Next Article in Journal
Determination of Transport Properties of Glycol-Based NanoFluids Derived from Surface Functionalized Graphene
Previous Article in Journal
Ups and Downs of Water Photodecolorization by Nanocomposite Polymer Nanofibers
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Tuning Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance of Nanoporous Gold with a Silica Shell for Surface Enhanced Raman Scattering

1
Shanghai Key Laboratory of Modern Optical System, Engineering Research Center of Optical Instrument and System (Ministry of Education), School of Optical-Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, China
2
State Key Laboratory of Metal Matrix Composites, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200030, China
3
Key Laboratory for Ultrafine Materials of Ministry of Education, School of Materials Science and Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work (C.M. and W.L.).
Nanomaterials 2019, 9(2), 251; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9020251
Submission received: 19 December 2018 / Revised: 2 February 2019 / Accepted: 3 February 2019 / Published: 12 February 2019

Abstract

:
We report the tuning of localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) of nanoporous gold (NPG) by silica coating, which also affects the surface enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) of NPG. In this study, controllable silica shell is assembled on the NPG surface, and a fully silica thin layer causes more than 50 nm red-shift of LSPR band due to dielectric medium dependence. Additionally, ~1 nm silica coated NPG film shows excellent SERS enhancement, which is due to electromagnetic coupling between ligaments and local surface plasmon field enhancement within pores, and theoretical analysis indicates that silica coating further improves the coupling effect, which demonstrates the electromagnetic origin of the tuning of SERS effect.

1. Introduction

Numerous nanoporous metals (NPM) that were obtained via dealloying exhibit a bicontinuous network and have been demonstrated to possess superior optical properties [1,2,3,4]. Among these, nanoporous gold (NPG) has stood apart for use in analytical and sensing applications, such as surface enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) [5,6,7], surface enhanced fluorescence (SEF) [8,9,10], and bio-chemo-sensing [1,11,12]. This can be attributed to its many desirable properties, including excellent chemical stability, tunable pore size, high effective surface area, and strong electromagnetic fields (EM) appearing in the vicinity of metallic ligaments. Recently, the SERS ability of free-standing NPG films have been systematically investigated, not only due to the high specific surface area and the interconnected hollow channels [5,12,13,14,15], but also because of the controllable localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) related with ligament and nanopore sizes. According to the research, NPG with smaller ligaments and nanopore size exhibits better SERS enhancement, and the relatively strong enhancement results from the hotspot due to the large curvatures of the nano-sized ligaments and the EM coupling between neighboring ligaments and intensified LSPR [6,7,8,9,16,17,18]. However, for the bare NPG with small ligaments, the LSPR band is around 545 nm [19]. In order to further tune the LSPR of NPG, a core-shell structure has been constructed with the LSPR band shifts red to ~620 nm [20,21]. Since the LSPR and coupling effects are the key to the NPG-based SERS substrates, in this study, we fabricated silica coated NPG (SiO2@NPG) [22,23,24,25], and systematically investigated the influence of silica shell on LSPR and the related SERS effect. The LSPR band seriously varied with silica shell thickness, and the SERS ability of SiO2@NPG substrate reached a maximum value with around 1–2 nm-thick silica coating, which is two times stronger than that of the bare NPG. The use of a chemically inert shell coating around the NPG not only can protect the SERS-active nanostructure from contact with whatever is being probed [26], but also extend the range of resonance excitation wavelength due to the tuning of NPG LSPR around few tens of nanometers. The enlarged SERS activity with longer wavelength laser excitation expanded the possible application of NPG-based substrate in the biochemical sensing field.

2. Materials and Methods

NPG films were prepared from Au35Ag65 (at.%) alloy films with a thickness of ~100 nm [27,28]. Polymer supported alloy films were immerged in nitric acid for 20 min at room temperature. The bare NPG films were washed several times by ultrapure water (18.25 MΩ·cm) to remove excess nitric acid, and then put in a drying cabinet for further experimentation.
Atomic layer deposition (ALD) is a widely used method for forming uniform and ultrathin solid films, including metal oxides and semiconductor materials with sub-nanometer thickness [2,21]; however, heating processes are always needed for vapor-phase ALD [21]. In order to avoid a coarsening effect of NPG during heating; here, we adopt another wet chemical method to coat NPG with thin silica. A surfactant template assistant method was applied to prepare a silica shell, and Figure 1 shows the fabrication process. NPG films were immerged in 0.1 M cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) aqueous solution for 1 h to assemble CTAB on the surface of NPG. Then, CTAB modified NPG films were stabilized in the plating solution, which was mixed by 50 mL 6 mM CTAB, 25 mL ethanol (99.7%) and 30 μL NH3·H2O at 35 °C with steadily stirring. Five minutes later, 80 μL tetraethoxysilane (TEOS) was added dropwise in the container under vigorous stirring to ensure homogeneity of the solution, silica was formed by hydrolysis of TEOS [22]. CTAB modified NPG films were kept in solution for 2 h, 5 h, 10 h, 20 h and 30 h, respectively, and silica shells with different thickness were generated on the NPG surface. The thickness of silica was increased with time but not with a linear dependence. Finally, the SiO2@NPG films were washed by ethanol and ultrapure water alternately, and then dried in the air. For comparison, the silica shell was coated on gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) decorated on polymer films with the same method described in Figure 1. The gold AuNPs were prepared by laser ablation, which has been reported in our previous work [29].
The SERS measurements were carried out on a homemade Raman spectroscope with a 50 mm spectrograph (Andor) and CCD (Andor). A droplet of crystal violet (CV) aqueous solution was dropped on as-prepared substrate and covered with coverslip for SERS dection. Both 532 nm and 633 nm laser excitation were used for the Raman measurements, and the size of laser beam is ~5 μm in diameter with a power of 0.6 mW on the sample surface and 10 s exposure time.

3. Results and Discussion

The microstructure of NPG and SiO2@NPG films were observed by scanning electron microscope (SEM, ThermoFisher Scientific, Massachusetts, MA, USA) and transmission electron microscope (TEM, JEM-2100F, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan). Figure 2a shows the SEM image of the bare NPG, and the average nanopore size of NPG is ~28 nm in diameter. From the TEM images (Figure 2b,c) of SiO2@NPG, it can be seen that silica fully covers the surface of NPG ligaments, and the thickness of the silica layer increases with the plating time. With 10 h of plating, the thickness of silica is ~1–2 nm (Figure 2b), while, with 20 h of plating, the thickness of silica is ~5–10 nm (Figure 2c). More evidence can be found from the Energy Dispersive Spectrometer (EDS), where the mass percentage of Si increases with the reaction time, while Au decreases gradually (Figure 2d). Thus, the thickness of the silica layer can be adjusted by controlling the reaction time, and it can also be noted that the silica film thickness is dependent on the shape of the pores, and different thickness is attained in spherical and elliptical pores.
The back-scattering spectra were accomplished by a UV-Vis spectrophotometer (HORIBA Dual-FL-UV-800, Kyoto, Japan). Extinction spectra of NPG and SiO2@NPG films are shown in Figure 3a. There are two characteristic peaks in each spectrum [30], and the shorter wavelength peak located at about 490 nm does not change with silica coating because this peak originates from the resonance of gold films [19,20,31,32], whereas the longer wavelength peak, arising from LSPR, represents red-shift from ~550 nm to ~610 nm with the increase of silica shell (Figure 3b), due to the larger refractive index of silica compared to air [20,21]. Additionally, the LSPR band dramatically changed after 5 h plating indicating that NPG is becoming perfectly covered. Compared to silica coated Au NPs (see Figure S1 in supporting information), the LSPR tuning of NPG via silica coating is more obvious than that of nanoparticles, where the extinction spectra exhibit only a slight red-shift after silica coating [25,26].
In order to investigate the silica effect on an NPG based SERS substrate, we measured the SERS activity of SiO2@NPG films with both 532 nm and 633 nm laser excitation. The SERS spectra were evaluated using CV as probe molecules and a droplet of 2.5 µL CV aqueous solution with the concentration of 10−5 M was dripped on the substrate, and then covered with a coverslip for measurement. Figure 4a,c,e show the SERS spectra of CV molecules on the substrates, and several characteristic peaks of CV range from 1000 to 1800 cm−1 can be observed. The normalized SERS intensity of Raman peaks of CV at 1178, 1369 and 1617 cm−1 with different silica coating times is analyzed and listed in Figure 4b,d,e. With 633 nm laser excitation, silica coating first leads to a slight decrease of SERS intensity; however, further coating with silica causes an obvious increase of SERS intensity due to the tuning of the LSPR wavelength to 610 nm, which is consonant with the excitation wavelength [26]. The SERS intensity gradually reached a peak value with the 10 h plated NPG, at which the SERS enhancement is twice that of bare NPG. After this, the SERS intensities decrease gradually due to the further increased inter-distance between the CV molecules and NPG surface. With 532 nm laser excitation (Figure 4c,d), the signal intensities decrease with the silica coating, indicating that the LSPR plays a key role for the SERS of an NPG substrate.
For comparison, SERS ability of silica coated Au nanoparticles (SiO2@AuNPs) was also evaluated using CV as probe molecules, and the detection process was similar to the NPG films. Figure 4e presents the SERS spectra of CV (10−4 M) molecules on AuNP decorated polymer films. The SERS intensities (Figure 4f) obtained from SiO2@AuNPs are weaker than the ones from SiO2@NPG. Those characteristic peak intensities dramatically decreased with the silica coating, unlike SiO2@NPG where a maximum point exhibits with ~2 nm silica shell by 633 nm laser excitation. The different performance of NPG is mainly attributed to the LSPR variation that related to the unique bicontinuous nanostructure and coupling effect of adjacent ligaments.
The electromagnetic enhancement origins of the SERS effect with SiO2@NPG as substrate were further investigated by finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) simulation, and the electromagnetic distribution of both bare NPG and silica-coated NPG were analyzed. A simplified 2D ring structure with identical ligament (D) and pore (d) sizes (Figure 5a) is introduced to qualitatively simulate the electromagnetic filed of NPG [33], and the characteristic length of ring is set as 28 nm in circular diameter, which is approximately equal to the ligament size of NPG that was used in the experiment. Moreover, a uniform silica thin layer is covered on the NPG surface to simulate SiO2@NPG, and the boundary condition is a perfectly matched layer (PML) and the fineness of the grid is 1 nm × 1 nm × 1 nm. To obtain the electromagnetic field in the vicinity of ring interface, an xy plane monitor is placed at the position of the central section, and the simulation time is set at 1000 fs to ensure complete decay of the field. Under the plane wave with wavelength of 633 nm and horizontal direction polarized propagating along the direction normal to the top surface of the nanostructure, the local electromagnetic distributions are shown in Figure 5b–g. Strong electromagnetic fields that related to the polarization direction of input source [34] appear in the vicinity of gold ligaments, and the inner intensities are stronger than the outside ones, which is due to the coupling between ligaments. Moreover, with the increasing of silica thickness, the intensity of electromagnetic fields exhibits a maximum value at the point of 2 nm silica (see Figure 5h), which matches well with the experimental results. Generally speaking, the coating ultrathin silica shell on the NPG surface can tune the LSPR wavelength as well as promote the intensity of SERS, and both the experimental and theoretical results confirm that the high sensitivity achieved with SiO2@NPG is attributed to the long-range effect of the enhanced field that was generated by strengthening of the coupling effect and index induced focus [35].

4. Conclusions

In summary, the NPG surface has been coated with ultrathin silica films by a chemical plating method with the thickness adjusted by the reaction time. The resonant LSPR band presents a remarkable red-shift with silica coating. Compared with core-shell nanoparticles, NPG films exhibit an excellent SERS effect after coating with silica, which is due to electromagnetic coupling between ligaments and local surface plasmon field enhancement within pores. This study has an important implication in developing the SiO2@NPG films as an SERS sensing candidate.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2079-4991/9/2/251/s1, Figure S1: Extinction spectra of SiO2@AuNPs with different silica coating time (0 h represents bare AuNPs).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.Z., W.L. and C.M.; Methodology, C.M.; Software, W.L.; Validation, L.Z., W.L. and C.M.; Formal Analysis, L.Z., W.L. and C.M.; Investigation, L.Z., W.L. and C.M. Resources, L.Z.; Data Curation, L.Z. and L.C.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, L.Z., W.L., L.C. and C.M.; Writing—Review & Editing, L.Z. and L.C.; Visualization, B.C.; Supervision, L.Z., L.C. and H.Z.; Project Administration, L.Z., L.C. and H.Z.; Funding Acquisition, L.Z., L.C. and H.Z.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Found of China (61675133, 61875126, 51502092 and 11727812), the Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Commission (17ZR1447500), and the Program for Professor of Special Appointment (Eastern Scholar) at Shanghai Institutions of Higher Learning (TP2015028).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Seker, E.; Shih, W.C.; Stine, K.J. Nanoporous metals by alloy corrosion: Bioanalytical and biomedical applications. MRS Bull. 2018, 43, 49–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Garoli, D.; Calandrini, E.; Ortolani, A.; Cattarin, S.; Barison, S.; Toma, A.; De Angelis, F. Boosting infrared energy transfer in 3D nanoporous gold antennas. NanoScale 2017, 9, 915–922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Garoli, D.; Calandrini, E.; Bozzola, A.; Toma, A.; Cattarin, S.; Ortolani, M.; De Angelis, F. Fractal-like plasmonic metamaterial with a tailorable plasma frequency in the near-infrared. ACS Photonics 2018, 5, 3408–3414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Garoli, D.; Ruffato, G.; Cattarin, S.; Barison, S. Nanoporous gold—Application to extraordinary optical transmission of light. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B Nanotechnol. Microelectron. Mater. Process. Meas. Phenom. 2012, 31, 2601–2606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhang, L.; Lang, X.Y.; Hirata, A.; Chen, M.W. Wrinkled nanoporous gold films with ultrahigh surface-enhanced Raman scattering enhancement. ACS Nano 2011, 5, 4407–4413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Lang, X.Y.; Gua, P.F.; Zhang, L.; Fujita, T.; Chen, M.W. Characteristic Length and Temperature Dependence of Surface Enhanced Raman Scattering of Nanoporous Gold. Phys. Chem. C 2009, 113, 10956–10961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Qian, L.H.; Yan, X.Q.; Fujita, T.; Inoue, A.; Chen, M.W. Surface enhanced Raman scattering of nanoporous gold: Smaller pore sizes stronger enhancements. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2007, 90, 783–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhang, L.; Song, Y.; Fujita, T.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, M.W.; Wang, T.H. Large Enhancement of Quantum Dot Fluorescence by Highly Scalable Nanoporous Gold. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 1289–1294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Song, Y.; Zhang, L.; Chen, M.W.; Wang, T.H. Single Quantum Dot Fluorescence Enhancement by Tunable Nanoporous Gold. In Proceedings of the 2012 12th IEEE International Conference on Nanotechnology (IEEE-NANO), Birmingham, UK, 20–23 August 2012. [Google Scholar]
  10. Lang, X.Y.; Guan, P.F.; Fujita, T.; Chen, M.W. Tailored nanoporous gold for ultrahigh fluorescence enhancement. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2011, 13, 3795–3799. [Google Scholar]
  11. Ruffato, G.; Romanato, F.; Garoli, D.; Cattarin, S. Nanoporous gold plasmonic structures for sensing applications. Opt. Express 2011, 19, 13164–13170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhang, L.; Chang, H.X.; Hirata, A.; Wu, H.K.; Xue, Q.K.; Chen, M.W. Nanoporous Gold Based Optical Sensor for Sub-ppt Detection of Mercury Ions. ACS Nano 2013, 7, 4595–4600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Liu, H.W.; Zhang, L.; Lang, X.Y.; Yamaguchi, Y.; Iwasaki, H.; Inouye, Y.; Xue, Q.K.; Chen, M.W. Single molecule detection from a large-scale SERS-active Au79Ag21 substrate. Sci. Rep. 2010, 1, 112–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Kucheyev, S.O.; Hayes, J.R.; Biener, J.; Huser, T.; Talley, C.E.; Hamza, A.V. Surface-enhanced Raman scattering on nanoporous Au. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2006, 89, 783–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Dixon, M.C.; Daniel, T.A.; Hieda, M.; Smilgies, D.M.; Chan, M.H.; Allara, D.L. Preparation, structure, and optical properties of nanoporous gold thin films. Langmuir 2007, 23, 2414–2422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Chen, L.Y.; Zhang, L.; Fujita, T.; Chen, M.W. Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering of Silver@Nanoporous Copper Core−Shell Composites Synthesized by an In Situ Sacrificial Template Approach. Phys. Chem. C 2009, 113, 14195–14199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ahmed, S.R.; Hossain, M.A.; Park, J.Y.; Kim, S.H.; Lee, D.Y.; Suzuki, T.; Lee, J.; Park, E.Y. Metal enhanced fluorescence on nanoporous gold leaf-based assay platform for virus detection. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2014, 58, 33–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Malek, K.; Brzózka, A.; Rygula, A.; Sulka, G.D. SERS imaging of silver coated nanostructured Al and Al2O3 substrates. The effect of nanostructure. Raman Spectrosc. 2014, 45, 281–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lang, X.Y.; Qian, L.H.; Guan, P.F.; Zi, J.; Chen, M.W. Localized surface plasmon resonance of nanoporous gold. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2011, 98, 189–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Qian, L.H.; Shen, W.; Das, B.; Shen, B.; Qin, G.W. Alumina coating of ultrafine nanoporous gold at room temperature and their optical properties. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2009, 479, 259–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Qian, L.H.; Shen, W.; Shen, B.; Qin, G.W.; Das, B. Nanoporous gold–alumina core–shell films with tunable optical properties. Nanotechnology 2010, 21, 5705–5711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Gorelikov, I.; Matsuura, N. Single-Step Coating of Mesoporous Silica on Cetyltrimethyl Ammonium Bromide-Capped Nanoparticles. Nano Lett. 2008, 8, 369–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Kobayashi, Y.; Katakami, H.; Mine, E.; Nagao, D.; Konno, M.; Liz-Marzán, L.M. Silica coating of silver nanoparticles using a modified Stober method. Colloid Interface Sci. 2005, 283, 392–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Liu, K.; Bai, Y.C.; Zhang, L.; Yang, Z.B.; Fan, Q.K.; Zheng, H.Q.; Yin, Y.D.; Gao, C.B. Porous Au-Ag Nanospheres with High-Density and Highly Accessible Hotspots for SERS Analysis. Nano Lett. 2016, 16, 3675–3681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Marta, N.S.; Kadir, S.; Sara, B.; Luis, M.L. Templated Growth of Surface Enhanced Raman Scattering-Active Branched Gold Nanoparticles within Radial Mesoporous Silica Shells. ACS Nano 2015, 9, 489–497. [Google Scholar]
  26. Li, J.F.; Huang, Y.F.; Ding, Y.; Yang, Z.L.; Li, S.B.; Zhou, X.S.; Fan, F.R.; Zhang, W.; Zhou, Z.Y.; Wu, D.Y.; et al. Shell-isolated nanoparticle-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Nature 2010, 1267, 392–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Ding, Y.; Kim, Y.J.; Erlebacher, J. Nanoporous Gold Leaf: “Ancient Technology”/Advanced Material. Adv. Mater. 2004, 16, 1897–1900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Garoli, D.; Ruffato, G.; Zilio, P.; Calandrini, E.; De Angelis, F.; Romanato, F.; Cattarin, S. Nanoporous gold leaves: Preparation, optical characterization and plasmonic behavior in the visible and mid-infrared spectral regions. Opt. Mater. Express 2015, 5, 2246–2256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Xie, M.; Zhang, L. A laser ablation method for the synthesis of AuAg alloy nanoparticles and the application in SERS. Opt. Instrum. 2017, 39, 46–49. [Google Scholar]
  30. Lin, L.; Reeves, R.J.; Blaikie, R.J. Surface-plasmon-enhanced light transmission through planar metallic films. Phys. Rev. B 2006, 74, 5407–5413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wang, D.; Schaaf, P. Plasmonic nanosponges. Adv. Phys. X 2018, 3, 476–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Jalas, D.; Canchi, R.; Petrov, A.; Lang, S.; Shao, L.; Weissmüller, J.; Eich, M. Effective medium model for the spectral properties of nanoporous gold in the visible. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2014, 105, 450–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Fujita, T.; Qian, L.H.; Inoke, K.; Erlebacher, J.; Chen, M.W. Three-dimensional morphology of nanoporous gold. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2008, 92, 450–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Lang, X.Y.; Guan, P.F.; Zhang, L.; Fujita, T.; Chen, M.W. Size dependence of molecular fluorescence enhancement of nanoporous gold. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2010, 96, 3701–3703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Li, F.; Zhang, Y.J.; Ding, S.Y.; Panneerselvam, R.; Tian, Z.Q. Core–Shell Nanoparticle-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 5002–5069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the SiO2 layer fabrication.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the SiO2 layer fabrication.
Nanomaterials 09 00251 g001
Figure 2. (a) Scanning electron microscope (SEM) image of nanoporous gold film with the nanopore and ligament sizes of ~28 nm; (b) Transmission electron microscope (TEM) micrograph of SiO2@NPG film with 1–2 nm SiO2 coating (10 h plating); (c) TEM micrograph of SiO2@NPG film with 5–10 nm SiO2 coating (20 h plating); (d) the ratio of the relative content of gold and silicon with different SiO2 coating time, detected by Energy Dispersive Spectrometer (EDS).
Figure 2. (a) Scanning electron microscope (SEM) image of nanoporous gold film with the nanopore and ligament sizes of ~28 nm; (b) Transmission electron microscope (TEM) micrograph of SiO2@NPG film with 1–2 nm SiO2 coating (10 h plating); (c) TEM micrograph of SiO2@NPG film with 5–10 nm SiO2 coating (20 h plating); (d) the ratio of the relative content of gold and silicon with different SiO2 coating time, detected by Energy Dispersive Spectrometer (EDS).
Nanomaterials 09 00251 g002
Figure 3. (a) extinction spectra and (b) the localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) wavelength (higher peak) position of SiO2@NPG films with different silica coating times (0 h represents bare NPG).
Figure 3. (a) extinction spectra and (b) the localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) wavelength (higher peak) position of SiO2@NPG films with different silica coating times (0 h represents bare NPG).
Nanomaterials 09 00251 g003
Figure 4. (a) and (c) surface enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) spectra of crystal violet (CV) molecules on SiO2@NPG films with silica coating time 0 h, 2 h, 5 h, 10 h, 20 h, 30 h (laser excitation: (a) 633 nm and (c) 532 nm); (b) the normalized SERS intensity of Raman bands of CV at 1178, 1369 and 1617 cm−1 on SiO2@NPG films shown in (a); (d) the normalized SERS intensity of Raman bands of CV at 1178, 1369 and 1617 cm−1 on SiO2@NPG films shown in (c); (e) SERS spectra of CV molecules on AuNPs and SiO2@AuNPs (at indicated coating time) with 633 nm laser excitation; (f) the normalized SERS intensity of Raman bands of CV at 1180, 1379 and 1625 cm−1 on SiO2@AuNPs films.
Figure 4. (a) and (c) surface enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) spectra of crystal violet (CV) molecules on SiO2@NPG films with silica coating time 0 h, 2 h, 5 h, 10 h, 20 h, 30 h (laser excitation: (a) 633 nm and (c) 532 nm); (b) the normalized SERS intensity of Raman bands of CV at 1178, 1369 and 1617 cm−1 on SiO2@NPG films shown in (a); (d) the normalized SERS intensity of Raman bands of CV at 1178, 1369 and 1617 cm−1 on SiO2@NPG films shown in (c); (e) SERS spectra of CV molecules on AuNPs and SiO2@AuNPs (at indicated coating time) with 633 nm laser excitation; (f) the normalized SERS intensity of Raman bands of CV at 1180, 1379 and 1625 cm−1 on SiO2@AuNPs films.
Nanomaterials 09 00251 g004
Figure 5. (a) three-dimensional ring structure for FDTD simulation. (bg) local electromagnetic distributions on the top surface of SiO2 coated NPG; (h) variation of electric field intensity with silica thickness.
Figure 5. (a) three-dimensional ring structure for FDTD simulation. (bg) local electromagnetic distributions on the top surface of SiO2 coated NPG; (h) variation of electric field intensity with silica thickness.
Nanomaterials 09 00251 g005

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, W.; Ma, C.; Zhang, L.; Chen, B.; Chen, L.; Zeng, H. Tuning Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance of Nanoporous Gold with a Silica Shell for Surface Enhanced Raman Scattering. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 251. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9020251

AMA Style

Li W, Ma C, Zhang L, Chen B, Chen L, Zeng H. Tuning Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance of Nanoporous Gold with a Silica Shell for Surface Enhanced Raman Scattering. Nanomaterials. 2019; 9(2):251. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9020251

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Wei, Chao Ma, Ling Zhang, Bin Chen, Luyang Chen, and Heping Zeng. 2019. "Tuning Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance of Nanoporous Gold with a Silica Shell for Surface Enhanced Raman Scattering" Nanomaterials 9, no. 2: 251. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9020251

APA Style

Li, W., Ma, C., Zhang, L., Chen, B., Chen, L., & Zeng, H. (2019). Tuning Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance of Nanoporous Gold with a Silica Shell for Surface Enhanced Raman Scattering. Nanomaterials, 9(2), 251. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9020251

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop