Next Article in Journal
Nicotinic Acid Improves Endurance Performance of Mice Subjected to Treadmill Exercise
Next Article in Special Issue
Metabolomics for Evaluating Flavor-Associated Metabolites in Plant-Based Products
Previous Article in Journal
Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of Imidazo[2,1-b]Thiazole based Sulfonyl Piperazines as Novel Carbonic Anhydrase II Inhibitors
Previous Article in Special Issue
Discrimination of Adzuki Bean (Vigna angularis) Geographical Origin by Targeted and Non-Targeted Metabolite Profiling with Gas Chromatography Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Component Profiling of Soy-Sauce-Like Seasoning Produced from Different Raw Materials

1
Department of Biotechnology, Graduate School of Engineering, Osaka University, 2-1 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
2
Research and Development Division, Kikkoman Corporation, 338 Noda, Noda, Chiba 278-0037, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Metabolites 2020, 10(4), 137; https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo10040137
Submission received: 29 February 2020 / Revised: 25 March 2020 / Accepted: 26 March 2020 / Published: 1 April 2020

Abstract

:
Soy sauce is a traditional Japanese umami seasoning commonly made from soybeans, wheat, and salt water. Soy-sauce-like seasoning, made from other raw materials, such as rice and peas, has recently been developed. However, differences in the taste of soy-sauce-like seasoning, depending on the raw materials, have not been evaluated. Component profiling based on GC/MS combined with a paired comparison test were used to investigate the effect of raw materials on seasoning components and umami taste in five grain-based and four bean-based soy-sauce-like seasonings. In a principal component (PC) analysis, grain-based samples and bean-based samples were separated along the PC1 axis (explaining 48.1% of the total variance). Grain-based samples had a higher saccharide content, and bean-based samples had a higher amino acid content. Furthermore, differences in the umami intensity were also observed among sample types. This is the first detailed metabolomics study of the characteristic compounds and umami of a variety of soy-sauce-like seasonings made from different raw materials.

1. Introduction

Soy sauce, a traditional Japanese fermented seasoning, is essential for conferring umami taste to Japanese dishes. According to the Japanese Agricultural Standard (JAS), soy sauce is defined as a fermented seasoning made by cooking soybeans and grain (wheat), growing koji mold, and adding salt water [1]. Accordingly, the raw materials in soy sauce are soybeans, grains, and salt water.
To meet consumer demands, soy-sauce-like seasonings [2,3,4] have recently been developed. In these alternative seasonings, soybeans and wheat are replaced with a single type of bean, such as peas or broad beans, or a single type of grain, such as rice or foxtail millet, as raw materials.
The characteristic aromatic compounds and the effect of microbes on soy sauce flavor compounds have been investigated in ordinary Japanese soy sauce made from soybeans and wheat [5,6]. However, few studies have focused on the flavor of soy-sauce-like seasoning. Additionally, nitrogen content has been measured using the Kjeldahl method to evaluate the quality of soy-sauce-like seasoning [7], salt content has been measured using the Mole method [8], and reducing sugar and amino acid analyses [2] have been performed. However, these analysis methods do not clearly reveal differences in flavor among soy-sauce-like seasonings made with different raw materials. Therefore, comprehensive component analyses and sensory evaluations are necessary to investigate the effect of raw materials on the flavor of soy-sauce-like seasonings.
Metabolomics is an omics approach based on the comprehensive analysis of metabolites; it is used in a wide variety of fields, such as medical research, microbiology, and food science [9]. In food research, metabolomics is combined with sensory evaluations to investigate correlations between metabolites and flavor, providing the ability to simultaneously analyze low-molecular-weight compounds related to flavor [10]. In contrast to targeted analyses of specific components, non-targeted or wide-targeted analyses by GC/MS are used to investigate many kinds of components and to understand sample characteristics based on component profiles [11]. Metabolomics approaches have been applied not only to soy sauce but also to cheese [12], coffee [13], and other food products [14,15]. In soy sauce research, correlations between hydrophilic low-molecular-weight compounds and dipeptides and sensory profiles have been investigated [16,17]. These previous studies demonstrate the effectiveness of metabolomics based on GC/MS for investigating the flavor of soy sauce.
In this study, a metabolomics analysis and sensory evaluation were used to evaluate soy-sauce-like seasonings made from only one type of bean or grain as a raw material. This is the first investigation of the effect of raw materials on the component profile and taste of soy-sauce-like seasonings.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Differences in Components between Soy-Sauce-Like Seasonings Made from Different Grains and Beans

A GC/MS analysis of soy-sauce-like seasoning was conducted to obtain a global view of compounds in samples. In particular, GC/MS-based component profiling of low-molecular-weight, hydrophilic compounds was performed. A total of 133 peaks were annotated in the soy-sauce-like seasonings, including fifteen unknown compounds. Using these 133 compounds as explanatory variables, a principal component analysis (PCA) was conducted, as shown in Figure 1. In the PCA, PC1 explained 48.1% of the total variance, and PC2 and PC3 explained 18.2% and 9.0% of the variance, respectively. A total of 75.3% of the variance among samples was explained by the PCA. In the score plot (Figure 1A), soy-sauce-like seasonings made from beans were located on the positive side, and samples made from grain were located on the negative side. The loading plot was used to investigate characteristic compounds contributing to the sample separation. In the loading plot, each compound was plotted as an explanatory variable. Compounds with higher factor loadings (as absolute values) corresponded to the samples plotted with a higher absolute value in the score plot. Compounds with factor loadings (as absolute values) greater than 0.1 for each PC are shown in Table 1. Soy-sauce-like seasonings made from grain contained high amounts of saccharides, such as glucose and trehalose, and those made from beans contained high amounts of amino acids, such as glycine, valine, and glutamic acid. According to the Standard Tables of Food Composition in Japan (Table 2), grains are rich in carbohydrates, and beans are rich in protein. During the fermentation of soy sauce, carbohydrates are decomposed to saccharides by amylases, and protein is decomposed to amino acids by proteases [18]. The carbohydrate and protein content in raw materials affects the amounts of saccharides and amino acids in soy-sauce-like seasoning. These results suggest that soy-sauce-like seasoning made from raw materials with high carbohydrate content has a high saccharide content, and soy-sauce-like seasoning made from raw materials with high protein content contains more amino acids.

2.2. Characteristic Components of Broad-Bean-Based Soy-Sauce-Like Seasoning

According to the PCA score plot in Figure 1A, samples made from broad beans were located on the positive side of PC2. In the loading plot, meso-erythritol, mannitol, and galactitol were on the positive side of PC2 (Table 3). Onishi et al. [19] previously reported that broad-bean-based soy-sauce-like seasoning contains some sugar alcohols, such as mannitol and erythritol. In addition, ornithine has been reported as a characteristic compound in broad-bean-based soy-sauce-like seasoning, consistent with our results. A previous study showed that lactic acid bacteria can break down arginine during fermentation [20]. This suggests that ornithine was produced by lactic acid bacteria, which was able to break down arginine in broad-bean-based soy-sauce-like seasoning.

2.3. Characteristic Components of Quinoa-Based Soy-Sauce-Like Seasoning

In the PCA score plot shown in Figure 1B, there was a clear separation between soy-sauce-like seasoning made from quinoa, on the positive side of PC3, and other samples. Moreover, in the loading plot (Table 4), tryptophan and ribose were plotted on the positive side of PC3. According to a previous study of quinoa [21], ratios of d-ribose in carbohydrates and tryptophan in proteins are high. Therefore, the detected compounds were considered characteristic components of quinoa-based soy-sauce-like seasoning because of the decomposition of carbohydrates and proteins by amylases and proteases. Based on these results, characteristics of raw materials influence the components of soy-sauce-like seasoning. In addition, PC4 and PC5 contributed to the separation of black beans, pea beans, and soybeans (Figure S1).

2.4. Differences in Umami and Sweetness Depending on Raw Materials Based on Paired Comparisons

In the PCA, PC1 explained 48.1% of the total variance among samples. This indicates that the components of PC1 contribute to the differences among soy-sauce-like seasonings made from different raw materials. In addition, the loading plot showed that samples made from grain contained large quantities of saccharides, and samples made from beans contained abundant amino acids. To investigate whether the differences in component profiles influence taste, paired comparisons were performed using samples made from grains and beans. The analysis focused on umami and sweetness for two reasons. First, enhancing the umami taste of foods is an important role of soy sauce. Second, based on the PCA, saccharides associated with sweetness were characteristic components of grain-based samples, and various amino acids associated with umami were characteristic components of bean-based samples. The results of the paired comparisons are summarized in Figure 2. Figure 2A,B shows the poll results that explain how many panelists selected bean samples or grain samples in each pair. As shown in Figure 2A, bean-based samples tended to have a more intense umami taste than grain-based samples. Furthermore, Figure 2C shows the total poll results, which explain how many panelists selected the bean group or the grain group in a total of 20 pairs based on umami and sweetness. In total, 84% of the panelists indicated that bean-based samples had a stronger umami taste, with a significant difference between grain-based and bean-based samples (binomial test, p < 0.01). Bean-based samples are predicted to have a stronger umami taste than grain-based samples because of the presence of glutamic acid [15], which was detected as a characteristic component of bean-based samples in the PCA. However, the panelists detected no significant difference in sweetness between sample types (Figure 2B,C).
In conclusion, to investigate the effects of raw materials on the components and taste of soy-sauce-like seasonings, hydrophilic, low-molecular-weight compounds were evaluated by a metabolomics approach, and paired comparisons of grain-based and bean-based samples with respect to umami and sweetness were performed. PCA results showed that there was a clear separation between soy-sauce-like seasonings made from beans and grain. Within these groups, grain-based samples were characterized by saccharides, such as glucose and trehalose, while bean-based samples were characterized by amino acids, such as glutamic acid. Additionally, for soy-sauce-like seasonings made from broad beans and quinoa, the characteristics of the raw material are expected to influence the characteristic components of soy-sauce-like seasoning. Sensory evaluation by means of paired comparison showed that bean-based samples had a stronger umami taste than grain-based samples. Accordingly, it is possible that the carbohydrate and protein content in raw materials determine the component profiles of soy-sauce-like seasoning and have an effect on the umami intensity. This is the first detailed study of the characteristic components and taste of a variety of soy-sauce-like seasonings made from different raw materials. The results of this study give the industry new insights to help in the selection of raw materials for developing a new soy sauce that would meet various consumer needs. In addition, this study can be used as a reference to expand the taste and variety of soy sauce by using different raw materials.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Soy-Sauce-Like Seasoning Sample

Soy-sauce-like seasonings made using only bean or grain and salt were purchased as samples (Table 5). All samples were stored at 4 °C.

3.2. Reagents

Ribitol and pure pyridine were purchased from Wako Pure Chemical Industries (Osaka, Japan). Methoxyamine hydrochloride was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Japan (Tokyo, Japan). N-Methyl-N-(trimethylsilyl), trifluoroacetamide (MSTFA), and alkane mix (C9–C40) were purchased from GL Science (Tokyo, Japan).

3.3. Derivatization of Hydrophilic, Low-Molecular-Weight Compounds for GC/MS Analysis

Soy-sauce-like seasoning samples were diluted 10-fold with ultrapure water. Next, 20 µL of diluted sample was dispensed into a 1.5 mL microfuge tube. Then, 60 µL of ribitol (0.2 mg/mL in ultrapure water) was added to the sample as an internal standard. Then, the mixture was lyophilized. Following that, 100 mL of methoxyamine hydrochloride in pyridine (20 mg/mL) was added for derivatization after a freeze-dry process. To induce the methoxylation reaction, the mixture was incubated in a shaker incubator (Eppendorf Ltd., Hamburg, Germany) at 30 °C for 90 min. For silylation reaction, 50 µL of MSTFA were added, and the mixture was incubated at 37 °C for 30 min. Finally, the derivatized solutions were transferred to vials for GC/MS analysis. In this experiment, each soy-sauce-like seasoning sample was analyzed in triplicate for technical replicate (n = 3).

3.4. GC/MS Analysis for Hydrophilic Compounds

In this study, GCMS-QP2010 Ultra (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan), equipped with a 30 m × 0.25 mm i.d. fused silica capillary column coated with 0.25 mm InertCap 5MS/NP (GL science, Tokyo, Japan), was used for analysis. The analytical conditions for hydrophilic compound analysis used were as follows: 1 µL of the derivatized sample was injected by 1 µL to GC/MS with split mode (25:1 (v/v)). The injection temperature was 230 °C. The carrier gas was helium at a linear velocity of 39 cm/s. The column temperature was held at 80 °C for 2 min isothermally, and then raised at 15 °C/min to 330 °C and held for 6 min. The transfer line and the ion source temperatures were 250 and 200 °C, respectively. Ions were generated by electron ionization (EI) at 70 eV. Mass spectra were recorded at 6.67 scans per second over the mass range of m/z 85–500. Order of the sample analysis was set randomly by using Excel’s RAND function. A standard alkane mixture (C9−C40) was injected at the beginning of the analysis to calculate retention indices (RIs) used for tentative identification.

3.5. Data Analysis

The obtained raw data from GC/MS analysis were converted to the netCDF format by using GC/MS solution software (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). Baseline correction, noise removal, peak detection, and alignment were done using a freely available software MetAlign [22]. Afterwards, data matrix was constructed based on processed data exported from MetAlign using AIoutput2 annotation software [23]. By comparing the retention indices (RIs) and their EI mass spectra with our in-house library prepared using authentic standards, the tentative peak identification was performed with AIoutput2. RIs of each peak were calculated based on retention time of standard n-alkane mixture. To confirm the results of annotations, NIST11 MS spectral library was used. The assigned peak intensities were normalized against the peak intensities of ribitol, which was added as an internal standard.

3.6. Investigation of Difference on Umami, Sweetness among Different Raw Material Based on Paired Comparison

The difference in umami and sweetness between bean-based and grain-based soy-sauce-like seasoning samples was investigated using a paired comparison test. Paired comparison is one of the most popular sensory tests. By using this method, panelists evaluate only two samples at a time, which significantly reduces the effect of fatigue, carryover, and memory compared to evaluating more than two samples at the same time. In this experiment, the same nine samples with GC/MS analysis were used for the paired comparison test. Each pair consisted of one bean-based sample (four types) and one grain-based sample (five types). In total, 20 pairs were tested in this experiment. Because the color of each sample was a little different, color was considered when determining what might influence and bias the panelists. For this reason, the color of each sample was hidden by using black plastic cups and black tea spoons. Ten milliliters of each sample was served to each panelist, and the samples were evaluated by 20 semitrained panelists. The semitrained panelists, who were between the ages of 22 to 27, were trained using the five basic taste test. Each pair was evaluated by 10 panelists, who were selected randomly from 20 panelists. The panelists then selected which sample tasted stronger based on umami and sweetness. Before and after sample tasting, panelists used mineral water to rinse their mouths to prevent carry-over of taste.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2218-1989/10/4/137/s1, Figure S1: PCA score plot using different principal components from PC1 ~ PC5.

Author Contributions

E.F., S.P.P., M.T. and T.Y. conceived and designed the experiments; Y.I. and N.O. prepared samples; T.Y. performed the experiments, analyzed data, and wrote the paper; E.F., S.P.P., M.T., T.Y., T.N. and Y.I. interpreted and discussed the data; E.F., S.P.P., M.T. and T.N. revised the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant number 18J20256(MT).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. Kikkoman Corporation collected samples and cooperated in the writing of the manuscript and aided in interpretation of data.

References

  1. Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries. Japanese Agricultural Standard of Soy Sauce; Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries: Tokyo, Japan, 2019; Volume 38, pp. 1–10. (In Japanese)
  2. Ohnishi, S. Soy Sauce-like Seasoning Made without Wheat and/or Soy Bean. J. Brew. Soc. JAPAN 2006, 101, 88–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Shinozaki, Y.; Nakahara, T. Soy Sauce-Like Seasoning. WO Patent No. 2013/073249A1, 23 May 2013. [Google Scholar]
  4. Nakahara, T.; Shiga, K.; Yamazaki, T.; Umezawa, H. Development and characterization of fermented pea sauce (soy-free, wheat-free soy sauce-like seasoning). J. Jpn. Soy Sauce Res. Inst. 2020, 46, 79–86. (In Japanese) [Google Scholar]
  5. Meng, Q.; Imamura, M.; Katayama, H.; Obata, A.; Sugawara, E. Key compounds contributing to the fruity aroma characterization in Japanese raw soy sauce. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2017, 81, 1984–1989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Harada, R.; Yuzuki, M.; Ito, K.; Shiga, K.; Bamba, T.; Fukusaki, E. Influence of yeast and lactic acid bacterium on the constituent profile of soy sauce during fermentation. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2017, 123, 203–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Nozawa, S.; Hakoda, A.; Sakaida, K.; Suzuki, T.; Yasui, A. Method performance study of the determination of total nitrogen in soy sauce by the Kjelda method. Anal. Sci. 2005, 21, 1129–1132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Niino, Y. Measurement method of salt concentration in food analysis. Sci. Cook. 1994, 27, 57–62. [Google Scholar]
  9. Putri, S.P.; Nakayaman, Y.; Matsuda, F.; Uchitaka, T.; Kobayashi, S.; Matsubara, A.; Fukusaki, E. Current metabolomics: Practical applications. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2013, 115, 579–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Mimura, N.; Isogai, A.; Iwashita, K.; Bamba, T.; Fukusaki, E. Gas chromatography/mass spectrometry based component profilingand quality prediction for Japanese sake. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2014, 118, 406–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Pongsuwan, W.; Fukusaki, E.; Bamba, T.; Yonetani, T.; Yamahara, T.; Kobayashi, A. Prediction of Japanese green tea ranking by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry-based hydrophilic metabolite fingerprinting. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2007, 55, 231–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ochi, H.; Naito, H.; Iwatsuki, K.; Bamaba, T.; Fukusaki, E. Metabolomics-based component profiling of hard and semi-hard natural cheeses with gas chromatography/time-of-flight-mass spectrometry, and its application to sensory predictive modeling. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2012, 113, 751–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Jumhawan, U.; Putri, S.P.; Yusianto; Marwani, E.; Bamba, T.; Fukusaki, E. Selection of discriminant markers for Authentication of Asian palm civet coffee (Kopi Luwak). J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013, 61, 7994–8001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Parijadi, A.A.R.; Putri, S.P.; Ridwani, S.; Dwivany, F.M.; Fukusaki, E. Metabolic profiling of Garcinia mangostana (mangosteen) based on ripening stages. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 125, 238–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Kadar, A.D.; Aditiawati, P.; Astawan, M.; Putri, S.P.; Fukusaki, E. Gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry-based metabolomics for the classification of tempe from different regions and production processes in Indonesia. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2018, 126, 411–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Yamamoto, S.; Bamba, T.; Sano, A.; Kodama, Y.; Imamura, M.; Obata, A.; Fukusaki, E. Metabolite profiling of soy sauce using gas chromatography with time-of-flight mass spectrometry and analysis of correlation with quantitative descriptive analysis. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2012, 114, 170–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Yamamoto, S.; Shiga, K.; Kodama, Y.; Imamura, M.; Uchida, R.; Obata, A.; Bamba, T.; Fukusaki, E. Analysis of the correlation between dipeptides and taste differences among soy sauces by using metabolomics-based component profiling. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2014, 118, 56–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Su, N.; Wang, M.; Kwok, K.; Lee, M. Effects of temperature and sodium chloride concentration on the activities of proteases and amylases in soy sauce koji. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2005, 53, 1521–1525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ohnishi, S.; Matsuoka, H.; Asai, T. Characterinstic components of Soramame-shoyu (Soy sauce-like seasoning made from broad bean). J. Brew. Soc. JAPAN 2014, 109, 860–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Tanaka, T. Effect of soy sauce lactic acid bacteria on soy sauce brewing. Seibutsu Kogaku Kaishi 2012, 90, 320–323. (In Japanese) [Google Scholar]
  21. Abugoch, J.; Lilian, E. Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.): Composition, chemistry, nutritional, and functional properties. Adv. Food Nutr. Res. 2009, 58, 1–31. [Google Scholar]
  22. Lommen, A. Metalign: Interface-driven, versatile metabolomics tool for hyphenated full-scan mass spectrometry data preprocessing. Anal. Chem. 2009, 81, 3079–3086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Tsugawa, H.; Tsujimoto, Y.; Arita, M.; Bamba, T.; Fukusaki, E. GC/MS based metabolomics: Development of a data mining system for metabolite identification by using soft independent modeling of class analogy (SIMCA). BMC Bioinform. 2011, 12, 131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Principal component analysis (PCA) score plot of hydrophilic, low-molecular-weight compounds based on gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC/MS). (A) PCA score plot (PC1 and PC2). Points and labels indicate samples and sample number, respectively. Circles indicate grain-based samples, and hexagons indicate bean-based samples. (B) PCA score plot (PC1 and PC3).
Figure 1. Principal component analysis (PCA) score plot of hydrophilic, low-molecular-weight compounds based on gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC/MS). (A) PCA score plot (PC1 and PC2). Points and labels indicate samples and sample number, respectively. Circles indicate grain-based samples, and hexagons indicate bean-based samples. (B) PCA score plot (PC1 and PC3).
Metabolites 10 00137 g001
Figure 2. Paired comparisons of the intensities of umami and sweetness between grain-based and bean-based samples. (A), (B) Number of panelists that selected each sample in pairwise comparisons of soy-sauce-like seasonings made from grain and beans. (C) Number of panelists that selected soy-sauce-like seasonings made from grain and beans based on umami and sweetness.
Figure 2. Paired comparisons of the intensities of umami and sweetness between grain-based and bean-based samples. (A), (B) Number of panelists that selected each sample in pairwise comparisons of soy-sauce-like seasonings made from grain and beans. (C) Number of panelists that selected soy-sauce-like seasonings made from grain and beans based on umami and sweetness.
Metabolites 10 00137 g002
Table 1. Characteristic hydrophilic low-molecular-weight compounds in grain-based and bean-based soy-sauce-like seasonings contributing to PC1.
Table 1. Characteristic hydrophilic low-molecular-weight compounds in grain-based and bean-based soy-sauce-like seasonings contributing to PC1.
(A)Compoundp(corr)[PC1]Compoundp(corr)[PC1]
β-Alanine0.1242 Galactose0.1174
Phenylalanine0.1241 Allose0.1174
β-N-Methyl amino alanine0.1237 Hypoxanthine0.1168
Glycine0.1237 Dihydroxyacetone0.1160
Isoleucine0.1237 Unknown0.1142
Valine0.1235 Inositol0.1136
Threonine0.1234 Xylonic acid0.1116
Lysine0.1234 Alanine0.1107
Phosphoric acid0.1232 Pyroglutamic acid0.1100
Leucine0.1230 Tyrosine0.1097
Maleic acid0.1228 Xanthine0.1084
Glutamic acid0.1227 Histidine0.1077
5-Aminovaleric acid0.1225 Cysteine0.1050
N-α-Acetyl ornithine0.1223 Unknown0.1049
N-α-Acetyl lysine0.1215 Xylitol0.1047
Proline0.1215 Alanylalanine0.1045
Normetanephrine0.1211 Methionine0.1040
2-Aminoethanol0.1203 Unknown0.1039
2-Aminoadipic acid0.1203 Uracil0.1033
Glycolic acid0.1197 Malonic acid0.1022
Serine0.1197 Mannose0.1021
Thymine0.1186 Phthalic acid0.1007
Lyxose0.1184 --
(B)Compoundp(corr)[PC1]Compoundp(corr)[PC1]
Glucose−0.1193 N-Acetyl galactosamine-0.1091
Unknown−0.1161 Trehalose-0.1067
Glyceryl-glycoside−0.1148 β-Lactosebe-0.1038
Thymidine−0.1131 Maltose-0.1036
Melibiose−0.1107 Lactitol-0.1034
(A) Compounds plotted on the positive side (bean-based side) along PC1 and factor loadings are shown. (B) Compounds plotted on the negative side (grain-based side) along PC1 and factor loadings are shown. Compounds with factor loadings of greater than ±0.1 were selected as standards.
Table 2. Protein and carbohydrate content in raw materials (from the Japanese Standard Tables of Food Composition in Japan 2015).
Table 2. Protein and carbohydrate content in raw materials (from the Japanese Standard Tables of Food Composition in Japan 2015).
Raw Material NameProtein (g) *aCarbohydrate (g) *b
Grain/Rice/Milled grain6.1 77.6
Grain/Foxtail millet/Milled grain11.269.7
Grain/Bamyard millet/Milled grain9.4 73.2
Grain/Millet/Milled grain11.370.9
Grain/Quinoa/Brown grain13.469.0
Grain/Wheat/Brown grain10.672.2
Bean/Broad bean/Dry26.0 55.9
Bean/Pea bean/Dry21.760.4
Bean/Black bean/Dry33.930.8
Bean/Soy bean/Dry33.829.5
*a: Calculated as the product of the quantitative nitrogen content measured by the improved Kjeldahl method and nitrogen–protein conversion factor. *b: Calculated by the subtraction method (i.e., total amounts of moisture, protein, lipids, and ash were subtracted from 100 g).
Table 3. Characteristic hydrophilic low-molecular-weight compounds in broad-bean-based soy-sauce-like seasoning on PC2.
Table 3. Characteristic hydrophilic low-molecular-weight compounds in broad-bean-based soy-sauce-like seasoning on PC2.
Compound p(corr)[PC2]Compound p(corr)[PC2]
Urea0.1743 Myristic acid0.1563
Putrescine0.1742 2-Hydroxybutyric acid0.1437
4-Aminobutyric acid0.1735 Lactic acid0.1409
Butanoic acid0.1735 Galactitol0.1375
Ornithine0.1708 Arabitol0.1301
Histamine0.1693 Galacturonic acid0.1274
Mannitol0.1693 Sorbitol0.1154
Cystamine0.1665 Guanine0.1138
meso-erythritol0.1663 Oxaloacetic acid+Pyruvic acid0.1056
Glycylglycine0.1627 Oxalic acid0.1008
Tyramine0.1577 --
Compounds on the positive side (broad-bean side) of PC2 and factor loadings are shown. Compounds were selected based on factor loadings of over 0.1 as standards.
Table 4. Characteristic hydrophilic low-molecular-weight compounds in quinoa-based soy-sauce-like seasoning on PC3.
Table 4. Characteristic hydrophilic low-molecular-weight compounds in quinoa-based soy-sauce-like seasoning on PC3.
Compound p(corr)[PC3]Compound p(corr)[PC3]
Unknown0.2645 Xylulose+Ribulose0.1989
Cadaverine0.2603 Acetoacetic acid0.1487
2-Aminobutyric acid0.2578 Tryptophan0.1282
Psicose+Tagatose0.2574 Lauric acid0.1153
3-Hydroxybutyric acid0.2512 Unknown0.1143
Ribose0.2512 2-Hydroxybutyric acid0.1109
Galacturonic acid0.2037 Xanthine0.1092
Oxalic acid0.2003 Gluconic acid0.1011
Compounds on the positive side (i.e., the side including quinoa) of PC3 and factor loadings are shown. Compounds were selected based on factor loadings of over 0.1 as standards.
Table 5. Soy-sauce-like seasoning sample list.
Table 5. Soy-sauce-like seasoning sample list.
Sample NumberSample NameRaw MaterialsClassification
1Rice shoyuRiceGrain
2Awa shoyuFoxtail millet
3Hie shoyuBarnyard millet
4Kibi shoyuMillet
5Quinoa shoyuQuinoa
6Soramame shoyuBroad beanBean
7Kuromame shoyuBlack bean
8Endomame shoyuPea bean
9Marudaizu shoyuSoy bean, wheat
Sample name, raw materials, and classification of raw materials of soy-sauce-like seasoning made from a single type of bean or grain are indicated.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yamana, T.; Taniguchi, M.; Nakahara, T.; Ito, Y.; Okochi, N.; Putri, S.P.; Fukusaki, E. Component Profiling of Soy-Sauce-Like Seasoning Produced from Different Raw Materials. Metabolites 2020, 10, 137. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo10040137

AMA Style

Yamana T, Taniguchi M, Nakahara T, Ito Y, Okochi N, Putri SP, Fukusaki E. Component Profiling of Soy-Sauce-Like Seasoning Produced from Different Raw Materials. Metabolites. 2020; 10(4):137. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo10040137

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yamana, Tomoyuki, Moyu Taniguchi, Takeharu Nakahara, Yusuke Ito, Natsuki Okochi, Sastia Prama Putri, and Eiichiro Fukusaki. 2020. "Component Profiling of Soy-Sauce-Like Seasoning Produced from Different Raw Materials" Metabolites 10, no. 4: 137. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo10040137

APA Style

Yamana, T., Taniguchi, M., Nakahara, T., Ito, Y., Okochi, N., Putri, S. P., & Fukusaki, E. (2020). Component Profiling of Soy-Sauce-Like Seasoning Produced from Different Raw Materials. Metabolites, 10(4), 137. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo10040137

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop