Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Using of Essential Oils and Plant Extracts against Pseudomonas savastanoi pv. glycinea and Curtobacterium flaccumfaciens pv. flaccumfaciens on Soybean
Previous Article in Journal
New Genomic Regions Identified for Resistance to Spot Blotch and Terminal Heat Stress in an Interspecific Population of Triticum aestivum and T. spelta
Previous Article in Special Issue
Anthracnose Disease Control and Postharvest Quality of Hass Avocado Stored in Biobased PLA/PBAT/Pine Essential Oil/Chitosan Active Packaging Nets
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 11
Issue 21
10.3390/plants11212988
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Antifungal Potential of Canarian Plant Extracts against High-Risk Phytopathogens

by
Carolina P. Reyes
1,
Samuel Rodríguez Sabina
2,
Rocío López-Cabeza
3,
Cristina G. Montelongo
2,
Cristina Giménez
2,
Ignacio A. Jiménez
3,
Raimundo Cabrera
2 and
Isabel L. Bazzochi
3,*
1
Instituto Universitario de Bio-Orgánica Antonio González, Departamento de Bioquímica, Microbiología, Biología Celular y Genética, Universidad de La Laguna, Avenida Astrofísico Francisco Sánchez 2, 38206 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain
2
Departamento de Botánica, Ecología y Fisiología Vegetal, Facultad de Ciencias, Sección Biología, Universidad de La Laguna, Avenida Astrofísico Francisco Sánchez, 38206 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain
3
Instituto Universitario de Bio-Orgánica Antonio González, Departamento de Química Orgánica, Avenida Astrofísico Francisco Sánchez 2, 38206 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2022, 11(21), 2988; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11212988
Submission received: 12 October 2022 / Revised: 28 October 2022 / Accepted: 2 November 2022 / Published: 5 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Plant Extracts as Biological Protective Agents)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Phytopathogens are responsible for great losses in agriculture. In particular, Fusarium, Alternaria and Botrytis are fungal diseases that affect crops worldwide. In the search for eco-friendly solutions to pest control, plants and their chemo-biodiversity are promising sources of biopesticides for integrated pest management. The aim of the present study is to report the evaluation of sixteen plant species from the Canary Islands Archipelago against the phytopathogenic fungi Botrytis cinerea, Fusarium oxysporum, and Alternaria alternata. The plants were selected on the basis of their traditional uses in medicine and/or pest control, as well as on scientific studies reporting their uses in crop protection. Their growth inhibition (% I), in an in vitro test-assay on mycelium, was used to identify six ethanolic plant extracts displaying activity (% I > 30% at 1 mg/mL) against at least one of the assayed fungi. The most effective plant extracts were further fractionated by liquid–liquid partition, using solvents of increasing polarity. This procedure led to an improvement of the bioactivity against the phytopathogens, even affecting the hexane fraction from S. canariensis and achieving an 83.93% of growth inhibition at 0.5 mg/mL on B. cinerea. These findings identified five plant-derived extracts as potential candidates for the future development of new biofungicides, which could be applied in integrated pest management.

1. Introduction

Though the use of synthetic pesticides has offered significant economic benefits by enhancing food production and preventing vector-borne diseases, evidence suggests that their use has adversely affected the health of human populations and the environment [1]. In fact, several synthetic pesticides have been withdrawn from the market due to environmental issues resulting from their intensive use in fields and a reduction in their effectiveness because of an increasing resistance to target organisms [2]. Therefore, there is growing interest in developing alternative strategies towards an integrated form of pest control [3]. In this regard, biopesticides [4], in particular plant-derived pesticides, represent promising candidates, since they have some benefits over synthetic pesticides, such as being less toxic to humans, less persistent in the environment, and possessing new modes of action and molecular chemistry, and they can be used in organic agriculture [5].
Among the various diseases that severely affect crops, fungal infections via ascomycetes are of great incidence worldwide and synthetic fungicides have been widely used to fight these phytopathogens [6]. However, some of these fungicides, such as chlorothalonil, fenamidone, propineb, quinoxyfen, thiram, propiconazole, and mancozeb, have been withdrawn and/or banned in the European Union in recent years [7]. Furthermore, many target pathogens have developed resistance to fungicides, thereby compromising pest control [8]. Moreover, mycotoxin contamination decreases product quality, has repercussions for human health, and causes significant economic losses [9]. Among the phytopathogenic fungi, Botrytis cinerea, Fusarium oxysporum, and Alternaria alternata are responsible for plant diseases in economically important crops. In fact, B. cinerea is an airborne plant pathogen that causes grey mold in more than 200 crops all over the world [10]. The sesquiterpenes botrydial and botcinin acid are the two major phytotoxins involved in the infection caused by this fungus [11]. This pathogen can infect the plant products from the seedling stage until the product’s ripening. Even the harvested product can spoil since this fungus can survive as sclerotia and dormant mycelia both in field and storage facilities under extreme conditions. Thus, this pathogen is considered high-risk and has been classified as the second most important plant pathogen according to Dean et al. [12]. Moreover, F. oxysporum, a soil-borne pathogen that causes Fusarium wilt in crops such as melons, tomatoes, cotton, and bananas, produces a range of mycotoxins, including enniatins, fusaric acid, and moniliformin [13], and is considered one of the 10 most important fungi from a scientific/economic point of view [12]. On the other hand, A. alternata is a fungus that can affect a broad range of crops (potato, apple, and tomato) worldwide and is responsible for several diseases during the postharvest shelf life [14]. The main mycotoxins found in rotten samples of crops infected by this fungus are altenuene, alternariol, and altertoxins [15]. In the Canary Islands, the gray mold caused by B. cinerea usually affects tomato crops grown in unheated greenhouses during the winter [16], and F. oxysporum affects banana crops, with an incidence ranging from 2 to 12% [17], and several species of Palmaceae, including the Canary palm (Phoenix canariensis) [18]. Furthermore, A. alternata strongly attacks potato and vine crops, which are relevant crops in the economy of the Canary Islands and various studies have pointed out the development of cross-resistance by this phytopathogen [19].
In the search for eco-friendly solutions for pest control and environmental management, the interest in plants and their chemo-biodiversity as a source of biopesticides for integrated pest management has increased over time [5,20]. In fact, previous studies have reported the bio-efficacy of several plant extracts against B. cinerea [10,21], A. alternata [21], and F. oxysporum [22]. The Canary Islands archipelago has a surprising ecological diversity due to their special environmental conditions, which have given rise to a rich and varied flora with numerous endemic species [23]. Thus, these plants could be potential sources of biofungicides and a viable alternative to agrochemicals. Despite the possible antifungal potential of Canarian herbal extracts, the studies addressing this issue are scarce. One such study is the one by Coşovenau et al. [21], which reported the fungicidal activity of extracts from Artemisa thuscula and Argyranthemum frutescens against relevant phytopathogens.
Reported herein is an evaluation of 16 ethanolic plant extracts from the Canary Islands against the high-risk phytopathogenic fungi B. cinerea, F. oxysporum, and A. alternata. The studied plants were selected based on ethnobotanical knowledge as well as scientific reports on their potential in pest control. Six extracts showing high fungicidal activity were further fractioned by liquid–liquid partition, using solvents of increasing polarity, hexanes, ethyl acetate, and water, and the enriched fractions were also assessed against the target phytopathogens.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Selection of Plants under Study

Many of the phytochemicals reported from medicinal plants (alkaloids, phenylpropanoids, terpenoids, or flavonoids) have been demonstrated to be effective in crop protection; therefore, the study of medicinal plant extracts [24] is becoming a field of growing interest as part of integrated pest management.
In the present work, sixteen plants from the Canary Islands were studied, and the details of their collection, including the ecological state, place of collection, geographic coordinates, and voucher specimens are summarized in Table 1.
The plants were selected for study based on their traditional uses as medicinal plants and/or in pest control (Table 2) and on scientific studies reporting their use in crop protection. The previous reports of the plants under study are briefly discussed.
Ceropegia fusca is a plant used in traditional medicine, and the antimicrobial and antifungal activity of the extracts from this plant against clinic fungi have been reported [25], although its use in pest management has not been explored. Two species belonging to the Asteraceae family, Argyranthemum broussonetti and Artemisia thuscula, have also been included in the present study, as the later has been previously reported as an insecticide in potato crops [26] and as a fungicide against various phytopathogens [21]. Several compounds (sesquiterpenes) isolated from Gymnosporia cassinoides, formerly known as Maytenus canariensis, have shown both antifeedant and insecticidal activities against larvae of Spodoptera littoralis [27,28]. However, the antifungal potential of this plant has not been previously studied. The Cistus genus contains about 21 species, and extracts from some species of this genus were reported to be effective against Geotrichum citri-aurantii [29] and G. candidum [30], fungi that cause sour rot in citrus crops worldwide. Therefore, Cistus symphytifolius, an endemic species to the Canary Islands, and whose antifungal potential has not been previously assessed, was also selected for the present study.
To the best of our knowledge, there have been no previous studies on the use of Lavandula canariensis and Salvia canariensis in pest control, which are two endemic species belonging to the Lamiaceae family. Nevertheless, the presence of compounds such as diterpenes [31] and triterpenes [32] with known fungicidal properties makes their study of interest. The study of Apollonias burbujana and Laurus novocanariensis (Lauraceae family) as fungicides could be promising, since several studies report the essential oils from L. novocanariensis as insecticides [33] and fungicides [34]. Ruta pinnata and Ruta chalepensis are two species of the Rutaceae family. The essential oils of R. chalepensis have shown fungicide activity against fungi of Fusarium [35], Alternaria [36], and Aspergillus [37] genera.
Several plant species belonging to the Solanaceae family have also been selected, including Datura stramonium, Datura innoxia, Nicotiana glauca, Salpichroa origanifolia, and Withania aristata. Various studies on D. stramonium and D. innoxia have revealed their potential as biopesticides against different pests [38], including fungi [39,40]. Moreover, the acetone extract of N. glauca has shown antifungal activity against phytopathogenic fungi [41]. S. origanifolia is characterized by a high content of withanolides, metabolites that act as feeding inhibitors of insect species such as Tribolium casraneum [42]. Species of the genus Withania, which includes W. aristata, are also a rich source of withanolides [43]. The high content of this type of metabolite in both S. origanifolia and W. aristata suggest these plants could be promising candidates for sources of natural fungicides against the selected phytopathogenic species.

2.2. Screening for Antifungal Bioactivity of Plants’ Ethanolic Extracts

In the first step, the ethanolic extracts of the plants were evaluated against three phytopathogenic fungi: Botrytis cinerea, Fusarium oxysporum, and Alternaria alternata (Figure 1, and Table S1 and Figure S1 in Supplementary Materials). The extracts were firstly screened at a concentration of 1 mg/mL, and those exhibiting an inhibition higher than 20% were tested at lower concentrations, namely, 0.5 and 0.1 mg/mL. Methylparaben [57], a mold inhibitor, was used as a positive control, showing a 100% inhibition of the three pathogens at the concentration of 1 mg/mL.
The crude ethanolic extracts showing bioactivity, namely, % growth inhibition (% I) > 10%, at the concentration of 1 mg/mL against at least one of the tested fungi were C. fusca, A. thuscula, C. symphytifolus, S. canariensis, L. novocanariensis, R. pinnata, R. chalepensis, D. innoxia, and W. aristata. C. fusca showed moderate activity against B. cinerea (% I = 28.91 at 1 mg/mL), exhibiting one of the lowest mycelial growth inhibition percentages compared to the other active plant extracts against this fungus. The extract of A. thuscula was more active against F. oxysporum (% I = 41.21% at 1 mg/mL) than against the other tested phytopathogens (% I = 23.63 and 12.41% for A. alternata and B.cinerea at 1 mg/mL, respectively). Coşoveanu et al. [21] reported similar results in their studies on A. thuscula leaf extracts. The ethanolic extract from C. symphytifolius exhibited antifungal activity against the three phytopathogens tested, ranging from 35.27 to 39.08% at 1 mg/mL. Therefore, the extract from this plant could be used as a broad-spectrum fungicide. However, the effect of the extract at lower concentrations is dependent on the fungus. In the case of A. alternata and F. oxysporum, the percentage of inhibition decreased considerably, becoming inactive for Fusarium fungus. By contrast, this extract showed similar potency against B. cinerea at 0.5 mg/mL (% I = 37.98%), and slightly lower at 0.1 mg/mL (% I = 19.57%). Two of the main metabolites reported in the Cistus genus are terpenoids and phenylpropanoids [58,59], whose antifungal activity has been previously studied. Moreover, several labdane diterpenes have been reported from C. symphytifolius [60,61] that could contribute to the bioactivity of this plant. Regarding S. canariensis, it was active against all the fungi evaluated, exhibiting a % I higher than 40% for all the fungi at 1 mg/mL. The activity was dose-dependent, although even at the lowest assayed concentration (0.1 mg/mL) the extract was able to inhibit fungal mycelial growth. Previous phytochemical studies on this species report the isolation of sterols, diterpenes, sesquiterpenes, and triterpenes [61], and some of these components exhibit an antifungal potential against the phytopathogens tested in this work. In fact, phenolic diterpenes such as carnosol and carnosic acid are active against B. cinerea [62], and triterpenes, including ursolic and oleanolic acids, are effective against A. alternata [63]. Therefore, the combination of these fungicidal compounds could be the responsible for the observed bioactivity of S. canariensis against the three fungi. L. novocanariensis showed a low activity against F. oxysporum (% I of 16.60 at 1 mg/mL), whereas it was inactive against the other tested fungi (% I < 10 mg/mL). The R. pinnata extract was moderately effective against B. cinerea and F. oxysporum at 1 mg/mL (28.27% and 25.47%, respectively). In the case of the other Rutaceae species studied, R. chalepensis showed a high activity against F. oxysporum (% I of 44.09% at 1 mg/mL), and a low activity towards A. alternata (% I of 17.08 at 1 mg/mL). Nevertheless, as the concentration decreased to 0.5 mg/mL, the % I dropped dramatically to 9.31%. D. innoxia exhibited antifungal activity against the three fungi tested, being more active against B. cinerea (% I = 52.11%), followed by A. alternata (% I = 37.95%), and exhibiting the lowest activity for F. oxysporum (% I = 20.74%) at 1 mg/mL. The antifungal activity of some plants belonging to the Solanaceae family has been associated with their content of tropane alkaloids [40,64], which, according to several studies, are high in D. innoxia, which was collected in different parts of the world [38,40,65]. Therefore, the great effectiveness of the D innoxia ethanolic extract against the tested fungi could be attributed to its content of tropane alkaloids such as hystocyamine and scopolamine [65]. W. aristata was active against the three phytopathogens. In particular, this species was the most active one against B. cinerea, showing a 72.22% growth inhibition at 1 mg/mL. An abundant group of withanolides have been identified in this plant [61], among which withanolide A exhibited antifungal and insecticide properties.
These results revealed that S. canariensis and D. innoxia ethanolic extracts were the most effective against A. alternata, showing a % I of 44.61% and 37.95%, respectively, at 0.5 mg/mL. The extract from W. aristata was the most remarkably active against B. cinerea, followed by those from S. canariensis and D. innoxia. Furthermore, those extracts from S. canariensis, R. chalepensis, and A. thuscula showed a higher % I against F. oxysporum at 1 mg/mL. Moreover, R. chalepensis was more pathogen-selective, affecting only F. oxysporum, whereas S. canariensis could be used as a broad-spectrum fungicide, exhibiting high potency against the three evaluated phytopathogens. Furthermore, the most sensitive fungus to the plant extracts seems to be B. cinerea, followed by F. oxysporum, whereas A. alternata turned out to be the least sensitive to the studied plants. Thus, seven plant extracts showed a degree of growth inhibition higher than 20% against F. oxysporum compared to six plant extracts against B. cinerea. However, the % I values against B. cinerea were higher (28.27–72.22% at 1 mg/mL). Moreover, five plant extracts showed a % I > 20% against A. alternata, with values ranging from 22.99 to 47.60% at 1 mg/mL.

2.3. Liquid–Liquid Partition of the Most Effective Extracts

Those extracts exhibiting higher % I (>30%) against at least one of the target fungi were submitted to a liquid–liquid partition into three fractions—a hexane fraction (F1), an ethyl acetate fraction (F2), and an aqueous fraction (F3)—which were tested on the phytopathogens (Figure 2, Figure 3 and Figure 4, and Table S2 in Supporting Materials).
The fractions from A. thuscula were tested on F. oxysporum, the most sensitive fungus to the ethanolic extract of this plant (% I > 30%). However, the fractionation did not increase its fungicidal activity (41.21% at 1 mg/mL), suggesting a synergistic effect between the components in the ethanolic extract that disappears when fractioning. Regarding C. symphytifolus, the percentage of inhibition increased with the fractionation for the three essayed fungi. This fact was noticeable in the case of B. cinerea, where the % I of the fractions C-F1 (88.43 and 85.80% at 1 and 0.5 mg/mL, respectively) and C-F2 (84.72 and 80.54% at 1 and 0.5 mg/mL, respectively) were two-fold higher than the ethanolic extract at 1 (39.08%) and 0.5 (37.98%) mg/mL, and three-fold higher at the lowest assayed concentration, 0.1 mg/mL. Thus, both the hexane and ethyl acetate fractions showed high activity, suggesting that different polarity compounds could be responsible for the fungicidal activity of this plant. The hexane (S-F1) and ethlyl acetate (S-F2) fractions from S. canariensis inhibited the mycelial growth of the three phytopathogens. These results are consistent with the fact that the diterpene and triterpene components are responsible for the antifungal activity of this plant, which are hydrophobic and, therefore, soluble in organic solvents [62,63]. A similar situation was observed in the case of R. chalepensis against F. oxysporum, because the lower polarity of the organic phases, the higher the percentage of mycelial inhibition. These results are in agreement with previous studies, which reported the antifungal activity of the essential oils from R. chalepensis [35,37]. In contrast, in the case of D. innoxia, the fraction showing less or no antifungal activity was the hexane fraction (D-F1), and its effectiveness against phytopathogens was higher by increasing the polarity. These results are in agreement with previous studies that attributed the fungicidal activity of D. innoxia to its content of tropane alkaloids [40], which are soluble in water. The bioactivity of W. aristata increased with the polarity of the solvent used, with the aqueous fraction being the most active against B. cinerea, exhibiting a slightly higher degree of mycelial inhibition (84.30%) compared to that of the ethanolic extract (72.22%). This fact could be attributed to the potential antifungal activity of some withanolide derivatives that are soluble in water. Thus, Seepe et al. [66] reported that a withaferin A glycoside isolated from a Whitania species was active against Fusarium verticilloides.
In general, except for A. thuscula, the liquid–liquid partition with solvents of different polarity increased the bioactivity against phytopathogens. Thus, the organic fractions (F1 and F2) from C. symphytifolius and S. canariensis significantly increased the potency against B. cinerea, whereas the bioactivity of the aqueous fractions from D. innoxia and W. aristata against this phytopathogen also increased, suggesting B. cinerea was sensitive to compounds of a different polarity and nature. The hexane and ethyl acetate fractions from C. symphytifolius and S. canariensis also exhibited a higher inhibition of A. alternata’s mycelial growth in comparison with the ethanolic extract.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Chemical and Reagents

All solvents used were analytical grade (Panreac, Barcelona, Spain). PGA culture medium (Potato glucose agar, Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and 9 cm diameter Petri dishes from Sarstedt (Nümbrecht, Germany) were used for the maintenance of fungal colonies and performance of the bioassays. Tetracycline (50 mg/L, Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was added to avoid bacterial growth on maintenance Petri dishes. Stock solutions of plant extracts were prepared with absolute ethanol (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA).

3.2. Plant Material

Plant species tested in this study were collected in Tenerife and Gran Canaria (Canary Islands, Spain). The details of their collection, including the ecological state, place of collection, geographic coordinates, voucher specimens, and traditional uses of the sixteen plant species are summarized in Table 1 and Table 2. A voucher specimen of each species was deposited in the Herbarium of the University of La Laguna (TFG-SEGAI), and identified by Cristina González Montelongo, PhD. The plant material (leaves or aerial parts) was spread on a tray, turned over occasionally, and left to air-dry at room temperature (25 ± 4 °C) for two weeks. The dried plant materials were ground and stored in sealed bags to preserve them from moisture until extraction.

3.3. Fungal Culture

Phytopathogenic fungi for bioassays belong to three cosmopolitan genera than cause serious damage to crops: Alternaria alternata, Botrytis cinerea, and Fusarium oxysporum. These fungi were maintained at 25 °C in darkness, and periodically replicated in Petri dishes with PGA culture medium and tetracycline to avoid the proliferation of contaminations. Strains of B. cinerea (B05.10) and A. alternata (Aa 100) were isolated from Vitis vinifera and Lycopersicon esculentum, respectively, both supplied by the Universidad de La Laguna, Tenerife. F. oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici (2715) strain, isolated from Lycopersicon esculentum, was provided by the Colección Española de Cultivos Tipo (CECT) from Valencia, Spain.

3.4. Plant Extracts Preparation

The air-dried, powdered plant materials (100 g) were extracted by repeated maceration (three times) with 1000 mL of ethanol (10 mL of ethanol/g of plant material) at room temperature for 24 h for each maceration process. The extract was filtered, and the solvent was removed under reduced pressure at 40 °C on a rotary evaporator, yielding green residue extracts. An aliquot (around 30 mg) of each extract was used for antifungal activity evaluation.

3.5. Liquid–Liquid Partition Procedure of Selected Plant Extracts

The ethanolic plant extracts that showed the highest fungicidal inhibition (% I > 30%) in at least one of the tested fungi were selected for further fractionation with different solvents. Thus, they were sequentially fractionated by liquid–liquid partition using a series of solvents of increasing polarity by a modification of the Kupchan method [67]. Briefly, 5 g of solid ethanolic extract was suspended in 60 mL of distilled water and successively extracted with 60 mL of hexanes (3 × 60 mL) and ethyl acetate (3 × 60 mL). The organic phases were dried with Na2SO4, filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure to afford the corresponding organic fractions. The aqueous phase was lyophilized, thereby yielding the aqueous fraction. All fractions from the liquid–liquid procedure were also assayed for their antifungal activity.

3.6. In Vitro Test-Assay on Mycelium

Antifungal activity was analyzed as mycelial growth inhibition by an agar-dilution method [68]. Once the culture medium solidified, eight 4 mm diameter discs of the target fungus per dish were placed in test and control Petri dishes. One dish per pathogen for each extract with eight sub-replicates in each dish was used. A stock solution of 50 mg/mL was prepared, using ethanol as solvent, and plant extracts were assayed at the concentration of 1 mg/mL. Colonies grown on Petri dishes were incubated for 48 h for B. cinerea and 72 h for A. alternata and F. oxysporum and were digitalized and measured with the application ImageJ (Image J, http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij, accessed on 5 September 2022). Percent inhibition (% I) was calculated as % I = (C − T/C) × 100, where C is the diameter of the control colonies and T is the diameter of the test colonies. Those extracts showing a % I higher than 20% at a concentration of 1 mg/mL were then tested at lower doses (0.5 and 0.1 mg/mL). Methylparaben [57] was used as a positive control at the concentration of 1 mg/mL, whereas ethanol was used as a negative control, using one dish per pathogen and 8 discs for each control.

4. Conclusions

In summary, we identified five plant extracts with potential for application as biofungicides. Thus, the evaluation of the sixteen plant extracts’ activity against phytopathogenic fungi that cause serious damage to crops—Alternaria alternata, Botrytis cinerea, and Fusarium oxysporum—revealed that the ethanolic extracts from S. canariensis and C. symphytifolius were effective against the three phytopathogens and, therefore, could be promising broad-spectrum biofungicides. Moreover, the A. thuscula, R. chalepensis, and W. aristata extracts exhibited fungal specificity. These results show that a simple, easy, and reproducible procedure gave rise to extracts with a high potency towards inhibiting the mycelial growth of these phytopathogens. Therefore, this extraction procedure could be feasible for use by farmers against fungal infections. Overall, the liquid–liquid partition led to an improvement in the bioactivity of the fractions against the phytopathogens. Thus, the organic fractions (hexane and ethyl acetate fractions) from S. canariensis exhibited an % I greater than the ethanolic extract for all the tested fungi. Likewise, the growth inhibition of the organic fractions from C. symphytifolius was higher than its ethanolic extract against A. alternata and B. cinerea. Although none of the plant extracts (or their fractions) exhibited a higher growth inhibition than the control (methylparaben), these biopesticides are expected to be less persistent and harmful than synthetic ones, making their use more desirable.
These findings support the notion that plant-derived extracts are promising sources of biopesticides to applied in integrated pest management. The compounds that could contribute to the bioactivity of plant extracts have been suggested based on previous studies. Nevertheless, further studies will be conducted to identify these bioactive components and to investigate their potential application as biofungicides.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/plants11212988/s1, Table S1: Antifungal effects (% growth inhibition) of plant extracts against Alternaria alternata, Botrytis cinerea, and Fusarium oxysporum; Table S2: Antifungal effects (% growth inhibition) of selected plant fractions against Alternaria alternata, Botrytis cinerea, and Fusarium oxysporum. Figure S1: In vitro test-assay of plant extracts against Alternaria alternata (A), Botrytis cinerea (B) and Fusarium oxysporum (C).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.C. and I.L.B.; methodology, I.A.J., C.P.R. and C.G.; investigation, S.R.S. and R.L.-C.; Resources (collection and identification of the plant species), C.G.M.; writing—original draft preparation, R.L.-C. and S.R.S.; writing—review and editing, I.L.B.; funding acquisition, I.L.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the project MACBIOPEST (MAC2/1.1a/289), the program Interreg MAC 2014-2020 co-funded by the European Regional Development Fund (FEDER), and the RTI2018-094356-B-C21 Spanish MINECO project, co-funded by the European Regional Development Fund (FEDER).

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Eugenio Reyes Naranjo, from Jardín Canario, Cabildo de Gran Canaria, for supporting this research with ethnobotanical information regarding traditional plant uses. RLC and SRS are grateful to project MACBIOPEST (MAC2/1.1a/289), program Interreg MAC2014–2020, for their financial support of this research.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zubrod, J.P.; Bundschuh, M.; Arts, G.; Bruhl, C.A.; Imfeld, G.; Knabel, A.; Payraudeau, S.; Rasmussen, J.J.; Rohr, J.; Scharmuller, A.; et al. Fungicides: An overlooked pesticide class? Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 53, 3347–3365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Pandian, S.; Ramesh, M. Development of pesticide resistance in pests: A key challenge to the crop protection and environmental safety. In Pesticides in Crop Production: Physiological and Biochemical Action, 1st ed.; Srivastava, P.K., Singh, V.P., Singh, A., Tripathi, D.K., Singh, S., Prasad, S.M., Chauhan, D.K., Eds.; Willey: New Jersey, NJ, USA, 2020; Chapter 1; pp. 1–13. [Google Scholar]
  3. Xu, Z.; Tang, T.; Lin, Q.; Yu, J.; Zhang, C.; Zhao, X.; Kah, M.; Li, L. Environmental risks and the potential benefits of nanopesticides: A review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2022, 20, 2097–2108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Marrone, P.G. Pesticidal natural products–status and future potential. Pest Manag. Sci. 2019, 75, 2325–2340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Souto, A.L.; Sylvestre, M.; Tölke, E.D.; Tavares, J.F.; Barbosa-Filho, J.M.; Cebrián-Torrejón, G. Plant-derived pesticides as an alternative to pest management and sustainable agricultural production: Prospects, applications and challenges. Molecules 2021, 26, 4835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Gikas, G.D.; Parlakidis, P.; Mavropoulos, T.; Vryzas, Z. Particularities of fungicides and factors affecting their fate and removal efficacy: A review. Sustainability 2022, 14, 4056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. EU. European Commission Amending Annexes I and V to Regulation (EU) No 649/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council Concerning the Export and Import of Hazardous Chemicals; EU: Brussels, Belgium, 2018; Volume 2016, pp. 48–119. [Google Scholar]
  8. Lucas, J.A.; Hawkins, N.J.; Fraaije, B.A. The Evolution of fungicide resistance. Adv. Appl. Microbiol. 2015, 90, 29–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Marc, R.A. Implications of Mycotoxins in Food Safety. In Mycotoxin and Food Safety-Recent Advances; Marc, R.A., Ed.; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2022; pp. 1–32. ISBN 978-1-83962-904-4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Abbey, J.A.; Percival, D.; Abbey, L.; Asiedu, S.K.; Prithiviraj, B.; Schilder, A. Biofungicides as alternative to synthetic fungicide control of grey mould (Botrytis cinerea)—Prospects and challenges. Biocontrol. Sci. Technol. 2019, 29, 241–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Dalmais, B.; Schumacher, J.; Moraga, J.; Le Pêcheur, P.; Tudzynski, B.; Collado, I.G.; Viaud, M. The Botrytis cinerea phytotoxin botcinic acid requires two polyketide synthases for production and has a redundant role in virulence with botrydial. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2011, 12, 564–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Dean, R.; Van Kan, J.A.L.; Pretorius, Z.A.; Hammond-Kosack, K.E.; Di Pietro, A.; Spanu, P.D.; Rudd, J.J.; Dickman, M.; Kahmann, R.; Ellis, J.; et al. The Top 10 fungal pathogens in molecular plant pathology. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2012, 13, 414–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Munkvold, G.P. Fusarium Species and Their Associated Mycotoxins. In Mycotoxigenic Fungi: Methods and Protocols; Moretti, A., Susca, A., Eds.; Springer Science-Business Media LLC: New York, NY, USA, 2017; pp. 51–106. ISBN 978-1-4939-6705-6. [Google Scholar]
  14. Troncoso-Rojas, R.; Tiznado-Hernández, M.E. Alternaria alternata (Black Rot, Black Spot). In Postharvest Decay Control Strategies, 1st ed.; Bautista-Baños, S., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2014; Chapter 5; pp. 147–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Fernández Pinto, V.E.; Patriarca, A. Alternaria Species and Their Associated Mycotoxins. In Mycotoxigenic Fungi: Methods and Protocols; Moretti, A., Susca, A., Eds.; Springer Science-Business Media LLC: New York, NY, USA, 2017; pp. 13–32. ISBN 978-1-4939-6705-6. [Google Scholar]
  16. Rodríguez, A.; Acosta, A.; Rodríguez, C. Fungicide resistance of Botrytis cinerea in tomato greenhouses in the Canary Islands and effectiveness of non-chemical treatments against gray mold. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2014, 30, 2397–2406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Bubici, G.; Kaushal, M.; Prigigallo, M.I.; Cabanás, C.G.L.; Mercado-Blanco, J. Biological control agents against Fusarium wilt of banana. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Hernández-Hernández, J.; Espino, A.; Rodríguez-Rodríguez, J.M.; Pérez-Sierra, A.; León, M.; Abad-Campos, P.; Armengol, J. Survey of diseases caused by Fusarium spp. on palm trees in the Canary Islands. Phytopathol. Mediterr. 2010, 49, 84–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yang, L.N.; He, M.H.; Ouyang, H.B.; Zhu, W.; Pan, Z.C.; Sui, Q.J.; Shang, L.P.; Zhan, J. Cross-resistance of the pathogenic fungus Alternaria alternata to fungicides with different modes of action. BMC Microbiol. 2019, 19, 205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Schnarr, L.; Segatto, M.L.; Olsson, O.; Zuin, V.G.; Kümmerer, K. Flavonoids as biopesticides—Systematic assessment of sources, structures, activities and environmental fate. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 824, 153781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Coşoveanu, A.; Cabrera, R.; Giménez, C.; Iacomi, B.M.; González-Coloma, A. Antifungal activity of plant extracts against pre and postharvest pathogens. Sci. Pap. Ser. A Agron. 2013, LVI, 206–211. [Google Scholar]
  22. Satish, S.; Raghavendra, M.P.; Raveesha, K.A. Antifungal potentiality of some plant extracts against Fusarium sp. Arch. Phytopathol. Plant Prot. 2009, 42, 618–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Francisco-Ortega, J.; Santos-Guerra, A.; Kim, S.C.; Crawford, D.J. Plant genetic diversity in the Canary Islands: A conservation perspective. Am. J. Bot. 2000, 87, 909–919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Nxumalo, K.A.; Aremu, A.O.; Fawole, O.A. Potentials of medicinal plant extracts as an alternative to synthetic chemicals in postharvest protection and preservation of horticultural crops: A review. Sustainability 2021, 13, 5897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Herrera, R.M.; Pérez, M.; Martín-Herrera, D.A.; López-García, R.; Rabanal, R.M.; Arias, A. Antimicrobial activity of extracts from plants endemic to the Canary Islands. Phyther. Res. 1996, 10, 364–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Cruz Suarez, S.J. Más de 100 Plantas Medicinales, 1st ed.; Obra Social de la Caja de Canaria: Las Palmas de Gran Canarias, Spain, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  27. González, A.G.; Jiménez, I.A.; Ravelo, A.G.; Bazzocchi, I.L. Minor sesquiterpenes from Maytenus canariensis with insecticidal and antifeedant activity. Tetrahedron 1993, 49, 6637–6644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. González, A.G.; Jiménez, I.A.; Ravelo, A.G.; Coll, J.; González, J.A.; Lloria, J. Antifeedant activity of sesquiterpenes from Celastraceae. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 1997, 25, 513–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Karim, H.; Boubaker, H.; Askarne, L.; Cherifi, K.; Lakhtar, H.; Msanda, F.; Boudyach, E.H.; Aoumar, A.A.B. Use of Cistus aqueous extracts as botanical fungicides in the control of citrus sour rot. Microb. Pathog. 2017, 104, 263–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Talibi, I.; Askarne, L.; Boubaker, H.; Boudyach, E.H.; Msanda, F.; Saadi, B.; Ait Ben Aoumar, A. Antifungal activity of some Moroccan plants against Geotrichum candidum, the causal agent of postharvest citrus sour rot. Crop Prot. 2012, 35, 41–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Abreu, M.E.; Müller, M.; Alegre, L.; Munné-Bosch, S. Phenolic diterpene and α-tocopherol contents in leaf extracts of 60 Salvia species. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2008, 88, 2648–2653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Breton-Funes, J.L.; De Atauri, I.J.R. Triterpenes from Lavandula canariensis. J. Nat. Prod. 1986, 49, 937–949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Furtado, R.; Baptista, J.; Lima, E.; Paiva, L.; Barroso, J.G.; Rosa, J.S.; Oliveira, L. Chemical composition and biological activities of Laurus essential oils from different Macaronesian Islands. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 2014, 55, 333–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Rodilla, J.M.; Tinoco, M.T.; Morais, J.C.; Giménez, C.; Cabrera, R.; Martín-Benito, D.; Castillo, L.; González-Coloma, A. Laurus novocanariensis essential oil: Seasonal variation and valorization. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 2008, 36, 167–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Bouajaj, S.; Romane, A.; Benyamna, A.; Amri, I.; Hanana, M.; Hamrouni, L.; Romdhane, M. Essential oil composition, phytotoxic and antifungal activities of Ruta chalepensis L. leaves from High Atlas Mountains (Morocco). Nat. Prod. Res. 2014, 28, 1910–1914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Bouabidi, W.; Hanana, M.; Gargouri, S.; Amri, I.; Fezzani, T.; Ksontini, M.; Jamoussi, B.; Hamrouni, L. Chemical composition, phytotoxic and antifungal properties of Ruta chalepensis L. essential oils. Nat. Prod. Res. 2015, 29, 864–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Haddouchi, F.; Chaouche, T.M.; Zaouali, Y.; Ksouri, R.; Attou, A.; Benmansour, A. Chemical composition and antimicrobial activity of the essential oils from four Ruta species growing in Algeria. Food Chem. 2013, 141, 253–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Sharma, M.; Dhaliwal, I.; Rana, K.; Delta, A.K.; Kaushik, P. Phytochemistry, pharmacology, and toxicology of Datura species—A review. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 1291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Kumar, S.; Chandra, R.; Behera, L. Assessment of plant extracts and their in vitro efficacy against potato early blight incited by Alternaria solani. J. Pure Appl. Microbiol. 2021, 15, 1591–1601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Matias, R.; Fernandes, V.; Corrêa, B.O.; Pereira, S.R.; de Oliveira, A.K.M. Phytochemistry and antifungal potential of Datura inoxia mill. on soil phytopathogen control. Biosci. J. 2020, 36, 691–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Mdee, L.K.; Masoko, P.; Eloff, J.N. The activity of extracts of seven common invasive plant species on fungal phytopathogens. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2009, 75, 375–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Mareggiani, G.; Picollo, M.I.; Veleiro, A.S.; Tettamanzi, M.C.; Benedetti-Doctorovich, M.O.V.; Burton, G.; Zerba, E. Response of Tribolium castaneum (Coleoptera, Tenebrionidae) to Salpichroa origanifolia withanolides. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002, 50, 104–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. LLanos, G.G.; Araujo, L.M.; Jiménez, I.A.; Moujir, L.M.; Bazzocchi, I.L. Withaferin A-related steroids from Withania aristata exhibit potent antiproliferative activity by inducing apoptosis in human tumor cells. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2012, 54, 499–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. de Paz, P.L.P.; Padrón, C.E.H. Plantas Medicinales o Útiles en la Flora Canaria: Aplicaciones Populares; Francisco Lemus: La Laguna, Spain, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  45. Margarita de Monte. CanariWiki, Consejería de Educación, Universidades, Cultura y Deportes Gobierno de Canarias. Available online: https://www3.gobiernodecanarias.org/medusa/wiki/index.php?title=Margarita_de_monte (accessed on 30 September 2022).
  46. Bramwell, D. Plantas Medicinales de las Islas Canarias; Rueda: Madrid, Spain, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  47. Amagante. CanariWiki, Consejería de Educación, Universidades, Cultura y Deportes, Gobierno de Canarias. Available online: https://www3.gobiernodecanarias.org/medusa/wiki/index.php?title=Amagante (accessed on 30 September 2022).
  48. Llorent-Martínez, E.J.; Spínola, V.; Castilho, P.C. Phenolic profiles of Lauraceae plant species endemic to Laurisilva forest: A chemotaxonomic survey. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2017, 107, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Jeon, J.H.; Kim, M.G.; Lee, H.S. Insecticidal activities of Ruta chalepensis leaves isolated constituent and structure-relationships of its analogues against Sitophilus oryzae. J. Korean Soc. Appl. Biol. Chem. 2013, 56, 591–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Aouadhi, C.; Ghazghazi, H.; Hamrouni, S.; Hasnaoui, B.; Maaroufi, A. In vitro antifungal activity of the essential oils and the methanolic extract of Ruta chalepensis. Archs. Inst. Pasteur Tunis 2013, 90, 39–46. [Google Scholar]
  51. Miller, A.B.; Cates, R.G.; Lawrence, M.; Soria, J.A.F.; Espinoza, L.V.; Martínez, J.V.; Arbizú, D.A. The antibacterial and antifungal activity of essential oils extracted from Guatemalan medicinal plants. Pharm. Biol. 2015, 53, 548–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Swathi, S.; Murugananthan, G.; Ghosh, S.; Pradeep, A.S. Larvicidal and repellent activities of ethanolic extract of Datura stramonium leaves against mosquitoes. Int. J. Pharm. Phytochem. Res. 2012, 4, 25–27. [Google Scholar]
  53. Pascual-Villalobos, M.J.; Robledo, A. Screening for anti-insect activity in Mediterranean plants. Ind. Crop. Prod. 1998, 8, 183–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Ali, S.M.A.; Ammad, A.M.; Ahmad, S.K.; Bilal, I.M.; Abdullah, A.; Talal, I.; Zulfiqar, M. Effectiveness of different plant extracts along with new chemistry insecticide against Tribolium castaneum. GSC Biol. Pharm. Sci. 2020, 13, 95–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Antigales, Huevito de Gallo. Available online: http://antigales.blogspot.com/2016/08/huevito-de-gallo.html (accessed on 30 September 2022).
  56. Llanos, G.G.; Varela, R.M.; Jiménez, I.A.; Molinillo, J.M.; Macías, F.A.; Bazzocchi, I.L. Metabolites from Withania aristata with potential phytotoxic activity. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2010, 5, 1043–1047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Haman, C.; Dauchy, X.; Rosin, C.; Munoz, J.-F. Occurrence, fate and behavior of parabens in aquatic environments: A review. Water Res. 2015, 68, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Zalegh, I.; Akssira, M.; Bourhia, M.; Mellouki, F.; Rhallabi, N.; Salamatullah, A.M.; Alkaltham, M.S.; Alyahya, H.K.; Mhand, R.A. A review on Cistus sp.: Phytochemical and antimicrobial activities. Plants 2021, 10, 1214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Papaefthimiou, D.; Papanikolaou, A.; Falara, V.; Givanoudi, S.; Kostas, S.; Kanellis, A.K. Genus Cistus: A model for exploring labdane-type diterpenes’ biosynthesis and a natural source of high value products with biological, aromatic, and pharmacological properties. Front. Chem. 2014, 2, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Calabuig, M.T.; Cortés, M.; Francisco, C.G.; Hernández, R.; Suárez, E. Labdane diterpenes from Cistus symphytifolius. Phytochemistry 1981, 20, 2255–2258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Molina, Á.V.; Guerra, A.S. Investigaciones Fitoquímicas en Plantas Canarias; Centro de Estudios Ramón Aceres: Madrid, Spain, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  62. Exarchou, V.; Kanetis, L.; Charalambous, Z.; Apers, S.; Pieters, L.; Gekas, V.; Goulas, V. HPLC-SPE-NMR characterization of major metabolites in Salvia fruticosa mill. extract with antifungal potential: Relevance of carnosic acid, carnosol, and hispidulin. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2015, 63, 457–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Shu, C.; Zhao, H.; Jiao, W.; Liu, B.; Cao, J.; Jiang, W. Antifungal efficacy of ursolic acid in control of Alternaria alternata causing black spot rot on apple fruit and possible mechanisms involved. Sci. Hortic. 2019, 256, 108636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Abdel-Motaal, F.F.; Nassar, M.S.M.; El-Zayat, S.A.; El-Sayed, M.A.; Ito, S. Responses of fungi to tropane alkaloids produced by a medicinal plant Hyoscyamus muticus (Egyptian henbane). Folia Microbiol. 2009, 54, 207–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. El Bazaoui, A.; Bellimam, M.A.; Soulaymani, A. Tropane alkaloids of Datura innoxia from Morocco. Z. Naturforsch. C J. Biosci. 2012, 67, 8–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Seepe, H.A.; Ramakadi, T.G.; Lebepe, C.M.; Amoo, S.O.; Nxumalo, W. Antifungal activity of isolated compounds from the leaves of Combretum erythrophyllum (Burch.) Sond. and Withania somnifera (L.) Dunal against Fusarium pathogens. Molecules 2021, 26, 4732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Kupchan, S.M. Recent advances in the chemistry of terpenoid tumor inhibitors. Pure Appl. Chem. 1970, 21, 227–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Cosoveanu, A.; Hernandez, M.; Iacomi-Vasilescu, B.; Zhang, X.; Shu, S.; Wang, M.; Cabrera, R. Fungi as endophytes in Chinese Artemisia spp.: Juxtaposed elements of phylogeny, diversity and bioactivity. Mycosphere 2016, 7, 102–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Plants 11 02988 g001 550
Figure 1. Antifungal effects (% growth inhibition) of plant extracts against Alternaria alternata, Botrytis cinerea, and Fusarium oxysporum. Results are expressed as percentage relative to the negative control. Methylparaben was used as a positive control (100% inhibition at 1 mg/mL). Data are presented as meas ± SD (Standard Deviation, n = 8).
Figure 1. Antifungal effects (% growth inhibition) of plant extracts against Alternaria alternata, Botrytis cinerea, and Fusarium oxysporum. Results are expressed as percentage relative to the negative control. Methylparaben was used as a positive control (100% inhibition at 1 mg/mL). Data are presented as meas ± SD (Standard Deviation, n = 8).
Plants 11 02988 g001
Plants 11 02988 g002 550
Figure 2. Antifungal effects (% growth inhibition) of the ethanolic extracts (EtOH) and fractions (F1: hexane fraction; F2: ethyl acetate fraction; F3: water fraction) from C. symphytifolius (C), S. canariensis (S), and D. innoxia (D) against Alternaria alternata. Results are expressed as percentage relative to the negative control. Methylparaben was used as a positive control (100% inhibition at 1 mg/mL). Data are presented as means ± SD (Standard Deviation, n = 8).
Figure 2. Antifungal effects (% growth inhibition) of the ethanolic extracts (EtOH) and fractions (F1: hexane fraction; F2: ethyl acetate fraction; F3: water fraction) from C. symphytifolius (C), S. canariensis (S), and D. innoxia (D) against Alternaria alternata. Results are expressed as percentage relative to the negative control. Methylparaben was used as a positive control (100% inhibition at 1 mg/mL). Data are presented as means ± SD (Standard Deviation, n = 8).
Plants 11 02988 g002
Plants 11 02988 g003 550
Figure 3. Antifungal effects (% growth inhibition) of the ethanolic extracts (EtOH) and fractions (F1: hexane fraction; F2: ethyl acetate fraction; F3: water fraction) from C. symphytifolius (C), S. canariensis (S), D. innoxia (D), and W. aristata (W) against Botrytis cinerea. Results are expressed as percentage relative to the negative control. Methylparaben was used as a positive control (100% inhibition at 1 mg/mL). Data are presented as means ± SD (Standard Deviation, n = 8).
Figure 3. Antifungal effects (% growth inhibition) of the ethanolic extracts (EtOH) and fractions (F1: hexane fraction; F2: ethyl acetate fraction; F3: water fraction) from C. symphytifolius (C), S. canariensis (S), D. innoxia (D), and W. aristata (W) against Botrytis cinerea. Results are expressed as percentage relative to the negative control. Methylparaben was used as a positive control (100% inhibition at 1 mg/mL). Data are presented as means ± SD (Standard Deviation, n = 8).
Plants 11 02988 g003
Plants 11 02988 g004 550
Figure 4. Antifungal effects (% growth inhibition) of the ethanolic extracts (EtOH) and fractions (F1: hexane fraction; F2: ethyl acetate fraction; F3: water fraction) from A. thuscula (A), C. symphytifolius (C), S. canariensis (S), and R.chalepensis (R) against Fusarium oxysporum. Results are expressed as percentage relative to the negative control. Methylparaben was used as a positive control (100% inhibition at 1 mg/mL). Data are presented as means ± SD (Standard Deviation, n = 8).
Figure 4. Antifungal effects (% growth inhibition) of the ethanolic extracts (EtOH) and fractions (F1: hexane fraction; F2: ethyl acetate fraction; F3: water fraction) from A. thuscula (A), C. symphytifolius (C), S. canariensis (S), and R.chalepensis (R) against Fusarium oxysporum. Results are expressed as percentage relative to the negative control. Methylparaben was used as a positive control (100% inhibition at 1 mg/mL). Data are presented as means ± SD (Standard Deviation, n = 8).
Plants 11 02988 g004
Table
Table 1. Details of collected plant species under study.
Table 1. Details of collected plant species under study.
FamilyPlant Species/Common Name/
Voucher Specimen 1		Ecological State 2/
Plant Organ		Collection Place 3/Geographic Coordinates 4/Date
ApocynaceaeCeropegia fusca Bolle/
cardoncillo, TFC 53.261		Endemic/
Aerial part		Montaña Pelada, Granadilla de Abona/
28°04′03″ N, 16°31′18″ W, 100 m.a.s.l./09-2018
AsteraceaeArgyranthemum broussonetii Pers.
& Humphries/
magarza de monte/TFC 53.398		Endemic/
Aerial part		Ctra. El Bailadero, La Cumbrilla, Anaga/
28°32′12″ N, 16°14′04″ W, 830 m.a.s.l./
06-2020
Artemisia thuscula Cav./
incienso/TFC 53.702		Endemic/
Aerial part		Ctra. Playa Santo Domingo, La Guancha/
28°23′32″ N, 16°40′34″ W, 88 m.a.s.l./02-2021
CelastraceaeGymnosporia cassinoides (L’Hér.) Masf. (=Maytenus canariensis
(Loes.) G. Kunkel & Sunding)/peralillo/TFC 53.244		Endemic/
Leaves		Centro Ambiental La Tahonilla, La Laguna/
28°28′34″ N, 16°19′16″ W, 574 m.a.s.l./
09-2018
CistaceaeCistus symphytifolius Lam./
jara/TFC 53.703		Endemic/
Leaves		Pista Forestal El Lagar, La Guancha/
28°20′42″ N, 16°39′15″ W, 1023 m.a.s.l./02-2019
LamiaceaeLavandula canariensis Mill./
lavanda, mato risco/TFC 53.400		Endemic/
Aerial part		Rambla de Castro, Los Realejos/
28°23′40″ N, 16°35′32″ W, 125 m.a.s.l./05-2020
Salvia canariensis L./
salvia, salvia morisca/TFC 53.328		Endemic/
Leaves		Gáldar/
28°02′10″ N, 15°37′30″ W, 1415 m.a.s.l./06-2019
LauraceaeApollonias barbujana (Cav.) A. Braun subsp. barbujana/
barbusano, ébano de Canarias/
TFC 53.397		Endemic/
Leaves		La Laguna/
28°28′48″ N, 16°19′11″ W, 560 m.a.s.l./
01-2020
Laurus novocanariensis Rivas-
Mart. et al./loro, laurel/
TFC 53.399		Endemic/
Leaves		Cruz del Carmen, Anaga/
28°31′63″ N, 16°16′48″ W, 970 m.a.s.l./
06-2020
RutaceaeRuta pinnata L. f./
ruda salvaje/TFC 53.243		Endemic/
Leaves		La Laguna/
28°28′44″ N, 16°19′21″ W, 575 m.a.s.l./09-2018
Ruta chalepensis L./
ruda/TFC 53.756		Native to Macaronesian/LeavesAraya, Candelaria/
28°21′24″ N, 16°23′27″ W, 320 m.a.s.l./09-2018
SolanaceaeDatura innoxia Mill./
burladora, métel/TFC 53.216		Non-native in the Canary Islands/LeavesLa Orotava/
28°23′40″ N, 16°32′46″ W, 198 m.a.s.l./
03-2018
Datura stramonium L./
estramonio, hierba del diablo, santas noches/TFC 53.217		Non-native in the Canary Islands/LeavesLa Orotava/
28°23′40″ N, 16°32′46″ W, 198 m.a.s.l./
03-2018
Nicotiana glauca Graham/
bobo, tabaco moro/TFC 53.214		Invasive in the Canary Islands/LeavesLa Orotava/
28°23′40″ N, 16°32′46″ W, 198 m.a.s.l./03-2018
Salpichroa origanifolia (Lam.) Baill./
huevito de gallo/TFC 53.215		Non-native in the Canary Islands/LeavesLa Orotava/
28°23′40″ N, 16°32′46″ W, 198 m.a.s.l./03-2018
Withania aristata (Aiton) Pauquy/
orobal/TFC 53.219		Native to the Canary Islands/LeavesCtra. Playa Santo Domingo, La Guancha/
28°23′33″ N, 16°40′32″ W, 88 m.a.s.l./04-2018
1 Voucher specimens were deposited at the Herbarium TFC (SEGAI) Universidad de La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain. 2 POWO (2021). Plants of the World Online. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. http://www.plantsoftheworldonline.org/, accessed on 9 July 2021. 3 All species were collected in Tenerife, except for Salvia canariensis collected in Gran Canaria, Canary Islands. 4 Geographic coordinates: latitude, longitude, and elevation.
Table
Table 2. Traditional uses and scientific reports of the plant species under study.
Table 2. Traditional uses and scientific reports of the plant species under study.
Plant SpeciesTraditional/Scientific UsesReferences
C. fuscaVulnerary, anti-hemorrhagic[44]
A. broussonetiiStomach remedy, anti-asthmatic, used to regulate menstrual disorders[45]
A. thusculaInsecticide, antiseptic,
Protection of potato crops from insects		[46]
[26]
G. cassinoidesAntiviral, antifungal
Insecticidal, antifeedant against Spodoptera littoralis		[46]
[27]
C. symphytifoliusAnalgesic[47]
L. canariensisVermifuge, antiparasitic, antiseptic
Insecticide, anti-inflammatory, diuretic, sedative		[46]
[26]
S. canariensisAntiseptic, antiviral
Antifungal, antibacterial		[44]
[26]
A. barbujanaDiuretic, analgesic, antiulcerogenic, cardiotonic, expectorant, stomachic, sedative[48]
L. novocanariensisTo treat bronchitis, pharyngitis, rheumatism
Insecticidal		[26]
[46]
R. pinnataAntiparasitic, antiseptic
Antibiotic, antifungal, anti-inflammatory, toxic		[46]
[26]
R. chalepensisToxic
Insecticide against Sitophilus oryzae
Phytotoxic and antifungal activities
Antibacterial and antifungal activity		[44]
[49]
[36,50]
[51]
D. innoxiaAnti-asthmatic, anesthetic, toxic[44]
D. stramoniumAntiasthmatic, antiparkinsonian, narcotic, antispasmodic, toxic
Larvicidal and repellent against mosquitoes
Anti-insect activity in Mediterranean plants
Insecticide against Tribolium castaneum		[44,46]
[52]
[53]
[54]
N. glaucaDermatic, toxic
Active against phytopathogenic fungi		[44]
[41]
S. origanifoliaAnti-inflammatory, heal skin abrasions, diuretic, narcotic
Isolated withanolides act as feeding inhibitors on Tribolium castaneum		[55]
[42]
W. aristataDiuretic, analgesic, anesthetic, anti-asthmatic, antirheumatic, antitumor, aphrodisiac
Apocarotenoids and carotenoids showed phytotoxicity towards Lepidium sativum,
Lactuca sativa, Lycopersicum esculentum, and Allium cepa		[26,46]
[56]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Reyes, C.P.; Sabina, S.R.; López-Cabeza, R.; Montelongo, C.G.; Giménez, C.; Jiménez, I.A.; Cabrera, R.; Bazzochi, I.L. Antifungal Potential of Canarian Plant Extracts against High-Risk Phytopathogens. Plants 2022, 11, 2988. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11212988

AMA Style

Reyes CP, Sabina SR, López-Cabeza R, Montelongo CG, Giménez C, Jiménez IA, Cabrera R, Bazzochi IL. Antifungal Potential of Canarian Plant Extracts against High-Risk Phytopathogens. Plants. 2022; 11(21):2988. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11212988

Chicago/Turabian Style

Reyes, Carolina P., Samuel Rodríguez Sabina, Rocío López-Cabeza, Cristina G. Montelongo, Cristina Giménez, Ignacio A. Jiménez, Raimundo Cabrera, and Isabel L. Bazzochi. 2022. "Antifungal Potential of Canarian Plant Extracts against High-Risk Phytopathogens" Plants 11, no. 21: 2988. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11212988

APA Style

Reyes, C. P., Sabina, S. R., López-Cabeza, R., Montelongo, C. G., Giménez, C., Jiménez, I. A., Cabrera, R., & Bazzochi, I. L. (2022). Antifungal Potential of Canarian Plant Extracts against High-Risk Phytopathogens. Plants, 11(21), 2988. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11212988

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop