Next Article in Journal
An Intelligent Detector for Sensing Pork Freshness In Situ Based on a Multispectral Technique
Previous Article in Journal
Simultaneous Amperometric Aptasensor Based on Diazonium Grafted Screen-Printed Carbon Electrode for Detection of CFP10 and MPT64 Biomarkers for Early Tuberculosis Diagnosis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Biomechanical Effects of Adding an Ankle Soft Actuation in a Unilateral Exoskeleton
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Biosensors in Rehabilitation and Assistance Robotics

Human Robotics Group, University of Alicante, 03690 Alicante, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biosensors 2022, 12(11), 997; https://doi.org/10.3390/bios12110997
Submission received: 7 November 2022 / Accepted: 8 November 2022 / Published: 10 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biosensors in Rehabilitation and Assistance Robotics)
Robotic developments in the field of rehabilitation and assistance have seen a significant increase in the last few years. The improvement of biosensing technologies provides robust ways of assessing the user’s neuromechanical behavior and mental states, which, when combined with robotic therapies, leads to critical improvements in motor or cognitive function recovery. Recent advances in bioelectrical signal processing and acquisition devices, in computer-vision techniques and machine-learning, and in the kinetic and dynamic analysis of movement have had a huge impact on the efficient development of the aforementioned robotic approaches.
This Special Issue is focused on breakthrough developments in the field of biosensors applied to rehabilitation and assistive robotics. The Special Issue has collected five outstanding papers covering different aspects of biosensing technologies and their use in different environments. What follows is a summary of the scope and main contributions of each of these papers, provided as a teaser for the interested reader.
The use of biosensors to monitor and assess progress during rehabilitation therapies is a key tool in many recent studies. For instance, the performance of a robotic ankle orthosis T-FLEX in combination with a lower-limb exoskeleton AGoRA has been evaluated using electromyographic (EMG) sensors to study muscular activity and using inertial sensors to study gait patterns [1]. Other parameters, such as metabolic costs and exerted forces, can be combined with EMG activity to evaluate the performance of these kinds of devices [2].
Another important application of biosensors in assistive technologies is their use as a way of inferring patients’ actual or intended motion to control external devices. A way of achieving this is by processing cortical activity with non-invasive electroencephalographic (EEG) devices. In [3], this approach is proposed to extract turning intention during human walking, showing the possibility of using this information to command robotic exoskeletons. EEG can also be useful to monitor cognitive performance during virtual reality-based interventions, as shown in [4]. In this case, another approach for motor rehabilitation is presented in [5], which proposes a sensorized arm wearable (ARMIA) that measures kinematic information through inertial sensors and muscular activity through EMG sensors. This device can be used both for active rehabilitation and to monitor physical performance.

Author Contributions

Writing—original draft, A.U.; writing—review and editing, A.U., G.J.G., C.A.J. and V.M.; conceptualization: A.U., G.J.G., C.A.J. and V.M. All authors contributed equally to the proposal and writing of this manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Otálora, S.; Ballen-Moreno, F.; Arciniegas-Mayag, L.; Cifuentes, C.; Múnera, M. Biomechanical Effects of Adding an Ankle Soft Actuation in a Unilateral Exoskeleton. Biosensors 2022, 12, 873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Cao, W.; Zhang, Z.; Chen, C.; He, Y.; Wang, D.; Wu, X. Biomechanical and Physiological Evaluation of a Multi-Joint Exoskeleton with Active-Passive Assistance for Walking. Biosensors 2021, 11, 393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Quiles, V.; Ferrero, L.; Iáñez, E.; Ortiz, M.; Azorín, J. Decoding of Turning Intention during Walking Based on EEG Biomarkers. Biosensors 2022, 12, 555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Muñoz, D.; Barria, P.; Cifuentes, C.; Aguilar, R.; Baleta, K.; Azorín, J.; Múnera, M. EEG Evaluation in a Neuropsychological Intervention Program Based on Virtual Reality in Adults with Parkinson’s Disease. Biosensors 2022, 12, 751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Garcia, G.; Alepuz, A.; Balastegui, G.; Bernat, L.; Mortes, J.; Sanchez, S.; Vera, E.; Jara, C.; Morell, V.; Pomares, J.; et al. ARMIA: A Sensorized Arm Wearable for Motor Rehabilitation. Biosensors 2022, 12, 469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ubeda, A.; Garcia, G.J.; Jara, C.A.; Morell, V. Biosensors in Rehabilitation and Assistance Robotics. Biosensors 2022, 12, 997. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios12110997

AMA Style

Ubeda A, Garcia GJ, Jara CA, Morell V. Biosensors in Rehabilitation and Assistance Robotics. Biosensors. 2022; 12(11):997. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios12110997

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ubeda, Andres, Gabriel J. Garcia, Carlos A. Jara, and Vicente Morell. 2022. "Biosensors in Rehabilitation and Assistance Robotics" Biosensors 12, no. 11: 997. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios12110997

APA Style

Ubeda, A., Garcia, G. J., Jara, C. A., & Morell, V. (2022). Biosensors in Rehabilitation and Assistance Robotics. Biosensors, 12(11), 997. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios12110997

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop