Next Article in Journal
Performance Evaluation of the IR Biotyper® System for Clinical Microbiology: Application for Detection of Staphylococcus aureus Sequence Type 8 Strains
Next Article in Special Issue
From Hospital to Community: Exploring Antibiotic Resistance and Genes Associated with Virulence Factor Diversity of Coagulase-Positive Staphylococci
Previous Article in Journal
Conifer Needle Phyllosphere as a Potential Passive Monitor of Bioaerosolised Antibiotic Resistance Genes
Previous Article in Special Issue
Antimicrobial and Antibiofilm Coating of Dental Implants—Past and New Perspectives
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

New Insights on Biofilm Antimicrobial Strategies, 2nd Volume

by
Andreia S. Azevedo
1,2,3,4,* and
Luís D. R. Melo
5,6,*
1
LEPABE-Laboratory for Process Engineering, Environment, Biotechnology and Energy, Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal
2
ALiCE-Associate Laboratory in Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal
3
i3S-Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, University of Porto, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal
4
IPATIMUP-Instituto de Patologia e Imunologia Molecular, Universidade do Porto, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal
5
Centre of Biological Engineering (CEB), University of Minho, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal
6
LABBELS—Associate Laboratory, Braga/Guimarães, Portugal
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antibiotics 2022, 11(7), 908; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11070908
Submission received: 23 June 2022 / Accepted: 4 July 2022 / Published: 7 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Insights on Biofilm Antimicrobial Strategies, 2nd Volume)
In biofilms, microorganisms are able to communicate together and assemble by themselves, creating a consortium with different properties from the original free-floating microorganisms. In fact, biofilm cells bind strongly to a living or non-living surface, enclosed in a self-produced extracellular matrix that is composed of extracellular polymeric substances. One benefit of this lifestyle is the increased resistance or tolerance to antimicrobial agents (e.g., antibiotics). Hence, research on the development of alternative strategies to prevent and control biofilms is highly relevant for society in terms of human health, industry and the environment. Different approaches to prevent or control biofilms using antibiotic alternative strategies were submitted to this Special Issue.
An important topic is the study of quorum sensing (QS) mechanisms during biofilm development. Daza et al. evaluated the use of alkylglycerols as QS inhibitors. The effect on the biofilm formation of fifteen natural enantiopure alkylglycerols was evaluated on Chromobacterium violaceum. The authors observed a dose-dependent response using each alkylglycerol at subinhibitory concentrations, with a maximum response of 97.2% reduction. (2S)-3-O-(cis-13′-docosenyl)-1,2-propanediol was the best QS inhibitor with just 20 μM [1].
The use of chemical compounds, bacteriophages and enzymes are also alternative approaches with the potential to control the bacterial growth and the biofilm development. For instance, Alfarrayeh et al. evaluated the effect of Caffeic Acid Phenethyl Ester (CAPE) on different Candida species. Both caspase-dependent and caspase-independent apoptosis were observed after CAPE treatment. The minimum biofilm inhibitory concentration oscillated between 50 and 100 µg/mL. Regarding biofilm control, the authors observed a low to high capability to control mature Candida biofilms [2].
In another study, Pereira et al. used gapmers and steric blockers as antisense oligonucleotides against Escherichia coli. These molecules were conjugated with vitamin B12 by copper-free azide-alkyne click-chemistry. The authors observed that despite the strong interaction with E. coli, conjugates were mostly located on the outer membrane. Only 6–9% reached the cytosol, which was not sufficient to inhibit bacterial growth. The authors concluded that this low internalization of conjugates was affected by E. coli’s low uptake for vitamin B12 and further studies are necessary before applying it to infectious biofilms [3].
Additionally, using stainless steel surfaces, González-Gómez et al. studied the efficacy of novel bacteriophages against E. coli biofilms. Three bacteriophages isolated from ground beef and poultry liver samples with a podovirus-like morphology were used alone or in combination to treat biofilms for 2, 14 and 48 h. Some very significant bacterial cell count reductions were observed after treatment, with it being important to note that the treatment success was influenced by the bacterial strain used, the used phage, phage concentration and biofilm formation stage [4].
The effects of enzymatic and chemical treatments were compared to remove mixed-species biofilms on surfaces simulating the food processing environment. Iñiguez-Moreno et al. used a novel chemical product named Sanicip Bio Control or peracetic acid as chemical agents and protease or α-amylase for enzymatic treatments. Biofilms were formed on stainless steel or polypropylene B and different media were used (whole milk, TSB with meat extract and TSB with chicken egg yolk). Despite the success of some treatments, in general the results were strongly affected by food contact surfaces and the surrounding media [5].
A combined treatment is another interesting strategy; Aljaafari et al. investigated the effect of various thermal shocks treatments (different temperature and times), the effect of different ciprofloxacin hydrochloride concentrations and the interaction of antibiotics and thermal shock on Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. In addition, to assess the viability after the thermal shock, the biofilms were subsequently re-incubated under the initial conditions. To generate biofilms with different population densities, structures, and maturities, P. aeruginosa biofilms were grown on 4-well dishes at 160 rpm in an incubator (ST biofilms) and in a Drip Flow Reactor (DFR biofilms). The authors concluded that the use of ciprofloxacin does not appear to enhance thermal shock directly. However, they suggested that thermal shock and antibiotics act with strictly orthogonal mechanisms on P. aeruginosa biofilms, decreasing the intensity of thermal shock needed [6].
Barros et al. tested the antimicrobial activity of biocide benzalkonium chloride (BAC) immobilized in millimetric aluminum oxide particles, against Escherichia coli bacteria in the planktonic state. The alumina particles were functionalized by using a nitrogen precursor (Dopamine (DA)). At the highest particle concentration (3000 mg/L), an inactivation of bacterial cells within 5 min was observed. In addition, a total loss of membrane integrity was achieved after 15 min for all tested concentrations. However, when reusing the Al2O3-DA-BAC particles, a higher contact time was needed to reach total inactivation. The authors concluded that Al2O3-DA-BAC particles are a suitable antimicrobial agent for the treatment of continuous water systems with minimal environmental and health impacts [7].
Surface engineering approaches are another successful strategy to control biofilms. Sunthar et al. analyzed the antibacterial properties of Cellulose Acetate (CA) reinforced with different weight percentages of aluminum nitride (AlN) composites against Staphylococcus epidermidis and E. coli. The results showed an effective antibacterial effect when AIN was added in weight percentages >10 wt.%, suggesting the potential application of CA/AlN composites as alternative materials for plastic packaging in the food industry. However, the authors suggest that the degradability and stability of this composite material should be studied in future work [8].
Using a different and innovative approach, Carvalho et al. evaluated the effect of two probiotic strains (Lactobacillus plantarum and Lactobacillus rhamnosus) in displacing E. coli and Staphylococcus aureus pre-formed biofilms. The biofilms were grown under conditions that mimic the urological devices, including silicone surfaces, artificial urine medium and a shear stress similar to those found inside of urinary catheters. This is the first study that demonstrates the ability of L. plantarum and L. rhamnosus to displace pre-established biofilms of E. coli and S. aureus. These results showed the potential of these Lactobacillus strains to control the development of biofilms on urinary tract devices [9].
Finally, Esteves et al. provided a review to evaluate the significance of the incorporation of antibacterial coatings in the reduction in the occurrence of bacterial infections and evaluate its effect on dental implant success rate. The authors summarize the diverse strategies proposed to enhance the antibacterial properties of titanium dental implants. This is significant because antibacterial coatings are a promising solution to control and prevent bacterial infections that compromise dental and orthopedic implant success [10].

Author Contributions

A.S.A. and L.D.R.M. wrote and reviewed the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by: LA/P/0045/2020 (ALiCE), UIDB/00511/2020 and UIDP/00511/2020 (LEPABE), funded by national funds through FCT/MCTES (PIDDAC); Project POCI-01-0145-FEDER-030431 (CLASInVivo), funded by FEDER funds through COMPETE2020—Programa Operacional Competitividade e Internacionalização (POCI) and by national funds (PIDDAC) through FCT/MCTES. This study was supported by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) under the scope of the strategic funding of the UIDB/04469/2020 unit and the project DeathTrigger PTDC/BIA-MIC/2312/2020.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Chaverra Daza, K.E.; Silva Gómez, E.; Moreno Murillo, B.D.; Mayorga Wandurraga, H. Natural and Enantiopure Alkylglyc-erols as Antibiofilms Against Clinical Bacterial Isolates and Quorum Sensing Inhibitors of Chromobacterium violaceum ATCC 12472. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Alfarrayeh, I.; Pollák, E.; Czéh, Á.; Vida, A.; Das, S.; Papp, G. Antifungal and Anti-Biofilm Effects of Caffeic Acid Phenethyl Ester on Different Candida Species. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 1359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Pereira, S.; Yao, R.; Gomes, M.; Jørgensen, P.; Wengel, J.; Azevedo, N.; Santos, R.S. Can Vitamin B12 Assist the Internalization of Antisense LNA Oligonucleotides into Bacteria? Antibiotics 2021, 10, 379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. González-Gómez, J.P.; González-Torres, B.; Guerrero-Medina, P.J.; López-Cuevas, O.; Chaidez, C.; Avila-Novoa, M.G.; Gutiérrez-Lomelí, M. Efficacy of Novel Bacteriophages against Escherichia coli Biofilms on Stainless Steel. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 1150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Iñiguez-Moreno, M.; Gutiérrez-Lomelí, M.; Avila-Novoa, M. Removal of Mixed-Species Biofilms Developed on Food Contact Surfaces with a Mixture of Enzymes and Chemical Agents. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Aljaafari, H.; Gu, Y.; Chicchelly, H.; Nuxoll, E. Thermal Shock and Ciprofloxacin Act Orthogonally on Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilms. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 1017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Barros, A.; Pereira, A.; Melo, L.; Sousa, J. New Functionalized Macroparticles for Environmentally Sustainable Biofilm Control in Water Systems. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Sunthar, T.P.M.; Boschetto, F.; Doan, H.N.; Honma, T.; Kinashi, K.; Adachi, T.; Marin, E.; Zhu, W.; Pezzotti, G. Antibacterial Property of Cellulose Acetate Composite Materials Reinforced with Aluminum Nitride. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 1292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Carvalho, F.M.; Mergulhão, F.J.M.; Gomes, L.C. Using Lactobacilli to Fight Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus Biofilms on Urinary Tract Devices. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 1525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Esteves, G.M.; Esteves, J.; Resende, M.; Mendes, L.; Azevedo, A.S. Antimicrobial and Antibiofilm Coating of Dental Implants—Past and New Perspectives. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Azevedo, A.S.; Melo, L.D.R. New Insights on Biofilm Antimicrobial Strategies, 2nd Volume. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 908. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11070908

AMA Style

Azevedo AS, Melo LDR. New Insights on Biofilm Antimicrobial Strategies, 2nd Volume. Antibiotics. 2022; 11(7):908. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11070908

Chicago/Turabian Style

Azevedo, Andreia S., and Luís D. R. Melo. 2022. "New Insights on Biofilm Antimicrobial Strategies, 2nd Volume" Antibiotics 11, no. 7: 908. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11070908

APA Style

Azevedo, A. S., & Melo, L. D. R. (2022). New Insights on Biofilm Antimicrobial Strategies, 2nd Volume. Antibiotics, 11(7), 908. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11070908

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop