Next Article in Journal
Characteristics of tet(X4)−Producing Escherichia coli in Chicken and Pig Farms in Hunan Province, China
Previous Article in Journal
Microbiomes in Acne Vulgaris and Their Susceptibility to Antibiotics in Indonesia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Multidrug-Resistant Helicobacter pylori Strains: A Five-Year Surveillance Study and Its Genome Characteristics
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Antibiotics
Volume 12
Issue 1
10.3390/antibiotics12010146
antibiotics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Antibiotic Resistance and Therapeutic Efficacy of Helicobacter pylori Infection in Pediatric Patients—A Tertiary Center Experience

by
Felicia Galoș
1,2,
Cătălin Boboc
2,
Mara-Ioana Ieșanu
2,3,*,
Mălina Anghel
2,
Andreea Ioan
2,
Elena Iana
2,
Maria Teodora Coșoreanu
1,2 and
Anca Andreea Boboc
1,2
1
Department of Pediatrics, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania
2
Department of Pediatrics, Marie Curie Emergency Children’s Hospital, 041451 Bucharest, Romania
3
Department of Functional Sciences, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antibiotics 2023, 12(1), 146; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12010146
Submission received: 21 December 2022 / Revised: 5 January 2023 / Accepted: 9 January 2023 / Published: 11 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Resistance and Tolerance of Helicobacter pylori)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
One of the most widespread bacterial infections worldwide, Helicobacter pylori is thought to affect almost half of the world’s population. Due to rising antibiotic resistance, treatment should be tailored according to antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST). This study aims to evaluate Helicobacter pylori antibiotic resistance and its therapeutic efficacy in children. We conducted a prospective, single-center study, that evaluated 68 children referred for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGE) following chronic dyspeptic syndrome. Each patient underwent multiple biopsies to perform bacterial cultures with AST and histopathological examinations for the diagnosis. Patients without antibiotic resistance or negative cultures received a 10-day sequential therapy, while the others had the antibiotic regimen tailored based on AST. Fifty-nine patients with a positive biopsy-based diagnosis (24 males) were finally included. Bacterial cultures with AST were positive for 13 patients (22.03%) and the antibiotic resistance for clarithromycin was 15.38%. Fifty-seven patients were administered sequential therapy with an eradication rate of 94.73%. Clarithromycin-resistant patients were successfully treated with 10-day triple therapy of esomeprazole, amoxicillin, and metronidazole. Although bacterial cultures had a low positivity rate, sequential therapy had a successful eradication rate. Further studies are necessary to better assess Helicobacter pylori antibiotic resistance to provide tailored treatment and identify children that need closer monitoring.

1. Introduction

In 1982, Warren and Marshall isolated for the first time Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) from gastric biopsies of patients with chronic gastritis and peptic ulcers [1]. As a category one carcinogen since 1994, H. pylori is currently regarded as the most prevalent etiologic agent of infection-related malignancies, which represent 5.5% of the global cancer burden [2,3]. The association of gastric cancer, one of the most frequent causes of death worldwide, with a treatable etiological factor, led to a profound impact on cancer research. Moreover, the World Health Organization nominated H. pylori as a pathogen of high priority for novel antimicrobial drug findings due to its high rate of antibiotic resistance, especially to clarithromycin [4].
H. pylori infection affects more than 50% of people worldwide, and cross-sectional studies suggest that infection almost invariably occurs within the first five years of life [5]. Less than 10% of children in developed countries are infected by the age of ten, reflecting a substantial decline in infection over the past 30 years. However, prevalence rates of up to 80% in children under the age of five have been reported in underdeveloped countries [6]. This high prevalence is generally related to poorer socioeconomic status and level of hygiene [7]. In Romania, a developing country, the prevalence of H. pylori infection is high, around 68% in adults [7,8] and ranging from 33% to 45% in children [9,10,11].
H. pylori are responsible for the onset of several pediatric gastric pathologies ranging from mild gastritis to malignancies. H. pylori can trigger gastritis and peptic ulceration, while long-term infections can lead to gastric adenocarcinoma and mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma [12]. Moreover, implications in other gastrointestinal pathologies (e.g., gastroesophageal reflux) or extra-digestive disorders (e.g., iron-deficiency anemia, chronic idiopathic thrombocytopenia, and growth failure) were recently discovered [12,13]. Children may experience non-specific symptoms of peptic ulcer disease caused by H. pylori, such as epigastric pain, especially after meals, night-time waking, unexplained nausea or vomiting, anorexia, and hematemesis [14].
When considering the diagnostic strategies for H. pylori infection in children, the Joint European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) and North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (NASPGHAN) guidelines support upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGE) with biopsies as the most reliable method [15]. From the biopsy samples, two diagnostic techniques are recommended, bacterial cultures with antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) and histopathological examination with an additional biopsy-based test (e.g., rapid urease test—RUT, polymerase chain reaction, or fluorescent in situ hybridization) [15]. For the assessment of histopathological changes, the guidelines recommend the use of the Updated Sydney Classification for gastritis [16,17].
In children, there are only a few antibiotics effective for treating H. pylori infection [18]. The treatment is usually empiric and includes antibiotic regimens comprising amoxicillin, clarithromycin, or metronidazole [15]. Levofloxacin and tetracycline are used mainly in adults for H. pylori eradication. Among pediatric patients, levofloxacin can be given only to adolescents due to possible negative effects on cartilage and teeth, while tetracycline is recommended for children older than 8 years old [15]. Besides the scarce drug availability in children, the rising antibiotic resistance enhances the difficulty in treating pediatric patients with H. pylori. Antibiotic resistance varies widely by area; for instance, it is more prevalent in Central/Western and Southern European countries than in Northern European nations [19]. Additionally, studies from early 2020 report an incidence of 23.5% [20], while more recent ones describe resistance in more than two-thirds of the patients infected with H. pylori [21]. As a result, physicians are facing a significant challenge in treating H. pylori infection in children. Thus, it is important to profile local or population-specific antibiotic resistance to determine the best course of treatment for children with H. pylori.
The current study aims to first, isolate H. pylori in cultures from pediatric gastric biopsy samples and test their susceptibility to amoxicillin, clarithromycin, metronidazole, and levofloxacin. Secondly, we aim to assess the efficacy of the sequential therapy in the pediatric population from our tertiary center during a specific timeframe.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Patients Selection

We performed a prospective, observational, single-center study that included 68 pediatric patients that underwent UGE at Marie Curie Emergency Children’s Hospital in Bucharest (Romania) between July 2015 and March 2018. These patients were referred by their physicians for UGE due to chronic dyspeptic syndrome. All the patients were screened at the beginning of the study for H. pylori and all of them presented a positive stool antigen test. The used test was the OnSite H. pylori Ag Rapid Test, which was validated using internal and external controls.
Depending on their age and level of understanding, pediatric patients or parents filled out a questionnaire to obtain information about each patient’s demographics and personal and family history. Patients’ demographic data included their age, gender, and place of residence (urban or country area). History of H. pylori infection, as well as previous therapies, were noted. Prior infectious diseases among the other members of the family were also assessed. Patients were questioned regarding the onset and duration of the GI symptoms and the use of different drugs (e.g., proton pump inhibitors—PPIs, H2 receptor antagonists, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, or corticosteroids). Smoking status and alcohol consumption among adolescents were evaluated.
Exclusion criteria consisted of the use of PPIs, H2 receptor antagonists, antibiotics, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and/or corticosteroids two weeks prior to the beginning of the study. This recommendation was similar to other studies [19]. By altering the pH, PPIs can indirectly interfere with H. pylori distribution in the stomach. The antrum is the most affected part of the stomach as PPIs can almost eradicate H. pylori from this area [22]. Thus, to elude false negative results, it is recommended to avoid these drugs at least two weeks before the endoscopy [19,23]. Additionally, a history of GI surgery (except polypectomy and appendectomy), concomitant severe disease (heart, lungs, kidneys, and endocrine diseases), and smoking or alcohol consumption were also considered exclusion criteria.
Sixty-eight patients met the aforementioned criteria and were included in the initial study. However, only 59 cases were considered eligible for having a positive diagnosis. The H. pylori diagnosis was based on invasive gastric biopsy techniques, including positive bacterial cultures, or histopathological findings of H. pylori scored using the Updated Sydney System [15,17]. The present study accepted positive bacterial cultures and histologic H. pylori findings as the “gold standard” for the diagnosis. According to the recommendations, the detection of H. pylori in at least one of these two investigations is accepted as H. pylori-positive diagnosis [15]. Negative results in both cultures and histology excluded the H. pylori infection. Thus, for the final analysis, only 59 patients were considered.
The protocol was accepted by the Marie Curie Emergency Children’s Hospital’s ethics committee (197/27 May 2015 and 627/26 May 2017), and the study was carried out in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Prior to the UGE, the patients’ parents or legal guardians provided their informed consent.

2.2. Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

All 68 patients underwent UGE, and biopsy specimens were taken for histopathologic examination (one sample from the antrum and one from the corpus) and bacterial cultures (two samples from the antrum). One additional sample from the antrum was used occasionally for the RUT. The samples were placed into distinct vials that had been previously marked and contained the appropriate medium for each test. The procedure was performed in patients with a minimum of 10 h of fasting, under general anesthesia or conscious sedation. During the entire procedure, vital signs were continuously monitored. No incidents or adverse effects were noted during or after the UGE.

2.3. Helicobacter pylori Cultures and Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing

The biopsy samples obtained for bacterial culture were transported in a special H. pylori transport medium (i.e., Portagerm pylori from BioMérieux SA, Marcy l’Etoile, France), and inoculated after a few hours onto selective medium Pylori Agar (BioMérieux Italia). For 72 h, the plates were incubated at 37 °C in a microaerobic environment. After incubation, Gram stain and oxidase, catalase, and urease tests were used to identify the H. pylori colonies. To perform an E-test on pylori agar, suspensions from the primary plates were prepared in a sterile solution. An E-Test strip (E-Test; AB Bio disk, Solna, Sweden) was placed onto each separate plate and immediately incubated in a microaerobic atmosphere at 37 °C for another 72 h. This procedure involved streaking an agar plate in three directions with a swab dipped into each bacterial suspension to create a lawn of growth. Isolated strains were screened for several antibiotic resistance (e.g., amoxicillin, clarithromycin, metronidazole, and levofloxacin) according to the recommendations of the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing.

2.4. Histopathological Examination

Gastric corpus and antrum biopsy samples were preserved in a 10% formaldehyde solution for further analysis. Following that, the gastric mucosa processing steps of dehydration and paraffin embedding were carried out as usual. For the histologic examination, two stains were used, namely hematoxylin–eosin and Giemsa stains.
Hematoxylin–eosin is an inexpensive, rapid, simple test that allows evaluation of H. pylori’s presence and its complications (e.g., intestinal metaplasia, neoplasms) [24]. However, this method presents some disadvantages, not being able to detect H. pylori in mild gastritis, when the bacterial amount is low, or when the patient received PPIs or antibiotics [25]. Thus, Giemsa is recommended as an ancillary stain in case the first one fails to identify the bacterium [24,25]. Giemsa stain is also a simple, rapid, and inexpensive test, that has superior sensitivity when compared to hematoxylin–eosin [24,25].
In the histology section, H. pylori were identified as short, spiraled, or curved bacilli lying on the mucus layer or epithelial surface [1]. The Updated Sydney System was used to characterize the morphological features of H. pylori-associated gastritis from the biopsies [16,17]. This classification evaluates the mucosal degree of inflammation, level of activity, and the presence of atrophy or intestinal metaplasia. According to this system, the density of H. pylori infection can be semi-quantitatively graded on a scale from 0 to 3 (i.e., none, mild, moderate, or severe) [17].

2.5. Therapeutic Regimens

Patients with a positive H. pylori diagnosis received adequate treatment for bacterial eradication. The antibiotic therapy was tailored based on AST where possible. In case of no antibiotic resistance or negative cultures, patients received a 10-day sequential therapy with a standard dosing regimen according to the recommendations [15]. Patients were administered PPI (i.e., esomeprazole) with amoxicillin for 5 days, followed by PPI with clarithromycin and metronidazole for another 5 days. The antibiotic dosage was adjusted according to body weight. Patients having less than 15 kg weight received the following recommended doses: esomeprazole 1 mg/kg/day, amoxicillin 50 mg/kg/day, clarithromycin 15 mg/kg/day, and metronidazole 20 mg/kg/day, divided equally every 12 h. For the other patients, the administered doses were as follows: esomeprazole—20 mg (15–24 kg), 30 mg (25–34 kg), 40 mg (>35 kg), amoxicillin—500 mg (15–24 kg), 750 mg (25–34 kg), 1000 mg (>35 kg), clarithromycin—250 mg (15–24 kg), 500 mg (>25 kg), and metronidazole—250 mg (15–24 kg), 500 mg (>25 kg), twice daily [15]. Patients resistant to clarithromycin were treated with 10-day targeted triple therapy of esomeprazole, amoxicillin, and metronidazole using the recommended doses.
Following the guidelines [15], at four to six weeks after antibiotic treatment completion, the patients had their symptoms evaluated by questionnaire, were physically examined, and were tested for H. pylori infection using the stool antigen test.

2.6. Data Analysis

The statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics 26. Continuous data with normal distribution were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). The normality was tested using the Shapiro–Wilk test. Differences and relationships between variables were analyzed using Fisher’s Exact test for low expected frequencies. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant for all the analyzed parameters, with a 95% confidence level for intervals. Sensitivity and specificity for H. pylori cultures and histologic examination were also calculated.

3. Results

All 68 patients enrolled in the study underwent UGE with biopsies. However, nine individuals were excluded due to negative results in both cultures and histology, indicating an 86.76% positivity rate (Figure 1).
For the final analyses, only 59 patients (86.76%) were included based on their positive H. pylori diagnosis. Thirty-five patients were females (59.32%) and 24 males (40.67%) and the age ranged between 2 years and 5 months and 17 years and 8 months, with a mean value of 11 years and 7 months ± 4 years and 5 months. In Table 1, the demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients included in the study are highlighted. Ten patients (16.94%) had a family history of peptic ulcer disease, 26 children (44.06%) presented symptoms for more than six months, and 22 patients (37.28%) were previously treated for H. pylori. The mean age of the patients who were previously treated was 11.63 ± 4.45 years old and 11.91 ± 4.85 years old for those who have not received any therapies in the past (p = 0.77, 95% CI −1.84: 2.43). Additionally, there was a statistically significant association between the severity of mucosal damage during endoscopy and the existence of a previous therapy against the infection (p = 0.01). Seven of the eight patients (87.50%) with normal endoscopic mucosa were previously treated (Table 2).
The mean duration between the onset of symptoms and the effective diagnosis in patients having a family history of upper GI diseases was 6.31 ± 6.80 months, while for those without a family history tended it to be higher at 8.14 ± 7.27 months (p = 0.41, 95% CI −6.70: 3.02).
The bacterial cultures were positive and the corresponding antibiotic susceptibility tests were available only for 13 patients, representing 22.03% of the total number of patients. Two of the bacterial cultures presented clarithromycin resistance. Both patients were previously administered H. pylori infection treatment. Thus, the clarithromycin resistance in our study was 15.38%. In three of these cases, although the cultures were positive, the bacteria could not be identified through the histological exam. The specificity for H. pylori culture in our study was 93.87%, but the sensitivity was low, only 22.03%. Histological examination was able to identify the presence of H. pylori in 56 patients (94.91%) (Figure 2). The specificity, in this case, was 94.23% and the sensitivity was 94.91%.
Additionally, we found a statistically significant correlation between the density of H. pylori in the histological exam and the number of positive bacterial cultures (p = 0.01), but under the reserve of a limited number of positive cultures. Moreover, we also checked the relationship between the activity of gastritis and the density of H. pylori in the histopathological exam and found a statistically significant correlation between them as we have previously showed in a smaller cohort. According to our results, this substantial difference between the groups allowed us to conclude that the degree of gastritis activity was related to the histologic H. pylori density (p = 0.03) (Table 3).
Regarding the treatment, 57 patients were administered sequential therapy. The two patients resistant to clarithromycin were treated with 10-day targeted triple therapy consisting of esomeprazole, amoxicillin, and metronidazole. The eradication rate for sequential therapy was 94.73% since three children presented with positive fecal H. pylori antigen after treatment.

4. Discussion

Despite evidence that H. pylori prevalence is declining in developed countries, the infection is nonetheless ubiquitous with important morbidity and mortality rates [26]. H. pylori can commonly be acquired during childhood and persist throughout life with rare spontaneous remission [27]. One of the main concerns nowadays is related to H. pylori eradication failure and antibiotic resistance [28]. Moreover, antibiotic misuse is one of the primary causes of this trend. As mentioned, H. pylori treatment in children is usually empiric and comprised of amoxicillin, clarithromycin, or metronidazole [15]. Typically, these antimicrobial agents are prescribed for other respiratory, genital, urinary, or even parasite pediatric infections [29]. Thus, ideal treatment should be tailored according to AST especially now the increasing antimicrobial resistance has become critical for the management of H. pylori infection.
The first step in our investigation was to summarize each patient’s characteristics and perform the UGE with biopsy collection for histopathological analysis and bacterial cultures. The second phase involved the assessment of the bacterial cultures with AST, and the third and final step comprised the therapeutic efficacy evaluation.
The mean duration between the symptoms’ onset and the diagnosis for patients having a family history of upper GI disorders was shorter than for those without a family history but not statistically significant. However, our results may have been influenced by the limited number of patients in our study. Since family history represents an independent predictor of several GI diseases, the most severe being gastric cancer [30,31,32], it is fairly understood that these patients would seek medical attention sooner after the symptoms develop. Moreover, the endoscopic findings were milder in patients that received previous treatment when compared to the others, consistent with our previous results [33]. Six of seven patients with normal endoscopic mucosa received prior treatment. These results suggest that children might become “tolerant” to the bacterium or that the growing child is more resistant to H. pylori-induced lesions. The evidence that H. pylori infection in children coexists with normal gastric mucosa was also reported in other studies [11,33]. This is the reason why we strongly recommend taking biopsies at least for the histological exams in children and adolescents, even if a normal appearance of the mucosa is observed during endoscopy.
Correct diagnosis, AST, and proper treatment of H. pylori gastric infection are pivotal for a positive outcome. The initial diagnosis should be made using invasive gastric biopsy techniques, including positive bacterial cultures, or histopathological findings of H. pylori with at least one other positive test (e.g., RUT, or molecular-based assays when available, including polymerase chain reaction or fluorescent in situ hybridization), according to the most recent guidelines for the management of H. pylori in children and adolescents. Non-invasive techniques such as 13C-UBT or stool antigens should not be used for the initial H. pylori diagnosis. However, when positive histology is the only available invasive test, a positive non-invasive result supports the diagnosis [15].
Fifty-nine out of sixty-eight patients enrolled in this study were diagnosed with H. pylori infection, indicating an 86.76% positivity rate. However, the positivity rate may be overestimated by the fact that all the patients initially presented a positive fecal antigen test. The histopathologic examination determined the diagnosis in 94.91% of the cases identifying the presence of H. pylori in 56 patients. The hematoxylin–eosin and Giemsa stains of the gastric antrum and body identified a higher number of patients with H. pylori infection compared to the bacterial cultures. The result was recorded as positive if the bacterium was isolated in either the antral mucosa and/or gastric body. The sensitivity and specificity of histopathology for the diagnosis depend on clinical settings, the density of colonization, and the histopathologist’s experience [34]. Histopathology delivers excellent diagnostic accuracy, allowing the detection of the bacteria, but also provides information about the gastritis grading. In children, the current recommended guideline to asses H. pylori histological changes in gastritis is the Updated Sydney Classification [16]. The usual recommendation derived from the Sydney system is to obtain two biopsy specimens from the antrum and two specimens from the corpus. Bacteria are usually present at both sites even if the lesions occur essentially in the antrum. Thus, other studies showed that only two antral biopsies were sufficient to detect H. pylori [35]. In our study, we determined a statistically significant correlation between the activity of gastritis and the H. pylori density in the histopathological exam. This significant difference allowed us to conclude that histologic H. pylori density was linked with the degree of gastritis activity. In comparison with adults, gastric biopsies obtained from children infected with H. pylori show a lower degree of inflammation with a predominant lymphocytic component [36]. In addition, a higher number of immunosuppressive regulatory T cells and a more prominent IL-10-mediated anti-inflammatory response, and lower IL-17 have been detected in pediatric patients [15,37]. In other studies, the strain of the organism may be a more important factor than the density of infection in determining the gastric inflammatory response to H. pylori [35,38]. Thus, children usually exhibit high colonization levels with scarce acute inflammation [11,36,37,39,40].
Only 13 out of 59 patients (22.03%) presented positive H. pylori cultures. These bacteria can be cultured from gastric biopsies, although this process frequently presents difficulties. H. pylori lose viability when exposed to the environment; thus, biopsies should be cultured quickly. If this is not possible, a specific transport media has to be used. Even experienced laboratories can culture the pathogen from 50% to 93% of the infected biopsies [34,41].
In our study, the specificity of H. pylori cultures was 93.87%, but the sensitivity was markedly decreased with a value of 22.03%. As the sensitivity of the culture method is low, a negative H. pylori culture does not indicate the absence of the infection. In the literature, various studies report inconsistent results. For example, Kaya et al. reported an H. pylori culture sensitivity of 22.5% and a specificity of 97.1% [42]. In another study conducted on children and adolescents, the sensitivity for H. pylori culture was 79.3% and the specificity was 100% [43]. In the adult population, the sensitivity of the culture method is higher, ranging from 62.7% to 96.3% in the performed studies [42,44,45]. Despite their long use, cultures are challenging due to the fastidious nature of the bacterium, with growth requirements regarding the media [46]. Therefore, although the culture method is accepted as the diagnostic “gold standard”, it is difficult to use solely as a routine diagnostic tool. The number of biopsies necessary to diagnose H. pylori infection is also a subject of controversy. Although a single antrum biopsy specimen (2 cm from the pylorus) has good sensitivity, it is not sufficient to provide a reliable diagnosis. The probability of finding H. pylori increases with the number of biopsy specimens tested since the bacterium may have a patchy distribution [47]. Although H. pylori are often present everywhere, there are some rare cases when the infection solely affects the corpus. For example, the corpus may be the only site that remains positive after the consumption of antisecretory drugs [19]. In our study, we only obtained two biopsies from the antrum for H. pylori cultures, and this could be adjusted by getting another one or two samples from the gastric body to improve the culture success rate. However, taking more biopsy samples can be difficult to apply to children.
To establish optimum therapy, meaning to achieve maximum efficacy and minimum side effects, it is essential to determine which antibiotic resistance has actually developed for every patient. Ideally, AST should be performed for all diagnosed patients. However, in standard clinical practice, AST is not always possible as it is challenging to use the culture method alone as a routine diagnostic approach.
In our study, antibiotic resistance was encountered only in two of the patients with H. pylori-positive cultures, accounting for 15.38% of the total number of cultures. More specifically, they presented clarithromycin resistance. Both patients previously underwent treatment for H. pylori infection. The international guidelines do not recommend clarithromycin when resistance to this antibiotic is >15% [15], as in our case.
A recent multicenter study across Europe evaluated H. pylori antibiotic resistance for a long period of time (i.e., 7 years, between 2013 and 2020) [48]. This study included 41,526 adult patients with bacterial cultures performed for 3974 (9.5%) individuals. This evidence suggests a low rate of using this method as it is not part of the routine clinical practice. The key finding was that only 9.5% of cases in Europe involved testing for antibiotic susceptibility, resulting in a low number of tests being conducted [48]. Our study reveals a low use of AST also in children (i.e., 22.03%). In the previously mentioned study, H. pylori resistance was generally high for clarithromycin, especially in countries in Southern Europe. The average resistance rate to clarithromycin was 25%, with a maximum peak in 2016 reaching 34% [48]. In our study, only clarithromycin resistance was encountered (i.e., 15.38%), presenting lower values but under the reserve of a limited number of positive cultures. Other studies also observed a significant increase in the H. pylori resistance rate toward clarithromycin, levofloxacin, and metronidazole which correlate with the number of previous treatment failures [49]. In another pediatric investigation, including 154 children, the highest amoxicillin resistance was reported, at 12%. The resistance rate for clarithromycin was 35%, and for tetracycline and levofloxacin was 8% and 2%, respectively [50].
Understanding H. pylori susceptibility to antibiotics and adherence to therapy is essential for successfully eradicating pediatric H. pylori infection [51]. At least a 90% eradication rate is the ideal target for first-line therapy, especially for preventing the emergence of antibiotic-resistant strains [14,52]. However, if culture and AST for H. pylori are unavailable, the treatment may rely on clinical experience and regional antimicrobial susceptibility profiles. In our study, the eradication rate for sequential therapy was successful, exceeding 90% (94.73%). This high efficacy of the sequential regimen is similar to a couple of other studies, reporting eradication rates ranging from 81.9% to 98% [53,54,55]. However, these eradication rates are lower when antibiotic resistance is present. For instance, sequential therapy efficacy was only 56% when clarithromycin resistance was present in a prospective multicenter European study of 165 children [56]. Thus, data collected from our study suggest a high susceptibility of H. pylori to antibiotics. This multi-drug treatment is particularly challenging for clinicians because pediatric patients must take pills several times a day. Thus, to improve compliance and prevent poor compliance or treatment discontinuation, which results in treatment failure, physicians should also educate patients’ families.

5. Study Limitations

We acknowledge that our study has several limitations. First of all, this is a single-center study, with a limited number of patients during a specific timeframe. This small number of patients restricted us to obtain possible significant results regarding antibiotic resistance. Moreover, the current pediatric guidelines recommend a diagnosis based on bacterial cultures or histology with at least one other positive test. However, when the study started the guidelines were not published yet. Thus, we did not perform in every case the extra needed test for the histopathological diagnosis. Furthermore, the guidelines propose obtaining at least six biopsy samples for the histopathological examination. Due to the fact that our patients were children and we also needed to collect samples for the bacterial cultures, we were unable to gather so many samples for our study. Therefore, in some of these circumstances, a misdiagnosis may be linked to our detecting methods. Additionally, sequential therapy effectiveness could be overestimated because this therapy was only prescribed to patients with no antibiotic resistances or negative cultures.

6. Conclusions

The encountered impediments in the bacterial growth in cultures restricted us from further accurately investigating the H. pylori antibiotic resistance. The histopathologic examination brought more information and was more easily performed. Thus, our recommendation is to continue using for the diagnosis biopsy-based investigations such as histopathology, but also determine the bacterial cultures with AST if possible or depending on local availability. Although the bacterial cultures had a low positivity rate, the sequential therapy had a successful eradication rate, suggesting the susceptibility of H. pylori infection in the children from our center with previous AST analysis.
To summarize, our data recommend that further clinical studies are necessary to better assess the H. pylori antibiotic resistance to provide tailored treatment and identify children that need closer monitoring.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.G., C.B. and M.A.; methodology, F.G., C.B. and M.A.; formal analysis, E.I., A.I. and M.T.C.; data curation, E.I.; writing—original draft preparation, F.G. and M.-I.I.; writing—review and editing, A.A.B., M.-I.I. and C.B.; supervision, F.G. and A.A.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Ethics Committee (197/27.05.2015 and 627/26.05.2017) of Marie Curie Emergency Children’s Hospital, Bucharest, Romania.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Augustina Enculescu and Alina Vasile for providing histopathological assistance in this study and Violeta Cristea for the support in isolation, culture and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of pediatric H. pylori gastric samples.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Marshall, B.J.; Armstrong, J.A.; McGechie, D.B.; Clancy, R.J. Attempt to Fulfil Koch’s Postulates for Pyloric Campylobacter. Med. J. Aust. 1985, 142, 436–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Parkin, D.M.; Bray, F.; Ferlay, J.; Pisani, P. Global Cancer Statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2005, 55, 74–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. IARC. Schistosomes, Liver Flukes and Helicobacter pylori. In IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans; IARC: Lyon, France, 1994; Volume 61, pp. 1–241. [Google Scholar]
  4. WHO. Publishes List of Bacteria for Which New Antibiotics Are Urgently Needed. Available online: https://www.who.int/news/item/27-02-2017-who-publishes-list-of-bacteria-for-which-new-antibiotics-are-urgently-needed (accessed on 12 August 2022).
  5. Suerbaum, S.; Michetti, P. Helicobacter pylori Infection. N. Engl. J. Med. 2002, 347, 1175–1186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Drumm, B.; Day, A.S.; Gold, B.; Gottrand, F.; Kato, S.; Kawakami, E.; Madrazo, A.; Snyder, J.; Thomas, J. Helicobacter pylori and Peptic Ulcer: Working Group Report of the Second World Congress of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 2004, 39 (Suppl. 2), S626–S631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Hooi, J.K.Y.; Lai, W.Y.; Ng, W.K.; Suen, M.M.Y.; Underwood, F.E.; Tanyingoh, D.; Malfertheiner, P.; Graham, D.Y.; Wong, V.W.S.; Wu, J.C.Y.; et al. Global Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori Infection: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Gastroenterology 2017, 153, 420–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Olar, L.; MitruŢ, P.; Florou, C.; Mălăescu, G.D.; Predescu, O.I.; Rogozea, L.M.; Mogoantă, L.; Ionovici, N.; Pirici, I. Evaluation of Helicobacter pylori Infection in Patients with Eso-Gastro-Duodenal Pathology. Rom. J. Morphol. Embryol. 2017, 58, 809–815. [Google Scholar]
  9. Corojan, A.L.; Dumitrașcu, D.-L.; Ciobanca, P.; Leucuta, D.-C. Prevalence of Helicobacter Pylori Infection among Dyspeptic Patients in Northwestern Romania: A Decreasing Epidemiological Trend in the Last 30 Years. Exp. Ther. Med. 2020, 20, 3488–3492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Mărginean, C.O.; Cotoi, O.S.; Pitea, A.M.; Mocanu, S.; Mărginean, C. Assessment of the Relationship between Helicobacter Pylori Infection, Endoscopic Appearance and Histological Changes of the Gastric Mucosa in Children with Gastritis (a Single Center Experience). Rom. J. Morphol. Embryol. 2013, 54, 709–715. [Google Scholar]
  11. Domșa, A.-M.T.; Lupușoru, R.; Gheban, D.; Șerban, R.; Borzan, C.M. Helicobacter Pylori Gastritis in Children—The Link between Endoscopy and Histology. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Pacifico, L.; Anania, C.; Osborn, J.F.; Ferraro, F.; Chiesa, C. Consequences of Helicobacter pylori Infection in Children. World J. Gastroenterol. 2010, 16, 5181–5194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Cho, J.; Prashar, A.; Jones, N.L.; Moss, S.F. Helicobacter pylori Infection. Gastroenterol. Clin. N. Am. 2021, 50, 261–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ertem, D. Clinical Practice: Helicobacter pylori Infection in Childhood. Eur. J. Pediatr. 2013, 172, 1427–1434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Jones, N.L.; Koletzko, S.; Goodman, K.; Bontems, P.; Cadranel, S.; Casswall, T.; Czinn, S.; Gold, B.D.; Guarner, J.; Elitsur, Y.; et al. Joint ESPGHAN/NASPGHAN Guidelines for the Management of Helicobacter pylori in Children and Adolescents (Update 2016). J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 2017, 64, 991–1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Dixon, M.F.; Genta, R.M.; Yardley, J.H.; Correa, P. Classification and Grading of Gastritis. The Updated Sydney System. International Workshop on the Histopathology of Gastritis, Houston 1994. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 1996, 20, 1161–1181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sipponen, P.; Price, A.B. The Sydney System for Classification of Gastritis 20 Years Ago. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2011, 26 (Suppl. 1), 31–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kalach, N.; Bontems, P.; Cadranel, S. Advances in the Treatment of Helicobacter Pylori Infection in Children. Ann. Gastroenterol. 2015, 28, 10–18. [Google Scholar]
  19. Mégraud, F.; Lehours, P. Helicobacter Pylori Detection and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2007, 20, 280–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Mégraud, F. H Pylori Antibiotic Resistance: Prevalence, Importance, and Advances in Testing. Gut 2004, 53, 1374–1384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Botija, G.; García Rodríguez, C.; Recio Linares, A.; Campelo Gutiérrez, C.; Pérez-Fernández, E.; Barrio Merino, A. Antibiotic Resistances and Eradication Rates in Helicobacter pylori Infection. An. Pediatr. 2021, 95, 431–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Gong, E.J.; Kim, D.H.; Ahn, J.Y.; Na, H.K.; Jung, K.W.; Lee, J.H.; Choi, K.D.; Song, H.J.; Lee, G.H.; Jung, H.-Y.; et al. Effects of Proton Pump Inhibitor on the Distribution of Helicobacter pylori and Associated Gastritis in Patients with Gastric Atrophy. Digestion 2020, 101, 279–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Megraud, F.; Boyanova, L.; Lamouliatte, H. Activity of Lansoprazole against Helicobacter Pylori. Lancet 1991, 337, 1486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Fallone, C.A.; Loo, V.G.; Lough, J.; Barkun, A.N. Hematoxylin and Eosin Staining of Gastric Tissue for the Detection of Helicobacter pylori. Helicobacter 1997, 2, 32–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Alkhamiss, A.S. Evaluation of Better Staining Method among Hematoxylin and Eosin, Giemsa and Periodic Acid Schiff-Alcian Blue for the Detection of Helicobacter pylori in Gastric Biopsies. Malays. J. Med. Sci. 2020, 27, 53–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Galoș, F.; Năstase, G.; Boboc, C.; Coldea, C.; Anghel, M.; Orzan, A.; Bălgrădean, M. A Study of the Correlation between Bacterial Culture and Histological Examination in Children with Helicobacter Pylori Gastritis; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2018; ISBN 978-1-78984-971-4. [Google Scholar]
  27. Sonnenberg, A.; Lash, R.H.; Genta, R.M. A National Study of Helicobactor Pylori Infection in Gastric Biopsy Specimens. Gastroenterology 2010, 139, 1894–1901.e2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Zabala Torrres, B.; Lucero, Y.; Lagomarcino, A.J.; Orellana-Manzano, A.; George, S.; Torres, J.P.; O’Ryan, M. Review: Prevalence and Dynamics of Helicobacter pylori Infection during Childhood. Helicobacter 2017, 22, e12399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Dong, B.N.; Graham, D.Y. Helicobacter pylori Infection and Antibiotic Resistance: A WHO High Priority? Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2017, 14, 383–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Megraud, F.; Bruyndonckx, R.; Coenen, S.; Wittkop, L.; Huang, T.-D.; Hoebeke, M.; Bénéjat, L.; Lehours, P.; Goossens, H.; Glupczynski, Y. Helicobacter pylori Resistance to Antibiotics in Europe in 2018 and Its Relationship to Antibiotic Consumption in the Community. Gut 2021, 70, 1815–1822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Choi, I.J.; Kim, C.G.; Lee, J.Y.; Kim, Y.-I.; Kook, M.-C.; Park, B.; Joo, J. Family History of Gastric Cancer and Helicobacter pylori Treatment. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 382, 427–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Nishizawa, T.; Suzuki, H.; Sakitani, K.; Yamashita, H.; Yoshida, S.; Hata, K.; Kanazawa, T.; Fujiwara, N.; Kanai, T.; Yahagi, N.; et al. Family History Is an Independent Risk Factor for the Progression of Gastric Atrophy among Patients with Helicobacter pylori Infection. United Eur. Gastroenterol. J. 2017, 5, 32–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Yatsuya, H.; Toyoshima, H.; Tamakoshi, A.; Kikuchi, S.; Tamakoshi, K.; Kondo, T.; Mizoue, T.; Tokui, N.; Hoshiyama, Y.; Sakata, K.; et al. Individual and Joint Impact of Family History and Helicobacter pylori Infection on the Risk of Stomach Cancer: A Nested Case-Control Study. Br. J. Cancer 2004, 91, 929–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Galoș, F.; Boboc, C.; Năstase, G.; Orzan, A.; Coldea, C.; Anghel, M.; Bălgrădean, M. Endoscopical Aspects of Helicobacter Pylori Gastritis in Children; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2018; ISBN 978-1-83881-147-1. [Google Scholar]
  35. Ricci, C.; Holton, J.; Vaira, D. Diagnosis of Helicobacter Pylori: Invasive and Non-Invasive Tests. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Gastroenterol. 2007, 21, 299–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Genta, R.M.; Graham, D.Y. Comparison of Biopsy Sites for the Histopathologic Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori: A Topographic Study of H. Pylori Density and Distribution. Gastrointest. Endosc. 1994, 40, 342–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Whitney, A.E.; Guarner, J.; Hutwagner, L.; Gold, B.D. Helicobacter pylori Gastritis in Children and Adults: Comparative Histopathologic Study. Ann. Diagn. Pathol. 2000, 4, 279–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Serrano, C.; Wright, S.W.; Bimczok, D.; Shaffer, C.L.; Cover, T.L.; Venegas, A.; Salazar, M.G.; Smythies, L.E.; Harris, P.R.; Smith, P.D. Down-Regulated Th17 Responses Are Associated with Reduced Gastritis in Helicobacter pylori-Infected Children. Mucosal Immunol. 2013, 6, 950–959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Nardone, G.; Staibano, S.; Rocco, A.; Mezza, E.; Balzano, T.; Salvatore, G.; Staiano, A.; Donofrio, V.; Grazioli, B.; de Rosa, G.; et al. Effect of Helicobacter pylori Infection on Gastric Cell Proliferation and Genomic Instablity in a Paediatric Population of Southern Italy. Dig. Liver Dis. 2001, 33, 743–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Yang, H.R. Updates on the Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori Infection in Children: What Are the Differences between Adults and Children? Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. Nutr. 2016, 19, 96–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Mitchell, H.M.; Bohane, T.D.; Tobias, V.; Bullpitt, P.; Daskalopoulos, G.; Carrick, J.; Mitchell, J.D.; Lee, A. Helicobacter pylori Infection in Children: Potential Clues to Pathogenesis. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 1993, 16, 120–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Malfertheiner, P.; Megraud, F.; O’Morain, C.A.; Gisbert, J.P.; Kuipers, E.J.; Axon, A.T.; Bazzoli, F.; Gasbarrini, A.; Atherton, J.; Graham, D.Y.; et al. Management of Helicobacter pylori Infection—The Maastricht V/Florence Consensus Report. Gut 2017, 66, 6–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Kaya, A.D.; Oztürk, C.E.; Akcan, Y.; Behçet, M.; Karakoç, A.E.; Yücel, M.; Mısırlıoglu, M.; Tuncer, S. Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori in Symptomatic Patients and Detection of Clarithromycin Resistance Using Melting Curve Analysis. Curr. Ther. Res. 2007, 68, 151–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Ogata, S.K.; Kawakami, E.; Patrício, F.R.; Pedroso, M.Z.; Santos, A.M. Evaluation of Invasive and Non-Invasive Methods for the Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori Infection in Symptomatic Children and Adolescents. Sao Paulo Med. J. 2001, 119, 67–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Cosgun, Y.; Yildirim, A.; Yucel, M.; Karakoc, A.E.; Koca, G.; Gonultas, A.; Gursoy, G.; Ustun, H.; Korkmaz, M. Evaluation of Invasive and Noninvasive Methods for the Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori Infection. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 2016, 17, 5265–5272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Saracino, I.M.; Zullo, A.; Holton, J.; Castelli, V.; Fiorini, G.; Zaccaro, C.; Ridola, L.; Ricci, C.; Gatta, L.; Vaira, D. High Prevalence of Primary Antibiotic Resistance in Helicobacter pylori Isolates in Italy. J. Gastrointest. Liver Dis. 2012, 21, 363–365. [Google Scholar]
  47. Patel, S.K.; Pratap, C.B.; Jain, A.K.; Gulati, A.K.; Nath, G. Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori: What Should Be the Gold Standard? World J. Gastroenterol. 2014, 20, 12847–12859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Kohli, Y.; Tanaka, Y.; Kato, T.; Ito, S. Endoscopic diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori distribution in human gastric mucosa by phenol red dye spraying method. Nihon Rinsho Jpn. J. Clin. Med. 1993, 51, 3182–3186. [Google Scholar]
  49. Bujanda, L.; Nyssen, O.P.; Vaira, D.; Saracino, I.M.; Fiorini, G.; Lerang, F.; Georgopoulos, S.; Tepes, B.; Heluwaert, F.; Gasbarrini, A.; et al. Antibiotic Resistance Prevalence and Trends in Patients Infected with Helicobacter pylori in the Period 2013–2020: Results of the European Registry on H. Pylori Management (Hp-EuReg). Antibiotics 2021, 10, 1058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Saracino, I.M.; Pavoni, M.; Zullo, A.; Fiorini, G.; Saccomanno, L.; Lazzarotto, T.; Cavallo, R.; Antonelli, G.; Vaira, D. Antibiotic Resistance and Therapy Outcome in H. Pylori Eradication Failure Patients. Antibiotics 2020, 9, 121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Pastukh, N.; Peretz, A.; Brodsky, D.; Isakovich, N.; Azrad, M.; On, A. Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Helicobacter pylori Strains Isolated from Children in Israel. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2018, 12, 175–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Schwarzer, A.; Bontems, P.; Urruzuno, P.; Kalach, N.; Iwanczak, B.; Roma-Giannikou, E.; Sykora, J.; Kindermann, A.; Casswall, T.; Cadranel, S.; et al. Sequential Therapy for Helicobacter pylori Infection in Treatment-Naïve Children. Helicobacter 2016, 21, 106–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Matos, I.A.; Oliva, S.E.D.; Escobedo, A.A.; Jiménez, O.M.V.; Villaurrutia, Y.D.C.V. Helicobacter pylori Infection in Children. BMJ Paediatr. Open 2020, 4, e000679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Bontems, P.; Kalach, N.; Oderda, G.; Salame, A.; Muyshont, L.; Miendje, D.Y.; Raymond, J.; Cadranel, S.; Scaillon, M. Sequential Therapy versus Tailored Triple Therapies for Helicobacter pylori Infection in Children. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 2011, 53, 646–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Zullo, A.; Rinaldi, V.; Winn, S.; Meddi, P.; Lionetti, R.; Hassan, C.; Ripani, C.; Tomaselli, G.; Attili, A.F. A New Highly Effective Short-Term Therapy Schedule for Helicobacter pylori Eradication. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2000, 14, 715–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Su, D.-J.; Chang, M.-H.; Yang, J.-C.; Ni, Y.-H.; Hsu, H.-Y.; Wu, J.-F. Fourteen-Day Sequential Therapy Is Superior to 7-Day Triple Therapy as First-Line Regimen for Helicobacter pylori Infected Children. J. Formos. Med. Assoc. 2022, 121, 202–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Antibiotics 12 00146 g001 550
Figure 1. Flowchart of the selection of the patients included in the study. Abbreviations: UGE, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy; H. pylori, Helicobacter pylori; AST, antibiotic susceptibility testing.
Figure 1. Flowchart of the selection of the patients included in the study. Abbreviations: UGE, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy; H. pylori, Helicobacter pylori; AST, antibiotic susceptibility testing.
Antibiotics 12 00146 g001
Antibiotics 12 00146 g002 550
Figure 2. Microscopic view of Helicobacter pylori in antral gastric biopsy stained with (A) hematoxylin–eosin, and (B) Giemsa. (A) 200× histological section of hematoxylin–eosin-stained antral gastric mucosa with inflammatory lymphoplasmacytic infiltration and vascular congestion; Helicobacter pylori can be seen within the mucus layer at the surface of gastric mucosa; (B) 400× histological section of Giemsa-stained antral gastric mucosa with Helicobacter pylori colonization of the gastric glands, depicted as minuscule curved structures.
Figure 2. Microscopic view of Helicobacter pylori in antral gastric biopsy stained with (A) hematoxylin–eosin, and (B) Giemsa. (A) 200× histological section of hematoxylin–eosin-stained antral gastric mucosa with inflammatory lymphoplasmacytic infiltration and vascular congestion; Helicobacter pylori can be seen within the mucus layer at the surface of gastric mucosa; (B) 400× histological section of Giemsa-stained antral gastric mucosa with Helicobacter pylori colonization of the gastric glands, depicted as minuscule curved structures.
Antibiotics 12 00146 g002
Table
Table 1. Demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients.
Table 1. Demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients.
Mean age ± SD, years11 years 7 months ± 4 years 5 months
Male/female24 (40.67%)/35 (59.32%)
Family history for H. pylori infection10/59 (16.94%)
Symptoms > 6 months 26/59 (44.06%)
Previous therapy 22/59 (37.28%)
Table
Table 2. Correlation between endoscopic aspect and previous H. pylori eradication status.
Table 2. Correlation between endoscopic aspect and previous H. pylori eradication status.
ParameterNormal
Endoscopic Aspect		Pathological Endoscopic Aspectp Value
Patients without previous therapies (37 patients)1/37 (2.70%)36/37 (97.29%)0.002
Patients with previous therapies (22 patients)7/22 (31.81%)15/22 (68.18%)
Table
Table 3. Correlation between H. pylori density in the histological examination, positive bacterial cultures, and the activity of associated gastritis.
Table 3. Correlation between H. pylori density in the histological examination, positive bacterial cultures, and the activity of associated gastritis.
ParameterLow H. pylori DensityModerate H. pylori DensityMarked H. pylori Densityp Value
Positive H. pylori cultures (%)5/28 (17.85%)4/21 (19.04%)1/7 (14.28%)0.01
Activity of H. pylori gastritisWithout activity (%)7/28 (25%)1/21 (4.76%)1/7 (14.28%)0.03
Mild activity (%)11/28 (39.2%)6/21 (28.57%)4/7 (57.14%)
Moderate activity (%)10/28 (35.7%)13/21 (61.9%)2/7 (28.57%)
Severe activity (%)01/21 (4.76%)0
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Galoș, F.; Boboc, C.; Ieșanu, M.-I.; Anghel, M.; Ioan, A.; Iana, E.; Coșoreanu, M.T.; Boboc, A.A. Antibiotic Resistance and Therapeutic Efficacy of Helicobacter pylori Infection in Pediatric Patients—A Tertiary Center Experience. Antibiotics 2023, 12, 146. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12010146

AMA Style

Galoș F, Boboc C, Ieșanu M-I, Anghel M, Ioan A, Iana E, Coșoreanu MT, Boboc AA. Antibiotic Resistance and Therapeutic Efficacy of Helicobacter pylori Infection in Pediatric Patients—A Tertiary Center Experience. Antibiotics. 2023; 12(1):146. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12010146

Chicago/Turabian Style

Galoș, Felicia, Cătălin Boboc, Mara-Ioana Ieșanu, Mălina Anghel, Andreea Ioan, Elena Iana, Maria Teodora Coșoreanu, and Anca Andreea Boboc. 2023. "Antibiotic Resistance and Therapeutic Efficacy of Helicobacter pylori Infection in Pediatric Patients—A Tertiary Center Experience" Antibiotics 12, no. 1: 146. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12010146

APA Style

Galoș, F., Boboc, C., Ieșanu, M. -I., Anghel, M., Ioan, A., Iana, E., Coșoreanu, M. T., & Boboc, A. A. (2023). Antibiotic Resistance and Therapeutic Efficacy of Helicobacter pylori Infection in Pediatric Patients—A Tertiary Center Experience. Antibiotics, 12(1), 146. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12010146

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop