, D.; Liao, W.; Cimaroli, A.J.; Roland, P.J.; Ellingson, R.J.; et al. Improving the Performance of Formamidinium and Cesium Lead Triiodide Perovskite Solar Cells using Lead Thiocyanate Additives. ChemSusChem 2016, 9, 3288–3297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Kim, J.; Saidaminov, M.I.; Tan, H.; Zhao, Y.; Kim, Y.; Choi, J.; Jo, J.W.; Fan, J.; Quintero-Bermudez, R.; Yang, Z.; et al. Amide-Catalyzed Phase-Selective Crystallization Reduces Defect Density in Wide-Bandgap Perovskites. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1706275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. McMeekin, D.P.; Sadoughi, G.; Rehman, W.; Eperon, G.E.; Saliba, M.; Horantner, M.T.; Haghighirad, A.; Sakai, N.; Korte, L.; Rech, B.; et al. A mixed-cation lead mixed-halide perovskite absorber for tandem solar cells. Science 2016, 351, 151–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  132. Luo, P.F.; Zhou, S.W.; Zhou, Y.G.; Xia, W.; Sun, L.; Cheng, J.G.; Xu, C.X.; Lu, Y.W. Fabrication of Cs(x)FA(1-x)PbI(3) Mixed-Cation Perovskites via Gas-Phase-Assisted Compositional Modulation for Efficient and Stable Photovoltaic Devices. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 42708–42716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Conings, B.; Babayigit, A.; Klug, M.T.; Bai, S.; Gauquelin, N.; Sakai, N.; Wang, J.T.-W.; Verbeeck, J.; Boyen, H.-G.; Snaith, H.J. A Universal Deposition Protocol for Planar Heterojunction Solar Cells with High Efficiency Based on Hybrid Lead Halide Perovskite Families. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 10701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Wang, Z.; McMeekin, D.P.; Sakai, N.; Reenen, S.V.; Wojciechowski, K.; Patel, J.B.; Johnston, M.B.; Snaith, H.J. Efficient and Air-Stable Mixed-Cation Lead Mixed-Halide Perovskite Solar Cells with n-Doped Organic Electron Extraction Layers. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1604186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Bischak, C.G.; Hetherington, C.L.; Wu, H.; Aloni, S.; Ogletree, D.F.; Limmer, D.T.; Ginsberg, N.S. Origin of Reversible Photoinduced Phase Separation in Hybrid Perovskites. Nano Lett. 2017, 17, 1028–1033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Liu, T.; Zong, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Yang, M.; Li, Z.; Game, O.S.; Zhu, K.; Zhu, R.; Gong, Q.; Padture, N.P. High-Performance Formamidinium-Based Perovskite Solar Cells via Microstructure-Mediated δ-to-α Phase Transformation. Chem. Mater. 2017, 29, 3246–3250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Xiao, M.; Huang, F.; Huang, W.; Dkhissi, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Etheridge, J.; Gray-Weale, A.; Bach, U.; Cheng, Y.B.; Spiccia, L. A fast deposition-crystallization procedure for highly efficient lead iodide perovskite thin-film solar cells. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2014, 53, 9898–9903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Bush, K.A.; Palmstrom, A.F.; Yu, Z.J.; Boccard, M.; Cheacharoen, R.; Mailoa, J.P.; McMeekin, D.P.; Hoye, R.L.Z.; Bailie, C.D.; Leijtens, T.; et al. 23.6%-efficient monolithic perovskite/silicon tandem solar cells with improved stability. Nat. Energy 2017, 2, 17009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Eperon, G.E.; Leijtens, T.; Bush, K.A.; Prasanna, R.; Green, T.; Wang, J.T.-W.; McMeekin, D.P.; Volonakis, G.; Milot, R.L.; May, R.; et al. Perovskite-perovskite tandem photovoltaics with optimized bandgaps. Science 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  140. Zhang, R.; Liu, D.T.; Wang, Y.F.; Zhang, T.; Gu, X.L.; Zhang, P.; Wu, J.; Chen, Z.D.; Zhao, Y.C.; Li, S.B. Theoretical lifetime extraction and experimental demonstration of stable cesium-containing tri-cation perovskite solar cells with high efficiency. Electrochim. Acta 2018, 265, 98–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Draguta, S.; Christians, J.A.; Morozov, Y.V.; Mucunzi, A.; Manser, J.S.; Kamat, P.V.; Luther, J.M.; Kuno, M. A quantitative and spatially resolved analysis of the performance-bottleneck in high efficiency, planar hybrid perovskite solar cells. Energy Environ. Sci. 2018, 11, 960–969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Mahboubi Soufiani, A.; Zhuo, Y.; Young, T.; Miyata, A.; Surrente, A.; Pascoe, A.R.; Galkowski, K.; Abdi-Jalebi, M.; Brenes, R.; Urban, J.; et al. Impact of Microstructure on the Electron-hole Interaction in Metal Halide Perovskites. Energy Environ. Sci. 2017, 10, 1358–1366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Tsai, H.; Asadpour, R.; Blancon, J.-C.; Stoumpos, C.C.; Durand, O.; Strzalka, J.W.; Chen, B.; Verduzco, R.; Ajayan, P.M.; Tretiak, S.; et al. Light-induced lattice expansion leads to high-efficiency perovskite solar cells. Science 2018, 360, 67–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Saliba, M.; Matsui, T.; Seo, J.Y.; Domanski, K.; Correa-Baena, J.P.; Nazeeruddin, M.K.; Zakeeruddin, S.M.; Tress, W.; Abate, A.; Hagfeldt, A.; et al. Cesium-containing triple cation perovskite solar cells: Improved stability, reproducibility and high efficiency. Energy Environ. Sci. 2016, 9, 1989–1997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Hu, Y.; Hutter, E.M.; Rieder, P.; Grill, I.; Hanisch, J.; Aygüler, M.F.; Hufnagel, A.G.; Handloser, M.; Bein, T.; Hartschuh, A.; et al. Understanding the Role of Cesium and Rubidium Additives in Perovskite Solar Cells: Trap States, Charge Transport, and Recombination. Adv. Energy Mater. 2018, 1703057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Yang, G.; Chen, C.; Yao, F.; Chen, Z.; Zhang, Q.; Zheng, X.; Ma, J.; Lei, H.; Qin, P.; Xiong, L.; et al. Effective Carrier-Concentration Tuning of SnO2 Quantum Dot Electron-Selective Layers for High-Performance Planar Perovskite Solar Cells. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1706023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Wang, C.H.; Zhang, C.J.; Wang, S.T.; Liu, G.; Xia, H.Y.; Tong, S.C.; He, J.; Niu, D.M.; Zhou, C.H.; Ding, K.X.; et al. Low-Temperature Processed, Efficient, and Highly Reproducible Cesium-Doped Triple Cation Perovskite Planar Heterojunction Solar Cells. Sol. RRL 2018, 2, 1700209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Sun, Y.; Peng, J.; Chen, Y.; Yao, Y.; Liang, Z. Triple-cation mixed-halide perovskites: Towards efficient, annealing-free and air-stable solar cells enabled by Pb(SCN)2 additive. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 46193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  149. Matsui, T.; Seo, J.Y.; Saliba, M.; Zakeeruddin, S.M.; Grätzel, M. Room-Temperature Formation of Highly Crystalline Multication Perovskites for Efficient, Low-Cost Solar Cells. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1606258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Deepa, M.; Salado, M.; Calio, L.; Kazim, S.; Shivaprasad, S.M.; Ahmad, S. Cesium power: Low Cs+ levels impart stability to perovskite solar cells. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2017, 19, 4069–4077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  151. Song, J.; Liu, L.; Wang, X.; Chen, G.; Tian, W.; Miyasaka, T. Highly efficient and stable low-temperature processed ZnO solar cells with triple cation perovskite absorber. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 13439–13447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Zhang, M.; Yun, J.S.; Ma, Q.; Zheng, J.; Lau, C.F.J.; Deng, X.; Kim, J.; Kim, D.; Seidel, J.; Green, M.A.; et al. High-Efficiency Rubidium-Incorporated Perovskite Solar Cells by Gas Quenching. ACS Energy Lett. 2017, 2, 438–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Duong, T.; Mulmudi, H.K.; Shen, H.; Wu, Y.; Barugkin, C.; Mayon, Y.O.; Nguyen, H.T.; Macdonald, D.; Peng, J.; Lockrey, M.; et al. Structural engineering using rubidium iodide as a dopant under excess lead iodide conditions for high efficiency and stable perovskites. Nano Energy 2016, 30, 330–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Zhang, X.; Wu, G.; Fu, W.; Qin, M.; Yang, W.; Yan, J.; Zhang, Z.; Lu, X.; Chen, H. Orientation Regulation of Phenylethylammonium Cation Based 2D Perovskite Solar Cell with Efficiency Higher Than 11%. Adv. Energy Mater. 2018, 1702498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Yuan, M.; Quan, L.N.; Comin, R.; Walters, G.; Sabatini, R.; Voznyy, O.; Hoogland, S.; Zhao, Y.; Beauregard, E.M.; Kanjanaboos, P.; et al. Perovskite energy funnels for efficient light-emitting diodes. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2016, 11, 872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Yao, K.; Wang, X.; Xu, Y.-X.; Li, F.; Zhou, L. Multilayered Perovskite Materials Based on Polymeric-Ammonium Cations for Stable Large-Area Solar Cell. Chem. Mater. 2016, 28, 3131–3138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Blancon, J.C.; Tsai, H.; Nie, W.; Stoumpos, C.C.; Pedesseau, L.; Katan, C.; Kepenekian, M.; Soe, C.M.M.; Appavoo, K.; Sfeir, M.Y.; et al. Extremely efficient internal exciton dissociation through edge states in layered 2D perovskites. Science 2017, 355, 1288–1291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  158. Ye, H.-Y.; Liao, W.-Q.; Hu, C.-L.; Zhang, Y.; You, Y.-M.; Mao, J.-G.; Li, P.-F.; Xiong, R.-G. Bandgap Engineering of Lead-Halide Perovskite-Type Ferroelectrics. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 2579–2586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  159. Milot, R.L.; Sutton, R.J.; Eperon, G.E.; Haghighirad, A.A.; Martinez Hardigree, J.; Miranda, L.; Snaith, H.J.; Johnston, M.B.; Herz, L.M. Charge-Carrier Dynamics in 2D Hybrid Metal–Halide Perovskites. Nano Lett. 2016, 16, 7001–7007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  160. Koh, T.M.; Shanmugam, V.; Schlipf, J.; Oesinghaus, L.; Müller-Buschbaum, P.; Ramakrishnan, N.; Swamy, V.; Mathews, N.; Boix, P.P.; Mhaisalkar, S.G. Nanostructuring Mixed-Dimensional Perovskites: A Route toward Tunable, Efficient Photovoltaics. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 3653–3661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  161. Grancini, G.; Roldán-Carmona, C.; Zimmermann, I.; Mosconi, E.; Lee, X.; Martineau, D.; Narbey, S.; Oswald, F.; De Angelis, F.; Graetzel, M.; et al. One-Year stable perovskite solar cells by 2D/3D interface engineering. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 15684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. Wang, K.; Liu, C.; Du, P.; Zheng, J.; Gong, X. Bulk heterojunction perovskite hybrid solar cells with large fill factor. Energy Environ. Sci. 2015, 8, 1245–1255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Wang, Z.; Lin, Q.; Chmiel, F.P.; Sakai, N.; Herz, L.M.; Snaith, H.J. Efficient ambient-air-stable solar cells with 2D–3D heterostructured butylammonium-caesium-formamidinium lead halide perovskites. Nat. Energy 2017, 2, 17135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Zhang, T.; Xie, L.; Chen, L.; Guo, N.; Li, G.; Tian, Z.; Mao, B.; Zhao, Y. In Situ Fabrication of Highly Luminescent Bifunctional Amino Acid Crosslinked 2D/3D NH3C4H9COO(CH3NH3PbBr3)n Perovskite Films. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2017, 27, 1603568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Hu, Y.; Qiu, T.; Bai, F.; Ruan, W.; Zhang, S. Highly Efficient and Stable Solar Cells with 2D MA3Bi2I9/3D MAPbI3 Heterostructured Perovskites. Adv. Energy Mater. 2018, 1703620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Ran, C.; Xi, J.; Gao, W.; Yuan, F.; Lei, T.; Jiao, B.; Hou, X.; Wu, Z. Bilateral Interface Engineering toward Efficient 2D–3D Bulk Heterojunction Tin Halide Lead-Free Perovskite Solar Cells. ACS Energy Lett. 2018, 3, 713–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Paul, T.; Chatterjee, B.K.; Maiti, S.; Sarkar, S.; Besra, N.; Das, B.K.; Panigrahi, K.J.; Thakur, S.; Ghorai, U.K.; Chattopadhyay, K.K. Tunable cathodoluminescence over the entire visible window from all-inorganic perovskite CsPbX3 1D architecture. J. Mater. Chem. C 2018, 6, 3322–3333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Ji, C.; Wang, P.; Wu, Z.; Sun, Z.; Li, L.; Zhang, J.; Hu, W.; Hong, M.; Luo, J. Inch-Size Single Crystal of a Lead-Free Organic–Inorganic Hybrid Perovskite for High-Performance Photodetector. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 28, 1705467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Zhou, C.; Tian, Y.; Wang, M.; Rose, A.; Besara, T.; Doyle, N.K.; Yuan, Z.; Wang, J.C.; Clark, R.; Hu, Y.; et al. Low-Dimensional Organic Tin Bromide Perovskites and Their Photoinduced Structural Transformation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 9018–9022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  170. Yuan, Z.; Zhou, C.; Tian, Y.; Shu, Y.; Messier, J.; Wang, J.C.; van de Burgt, L.J.; Kountouriotis, K.; Xin, Y.; Holt, E.; et al. One-dimensional organic lead halide perovskites with efficient bluish white-light emission. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 14051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  171. Yao, K.; Wang, X.; Li, F.; Zhou, L. Mixed perovskite based on methyl-ammonium and polymeric-ammonium for stable and reproducible solar cells. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 15430–15433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  172. Yao, K.; Wang, X.F.; Xu, Y.X.; Li, F. A general fabrication procedure for efficient and stable planar perovskite solar cells: Morphological and interfacial control by in-situ-generated layered perovskite. Nano Energy 2015, 18, 165–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Bai, Y.; Xiao, S.; Hu, C.; Zhang, T.; Meng, X.; Lin, H.; Yang, Y.; Yang, S. Dimensional Engineering of a Graded 3D–2D Halide Perovskite Interface Enables Ultrahigh Voc Enhanced Stability in the p-i-n Photovoltaics. Adv. Energy Mater. 2017, 7, 1701038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Yang, S.; Wang, Y.; Liu, P.; Cheng, Y.-B.; Zhao, H.J.; Yang, H.G. Functionalization of perovskite thin films with moisture-tolerant molecules. Nat. Energy 2016, 1, 15016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Chen, J.; Seo, J.Y.; Park, N.G. Simultaneous Improvement of Photovoltaic Performance and Stability by In Situ Formation of 2D Perovskite at (FAPbI3)0.88(CsPbBr3)0.12/CuSCN Interface. Adv. Energy Mater. 2018, 1702714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Chen, P.; Bai, Y.; Wang, S.; Lyu, M.; Yun, J.H.; Wang, L. In Situ Growth of 2D Perovskite Capping Layer for Stable and Efficient Perovskite Solar Cells. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 1706923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Cho, K.T.; Grancini, G.; Lee, Y.; Oveisi, E.; Ryu, J.; Almora, O.; Tschumi, M.; Schouwink, P.A.; Seo, G.; Heo, S.; et al. Selective growth of layered perovskites for stable and efficient photovoltaics. Energy Environ. Sci. 2018, 11, 952–959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Zhang, J.; Bai, D.; Jin, Z.; Bian, H.; Wang, K.; Sun, J.; Wang, Q.; Liu, S. 3D–2D–0D Interface Profiling for Record Efficiency All-Inorganic CsPbBrI2 Perovskite Solar Cells with Superior Stability. Adv. Energy Mater. 2018, 1703246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Lee, J.W.; Seol, D.J.; Cho, A.N.; Park, N.G. High-Efficiency Perovskite Solar Cells Based on the Black Polymorph of HC(NH2)2PbI3. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 4991–4998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  180. Cho, K.T.; Paek, S.; Grancini, G.; Roldán-Carmona, C.; Gao, P.; Lee, Y.; Nazeeruddin, M.K. Highly efficient perovskite solar cells with a compositionally engineered perovskite/hole transporting material interface. Energy Environ. Sci. 2017, 10, 621–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Etgar, L.; Gao, P.; Xue, Z.; Peng, Q.; Chandiran, A.K.; Liu, B.; Nazeeruddin, M.K.; Grätzel, M. Mesoscopic CH3NH3PbI3/TiO2 Heterojunction Solar Cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 17396–17399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  182. Kim, H.-S.; Lee, J.-W.; Yantara, N.; Boix, P.P.; Kulkarni, S.A.; Mhaisalkar, S.; Grätzel, M.; Park, N.-G. High Efficiency Solid-State Sensitized Solar Cell-Based on Submicrometer Rutile TiO2 Nanorod and CH3NH3PbI3 Perovskite Sensitizer. Nano Lett. 2013, 13, 2412–2417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  183. Zhang, F.; Shi, W.; Luo, J.; Pellet, N.; Yi, C.; Li, X.; Zhao, X.; Dennis, T.J.S.; Li, X.; Wang, S.; et al. Isomer-Pure Bis-PCBM-Assisted Crystal Engineering of Perovskite Solar Cells Showing Excellent Efficiency and Stability. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1606806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  184. Zhao, Y.; Wei, J.; Li, H.; Yan, Y.; Zhou, W.; Yu, D.; Zhao, Q. A polymer scaffold for self-healing perovskite solar cells. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 10228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  185. Chiang, C.-H.; Wu, C.-G. Bulk heterojunction perovskite–PCBM solar cells with high fill factor. Nat. Photonics 2016, 10, 196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Xu, J.; Buin, A.; Ip, A.H.; Li, W.; Voznyy, O.; Comin, R.; Yuan, M.; Jeon, S.; Ning, Z.; McDowell, J.J.; et al. Perovskite–fullerene hybrid materials suppress hysteresis in planar diodes. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 7081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  187. Li, X.; Ibrahim Dar, M.; Yi, C.; Luo, J.; Tschumi, M.; Zakeeruddin, S.M.; Nazeeruddin, M.K.; Han, H.; Grätzel, M. Improved performance and stability of perovskite solar cells by crystal crosslinking with alkylphosphonic acid ω-ammonium chlorides. Nat. Chem. 2015, 7, 703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  188. Liu, C.; Wang, K.; Du, P.; Yi, C.; Meng, T.; Gong, X. Efficient Solution-Processed Bulk Heterojunction Perovskite Hybrid Solar Cells. Adv. Energy Mater. 2015, 5, 1402024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Jiang, J.; Wang, Q.; Jin, Z.; Zhang, X.; Lei, J.; Bin, H.; Zhang, Z.G.; Li, Y.; Liu, S. Polymer Doping for High-Efficiency Perovskite Solar Cells with Improved Moisture Stability. Adv. Energy Mater. 2018, 8, 1701757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Chung, C.C.; Narra, S.; Jokar, E.; Wu, H.P.; Diau, E.W.G. Inverted planar solar cells based on perovskite/graphene oxide hybrid composites. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 13957–13965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Hadadian, M.; Correa-Baena, J.P.; Goharshadi, E.K.; Ummadisingu, A.; Seo, J.Y.; Luo, J.; Gholipour, S.; Zakeeruddin, S.M.; Saliba, M.; Abate, A.; et al. Enhancing Efficiency of Perovskite Solar Cells via N-doped Graphene: Crystal Modification and Surface Passivation. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 8681–8686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  192. Qian, L.; Sun, Y.; Wu, M.; Xie, D.; Ding, L.; Shi, G. A Solution-Processed High-Performance Phototransistor based on a Perovskite Composite with Chemically Modified Graphenes. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1606175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  193. He, M.; Chen, Y.; Liu, H.; Wang, J.; Fang, X.; Liang, Z. Chemical decoration of CH3NH3PbI3 perovskites with graphene oxides for photodetector applications. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 9659–9661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Introduction of (a) power conversion efficiency of perovskite solar cells over the years [4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11]; (b) the structure of the hybrid perovskite solar cells.
Figure 1. Introduction of (a) power conversion efficiency of perovskite solar cells over the years [4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11]; (b) the structure of the hybrid perovskite solar cells.
Nanomaterials 08 00356 g001
Figure 2. Physical properties of perovskites. (a) Schematic illustration of an ideal perovskite structure. The correlation between the Goldschmidt tolerance factor and the perovskite structure of (b) a typical perovskite and (c) Cs-FA cation perovskite. Reprinted with permission from ref. [41] Copyright 2016 American Chemical Society.
Figure 2. Physical properties of perovskites. (a) Schematic illustration of an ideal perovskite structure. The correlation between the Goldschmidt tolerance factor and the perovskite structure of (b) a typical perovskite and (c) Cs-FA cation perovskite. Reprinted with permission from ref. [41] Copyright 2016 American Chemical Society.
Nanomaterials 08 00356 g002
Figure 3. Energy-level diagram showing the valence band (VB) and conduction band (CB) levels of several typical perovskites [43,44,45,46,47,48].
Figure 3. Energy-level diagram showing the valence band (VB) and conduction band (CB) levels of several typical perovskites [43,44,45,46,47,48].
Nanomaterials 08 00356 g003
Figure 4. Solar cells can be described by an (a) equivalent circuit; (b) Example of a current density-voltage profile.
Figure 4. Solar cells can be described by an (a) equivalent circuit; (b) Example of a current density-voltage profile.
Nanomaterials 08 00356 g004
Figure 5. Structures of (a) inverted (p-i-n) and (b) normal planar structure (n-i-p) perovskite solar cells, (c) mesoporous structured (c) inverted (p-i-n) and (d) normal planar structure (n-i-p) perovskite solar cells. ETL and HTL represent the electron transport layer and hole transport layer, respectively.
Figure 5. Structures of (a) inverted (p-i-n) and (b) normal planar structure (n-i-p) perovskite solar cells, (c) mesoporous structured (c) inverted (p-i-n) and (d) normal planar structure (n-i-p) perovskite solar cells. ETL and HTL represent the electron transport layer and hole transport layer, respectively.
Nanomaterials 08 00356 g005
Table 1. Summary of perovskite solar cell performances employing Cs–MA cations. FTO: fluorine-doped tin oxide; ITO: indium oxide; PCBM: phenyl-C61-butyric acid methyl ester; PCE: power conversion efficiency; PEDOT:PSS: poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) polystyrene sulfonate; Spiro-OMeTAD: 2,2′,7,7′-tetrakis-(N,N-di-p-methoxyphenylamine)9,9′-spirobifluorene.
Table 1. Summary of perovskite solar cell performances employing Cs–MA cations. FTO: fluorine-doped tin oxide; ITO: indium oxide; PCBM: phenyl-C61-butyric acid methyl ester; PCE: power conversion efficiency; PEDOT:PSS: poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) polystyrene sulfonate; Spiro-OMeTAD: 2,2′,7,7′-tetrakis-(N,N-di-p-methoxyphenylamine)9,9′-spirobifluorene.
Device StructurePerovskiteJsc (mA·cm−2)Voc (V)FF (%)PCE (%)YearRef.
ITO/PEDOT:PSS/perovskie/PCBM/AlCs0.1MA0.9PbI310.101.050.737.682014[113]
FTO/c-TiO2/mp-TiO2/perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/AgCsxMA1−xPbI3////2016[114]
FTO/c-TiO2/mp-TiO2/perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/AgCs0.1MA0.9PbI320.971.100.7417.082017[118]
FTO/c-TiO2/mp-TiO2/perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/AuCs0.09MA0.91PbI322.571.060.7618.12017[115]
FTO/c-TiO2/mp-TiO2/perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/AuCs0.1MA0.9PbI319.200.960.7013.02018[119]
FTO/c-TiO2/mp-TiO2/perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/Ag(CsBr)0.1
(MAPbI3)0.9
22.600.930.6513.62017[117]
FTO/c-TiO2/mp-TiO2/perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/Au(MAPbI3)0.9
(CsPbBr3)0.1,
22.81.050.7317.62016[116]
Table 2. Summary of perovskite solar cell performances employing Cs-FA cations.
Table 2. Summary of perovskite solar cell performances employing Cs-FA cations.
Device StructurePerovskiteJsc (mA·cm−2)Voc (V)FF (%)PCE (%)YearRef.
FTO/c-TiO2/perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/AgCs0.1FA0.9PbI323.51.060.6616.52015[127]
FTO/c-TiO2/mp-TiO2/perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/AuCs0.2FA0.8PbI321.51.010.715.692016[128]
FTO/c-TiO2/mTiO2/perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/AuCs0.2FA0.8PbI2.84Br0.1621.91.070.7417.352016[128]
FTO/NiO/perovskite/PCBM/PFN-Br/AgCs0.2FA0.8PbI319.851.010.7115.382017[121]
FTO/SnO2/C60-SAM/perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/AuCs0.2FA0.8PbI321.851.060.7617.612016[129]
FTO/SnO2/C60-SAM/perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/AuCs0.2FA0.8PbI3 & 0.6% Pb(SCN)222.251.090.8119.572016[129]
ITO/c-TiO2/perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/AuFA0.83Cs0.17Pb(I0.6Br0.4)318.341.230.7917.82018[130]
FTO/SnO2/PCBM/perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/AgFA0.83Cs0.17Pb(I0.6Br0.4)319.41.190.7817.92016[131]
FTO/c-TiO2/perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/AgCs0.15FA0.85PbI322.850.910.6914.462017[132]
ITO/SnO2/C60/perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/AgFA0.85Cs0.15Pb(I0.95Br0.05)322.41.010.7216.22016[133]
ITO/TPD/perovskite/C60/AgCs0.15FA0.85PbI323.361.000.6415.182018[122]
FTO/c-TiO2/perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/AgFA0.85Cs0.15PbI321.501.080.7517.32016[41]
FTO/SnO2/C60/perovskite/spiro-OMeTAD/Au(HC(NH2)2)0.83Cs0.17Pb(I0.6Br0.4)323.01.060.7518.32017[134]
FTO/c-TiO2/perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/AuCs0.07FA0.93PbI321.90.980.7215.32018[126]
Table 3. Performance summary of perovskite solar cells employing multiple cations.
Table 3. Performance summary of perovskite solar cells employing multiple cations.
Device StructurePerovskiteJsc (mA·cm−2)Voc (V)FF (%)PCE (%)YearRef.
FTO/c-TiO2/mp-TiO2/perovskite/PTAA/AuMA-FAPb-Br-I25.001.100.8022.12017[5]
FTO/SnO2/C60/perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/Ag(FA0.83MA0.17)0.95 Cs0.05Pb(I0.9Br0.1)322.61.080.7418.02016[133]
ITO/NiOx/F6TCNNQ/perovskite/PCBM/Zracc/AgCs-FA-MAPb-Br-I23.181.120.8020.862018[70]
FTO/SnO2/perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/AuCs0.056FA0.76MA0.15PbI2.42Br0.4822.031.150.7719.562018[21]
ITO/PEN/QD-SnO2/perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/AuCs0.05(MA0.17FA0.83)0.95Pb(I0.83Br0.17)323.051.130.7920.792018[146]
ITO/SnO2/Perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/AgFA0.945MA0.025Cs0.03 Pb(I0.975Br0.025)324.941.120.7320.512018[147]
FTO/QD-SnO2/perovskite/PBDBT/Spiro-OMeTAD/Au(CsPbI3)0.04(FAPb I3)0.82(MAPbBr3)0.1422.391.120.7919.852018[37]
FTO/c-TiO2/perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/AuCs-FA-MAPb-Br-I21.771.130.7618.762018[141]
FTO/c-TiO2/mp-TiO2/perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/AuCs0.06FA0.79MA0.15 Pb(I0.85Br0.15)3 & KI23.21.170.7921.52018[22]
ITO/PTAA/perovskite/C60/BCP/CuMA0.6FA0.38Cs0.02PbI2.975Br0.025 & 5 mol% MACl22.701.100.7319.22017[59]
ITO/PEDOT:PSS/perovskite/PC61BM/Bphen/AlFA0.7MA0.2Cs0.1Pb (I5/6Br1/6)3 & Pb(SCN)218.211.060.7316.092017[148]
FTO/c-TiO2/mp-TiO2/perovskite/PTAA/Au(FA0.79MA0.16Cs0.05) Pb(I0.83Br0.17)321.51.150.7318.102017[149]
FTO/c-TiO2/mp-TiO2/perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/AuCs0.05(MA0.15FA0.85)0.95
Pb(I0.85Br0.15)3
21.71.050.7517.12017[150]
ITO/ZnO/perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/AgCs6(MA0.17FA0.83)94Pb(I0.83Br0.17)322.51.120.7318.62017[151]
FTO/bl-TiO2/Li-mp-TiO2/perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/Au(FAPbI3)0.83(MAPbBr3)0.1723.501.070.7421.12016[144]
FTO/c-TiO2/Li-mp-TiO2/perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/AuRb5(Cs5MAFA)0.95Pb(IBr)x22.81.180.8121.82016[6]
FTO/c-TiO2/perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/AuRb0.05Cs0.05[(FA0.83MA0.17)]0.9 Pb(I0.83Br0.17)320.651.470.7217.022018[145]
FTO/c-TiO2/mp-TiO2/perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/AuFA0.80MA0.15Rb0.05 PbI2.55Br0.4523.21.170.7320.02017[152]
FTO/c-TiO2/mp-TiO2/perovskite/PTAA/AuRb-MA-FA-Pb-I-Br23.241.120.7218.802016[153]
Table 4. Performance summary of one-dimensional (1-D), two-dimensional (2-D), and three-dimensional (3-D) perovskite solar cells.
Table 4. Performance summary of one-dimensional (1-D), two-dimensional (2-D), and three-dimensional (3-D) perovskite solar cells.
Device SintructurePerovskiteJsc (mA·cm−2)Voc (V)FF (%)PCE (%)YearRef.
ITO/PEDOT:PSS/perovskite/PCBM/AlCH3NH3PbI3/A10C6019.410.880.8213.972015[162]
FTO/SnO2/PC61BM/perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/AuBA0.05(FA0.83 Cs0.17)0.95Pb(I0.8Br0.2)322.71.140.820.62017[163]
FTO/c-TiO2/perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD /AuCsPbI3•0.025EDAPbI414.531.150.7111.862017[164]
FTO/bl-TiO2/perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD /AuMAPbI3/MA3Bi2I923.031.090.7618.972018[165]
ITO/PEDOT:PSS/perovskite/C60/BCP/AlFASnI3/PEAI24.10.520.719.012018[27]
FTO/c-TiO2/mp-TiO2/perovskite/TBP/AuCs0.04MA0.16FA0.8PbI0.85Br0.15/PZPY21.701.080.7718.102018[29]
FTO/c-TiO2/mp-TiO2/perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/AuCH3NH3PbI3/(HOOC(CH2)4 NH3)2PbI418.841.020.7514.62017[161]
FTO/c-TiO2/mp-TiO2/perovskite/ZrO2/CarbonCH3NH3PbI3/(HOOC(CH2)4 NH3)2PbI423.990.850.6312.712017[161]
FTO/c-TiO2/mp-TiO2/perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/Ag(MAPbI3)1−x/
[(PEI)2PbI4]x
20.101.070.7315.602015[171]
ITO/PEDOT:PSS/Perovskite/PCBM/LiF/Ag[(PEI)2PbI4]x/
(MAPbI3)1−x
19.951.070.7225.272015[172]
FTO/c-TiO2/mp-TiO2/perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/Au(IC2H4NH3)2 (CH3NH3)n−1PbnI3n+1:CH3NH3PbI314.880.830.699.032016[160]
ITO/PEDOT:PSS/Perovskite/C60/BCP/Ag(PEA,FA)SnI320.070.470.746.982018[166]
Table 5. Performance summary of graded hybrid perovskite solar cells.
Table 5. Performance summary of graded hybrid perovskite solar cells.
Device SintructurePerovskiteJsc (mA cm−2)Voc (V)FF (%)PCE (%)YearRef.
ITO/PEDOT:PSS/perovskite/PCBM/Rhodamine 101/LiF/AgCA2PbI4/MAPbIxCl3−x19.290.920.7713.862016[31]
FTO/TiO2/perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/AuCH3NH3PbI3 (TMA)20.100.990.6513.002016[174]
FTO/c-TiO2/perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/AuCH3NH3PbI3 (TEA)19.600.990.6712.892016[174]
FTO/c-TiO2/mp-TiO2/perovskite/CuSCN/Au(5AVA)2PbI4/(FAPbI3)0.88(Cs PbBr3)0.12 & HI21.931.070.7216.752018[175]
FTO/c-TiO2/mp-TiO2/perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/AuCs0.05(FA0.83 MA0.17)0.95Pb(I0.83Br0.17)322.891.110.7318.512018[176]
ITO/PTAA/perovskite/PCBM/C60/BCP/CuMAPbI3/BA22.491.110.7819.562018[28]
ITO/PTAA/perovskite/PCBM/C60/BCP/CuMAPbI3/BAI22.591.090.7718.852018[28]
FTO/c-TiO2/mp-TiO2/perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/AuFAPbI3/MAPbI320.971.030.7416.012014[179]
FTO/c-TiO2/mp-TiO2/perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/Au(FAPbI3)0.85(MAPbBr3)0.15/FAPbBr3−xIx23.181.160.7921.312017[180]
FTO/c-TiO2/mp-TiO2/perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/AuCs0.1FA0.74MA0.13PbI2.48Br0.39/PEIA22.731.140.7620.082018[177]
FTO/c-TiO2/mp-TiO2/perovskite/PTAA/Au3-D/2-D/0-D CsPbBrI212.931.190.8012.392018[178]
FTO/NiOx/perovskite/PCBM/AgMAPbI3/PEAI21.81.170.7819.892017[173]
Table 6. Summary of hybrid composite perovskite/material-based solar cells (PSCs).
Table 6. Summary of hybrid composite perovskite/material-based solar cells (PSCs).
Device StructurePerovskiteJsc(mA cm−2)Voc (V)FF (%)PCE (%)YearRef.
FTO/c-TiO2/mp-Li-TiO2/perovskit/Spiro-OMeTAD/AgCs0.05(MA0.17FA0.83)0.95 Pb(I0.83Br0.17)3:carbon nanoparticles22.101.160.7218.302018[34]
FTO/c-TiO2/P61BM/perovskit/P3HT/Mo3/AgCH3NH3PbI3:PC 61BM26.860.90.5312.782015[188]
FTO/SnO2/perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD /Au(CsPbI3)0.04(FAPbI3)
0.82(MAPbBr3)0.14:
PBDB-T
22.391.110.7819.382018[35]
ITO/Mixing graphene oxide/perovskite/PCBM/AgMAPbI3:Mixing graphene oxide20.710.960.7615.202017[190]
FTO/c-TiO2/mp-TiO2/perovskit/Spiro-OMeTAD/AuFA0.85 MA0.15 Pb(I0.85 Br0.15)3:reduced graphene oxides21.801.150.7418.732016[191]
ITO/PEDOT:PSS/Perovskite/Ca/PC71BM/AlCH3NH3PbI3:PC61BM20.200.970.8216.02016[185]
FTO/c-TiO2/mp-TiO2/perovskit/Spiro-OMeTAD/AuCH3NH3PbI3:4-ABPACl21.981.000.7015.382015[187]
FTO/c-TiO2/perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/AuMAI:(Pb(Ac)2):PCBM18.01.080.7514.42015[186]
FTO/c-TiO2/mp-TiO2/perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/AuCH3NH3PbI3−xClx: C60SAM19.600.840.7211.72013[36]
FTO/c-TiO2/mp-TiO2/perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/Au(FAI)0.81(PbI2)0.85
(MABr)0.15(PbBr2)0.15: α-bis-PCBM
23.731.110.7320.802017[183]
FTO/c-TiO2/perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/AuCH3NH3PbI:PC61BM22.50.980.7215.42016[184]
FTO/c-TiO2/perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/AuCH3NH3PbI:J7122.311.110.7819.192018[189]
FTO/c-TiO2/perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/AuCH3NH3PbI:J5022.281.100.7618.812018[189]
FTO/c-TiO2/perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/AuCH3NH3PbI:J5122.111.100.7718.922018[189]
FTO/c-TiO2/perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/AuCH3NH3PbI:J6122.351.100.7518.692018[189]
FTO/c-TiO2/perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/AuCH3NH3PbI:N220022.271.100.7719.072018[189]
FTO/c-TiO2/perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/AuCH3NH3PbI:PMMA21.711.110.7618.402018[189]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wu, Y.; Chen, W.; Chen, G.; Liu, L.; He, Z.; Liu, R. The Impact of Hybrid Compositional Film/Structure on Organic–Inorganic Perovskite Solar Cells. Nanomaterials 2018, 8, 356. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano8060356

AMA Style

Wu Y, Chen W, Chen G, Liu L, He Z, Liu R. The Impact of Hybrid Compositional Film/Structure on Organic–Inorganic Perovskite Solar Cells. Nanomaterials. 2018; 8(6):356. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano8060356

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wu, Yinghui, Wei Chen, Guo Chen, Liyu Liu, Zhubing He, and Ruchuan Liu. 2018. "The Impact of Hybrid Compositional Film/Structure on Organic–Inorganic Perovskite Solar Cells" Nanomaterials 8, no. 6: 356. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano8060356

APA Style

Wu, Y., Chen, W., Chen, G., Liu, L., He, Z., & Liu, R. (2018). The Impact of Hybrid Compositional Film/Structure on Organic–Inorganic Perovskite Solar Cells. Nanomaterials, 8(6), 356. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano8060356

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop