Next Article in Journal
Preparation of Wood-Based Carbon Quantum Dots and Promotion of Light Capture Applications
Next Article in Special Issue
Study on Characterization of Phase Transition in Continuous Cooling of Carbon Steel Using In Situ Thermovoltage Measurement
Previous Article in Journal
Experimental Study on Tribological Properties of Coated Surface and Textured Surface under Seawater Lubrication Conditions
Previous Article in Special Issue
Corrosion Performance of Epoxy/Sulfur–Selenium Coating on Q235 Steel
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Study on High-Temperature, Ultra-Low Wear Behaviors of Ti6Al4V Alloy with Thermal Oxidation Treatment

1
Key Laboratory of Education Ministry for Modern Design and Rotor-Bearing System, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China
2
Beijing Aeronautical Engineering Technical Research Center, Beijing 100076, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Coatings 2024, 14(4), 416; https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings14040416
Submission received: 22 February 2024 / Revised: 27 March 2024 / Accepted: 29 March 2024 / Published: 31 March 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advancement in Heat Treatment and Surface Modification for Metals)

Abstract

:
Thermal oxidation (TO) is a simple and economical way to enhance the wear resistance of the Ti6Al4V alloy. The TO temperature has a very important effect on the tribological properties of the TiO2 layer formed. However, the impact of the oxidation temperature on the high-temperature tribological behavior of a TO-treated Ti6Al4V alloy is not clear. Therefore, the Ti6Al4V alloy was oxidized at 400 °C, 600 °C, and 700 °C for 36 h, and the sliding friction experiments were conducted at room temperature (RT) and 400 °C with a Si3N4 ball as the counter body to comparatively study the effect of the oxidation temperature on the high-temperature friction behavior of the TO-treated Ti6Al4V alloy. The results show that the TO treatment can effectively improve the wear resistance of the samples at both room and high temperatures. Among them, the oxidation-treated samples at 700 °C show the best wear resistance, with a reduction of 92.6% at high temperatures; the amount of wear loss at room temperature was so small that it was almost incalculable. At room temperature, the friction surface formed uneven agglomerate formations, resulting in an elevated coefficient of friction (CoF) compared to the untreated samples. At a high temperature, however, the CoF is reduced compared to the untreated samples due to the formation of a homogeneous transfer film in the wear area that is caused by the interaction of Si3N4 and oxygen.

1. Introduction

The Ti6Al4V alloy, due to its low density, high specific strength, and excellent performance, is one of the mainstream materials used for making aero-engine blades [1,2,3,4,5]. In an aero engine, the clearance between the blade case is a key factor that affects its efficiency [6,7,8]. In order to minimize the clearance, the casing is coated with a sacrificial abradable seal [9,10,11,12]. During engine operation, the blade tip and the sealing coating are subject to high-speed scraping. Therefore, improving the wear resistance of Ti6Al4V alloy blade tips is crucial for the safety and lifetime of aero engines. For a Ti6Al4V alloy, thermal oxidation (TO) is a simple and efficient means to enhance its wear resistance due to the high affinity of titanium for oxygen and the high hardness of titanium dioxide [13,14,15,16].
Guleryuz and Cimenoglu [17] investigated the effect of the TO process on the room temperature dry sliding wear behavior of a Ti6Al4V alloy treated at 600 °C for 60 h. The TO process induced a hard surface layer of TiO2 and an oxygen diffusion zone, which improved the surface hardness from 450 to 1300 HV0.01 and improved the wear resistance. Wang et al. [18] performed thermal oxidation at 600 °C to 800 °C for 4 h under a vapor environment and investigated the room temperature tribological properties. It was found that the optimal oxidation temperature was 700 °C, with an 80% reduction in the wear volume. Then, they studied the effects of different durations from 2 h to 8 h under a water-oxidizing atmosphere [19]. The results showed that the growth of the oxide gradually became sufficient with the increase in time, and when the time was more than 6 h, the oxide particles were overgrown, and the surface was gradually roughened.
However, most of the available studies have focused on the effect of the thermal oxidation technique on the room temperature tribological properties of the samples, and little research has been conducted on the wear behavior of a thermally oxidized Ti6Al4V alloy at elevated temperatures [20,21]. The existing literature shows that the thermal oxidation temperature has a significant effect on the wear resistance of the Ti6Al4V alloy, but there are few studies on its role on the friction and wear properties at high temperatures [22,23]. In fact, the operating temperature of Ti6Al4V alloy blades can reach up to 400 °C [24,25]. For titanium and its alloys, the oxide layer (OL) and the oxidation diffusion zone (ODZ) form simultaneously at temperatures above 400 °C. The OL and ODZ form at the same time. However, at temperatures above 800 °C, the thick OL and the ODZ detach, leading to a reduction in the high-temperature properties of the alloy [21,26,27]. Therefore, in this investigation, the Ti6Al4V alloy was oxidized at three different temperatures of 400 °C (TO-400 °C), 600 °C (TO-600 °C), and 700 °C (TO-700 °C) for 36 h. Sliding wear experiments were conducted at room temperature and 400 °C to comparatively study the effect of the thermal oxidation temperature on the high-temperature tribological performance of a Ti6Al4V alloy.

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Materials and Thermal Oxidation

The components of the Ti6Al4V alloy were 5.85 wt% Al, 3.68 wt% V, 0.18 wt% O, 1.3 wt% N, 1.47 wt% Fe, and Ti was balanced. First, the Ti6Al4V alloy was cut into round blocks with a diameter of 30 mm and a thickness of 3 mm for use as the experimental samples. Before thermal oxidation, one side of the samples was polished to Ra 0.02 μm, which was measured using a laser scanning confocal microscope (LSCM, OLS4000, Japan), and then cleaned with anhydrous ethanol. The polished samples were heated at 400 °C, 600 °C, and 700 °C for 36 h using a tube furnace, and then the furnace cooled to room temperature.

2.2. Characterization

The oxide phases formed after TO were analyzed using X-ray diffractometry (Bruker D8 ADVANC, Saarbrucken, Germany), using a Cu-targeted source at a wave length of 0.15418 nm. The oxidized samples were scanned from 20° to 90° (2θ), using a step size of 0.02°/s and an acquisition time of 0.05 s at each the step. The hardness measurements were carried out at three different locations on the oxide surface with a Vickers hardness tester (TMVS-1, Beijing, China), at a load of 50 g and a hold time of 15 s, following the ISO standard 6507 [28]. Field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM) (GeminiSEM 500, Zeiss, German) was used to evaluate the surface morphologies as well as the microstructures of the abrasive marks after oxidation, and energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) was used to analyze the elemental composition of the surface. The surface of the wear tracks was scanned using a laser scanning confocal microscope (LSCM, OLS4000, Japan) to measure the cross-sectional area of the abrasion marks and calculate the wear rate.

2.3. Tribological Testing

Both the room temperature and high-temperature friction experiments were carried out using an RTEC Multi-Function Friction Tester in a ball-on-disc friction mode following the ASTM standard G99 [29]. The friction occurred in the form of a rotational motion in an air atmosphere. A silicon nitride ceramic (Si3N4) ball with a diameter of 9.525 mm was used as the friction partner. The load was a constant load of 3 N. The relative sliding speed between the ball and the disk was 0.05 m/s for a duration of 1800 s. The experiments were carried out at room temperature and 400 °C, respectively.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Oxide Layer

Figure 1 shows the SEM images of the Ti6Al4V alloy after TO treatment at different temperatures. The thickness of the oxide layer gradually increases with the increase in temperature. Traces left by polishing can still be clearly seen in the samples after TO treatment at 400 °C, the abrasion marks observed in the samples after treatment at 600 °C are significantly reduced, and the traces of polishing can no longer be observed at all on the surface after treatment at 700 °C. As the TO temperature increases, the surface unevenness of the samples increases significantly.
Figure 2 shows the cross-sectional images of the oxide layers in TO-treated samples. When the oxidation temperature is 400 °C, it can be observed that a significant oxygen diffusion occurs, but the degree of oxidation is weak, the oxides do not gather to form a complete oxide layer, and there is no obvious demarcation line with the substrate. However, in Figure 2a, clear agglomeration can be observed, and it becomes denser the closer to the surface it occurs. In the process of oxide formation, the alloy first adsorbs oxygen molecules in the atmosphere, then the oxide nucleates and gradually aggregates to form an oxide film [18,30]. The oxide on the surface of the 400 °C TO sample is on the verge of forming an oxide film, and the oxide aggregation is obvious. As the temperature rises, the rate of oxide generation accelerates and the oxide grows and agglomerates, forming complete oxide layers [31]. As shown in Figure 2b,c, clear oxide layers can be observed in 600 °C and 700 °C TO samples, where the oxide layer thickness of the 700 °C TO sample reaches 3.656 μm.
Figure 3 shows the XRD patterns of the untreated samples and the TO-treated samples at different temperatures. The sample oxidized at 400 °C did not show TiO2 phase peaks due to the thin oxide layer at this time [21]. The sample oxidized at 600 °C started to show TiO2 phase peaks, but with a low peak intensity. The sample oxidized at 700 °C had a clear rutile-TiO2 phase peak with a stronger peak intensity. Table 1 shows the microhardness values of TO-treated samples and the surface element content obtained using EDS. The microhardness of the samples gradually increased with an increasing TO treatment temperature. The greatest increase in hardness was observed for the samples treated at 700 °C, from 370 ± 20 HV0.05 to 1250 ± 40 HV0.05. In order to obtain the intrinsic hardness of the oxide layer, the hardness of the oxide layer was calculated using the Jonsonn and Hogmark model [32]:
H f = H s + H c H s 2 C t / h C 2 ( t / h ) 2
where Hf is the hardness of the coatings, Hs is the hardness of the substrate, Hc is the composite hardness, C is a constant dependent upon the indenter geometry, t is the coating thickness, and h is the indentation depth. According to Equation (1), the intrinsic hardness of the 600 °C and 700 °C TO samples can be calculated as 1258.11 HV0.05 and 1469.51 HV0.05, respectively. The intrinsic hardness of the 400 °C TO sample cannot be calculated due to an obvious demarcation line in the substrate. It can be seen that the intrinsic hardness of the oxide layer also increases with temperature. To highlight the proportionality between Ti and O, the sum of the Ti and O content was calculated as 100%. From the analysis results of EDS, it can be seen that with an increase in the oxidation temperature, the samples exhibited a gradual increase in the content of O, which gradually approached an atomic ratio for Ti to O of 1:2 in TiO2. It indicated that the degree of oxidation and oxygen diffusion of the Ti6Al4V alloy surface gradually deepens with the increase in oxidation temperature.

3.2. Tribological Behavior

Figure 4 shows the coefficients of friction (CoFs) of untreated and TO-treated samples tested against a Si3N4 ball counter body at a constant load of 3 N at room temperature (RT) and 400 °C. As shown in Figure 4a,c, the TO-treated samples show higher CoF values than untreated samples at RT. The lowest CoF (0.31) was found for the untreated sample, and the highest CoF (0.50) was found for the 600 °C TO sample, while the CoF values of the untreated sample showed a greater fluctuation. At 400 °C, the TO-treated samples exhibited a lower CoF in the stabilization phase than the untreated sample. The untreated samples had the highest CoF (0.46), and the 400 °C TO samples had the lowest CoF (0.34).
Figure 5 shows the wear rates of untreated and TO-treated samples. It can be found that the TO-treated samples show excellent wear resistance, which can effectively reduce the wear rate. The low wear rate of the TO-treated samples can be attributed to the fact that the high hardness of the oxide layer improves the wear resistance of the sample’s surface, reduces the stresses at the contact interface, and decreases the elastic and plastic deformation at the contact interface, which ultimately leads to a reduction in the wear. The 700 °C TO sample exhibits the best wear resistance, with a 92.6% reduction in the wear rate from 2.77 × 10−4 mm3N−1m−1 to 2.05 × 10−5 mm3N−1m−1 at 400 °C, while at RT, its wear is so small, it is almost incalculable. This also proves that the high surface hardness resulting from the formation of the oxide layer significantly increases the resistance to wear. The wear rate of the untreated sample at RT (7.06 × 10−4 mm3N−1m−1) is higher than that at 400 °C, which may be due to the fact that the TiO2 formed during the friction of the Ti6Al4V alloy at a high temperature formed a friction layer in the wear area, which has a certain protective effect on the samples [32]. In particular, unlike the 400 °C and 700 °C TO samples, the 600 °C TO sample has a significantly higher wear rate at RT (1.93 × 10−4 mm3N−1m−1) than at 400 °C (3.01 × 10−5 mm3N−1m−1).
Figure 6 shows the SEM morphology of the wear track and the element distribution of the untreated sample and TO-treated samples tested at RT. It was found that the surface of the untreated sample had a lot of wear debris distributed on it. The 400 °C and 600 °C TO surfaces show significant adhesive wear and furrow wear, while the 700 °C TO surface shows even more severe adhesive wear, with scaly adhesive layers on the surface. In addition, from the elemental distribution results, it can be seen that the wear traces of the TO-treated samples showed a significant Si diffusion phenomenon. This is due to the weak resistance of Si3N4 to chemical attack by atoms of the Ti6Al4V alloy, and the chemical activity of the Si element was motivated during the friction with the Ti6Al4V alloy under atmospheric conditions [33]. The diffusion of Si elements and their reaction with oxygen to form Si–O compounds leads to the increased adhesive wear at RT friction and the formation of an inhomogeneous adhesion layer. This may be one of the main reasons for the increase in the CoF. The wear track of the 400 °C and 600 °C TO samples show deep ploughing grooves due to the hard oxide layer and Si3N4 balls breaking up during friction and forming hard wear particles. The further aggravation of Si diffusion and ultra-high surface hardness of the 700 °C TO sample lead to no obvious ploughing grooves appearing in the wear tracks.
Figure 7 shows the SEM morphology of the wear track and the element distribution of the untreated sample and TO-treated samples tested at RT. From Figure 6a and its element distributions, the Si diffusion of the untreated sample was increased and significant adhesive wear was observed on the surface, which may be due to the further activation of the chemical activity of Si at a high temperature. It was found that Si diffusion of the 400 °C TO sample was significantly weakened. The thinner oxide layer on the surface of the 400 °C TO sample breaks down during friction with the hard Si3N4 and works together with the TiO2 formed by the oxidation of the substrate at the high temperature, preventing the diffusion of Si. This is also the reason why the CoF of the 400 °C TO sample is lower than that of the three other samples at 400 °C [34]. The wear tracks of the 600 °C and 700 °C TO samples form a dense and uniform adhesive layer that protects the substrate, which explains their low wear rate and large fluctuations in the CoF compared to the untreated and 400 °C TO samples.
The wear scars on the Si3N4 counter body tested against untreated and TO-treated samples are shown in Figure 8. At RT and 400 °C, for untreated and 400 °C TO samples, the occurrence of adhesive wear is evidenced by a very high amount of adhesion on the Si3N4 counter body, which is consistent with the results observed on the Ti6Al4V alloy samples’ wear tracks. For the 600 °C TO samples, more adhesion on the surface of the Si3N4 ball in the RT experiment corresponds to the more severe adhesive wear and higher wear rate at RT. We observed a very significant loss on the surface of the Si3N4 counter body against the 700 °C TO samples at RT, and there is almost no transfer on the surface, which confirms the incalculable wear rate at RT. Relatively speaking, the increase in the surface transfer of the Si3N4 counter body at 400 °C confirms the adhesion observed on the 700 °C TO sample surface.

3.3. Discussion

Figure 9 shows the schematic diagram of oxide layer formation and the wear mechanism. The thermal oxidation process of the Ti6Al4V alloy begins with the adsorption of oxygen molecules from the atmosphere, followed by the nucleation of the oxide, gradual agglomeration of the oxide particles to form a thin oxide film, and finally, the formation of a thicker oxide layer with the time increase [18,30]. As the temperature rises, the oxidation reaction is catalyzed, and the rate of oxidation accelerates. In the end, the thickest oxide layer was obtained for the 700 °C TO sample in the same period of time, and the oxide layer did not show any cracking and was well bound to the substrate. The formation of a TiO2 layer greatly improves the surface hardness of the Ti6Al4V alloy and enhances its wear resistance. Even for the 400 °C TO samples without a complete oxide layer, the diffused oxide in the oxygen diffusion zone greatly enhances the surface hardness and increases the wear resistance.
In general, thermally oxidized Ti6Al4V alloys have a high hardness due to the TiO2 on the surface, and the hard particles generated during wear will result in a predominantly abrasive form of wear [35]. However, when Si3N4 is used as the counter body, the activity of the Si in Si3N4 is activated, resulting in Si diffusion during friction and severe adhesive wear. In particular, adhesive wear was most severe for the 700 °C TO sample, which had the best wear resistance, with almost unidirectional material transfer from the Si3N4 ball to the 700 °C TO sample. A continuous transfer film was formed on the surface of the 700 °C TO sample, whereas material removal from the surface of the silicon nitride ball was evident, and there was little adhesion. The formation of a transfer film further protects the sample from wear, ultimately leading to the low wear rate of the 700 °C TO sample.
At 400 °C, the increase in temperature further stimulates the chemical activity of the Si in the Si3N4 counter body, leading to a further increase in adhesive wear. This is why the CoF curves of the TO-treated samples fluctuate even more. At high temperatures, hard counter bodies tend to cause fractures in the titanium dioxide oxide layer during friction with the oxide layer [36]. However, when Si3N4 is used as a counter body, the increased adhesive wear due to Si diffusion instead protects the oxide layer from fracture, which allows the oxide layer to maintain a good bond strength with the substrate after a period of friction. This implies that when a TO-treated Ti6Al4V alloy is used as a friction partner with Si3N4, the anti-wear properties of the oxide layer may be able to be maintained for a longer period of time. Especially for the 600 °C and 700 °C TO samples, which have better hardness and wear resistance, the fine and uniform friction layer formed at the wear tracks can better protect the oxide layer from further wear.

4. Conclusions

The effect of the thermal oxidation temperature on the tribological performance of the Ti6Al4V alloy was investigated systemically. The results show that a suitable thermal oxidation temperature can effectively enhance the anti-wear performance of the Ti6Al4V alloy. The conclusions obtained from the present work can be summarized as follows:
(1)
The thermal oxidation temperature has a considerable influence on the formation of the oxide layer. As the temperature increases, the oxide grows and agglomerates to form a complete oxide layer with an increasing thickness. The sample treated at 700 °C has the highest thickness (3.656 μm) and the surface hardness increases from 366 ± 20 HV0.05 to 1246 ± 40 HV0.05.
(2)
The TiO2 layer formed by thermal oxidation can significantly enhance the wear resistance of the Ti6Al4V alloy. The oxidation-treated samples at 700 °C show the best wear resistance, with a reduction of 92.6% at high temperatures, and the amount of wear at room temperature is almost incalculable.
(3)
The wear mechanism at RT and 400 °C is adhesive wear. In addition, due to the activation of the tribochemical activity of Si during the friction of Si3N4 with the Ti6Al4V alloy, there is clear silicon diffusion in the wear track.

Author Contributions

Resources, Z.P.; Data curation, S.S. and Z.P.; Writing—original draft, Q.Z.; Writing—review & editing, S.S.; Supervision, X.W.; Funding acquisition, Q.Z. and X.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The present work was financially supported by National Science and Technology Major Project (j2019-IV-0004-0071), Shanxi Province Science and Technology Cooperation and Exchange Special Project (202204041101021), and Liaoning Key Laboratory of Aero-Engine Materials Tribology (LKLAMTF202401).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Pavlenko, D.; Dvirnyk, Y.; Przysowa, R. Advanced materials and technologies for compressor blades of small turbofan engines. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2021, 1024, 012061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zeng, Q.; Wang, Z.; He, W.; Pang, Z.; Ning, Z.; Chen, R.; Zheng, C.; Yan, C.; Guo, L. Improved tribocorrosionproperties of Ti6Al4V alloy by anodic plasma electrolytic oxidation. Adv. Eng. Mater. 2023, 25, 2300228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Yang, W.; He, X.; Li, H.; Dong, J.; Chen, W.; Xin, H.; Jin, Z. A tribological investigation of SLM fabricated TC4 Titanium alloy with carburization pre-treatment. Ceram. Int. 2020, 46, 3043–3050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zhu, Y.; Chen, X.; Zou, J.; Yang, H. Sliding wear of selective laser melting processed Ti6Al4V under boundary lubrication conditions. Wear 2016, 368–369, 485–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Shao, M.; Wang, W.; Yang, H.; Zhang, X.; He, X. Preparation of wear-resistant coating on Ti6Al4V alloy by cold spraying and plasma electrolytic oxidation. Coatings 2021, 11, 1288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Xue, W.; Gao, S.; Duan, D.; Wang, L.; Liu, Y.; Li, S. Study on the high-speed rubbing wear behavior between Ti6Al4V blade and nickel–graphite abradable seal Coating. J. Tribol. 2017, 139, 021604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Xue, W.; Gao, S.; Duan, D.; Liu, Y.; Li, S. Material transfer behaviour between a Ti6Al4V blade and an Aluminumhexagonal boron nitride abradable coating during high-speed rubbing. Wear 2015, 322–323, 76–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Tüfekci, M. Performance Evaluation Analysis of Ti-6Al-4V foam fan blades in aircraft engines: A numerical study. Compos. Part C Open Access 2023, 12, 100414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zeng, Q.; Qi, W. High temperature superlubricity behaviors achieved by AlSiN coatings against WS2 coatings at 600 °C. Ceram. Int. 2024, 50, 3787–3796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zeng, Q. High-temperature superlubricityperformance of h-BN coating on the textured Inconel X750 Alloy. Lubricants 2023, 11, 258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Baïz, S.; Fabis, J.; Boidin, X.; Desplanques, Y. Experimental investigation of the blade/seal interaction. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part J 2013, 227, 980–995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Scrinzi, E.; Giovannetti, I.; Sheng, N.; Leblanc, L. Development of New Abradable/Abrasive Sealing Systems for Clearance Control in Gas Turbines; American Society of Mechanical Engineers Digital Collection; ASME: Hamburg, Germany, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  13. Philip, J.; Mathew, J.; Kuriachen, B. Tribology of Ti6Al4V: A review. Friction 2019, 7, 497–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Borgioli, F.; Galvanetto, E.; Iozzelli, F.; Pradelli, G. Improvement of wear resistance of Ti–6Al–4V alloy by means of thermal oxidation. Mater. Lett. 2005, 59, 2159–2162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Dong, H.; Bell, T. Enhanced wear resistance of Titanium surfaces by a new thermal oxidation treatment. Wear 2000, 238, 131–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zeng, Q.; Zhang, W. A systematic review of the recent advances in superlubricity research. Coatings 2023, 13, 1989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Guleryuz, H.; Cimenoglu, H. Surface modification of a Ti–6Al–4V alloy by thermal oxidation. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2005, 192, 164–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wang, S.; Liao, Z.; Liu, Y.; Liu, W. Influence of thermal oxidation temperature on the microstructural and tribological behavior of Ti6Al4V Alloy. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2014, 240, 470–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wang, S.; Liao, Z.; Liu, Y.; Liu, W. Influence of thermal oxidation duration on the microstructure and fretting wear behavior of Ti6Al4V alloy. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2015, 159, 139–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lou, M.; Alpas, A. High temperature wear mechanisms in thermally oxidized Titanium alloys for engine valve applications. Wear 2019, 426–427, 443–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Liu, J.; Suslov, S.; Lim, S.; Qin, H.; Ren, Z.; Ma, C.; Wang, G.; Doll, G.; Cong, H.; Dong, Y.; et al. Effects of ultrasonic nanocrystal surface modification on the thermal oxidation behavior of Ti6Al4V. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2017, 325, 289–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Yuan, S.; Lin, N.; Zou, J.; Lin, X.; Liu, Z.; Yu, Y.; Wang, Z.; Zeng, Q.; Chen, W.; Tian, L.; et al. In-situ fabrication of gradient titanium oxide ceramic coating on laser surface textured Ti6Al4V alloy with improved mechanical property and wear performance. Vacuum 2020, 176, 109327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zhang, C.; Li, C.; Zhang, J. Study on effect of thermal oxidation treatment on wear resistance of Titanium alloy. Surf. Technol. 2008, 37, 18–20 + 23. [Google Scholar]
  24. Li, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Zeng, W. Application and development of aerial Titanium alloys. Mater. Rep. 2020, 34, 280–282. [Google Scholar]
  25. Singh, P.; Pungotra, H.; Kalsi, N. On the characteristics of Titanium alloys for the aircraft applications. Mater. Today Proc. 2017, 4, 8971–8982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Guleryuz, H.; Cimenoglu, H. Oxidation of Ti–6Al–4V Alloy. J. Alloys Compd. 2009, 472, 241–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kumar, S.; Sankara Narayanan, T.; Ganesh Sundara Raman, S.; Seshadri, S. Thermal Oxidation of Ti6Al4V alloy: Microstructural and electrochemical characterization Ti6Al4V. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2010, 119, 337–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. ISO 6507; Metallic Materials-Vickers Hardness Test—Part 1: Test Method. International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2023.
  29. ASTM G99-23; Standard Test Method for Wear Testing with a Pin-on-Disk Apparatus. American Society for Testing and Materials: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2023.
  30. Krzysztof, A. The influence of thermal oxidation parameters on the growth of oxide layers on titanium. Vacuum 2017, 144, 94–100. [Google Scholar]
  31. Zeng, Q.; Ning, Z.; Pang, Z.; Wang, Z.; Zheng, C. Self-assembled multilayer WS2/GO films on amorphous silicon coating for enhancing the lubricating properties. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2023, 624, 157184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Jönsson, B.; Hogmark, S. Hardness Measurements of Thin Films. Thin Solid Films 1984, 114, 257–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Alvi, S.; Neikter, M.; Antti, M.; Akhtar, F. Tribological performance of Ti6Al4V at elevated temperatures fabricated by electron beam powder bed fusion. Tribol. Int. 2021, 153, 106658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Dang, J.; Zhang, H.; Ming, W.; An, Q.; Chen, M. New observations on wear characteristics of solid Al2O3/Si3N4ceramictool in high speed milling of additive manufactured Ti6Al4V. Ceram. Int. 2020, 46, 5876–5886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Sun, Q.; Hu, T.; Fan, H.; Zhang, Y.; Hu, L. Thermal Oxidation Behavior and Tribological Properties of Textured TC4 Surface: Influence of Thermal Oxidation Temperature and Time. Tribol. Int. 2016, 94, 479–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Singh, K.; Raman, S. High temperature sliding wear behaviour of Ti6Al4V thermal oxidised for different oxidation durations. Met. Mater. Int. 2023, 29, 357–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. SEM morphology of oxide layers obtained at (a) 400 °C, (b) 600 °C, and (c) 700 °C.
Figure 1. SEM morphology of oxide layers obtained at (a) 400 °C, (b) 600 °C, and (c) 700 °C.
Coatings 14 00416 g001
Figure 2. Cross-sectional images of oxide layers obtained at (a) 400 °C, (b) 600 °C, and (c) 700 °C.
Figure 2. Cross-sectional images of oxide layers obtained at (a) 400 °C, (b) 600 °C, and (c) 700 °C.
Coatings 14 00416 g002
Figure 3. XRD patterns of untreated and TO-treated samples oxidized at different temperatures.
Figure 3. XRD patterns of untreated and TO-treated samples oxidized at different temperatures.
Coatings 14 00416 g003
Figure 4. CoF and average CoF of untreated and TO-treated samples tested at (a,c) room temperature (RT) and (b,d) 400 °C.
Figure 4. CoF and average CoF of untreated and TO-treated samples tested at (a,c) room temperature (RT) and (b,d) 400 °C.
Coatings 14 00416 g004
Figure 5. Wear rates of untreated and TO-treated samples tested at two temperatures.
Figure 5. Wear rates of untreated and TO-treated samples tested at two temperatures.
Coatings 14 00416 g005
Figure 6. The SEM morphology of the wear track of the (a) untreated sample and (b) 400 °C, (c) 600 °C, and (d) 700 °C TO samples tested at RT. (a1a4) The distribution of elements in (a). (b1b4) The distribution of elements in (b). (c1c4) The distribution of elements in (c). (d1d4) The distribution of elements in (d). 1–4 are the distributions of Ti, Si, O, and V, respectively.
Figure 6. The SEM morphology of the wear track of the (a) untreated sample and (b) 400 °C, (c) 600 °C, and (d) 700 °C TO samples tested at RT. (a1a4) The distribution of elements in (a). (b1b4) The distribution of elements in (b). (c1c4) The distribution of elements in (c). (d1d4) The distribution of elements in (d). 1–4 are the distributions of Ti, Si, O, and V, respectively.
Coatings 14 00416 g006
Figure 7. The SEM morphology of the wear track of the (a) untreated sample and (b) 400 °C, (c) 600 °C, and (d) 700 °C TO samples tested at 400 °C. (a1a4) The distribution of elements in (a). (b1b4) The distribution of elements in (b). (c1c4) The distribution of elements in (c). (d1d4) The distribution of elements in (d). 1–4 are the distributions of Ti, Si, O, and V, respectively.
Figure 7. The SEM morphology of the wear track of the (a) untreated sample and (b) 400 °C, (c) 600 °C, and (d) 700 °C TO samples tested at 400 °C. (a1a4) The distribution of elements in (a). (b1b4) The distribution of elements in (b). (c1c4) The distribution of elements in (c). (d1d4) The distribution of elements in (d). 1–4 are the distributions of Ti, Si, O, and V, respectively.
Coatings 14 00416 g007
Figure 8. The SEM morphology of Si3N4 counter bodies tested against untreated and TO-treated samples at RT (ad) and 400 °C (eh): (a,e) Untreated, (b,f) 400 °C TO, (c,g) 600 °C TO, and (d,h) 700 °C TO.
Figure 8. The SEM morphology of Si3N4 counter bodies tested against untreated and TO-treated samples at RT (ad) and 400 °C (eh): (a,e) Untreated, (b,f) 400 °C TO, (c,g) 600 °C TO, and (d,h) 700 °C TO.
Coatings 14 00416 g008
Figure 9. Schematic diagram of (a) oxide layer formation and (b) wear mechanism.
Figure 9. Schematic diagram of (a) oxide layer formation and (b) wear mechanism.
Coatings 14 00416 g009
Table 1. EDS analysis of TO-treated samples at different temperatures.
Table 1. EDS analysis of TO-treated samples at different temperatures.
SamplesTreatment Temperature (°C)Treatment Duration (h)Hardness (HV0.05)Element Content
Ti (at%)O (at%)
Untreated--366 ± 2099.790.21
400 °C TO400 °C36 h530 ± 2067.0232.98
600 °C TO600 °C36 h951 ± 3037.8562.15
700 °C TO700 °C36 h1246 ± 4032.0867.02
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zeng, Q.; Sun, S.; Pang, Z.; Wei, X. Study on High-Temperature, Ultra-Low Wear Behaviors of Ti6Al4V Alloy with Thermal Oxidation Treatment. Coatings 2024, 14, 416. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings14040416

AMA Style

Zeng Q, Sun S, Pang Z, Wei X. Study on High-Temperature, Ultra-Low Wear Behaviors of Ti6Al4V Alloy with Thermal Oxidation Treatment. Coatings. 2024; 14(4):416. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings14040416

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zeng, Qunfeng, Shichuan Sun, Zeming Pang, and Xunkai Wei. 2024. "Study on High-Temperature, Ultra-Low Wear Behaviors of Ti6Al4V Alloy with Thermal Oxidation Treatment" Coatings 14, no. 4: 416. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings14040416

APA Style

Zeng, Q., Sun, S., Pang, Z., & Wei, X. (2024). Study on High-Temperature, Ultra-Low Wear Behaviors of Ti6Al4V Alloy with Thermal Oxidation Treatment. Coatings, 14(4), 416. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings14040416

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop