Next Article in Journal
Regulation of NADP-Malic Enzyme Activity in Maize (Zea mays L.) under Salinity with Reference to Light and Darkness
Next Article in Special Issue
Marine Floral Biodiversity, Threats, and Conservation in Vietnam: An Updated Review
Previous Article in Journal
Flowers and Inflorescences of Selected Medicinal Plants as a Source of Triterpenoids and Phytosterols
Previous Article in Special Issue
Untargeted Metabolomics for Integrative Taxonomy: Metabolomics, DNA Marker-Based Sequencing, and Phenotype Bioimaging
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

New and Interesting Taxa from the Diatom Genus Gomphonema Ehrenberg in Shallow, Nearshore Sites on the Eastern Coast of Lake Baikal

by
Maxim S. Kulikovskiy
1,*,
John Patrick Kociolek
2,
Cüneyt Nadir Solak
3,
Irina V. Kuznetsova
1 and
Anton M. Glushchenko
1
1
K.A. Timiryazev Institute of Plant Physiology RAS, IPP RAS, 35 Botanicheskaya St., 127276 Moscow, Russia
2
Museum of Natural History, Henderson Building, 15th and Broadway, Boulder, CO 80309, USA
3
Department of Biology, Art & Science Faculty, Dumlupınar University, Kütahya 43100, Turkey
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2023, 12(9), 1835; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12091835
Submission received: 17 November 2022 / Revised: 24 April 2023 / Accepted: 25 April 2023 / Published: 29 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Integrative Taxonomy of Plants)

Abstract

:
During this investigation, sixteen species from the genus Gomphonema were found in a shallow bay (near Oimur, Kabansky District) located on the eastern shore of Lake Baikal. Eleven of these taxa have been described previously. Five species are described as new to science. We provide ecological information about these Gomphonema species, including their distribution within and outside Lake Baikal, and compare and contrast the new taxa with morphologically similar congeners. The diversity of morphologies present in Lake Baikal among the Gomphonema species suggests there has been both in-lake speciation as well as the introduction of various groups of species. The idea that Lake Baikal may support a high number of endemics by their partitioning niches based on depth is supported by the different groups of gomphonemoid diatoms present.

1. Introduction

Lake Baikal is a unique aquatic ecosystem, being the oldest continuously existing water body [1] and supporting high levels of endemic species across many groups of organisms [2,3,4,5]. A comprehensive picture of the diversity of freshwater diatoms in Lake Baikal is coming into focus, based on earlier studies that proposed about 400 new taxa [6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15], more recent works published in two monographs, and many manuscripts that have revealed 13 new genera and more than an additional 400 new species [16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41].
In early revisions of the diatoms from Lake Baikal, Skvortzow and Meyer [13], Skvortzow [14], and Meyer [12] reported about 40 specific and infraspecific taxa from the genus Gomphonema Ehrenberg. Some of the discussed taxa belong to the genus Gomphoneis Cleve (=Gomphonella Rabenhorst nowadays) [33,42]. About twenty specific and infraspecific taxa were described as new to science and some of them were considered as endemic diatoms [13,14]. The history of diatom research from Lake Baikal was discussed by us previously [20]. Three more recent publications were dedicated to documenting the genus Gomphonema [25,34,43] in Lake Baikal. The morphology and distribution of endemic and widespread taxa from Lake Baikal were presented. Comprehensive light microscopic documentation of the valve diminution series of Gomphonema taxa is a basis for our understanding of species diversity in ancient Lake Baikal and the biogeography of the taxa present there. For example, a previous investigation of taxa from the G. acuminatum and G. truncatum–capitatum species complexes in Lake Baikal revealed some new species for science [25]. Some of the taxa treated in that publication were previously observed from other regions, especially from Mongolia. Our data show a wide distribution of species in the waterbodies of Central Asia and confirm the presence of some cosmopolitan taxa within Lake Baikal [25]. Some publications were dedicated to the discussion of Gomphonema species composition in the Baikal region, which are additional resources for taxonomical reinvestigation of diatom taxa [44].
Lake Baikal is the deepest lake in the world, being more than 1500 m in depth. The theory of “immiscibility” suggests there are endemic species found only in Baikal (and not in the surrounding lotic and lentic systems), while other species are found only in the surrounding aquatic habitats. There are many papers written about this phenomenon in the Russian literature [45], especially about the lake’s fauna. For diatoms, the plankton flora may not conform to this theory [46,47] due to the relatively recent development of the current species composition, while data on the benthic flora seem to support this idea.
The aim of this study is a taxonomic review and documentation of the species diversity of the Gomphonema taxa from a shallow water bay located in an underexplored region in the southern part of Lake Baikal. We compare the distribution of the species considered herein with others from deep waters.

2. Results and Discussion

During this investigation, 16 Gomphonema species were found and, of them, five are new to science. The previously-known taxa include Gomphonema makarovae Lange-Bertalot in Lange-Bertalot and Genkal 1999, G. distans (Cleve-Euler) Lange-Bertalot and Reichardt in Lange-Bertalot and Genkal 1999, G. subarcticum Lange-Bertalot and Reichardt in Lange-Bertalot and Genkal 1999, G. parvulius (Lange-Bertalot and Reichardt) Lange-Bertalot and Reichardt in Lange-Bertalot and Metzeltin 1996, G. duplipunctatum Lange-Bertalot and Reichardt in Lange-Bertalot, Kulbs, Lauser, Norpel-Schempp and Willmann 1996, G. sphenovertex Lange-Bertalot and Reichardt in Lange-Bertalot and Metzeltin 1996, G. jergackianum Reichardt 2009, G. popovae Levadnaja emend. Vishnjakov and Romanov 2015, G. medioasiae Metzeltin, Lange-Bertalot and Nergui 2009, G. demersum Reichardt 2009 and G. pseudoaugur Lange-Bertalot 1979. Descriptions of new species follow the presentation of the previously described taxa.
Gomphonema makarovae Lange-Bertalot in Lange-Bertalot and Genkal (Figure 1A–F)
Remarks. The specimens in our samples were 23.5–50.0 μm long, 6.0–7.5 μm wide, and had 9–11 striae in 10 μm.
This species was found on slide no. 18589.
Gomphonema subarcticum Lange-Bertalot and Reichardt in Lange-Bertalot and Genkal (Figure 1G–O)
Synonym: Gomphonema angustatum var. undulatum Grunow sensu auct. nonnull.
Remarks. The specimens in our samples were 20.0–31.0 μm long, 5.0–5.8 μm wide, and had 8–12 striae in 10 μm.
This species was found on slide no. 18599.
Gomphonema distans (Cleve-Euler) Lange-Bertalot and Reichardt in Lange-Bertalot and Genkal (Figure 2A–N)
Basionym: Gomphonema lagerheimii var. distans A. Cleve 1934.
Remarks. The specimens in our samples were 29.0–42.5 μm long, 6.0–7.0 μm wide, and had 8–11 striae in 10 μm.
This species was found on slide no. 18606.
Gomphonema demersum Reichardt 2009 (Figure 3A–H)
Remarks. The specimens in our samples were 18–38 μm long, 4.5–6.0 μm wide, and had 12–14 striae in 10 μm.
This species was found on slides no. 18589 and 18606.
Gomphonema parvulius (Lange-Bertalot and Reichardt) Lange-Bertalot and Reichardt in Lange-Bertalot and Metzeltin (Figure 3I–L)
Basionym: Gomphonema parvulum var. parvulius Lange-Bertalot and Reichardt in Lange-Bertalot 1993
Remarks. The specimens in our samples were 17.0–20.0 μm long, 4.5–5.9 μm wide, and had 12–14 striae in 10 μm.
This species was found in slides no. 18589 and 18599.
Gomphonema duplipunctatum Lange-Bertalot et Reichardt in Lange-Bertalot, Kulbs, Lauser, Norpel-Schempp and Willmann (Figure 3M,N)
Synonym: Gomphonema bipunctatum Krasske 1943.
Remarks. The specimens in our samples were 20.0–21.5 μm long, 4.0–4.5 μm wide, and had 12–14 striae in 10 μm.
This species was found on slides no. 18599 and 18606.
Gomphonema sphenovertex Lange-Bertalot et Reichardt in Lange-Bertalot and Metzeltin (Figure 4A–R)
Remarks. The specimens in our samples were 9.5–30.5 μm long, 4.5–6.9 μm wide, and had 12–16 striae in 10 μm.
This species was found on slide no. 18606.
Gomphonema jergackianum Reichardt (Figure 5A–R)
Remarks. The specimens in our samples were 11.0–32.5 μm long, 4.0–6.0 μm wide, and had 11–14 striae in 10 μm.
This species was found on slides no. 18589 and 18599.
Gomphonema popovae Levadnaja emend. Vishnjakov and Romanov (Figure 6A–T)
Synonym: Gomphonema liyanlingae Metzeltin and Lange-Bertalot in Metzeltin et al. 2009
Remarks. The specimens in our samples were 22.5–78.0 μm long, 6.8–12.0 μm wide, and had 10–13 striae in 10 μm.
This species was found on slide no. 18599.
Comments. This is an oligotrophic species [48,49]. Our specimens have expanded striae density as compared to previous reports (Table 1). It is a highly variable taxon, as previously discussed [48]. In one sample, we found two morphotypes of this species. The first morphotype (Figure 6A–J; Table 1) has wider valves that are more club shaped. The second morphotype (Figure 6K–J; Table 1) has narrower valves, less widened in their central part. At the same time, the densities of striae and areolae are identical for these two morphotypes (see Table 1). Our specimens are somewhat different from both the material shown by Vishnyakov and Romanov [48] and from the material shown from Mongolia [50] (Table 1). At the same time, no noticeable morphological differences were found to separate these populations.
Gomphonema medioasiae Metzeltin, Lange-Bertalot and Nergui (Figure 7A–O)
Remarks. The specimens in our samples were 17.0–48.0 μm long, 4.5–7 μm wide, and had 10–13 striae in 10 μm.
This species was found on slide no. 18599.
Gomphonema pseudoaugur Lange-Bertalot (Figure 8A–R and Figure 9A–D)
Description. LM (Figure 8A–L). Valves are distinctly heteropolar, clavate with broadly rounded and short rostrate headpole, and acute footpole. The valve length is 19.5–42.0 µm, breadth 7.0–9.0 µm. The axial area is narrow and linear. The central area is small, transversally elongated made by the shortening of one central stria. Central striae on both valve sides are distantly spaced from the other striae. One isolated pore is present in the central area located very close to the slightly shortened central stria. Striae fine and uniseriate, radiate, 12–16 in 10 µm.
SEM, external view (Figure 8M–R). Striae uniseriate. The areolae are occluded by flaps that create c-shaped openings, ≈40 in 10 µm. The proximal raphe endings are expanded, pore-like, and deflected towards the isolated round pore. The apical pore field is composed of round porelli.
SEM, internal view (Figure 9A–D). The areolae are located in narrow foraminal rows between strongly silificed vimines. Beneath the vimines, the sides of the grooves bear pairs of small struts. The proximal raphe ends are hooked and located on a raised central nodule. There is an isolated pore with a long slit-like opening. The septa are present (Figure 9B, black arrow). Small pseudosepta are present, visible at footpoles (Figure 9D, black arrow). The helictoglossae are offset from the raphe branch. A small septum is present at the headpole, though one has not been seen at the footpole.
New species:
Gomphonema baicalodemersum Kulikovskiy, Kociolek, Solak and Glushchenko sp. nov. (Figure 10A–V)
Holotype. Deposited in the herbarium of MHA, Main Botanical Garden Russian Academy of Science, Moscow, Russia, the holotype here designated, slide no. 18589 (Figure 10D).
Isotype. Collection of Maxim Kulikovskiy at the Herbarium of the Institute of Plant Physiology Russian Academy of Science, Moscow, Russia, slide no. 18589a.
Description. LM (Figure 10A–Q). The valves are slightly heteropolar, rhombic lanceolate (in larger specimens), or very slightly clavate (in smaller specimens) with acutely rounded headpoles and footpoles. Valve length 14.5–38.5 µm and breadth 3–6 µm. Raphe filiform, weakly lateral with proximal ends dilated slightly and distal ends deflected onto the valve mantle. The axial area is lanceolate, with a widening at the central area. The central area is weakly expressed. There is an isolated pore near the central nodule and densely spaced to the rather long median stria. The striae are short and radiate, 11–15 in 10 µm.
SEM, external view (Figure 10R–T). The striae are uniseriate. The areolae are occluded by large reniform siliceous flaps and merged with the valve surface, ≈30 in 10 µm. The proximal raphe endings are pore-like and deflected towards the isolated round pore. There is a prominent bilobed apical pore field composed of round porelli and bisected by external distal-raphe ends.
SEM, internal view (Figure 10U,V). The areolar openings are large and round with reniform external occlusion located in a deep foraminal row between the strongly silicified vimines. There is an isolated pore that is large, transversely elongated, and located in a long groove. The proximal raphe ends are long, right-angled, terminating with a pore located on a thickened ridge. Pseudosepta are present and visible at both poles. The helictoglossae are offset from the raphe branch.
Comments. Gomphonema baicalodemersum sp. nov. belongs to the group of species with a wide axial area considered by Reichardt [51] and a number of other authors. Species of this group are known from Africa, Australasia, Europe, Asia, and North and South America [44,51,52,53]. A distinctive feature of G. baicalodemersum sp. nov. is the presence of a long internal slit-like opening of the isolated pore, which passes into the foraminal row. In the light microscope, this structure is perceived as an elongated stria. A similar isolated pore structure is present in G. medioasiae [50]. At the same time, G. baicalodemersum sp. nov. has a narrower headpole and footpole of valves than G. medioasiae. The valve width of G. baicalodemersum sp. nov. (3–6 µm) is mostly narrower than the width of G. medioasiae (4.5–8.0 µm).
G. baicalodemersum sp. nov. is similar to G. demersum (Table 2) and the two species have similar valve widths (3–6 µm in G. baicalodemersum sp. nov. versus 3.6–6.0 µm in G. demersum) and striae densities (11–16 in 10 µm in G. baicalodemersum sp. nov. versus 12–16 in 10 µm in G. demersum). The two differ in that G. baicalodemersum sp. nov. has a more narrow headpole as compared to G. demersum.
Additionally, the internal slit-like opening of the isolated pore of G. baicalodemersum sp. nov. is quite extended and connected with a narrow foraminal row of stria, while in G. demersum the isolated pore opening also has a slit-like shape, though less extended and does not reach the marginal stria.
Gomphonema genkalii Kulikovskiy, Kociolek, Solak and Glushchenko sp. nov. (Figure 11A–H)
Holotype. Deposited in the herbarium of MHA, Main Botanical Garden Russian Academy of Science, Moscow, Russia, holotype here designated, slide no. 18607 (Figure 11B).
Isotype. Collection of Maxim Kulikovskiy at the Herbarium of the Institute of Plant Physiology Russian Academy of Science, Moscow, Russia, slide no. 18607a.
Type locality. Russia, Lake Baikal, shallow-water bay, Cladophora spp. On the bottom, 52°27.042′ N; 106°53.215′ E. Collected by M.S. Kulikovskiy, 14 July 2014, pH = 9.3, conductivity = 151 µS cm−1, t = 21.3 °C.
Etymology. Species dedicated to the Russian diatomist Dr. Sergei Genkal.
Distribution. Known only from the type locality.
Description. LM (Figure 11A–F). The valves are heteropolar, rhombic lanceolate (in larger specimens), or very slightly clavate (in smaller specimens) with acutely rounded headpoles and footpoles. The valve length is 18.0–29.5 µm and the breadth is 4.0–4.5 µm. The raphe is straight with proximal ends dilated slightly and distal ends deflected onto the valve mantle. The axial area is narrow but expands near the central area. Isolated pores are absent. The striae are short and weakly radiate, 12–14 in 10 µm.
SEM, internal view (Figure 11G,H). The areolar openings are small, round, and located in shallow foraminal rows. The side walls of the areolae bear part of small struts. The proximal raphe ends are hooked and located on a raised central nodule. The pseudosepta is poorly defined and visible at both poles. The helictoglossae is offset from the raphe branch.
Comments. Gomphonema genkalii sp. nov. can be assigned to the group of species with a wide axial area considered by Reichardt [51]. At the same time, the species has a unique valve outline and an absent isolated pore that makes it difficult to compare with any species of this group.
Gomphonema trifonovae Kulikovskiy, Kociolek, Solak and Glushchenko sp. nov. (Figure 12A–H)
Holotype. Deposited in the herbarium of MHA, Main Botanical Garden Russian Academy of Science, Moscow, Russia, holotype here designated, slide no. 18608 (Figure 12C).
Isotype. Collection of Maxim Kulikovskiy at the Herbarium of the Institute of Plant Physiology Russian Academy of Science, Moscow, Russia, slide no. 18608a.
Type locality. Russia, Lake Baikal, shallow-water bay, bottom sediments, and detritus in a clump of Carex spp., 52°27.042′ N; 106°53.215′ E. Collected by M.S. Kulikovskiy, 14 July 2011, pH = 9.0, conductivity = 456 µS cm−1, t = 18.2 °C.
Etymology. This species is dedicated to the Russian hydrobiologist, Prof. Dr. Irina Trifonova from the Institute of Limnology, Saint Petersburg.
Distribution. Known only from the type locality.
Description. LM (Figure 12A–E). The valves are clavate and are asymmetrical to the longitudinal axis with an acute to narrow rounded headpole. The footpole is acutely rounded. The valve length is 13–26 µm and the breadth is 2.8–3.5 µm. The raphe are straight with the proximal ends dilated slightly and the distal ends are deflected onto the valve mantle. The axial area is narrow but expands near the central area. The isolated pores are absent. The striae are short and radiate 11–12 in 10 µm.
SEM, external view (Figure 12F,G). The striae are uniseriate and not interrupted near the valve face–mantle junction and continue in uniseriate rows onto the mantle. The areolae are occluded by large c-like semilunar siliceous flaps and merged with the areolar surface, ≈50 in 10 µm. The proximal raphe endings are expanded, pore-like, and deflected towards the isolated round pore. The apical pore field is composed of round porelli and is located along one mantle and the valve terminus.
SEM, internal view (Figure 12H). The areolar opening is small, round, and located in a shallow foraminal row. The side walls of the areolae bear small struts. The proximal raphe ends are hooked and located on a raised central nodule. The pseudosepta are poorly defined and visible at both poles. The helictoglossae are offset from the raphe branch.
Comments. Gomphonema trifonovae sp. nov. has a valve shape similar to G. angustivalva Reichardt (Table 3). The two species have similar valve widths (2.8–3.5 µm in G. trifonovae sp. nov. versus 2.5–3.7 µm in G. angustivalva). The two species differ in their densities of striae: 11–12 in 10 µm in G. trifonovae sp. nov. versus 14–18 in 10 µm in G. angustivalva. G. trifonovae sp. nov. has asymmetric valves along the longitudinal axis (Table 3), while in G. angustivalva, the valves are symmetrical along the longitudinal axis. The central area in G. trifonovae sp. nov. is not pronounced, while in G. angustivalva, it is transversely rectangular [54,55,56]. In G. trifonovae sp. nov. the isolated pore is absent (Figure 12G,H); in G. angustivalva, the external opening of the isolated pore is clearly visible [54,56].
Gomphonema zapitaja Kulikovskiy, Kociolek, Solak and Glushchenko sp. nov. (Figure 13)
Holotype. Deposited in the herbarium of MHA, Main Botanical Garden Russian Academy of Science, Moscow, Russia, holotype here designated, slide no. 18599 (Figure 13B).
Isotype. Collection of Maxim Kulikovskiy at the Herbarium of the Institute of Plant Physiology of the Russian Academy of Science, Moscow, Russia, slide no. 18599a.
Type locality. Russia, Lake Baikal, shallow-water bay, fragments of filamentous algae and higher plants, 52°27.042′ N; 106°53.215′ E. Collected by M.S. Kulikovskiy, 14 July 2011, pH = 9.3, conductivity = 151 µS cm−1, t = 21.3 °C.
Etymology. The word “zapitaja” in Russian means comma and the epithet refers to the shape of the valves.
Distribution. Known only from the type locality.
Description. LM (Figure 13A–O). The valves are clavate and are asymmetrical to the longitudinal axis with an acutely rounded headpole. The footpole is narrowly rounded. The valve length is 13.5–34.5 µm and the breadth is 5–7 µm. The raphe is straight with the proximal ends dilated slightly and the distal ends deflected onto the valve mantle. The axial area is narrow but expands near the central area. The central area is formed by a shortening of the central striae. There is an isolated pore near the central nodule and is densely spaced to the rather long median stria. The striae are short and radiate at 11–15 in 10 µm. The striae radiate at 11–13 in 10 µm.
SEM, external view (Figure 13P–U). The striae are uniseriate. The areolae are occluded by large c-like semilunar siliceous flaps and merged with the areolar surface, ≈40 in 10 µm. The proximal raphe endings are expanded, pore-like, and deflected towards the isolated round pore. The apical pore field is composed of round porelli and is asymmetrical between the two sides of the footpole. The distal raphe end is strongly hooked to bisect the apical pore field.
SEM, internal view (Figure 13V–X). The areolar openings are small, round, and located in shallow foraminal rows. The side walls of the areolae bear parts of small struts. The isolated pore is small, transversely elongated, and located in a long groove. The proximal raphe ends are hooked and located on a raised central nodule. The pseudosepta are present, visible at both poles. The helictoglossae offset from the raphe branch.
Comments. On the basis of valve shape, Gomphonema zapitaja sp. nov. is similar to G. cymbelliclinum and G. angustatum (Table 4). The valves of G. zapitaja sp. nov., similar to the valves of G. cymbelliclinum, are asymmetric along the longitudinal axis ([55]; 61, Pl. 40, Figures 1–31). G. zapitaja sp. nov. differs from G. cymbelliclinum ([57], Pl. 40, Figures 1–31) in having more acute headpole and footpole of the valves.
The valves of G. zapitaja sp. nov. are more club shaped and the footpole is more tapered than the headpole (Figure 13A–O); these features are less evident in G. cymbelliclinum. The internal opening of the isolated pore in G. zapitaja sp. nov. (Figure 13V,W), as in G. cymbelliclinum, is slit-like ([57], Pl. 40, Figure 33). At the same time, the slit of the isolated pore of G. zapitaja sp. nov. is shorter. The striae in G. zapitaja sp. nov. consist of areolae covered with siliceous flaps, while in G. cymbelliclinum the areolae are not covered ([55], Pl. 90, Figure 3; 61, Pl. 40, Figure 33). Pore fields of G. zapitaja sp. nov. are formed by large poroids, asymmetrically developed, and separated by the distal raphe branch. One part of the pore field extends onto the front surface of the valve and the second part is predominantly located on the valve margin (Figure 13R). In G. cymbelliclinum, the pore field is formed by smaller poroids; the poroids almost do not extend onto the front surface of the valve ([55], Pl. 90, Figure 6).
G. zapitaja sp. nov. resembles G. angustatum in valve shape. The species have similar valve widths (5–7 µm in G. zapitaja sp. nov. and 5.3–6.7 µm in G. angustatum) and striae densities (11–13 µm in G. zapitaja sp. nov. and 10–14 µm in G. angustatum). Both species have areolae covered with siliceous flaps ([55], Pl. 138, Figures 1 and 4). In both species, the poroids of the pore fields extend onto the front surface of the valves (Table 4; ref. [55], Pl. 138, 1). However, G. zapitaja sp. nov. has asymmetry of the valves along the apical axis, which easily distinguishes it from G. angustatum (Table 4).
Gomphonema megabaicalensis Kulikovskiy, Kociolek, Solak and Glushchenko sp. nov. (Figure 14A–G and Figure 15A–C)
Holotype. Deposited in the herbarium of MHA, Main Botanical Garden Russian Academy of Science, Moscow, Russia, holotype here designated, slide no. 18609 (Figure 14A).
Isotype. Collection of Maxim Kulikovskiy at the Herbarium of the Institute of Plant Physiology Russian Academy of Science, Moscow, Russia, slide no. 18609a.
Type locality. Russia, Lake Baikal, shallow-water bay, bottom sediments, 52°27.042′ N; 106°53.215′ E. Collected by M.S. Kulikovskiy, 14 July 2011, pH = 7.5, conductivity = 295 µS cm−1, t = 25.0 °C.
Etymology. The epithet refers to the type locality and the large-sized specimens.
Distribution. Known only from the type locality.
Description. LM (Figure 14A–C). The valves are heteropolar, clavate with broadly rounded or subclavate headpoles, and widely rounded with weakly protracted footpoles. The valve length is 68–103 µm and the breadth is 12.5–16.0 µm. The raphe is lateral with the proximal ends dilated slightly and the distal ends deflected onto the valve mantle. The axial area is wide and gradually widens towards a rectangular central area. The isolated pore is absent. The striae weakly radiate at 5–7 in 10 µm.
SEM, external view (Figure 14D–G). The striae are uniseriate. The areolae are rounded or elongated and located in small round depressions, separated by a thickened rim, ≈20 in 10 µm. The proximal raphe endings are expanded, pore-like, and deflected towards the isolated round pore. The apical pore field bilobed is composed of round porelli.
SEM, internal view (Figure 15A–C). The areolar openings are large and round without internal occlusions and located in deep foraminal rows between the strongly silicified vimines. Beneath the vimines, the sides of the grooves bear pairs of small struts. The proximal raphe ends are hooked and located on a raised central nodule. The pseudosepta are present and visible at the headpole. The helictoglossae are offset from the raphe branch.
Comments. Gomphonema megabaicalensis sp. nov. has a large axial and central area bearing various depressions. However, the new species is well distinguished from similar species (Table 5). G. megabaicalensis sp. nov. differs from G. oxycephalum P.T. Cleve in the club-shaped valves and G. oxycephalum has rhomboid-lanceolate club-shaped valves. The valves of G. megabaicalensis sp. nov. are noticeably narrower than G. oxycephalum (12.5–16.0 in G. megabaicalensis sp. nov. versus 18–23 µm in G. oxycephalum). G. megabaicalensis sp. nov. has a rectangular central area, defined by a few small, shortened striae, or in the form of a fascia.
The striae in the central area of the valves of the species G. oxycephalum are not shortened; the axial area expands and passes into the central area ([52], Pl. 147, Figures 1–4). The two species also have ultrastructural differences.
G. megabaicalensis sp. nov. has small maculae on the external surface of the valves and small thickenings between the areolae (Figure 14D,E). In G. oxycephalum the inlay of the surface of the valves is more complex ([52], Pl. 148, Figures 1–4). In G. megabaicalensis sp. nov., an isolated pore is absent (Figure 14E and Figure 15A,B).
G. megabaicalensis sp. nov. has some similarities with G. demerarae: these species lack isolated pores, have areolae with a crater-like structure, and possess chaotically located maculae present on the front surface of the valves ([52], Pl. 152, Figures 1–5; Pl. 153, Figures 1 and 4). However, in G. megabaicalensis sp. nov. the striae are always uniseriate, with crater-shaped areolae lying in individually-rounded depressions which are separated by small thickenings (Figure 14D,E). In G. demerarae, the striae consist of two rows of crater-shaped or slit-like areolae without any thickenings, and the areolae of the striae are located in small individual or general depressions ([52], Pl. 153, Figures 2–5). G. megabaicalensis sp. nov. also differs from G. demerarae in having more narrow valves in the central part and the less tapering headpole of the valves ([52], Pl. 152, Figures 1–5). G. megabaicalensis sp. nov. is noticeably larger than G. demerarae, and in terms of the width of the axial area, G. megabaicalensis sp. nov. has a smaller axial area than G. demerarae ([52], Pl. 152, Figures 1–5). Striae density in G. megabaicalensis sp. nov. is lower (5–7 in 10 µm) than in G. demerarae (8–9 in 10 µm).
G. megabaicalensis sp. nov., similar to G. spectabilissimum Metzeltin and Lange-Bertalot 1998, has maculae ([52], Pl. 146, Figures 1–3, Pl. 162, Figures 3–5). At the same time, G. megabaicalensis sp. nov. has club-shaped valves, while in G. spectabilissimum the valves are linear, being only slightly club shaped. G. megabaicalensis sp. nov. has a well-defined central area (Figure 14E), while in G. spectabilissimum the central area is lacking ([52], Pl. 146, Figures 1–3, Pl. 162, Figures 3 and 4). Even more differences are found in the ultrastructure of these two species. In the G. megabaicalensis sp. nov. are striae formed from 3–8 areolae, while those of G. spectabilissimum are shorter, formed from 2–4 areolae. The structure of the areolae also differs between the two species: in G. megabaicalensis sp. nov., the areolae are crater-shaped, lying in individual depressions separated by small thickenings, while in G. spectabilissimum the areolae of the stria lie in a common depression, and each of the areolae is covered with a siliceous flap ([52], Pl. 162, Figures 3–5). There are also differences in the structure of the raphe: in G. megabaicalensis sp. nov., the central raphe ends are simple and slightly widened, while in G. spectabilissimum, the central raphe ends lie in widening depressions ([52], Pl. 162, Figure 3). Silica granules are present at the boundary between the front surface and valve inflection in G. spectabilissimum, which are absent in G. megabaicalensis sp. nov. In G. megabaicalensis sp. nov. the isolated pore is absent (Figure 14E and Figure 15A,B), while in G. spectabilissimum the external isolated pore opening is clearly seen in SEM ([52], Pl. 162, Figures 3 and 4).
The data presented herein, along with other published observations, are beginning to help develop an understanding of the distribution species and genera of diatoms within the Lake Baikal and Transbaikal region, as well as the variety of morphological groups that inhabit this amazing freshwater ecosystem. Distributional patterns may be viewed spatially and temporally in the lake and region.
Both large-scale sampling surveys [20,58] and more focused collections (the majority of published results) have shown that within Lake Baikal, species can be found in certain basins or regions. Due to rifts within the Baikal basin, the lake can be split latitudinally into the northern, central, and southern basins, each with its own physical and chemical composition [1]. The northern basin, which has deep waters, is also the least developed in terms of anthropogenic impacts and harbors many endemic diatom genera and species in the lake, including species of Gomphonema [10,20,26]. The central basin, which is the easiest access point to the lake due to the geographic position relative to the communities of Irktusk and Lystvyanka, has had many species described exclusively from this region, including gomphonemoid diatoms [13,14,25,29,33]. The southern basin, characterized in general as being more shallow and, due to the inputs from the Selenga River delta from the eastern side of the lake, has been shown to have its own floristic composition [59,60]. In this latter region, anthropogenic nutrient inputs have changed the cycling of silica and the diatom flora [61].
In addition to the north–south axis of the lake, a spatial difference in diatoms also occurs with respect to the east and west shores of Lake Baikal. Of course, the strongest gradient in this regard is driven by the inputs of the Selenga River (as described above), the data presented herein also suggest some differences in the diatom flora between the eastern and western shores. For instance, all of the new species described herein are known only from the eastern shore of Lake Baikal, while previous considerations of the Gomphonema species collected from the western shore were not encountered in the current study. As indicated, many studies originated in Lake Baikal in the central basin of the western shore due to logistical reasons. The smaller number of taxa described from the eastern shore is likely due in large part to sampling intensity since most work on Lake Baikal has originated and focused on collections from the western shore.
Among the representatives of the genus Gomphonema found in Lake Baikal, there are many that appear to be endemic [13,14,25,34,62,63], though there are also species found in the lake that are more widely distributed [25]. In the present report, we note species that have been found beyond Lake Baikal, especially in Siberia. These include species such as Gomphonema makarovae, G. distans, G. subarcticum, G. parvulius, G. duplipunctatum, G. sphenovertex, G. jergackianum, G. popovae, G. medioasiae, G. demersum, and G. auguriosiberica. These species were described previously from Siberia and the Arctic zone of Eurasia. Gomponema makarovae, for example, was described from a small, unnamed freshwater lake near the White Sea, Arkhangelsk Oblast, Russia [64]. The report of this species from Lake Kanas in China [65] requires verification. Gomphonema subarcticum was described from a Sphagnum collection from the Yugorskiy Shar Peninsula, NW Siberia, Russia [64]. Later it was found in Lake Elgygytgyn, Chukotka, Russia [66]. It is a circumboreal oligotrophic and dystrophic species. Gomphonema distans was described from Finnish Lapland as G. lagerheimii var. distans [67]. The taxon was later discovered in Siberia and a taxonomic combination was proposed by the authors [64]. The species is distributed in the northern regions of the Holarctic [68]. Gomphonema demersum is probably widespread in Siberia [44]. According to Reichardt [44], G. demersum is a complex of closely related species with similar morphology. Gomphonema parvulius is known from northern and central Europe and is characterized as an oligotrophic species [54,55]. Gomphonema duplipunctatum has been described in Finland. It is known from Europe [55] and the Northwestern USA [69]. Ecologically it is characterized as an oligotrophic-mesotrophic Holarctic species [55,68]. Gomphonema sphenovertex was described in Finland and has also been reported in Scandinavia and Iceland [70]. This is a rare species that does not have large populations. Gomphonema jergackianum was described from the Western Sajan Mountains, Russia [44]. An oligotrophic species, it is also known to be from Finland, Iceland, and Germany [44,70]. Gomphonema popovae is known to be from Russia, Mongolia, and China. Gomphonema medioasiae is known to be from Mongolia [50]. The species was previously known only from its type locality, the Barchuluut River [50]. The species found in Baikal and in Siberia may represent a group of species described by Vereshchagin [71] as a Siberian–Baikal species, representing an intermediate group of taxa that may be endemic to either Lake Baikal or Siberia. These observations suggest that benthic diatoms (as opposed to the plankton flora [72] in Lake Baikal and the surrounding Transbaikal region may follow distribution patterns seen in elements of the Baikal fauna [45]. Further research is needed to explore the distributional patterns of benthic diatoms in Lake Baikal and their relationships to species exclusively endemic to each region. Gomphonema pseudoaugur is known from the Holarctic [54]. An oligotrophic species, it is often observed in meso- and eutrophic lakes [54].
The Gomphonema diatom flora of Lake Baikal is rich in terms of the total number of taxa though it is also diverse in terms of the presence of morphologically distinct groups. In terms of richness, for both endemic and more widely distributed taxa, there have been over 100 species reported from this single lake. Unlike the situation in the closely related family Cymbellaceae, which less than four decades ago was recognized as a single genus [73,74] and now has been split up into almost 20 genera [75,76,77,78,79], the morphological groups within Gomphonema [80] have rarely been separated out as separate genera (Lange-Bertalot 1995; Kociolek et al. 2015). Despite this, we can distinguish numerous morphological groups in the genus, many of which are found in Lake Baikal. Morphological groups of the Gomphonema species present in Lake Baikal include members of the “classical” species of the genus [25] and the G. auguriosiberica sp. nov. described herein. Groups with c-shaped areolae, similar to the classical group, vary in some other features (robust valves such as in G. popovae; isolated pore connected to the striae as in G. baicaldermersus sp. nov.; astigmate taxa such as G. genkalii sp. nov.) are also present. Other species groups previously recognized, but not included in the present treatment, include the G. ventricosum group (with a special type of occlusion in the areolae [34,75,80]; and very large, robust species [13] which may have close allies elsewhere in Asia [81] and species with doubly punctate striae. Two species described herein that require further attention are G. trifonovae sp. nov. and G. zapitaja sp. nov. These species have cells that are both asymmetrical to the apical and transapical axes and, unlike other genera with that combination of symmetry features (e.g., Afrocymbella Krammer, Gomphocymbellopsis Krammer) [76], these small species have their bilobed apical pore fields (APF) positioned asymmetrically on the footpole, with one lobe along one margin and the other positioned at the base of the footpole. This unique APF construction is found nowhere else amongst the gomphonemoid diatoms (let alone within Gomphonema specifically), warranting observations of their growth habit and systematic position.

3. Materials and Methods

Sampling. Samples used in this publication were collected by Maxim Kulikovskiy in 2011 from a shallow-water bay from the south part of Lake Baikal at 8 km from Enkhaluk village or small pools near it (near Oimur, Kabansky District) located on the eastern shore of Lake Baikal. Physical and chemical water parameters were measured with a Hanna Combo (HI 98129) multiparameter probe (Hanna Instruments, Inc., Woonsocket, RI, USA). Samples were collected from different parts of the bay and from different substratum. A list of slides and their characteristics are given see Table 6.
Preparation of slides and microscope investigation. Samples were processed by means of a standard procedure involving treatment with 10% HCl and concentrated hydrogen peroxide. After treatment with HCl, the samples were washed with deionized water. Permanent diatom preparations were mounted in Naphrax® (Brunel Microscopes, Chippenham, UK). Light microscopic (LM) observations were performed with a Zeiss Axio Scope A1 (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) microscope equipped with an oil immersion objective (x100/n.a.1.4, DIC). Valve ultrastructure was examined by means of a JSM-6510LV scanning electron microscope (JEOL Ltd., Akishima, Tokyo, Japan), operated at 10 kV and 11 mm distance. For scanning electron microscopy (SEM), parts of the suspensions were fixed on aluminum stubs after air drying. The stubs were sputter coated with 50 nm of gold in an Eiko IB 3 (Eiko Engineering, Yamazaki, Hitachinaka Shi, Ibaraki Ken, Japan).
Samples and slides are deposited in the collection of Maxim Kulikovskiy at the Herbarium of the Institute of Plant Physiology Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.S.K.; methodology, M.S.K. and A.M.G.; validation, A.M.G., M.S.K. and J.P.K.; investigation, A.M.G. and M.S.K.; resources, M.S.K. and A.M.G.; writing—original draft preparation, A.M.G. and M.S.K.; writing—review and editing, J.P.K.; visualization, A.M.G., C.N.S., I.V.K. and M.S.K.; supervision, M.S.K.; funding acquisition, A.M.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Publication is based on research carried out with financial support by the Russian Science Foundation (21-74-00097) for LM and SEM and by the framework of state assignment of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (theme 122042700045-3) for finishing manuscript.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Touchart, L. Baikal, Lake. In Encyclopedia of Lake and Reservoirs; Bengttsson, L., Herschy, R.W., Fairbridge, R.W., Eds.; Encyclopedia of Earth Sciences Series; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2012; pp. 83–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Brooks, J.L. Speciation in ancient lakes. Q. Rev. Biol. 1950, 25, 30–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kozhov, M. Lake Baikal and Its Life. Scientific-Popular. Feature Article, 4th ed.; Publishing House: Irkutsk, Russia, 1963; p. 98. [Google Scholar]
  4. Kontula, T.; Kirilchik, S.V.; Väinölä, R. Endemic diversification of the monophyletic cottoid fish species flock in Lake Baikal explored with mtDNA sequencing. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2003, 27, 143–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Slugina, Z.V. Endemic Bivalvia in ancient lakes. Hydrobiologia 2006, 568, 213–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Antipova, N.L. Uber eine neue Art der Gattung Cyclotella aus dem Baikal See. Not. Syst. E Sect. Cryptogam. Inst. Bot. Nomine V.L. Komar. Acad. Sci. URSS 1956, 11, 35–39. [Google Scholar]
  7. Edlund, M.B.; Stoermer, E.F.; Taylor, C.M. Aulacoseira skvortzowii sp. nov. (Bacillariophyta), a poorly understood diatom from Lake Baikal, Russia. J. Phycol. 1996, 32, 165–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Gutwinski, R. Algarum e lacu Baykal et e peninsula Kamtschatka clariss. prof. Dr. B. Dybowski anno 1877 reportatarum enumeratio et diatomacearum lacus Baykal cum iisdem tatricorum, italicorum atque franco-gallicorum lacuum comparatio. Nova. Notarisia 1891, 2, 1–27. [Google Scholar]
  9. Jasnitsky, V. Neue und interessante Arten der Diatomeen aus dem Baikalsee. Bot. Zhurnal 1936, 21, 689–703. [Google Scholar]
  10. Skabichevskii, A.P. Neue und interessante Diatomeen aus dem nordlichen Baikalsee. Bot. Zhurnal 1936, 21, 705–719. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  11. Meyer, K.I.; Reinhardt, L.B. Contribution a la flore algologique du lac Baikal et de la Transbaikalie. Bull. De La Société Impériale Des Nat. De Moscou 1925, 33, 201–243. [Google Scholar]
  12. Meyer, K.I. Einfuhrung in die Algenflora des Baicalsees. Biulleten Mosk. Obs. Ispyt. Prir. Otd. Biol. 1930, 39, 179–396. [Google Scholar]
  13. Skvortzow, B.W.; Meyer, K.I. A contribution to the diatoms of Baikal Lake. Proc. Sungaree River Biol. Stn. 1928, 1, 1–55. [Google Scholar]
  14. Skvortzow, B.W. Bottom diatoms from Olhon Gate of Lake Baikal. Philipp. J. Sci. 1937, 62, 293–377. [Google Scholar]
  15. Wislouch, S.M. Beitrage zur Diatomeenflora von Asien II. Neuer Untersuchungen uber die Diatomeen des Baikalsees. Ber. Der Dtsch. Bot. Gessellschaft 1924, 42, 163–173. [Google Scholar]
  16. Genkal, S.I.; Popovskaya, G.I.; Kulikovskiy, M.S. New for science species from the genus Hannaea Patrick (Bacillariophyta). Int. J. Algae 2008, 10, 321–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Genkal, S.I.; Kulikovskiy, M.S.; Kuznetsova, I.V. New data on Centrophyceae (Bacillariophyta) of Lake Baikal, Russia. Int. J. Algae 2013, 15, 50–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kulikovskiy, M.S.; Lange-Bertalot, H.; Witkowski, A.; Khursevich, G.K. Achnanthidium sibiricum (Bacillariophyceae), a new species from bottom sediments in Lake Baikal. Arch. Hydrobiol. Algol. Stud. 2011, 136–137, 77–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kulikovskiy, M.S.; Lange-Bertalot, H.; Khursevich, G.K.; Kuznetsova, I.V. New diatom species of the genus Eolimna (Bacillariophyceae) from Lake Baikal. Nov. Sist. Nizshikh Rastenii 2012, 46, 46–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kulikovskiy, M.S.; Lange-Bertalot, H.; Metzeltin, D.; Witkowski, A. Lake Baikal: Hotspot of endemic diatoms I. Iconogr. Diatomol. 2012, 23, 7–608. [Google Scholar]
  21. Kulikovskiy, M.S.; Witkowski, A.; Khursevich, G.K. Encyonema horstii sp. nov., a species of unusual valve outline from Pleistocene deposits of Lake Baikal. Nova Hedwig. Beih. 2012, 141, 365–374. [Google Scholar]
  22. Kulikovskiy, M.S.; Lange-Bertalot, H.; Witkowski, A. Gliwiczia gen. nov., a new achananthoid diatom genus with description of four species new for science. Phytotaxa 2013, 109, 120–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kulikovskiy, M.S.; Gusev, E.S.; Andreeva, S.A.; Annenkova, N.V. Phylogenetic position of the diatom genus Geissleria Lange-Bertalot & Metzeltin and description of two new species from Siberian mountain lakes. Phytotaxa 2014, 177, 249–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kulikovskiy, M.S.; Lange-Bertalot, H.; Witkowski, A.; Kuznetsova, I.V. Description of four species belonging in Cavinula D.G. Mann & Stickle from Lake Baikal with notes on family Cavinulaceae D.G. Mann in Round et al. 1990. Nova Hedwigia 2014, 99, 487–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kulikovskiy, M.S.; Kociolek, J.P.; Solak, C.N.; Kuznetsova, I.V. The diatom genus Gomphonema Ehrenberg in Lake Baikal. II. Revision of taxa from Gomphonema acuminatum and Gomphonema truncatum-capitatum complexes. Phytotaxa 2015, 233, 251–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kulikovskiy, M.S.; Lange-Bertalot, H.; Kuznetsova, I.V. Lake Baikal: Hotspot of endemic diatoms II. Iconogr. Diatomol. 2015, 26, 7–608. [Google Scholar]
  27. Kulikovskiy, M.S.; Lange-Bertalot, H.; Kuznetsova, I.V.; Khursevich, G.K. Three new species of Eolimna Lange-Bertalot & Schiller (Bacillariophyta) from Lake Baikal. Nova Hedwig. Beih. 2015, 144, 199–209. [Google Scholar]
  28. Kulikovskiy, M.S.; Lange-Bertalot, H.; Witkowski, A.; Khursevich, G.K.; Kociolek, J.P. New species of Eunotia (Bacillariophyta) from Lake Baikal with comments on morphology and biogeography of the genus. Phycologia 2015, 54, 248–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kulikovskiy, M.S.; Lange-Bertalot, H.; Witkowski, A.; Khursevich, G.K.; Kuznetsova, I.V. Lectotypification of diatoms from Lake Baikal. I. Some species described by A.P. Skabitschewsky. Nova Hedwig. 2015, 100, 215–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kulikovskiy, M.S.; Kuznetsova, I.V. Morphology, taxonomical position, and distribution of the genera of diatoms Ochigma and Khursevichia from Lake Baikal. Inland Water Biol. 2016, 9, 226–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kulikovskiy, M.S.; Lange-Bertalot, H.; Annenkova, N.V.; Gusev, E.S.; Kociolek, J.P. Morphological and molecular evidence support description of two new diatom species from the genus Ulnaria in Lake Baikal. Fottea 2016, 16, 34–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kulikovskiy, M.S.; Lange-Bertalot, H.; Kuznetsova, I.V. Cocconeis nanoburyatica sp. nov.—A new monoraphid diatom species from Lake Baikal. Inland Water Biol. 2016, 9, 112–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kociolek, J.P.; Kulikovskiy, M.S.; Solak, C.N. The diatom genus Gomphoneis Cleve (Bacillariophyceae) from Lake Baikal, Russia. Phytotaxa 2013, 154, 1–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kociolek, J.P.; Kulikovskiy, M.S.; Kuznetsova, I.V.; Glushchenko, A.M.; Solak, C.N. A putative species flock in the diatom genus Gomphonema Ehrenberg (Bacillariophyta: Gomphonemataceae) from Lake Baikal, Russia: Description of six new species similar to G. ventricosum W. Gregory. Cryptogam. Algol. 2018, 39, 365–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Vishnyakov, V.S.; Kulikovskiy, M.S.; Genkal, S.I.; Dorofeyuk, N.I.; Lange-Bertalot, H.; Kuznetsova, I.V. Taxonomy and geographical distribution of the diatom genus Epithemia Kützing in water bodies of Central Asia. Inland Water Biol. 2014, 7, 318–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Vishnyakov, V.S.; Kulikovskiy, M.S.; Genkal, S.I.; Kuznetsova, I.V. Comparative morphological characteristic of diatoms of genus Hannaea Patrick of the two largest lakes of the Baikal rift zone with a description of the new species. Inland Water Biol. 2015, 8, 222–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Rodionova, Y.V.; Pomazkina, G.V.; Makarevich, O.Y. Encyonema mirabilis, Cymbella olgae and C. cognata: New diatom species from Lake Baikal. Diatom Res. 2013, 28, 487–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Rodionova, Y.V.; Pomazkina, G.V.; Sherbakova, T.A. Three new diatom species of the genus Diploneis (Bacillariophyta) from Lake Baikal. Diatom Res. 2019, 34, 95–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Pomazkina, G.V.; Rodionova, E.V. Diatoms of the Family Cymbellaceae of Lake Baikal; Atlas and Key: Nauka, Russia, 2014; p. 241. [Google Scholar]
  40. Pomazkina, G.V.; Rodionova, E.V.; Sherbakova, T.A.; Williams, D.M. Petroplacus gen. nov. (Bacillariophyta): A new genus of diatom from Lake Baikal. Phytotaxa 2016, 272, 267–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Pomazkina, G.V.; Rodionova, E.V.; Sherbakova, T.A. Validation of 123 names of new diatom taxa from Lake Baikal. Limnol. Freshw. Biol. 2019, 1, 181–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Jahn, R.; Kusber, W.-F.; Skibbe, O.; Zimmermann, J.; Van, A.T.; Buczkó, K.; Abarca, N. Gomphonella olivacea (Bacillariophyceae)—A new phylogenetic position for a well-known taxon, its typification, new species and combinations. Plant Ecol. Evol. 2019, 152, 219–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kulikovskiy, M.S.; Kociolek, J.P. The diatom genus Gomphonema Ehrenberg from Lake Baikal. I. Morphology and taxonomic history of two endemic species. Nova Hedwig. Beih. 2014, 143, 507–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Reichardt, E. New and recently described Gomphonema species (Bacillariophyceae) from Siberia. Fottea 2009, 9, 289–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Timoschkin, O.A.; Naumova, T.V.; Novikova, O.A. Index of Animal Species Inhabiting Lake Baikal and its Catchment Area. Nauka Novosib. 2001, 1, 74–113. [Google Scholar]
  46. Khursevich, G.K.; Karabanov, E.B.; Prokopenko, A.A.; Williams, D.V.; Kuzmin, M.I.; Fedenya, S.A.; Gvozdkov, A.N.; Kerber, E.B. Detailed diatom biological stratification of Lake Baikal deposits in the Brunhes and climatic factors of species formation. Geol. Geophys. 2001, 42, 108–129. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  47. Genkal, S.I.; Bondarenko, N.A. Are the Lake Baikal diatoms endemic? Hydrobiologia 2006, 568, 143–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Vishnyakov, V.S.; Romanov, R.E. Typification of the name Gomphonema popovae (Bacillariophyceae). Bot. Zhurnal 2015, 100, 382–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Bazhenova, O.P.; Glushchenko, A.M.; Igoshkina, I.Y.; Shkilev, T.E.; Kulikovskiy, M.S. Plankton diatoms (Fragilariophyceae, Bacillariophyceae) from the middle part of Irtysh River. Nov. Sist. Nizshikh Rastenii 2019, 53, 207–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Metzeltin, D.; Lange-Bertalot, H.; Nergui, S. Diatoms in Mongolia. Iconogr. Diatomol. 2009, 20, 3–686. [Google Scholar]
  51. Reichardt, E. Die Identitiit von Gomphonema entolejum Østrup (Bacillariphyceae) sowie Revision anlicher Arten mit weiter Axialarea. Nova Hedwig. 2005, 81, 115–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Metzeltin, D.; Lange-Bertalot, H. Tropical diatoms of South America I: About 700 predominantly rarely known or new taxa representative of the neotropical flora. Iconogr. Diatomol. 1998, 5, 3–695. [Google Scholar]
  53. Stancheva, R.; Sheath, R.G.; Kociolek, J.P. New Freshwater Gomphonemoid Diatoms from Streams in the Sierra Nevada Mountains, California, USA. Phytotaxa 2016, 289, 118–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Lange-Bertalot, H.; Hofmann, G.; Werum, M.; Cantonati, M. Freshwater Benthic Diatoms of Central Europe: Over 800 Common Species Used in Ecological Assessment; Koeltz Botanical Books: Oberreifenberg, Germany, 2017; p. 942. [Google Scholar]
  55. Levkov, Z.; Mitic-Kopanja, D.; Reichardt, E. The diatom genus Gomphonema from the Republic of Macedonia. Diatoms Eur. 2016, 8, 1–552. [Google Scholar]
  56. Buczkó, K.; Magyari, E.K.; Szabó, Z.; Korponai, J. Gomphonema angustivalva (Bacillariophyta), a new diatom record for Romania. Stud. Bot. Hung. 2021, 52, 41–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Reichardt, E. Zur Revision der Gattung Gomphonema. Die Arten um G. affine/insigne, G. angustatum/micropus, G. acuminatum sowie gomphonemoide Diatomeen aus dem Oberoligozän in Böhmen. Iconogr. Diatomol. 1999, 8, 1–203. [Google Scholar]
  58. Flower, R.J. A review of diversification trends in diatom research with special reference to taxonomy and environmental applications using examples from Lake Baikal and elsewhere. In Diatoms, Taxonomy and Ecology: A Marriage of Necessity: Proceedings of a Workshop, Kulice, Poland, 23–27 October 2002; Kociolek, J.P., Witkowski, A., Eds.; California Academy of Sciences: San Francisco, CA, USA, 2005; pp. 107–128. [Google Scholar]
  59. Bondarenko, N.; Guselnikova, N.; Logacheva, N.; Pomazkina, G. Spatial distribution of phytoplankton in Lake Baikal, Spring 1991. Freshw. Biol. 1996, 35, 517–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Genkal, S.I.; Popovskaya, G.I. Centric diatom algae of the Selenga River and its delta branches. Inland Water Biol. 2008, 1, 120–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Swann, G.E.A.; Panizzo, V.N.; Piccolroaz, S.; MacKay, A.W. Changing nutrient cycling in Lake Baikal, the world’s oldest lake. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 27211–27217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Skabichevskii, A.P. Species of the genus Gomphonema Ag. of Lake Baikal. Nov. Sist. Nizschikh Rastenii 1984, 21, 51–62. [Google Scholar]
  63. Skabichevskii, A.P. About two species of Gomphonema Ag. (Bacillariophyta) from Lake Baikal. Biulleten Mosk. Obs. Ispyt. Prir. Otd. Biol. 1985, 90, 92–103. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  64. Lange-Bertalot, H.; Genkal, S.I. Diatoms from Siberia I. Islands in the Arctic Ocean (Yugorsky-Shar Strait). Iconogr. Diatomol. 1999, 6, 1–292. [Google Scholar]
  65. Lin, X.-R.; Rioual, P.; Bai, Z.-J.; Peng, W.; Sun, M.-J.; Huang, X.-Z. The recent diatom flora in Lake Kanas, Xinjiang: Unusual species and new records in China. Acta Hydrobiol. Sin. 2018, 42, 641–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Genkal, S.I.; Kharitonov, V.G. Pennate diatoms (Pennatophyceae) of the ultraoligotrophic lake Elgygytgyn and waterbodies of its basin (Chukotka peninsula). Bot. Zhurnal. 2012, 97, 1183–1191. [Google Scholar]
  67. Cleve-Euler, A. The diatoms of Finnish Lapland Societas Scientiarum Fennica. Comment. Biol. 1934, 4, 1–154. [Google Scholar]
  68. Kulikovskiy, M.S.; Glushchenko, A.M.; Genkal, S.I.; Kuznetsova, I.V. Identification Book of Diatoms from Russia; Filigran: Yaroslavl, Russia, 2016; p. 804. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  69. Bahls, L.  Gomphonema duplipunctatum. In Diatoms of North America; USA, 2017; Available online: https://diatoms.org/species/gomphonema_duplipunctatum (accessed on 16 November 2022).
  70. Lange-Bertalot, H.; Metzeltin, D. Indicators of oligotrophy—800 taxa representative of three ecologically distinct lake types, Carbonate buffered—Oligodystrophic—Weakly buffered soft water. Iconogr. Diatomol. 1996, 2, 1–390. [Google Scholar]
  71. Vereshchagin, G.Y. Two types of Baikal biological complexes. Proc. Baikal Limnol. Stn. Acad. Sci. USSR 1935, 6, 199–212. [Google Scholar]
  72. Genkal, S.I.; Bondarenko, N.A. Cyclotella melnikiae sp. nov., a new diatom from the mountain lakes of Pribaikalie, Russia. Diatom Res. 2010, 25, 281–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Patrick, R.M.; Reimer, C.W. The diatoms of the United States exclusive of Alaska and Hawaii. Volume 2. Part 2. Entomoneidaceae, Cymbellaceae, Gomphonemaceae, Epithemiaceae. Monogr. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila. 1975, 13, 1–213. [Google Scholar]
  74. Krammer, K.; Lange-Bertalot, H. Bacillariophyceae. Teil 1. Naviculaceae. In Süßwasserflora von Mitteleuropa, Bd. 2/1; Ettl, H., Gerloff, J., Heynig, H., Mollenhauer, D., Eds.; Gustav Fisher Verlag: Stuttgart, Germany, 1986; pp. 1–876. [Google Scholar]
  75. Kociolek, J.P.; Stoermer, E.F. Geographic range and variability of the diatom (Bacillariophyceae) Gomphonema ventricosum Gregory. Nova Hedwigia 1987, 45, 223–236. [Google Scholar]
  76. Krammer, K. Cymbopleura, Delicata, Navicymbula, Gomphocymbellopsis, Afrocymbella. Diatoms Eur. 2003, 4, 1–529. [Google Scholar]
  77. Jüttner, I.; Krammer, K.; Van de Vijver, B.; Tuji, A.; Simkhada, B.; Gurung, S.; Sharma, S.; Sharma, C.M.; Cox, E.J. Oricymba (Cymbellales, Bacillariophyceae), a new cymbelloid genus and three new species from the Nepalese Himalaya. Phycologia 2010, 49, 407–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Glushchenko, A.M.; Kulikovskiy, M.S.; Kuznetsova, I.V.; Kociolek, J.P. Karthickia verestigmata gen. et sp. nov.—An interesting diatom with frustular morphology similar to several different cymbelloid diatom genera. Eur. J. Phycol. 2019, 58, 605–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Liu, Y.; Kociolek, J.P.; Kulikovskiy, M.S.; Glushchenko, A.M.; Yu, P.; Wang, Q.; Lu, X.; Fan, Y. A new genus of freshwater cymbelloid diatoms, Qinia gen. nov. from Yunnan Province, China. J. Oceanol. Limnol. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Kociolek, J.P.; Stoermer, E.F. Freshwater gomphonemoid diatom phylogeny: Preliminary results. Hydrobiologia 1993, 269–270, 31–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Liu, Y.; Kociolek, J.P.; Fan, Y. Valve ultrastructure of two species of the diatom genus Gomphonema Ehrenberg (Bacillariophyta) from Yunnan Province, China. Fottea 2020, 20, 25–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (AO). Gomphonema spp. Light microscopy, differential interference contrast, size diminution series. (AF). G. makarovae. Slide no. 18589. (GO). G. subarcticum. Slide no. 18599. Scale bar = 10 μm.
Figure 1. (AO). Gomphonema spp. Light microscopy, differential interference contrast, size diminution series. (AF). G. makarovae. Slide no. 18589. (GO). G. subarcticum. Slide no. 18599. Scale bar = 10 μm.
Plants 12 01835 g001
Figure 2. (AN). Gomphonema distans. Light microscopy, differential interference contrast, size diminution series. Slide no. 18606. Scale bar = 10 μm.
Figure 2. (AN). Gomphonema distans. Light microscopy, differential interference contrast, size diminution series. Slide no. 18606. Scale bar = 10 μm.
Plants 12 01835 g002
Figure 3. (AN). Gomphonema spp. Light microscopy, differential interference contrast, size diminution series. (AH). G. demersum. Slides no. 18589 and 18606. (IL). G. parvulius. Slides no. 18589 and 18599. (M,N). G. duplipunctatum. Slides no. 18599 and 18606. Scale bar = 10 μm.
Figure 3. (AN). Gomphonema spp. Light microscopy, differential interference contrast, size diminution series. (AH). G. demersum. Slides no. 18589 and 18606. (IL). G. parvulius. Slides no. 18589 and 18599. (M,N). G. duplipunctatum. Slides no. 18599 and 18606. Scale bar = 10 μm.
Plants 12 01835 g003
Figure 4. (AR). Gomphonema sphenovertex. Light microscopy, differential interference contrast, size diminution series. Slide no. 18606. Scale bar = 10 μm.
Figure 4. (AR). Gomphonema sphenovertex. Light microscopy, differential interference contrast, size diminution series. Slide no. 18606. Scale bar = 10 μm.
Plants 12 01835 g004
Figure 5. (AR). Gomphonema jergackianum. Light microscopy, differential interference contrast, size diminution series. Slides no. 18589 and 18599. Scale bar = 10 μm.
Figure 5. (AR). Gomphonema jergackianum. Light microscopy, differential interference contrast, size diminution series. Slides no. 18589 and 18599. Scale bar = 10 μm.
Plants 12 01835 g005
Figure 6. (AT). Gomphonema popovae. Light microscopy, differential interference contrast, size diminution series. Slide no. 18589. Scale bar = 10 μm.
Figure 6. (AT). Gomphonema popovae. Light microscopy, differential interference contrast, size diminution series. Slide no. 18589. Scale bar = 10 μm.
Plants 12 01835 g006
Figure 7. (AO). Gomphonema medioasiae. Light microscopy, differential interference contrast, size diminution series. Slide no. 18599. Scale bar = 10 μm.
Figure 7. (AO). Gomphonema medioasiae. Light microscopy, differential interference contrast, size diminution series. Slide no. 18599. Scale bar = 10 μm.
Plants 12 01835 g007
Figure 8. (AR). Gomphonema pseudoaugur Lange-Bertalot (AL). Light microscopy, differential interference contrast, size diminution series. Slide no. 18599. (MP). Scanning electron microscopy, external views. Scale bar (AL) = 10 μm; (M) = 5 μm; (N) = 2 μm; (OR) = 1 μm.
Figure 8. (AR). Gomphonema pseudoaugur Lange-Bertalot (AL). Light microscopy, differential interference contrast, size diminution series. Slide no. 18599. (MP). Scanning electron microscopy, external views. Scale bar (AL) = 10 μm; (M) = 5 μm; (N) = 2 μm; (OR) = 1 μm.
Plants 12 01835 g008
Figure 9. (AD). Gomphonema pseudoaugur Lange-Bertalot. Scanning electron microscopy, internal views. (B). The black arrow shows the septum. (D). The black arrow shows the pseudoseptum. Scale bar (A) = 2 μm; (BD) = 1 μm.
Figure 9. (AD). Gomphonema pseudoaugur Lange-Bertalot. Scanning electron microscopy, internal views. (B). The black arrow shows the septum. (D). The black arrow shows the pseudoseptum. Scale bar (A) = 2 μm; (BD) = 1 μm.
Plants 12 01835 g009
Figure 10. (AQ). Gomphonema baicalodemersum Kulikovskiy, Kociolek, Solak and Glushchenko sp. nov. (AQ). Light microscopy, differential interference contrast, size diminution series. Slide no. 18589. (RT). Scanning electron microscopy, external views. (U,V). Scanning electron microscopy, internal views. (D). Holotype. Scale bar (AQ) = 10 μm; (S) = 6 μm; (T) = 3 μm; (S,U,V) = 1 μm.
Figure 10. (AQ). Gomphonema baicalodemersum Kulikovskiy, Kociolek, Solak and Glushchenko sp. nov. (AQ). Light microscopy, differential interference contrast, size diminution series. Slide no. 18589. (RT). Scanning electron microscopy, external views. (U,V). Scanning electron microscopy, internal views. (D). Holotype. Scale bar (AQ) = 10 μm; (S) = 6 μm; (T) = 3 μm; (S,U,V) = 1 μm.
Plants 12 01835 g010
Figure 11. (AH). Gomphonema genkalii Kulikovskiy, Kociolek, Solak and Glushchenko sp. nov. (AF). Light microscopy, differential interference contrast, size diminution series. Slide no. 18607. (G,H). Scanning electron microscopy, internal views. (B). Holotype. Scale bar (AF) = 10 μm; (H) = 6 μm; (G) = 2 μm.
Figure 11. (AH). Gomphonema genkalii Kulikovskiy, Kociolek, Solak and Glushchenko sp. nov. (AF). Light microscopy, differential interference contrast, size diminution series. Slide no. 18607. (G,H). Scanning electron microscopy, internal views. (B). Holotype. Scale bar (AF) = 10 μm; (H) = 6 μm; (G) = 2 μm.
Plants 12 01835 g011
Figure 12. (AH). Gomphonema trifonovae Kulikovskiy, Kociolek, Solak and Glushchenko sp. nov. (AE). Light microscopy, differential interference contrast, size diminution series. Slide no. 18608. (F,G). Scanning electron microscopy, external views. (H). Scanning electron microscopy, internal view. (C). Holotype. Scale bar (AE) = 10 μm; (F,G) = 1 μm; (H) = 1 μm.
Figure 12. (AH). Gomphonema trifonovae Kulikovskiy, Kociolek, Solak and Glushchenko sp. nov. (AE). Light microscopy, differential interference contrast, size diminution series. Slide no. 18608. (F,G). Scanning electron microscopy, external views. (H). Scanning electron microscopy, internal view. (C). Holotype. Scale bar (AE) = 10 μm; (F,G) = 1 μm; (H) = 1 μm.
Plants 12 01835 g012
Figure 13. (AO). Gomphonema zapitaja Kulikovskiy, Kociolek, Solak and Glushchenko sp. nov. (AO). Light microscopy, differential interference contrast, size diminution series. Slide no. 18599 (AE,G,H,JO) and 18606 (F,I). (PU). Scanning electron microscopy, external views. (VX). Scanning electron microscopy, internal view. (B). Holotype. Scale bar (AO) = 10 μm; (P,W,X) = 5 μm; (Q) = 2 μm; (RV) = 1 μm.
Figure 13. (AO). Gomphonema zapitaja Kulikovskiy, Kociolek, Solak and Glushchenko sp. nov. (AO). Light microscopy, differential interference contrast, size diminution series. Slide no. 18599 (AE,G,H,JO) and 18606 (F,I). (PU). Scanning electron microscopy, external views. (VX). Scanning electron microscopy, internal view. (B). Holotype. Scale bar (AO) = 10 μm; (P,W,X) = 5 μm; (Q) = 2 μm; (RV) = 1 μm.
Plants 12 01835 g013
Figure 14. (AG). Gomphonema megabaicalensis Kulikovskiy, Kociolek, Solak and Glushchenko sp. nov. (AC). Light microscopy, differential interference contrast, size diminution series. Slide no. 18609. (DG). Scanning electron microscopy, external views. (A). Holotype. Scale bar (G) = 20 μm; (AC) = 10 μm; (E,F) = 5 μm; (D) = 2 μm.
Figure 14. (AG). Gomphonema megabaicalensis Kulikovskiy, Kociolek, Solak and Glushchenko sp. nov. (AC). Light microscopy, differential interference contrast, size diminution series. Slide no. 18609. (DG). Scanning electron microscopy, external views. (A). Holotype. Scale bar (G) = 20 μm; (AC) = 10 μm; (E,F) = 5 μm; (D) = 2 μm.
Plants 12 01835 g014
Figure 15. (AC). Gomphonema megabaicalensis Kulikovskiy, Kociolek, Solak and Glushchenko sp. nov. Scanning electron microscopy, internal views. Scale bar (A) = 10 μm; (B,C) = 2 μm.
Figure 15. (AC). Gomphonema megabaicalensis Kulikovskiy, Kociolek, Solak and Glushchenko sp. nov. Scanning electron microscopy, internal views. Scale bar (A) = 10 μm; (B,C) = 2 μm.
Plants 12 01835 g015
Table 1. Comparison of the morphological features of some finds of G. popovae.
Table 1. Comparison of the morphological features of some finds of G. popovae.
G. popovaeG. popovae
(as G. liyanlingae)
G. popovae
Morphotype 1
G. popovae
Morphotype 2
References[48][44,50]This studyThis study
Outlineheteropolar, lanceolate-clavatelinear-clavateheteropolar, lanceolate-clavateheteropolar, lanceolate-clavate
Headpolewidely roundedbroadly roundedbroadly roundedbroadly rounded
Footpolenarrowly roundedobtusely roundedacutely roundedacutely rounded footpole
Axial areanarrow, sometimes extended towards the central partnarrow in smaller species becoming moderately wider in larger onesnarrow, sometimes extended towards the central partnarrow, sometimes extended towards the central part
Central areawide, transversely expanded, sometimes slightly rhombic, bordered in the central part of the valve, usually by one or more irregularly shortened striae on each sideshaped roughly rhombical proximally, then abruptly expanded to a broad fascia at either side with one regularly shortened stria pair in the middle of a few additional irregularly shortened striaewide, transversely expanded, or slightly rhombic, bordered by 1–3 shorted striaewide, transversely expanded, or slightly rhombic, bordered by 1–3 shorted striae
Valve length (μm)47–9442–10022.5–79.043.5–67.0
Valve breadth (μm)8.0–13.310–166.5–12.08.0–9.5
Striae in 10 μm9.5–11.5 at the head part, 9.5–11.0 at the basal part9–109–1311–13
Areolae in 10 μm15–16 (18–20) *15–1718–2018–20
DistributionRussia, Mongolia, ChinaMongoliaRussia, BaikalRussia, Baikal
* counted from published data.
Table 2. Comparison of morphological features of Gomphonema baicalodemersum sp. nov. and related species.
Table 2. Comparison of morphological features of Gomphonema baicalodemersum sp. nov. and related species.
G. baicalodemersum sp. nov.G. medioasiaeG. demersum
Outlineslightly heteropolar, rhombic lanceolate (in larger specimens), or very slightly clavate (in smaller specimens)only very slightly clavate but almost naviculoid symmetrical to the transapical axis since head poles appear weakly broader than basal poles and lateral margins gradually taper to the poleslanceolate, only very slightly gomphonemoid-cuneate
Headpoleacutely roundedacutely roundedobtusely rounded
Footpoleacutely roundedacutely roundednarrower than headpole
Axial arealanceolate, widening at the central areabarely or not separated appearing lanceolatelanceolate, widening at the central area
Central areaweakly expressedbarely or not separated appearing lanceolatebroad rhombic lanceolate
Valve length (μm)14.5–38.547–5213–41
Valve breadth (μm)3–66–83.6–6.0
Striae number in 10 μm11–158–1112–16
Areolae number in 10 μm≈3016–18≈30 *
Isolated pore typeexternally, the circular opening located near the central nodule; internally, large, transversely elongated, and located in a long groove, turning into foraminal rowslocated near the central nodule and densely spaced to the rather long median striathe circular external stigma opens internally in an elongated pore
DistributionRussia. BaikalMongoliaRussia. Baikal
ReferencesThis study[50][44]
* Counted from published data.
Table 3. Comparison of morphological features of Gomphonema trifonovae sp. nov. and related species.
Table 3. Comparison of morphological features of Gomphonema trifonovae sp. nov. and related species.
G. trifonovae sp. nov.G. angustivalva
Outlineclavate, asymmetrical to the longitudinal axisslightly heteropolar, linear to linear lanceolate
Headpoleacutely to narrowly roundednarrowly rounded
Footpoleacutely roundednarrowly rounded
Axial areanarrow but expands near the central areanarrow, linear
Central areais an extension of the axial arealarge, transversely elongated
Valve length (μm)13–2614–34
Valve breadth (μm)2.8–3.52.5–3.5
Striae number in 10 μm,11–1215–18
Areolae typec-likec-like
Isolated poreabsentpresent
DistributionRussia, BaikalEurope
ReferencesThis study[54,55,56]
Table 4. Comparison of morphological features of Gomphonema zapitaja sp. nov. and related species.
Table 4. Comparison of morphological features of Gomphonema zapitaja sp. nov. and related species.
G. zapitaja sp. nov.G. cymbelliclinumG. angustatum
Outlineclavate, asymmetrical to the longitudinal axisslightly heteropolar, linear to linear-lanceolatelanceolate to rhombic lanceolate, larger specimens less club-shaped than the smaller
Headpoleacutely roundedrostrate to subcapitatewedge-shaped, blunter to more pointed
Footpolenarrowly roundedrostratebarely narrower in larger specimens
Axial areanarrow but expands near the central areavery narrow, linearnarrowly linear
Central areaformed by shortening of the central striaelarge, asymmetric, wider on the side opposite to the isolated pore, bordered on each margin by a single shortened striausually extending over more than half of the valve by strong unilateral shortening of the central striae
Valve length (μm)13.5–34.516.0–37.516–48
Valve breadth (μm)5–74.5–6.75.3–6.7
Striae number in 10 μm,11–139–1610–14
Areolae typeoccluded by large c-like semilunar siliceous flaps, merged with the areolar surfacenot occludedoccluded by large c-like or reniform semilunar siliceous flaps, merged with the areolar surface
Areolae number in 10 μm≈4030–3535–40
Internal opening of isolated poreslit-likeslit-likeslit-like
DistributionRussia, BaikalEuropeEurope
ReferencesThis study[55,57][54,55]
Table 5. Comparison of morphological features of Gomphonema baicalodemersum sp. nov. and related species.
Table 5. Comparison of morphological features of Gomphonema baicalodemersum sp. nov. and related species.
G. megabaicalensissp. nov.G. oxycephalum*G. demerarae*G. spectabilissimum
Outlineheteropolar, clavaterhomboid-lanceolate clavaterhomboid-lanceolate clavatelinear, weakly clavate
Apex shapebroadly rounded or subclavate headpole and widely rounded, weakly protracted footpolewedge-shaped headpole and widely rounded, protracted footpolewedge-shaped headpole and widely rounded, protracted footpolebluntly rounded headpole and footpole
Axial areawide, gradually widening towards central part of valvewide, gradually widening towards central part of valvebroadly lanceolate, abruptly widening towards central part of valvewide, gradually widening towards central part of valve
Central arearectangular, in the form of a fascia or bordered to shortened striaeis an extension of the axial areaabsentis an extension of the axial area
Valve length (μm)68–10365–11065–12590–120
Valve breadth (μm)12.5–16.018–2315–2011–13
Striae typeuniseriateuniseriatebiseriate, very shortuniseriate
Striae number in 10 μm,5–76–88–95
Areolae type,rounded or elongated, located in small round depressions, separated by a thickened rimrounded or elongated, located in small round depressions, separated by a thickened rimslit-like or crater-likec-shaped, located in longitudinal depressions
Isolated poresabsentpresentabsentpresent
DistributionRussia, BaikalSouth America. Venezuela, GuyanaSouth America. Brazil, GuyanaGuyana
ReferencesThis study[52][52][52]
* Characterized and counted from published data.
Table 6. List of the slides.
Table 6. List of the slides.
Slide No.LocalityCoordinatesSubstratumCond., µS/cmpHt, °CCollection of Date
18589Lake Baikal, pool near shallow-water bay52°27.042′ N 106°53.215′ Efouling on a tree submerged in water1519.321.314 July 2011
18599Lake Baikal, shallow-water bay52°27.042′ N 106°53.215′ Efragments of filamentous algae and higher plants1519.321.314 July 2011
18606Lake Baikal, small pool near shallow-water bay52°27.042′ N 106°53.215′ Edetritus on sands1519.321.314 July 2011
18607Lake Baikal, shallow-water bay52°27.042′ N 106°53.215′ ECladophora spp. on bottom1519.321.314 July 2011
18608Lake Baikal, shallow-water bay52°27.042′ N 106°53.215′ Ebottom sediments and detritus in a clump of Carex spp.4569.018.214 July 2011
18609Lake Baikal, shallow-water bay52°27.042′ N 106°53.215′ Ebottom sediments2957.525.014 July 2011
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kulikovskiy, M.S.; Kociolek, J.P.; Solak, C.N.; Kuznetsova, I.V.; Glushchenko, A.M. New and Interesting Taxa from the Diatom Genus Gomphonema Ehrenberg in Shallow, Nearshore Sites on the Eastern Coast of Lake Baikal. Plants 2023, 12, 1835. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12091835

AMA Style

Kulikovskiy MS, Kociolek JP, Solak CN, Kuznetsova IV, Glushchenko AM. New and Interesting Taxa from the Diatom Genus Gomphonema Ehrenberg in Shallow, Nearshore Sites on the Eastern Coast of Lake Baikal. Plants. 2023; 12(9):1835. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12091835

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kulikovskiy, Maxim S., John Patrick Kociolek, Cüneyt Nadir Solak, Irina V. Kuznetsova, and Anton M. Glushchenko. 2023. "New and Interesting Taxa from the Diatom Genus Gomphonema Ehrenberg in Shallow, Nearshore Sites on the Eastern Coast of Lake Baikal" Plants 12, no. 9: 1835. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12091835

APA Style

Kulikovskiy, M. S., Kociolek, J. P., Solak, C. N., Kuznetsova, I. V., & Glushchenko, A. M. (2023). New and Interesting Taxa from the Diatom Genus Gomphonema Ehrenberg in Shallow, Nearshore Sites on the Eastern Coast of Lake Baikal. Plants, 12(9), 1835. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12091835

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop