Next Article in Journal
Assessing the Efficacy of PLGA-Loaded Antimicrobial Peptide OH-CATH30 Microspheres for the Treatment of Bacterial Keratitis: A Promising Approach
Previous Article in Journal
LVPT: Lazy Velocity Pseudotime Inference Method
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Systematic Review

Methods for Radiolabeling Nanoparticles (Part 3): Therapeutic Use

Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and of Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, “Sapienza” University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomolecules 2023, 13(8), 1241; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom13081241
Submission received: 26 June 2023 / Revised: 4 August 2023 / Accepted: 5 August 2023 / Published: 12 August 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Biological and Bio- Materials)

Abstract

:
Following previously published systematic reviews on the diagnostic use of nanoparticles (NPs), in this manuscript, we report published methods for radiolabeling nanoparticles with therapeutic alpha-emitting, beta-emitting, or Auger’s electron-emitting isotopes. After analyzing 234 papers, we found that different methods were used with the same isotope and the same type of nanoparticle. The most common type of nanoparticles used are the PLGA and PAMAM nanoparticles, and the most commonly used therapeutic isotope is 177Lu. Regarding labeling methods, the direct encapsulation of the isotope resulted in the most reliable and reproducible technique. Radiolabeled nanoparticles show promising results in metastatic breast and lung cancer, although this field of research needs more clinical studies, mainly on the comparison of nanoparticles with chemotherapy.

1. Introduction

In the last ten years, the field of nanomedicine and associated research has enormously expanded, without a significant reduction due to the COVID pandemic in the previous three years.
This exponential growth in publications is particularly evident if we use “nanoparticles” as a search input, rising from 17,046 in 2012 to 34,132 in 2022 (Figure 1).
A few of these publications discuss the use of “radiolabeled nanoparticles”, which include “radiolabeled nanoparticles for diagnostic SPECT use”, “radiolabeled nanoparticles for diagnostic PET use”, and “radiolabeled nanoparticles for therapy” (Figure 1).
In general, the methods for NP measurement in biological samples depend on the chemical composition and structure of NPs, and there is no universal technique that is suitable for all NPs. Among the techniques established for NP measurement and imaging, isotope tracing, particularly radioactive tracing, is one of the most powerful for assigning a source and monitoring its distribution from the nano to the global scale. Furthermore, radiolabeled NPs have received significant attention in nuclear medicine, molecular imaging, drug delivery, and radiation therapy [1,2].
We previously published two systematic reviews on “methods for radiolabeling nanoparticles for diagnostic SPECT use” [3] and “methods for radiolabeling nanoparticles for diagnostic PET use” [4]. This paper addresses a systematic review of the published research on “methods for radiolabeling nanoparticles for therapy”, including an Auger’s electron-emitting, Alpha-emitting, and Beta-emitting isotopes.

2. Radiolabeling of NPs with Auger’s Electron-Emitting Isotopes

Auger’s electrons are emitted from radioactive nuclei due to the Auger effect. The Auger effect is the emission of an Auger’s electron from an atom that has gained energy by filling an external electronic shell, which fills a vacancy in an external electronic orbital that can occur during radioactive decay.
Auger’s electrons have a high level of linear energy transfer (LET) (1–26 keV mm−1) and a very small particle range (<0.5 mm). These properties enable the radioisotope to be transported intracellularly to the nucleus, maximizing cytotoxic activity, which results in DNA double-strand breaks [5].
Several isotopes can emit Auger’s electrons, such as 64Cu, 161Tb, 195mPt, 111In, 67Ga, 99mTc, 125I, 124I, and 123I. However, most of these isotopes are used for diagnostic purposes and have already been described in the Part 1 and Part 2 reviews [3,4].
Here, we describe the labeling methods using 64Cu, one of the most commonly used radioisotopes for therapeutic purposes, as summarized in Table 1.

2.1. Radiolabeling with Copper-64

Copper-64 (64Cu) is a cyclotron-produced radionuclide with a half-life of 12.7 h, and it decays through β+ emission (17%), β emission (39%), and Auger’s electrons (44%). These features make 64Cu a suitable radioisotope for radiotherapy by β particles and Auger’s electrons and for radio imaging, including positron-emission tomography (PET) imaging by β+ particles, in cancer. The decaying of 64Cu makes it a perfect radionuclide for theragnostics [6,16].

2.1.1. Direct Radiolabeling

The 64Cu has been used to directly and indirectly label different NPs. Copper-sulfide nanoparticles (Cu2S NPs) are among the NPs that can be labeled by the direct method and show therapeutic effects. The synthesis of these NPs begins with the introduction of Na2S into an aqueous solution of CuCl2 together with an aliquot of 64CuCl2, in the presence of PEG-SH. The rapidity of this method, which takes only 20 min, is important for minimizing radioactive decay. The radiolabeling efficiency and stability were analyzed using instant thin-layer chromatography (iTLC), and the results showed that more than 99% of the radioactivity was associated with the radiolabeled NPs at the end of synthesis [6].
Gailkwad et al. proposed another strategy for direct radiolabeling with NPs. Chitosan (CHS) was first radiolabeled and then converted to NPs through ionotropic gelation. The authors tried this method with several therapeutic radioisotopes, such as 64Cu, 90Y, 166Ho, and 177Lu. The radiolabeling process started with the mixing of the CHS solution with a water-soluble chitosan (COS) solution, and, after adjusting the pH to 5 using NaOH, the solution was stirred for 30 min at room temperature. Subsequently, the relevant radiometal solution was added with TPP and stirred for 10 min, producing radioactive-CH NPs. The chitosan NPs were cross-linked with a glutaraldehyde solution while stirring for at least 30 min. The radiochemical purity was determined using iTLC and was greater than 98% for all the samples. This novel technique takes advantage of chitosan’s unique physical and chemical properties to provide an easy, rapid, and highly selective radiolabeling strategy [7].
Instead of chitosan, other organic materials can also be used for the synthesis of radiolabeled nanoparticles; Zhou et al. fabricated radiolabeled melanin NPs (MNPs) with a chelator-free approach, mixed them with 64CuCl2 in the presence of a sodium acetate (NaOAc) buffer, and left the mixture to incubate for 1 h at 40 °C. An Al aliquot of trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) was used to stop the reaction.
The radiochemical purity (RCP) was evaluated by ITLC, and it was found to be greater than 95%. The therapeutic effect was evaluated on human-epidermoid-carcinoma-tumor-bearing nude mice, and the findings showed a positive result, in that the tumor growth was significantly inhibited after treatment with a single dose (55.5 MBq). The comprehensive study concluded that 64Cu-MNPs is a promising candidate for cancer therapy [8].
Gholami et al. developed radiolabeled NPs with superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO) cores, commonly known as Feraheme® (FH) NPs, in which radioisotopes bind directly to the surface of the SPIO core. The therapeutic radioisotopes used were 223Ra, 177Lu, 90Y, and 64Cu. The study showed that the FH NPs could be radiolabeled with high RCY and RCP using both diagnostic radioisotopes with long-range beta emitters and therapeutic radioisotopes with short-range alpha emitters [9].
Boron nitride nanotubes (BNNTs) are cylindrical structures formed by atoms of boron (B) and nitrogen (N). The empty internal spaces allow BNNTs to occupy various chemical species, including radioisotopes, in their vacant sites. The solvothermal process is mainly used to radiolabel BNNTs with 64Cu. In this procedure, the BNNTs were dispersed in anhydrous ethanol, and the 64Cu was encapsulated using an autoclave with a polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) vessel for 2 h at 180 °C. This method resulted in a stable and contaminant-free radioisotope, and the TEM images showed that the BNNTs were structurally well organized, presenting 64Cu nanoparticles not only in their internal channels but also on their surfaces [10].
All of these studies convey the fact that radiolabeling occurs during nanoparticle synthesis. However, Xie et al. studied a post-synthesis approach that allows the encapsulation of 64Cu into NPs, particularly covellite nanocrystals (CuS NCs). The researchers demonstrated that the covellite NCs dispersed with toluene incorporated Cu(I) ions [11]. Consequently, the in situ reduction of 64Cu (II) to 64Cu(I) was required. For this purpose, ascorbic acid, a nontoxic and mild reducing agent, was added to the solution. The reactions on the NCs were tested in an aqueous environment, and most of the incorporation process was complete within a few minutes at room temperature [12].
A new carrier system based on a simple single-step precipitation technique was designed to synthesize radioactive barium sulfate nanoparticles (BaSO4 NPs) with excellent stability in an aqueous environment (<5% activity release). In this work, the incorporation of several radionuclides, such as 131Ba, 133Ba, 224Ra, 18F, 64Cu, 89Zr, 111In, and 177Lu, was investigated. The synthesis and radiolabeling process forecasts barium-alendronate precipitation by adding ethanol and the respective radionuclide, which provide nano-templates for the subsequent growth of the alendronate-containing BaSO4 NPs. The radio-chemical yield (RCY) was expressed as the ratio of the amount of activity in the NP pellets to the starting activity, and while the 177Lu- BaSO4 NPs had an acceptable RCY, of 69%, the 64Cu-BaSO4 NPs did not achieve sufficient labeling due to the affinity of the alendronate as a complexing agent for copper ions [13].
The neutron irradiation of the non-radioactive isotopes that comprise NPs is another method for obtaining radioactive NPs. The hydrothermal coprecipitation method was used to synthesize hydroxyapatite (HA) NPs with copper. The synthesis started with the introduction of two precursor solutions: the first was prepared by mixing in water cetyl-trimethyl-ammonium-bromide (CTAB), calcium nitrate tetrahydrate (Ca(NO3)2·4H2O,) and copper(II) nitrate hydrate (Cu(NO3)2·3H2O). In contrast, the second solution was obtained by mixing potassium phosphate dibasic trihydrate (K2HPO4·3H2O) with water. After adjusting the pH of both solutions to 12, the precursor solution was left for 6 h, and then the second solution was added dropwise to the first solution. The final product was stirred continuously throughout the night before being transferred to an autoclave to continue the hydrothermal treatment at 100 °C for 10 h. The materials were calcined at 600 °C under air pressure for 6 h after centrifugation and vacuum filtering to remove the organic template and grow the tenorite phase. The NPs were irradiated for 2 h with a thermal neutron flow to activate the 64Cu [14].

2.1.2. Indirect Radiolabeling

Most of the previous studies involved the use of 64Cu for a diagnostic purpose, which we discussed in our previous review [3]. However, there are few works in the literature on the indirect labeling of nanoparticles with 64Cu for therapeutic purposes.
Rossin et al. studied folate-conjugated shell-cross-linked nanoparticles (SCKs) functionalized with 1,4,8,11-tetraazacyclotetradecane-N, N′, N″, and N‴-tetraacetic acid (TETA). This bifunctional chelator (BFC) is a macrocyclic ligand that provides thermodynamic stability and copper-complex kinetics in vivo. To obtain these NPs, a multi-step process was required. The authors proceeded to synthesize the BFC after conjugating the SCK with folate, allowing them to react with a mono tert-Boc-protected diamine (N-butoxycarbonyl-[2,2′-(ethylenedioxy) bis(ethylamine)]) with TETA in the presence of EDC for 16 h. The tert-Boc-protecting group was cleaved using trifluoroacetic acid, and the TETA–NH2 product was purified via methanol and acetone precipitation. The carboxylic groups on the SCK–folate shells were activated by the EDC-NHs system in a PBS solution for 2 h at 4 °C while stirring. The TETA-NH2 was added after the excess EDC-NHS was separated, and the reaction mixtures were gently stirred overnight at 4 °C. The 64Cu chloride was converted to 64Cu acetate for radiolabeling by adding an ammonium acetate buffer (pH 6.5) and added to the TETA–SCK solution. The solution was incubated in a thermomixer (1000 rpm) under mild reaction conditions (43 °C for 2.5 h), yielding radiolabeled NPs with a high RCP (>95%) [15].

2.1.3. Discussion

To summarize, many strategies can be used to achieve 64Cu-labeled NPs by direct radiolabeling. The possibility of radiolabeling NPs without the use of BFCs is due to their chemical characteristics and, furthermore, this possibility does not apply to all types of NP. For indirect radiolabeling, only TETA was studied for this radioisotope. Since this is a multi-step process, the chemical characteristics of the NPs must not be modified, in order to limit the influence on their targeting specificity as far as possible.

3. Radiolabeling of NPs with Alpha-Emitting Isotopes

Alpha particles (helium nuclei) have a high LET, of approximately 80–100 keV/μm, and a penetration range that is typically <100 μm (equivalent to a few cells layer). Due to their high LET, alpha particles mostly interact with DNA, causing irreversible double-strand breaks, and other effects such as G2-phase delay, the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), and chromosomal rearrangements [17]. Additionally, β-radiation, for example, can induce damage in neighboring cells [18].
The methods for radiolabeling NPs with α-emitting isotopes are summarized in Table 2.

3.1. Radiolabeling with Astatine-211

One of the most promising candidates for targeted α-radionuclide therapy (TAT) is 211At. Its long half-life (7.2 h) allows distribution from the production site, labeling procedures, quality control (QC), and clinical application without producing long-lived daughters emitting other α or β particles. Furthermore, this radionuclide is easily produced by cyclotrons with the nuclear reaction of 209Bi (α, 2n) 211At, followed by dry distillation and isolation from irradiated bismuth [18]. These characteristics make this radionuclide suitable for radiolabeling several types of NP.

3.1.1. Direct Radiolabeling

Astatine is commonly considered a halogen, but the aryl-carbon–halogen bond is very weak, and radiolabeling methods used for other halogens (i.e., iodine) cannot be used without rapid loss, in vivo, of 211At from NPs.
To overcome this problem, several authors proposed the use of gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) as carriers for 211At. The use of gold is based on the fact that iodine is absorbed by the surfaces of noble metals, establishing strong covalent bonds. Due to the similarities between iodine and astatine, it was expected that 211At would form a covalent bond on the surfaces of the AuNPs. For the radiolabeling process, the 211At was diluted in Na2SO3/methanol, the solution was evaporated, and the radionuclide was dissolved in water. For the labeling, 20 mL of 211At were added to 200 mL of AuNPs, the pH was maintained at 6, and the final solution was incubated at room temperature under stirring. The radiolabeling yield was >99%, as evaluated by iTLC, with MeOH [19,20,21].
The same method was used for the radiolabeling of gold nanostars (GNSs). In this case, centrifugation was used to separate the free 211At from the 211At-GNS at the end of the labeling procedure [22].
Kucka et al. investigated the feasibility of radiolabeling silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) using the affinity of astatine for metallic silver. In citrate-phosphate buffers, commercially available AgNPs were labeled at pH 5 and pH 8. Chloramine-T was used to oxidize the 211At, followed by reduction with ascorbic acid. The results showed that the pH did not affect the labeling yield, which was greater than 95% in both cases. The same method was then applied to experimentally synthesized AgNPs using KMnO4 as an oxidant and NaBH4 or Na2SO3 as a reducing agent. The radiolabeling yield was 77.1% without a reducing/oxidant agent, while rates of 53.7%, 99.7%, and 94.2% were achieved in the presence of KMnO4, NaBH4, and Na2SO3, respectively. The use of oxidating or reducing agents can overcome limitations such as the low reproducibility of the radiolabeling yields. The researchers found that astatine can oxidize due to water radiolysis and does not allow it to react on the surface of silver in an oxidation state. The radiolabeling yield and reproducibility can be increased by protecting astatine from oxidation. It was also shown that low water contents in methanol can quench radiolysis and cause it to behave like an oxygen-radical scavenger [23].

3.1.2. Discussion

So far, 211At has been radiolabeled with NPs by the direct method only. It is yet to be explored with indirect and encapsulation methods.
The direct radiolabeling of NPs with 211At is based on the affinity between the radionuclide and the NPs. The 211 At showed a high affinity for gold surfaces, while with silver surfaces, it is essential to prevent astatine oxidation by using a reducing agent in the radiolabeling process.

3.2. Radiolabeling with Actinium-225

Actinium-225 (225Ac) acts as an α-particle generator because of its half-life of 10 days and multiple decaying properties (221Fr, 217At, 213Bi) [41]. The decaying of a radionuclide can occur via a cascade of six radionuclide daughters with short half-lives. This predominantly decaying path generates four α-particles with high energy, while the cascade releases two β disintegrations, such as 221Fr and 213Bi. The 213Bi is an α and β emitter with a half-life of 46 min. It decays to 213Po by emitting α particles with half-lives of 4.2 µs, breaking the DNA double strand and causing cytotoxic effects [42].

3.2.1. Direct Radiolabeling

Iron-oxide-based nanoparticles (SPIONs) have attracted broad interest for their intrinsic magnetic properties, like their high surface-area-to-volume ratio and their ability to change their core composition and surface chemically. This chemical modification can be performed through the direct labeling of radioisotopes. Cędrowska et al. synthetized NPs by co-precipitating FeCl3 and 225Ac, followed by the addition of ammonia to obtain a solution with pH 10. The formed solution was stirred for 15 min, reaching a labeling efficiency of >98% [24].

3.2.2. Indirect Radiolabeling

Single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWNTs) can be radiolabeled indirectly using dodecane tetra-acetic acid (DOTA), a bifunctional chelator.
Ruggiero et al. conjugated DOTA with the primary amines of the SWNT sidewalls. After incubation, 225Ac was added to the solution, producing radiolabeled NPs with a 96% RCP [29].
A DOTA-derivative chelator, TADOTAGA, was studied as a BFC for the radiolabeling of AuNPs. The labeling process was similar to that for DOTA. First, TADOTAGA was added to the gold salt solution while stirring, and then a NaBH4 aqueous solution was added after a few minutes. After stirring for 1 h, followed by dialysis, the 225AcCl3 was added and kept in the incubator for 30 min at 70 °C. The sample purification was performed through centrifugation for 15 min at 8110 rpm. The percentage of 225Ac was incorporated, and the RCP was determined by iTLC. The results showed RCY values of 86.0 ± 1.8% before centrifugation and 68.5 ± 2.3% after centrifugation, with the RCP greater than 93% [28].

3.2.3. Radiolabeling by Encapsulation

Sofou et al. used liposomes as therapeutic agents for micro metastases and selected the method of encapsulating the radionuclide within the NP. For the synthesis of radioactive liposomes, 225Ac was mixed with sucrose-loaded liposomes in PBS and incubated at room temperature for 1h. The binding of the radionuclide to the liposomes was measured using an ultracentrifugation assay, 142,000× g for 2 h at 25 °C, allowing the separation of the labeled liposomes from the free 225Ac [25].
Inorganic nanoparticles were used as vehicles for targeted radiotherapy. McLaughlin et al. performed a study in which they radiolabeled gold-coated lanthanide phosphate NPs ({La0.5 Gd0.5}(225Ac)PO4 NPs) and LaPO4 (monazite) NPs without BFCs. Firstly, 225AcCl3 was added to the lanthanide mixture, followed by four additional shells of pure GdPO4. The resulting mixture was sealed and heated for 3 h at 90 °C and, finally, purified overnight via dialysis. To test the retention of 225Ac decay in vitro, an aliquot was taken from the dialysis tube at different time points and analyzed. The results showed that these NPs were very stable over three weeks, and the NPs retained more than 99.9% of the 225Ac [26].
Woodward et al. synthesized LaPO4 NPs. In this process, LaCl3 in H2O was diluted with HCl containing 225AcCl3. The solution was then evaporated, resuspended in tri-n-butyl phosphate and phenyl-ether, and heated to 100 °C under vacuum with stirring. Next, an aliquot of H3PO4 solution was added, and the total mixture was heated to 200 °C in an argon atmosphere while stirring for 2 h. Once the solution reached room temperature, the product was separated from the colloids by adding a combination of hexane and hexadecane and centrifuging for 20 min at 14.000× g. A sample of NPs was dialyzed for one month to test the in vitro release of the radionuclides. The presence of free 221Fr and 213Bi was measured in the sample for 2 min at 1-min intervals, while the presence of 225Ac was determined by recounting the same sample after 1 h. The results showed the partial sequestration of the 221Fr and 213Bi daughters, while the 225Ac was completely retained in the NPs [27].
Mulvey et al. investigated the radiolabeling of SWCNT with 225Ac by three techniques. In the first, 225Ac3+ ions were added to the NPs; in the second, a mixture of Gd3+ ions and 225Ac3+ ions were added together; and in the third, Gd3+ ions, followed by 225Ac3+ ions, were added sequentially. The samples were sonicated for 2 h to ensure the encapsulation of the 225Ac, and then allowed to equilibrate overnight. All the samples were washed and filtered the next day with a paper membrane. The extent of the 225Ac3+ labeling was determined by serial washing via centrifuge filtration. For the samples with only 225Ac3+, over 95% of the activity remained with the NPs, while for the other two techniques, only 50% of the activity remained associated, probably due to the excess of Gd3+ ions saturating all the binding sites for the 225Ac. Challenge experiments in human serum were conducted to simulate in vivo conditions, and the results showed that only 40% of the 225Ac3+ remained for the US tubes labeled with 225Ac3+ only [30].
Hernández-Jiménez et al. encapsulated 225Ac-radionuclides into reconstituted high-density lipoprotein (rHDL) nanoparticles. The findings demonstrated that the fabricated 13-nanometer nanosystem had more a rate of radiochemical purity of more than 99% and was stable in human serum [31].
Toro-González et al. encapsulated 225Ac-radionuclide into gadolinium vanadate (GdVO4 NPs). The results showed that the radiochemical yield for the Gd(225Ac)VO4 was 66.8 ± 7.2% [32].

3.2.4. Discussion

According to published methodologies, the most significant aspect of radiolabeled 225Ac-NPs is the stability of the labeled compound over time. The stability of labeling is related not only to 225Ac, but also to its decay products [43]. For this reason, materials with high density are required to ensure the sufficient retention of all the decay products within the NPs to limit the cytotoxicity to healthy tissues.

3.3. Radiolabeling with Radium-223

As a radium dichloride ([223Ra]RaCl2), 223Ra was the first α-emitting isotope with FDA marketing authorization for the treatment of bone metastases, and it was examined as a potential for targeted radionuclide therapy employing NPs as carriers. This isotope does not have the translocation problem, which is an advantage; while 225Ac has a decay chain leading to the generation of daughter nuclides, 75% of the total alphas in the 223Ra are delivered within a few seconds (T1/2 = 4 s) [44,45,46].

3.3.1. Direct Radiolabeling

The fundamental restriction of 223Ra in clinical applications is the difficulty in binding the radioisotope to biomolecules in a stable way. This can be overcome by direct radiolabeling or by encapsulating 223Ra into NPs.
The encapsulation of this radioisotope in GdVO4 NPs was performed by Toro-Gonzalez et al., with two different methods. The first consisted in mixing a solution containing 223Ra evaporated to dryness using an infrared heatlamp and a hot plate with a GdCl3 solution and stirred for 10 min, followed by the dropwise addition of a Na3VO4 solution. In the second method, Na3VO4 was mixed with the radionuclides, followed by the addition of the GdCl3 solution dropwise.
Radiolabeled GdVO4 NPs were dialyzed against water to assess the encapsulation and to evaluate the radiochemical yield of the radioisotope and the leakage of the decay daughters. The radiochemical yield was obtained by measuring the initial activity and the activity lost during the synthesis and dialysis. For the first method, the results showed a loss of approximately 25% of the initial activity in the dialysate. With the second method, the results demonstrated a continuous increase in 223Ra in the dialysate activity, up to a maximum of 43.6 ± 2.4% for the NPs radiolabeled with the second method. The final radiochemical yields were 34.1 ± 2.9% and 72.3 ± 3.0%, respectively [32].
Liposomes are polymeric NPs can be directly radiolabeled with radionuclides by an ionophore-mediated process. The radionuclide was first added to a vial containing a Caionophore film, and the pH was adjusted to 7.4. Liposomes were added to the solution and incubated at 65 °C for 30 min. The addition of enediamine-N and Nl-tetraacetic acid (EDTA) in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) quenched the loading, and then the mixture was kept in the rest phase for 10 min. Purification was accomplished using size-exclusion chromatography with a PD-10 column. The researchers found that temperature was a significant parameter for the high uptake of the 223Ra into the liposomes. The rate of incorporation was <2% at 45 min, and it increased to 78 ± 6% in the final condition [33].
Nanomicelles are colloidal structures with a hydrophilic outer layer and a hydrophobic inner layer formed by amphiphilic monomers. Nanomicells are thermodynamically more stable than conventional micelles, and they are known for their excellent drug-delivery system.
Souza et al. synthesized nanomicelles of [223Ra]RaCl2 co-loaded with [198Au]AuNPs. Non-radioactive AuNPs were synthesized and irradiated for 12 h in an Argonauta reactor to produce [198Au]-AuNPs. Subsequently, the [223Ra]RaCl2 nanomicelles were synthesized, and a Pluronic F127 copolymer was dispersed while stirring. Next, [198Au]AuNPs were added to the solution and ultrasonicated for more than 2 min in an ice bath at 10 °C. The in vitro citotoxicity studies revealed a substantial increase in tumor-cell death when the treatments with both [223Ra]RaCl2 and [198Au]Au-NPs were combined in the same formulation, compared to the [223Ra]RaCl2 or [198Au]Au-NPs alone [35].
Iron-oxide NPs can be radiolabeled without with a chelator utilizing a heat-induced metal-ion-binding method, which avoids the use of a multi-step radiolabeled process by using a diagnostic radioisotope in the indirect approach [4].
Gholami et al. developed radiolabeled NPs with superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO) cores, commonly known as Feraheme® (FH) NPs, in which radioisotopes bind directly to the surface of the SPIO core. The therapeutic radioisotopes used were 223Ra, 177Lu, 90Y, and 64Cu. The study showed that the FH NPs could be radiolabeled with high RCY and RCP using both diagnostic radioisotopes with long-range beta emitters and therapeutic radioisotopes with short-range alpha emitters [36].
Gawęda et al. radiolabeled barium-ferrite nanoparticles (BaFe NPs) with 223Ra. Iron chloride and barium chloride were mixed in an 8:1 molar ratio (Fe3+:Ba2+), and then 223Ra chloride salt was added, followed by sodium hydroxide. The percentage of 223Ra incorporated was calculated from the ratio of the radioactivity retained inside the nanoparticles to the radioactivity of the 223Ra initially added, producing 61.3 ± 1.8% [37].
Suchánková et al. compared two different approaches to radiolabeling with hydroxyapatite NPs. The radionuclide was directly coupled with the surfaces of previously synthesized NPs in the first approach. After dispersing the NPs in a physiological saline solution, 223Ra was added. The samples were mixed for 1 h at room temperature and then washed thrice with saline. The second approach was used to incorporate radionuclides into the structures of nanoparticles by adding Ca(NO3)2 to demineralized water. Both methods showed high RCY (≥94%), demonstrating that they are both feasible strategies for labeling, with the caveat that the daughter radionuclides were not determined [38].
Graphene quantum dots (GQDs) were chosen from among carbon-based nanomaterials for direct radiolabeling with 223Ra. The radiolabeling process was simple; after the addition of EDC in a Britton–Robinson buffer in a GQD-FA solution, an aliquot of [223Ra]RaCl2 was added, and the mixture was heated under stirring at 90 °C for 1 h. To demonstrate the presence of radiolabeled NPs, X-ray spectroscopy (EDS), was performed after two and fourteen days of radiolabeling, associating the presence of 223Ra with the formation of 211Pb and 207Pb as products of 223Ra decay [39].
Piotrowska et al. radiolabeled nanozeolites with 223Ra by exchanging the Na+ with the 223Ra2+ cations in the zeolite structure. A 223Ra(NO3)2 solution was added to the nanozeolite sample, which was then sonicated in an ultrasound bath for 15 min and gently shaken for 2 h. Next, the suspension was centrifuged at 13,000 rpm for 10 min and separated from the supernatant. The findings suggested a successful radiolabeling, with a high affinity and stability of 223Ra [34]. Mokhodoeva et al. radiolabeled superparamagnetic iron-oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs) with 223Ra and reported an analysis of the 223Ra uptake by the Fe3O4 SPIONs. The results showed that the uptake speed of the radium was moderate, and 30–60 min were required for the radiolabeling with SPIONs, with yields of over 85%, ranging up to 99% [40].
Subsequently, the same research group studied the release of 223Ra, 211Bi, and 211Pb recoils from radiolabeled NPs [45]. The results showed the low release of all the isotopes from the NPs, depending on the method used to separate them (dialysis or centrifugation). With these experiments, the authors highlighted that false-positive results of radiolabeled NP stability can occur and, in particular, the recoiling progeny may induce artifacts. In conclusion, the authors suggested that in vitro stability tests should always be designed under real or very-similar-to-real conditions [45].

3.3.2. Discussion

The radiolabeling of 223Ra with NPs using BFCs is a complicated process due to the properties of the radioisotope; this incorporation can be achieved by the direct radiolabeling method. Studies highlight strategies that allow direct radiolabeling; however, certain restrictions are associated. For example, Radon-219 (219Rn) is a daughter isotope of 223Ra, whose in vivo redistribution is unknown. Further investigation into the biodistribution of 223Ra and its daughter isotopes is required for future clinical application.

4. Radiolabeling of NPs with Beta-Emitting Isotopes

Beta (β) emitters are the most commonly used radionuclides in therapy. These β-emitting radioisotopes have the largest particle range (≤12 mm) and lowest linear energy transfer (LET) (0.1–1.0 keV μm−1). The β particles emit electrons that interact with atoms by passing through tumor tissues and losing their energy, leading to the release of ionized and excited atoms, as well as free radicals, which cause single-strand breaks in DNA and cell damage. However, this damage can also affect healthy tissue around tumor sites [46,47,48]. The methods for radiolabeling NPs with alpha-emitting isotopes are summarized in Table 3.

4.1. Radiolabeling with Gold-198

The radionuclide Au-198 (198AuCl4) has a half-life of 2.7 d with cyclotron production and β and γ decay. The main advantage of the application of this isotope in nanomedicine is that the radiochemical compound is often the same element of the NP structure (AuNPs).

4.1.1. Direct Radiolabeling

Extensive studies of AuNPs have been carried out for a wide range of applications. Their characteristics, such as their easy synthesis process, the possibility of their functionalization, their inertness, and their peculiar optical properties, make them interesting candidates for both diagnostic and therapeutic purposes [114]. Indeed, most studies used AuNPs to synthesize 198AuNPs for radiation therapy (RT) with the goal of delivering a lethal dosage of radiation to tumor lesions while avoiding exposure to surrounding healthy tissues. The synthesis of 198Au-labeled NPs differs significantly from that with other isotopes. Most investigations are based on the neutron irradiation of the gold foil, which produces radiolabeled NPs. The gold foil is irradiated by a neutron flux from a 198Au reactor, and then dissolved in aqua regia, followed by the addition of HCl, after which it is allowed to evaporate the solvent.
This evaporation process is repeated three times, and then the specimen is left at room temperature for the crystallization of H198AuCl4·3H2O. Once the radioactive precursor is synthesized, the next step is conjugation with additional molecules to improve the specificity of the NPs.
Several molecules are used for this purpose: arabinoxylan (AX), a hemicellulosic material with a colon-specific uptake; gum arabic glycoprotein (GA), a plant extract approved by the FDA to target tumor cells; epigallocatechin-gallate (EGCg), which was shown to be beneficial in treating brain, prostate, cervical, and bladder cancers; mangiferin (MGF), a prostate-tumor-specific natural substance; cyclic arginine−glycine−aspartate peptide (RGD), known as a peptide that can specifically bind to integrin-αvβ3 expression in tumor angiogenesis; and, finally, human serum albumin (HSA) or apolipoprotein E (apoE).
Conjugation with these molecules often requires a reducing agent, such as N2H4 or NaBH4, to reduce Au3+ ions to Au0, stabilizing the isotope.
The characterization of NPs can be performed in different ways: by surface plasmon resonance (SPR), in which absorption at 526 nm is used to determine the shape and the particle size; by transmission-electron microscopy (TEM); by ultraviolet-visible spectrophotometry, in which an absorption band around 540 nm is characteristic of AuNPs; by high-resolution γ-ray spectrometry using a HPGe detector; or by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR).
The particle size is frequently measured using dynamic light scattering (DLS), and a DLS analysis of AuNPs revealed the formation of very small nanoparticles (12–18 nm), while Zetasizer Nano ZS confirmed the polydispersity index (PDI) of 0.106 [35,48,49,50,51,52,53,54].
The surface charges of nanoparticles are an important factor in influencing their biological properties. The biodistribution of AuNPs is affected due to surface charge, such as in the kidneys, positively charged particles are used to accumulate, while a high accumulation of negative and non-charged particles was shown in the liver [15]. Hirn et al. radiolabeled 198Au with 1.4-, 5-, 18-, 80-, and 200-nanometer negatively charged AuNPs and 2.8-nanometer positive charged AuNPs. The biodistribution of AuNP was measured by gamma spectrometry after 24 h of intravenous administration into rats. The results showed that the liver accumulation increased from 50% of 1.4-nanometer AuNPs to more than 99% of 200-nanometer NPs, while most other organs had small size-dependent accumulations of 18–200-nanometer AuNPs. However, the accumulation of AuNPs between 1.4 nm and 5 nm increased significantly with a decrease in the particle size, showing a linear relationship with the volumetric specific surface area [115,116].
The development of both nanobiological interfaces and their potential treatment requires an understanding of the in vivo effects of the surface chemistry of AuNPs. Wang et al. investigated the in vivo biodistribution, excretion, and toxicity of three different surface-charged glutathione-protected gold nanoclusters (AuNCs), but with equal hydrodynamic sizes. In addition, the authors analyzed the potential application of these nanoclusters in radiation therapy and tumor uptake. The findings revealed that the surface charge significantly affected the pharmacokinetics, specifically in terms of their renal excretion and accumulation in the liver, testes, kidneys, and spleen. The peripheral blood system was temporarily affected by positively charged clusters, while negatively charged Au NCs had lesser excretion and higher tumor uptake, implying the potential of NC-based therapeutics [117].

4.1.2. Discussion

As discussed above, a research reactor is needed to synthesize 198Au-labeled NPs. This approach allows radiolabeling with high radiochemical yields, but it can only be used during the synthesis of NPs.

4.2. Radiolabeling with Holmium-166

Holmium-166 (166Ho) is a radioisotope with a half-life of 26.9 h; it is used in gamma scintigraphy by combining the emission of therapeutic β particles with γ rays [118].
These features make 166Ho an ideal isotope for theragnostic purposes. Furthermore, 166Ho is a paramagnetic and electron-dense element that can be used for X-ray computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging [119,120,121].

4.2.1. Direct Radiolabeling

Holmium-acetylacetonate microspheres (HoAcAcMS) were studied by Bult et al. Once synthetized, the samples were irradiated with a thermal neutron flux of 5 × 1012 cm−2 s−1 for 3 or 6 h, and the radioactive 166Ho was left to decay closed in vials for one month. The degradation of the microspheres (the release of Ho3+ ions from HoAcAcMS) was evaluated by suspending 100 μL of 166HoAcAcMS in 2% Pluronic® F68 aqueous solution and incubation in test tubes containing an isotonic phosphate buffer. The test tubes were placed in a continuously shaken water bath at 37 °C and centrifuged at different times (1 day, 4 days, and 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 weeks). The supernatant was analyzed after six months of incubation in the buffer and showed a release below 0.5%, demonstrating the stability of 166HoAcAcMS. This was also confirmed in in vivo, by studies carried out in VX2-tumor-bearing rabbits, where no release of holmium was observed, and the microspheres remained intact in the tumor tissue for one month [111].
Electrospinning is a simple and low-cost technology for producing nanoparticle-embedded fibers with homogeneously dispersed NPs. Munaweera et al. incorporated non-radioactive holmium-165 (165Ho) iron-garnet nanoparticles (HoIGNPs) into a bandage by using the electrospinning method for neutron irradiation. The polymer fibers were stable following neutron activation, with no leakage of radioactive material [112].
The radiolabeling process can also be performed after synthesizing nanoparticles without using a chelator. Vimalnath et al. radiolabeled agglomerated IONPs by mixing them with a 166HoCl3 solution (obtained by radiative neutron capture) and stirring the mixture at room temperature for 60 min. The 166HoIONPs were separated from the supernatant, after which the unlabeled residue was purified by washing with a sterile solution. The findings demonstrated that a minimum amount of IONPs (5 mg of particles in 1 mL of reaction volume) achieved a radiolabeling yield of more than 95%. The yield was excessively low at pH levels below 5, whereas no significant changes were detected at pH levels between 5 and 10. As a result, the optimal pH was determined to be 7–8, which is advantageous, since it is close to the physiological pH [113].

4.2.2. Discussion

We reported the neutron irradiations and the electrospinning approach to radiolabel NPs with 166Ho. The neutron-irradiation method is effective but time-consuming, whereas electrospinning is simple and cost-efficient. However, both techniques led to a high radiochemical yield with a non-significant release of free 166Ho over time.

4.3. Radiolabeling with Yttrium-90

Yttrium-90 (90Y) is a β-emitter with a half-life of 64.1 h and a high average level of energy (2.27 MeV), making it ideal for radionuclide therapy for large tumors, since it can damage tumor cells up to a depth of 11 mm in soft tissue [122]. Nevertheless, significant damage can also occur to neighbor normal tissues.

4.3.1. Direct Radiolabeling

Magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) are found to be suitable for direct radiolabeling with 90Y. Radović et al. synthesized Fe3O4-MNPs and Fe3O4 functionalized polyethylene glycol 600 diacid (PEG600)-MNPs to compare their efficacy as radioactive vectors. The radiolabeling was achieved by mixing the NPs solution with 90YCl3 and stirring the reaction mixture for 1 h at room temperature. The results showed high radiolabeling yields for both MNPs: 97% for the naked Fe3O4 and 99% for the Fe3O4–PEG600 [55].
Ognjanovíc et al. used 90Y and 177Lu with IONP-coated citric acid (CA), poly(acrylic acid) (PAA), and poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG). The radiolabeling process was based on incubating the radionuclide with the IONPs for 30 min or 60 min. The iTLC confirmed that the radiolabeling yields were greater than 99% for every sample except for the 177LuPEG-IONP, regardless to the incubation time [56].
In another work, Radović et al. designed 90Y-labeled imidodiphosphate- and inositol-hexaphosphate-coated magnetic nanoparticles. Their iTLC analysis confirmed that the radiolabeling yield from the coated-MNPs was greater than 98% [57].
Soni et al. radiolabeled YPO4:Er3+−Yb3+ NPs, rare earth (RE) NPs, with 90YCl3 or 177LuCl3, without the use of any BFC. The binding equilibrium for both radioisotopes was achieved within 30 min of incubation at pH 6.5; after the purification, both formulations achieved a radiochemical purity of more than 95% [58].

4.3.2. Indirect Radiolabeling

Diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA) and DOTA are primarily used, as BFCs, for radiolabeling NPs with 90Y.
Li et al. used DTPA for the radiolabeling of liposomes. The liposomes were conjugated with DTPA in a chloroform solution. The chloroform was then removed by evaporation at 60 °C, water was added to obtain an aqueous solution, and 90YCl3 was added at room temperature for 30 min. The RCY was evaluated using a nanosep filter in a microfuge at 4000 rpm, and the results showed that more than 95% of the 90Y bound to the liposomes [59].
Buckway et al. used a N-(2-hydroxypropyl)-methacrylamide (HPMA) copolymer to synthesize polymeric NPs and radiolabeled them with DOTA. The HPMA-DOTA copolymerization was achieved using reversible addition–fragmentation-chain transfer (RAFT), after which 90YCl3 was added, and the solution was incubated for 1 h at 50 °C under nitrogen. EDTA was added to the solution after it reached room temperature to eliminate any free or loosely bound 90Y3+ ions. The results showed that DOTA may be a stable chelator for this radioisotope [60].

4.3.3. Discussion

As discussed above, the negative surface charging of nanoparticles is required for direct radiolabeling with positively charged 90Y3+. If the native NPs do not have a negative charge, they can be coated with multiple molecules without affecting their chemical–physical properties. Furthermore, different BFCs can effectively be used for indirect radiolabeling.

4.4. Radiolabeling with Lutetium-177

Lutetium-177 (177Lu) has a half-life of 6.7 days; it is considered ideal for the theragnostic emission of γ photons and β particles, which penetrate only 2 mm into tissues and, thus, spare normal neighboring tissues or cells from irradiation. In addition, 177Lu has been used in radio-synovectomy and hepatocellular carcinoma therapy, and it is currently used for several new treatments for cancers, including neuro-endocrine tumors [123] and prostate cancer [124].

4.4.1. Direct Radiolabeling

By modifying the surfaces of MNPs, to design potential theragnostic agents, these can be radiolabeled as chelator-free with high radiochemical purity and stability. Salvanou et al. radiolabeled alginic coated (MA) IONPs with 177Lu (177Lu–MA) and also stabilized them with a layer of polyethylene glycol (PEG) (177Lu-MA-PEG). The iTLC-SG analysis confirmed values of 95.2 ± 1.3% RCY for the 177Lu-MA and 93.6 ± 1.0% for the 177Lu-MA-PEG [61].
Poly-L-lysine, proline, and tryptophan can also be used for MNP coating. Mirković et al. fabricated poly-L-lysine coated MNPs (PLL-MNPs) and modified IONPs with proline (Pro-MF) and tryptophan (Trp-MF). These NPs were radiolabeled with two therapeutic radioisotopes, 177Lu and 131I. The radiolabeling yield was quantified by iTLC, which showed that the highest radiolabeling yield was for the PLL-MNPs (99% for both formulations), while the Pro-MF and Trp-MF yielded 59.5% and 45.6%, respectively, at room temperature, and 69.2%, and 70.3% at 80 °C [62].
Phosphates like imidodiphosphate (IDP) and inositol hexaphosphate (IHP), and phosphonates like methylene diphosphonate (MDP) and hydroxyethylidine diphosphonate (HEDP), were also used as coatings for MNPs.
Radović et al. radiolabeled 177Lu with both phosphates and phosphonate-coated MNPs. Their iTLC analysis confirmed a radiolabeling yield of 99% from the 177Lu-labeled phosphate-coated MNPs, and yields of 78.7 ± 0.7% and 75.0 ± 1.1% for the 177Lu-MDP-MNPs and 177Lu-HEDP-MNPs, respectively. The radiolabeling yield increased to 95% after the purification of the phosphonate-coated MNPs [63].
Joshi et al. recently published an interesting report on the radiolabeling of NaGdF4/Ho-Yb@m-SiO2 nanoparticles (UCNPs) with 177Lu, obtaining 98.4 ± 0.4% RCY, and studied their biodistribution in rats, showing no uptake of free 177Lu in bones up to 168 h [64].
Chakraborty et al. radiolabeled hydroxyapatite NPs with 177Lu. Their results showed a high radiolabeling yield (99.1 ± 0.2%), and no radioactivity of the free radioisotope was detected [66].
Finally, Azorín-Vega et al. radiolabeled Tyr3-octreotate-conjugated AuNPs with 177Lu. Their iTLC analysis confirmed radiochemical purity values of more than 98% [90].

4.4.2. Indirect Radiolabeling

Among the BFCs, 177Lu can form a stable coordination complex with DOTA or with its derivates. The radiolabeling process can be performed either by labeling NPs with 177Lu-BFC or by labeling BFC-conjugated NPs.
For the first strategy, the radiolabeling of DOTA with 177Lu required an incubation time at a high temperature (80–90 °C) and a purification step to remove the unbound 177Lu. Next, conjugation with AuNPs was performed in mild conditions under stirring for a few minutes. The results showed that DOTA can efficiently bind to AuNPs. Indeed, the radiochemical purity in all the published papers was >90% [84,85,86,87,88,89,90].
The second strategy was chosen by several other authors, who chose a very similar methodology.
The DOTA was not only used with AuNPs but also with several other types of NP, such as PLGA-NPs. To conjugate the chelator, lyophilized PLGA-NPs were dissolved in water, DMF, DIPEA solution, and carboxylate-activating agent (HATU). The DOTA was added subsequently, and the mixture was incubated under slow stirring for 2 h at room temperature. Next, a solution of 177LuCl3 was added in an acetate buffer (pH 7) to the DOTA-PLGA-NP solution and was then heated at 37 °C for 3 h, producing radiolabeled NPs with high radiochemical purity [70,71].
Mendoza-Nava et al. attached 177Lu to a DOTA-derivate, S-2-[4-Isothiocyanatobenzyl]-1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane tetraacetic acid (p-SCN-benzyl-DOTA)-conjugated-G4-PAMAM-(NH2)64 dendrimer. The size-exclusion radio-HPLC confirmed a level of radiochemical purity of more than 95% [73]. Two further examples were published by Mendoza-Nava et al. [69] and by Kovacs et al. [72]. Here, DOTA was bound to polyamidoamine (PAMAM) dendrimers, followed by an incubation of 1–1.5 h, and, subsequently, by the addition of 177LuCl3, and incubated at 37–50 °C for 20–60 min.
In addition, DOTA can be conjugated with NPs during the synthesis of particles, as demonstrated by Wang et al. when they radiolabeled DOTA-tri arginine-lipid with 177Lu [75].
Finally, Goos et al. functionalized a nanostar polymer (p(AEA-co-OEGA-co- [Gd3+]VDMD) with trans-cyclooctene (TCO) to enable the conjugation of nanostars with tetrazine-functionalized DOTA (Tz-DOTA). This two-step labeling approach was chosen to prevent the metal exchange of Gd3+ and 177Lu3+. First, the Tz-PEG7-DOTA was radiolabeled with 177Lu3+, and then it was reacted with star polymer to obtain a p([177Lu]Lu-DPAEA-co-OEGA-co-[Gd3+]VDMD) star polymer, with a high radiochemical yield (87%) and purity (>99%) [76].
Reconstituted high-density lipoproteins (rHDLs) are promising platforms for developing theragnostic systems due to their ability to transport and release drugs and imaging agents through the scavenger receptor (type B1 (SR-B1)) to tumor-targeting sites. Aranda-Lara et al. studied 177Lu-radiolabeled rHDLs, using DOTA as a chelator. The radiochemical yield was 85% before the purification (performed by centrifugation) and 99% after the purification. Moreover, these NPs showed high stability, with a radiochemical purity >95% after 24 h of incubation at 37 °C in saline and human serum [77].
Vats et al. developed 177Lu-labeled cyclic Asn–Gly–Arg peptide-tagged carbon nanospheres as potential radio-nanoprobes. The radiochemical yield was confirmed by an iTLC analysis at 80% [78].
Zhang et al. fabricated alpha-melanocyte-stimulating hormone (αMSH)-surface-engineered PEG-coated silica NPs and radiolabeled them with 177Lu by using DOTA as a chelator to target the melanocortin-1 receptor (MC1-R) in melanoma-tumor cells. The results showed a radiochemical yield of more than 95% [79].
Shultz et al. investigated the theragnostic effect of radiolabeled 177Lu and 177Lu-DOTA with functionalized metallofullerene (Gd3NC80) NPs (177Lu-Gd3NC80 and 177Lu-DOTA-f-Gd3NC80) in brachytherapy. The results showed radiopurity of 80%, while the in vivo stability study revealed some 177Lu-DOTA degradation or cleavage from the f-Gd3NC80 surface. Despite this level of in vivo degradation, this investigation demonstrated effective brachytherapy by comparing 177Lu-labeled f-Gd3NC80 to f-Gd3NC80 alone [80].
D’Huyvetter et al. designed 177Lu-nanobodies by conjugating DOTA and DTPA chelators to target HER2-positive breast cancer. Both formulations showed radiochemical purity of more than 98% in the iTLC analysis [81].
In addition, DTPA was used for liposomes. The conjugation between the chelator and the NPs was performed during the synthesis of the liposomes, which involved mixing the lipids in chloroform-methanol and dimyristoylphosphoethanolamine-DTPA (DMPE-DTPA) in two different molar ratios to achieve two formulations, with “high” DTPA loading and with “low” DTPA loading. The radiolabeling was performed by simply adding a solution of 177LuCl3 to the liposomal solutions and incubating the solutions at room temperature for 30 min. The RCY was higher than 80%, but a high amount of NPs was necessary. This was due to the higher amount of carrier-lutetium in this radionuclide, which resulted in a higher mass of lutetium per radioactivity, which led to achieving a lower SA [82].
Ge et al. reported that Fe3O4 NPs can be labeled with 177Lu using DP-PEG as a chelating agent. They also labeled these NPs with 99mTc for SPECT and with 68Ga for PET imaging. The RCY was approximately 50%, but the labeling was stable and did not modify the physical properties of the NPS [67].
Finally, 177Lu-labeled polyaminoamide (PAMAM) dendrimers using a DOTA-like bifunctional chelator and methylenepyridine-N-oxide pendant arm (DO3A-py(NO-C)) showed a high labeling yield, stability, and a rate of chemical purity of over 98% [74].

4.4.3. Radiolabeling by Encapsulation

The encapsulation of radioisotopes in nanoparticles may prevent biological degradation, and, as a result, lower concentrations may be sufficient to achieve the desired effects. Chakravarty et al. developed a human serum albumin (HSA)-mediated biomineralization process for the synthesis of intrinsically radiolabeled 177Lu2O3 nanoparticles entrapped in a protein scaffold (177Lu2O3-HSA nanocomposite). The radiochemical purity of the 177Lu2O3−HSA nanocomposite was determined by radio-thin-layer chromatography (radio-TLC), and a purity rate of more than 98% was achieved [65].
Arora et al. fabricated 177Lu-DOTA-TATE-loaded PLGA nanoparticles (NPs). The results showed that the encapsulation efficiency (EE) was between 77.3 ± 4.9% and 58.4 ± 5.3%, depending on the experimental condition. The authors showed that PLGA-NPs also have a slower release rate for the isotope [83].

4.4.4. Discussion

The direct method of radiolabeling NPs with 177Lu requires high temperatures and may disrupt the NPs; on the other hand, the indirect method may take a long time under acidic pH [124]. To overcome these limitations, the radiolabeling of NPs can be performed with 177Lu-DTPA. The encapsulation approach for radiolabeling is preferable because of its excellent yield and reproducibility under mild and physiological conditions.

4.5. Radiolabeling with Iodine-131

It is known that 131I, which has a radioactive decay half-life of 8.02 days, is the most commonly used β-particle-emitting radioisotope in nuclear medicine for treating thyroid cancer, neuroblastoma, and pheochromocytoma [125].
The emission of γ-rays makes it a potential radioisotope for molecular imaging [3]. The radiolabeling of NPs with iodine radioisotopes is based on halogen-nucleophilic exchange, which can be conducted directly with an oxidizing agent via the direct radioiodination of NPs, or indirectly, by employing prosthetic groups.

4.5.1. Direct Radiolabeling

Chen et al. radiolabeled palladium (Pd) nanosheets with 131I by using the direct method without using an oxidizing agent. The results showed a labeling efficiency of more than 98% [110].
Among the oxidizing agents, the 1,3,4,6-tetrachloro-3α,6α-diphenylglycouril (Iodogen) method and the N-chlorobenzenesulfonamide (chloramine-T) method are the frequently most used. The first is a less aggressive process based on the dissolution of Iodogen in an organic solvent and evaporated in the presence of a tube, remaining bound to the wall. The second is a strong oxidant that leads to radioiodination in a few seconds, but a reducing agent is required to stop the reaction. To control the oxidizing activity without affecting the biomolecules present in the solution, polystyrene beads are used to fix the activity; thus, the oxidizing reaction is stopped when the beads are removed from the solution [126].
The Iodogen method allows the radiolabeling of several types of NPs. İnce et al. synthesized the glucuronide derivative of thymoquinone (TQG) enzymatically, conjugated it with a synthesized MNP, and then radio-iodinated the mixture with 131I. The findings suggested that the nanoparticles were radio-iodinated with 131I with a yield of over 95% [92].
Er et al. determined intracellular uptake and in vivo photodynamic-therapy potential of Zn phthalocyanine-loaded 131I-labeled mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNP5) against pancreatic cancer cells. The radiolabeling efficiency was 95.5 ± 1.2% with a pH of 9 and a 60-min reaction time. Furthermore, the highest intracellular-uptake yields of the 131I-MSNP5 nanoparticles in the MIA PaCa-2, AsPC-1, and PANC-1 cells were determined as 43.9 ± 3.8%, 41.8 ± 0.2%, and 37.9 ± 1.3%, respectively, with 24 of incubation [93].
He et al. incorporated 131I into a PAMAM (G5.0) dendrimer to target thyroid carcinoma. The radiolabeling efficiencies of the 131I–PAMAM (G5.0) and 131I–PAMAM (G5.0) were 93 ± 1% and 85 ± 2%, respectively. The 131I–PAMAM (G5.0) exhibited small but significant changes in radiochemical purity as a function of time after labeling. The highest observed purity was 82 ± 2%. The 131I–PAMAM (G5.0)–VTP displayed larger changes in radiochemical purity as a function of time after labeling, with a maximum of 80 ± 2% [94].
Avcıbaşı et al. radiolabeled N-methacryloyl-l-phenylalanine (MAPA) containing poly(2-hydroxyethylmethacrylate) (HEMA)-based magnetic poly(HEMA–MAPA) nanobeads [mag-poly(HEMA–MAPA)] with 131I [131I-mag-poly(HEMA–MAPA)]. The binding yield of the 131I-mag-poly(HEMA–MAPA) was about 95–100% [91].
Zhu et al. synthesized a G5.NH2 PAMAM dendrimer modified with 3-(4′-hydroxyphenyl) propionic acid-OSu (HPAO) and folic acid (FA) linked with polyethylene glycol (PEG) and labeled with 131I. An iTLC was performed to evaluate the radiochemical purity and stability at different time points (0–1–3–27 h). The results showed a radiochemical purity of 97.7%, which remained at >90% on each occasion [95].
Zhang et al. synthesized 131I-labeled bovine serum albumin (BSA)-modified copper sulfide (CuS) NPs (131I-BSA@CuS), with attributes of both radiotherapy and PTT, as a therapeutic agent against anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (ATC). Their iTLC analysis confirmed a radiochemical purity 66–80% [103].
Chen et al. developed albumin-based gadolinium-oxide NPs (GdNPs) loaded with doxorubicin (DOX) and conjugated with bone-seeking alendronate (ALN) to treat malignant bone destruction. The abundance of tyrosine residues in the albumin molecule resulted in a high radiolabeling efficiency [107].
Using the chloramine-T method, Zhao et al. radiolabeled 131I to the surface of polydopamine (PDA)-coated SWCNT modified with PEG to increase blood-circulation half-life (SWCNT@PDA-PEG). The results showed a radiolabeling yield of approximately 90% [97]. Several other authors used the chloramine-T method [99,100,102,103], with RCY values varying from 55% to 90%, suggesting the need for the further purification of radiolabeled NPs from unbound iodine. As an alternative to chloramine-T, Liu et al. used NaClO4 as an oxidizing agent to oxidize iodine from I to I+. They labeled hollow copper-sulfide NPs with paclitaxel, thus combining phototermal, chemo- and radio-therapies [109].

4.5.2. Indirect Radiolabeling

The Bolton–Hunter reagent, the N-hydroxysuccinimide ester of iodinated p-hydroxyphenyl propionic acid, is the only BFC utilized for iodine radioisotopes. It is used to iodinate molecules that do not have tyrosine residues, allowing them to be radiolabeled with NPs.
Its precursor, 3-(4-hydroxyphenyl)propionic acid-OSu (HPAO), was also used to radiolabel NPs, particularly for the radiolabeling of polyethyleneimine-entrapped gold nanoparticles (Au PENPs) and PAMAM dendrimers. For the former, polyethyleneimine (PEI) was selected as a template for the further modification with PEG, chlorotoxin, a glioma-specific peptide (CTX), and HPAO, which were then used to entrap gold nanoparticles (Au NPs). Conjugation with HPAO was achieved by adding HPAO to the template after the modification with PEG and CTX, and stirring overnight. After trapping the AuNPs in the modified PEI,PENP-CTX was obtained. The radiolabeling process was performed by, first, mixing the Na131I solution with chloramine-T and PENPs-CTX with continuous stirring. The final mixture was incubated for 30 min at 37 °C and was then purified with a PD-10 desalting column. The radiochemical purity (determined by ITLC) was measured at different times to evaluate the radio-stability, showing a radiochemical purity of over 99%, remaining above 90% after 24 h in PBS at room temperature and in FBS at 37 °C [97,99].
Song et al. synthesized 131I-labeled dendrimers modified with the LyP-1 peptide as a multifunctional platform for single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging and radionuclide therapy for metastatic cancer. The iTLC analysis confirmed a radiochemical purity of more than 99% and radiochemical stability of more than 90% [96].
Finally, Ji et al. radiolabeled albumin nanospheres loaded with doxorubicin using a new chelating agent, namely N-succinimidyl-3-(2-pyridyldithiol)propionate (SPDP). Firstly, iodine was bound to a monoclonal antibody (anti-AFPMc), and then the radiolabeled antibody was linked to the NP via the SPDP cross-linker. It was not possible to use the resulting construct to perform chemo–radiotherapy for liver cancer. The results obtained from Balb/c mice with HepG2 xenografts showed improved tumor reduction compared with mice treated with doxorubicine alone [100].

4.5.3. Radiolabeling by Encapsulation

The chloramine-T method was used for labeling BSA encapsulated into the cores of liposomes. The encapsulation of the radionuclide was possible due to the capacity of the oxidized 131I2 to pass through the phospholipid bilayer of the liposome and react with the tyrosine residue present on the BSA. The oxidation was carried out by mixing the liposomes with K131I and chloramine-T. The solution was vortexed for 10 min, and then purified using a Sephadex G-100 column. The radiolabeling yield, measured by a gamma counter, was over 90% [106].
Sakr et al. synthesized polyethylene-glycol-capped silver nanoparticles doped with I-131 radionuclide (131I-doped Ag-PEG NPs). The radiolabeling yields and the encapsulation efficiency of the Ag-PEG NPs were studied at room temperature for up to 8 h. The maximum radiolabeling yield (98 ± 1%) was obtained after 3 h of stirring, and there was no 131I-leakage from the Ag-PEG NPs until 6 h post-synthesis [108].

4.5.4. Discussion

The radiolabeling of NPs with 131I typically involves the electrophilic aromatic substitution of phenolic or trialkylstannylated substrates using an oxidant agent, such as chloramine-T or Iodogen [127]. With these methods, high radiochemical yields are obtained. The main limitation of iodine-labeled NPs is deiodination, with the undesired accumulation of radionuclides in normal tissues, such as the thyroid and stomach. Therefore, the fabrication of stable and multifunctional nanocarriers for the efficient delivery of radioactive iodine to targets is required [127].

5. General Conclusions

There has been a significant increase in interest in integrated research at the interface of nuclear medicine and nanotechnology over the last two decades [126,128]. This developing convergent science can potentially overcome the limitations of current radionuclide therapy. This review highlights the radiolabeling of NPs with Auger’s electron-emitting isotopes, alpha-emitting isotopes, and beta-emitting isotopes by direct, indirect, and encapsulation methods. Nanostructures with linked Auger’s electron emitters have a substantial advantage over traditionally labeled biomolecules, delivering significantly more radioactivity to targeted tissues. This is important for Auger’s electron therapy since it needs considerably higher radionuclide activity to achieve a therapeutic effect. Therapeutic β-emitting radioisotopes are found in various organic, inorganic, and hybrid forms of nanomaterials. Radiolabeling is typically accomplished through the use of a bifunctional chelator or through the formation of covalent bonds. The easy availability of β-emitters and successful results may enable the development of various nanoplatforms for effective theragnostic research. The α-particle-incorporated nanomaterials have received less attention because of their higher production costs and lower availability. The encapsulation of radionuclides within nanostructures was preferred for generating stable therapeutic agents because commonly employed chelating agents or labeling processes typically cannot sequester the α-emitter and its decay products.
Nanoparticles can be radiolabeled with radioisotopes by multiple methods to allow multimodal therapy. The specific therapeutic application of NPs is based on the most appropriate choice of nanomaterials and isotopes, and the most suitable radiolabeling method. Indeed, all these factors influence the results and the possible application of the method to humans.
As shown in this review, different methods for radiolabeling NPs have been proposed. Therefore, it is essential to standardize these processes and develop reproducible protocols to apply them for clinical purposes.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization—A.S., M.V. and V.B. Methodology—P.N., C.L. and A.S. Writing, first draft—M.V. and V.B. Final writing, review, and editing of paper—A.S., C.L. and P.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro, grant number AIRC IG-Grant 20411, and supported by Nuclear Medicine Discovery.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All papers and data are available upon request to M.V.

Acknowledgments

V.B. is a student on the doctoral course, “Pre-Clinical and Clinical Research in Biomedical and Surgical Sciences”, in the Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine; P.N. is a student on the doctoral course, “Translational Medicine and Oncology”, in the Department of Medical–Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine. Both are based at the “Sapienza” University of Rome, Italy.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Goel, M.; Mackeyev, Y.; Krishnan, S. Radiolabeled nanomaterial for cancer diagnostics and therapeutics: Principles and concepts. Cancer Nanotechnol. 2023, 1, 15. [Google Scholar]
  2. Dai, W.; Zhang, J.; Wang, Y.; Jiao, C.; Song, Z.; Ma, Y.; Ding, Y.; Zhang, Z.; He, X. Radiolabeling of Nanomaterials: Advantages and Challenges. Front. Toxicol. 2021, 3, 753316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Varani, M.; Bentivoglio, V.; Lauri, C.; Ranieri, D.; Signore, A. Methods for Radiolabelling Nanoparticles: SPECT Use (Part 1). Biomolecules 2022, 12, 1522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Bentivoglio, V.; Varani, M.; Lauri, C.; Ranieri, D.; Signore, A. Methods for Radiolabelling Nanoparticles: PET Use (Part 2). Biomolecules 2022, 12, 1517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Ku, A.; Facca, V.J.; Cai, Z.; Reilly, R.M. Auger electrons for cancer therapy—A review. EJNMMI Radiopharm. Chem. 2019, 4, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Zhou, M.; Zhao, J.; Tian, M.; Song, S.; Zhang, R.; Gupta, S.; Tan, D.; Shen, H.; Ferrari, M.; Li, C. Radio-photothermal therapy mediated by a single compartment nanoplatform depletes tumor-initiating cells and reduces lung metastasis in the orthotopic 4T1 breast tumor model. Nanoscale 2015, 7, 9438–9447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Gaikwad, G.; Rohra, N.; Kumar, C.; Jadhav, S.; Sarma, H.D.; Borade, L.; Chakraborty, S.; Bhagwat, S.; Dandekar, P.; Jain, R.; et al. A facile strategy for synthesis of a broad palette of intrinsically radiolabeled chitosan nanoparticles for potential use in cancer theranostics. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2021, 63, 1773–2247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhou, H.; Zhang, Q.; Cheng, Y.; Xiang, L.; Shen, G.; Wu, X.; Cai, H.; Li, D.; Zhu, H.; Zhang, R.; et al. 64Cu-labeled melanin nanoparticles for PET/CT and radionuclide therapy of tumor. Nanomedicine 2020, 29, 102248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gholami, Y.H.; Josephson, L.; Akam, E.A.; Caravan, P.; Wilks, M.Q.; Pan, X.Z.; Maschmeyer, R.; El Kolnick, A.; Fakhri, G.; Normandin, M.D.; et al. A Chelate-Free Nano-Platform for Incorporation of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Isotopes. Int. J. Nanomed. 2020, 15, 31–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Silva, W.M.; Ribeiro, H.; Taha-Tijerina, J.J. Potential Production of Theranostic Boron Nitride Nanotubes (64Cu-BNNTs) Radiolabeled by Neutron Capture. Nanomaterial 2021, 11, 2907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Xie, Y.; Riedinger, A.; Prato, M.; Casu, A.; Genovese, A.; Guardia, P.; Sottini, S.; Sangregorio, C.; Miszta, K.; Ghosh, S.; et al. Copper sulfide nanocrystals with tunable composition by reduction of covellite nanocrystals with Cu+ ions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 17630–17637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Riedinger, A.; Avellini, T.; Curcio, A.; Asti, M.; Xie, Y.; Tu, R.; Marras, S.; Lorenzoni, A.; Rubagotti, S.; Iori, M.; et al. Post-Synthesis Incorporation of ⁶⁴Cu in CuS Nanocrystals to Radiolabel Photothermal Probes: A Feasible Approach for Clinics. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 15145–15151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Reissig, F.; Zarschler, K.; Hübner, R.; Pietzsch, H.J.; Kopka, K.; Mamat, C. Sub-10 nm Radiolabeled Barium Sulfate Nanoparticles as Carriers for Theranostic Applications and Targeted Alpha Therapy. ChemistryOpen 2020, 9, 797–805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Cipreste, M.F.; de Rezende, M.R.; Hneda, M.L.; Peres, A.M.; Cotta, A.A.C.; de Carvalho Teixeira, V.; de Almeida Macedo, W.A.; Barros de Sousa, E.M. Functionalized-radiolabeled hydroxyapatite/tenorite nanoparticles as theranostic agents for osteosarcoma. Ceram. Int. 2018, 44, 17800–17811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Rossin, R.; Pan, D.; Qi, K.; Turner, J.L.; Sun, X.; Wooley, K.L.; Welch, M.J. 64Cu-labeled folate-conjugated shell cross-linked nanoparticles for tumor imaging and radiotherapy: Synthesis, radiolabeling, and biologic evaluation. J. Nucl. Med. 2005, 46, 1210–1218. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  16. Capriotti, G.; Piccardo, A.; Giovannelli, E.; Signore, A. Targeting copper in cancer imaging and therapy: A new theragnostic agent. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 12, 223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Poty, S.; Francesconi, L.C.; McDevitt, M.R.; Morris, M.J.; Lewis, J.S. α-Emitters for Radiotherapy: From Basic Radiochemistry to Clinical Studies-Part 1. J. Nucl. Med. 2018, 59, 878–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Hamoudeh, M.; Kamleh, M.A.; Diab, R.; Fessi, H. Radionuclide delivery systems for nuclear imaging and radiotherapy of cancer. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2008, 60, 1329–1346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Dziawer, L.; Koźmiński, P.; Męczyńska-Wielgosz, S.; Pruszyński, M.; Łyczko, M.; Wąs, B.; Celichowski, G.; Grobelny, J.; Jastrzębski, J.; Bilewicz, A. Gold nanoparticle bioconjugates labelled with 211At for targeted alpha therapy. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 41024–41032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Dziawer, Ł.; Majkowska-Pilip, A.; Gaweł, D.; Godlewska, M.; Pruszyński, M.; Jastrzębski, J.; Wąs, B.; Bilewicz, A. Trastuzumab-Modified Gold Nanoparticles Labeled with 211At as a Prospective Tool for Local Treatment of HER2-Positive Breast Cancer. Nanomaterial 2019, 9, 632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Kato, H.; Huang, X.; Kadonaga, Y.; Katayama, D.; Ooe, K.; Shimoyama, A.; Kabayama, K.; Toyoshima, A.; Shinohara, A.; Hatazawa, J.; et al. Intratumoral administration of astatine-211-labeled gold nanoparticle for alpha therapy. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2021, 19, 223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Liu, Y.; Zhou, Z.; Feng, Y.; Zhao, X.G.; Vaidyanathan, G.; Zalutsky, M.R.; Vo-Dinh, T. Gold Nanostars: A novel platform for developing 211At-labeled agents for targeted alpha-particle therapy. Int. J. Nanomed. 2021, 16, 7297–7305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Kucka, J.; Hrubý, M.; Konák, C.; Kozempel, J.; Lebeda, O. Astatination of nanoparticles containing silver as possible carriers of 211At. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 2006, 64, 201–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Cędrowska, E.; Pruszyński, M.; Gawęda, W.; Żuk, M.; Krysiński, P.; Bruchertseifer, F.; Morgenstern, A.; Karageorgou, M.A.; Bouziotis, P.; Bilewicz, A. Trastuzumab Conjugated Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles Labeled with 225Ac as a Perspective Tool for Combined α-Radioimmunotherapy and Magnetic Hyperthermia of HER2-Positive Breast Cancer. Molecules 2020, 25, 1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Sofou, S.; Thomas, J.L.; Lin, H.Y.; McDevitt, M.R.; Scheinberg, D.A.; Sgouros, G. Engineered liposomes for potential alphMatsa-particle therapy of metastatic cancer. J. Nucl. Med. 2004, 45, 253–260. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  26. McLaughlin, M.F.; Woodward, J.; Boll, R.A.; Wall, J.S.; Rondinone, A.J.; Kennel, S.J.; Mirzadeh, S.; Robertson, J.D. Gold-coated lanthanide phosphate nanoparticles for targeted alpha generator radiotherapy. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e54531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Woodward, J.; Kennel, S.J.; Stuckey, A.; Osborne, D.; Wall, J.; Rondinone, A.J.; Standaert, R.F.; Mirzadeh, S. LaPO4 nanoparticles doped with actinium-225 that partially sequester daughter radionuclides. Bioconjug. Chem. 2011, 22, 766–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Salvanou, E.A.; Stellas, D.; Tsoukalas, C.; Mavroidi, B.; Paravatou-Petsotas, M.; Kalogeropoulos, N.; Xanthopoulos, S.; Denat, F.; Laurent, G.; Bazzi, R.; et al. A Proof-of-concept study on the therapeutic potential of Au nanoparticles radiolabeled with the Alpha-Emitter Actinium-225. Pharmaceutics 2020, 12, 188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Ruggiero, A.; Villa, C.H.; Holland, J.P.; Sprinkle, S.R.; May, C.; Lewis, J.S.; Scheinberg, D.A.; McDevitt, M.R. Imaging and treating tumor vasculature with targeted radiolabeled carbon nanotubes. Int. J. Nanomed. 2010, 5, 783–802. [Google Scholar]
  30. Mulvey, J.J.; Villa, C.H.; McDevitt, M.R.; Escorcia, F.E.; Casey, E.; Scheinberg, D.A. Self-assembly of carbon nanotubes and antibodies on tumours for targeted amplified delivery. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2013, 8, 763–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Hernández-Jiménez, T.; Ferro-Flores, G.; Morales-Ávila, E.; Isaac-Olivé, K.; Ocampo-García, B.; Aranda-Lara, L.; Santos-Cuevas, C.; Luna-Gutiérrez, M.; De Nard, L.; Rosato, A.; et al. 225Ac-rHDL Nanoparticles: A Potential Agent for Targeted Alpha-Particle Therapy of Tumors Overexpressing SR-BI Proteins. Molecules 2022, 7, 2156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Toro-González, M.; Dame, A.N.; Mirzadeh, S.; Rojas, J.V. Encapsulation and retention of 225Ac, 223Ra, 227Th, and decay daughters in zircon-type gadolinium vanadate nanoparticles. Radiochim. Acta 2020, 12, 967–977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Henriksen, G.; Schoultz, B.W.; Michaelsen, T.E.; Bruland, Ø.S.; Larsen, R.H. Sterically stabilized liposomes as a carrier for alpha-emitting radium and actinium radionuclides. Nucl Med Biol 2004, 31, 441–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Piotrowska, A.; Leszczuk, E.; Bruchertseifer, F.; Morgenstern, A.; Bilewicz, A. Functionalized NaA nanozeolites labeled with 224, 225Ra for targeted alpha therapy. J. Nanopart. Res. 2013, 15, 2082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Souza, B.N.R.F.; Ribeiro, E.R.F.R.; da Silva de Barros, A.O.; Pijeira, M.S.O.; Kenup-Hernandes, H.O.; Ricci-Junior, E.; Diniz Filho, J.F.S.; Dos Santos, C.C.; Alencar, L.M.R.; Attia, M.F.; et al. Nanomicelles of radium dichloride [223Ra]RaCl2 co-loaded with radioactive gold [198Au]Au nanoparticles for targeted alpha-Beta radionuclide therapy of osteosarcoma. Polymer 2022, 14, 14054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Gholami, Y.H.; Maschmeyer, R.; Kuncic, Z. Radio-enhancement effects by radiolabeled nanoparticles. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 14346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Gawęda, W.; Pruszyński, M.; Cędrowska, E.; Rodak, M.; Majkowska-Pilip, A.; Gaweł, D.; Bruchertseifer, F.; Morgenstern, A.; Bilewicz, A. Trastuzumab modified barium ferrite magnetic nanoparticles labeled with radium-223: A new potential radiobioconjugate for alpha radioimmunotherapy. Nanomaterial 2020, 10, 2067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Suchánková, P.; Kukleva, E.; Nykl, E.; Nykl, P.; Sakmár, M.; Vlk, M.; Kozempel, J. Hydroxyapatite and titanium dioxide nanoparticles: Radiolabelling and in vitro stability of prospective theranostic nanocarriers for 223Ra and 99mTc. Nanomaterial 2020, 10, 1632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Pijeira, M.S.O.; de Menezes, A.S.; Fechine, P.B.A.; Shah, S.Q.; Ilem-Ozdemir, D.; López, E.O.; Maricato, J.T.; Rosa, D.S.; Ricci-Junior, E.; Junior, S.A.; et al. Folic acid-functionalized graphene quantum dots: Synthesis, characterization, radiolabeling with radium-223 and antiviral effect against Zika virus infection. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2022, 180, 91–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Mokhodoeva, O.; Vlk, M.; Málková, E.; Kukleva, E.; Mičolová, P.; Štamberg, K.; Šlouf, M.; Dzhenloda, R.; Kozempel, J. Study of 223 Ra uptake mechanism by Fe 3 O 4 nanoparticles: Towards new prospective theranostic SPIONs. J. Nanopart. Res. 2016, 18, 301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Tafreshi, N.K.; Pandya, D.N.; Tichacek, C.J.; Budzevich, M.M.; Wang, Z.; Reff, J.N.; Engelman, R.W.; Boulware, D.C.; Chiappori, A.A.; Strosberg, J.R.; et al. Preclinical evaluation of [225Ac] Ac-DOTA-TATE for treatment of lung neuroendocrine neoplasms. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2021, 48, 3408–3421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Morgenstern, A.; Apostolidis, C.; Kratochwil, C.; Sathekge, M.; Krolicki, L.; Bruchertseifer, F. An overview of targeted alpha therapy with 225-actinium and 213-bismuth. Curr. Radiopharm. 2018, 11, 200–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Sciuto, R.; Rea, S.; Ungania, S.; Testa, A.; Dini, V.; Tabocchini, M.A.; Patrono, C.; Soriani, A.; Palma, V.; Marconi, R.; et al. The role of dosimetry and biological effects in metastatic castration–resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients treated with 223Ra: First in human study. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2021, 40, 281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Brito, A.E.; Etchebehere, E. Radium-223 as an approved modality for treatment of bone metastases. Semin. Nucl. Med. 2020, 2, 177–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Kozempel, J.; Sakmár, M.; Janská, T.; Vlk, M. Study of 211Bi and 211Pb Recoils Release from 223Ra Labelled TiO2 Nanoparticles. Materials 2022, 16, 343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Pellico, J.; Gawne, P.J.; de Rosales, R.T.M. Radiolabelling of nanomaterials for medical imaging and therapy. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2021, 50, 3355–3423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Hong, H.; Zhang, Y.; Sun, J.; Cai, W. Molecular imaging and therapy of cancer with radiolabeled nanoparticles. Nano Today 2009, 4, 399–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Khan, M.K.; Minc, L.D.; Nigavekar, S.S.; Kariapper, M.S.; Nair, B.M.; Schipper, M.; Cook, A.C.; Lesniak, W.G.; Balogh, L.P. Fabrication of {198Au0} radioactive composite nanodevices and their use for nanobrachytherapy. Nanomedicine 2008, 4, 57–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Chanda, N.; Kan, P.; Watkinson, L.D.; Shukla, R.; Zambre, A.; Carmack, T.L.; Engelbrecht, H.; Lever, J.R.; Katti, K.; Fent, G.M.; et al. Radioactive gold nanoparticles in cancer therapy: Therapeutic efficacy studies of GA-198AuNP nanoconstruct in prostate tumor-bearing mice. Nanomedicine 2010, 6, 201–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Shukla, R.; Chanda, N.; Zambre, A.; Upendran, A.; Katti, K.; Kulkarni, R.R.; Nune, S.K.; Casteel, S.W.; Smith, C.J.; Vimal, J.; et al. Laminin receptor specific therapeutic gold nanoparticles (198AuNP-EGCg) show efficacy in treating prostate cancer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 12426–12431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Al-Yasiri, A.Y.; Khoobchandani, M.; Cutler, C.S.; Watkinson, L.; Carmack, T.; Smith, C.J.; Kuchuk, M.; Loyalka, S.K.; Lugão, A.B.; Katti, K.V. Mangiferin functionalized radioactive gold nanoparticles (MGF-198AuNPs) in prostate tumor therapy: Green nanotechnology for production, in vivo tumor retention and evaluation of therapeutic efficacy. Dalton. Trans. 2017, 46, 14561–14571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Chakravarty, R.; Chakraborty, S.; Guleria, A.; Kumar, C.; Kunwar, A.; Nair, V.K.V.; Sarma, H.D.; Dash, A. Clinical scale synthesis of intrinsically radiolabeled and cyclic RGD peptide functionalized 198Au nanoparticles for targeted cancer therapy. Nucl. Med. Biol. 2019, 72–73, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Schäffler, M.; Sousa, F.; Wenk, A.; Sitia, L.; Hirn, S.; Schleh, C.; Haberl, N.; Violatto, M.; Canovi, M.; Andreozzi, P.; et al. Blood protein coating of gold nanoparticles as potential tool for organ targeting. Biomaterials 2014, 35, 3455–3466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Rambanapasi, C.; Barnard, N.; Grobler, A.; Buntting, H.; Sonopo, M.; Jansen, D.; Jordaan, A.; Steyn, H.; Zeevaart, J.R. Dual radiolabeling as a technique to track nanocarriers: The case of gold nanoparticles. Molecules 2015, 20, 12863–12879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Radović, M.; Calatayud, M.P.; Goya, G.F.; Ibarra, M.R.; Antić, B.; Spasojević, V.; Nikolić, N.; Janković, D.; Mirković, M.; Vranješ-Đurić, S. Preparation and in vivo evaluation of multifunctional ⁹⁰Y-labeled magnetic nanoparticles designed for cancer therapy. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 2015, 103, 126–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Ognjanović, M.; Radović, M.; Mirković, M.; Prijović, Ž.; Puerto Morales, M.D.; Čeh, M.; Vranješ-Đurić, S.; Antić, B. 99mTc-, 90Y-, and 177Lu-Labeled Iron Oxide Nanoflowers Designed for Potential Use in Dual Magnetic Hyperthermia/Radionuclide Cancer Therapy and Diagnosis. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 41109–41117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Radović, M.; Mirković, M.; Perić, M.; Janković, D.; Vukadinović, A.; Stanković, D.; Petrović, Đ.; Bošković, M.; Antić, B.; Marković, M.; et al. Design and preparation of 90Y-labeled imidodiphosphate- and inositol hexaphosphate-coated magnetic nanoparticles for possible medical applications. J. Mater. Chem. B 2017, 5, 8738–8747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Soni, A.K.; Yadav, K.K.; Singh, B.P.; Joshi, R.; Chakraborty, S.; Chakravarty, R.; Nagaraja, N.K.; Singh, D.K.; Kain, V.; Dash, A.; et al. Smart YPO4:Er–Yb Nanophosphor for Optical Heating, Hyperthermia, Security Ink, Cancer Endoradiotherapy, and Uranyl Recovery. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2021, 4, 850–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Li, L.; Wartchow, C.A.; Danthi, S.N.; Shen, Z.; Dechene, N.; Pease, J.; Choi, H.S.; Doede, T.; Chu, P.; Ning, S.; et al. A novel antiangiogenesis therapy using an integrin antagonist or anti-Flk-1 antibody coated 90Y-labeled nanoparticles. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys 2004, 58, 1215–1227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Buckway, B.; Frazier, N.; Gormley, A.J.; Ray, A.; Ghandehari, H. Gold nanorod-mediated hyperthermia enhances the efficacy of HPMA copolymer-90Y conjugates in treatment of prostate tumors. Nucl. Med. Biol. 2014, 41, 282–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Salvanou, E.A.; Kolokithas-Ntoukas, A.; Liolios, C.; Xanthopoulos, S.; Paravatou-Petsotas, M.; Tsoukalas, C.; Avgoustakis, K.; Bouziotis, P. Preliminary Evaluation of Iron Oxide Nanoparticles Radiolabeled with 68Ga and 177Lu as Potential Theranostic Agents. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 2490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Mirković, M.; Milanović, Z.; Perić, M.; Vranješ-Đurić, S.; Ognjanović, M.; Antić, B.; Kuraica, M.; Krstić, I.; Kubovcikova, M.; Antal, I.; et al. Design and preparation of proline, tryptophan, and poly-l-lysine functionalized magnetic nanoparticles and their radiolabeling with 131I and 177Lu for potential theranostic use. Int. J. Pharm. 2022, 628, 122288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Radovic, M.; Mirković, M.; Nikolić, A.; Kuraica, M.; Iskrenović, P.; Milanović, Z.; Vranjes-Durić, S.; Perić, M. Transmittance Measurements in Non-alternating Magnetic Field as Reliable Method for Determining of Heating Properties of Phosphate and Phosphonate Coated Fe3O4 Magnetic Nanoparticles. J. Inorg Organomet. Polym. Mater. 2021, 31, 4426–4433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Joshi, R.; Patra, S.; Srivastava, M.; Singh, B.P.; Chakraborty, A.; Shelar, S.B.; Chakravarty, R.; Chakraborty, S.; Ningthoujam, R.S. Mesoporous NaGdF4/Ho−Yb@m-SiO2 Upconversion Nanophosphors as a Potent Theranostic Probe. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2022, 5, 12962–12971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Chakravarty, R.; Guleria, A.; Jadhav, S.; Kumar, C.; Debnath, A.K.; Sarma, H.D.; Chakraborty, S. Bioinspired Synthesis of Intrinsically 177-Lu Hybrid Nanoparticles for Potential Cancer Therapy. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2020, 59, 22492–22500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Chakraborty, S.; Das, T.; Sarma, H.D.; Venkatesh, M.; Banerjee, S. Preparation and preliminary studies on 177Lu-labeled hydroxyapatite particles for possible use in liver cancer therapy. Nucl. Med. Biol. 2008, 35, 589–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Ge, J.; Chen, L.; Huang, B.; Gao, Y.; Zhou, D.; Zhou, Y.; Chen, C.; Wen, L.; Li, Q.; Zeng, J.; et al. Anchoring Group-Mediated Radiolabeling of Inorganic Nanoparticles-A Universal Method for Constructing Nuclear Medicine Imaging Nanoprobes. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14, 8838–8846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Gibbens-Bandala, B.; Morales-Avila, E.; Ferro-Flores, G.; Santos-Cuevas, C.; Luna-Gutiérrez, M.; Ramírez-Nava, G.; Ocampo-García, B. Synthesis and Evaluation of 177Lu-DOTA-DN(PTX)-BN for Selective and Concomitant Radio and Drug-Therapeutic Effect on Breast Cancer Cells. Polymer 2019, 11, 1572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Mendoza-Nava, H.; Ferro-Flores, G.; de Maria Ramírez, F.; Ocampo-García, B.; Santos-Cuevas, C.; Aranda-Lara, L.; Azorín-Vega, E.; Morales-Avila, E.; Isaac-Olivé, K. 177Lu-Dendrimer Conjugated to Folate and Bombesin with Gold Nanoparticles in the Dendritic Cavity: A Potential Theranostic Radiopharmaceutical.J. Nanomater. 2016, 11, 1687–4110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Trujillo-Nolasco, R.M.; Morales-Avila, E.; Ocampo-García, B.E.; Ferro-Flores, G.; Gibbens-Bandala, B.V.; Escudero-Castellanos, A.; Isaac-Olive, K. Preparation and in vitro evaluation of radiolabeled HA-PLGA nanoparticles as novel MTX delivery system for local treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 2019, 103, 109766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Gibbens-Bandala, B.; Morales-Avila, E.; Ferro-Flores, G.; Santos-Cuevas, C.; Meléndez-Alafort, L.; Trujillo-Nolasco, M.; Ocampo-García, B. 177Lu-Bombesin-PLGA (paclitaxel): A targeted controlled-release nanomedicine for bimodal therapy of breast cancer. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 2019, 105, 110043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Kovacs, L.; Tassano, M.; Cabrera, M.; Zamboni, C.B.; Fernández, M.; Anjos, R.M.; Cabral, P. Development of (177)Lu-DOTA-Dendrimer and Determination of Its Effect on Metal and Ion Levels in Tumor Tissue. Cancer Biother. Radiopharm. 2015, 30, 405–409. [Google Scholar]
  73. Mendoza-Nava, H.; Ferro-Flores, G.; Ramírez, F.M.; Ocampo-García, B.; Santos-Cuevas, C.; Azorín-Vega, E.; Jiménez-Mancilla, N.; Luna-Gutiérrez, M.; Isaac-Olivé, K. Fluorescent, Plasmonic, and Radiotherapeutic Properties of the 177Lu-Dendrimer-AuNP-Folate-Bombesin Nanoprobe Located Inside Cancer Cells. Mol. Imaging 2017, 16, 1536012117704768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Laznickova, A.; Biricova, V.; Laznicek, M.; Hermann, P. Mono(pyridine-N-oxide) DOTA analog and its G1/G4-PAMAM dendrimer conjugates labeled with 177Lu: Radiolabeling and biodistribution studies. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 2014, 84, 70–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Wang, W.; Fliedner, F.P.; Hansen, A.E.; Eliasen, R.; Melander, F.; Kjaer, A.; Andresen, T.L.; Jensen, A.I.; Henriksen, J.R. Preclinical evaluation of cationic DOTA-triarginine-lipid conjugates for theranostic liquid brachytherapy. Nanotheranostics 2020, 4, 142–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Goos, J.A.C.M.; Cho, A.; Carter, L.M.; Dilling, T.R.; Davydova, M.; Mandleywala, K.; Puttick, S.; Gupta, A.; Price, W.S.; Quinn, J.F.; et al. Delivery of polymeric nanostars for molecular imaging and endoradiotherapy through the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect. Theranostics 2020, 10, 567–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Aranda-Lara, L.; Isaac-Olivé, K.; Ocampo-García, B.; Ferro-Flores, G.; González-Romero, C.; Mercado-López, A.; García-Marín, R.; Santos-Cuevas, C.; Estrada, J.A.; Morales-Avila, E. Engineered rHDL Nanoparticles as a Suitable Platform for Theranostic Applications. Molecules 2022, 27, 7046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Vats, K.; Satpati, A.K.; Sharma, R.; Sarma, H.D.; Satpati, D.; Dash, A. 177Lu-labeled cyclic Asn-Gly-Arg peptide tagged carbon nanospheres as tumor targeting radio-nanoprobes. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2018, 152, 173–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Zhang, X.; Chen, F.; Turker, M.Z.; Ma, K.; Zanzonico, P.; Gallazzi, F.; Shah, M.A.; Prater, A.R.; Wiesner, U.; Bradbury, M.S.; et al. Targeted melanoma radiotherapy using ultrasmall 177Lu-labeled α-melanocyte stimulating hormone-functionalized core-shell silica nanoparticles. Biomaterials 2020, 241, 119858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Shultz, M.D.; Wilson, J.D.; Fuller, C.E.; Zhang, J.; Dorn, H.C.; Fatouros, P.P. Metallofullerene-based nanoplatform for brain tumor brachytherapy and longitudinal imaging in a murine orthotopic xenograft model. Radiology 2011, 261, 136–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  81. D’Huyvetter, M.; Aerts, A.; Xavier, C.; Vaneycken, I.; Devoogdt, N.; Gijs, M.; Impens, N.; Baatout, S.; Ponsard, B.; Muyldermans, S.; et al. Development of 177Lu-nanobodies for radioimmunotherapy of HER2-positive breast cancer: Evaluation of different bifunctional chelators. Contrast Media Mol. Imaging 2012, 7, 254–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Helbok, A.; Decristoforo, C.; Dobrozemsky, G.; Rangger, C.; Diederen, E.; Stark, B.; Prassl, R.; von Guggenberg, E. Radiolabeling of lipid-based nanoparticles for diagnostics and therapeutic applications: A comparison using different radiometals. J. Liposome Res. 2010, 20, 219–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Arora, G.; Shukla, J.; Ghosh, S.; Maulik, S.K.; Malhotra, A.; Bandopadhyaya, G. PLGA nanoparticles for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy of neuroendocrine tumors: A novel approach towards reduction of renal radiation dose. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e34019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Yook, S.; Cai, Z.; Lu, Y.; Winnik, M.A.; Pignol, J.P.; Reilly, R.M. Intratumorally Injected 177Lu-Labeled Gold Nanoparticles: Gold Nanoseed Brachytherapy with Application for Neoadjuvant Treatment of Locally Advanced Breast Cancer. J. Nucl. Med. 2016, 57, 936–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Vilchis-Juárez, A.; Ferro-Flores, G.; Santos-Cuevas, C.; Morales-Avila, E.; Ocampo-García, B.; Díaz-Nieto, L.; Luna-Gutiérrez, M.; Jiménez-Mancilla, N.; Pedraza-López, M.; Gómez-Oliván, L. Molecular targeting radiotherapy with cyclo-RGDFK(C) peptides conjugated to 177Lu-labeled gold nanoparticles in tumor-bearing mice. J. Biomed. Nanotechnol. 2014, 10, 393–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Cai, Z.; Yook, S.; Lu, Y.; Bergstrom, D.; Winnik, M.A.; Pignol, J.P.; Reilly, R.M. Local Radiation Treatment of HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Using Trastuzumab-Modified Gold Nanoparticles Labeled with 177Lu. Pharm. Res. 2017, 34, 579–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Silva, F.; D’Onofrio, A.; Mendes, C.; Pinto, C.; Marques, A.; Campello, M.P.C.; Oliveira, M.C.; Raposinho, P.; Belchior, A.; Di Maria, S.; et al. Radiolabeled Gold Nanoseeds Decorated with Substance P Peptides: Synthesis, Characterization and In Vitro Evaluation in Glioblastoma Cellular Models. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Jiménez-Mancilla, N.; Ferro-Flores, G.; Santos-Cuevas, C.; Ocampo-García, B.; Luna-Gutiérrez, M.; Azorín-Vega, E.; Isaac-Olivé, K.; Camacho-López, M.; Torres-García, E. Multifunctional targeted therapy system based on (99m) Tc/(177) Lu-labeled gold nanoparticles-Tat(49-57)-Lys(3)-bombesin internalized in nuclei of prostate cancer cells. J. Label. Comp. Radiopharm. 2013, 56, 663–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Luna-Gutiérrez, M.; Ferro-Flores, G.; Ocampo-García, B.; Jiménez-Mancilla, N.; Morales-Avila, E.; De León-Rodríguez, L.; Isaac-Olivé, K. 177Lu-labeled monomeric, dimeric and multimeric RGD peptides for the therapy of tumors expressing α(ν)β(3) integrins. J. Label Compd. Radiopharm. 2012, 55, 140–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Azorín-Vega, E.P.; Zambrano-Ramírez, O.D.; Rojas-Calderón, E.L.; Ocampo-García, B.E.; Ferro-Flores, G. Tumoral fibrosis effect on the radiation absorbed dose of (177)Lu-Tyr(3)-octreotate and (177)Lu-Tyr(3)-octreotate conjugated to gold nanoparticles. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 2015, 100, 96–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Avcıbaşı, U.; Demiroğlu, H.; Ediz, M.; Akalın, H.A.; Özçalışkan, E.; Şenay, H.; Türkcan, C.; Özcan, Y.; Akgöl, S.; Avcıbaşı, N. Radiolabeling of new generation magnetic poly(HEMA-MAPA) nanoparticles with (131) I and preliminary investigation of its radiopharmaceutical potential using albino Wistar rats. J. Label. Comp. Radiopharm. 2013, 56, 708–716. [Google Scholar]
  92. İnce, İ.; Müftüler, Z.B.; Medine, E.İ.; Güldü, Ö.K.; Takan, G.; Ergönül, A.; Parlak, Y.; Yıldırım, Y.; Çakar, B.; Bilgin, E.S.; et al. Thymoquinone Glucuronide Conjugated Magnetic Nanoparticle for Bimodal Imaging and Treatment of Cancer as a Novel Theranostic Platform. Curr. Radiopharm. 2021, 14, 23–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Er, O.; Tuncel, A.; Ocakoglu, K.; Ince, M.; Kolatan, E.H.; Yilmaz, O.; Aktaş, S.; Yurt, F. Radiolabeling, In Vitro Cell Uptake, and In Vivo Photodynamic Therapy Potential of Targeted Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles Containing Zinc Phthalocyanine. Mol. Pharm. 2020, 17, 2648–2659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. He, R.; Wang, H.; Su, Y.; Chen, C.; Xie, L.; Chen, L.; Yu, J.; Toledo, Y.; Abayaweera, G.S.; Zhu, G.; et al. Incorporating 131I into a PAMAM (G5.0) dendrimer-conjugate: Design of a theranostic nanosensor for medullary thyroid carcinoma. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 16181–16188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. Zhu, J.; Zhao, L.; Cheng, Y.; Xiong, Z.; Tang, Y.; Shen, M.; Zhao, J.; Shi, X. Radionuclide (131)I-labeled multifunctional dendrimers for targeted SPECT imaging and radiotherapy of tumors. Nanoscale 2015, 7, 18169–18178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Song, N.; Zhao, L.; Xu, X.; Zhu, M.; Liu, C.; Sun, N.; Yang, J.; Shi, X.; Zhao, J. LyP-1-Modified Multifunctional Dendrimers for Targeted Antitumor and Antimetastasis Therapy. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 12395–12406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Zhao, L.; Li, Y.; Zhu, J.; Sun, N.; Song, N.; Xing, Y.; Huang, H.; Zhao, J. Chlorotoxin peptide-functionalized polyethylenimine-entrapped gold nanoparticles for glioma SPECT/CT imaging and radionuclide therapy. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2019, 17, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  98. Sun, N.; Zhao, L.; Zhu, J.; Li, Y.; Song, N.; Xing, Y.; Qiao, W.; Huang, H.; Zhao, J. 131I-labeled polyethylenimine-entrapped gold nanoparticles for targeted tumor SPECT/CT imaging and radionuclide therapy. Int. J. Nanomed. 2019, 14, 4367–4381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  99. Zhao, H.; Chao, Y.; Liu, J.; Huang, J.; Pan, J.; Guo, W.; Wu, J.; Sheng, M.; Yang, K.; Wang, J.; et al. Polydopamine Coated Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes as a Versatile Platform with Radionuclide Labeling for Multimodal Tumor Imaging and Therapy. Theranostics 2016, 6, 1833–1843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  100. Ji, A.; Zhang, Y.; Lv, G.; Lin, J.; Qi, N.; Ji, F.; Du, M. 131 I radiolabeled immune albumin nanospheres loaded with doxorubicin for in vivo combinatorial therapy. J. Label. Comp. Radiopharm. 2018, 4, 362–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Tian, L.; Chen, Q.; Yi, X.; Wang, G.; Chen, J.; Ning, P.; Yang, K.; Liu, Z. Radionuclide I-131 Labeled Albumin-Paclitaxel Nanoparticles for Synergistic Combined Chemo-radioisotope Therapy of Cancer. Theranostics 2017, 3, 614–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Li, W.; Liu, Z.; Li, C.; Li, N.; Fang, L.; Chang, J.; Tan, J. Radionuclide therapy using ¹³¹I-labeled anti-epidermal growth factor receptor-targeted nanoparticles suppresses cancer cell growth caused by EGFR overexpression. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 2016, 3, 619–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Zhang, C.; Chai, J.; Jia, Q.; Tan, J.; Meng, Z.; Li, N.; Yuan, M. Evaluating the therapeutic efficacy of radiolabeled BSA@CuS nanoparticle-induced radio-photothermal therapy against anaplastic thyroid cancer. IUBMB Life 2022, 74, 433–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Chen, L.; Zhong, X.; Yi, X.; Huang, M.; Ning, P.; Liu, T.; Ge, C.; Chai, Z.; Liu, Z.; Yang, K. Radionuclide (131)I labeled reduced graphene oxide for nuclear imaging guided combined radio- and photothermal therapy of cancer. Biomaterials 2015, 66, 21–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Song, X.; Liang, C.; Feng, L.; Yang, K.; Liu, Z. Iodine-131-labeled, transferrin-capped polypyrrole nanoparticles for tumor-targeted synergistic photothermal-radioisotope therapy. Biomater. Sci. 2017, 9, 1828–1835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Liang, C.; Chao, Y.; Yi, X.; Xu, J.; Feng, L.; Zhao, Q.; Yang, K.; Liu, Z. Nanoparticle-mediated internal radioisotope therapy to locally increase the tumor vasculature permeability for synergistically improved cancer therapies. Biomaterials 2019, 197, 368–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Chen, Z.; Yu, H.; Lu, W.; Shen, J.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Y. Bone-Seeking Albumin-Nanomedicine for In Vivo Imaging and Therapeutic Monitoring. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2020, 6, 647–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Sakr, T.M.; Khowessah, O.M.; Motaleb, M.A.; Abd El-Bary, A.; El-Kolaly, M.T.; Swidan, M.M. I-131 doping of silver nanoparticles platform for tumor theranosis guided drug delivery. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2018, 122, 239–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Liu, Q.; Qian, Y.; Li, P.; Zhang, S.; Wang, Z.; Liu, J.; Sun, X.; Fulham, M.; Feng, D.; Chen, Z.; et al. The combined therapeutic effects of 131iodine-labeled multifunctional copper sulfide-loaded microspheres in treating breast cancer. Acta Pharm. Sin. B 2018, 8, 371–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Chen, M.; Guo, Z.; Chen, Q.; Wei, J.; Li, J.; Shi, C.; Xu, D.; Zhou, D.; Zhang, X.; Zheng, N. Pd nanosheets with their surface coordinated by radioactive iodide as a high-performance theranostic nanoagent for orthotopic hepatocellular carcinoma imaging and cancer therapy. Chem. Sci. 2018, 9, 4268–4274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Bult, W.; de Leeuw, H.; Steinebach, O.M.; van der Bom, M.J.; Wolterbeek, H.T.; Heeren, R.M.; Bakker, C.J.; van Het Schip, A.D.; Hennink, W.E.; Nijsen, J.F. Radioactive holmium acetylacetonate microspheres for interstitial microbrachytherapy: An in vitro and in vivo stability study. Pharm. Res. 2012, 29, 827–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  112. Munaweera, I.; Levesque-Bishop, D.; Shi, Y.; Di Pasqua, A.J.; Balkus, K.J., Jr. Radiotherapeutic bandage based on electrospun polyacrylonitrile containing holmium-166 iron garnet nanoparticles for the treatment of skin cancer. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 22250–22256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Vimalnath, K.V.; Chakraborty, S.; Rajeswari, A.; Sharma, K.S.; Sarma, H.D.; Ningthoujam, R.S.; Vatsa, R.K.; Dash, A. Formulation, Characterization, and Bio-evaluation of Holmium-166 labeled Agglomerated Iron Oxide Nanoparticles for Treatment of Arthritis of Knee Joints. Mater. Today Proc. 2017, 4, 4329–4433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Her, S.; Jaffray, D.A.; Allen, C. Gold nanoparticles for applications in cancer radiotherapy: Mechanisms and recent advancements. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2017, 109, 84–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Balogh, L.; Nigavekar, S.S.; Nair, B.M.; Lesniak, W.; Zhang, C.; Sung, L.Y.; Kariapper, M.S.T.; El-Jawahri, A.; Llanes, M.; Bolton, B.; et al. Significant effect of size on the in vivo biodistribution of gold composite nanodevices in mouse tumor models. Nanomed. Nanotechnol. Biol. Med. 2007, 3, 281–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Hirn, S.; Semmler-Behnke, M.; Schleh, C.; Wenk, A.; Lipka, J.; Schäffler, M.; Takenaka, S.; Möller, W.; Schmid, G.; Simon, U.; et al. Particle size-dependent and surface charge-dependent biodistribution of gold nanoparticles after intravenous administration. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2011, 77, 407–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  117. Wang, J.Y.; Chen, J.; Yang, J.; Wang, H.; Shen, X.; Sun, Y.M.; Guo, M.; Zhang, X.D. Effects of surface charges of gold nanoclusters on long-term in vivo biodistribution, toxicity, and cancer radiation therapy. Int. J. Nanomed. 2016, 27, 3475–3485. [Google Scholar]
  118. Stella, M.; Braat, A.J.; van Rooij, R.; de Jong, H.W.; Lam, M.G. Holmium-166 radioembolization: Current status and future prospective. CardioVascular. Interv. Radiol. 2022, 45, 1634–1645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Chakraborty, K.; Mondal, J.; An, J.M.; Park, J.; Lee, Y.K. Advances in Radionuclides and Radiolabelled Peptides for Cancer Therapeutics. Pharmaceutics 2023, 15, 971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Zhang, T.; Deng, M.; Zhang, L.; Liu, Z.; Liu, Y.; Song, S.; Gong, T.; Yuan, Q. Facile Synthesis of Holmium-Based Nanoparticles as a CT and MRI Dual-Modal Imaging for Cancer Diagnosis. Front. Oncol. 2021, 11, 741383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Seevinck, P.R.; Seppenwoolde, J.H.; de Wit, T.C.; Nijsen, J.F.; Beekman, F.J.; van Het Schip, A.D.; Bakker, C.J. Factors affecting the sensitivity and detection limits of MRI, CT, and SPECT for multimodal diagnostic and therapeutic agents. Anticancer Agents Med. Chem. 2007, 7, 17–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Häfeli, U.O.; Sweeney, S.M.; Beresford, B.A.; Humm, J.L.; Macklis, R.M. Effective targeting of magnetic radioactive 90Y-microspheres to tumor cells by an externally applied magnetic field. Preliminary in vitro and in vivo results. Nucl. Med. Biol. 1995, 22, 147–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Signore, A.; Prosperi, D.; Gentiloni, G.; Di Girolamo, M.; Lauri, C.; Filice, A.; Panzuto, F. Therapy of NET with radiolabelled SST analogs. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2022, 4, 135–144. [Google Scholar]
  124. Das, T.; Banerjee, S. Theranostic Applications of Lutetium-177 in Radionuclide Therapy. Curr. Radiopharm. 2016, 9, 94–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. George, S.L.; Falzone, N.; Chittenden, S.; Kirk, S.J.; Lancaster, D.; Vaidya, S.J.; Mandeville, H.; Saran, F.; Pearson, A.D.; Du, Y.; et al. Individualized 131I-mIBG therapy in the management of refractory and relapsed neuroblastoma. Nucl. Med. Commun. 2016, 37, 466–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  126. Jeon, J. Review of Therapeutic Applications of Radiolabeled Functional Nanomaterials. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  127. Tashtoush, B.M.; Traboulsi, A.A.; Dittert, L.; Hussain, A.A. Chloramine-T in radiolabeling techniques. IV. Penta-O-acetyl-Nchloro-N-methylglucamine as an oxidizing agent in radiolabelling techniques. Anal. Biochem. 2001, 288, 16–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Varani, M.; Galli, F.; Bentivoglio, V.; Signore, A. Particles and nanoparticles in nuclear medicine: Basic principles and instrumentation. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2022, 1, 202–211. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Publications on nanoparticles and on radiolabeled nanoparticles for diagnostic SPECT/PET use from 2012 to 2022.
Figure 1. Publications on nanoparticles and on radiolabeled nanoparticles for diagnostic SPECT/PET use from 2012 to 2022.
Biomolecules 13 01241 g001
Table 1. Particles and labeling methods with Auger’s electron emitter.
Table 1. Particles and labeling methods with Auger’s electron emitter.
IsotopeNPType of RadiolabelingFunctionalizationRCYApplications Stage of ResearchReference
64CuCopper sulfide NPsDirect incubation n.d.a.>99%Radiotherapy (RT) and photothermal therapy (PTT) of breast cancerTested on human breast cancer xenograft [6]
Chitosan NPsDirect incubation with stirringn.d.a.n.d.a. Cancer imaging and therapyn.d.a.[7]
Melanin NPsDirectCoated with PEG90%Targeted radionuclide therapyTested on epidermoid carcinoma xenograft[8]
Feraheme nanoparticle (FH-NPs)Direct incubation Coated with carboxymethyl-dextran (CMD)>85%Cancer therapyn.d.a.[9]
Boron-nitride nanotubes (BNNTs)Direct (encapsulation)n.d.a.n.d.a.Cancer diagnosis and therapyn.d.a.[10]
Covellite nanocrystals (CuS NCs)Direct (encapsulation)Coated with PEG49%Photothermal probes in tumor-ablation treatmentsn.d.a.[11,12]
Barium-sulphate NPsDirect incubation n.d.a.69%Targeted alpha therapy (TAT)n.d.a.[13]
Hydroxyapatite/ tenorite NPs Direct (neutron irradiation)Folic acidn.d.a. Treatment and diagnosis of osteosarcoma n.d.a.[14]
Shell cross-linked NPs (SCKs)With TETA Folate 15–20%Therapy for tumors overexpressing the folate receptor (FR)Tested on keratin-forming tumor cell line HeLa[15]
n.d.a. = no data available; NPs = nanoparticles.
Table 2. Particles and labeling methods with α emitters.
Table 2. Particles and labeling methods with α emitters.
IsotopeNPType of RadiolabelingFunctionalizationRCYApplications Stage of ResearchReference
211AtGold NPs Direct incubation Substance P(5–11)>99%Radionuclide therapyTested on glioblastoma multiforme cells[19]
Trastuzumab>99%Nano-brachy-therapy for HER2-positive breast cancerTested on ovarian adenocarcinoma cells[20]
n.d.a.n.d.a.Local radiation therapy for cancerTested on rat glioma and epithelioid carcinoma of pancreatic duct xenografts[21]
Gold nanostarsDirect incubation n.d.a.>99%Targeted alpha-particle therapy (TAT)Tested on human glioma xenografts[22]
Silver NPsWith chloramine-T methodCoated with PEO>95%Therapy of small tumors and metastasesn.d.a.[23]
225AcSuperpara-magnetic iron-oxide-based NPs (SPIONs)Direct incubation Trastuzumab>98%Radioimmunotherapy and magnetic hyperthermiaStudy of the biodistribution profiles in SCID mice[24]
LiposomesDirect (encapsulation)n.d.a.n.d.a.Therapy of metastatic cancersn.d.a.[25]
Gold-coated lanthanide phosphate NPsDirect incubation Coated with gold>99%Targeted alpha therapy (TAT)n.d.a.[26]
LaPO4 (monazite) NPsDirect incubation Monoclonal antibody 201B66 ± 4% Targeted radiotherapyStudy of the biodistribution profiles in healthy BALB/c mice[27]
Gold NPs With TADOTAGAn.d.a.86.0 ± 1.8%Targeted radionuclide therapyTested on human glioblastoma xenografts[28]
Single-wall carbon nanotube (SWCNT)With DOTATumor neovascular-targeting antibody E4G10n.d.a.Targeted radioimmunotherapyTested on murine xenograft model of human
colon carcinoma
[29]
Morpholino oligonucleotide complementary to a modified antibody (cMORF)n.d.a.Cancer therapyTested on Burkitt’s lymphoma xenografts[30]
rHDL NPsWith DOTAn.d.a.n.d.a.Therapy for tumors overexpressing SR-BI proteinsStuy of the biodistribution profile in healthy mice[31]
GdVO4 NPsDirect (encapsulation)n.d.a.67.9 ± 2.4%Targeted alpha therapy (TAT)Tested radiochemical yield in vitro[32]
223RaLiposomesDirect (encapsulation)Folic acid (FA) F(ab’)2 95 ± 2% Targeted radiotherapy of cancern.d.a.[33]
Nanozeolite bioconjugatesDirect incubation Substance P (5–11) peptide fragment n.d.a. Therapeutic construct for targeting glioma cells n.d.a.[34]
NanomicellesDirect incubation n.d.a.n.d.a.Targeted radionuclide therapy for bone tumorsTested on osteosarcoma cell lines [35]
Feraheme nanoparticle (FH-NPs)Direct incubation Coated with carboxymethyl-dextran (CMD)n.d.a.Therapy for cancersn.d.a.[36]
Barium ferrite (BaFe) NPsDirect incubation Trastuzumab61.3 ± 1.8% Targeted α-therapyTested on ovarian adenocarcinoma spheroids[37]
Hydroxyapatite and titanium dioxide NPsDirect incubation n.d.a.≥94% Radionuclide therapyn.d.a.[38]
Folic-acid-functionalized graphene quantum dots (GQD-FA)Direct incubation Folic acidn.d.a. Antiviral effect against Zika-virus infection Testing of in vitro antiviral effect against replication on ZIKV infection [39]
SPION NPsDirect incubation n.d.a.99%Targeted alpha therapy (TAT)Testing of in vitro stability in PBS, bovine plasma and serum[40]
GdVO4 NPsDirect (encapsulation)n.d.a.72.3 ± 3.0%Targeted alpha therapy (TAT)Testing radiochemical yield in vitro[32]
n.d.a. = no data available; NPs = nanoparticles.
Table 3. Particles and labeling methods with β−emitters.
Table 3. Particles and labeling methods with β−emitters.
IsotopeNPType of RadiolabelingFunctionalizationRCYApplications Stage of ResearchReference
198AuPAMAM dendrimersDirect (neutron irradiations)n.d.a.n.d.a.Tumor nano-brachytherapyTested on mouse-melanoma-tumor model[48]
Gold NPs Coated with gum arabic glycoprotein (GA) n.d.a.Prostate cancer therapyTested on mice bearing human-prostate-tumor xenografts[49]
Coated with epigallocatechin-gallate (EGCg) ≥99% [50]
Coated with mangiferin-a glucose (MGF) 97% PC-3 prostate-tumor therapyTested on mice bearing human-prostate-tumor xenografts[51]
n.d.a.n.d.a. Bone cancer therapy Testing of cytotoxicity effect on human osteosarcoma[35]
Cyclic arginine−glycine−aspartate peptide (RGD)>99%Tumor targetingTested on melanoma-tumor-bearing mice[52]
Human serum albumin (alb-AuNP) or apolipoprotein E (apoE-AuNP)n.d.a.Organ targetingStudy of biodistribution profiles in healthy mice[53]
n.d.a.n.d.a.n.d.a.Study of biodistribution profiles in healthy Sprague Dawley rats[54]
90YMagnetic NPs (MNPs)Direct incubation Coated with polyethylene glycol 600 diacid (PEG600) 97% for Fe3O4-naked and
99% for Fe3O4-PEG600
Hyperthermia-based cancer treatments Study of biodistribution profiled in healthy Wistar rats[55]
Iron-oxide NPs (IONPs) Direct incubationCoated with citric acid, poly(acrylic acid) (PAA) and poly(ethylene glycol)>99%Diagnosis and dual magnetic hyperthermia/radionuclide cancer therapyTested on murine colorectal carcinoma cells[56]
Magnetic NPs (MNPs)Direct incubation Coated with imidodiphosphate (IDP) and inositol hexaphosphate (IHP) >98%Radionuclide therapy Study of biodistribution profiles in healthy Wistar rats[57]
Feraheme NPs (FH-NPs)Direct incubation at 120–130 °CCoated with cCarboxymethyl-dextran (CMD)>85%Therapy for cancersn.d.a.[9]
Chitosan NPsDirect incubation with stirringn.d.a.n.d.a.Cancer imaging and therapyStudy of biodistribution profile in healthy mice[7]
YPO4:Er3+−Yb3+ NPsDirect incubationn.d.a.>95%Optical-based imaging and alternating current (AC) field-based hyperthermian.d.a.[58]
Lipid NPsWith DTPAAnti–Flk-1 MAb>95%Anti-angiogenesis therapyTested on melanoma- and colon-carcinoma-bearing mice[59]
HPMA NPsWith DOTAn.d.a.n.d.a.Plasmonic photothermal therapy (PPTT) for prostate tumorsTested on prostate-tumor-bearing mice[60]
177LuIron-oxide NPs (IONPs) Direct incubationCoated with citric acid, poly(acrylic acid) (PAA) and poly(ethylene glycol)>90%Diagnosis and dual magnetic hyperthermia/radionuclide cancer therapyTested on colon carcinoma cell line[56]
Coated with alginic acid (MA)95.21 ± 1.28% for 177Lu-MA and 93.65 ± 1.03% for 177Lu-MA-PEGNano-brachytherapyTested on murine mammary carcinoma cell line[61]
Feraheme NPs (FH-NPs)Direct incubation at 120–130 °CCoated with carboxymethyldextran (CMD)>85%n.d.a.n.d.a.[9]
Magnetic NPs (MNPs)Direct incubation at RT and 80 °C Poly-L-lysine, proline, and tryptophan99%Cancer diagnosis and radionuclide-hyperthermia therapyn.d.a.[62]
Direct incubationCoated with IHP, IDP, hydroxyethylidene diphosphonic acid (HEDP), and methanediylbis(phosphonic acid) (MDP)95%Hyperthermia cancer therapyn.d.a.[63]
Chitosan NPsDirect incubation with stirringn.d.a.n.d.a.n.d.a.Evaluated in epithelial lung cancer cells[7]
YPO4:Er3+−Yb3+ NPsDirect incubationn.d.a.>95%Optical-based imaging and alternating current (AC) field-based hyperthermian.d.a.[59]
Barium-sulfate NPsDirect incubationn.d.a.69%Targeted alpha therapy of cancern.d.a.[13]
NaGdF4/Ho−Yb NPsDirect incubaionCoated with mesoporous silica (m-SiO2)98.4 ± 0.4%Radionuclide therapyn.d.a.[64]
Lu2O3 NPsDirect (encapsulation)n.d.a.>85%Cancer diagnostics and therapyTested on mice bearing melanoma tumors[65]
Hydroxyapatite (HA) particlesDirect incubationn.d.a.99.1 ± 0.2%Intra-arterial liver cancer therapyStudy of biodistribution profiles in healthy Wistar rats[66]
Fe3O4 NPsWith DP-PEGCoated with diphosphonate-polyethylene glycol (DP-PEG) 67.4%SPECT and radiotherapyTested on murine breast cancer[67]
PAMAM-dendrimerWith DOTA Lys1Lys3 (DOTA)-bombesin (BN) peptide97.72 ± 0.26%Peptide-receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT)Tested on infiltrating ductal carcinoma of breast-tumor-bearing mice[68]
Lys1 Lys3 (DOTA)-bombesin and folic acid72%Targeted radiotherapyEvaluated in breast tumors over-expressing GRPR and FR cell line[69]
HA-PLGA NPsWith DOTAHyaluronic acid (HA) n.d.a.Radio-synovectomyTested on murine macrophage cell line[70]
PLGA NPsWith DOTALys1Lys3(DOTA)-bombesinn.d.a.GRPr-positive breast cancer therapyTested on breast-tumor-bearing mice[71]
DendrimersWith DOTAn.d.a.>98%Cancer therapyTested on melanoma-bearing mice[72]
Direct incubationFolate-bombesinn.d.a.Plasmonic, photothermal therapy, and targeted radiotherapy of cancersTested on breast ductal carcinoma cells[73]
With DO3A-py(NO-C)n.d.a.n.d.a.Basis for targeted therapyValidation of labeling method and biodistribution in rats[74]
Micelles With DOTAn.d.a.n.d.a.Liquid brachytherapyTested on murine-colon-carcinoma-bearing mice[75]
NanostarWith DOTAn.d.a.>99%Endo-radiotherapyTested on colon cancer isografts and pancreatic cancer xenografts[76]
rHDL NPsWith DOTACholesterol>95% Targeted radiotherapyTested on breast ductal carcinoma xenografts[77]
Carbon nanospheresWith DOTAG3-cNGR peptide 80%Targeted radio-nanomedicineTested on melanoma-bearing mice[78]
Fluorescent core-shell silica NPsWith DOTAn.d.a.>95%Targeted radionuclide therapyTested on melanoma-bearing mice[79]
f-Gd₃N@CC₈₀ nanoplatform With DOTAn.d.a.80%BrachytherapyTested on human glioblastoma xenografts[80]
Nanobody With DOTAn.d.a.98%Radioimmunotherapy for HER2-positive breast cancerTested on HER+ ovarian-adenocarcinoma- and melanoma-tumor-bearing mice [81]
With DTPAn.d.a.98%Radioimmunotherapy for HER2-positive breast cancer Tested on HER+ ovarian-adenocarcinoma- and melanoma-tumor-bearing mice
Lipid-based NPsWith DTPACoated with PEG>80%Treatment in oncologyn.d.a.[82]
PLGA NPsWith DOTA-TATE Coated with PEG98%Peptide-receptor-radionuclide therapy (PRRT) for NETsStudy of biodistribution profile in healthy Wistar albino rats[83]
AuNPsWith DOTA Panitumumab n.d.a. Brachytherapy treatment for locally advanced breast cancer Tested on metastatic-breast-adenocarcinoma-bearing mice[84]
Cyclic Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD) sequencen.d.a.Targeted radionuclide therapy for tumors expressing α(V)β(3) integrins.Tested on human α(V)β(3)-positive glioblastoma xenografts[85]
Trastuzumabn.d.a.HER2-overexpressing breast cancer therapyTested on human breast cancer xenografts overexpressing HER2 [86]
Substance P (SP) peptides>95%Treatment of localized glioblastoma multiformeTesting of radiobiological effects on human glioblastoma astrocytoma cells [87]
Lys3-bombesinn.d.a.Radiotherapy and thermal ablation Tested on PC3-overexpressing cell lines[88]
Lys1Lys3-bombesin (BN) peptide n.d.a. Peptide-receptor-radionuclide therapy (PRRT) Tested on breast-ductal-carcinoma-bearing mice[73]
Cyclo(Arg-Gly-Asp-Phe-Lys)Cy ((RGDfK)C)69%Targeted radionuclide therapy for tumors expressing α(n)β(3) integrinsTested on α(V)β(3) integrin-positive glioma tumors in mice[89]
Direct incubation at 90 °CTyr3-octreotate>98%Tumoral-fibrosis therapyTested on HeLa human cervical cancer cells[90]
131IMag-poly(HEMA–MAPA) NPsWith Iodogen n.d.a.95–100%Cancer therapyStudy of biodistribution profiles in healthy Wistar albino rats[91]
Magnetic NPs (Fe3O4)With Iodogen Thymoquinone glucuronide95%Treatment and diagnosis of lung cancerTested on human lung cancer xenograft[92]
Mesoporous silica NPsWith Iodogen n.d.a.95.5 ± 1.2% Photodynamic therapy (PDT)Tested on pancreas adenocarcinoma cells[93]
PAMAM dendrimerWith Iodogen Vascular targeting peptide (VTP)77.6%Theranostic nano-sensors for medullary thyroid carcinomaTested on medullary carcinoma cells[94]
With chloramine-T method3-(4′-hydroxyphenyl)-propionic acid-OSu (HPAO) and folic acid (FA)97.7 ± 0.7%Imaging and radiotherapy for tumorsTested on rat glioma bearing mice[95]
With chloramine-T methodLyP-1 peptide61.95 ± 3.18%SPECT imaging, radionuclide therapy, and metastasis therapy for cancerTested on stage IV human breast cancer xenograft[96]
Polyethylenimine-entrapped gold NPs (Au PENPs)With HPAO moietyChlorotoxin60.4 ± 5.4%Imaging and radionuclide therapy for gliomaTested on rat-glioma-bearing mice[97]
Buthus martensii Karsch chlorotoxin (BmK CT)77.0 ± 4.97%Imaging and radionuclide therapy for gliomaTested on rat-glioma-bearing mice[98]
Single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWNTs)With chloramine-T methodCoated with polydopamine (PDA)~90% Multimodal-imaging-guided combination therapy for cancerTested on stage IV human breast cancer xenografts[99]
Albumin nanospheresWith SPDPanti-AFPMcAb65%Radio-chemotherapy of hepatomaTested on human hepatoma xenografts[100]
Albumin-paclitaxel NPsWith chloramine-T methodPaclitaxel (PTX)n.d.a.Combined chemotherapy and radioisotope therapy (RIT) of cancerTested on stage IV human-breast-cancer xenografts[101]
BSA–PCL NPsWith chloramine-T methodAnti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR–BSA–PCL)50–85%Radionuclide therapy in EGFR-overexpressing tumorsTested on stage IV lung-adenocarcinoma xenografts[102]
BSA@CuS NPsWith chloramine-T methodn.d.a.66–80%Radiotherapy and photo-thermal-therapy of anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (ATC)Tested on thyroid-gland-anaplastic-carcinoma xenografts[103]
Reduced nano-graphene oxide (RGO)With chloramine-T methodPolyethylene glycol (PEG) coated80%Combined chemotherapy and radionuclide therapy (RIT) for cancerTested on stage IV human-breast-cancer xenografts[104]
Transferrin-capped polypyrrole NPsWith chloramine-T methodTransferrin90%Photothermal radiotherapyTested on glioblastoma xenograft[105]
Albumin-encapsulated liposomesWith chloramine-T method (encapsulation)n.d.a.90%Internal radioisotope therapy (RIT)Tested on stage IV human-breast-cancer xenografts[106]
Albumin-based gadolinium oxide NPs (GdNPs)With chloramine-T methodBone-seeking alendronate>95%Therapeutic monitoring of primary bone tumors and metastasesTested on rat model of focal malignant osteolysis[107]
Polyethylene-glycol-capped silver NPsDirect (encapsulation)Coated with PEG98.0 ± 0.8%Tumor theranostic probeTested on solid-tumor-sarcoma-bearing mice[108]
Hollow copper-sulfide NPs and paclitaxelDirect with NaClO4Paclitaxel95.8 ± 1.3%.Theranostic agent for orthotopic breast cancerTested on orthotopic breast cancer xenografts[109]
Magnetic NPs (MNPs)Carbodiimide method with EDC Poly-l-lysine, proline, and tryptophan 99% Cancer diagnosis and radionuclide-hyperthermia therapy Study of biodistribution profiles in healthy Wistar rats[71]
Ultrasmall Pd nanosheetsDirect incubation with stirringCoated with PEG>98%Photoacoustic imaging and combined photothermal and radiotherapyTested on stage IV human breast cancer xenograft, on spontaneous mammary tumor in BALB/c mouse model, and on a Mst1/2 double-knockout hepatoma model[110]
166HoHolmium acetylacetonate NPsDirect (neutron irradiations)n.d.a.n.d.a.Intra-tumoral radionuclide treatment for solid malignanciesTested on rabbit anaplastic squamous cell carcinoma [111]
Holmium iron garnet NPsDirect (neutron irradiations)n.d.a.n.d.a.Treatment of skin cancern.d.a.[112]
Iron-oxide NPsDirect incubation with stirringVascular targeting peptide (VTP)>95%Treatment of knee arthritisn.d.a.[113]
Chitosan NPsDirect incubation with stirringn.d.a.n.d.a. Cancer imaging and therapyn.d.a.[7]
n.d.a. = no data available; NPs = nanoparticles.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bentivoglio, V.; Nayak, P.; Varani, M.; Lauri, C.; Signore, A. Methods for Radiolabeling Nanoparticles (Part 3): Therapeutic Use. Biomolecules 2023, 13, 1241. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom13081241

AMA Style

Bentivoglio V, Nayak P, Varani M, Lauri C, Signore A. Methods for Radiolabeling Nanoparticles (Part 3): Therapeutic Use. Biomolecules. 2023; 13(8):1241. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom13081241

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bentivoglio, Valeria, Pallavi Nayak, Michela Varani, Chiara Lauri, and Alberto Signore. 2023. "Methods for Radiolabeling Nanoparticles (Part 3): Therapeutic Use" Biomolecules 13, no. 8: 1241. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom13081241

APA Style

Bentivoglio, V., Nayak, P., Varani, M., Lauri, C., & Signore, A. (2023). Methods for Radiolabeling Nanoparticles (Part 3): Therapeutic Use. Biomolecules, 13(8), 1241. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom13081241

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop