Next Article in Journal
Cryo-Technologies for Ex Situ Conservation of Rosa Germplasm
Previous Article in Journal
Negligible Impact of Drought-Resistant Genetically Modified Maize on Arthropod Community Structure Observed in a 2-Year Field Investigation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Transient Expression of Glycosylated SARS-CoV-2 Antigens in Nicotiana benthamiana

Department of Applied Genetics and Cell Biology, Institute of Plant Biotechnology and Cell Biology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Muthgasse 18, A-1190 Vienna, Austria
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2022, 11(8), 1093; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11081093
Submission received: 25 March 2022 / Revised: 12 April 2022 / Accepted: 15 April 2022 / Published: 18 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Plant-Based Expression System)

Abstract

:
The current COVID-19 pandemic very dramatically shows that the world lacks preparedness for novel viral diseases. In addition to newly emerging viruses, many known pathogenic viruses such as influenza are constantly evolving, leading to frequent outbreaks with severe diseases and deaths. Hence, infectious viruses are a recurrent burden to our daily life, and powerful strategies to stop the spread of human pathogens and disease progression are of utmost importance. Transient plant-based protein expression is a technology that allows fast and highly flexible manufacturing of recombinant viral proteins and, thus, can contribute to infectious disease detection and prevention. This review highlights recent progress in the transient production of viral glycoproteins in N. benthamiana with a focus on SARS-CoV-2-derived viral antigens.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The increasing emergence of infectious diseases caused by viruses constitutes a significant threat to human and animal health. The fast and global spread of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), the causative pathogen of COVID-19, resulted in an unprecedented worldwide crisis with million deaths [1]. In the last two decades, three highly pathogenic coronaviruses, SARS-CoV-1, SARS-CoV-2, and Middle Eastern Respiratory Syndrome (MERS)-CoV eventually crossed the species barrier to infect humans and cause pathogenesis [2,3]. Spurred on by more frequent contact with wildlife animals, urbanization, and climate change, it appears inevitable that similar zoonotic or vector-borne transmission events will occur in the near future and cause comparable epidemics and pandemics. Newly arising SARS-CoV-2 variants such as Omicron, which result in immune escape and faster transmission of the virus [4], demonstrate that our countermeasures to fight the virus require constant and rapid adaptations. In this light, new diagnostic, therapeutic, and vaccination approaches must be quickly available to keep pace with evolving viruses and prevent devastating waves of infections. Transient plant-based protein expression allows rapid and highly flexible manufacturing of recombinant viral proteins and, thus, contributes to solving current and emerging global health challenges [5]. Plant-based recombinant protein production is cost-efficient, safe, easily scalable and, thus, very attractive for developing countries with limited infrastructure [6,7]. The use of plants or plant cells for production of monoclonal antibodies, vaccines and other recombinant proteins is well established, and many studies have proven the functionality of the plant-produced material in animals or clinical trials [8,9,10,11].
Most enveloped human and veterinary viruses have a glycoprotein coat consisting of envelope or spike proteins that are embedded in a lipid layer derived from the infected host cell [12]. Glycosylation of these viral proteins plays an important role in their folding, virus entry, and the host immune response to infection [12,13]. In addition to the manufacturing of antigens as diagnostic reagents or for vaccine development [14,15], recombinant viral glycoproteins with defined glycans are important tools for research, for example, to guide design for mRNA vaccine technologies [16,17]. Here, we highlight recent advancements and limitations in the transient production of heterologous viral glycoproteins in Nicotiana benthamiana, a tobacco-related species that is widely used for plant-based recombinant protein expression.

2. Transient Expression

The production of heterologous proteins in plants can be achieved via stable or transient expression. The production of transgenic plants for protein expression is time-consuming, protein yields are often low, and adaptation of the expression system to changes in the protein of interest, for example, to produce a slightly different recombinant protein, requires a repetition of the whole process [18]. This makes transgenic plants as production hosts for viral antigens of emerging or evolving viruses impracticable. By contrast, transient expression is fast and flexible, which allows high-throughput screening of numerous expression constructs and simple scalability from research-scale (e.g., 100–500 g biomass) to large-scale manufacturing (e.g., >500 kg biomass). Due to these advantages, efficacious recombinant viral antigens or virus-like particles can be produced at high levels within a few weeks [19].
Agrobacteria are transformed with expression vectors for recombinant proteins, and transient expression is achieved by Agrobacterium-mediated infiltration (agroinfiltration) of N. benthamiana leaves using a syringe (research scale) or vacuum. Agrobacteria carry DNA that is delivered to the nucleus of plant cells for the production of mRNA and the protein of interest. Recombinant proteins are purified a few days after agroinfiltration from infiltrated leaves (Figure 1).
N. benthamiana is the preferred host for transient protein production because this nonfood plant is highly susceptible to virus infection [20], and leaves can easily be infiltrated. Furthermore, N. benthamiana has rather simple growth requirements, produces high biomass, and is amenable to modifications by gene silencing or genome editing. Transgenic expression of two RNAi hairpin constructs resulted, for example, in the generation of glycoengineered N. benthamiana ΔXT/FT plants that have silenced expression of β1,2-xylosyltransferases and core α1,3-fucosyltransferases genes [21]. This plant line is used worldwide by academia and industry to produce recombinant glycoproteins with complex N-glycans that are almost completely devoid of core α1,3-fucose and β1,2-xylose residues and resemble human-type complex N-glycans. Notably, the ZMapp monoclonal antibody cocktail that was used for treatment of Ebola virus infections was produced in ΔXT/FT plants [22,23]. Genome editing has recently been used to generate N. benthamiana that are completely devoid of functional β1,2-xylosyltransferases and core α1,3-fucosyltransferases [24]. Under greenhouse conditions, the knockout plants grew normally and did not display any phenotype which is consistent with previous studies, showing that N. benthamiana tolerates stable glycoengineering very well [21,25,26]. The detailed annotation of the N. benthamiana genome, transcriptome, and proteome [27,28] makes it more straightforward to overcome current bottlenecks in the expression host and perform multiple genome-editing steps to inactivate whole gene families that contribute to unwanted posttranslational modifications or proteolytic processing.
In addition to achievements in glycoengineering and genome-editing technologies, a number of powerful expression vectors for transient expression in N. benthamiana have been developed in the last 20 years. Commonly used expression vectors contain elements from plant viruses for high-level expression in leaves. Among the most widely used vectors are those carrying cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) regulatory sequences (e.g., pTRA [29]), cowpea mosaic virus-derived (CPMV) vectors (e.g., pEAQ-HT [30]), potato virus X (PVX)- and tobacco mosaic virus (TMV)-based vectors (e.g., magnICON [31]), or bean yellow dwarf geminivirus-derived DNA replicon vectors [32,33].

3. Protein Glycosylation

Glycosylation is a fundamental co- or posttranslational modification of proteins. The attachment of a preassembled oligosaccharide or an individual sugar onto proteins can have a major impact on many cellular processes and very often diversifies the functions of the modified proteins. Common modifications such as N- and O-glycosylation exert a major influence on the immunogenicity of a viral protein by affecting the protein conformation or by shielding of epitopes at the surface of the protein. Glycosylation and processing of glycans depends on structural properties of the viral glycoprotein and host cell factors including the glycosylation machinery of the expressing cell and the trafficking route through the secretory pathway. Since exposed envelope or spike glycoproteins are principal targets of the host immune response [34,35], it is crucial to use protein production systems for viral glycoproteins that allow the control of glycosylation and the production of authentic glycan structures. Glycosylation should, therefore, be considered as an important parameter in antigen design for subunit vaccine development or for components in serological diagnostic tests. Recent advances in glycoengineering in plants enable the production of custom-made glycoproteins carrying homogeneous human-type N-glycans and the controlled modulation of glycosylation for structure–function studies [36]. Notably, plants have a much simpler N-glycan processing pathway which can be altered in N. benthamiana without affecting the overall plant development, biomass production, or recombinant protein production. Furthermore, since plants lack a mammalian mucin-type O-glycan biosynthesis pathway, they offer another advantage over mammalian cells and can be engineered to facilitate the stepwise assembly of defined O-glycans by expression of the required glycosyltransferases without any interference from mammalian glycosylation pathways [37,38,39].
During viral infections, viruses enter cells by binding to their cognate cell surface receptors. For instance, SARS-CoV-2 cell entry is dependent on the heavily glycosylated trimeric spike protein via recognition of the host cell receptor angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2). The spike protein is a type I transmembrane protein with a large N-terminal ectodomain that protrudes from the viral surface, and the monomeric spike protein harbors 22 N-glycans and several potential O-glycosylation sites [40,41,42]. For coronaviruses, N-glycans are important for spike protein folding, for modulating the accessibility to host proteases, for shielding to avoid the detection by the immune response of infected individuals, and for interaction with cellular receptors [43,44,45,46]. The loss of the conserved N-glycosylation site at asparagine 370 in the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein affects the conformation of the receptor-binding domain (RBD) resulting in a higher affinity to ACE2 and enhanced virus replication [47,48]. A reacquisition of this N-glycan by mutation provides a means to evade an established immune response [49]. Such an event may occur in the future, and the N-glycan at N370 may then act as a barrier against neutralizing antibodies. A role of N-glycosylation in immune evasion by camouflaging immunogenic protein epitopes is well known for pathogenic viruses [35,50], and the presence or absence of N-glycans can have positive or detrimental effects on the virus infectivity and antigenicity [51,52]. These selected examples demonstrate the importance of glycosylation for viruses and rational antigen design.

4. Pathways for N- and O-Glycan Processing

The initial step of N-glycosylation is the en bloc transfer of a preassembled oligosaccharide (Glc3Man9GlcNAc2) from a lipid-linked carrier to an asparagine residue present in a consensus sequence (Asn–X–Ser/Thr, X can be any amino acid except proline) on nascent polypeptides [53]. The oligosaccharyltransferase (OST) complex catalyzes the transfer of the assembled oligosaccharide to the nascent polypeptide in the lumen of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) (Figure 2). Immediately after the transfer, two glucose residues are sequentially removed from the oligosaccharide by α-glucosidase I (GCSI) and II (GCSII). The remaining glucose residue on the oligomannosidic N-glycan allows the viral glycoproteins to associate with the lectin chaperones calnexin (CNX) and calreticulin (CRT). Together with other proteins like protein disulfide isomerases, CNX/CRT promote the folding of glycoproteins. Iminosugar inhibitors that block α-glucosidases and interfere with CNX/CRT binding have, therefore, been investigated as drugs to prevent native viral glycoprotein folding and subsequent virus assembly and propagation [53,54].
Following trimming of the remaining glucose residue by GCSII, glycoproteins that have acquired their native conformation are released from the CNX/CRT quality control cycle and allowed to exit the ER to the Golgi apparatus. In the next N-glycan processing step, a single mannose residue is removed from the middle branch of the oligomannosidic N-glycan by the ER-α-mannosidase I (MNS3) to form the Man8GlcNAc2 N-glycan [55,56]. Golgi α-mannosidase I (GMI) cleaves off three additional mannose residues and generates the acceptor substrate for N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase I (GNTI) which adds a GlcNAc to the core α1,3-mannose residue. GNTI has a central function in N-glycan processing, as the transferred GlcNAc residue is a prerequisite for further processing and complex N-glycan formation [57]. These early steps of N-glycan processing that take place in the ER and cis/medial Golgi are conserved between mammals and plants.
After the action of GNTI, the plant N-glycans are typically trimmed by Golgi α-mannosidase II (GMII), and N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase II (GNTII) transfers a GlcNAc to the α1,6-mannose residue. In addition, β1,2-xylosyltransferase (XYLT) and core α1,3-fucosyltransferase (FUT) use the processed structures as substrates to generate typical plant complex N-glycans (GlcNAc2XylFucMan3GlcNAc2 also termed GnGnXF) [58]. Further elongation is only found on a rather small number of plant proteins, and these so-called Lewis A structures (Fucα1,4-(Galβ1,3-GlcNAc-R) are generated in the trans Golgi by β1,3-galactosyltransferase 1 (GALT1) and α1,4-fucosyltransferase (FUT13) [59].
In mammalian cells, the innermost GlcNAc residue of complex N-glycans is frequently modified by core α1,6-fucosyltransferase (FUT8) which transfers a fucose in α1,6-linkake instead of the α1,3-fucose that is attached by plant FUT. N-Acetylglucosaminyltransferases IV and V initiate branching of the N-glycan structures, and N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase III can add a bisecting GlcNAc to complex N-glycans. While this bisecting GlcNAc is not further elongated, the other GlcNAc residues can be modified with galactose mainly in β1,4-linkage and terminal sialic acid residues (Figure 2). All these complex N-glycan modifications are not present in plants, but N. benthamiana can be engineered to produce mammalian-type complex N-glycan structures including core α1,6-fucosylation, the attachment of β1,4-linked galactose, branching of N-glycans, and the incorporation of sialic acid in different linkages [36,60].
While the N-glycan processing machinery is partly conserved between plants and mammals, O-glycosylation is fundamentally different [61]. In mammals, the most common O-glycosylation found on secretory proteins is the posttranslational incorporation of a single N-acetylgalactosamine (GalNAc) to specific serine or threonine residues (Figure 3). This reaction is catalyzed by a large family of polypeptide N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferases (GalNAc-T) [62]. The single GalNAc can be further modified by the stepwise attachment of different monosaccharides including galactose, GlcNAc, fucose, and sialic acids. These modifications result in a range of structurally diverse mucin-type core O-glycans. Polypeptide N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferases and other glycosyltransferases involved in mucin-type O-glycan elongation in mammals are absent from plants. Plants, on the other hand, can modify serine residues with a single galactose, and prolines can be hydroxylated and subsequently modified to carry short arabinose chains or larger arabinogalactan glycan moieties [61]. Transient expression of the mammalian mucin-type O-glycosylation pathway in N. benthamiana resulted in the formation of different human-type O-glycan core structures on recombinant proteins such as IgA1 or EPO-Fc [37,63]. Virus envelope and spike proteins can be highly O-glycosylated with very heterogeneous structures that also contribute to epitope shielding and interaction with host cells [64]. As observed for other recombinant human glycoproteins [38,65], it is likely that exposed proline residues of transiently expressed viral glycoprotein will be converted to hydroxyproline and further modified with arabinose residues. For subunit vaccine development or therapeutic applications of recombinant proteins, these nonhuman modifications are unwanted and could lead to adverse immune reactions [66]. However, this limitation of the plant-based production platform may be overcome by identification and elimination of the corresponding prolyl-4-hydroxylases (P4Hs) that catalyze hydroxyproline formation on recombinant glycoproteins [67].
The impact of protein glycosylation on viral glycoprotein function is well known. For many viruses, different glycan-mediated interactions play a role at the host–pathogen interface. The envelope proteins of HIV-1, Ebola, and herpes simplex virus are modified by O-linked glycosylation, which can affect the binding to cellular receptors [68] and directly or indirectly influence various steps of viral infection and replication. Together with N-glycans, distinct O-glycans potentially present ligands for innate immune receptors that bind in a glycan-dependent manner and subsequently promote the interaction with the primary cellular receptors. For example, C-type lectin receptors such as DC-SIGN present in epithelial and endothelial cells interact with the oligomannosidic and complex N-glycans on the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein [69,70]. Thus, for many viruses, N- and O-glycans contribute to virus infection and play a role at different steps of the viral life cycle and for the host immune response.

5. Transiently Expressed Glycosylated SARS-CoV-2 Antigens

Soon after the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak was declared a pandemic, several studies showed that transient production of SARS-CoV-2 antigens is possible in N. benthamiana within a short time [14,71,72]. Recombinant RBD of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein is frequently used as antigen in serological assays [73] and for vaccine development because RBD is the primary target for potent virus-neutralizing antibodies [15,74]. Recombinant plant-produced and human HEK293 cell-produced RBD displayed comparable binding affinities to ACE2 [75,76]. Furthermore, plant-derived RBD was recognized by a conformation-dependent RBD-specific antibody [71,77] and by sera from SARS-CoV-2-infected individuals [14,75,78]. Taken together, these studies very impressively demonstrate the functionality of the plant-produced SARS-CoV-2 antigen.
The SARS-CoV-2 RBD (most widely used sequence domain: R319–F541) has two N-glycosylation sites (N331 and N343) that are glycosylated with complex N-glycans when expressed in N. benthamiana [77,79]. The two RBD N-glycans are not part of the receptor-binding motif and not directly involved in receptor binding, which is consistent with comparable ACE2 binding affinities for glycoengineered RBD produced in the ΔXT/FT line, in wildtype N. benthamiana or in HEK293 cells. However, the two SARS-CoV-2 RBD N-glycans are crucial for protein folding and efficient production in plants [77]. A slightly truncated RBD protein (amino acids 319–533) that lacks an unpaired cysteine at position C538, could not be produced as soluble protein when both or individual N-glycosylation sites were mutated, suggesting that both N-glycans contribute to proper folding of RBD in plants [77].
Comparison of the seroreactivity to the RBD carrying N-glycans with β1,2-xylose and core α1,3-fucose (GnGnXF structures) and to the RBD lacking these sugar residues (GlcNAc2Man3GlcNAc2, GnGn structures) showed that both RBD glycoforms are suitable for serological assays. A minor limitation for production of glycosylated viral antigens in wildtype plants is a potential higher number of false-positive results with sera containing allergy-related cross-reactive carbohydrate determinant (CCD) antibodies [75]. In addition to functional testing in serological assays, the immunogenicity of N. benthamiana-produced RBD variants has been examined by immunization of mice [76,80,81] and cynomolgus monkeys [80]. Immunization with plant-produced RBD protein resulted in the generation of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies that could neutralize the virus in cell-based assays. Mamedov et al. (2021) showed that a deglycosylated RBD variant could elicit high titers of antibodies with a potent virus-neutralizing activity similar to the glycosylated RBD [76]. The deglycosylation of RBD was achieved by co-expression of an ER-targeted endoglycosidase (Endo H) which cleaves between the chitobiose core of oligomannosidic N-glycans. Thus, the protein is not fully deglycosylated, and a single GlcNAc is still present at the N-glycosylation site. Notably, the Endo H modified RBD displayed almost similar affinity to ACE2 as the fully glycosylated RBD carrying oligomannosidic N-glycans [76]. The findings are consistent with the observation that RBD N-glycans are essential for proper folding in the ER [77], but not for ACE2 binding and the presentation of immunogenic epitopes [15,75,76,82,83]. The SARS-CoV-2 nucleoprotein (N protein) was also expressed in the ER in N. benthamiana. The viral nucleoprotein is involved in packaging of the viral RNA in the cytosol and is normally not in contact with the glycosylation machinery of the host. Despite having five potential N-glycosylation sites, the nucleoprotein targeted to the secretory pathway appeared not glycosylated [84]. Whether the recombinant nucleoprotein was correctly folded in the milieu of the ER was not further investigated, but an antigen cocktail comprising RBD and the nucleoprotein elicited high-titer antibodies in mice, suggesting that immunogenic epitopes were preserved. A truncated SARS-CoV-2 nucleoprotein comprising the C-terminal region with a single N-glycosylation site was expressed in the secretory pathway [85]. The produced protein was functional in serological assays and showed high diagnostic sensitivity and specificity for SARS-CoV-2 antibody detection.
For RBD expression, slightly different regions from the S1 domain of the spike protein were expressed in plants, and different purification tags (e.g., Fc, His, FLAG tags) and purification approaches (crude protein extracts or apoplastic fluid) were used. Furthermore, in some studies, the KDEL Golgi-to-ER retrieval signal was attached to the C-terminus for retention in the ER [72,76,77]. However, in all these studies on transient RBD production in N. benthamiana, similar expression levels (up to 100 µg/g fresh weight) and yields after purification (ranging from 2 to 25 µg/g fresh weight) were reported. While viral antigens often give low yields, expression levels of monoclonal IgG antibodies can be in the range of 1 mg/g or higher [86,87]. Therefore, economically feasible manufacturing of recombinant SARS-CoV-2 antigens may require further optimization and engineering of the secretory pathway [88]. With one exception, all current studies related to RBD expression focused on the original sequence from the SARS-CoV-2 Wuhan isolate. RBD-Fc variants corresponding to the alpha and beta SARS-CoV-2 variants have been expressed in N. benthamiana [89]. While both variants displayed binding to ACE2, the plant-produced beta variant displayed differences in the reactivity with neutralizing antibodies. This finding likely reflects sequence intrinsic effects on the conformation of epitopes in the beta variant rather than conformational changes caused by the folding machinery of the expression host.
Although most studies have focused on the expression of spike protein domains, the SARS-CoV-2 genome encodes other N-glycosylated proteins, such as the envelope (E) and membrane (M) proteins [90]. The functions of their N-glycans for SARS-CoV-2 have not yet been studied in detail. In N. benthamiana, co-expression of native forms of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein with the envelope and membrane proteins resulted in the formation of VLPs that were recognized by antibodies in sera from convalescent patients [91]. Such noninfectious plant-made VLPs were also obtained by co-expressing the envelope, membrane, and nucleocapsid proteins [92]. In both studies, the N-glycosylation status of the viral glycoproteins was not assessed.
The biopharmaceutical company Medicago designed a VLP (CoVLP) using the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein as an antigen. This VLP-based vaccine was produced using a manufacturing platform that was developed for a quadrivalent VLP influence vaccine [93]. The VLP mimics the surface structure of the natural virus with an antigenic moiety but is noninfectious and nonreplicating as it lacks the replicating viral RNA. Hence, VLPs are generally considered safe and can stimulate an immune response against the virus when administered to humans. In the CoVLP, the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein is presented in the prefusion conformation that closely resembles the native structure in the virus [94]. A few mutations have been introduced to increase the stability of the spike protein, but none of these changes directly affects an N-glycosylation site. Hence, a spike monomer in the CoVLP vaccine carries all 22 N-glycosylation sites. This VLP is, therefore, heavily glycosylated and supposed to harbor numerous complex N-glycans carrying β1,2-xylose and core α1,3-fucose when produced in N. benthamiana wildtype plants. Importantly, the reported positive outcome from the clinical studies shows that the plant-produced vaccine is safe without any severe allergic reactions and efficacious against SARS-CoV-2 including the Delta variant of concern [94,95,96,97]. On 24 February 2022, Medicago in collaboration with GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) announced that Health Canada has granted approval for COVIFENZ®, a COVID-19 vaccine based on N. benthamiana-produced CoVLP.

6. Glycan Processing, N-Glycosylation Site Occupancy, and Strategies to Overcome Current Limitations of Viral Glycoprotein Expression in Plants

Given the importance of glycosylation for virus infection and the immune response of the host, it is crucial to overcome shortcomings of the plant-based production system for viral glycoproteins. A comparative analysis of the site-specific N-glycosylation of recombinant viral glycoproteins expressed in N. benthamiana and mammalian cells revealed reduced N-glycan processing and under-glycosylation at certain N-glycosylation sites [98] (Figure 4). In addition, many heavily glycosylated viral antigens such as the ectodomain of the SARS-CoV-2 spike [99] or HIV envelope proteins are expressed in plants at low levels [100].
For N-glycans, the degree of glycan processing (e.g., oligomannosidic vs. specific complex-type modifications) is influenced by the architecture of the viral glycoprotein and the resulting accessibility of glycans to the processing glycosidases and glycosyltransferases. Viral glycoproteins often display a large number of oligomannosidic N-glycans that are not further processed to complex N-glycans [41]. The reduced processing of these N-glycans can be caused by the presence of dense patches of N-glycans with glycan–glycan contacts that abolish access by α-mannosidases and initiation of complex N-glycan formation by GNTI [101]. For SARS-CoV-2, a comparison of N-glycans from mammalian cell-derived RBD, monomeric, trimeric, or virion-derived spike revealed an overall conservation of N-glycan occupancy and N-glycan processing, with some minor differences in N-glycan composition on distinct sites [102,103]. Human HEK293 cell-derived monomeric RBD displayed complex N-glycans with core α1,6-fucose and sialylation on both glycosylation sites. By contrast, on spike derived from purified virus, core fucosylation was reduced, and the majority of the N-glycans lacked sialic acid and were galactosylated. Recombinant SARS-CoV-2 RBD produced in wildtype N. benthamiana showed typical plant complex N-glycans (GnGnXF), and, in glycoengineered ΔXT/FT N. benthamiana, mainly complex-type GnGn N-glycans were detected on both N-glycosylation sites [76]. This provides evidence that the site-specific processing of the N-glycans on the RBD of the SARS-CoV-2 spike is conserved when produced in plants. The predominant GnGn structure is optimally suited to engineer variants with defined complex N-glycans including Lewis A or blood group antigen-containing structures [75,79]. A site-specific analysis of recombinant SARS-CoV-2 S1, full-length monomeric or trimeric spike expressed in plants has not been reported yet. However, according to the data for the conserved accessibility of distinct N-glycans when expressed in different animal cells, we anticipate that under-processed glycans (e.g., the oligomannosidic N-glycan at site N234) in the virus-derived spike will also be under-processed when expressed in plants. The transient co-expression of glycosyltransferases for core α1,6-fucosylation, β1,4-galactosylation, and attachment of sialic acid will enable the production of viral glycoproteins with desired N-glycan structures for functional characterization or specific applications in plants. Furthermore, glycoengineering can be used to produce viral antigens with glycan epitopes that are recognized by naturally circulating antibodies [79]. For example, distinct blood group antigens present on viral glycoproteins may be recognized by naturally occurring anti-glycan antibodies, and the antibody binding may block the virus transmission and infection of cells [104,105]. In future applications, immunization with viral antigens carrying distinct glycan epitopes may be used to elicit an immunostimulatory effect [106,107]. Glycoengineering combined with transient expression in N. benthamiana is very attractive for applications aiming to optimize the safety, functionality, and efficacy of protein-based vaccines.
While the function of the OST complex is conserved in all eukaryotes, there are yet unknown differences in plants that cause under-glycosylation of transiently expressed recombinant proteins. For immunoglobulins such as IgG, 10–20% of the single N-glycosylation site in the heavy chain is often non-glycosylated [108]. For other glycoproteins, including heavily glycosylated HIV antigens, some N-glycosylation sites are almost completely unoccupied and display aberrant glycosylation [98]. A high proportion of under-glycosylation has two important consequences for viral glycoproteins. Firstly, the lack of an N-glycan at a distinct position leads to accessibility of the polypeptide surface that is otherwise shielded by the glycan, which potentially results in an off-target immune response [109]. Secondly, since N-glycans are directly or indirectly involved in protein folding, under-glycosylation at distinct sites affects proper folding of the recombinant protein and, thus, the expression levels and protein function. The direct effects are potentially related to reduced solubility, conformational changes, and an increased tendency to aggregate. The indirect effect is likely caused by an impaired interaction with the lectin chaperones CNX/CRT. The lack of an N-glycan from SARS-CoV-2 has a huge impact on RBD expression in N. benthamiana [77]. Notably, human CRT overexpression rescued the expression of RBD carrying a single N-glycan, which shows the dependency of the plant-produced viral protein on glycan-mediated protein folding. The beneficial effect of human CRT has also been demonstrated for other viral glycoproteins expressed in N. benthamiana, showing that lectin chaperone expression is a general approach to improve protein yields and reduce constraints that arise from the expression of heavily glycosylated heterologous proteins [99,100]. In future studies, it will be interesting to examine how the CNX/CRT co-expression affects N-glycan processing, recombinant protein secretion, and the overall functionality of the expressed viral antigens. As shown for antibodies, under-glycosylation of viral glycoproteins may be overcome by transient co-expression of a single-subunit OST from Leishmania major (LmSTT3D) [108]. Further studies are needed to combine different approaches and increase the quality and quantity of viral glycoproteins when transiently expressed in N. benthamiana.

7. Conclusions

The recent examples of SARS-CoV-2 viral antigen expression in N. benthamiana demonstrate that plant-produced viral antigens can be used in serological assays to monitor the immune surveillance, or as VLPs and protein subunit vaccines to elicit specific immune responses. A number of plant-produced SARS-CoV-2 antigens and VLPs are in preclinical and clinical trials [11]. The spike-containing VLP-based vaccine from Medicago has shown efficacy and safety in phase 3 clinical trials [97] and has been approved, which is a great success and a huge breakthrough for plant-based manufacturing of vaccines and therapeutic proteins. Compared to mammalian cell-based expression systems, the transient expression in N. benthamiana provides a safe, simplified, and scalable manufacturing approach. Investment in infrastructure in low- and middle-income countries, and build-up of regional plant-based manufacturing capacity should help to increase the global access to reagents and therapeutics, reduce the timelines for production, and potentially result in more affordable products with the aim of increasing global readiness for the next pandemic.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, V.R. and R.S.; writing—original draft preparation, V.R. and R.S.; writing—review and editing, V.R. and R.S.; visualization, V.R.; supervision, R.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Austrian Science Fund W1224-B09.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hu, B.; Guo, H.; Zhou, P.; Shi, Z.L. Characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2021, 19, 141–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Lu, G.; Wang, Q.; Gao, G.F. Bat-to-human: Spike features determining ‘host jump’ of coronaviruses SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV, and beyond. Trends Microbiol. 2015, 23, 468–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Zhou, P.; Yang, X.L.; Wang, X.G.; Hu, B.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, W.; Si, H.R.; Zhu, Y.; Li, B.; Huang, C.L.; et al. A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin. Nature 2020, 579, 270–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Cameroni, E.; Bowen, J.E.; Rosen, L.E.; Saliba, C.; Zepeda, S.K.; Culap, K.; Pinto, D.; VanBlargan, L.A.; De Marco, A.; di Iulio, J.; et al. Broadly neutralizing antibodies overcome SARS-CoV-2 Omicron antigenic shift. Nature 2022, 602, 664–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Capell, T.; Twyman, R.M.; Armario-Najera, V.; Ma, J.K.; Schillberg, S.; Christou, P. Potential Applications of Plant Biotechnology against SARS-CoV-2. Trends Plant Sci. 2020, 25, 635–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Murad, S.; Fuller, S.; Menary, J.; Moore, C.; Pinneh, E.; Szeto, T.; Hitzeroth, I.; Freire, M.; Taychakhoonavudh, S.; Phoolcharoen, W.; et al. Molecular Pharming for low and middle income countries. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2020, 61, 53–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Margolin, E.; Burgers, W.A.; Sturrock, E.D.; Mendelson, M.; Chapman, R.; Douglass, N.; Williamson, A.L.; Rybicki, E.P. Prospects for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics, therapeutics and vaccines in Africa. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2020, 18, 690–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lomonossoff, G.P.; D’Aoust, M.A. Plant-produced biopharmaceuticals: A case of technical developments driving clinical deployment. Science 2016, 353, 1237–1240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Rybicki, E.P. Plant-made vaccines and reagents for the One Health initiative. Hum. Vaccin. Immunother. 2017, 13, 2912–2917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Schillberg, S.; Finnern, R. Plant molecular farming for the production of valuable proteins—Critical evaluation of achievements and future challenges. J. Plant Physiol. 2021, 258–259, 153359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Shanmugaraj, B.; Siriwattananon, K.; Malla, A.; Phoolcharoen, W. Potential for Developing Plant-Derived Candidate Vaccines and Biologics against Emerging Coronavirus Infections. Pathogens 2021, 10, 1051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Watanabe, Y.; Bowden, T.A.; Wilson, I.A.; Crispin, M. Exploitation of glycosylation in enveloped virus pathobiology. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Gen. Subj. 2019, 1863, 1480–1497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Iyer, S.; Yadav, R.; Agarwal, S.; Tripathi, S.; Agarwal, R. Bioengineering Strategies for Developing Vaccines against Respiratory Viral Diseases. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2022, 35, e0012321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Klausberger, M.; Duerkop, M.; Haslacher, H.; Wozniak-Knopp, G.; Cserjan-Puschmann, M.; Perkmann, T.; Lingg, N.; Aguilar, P.P.; Laurent, E.; De Vos, J.; et al. A comprehensive antigen production and characterisation study for easy-to-implement, specific and quantitative SARS-CoV-2 serotests. EBioMedicine 2021, 67, 103348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Yang, J.; Wang, W.; Chen, Z.; Lu, S.; Yang, F.; Bi, Z.; Bao, L.; Mo, F.; Li, X.; Huang, Y.; et al. A vaccine targeting the RBD of the S protein of SARS-CoV-2 induces protective immunity. Nature 2020, 586, 572–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wu, C.Y.; Cheng, C.W.; Kung, C.C.; Liao, K.S.; Jan, J.T.; Ma, C.; Wong, C.H. Glycosite-deleted mRNA of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein as a broad-spectrum vaccine. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2022, 119, e2119995119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ozdilek, A.; Avci, F.Y. Glycosylation as a key parameter in the design of nucleic acid vaccines. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2022, 73, 102348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Stoger, E.; Fischer, R.; Moloney, M.; Ma, J.K. Plant molecular pharming for the treatment of chronic and infectious diseases. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2014, 65, 743–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. D’Aoust, M.A.; Couture, M.M.; Charland, N.; Trépanier, S.; Landry, N.; Ors, F.; Vézina, L.P. The production of hemagglutinin-based virus-like particles in plants: A rapid, efficient and safe response to pandemic influenza. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2010, 8, 607–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bally, J.; Jung, H.; Mortimer, C.; Naim, F.; Philips, J.G.; Hellens, R.; Bombarely, A.; Goodin, M.M.; Waterhouse, P.M. The Rise and Rise of Nicotiana benthamiana: A Plant for All Reasons. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2018, 56, 405–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Strasser, R.; Stadlmann, J.; Schähs, M.; Stiegler, G.; Quendler, H.; Mach, L.; Glössl, J.; Weterings, K.; Pabst, M.; Steinkellner, H. Generation of glyco-engineered Nicotiana benthamiana for the production of monoclonal antibodies with a homogeneous human-like N-glycan structure. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2008, 6, 392–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Qiu, X.; Wong, G.; Audet, J.; Bello, A.; Fernando, L.; Alimonti, J.B.; Fausther-Bovendo, H.; Wei, H.; Aviles, J.; Hiatt, E.; et al. Reversion of advanced Ebola virus disease in nonhuman primates with ZMapp. Nature 2014, 514, 47–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Davey, R.T.; Dodd, L.; Proschan, M.A.; Neaton, J.; Neuhaus Nordwall, J.; Koopmeiners, J.S.; Beigel, J.; Tierney, J.; Lane, H.C.; Fauci, A.S.; et al. A Randomized, Controlled Trial of ZMapp for Ebola Virus Infection. N. Engl. J. Med. 2016, 375, 1448–1456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Jansing, J.; Sack, M.; Augustine, S.M.; Fischer, R.; Bortesi, L. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knockout of six glycosyltransferase genes in Nicotiana benthamiana for the production of recombinant proteins lacking β-1,2-xylose and core α-1,3-fucose. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2019, 17, 350–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Kallolimath, S.; Castilho, A.; Strasser, R.; Grünwald-Gruber, C.; Altmann, F.; Strubl, S.; Galuska, C.E.; Zlatina, K.; Galuska, S.P.; Werner, S.; et al. Engineering of complex protein sialylation in plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 9498–9503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Limkul, J.; Iizuka, S.; Sato, Y.; Misaki, R.; Ohashi, T.; Fujiyama, K. The production of human glucocerebrosidase in glyco-engineered Nicotiana benthamiana plants. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2016, 14, 1682–1694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Schiavinato, M.; Strasser, R.; Mach, L.; Dohm, J.C.; Himmelbauer, H. Genome and transcriptome characterization of the glycoengineered Nicotiana benthamiana line ΔXT/FT. BMC Genom. 2019, 20, 594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Kourelis, J.; Kaschani, F.; Grosse-Holz, F.M.; Homma, F.; Kaiser, M.; van der Hoorn, R.A.L. A homology-guided, genome-based proteome for improved proteomics in the alloploid Nicotiana benthamiana. BMC Genom. 2019, 20, 722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sack, M.; Paetz, A.; Kunert, R.; Bomble, M.; Hesse, F.; Stiegler, G.; Fischer, R.; Katinger, H.; Stoeger, E.; Rademacher, T. Functional analysis of the broadly neutralizing human anti-HIV-1 antibody 2F5 produced in transgenic BY-2 suspension cultures. FASEB J. 2007, 21, 1655–1664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sainsbury, F.; Thuenemann, E.C.; Lomonossoff, G.P. pEAQ: Versatile expression vectors for easy and quick transient expression of heterologous proteins in plants. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2009, 7, 682–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Giritch, A.; Marillonnet, S.; Engler, C.; van Eldik, G.; Botterman, J.; Klimyuk, V.; Gleba, Y. Rapid high-yield expression of full-size IgG antibodies in plants coinfected with noncompeting viral vectors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 14701–14706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Santi, L.; Batchelor, L.; Huang, Z.; Hjelm, B.; Kilbourne, J.; Arntzen, C.J.; Chen, Q.; Mason, H.S. An efficient plant viral expression system generating orally immunogenic Norwalk virus-like particles. Vaccine 2008, 26, 1846–1854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Yamamoto, T.; Hoshikawa, K.; Ezura, K.; Okazawa, R.; Fujita, S.; Takaoka, M.; Mason, H.S.; Ezura, H.; Miura, K. Improvement of the transient expression system for production of recombinant proteins in plants. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 4755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Li, Q.; Wu, J.; Nie, J.; Zhang, L.; Hao, H.; Liu, S.; Zhao, C.; Zhang, Q.; Liu, H.; Nie, L.; et al. The Impact of Mutations in SARS-CoV-2 Spike on Viral Infectivity and Antigenicity. Cell 2020, 182, 1284–1294.e1289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Watanabe, Y.; Berndsen, Z.T.; Raghwani, J.; Seabright, G.E.; Allen, J.D.; Pybus, O.G.; McLellan, J.S.; Wilson, I.A.; Bowden, T.A.; Ward, A.B.; et al. Vulnerabilities in coronavirus glycan shields despite extensive glycosylation. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 2688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Montero-Morales, L.; Steinkellner, H. Advanced Plant-Based Glycan Engineering. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2018, 6, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Castilho, A.; Neumann, L.; Daskalova, S.; Mason, H.S.; Steinkellner, H.; Altmann, F.; Strasser, R. Engineering of Sialylated Mucin-type O-Glycosylation in Plants. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287, 36518–36526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Yang, Z.; Drew, D.P.; Jørgensen, B.; Mandel, U.; Bach, S.S.; Ulvskov, P.; Levery, S.B.; Bennett, E.P.; Clausen, H.; Petersen, B.L. Engineering mammalian mucin-type O-glycosylation in plants. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287, 11911–11923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Dicker, M.; Schoberer, J.; Vavra, U.; Strasser, R. Subcellular Targeting of Proteins Involved in Modification of Plant N- and O-Glycosylation. Methods Mol. Biol. 2015, 1321, 249–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Walls, A.C.; Park, Y.J.; Tortorici, M.A.; Wall, A.; McGuire, A.T.; Veesler, D. Structure, Function, and Antigenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Glycoprotein. Cell 2020, 181, 281–292.e286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Watanabe, Y.; Allen, J.D.; Wrapp, D.; McLellan, J.S.; Crispin, M. Site-specific glycan analysis of the SARS-CoV-2 spike. Science 2020, 369, 330–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Shajahan, A.; Supekar, N.T.; Gleinich, A.S.; Azadi, P. Deducing the N- and O- glycosylation profile of the spike protein of novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2. Glycobiology 2020, 30, 981–988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Walls, A.C.; Tortorici, M.A.; Frenz, B.; Snijder, J.; Li, W.; Rey, F.A.; DiMaio, F.; Bosch, B.J.; Veesler, D. Glycan shield and epitope masking of a coronavirus spike protein observed by cryo-electron microscopy. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2016, 23, 899–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Pallesen, J.; Wang, N.; Corbett, K.S.; Wrapp, D.; Kirchdoerfer, R.N.; Turner, H.L.; Cottrell, C.A.; Becker, M.M.; Wang, L.; Shi, W.; et al. Immunogenicity and structures of a rationally designed prefusion MERS-CoV spike antigen. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, E7348–E7357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Xiong, X.; Tortorici, M.A.; Snijder, J.; Yoshioka, C.; Walls, A.C.; Li, W.; McGuire, A.T.; Rey, F.A.; Bosch, B.J.; Veesler, D. Glycan Shield and Fusion Activation of a Deltacoronavirus Spike Glycoprotein Fine-Tuned for Enteric Infections. J. Virol. 2018, 92, e01628-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Gao, C.; Zeng, J.; Jia, N.; Stavenhagen, K.; Matsumoto, Y.; Zhang, H.; Li, J.; Hume, A.J.; Mühlberger, E.; van Die, I.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Interacts with Multiple Innate Immune Receptors. bioRxiv 2020. preprint. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zhang, S.; Liang, Q.; He, X.; Zhao, C.; Ren, W.; Yang, Z.; Wang, Z.; Ding, Q.; Deng, H.; Wang, T.; et al. Loss of Spike N370 glycosylation as an important evolutionary event for the enhanced infectivity of SARS-CoV-2. Cell Res. 2022, 32, 315–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kang, L.; He, G.; Sharp, A.K.; Wang, X.; Brown, A.M.; Michalak, P.; Weger-Lucarelli, J. A selective sweep in the Spike gene has driven SARS-CoV-2 human adaptation. Cell 2021, 184, 4392–4400.e4394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Nabel, K.G.; Clark, S.A.; Shankar, S.; Pan, J.; Clark, L.E.; Yang, P.; Coscia, A.; McKay, L.G.A.; Varnum, H.H.; Brusic, V.; et al. Structural basis for continued antibody evasion by the SARS-CoV-2 receptor binding domain. Science 2022, 375, eabl6251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Stewart-Jones, G.B.; Soto, C.; Lemmin, T.; Chuang, G.Y.; Druz, A.; Kong, R.; Thomas, P.V.; Wagh, K.; Zhou, T.; Behrens, A.J.; et al. Trimeric HIV-1-Env Structures Define Glycan Shields from Clades A, B, and G. Cell 2016, 165, 813–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Vigerust, D.J.; Ulett, K.B.; Boyd, K.L.; Madsen, J.; Hawgood, S.; McCullers, J.A. N-linked glycosylation attenuates H3N2 influenza viruses. J. Virol. 2007, 81, 8593–8600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Strasser, R. Plant protein glycosylation. Glycobiology 2016, 26, 926–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Clarke, E.C.; Nofchissey, R.A.; Ye, C.; Bradfute, S.B. The iminosugars celgosivir, castanospermine and UV-4 inhibit SARS-CoV-2 replication. Glycobiology 2021, 31, 378–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Alonzi, D.S.; Scott, K.A.; Dwek, R.A.; Zitzmann, N. Iminosugar antivirals: The therapeutic sweet spot. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2017, 45, 571–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Liebminger, E.; Hüttner, S.; Vavra, U.; Fischl, R.; Schoberer, J.; Grass, J.; Blaukopf, C.; Seifert, G.; Altmann, F.; Mach, L.; et al. Class I alpha-mannosidases are required for N-glycan processing and root development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant. Cell 2009, 21, 3850–3867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Schoberer, J.; König, J.; Veit, C.; Vavra, U.; Liebminger, E.; Botchway, S.W.; Altmann, F.; Kriechbaumer, V.; Hawes, C.; Strasser, R. A signal motif retains Arabidopsis ER-α-mannosidase I in the cis-Golgi and prevents enhanced glycoprotein ERAD. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 3701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. von Schaewen, A.; Sturm, A.; O’Neill, J.; Chrispeels, M. Isolation of a mutant Arabidopsis plant that lacks N-acetyl glucosaminyl transferase I and is unable to synthesize Golgi-modified complex N-linked glycans. Plant Physiol. 1993, 102, 1109–1118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Strasser, R.; Altmann, F.; Mach, L.; Glössl, J.; Steinkellner, H. Generation of Arabidopsis thaliana plants with complex N-glycans lacking beta1,2-linked xylose and core alpha1,3-linked fucose. FEBS Lett. 2004, 561, 132–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Beihammer, G.; Maresch, D.; Altmann, F.; Van Damme, E.J.M.; Strasser, R. Lewis A Glycans Are Present on Proteins Involved in Cell Wall Biosynthesis and Appear Evolutionarily Conserved Among Natural. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 630891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Schoberer, J.; Strasser, R. Plant glyco-biotechnology. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2018, 80, 133–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Strasser, R.; Seifert, G.; Doblin, M.S.; Johnson, K.L.; Ruprecht, C.; Pfrengle, F.; Bacic, A.; Estevez, J.M. Cracking the “Sugar Code”: A Snapshot of N- and O-Glycosylation Pathways and Functions in Plants Cells. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 640919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Bennett, E.P.; Mandel, U.; Clausen, H.; Gerken, T.A.; Fritz, T.A.; Tabak, L.A. Control of mucin-type O-glycosylation: A classification of the polypeptide GalNAc-transferase gene family. Glycobiology 2012, 22, 736–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Dicker, M.; Tschofen, M.; Maresch, D.; König, J.; Juarez, P.; Orzaez, D.; Altmann, F.; Steinkellner, H.; Strasser, R. Transient Glyco-Engineering to Produce Recombinant IgA1 with Defined N- and O-Glycans in Plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Bagdonaite, I.; Wandall, H.H. Global aspects of viral glycosylation. Glycobiology 2018, 28, 443–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Göritzer, K.; Maresch, D.; Altmann, F.; Obinger, C.; Strasser, R. Exploring Site-Specific N-Glycosylation of HEK293 and Plant-Produced Human IgA Isotypes. J. Proteome Res. 2017, 16, 2560–2570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Leonard, R.; Petersen, B.O.; Himly, M.; Kaar, W.; Wopfner, N.; Kolarich, D.; van Ree, R.; Ebner, C.; Duus, J.; Ferreira, F.; et al. Two novel types of O-glycans on the mugwort pollen allergen Art v 1 and their role in antibody binding. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 7932–7940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Mócsai, R.; Göritzer, K.; Stenitzer, D.; Maresch, D.; Strasser, R.; Altmann, F. Prolyl Hydroxylase Paralogs in Nicotiana benthamiana Show High Similarity With Regard to Substrate Specificity. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 636597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Wang, J.; Fan, Q.; Satoh, T.; Arii, J.; Lanier, L.L.; Spear, P.G.; Kawaguchi, Y.; Arase, H. Binding of herpes simplex virus glycoprotein B (gB) to paired immunoglobulin-like type 2 receptor alpha depends on specific sialylated O-linked glycans on gB. J. Virol. 2009, 83, 13042–13045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Hoffmann, D.; Mereiter, S.; Jin Oh, Y.; Monteil, V.; Elder, E.; Zhu, R.; Canena, D.; Hain, L.; Laurent, E.; Grünwald-Gruber, C.; et al. Identification of lectin receptors for conserved SARS-CoV-2 glycosylation sites. Embo J. 2021, 40, e108375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Lempp, F.A.; Soriaga, L.B.; Montiel-Ruiz, M.; Benigni, F.; Noack, J.; Park, Y.J.; Bianchi, S.; Walls, A.C.; Bowen, J.E.; Zhou, J.; et al. Lectins enhance SARS-CoV-2 infection and influence neutralizing antibodies. Nature 2021, 598, 342–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Rattanapisit, K.; Shanmugaraj, B.; Manopwisedjaroen, S.; Purwono, P.B.; Siriwattananon, K.; Khorattanakulchai, N.; Hanittinan, O.; Boonyayothin, W.; Thitithanyanont, A.; Smith, D.R.; et al. Rapid production of SARS-CoV-2 receptor binding domain (RBD) and spike specific monoclonal antibody CR3022 in Nicotiana benthamiana. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 17698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Diego-Martin, B.; González, B.; Vazquez-Vilar, M.; Selma, S.; Mateos-Fernández, R.; Gianoglio, S.; Fernández-Del-Carmen, A.; Orzáez, D. Pilot Production of SARS-CoV-2 Related Proteins in Plants: A Proof of Concept for Rapid Repurposing of Indoor Farms Into Biomanufacturing Facilities. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 612781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Amanat, F.; Stadlbauer, D.; Strohmeier, S.; Nguyen, T.H.O.; Chromikova, V.; McMahon, M.; Jiang, K.; Arunkumar, G.A.; Jurczyszak, D.; Polanco, J.; et al. A serological assay to detect SARS-CoV-2 seroconversion in humans. Nat. Med. 2020, 26, 1033–1036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Piccoli, L.; Park, Y.J.; Tortorici, M.A.; Czudnochowski, N.; Walls, A.C.; Beltramello, M.; Silacci-Fregni, C.; Pinto, D.; Rosen, L.E.; Bowen, J.E.; et al. Mapping Neutralizing and Immunodominant Sites on the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Receptor-Binding Domain by Structure-Guided High-Resolution Serology. Cell 2020, 183, 1024–1042.e1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Schwestka, J.; König-Beihammer, J.; Shin, Y.J.; Vavra, U.; Kienzl, N.F.; Grünwald-Gruber, C.; Maresch, D.; Klausberger, M.; Laurent, E.; Stadler, M.; et al. Impact of Specific N-Glycan Modifications on the Use of Plant-Produced SARS-CoV-2 Antigens in Serological Assays. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 747500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Mamedov, T.; Yuksel, D.; Ilgın, M.; Gurbuzaslan, I.; Gulec, B.; Yetiskin, H.; Uygut, M.A.; Islam Pavel, S.T.; Ozdarendeli, A.; Mammadova, G.; et al. Plant-Produced Glycosylated and In Vivo Deglycosylated Receptor Binding Domain Proteins of SARS-CoV-2 Induce Potent Neutralizing Responses in Mice. Viruses 2021, 13, 1595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Shin, Y.J.; König-Beihammer, J.; Vavra, U.; Schwestka, J.; Kienzl, N.F.; Klausberger, M.; Laurent, E.; Grünwald-Gruber, C.; Vierlinger, K.; Hofner, M.; et al. N-Glycosylation of the SARS-CoV-2 Receptor Binding Domain Is Important for Functional Expression in Plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 689104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Makatsa, M.S.; Tincho, M.B.; Wendoh, J.M.; Ismail, S.D.; Nesamari, R.; Pera, F.; de Beer, S.; David, A.; Jugwanth, S.; Gededzha, M.P.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 Antigens Expressed in Plants Detect Antibody Responses in COVID-19 Patients. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 589940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. König-Beihammer, J.; Vavra, U.; Shin, Y.J.; Veit, C.; Grünwald-Gruber, C.; Gillitschka, Y.; Huber, J.; Hofner, M.; Vierlinger, K.; Mitteregger, D.; et al. In Planta Production of the Receptor-Binding Domain from SARS-CoV-2 with Human Blood Group A Glycan Structures. Front. Chem. 2021, 9, 816544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Siriwattananon, K.; Manopwisedjaroen, S.; Shanmugaraj, B.; Rattanapisit, K.; Phumiamorn, S.; Sapsutthipas, S.; Trisiriwanich, S.; Prompetchara, E.; Ketloy, C.; Buranapraditkun, S.; et al. Plant-Produced Receptor-Binding Domain of SARS-CoV-2 Elicits Potent Neutralizing Responses in Mice and Non-human Primates. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 682953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Maharjan, P.M.; Cheon, J.; Jung, J.; Kim, H.; Lee, J.; Song, M.; Jeong, G.U.; Kwon, Y.; Shim, B.; Choe, S. Plant-Expressed Receptor Binding Domain of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Elicits Humoral Immunity in Mice. Vaccines 2021, 9, 978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Royal, J.M.; Simpson, C.A.; McCormick, A.A.; Phillips, A.; Hume, S.; Morton, J.; Shepherd, J.; Oh, Y.; Swope, K.; DeBeauchamp, J.L.; et al. Development of a SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Candidate Using Plant-Based Manufacturing and a Tobacco Mosaic Virus-like Nano-Particle. Vaccines 2021, 9, 1347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Hoffmann, M.; Kleine-Weber, H.; Schroeder, S.; Krüger, N.; Herrler, T.; Erichsen, S.; Schiergens, T.S.; Herrler, G.; Wu, N.H.; Nitsche, A.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 Cell Entry Depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and Is Blocked by a Clinically Proven Protease Inhibitor. Cell 2020, 181, 271–280.e278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Mamedov, T.; Yuksel, D.; Ilgın, M.; Gürbüzaslan, I.; Gulec, B.; Mammadova, G.; Ozdarendeli, A.; Yetiskin, H.; Kaplan, B.; Islam Pavel, S.T.; et al. Production and Characterization of Nucleocapsid and RBD Cocktail Antigens of SARS-CoV-2 in Nicotiana benthamiana Plant as a Vaccine Candidate against COVID-19. Vaccines 2021, 9, 1337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Williams, L.; Jurado, S.; Llorente, F.; Romualdo, A.; González, S.; Saconne, A.; Bronchalo, I.; Martínez-Cortes, M.; Pé-rez-Gómez, B.; Ponz, F.; et al. The C-Terminal Half of SARS-CoV-2 Nucleocapsid Protein, Industrially Produced in Plants, Is Valid as Antigen in COVID-19 Serological Tests. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 699665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Bendandi, M.; Marillonnet, S.; Kandzia, R.; Thieme, F.; Nickstadt, A.; Herz, S.; Fröde, R.; Inogés, S.; Lòpez-Dìaz de Cerio, A.; Soria, E.; et al. Rapid, high-yield production in plants of individualized idiotype vaccines for non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Ann. Oncol. 2010, 21, 2420–2427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Zischewski, J.; Sack, M.; Fischer, R. Overcoming low yields of plant-made antibodies by a protein engineering approach. Biotechnol. J. 2016, 11, 107–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Margolin, E.A.; Strasser, R.; Chapman, R.; Williamson, A.L.; Rybicki, E.P.; Meyers, A.E. Engineering the Plant Secretory Pathway for the Production of Next-Generation Pharmaceuticals. Trends Biotechnol. 2020, 38, 1034–1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Rattanapisit, K.; Bulaon, C.J.I.; Khorattanakulchai, N.; Shanmugaraj, B.; Wangkanont, K.; Phoolcharoen, W. Plant-produced SARS-CoV-2 receptor binding domain (RBD) variants showed differential binding efficiency with anti-spike specific monoclonal antibodies. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0253574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Gong, Y.; Qin, S.; Dai, L.; Tian, Z. The glycosylation in SARS-CoV-2 and its receptor ACE2. Signal. Transduct. Target. Ther. 2021, 6, 396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Jung, J.W.; Zahmanova, G.; Minkov, I.; Lomonossoff, G.P. Plant-based expression and characterization of SARS-CoV-2 virus-like particles presenting a native spike protein. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2022. online ahead of print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Moon, K.B.; Jeon, J.H.; Choi, H.; Park, J.S.; Park, S.J.; Lee, H.J.; Park, J.M.; Cho, H.S.; Moon, J.S.; Oh, H.; et al. Construction of SARS-CoV-2 virus-like particles in plant. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 1005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Ward, B.J.; Makarkov, A.; Séguin, A.; Pillet, S.; Trépanier, S.; Dhaliwall, J.; Libman, M.D.; Vesikari, T.; Landry, N. Efficacy, immunogenicity, and safety of a plant-derived, quadrivalent, virus-like particle influenza vaccine in adults (18-64 years) and older adults (≥65 years): Two multicentre, randomised phase 3 trials. Lancet 2020, 396, 1491–1503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Ward, B.J.; Gobeil, P.; Séguin, A.; Atkins, J.; Boulay, I.; Charbonneau, P.Y.; Couture, M.; D’Aoust, M.A.; Dhaliwall, J.; Finkle, C.; et al. Phase 1 randomized trial of a plant-derived virus-like particle vaccine for COVID-19. Nat. Med. 2021, 27, 1071–1078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Pillet, S.; Arunachalam, P.S.; Andreani, G.; Golden, N.; Fontenot, J.; Aye, P.P.; Röltgen, K.; Lehmicke, G.; Gobeil, P.; Dubé, C.; et al. Safety, immunogenicity, and protection provided by unadjuvanted and adjuvanted formulations of a recombinant plant-derived virus-like particle vaccine candidate for COVID-19 in nonhuman primates. Cell Mol. Immunol. 2022, 19, 222–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Gobeil, P.; Pillet, S.; Séguin, A.; Boulay, I.; Mahmood, A.; Vinh, D.C.; Charland, N.; Boutet, P.; Roman, F.; Van Der Most, R.; et al. Interim Report of a Phase 2 Randomized Trial of a Plant-Produced Virus-Like Particle Vaccine for Covid-19 in Healthy Adults Aged 18–64 and Older Adults Aged 65 and Older. medRxiv 2021. preprint. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Hager, K.J.; Marc, G.P.; Gobeil, P.; Diaz, R.S.; Heizer, G.; Llapur, C.; Makarkov, A.I.; Vasconcellos, E.; Pillet, S.; Riera, F.; et al. Efficacy and Safety of a Plant-Based Virus-Like Particle Vaccine for COVID-19 Adjuvanted with AS03. medRxiv 2022. preprint. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Margolin, E.; Allen, J.D.; Verbeek, M.; van Diepen, M.; Ximba, P.; Chapman, R.; Meyers, A.; Williamson, A.L.; Crispin, M.; Rybicki, E. Site-Specific Glycosylation of Recombinant Viral Glycoproteins Produced in Nicotiana benthamiana. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 709344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Margolin, E.; Verbeek, M.; de Moor, W.; Chapman, R.; Meyers, A.; Schäfer, G.; Williamson, A.L.; Rybicki, E. Investigating Constraints Along the Plant Secretory Pathway to Improve Production of a SARS-CoV-2 Spike Vaccine Candidate. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 798822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Margolin, E.; Oh, Y.J.; Verbeek, M.; Naude, J.; Ponndorf, D.; Meshcheriakova, Y.A.; Peyret, H.; van Diepen, M.T.; Chapman, R.; Meyers, A.E.; et al. Co-expression of human calreticulin significantly improves the production of HIV gp140 and other viral glycoproteins in plants. Plant. Biotechnol. J. 2020, 18, 2109–2117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  101. Pritchard, L.K.; Spencer, D.I.; Royle, L.; Bonomelli, C.; Seabright, G.E.; Behrens, A.J.; Kulp, D.W.; Menis, S.; Krumm, S.A.; Dunlop, D.C.; et al. Glycan clustering stabilizes the mannose patch of HIV-1 and preserves vulnerability to broadly neutralizing antibodies. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 7479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  102. Wang, Y.; Wu, Z.; Hu, W.; Hao, P.; Yang, S. Impact of Expressing Cells on Glycosylation and Glycan of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Glycoprotein. ACS Omega 2021, 6, 15988–15999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Allen, J.D.; Chawla, H.; Samsudin, F.; Zuzic, L.; Shivgan, A.T.; Watanabe, Y.; He, W.T.; Callaghan, S.; Song, G.; Yong, P.; et al. Site-specific steric control of SARS-CoV-2 spike glycosylation. bioRxiv 2021, 60, 2153–2169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Guillon, P.; Clément, M.; Sébille, V.; Rivain, J.G.; Chou, C.F.; Ruvoën-Clouet, N.; Le Pendu, J. Inhibition of the interaction between the SARS-CoV spike protein and its cellular receptor by anti-histo-blood group antibodies. Glycobiology 2008, 18, 1085–1093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  105. Goel, R.; Bloch, E.M.; Pirenne, F.; Al-Riyami, A.Z.; Crowe, E.; Dau, L.; Land, K.; Townsend, M.; Jecko, T.; Rahimi-Levene, N.; et al. ABO blood group and COVID-19: A review on behalf of the ISBT COVID-19 Working Group. Vox Sang. 2021, 116, 849–861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Galili, U. Human Natural Antibodies to Mammalian Carbohydrate Antigens as Unsung Heroes Protecting against Past, Present, and Future Viral Infections. Antibodies 2020, 9, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Sandig, G.; von Horsten, H.H.; Radke, L.; Blanchard, V.; Frohme, M.; Giese, C.; Sandig, V.; Hinderlich, S. Engineering of CHO Cells for the Production of Recombinant Glycoprotein Vaccines with Xylosylated N-glycans. Bioengineering 2017, 4, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  108. Castilho, A.; Beihammer, G.; Pfeiffer, C.; Göritzer, K.; Montero-Morales, L.; Vavra, U.; Maresch, D.; Grünwald-Gruber, C.; Altmann, F.; Steinkellner, H.; et al. An oligosaccharyltransferase from Leishmania major increases the N-glycan occupancy on recombinant glycoproteins produced in Nicotiana benthamiana. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2018, 16, 1700–1709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Ringe, R.P.; Pugach, P.; Cottrell, C.A.; LaBranche, C.C.; Seabright, G.E.; Ketas, T.J.; Ozorowski, G.; Kumar, S.; Schorcht, A.; van Gils, M.J.; et al. Closing and Opening Holes in the Glycan Shield of HIV-1 Envelope Glycoprotein SOSIP Trimers Can Redirect the Neutralizing Antibody Response to the Newly Unmasked Epitopes. J. Virol. 2019, 93, e01656-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the approach to transiently produce viral antigens in N. benthamiana. Upon selection of the appropriate target viral protein (e.g., the spike protein from SARS-CoV-2), codon-optimized synthetic DNA fragments coding for the viral protein are cloned into an expression vector, Agrobacteria are transformed, and the bacterial suspension is infiltrated into leaves of N. benthamiana. A few days after infiltration leaves are harvested, and the protein of interest is purified. This figure was created with BioRender.com (accessed on 5 March 2022).
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the approach to transiently produce viral antigens in N. benthamiana. Upon selection of the appropriate target viral protein (e.g., the spike protein from SARS-CoV-2), codon-optimized synthetic DNA fragments coding for the viral protein are cloned into an expression vector, Agrobacteria are transformed, and the bacterial suspension is infiltrated into leaves of N. benthamiana. A few days after infiltration leaves are harvested, and the protein of interest is purified. This figure was created with BioRender.com (accessed on 5 March 2022).
Plants 11 01093 g001
Figure 2. Schematic overview of natural and engineered N-glycan processing pathways. (A) N-glycan processing steps in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and Golgi apparatus of plants. OST, oligosaccharyltransferase complex; GCSI, α-glucosidases I (GCSI); GCSII, α-glucosidases II; MNS3, ER α-mannosidase; GMI, Golgi α-mannosidase I; GNTI, β1,2-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase I; GMII, Golgi α-mannosidase II; GNTII, β1,2-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase II; XYLT, β1,2-xylosyltransferase; FUT, core α1,3-fucosyltransferases; GALT1, Lewis type β1,3-galactosyltransferase; FUT13, α1,4-fucosyltransferase. (B) Engineered N-glycan processing pathway in plants. The knockout of XYLT and FUT (xylt fut) results in the formation of the GlcNAc2Man3GlcNAc2 (GnGn) structure, which serves as the acceptor substrate for β1,4-galactosyltransferase (GALT, β1,4-galactosylation) and core α1,6-fucosyltransferase (FUT8, core a1,6-fucosylation). Capping with terminal sialic acid is achieved by expression of α2,6-sialyltransferase (ST, a2,6-sialylation) together with the Golgi CMP-sialic acid transporter (CST) and proteins for CMP-sialic acid biosynthesis (not shown) [36,60].
Figure 2. Schematic overview of natural and engineered N-glycan processing pathways. (A) N-glycan processing steps in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and Golgi apparatus of plants. OST, oligosaccharyltransferase complex; GCSI, α-glucosidases I (GCSI); GCSII, α-glucosidases II; MNS3, ER α-mannosidase; GMI, Golgi α-mannosidase I; GNTI, β1,2-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase I; GMII, Golgi α-mannosidase II; GNTII, β1,2-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase II; XYLT, β1,2-xylosyltransferase; FUT, core α1,3-fucosyltransferases; GALT1, Lewis type β1,3-galactosyltransferase; FUT13, α1,4-fucosyltransferase. (B) Engineered N-glycan processing pathway in plants. The knockout of XYLT and FUT (xylt fut) results in the formation of the GlcNAc2Man3GlcNAc2 (GnGn) structure, which serves as the acceptor substrate for β1,4-galactosyltransferase (GALT, β1,4-galactosylation) and core α1,6-fucosyltransferase (FUT8, core a1,6-fucosylation). Capping with terminal sialic acid is achieved by expression of α2,6-sialyltransferase (ST, a2,6-sialylation) together with the Golgi CMP-sialic acid transporter (CST) and proteins for CMP-sialic acid biosynthesis (not shown) [36,60].
Plants 11 01093 g002
Figure 3. Schematic overview of natural and engineered O-glycosylation pathways. (A) Plant-type O-glycosylation. Proline residues next to Ser/Thr residues can be converted to hydroxyproline (Hyp) by prolyl-4-hydroxylases (P4Hs). Hyp residues are further elongated by arabinosyltransferases (AraTs). (B) Engineered mammalian-type O-glycosylation. The knockout of P4Hs prevents Hyp formation [67]. Expression of polypeptide GalNAc-transferases (GalNAc-T), β1,3-galactosyltransferase 1 (C1GalT1), sialyltransferase (ST), the Golgi CMP-sialic acid transporter (CST), and proteins for CMP-sialic acid biosynthesis (not shown) results in mucin-type O-glycan formation [37].
Figure 3. Schematic overview of natural and engineered O-glycosylation pathways. (A) Plant-type O-glycosylation. Proline residues next to Ser/Thr residues can be converted to hydroxyproline (Hyp) by prolyl-4-hydroxylases (P4Hs). Hyp residues are further elongated by arabinosyltransferases (AraTs). (B) Engineered mammalian-type O-glycosylation. The knockout of P4Hs prevents Hyp formation [67]. Expression of polypeptide GalNAc-transferases (GalNAc-T), β1,3-galactosyltransferase 1 (C1GalT1), sialyltransferase (ST), the Golgi CMP-sialic acid transporter (CST), and proteins for CMP-sialic acid biosynthesis (not shown) results in mucin-type O-glycan formation [37].
Plants 11 01093 g003
Figure 4. Both macroheterogeneity (variable occupancy of N-glycosylation sites) and microheterogeneity (variable N-glycan composition at distinct N-glycosylation sites) of glycosylation can have a negative impact on recombinant glycoprotein production and function. Macroheterogeneity can be overcome by engineering of the oligosaccharyltransferase (OST) complex. Microheterogeneity can be overcome by glycoengineering which involves elimination of unwanted glycan processing reactions and expression of glycosidases and glycosyltransferases for defined glycan structures. This figure was created with BioRender.com (accessed on 5 March 2022).
Figure 4. Both macroheterogeneity (variable occupancy of N-glycosylation sites) and microheterogeneity (variable N-glycan composition at distinct N-glycosylation sites) of glycosylation can have a negative impact on recombinant glycoprotein production and function. Macroheterogeneity can be overcome by engineering of the oligosaccharyltransferase (OST) complex. Microheterogeneity can be overcome by glycoengineering which involves elimination of unwanted glycan processing reactions and expression of glycosidases and glycosyltransferases for defined glycan structures. This figure was created with BioRender.com (accessed on 5 March 2022).
Plants 11 01093 g004
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ruocco, V.; Strasser, R. Transient Expression of Glycosylated SARS-CoV-2 Antigens in Nicotiana benthamiana. Plants 2022, 11, 1093. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11081093

AMA Style

Ruocco V, Strasser R. Transient Expression of Glycosylated SARS-CoV-2 Antigens in Nicotiana benthamiana. Plants. 2022; 11(8):1093. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11081093

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ruocco, Valentina, and Richard Strasser. 2022. "Transient Expression of Glycosylated SARS-CoV-2 Antigens in Nicotiana benthamiana" Plants 11, no. 8: 1093. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11081093

APA Style

Ruocco, V., & Strasser, R. (2022). Transient Expression of Glycosylated SARS-CoV-2 Antigens in Nicotiana benthamiana. Plants, 11(8), 1093. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11081093

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop