Next Article in Journal
Do We Need to Breed for Regional Adaptation in Soybean?—Evaluation of Genotype-by-Location Interaction and Trait Stability of Soybean in Germany
Next Article in Special Issue
Essential Oils and Biological Activities of Eucalyptus falcata, E. sideroxylon and E. citriodora Growing in Tunisia
Previous Article in Journal
Customized Technological Designs to Improve the Traditional Use of Rosa canina Fruits in Foods and Ingredients
Previous Article in Special Issue
Abutilon theophrasti’s Resilience against Allelochemical-Based Weed Management in Sustainable Agriculture – Due to Collection of Highly Advantageous Microorganisms?
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 12
Issue 4
10.3390/plants12040755
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Is the Phytotoxic Effect of Digestive Fluid of Nepenthes x ventrata on Tomato Related to Reactive Oxygen Species?

by
Pawel Staszek
*,
Maciej Piekarniak
,
Agnieszka Wal
,
Urszula Krasuska
and
Agnieszka Gniazdowska
*
Department of Plant Physiology, Institute of Biology, Warsaw University of Life Sciences-SGGW, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2023, 12(4), 755; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12040755
Submission received: 9 January 2023 / Revised: 2 February 2023 / Accepted: 6 February 2023 / Published: 8 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Plant Allelopathy: Mechanisms and Applications in Regenerative Agriculture)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The digestive fluid of pitcher plants is a rich source of enzymes and secondary metabolites, but its impact on higher plant growth and development remains unknown. The aim of the study was to determine the phytotoxicity of the digestive fluid of the pitcher plant (Nepenthes x ventrata) on the germination of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) seeds, elongation growth and cell viability of roots of tomato seedlings. The digestive fluid was collected from pitchers before feeding and four days after feeding; the pH and electrical conductivity of the fluid were determined. Undiluted and 50% fluids were used in the study. An inhibition of germination of tomato seeds, by around 30% and 55%, was respectively observed in 50% and 100% digestive fluids collected before and after feeding. Digestive fluid did not affect the root growth of tomato seedlings; a slight (6%) inhibition was only observed after the application of 100% digestive fluid from an unfed trap. The roots of the tomato seedlings treated with undiluted fluid were characterized by reduced cell viability. Reactive oxygen species (H2O2 and O2•−) were mainly localized in the root apex regardless of the used phytotoxic cocktail, and did not differ in comparison to control plants.

1. Introduction

Nepenthes x ventrata belongs to the Nepenthaceae family and is a natural hybrid of Nepenthes alata Blanco and Nepenthes ventricosa Blanco. This species is endemic to forests in the Philippines [1]. N. ventrata forms jug-shaped containers that function as passive pitcher traps. Pitchers are filled with digestive fluid, being the mixture that enables the release of nutrients from the bodies of the captured prey [2].
Many enzymes have been found in the digestive fluid of pitcher plants: proteases, peptidases, phosphatases, esterases, ribonucleases and chitinases [3,4,5,6]. The aspartyl proteinases Nepenthesin-1 and Nepenthesin-2 have also been isolated from the digestive fluid [7]. The digestive fluid also contains a thaumatin-like protein with antibacterial and antifungal properties [8]. In addition, pitcher fluid contains compounds of low molecular weight, e.g., two naphthoquinones: droseron (3,5-dihydroxy-2-methyl-1,4-naphthoquinone) and its derivative 5-O-methyldroserone (2-methyl-3-hydroxy-5-methoxy-1,4- naphthoquinone) [9], of antifungal activity against a wide range of human and plant fungal pathogens [10]. Another low-molecular substance is plumbagin, isolated from N. alata [11] and characterized by antimalarial, antibacterial, antifungal and anticancer properties [12,13,14] and 7-methyl-juglone [11]. The digestive fluid of the Nepenthes species is rich in mineral nutrient composition (boron, calcium, copper, iron and nickel) and anions Cl−, Br− and SO42− [11]. Prey digestion (feeding process) is accompanied by alteration in fluid composition, including reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS) levels [15].
The physicochemical properties of the digestive fluid, such as lower surface tension against water and high viscoelasticity, play an important role in preventing the escape of captured insects [16].
Application of allelopathic cocktails in cultivation can effectively influence weed populations and insect pests. Allelopathy thus offers an attractive environmentally friendly alternative to pesticides in agriculture [17]. Volatile organic compounds belonging to the group of allelochemicals could repel insects or mask the host’s odor to confuse them [18,19].
Digestive fluid as a mixture of many compounds with a possible phytotoxic potential may prove to be a key element in research on natural herbicides that would replace artificial and less specific compounds currently used in agriculture. The exact composition of the digestive fluid is unknown, but the digestive fluid of some species is known to contain compounds that have phytotoxic potential.
The aim of our study was to characterize some properties of phytotoxic cocktails and to determine the effect of the digestive fluid from pitchers of N. ventrata, collected before and after plant feeding, on tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) seed germination and root growth.
Based on the mode of action of many allelochemicals and phytotoxins [20], we hypothesized that pitcher plants’ digestive fluid impacts the seed germination and root growth of tomato seedlings by the induction of oxidative stress.

2. Results

2.1. Electrical Conductivity

The electrical conductivity and pH of the phytotoxic cocktail depended on the origin of the fluid (from fed or unfed traps) and the concentration. The highest pH value was found in distilled water used as a control, and the lowest in heat-treated, 100% fluid from fed traps (Table 1). The pH of the fluid from fed pitchers was lower than that from unfed ones, regardless of concentration or heat-treatment (Table 1).
The highest electrical conductivity (1.364 mS cm−1) was recorded for heat-treated undiluted fluid from unfed pitchers, and the lowest (0.0209 mS cm−1) for the distilled water (control) (Table 1). Digestive fluids (100%) were characterized by higher electrical conductivity compared to diluted ones, irrespective of the origin of the fluid and heat-treatment.

2.2. Germination Tests

Two-way Anova showed that there were no statistically significant differences between the germination of tomato seeds in crude fluid and heat-treated fluid (p = 0.73, F = 0.13). Due to the lack of associations, the dataset for crude and heat-treated fluids was not separated in the remaining analyses.
Tomato seeds germinated in 100% fluid after three days of imbibition in water (Figure 1). Undiluted digestion fluids from unfed or fed traps inhibited the germination of tomato seeds by 59% or 53%, respectively. In diluted phytotoxic cocktails of fed and unfed pitchers, tomato seeds germinated in 67% and 75%, respectively (Figure 1).

2.3. Root Growth Biotest

Two-way Anova showed that there were no statistically significant differences between the growth of tomato seedlings in crude fluid and heat-treated fluid (p = 0.33, F = 0.95). Due to the lack of associations, the dataset for crude and heat-treated fluids was not separated in the remaining analyses.
Roots of the control tomato seedlings growing in water for 24 h were about 16 mm long. Fluids from traps of pitcher plants repressed the growth of tomato roots in only 6% (Figure 2). The longest roots were observed in seedlings treated with the diluted fluid from unfed traps. The strongest inhibition of root growth was noted for seedlings treated with 100% fluids from unfed traps. Root lengths measured in seedlings treated with diluted and undiluted fluid from fed traps differed by 0.25 mm and 0.5 mm from the control, respectively, but the differences were not statistically significant.

2.4. Test of Root Cell Viability

The viability of the root cells of seedlings treated for 24 h with crude and heat-treated phytotoxic cocktails slightly differed (Table 2). Excluding the control plants, the highest viability was estimated for roots of seedlings treated with crude, diluted fluid from fed traps, and the lowest viability was noticed for the roots of seedlings grown in 100% crude digestion fluid from unfed pitchers, which was very similar to 100% heat-treated fluid from fed traps (31,8–31,3% of damages, respectively). The roots of seedlings treated with 50% fluid were characterized by a higher viability than the roots of seedlings treated with undiluted fluid, irrespective of heat treatment.

2.5. In Situ H2O2 Localization in Tomato Seedlings Cultured

H2O2 was localized using DAB staining as brown precipitates of polymerized DAB (Figure 3). For all tested seedlings, the most visible staining was detected in the root tips. Stronger coloration of the upper part of the roots, on the border with the hypocotyl, was observed in seedlings treated with heat-treated fluid, regardless of the concentration of the fluids or the feeding of the traps (from fed or unfed ones).

2.6. In Situ O2•− Localization

The histochemical localization of O2•− was carried out using NBT staining. A dark blue coloration of formazan was observed in the root tips of all the tested seedlings (Figure 4). Only the outer layers of the roots were colored above the tips. The roots of seedlings treated with 50% digestive fluid were characterized by a slightly higher color intensity, regardless of the heating of the phytotoxic cocktails (Figure 4). However, in general, no differences in NBT staining were noticed between the roots of tomato seedlings treated with digestive fluids and those growing in water (Figure 4).

3. Discussion

Nepenthes is a plant which, by adapting to specific environmental conditions, in the process of evolution, developed a carnivorous syndrome. Although it is known where the components of the fluid are produced and how the substances resulting from the digestion of the prey are absorbed by the plant, knowledge about the composition of the digestive fluid is limited. The phenomenon of carnivorous syndrome in plants has been described for over 150 years; the isolation and identification of enzymes involved in digestion is still only fragmentary. It refers to both the composition of enzymes and other molecules in the digestive fluid. Their identification, structure and biosynthesis may be an interesting target for further research [9]. Until now, the digestive fluid of pitcher plants has been mostly examined in the context of plant nutrition, but its putative toxicity on neighboring plants should not be omitted. Our study is a unique observation of the impact of the digestive fluid on the germination and growth of other plants; acceptors, according to allelopathic terminology.
At the start of this study, we determined the impact of pitcher plant feeding and the inactivation of the fluid by heating on its phytotoxicity. No influence of the temperature inactivation on the toxicity of the digestive fluid on the germination of tomato seeds and the elongation growth of roots suggests temperature-resistant compounds of the fluid, rather than enzymes of the fluid, are responsible for its negative action. The feeding of the pitcher plant resulted in decreased pH of the fluid, which is a typical reaction in the digestion process [21], although it did not affect tomato seed germination. The germination of seeds was inhibited by phytotoxic cocktails with no respect to the pH of the fluid. Tomato seeds similarly germinated in the digestive fluid with a pH range of 3.3–3.8, taken from fed traps and in the digestive fluid of unfed traps (pH 5.5 to 6.1). The low pH of the digestive fluid also did not influence the elongation growth of the tomato roots. The pH value also seems to be correlated with bacterial community composition [22] and feeding. Taking to account no differences in cocktail phytotoxicity in the tomato seedlings before and after heating, it can be concluded that microorganisms from the fluid are not toxic to acceptor tissues; however, perhaps the experiments should be performed longer to observe such effects. The electrical conductivity of the digestive fluid showed no difference in dependence on feeding, nor heating; it only decreased as the dilution of the liquid was performed. Electrical conductivity in a range of 0.8–1.6 mS cm−1, observed in the research, indicates moderately saline soils, where only plants resistant to salinity can grow [23,24]. This data confirms the information that the pitcher fluid of Nepenthes plants (N. alata, N. fusca, N.gracilis, N. mirabilis, N. superba, N. thorelii and N. ventricosa) is a 25 mM KCl solution with few additional ions [11].
During the germination tests, solutions with a similar pH, but different digestive fluid concentration, were applied, on which the results of the experiment mainly depended. Undiluted digestive fluid, taken from a pitcher of N. ventrata fed with the proteins, inhibited tomato seed germination as compared to the 50% cocktail. Some compounds that may adversely affect the growth and development of other plants have been isolated from carnivorous plants. Studies conducted with the use of Portuguese sundew ((Drosophyllum lusitanicum L. (Link)) extracts have shown that the extracts inhibited the germination of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) seeds. Plumbagin has been identified as the main compound responsible for the inhibition of lettuce sprouting [25]. Other compounds, isolated from carnivorous plants, may show a toxic effect; these include two naphthoquinones, droserone and its derivative 5-O-methyldroserone, which have beem found in the digestive fluid of N. khasiana [10] or 7-methyl-juglone isolated from N. alata [11]. Previous reports from our laboratory indicated the presence of phenolic compounds in the digestive fluid, the total content of which increased in fed traps [15]. Phenolics are regarded as strong allelochemicals of various modes of action in acceptor plants [26].
Investigating the mode of action of allelopathic compounds is complicated due to the multitude of potential molecular targets. Biological tests using plants or plant tissues successfully detect the biological activity of many synthetic and natural compounds [27]. One of the first visible effects of phytotoxin’s action is the reduction of seed germination and/or seedling growth [28]. Diverse phytotoxins (like cyanamide, citral, coumarin) act as inhibitors of root tip cell division, influencing root growth [29,30,31]. Treatment of tomato seedlings with digestive fluids showed that components of these cocktails had no effect on the growth and development of the young seedlings. Morphology and length of the roots of tomato plants exposed to 100% and 50% digestive fluids of N. ventrata traps did not differ and were similar to those observed in control seedlings. It suggests that the impact of the phytotoxic cocktails of the digestive fluids on growth of the roots is weaker than on seed germination. This observation is atypical in allelopathy research, as most allelochemicals applied as the mixture or extract originated from the tissue of allelopathic plant are more toxic in growth tests than germination tests [32]. Many allelochemicals affect seed germination by inhibition of the activity of the enzymes crucial for the process. Extracts from the leaves and flowers of catnip (Nepeta meyeri Benth.) decreased α-amylase, ß-1,3 glucanase and protease activities in seeds of field dodder (Cuscuta campestris Yunck) [33]. Allelochemicals could disrupt the action of phytohormones in germinating seeds. The inhibition of germination of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) by myrigalone A, C-methylated dihydrochalcone from sweet gale (Myrica gale L.) was accompanied by alterations in gibberellins metabolism by inhibiting GA3 oxidase, as well as by interfering with the gibberellin signaling pathway [34]. Perturbations in ROS metabolism and the induction of oxidative stress were identified as the cause of inhibition of seed germination. Sunflower (Helianthus annus L.) extracts increased H2O2 content in mustard (Sinapsis alba L.) seeds, resulting in the restriction of their germination [35].
Although evidence for allelopathic interactions and/or the potential of allelochemicals is based on the evaluation of seed germination and seedling growth of the target species [28], these tests only provide general information regarding the biological effects of phytotoxins. They do not indicate a mechanism of their action [36,37]. In many studies, it has been demonstrated that, for allelopathy stress, as for other stresses, the induction of oxidative stress is the common response of acceptor plants [20,28,29,38]. Such observations are typical for both crude extracts of allelopathic plants, as well as for single allelopathic compounds. An accumulation of ROS, a modification of their localization and a disruption of cellular antioxidant systems were shown for various plants exposed to different allelochemicals (for review, see [20,29,38]. In our study, phytotoxic cocktails of digestive fluids did not lead to increased levels of H2O2 or O2•−. Moreover, no alteration in the localization of ROS in roots in response to digestive fluids were shown. It may be proposed that compounds in the fluids from N. ventrata traps do not impact ROS production. Although investigations of the activity of enzymes of the antioxidant system are still required, the presence of ROS and reactive nitrogen species in the digestion liquid of these plants has been recently revealed [15].

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Experimental Model

In our experiments, we used tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L. cv Malinowy Ożarowski) seedlings as the test plant. A digestive fluid from pitchers of Nepenthes was applied in the tests as a phytotoxic cocktail.
Pitcher plants Nepenthes x ventrata Hort. ex Fleming [=(N. ventricosa Blanco × N. alata Blanco)] were grown in the greenhouse under conditions of constant high humidity (60%) and temperature (28 °C); light was supplemented with sodium lamps to obtain a 16-/8-h day/night photoperiod. A mixture of acid peat, perlite and sphagnum moss was used as a growing medium and plants were watered with distilled water every other day. The traps of pitcher plants, immediately after opening, were covered with gauze to avoid contamination by accidental insects. Digestive fluid was collected from fed or unfed mature pitchers (aerial type, length approximately 9 cm). Traps were fed with 40 μg hen egg white solution (1 µg µL−1) introduced with a pipette directly into a pitcher. Digestive fluids from fed traps were collected four days after feeding. The fluids (from fed and unfed pitchers) were shortly centrifuged (5522× g, 5 min at 4 °C), and the supernatants were transferred to the sterile tubes, frozen and used for biotests.
Before biotesting, digestive fluids from several traps were combined (fluid separately from fed and unfed traps) to maximize the volume of the phytotoxic cocktail. One portion of the fluid was boiled at 100 °C for 10 min (heat-treated fluid) and the rest was left untreated (crude fluid). Then, part of each fluid (heat-treated or crude) was diluted twice to obtain a 50% solution. The electrical conductivity and pH of phytotoxic cocktails were determined using a pH/conductivity meter (CPC-505 Elmetron, Zabrze, Poland, with suitable electrodes ECF-60 and EPS-1, respectively).

4.2. Germination Tests

Tomato seeds (Solanum lycopersicum L. cv. Malinowy Ożarowski) (commercially obtained from PNOS Sp. z o.o., Poland) were surface sterilized with 0.5% sodium hypochloride for 10 min at room temperature. Then, seeds were rinsed three times with distilled water, and 8 seeds were placed on Petri dishes (ø 3.5 cm) filled with filter paper wetted with 2.5 mL phytotoxic cocktail or 2.5 mL distilled water (control). The culture was carried out in a growth chamber (Fitotron Versatile Environmental Test Chamber-PAR-10Mn, by Sanyo, Osaka, Japan, model MLR-350H), in darkness at 20 °C for 3 days. Seeds were considered germinated when the radicle had emerged through the seed coat.
To investigate the impact of pitcher fluids on the growth of tomato seedlings, biotests were performed. Tomato seeds were germinated in water in darkness at 20 °C for 3–4 days. Then, 8 seedlings with roots of equal length (0.5 cm) were selected and transferred to Petri dishes (ø 3.5 cm) filled with filter paper wetted with 2.5 mL phytotoxic cocktails or 2.5 mL distilled water (control). Control seedlings and seedlings treated with digestive fluid were cultured in a growth chamber at 23/20 °C, 12-/12-h day/night regime, and a light intensity of 90 µmol PAR m−2 s−1 for 24 h as described by Krasuska et al. [39]. The root length of seedlings was measured after 24 h of the culture.

4.3. Test of Root Cell Viability

The viability of tomato root cells was determined using Evans blue staining [40]. The whole control seedlings or seedlings treated with pitcher fluids for 24 h were incubated in a 0.25% solution of Evans blue for 30 min at room temperature. Then, seedlings were washed three times in distilled water and roots were isolated, weighed and homogenized in 1 mL of a 1% solution of sodium dodecylsulphate (SDS). After 10 min centrifugation at 21,000× g at 4 °C, the supernatant was collected and absorbance was measured at 600 nm (Sunrise, Tecan, Männedorf, Switzerland). For the positive control (100% cell damage), the roots were boiled for 10 min, cooled and then treated as described above. Three roots were used for one repetition. The concentration of the extracted dye was estimated from the standard curve prepared with Evans blue in 1% SDS and expressed as mg g−1 FW or % of cell damage. The data were means of three measurements from each of three sets of experiments.

4.4. In Situ H2O2 Localization

The histochemical localization of H2O2 was carried out with 3,3′-diaminobenzidine (DAB) staining [39]. The roots of the control seedlings and seedlings treated with pitcher fluids for 24 h were washed twice in distilled water and incubated with DAB solution (1 mg mL−1) with 2 mM DMSO. Staining was carried out for 4 h at room temperature, in darkness.

4.5. In Situ O2•− Localization

The histochemical localization of O2•− was performed according to Beyer and Fridovich [41] using nitroblue tetrazolium (NBT) staining. Roots isolated from the control seedlings and seedlings treated with pitcher fluids for 24 h were washed twice in distilled water and incubated for 20 min in darkness at room temperature in 2 mM NBT (Sigma–Aldrich, Tokyo, Japan), freshly prepared in 10 mM Tris-HCl buffer pH 7.4 with 2 mM DMSO. After staining, the roots were cleaned for 24 h in chloral hydrate to avoid artifacts by removing oxidized phenolics [42]. O2•− was visualized as a deposit of a dark blue insoluble formazan compound.
Images of seedlings stained with DAB and NBT were taken with the TAGARNO FHD TREND digital microscope (magnification x 5.2, F4 diaphragm, enhancement 10.2 dB, exposure time 1/15 s).
Data were obtained in at least three independent experiments with at least three repetitions each. The plants for experiments were randomly selected from 25 individuals. Data were analyzed using Statistica Software. Mean values were calculated and SD was provided. After Anova, homogenous groups were evaluated using Fisher’s LSD post hoc test.

5. Conclusions

We demonstrated the negative, dose-dependent effect of the digestive fluid of the pitcher plant on tomato seed germination; whereas its impact on root elongation was less evident, but still significant. Application of the digestive fluid decreased cell viability but did not alter ROS (H2O2 and O2•−) distribution in the roots of tomato seedlings. The explanation of the phytotoxic potential of the digestive fluid requires further study, in which the compounds of the trap fluid, being mainly secondary metabolites, are determined prior to their use in phytotoxicity tests. The context of perturbation in ROS levels in acceptor plants as the target of digestive fluid action needs examination of the activity of the enzymatic antioxidants in the tissue of the acceptor plants.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.S. and U.K.; methodology, P.S. and U.K.; validation, P.S. and A.G.; formal analysis, P.S. and A.G.; investigation, A.W., M.P. and P.S.; data curation, P.S.; writing—original draft preparation, P.S. and A.G.; writing—review and editing, P.S., A.W. and A.G.; visualization, P.S. and A.W.; supervision, P.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Upon request, the data will be provided by the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Clarke, C. Nepenthes of Sumatra and Peninsular Malaysia; Natural History Publications (Borneo): Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  2. Adlassnig, W.; Peroutka, M.; Lendl, T. Traps of Carnivorous Pitcher Plants as a Habitat: Composition of the Fluid, Biodiversity and Mutualistic Activities. Ann. Bot. 2011, 107, 181–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. An, C.; Fukusaki, E.I.; Kobayashi, A. Aspartic Proteinases Are Expressed in Pitchers of the Carnivorous Plant Nepenthes Alata Blanco. Planta 2002, 214, 661–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Eilenberg, H.; Pnini-Cohen, S.; Schuster, S.; Movtchan, A.; Zilberstein, A. Isolation and Characterization of Chitinase Genes from Pitchers of the Carnivorous Plant Nepenthes Khasiana. J. Exp. Bot. 2006, 57, 2775–2784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Płachno, B.J.; Adamec, L.; Lichtscheidl, I.K.; Peroutka, M.; Adlassnig, W.; Vrba, J. Fluorescence Labelling of Phosphatase Activity in Digestive Glands of Carnivorous Plants. Plant Biol. 2006, 8, 813–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Stephenson, P.; Hogan, J. Cloning and Characterization of a Ribonuclease, a Cysteine Proteinase, and an Aspartic Proteinase from Pitchers of the Carnivorous Plant Nepenthes Ventricosa Blanco. Int. J. Plant Sci. 2006, 167, 239–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Athauda, S.B.P.; Matsumoto, K.; Rajapakshe, S.; Kuribayashi, M.; Kojima, M.; Kubomura-Yoshida, N.; Iwamatsu, A.; Shibata, C.; Inoue, H.; Takahashi, K. Enzymic and Structural Characterization of Nepenthesin, a Unique Member of a Novel Subfamily of Aspartic Proteinases. Biochem. J. 2004, 381, 295–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hatano, N.; Hamada, T. Proteome Analysis of Pitcher Fluid of the Carnivorous Plant Nepenthes alata. J. Proteome Res. 2008, 7, 809–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mithöfer, A. Carnivorous Pitcher Plants: Insights in an Old Topic. Phytochemistry 2011, 72, 1678–1682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Eilenberg, H.; Pnini-Cohen, S.; Rahamim, Y.; Sionov, E.; Segal, E.; Carmeli, S.; Zilberstein, A. Induced Production of Antifungal Naphthoquinones in the Pitchers of the Carnivorous Plant Nepenthes khasiana. J. Exp. Bot. 2010, 61, 911–922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Buch, F.; Rott, M.; Rottloff, S.; Paetz, C.; Hilke, I.; Raessler, M.; Mithöfer, A. Secreted Pitfall-Trap Fluid of Carnivorous Nepenthes Plants Is Unsuitable for Microbial Growth. Ann. Bot. 2013, 111, 375–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Likhitwitayawuid, K.; Kaewamatawong, R.; Ruangrungsi, N.; Krungkrai, J. Antimalarial Naphthoquinones from Nepenthes thorelii. Planta Med. 1998, 64, 237–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Sandur, S.K.; Ichikawa, H.; Sethi, G.; Ahn, K.S.; Aggarwal, B.B. Plumbagin (5-Hydroxy-2-Methyl-1,4-Naphthoquinone) Suppresses NF-ΚB Activation and NF-ΚB-Regulated Gene Products Through Modulation of P65 and IκBα Kinase Activation, Leading to Potentiation of Apoptosis Induced by Cytokine and Chemotherapeutic Agents. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 17023–17033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Shin, K.-S.; Lee, S.-K.; Cha, B.-J. Antifungal Activity of Plumbagin Purified from Leaves of Nepenthes Ventricosa x Maxima against Phytopathogenic Fungi. Plant Pathol. J. 2007, 23, 113–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wal, A.; Staszek, P.; Pakula, B.; Paradowska, M.; Krasuska, U. ROS and RNS Alterations in the Digestive Fluid of Nepenthes × Ventrata Trap at Different Developmental Stages. Plants 2022, 11, 3304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Gaume, L.; Forterre, Y. A Viscoelastic Deadly Fluid in Carnivorous Pitcher Plants. PLoS ONE 2007, 2, 1185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Macías, F.A.; Molinillo, J.M.; Varela, R.M.; Galindo, J.C. Allelopathy—A Natural Alternative for Weed Control. Pest Manag. Sci. 2007, 63, 327–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Piesik, D.; Wenda-Piesik, A. Sitophilus Granarius Responses to Blends of Five Groups of Cereal Kernels and One Group of Plant Volatiles. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2015, 63, 63–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Piesik, D.; Wenda-Piesik, A.; Krasińska, A.; Wrzesińska, D.; Delaney, K.J. Volatile Organic Compounds Released by Rumex Confertus Following Hypera Rumicis Herbivory and Weevil Responses to Volatiles. J. Appl. Entomol. 2016, 140, 308–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Staszek, P.; Krasuska, U.; Wal, A.; Zak, J.; Gniazdowska, A. NO and Metabolic Reprogramming under Phytotoxicity Stress. In Nitric Oxide in Plant Biology; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2022; pp. 297–318. [Google Scholar]
  21. Chan, X.-Y.; Hong, K.-W.; Yin, W.-F.; Chan, K.-G. Microbiome and Biocatalytic Bacteria in Monkey Cup (Nepenthes Pitcher) Digestive Fluid. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 20016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Bittleston, L.S.; Wolock, C.J.; Yahya, B.E.; Chan, X.Y.; Chan, K.G.; Pierce, N.E.; Pringle, A. Convergence between the Microcosms of Southeast Asian and North American Pitcher Plants. Elife 2018, 7, e36741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hossain, M.S.; Rahman, G.K.M.M.; Solaiman, A.R.M.; Alam, M.S.; Rahman, M.M.; Mia, M.A.B. Estimating Electrical Conductivity for Soil Salinity Monitoring Using Various Soil-Water Ratios Depending on Soil Texture. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 2020, 51, 635–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Huliusz, P. Quantitative and Qualitative Diferentiation of Soil Salinity in Poland. Ber. Dtsch. Bodenkd. Ges. 2008, 1, 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  25. Gonçalves, S.; Ferraz, M.; Romano, A. Phytotoxic Properties of Drosophyllum Lusitanicum Leaf Extracts and Its Main Compound Plumbagin. Sci. Hortic. 2009, 122, 96–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Li, Z.-H.; Wang, Q.; Ruan, X.; Pan, C.-D.; Jiang, D.-A. Phenolics and Plant Allelopathy. Molecules 2010, 15, 8933–8952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Macías, F.A.; Castellano, D.; Molinillo, J.M.G. Search for a Standard Phytotoxic Bioassay for Allelochemicals. Selection of Standard Target Species. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2000, 48, 2512–2521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Gniazdowska, A.; Bogatek, R. Allelopathic Interactions between Plants. Multi Site Action of Allelochemicals. Acta Physiol. Plant 2005, 27, 395–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Staszek, P.; Krasuska, U.; Ciacka, K.; Gniazdowska, A. ROS Metabolism Perturbation as an Element of Mode of Action of Allelochemicals. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 1648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Soltys, D.; Rudzińska-Langwald, A.; Gniazdowska, A.; Wiśniewska, A.; Bogatek, R. Inhibition of Tomato (Solanum Lycopersicum L.) Root Growth by Cyanamide Is Due to Altered Cell Division, Phytohormone Balance and Expansin Gene Expression. Planta 2012, 236, 1629–1638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Graña, E.; Sotelo, T.; Díaz-Tielas, C.; Araniti, F.; Krasuska, U.; Bogatek, R.; Reigosa, M.J.; Sánchez-Moreiras, A.M. Citral Induces Auxin and Ethylene-Mediated Malformations and Arrests Cell Division in Arabidopsis Thaliana Roots. J. Chem. Ecol. 2013, 39, 271–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Haugland, E.; Brandsaeter, L.O. Experiments on Bioassay Sensitivity in the Study of Allelopathy. J. Chem. Ecol. 1996, 22, 1845–1859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Shekari, F.; Shekari, F.; Najafi, J.; Abassi, A.; Radmanesh, Z.; Bones, A.M. Phytotoxic Effects of Catnip (Nepeta Meyeri Benth.) on Early Growth Stages Development and Infection Potential of Field Dodder (Cuscuta Campestris Yunck). Plants 2022, 11, 2629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Oracz, K.; Voegele, A.; Tarkowská, D.; Jacquemoud, D.; Turečková, V.; Urbanová, T.; Strnad, M.; Sliwinska, E.; Leubner-Metzger, G. Myrigalone A Inhibits Lepidium Sativum Seed Germination by Interference with Gibberellin Metabolism and Apoplastic Superoxide Production Required for Embryo Extension Growth and Endosperm Rupture. Plant Cell Physiol. 2012, 53, 81–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Oracz, K.; Bouteau, H.E.-M.; Farrant, J.M.; Cooper, K.; Belghazi, M.; Job, C.; Job, D.; Corbineau, F.; Bailly, C. ROS Production and Protein Oxidation as a Novel Mechanism for Seed Dormancy Alleviation. Plant J. 2007, 50, 452–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Inderjit; Weston, L.A.; Duke, S.O. Challenges, Achievements and Opportunities in Allelopathy Research. J. Plant Interact. 2005, 1, 69–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Williams, R.; Hoagland, R. Bioassays- Useful Tools for the Study of Allelopathy. In Allelopathy; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2003; pp. 315–351. [Google Scholar]
  38. Gniazdowska, A.; Krasuska, U.; Andrzejczak, O.; Soltys, D. Allelopathic Compounds as Oxidative Stress Agents: Yes or NO. In Reactive Oxygen and Nitrogen Species Signaling and Communication in Plants, Signaling and Communication in Plants; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2015; Volume 23, pp. 155–176. [Google Scholar]
  39. Krasuska, U.; Andrzejczak, O.; Staszek, P.; Borucki, W.; Gniazdowska, A. Toxicity of Canavanine in Tomato (Solanum Lycopersicum L.) Roots Is Due to Alterations in RNS, ROS and Auxin Levels. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2016, 103, 84–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Baker, C.; Mock, M. An Improved Method for Monitoring Cell Death in Cell Suspension and Leaf Disc Assays Using Evans Blue. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 1994, 39, 7–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Beyer, W.F.; Fridovich, I. Assaying for Superoxide Dismutase Activity: Some Large Consequences of Minor Changes in Conditions. Anal. Biochem. 1987, 161, 559–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ciacka, K.; Tyminski, M.; Gniazdowska, A.; Krasuska, U. Cold Stratification-Induced Dormancy Removal in Apple (Malus Domestica Borkh.) Seeds Is Accompanied by an Increased Glutathione Pool in Embryonic Axes. J. Plant Physiol. 2022, 274, 153736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Plants 12 00755 g001 550
Figure 1. Germination of tomato seeds in water (control) or in phytotoxic cocktails of 100% or 50% digestive fluids from fed and unfed traps of pitcher plants. Due to the lack of significant differences, we did not separate data obtained after treatment with crude and heat-treaded fluids. Values are average ± SD of three replications. Homogenous groups (a–c) were evaluated using Fisher’s LSD post hoc test with p < 0.5.
Figure 1. Germination of tomato seeds in water (control) or in phytotoxic cocktails of 100% or 50% digestive fluids from fed and unfed traps of pitcher plants. Due to the lack of significant differences, we did not separate data obtained after treatment with crude and heat-treaded fluids. Values are average ± SD of three replications. Homogenous groups (a–c) were evaluated using Fisher’s LSD post hoc test with p < 0.5.
Plants 12 00755 g001
Plants 12 00755 g002 550
Figure 2. Length of roots of tomato seedlings growing for 24 h in water (control) or in phytotoxic cocktails of 100% or 50% digestive fluids from fed and unfed traps of pitcher plants. Due to the lack of significant differences, we did not separate data obtained after treatment, the division into crude and heat-treaded fluids was not included. Values are average ± SD of three replications. Homogenous groups (a, b) were evaluated using Fisher’s LSD post hoc test with p < 0.5.
Figure 2. Length of roots of tomato seedlings growing for 24 h in water (control) or in phytotoxic cocktails of 100% or 50% digestive fluids from fed and unfed traps of pitcher plants. Due to the lack of significant differences, we did not separate data obtained after treatment, the division into crude and heat-treaded fluids was not included. Values are average ± SD of three replications. Homogenous groups (a, b) were evaluated using Fisher’s LSD post hoc test with p < 0.5.
Plants 12 00755 g002
Plants 12 00755 g003 550
Figure 3. In situ H2O2 localization in tomato seedlings cultured for 24 h in water (the control) or in phytotoxic cocktails of 100% or 50% fed or unfed traps of pitcher plants. Control seedlings (A), seedlings growing in crude concentrated fluids of unfed traps (B), treated with crude diluted cocktail of unfed traps (C), cultured in crude concentrated fluids of fed traps (D), exposed to crude diluted cocktails of unfed traps (E), growing in heat-treated concentrated fluids of unfed traps (F), heat-treated diluted cocktails of unfed traps (G), heat-treated concentrated fluids of fed traps (H) and heat-treated diluted cocktails of fed traps (I). Bar = 2 mm.
Figure 3. In situ H2O2 localization in tomato seedlings cultured for 24 h in water (the control) or in phytotoxic cocktails of 100% or 50% fed or unfed traps of pitcher plants. Control seedlings (A), seedlings growing in crude concentrated fluids of unfed traps (B), treated with crude diluted cocktail of unfed traps (C), cultured in crude concentrated fluids of fed traps (D), exposed to crude diluted cocktails of unfed traps (E), growing in heat-treated concentrated fluids of unfed traps (F), heat-treated diluted cocktails of unfed traps (G), heat-treated concentrated fluids of fed traps (H) and heat-treated diluted cocktails of fed traps (I). Bar = 2 mm.
Plants 12 00755 g003
Plants 12 00755 g004 550
Figure 4. In situ O2•− localization in tomato seedlings cultured for 24 h in water (control) or in phytotoxic cocktails of 100% or 50% fed or unfed traps of pitcher plants. Control seedlings (A), seedlings growing in crude concentrated fluids of unfed traps (B), treated with crude diluted cocktail of unfed traps (C), cultured in crude concentrated fluids of fed traps (D), exposed to crude diluted cocktails of unfed traps (E), growing in heat-treated concentrated fluids of unfed traps (F), heat-treated diluted cocktails of unfed traps (G), heat-treated concentrated fluids of fed traps (H) and heat-treated diluted cocktails of fed traps (I). Bar = 2 mm.
Figure 4. In situ O2•− localization in tomato seedlings cultured for 24 h in water (control) or in phytotoxic cocktails of 100% or 50% fed or unfed traps of pitcher plants. Control seedlings (A), seedlings growing in crude concentrated fluids of unfed traps (B), treated with crude diluted cocktail of unfed traps (C), cultured in crude concentrated fluids of fed traps (D), exposed to crude diluted cocktails of unfed traps (E), growing in heat-treated concentrated fluids of unfed traps (F), heat-treated diluted cocktails of unfed traps (G), heat-treated concentrated fluids of fed traps (H) and heat-treated diluted cocktails of fed traps (I). Bar = 2 mm.
Plants 12 00755 g004
Table
Table 1. Electrical conductivity and pH of digestive fluid solutions used in the experiments as phytotoxic cocktails.
Table 1. Electrical conductivity and pH of digestive fluid solutions used in the experiments as phytotoxic cocktails.
pHElectrical Conductivity [mS cm−1]
Control6.29 ± 0.07 c0.021 ± 0.017 A
Crude fluid
Unfed trap50% fluid5.96 ± 0.17 bc0.786 ± 0.078 B
100% fluid5.82 ± 0.03 b1.333 ± 0.012 C
Fed trap50% fluid3.78 ± 0.19 a0.704 ± 0.042 B
100% fluid3.38 ± 0.08 a1.247 ± 0.017 C
Heat-treated fluid
Unfed trap50% fluid 6.09 ± 0.29 bc0.771 ± 0.026 B
100% fluid5.54 ± 0.10 b1.364 ± 0.052 C
Fed trap50% fluid3.83 ± 0.31 a0.630 ± 0.040 B
100% fluid3.36 ± 0.16 a1.127 ± 0.039 C
Table includes average values ± SD of three replicated experiments. Homogenous groups (a–c or A–C) were evaluated using Fisher’s LSD post hoc test with p < 0.5.
Table
Table 2. Cell viability (Evans blue test) and cell damage of roots of tomato seedlings cultured in water or treated with digestive fluids from Nepenthes traps (crude, heat-treated, concentrated (100%) or diluted (50%)) after 24 h of the culture.
Table 2. Cell viability (Evans blue test) and cell damage of roots of tomato seedlings cultured in water or treated with digestive fluids from Nepenthes traps (crude, heat-treated, concentrated (100%) or diluted (50%)) after 24 h of the culture.
Evans Blue Uptake to the Roots
[mg dye g−1 FW]		Cell Damage
[%]
Positive control (heat-treated roots)0.476 ± 0.011 c100 E
Control (seedlings grown in water)0.086 ± 0.021 a18.1 A
Crude fluid
Unfed trap50% fluid0.122 ± 0.064 b25.7 BC
100% fluid0.151 ± 0.053 b31.8 D
Fed trap50% fluid0.100 ± 0.048 b20.9 B
100% fluid0.140 ± 0.079 b29.3 BC
Heat-treated fluid
Unfed trap50% fluid0.109 ± 0.056 b22.9 BC
100% fluid0.113 ± 0.055 b23.7 D
Fed trap50% fluid0.135 ± 0.008 b28.4 B
100% fluid0.149 ± 0.084 b31.3 BC
Table includes average values ± SD of three replicated experiments. Homogenous groups (a–c or A–E) were evaluated using Fisher’s LSD post hoc test with p < 0.5.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Staszek, P.; Piekarniak, M.; Wal, A.; Krasuska, U.; Gniazdowska, A. Is the Phytotoxic Effect of Digestive Fluid of Nepenthes x ventrata on Tomato Related to Reactive Oxygen Species? Plants 2023, 12, 755. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12040755

AMA Style

Staszek P, Piekarniak M, Wal A, Krasuska U, Gniazdowska A. Is the Phytotoxic Effect of Digestive Fluid of Nepenthes x ventrata on Tomato Related to Reactive Oxygen Species? Plants. 2023; 12(4):755. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12040755

Chicago/Turabian Style

Staszek, Pawel, Maciej Piekarniak, Agnieszka Wal, Urszula Krasuska, and Agnieszka Gniazdowska. 2023. "Is the Phytotoxic Effect of Digestive Fluid of Nepenthes x ventrata on Tomato Related to Reactive Oxygen Species?" Plants 12, no. 4: 755. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12040755

APA Style

Staszek, P., Piekarniak, M., Wal, A., Krasuska, U., & Gniazdowska, A. (2023). Is the Phytotoxic Effect of Digestive Fluid of Nepenthes x ventrata on Tomato Related to Reactive Oxygen Species? Plants, 12(4), 755. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12040755

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop