Next Article in Journal
Application of Moringa Leaf Extract as a Seed Priming Agent Enhances Growth and Physiological Attributes of Rice Seedlings Cultivated under Water Deficit Regime
Previous Article in Journal
Olive Oil Sensory Analysis as a Tool to Preserve and Valorize the Heritage of Centenarian Olive Trees
Previous Article in Special Issue
Pre-Sowing Treatments Improve Germinability of South Texas Native Plant Seeds
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 11
Issue 3
10.3390/plants11030259
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Seed Treatments with Microorganisms Can Have a Biostimulant Effect by Influencing Germination and Seedling Growth of Crops

by
Mariateresa Cardarelli
1,*,
Sheridan L. Woo
2,3,4,
Youssef Rouphael
5 and
Giuseppe Colla
1
1
Department of Agriculture and Forest Sciences (DAFNE), University of Tuscia, 01100 Viterbo, Italy
2
BAT Center-Interuniversity Center for Studies on Bioinspired Agro-Environmental Technology, University of Naples Federico II, 80055 Portici, Italy
3
Department of Pharmacy, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Napoli, Italy
4
Task Force on Microbiome Studies, University of Naples Federico II, 80055 Portici, Italy
5
Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, 80055 Portici, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2022, 11(3), 259; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11030259
Submission received: 3 December 2021 / Revised: 13 January 2022 / Accepted: 15 January 2022 / Published: 19 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biological Seed Treatments for Ecosustainable Agriculture)
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Seed quality is an important aspect of the modern cultivation strategies since uniform germination and high seedling vigor contribute to successful establishment and crop performance. To enhance germination, beneficial microbes belonging to arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, Trichoderma spp., rhizobia and other bacteria can be applied to seeds before sowing via coating or priming treatments. Their presence establishes early relationships with plants, leading to biostimulant effects such as plant-growth enhancement, increased nutrient uptake, and improved plant resilience to abiotic stress. This review aims to highlight the most significant results obtained for wheat, maize, rice, soybean, canola, sunflower, tomato, and other horticultural species. Beneficial microorganism treatments increased plant germination, seedling vigor, and biomass, as well as overcoming seed-related limitations (such as abiotic stress), both during and after emergence. The results are generally positive, but variable, so more scientific information needs to be acquired for different crops and cultivation techniques, with considerations to different beneficial microbes (species and strains) and under variable climate conditions to understand the effects of seed treatments.

1. Introduction

The global agriculture system occupies approximately 40% of the earth’s surface and has the main objective of producing food for an ever-increasing population (7.5 billion people today, and nearly 10 billion by 2050) [1]. Due to the massive use of resources (water, soil, energy, and air), the agricultural sector leaves a large environmental footprint [2] and for this reason, modern technologies and innovative cultivation strategies are almost exclusively aimed at reducing the environmental impact and preserving natural resources for future generations. The main challenges are therefore: (i) to promote the whole soil–plant system equilibrium in space and time, (ii) to reduce nutrient losses from the agroecosystem and to increase soil C sink-potential, (iii) to limit greenhouse gas emissions in order to deal with climate change and to improve system energy use efficiency, and (iv) to ensure high quality production and economic advantages for agricultural producers through an effective and proper use of agronomic inputs [3].
For maize, soybean, cereals, rice, cotton, and most vegetable crops the cultivation cycle begins with direct seed sowing; consequently, uniform germination and high seedling vigor contribute decisively to successful crop establishment and thus to crop performance [4]. Indeed, when seedlings emerge fast and vigorously, they have a greater possibility to capture resources, tolerate biotic and abiotic stress, compete with weeds, and, in general, cope better with adverse environmental conditions [5]. Seed quality is therefore a primary objective of the agricultural industry, which reports a significant increase in the global seed market (from USD 30 billion in 1996 to USD 92.32 billion by 2025, according to a new report by Grand View Research, Inc.). To enhance seed quality different seed treatment technologies are now available; in particular, pre-sowing seed treatments arouse great interest because of their efficacy and environmental benefits, plus the field is experiencing large investments by major seed-research and market players. According to market research reports, the global biological seed treatment market is projected to reach USD 1.7 billion by 2025, recording a CAGR of 11.9% since 2020, including biofertilizers, biopesticides, and biostimulants [6]. Considering only seed treatments with microorganisms and natural substances applied as biostimulants, the global market is forecasted to reach USD 338 million by 2025.
Pre-sowing seed treatments with beneficial microorganisms have relatively low application costs, as they require a single treatment and the active ingredients are applied at low dose rates [7,8,9]. These treatments include seed coating and seed priming. Seed coating consists in applying a thin layer of external material onto the seed surface, altering little the seed shape, size, or weight [10,11]. It is generally used for the application of identification colors and tracers (e.g., fluorescent dyes) or active compounds (protectants, plant growth regulating agents, plant nutrients, and microbials) [12]. Some authors prefer to differentiate between ‘seed treatment’ and ‘seed coating’, in order to discriminate between formulations containing useful microorganisms and natural substances in the former and treatments with artificial ingredients such as pesticides in latter [12,13]. Seed treatments do not induce any changes within the seed and the active ingredients provide an advantage for the crop during germination and seedling growth.
Instead, seed priming is a process of controlled seed hydration with water (hydro-priming) or special solutions (osmo-priming, physicochemical-priming, hormonal priming, or matric-priming) that allows controlled seed imbibition and triggers pre-germinative metabolic processes (de novo synthesis of nucleic acids and proteins, ATP production, sterols and phospholipids accumulation, or activation of DNA repair and antioxidant mechanisms) [14]. Imbibition must be stopped before overcoming the reversible phase, thus prior to emergence of radical from the seed coat [15].
Considering the seed industry’s interest on innovative technologies that can make a substantial contribution to the yield and economics, plus the environmental sustainability of the agricultural system, this review aims to focus on the biostimulating effect of beneficial microorganisms applied to the seed of the major crops whose cultivation cycle begins with seed sowing. This effect results in increased plant germination, seedling vigor, and biomass, as well as the capability to overcome seed-related issues (such as abiotic stress) both during and after emergence.

2. Applications of Beneficial Microorganisms

Plant beneficial microbes (PBMs) (growth-promoting rhizo-microorganisms) are specific fungi or bacteria able to establish “intimate” relationships with plants, leading to plant-growth enhancement, increased nutrient uptake, restoration of soil fertility, and improvement of plant resilience to abiotic and biotic stress [16,17,18,19]. Their application to the soil leads to savings in the use of fertilizers and pesticides with considerable agro-ecological advantages [20]. The possibility of applying PBMs directly to the seed produces two substantial benefits, viz. less microbial inoculum per plant located at the seed–soil interface, and immediate contact between microbes and roots at the time of germination and early developmental stages [21,22]. Based on recent research, inoculations refer to seed treatments or biopriming treatments that consist of soaking seeds in a microbial suspension. The microorganisms mainly used for seed treatments belong to arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi, Trichoderma spp., rhizobia, and plant-growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) (such as Pseudomonas spp., Bacillus spp., and Enterobacter spp.) [14], that have been applied to cereals, vegetables, oil and seed pulse crops, and fiber and forage crops [12].
Due to the variability of the experimental conditions, such as the PBMs species-strains, plant species-varieties, cultivation techniques, growing conditions (open field or greenhouse), and climate, the following results have been organized in reference to the most economically important crops for which seeds have been treated using beneficial microorganisms prior sowing.

2.1. Wheat

Triticum aestivum L. and T. durum Desf. are the most widely cultivated wheat species in the world being adapted to a wide range of soil and climate conditions. The cultivation technique for these species has long been characterized by extensive use of agrochemicals and management with a high environmental impact, compromising soil fertility and crop development. On this basis, T. durum seeds were treated with a consortium of endophytic microorganisms consisting of Rhizoglomus intraradices BEG72 (former Glomus intraradices), Funneliformis mosseae (former G. mosseae), and Trichoderma atroviride MUCL 45632 to verify the ability of the fungi to promote emergence and plant growth of seedlings [23] (Table 1). Seventeen days after sowing, a significant effect of the microorganism inoculum was observed in seedlings, with an increase in leaf number (+28.6%), and shoot (+23.1%) and root (+64.2%) dry biomass compared to untreated wheat seedlings. However, there is scientific evidence that different results can be obtained depending on the strain used, as in the case of the experiment carried out by Kthiri et al. [24] on durum wheat (cv. Karim). The authors applied different Trichoderma harzianum strains to the outer surface of seeds and obtained different values for germination, seedling growth, and antioxidative system data (phenols and peroxidase enzymes). The strain S.INAT increased root and shoot length, vigor index, and leaf phenolic accumulation with respect to untreated seeds, while the strain S.IO2 induced a higher dry-matter content and peroxidase activity in seedling leaves. Since phenolic compounds and peroxidase enzymes are involved in wall-building processes such as lignification and reinforcement of plant structural components [25], their stimulation via seed treatments can contribute to promote vigor and growth of seedlings [24]. Durum-wheat seeds cv. Karim were also inoculated with Meyerozyma guilliermondii yeast, strain S.INAT (MT731365), and sown in pots under controlled conditions. The effect of M. guilliermondii yeast on germination and seedling growth was thus verified for the first time. Yeast seed-treatment promoted germination, which increased from 47% (untreated seeds) to 93%, and such growth parameters as shoot and root length and plant biomass. M. guilliermondii was able to induce IAA (indole-3-acetic acid) production so promoting plant-cell enlargement, root initiation and lateral-root formation in seedlings [26].
External treatments on T. aestivum seeds were compared to soil inoculation and foliar spraying in post-emergence by applying mycorrhizal fungus R. irregularis and diazotrophic N-fixing bacterium Azotobacter vinelandii [27]. The experiment was conducted under controlled conditions and direct seed inoculation led to high root colonization and improved root development through increased root-tip density and branching with respect to other treatments. There is a relationship between root growth and root exudation [28,29] and it is also known that microorganisms modulate root excretion of metabolites in the rhizosphere [30]. Some authors investigated the modulation of root exudation of T. aestivum plantlets with respect to the inoculation technique of T. atroviride AT10 i.e., with applications of the beneficial fungus in the substrate or as seed treatments [30]. Although no differences were found with respect to inoculation technique for shoot and root dry biomass, the analysis with liquid and gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry revealed a distinctive modulation of metabolites (such as lipids, phenols and terpenoids, siderophores and chelating acids, derivatives of amino acids, and phytohormones) in the root exudates depending on the inoculation method.
To support germination and seedling growth under adverse environmental stress conditions, Lastochkina et al. [31] studied the protective effects of Bacillus subtilis (strain 10-4) against drought stress. The bacterium was applied through a bio-priming treatment on seeds of wheat that were sensitive (T. aestivum cv. Salavat Yulaev) or tolerant (cv. Ekada 70) to drought conditions during the germination phase. B. subtilis promoted germination and plant growth of 6-day-old seedling (both length and fresh/dry weight of roots and shoots) under normal growth conditions and promptly activated specific metabolic adaptations to drought-stress conditions by decreasing lipid peroxidation, proline content, and electrolyte leakage in 21-day-old seedlings [31]. Even Proteus mirabilis R2 (LS975374), Pseudomonas balearica RF-2 (LS975373), and Cronobacter sakazakii RF-4 (LS975370) improved germination of wheat seeds under normal as well as water-stress conditions. Germination and promptness indices reached their highest values (100% and 68%, respectively) for seed treatment with Pseudomonas balearica, and even seedling biomass and leaf area were positively affected by the same strain [32]. Otherwise, Proteus mirabilis resulted in the highest values of dry weight and leaf area under drought conditions (50% water-holding capacity), which can be attributed to the IAA-production ability of R2 promoting root development and thus nutrient uptake [33,34], and Cronobacter sakazakii-treated seeds developed seedlings with minimum cell injury and electrolyte leakage, and maximum cell membrane stability in the presence of drought stress [32]. All bacterial strains induced ACC deaminase and catalase enzyme activity. These are both involved in regulating physiological response to stress since ACC-deaminase regulates the ethylene levels during stress [35] while catalase helps in maintaining reactive oxygen species (ROS) [36,37].
Table
Table 1. Effect of seed treatments with microorganisms on germination and seedling growth of wheat under different growing conditions.
Table 1. Effect of seed treatments with microorganisms on germination and seedling growth of wheat under different growing conditions.
CropActive MicroorganismsMode of Seed Inoculation;
Growth Conditions		Abiotic Stress and
References		Main Parameters Improved
Wheat
Triticum durum Desf		Fungi:
Rhizoglomus intraradices + Funneliformis mosseae + Trichoderma atroviride		Seed coating; growth chamberNo stress
[23]		Increased leaf number (+28.6%), and shoot (+23.1%) and root (+64.25%) dry biomass
Fungi:
Trichoderma harzianum
(different strains)		Seed coating; growth chamberNo stress
[24]		Increased germination (+35%), root (+63%) and shoot (+38%) length, plant dry matter (+550%), vigor index (+120%), and leaf phenols (+128%), according to the strain considered
Yeast:
Meyerozyma guilliermondii		Seed coating; growth chamberNo stress
[26]		Increased germination (+97%), shoot (+41%) and root (+69%) length, and plant biomass (+16%)
Wheat
T. aestivum L.		Fungus + bacterium:
Rhizophagus irregularis + Azotobacter vinelandii		Seed coating;
rhizoboxes		No stress
[27]		Increased root tip
density (+28%) and branching (+29%)
Fungus:
Trichoderma atroviride		Seed coating; greenhouseNo stress
[30]		Different modulation of metabolites (lipids, phenols and terpenoids, siderophores and chelating acids, derivatives of amino acids, and phytohormones) in the root exudates
Bacterium:
Bacillus subtilis		Seed priming; growth chamber Drought
[31]		Increased plant elongation (+15%) and plant dry weight (+10%)

2.2. Maize

Zea mays (L.) is a very important crop for the human diet and as an animal feed [38], and it is grown under a wide range of soil and climatic conditions. Recent research has focused on applying beneficial microorganisms to the seed so that it has a more uniform germination and a better seedling growth. An indigenous strain of T. harzianum, for example, proved to be effective as a coating agent of maize seeds in an experiment conducted in open-field conditions (Embu District, Kenya) [39]; whereby inoculated seeds showed higher germination values and 14 days after emergence seedlings had better shoot and root development under T. harzianum-coating treatment. Sharma et al. [40] set up an experiment to compare a cyanobacteria consortium (BF1-4) with a biofilm obtained using cyanobacterium Anabaena torulosa as matrix and Trichoderma viride as partner (An-Tr biofilm), both were applied through priming treatments on two elite maize inbreds (HKI323PV and HKI161PV) (Table 2). The cyanobacterial consortium was comprised of BF1 A. torulosa, BF2 Nostoc carneum, BF3 Nostoc piscinale, and BF4 Anabaena doliolum. Germination and germination-related enzymes (α-amylase and invertase activity) were detected 96 h after sowing, highlighting the different effect of BF1-4 and An-Tr biofilm on seeds. Seed inoculation with microorganisms (BF1-4 or An-Tr biofilm) increased germination percentage and enzyme activities for both maize inbreds. The highest germination values were found for inbred HKI323PV seeds inoculated with An-Tr biofilm (16% increase compared to uninoculated control) while for the enzymes involved in the hydrolysis of seed reserve sugars, the greatest increases compared to uninoculated treatment (10 for amylase and 13% for invertase) were found with An-Tr biofilm-based treatment for maize inbred HKI161PV. This improved mobilization of nutrients at the seed stage provides energy for growing of seedlings, as checked at 7 and 21 days after sowing, with significant increases in root length, shoot length, fresh weight, and dry weight upon inoculation with An-Tr biofilm [40].
By using an endophytic bacterial inoculation, higher seed germination and seedling vigor have been observed on young maize plantlets grown in open-field conditions after seed treatment with Pseudomonas putida, Pseudomonas fluorescens, Azospirillum lipoferum, and Azospirillum brasilense [41]. Noumavo et al. [42] considered different seed treatments with P. putida, P. fluorescens, and A. lipoferum, alone or in combination, and the best results for germination percentage, root and shoot length, vigor index, and leaf area were obtained with the combination P. putida and P. fluorescens. A. lipoferum applied alone, on the other hand, stimulated seedling height and root dry matter more than the other treatments [42]. Even under salt-stress conditions, Pseudomonas proved to be effective in supporting plant growth and bioaccumulation of natural antioxidant enzymes [43]. The strain (Pseudomonas genicultate MF-84) was isolated from maize rhizosphere, tagged with green fluorescent protein for localization in the plant system and used to prime maize seeds; based on observations made with confocal microphotographs, in 15 days P. genicultate colonized more than 70% of roots by locating in the epidermal cells, cortical tissues, endodermis, and vascular bundles.
A seed coating treatment has been performed by using a commercial A. lipoferum strain originally isolated from the maize rhizosphere and the sowing experiment was conducted under controlled laboratory conditions. Germination was not affected by A. lipoferum treatment but morphological characteristics of the six-leaf-stage seedlings, with longer radicles and larger shoots, revealed the positive impact of Azospirillum on early development of plants and, consequently, on leaf photosynthetic potential [44]. Similarly, different isolates belonging to Bacillus spp. and characterized for indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) production were applied on maize seeds without leading to differences in germination rate compared to the control but with a significant increase in epigean growth (fresh and dry biomass and shoot length) and root development (fresh and dry biomass and number of adventitious roots) with different results depending on the bacterium strain considered [45]. Accinelli et al. [46] applied a Bacillus subtilis strain (QST 713) to maize seeds through the incorporation of spores into a bioplastic-based formulation and only in the presence of the bacterium (but not for treatment with bioplastic film alone) was there a greater elongation of maize seedlings (stems and roots). The application of beneficial microorganisms to the seed via biofilms was also compared with simple seed-coating with adherent spores, using, in this case, two species of T. harzianum, and results showed that both Trichoderma species promoted seedling growth, especially when applied in a bioplastic layer [47]. For Accinelli et al. [46,47], as for Rozier et al. [44] and Lwin et al. [45], the microorganism treatment did not affect germination percentage but rather, seedlings development and biomass accumulation. On the contrary maize-seed priming by cyanobacterium Spirulina platensis accelerated germination in both control and Cd-toxicity conditions with a maximum in the absence of Cd contamination. Even shoot length and photosynthetic capacity of seedlings (measured 20 days after sowing) were enhanced by the S. platensis treatment whereas Cd accumulation and its translocation from root to shoot was significantly restricted after maize-seed inoculation with cyanobacterium, pointing out the value of seed treatment with S. platensis in cropping systems conducted on contaminated soil [48]. Recently, an experiment was conducted with the aim of testing the effect of the endophytic bacterium Mixta theicola isolated from roots of Solenostemma argel, a wild herb, in maize seed priming. Inoculation resulted in a significant enhancement of seed germination, root elongation, seedling vigor index, and fresh and dry biomass of 15-day-old plantlets. Even chlorophyll, carbohydrates, proteins, anthocyanins, total phenolics, and flavonoids were increased in the inoculated seedlings indicating an improved physiological and biochemical status of maize seedlings [49].
Table
Table 2. Effect of seed treatments with microorganisms on germination and seedling growth of maize (Zea mays L.) under different growing conditions.
Table 2. Effect of seed treatments with microorganisms on germination and seedling growth of maize (Zea mays L.) under different growing conditions.
Active MicroorganismsMode of Seed Inoculation;
Growth Conditions		Abiotic Stress and
References		Main Parameters Improved
Cyanobacteria and fungus:
Anabaena torulosa + Nostoc carneum + Nostoc piscinale + Anabaena doliolum or Anabaena torulosa + Trichoderma viride		Seed coating; greenhouseArsenic
[37]		Germination (+16%) and seed-germination-related enzymes (+10% for α-amylase and + 13% for invertase), root length (+43%), shoot length (+90%), fresh weight (+21%), and dry weight (+31%)
Bacteria:
Pseudomonas putida, Pseudomonas fluorescens, Azospirillum lipoferum, alone or in combination		Seed coating; growth chamberNo stress
[42]		Germination (+22%), root length (+51%), shoot length (+54%), vigor index (+75%), and leaf area (+86%)
Cyanobacterium:
Azospirillum lipoferum		Seed coating; growth chamberNitrogen
[44]		Radicle (+36%) and shoot biomass (+30%)
Bacterium:
Bacillus spp.		Seed soaking;
Growth chamber		No stress
[45]		Shoot fresh (+90%) and dry (+91%) biomass, shoot length (+37%), root fresh (+88%) and dry (+69%) biomass, and number of adventitious roots (+61%)
Bacterium:
Bacillus subtilis		Seed coating (bioplastic formulation); growth chamberNo stress
[46]		Shoot (+7%) and root (+10%) length
Fungus:
Trichoderma harzianum		Seed coating (and biofilm application); growth chamber No stress
[47]		Shoot (+14%) and root (+9%) length
Bacterium:
Mixta theicola		Seed soaking; growth chamberNo stress
[49]		Germination (+38%), root elongation (109%), seedling-vigor index (+117%), and fresh (+108%) and dry (+207%) biomass
Cyanobacterium:
Spirulina platensis		Seed priming; growth chamberCadmium
[48]		Germination (+63%), root dry weight (+57%), and leaf area (+20%)

2.3. Rice

Rice (Oryza sativa L.) is one of the most widely consumed grains in the world, with high water requirements and a distinctive cultivation technique. At present, dry-direct seeding is preferred as it reduces labor and water consumption, but it means more weed competition during the first developmental stage, which can reduce the crop yield by 30–80%. To promote seedling emergence and development after dry-direct seeding, Javed et al. [50] applied plant-growth-promoting bacteria (Bacillus sp. KS-54) to the seeds with coating technology (Table 3). Seed coating with Bacillus sp. KS-54 was effective in both controlled and open-field conditions compared to noncoated seeds—in the first case the coating treatment enhanced final germination and lowered mean germination time, whereas in field conditions it increased emergence and values of the emergence index, representing a fast and synchronized germination [50]. Even the simultaneous application of Pseudomonas and Bacillus increased the rice seed vigor index, as reported by Palupi et al. [51]. A coating treatment with Paenibacillus yonginensis bacterium combined with SiO2 resulted in an increase in all seedling growth parameters (shoot length, root length, root number, fresh weight, and dry weight) and vigor index estimated by means of seedling length and germination [52].

2.4. Soybean

Glycine max ((L.) Merr) is an important crop worldwide. Its development and yield in open fields are strongly influenced by the symbiosis with soil microbes. However, there are not many trials involving seed treatments with microorganisms and natural substances, although soybean plants are naturally found associated with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and rhizobia [53]. Yusnawan et al. [54] analyzed how seed coating with different Trichoderma virens isolates affects germination and development of soybean seedlings (Table 4). Germination was inhibited by five of the seven strains tested and no strain improved the final germination percentage compared to uncoated seeds. Some T. virens isolates positively affected shoot and root length whereas all T. virens strains increased root weight. Total flavonoid and phenolic content of 14-day-old seedlings was also affected by seed treatments revealing a significant stimulation of secondary metabolism in the presence of Trichoderma inoculum. Bacillus velezensis strain CMRP 4490 was applied as a coating film on soybean seeds and the germination rate increased compared to the control from 55.5 to 64% [55]. The CMRP 4490 treatments resulted in differences in total root length and total root surface and strain genome exploration revealed the presence of genes linked to the regulation of biofilms, motility, and important properties for rhizospheric colonization and plant-growth-promoting ability [55]. Jarecki [56] demonstrated the effectiveness of Bradyrhizobium japonicum as a seed inoculant for increasing root nodulation of soybean. The same bacterium, either alone or in combination with a mycorrhizal inoculum (Glomus clarum, Glomus mosseae, and Gigaspora margarita), improved root length and plant dry-weight as compared to untreated plants [57].

2.5. Canola

Canola (Brassica napus L.) has become one of the world’s most important oilseed crops. With the aim to promote canola-seedling growth in open-field conditions, Noel et al. [58] evaluated the effectiveness of seed inoculation with Rhizobium leguminosarum as a plant-growth-promoting rhizobacterium and achieved early stimulation of seedling root growth (Table 4). Direct involvement of the plant growth regulators indole-3-acetic acid and cytokinin was confirmed by using an auxotrophic Rhizobium mutant that requires tryptophan or adenosine for indole-3-acetic acid and cytokinin synthesis, respectively, and did not promote seedling roots as would be the case in a non-auxotrophic Rhizobium strain [58]. As for maize, Accinelli et al. [46] obtained a significant stimulation of canola seedling growth, but not of germination rate, after seed-coating treatments with T. harzianum. Under salt stress, biopriming treatments with Bacillus subtilis (bacterium), Macrophomina phaseolina (fungus), or a combination of both, enhanced germination parameters (percentage and velocity) of canola seeds, even under high salinity conditions [59]. Similarly, B. subtilis and Trichoderma harzianum increased germination as well as root length and seedling vigor index if applied as a coating to canola seeds [60].

2.6. Sunflower

Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) seeds have been treated with Enterobacter (FD-17), Bacillus sp. (KS-54) and Paraburkholderia phytofirmans (PsJN) because these microorganisms contribute to nutrient mineralization and solubilization and could improve seed germination [61] (Table 4). According to results, Enterobacter and P. phytofirmans optimized germination percentage, mean growth time, and vigor indices of the biochemical profile of sunflower seedlings (activity of catalase, peroxidase, superoxide dismutase, protease, α-amylase enzymes; total soluble proteins; and lipid peroxidation). Even thirty Pseudomonas fluorescens strains were applied as coating agents improving seed germination and the vigor index of sunflower seedling over the control (untreated seeds) [62]. Pseudomonas fluorescens strains were also evaluated for their ability to enhance shoot and root length, lateral rooting, and biomass with positive results for all growth indices measured on sunflower seedlings.
Table
Table 4. Effect of seed treatments with microorganisms on germination and seedling growth of industrial crops under different growing conditions.
Table 4. Effect of seed treatments with microorganisms on germination and seedling growth of industrial crops under different growing conditions.
CropActive MicroorganismsMode of Seed Inoculation;
Growth Conditions		Abiotic Stress and
Reference		Main Parameters Improved
Soybean
Glycine max (L.) Merr		Fungus:
Trichoderma virens		Seed coatingNo stress
[54]		Shoot (+16%) and root (+37%) length, root weight (+77%), and shoot weight (+25%)
Bacterium:
Bacillus velezensis		Seed coating; growth chamberNo stress
[55]		Germination rate (+15%), total root length (+33%), and total root surface (+27%)
Canola
Brassica napus L.		Bacterium:
Bacillus subtilis		Seed coating (bioplastic formulation); growth chamberNo stress
[46]		Shoot (+15%) and root (+12%) length
Bacterium and fungus:
Bacillus subtilis, Macrophomina phaseolina, alone or in combination		Seed priming; growth chamber Salt
[59]		Germination
Bacterium and fungus:
Bacillus subtilis + Trichoderma harzianum		Seed priming; growth chamberSalt
[60]		Germination
Sunflower
Helianthus annuus L. L.		Bacteria:
Enterobacter, Bacillus sp., Paraburkholderia phytofirmans		Seed priming; growth chamberNo stress
[61]		Germination and vigor index
Bacterium:
Pseudomonas fluorescens 		Seed priming; growth chamberNo stress
[62]		Germination and vigor index

2.7. Tomato

Tomato is a very important vegetable crop, grown worldwide in outdoor fields, greenhouses, and net houses. Mastouri et al. [63] considered different abiotic stress conditions during tomato seed germination and evaluated the effect of Trichoderma seed treatment as means to maintain good seedling performance even in such conditions. Trichoderma treatment did not have an effect in absence of stress but under osmotic, salt, or suboptimal temperature conditions it guaranteed a faster and more uniform germination with respect to the control. A common mechanism through which the plant–fungus association enhances tolerance to different abiotic stresses was postulated—Trichoderma could induce some physiological protection in stressed seedling through a reduced accumulation of lipid peroxides in the presence of oxidative damage. Seed biopriming with Trichoderma pseudokoningii in combination with vermiwash, increased root biomass of tomato seedling under heat-stress conditions [64]. A coating inoculum of T. harzianum and P. fluorescens (either singly or in combination) induced a significantly higher germination rate (more than 48%) and a lower mean germination time (less than 2.5 days) of tomato seeds; the combinations of inoculants were more effective than single-isolate treatments [65] (Table 5).

2.8. Other Horticultural Species

There are some cases in which seed treatments induced negative effects on germination rate and plant height. This is the case of seed coating by using the consortium of Trichoderma spp., Beauveria bassiana, Metarhizium anisopliae, and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi that reduced the germination of lettuce seeds [66]. Similar results were obtained by coating sweet pepper seeds with T. viride, T. polysporhum, T. stromaticum, B. bassiana, M. anisopliae, and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi [12]. It should be noted that Trichoderma produces and secretes a wide range of extracellular hydrolytic enzymes capable of degrading plant cell walls; if applied in in high doses, it can therefore attack the seed tegument, damaging it and causing a reduction in germination and plant growth [67,68]. Carrot and onion seeds primed with beneficial microorganisms (Clonostachys rosea, Pseudomonas chlororaphis, Pseudomonas fluorescens, T. harzianum, and T. viride) were sown in glasshouse experiments and displayed improved emergence of treated carrot seeds and a better emergence time for C. rosea coating treatment [69] (Table 5). Considering cucumber seeds, Pill et al. [70] applied a commercial preparation of T. harzianum as a coating agent obtaining higher seedling emergence and seedling shoot fresh weight with respect to uncoated seeds. The same Trichoderma species was effective for ameliorating germination and seedling growth of Cucurbita pepo under different salinity stresses (50 and 100 mM NaCl solution) [71] and of Cuminum cyminum under drought stress [72]. Piri et al. [72] applied different T. harzianum strains or Pseudomonas fluorescence bacteria and observed an increase in soluble protein and antioxidant enzyme activity of inoculated seeds with respect to a control without inoculation leading to enhancement of some morphological indices.
Table
Table 5. Effect of seed treatments with microorganisms on germination and seedling growth of vegetable crops under different growing conditions.
Table 5. Effect of seed treatments with microorganisms on germination and seedling growth of vegetable crops under different growing conditions.
CropActive MicroorganismsMode of Seed Inoculation; Growth ConditionsAbiotic Stress and
References		Main Parameters Improved
Tomato
Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.		Bacterium and fungus:
Trichoderma harzianum, Pseudomonas fluorescens. alone or in combination		Seed coating; growth chamberNo stress
[65]		Germination rate (+48%)
Fungus:
Trichoderma pseudokoningii		Seed priming; growth chamberHeat
[64]		Shoot (+169%) and root (+135%) length, root number (+77%), shoot (+26%) and root (+54%) fresh weight, and shoot (+131%) and root (+276%) dry weight
Cucumber
Cucumis sativus L.		Fungus:
Trichoderma harzianum		Seed coating; growth chamberNo stress
[70]		Seedling emergence and shoot fresh weight
Carrot
Daucus carota L. and onion
Allium cepa L. 		Bacteria and fungi:
Clonostachys rosea, Pseudomonas chlororaphis, Pseudomonas fluorescens, Trichoderma harzianum, Trichoderma viride		Seed priming; greenhouseNo stress
[69]		Emergence

3. Conclusions

Since seed quality is a primary objective of the agricultural industry and different seed-treatment technologies are now available, it is interesting to consider the effectiveness of beneficial microorganisms for seed treatments of the main crops whose cultivation cycle begins with direct seed sowing. In fact, both germination and seedling vigor contribute to successful crop performance because rapidly emerging healthy seedlings are able to immediately utilize the available resources, tolerate biotic and abiotic stresses and other adverse environmental conditions. We examined how plant beneficial microbes belonging to arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, Trichoderma spp., rhizobia, and other bacteria improve germination and emergence performance of crops. In addition to agronomic benefits, the possibility of applying beneficial microorganisms directly to the seed allows for reduction of the amount of microbial inoculum per plant (economic advantage) and ensures an early contact between microbes and rootlets. Until now, the most significant results have been obtained for wheat, maize, rice, soybean, canola, sunflower, tomato, and other horticultural species. More research is needed to explore new crops and microorganism strains and to deepen scientific information on different climate and growing conditions.
Currently, only mycorrhizal fungi, Rhizobium spp., Azotobacter spp., and Azospirillum spp. are included in EU Fertilizer Regulation 2019/1009 (Component Material Categories, number 7) (CMC-7) as microbial plant biostimulants. With regard to other microorganisms in this review, currently Trichoderma spp. is registered as a microbial biological control agent, as a biopesticide against plant pathogens. However, this fungus, and numerous other microorganisms are found frequently as active ingredients in many commercial formulations with indications as biofertilizers, bio-growth enhancers, and biostimulants due to the ability of these biological components to promote plant growth, abiotic stress tolerance, improve yield and nutritional quality, as proven in various crop studies. The above findings presented suggest that newly selected microbial organisms should be considered for inclusion in revised versions of the CMC-7 list, according to their ability to establish broad and positive relationships with plants, even under suboptimal or stressful environmental conditions, and to enhance yield and quality. However, the future inclusion of new microbial strains will require sufficient scientific evidence that demonstrates and supports not only their efficacy, but also their safety to the consumers and environment.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization and review writing, M.C.; review and editing of draft, M.C., G.C., and Y.R.; provision and management of research material, S.L.W.; collection of literature regarding review, M.C. and S.L.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not available.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge MIUR (Minister for Education, University and Research) for financial support (Law 232/216, Department of excellence) of Department of Agriculture and Forest Sciences, University of Tuscia.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. OECD. Environmental Outlook to 2050: The Consequences of Inaction—Key Facts and Figures. Available online: www.oecd.org/env/indicators-modelling-outlooks/oecdenvironmentaloutlookto2050theconsequencesofinaction-keyfactsandfigures.htm (accessed on 2 November 2021).
  2. Awika, J.M. Major Cereal Grains Production and Use around the World. In Advances in Cereal Science: Implications to Food Processing and Health Promotion; ACS Symposium Series; ACS Publications: Washington, DC, USA, 2011; Volume 1089, pp. 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Rouphael, Y.; Lucini, L.; Miras-Moreno, B.; Colla, G.; Bonini, P.; Cardarelli, M. Metabolomic responses of maize shoots and roots elicited by combinatorial seed treatments with microbial and non-microbial biostimulants. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Damalas, C.A.; Koutroubas, S.D.; Fotiadis, S. Hydro-priming effects on seed germination and field performance of faba bean in spring sowing. Agriculture 2019, 9, 201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Osburn, R.M.; Schroth, M. Effect of osmopriming sugar beet seed on germination rate and incidence of Pythium ultimum damping-off. Plant Dis. 1989, 73, 21–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Markets and Markets. Biological Seed Treatment Market by Type (Microbials and Botanicals), Crop (Corn, Wheat, Soybean, Cotton, Sunflower, and Vegetable Crops), Function (Seed Protection and Seed Enhancement), and Region—Global Forecast to 2025. Available online: https://www.marketsandmarkets.com/Market-Reports/biological-seed-treatment-market-162422288.html (accessed on 2 November 2021).
  7. Rouphael, Y.; Cardarelli, M.; Bonini, P.; Colla, G. Synergistic action of a microbial-based biostimulant and a plant derived-protein hydrolysate enhances lettuce tolerance to alkalinity and salinity. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Amirkhani, M.; Mayton, H.S.; Netravali, A.N.; Taylor, A.G. A seed coating delivery system for bio-based biostimulants to enhance plant growth. Sustainability 2019, 11, 5304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Qiu, Y.Q.; Amirkhani, M.; Mayton, H.; Chen, Z.; Taylor, A.G. Biostimulant seed coating treatments to improve cover crop germination and seedling growth. Agronomy 2020, 10, 154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Halmer, P. Commercial seed treatment technology. In Seed Technology and Its Biological Basis; Black, M., Bewley, J.D., Eds.; Sheffield Academic Press: Sheffield, UK, 2000; pp. 257–286. [Google Scholar]
  11. Halmer, P. Seed technology and seed enhancement. Acta Hort. 2008, 771, 17–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Rocha, I.; Ma, Y.; Souza-Alonso, P.; Vosátka, M.; Freitas, H.; Oliveira, R.S. Seed coating: A tool for delivering beneficial microbes to agricultural crops. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 1357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Cardarelli, M.; Rouphael, Y.; Coppa, E.; Hoagland, L.; Colla, G. Using microgranular-based biostimulant in vegetable transplant production to enhance growth and nitrogen uptake. Agronomy 2020, 10, 842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Paparella, S.; Araujo, S.S.; Rossi, G.; Wijayasinghe, M.; Carbonera, D.; Balestrazzi, A. Seed priming: State of the art and new perspectives. Plant Cell Rep. 2015, 34, 1281–1293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lutts, S.; Benincasa, P.; Wojtyla, L.; Kubala, S.; Pace, R.; Lechowska, K.; Quinet, M.; Garnczarska, M. Seed priming: New comprehensive approaches for an old empirical technique. In New Challenges in Seed Biology—Basic and Translational Research Driving Seed Technology; Araujo, S., Balestrazzi, A., Eds.; InTechOpen: London, UK, 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Waller, F.; Achatz, B.; Baltruschat, H.; Fodor, J.; Becker, K.; Fischer, M.; Heier, T.; Hückelhoven, R.; Neumann, C.; von Wettstein, D.; et al. The endophytic fungus Piriformospora indica reprograms barley to salt-stress tolerance, disease resistance, and higher yield. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 13386–13391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Malusá, E.; Sas-Paszt, L.; Ciesielska, J. Technologies for beneficial microorganisms inocula used as biofertilizers. Sci. World J. 2012, 1, 491206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Comite, E.; El-Nakhel, C.; Rouphael, Y.; Ventorino, V.; Pepe, O.; Borzacchiello, A.; Vinale, F.; Rigano, D.; Staropoli, A.; Lorito, M.; et al. Bioformulations with beneficial microbial consortia, a bioactive compound and plant biopolymers modulate sweet basil productivity, photosynthetic activity and metabolites. Pathogens 2021, 10, 870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Silletti, S.; Di Stasio, E.; Van Oosten, M.J.; Ventorino, V.; Pepe, O.; Napolitano, M.; Marra, R.; Woo, S.L.; Cirillo, V.; Maggio, A. Biostimulant activity of Azotobacter chroococcum and Trichoderma harzianum in durum wheat under water and nitrogen deficiency. Agronomy 2021, 11, 380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Castiglione, A.M.; Mannino, G.; Contartese, V.; Bertea, C.M.; Ertani, A. Microbial biostimulants as response to modern agriculture needs: Composition, role and application of these innovative products. Plants 2021, 10, 1533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Philippot, L.; Raaijmakers, J.M.; Lemanceau, P.; van der Putten, W.H. Going back to the roots: The microbial ecology of the rhizosphere. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2013, 11, 789–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Oliveira, R.S.; Rocha, I.; Ma, Y.; Vosátka, M.; Freitas, H. Seed coating with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi as an ecotechnological approach for sustainable agricultural production of common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). J. Toxicol. Environ. Health Part A 2016, 79, 329–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Colla, G.; Rouphael, Y.; Bonini, P.; Cardarelli, M. Coating seeds with endophytic fungi enhances growth, nutrient uptake, yield and grain quality of winter wheat. Int. J. Plant Prod. 2015, 9, 171–190. [Google Scholar]
  24. Kthiri, Z.; Ben Jabeur, M.; Machraoui, M.; Gargouri, S.; Hiba, K.; Hamada, W. Coating seeds with Trichoderma strains promotes plant growth and enhance the systemic resistance against Fusarium crown rot in durum wheat. Egypt. J. Biol. Pest Control 2020, 30, 139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Akbari-Vafaii, A.; Ketabchi, S.; Moradshahi, A. Effect of methyl jasmonate (MeJA) on biochemical responses of wheat seedlings infected by Fusarium culmorum. Arch. Phytopathol. Pflanzenschutz 2014, 47, 1893–1904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kthiri, Z.; Ben Jabeur, M.; Chairi, F.; López-Cristoffanini, C.; López-Carbonell, M.; Serret, M.D.; Araus, J.L.; Karmous, C.; Hamada, W. Exploring the potential of Meyerozyma guilliermondii on physiological performances and defense response against Fusarium crown rot on durum wheat. Pathogens 2021, 10, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Dal Cortivo, C.; Barion, G.; Ferrari, M.; Visioli, G.; Dramis, L.; Panozzo, A.; Vamerali, T. Effects of field inoculation with VAM and bacteria consortia on root growth and nutrients uptake in common wheat. Sustainability 2018, 10, 3286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Calvo, P.; Nelson. L.; Kloepper, J.W. Agricultural uses of plant biostimulants. Plant Soil 2014, 383, 3–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Rouphael, Y.; Cardarelli, M.; Colla, G. Role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in alleviating the adverse effectsof acidity and aluminium toxicity in zucchini squash. Sci. Hortic. 2015, 188, 97–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lucini, L.; Colla, G.; Miras Moreno, M.B.; Bernardo, L.; Cardarelli, M.; Terzi, V.; Bonini, P.; Rouphael, Y. Inoculation of Rhizoglomus irregulare or Trichoderma atroviride differentially modulates metabolite profiling of wheat root exudates. Phytochemistry 2019, 157, 158–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lastochkina, O.; Garshina, D.; Ivanov, S.; Yuldashev, R.; Khafizova, R.; Allagulova, C.; Fedorova, K.; Avalbaev, A.; Maslennikova, D.; Bosacchi, M. Seed priming with endophytic Bacillus subtilis modulates physiological responses of two different Triticum aestivum L. cultivars under drought stress. Plants 2020, 9, 1810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zia, R.; Nawaz, M.S.; Yousaf, S.; Amin, I.; Hakim, S.; Mirza, M.S.; Imran, A. Seed inoculation of desert-plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria induce biochemical alterations and develop resistance against water stress in wheat. Physiol. Plant. 2021, 172, 990–1006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Egamberdieva, D.; Wirth, S.J.; Alqarawi, A.A.; Abd_Allah, E.F.; Hashem, A. Phytohormones and beneficial microbes: Essential components for plants to balance stress and fitness. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 2104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Nabti, E.; Sahnoune, S.; Ghoul, M.; Fischer, D.; Hofmann, A.; Rothballer, M.; Schmid, M.; Hartmann, A. Restoration of growth of durum wheat (Triticum durum var. waha) under saline conditions due to inoculation with the rhizosphere bacterium Azospirillum brasilense NH and extracts of the marine alga Ulva lactuca. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2010, 29, 6–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Singh, R.P.; Shelke, G.M.; Kumar, A.; Jha, P.N. Biochemistry and genetics of ACC deaminase: A weapon to “stress ethylene” produced in plants. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ali, B.; Deng, X.; Hu, X.; Gill, R.A.; Ali, S.; Wang, S.; Zhou, W. Deteriorative effects of cadmium stress on antioxidant system and cellular structure in germinating seeds of Brassica napus. J. Agric. Sci. Technol. 2015, 17, 63–74. [Google Scholar]
  37. Sharma, I. Arsenic induced oxidative stress in plants. Biologia 2021, 67, 447–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wu, F.; Guclu, H. Global maize trade and food security: Implications from a Social Network Model. Risk Analysis 2013, 33, 2168–2178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Okoth, S.A.; Otadoh, J.A.; Ochanda, J.O. Improved seedling emergence and growth of maize and beans by Trichoderma harziunum. Trop. Subtrop. Agroecosystems 2011, 13, 65–67. [Google Scholar]
  40. Sharma, V.; Prasanna, R.; Hossain, F.; Muthusamy, V.; Nain, L.; Das, S.; Singh Shivay, Y.; Kumar, A. Priming maize seeds with cyanobacteria enhances seed vigour and plant growth in elite maize inbreds. Biotech 2020, 10, 154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Gholami, A.; Shahsavani, S.; Nezarat, S. The effect of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) on germination, seedling growth and yield of maize. World Acad. Sci. Eng. Technol. 2009, 37, 19–24. [Google Scholar]
  42. Noumavo, P.A.; Kochoni, E.; Didagbé, Y.O.; Adjanohoun, A.; Allagbé, M.; Sikirou, R.; Gachomo, E.W.; Kotchoni, S.O.; Baba-Moussa, L. Effect of different plant growth promoting Rhizobacteria on maize seed germination and seedling development. Am. J. Plant Sci. 2013, 4, 1013–1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Singh, P.; Chatterjee, A.; Bhatia, V.; Prakash, S. Application of laser biospeckle analysis for assessment of seed priming treatments. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2020, 169, 105212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Rozier, C.; Hamzaoui, H.; Lemoine, D.; Czarnes, S.; Legendre, L. Field-based assessment of the mechanism of maize yield enhancement by Azospirillum lipoferum CRT1. Scientific Reports 2017, 7, 7416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Lwin, K.M.; Myint, M.M.; Tar, T.; Aung, W.Z.M. Isolation of plant hormone (Indole-3-Acetic Acid—IAA) producing rhizobacteria and study on their effects on maize seedling. Eng. J. 2012, 16, 137–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Accinelli, C.; Abbas, H.K.; Shier, W.T. A bioplastic-based seed coating improves seedling growth and reduces production of coated seed dust. J. Crop Improv. 2018, 32, 318–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Accinelli, C.; Abbas, H.K.; Little, N.S.; Kotowicz, J.K.; Mencarelli, M.; Shier, W.T. A liquid bioplastic formulation for film coating of agronomic seeds. Crop Protection 2016, 89, 123–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Seifikalhor, M.; Hassani, S.B.; Aliniaeifard, S. Seed priming by cyanobacteria (Spirulina platensis) and salep gum enhances tolerance of maize plant against cadmium toxicity. J. Plant Growth Regulation 2020, 39, 1009–1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Hagaggi, N.S.A.; Mohamed, A.A.A. Enhancement of Zea mays (L.) growth performance using indole acetic acid producing endophyte Mixta theicola isolated from Solenostemma argel (Hayne). S. Afr. J. Bot. 2020, 134, 64–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Javed, T.; Afzal, I.; Mauro, R.P. Seed coating in direct seeded rice: An innovative and sustainable approach to enhance grain yield and weed management under submerged conditions. Sustainability 2021, 13, 2190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Palupi, T.; Ilyas, S.; Machmud, M.; Widajati, E. Effect of seed coating with biological agents on seed quality of rice. Biodiversitas 2017, 18, 727–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Choi, E.S.; Sukweenadhi, J.; Kim, Y.J.; Jung, K.H.; Koh, S.C.; Hoang, V.A.; Yang, D.C. The effects of rice seed dressing with Paenibacillus yonginensis and silicon on crop development on South Korea’s reclaimed tidal land. Field Crops Res. 2016, 188, 121–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Pagano, C.; Miransari, M. The importance of soybean production worldwide. In Abiotic and Biotic Stresses in Soybean Production; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2016; pp. 1–26. [Google Scholar]
  54. Yusnawan, E.; Inayati, A.; Baliadi, Y. Effect of soybean seed treatment with Trichoderma virens on its growth and total phenolic content. AIP Conf. Proc. 2019, 2120, 020003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Teixeira, G.M.; Mosela, M.; Abreu Nicoletto, M.L.; Ribeiro, R.A.; Hungria, M.; Youssef, K.; Yukio Higashi, A.; Mian, S.; Sampaio Ferreira, A.; Azeredo Gonçalves, L.S.; et al. Genomic insights into the antifungal activity and plant growth-promoting ability in Bacillus velezensis CMRP 4490. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 11, 618415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Jarecki, W. Soybean response to seed coating with chitosan + alginate/PEG and/or inoculation. Agronomy 2021, 11, 1737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Sheteiwy, M.S.; Ali, D.F.I.; Xiong, Y.C.; Bresti, M.; Skalicky, M.; Hamoud, Y.A.; Ulhassan, Z.; Shaghaleh, H.; AbdElgawad, H.; Farooq, M.; et al. Physiological and biochemical responses of soybean plants inoculated with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and Bradyrhizobium under drought stress. BMC Plant Biol. 2021, 21, 195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Noel, T.C.; Sheng, C.; Yost, C.K.; Pharis, R.P.; Hynes, M.F. Rhizobium leguminosarum as a plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium: Direct growth promotion of canola and lettuce. Can. J. Microbiol. 1996, 42, 279–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Mousavi, M.; Omidi, H. Seed priming with bio-priming improves stand establishment, seed germination and salinity tolerance in canola cultivar (Hayola 401). Iran. J. Plant Physiol. 2019, 9, 2807–2817. [Google Scholar]
  60. Somagh, H.A.; Mousavi, S.M.; Omidi, H.; Mohammadian, E.; Hemmati, M. Canola seed germination and seedling growth in response to saline condition and bio-priming. Iran. J. Plant Physiol. 2017, 7, 2149–2156. [Google Scholar]
  61. Den, N.Z.U.; Bukhari, S.A.; Iftikhar, T.; Mustafa, G. Biochemical and phenolic acid profiling of sunflower hybrid varieties’ seeds treated with different bio-priming agents. Pak. J. Bot. 2021, 53, 981–989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Moeinzadeh, A.; Sharif-Zadeh, F.; Ahmadzadeh, M.; Tajabadi, F.H. Biopriming of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) seed with Pseudomonas fluorescens for improvement of seed invigoration and seedling growth. Aust. J. Crop Sci. 2010, 4, 564–570. [Google Scholar]
  63. Mastouri, F.; Björkman, T.; Harman, G.E. Seed treatment with Trichoderma harzianum alleviates biotic, abiotic, and physiological stresses in germinating seeds and seedlings. Phytopathology 2010, 100, 1213–1221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Rajput, R.S.; Singh, J.; Singh, P.; Vaishnav, A.; Singh, A.B. Influence of seed biopriming and vermiwash treatment on tomato plant’s immunity and nutritional quality upon Sclerotium rolfsii challenge inoculation. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2020, 40, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Srivastava, R.; Khalid, A.; Singh, U.S.; Sharma, A.K. Evaluation of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus, fluorescent Pseudomonas and Trichoderma harzianum formulation against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. Lycopersici for the management of tomato wilt. Biol. Control 2010, 53, 24–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Diniz, K.A.; Oliveira, J.A.; Guimarães, R.M.; De Carvalho, M.L.M.; Machado, J.D.C. Incorporation of microorganism, amino acids, micronutrients and growth regulators in lettuce seed through the coating technique. Revista Brasileira de Sementes 2006, 28, 37–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Almeida, D.A.; Crivelente Horta, M.A.; Ferreira Filho, J.A.; Faraj Murada, N.; Pereirade Souza, A. The synergistic actions of hydrolytic genes reveal the mechanism of Trichoderma harzianum for cellulose degradation. J. Biotechnol. 2021, 334, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Do Vale, L.H.F.; Gómez-Mendoza, D.P.; Kim, M.S.; Pandey, A.; Ricart, C.A.O.; Filho, E.X.F.; Sousa, M.V. Secretome analysis of the fungus Trichoderma harzianum grown on cellulose. Proteomics 2012, 12, 2716–2728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Bennett, A.J.; Mead, A.; Whipps, J.M. Performance of carrot and onion seed primed with beneficial microorganisms in glasshouse and field trials. Biol. Control 2009, 51, 417–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Pill, W.G.; Collins, C.M.; Goldberger, B.; Gregory, N. Responses of non-primed or primed seeds of ‘Marketmore 76’ cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) slurry coated with Trichoderma species to planting in growth media infested with Pythium aphanidermatum. Sci. Hortic. 2009, 121, 54–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Afzal, I.; Javed, T.; Amirkhani, M.; Taylor, A.G. Modern seed technology: Seed coating delivery systems for enhancing seed and crop performance. Agriculture 2020, 10, 526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Piri, R.; Moradi, A.; Balouchi, H.; Salehi, A. Improvement of cumin (Cuminum cyminum) seed performance under drought stress by seed coating and biopriming. Sci. Hortic. 2019, 257, 108667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table
Table 3. Effect of seed treatments with microorganisms on germination and seedling growth of rice (Oryza sativa L.) under different growing conditions.
Table 3. Effect of seed treatments with microorganisms on germination and seedling growth of rice (Oryza sativa L.) under different growing conditions.
Active MicroorganismsMode of Seed Inoculation;
Growth Conditions		Abiotic Stress and
References		Main Parameters Improved
Bacterium:
Bacillus sp.		Seed coating; growth chamberSubmersion
[50]		Germination
Bacterium:
Paenibacillus yonginensis 		Seed soaking; growth chamberNo stress
[52]		Germination (+4%), shoot length (+14%), root length (+26%), root number (+46%), and seedling fresh weight (+9%)
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cardarelli, M.; Woo, S.L.; Rouphael, Y.; Colla, G. Seed Treatments with Microorganisms Can Have a Biostimulant Effect by Influencing Germination and Seedling Growth of Crops. Plants 2022, 11, 259. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11030259

AMA Style

Cardarelli M, Woo SL, Rouphael Y, Colla G. Seed Treatments with Microorganisms Can Have a Biostimulant Effect by Influencing Germination and Seedling Growth of Crops. Plants. 2022; 11(3):259. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11030259

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cardarelli, Mariateresa, Sheridan L. Woo, Youssef Rouphael, and Giuseppe Colla. 2022. "Seed Treatments with Microorganisms Can Have a Biostimulant Effect by Influencing Germination and Seedling Growth of Crops" Plants 11, no. 3: 259. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11030259

APA Style

Cardarelli, M., Woo, S. L., Rouphael, Y., & Colla, G. (2022). Seed Treatments with Microorganisms Can Have a Biostimulant Effect by Influencing Germination and Seedling Growth of Crops. Plants, 11(3), 259. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11030259

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop