Next Article in Journal
Azithromycin: An Underappreciated Quinolone-Sparing Oral Treatment for Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infections
Next Article in Special Issue
Genomic Diversity of NDM-Producing Klebsiella Species from Brazil, 2013–2022
Previous Article in Journal
Secondary Metabolite Variation and Bioactivities of Two Marine Aspergillus Strains in Static Co-Culture Investigated by Molecular Network Analysis and Multiple Database Mining Based on LC-PDA-MS/MS
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Antibiotics
Volume 11
Issue 4
10.3390/antibiotics11040514
antibiotics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Multicenter Study of Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacterales in Havana, Cuba, 2016–2021

by
Haiyang Yu
1,
María Karla González Molina
1,
Yenisel Carmona Cartaya
1,
Marcia Hart Casares
2,
Meiji Soe Aung
3,
Nobumichi Kobayashi
3,* and
Dianelys Quiñones Pérez
1,*
1
Healthcare-Associated Infections National Laboratory, Pedro Kourí Institute of Tropical Medicine, Havana 11400, Cuba
2
Microbiology Laboratory, Hermanos Ameijeiras Hospital, Havana 10400, Cuba
3
Department of Hygiene, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo 060-8556, Japan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antibiotics 2022, 11(4), 514; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11040514
Submission received: 22 March 2022 / Revised: 1 April 2022 / Accepted: 6 April 2022 / Published: 12 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Surveillance of carbapenem resistance is particularly important for Enterobacterales, mainly in countries with limited healthcare resources. We conducted a cross-sectional study to detect carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales at 10 sentinel hospitals in Havana, Cuba for a six year-period (2016–2021) by the National Reference Laboratory for Health Care-Associated Infections in the Pedro Kourí Institute. A total of 152 isolates were collected with phenotypic production of metallo-β-lactamase. NDM-type carbapenemase was detected in all the 152 isolates, and KPC-type enzyme gene was simultaneously identified in four NDM-positive isolates. The most abundant carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) species was Klebsiella pneumoniae (69.7%), followed by Enterobacter cloacae complex (13.2%), and Escherichia coli (5.9%). Over the study period, among CPE, prevalence of K. pneumoniae was almost constant, while Enterobacter spp. showed slightly increasing tendency. The urinary tract (36.2%) was the most prevalent source of infection with CPE, followed by bloodstream (26.3%) and surgical wound (17.1%), being frequently derived from Intensive Care Units (35.5%) and urology wards (21.7%). This study revealed the present situation of CPE in hospitals in Havana, Cuba, showing the emergence and dissemination of Enterobacterales producing NDM-type carbapenemase, mainly K. pneumoniae.

1. Introduction

In the last two decades, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) infection has become a major public health problem globally, with a high fatality rate and outbreaks [1]. Unfortunately, the COVID-19 pandemic favored the emergence of extremely resistant microorganisms and an increased incidence of resistance to carbapenems, possibly related to the increased use of broad-spectrum antibiotics in patients with COVID-19 [2,3].
In 2017, the WHO placed carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae among the first in its published list of “priority pathogens”, for which epidemiological surveillance and scientific research must be encouraged due to the few or no therapeutic options to treat the infections [4]. Later in the same year, the WHO issued global guidelines for the prevention and control of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumannii complex in healthcare-associated infections in order to reduce their spread and the negative impact of resistance to carbapenems in patients and health care settings [5]. In this context, the implementation of surveillance systems is the first step and a fundamental part of said strategy.
Cuba also has not escaped from the CRE emergency and its clinical, epidemiological, economic and social repercussions. Faced with this call and the growing worldwide multi-drug resistance of the pathogens that cause healthcare-associated infections (HAI), “Pedro Kourí” Institute (IPK) started in 2015 a wide-scale laboratory surveillance of Gram-negative bacilli producing carbapenemases, significant part of which is Enterobacterales [6].
The main mechanism causing carbapenems resistance in Enterobacterales is the carbapenemase production [7], and according to the Ambler criterion, they are classified into three classes (A, B and D). Class A enzymes (KPC-like) are the most prevalent in the US and Latin American region [8]. On the contrary, class B metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs) (VIM, IMP, NDM) have been increasingly reported in many Latin American countries [9] and class D β-lactamases (OXA), especially the OXA-48, have already been detected in some South American countries [10]. Currently, enzymes from the families Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC), oxacillinase (OXA), New Delhi Metallo-β-lactamase (NDM), Verona Integron Encoded Metallo-β-lactamase (VIM) and Imipenemase (IMP) are those detected most frequently worldwide.
In Cuba, carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) was first reported in 2010 in a K. pneumoniae clone causing a nosocomial outbreak at Havana [11]. Thereafter, in 2012, the class B enzyme (NDM) was detected in Acinetobacter soli [12]. As of 2015, there was a significant increase of CPE, including the geographical spread through the island and the dissemination among different species of gram-negative bacteria [13,14]. Consequently, we decided to start a continuous monitoring which this is the first report. The present study addresses the clinical, microbiological and epidemiological characteristics of CPE causing infections in ten tertiary hospitals in Havana for six years, which includes types of infections, medical treatment sections, bacterial species, antibiograms, as well as the molecular carbapenemase characterization.

2. Results

During the surveillance period, a total of 357 isolates of Enterobacterales were sent to the national reference laboratory in the Pedro Kourí Institute from 10 sentinels’ hospitals in Havana, Cuba. Among them, 152 isolates were phenotypically identified as carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) and further characterized. As shown in Figure 1a, Klebsiella was the dominant genus of CPE, including the major species K. pneumoniae (69.7%), with other minor species (K. aerogenes and K. oxytoca). Genera of other CPE were Enterobacter (Enterobacter cloacae complex), Escherichia (E. coli), Serratia (S. marcescens), Citrobacter (C. koserii and C. freundii), and Morganella (M. morganii). During 2016–2021, Klebsiella (K. pneumoniae, K. aerogenes, and K. oxytoca) maintained the highest prevalence, with a sharp increase in 2019 (Figure 2). Although prevalence of other genus/species was low, increase in genus Enterobacter was noted in the last three years of the study period (2019–2021). Increasing trend was evident for the number of hospitals where CPE was isolated with the passing of years.
As specimens for CPE, urine was the most common, followed by blood, surgical wound, all of which accounted for approximately 80% (Figure 1b). More than half of CPE isolates (57%) were derived from intensive care unit (ICU) and urology department, while low number of CPE were obtained in various clinical departments (Figure 1c).
Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of the CPE isolates are shown in Table 1. All the isolates were resistant to ampicillin-sulbactam (SAM), piperacillin-tazobactam (TZP), ceftazidime (CAZ), and cefotaxime (CTX). High resistance rates (more than 70%) were observed against aztreonam (ATM), ciprofloxacin (CIP), gentamicin (GEN), amikacin (AMK), and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (SXT). To fosfomycin (FOS), E. coli was mostly susceptible, while other species showed high resistance rates (50–100%). Overall, 73 and 63% of CPE were susceptible to colistin (CST) and tigecycline (TGC), respectively. Resistance to TGC was detected in 11–20% of Enterobacterales, except for K. aerogenes (all susceptible or intermediate).
Phenotypically, all the CRE isolates were found to produce metallo-β-lactamase. By immunochromatography (IC), all the isolates (n=152) were positive for NDM, while other carbapenemases (KPC, VIM, OXA-48) were negative in any isolates. Presence of blaNDM was confirmed by PCR for the selected 59 IC-positive isolates (43 K. pneumoniae, 5 Enterobacter cloacae complex, 5 E. coli, 2 K. aerogenes, one isolate each of S. marcescens, C. koseri, C. freundii, and M. morganii), among which KPC gene was also identified in four isolates (2 K. pneumoniae, one each of E. coli and K. aerogenes).

3. Discussion

CRE have become one of the most challenging pathogens in hospital infection control and are increasing at an alarming rate globally [15]. In most cases, the resistance CRE phenotype is associated with the presence of carbapenemase-type beta-lactamases that favor extreme drug resistance, including pan-drug resistance to antibiotics with few or no therapeutic options [16]. Cuba is no exception to this problem, as is revealed in the present study.
The most prevalent CPE species was K. pneumoniae accounting for about 70%, which was consistent with the internationally alarming situation, i.e., the emergence of carbapenemases in K. pneumoniae [15]. From 2006 to 2010, resistance to carbapenems in K. pneumoniae was sporadic in some countries, however, from 2010 to 2019, countries in the Latin American region reported a gradual but sustained increase, with a wide heterogeneity, reaching above 60% prevalence in some countries [10]. In contrast to the situation in Latin America and the Caribbean, a European monitoring study of urine culture and intra-abdominal cultures (2015–2017) showed that E. coli was the predominant species [17].
The clinical departments implicated in our study were ICU, urology, surgery, hematology, and nephrology. ICU-admitted patients have a higher risk to be colonized by antibiotic multiresistant microorganisms, since the antibiotic burden is greater, and they also undergo various invasive manipulations. This favors the selection of resistant strains and the increase in colonization in these departments [18]. By the specimen types, urinary tract infections and bloodstream infections (bacteremia or sepsis) are considered most common infections related to CPE. These infection types are usually associated with intestinal colonization and retrograde spread of bacteria or contact transmission (person-to-person and environment-to-person) [19,20]. The risk of CPE infection is related to individual factors such as length of hospital stay and exposure to invasive procedures. Previous treatments with various antimicrobials in addition to carbapenems, and especially its duration, are essential risk factors for its acquisition as mentioned above [21].
A high prevalence of NDM enzyme associated with low incidence of KPC co-production contrasts with the epidemiology of these enzymes in Latin America and the Caribbean where the KPC-type carbapenemases were widely disseminated in Enterobacterales [10]. In China and Europe, a higher prevalence of KPC over NDM is also reported [22,23]. In addition to the location of NDM-type carbapenemase gene on plasmid, the increase in population flow and medical tourism also play an important role in the spread of this carbapenemase gene globally [24]. NDM-type carbapenemase, which was first identified in India (2008), reached the Americas in 2011 [25] and subsequently reported in most Latin American countries [26]. In Cuba, it was first reported in Acinetobacter soli in 2012 [12].
NDM-producing bacteria often harbor multiple other resistance genes, and thus they are capable of being resistant to almost all β-lactams and are not inhibited by beta-lactamase inhibitors except AZT. However, co-expression of other resistance genes, such as genes encoding extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs), AmpC, or another class of carbapenemases (e.g., KPCs) gives rise to resistance to aztreonam [27]. Combining with ribosomal rRNA methylases (16S-RMTases) additionally confers a high level of resistance to all aminoglycosides [28]. All the above limit the use of antimicrobial drugs currently available as monotherapy. The co-expression of different types of carbapenemases, mainly KPC and NDM, as reported in the present study, seems to be further public health concern, associated with the COVID-19 pandemic.
In the present study, high rate of FOS-resistance was noted in most species of Enterobacterales, except for E. coli. FOS is a broad-spectrum antimicrobial with bactericidal effect, and considered a potential treatment option against Enterobacterales producing ESBL and/or carbapenemase. A main mechanism of FOS resistance in Enterobacterales is the acquisition of FOS-modifying enzyme gene fosA, which is commonly located on plasmid, transposon, or within integron [29]. This gene has been revealed to co-localize on plasmid with genes ecoding CTX-M type ESBL, NDM-type carbapenemase, or aminoglycoside modifying enzymes. This implies that the spread of FOS-resistance may be presumably associated with ESBL/carbapenemase genes, as well as the use of antimicrobials other than FOS [29]. Therefore, fosA-mediated FOS-resistance should be also carefully monitored along with beta-lactamase genes in Enterobacterales.
According to the susceptibility to non-carbapenem antibiotics of CPE in the present study, SAM, TZP, ATM, CIP, GEN, AMK, SXT are not recommended in empirical therapy, unless susceptibility to them is previously demonstrated. Because relatively high susceptibility was shown by CST and TGC, combination antibiotic therapy with these antimicrobials may be recommended. Common two-drug combinations include polymyxin plus carbapenems or TGC or FOS [30,31]; TGC plus carbapenems or aminoglycosides or FOS [31,32]; FOS plus aminoglycoside [32]. Triple drug combinations are mainly polymyxin plus TGC and carbapenems if the MIC of the latter is less than or equal to 8 ug/mL [33,34]. There are new antibiotics approved by the FDA in previous years, such as ceftazidime-avibactam in 2015 and meropenem-vaborbactam in 2017, which are active against KPC-type carbapenemases, but not against metallo-β-lactamases [35]. However, these options are expensive and therefore inaccessible to countries with limited health resources.
Given the change in the geographical distribution of carbapenemases, and the emergence and spread of bacteria that produce more than one of these enzymes, the Pan American Health Organization/World Health Organization (PAHO/WHO) emphasizes the importance of proper microbiological diagnosis and the effective and coordinated implementation of infection prevention and control programs, as well as regulations to optimize the use of antimicrobials. The results of the present study revealed the actual situation of CPE in hospitals in Havana, Cuba, during the recent six-year period, showing the emergence and dissemination of NDM-producing Enterobacterales, mainly K. pneumoniae. This highlights the importance of continuous epidemiological surveillance of carbapenem resistance and their genetic determinants in Enterobacterales in medical care facilities.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Bacterial Isolation and Species Identification

Clinical isolates of Enterobacterales were collected in ten sentinel hospitals in Havana, as part of the national surveillance of carbapenemases in LNR-IAAS (the National Reference Laboratory for Health Care-Associated Infections) of the Pedro Kourí Institute during the period from 2016 to 2021. The clinical specimens were cultured on McConkey agar (Biolife, Milan, Italy), followed by incubation at 37 °C (Memmert Incubator, Schwabach, Germany) for 18 to 24 h. When a growth of presumptive pathogenic bacteria was confirmed, bacterial species was identified by the conventional method through biochemical tests according to the Manual of Operations of Diagnostic Procedures (MOPD) of the LNR-IAAS. The Kligler and oxidase tests were performed initially and later the following culture media were used for species identification: Simmons citrate agar (Biolife), Christensen urea agar (Biolife), mobility-indole agar (Biolife), malonate sodium (DIFCO), lysine decarboxylase broth (DIFCO) and ornithine decarboxylase broth (DIFCO).

4.2. Determination of Antimicrobial Susceptibility

The Epsilon-test (E-test) method was used on Müeller Hinton agar (Oxoid Ltd., Hampshire, UK) to examine susceptibility to SAM, TZP, CAZ, CTX, cefepime, imipenem, meropenem, AMK, GEN, CIP, and TGC, while the disc diffusion method (Kirby-Bauer) (Liofilchem, Roseto degli Abruzzi, Italy) was used for ATM and FOS. CST was evaluated by the disk elution method. The results were interpreted according to the criteria established by the CLSI, 2021 and EUCAST, 2021 [36,37]. Control strains used were E. coli ATCC 25,922 and E. coli NCTC 13,846 (mcr-1 positive).

4.3. Phenotypic Detection of Carbapenemases

Carbapenemases were phenotypically detected by the commercial method of combined tablets KPC-MBL Confirm ID Pack (Rosco Diagnóstica, Taastrup, Denmark), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. K. pneumoniae ATCC BAA-1705-MHT was used as a control strain producing carbapenemase, and K. pneumoniae ATCC BAA-1706-MHT was used as a negative control.

4.4. Detection of Genetic Types of Carbapenemases

First, immunochromatography (IC) was employed using the commercial kit RESIST-4.0.K.N (CORIS, BioConcept, Gembloux, Belgium), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. In case of negative result, only a red-purple line is observed over the central reading window, at the position of the control line. When result is positive, in addition to a red-purple band in the control line, a visible red-purple band appears in one of the corresponding positions representing OXA-48, KPC, NDM, or VIM.
PCR was applied to the strains with phenotypic production of carbapenemases to determine the presence of the genes encoding KPC, NDM, IMP, VIM, SPM, GIM, SIM, and OXA-48 enzymes. PCR was performed using the primers and conditions described by Poirel et al. (2011) [38].

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.Q.P.; methodology, H.Y., Y.C.C., M.K.G.M. and D.Q.P.; investigation, H.Y., M.H.C., Y.C.C., M.K.G.M., M.S.A., N.K. and D.Q.P.; resources, M.H.C. and D.Q.P.; writing—original draft preparation, H.Y.; writing—review and editing, M.S.A., N.K. and D.Q.P.; supervision, D.Q.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Ethical review and approval were waived for this study because no specimens and information from humans were analyzed.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We thank to all the staff of the microbiology laboratories who contributed to the surveillance of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales in the sentinel hospitals in Havana, Cuba.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Yu, H.; Han, X.; Quiñones, D. La humanidad enfrenta un desastre: La resistencia antimicrobiana. Rev. Habanera Cienc. Méd. 2021, 20, e3850. [Google Scholar]
  2. Farfour, E.; Lecuru, M.; Dortet, L.; Le Guen, M.; Cerf, C.; Karnycheff, F.; Bonnin, R.A.; Vasse, M.; Lesprit, P. Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales outbreak: Another dark side of COVID-19. Am. J. Infect. Control 2020, 48, 1533–1536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Ghosh, S.; Bornman, C.; Zafer, M.M. Antimicrobial Resistance Threats in the emerging COVID-19 pandemic: Where do we stand? J. Infect. Public Health 2021, 14, 555–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. WHO. WHO Publishes List of Bacteria for Which New Antibiotics are Urgently Needed. Available online: https://www.who.int/es/news/item/27-02-2017-who-publishes-list-of-bacteria-for-which-new-antibiotics-are-urgently-needed (accessed on 1 March 2022).
  5. WHO. Guidelines for the Prevention and Control of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae, Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Health Care Facilities; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2017; Available online: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/259462/9789241550178-eng.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y (accessed on 1 March 2022).
  6. Quiñones Pérez, D.; Diaz, G.; Carmona, Y.; Zayas, A.; Abreu, M.; Salazar, D.; García, S.; Santiesteban, Y.; Jiménez, T.N.; Hart, M. Infecciones por Klebsiella: Un desafío en Hospitales Cubanos. Contribución del LNRM-IPK en su prevención y control. An. Acad. Cienc. Cuba 2015, 5. Available online: http://revistaccuba.sld.cu/index.php/revacc/article/view/287/287 (accessed on 1 March 2022).
  7. Iredell, J.; Brown, J.; Tagg, K. Antibiotic resistance in Enterobacteriaceae: Mechanisms and clinical implications. BMJ 2016, 352, h6420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. van Duin, D.; Doi, Y. The global epidemiology of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Virulence 2017, 8, 460–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Villegas, M.V.; Pallares, C.J.; Escandón-Vargas, K.; Hernández-Gómez, C.; Correa, A.; Álvarez, C.; Rosso, F.; Matta, L.; Luna, C.; Zurita, J.; et al. Characterization and Clinical Impact of Bloodstream Infection Caused by Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae in Seven Latin American Countries. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0154092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Alerta Epidemiológica: Emergencia e Incremento de Nuevas Combinaciones de Carbapenemasas en Enterobacterales en Latinoamérica y el Caribe; Organización Panamericana de la Salud/Organización Mundial de la Salud: Washington, DC, USA, 2021.
  11. Quinones, D.; Hart, M.; Espinosa, F.; Garcia, S.; Carmona, Y.; Ghosh, S.; Urushibara, N.; Kawaguchiya, M.; Kobayashi, N. Emergence of Klebsiella pneumoniae clinical isolates producing KPC-2 carbapenemase in Cuba. New Microbes New Infect. 2014, 2, 123–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Quiñones, D.; Carvajal, I.; Perez, Y.; Hart, M.; Perez, J.; Garcia, S.; Salazar, D.; Ghosh, S.; Kawaguchiya, M.; Aung, M.S.; et al. High prevalence of blaOXA-23 in Acinetobacter spp. and detection of blaNDM-1 in A. soli in Cuba: Report from National Surveillance Program (2010–2012). New Microbes New Infect. 2015, 7, 52–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Ortiz, T.J. Enterobacterias Productoras de Carbapenemasas en Cuba, Tipos, Evaluación de Métodos Para su Detección y Antibiotipos; Tesis de Maestría en Bacteriología-Micología; Instituto Pedro Kourí: La Habana, Cuba, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  14. Llerena, M.R. Caracterización Clínica, Epidemiológica y Microbiológica de Infecciones Por Enterobacterias Productoras de Carbapenemasas en Hospitales Centinelas; Tesis de Especialista en Microbiología Clínica; Instituto Pedro Kouri: La Habana, Cuba, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  15. Castanheira, M.; Deshpande, L.M.; Mendes, R.E.; Canton, R.; Sader, H.S.; Jones, R.N. Variations in the Occurrence of Resistance Phenotypes and Carbapenemase Genes Among Enterobacteriaceae Isolates in 20 Years of the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 2019, 6, S23–S33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Bolaño Ardila, N.D. Uso de la terapia combinada en infecciones causadas por enterobacterias resistente a carbapenémicos desde un enfoque microbiológico: Revisión sistemática. Med. Lab. 2016, 22, 165–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lob, S.H.; Karlowsky, J.A.; Young, K.; Motyl, M.R.; Hawser, S.; Kothari, N.D.; Sahm, D.F. In vitro activity of imipenem-relebactam against resistant phenotypes of Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from intraabdominal and urinary tract infection samples—SMART Surveillance Europe 2015–2017. J. Med. Microbiol. 2020, 69, 207–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Soria-Segarra, C.; Soria-Segarra, C.; Catagua-González, A.; Gutiérrez-Fernández, J. Carbapenemase producing Enterobacteriaceae in intensive care units in Ecuador: Results from a multicenter study. J. Infect. Public Health 2020, 13, 80–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Padilla-Serrano, A.; Serrano-Castañeda, J.J.; Carranza-González, R.; García-Bonillo, M.P. Clinical significance and risk factors for multidrug resistant Enterobacteriaceae colonization. Rev. Esp. Quim. 2018, 31, 257–262. [Google Scholar]
  20. Femi, A.; Chidalu Nnabude, B.; Otuechere, C.A. Hand Hygiene Practices and the Effectiveness of Hand Sanitizers at Controlling Enteropathogens among the Residents of a University Community in Osun State Nigeria. Microbiol. Res. J. Int. 2019, 27, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  21. Mariappan, S.; Sekar, U.; Kamalanathan, A. Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae: Risk factors for infection and impact of resistance on outcomes. Int. J. Appl. Basic Med. Res. 2017, 7, 32–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Zhang, R.; Liu, L.; Zhou, H.; Chan, E.W.; Li, J.; Fang, Y.; Li, Y.; Liao, K.; Chen, S. Nationwide Surveillance of Clinical Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) Strains in China. EBioMedicine 2017, 19, 98–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Grundmann, H.; Glasner, C.; Albiger, B.; Aanensen, D.M.; Tomlinson, C.T.; Andrasević, A.T.; Cantón, R.; Carmeli, Y.; Friedrich, A.W.; Giske, C.G.; et al. Occurrence of carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli in the European survey of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (EuSCAPE): A prospective, multinational study. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2017, 17, 153–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Khan, A.U.; Maryam, L.; Zarrilli, R. Structure, Genetics and Worldwide Spread of New Delhi Metallo-β-lactamase (NDM): A threat to public health. BMC Microbiol. 2017, 17, 101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Pasteran, F.; Albornoz, E.; Faccone, D.; Gomez, S.; Valenzuela, C.; Morales, M.; Estrada, P.; Valenzuela, L.; Matheu, J.; Guerriero, L.; et al. Emergence of NDM-1-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae in Guatemala. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2012, 67, 1795–1797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. García-Betancur, J.C.; Appel, T.M.; Esparza, G.; Gales, A.C.; Levy-Hara, G.; Cornistein, W.; Vega, S.; Nuñez, D.; Cuellar, L.; Bavestrello, L.; et al. Update on the epidemiology of carbapenemases in Latin America and the Caribbean. Expert Rev. Anti-Infect. Ther. 2021, 19, 197–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Findlay, J.; Poirel, L.; Kessler, J.; Kronenberg, A.; Nordmann, P. New Delhi Metallo-β-Lactamase–Producing Enterobacterales Bacteria, Switzerland, 2019–2020. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2021, 27, 2628–2637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Doi, Y.; Wachino, J.I.; Arakawa, Y. Aminoglycoside resistance: The emergence of acquired 16S ribosomal RNA methyltransferases. Infect. Dis. Clin. 2016, 30, 523–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Zurfluh, K.; Treier, A.; Schmitt, K.; Stephan, R. Mobile fosfomycin resistance genes in Enterobacteriaceae-An increasing threat. Microbiologyopen 2020, 9, e1135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Wu, W.; Feng, Y.; Tang, G.; Qiao, F.; McNally, A.; Zong, Z. NDM Metallo-β-Lactamases and Their Bacterial Producers in Health Care Settings. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2019, 32, e00115–e00118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  31. Dundar, D.; Duymaz, Z.; Genc, S.; Er, D.K.; İrvem, A.; Kandemir, N. In-vitro activities of imipenem–colistin, imipenem–tigecycline, and tigecycline–colistin combinations against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. J. Chemother. 2018, 30, 342–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Ramos, J.R.; Lletí, M.S. Fosfomicina en las infecciones producidas por gramnegativos multirresistentes. Rev. Esp. De Quimioter. 2019, 32, 45–54. [Google Scholar]
  33. Alves, P.H.; Boff, R.T.; Barth, A.L.; Martins, A.F. Synergy of polymyxin B, tigecycline and meropenem against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacter cloacae complex isolates. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2019, 94, 81–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Sheu, C.C.; Chang, Y.T.; Lin, S.Y.; Chen, Y.H.; Hsueh, P.R. Infections Caused by Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae: An Update on Therapeutic Options. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Tumbarello, M.; Losito, A.R.; Giamarellou, H. Optimizing therapy in carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae infections. Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis. 2018, 31, 566–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. CLSI. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing, 31st ed.; Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: Wayne, PA, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  37. EUCAST. Breakpoint Tables for Interpretation of MICs and Zone Diameters, version 11.0; The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: Växjö, Sweden, 2021; Available online: https://www.eucast.org/fileadmin/src/media/PDFs/EUCAST_files/Breakpoint_tables/v_11.0_Breakpoint_Tables.pdf (accessed on 1 March 2022).
  38. Poirel, L.; Walsh, T.R.; Cuvillier, V.; Nordmann, P. Multiplex PCR for detection of acquired carbapenemase genes. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2011, 70, 119–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Antibiotics 11 00514 g001 550
Figure 1. Bacterial species of the 152 CPE isolates (a), clinical specimens (b) and clinical departments (c) from which the CRE isolates were derived (Pedro Kourí Institute, from 2016 to 2021).
Figure 1. Bacterial species of the 152 CPE isolates (a), clinical specimens (b) and clinical departments (c) from which the CRE isolates were derived (Pedro Kourí Institute, from 2016 to 2021).
Antibiotics 11 00514 g001
Antibiotics 11 00514 g002 550
Figure 2. Distribution of CPE genera per year (total 152 isolates) and number of hospitals (total 10 hospitals) (Pedro Kourí Institute, from 2016 to 2021).
Figure 2. Distribution of CPE genera per year (total 152 isolates) and number of hospitals (total 10 hospitals) (Pedro Kourí Institute, from 2016 to 2021).
Antibiotics 11 00514 g002
Table
Table 1. Antimicrobial susceptibility rate (%) of CPE isolates (n = 152) from 2016 to 2021, Havana, Cuba.
Table 1. Antimicrobial susceptibility rate (%) of CPE isolates (n = 152) from 2016 to 2021, Havana, Cuba.
Antimicrobials 1Susceptibility 2Bacterial Species
K. peumoniaeEnterobacter cloacae complexE. coliK. aerogenesS. marcescensOthers 3Total
(n = 106)(n = 20)(n = 9)(n = 6)(n = 6)(n = 5)(n = 152)
SAMR100%100%100%100%100%100%100%
TZPR100%100%100%100%100%100%100%
MEMI2%0%0%17%0%20%3%
R98%100%100%83%100%80%97%
IPMI4%5%0%17%0%20%5%
R96%95%100%83%100%80%95%
ATMS1%10%11%17%0%20%4%
I0%0%11%0%0%0%1%
R99%90%78%83%100%80%95%
CIPS8%10%33%0%17%0%10%
I1%0%0%0%0%0%1%
R91%90%67%100%83%100%89%
GENS5%5%11%0%0%0%5%
I2%0%0%0%0%0%1%
R93%95%89%100%100%100%94%
AMKS8%10%22%0%0%0%8%
I2%0%11%0%0%0%2%
R90%90%67%100%100%100%90%
SXTS3%0%22%0%17%0%4%
I0%0%0%0%0%0%0%
R97%100%78%100%83%100%96%
FOSS22%20%78%0%17%20%24%
I4%5%0%0%33%0%5%
R74%75%22%100%50%80%71%
CST 4S75%75%100%67%-100%73%
I0%0%0%0%-0%0%
R25%25%0%33%-0%27%
TGCS58%75%67%83%66%80%63%
I27%10%22%17%17%0%23%
R15%15%11%0%17%20%14%
1 Abbreviation: SAM, ampicillin-sulbactam (SAM); TZP, piperacillin-tazobactam; MEM, meropenem; IPM, imipenem; ATM, aztreonam; CIP, ciprofloxacin; GEN, gentamicin; AMK, amikacin; SXT, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole; FOS, fosfomycin; CST, colistin; TGC, tigecycline. 2 S, susceptible; I, intermediate; R, resistant. 3 others: C. koseri, C. freundii, K. oxytoca, M. morganii. 4 Susceptibility rate is not shown for S. marcaescens and M. morganii, because these species are intrinsically resistant to CST.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yu, H.; González Molina, M.K.; Carmona Cartaya, Y.; Hart Casares, M.; Aung, M.S.; Kobayashi, N.; Quiñones Pérez, D. Multicenter Study of Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacterales in Havana, Cuba, 2016–2021. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 514. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11040514

AMA Style

Yu H, González Molina MK, Carmona Cartaya Y, Hart Casares M, Aung MS, Kobayashi N, Quiñones Pérez D. Multicenter Study of Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacterales in Havana, Cuba, 2016–2021. Antibiotics. 2022; 11(4):514. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11040514

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yu, Haiyang, María Karla González Molina, Yenisel Carmona Cartaya, Marcia Hart Casares, Meiji Soe Aung, Nobumichi Kobayashi, and Dianelys Quiñones Pérez. 2022. "Multicenter Study of Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacterales in Havana, Cuba, 2016–2021" Antibiotics 11, no. 4: 514. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11040514

APA Style

Yu, H., González Molina, M. K., Carmona Cartaya, Y., Hart Casares, M., Aung, M. S., Kobayashi, N., & Quiñones Pérez, D. (2022). Multicenter Study of Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacterales in Havana, Cuba, 2016–2021. Antibiotics, 11(4), 514. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11040514

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop