Next Article in Journal
Exploring Acceptance of Agro-Biomass as Innovative Solution for Heating in Rural Areas in Romania
Previous Article in Journal
Sources Affecting Microplastic Contamination in Mountain Lakes in Tatra National Park
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Local Use of Mangroves on the Coast of Southeastern México

by
Carlos Alberto Martínez-Márquez
1,
Ángel Sol Sánchez
2,*,
Juan Manuel Zaldívar Cruz
2,
Saúl Sánchez Soto
2,
Nydia Del Rivero Bautista
2 and
Mario Manuel Aliphat Fernández
3
1
Program in Agricultural Aciences in the Tropics Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Postgraduate College, Km 3.5. Cárdenas-Huimaguillo Highway. H. Cárdenas, Cardenas 86500, Tabasco, Mexico
2
Natural Resources Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Postgraduate College, Km 3.5. Cárdenas-Humaguillo Highway. H. Cárdenas, Cardenas 86500, Tabasco, Mexico
3
Rural Devepment Department, Faculty of Rural Development Strategies, Postgraduate College, Boulevard Forjadores de Puebla, Num 205. Santiago Momoxpan, Mpio San Pedro Cholula 72760, Puebla, Mexico
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Resources 2024, 13(11), 154; https://doi.org/10.3390/resources13110154
Submission received: 26 July 2024 / Revised: 30 September 2024 / Accepted: 3 October 2024 / Published: 29 October 2024

Abstract

:
Mangroves are essential for the well-being of the inhabitants of coastal areas, who have extensive knowledge about the use and exploitation of this resource. However, this knowledge is decreasing, which could trigger negative repercussions for this ecosystem. Ethnobiological investigations make it possible to gather information on the use, management, and exploitation of this resource. Hence, this paper presents a study that is framed around the coastal area of the state of Tabasco, in southeast México, and consists of 74 semi-structured interviews that were carried out, while the local relevance of each mangrove species was evaluated using ethnobiological indices. Three species of mangrove were identified, Avicennia germinans, Laguncularia racemosa, and Rhizophora mangle, and the latter species had the highest Use-Value (UV) Index value of 6.08. A total of 27 forms of forestry use were found, 11 for non-timber use and 16 for timber use. Firewood stood out as the main use with 12.6%, while the use of needles to make cloth and crafts represented the lowest percentage with 0.3%. The uses given by the coastal population to the mangroves and their respective species were influenced by immediate needs and specific characteristics of each species. To ensure the sustainability of mangroves, it is essential to design environmental strategies that integrate local ethnobiological knowledge and promote the active participation of direct users of this ecosystem. These strategies should be incorporated into public conservation policies, recognizing the cultural and economic value that mangroves hold for local communities. By implementing these actions, the relationship between communities and their environment will be strengthened, laying the groundwork for further exploration of coastal ethnobiology.

1. Introduction

The majority of the world’s population is concentrated along the coastal areas [1], thus allowing for the development of a wide range of economic activities such as transportation, tourism, fishing, and aquaculture [2]. In these coastal regions, ecosystems can be found, such as mangroves, which cover a global area of 14,735,900 hectares [3], and play an essential role in the development and functioning of these areas [4].
Mangroves are considered one of the most valuable and productive coastal ecosystems on the planet [5], providing habitat to a wide diversity of species, including human beings [6], turning these areas into essential spaces as an economic source, and means of subsistence for residents of coastal areas [7,8,9,10].
Since prehistoric times, humans have coexisted with mangroves, as demonstrated by ceramic remains from more than 7000 years ago, which were found in the mangroves of South America and East Africa [6]. This ecosystem provides a wide range of environmental goods and services, such as fishing materials, tannins, medicines, fishing ground, firewood, fence posts, charcoal, honey, housing construction materials, habitats for various species, sediment deposition, storage of carbon, nutrients, and protection against erosion, and acts as buffers and stabilizers of coasts [6,11,12,13,14], thus contributing to human development. In this context, mangrove conservation is highly profitable, and has a particular benefit for marginalized communities with limited access to basic services [15].
The use of plants has been accumulated and transmitted from generation to generation, thus establishing a significant link between rural communities and natural resources [16]. This knowledge plays a crucial role in understanding the relationship between humans and the surrounding vegetation, which is essential to the optimization of plant usage for human benefit [17]. In addition, plant use has great value in planning programs for sustainable forest management. However, the rapid decline in knowledge of the traditional uses of plants is an issue of great concern, because the rate of decline is higher than the disappearance rate of the species themselves [18]. Plants have been used by humans in various ways over time, and continue to be used today [17]; these relationships between people and plants are becoming increasingly important in biodiversity conservation [19].
This close relationship between the mangrove ecosystem and the society has been evidenced in research carried out in places such as the City of Bolívar, in the province of Esmeraldas, Ecuador, where mangroves provide services to the community, and mangrove users reciprocate with protection and care [20]. Additionally, the mangrove is recognized as providing food, firewood, construction poles, habitat for aquatic animals, as well as sources of medicines and chemicals in communities adjacent to the mangroves in the northwestern and southern provinces of Sri Lanka [21]. This connection is also present in México, where mangroves are used for various purposes, such as obtaining firewood and poles, fishing, commerce, housing, medicine, and furniture on the public land (ejido) of Cerro de Tumilco, in the municipality of Tuxpan, in the province of Veracruz [22]. This is also true of the Biosphere Reserve Pantanos de Centla, in the province of Tabasco, where the community conserves and restores this ecosystem, while being fully aware of the multiple benefits it provides them, which in turn contributes to improving their livelihoods and well-being [23].
The highly diversified use of this resource is possibly the result of the long-term development of the local population, based on their knowledge of the properties and characteristics of the different materials available [24]. For example, wood is valued for its ability to resist decay and damage caused by termites [6], demonstrating that inhabitants of mangrove areas have traditional ecological knowledge about the species they interact with.
With increasing threats and diverse uses of these ecosystems, it is crucial to analyze the nature and importance of social uses that are present in coastal ecosystems, determine where and to what extent they occur, and evaluate their value to local inhabitants [5]. Therefore, to promote sustainable development in coastal areas, it is necessary to encourage the participation of all interested parties in the implementation of environmental management programs [25]. For this, it is essential to understand how a human group uses the territory to guarantee its survival, since this is directly related to the use that group makes of natural resources [26].
Through ethnobotanical research, we can collect and document information about different plant species and their uses, which will allow us to better understand this interaction. This study responds to the urgent need to document and preserve the knowledge of mangrove users with legal harvesting permits on the coast of the state of Tabasco, México. This will allow for a detailed and up-to-date understanding of mangrove use and management in the region, highlighting its cultural importance and providing a solid basis for future research projects and conservation strategies.
This situation becomes particularly relevant in the coastal zone, where most of the world’s population resides; this area is constantly subject to change due to the construction of both marine and terrestrial infrastructure, which alters the natural dynamics [1]. In Tabasco, the relevance of the coastal zone is increasing, due to the rise in sea level that has accelerated as a result of global warming, which represents a significant threat to coastal plains and small islands [27]. Also, the increase in industrial activity, particularly the intervention of the oil industry with extensive onshore and offshore oil exploitation, is causing tensions in these ecosystems, resulting in the degradation of mangroves, thus causing environmental and social vulnerability for coastal communities situated near the mangroves of the state of Tabasco [28]. An example of this situation is the development of a refinery promoted by the Federal government in the coastal area of the state of Tabasco.
This study distinguishes itself by using an ethnobiological approach to assess the relevance of mangrove species in the region, documenting traditional knowledge and uses that have been underestimated or little explored in previous research. The main objective is to describe the uses and valuation of each mangrove species on the coast of Tabasco, México, using methods that provide an accurate picture of local knowledge.
In addition, this approach seeks to highlight both traditional and emerging uses in order to revalue the benefits offered by mangroves. In this way, it is hoped to lay the foundations for conservation strategies that actively involve local communities, contributing to the sustainable development of the region and to the adaptive and effective management of mangroves.
Therefore, this study responds to the urgent need to integrate scientific and local knowledge into sustainable forest management, establishing a framework that strengthens the protection and management of mangroves in Tabasco.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area

The study region is located on the coast of the state of Tabasco, México, between longitudes 92°28′ W and 94°10′ W, and latitudes 17°15′ N and 18°39′ N, in the south–southeast mesoregion of the country. The study region is bounded to the north by the Gulf of México, to the south by the state of Tabasco itself, to the east–northeast by the state of Campeche, and to the west by the state of Veracruz [29] (Figure 1); it has approximately 200 km of coastline along the Gulf of México [30], and connects with important coastal basins and lagoon systems that support activities such as fishing, aquaculture, agriculture, livestock, and the oil industry [31]. Among the most representative ecosystems are the flooded palm forest, hydrophilic vegetation, and the mangrove [32], whereby the mangrove area in the state reaches 49,225 hectares [33], which represents 5.4% of the mangrove area of the whole country.

2.2. Data Collection

To understand the interaction of local people with the mangrove, research tours were undertaken in various areas, in order to meet local people who, have legal permits for use and their relationship with the mangrove ecosystem. The research tours made it possible to establish contact with the population and present the project to local authorities. Semi-structured ethnobiological interviews were used in order to gather information about this relationship because their flexibility is adequate for obtaining interpretations that are consistent with the objectives of the research, as noted in the work of Díaz-Bravo et al. [34] and Tejero [35]. The interviews consisted of two sections: the first section addresses demographic data (age, gender, education level, indigenous languages) and the second section collected information on ethnobotanical aspects (species present and uses for each species) such as in the uses of mangrove species. Further, the information obtained in the interviews was complemented with direct observations of the interviewees concerning the use of the mangrove in their daily lives.
To determine the number of interviews, first, all the people (local inhabitants) were identified who traditionally use the mangrove (mangleros), who are part of some common agricultural land (ejido) or coastal town in the state of Tabasco, and who also have permits of mangrove exploitation granted by the Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources (SEMARNAT). This approach was based on the criteria suggested by Quintana-Peña [36], which establishes the importance of considering for the analysis those individuals who are linked to the problem under study. Subsequently, the sample size (“n”) was calculated, in accordance with the study by Aguilar-Barojas [37], and consequently, it was determined to conduct 74 interviews with a confidence level of 95%, which were selected at random. The interviews were conducted at different stages of the research from 2021 to 2023. Only one member per household was interviewed, in order to avoid duplication of participants within the same household.
The mangrove species were identified using the field guide of Agráz-Hernández et al. [38]. For a more detailed analysis, the uses associated with each mangrove species were initially identified, then they were subsequently grouped, and finally classified into two categories: timber forest products (TFPs) and non-timber forest products (NTFPs).
Before conducting the interviews, a clear explanation of the purpose of the study was given to the participants. Consent was obtained from all participants, guaranteeing the privacy of each interviewee at all times, and ensuring the confidentiality of the information collected.

2.3. Data Analysis

All data provided by the interviewees were recorded and organized in a database using Microsoft Excel 2010. The ethnobotanical uses and taxa identified were evaluated based on the information collected during the interviews. The local importance of each species was determined using ethnobiological indices, which allow for a deeper cognitive analysis and provide information on the mechanisms that influence the creation, loss, and persistence of ethnobotanical knowledge [39,40,41]. These indices were chosen for their ability to provide a broader view of the responses related to the various categories of use of each mangrove species, thus aligning with the objectives of the study.
The indices used to calculate the local importance of each species were the following:
The Use-Value (UV) Index is used to evaluate the population’s preferences towards a specific plant [42,43,44]. It is calculated using the following formula:
U V = U V i s n i s
where
U V i s represents the sum of the Use Values attributed by the participants for a given species
n i s is the total number of participants interviewed
To quantify the use of mangrove plants, mangrove species, and the experience in the species used by the coastal population, the value of Informant Diversity (ID) was used [45]. Informant Diversity was calculated according to the following formula:
I D = U x U t
where
U x is the number of uses cited by the given informant
U t divided by the total number of uses
To evaluate the cultural importance of mangrove species in the study area, significant use was determined [46,47] using the following formula:
U S T = S p e c i f i c   U s e s n i s 100
where
U S T = Level of Significant Use (where T is usually TRAMIL or “Traditional Medicine in the Islands”)
S p e c i f i c   U s e s   = number of citations for each species
n i s = number of informants surveyed
To evaluate the relationship between demographic variables (gender, educational level, and age) and knowledge about the uses of mangrove species, appropriate statistical tests were applied. The chi-square test was used to assess associations between gender, educational level, and knowledge of mangrove species’ uses. To examine the relationship between age and knowledge of these uses, an analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed. All the analyses were performed using RStudio software (version 4.2.1 for Windows).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Demographic Analysis

The average age of interviewed participants was 59.9 years, with a minimum age of 37 years and a maximum age of 85 years. Regarding distribution by gender, it was found that 79.7% of participants interviewed were men and 20.2% were women. Age and gender will reflect the dynamics of social roles that have been established in the use of mangrove in the area under study, with a pronounced male predominance that is in line with the historical tradition which has given men a predominant role in activities linked to these coastal ecosystems. This gender disparity in participation can be attributed to the differentiated assignments of social roles in the use of natural resources [48].
Regarding educational level, according to Mexican standards, the following percentages were found: 5.4% had completed their university studies (higher or tertiary level), 6.7% had completed preparatory education (higher secondary level), 21.6% had completed secondary education, and 31.0% had completed primary education (basic level), while 35.1% had not received any formal education.
It was identified that 2.07% of the interviewed population spoke an indigenous language, specifically Chontal. These data are consistent with the records of the 2020 Population and Housing Census, which indicates that 4.0% of the population of the state of Tabasco speak an indigenous language [49].
The results of the chi-square test indicate a significant relationship between gender and educational level and knowledge about the uses of different mangrove species (χ² = 23.84; p < 0.0001 and χ² = 27.49; p < 0.0001, respectively). This suggests that both sociodemographic variables influence the distribution of knowledge regarding mangrove uses. The analysis of variance did not show a significant relationship between age and knowledge of mangrove uses (F = 0.96; p > 0.51). Although this result suggests that, in general terms, age is not a determining factor, the existence of differences for specific types of uses could be possible.

3.2. Mangrove Species

The interviewees identified three mangrove species in their local area: Rhizophora mangle Linnaeus (red mangrove or “colorado mangrove”), Laguncularia racemosa (Linnaeus) Gärtner (“white” mangrove), and Avicennia germinans Linnaeus (black mangrove or “prieto” mangrove). This is consistent with the mangrove species composition described in the Mecoacán lagoon in the state of Tabasco, México [50]. That is, three of the four species previously reported for the coastal plain of Tabasco were confirmed [51]. In addition, 9.4% of the interviewees mentioned a variant of mangrove they call “yellow mangrove”, which they distinguish by its characteristic yellow color when the bark is removed. However, in the present study, this variant was classified as L. racemosa (L. G.) (white mangrove), as there are no specific records to suggest that it is a new species. Therefore, it would be relevant to conduct genetic research to determine whether this characteristic represents variation within a known species, a local variety, or a completely new species. This recognition of local mangrove species highlights the strong ecological knowledge embedded within the community, which has been previously documented in studies from southeastern México [22,52]. In addition, the importance of mangroves in providing environmental goods and services has been recognized [53,54]. This makes it an essential ecosystem for the livelihood of coastal communities, especially in developing countries [55].

3.3. Use Value of Mangrove Species

The highest Use-Value Index was for R. mangle (L.), with 6.08, followed by L. racemosa (L. G.) with 5.04, and A. germinans (L.) with 3.5 (Table 1). These values reflect the importance of these species in the life and activities of the local people. Differences in Use Values between species may be related both to their physical properties and characteristics, and to the particular needs and preferences of each person. The Use Values obtained in this study are significantly higher than those reported in Ejido Sinaloa, Cárdenas, Tabasco [56], which could be due to differences in cultural perception, dependence on natural resources, and ecological particularities of each area. The higher Use Value reflects the population’s preference for R. mangle (L.), which is consistent with Chil and Ramírez [25], who report that this species is culturally significant. This underlines the need for sustainable management, as species with high cultural relevance tend to have greater potential for future research on the characteristics that make them useful, as well as for studies focused on their uses and conservation [57].
Reporter diversity (ID) values recorded were 0.22 for R. mangle (L.), 0.18 for L. racemosa (L. G.), and 0.12 for A. germinans (L.) (Table 1). This variation can possibly be attributed to the geographical location that acts as a link between the marine environment and local communities [28,31]. In addition, cultural and traditional practices of local communities may influence the variation in values, along with other factors such as species availability and accessibility.
The Level of Significant Use indicates that R. mangle (L.) and L. racemosa (L. G.) species are widely used, with values of 33.7% and 21.6%, respectively, exceeding the 20% threshold (Table 1). However, the fact that a species does not exceed this threshold does not imply that it is less important, but possibly that it has a more limited or specialized use. This demonstrates the importance of these species, and suggests that they are considered significant in terms of their cultural acceptance in the study area. This can be attributed to their particular properties and characteristics, which make them particularly useful and valuable for a variety of uses and applications [8,9,58].
Therefore, it is necessary to continue with scientific evaluation and validation studies, which can contribute to a more complete knowledge of the properties, benefits, and possible applications of these species, as well as provide guidance on their sustainable management and conservation.

3.4. Timber and Non-Timber Forest Products Obtained from Mangrove Species

A total of 27 forms of forestry use were identified, and then classified into non-timber forest products (NTFPs) and timber forest products (TFPs). The NTFPs were subdivided into four groups with a total of 11 forms of use, while the TFP were divided into two groups with 16 forms of use (Table 2). These results highlight the versatility of mangrove species, demonstrating their ability to be used in a wide range of forest products. This observation is consistent with the study by Walters et al. [59], which emphasized the diversity of products that can be obtained from these mangrove species. Further, the observation agrees with the work of Faridah-Hanum et al. [53], which identified forestry as one of the main activities carried out in mangroves. The above information indicates that it is necessary to have sustainable forest management that guarantees the conservation of mangroves and the continuous provision of these vital resources.
These processes of appropriation and use of forest resources, such as mangroves, are the responsibility of both the community and local merchants [9]. This dynamic is evident in the homes surrounding the mangrove on the Tabasco coast, where people are supported by a variety of activities involving mangroves [28]. Over a period of decades, these communities have depended on both timber and non-timber forest resources for their subsistence [51]. In this context, ethnobiological knowledge plays an important role in people’s ability to manage, conserve, and improve the governance of the mangrove ecosystem [21], and this knowledge permits us to have a deep understanding of the ecology and functioning of mangroves, as well as sustainable practices for their management.

3.5. Mangrove Ecological Dynamics

The coastal characteristics of the study area revealed that the mangrove population has advanced inland, occupying areas that were previously used for agricultural activities. This advance of the mangrove has been driven by ecosystem changes, including coastal erosion and the effects of climate change, which have forced some people to relocate and shift their activities. Additionally, many species that once inhabited the area have been affected, either migrating to other regions or disappearing locally (Figure 2).
Regarding to the structure of the mangrove, two physiognomic types were identified: (A) fringe or edge mangrove, located mainly along the coastline, which is influenced daily by the tides, dominated by R. mangle (L.) and A. germinans (L.) in the tree layer; (B) basin mangrove, located inland behind the fringe mangrove, with less tidal influence. This type features monospecific or mixed forests of L. racemosa (L. G.) and A. germinans (L). These characteristics are consistent with findings reported in Laguna Mecoacán, a coastal plain in the state of Tabasco, México, where fringe and basin mangrove structures are also described [50].

3.6. Non-Timber Forestry Use of Mangroves

Dendroenergy: It was found that firewood is an indispensable resource for the local population in coastal areas who do not discriminate against any species of mangrove since the three species are used for this purpose by all interviewees in this study (Figure 3). This reflects the importance of this resource as a source of energy in coastal areas, which coincides with the study by Furukawa et al. [24], that documented the fundamental role of mangroves as supplies of fuel material for daily use. Further, the collection of mangrove firewood remains the main source of energy, mainly as fuel for cooking in these areas [8,60,61,62,63]. The lack of discrimination between the mangrove species used suggests that all mangrove species are equally valuable as sources of firewood, further reinforcing their importance in the livelihoods of local communities. This was demonstrated in studies by Fernandes et al. [9] and Paniagua-Cano et al. [64], which found that these same mangrove species are used for this purpose.
In relation to the use for production of charcoal, it was found that 37.8% of interviewees use R. mangle (L.) for this purpose, while having less preference for A. germinans (L.) with 10.8% (Figure 3). This preference can be attributed to the specific properties of R. mangle (L.), which is characterized by being a hard wood, with lower moisture content, and reduced mass loss during the carbonization process in producing charcoal. Charcoal production is a common activity in these areas, as demonstrated by Adanguidi et al. [61], who found that this activity constitutes the second most common form of energy used. Furthermore, Guevara et al. [12] note that this activity is used for both self-consumption and sale. Therefore, charcoal production is not only of significant economic importance, but also of social importance, as it contributes to the livelihood of local communities.
Agricultural implements: Five uses were identified, with the highest proportion of mentions for rod o stick “palanca” with 62.2%, showing a preference for L. racemosa (L. G.), likely due to its abundance at the edges of mangroves and its resistance and durability when in direct contact with water [9]. The lowest percentage was for netting needle with which to make cloth (i.e., for fishing nets) with 2.7%, where the interviewees showed preference for R. mangle (L.), due to its durability, and noted that the root of this species is used in the manufacture of needles (Figure 3). This phenomenon is explained by the fact that Rhizophora spp. is a species used as green wood to build tools [62].
The population uses these mangrove species to make oars for rowing and mobility of small boats, or to build fishing traps (Figure 3), since it has been shown that different mangrove species can be used successfully for these purposes [65], as well as for the manufacture of fishing gear, or the preparation of traps to capture shrimp [63,64]. Therefore, the various mangrove species that are present in the area are a natural resource which is used for different purposes, depending on the characteristics of the species. This reflects extensive knowledge about these species and their high valuation.
Ornamental and artisanal: Three forms of use were found, namely, artisanal, ornamental and leather tanning, with 2.7%, 6.8%, and 8.1% respectively, where R. mangle (L.) is used (Figure 3). These anthropic uses of plants are evident in studies carried out by Guadarrama et al. [66] in the southeast of the state of México, where those authors observed the use of vascular plants for ornamental and artisanal or craft purposes. These uses allow the population to be in harmony with the environment, since crafts, for example, are an activity that reduces anguish and stress, and calms the mind [67]. Additionally, mangrove tannin continues to be used in India and Bangladesh for leather tanning [13], demonstrating the ongoing relevance of these practices in integrating natural resource use with human well-being and environmental sustainability.
Therapeutic: Medicinal use stands out as an important practice in the area, since it allows people to treat various diseases or illnesses, which were reported by 27% of the interviewed population, where the species R. mangle (L.) is the only species used for this purpose (Figure 3). The observation on the medicinal use of R. mangle (L.) in the studied region agrees with what was documented by Sol et al. [68], who specifically note the medicinal use of this species on the coast of the state of Tabasco. In that, this plant helps in the treatment of diseases, such as respiratory conditions, diarrhea, fungi, pain, and wound healing [25]. The hemostatic action, for example, is probably due to the presence of various polyphenolic compounds in the chemical structure of R. mangle (L.), such as phenols, flavonoids, and tannins [13,69]. All this reinforces the importance and prevalence of the therapeutic use of this species in different coastal regions of México.

3.7. Mangrove Forestry Timber Use

Wood: Six types of uses were identified for the species under study. The most frequent use was fence posts, which represented 90.5% of the total number of interviewees, using L. racemosa (L. G.). The least common uses were furniture and tables, each with a percentage of 4.1%, where A. germinans (L.) is used (Figure 4). This agrees with the study by Faridah-Hanum et al. [53], in which it is noted that mangrove wood is mainly used for fence posts. Further, according to Fernandes et al. [9], the mangrove tree species L. racemosa (L. G.) and A. germinans (L.) are used to construct pens for raising pigs. For their part, Gallup et al. [62] note that mangrove wood is used in furniture manufacturing. These findings underline the versatility and importance of mangrove species for coastal communities.
Rural or marine construction: A total of 10 uses were identified, and the most predominant use was construction props “puntales”, with 56.8% using L. racemosa (L. G.). The lowest percentage was for piles “pilotes” with 4.1% where they use A. germinans (L.) (Figure 4). This may be due to the fact that, in rural communities, the extraction of mangrove wood for construction continues to be very important, as demonstrated by studies carried out in southeastern México by Hernández and Morales [58] and Basáñez et al. [22], where it was noted that mangrove wood is used for the construction of houses. In addition, the mangrove forest is also used in tourism infrastructure, such as docks [8]. The species A. germinans (L.), R. mangle (L.), and L. racemosa (L. G.) are used in construction [9,57,59]. This is due to their quality and durability, including resistance to pests and rot, which make mangrove wood ideal for use in land or marine construction [8,70,71].

3.8. Integrating Local Knowledge into Mangrove Conservation

This study provides an innovative perspective on the traditional use of mangroves in coastal southeastern México, highlighting their crucial importance for the livelihoods of local communities and how these uses are deeply rooted in their cultural heritage. In contrast to previous research, which has focused primarily on the ecological functions of mangroves, such as carbon storage [72], this work documents how local people exploit both timber and non-timber forest products from the mangrove through sustainable practices, revealing traditional ecological knowledge that is closely linked to the improvement of human and cultural well-being [73,74]. Similar to findings in the Sundarbans, where villagers near the mangrove forest depend on its resources to varying degrees [75], local people utilize mangrove resources by integrating these practices into their daily lives and local economy [9].
In addition, the information registered on species-specific use and differential valuation, particularly in relation to forest harvesting, represents an interesting contribution, as it provides up-to-date and contextual data that have not been explored in previous studies in this area. This lack of knowledge about the uses of mangrove forests has led to problems such as the overexploitation of certain species and a lack of knowledge about the appropriate forms of management [76].
It is important to emphasize that many forms of appropriation and use of mangrove resources are relevant in order to have a better understanding of the interaction between users and the mangrove as a common good [9]. However, as in other contexts, community-based management faces significant limitations, such as lack of resources, to effectively enforce sanctions and regulation, which underlines the need for collaboration with government authorities and other stakeholders for more comprehensive and effective management [77]. This approach highlights the importance of community self-management as a replicable model that demonstrates that local empowerment is essential for long-term sustainability. Furthermore, the findings underline the relevance of preserving both mangrove ecosystems and the associated local knowledge to ensure their sustainable use and the survival of the people who depend on them. Whereas the integration of local knowledge into conservation strategies can be more effective than externally imposed policies, it emphasizes the need for socio-culturally and economically sustainable integration, linking mangrove conservation with the livelihoods of local communities [78].
This study documents how mangrove uses continue to exist despite external pressures, and highlighting the importance of considering local knowledge and individual demographic characteristics. These dimensions have important implications for the design of inclusive and adaptive management policies, and highlight the need for collaborative conservation strategies involving communities, governments, and organizations to ensure the continued protection of mangroves [79].

4. Conclusions

A close relationship was identified between the “mangleros” and the different species of mangroves, an interaction that transcends economic, social, environmental, and cultural spheres. The results reveal that traditional practices linked to mangrove use remain fundamental to livelihoods, especially in the harvesting of products such as firewood, used for both domestic consumption and income generation. The species with the highest Use Value was R. mangle (L), reflecting its importance in economic, medicinal, and ecological terms. This demonstrates the need to prioritize its conservation in local policies. The diversity of uses of each mangrove species is determined by its individual characteristics and the specific needs of the people. This traditional knowledge has generated a culture of use that must be integrated into the formulation of public policies, ensuring the conservation of coastal ecosystems and the active participation of the “mangleros”. It is essential to incorporate local knowledge in the design of conservation policies, as it is key to the sustainability of mangrove ecosystems. Successful management strategies must ensure tangible benefits for local people, thereby encouraging their active participation in conservation and sustainable use activities.
Strengthening institutional linkages will be essential to overcome the technical and financial challenges faced by these communities and to ensure their resilience in the face of environmental change. The success of conservation strategies depends to a large extent on the benefits perceived by each person, since when people understand and value the benefits of mangroves, they are more willing to participate in their protection and sustainable management. Therefore, the participation of local people, especially the direct users of mangroves, is key to developing resilient coasts and ensuring long-term sustainability.

Author Contributions

C.A.M.-M.: research, writing, and analysis of information; Á.S.S.: review and correction of style, supervision, and management of financial resources; J.M.Z.C., S.S.S., N.D.R.B. and M.M.A.F.: analysis of the manuscript, review, and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

We thank the Consejo Nacional Humanidades Ciencia y Tecnología (CONAHCYT) for the doctorate scholarship awarded to the first author No. 294289 (CVU).

Data Availability Statement

Data are not available due to the privacy of the informants.

Acknowledgments

We extend our thanks to the Colegio de Postgraduados, Campus Tabasco, the knowledge generation and application line 1: Management and Conservation of Natural Resources, and to the mangrove producers (mangleros) of the coast of Tabasco, México.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Ruiz de Alegría-Arzaburu, A.; Medellín, G. Importancia del monitoreo costero para la construcción de la resiliencia. In Gobernanza y Manejo de las Costas y Mares Ante la Incertidumbre; Una Guía para Tomadores de Decisiones; Rivera-Arriaga, E., Azuz-Adeath, I., Rosas, O.D.C., Espinoza-Tenorio, A., Casarín, R.S., Ortega-Rubio, A., Botello, A.V., Vega-Serratos, B.E., Eds.; Universidad Autónoma de Campeche, RICOMAR: Campeche, México, 2020; pp. 543–561. [Google Scholar]
  2. Serrano, C.R. The Coastal Zone: A Vision of Comparative Law: Trascendencia ambiental. HUMAN REVIEW. Int. Humanit. Rev./Rev. Int. Humanidades 2022, 15, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Bunting, P.; Rosenqvist, A.; Hilarides, L.; Lucas, R.; Thomas, N.; Tadono, T.; Worthington, T.; Spalding, M.; Murray, N.; Rebelo, L.M. Global Mangrove Watch (1996–2020) Version 3.0 Dataset (3.0) [Data Set]; Zenodo: Genève, Switzerland, 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Herrera-Silveira, J.A.; Teutli-Hernández, C.; Gómez, R.P.A.; Comín, F. Restauración ecológica de manglares de México. In Gobernanza y Manejo de las Costas y Mares ante la Incertidumbre; Una Guía para Tomadores de Decisiones; Rivera-Arriaga, E., Azuz-Adeath, I., Cervantes, R.O.D., Espinoza-Tenorio, A., Silva, C.R., Ortega-Rubio, A., Botello, A.V., Vega-Serratos, B.E., Eds.; Universidad Autónoma de Campeche, RICOMAR: Campeche, México, 2020; pp. 649–674. [Google Scholar]
  5. Himes-Cornell, A.; Grose, S.O.; Pendleton, L. Mangrove Ecosystem Service Values and Methodological Approaches to Valuation: Where Do We Stand? Front. Mar. Sci. 2018, 5, 376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Spalding, M.D.; Leal, M. (Eds.) The State of the World’s Mangroves 2021; Global Mangrove Alliance: Washington, DC, USA, 2021; 79p. [Google Scholar]
  7. Mendoza, A.H.E.; Barreto, P.Á.E.; Morla, P.J.C.; Mera, C.P.; López, B.E.J. Valoración socioeconómica y ecológica en la dinámica del comercio justo de los usuarios del ecosistema de manglar. Rev. Univ. Soc. 2020, 12, 170–175. [Google Scholar]
  8. Nyein, A.W.; Wen, Y.; Marin, K.; Thapa, S.; Tun, A.W. Contribution of mangrove forest to the livelihood of local communities in Ayeyarwaddy region, Myanmar. Forests 2019, 10, 414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Fernandes, M.E.B.; Oliveira, F.P.; Eyzaguirre, I.A.L. Mangroves on the Brazilian Amazon Coast: Uses and Rehabilitation. In Threats to Mangrove Forests: Hazards, Vulnerability, and Management; Makowski, C., Finkl, C., Eds.; Coastal Research Library, Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; Volume 25, pp. 621–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. López, R.F.V. Mangrove concessions: An innovative strategy for community mangrove conservation in Ecuador. In Threats to Mangrove Forests: Hazards, Vulnerability, and Management; Makowski, C., Finkl, C., Eds.; Coastal Research Library, Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; Volume 25, pp. 557–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Rosli, N.N.; Majid, N.A.; Selamat, S.N. Perubahan Guna Tanah Paya Bakau Di Malaysia: Satu Ulasan Sistematik. Geogr.—Malays. J. Soc. Space 2023, 19, 61–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Guevara, C.M.; Palma, L.V.; Maltés, G.C. Fuego en el manglar: La producción de carbón vegetal entre los mayas chontales de la costa de Centla, Tabasco. Antrópica. Rev. Cienc. Soc. Humanidades 2020, 6, 65–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Mitra, A. Mangrove Forests in India: Exploring Ecosystem Services; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Calderón, C.; Aburto, O.; Ezcurra, E. El valor de los manglares. Biodiversitas 2009, 82, 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  15. Sol-Sánchez, A.; Hernandez-Melchor, G.I.; Hernández-Hernández, M.; Toruño, P.J. Desarrollo bioeconómico y manglares en América Latina. Rev. Iberoam. Bioeconomía Cambio Climático 2022, 8, 2007–2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Olea-Reséndiz, M.J.; Segura-Pacheco, H.R.; Herrera-Castro, N.D.; Barrera-Catalán, E. Cultural importance of trees among six rural communities in Guerrero, México. Etnobiología 2022, 20, 31–45. [Google Scholar]
  17. Pullaiah, T.; Divakara, B.N. Wood Uses, Ethnobotany and Pharmacognosy. In Red Sanders: Silviculture and Conservation; Pullaiah, T., Balasubramanya, S., Anuradha, M., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2019; pp. 17–34. [Google Scholar]
  18. Mardaninejad, S.; Janghorban, M.; Vazirpour, M. Collection and identification of medicinal plants used by the indigenous people of Mobarakeh (Isfahan), southwestern Iran. J. Herbal Drugs 2013, 4, 23–32. [Google Scholar]
  19. Ncube, S.F.; Ndagurwa, H.G.T.; Mundy, P.J.; Sibanda, S.; Dlodlo, M. Ethnobotanical knowledge and use-value of Harpagophytum (Devil’s claw) in Matabeleland, Zimbabwe, South African. J. Bot. 2022, 144, 134–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Treviño, M. “The mangrove is like a friend”: Local perspectives of mangrove cultural ecosystem services among mangrove users in northern Ecuador. Hum. Ecol. 2022, 50, 863–878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Mafaziya, N.T.W.G.F.; Ephrem, N.; Hugé, J.; Kodikara, K.A.S.; Dahdouh-Guebas, F. Understanding the ethnobiological importance of mangroves to coastal communities: A case study from Southern and North-western Sri Lanka. Mar. Policy 2023, 147, 105391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Basáñez, M.A.; Olmedo, P.G.; Rojas, M.P. Características estructurales y usos del manglar en el ejido Cerro de Tumilco, Tuxpan, Veracruz. México. Rev. UDO Agrícola 2006, 6, 114–120. [Google Scholar]
  23. Gómez-Ruiz, P.A.; Betancourth-Buitrago, R.A.; Arteaga-Cote, M.; Carbajal-Borges, J.P.; Teutli-Hernández, C.; Laffon-Leal, S. Fostering a participatory process for ecological restoration of mangroves in Pantanos de Centla Biosphere Reserve (Tabasco, México). Ecosyst. People 2022, 18, 112–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Furukawa, F.; Kobayashi, S.; Iwata, A. Changing relationships between mangrove resources and local residents in South Sulawesi and Maluku, Indonesia. Tropics 2015, 24, 33–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Chil, N.I.; Ramírez, E.L.L. Caracterización etnobotánica de las especies Coccoloba uvifera L. y Rhizophora mangl L. en la costa suroriental de Cuba. Orange J. 2022, 4, 39–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Guevara, R.M.L.; Téllez, M.M.B.R.; Flores, L.M.D.L. Sustainable use of natural resources from the perspective of indigenous communities: Sierra Norte of Puebla. Nova Sci. 2015, 7, 511–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Gama, C.L.; Díaz, L.H.M.; Collado, T.R.; Macias, V.T.M.E.; Mata, Z.E.E.; Figueroa, M.J.M. Implicaciones de la potencial elevación del nivel del mar para la población costera de Tabasco, México. Estud. Demográficos Urbanos 2023, 38, 283–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Galmiche, T.A.; Solana, V.N. La disponibilidad de capitales en las poblaciones aledañas a los manglares en la costa tabasqueña. In Medios de Vida en las Comunidades Rurales de Tabasco y Veracruz: Intervenciones Sociales y Vulnerabilidad; Galmiche, T.Á., Solana, V.N., Martínez, A.H.J., Coordinadores; Universidad Autónoma de Chihuahua: Chihuahua, México, 2021; pp. 163–198. [Google Scholar]
  29. Hernández SJ, R.; Ortiz PM, A.; Méndez LA, P.; Gama, C.L. Morfodinámica de la línea de costa del estado de Tabasco, México: Tendencias desde la segunda mitad del siglo XX hasta el presente. Investig. Geográficas 2008, 65, 7–21. [Google Scholar]
  30. Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía (México). Anuario Estadístico y Geográfico por Entidad Federativa 2020; Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía, INEGI: Aguascalientes, México, 2021; 625p. [Google Scholar]
  31. Espinoza-Tenorio, A.; Zepeda-Domínguez, J.A.; Núñez-Gómez, J.C.; Mendoza-Carranza, M.; Barba-Macías, E. ¿De la intuición al conocimiento científico? Publicaciones sobre las lagunas costeras de Tabasco, México. Interciencia 2015, 40, 448–456. [Google Scholar]
  32. Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad (CONABIO). La Biodiversidad en Tabasco: Estudio de Estado. 2021. Available online: https://www.biodiversidad.gob.mx/region/EEB/estudios/ee_tabasco (accessed on 25 June 2024).
  33. Velázquez-Salazar, S.; Rodríguez-Zúñiga, M.T.; Alcántara-Maya, J.A.; Villeda-Chávez, E.; Valderrama-Landeros, L.; Troche-Souza, C.; Vázquez-Balderas, B.; Pérez-Espinosa, I.; Cruz-López, M.I.; Ressl, R.; et al. Manglares de México. Actualización y Análisis de los Datos 2020; Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad, México CDMX: Tlalpan, México, 2021; 168p. [Google Scholar]
  34. Díaz-Bravo, L.; Torruco-García, U.; Martínez-Hernández, M.; Varela-Ruiz, M. La entrevista, recurso flexible y dinámico. Investig. Educ. Médica 2013, 2, 162–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Tejero, G.J.M. Técnicas de Investigación Cualitativa en los de Investigación Cualitativa en los Ámbitos Sanitario y Sociosanitario; Ediciones de la Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha: Cuenca, Spain, 2021; 180p. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Quintana-Peña, A. Metodología de investigación científica cualitativa. In Psicología: Tópicos de actualidad; Quintana, A., Montgomery, W., Eds.; Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos (UNMSM): Lima, Perú, 2006; pp. 47–84. [Google Scholar]
  37. Aguilar-Barojas, S. Fórmulas para el cálculo de la muestra en investigaciones de salud. Salud Tabasco 2005, 11, 333–338. [Google Scholar]
  38. Agráz-Hernández, C.; Noriega-Trejo, R.; López-Portillo, J.; Flores-Verdugo, F.J.; Jiménez-Zacarías, J.J. Guía de Campo. Identificación de los Manglares en México; Universidad Autónoma de Campeche: Campeche, México, 2006; 45p. [Google Scholar]
  39. Tardío, J.; Pardo de Santayana, M. Cultural Importance Indices: A comparative analysis based on the useful wild plants of southern Cantabria (Northern Spain). Econ. Bot. 2008, 62, 24–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Castaneda, H.; Stepp, J.R. Ethnoecological importance value (EIV) methodology: Assessing the cultural importance of ecosystems as sources of useful plants for the Guaymi people of Costa Rica. Ethnobot. Res. Appl. 2007, 5, 249–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Hoffman, B.; Gallaher, T. Importance indices in ethnobotany. Ethnobot. Res. Appl. 2007, 5, 201–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Coe, M.A.; Gaoue, O.G. Most Cultural Importance Indices Do Not Predict Species’ Cultural Keystone Status. Hum. Ecol. 2020, 48, 721–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Albuquerque, U.P.; Cunha, L.V.F.C.; Lucena, R.F.P.; Alves, R.R.N. Methods and Techniques in Ethnobiology and Ethnoecology; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2014; 480p. [Google Scholar]
  44. Phillips, O.; Gentry, A.H. The Usefull Plants of Tambopata, Peru: I. Statistical hypothesis test with a new quantitative technique. Econ. Bot. 1993, 47, 15–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Alalwan, T.A.; Alkhuzai, J.A.; Jameel, Z.; Mandeel, Q.A. Quantitative ethnobotanical study of some medicinal plants used by herbalists in Bahrain. J. Herbal Med. 2019, 17, 100278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Saldarriaga, F.B.L.; Jimenez, G.A.; Gras, R.R.; Cabrera, V.C.A. Evaluación del aprovechamiento de los productos forestales no madereros en cinco comunidades de la parroquia Noboa, Manabí, Ecuador. In Componentes de la Diversidad Biológica Empleados por las Familias Manabitas en la Medicina Natural y Tradicional; Jimenez, G.A., Rosete, B.S., Cantos, C.C.G., Tapia, Z.M.V., Castro, P.S.I., Gras, R.R., Cabrera, V.C.A., Eds.; Mawil Publicaciones de Ecuador: Quito, Ecuador, 2021; pp. 226–254. [Google Scholar]
  47. Germosen-Robineau, L. Hacia una Farmacopea Vegetal Caribeña. Edición TRAMIL 7; Enda—Caribe, UAG & Universidad de Antioquia: Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic, 1995; 686p. [Google Scholar]
  48. Ruiz, M.L.E. Relaciones de género y derechos ambientales. Estudio de caso en Motozintla, Chiapas. Rev. Geogr. Agrícola 2006, 37, 17–34. [Google Scholar]
  49. Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía (México); Censo de Población y Vivienda. Principales Resultados del Censo de Población y Vivienda 2020: Tabasco; Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía, INEGI: Aguascalientes, México, 2023; Volume xvii, 146p. [Google Scholar]
  50. Torres, J.R.; Infante-Mata, D.; Sánchez, A.J.; Espinoza-Tenorio, A.; Barba, E. Atributos estructurales, productividad (hojarasca) y fenología del manglar en la Laguna Mecoacán, Golfo de México. Rev. Biol. Trop. 2017, 65, 1592–1608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Domínguez-Domínguez, M.; Martínez-Zurimendi, P. Beneficios ambientales, usos forestales maderables y no maderables del manglar en la planicie costera. In CONABIO. La Biodiversidad en Tabasco. Estudio de Estado; Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad: México City, Mexico, 2019; Volume 1, pp. 243–247. [Google Scholar]
  52. Díaz, L.A.M.; Díaz, G.J.R.; Romero, B.E.I. Uso local de la madera de manglar en el Sistema Lagunar Mar Muerto, Chiapas, México. In Estudios del Bosque de Manglar; Quintero-Romanillo, A.L., Rodríguez-Apodaca, J.R., Ibarra-Ceceña, M.G., Coordinadores; UAIS-UAIM: El Fuerte, México, 2019; pp. 105–126. [Google Scholar]
  53. Faridah-Hanum, I.; Yusoff, F.M.; Fitrianto, A.; Ainuddin, N.A.; Gandaseca, S.; Zaiton, S.; Norizah, K.; Nurhidayu, S.; Roslan, M.K.; Hakeem, K.R.; et al. Development of a comprehensive mangrove quality index (MQI) in Matang Mangrove: Assessing mangrove ecosystem health. Ecol. Indic. 2019, 102, 103–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. García, M.Y.; Cortes-Castillo, D.V. Estado de conservación de los manglares del Caribe colombiano y su potencial en productos forestales no maderables. CITAS Cienc. Innovación Tecnol. Ambiente Soc. 2018, 4, 95–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Orchard, S.E.; Stringer, L.C.; Quinn, C.H. Impacts of aquaculture on social networks in the mangrove systems of northern Vietnam. Ocean Coast. Manag. 2015, 114, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Gómez, G.E.; Sol S, Á.; García, L.E.; Pérez, V.A. Valor de uso de la flora del Ejido Sinaloa 1a sección, Cárdenas, Tabasco, México. Rev. Mex. Cienc. Agrícolas 2016, 7, 2683–2694. [Google Scholar]
  57. Castañeda, S.R.; Albán, C.J. Importancia cultural de la flora silvestre del distrito de Pamparomás, Ancash, Perú. Ecol. Apl. 2016, 15, 151–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Hernández, G.J.; Morales, D.A. Aprovechamiento y problemáticas de los manglares en el ejido Potrerillo, Centla, Tabasco, México. Herreriana Rev. Divulg. Cienc. 2009, 5, 14–15. [Google Scholar]
  59. Walters, B.B.; Rönnbäck, P.; Kovacs, J.M.; Crona, B.; Hussain, S.A.; Badola, R.; Primavera, J.H.; Barbier, E.; Dahdouh-Guebas, F. Ethnobiology, socio-economics and management of mangrove forests: A review. Aquat. Bot. 2008, 89, 220–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Gnansounou, S.C.; Toyi, M.; Salako, K.V.; Ahossou, D.O.; Akpona, T.J.D.; Gbedomon, R.C.; Assogbadjo, A.E.; Kakaï, R.G. Local uses of mangroves and perceived impacts of their degradation in Grand-Popo municipality, a hotspot of mangroves in Benin, West Africa. Trees For. People 2021, 4, 100080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Adanguidi, J.; Padonou, E.A.; Zannou, A.; Houngbo, S.B.; Saliou, I.O.; Agbahoungba, S. Fuelwood consumption and supply strategies in mangrove forests-Insights from RAMSAR sites in Benin. For. Policy Econ. 2020, 116, 102192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Gallup, L.; Sonnenfeld, D.A.; Dahdouh-Guebas, F. Mangrove use and management within the Sine-Saloum Delta, Senegal. Ocean Coast. Manag. 2020, 185, 105001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Carrasquilla-Henao, M.; Ban, N.; Rueda, M.; Juanes, F. The mangrove-fishery relationship: A local ecological knowledge perspective. Mar. Policy 2019, 108, 103656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Paniagua-Cano, E.I.; Granados-Sánchez, D.; Granados-Victorino, R.L. Structure, goods and services of the Mandinga mangrove in Veracruz. Rev. Chapingo Ser. Cienc. For. Ambiente 2018, 24, 171–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Báez, P.M.; Estrada Lugo, E.I.J. Miradas desde el humedal: Fotografía participativa con pescadoras y pescadores del sistema lagunar de Alvarado. Culturales 2014, 2, 9–48. [Google Scholar]
  66. Guadarrama, M.N.; Rubí, A.M.; Chávez, M.M.C.; Thomé, O.H. Usos antrópicos de las plantas vasculares en el sureste del Estado de México. Península 2022, 13, 175–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Pöllänen, S. The meaning of craft: Craft makers’ descriptions of craft as an occupation. Scand. J. Occup. Ther. 2013, 20, 217–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Sol S, Á.; Hernández MG, I.; Zaldívar CJ, M. Function of the Medicinal Plants of the Mangroves in a Society of High Marginalization in Tabasco, México. In Bioeconomy for Sustainable Development; Keswani, C., Ed.; Springer: Singapore, 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Moynelo, I.E.; Cesar, M.V.; Simón, G.G.; Orta RM, C.; López, R.M. Evaluación del efecto hemostático del gel al 25% de mangle rojo en la hemorragia aguda. Rev. Cuba. Med. Mil. 2023, 52, 02302283. [Google Scholar]
  70. Walters, B.B. Patterns of local wood use and cutting of Philippine mangrove forests. Econ. Bot. 2005, 59, 66–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Miththapala, S. Mangroves; Coastal Ecosystems Series; Ecosystems and Livelihoods Group Asia, IUCN: Colombo, Sri Lanka, 2008; Volume 2, pp. 1–28. [Google Scholar]
  72. Alongi, D.M. Carbon cycling and storage in mangrove forests. Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci. 2014, 6, 195–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Meli, P.; Vieli, L.; Spirito, F.; Reyes-Riveros, R.; Gonzalez-Suhr, C.; Altamirano, A. The importance of considering human well-being to understand social preferences of ecosystem services. J. Nat. Conserv. 2023, 72, 126344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Nyangoko, B.P.; Berg, H.; Mangora, M.M.; Gullström, M.; Shalli, M.S. Community perceptions of mangrove ecosystem services and their determinants in the Rufiji Delta, Tanzania. Sustainability 2021, 13, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Mallick, B.; Priodarshini, R.; Kimengsi, J.N.; Biswas, B.; Hausmann, A.E.; Islam, S.; Huq, S.; Vogt, J. Livelihoods dependence on mangrove ecosystems: Empirical evidence from the Sundarbans. Curr. Res. Environ. Sustain. 2021, 3, 100077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad, Cd. de México. México. 2020. Available online: https://www.biodiversidad.gob.mx/diversidad/maderable (accessed on 25 June 2024).
  77. Macamo, C.d.C.F.; Inácio da Costa, F.; Bandeira, S.; Adams, J.B.; Balidy, H.J. Mangrove community-based management in Eastern Africa: Experiences from rural Mozambique. Front. Mar. Sci. 2024, 11, 1337678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Romañach, S.S.; DeAngelis, D.L.; Koh, H.L.; Li, Y.; Teh, S.Y.; Barizan, R.S.R.; Zhai, L. Conservación y restauración de manglares: Estado global, perspectivas y pronóstico. Ocean Coast. Manag. 2018, 154, 72–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Akram, H.; Hussain, S.; Mazumdar, P.; Ooi Chua, K.; Butt, T.E.; Harikrishna, J.A. Mangrove Health: A Review of Functions, Threats, and Challenges Associated with Mangrove Management Practices. Forests 2023, 14, 1698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Identification of the study area. The purple color represents the state of Tabasco, while the green color indicates the areas with mangroves in Tabasco state.
Figure 1. Identification of the study area. The purple color represents the state of Tabasco, while the green color indicates the areas with mangroves in Tabasco state.
Resources 13 00154 g001
Figure 2. Mangrove as a coastal ecosystem.
Figure 2. Mangrove as a coastal ecosystem.
Resources 13 00154 g002
Figure 3. Non-timber forest use of mangrove by species. Keys: D—dendroenergy; F—firewood; C—charcoal; IA—agricultural implements; P—rod o stick “palanca”; N—netting needle; OR—oars and fishing tools; I—instruments for rustic work; V—vegetable support poles; OA— ornamental and artisanal; TL—leather tanning; A—artisanal; O—ornamental; TH—therapeutic; M—medicinal use.
Figure 3. Non-timber forest use of mangrove by species. Keys: D—dendroenergy; F—firewood; C—charcoal; IA—agricultural implements; P—rod o stick “palanca”; N—netting needle; OR—oars and fishing tools; I—instruments for rustic work; V—vegetable support poles; OA— ornamental and artisanal; TL—leather tanning; A—artisanal; O—ornamental; TH—therapeutic; M—medicinal use.
Resources 13 00154 g003
Figure 4. Mangrove forestry timber use. Keys: W—wood; FP—fence posts; WR—roof support posts “horcones”; FU—furniture; PE—poles for electrical lines; SP—square posts; T—tables; RMC—rural or marine construction; PT—piles “pilotes”; RS—scissors for homes; B—beams; FW—formwork “cimbra”; DS—sole plate “solera”; RR—roof struts “chombero”; PS—pattern or stakes; CB—crossbars in homes; CP—construction props“puntales”; ST—batten“Cintas”.
Figure 4. Mangrove forestry timber use. Keys: W—wood; FP—fence posts; WR—roof support posts “horcones”; FU—furniture; PE—poles for electrical lines; SP—square posts; T—tables; RMC—rural or marine construction; PT—piles “pilotes”; RS—scissors for homes; B—beams; FW—formwork “cimbra”; DS—sole plate “solera”; RR—roof struts “chombero”; PS—pattern or stakes; CB—crossbars in homes; CP—construction props“puntales”; ST—batten“Cintas”.
Resources 13 00154 g004
Table 1. Mangrove ethnobiological indices.
Table 1. Mangrove ethnobiological indices.
SpeciesUse-Value (UV)Informant Diversity (ID) Value (Media ± DE)Level of Significant Use (UST)
R. mangle (L)6.080.22 ± 0.1033.7
L. racemosa (L. G.)5.040.18 ± 0.0721.6
A. germinans (L.)3.50.12 ± 0.0618.9
Table 2. Mangrove use.
Table 2. Mangrove use.
Forest ProductsGroupsMangrove UsesDescriptionPercentage of Uses
(NTFP)DendroenergyFirewoodRemains of the plant used as fuel for cooking, or to obtain charcoal.12.6
CharcoalA product obtained from the carbonization of mangrove firewood. This process is carried out in ovens where the environment is controlled to avoid the presence of oxygen and to maintain controlled heat.4.7
Agricultural implementsRod o stick “palanca” A rigid rod that can be used to lift, move, or hold an object.9.2
Instruments for rustic work Tools commonly used in agricultural and forestry environments, such as hooks, which are used to collect or move vegetation during the pruning process.6.3
Oars and instruments used in fishing gear Oars are instruments of different shapes and sizes, depending on the type of boat, while scrapers are utensils used to collect oysters, such as the species Crassostrea virginica.2.5
Vegetable support poles Used to give vertical support to plants, thus helping them grow as straight as possible.2.5
Netting needle Straight, pointed needle with an eye through which the thread is passed. Commonly used to weave or repair fishing nets (i.e., cloths) used in catching fish.0.3
Ornamental and artisanal Leather tanning Using the tannins present in mangrove bark as a tanning agent.1.0
Ornamental Used to generate visual interest in the environment.0.8
ArtisanalA type of artisanal work is carried out, whereby in some cases the roots are used to make figures.0.3
TherapeuticMedicinal use To treat an illness or disease.3.4
(TFP)Wood Fence posts Used in the installation of fences to delimit or protect areas of land.11.9
Roof support posts “horcones”A piece that is as straight as possible, with a V-shaped upper part, used to support the roof. The heart of the tree is regularly used.4.0
Square posts Pieces of wood with a square-shaped cross section. These posts are commonly used where strong and durable vertical support is required.2.2
TablesFlat piece which varies in size and thickness depending on needs.1.5
FurnitureMade from solid wood or recycled wood, which is often left untreated.1.0
Poles for electrical linesVertical posts that are used to support cables that distribute electrical energy. These poles are installed on properties where electricity supply is required.1.0
Rural or marine construction Construction props “puntales”Used to provide vertical support to a structure.7.6
Scissors for homes Used to distribute loads and provide necessary support to hold a roof covering.6.6
Beams Long, rectangular pieces used to support a roof.4.7
Formwork “cimbra” A temporary structure that provides necessary support to ensure that the concrete remains in place while achieving the strength necessary to support itself.3.4
Crossbars in homes Horizontal structural elements used to distribute weight and to reinforce the roof structure.3.0
Piles “pilotes”Used for support and stability in structures built on swampy terrain.2.3
Sole plate “solera” Serves as the base on which the walls will be built.2.2
Pattern or stakesUsed to mark specific points at specific locations to guide to the goal of a specific design.1.7
Roof struts “chombero”Used to provide structural stability and prevent water leaks at the highest point of the roof; a rod that passes from one side to the other.1.1
Batten “Cintas”Thin, long piece of wood used to provide support.1.0
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Martínez-Márquez, C.A.; Sol Sánchez, Á.; Zaldívar Cruz, J.M.; Sánchez Soto, S.; Del Rivero Bautista, N.; Aliphat Fernández, M.M. Local Use of Mangroves on the Coast of Southeastern México. Resources 2024, 13, 154. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources13110154

AMA Style

Martínez-Márquez CA, Sol Sánchez Á, Zaldívar Cruz JM, Sánchez Soto S, Del Rivero Bautista N, Aliphat Fernández MM. Local Use of Mangroves on the Coast of Southeastern México. Resources. 2024; 13(11):154. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources13110154

Chicago/Turabian Style

Martínez-Márquez, Carlos Alberto, Ángel Sol Sánchez, Juan Manuel Zaldívar Cruz, Saúl Sánchez Soto, Nydia Del Rivero Bautista, and Mario Manuel Aliphat Fernández. 2024. "Local Use of Mangroves on the Coast of Southeastern México" Resources 13, no. 11: 154. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources13110154

APA Style

Martínez-Márquez, C. A., Sol Sánchez, Á., Zaldívar Cruz, J. M., Sánchez Soto, S., Del Rivero Bautista, N., & Aliphat Fernández, M. M. (2024). Local Use of Mangroves on the Coast of Southeastern México. Resources, 13(11), 154. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources13110154

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop