Next Article in Journal
The Genus Hyssopus: Traditional Use, Phytochemicals and Pharmacological Properties
Next Article in Special Issue
In Vitro Biotechnology for Conservation and Sustainable Use of Plant Genetic Resources
Previous Article in Journal
Implementation and Evaluation of Spatial Attention Mechanism in Apricot Disease Detection Using Adaptive Sampling Latent Variable Network
Previous Article in Special Issue
In Vitro Conservation of Mexican Garlic Varieties by Minimal Growth
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Long-Term Conservation for the Safeguard of Abies nebrodensis: An Endemic and Endangered Species of Sicily

1
Institute for BioEconomy (IBE), National Research Council (CNR), Via Madonna del Piano 10, 50019 Sesto Fiorentino, Florence, Italy
2
Institute of Chemistry of Organometallic Compounds (ICCOM)-Electron Microscopy Centre (Ce.M.E.), National Research Council (CNR), Via Madonna del Piano 10, 50019 Sesto Fiorentino, Florence, Italy
3
Department of Agricultural, Food and Forestry Sciences, University of Palermo, 90128 Palermo, Italy
4
Institute for Sustainable Plant Protection (IPSP), National Research Council (CNR), Via Madonna del Piano 10, 50019 Sesto Fiorentino, Florence, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2024, 13(12), 1682; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13121682
Submission received: 12 March 2024 / Revised: 12 June 2024 / Accepted: 13 June 2024 / Published: 18 June 2024

Abstract

:
The combined approaches between ex situ and in situ conservation are of great importance for threatened species in urgent need of protection. This study aims to develop concrete actions to preserve the relic of 30 adult trees of the Sicilian fir (Abies nebrodensis) from extinction using long-term germplasm conservation in liquid nitrogen (LN, −196 °C). Pollen grains were collected, and their moisture content (MC) was measured. Then, viability (2,3,5-tryphenyl tetrazolium chloride, TTC), in vitro germinability, and enzymatic antioxidant activity (ascorbate peroxidase, APX; catalase, CAT) were evaluated before and after cryopreservation. Seeds collected from mature cones underwent X-ray analysis, and only full seeds were used to excise the zygotic embryos (ZEs) for cryopreservation. The MC percentage of ZEs was determined, and then they were plunged in LN with (+PVS2) or without (−PVS2) Plant Vitrification Solution 2; untreated ZEs were used as a control. Viability (TTC test) and in vitro germination were assessed for all ZEs (+PVS2, −PVS2, and control). Embryogenic callus (EC) lines obtained from mature ZEs were cryopreserved applying the ‘encapsulation-dehydration’ technique. This study has allowed, after optimizing cryopreservation protocols for pollen, ZEs, and EC of A. nebrodensis, to establish the first cryobank of this endangered species in Polizzi Generosa (Palermo, Italy), inside the ‘Madonie Regional Park’. The strategy developed for Sicilian fir conservation will pave the way for similar initiatives for other critically endangered conifer species.

1. Introduction

Abies nebrodensis, commonly known as the Sicilian fir, is a critically endangered conifer species endemic to the Madonie Regional Park in the north of Sicily. This species is subject to significant threats caused by genetic erosion, fragmentation, poor natural regeneration, and a high rate of empty seeds leading to low seed germination. The remaining natural population is alarmingly small, consisting of only 30 adult trees, underscoring the urgency for effective conservation strategies [1,2,3]. According to the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), A. nebrodensis is classified as CR-D in the Red List of Endangered Species (https://top50.iucn-mpsg.org/species/1; accessed on 12 March 2024).
Historical exploitation and habitat degradation have contributed to the species decline, with its wood once highly valued for construction due to its elasticity and resistance. The past few decades have seen various projects aimed at both in situ and ex situ conservation, including experimental plantations and protective measures like fencing to support natural regeneration. Studies have highlighted A. nebrodensis as a species highly variable in seed production and the vital role of embryo presence in seeds for germination [4]. In addition, this species is characterized by a very limited natural regeneration due to the high rate of empty seeds, slow growth of seedlings, rocky soils, and grazing by wild herbivores.
The LIFE4FIR project (http://www.life4fir.com/it/), started in 2019, aims to develop an effective strategy to improve the conservation status of A. nebrodensis (Figure 1a) through a comprehensive approach that includes different actions: protecting the relic population, increasing genetic diversity by controlled cross-pollination, breeding selected outbred seedlings, and reforesting with selected seedlings to create new cores of the species within the Madonie Regional Park [1]. The project strategy is also based on ex situ conservation strategies, like establishing a seed bank and a cryobank for long-term germplasm conservation. Among the conservation techniques, cryopreservation stands out as a particularly promising method for the safe, long-term maintenance of A. nebrodensis.
The current conservation efforts greatly focus on biotechnological approaches, and cryopreservation has emerged as a crucial tool for the long-term maintenance of germplasm [5,6], allowing for the storage of plant material at ultra-low temperatures, effectively halting any enzymatic or chemical activity that could damage the biological material [7]. Under these conditions, any enzymatic or chemical activity is stopped, preventing structural and physiological damage to the stored biological material. This method allows for the indefinite storage of valuable plant material, making it a widely used tool for ex situ conservation of a variety of crops, fruit, and forest trees [8,9,10,11]. At present, plant cryopreservation techniques are available for storage of explants derived from in vivo and in vitro conditions [6,7,11], such as meristem and shoot tips, root tips, callus, pollen, seeds, cyanobacteria, algae, bryophytes, ferns, suspension cultures, embryogenic cultures of both zygotic and somatic embryos, and dormant buds [11,12,13,14,15].
This biotechnological approach for long-term conservation represents a safe and cost-effective tool where samples are stored in small volumes, protected from contamination, and without the need for laborious management. It should be noted that using desiccation, vitrification, and encapsulation-based methods for the cryopreservation of in vitro-derived shoot tips, several cryobanks of different economically important crops were established [16,17,18,19,20]. Similar efforts have been directed at the cryopreservation of some endangered species [21,22]. For example, several strategies were developed for threatened plants such as lilies, orchids, and redwood [23] as well as for the conservation of seeds and shoot tips of Canadian cherry birch [24].
In addition to shoot tips, several other explant types have been used in cryopreservation, such as pollen, zygotic embryos (ZEs), and embryogenic callus (EC). Particularly, pollen conservation is an important tool for the maintenance of plant genetic resources and can promote improved efficiency in breeding programs as well as germplasm conservation and exchange [25]. Cryopreservation of embryogenic tissue enables large-scale propagation and preservation of forestry resources [26]. Zygotic embryos, embryonic axes, and somatic embryos of different temperate and tropical species, including crops, fruit, and forest trees, have been effectively cryopreserved [27].
Within the genus Abies, the species subjected to cryopreservation include A. cephalonica L. [28,29], A. nordmanniana [30,31], A. alba [32], and some fir hybrids [33]. Currently, methodologies of conifer breeding integrate cryopreservation with somatic embryogenesis, extensively evaluated for A. alba [32].
For the above reasons, this study was focused on finding the optimal protocols for cryopreservation of pollen, ZEs, and EC to establish a cryobank for the critically endangered A. nebrodensis.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Material

Mature cones of Abies nebrodensis trees were collected during October 2020 in their natural habitat, located in the north-west of Sicily, in the Madonie Regional Park, Palermo (Italy), considering all the relevant guidelines and regulations to avoid any damage to the relict trees. Seeds extracted from a large part of the 30 residual trees were packed in sealable paper bags, signed, and transferred to the laboratory of the CNR-IBE, where they were stored at 4 °C until further use. In May 2022, the male cones were gently removed from adult trees. It was not possible to sample all 30 trees due to either a lack of seed production from some trees (only 24 are mature) or difficulties in collecting cones from trees located in impervious sites.

2.2. X-ray Analysis

To select full seeds (i.e., seeds containing well-formed embryos), all seeds extracted from mature cones from trees numbers 6, 8, 10, 12, 13, 19, 21, 22, and 27 were X-ray radiographed through the X-ray apparatus “Gilardoni radio light” (Lecco, Italy) [2] set up as follows: 25 kV, 3 mA (soft X-rays), a focus-film distance of 45 cm, and a 2-min time of exposure. Seeds from each tree were placed in plastic square well plates (20 × 20 cm), 100 at a time, each seed in a separate well. The seeds were in direct contact with a Carestream X-ray film during the exposure. After X-ray application, the films were washed in development solution (4 min) and then in fixation solution (3 min) on a shaker (20 rpm). The films were washed under tap water (3–5 s) before further examination by the film viewer screen.

2.3. Procedures for the Conservation in Liquid Nitrogen (LN, −196 °C)

2.3.1. Pollen

Male cones were collected in mid-May 2022 from trees N° 1, 2, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 21, 22, 23, 24, 27, and 29. After extraction from cones, the pollen was cleaned and sieved to remove all the impurities (Figure 1b,c) and maintained in paper bags at room temperature for 2 days. The moisture content (MC) of fresh pollen from different trees was measured using the moisture analyzer (Mettler-Toledo AG, Laboratory & Weighing Technologies, Greifensee, Switzerland). Measurements of MC were performed with 0.1 g of pollen per replicate and repeated three times for each tree.
Morphological pollen observations were carried out at the CEME-Centro di Microscopie Elettroniche “Laura Bonzi”-CNR Research Area (Florence, Italy), using a Gaia 3 (Tescan s.r.o., Brno, Czech Republic) FIB-SEM (Focused Ion Beam-Scanning Electron Microscope) electron beam for scanning electron microscope (SEM) imaging with a voltage of 2 kV, operating in high vacuum mode, and a secondary electron (in-beam SE) detector. Samples were deposited on a stub and then coated with an ultrathin coating of gold. Pollen grains were photographed, and SEM measurements of the polar axis (P) were performed. At least 70 fresh pollen grains were examined to ensure a complete morphological analysis. Furthermore, the pollen observations were complemented by a stereomicroscope (Zeiss Stemi 2000 C, Jena, Germany) and an optical microscope (Leica DM-500, Heerbrugg, Switzerland) for counting viable and germinated pollen grains.

Viability Test

To evaluate the viability of pollen before and after LN immersion, the 2,3,5-tryphenyl tetrazolium chloride (TTC) test was used. A TTC 1% solution (purity 99%, Sigma-Aldich, Buchs, Switzerland) was prepared by adding 200 mg of TTC and 12 g of sucrose in 20 mL of distilled water. Two drops of this mixture were dropped on a microscope slide; the pollen was dusted over it, covered with a coverslip, and kept at room temperature for 24–48 h in the dark [34]. Following incubation, 400 pollen grains were randomly counted under the optical microscope (Leica DM-500). Pollen grains stained red were categorized as “viable”, whereas colorless-stained pollen was “non-viable”. The estimation of pollen vitality was expressed as the percentage of stained grains in the total number of grains counted. The TTC test was performed in two replicates for each tree. Three microscopic field views were observed per replicate, containing a minimum of 300 pollen grains/replication.

In Vitro Germinability Test

The assessment of in vitro pollen germinability, both prior to and after cryopreservation, was carried out by placing pollen grains on a semisolid medium and evaluating the elongation of the pollen tube. After 48 h of incubation, the pollen tube that achieved a length at least three times the diameter of the pollen grain was considered germinated [35]. The composition of the germination medium consisted of boric acid (50 mg L−1), sucrose (15 g L−1), and plant agar (6 g L−1; Duchefa Biochemie, Haarlem, The Netherlands). The pollen was maintained in the dark at 25 °C as an optimal temperature for in vitro germination assays of most species [36]. For each plant, two replicates were conducted, and within each replicate, three microscopic fields were randomly selected for observation (at least 300 grains/replicate). The percentage of germination represented the number of germinated pollen grains in relation to the total number of grains counted. The number of germinated pollen grains was counted using a Leica DM-500 optical microscope.

Pollen Catalase and Ascorbate Peroxidase

The determination of catalase (CAT) and ascorbate peroxidase (APX) activity was carried out for pollen samples of trees 6, 8, 9, 11, 13, 14, 22, 24, and 27, according to Ren et al. [37]. For both CAT and APX activity measurement, three replicates of 0.03 g pollen for each tree, before and after immersion in LN, were used for homogenization and extraction. For CAT activity, the absorbance, after the addition of 30% H2O2, was measured at a wavelength of 240 nm. For APX activity, the absorbance, after the addition of 30% H2O2, was measured at a wavelength of 290 nm. Each analysis was repeated three times. The results are expressed as U/g protein.

Immersion, Storage in Liquid Nitrogen, and Recovery of Pollen

Samples of pollen were transferred in 2-mL cryovials. For each tree, two cryovials (0.30 g/cryovial) were immersed directly into LN. After storage in LN, for at least 1 h, the cryovials containing the pollen were thawed under a laminar flow cabinet for 2 h at room temperature. Subsequently, following the procedure described above, the viability (TTC) and in vitro germinability of cryopreserved pollen (Figure 2) were tested.

2.3.2. Excised Zygotic Embryos

Under laminar flow, X-rayed seeds containing mature embryos were treated with 70% EtOH (5 min), rinsed with sterile distilled water 3 times, treated with sodium hypochlorite (20% v/v) with a few drops of Tween 20 solution (20 min), and rinsed again 3 times with sterile distilled water. Finally, seeds were imbibed in water for 48 h under sterile conditions and then opened to excise the ZEs.

Viability (TTC Test) and In Vitro Germination Test of ZEs

The viability of ZEs was determined by the TTC. Briefly, ZEs were soaked in TTC solution 0.1% (w/v) in 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 7.6) for 24 h, in total darkness at 30 °C. After staining, the ZEs were placed on moist filter paper to observe their viability. The red color of embryonic tissues was the main indicator of ZEs viability.
For the germination test, before and after the LN, excised ZEs were cultured in vitro on hormone-free Murashige and Skoog (MS; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) [38] medium (MS-HF), containing sucrose (20 g L−1) and agar (7 g L−1) at pH 5.8. All ZEs were maintained at 24 °C under a 16-h photoperiod (60 μmol m−2s1 of photosynthetically active radiation). After 3 weeks of culture, the germination rate was evaluated.

Immersion in LN and Recovery of ZEs

Prior to the immersion in LN, the MC of ZEs (approx. 15 ZEs = 0.1 g/tree) was determined under the sterile laminar airflow following the method of Ayala et al. [39]. From each tree, a total number of 108 ZEs was divided into three groups; each group included three replicates: (1) submerged in Plant Vitrification Solution 2 (+PVS2; 30% glycerol, 15% ethylene glycol, 15% dimethyl sulfoxide in MS, and 0.4 M sucrose [40]), (2) without Plant Vitrification Solution 2 treatment (−PVS2), and (3) untreated control (neither PVS2 nor LN). The cryovial (2 mL) containing 4 ZEs from the +PVS2 and −PVS2 groups were immersed in LN for at least 1 h. Thereafter, the cryovials were taken out of the LN and thawed in a water bath (40 °C) for 1 min. Under laminar flow, cryopreserved ZEs were washed with liquid MS medium containing 1.2 M sucrose (washing solution) for 20 min. All ZEs cryopreserved (+PVS2 and −PVS2) or not cryopreserved (control) were subjected to viability and in vitro germination tests (Figure 2), as described above. Both tests were carried out with three replicates per tree (6 zygotic embryos/replicate).

2.3.3. Embryogenic Callus

The EC was obtained following a protocol developed by Jouini et al. [2]. Briefly, ECs obtained from ZEs were developed and subcultured every 4 weeks on Schenk and Hildebrandt (SH; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) [41] media supplemented with 1 mg L−1 6-benzyladenine (BA; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), 1 g L−1 casein (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), 500 mg L−1 glutamine (Duchefa Biochemie, Haarlem, The Netherlands), 20 g L−1 sucrose, and 7 g L−1 agar at 24 °C in dark conditions. After eight subcultures, the EC cryopreservation was carried out using the encapsulation-dehydration technique. Portions of EC obtained from the ZE of tree N°10 were encapsulated in Ca-Alginate beads as described by Standardi and Micheli [42]. Then, the beads were transferred into sterilized filter paper inside the Petri dishes (60 Ø mm) and placed inside a glass jar (500 cc) containing 150 g of silica gel previously sterilized in an oven at 105 °C for 16 h. The jars were sealed with tape, and the beads were exposed to silica gel at room temperature for 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 h. A control treatment of encapsulated ECs without desiccation was also included. The desiccated beads were placed in 2 mL cryovials (5 per each), replicated three times, and plunged directly into LN for at least 1 h. Thereafter, cryopreserved encapsulated ECs in cryovials were thawed in a water bath at 40 °C for 2 min and treated with a washing solution for 20 min. Beads were placed on fresh SH regrowth medium, supplemented with 1 mg L−1 BA, 1 g L−1 casein, 500 mg L−1 glutamine, 20 g L−1 sucrose, and 7 g L−1 agar. The regrowth ability of encapsulated ECs was determined when the callus broke through the gel of the bead. The same protocol was applied for the other ECs obtained from trees N° 7, 8, 21, and 22.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

The primary cause of the variation in the amount of zygotic embryos and pollen collected from A. nebrodensis trees depends on the production of trees, which was extremely variable from one year to the next. All cryopreservation experiments followed the randomized block trial design. The moisture content of pollen, the viability and germination of pollen, and ZEs, both before and after cryopreservation, were expressed as percentages. All percentages of data were subjected to an arcsine transformation. Means were differentiated through analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by the least significant difference (LSD) post-hoc test to evaluate the differences in germination and viability of pollen and ZEs, and CAT and APX data analysis activities within A. nebrodensis trees. For the moisture content of the pollen, Duncan’s multiple range test was used. Data analysis was conducted using JMP® software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA) version 5.00, with the significance level at p ≤ 0.001. The Pearson correlation analysis between the germination of pollen and its viability, as well as the germination of ZEs and its viability, was computed using the corrplot package in the R programming language (version 4.3.1).

3. Results and Discussion

The A. nebrodensis species is affected by a very low seed germination rate, mainly depending on a large number of empty seeds [4]. Moreover, Sicilian fir is characterized by abundant seed production every 3–4 years, similar to other conifer species [43]. For this reason, the quantity of explants and the number of trees analyzed varied in the current study.

3.1. Evaluation of X-ray Analysis

Based on the X-ray image, two groups of seeds were distinguished: (1) viable and able to germinate (Figure 3a), and (2) unviable, either empty or with an undeveloped embryo and endosperm (Figure 3b). It was observed that a significant proportion of the seeds, varying by A. nebrodensis tree, were devoid of ZEs [2]. The validation of X-ray analysis was confirmed through the dissection and direct observation of the X-rayed seeds, along with an assessment of their germination potential (Figure 3c,d).
The X-ray technique was essential for verifying the presence of the ZEs within the seeds [44]. This approach allowed us to save time in the excision of the ZEs used for cryopreservation purposes and EC induction, as empty seeds were discarded. Earlier, Fedorkov [45] confirmed the advantage of this method to optimize seed storage and improve the production of plant material. Although radiographic inspection is potentially harmful, seeds are exposed to a non-lethal dose during the test; hence, no damage was expected to occur or adversely affect germination [46].
Furthermore, X-ray analysis is a non-destructive method that safely allows the selection of high-quality seeds from deteriorating and dead seeds [47]. Therefore, X-ray tests have been widely applied to evaluate the quality of conifer seeds, such as in Cupressus sempervirens, C. arizonica [48], Pinus sylvestris [49,50,51], P. sibirica, and P. koraiensis [52] to separate the empty seeds from seed samples.

3.2. Conservation in Liquid Nitrogen (LN, −196 °C)

3.2.1. Pollen

Morphological Characteristics of Pollen

The pollen of A. nebrodensis was observed by a scanning electron microscope (Figure 4), a Leica stereomicroscope, and a Leica Optical Microscope (Figure 5), and these examinations revealed that the pollen had the typical characteristics of the genus Abies [53,54,55]. Pollen grains resulted isodiametric with an elliptical central body with two lateral air sacs (bisaccate) and one aperture leptoma. The air sacs are clearly protruding from the body.
Measurements of the polar axis (P) of A. nebrodensis pollen grains exhibited a range from 68.11 to 92.34 µm, with an average of 83.47 µm in accordance with the study of Wrońska-Pilarek et al. [55] on A. alba. Most of the observed pollen grains showed a large size, over 80 µm (73%).

Evaluation of Pollen MC

The MC in explants used in cryopreservation is a crucial factor for the success of this conservation method. For this reason, before the cryopreservation process, the MC content of pollen samples from different A. nebrodensis trees was recorded. Figure 6 shows that MC significantly varied among trees and was restricted in a percentage ranging between 6.8 and 11.3%. Trees 19 and 21 had the lowest percentage, while tree 6 exhibited the highest MC.
Many factors influence the viability and germinability of cryopreserved pollen, mainly the MC, which is critical to avoid the formation of deleterious ice crystals breaking the cell membranes [12] and also the developmental stage of pollen grains (bi- or tricellular) [25,56,57].
Different methods are applied for pollen dehydration to adjust the moisture content [58,59,60]. The pollen MC from 8 to 10% avoids tissue damage during the freezing process, regardless of the final cold storage method [61]. Connor and Towill [62] reported the success of long-term conservation of pollen with moisture contents between 7 and 20% by applying −80 to −196 °C. Moreover, in some conifer species, MC percentages of pollen of 9.8–10.1 were recorded before immersion in LN [63]. In the case of A. nebrodensis, the MC of pollen maintained for two days at room temperature was suitable (about 10%) for direct immersion in LN without compromising its viability and germinability. This aspect is notable because it makes the cryopreservation procedure easier and faster.
Weatherhead et al. [64] obtained successful pollen cryopreservation of potato (Solanum spp.) without desiccation for 9 months, with no significant reduction in pollen viability. Moreover, Anushma et al. [65] immersed the pollen of nine wild Solanum spp. directly in LN without dehydration; pollen viability and germinability were retained in all species without any significant reduction during the cryostorage for 36 weeks. Similarly, the cryopreservation of non-dehydrated pollen from Diospyros spp. and Olea europaea maintained both viability and germination capability for up to 360 days of storage in LN [66,67].

Viability and In Vitro Pollen Germinability

Pollen samples from different trees of A. nebrodensis were subjected to a TTC test to assess their viability in fresh and cryopreserved samples (Figure 7a–c). Results of the TTC test showed (Table 1) that pollen was viable both in the control group (−LN) and in the group that was stored in LN. Significant differences were observed in terms of tree and treatment, and the interaction between tree and treatment was also significant. In the control, the highest viability rates were recorded for trees N° 8 and 23 (98.88%), while after LN treatment, the highest viability was observed in trees 6 (95.08%) and 18 (95.52%). Trees N° 2, 19, 21, and 29 exhibited low viability rates in both the control (from 3.88 to 9.26%) and cryopreserved pollen (from 6.45 to 33.29%). However, the pollen from all trees responded favorably to the application of LN in terms of viability. The effect of the A. nebrodensis tree on pollen viability, both before and after cryopreservation, was significant. The highest mean viability, regardless of control and LN treatments, was recorded in trees N° 8, 17, 18, and 24, ranging from 93% to 95% (Table 1).
For the in vitro germinability test, the control and cryopreserved pollen samples (Figure 7d,e) were placed on semisolid medium and incubated at a constant temperature of 25 °C for 48 h. Observations conducted post-incubation identified the presence of pollen tube formation in both groups. The in vitro germinability outcomes indicated that the tree, treatment, and the interaction between the tree and treatment were significant (Table 2). In the control group (−LN), the germinability rate for the tree-by-treatment interaction varied from a low of 9.16% to a high of 99.72%. The highest germinability rate in the control was observed in trees N°15 (99.72%) and 14 (99.44%). Following immersion in LN, the germination capacity of the pollen from the twenty-two trees ranged from 12.66 to 99.33%. Trees N°23 and 24 showed the highest germinability, with 99.33% and 99%, respectively, whereas no germinability was observed in the cryopreserved pollen of tree 19. Generally, the treatment with LN was found to enhance pollen germination (mean 81.95%) compared to the control (mean 79.16%).
The results of the correlation analysis revealed a significant correlation between the viability and germinability percentages of pollen before and after liquid nitrogen treatment (Figure 8). This correlation was positive either in pollen cryopreserved or not cryopreserved reporting values of R2 = 0.78 and R2 = 0.83, respectively.

Pollen Catalase and Ascorbate Peroxidase Activities

The effects of storage temperature of LN on enzymatic activities, CAT and APX, were determined for pollen samples of nine trees (Figure 9). Changes in CAT and APX activity after freezing were different among trees. Indeed, freezing induced a reduction in CAT activity in all the trees compared with the activity measured in crude extracts from fresh pollen, with the exception of trees N°8 and 9, where this reduction was not significant. In trees 14, 24, and 27, a drastic decline was detected, with activity almost absent (about 98% of the decrease), while for the other trees, a reduction of 20–55% was observed.
Concerning the APX activity, in cryopreserved pollen of five trees out of nine examined (13, 14, 22, 24, and 27), the values decreased, and the differences compared to fresh pollen resulted in a range of 24% to 79%. The major reduction in activity was detected in the range of 70–79% for the trees N°13, 14, 22, and 24, while it was 58% for the trees N°27. In the other trees, the APX activity, after LN, significantly increased to 18% and 43% in trees 11 and 9, respectively, and almost doubled in trees 6 and 8. Changes in antioxidant enzyme activities before and after LN were significantly different for each tree, except for CAT in trees 9 and 8. Interestingly, the trees showing an increase in APX activity after LN (6, 8, 9, and 11) had the lowest decrease in CAT activity, indicating that in these trees the stress due to freezing was less damaging.
Similar to other environmental stresses, freezing and cold stress can affect plant metabolism, causing the generation of several kinds of active oxygen molecules. In response to oxidative stress, plants develop antioxidant defense systems via enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidant reactions to maintain normal metabolisms and functions in the cell, thus protecting themselves against oxidative stress [37,68,69,70,71].
CAT and APX are two significant antioxidant enzymes. Among the tested trees in this study, only three (14, 24, and 27) showed a strong decrease in CAT activity after immersion in LN. In general, an increase in antioxidant activities is normally promoted under stressful conditions to react to the stress, generating free radicals. However, according to the conditions, the response to stress can be different. The decrease in CAT activity after freezing has already been observed in frozen apple tissue [72]. This decline was attributed to damage occurring at the tetrameric enzyme structure and to the loss of the total CAT protein amount. Other findings reported that the decrease in CAT activity may be linked to the conversion of the superoxide radical to hydrogen peroxide, resulting in excessive oxidative stress [73]. Indeed, Jia et al. [74] and Jiang et al. [75] reported that the application of CAT to the LN-stored pollen could significantly improve the viability of pollen after cryopreservation.
However, it is important to note that a considerable APX activity was present in the above-mentioned trees; it may indicate a positive response to freezing stress.
The CAT activity declined in the most cryopreserved trees, while N°6, 8, 9, and 11 showed higher levels of both antioxidant enzyme activity (CAT and APX), and they could be considered more tolerant to the freezing condition. Despite the freezing stress, the cryopreserved pollen in the current study responded well in terms of viability and germinability, proving to be an adequate propagule for the cryopreservation of A. nebrodensis.
The importance of pollen cryopreservation for the long-term conservation of genetic resources has been highlighted in many plant species, including ornamental, fruit, and forest [76,77,78,79]. Pollen grains are suitable genetic materials for preservation for their small size and desiccation tolerance, and their conservation is beneficial in breeding programs overcoming seasonal and geographical restrictions [25]. Pollen from Prunus persica [80] and Carya illinoensis [81] was preserved in LN for 10 years and for 5 years in Vitis vinifera [82]. Zhang et al. [83] successfully cryopreserved pollen grains from 51 cultivars of Prunus mume for the establishment of the cryobank.
In A. nebrodensis, pollen preservation is fundamental to carrying out controlled cross-breeding among trees of this species to counteract the high level of inbreeding due to fragmentation and cross-contamination with other fir species present near its natural area, such as A. alba and A. cephalonica.
Pollen from conifer trees for germplasm conservation has been successfully preserved in LN. Dehydrated pollen of Picea pungens and Pinus ponderosa showed germination rates of 84% after 6 months of cryopreservation [59,62]; while for Pseudotsuga menziesii, the pollen cryopreserved for 1 year showed a germination rate of 81%, exhibiting a fertility nearly as high as that of fresh pollen when applied for controlled pollinations [84]. These data were in accordance with our findings on A. nebrodensis, where the maximum pollen germinability was recorded at 99% after cryopreservation. Lanteri et al. [63] reported good results in terms of pollen germinability after preservation at −196 °C for Picea abies (78.2%) and Pinus nigra (65.8%), without significant differences between cryopreserved and fresh pollen. In the same study, all the assessed conifer species responded well to the cryopreservation process, and it was notable that in Picea abies, P. sylvestris, and P. uncinata, the pollen germinability rate increased in the first month of LN storage.
In tropical forest trees, pollen cryopreservation was also reported for teak and sandalwood [85,86]. In the former species (Tectona grandis), after 2 days of cryopreservation, the pollen showed a very slight decrease in germination (52.18%) compared to the fresh pollen (58.25%), while in Santalum album L, where dried anthers with pollen were preserved in LN, no reduction was observed in the germination of cryopreserved pollen (84.20%) compared to fresh dehydrated pollen (84.50%).
The pollen viability and germinability evaluation is an essential step in verifying the success of its storage conditions. In several cryopreserved A. nebrodensis trees, the viability and germinability increased with respect to the control. This event was reported for other species such as Prunus nume [83], pineapple [78], Solanum spp. [65], pecan [87], mango, and litchi pollen [88]. This increase can be attributed to the very low temperature or/and the dehydration that, in combination or individually, contributed to the breakdown of the grain dormancy with an improvement in the percentage of vitality and germination [78,83]. Moreover, the viability and germinability of pollen before and after LN can be dependent on other factors such as initial grain water content and reserve compounds, external temperature, relative humidity, and gamete maturity. Indeed, Anushma et al. [65] reported that the variable response to cryopreservation observed in wild species of Solanum pollen could be due to inherent genetic variations and differences in the level of maturity. In Serbian spruce (Picea omorika), Batos and Miljkovic [89] indicated that climate conditions preceding pollen maturation influenced the pollen quality and vitality after conservation at −20 °C for 14 years. Pollen production and its subsequent performance depend on various factors, with wide variability between and within species. In particular, environmental conditions can influence pollen physiological processes such as carbohydrate storage reserves [90]. Indeed, carbohydrates, water content, and pollen viability and longevity are closely related [91,92]. In A. nebrodensis, the different conditions in the location of the plants (soil, wind exposure, altitudes) could influence the germination of pollen storage, even if our findings demonstrated a clear effect of the genotype.

3.2.2. Zygotic Embryos

Viability and In Vitro Germination of ZEs

The applicability of a simplified cryopreservation protocol, with or without PVS2, for the long-term storage of ZEs was investigated for A. nebrodensis, and viability and germination tests were applied. Prior to cryopreservation, the MC of the non-dehydrated ZEs (Figure 10a) was 58% and decreased under the sterile laminar airflow to achieve 25–27% after 2 h [39].
The results of the viability test (Figure 10b,c) revealed that the treatment and the interaction between treatment and tree were not statistically significant (Table 3). However, the differences in tree averages were found to be statistically significant. Notably, after cryopreservation, trees N°8, 10, 13, and 27 exhibited 100% viability in the group of + PVS2 treatment. The presence of PVS2 has a protective role on plant tissues [13,27,40]. Moreover, it was interesting that only ZEs from tree N°10 maintained 100% viability after LN application, both with PVS2 and without PVS2, compared with the control. In the group −PVS2+LN treatment, viability rates of 100% were observed only in the ZEs of trees N° 6 and 10. Considering either the groups (+PVS2+LN or −PVS2+LN) the viability fluctuated between 66% and 100%.
Table 3 demonstrated that in the control group, the percentage of viability (75.69%) was lower than those observed in both the −PVS2+LN (81.94%) and +PVS2+LN (92.01%) treatments.
The investigation further demonstrated that the viability rates were influenced by the tree effect, as statistical analysis showed a significant variation among A. nebrodensis trees. These findings underscore the critical role of genetic factors in determining the susceptibility of ZEs to the cryopreservation process.
The in vitro germination test, conducted on ZEs (Figure 10d,e), revealed that the tree, treatment, and tree-treatment interaction were all statistically significant (Table 4). Germination rates exhibited variation among trees across the control group, as well as after LN applications, both with and without the submerge in PVS2. In particular, tree N°10 achieved a 100% germination rate across all three treatment conditions (control, −PVS2+LN, and +PVS2+LN). Generally, a significant reduction in germination rates for ZEs of all other trees was observed post-cryopreservation. In tree N°6, the control recorded a higher germination rate (88.89%), while, following LN treatment, the germination decreased to 16.66% without PVS2 or to 0% with PVS2. Also, the germination of trees N° 12 and 27 was null following the LN application with PVS2. These results highlight that the ZEs of the control group exhibited superior in vitro germination rates compared to the ZEs cryopreserved.
Additionally, the tree was shown to play a significant role in in vitro germination (Table 4). Tree N°10 showed the highest germination response, while in the other trees, it ranged from 14.81 to 50.37%. This underscores the significance of trees effects on the success of in vitro germination in pre- and post-cryopreservation.
A correlation analysis was conducted to explore the relationship between viability and germination in ZEs (Figure 11). The analysis revealed a non-significant correlation between viability and germination across all treatments. This finding suggests an absence of a relation between the germination and viability of ZEs, both before and after cryopreservation treatments, indicating that the processes influencing viability may not directly correspond to those affecting the germination of ZEs in the context of cryopreservation.
In conifers, Ayala et al. [39] investigated the cryopreservation of mature ZEs from the interspecific hybrid Pinus elliottii var. elliottii x Pinus caribaea var. hondurensis, achieving a 100% survival rate after 120 min of desiccation, leading to a moisture content of 23.7%. This precise desiccation treatment facilitated a high regeneration rate, with 86.7% of the surviving explants producing an average of 16.1 adventitious buds. This success, achieved with a simple desiccation step followed by direct immersion in LN, provides valuable insights into effective cryopreservation strategies. This finding is in accordance with our results, where ZEs were only desiccated and not immersed in PVS2 (−PVS2) before cryopreservation. In Castanea sativa, Corredoira et al. [93] reported a high survival rate of 93–100% in the embryonic axes after desiccation in a laminar flow cabinet to 20–24% MC. Following the LN storage, about 63% of these axes developed into whole plants. For the cryopreservation of embryonic axes of several Quercus spp. by the drying method, a recovery range of 10–80% was reported, while the treatment with 15% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) solution or the application of the encapsulation-dehydration method resulted in a recovery of 40% and 12%, respectively [94]. In another study on Citrus x aurantiifolia, excised embryonic axes showed survival rates of 60% to 67% when undergoing dehydration and LN, significantly higher than the 10% to 13% survival following cryopreservation-vitrification with PVS2 [95]. Our investigation revealed a wide range of germination rates (0 to 100%) in post-cryopreservation, with a significant treatment-x-tree interaction, regardless of the presence of PVS2. The significant variability among trees observed in A. nebrodensis for some trees, demonstrating exceptionally high viability and germination rates, reflected the importance of genetic factors (the genotype effect) in determining cryopreservation success. Thus, the current cryopreservation protocol may offer a better protective effect for ZEs in some trees. Likewise, in ZEs of oil palm, a high success rate of cryopreservation was obtained, achieving up to 96.67% viability and 90.88% germination through an easy air-drying procedure without chemical pretreatment [96]. Pinto et al. [97] demonstrated that dehydration to 23% of MC achieved after 60 min, followed by osmotic solution rehydration, was optimal for cryopreservation of Coffea arabica ZEs, with a significant increase in germination rates. Moreover, the dehydration time significantly influenced both the viability and germination percentage of coffee ZEs, highlighting the delicate balance between removing sufficient moisture to prevent ice crystal formation and retaining enough to ensure cellular integrity. In this study, the optimal ZEs desiccation (25–27%) was obtained after 120 min under laminar airflow.
Therefore, dehydration of ZEs prior to their introduction into LN is a method chosen for the cryopreservation of species producing recalcitrant seeds [98]. Recently, an innovative approach was applied to cryopreserve the embryonic axes of Syzygium maire, a species challenged by recalcitrant seeds, using a metal-mesh vacuum infiltration method with PVS2, resulting in a post-cryopreservation survival of 19% following a 20-min PVS2 incubation [99]. The difference in recovery rates among different studies highlights the species-specific and technique-specific challenges and successes inherent to cryopreservation efforts.

3.2.3. Embryogenic Callus

The capability to induce EC from mature embryos of A. nebrodensis was demonstrated by Jouini et al. [2], and it could be a crucial step towards ex situ conservation and large-scale propagation of this endangered fir, although it was not possible to induce EC from all the fertile trees. Indeed, the ECs were obtained from a few trees, namely N°7, 8, 10, 21, and 22, due to the variation in the response of mature ZEs to the induction medium, and even when ECs were produced, their growth was very slow.
Immature or mature embryos were widely employed to establish embryogenic cultures from coniferous species [100]. To reduce costs and time spent on periodical subculture and to minimize the occurrence of somaclonal variation, somatic embryogenesis combined with cryopreservation is needed to maintain the juvenility and regenerability of lines [101]. In this study, the possibility of cryopreserving EC obtained from ZEs was investigated by applying a procedure of encapsulation-dehydration of callus samples (Figure 12).
Before freezing in LN, encapsulated EC beads were gradually dehydrated over silica gel. The initial MC of non-dehydrated beads was 91%, and after 5 h of desiccation, it decreased to 23% (Figure 13). This percentage was suitable for the cryopreservation of EC beads from tree N°10. Generally, the most preferred MC for encapsulated explants, either dehydrated under a laminar airflow cabinet or over silica gel, is around 20% on a fresh weight basis [27]. The optimal MC of alginate beads, prior to direct immersion in LN, is largely dependent on the plant species, e.g., 39.50% for Phoenix dactylifera [102], 35% for Quercus suber [103] and 22% for Thymus moroderi [104]. For A. nebrodensis, acceptable survival was observed for EC alginate beads with a MC of 23%. The first evidence of regrowth was visible after 4 weeks on SH medium, with 35% of EC beads developing after 8 weeks. Then, following the same procedure of encapsulation-dehydration, ECs obtained from the other lines were cryopreserved, reaching a regrowth rate of 35% in tree N°7, 30% in N°8, 32% in N°21, and 40% in N°22 by the end of 8 weeks. The recovery period, including the latency phase, is affected by the A. nebrodensis tree effect [105]. In our protocol, with the application of the encapsulation-dehydration technique, no cryoprotectant was used [100] to minimize the water content of calli beads, thus avoiding the toxic effect of cryoprotectants such as PVS2 [106] and lessening the risk of tissue damage.
The regeneration percentage in different conifer species determined the success of cryopreservation protocols. In the case of A. nebrodensis, with the encapsulation-vitrification method, 80% of recovery was achieved from non-cryopreserved EC beads, while no proliferation was obtained from those immersed in LN [2]. Our results exhibited for the first time the possibility to reach 30–40% of regrowth following the encapsulation-dehydration method after the freezing in LN, although the results depend strictly on the A. nebrodensis tree. Application of the slow-freezing cryopreservation protocol in hybrid firs Abies alba × A. cephalonica and Abies alba × A. numidica led to 37.5%–100% regrowth of cryopreserved embryogenic tissues [33]. Similarly, applying the same method to embryogenic lines from A. alba enabled regeneration ranging from 91.66 to 100% [107]. Slow-freezing is an effective method for the cryopreservation of EC, but it is not simple and requires specific programmable apparatus for slow-cooling before the sample immersion into LN. A proper protocol with an 80% survival by vitrification method was optimized to cryopreserve embryogenic cell lines of Larix kaempefri × Larix gmelinii, involving pre-culturing of embryogenic tissue on a medium containing an osmotic agent, followed by cryoprotectant treatment [108].
Survival rates of 84.4% and 86.7% were reached by the stepwise dehydration method (sucrose steps from 0.25 to 1.0 M for 7 days, followed by desiccation over silica gel) of embryogenic tissues from A. alba × A. numidica and P. nigra, respectively, 28 and 35 days after recovery from LN [109]. In another study with the vitrification method, Latutrie and Aronen [110] observed 80–93% recovery for P. sylvestris embryogenic lines.
Regrowth with our encapsulation-dehydration protocol was reliable but lower than for other conifer species, regardless of cryopreservation technique. The preliminary results obtained from the current study demonstrate that the encapsulation-dehydration method can be successfully used for the cryopreservation of A. nebrodensis ECs. Further investigation is needed to improve the regrowth percentage after immersion in LN of EC of Sicilian fir, such as pre-culture of encapsulated ECs in medium supplemented with osmotic agents for a specific time or modification of the regrowth medium to optimize the recovery percentage. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report on the application of this technique for A. nebrodensis, offering an alternative method for the efficient and long-term storage of its germplasm in LN.

4. Conclusions

This study, developed in the framework of the LIFE4FIR Project, financed by the European Union, represents a qualifying example of actions aimed at safeguarding the Sicilian fir, which is listed by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) as an endangered species due to serious genetic erosion. For this reason, the plan of protection of the 30 relict trees involved a series of actions combining two strategies: in situ, by monitoring their health status and protecting their survival in the natural habitat, and ex situ, through the conservation of the seeds and the cryopreservation of organs and tissues taken from the relict trees. A. nebrodensis is a conifer characterized by the presence of a low percentage of full seeds with an unknown life span in terms of years, even in the sporadic years of abundant seed production. Therefore, in addition to the establishment of a ‘Seed Bank’, the project, through a cryopreservation approach, has obtained effective conservation of pollen, zygotic embryos, and lines of embryogenic callus in liquid nitrogen. In this study, the cryopreservation protocols for several explants of A. nebrodensis were optimized and validated, reaching a satisfactory recovery percentage of pollen, ZEs, and EC after LN. Therefore, the obtained results enabled the secure preservation of the germplasm of the remaining population and the establishment of a cryobank inside the ‘MAN/Museum of the A. nebrodensis’ located near the ‘Madonie Regional Park’ in the Municipality of Polizzi Generosa.
To our knowledge, the Sicilian fir ‘Cryobank’ is currently a unique example for the application of cryopreservation technique to a conifer at immediate risk of extinction, can pave the way for similar strategies with other conifers subjected to advanced genetic erosion, and also serves as a critical model to preserve biodiversity in facing the challenges of environmental changes.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, W.T., M.L. and C.B.; methodology, W.T., T.İ., C.F., M.C.S., N.J., M.A. and C.B.; data curation, M.A., T.İ. and W.T.; writing—original draft preparation, W.T., T.İ., C.F. and C.B.; writing—review and editing, W.T., T.İ., M.A.G. and C.B.; supervision, C.B., R.D. and M.L.; funding acquisition, R.D. and M.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the European Union by the LIFE4FIR project, grant number LIFE18 NAT/IT/000164.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

The authors want to thank Gaetano La Placa and Giuseppe Di Noto for the collection of plant material used in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Frascella, A.; Della Rocca, G.; Barberini, S.; Emiliani, G.; Secci, S.; Lambardi, M.; Benelli, C.; Tarraf, W.; Izgu, T.; Schicchi, R.; et al. Innovative in situ and ex situ conservation strategies of the madonie fir Abies nebrodensis. Sustainability 2022, 14, 12643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Jouini, N.; Yahyaoui, E.; Tarraf, W.; İzgü, T.; Benelli, C.; Lambardi, M.; Germanà, M.A. Somatic embryogenesis in Abies nebrodensis, an endangered Sicilian fir. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2023, 152, 393–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Tarraf, W.; Izgu, T.; Jouini, N. Strategies for the conservation by biotechnological approaches of Abies nebrodensis, a relict conifer of Sicily. Acta Hortic. 2023, 1359, 215–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Scialabba, A. Seed germination in Abies nebrodensis (Pinaceae). In Mediterranean Plant Germination Reports; Magrini, S., Salmeri, C., Eds.; Fl. Medit: Palermo, Italy, 2019; Volume 29, pp. 272–276. [Google Scholar]
  5. Benelli, C. Plant Cryopreservation: Look at the present and the future. Plants 2021, 10, 2744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Nagel, M.; Pence, V.; Ballesteros, D.; Lambardi, M.; Popova, E.; Panis, B. Plant cryopreservation: Principles, applications, and challenges of banking plant diversity at ultralow temperatures. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2024, 75, 7.1–7.28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Engelmann, F. Plant cryopreservation: Progress and prospects. Vitr. Cell. Dev. Biol.—Plant 2004, 40, 427–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Engelmann, F. Importance of cryopreservation for the conservation of plant genetic resources. In Cryopreservation of Tropical Plant Germplasm. Current Research Progress and Application; Engelmann, F., Takagi, H., Eds.; Japan International Research Center for Agricultura: Tsukuba, Japan; International Plant Genetic Resources Institute: Rome, Italy, 2000; pp. 8–20. [Google Scholar]
  9. Gonzalez Benito, M.E.; Clavero-Ramirez, I.; López-Aranda, J.M. The use of cryopreservation for germplasm conservation of vegetatively propagated crops. Span. J. Agric. Res. 2004, 2, 341–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Benelli, C.; De Carlo, A.; Engelmann, F. Recent advances in the cryopreservation of shoot-derived germplasm of economically important fruit trees of Actinidia, Diospyros, Malus, Olea, Prunus, Pyrus and Vitis. Biotechnol. Adv. 2013, 31, 175–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Wang, M.R.; Lambardi, M.; Engelmann, F.; Pathirana, R.; Panis, B.; Volk, G.M.; Wang, Q.C. Advances in cryopreservation of in vitro-derived propagules: Technologies and explant sources. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2021, 144, 7–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Benson, E.E. Cryopreservation theory. In Plant Cryopreservation: A Practical Guide; Reed, B.M., Ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2008; pp. 15–32. [Google Scholar]
  13. Reed, B.M. Plant Cryopreservation: A Practical Guide; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  14. Kulus, D.; Zalewska, M. Cryopreservation as a tool used in long-term storage of ornamental species—A review. Sci. Hortic. 2014, 168, 88–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Li, H.H.; Lu, J.L.; Lo, H.E.; Tsai, S.; Lin, C. Effect of cryopreservation on proteins from the ubiquitous marine dinoflagellate Breviolum sp. (family symbiodiniaceae). Plants 2021, 10, 1731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Ruta, C.; Lambardi, M.; Ozudogru, E.A. Biobanking of vegetable genetic resources by in vitro conservation and cryopreservation. Biodivers. Conserv. 2020, 29, 3495–3532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Höfer, M.; Hanke, M.V. Cryopreservation of fruit germplasm. Vitr. Cell. Dev. Biol.—Plant 2017, 53, 372–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Keller, E.R.J.; Senula, A.; Grübe, M.; Diekmann, K.; Dehmer, K.J. Fifteen years of cryopreservation in the IPK genebank—Experience, conclusions and outlook. Acta Hortic. 2014, 1039, 249–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Jenderek, M.M.; Reed, B.M. Cryopreserved storage of clonal germplasm in the USDA National Plant Germplasm System. Vitr. Cell. Dev. Biol.—Plant 2017, 53, 299–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Panis, B.; Nagel, M.; Van den Houwe, I. Challenges and Prospects for the Conservation of Crop Genetic Resources in Field Genebanks, in In Vitro Collections and/or in Liquid Nitrogen. Plants 2020, 9, 1634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Pence, V.C. In vitro methods and cryopreservation: Tools for endangered exceptional species preservation and restoration. Acta Hortic. 2014, 1039, 73–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Pence, V.C. Tissue cryopreservation for plant conservation: Potential and challenges. Int. J. Plant Sci. 2014, 175, 40–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kaviani, B.; Kulus, D. Cryopreservation of endangered ornamental plants and fruit crops from tropical and subtropical regions. Biology 2022, 11, 847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Rathwell, R.; Popova, E.; Shukla, M.R.; Saxena, P.K. Development of cryopreservation methods for cherry birch (Betula lenta L.), an endangered tree species in Canada. Can. J. For. Res. 2016, 46, 1284–1292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Volk, G.M. Collecting pollen for genetic resources conservation. In Collecting Plant Genetic Diversity: Technical Guidelines—2011 Update; Guarino, L., Rao, V.R., Reid, R., Eds.; CAB International: Wallingford, UK, 2011; pp. 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  26. Lelu-Walter, M.A.; Thompson, D.; Harvengt, L.; Sanchez, L.; Toribio, M.; Pâques, L.E. Somatic embryogenesis in forestry with a focus on Europe: State-of-the-art, benefits, challenges and future direction. Tree Genet. Genomes 2013, 9, 883–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Engelmann, F. Cryopreservation of Embryos: An Overview. In Plant Embryo Culture. Methods in Molecular Biology; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2011; Volume 710, pp. 155–184. [Google Scholar]
  28. Aronen, T.S.; Krajnakova, J.; Häggman, H.M.; Ryynänen, L.A. Genetic fidelity of cryopreserved embryogenic cultures of open-pollinated Abies cephalonica. Plant Sci. 1999, 142, 163–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Krajňáková, J.; Sutela, S.; Aronen, T.; Gömöry, D.; Vianello, A.; Häggman, H. Long-term cryopreservation of Greek fir embryogenic cell lines: Recovery, maturation and genetic fidelity. Cryobiology 2011, 63, 17–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Nörgaard, J.V.; Baldursson, S.; Krogstrup, P. Genotypic differences in the ability of embryogenic Abies nordmanniana cultures to survive cryopreservation. Silvae Genet. 1993, 42, 93–97. [Google Scholar]
  31. Misson, J.P.; Druart, P.; Panis, B.; Watillon, B. Contribution to the study of the maintenance of somatic embryos of Abies nordmanniana LK: Culture media and cryopreservation method. Propag. Ornam. Plants 2006, 6, 17–23. [Google Scholar]
  32. Krajňáková, J.; Bertolini, A.; Gömöry, D.; Vianello, A.; Häggman, H. Initiation, long-term cryopreservation, and recovery of Abies alba Mill. embryogenic cell lines. Vitr. Cell. Dev. Biol.—Plant 2013, 49, 560–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Salaj, T.; Matusikova, I.; Panis, B.; Swennen, R.; Salaj, J. Recovery and characterisation of hybrid firs (Abies alba x A. cephalonica, Abies alba x A. numidica) embryogenic tissues after cryopreservation. CryoLetters 2010, 31, 206–217. [Google Scholar]
  34. Buchner, L.; Eisen, A.K.; Šikoparija, B.; Jochner-Oette, S. Pollen viability of Fraxinus excelsior in storage experiments and investigations on the potential effect of long-range transport. Forests 2022, 13, 600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Pinney, K.; Polito, V.S. Olive pollen storage and in vitro germination. Acta Hortic. 1990, 286, 207–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ferri, A.; Giordani, E.; Padula, G.; Bellini, E. Viability and in vitro germinability of pollen grains of olive cultivars and advanced selections obtained in Italy. Adv. Hort. Sci. 2008, 22, 116–122. [Google Scholar]
  37. Ren, R.; Li, Z.; Zhang, L.; Zhou, H.; Jiang, X.; Liu, Y. Enzymatic and nonenzymatic antioxidant systems impact the viability of cryopreserved Paeonia suffruticosa pollen. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2021, 144, 233–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Murashige, T.; Skoog, F. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant 1962, 15, 473–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ayala, L.P.E.; Luna, C.V.; Brugnoli, E.A.; Espasandin, F.D.; Duarte, M.J.; González, A.M.; Gauchat, M.E.; Moncaleán Guillén, P.; Sansberro, P.A. Cryopreservation of mature zygotic embryos, shoot bud regeneration, and field establishment of Pinus elliottii var. elliottii x Pinus caribaea var. hondurensis in vitro-derived plants. Trees—Struct. Funct. 2023, 37, 417–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Sakai, A.; Kobayashi, S.; Oiyama, I. Cryopreservation of nucellar cells of navel orange (Citrus sinensis Osb. var. brasiliensis Tanaka) by vitrification. Plant Cell Rep. 1990, 9, 30–33. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  41. Schenk, R.O.Y.U.; Hildebrandt, A.C. Medium and techniques for induction and growth of monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous plant cell cultures. Can. J. Bot. 1972, 50, 199–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Standardi, A.; Micheli, M. Protocols for Micropropagation of Selected Economically-Important Horticultural Plants. In Protocols for Micropropagation of Selected Economically-Important Horticultural Plants. Methods in Molecular Biology; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2012; Volume 994, pp. 397–418. [Google Scholar]
  43. Owens, J.N.; Blake, M.D. Forest tree Seed Production. In A Review of the Literature and Recommendations for Future Research; Petawawa National Forestry Institute: Chalk River, ON, Canada, 1985; Volume PI-X-53. [Google Scholar]
  44. Skrzyszewska, K.; Chłanda, J. A study on the variation of morphological characteristics of silver fir (Abies alba Mill.) seeds and their internal structure determined by X-ray radiography in the beskid sâdecki and beskid niski mountain ranges of the Carpathians (southern Poland). J. For. Sci. 2009, 55, 403–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Fedorkov, A. Climatic adaptation of seed maturity in scots pine and Norway spruce populations. Silva Fenn. 2001, 35, 119–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Gagliardi, B.; Marcos-Filho, J. Germination and seed structure assessed by the X-ray test Relationship between germination and bell pepper seed structure assessed by the X-ray test. Sci. Agric. 2011, 68, 411–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Dell’Aquila, A. Development of novel techniques in conditioning, testing and sorting seed physiological quality. Seed Sci. Technol. 2009, 37, 608–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Chavagnat, A.; Bastien, J.C. Determination of the quality of Cupressus sempervirens and Cupressus arizonica seeds by X-ray radiography. Seed Sci. Technol. 1991, 19, 139–146. [Google Scholar]
  49. Bye, H.R.; Edvardsen, Ø.M. The use of X-ray for prediction of seed viability in cones” The Norwegian Forest Seed Station. In Proceedings of the ISTA Congress, Budapest, Hungary, 17–19 May 2004. [Google Scholar]
  50. Nygren, M.; Himanen, K.; Ruhanen, H. Viability and germination of Scots pine seeds after freezing of harvested cones in vitro. Can. J. For. Res. 2016, 46, 1035–1041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Tuomainen, T.V.; Himanen, K.; Helenius, P.; Kettunen, M.I.; Nissi, M.J. Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of scots pine seeds and the assessment of germination potential. Can. J. For. Res. 2022, 52, 685–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Arkhipov, M.V.; Priyatkin, N.S.; Gusakova, L.P.; Karamysheva, A.V.; Trofimuk, L.P.; Potrakhov, N.N.; Bessonov, V.B.; Shchukina, P.A. Microfocus X-ray method for detecting hidden defects in seeds of woody forest species and other types of vascular plants. Tech. Phys. 2020, 65, 324–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Bagnell, J.R.; Robert, C. Species distinction among pollen grains of Abies, Picea, and Pinus in the Rocky Mountain area (a scanning electron microscope study). Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol. 1975, 19, 203–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Saito, T.; Tsuchida, K. Pollen morphology of the genus. Jpn. J. Palynol. 1992, 38, 158–171. [Google Scholar]
  55. Wrońska-Pilarek, D.; Dering, M.; Bocianowski, J.; Lechowicz, K.; Kowalkowski, W.; Barzdajn, W.; Hauke-Kowalska, M. Pollen morphology and variability of Abies alba Mill. genotypes from South-Western Poland. Forests 2020, 11, 1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Sidhu, R.K. Pollen storage in vegetable crops: A review. J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem. 2019, 8, 599–603. [Google Scholar]
  57. Rajasekhraran, P.E. ICAR Short Course on In Vitro Conservation and Cryopreservation-New Options to Conserve Horticultural Genetic Resources; Indian Institute of Horticultural Research: Hessaraghatta Lake PO Bangalore, India, 2006; pp. 1–199. [Google Scholar]
  58. Wang, L.; Wu, J.; Chen, J.; Fu, D.; Zhang, C.; Cai, C.; Ou, L. A simple pollen collection, dehydration, and long-term storage method for litchi (Litchi chinensis Sonn.). Sci. Hortic. 2015, 188, 78–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Dinato, N.B.; Imaculada Santos, I.R.; Zanotto Vigna, B.B.; de Paula, A.F.; Fávero, A.P. Pollen cryopreservation for plant breeding and genetic resources conservation. CryoLetters 2020, 41, 115–127. [Google Scholar]
  60. Araújode Oliveira, A.C.; da Silva Lédo, A.; Polek, M.; Krueger, R.; Shepherd, A.; Volk, G.M. Optimization of in vitro germination and cryopreservation conditions for preserving date palm pollen in the USDA National Plant Germplasm System. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2021, 144, 223–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Sprague, J.R.; Johnson, V.W. Extraction and storage of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) pollen [Germination]. In Proceedings of the Proceedings-Southern Conference on Forest Tree Improvement (USA), Gainesville, FL, USA, 14–16 June 1977. [Google Scholar]
  62. Connor, K.F.; Towill, L.E. Pollen-handling protocol and hydration/dehydration characteristics of pollen for application to long-term storage. Euphytica 1993, 68, 77–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Lanteri, S.; Belletti, P.; Lotito, S. Storage of pollen of Norway spruce and different pine species. Silvae Genet. 1992, 42, 104–109. [Google Scholar]
  64. Weatherhead, M.A.; Grout, B.W.W.; Henshaw, G.G. Advantages of storage of potato pollen in liquid nitrogen. Potato Res. 1978, 21, 331–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Anushma, P.L.; Rajasekharan, P.E.; Singh, T.H. Pollen cryobanking in wild solanums for conservation and utilization of nuclear genetic diversity. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 2023, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Ferri, A.; Giordani, E.; Benelli, C. Viability and in vitro germination rate of pollen grains of D. kaki Thunb., D. lotus L. and D. virginiana L. in relation to storage time and temperatures. Acta Hortic. 2013, 996, 97–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Benelli, C.; Giordani, E.; Bonetti, D.; Nin, S. Effect of storage temperature on pollen viability and in vitro germinability of fruit. Acta Italus Hortus 2024, 40, 114–118. [Google Scholar]
  68. Gill, S.S.; Tuteja, N. Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2010, 48, 909–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Valizadeh-Kamran, R.; Toorchi, M.; Mogadam, M.; Mohammadi, H.; Pessarakli, M. Effects of freeze and cold stress on certain physiological and biochemical traits in sensitive and tolerant barley (Hordeum vulgare) genotypes. J. Plant Nutr. 2018, 41, 102–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Balestrasse, K.B.; Tomaro, M.L.; Batlle, A.; Noriega, G.O. The role of 5-aminolevulinic acid in the response to cold stress in soybean plants. Phytochemistry 2010, 71, 2038–2045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Taiz, L.; Zeiger, E.; Moller, I.M.; Murphy, A. Plant Physiology and Development, 6th ed.; Sinauer Associates, Inc.: Sunderland, MA, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  72. Gong, Y.; Toivonen, P.M.A.; Wiersma, P.A.; Lu, C.; Lau, O.L. Effect of freezing on the activity of catalase in apple flesh tissue. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2000, 48, 5537–5542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Poobathy, R.; Sinniah, U.R.; Xavier, R.; Subramaniam, S. Catalase and superoxide dismutase activities and the total protein content of protocorm-like bodies of Dendrobium Sonia-28 subjected to Vitrification. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2013, 170, 1066–1079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Jia, M.X.; Jiang, X.R.; Xu, J.; Di, W.; Shi, Y.; Liu, Y. CAT and MDH improve the germination and alleviate the oxidative stress of cryopreserved Paeonia and Magnolia pollen. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2018, 40, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Jiang, M.X.; Li, Z.D.; Ren, R.F.; Xu, J.; Li, B.L.; Liu, Y.; Jiang, X.R.; Di, W. MDH and CAT increase the germination of cryopreserved Paeonia pollen by regulating the ROS and apoptosis-like events. Acta Hortic. 2019, 1234, 105–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Xu, J.; Li, B.; Liu, Q.; Shi, Y.; Peng, J.; Jia, M.; Liu, Y. Wide-scale pollen banking of ornamental plants through cryopreservation. CryoLetters 2014, 35, 312–319. [Google Scholar]
  77. Borghezan, M.; Clauman, A.D.; Steinmacher, D.A.; Guerra, M.P.; Orth, A.I. In vitro viability and preservation of pollen grain of kiwi (Actinidia chinensis var. deliciosa (A. Chev.) A. Chev). Crop Breed. Appl. Biotechnol. 2011, 11, 338–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. da Silva, R.L.; de Souza, E.H.; de Jesus Vieira, L.; Pelacani, C.R.; Souza, F.V.D. Cryopreservation of pollen of wild pineapple accessions. Sci. Hortic. 2017, 219, 326–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Rajasekharan, P.E.; Rohini, M.R. Pollen cryopreservation: Advances and prospects. In Pollen Cryopreservation Protocols; Springer Protocols Handbooks; Rajasekharan, P.E., Rohini, M.R., Eds.; Humana Press: New York, NY, USA, 2023; pp. 1–18. [Google Scholar]
  80. Omura, M.; Akiham, T.A. Pollen preservation of fruit trees for gene banks in Japan. Plant Genet. Res. Newsl. 1980, 43, 28–31. [Google Scholar]
  81. Shang, X. Studies on Cryopreservation of Peony Pollen. Master’s Thesis, Beijing Forestry University Library, Beijing, China, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  82. Ganeshan, S.; Alexander, M. Fertilizing ability of cryopreserved grape, Vitis vinifera L. pollen. Vitis 1990, 29, 145–150. [Google Scholar]
  83. Zhang, Y.-L.; Chen, R.-D.; Huang, C.-J.; Liu, Y. Cryo-banking of Prunus mume pollen and its application in cross-breeding. Cryo Letters 2009, 30, 165–170. [Google Scholar]
  84. Copes, D.L. Fertility of Douglas-fir Pollen After One Year of Storage in Liquid Nitrogen. For. Sci. 1985, 31, 569–574. [Google Scholar]
  85. Anilkumar, G.S.; Rajasekharan, P.E. Cryopreservation of Sandalwood (Santalum album L.) Pollen. In Pollen Cryopreservation Protocols; Springer Protocols Handbooks; Rajasekharan, P., Rohini, M., Eds.; Humana Press: New York, NY, USA, 2023; pp. 601–607. [Google Scholar]
  86. Anilkumar, G.S.; Rajasekharan, P.E. Cryopreservation of Pollen for Long-Term Storage in Teak (Tectona grandis). In Pollen Cryopreservation Protocols; Springer Protocols Handbooks; Rajasekharan, P., Rohini, M., Eds.; Humana Press: New York, NY, USA, 2023; pp. 609–616. [Google Scholar]
  87. Sparks, D.; Yates, I.E. Pecan pollen stored over a decade retains viability. HortScience 2002, 37, 176–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Chaudhury, R.; Malik, S.K.; Rajan, S. An improved pollen collection and cryopreservation method for highly recalcitrant tropical fruit species of mango (Mangifera indica L.) and litchi (Litchi chinensis Sonn.). Cryo Letters 2010, 31, 268–278. [Google Scholar]
  89. Batos, B.; Miljković, D. The vitality of the Serbian spruce (Picea omorika) pollen during the long-term cryopreservation. Grana 2019, 58, 433–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Franchi, G.G.; Bellani, L.; Nepi, M.; Pacini, E. Types of carbohydrate reserves in pollen: Localization, systematic distribution and ecophysiological significance. Flora 1996, 191, 143–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Nepi, M.; Franchi, G.G.; Pacini, E. Pollen hydration status at dispersal: Cytophysiological features and strategies. Protoplasma 2001, 216, 171–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Pacini, E.; Guarnieri, M.; Nepi, M. Pollen carbohydrates and water content during development, presentation, and dispersal: A short review. Protoplasma 2006, 228, 73–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Corredoira, E.; San-José, M.C.; Ballester, A.; Vieitez, A.M. Cryopreservation of zygotic embryonic axes and somatic embryos of european chestnut. CryoLetters 2004, 25, 33–42. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  94. Gonzalez-Benito, M.E.; Martín, C., III. 9 Cryopreservation of Quercus (Oak) Species. In Cryopreservation of Plant Germplasm II; Towill, L.E., Bajaj, Y.P.S., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2013; pp. 312–322. [Google Scholar]
  95. Camellia, N.A.; Muhaimin, A.K.; Shukri, M.A. Desiccation and cryopreservation of key lime (Citrus × aurantiifolia) seed and zygotic embryonic axes. Res. Crop. 2020, 21, 268–275. [Google Scholar]
  96. Wei, Q.; Shi, P.; Khan, F.S.; Htwe, Y.M.; Zhang, D.; Li, Z.; Wei, X.; Yu, Q.; Zhou, K.; Wang, Y. Cryopreservation and cryotolerance mechanism in zygotic embryo and embryogenic callus of oil palm. Forests 2023, 14, 966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. de Pinto, M.S.; Paiva, R.; da Silva, D.P.C.; Santos, P.A.A.; de Freitas, R.T.; Silva, L.C. Cryopreservation of coffee zygotic embryos: Dehydration and osmotic rehydration. Cienc. Agrotecnologia 2016, 40, 380–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Berjak, P.; Walker, M.; Mycock, D.J.; Wesley-Smith, J.; Watt, P.; Pammenter, N.W. Cryopreservation of recalcitrant zygotic embryos. In Cryopreservation of Tropical Plant Germplasm; Engelmann, F., Takagi, H., Eds.; International Plant Genetic Resources Institute: Rome, Italy, 2000; pp. 140–155. [Google Scholar]
  99. van der Walt, K.; Nadarajan, J.; Mathew, L.; Bettoni, J.C.; Souza, J.A. Advances in cryopreservation of Syzygium maire (swamp maire, maire tawake) zygotic embryos, a critically endangered tree species endemic to New Zealand. Front. Conserv. Sci. 2023, 4, 1269881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Häggman, H.M.; Aronen, T.S.; Ryynänen, L.A. Cryopreservation of Embryogenic Cultures of Conifers. In Somatic Embryogenesis in Woody Plants; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  101. Ballesteros, D.; Martínez, M.T.; Sánchez-Romero, C.; Montalbán, I.A.; Sales, E.; Moncaleán, P.; Arrillaga, I.; Corredoira, E. Current status of the cryopreservation of embryogenic material of woody species. Front. Plant Sci. 2024, 14, 1337152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Metwali, E.M.R.; Kadasa, N.M.S.; Soliman, H.I.A.; Almaghrabi, O.A.; Fuller, M.P. Cryopreservation of embryogenic callus of date palm (Phoenix dactylifera) cv. Magdoul through encapsulation-dehydration technology. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 2020, 24, 1762. [Google Scholar]
  103. Fernandes, P.; Rodriguez, E.; Pinto, G.; Roldán-Ruiz, I.; De Loose, M.; Santos, C. Cryopreservation of Quercus suber somatic embryos by encapsulation-dehydration and evaluation of genetic stability. Tree Physiol. 2008, 28, 1841–1850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Marco-Medina, A.; Casas, J.L.; Elena González-Benito, M. Comparison of vitrification and encapsulation-dehydration for cryopreservation of Thymus moroderi shoot tips. CryoLetters 2010, 31, 301–309. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  105. Lineros, Y.; Balocchi, C.; Muñoz, X.; Sánchez, M.; Ríos, D. Cryopreservation of Pinus radiata embryogenic tissue: Effects of cryoprotective pretreatments on maturation ability. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2018, 135, 357–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Volk, G.M.; Harris, J.L.; Rotindo, K.E. Survival of mint shoot tips after exposure to cryoprotectant solution components. Cryobiology 2006, 52, 305–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Salaj, T.; Panis, B.; Klubicova, K.; Salaj, J. Cryopreservation of Abies alba embryogenic tissues by slow-freezing method. Not. Bot. Horti Agrobot. Cluj-Napoca 2022, 50, 12770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Ma, M.; Wang, X.; Zhang, C.; Pak, S.; Wu, H.; Yang, J.; Li, C. Enhancing the cryopreservation system of larch embryogenic culture by optimizing pre-culture, osmoprotectants, and rapid thawing. Forests 2023, 14, 1621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Hazubska-Przybył, T.; Wawrzyniak, M.K.; Obarska, A.; Salaj, T. Cryopreservation of Abies alba × A. numidica and Pinus nigra embryogenic tissues by stepwise dehydration method. Plant Methods 2024, 20, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Latutrie, M.; Aronen, T. Long-term cryopreservation of embryogenic Pinus sylvestris cultures. Scand. J. For. Res. 2013, 28, 103–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Abies nebrodensis tree (a); male cones (b); pollen (c).
Figure 1. Abies nebrodensis tree (a); male cones (b); pollen (c).
Plants 13 01682 g001
Figure 2. Steps of cryopreservation process for pollen and zygotic embryos (ZE) from A. nebrodensis. TTC: tryphenyl tetrazolium chloride; PVS2: Plant Vitrification Solution 2; LN: liquid nitrogen.
Figure 2. Steps of cryopreservation process for pollen and zygotic embryos (ZE) from A. nebrodensis. TTC: tryphenyl tetrazolium chloride; PVS2: Plant Vitrification Solution 2; LN: liquid nitrogen.
Plants 13 01682 g002
Figure 3. Seeds after X-ray exposure: full seed with embryo ((a); red arrow), empty seed (b) and validation of X-ray analysis: presence of embryo ((c); red arrow), and seed germination (d).
Figure 3. Seeds after X-ray exposure: full seed with embryo ((a); red arrow), empty seed (b) and validation of X-ray analysis: presence of embryo ((c); red arrow), and seed germination (d).
Plants 13 01682 g003
Figure 4. Pollen grains of Abies nebrodensis under SEM. (a) Pollen grains in the polar and equatorial views; (b) two sacci in equatorial views; (c) two sacci in polar distal view; (d) polar proximal view.
Figure 4. Pollen grains of Abies nebrodensis under SEM. (a) Pollen grains in the polar and equatorial views; (b) two sacci in equatorial views; (c) two sacci in polar distal view; (d) polar proximal view.
Plants 13 01682 g004
Figure 5. Pollen grain morphology of A. nebrodensis observed under optical microscope ((a); from Frascella et al. [1]), stereomicroscope (b).
Figure 5. Pollen grain morphology of A. nebrodensis observed under optical microscope ((a); from Frascella et al. [1]), stereomicroscope (b).
Plants 13 01682 g005
Figure 6. Moisture content of pollen in tested trees of A. nebrodensis before cryopreservation. Values with the same letters are not significantly different at the 0.05 level (Duncan’s multiple range test).
Figure 6. Moisture content of pollen in tested trees of A. nebrodensis before cryopreservation. Values with the same letters are not significantly different at the 0.05 level (Duncan’s multiple range test).
Plants 13 01682 g006
Figure 7. Cryopreserved pollen grains of Abies nebrodensis: viable pollen grains after TTC under stereomicroscope (a) and under microscope (b); non-viable pollen grains under optical microscope (c); in vitro germination of pollen grains under optical microscope (d,e) (Bars, 100 µm).
Figure 7. Cryopreserved pollen grains of Abies nebrodensis: viable pollen grains after TTC under stereomicroscope (a) and under microscope (b); non-viable pollen grains under optical microscope (c); in vitro germination of pollen grains under optical microscope (d,e) (Bars, 100 µm).
Plants 13 01682 g007
Figure 8. Heatmap for Pearson’s linear correlation coefficients between viability (VP) and germinability (GP) of pollen. −LN: control; +LN: immersion in liquid nitrogen.
Figure 8. Heatmap for Pearson’s linear correlation coefficients between viability (VP) and germinability (GP) of pollen. −LN: control; +LN: immersion in liquid nitrogen.
Plants 13 01682 g008
Figure 9. Changes of CAT and APX activity before (−LN) and after liquid nitrogen (+LN) in pollen from the tested A. nebrodensis trees. Different letters indicate significant differences between the values for each tree. The data are the means of three replicates.
Figure 9. Changes of CAT and APX activity before (−LN) and after liquid nitrogen (+LN) in pollen from the tested A. nebrodensis trees. Different letters indicate significant differences between the values for each tree. The data are the means of three replicates.
Plants 13 01682 g009
Figure 10. Untreated zygotic embryo (a), cryopreserved zygotic embryo after TTC test: non-viable (b) and viable (c); cryopreserved germinated zygotic embryo after 7 (d) and 20 days (e).
Figure 10. Untreated zygotic embryo (a), cryopreserved zygotic embryo after TTC test: non-viable (b) and viable (c); cryopreserved germinated zygotic embryo after 7 (d) and 20 days (e).
Plants 13 01682 g010
Figure 11. Heatmap for Pearson’s linear correlation coefficients between viability (VZE) and germination (GZE) of zygotic embryos. −LN: control; +PVS2+LN: with PVS2 and immersion in liquid nitrogen; −PVS2+LN: without PVS2 and immersion in liquid nitrogen.
Figure 11. Heatmap for Pearson’s linear correlation coefficients between viability (VZE) and germination (GZE) of zygotic embryos. −LN: control; +PVS2+LN: with PVS2 and immersion in liquid nitrogen; −PVS2+LN: without PVS2 and immersion in liquid nitrogen.
Plants 13 01682 g011
Figure 12. Flowchart depicts the major steps of cryopreservation for embryogenic callus of A. nebrodensis. Embryogenic callus-EC (a); preparation of EC beads (b,c); EC beads dehydration on silica gel (d); dehydrated EC beads in cryovials and cryoboxes (e); immersion in liquid nitrogen (f); regrowth of cryopreserved EC (g).
Figure 12. Flowchart depicts the major steps of cryopreservation for embryogenic callus of A. nebrodensis. Embryogenic callus-EC (a); preparation of EC beads (b,c); EC beads dehydration on silica gel (d); dehydrated EC beads in cryovials and cryoboxes (e); immersion in liquid nitrogen (f); regrowth of cryopreserved EC (g).
Plants 13 01682 g012
Figure 13. Moisture content of A. nebrodensis embryogenic callus beads after silica gel dehydration at different times.
Figure 13. Moisture content of A. nebrodensis embryogenic callus beads after silica gel dehydration at different times.
Plants 13 01682 g013
Table 1. Viability percentage of pollen before and after cryopreservation.
Table 1. Viability percentage of pollen before and after cryopreservation.
N° Tree (T)Treatment (Tr)Tr xT T MeanTr Mean
1Control77.77 h–l76.14 GHI
+LN74.51 i–m
2Control9.16 n7.81 LM
+LN6.45 n
6Control90.00 b–f92.54 ABC
+LN95.08 abc
7Control88.89 c–g79.51 FGH
+LN70.14 klm
8Control98.88 a95.29 A
+LN91.69 b–f
9Control79.16 g–k85.94 DEF
+LN92.71 bcde
10Control88.16 b–f90.94 ABCD
+LN93.72 bcd
11Control90.55 b–f92.10 ABCD
+LN93.66 bcdControl
12Control65.88 lm74.08 GHI68.93 B
+LN82.27 f–j
13Control90.44 bcde89.89 BCD
+LN89.33 b–g+LN
14Control74.99 i–m74.07 HI73.22 A
+LN73.14 i–m
15Control65.83 lm68.27 IJ
+LN70.70 klm
16Control90.27 b–f87.14 DEF
+LN84.02 e–i
17Control93.61 bcd93.80 AB
+LN93.99 bcd
18Control96.39 ab95.95 AB
+LN95.52 abc
19Control3.88 n5.79 M
+LN7.69 n
21Control4.99 n34.68 K
+LN33.29 m
22Control33.05 m59.85 J
+LN86.65 d–h
23Control98.88 a82.63 CDE
+LN66.38 lm
24Control94.44 bcd93.86 AB
+LN93.28 bcd
27Control71.94 jklm82.09 EFG
+LN92.24 b–f
29Control9.26 n16.85 L
+LN24.43 m
p value0.0002 ***0.0001 ***0.0001 ***
LSDtree: 5.81 ***. LSDtreatment: 1.75 ***. LSDtree×treatment: 8.22 ***. *** p < 0.001; +LN: Immersed in liquid nitrogen; −LN: Control not immersed in liquid nitrogen. The values of Tr xT are the mean of two replicates/tree (at least 300 pollen grains/replicate). Different letters within a column indicate significantly different means (LSD test). Lowercase letters indicate significant differences between A. nebrodensis trees and treatments. Uppercase letters indicate significant differences among total trees and the mean of treatments.
Table 2. Germinability percentage of pollen before and after cryopreservation.
Table 2. Germinability percentage of pollen before and after cryopreservation.
N° Tree (T)Treatment (Tr)TrxTT MeanTr Mean
1Control84.72 l–p 83.69 G
+LN82.66 op
2Control22.62 qr 20.83 I
+LN41.66 q
6Control88.89 i–p 87.77 EFG
+LN86.66 k–p
7Control90.00 h–p 85.00 FG
+LN80.00 p
8Control91.11 h–p 91.55 DEF
+LN92.00 g–o
9Control87.77 j–p 88.38 EFG
+LN89.00 i–p
10Control98.61 abcd 95.80 ABC
+LN93.00 f–o
11Control93.89 d–l 92.44 CDE
+LN91.00 h–p
12Control92.22 g–o 91.44 CDE Control
+LN90.66 e–m 79.16 B
13Control89.44 i–p 92.88 CDE
+LN96.33 a–h +LN
14Control99.44 ab 95.38 ABC 81.95 A
+LN91.33 e–n
15Control99.72 a 96.69 AB
+LN93.66 b–j
16Control90.83 h–p 94.25 BCD
+LN97.66 a–g
17Control85.83 l–p 92.08 CDE
+LN98.33 a–e
18Control83.61 n–p 84.14 FG
+LN84.66 m–p
19Control23.89 qr 11.94 I
+LN0.00 t
21Control30.28 q 62.14 H
+LN94.00 c–k
22Control91.66 g–o 92.50 CDE
+LN93.33 e–m
23Control98.05 a–f 98.69 A
+LN99.33 a
24Control98.89 abcd 98.94 A
+LN99.00 abc
27Control90.83 h–p 93.41 CDE
+LN96.00 a–i
29Control9.16 s 10.91 I
+LN12.66 rs
p value0.0001 ***0.0009 ***0.0001 ***
LSDtree: 6.69 ***. LSDtreatment: 2.01 ***. LSDtree×treatment: 9.47 ***. *** p < 0.001; +LN: Immersed in liquid nitrogen; −LN: Control not immersed in liquid nitrogen. The values of Tr xT are the mean of two replicates/tree (at least 300 pollen grains/replicate). Different letters within a column indicate significantly different means (LSD test). Lowercase letters indicate significant differences between A. nebrodensis trees and treatments. Uppercase letters indicate significant differences among total trees and the mean of treatments.
Table 3. Viability percentage of zygotic embyos before and after cryopreservation.
Table 3. Viability percentage of zygotic embyos before and after cryopreservation.
N° Tree (T)Treatment (Tr)TrxTT MeanTr Mean
6ControlUN33.33 a
+LN−PVS2100 a74.07 BC
+PVS288.88 a
8ControlUN83.33 a
+LN−PVS288.88 a90.74 ABC
+PVS2100 a
10ControlUN100 a Control
+LN−PVS2100 a 100 A 75.69 A
+PVS2100 a
12ControlUN66.66 a
+LN−PVS266.66 a 66.66 C
+PVS266.66 a −PVS2 +LN
13ControlUN88.89 a 81.94 A
+LN−PVS266.66 a 85.18 ABC
+PVS2100 a
21ControlUN100 a
+LN−PVS277.77 a88.88 ABC +PVS2 +LN
+PVS288.88 a 92.01 A
22ControlUN33.33 a
+LN−PVS272.22 a 65.74 C
+PVS291.66 a
27ControlUN100 a
+LN−PVS283.33 a 94.44 AB
+PVS2100 a
p value0.25030.0498 *0.1126
LSDtree: 22.91 *. LSDtreatment: Not Significant. LSDtree×treatment: Not Significant. * p < 0.05. UN: untreated Control, neither PVS2 nor LN. The values of Tr xT are the mean of three replicates per tree (6 zygotic embryos/replicate). Different letters within a column indicate significantly different means (LSD test). Lowercase letters indicate significant differences between A. nebrodensis trees and treatments. Uppercase letters indicate significant differences among total trees and the mean of treatments.
Table 4. Germination percentage of zygotic embryos before and after cryopreservation.
Table 4. Germination percentage of zygotic embryos before and after cryopreservation.
N° Tree (T)Treatment (Tr)TrxTT MeanT Tr Mean
6ControlUN88.89 ab
+LN−PVS216.66 fghi 35.18 B
+PVS20.00 i
8ControlUN83.33 abc
+LN−PVS258.33 cde 50.00 B
+PVS28.33 ghi
10ControlUN100 a
+LN−PVS2100 a 100 A Control
+PVS2100 a 65.97 A
12ControlUN33.33 efgh
+LN−PVS233.33 efgh 14.81 C
+PVS20.00 i −PVS2 +LN
13ControlUN77.78 abc 39.79 B
+LN−PVS258.33 cde 50.37 B
+PVS215 fghi
21ControlUN75 bcd
+LN−PVS235 defg 46.66 B +PVS2 +LN
+PVS230 d-f 25.11 B
22ControlUN36.11 defg
+LN−PVS25.55 hi 29.76 BC
+PVS247.61 cdef
27ControlUN33.33 efgh
+LN−PVS211.11 ghi 14.81 C
+PVS20.00 i
p value0.0003 ***0.0001 ***0.0001 ***
LSDtree: 15.79 ***. LSDtreatment: 11.63 ***. LSDtree×treatment: 27.36 ***. *** p < 0.001; UN: untreated Control, neither PVS2 nor LN. The values of Tr xT are the mean of three replicates per tree (6 zygotic embryos /replicate). Different letters within a column indicate significantly different means (LSD test). Lowercase letters indicate significant differences between A. nebrodensis trees and treatments. Uppercase letters indicate significant differences among total trees and the mean of treatments.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Benelli, C.; Tarraf, W.; İzgü, T.; Anichini, M.; Faraloni, C.; Salvatici, M.C.; Jouini, N.; Germanà, M.A.; Danti, R.; Lambardi, M. Long-Term Conservation for the Safeguard of Abies nebrodensis: An Endemic and Endangered Species of Sicily. Plants 2024, 13, 1682. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13121682

AMA Style

Benelli C, Tarraf W, İzgü T, Anichini M, Faraloni C, Salvatici MC, Jouini N, Germanà MA, Danti R, Lambardi M. Long-Term Conservation for the Safeguard of Abies nebrodensis: An Endemic and Endangered Species of Sicily. Plants. 2024; 13(12):1682. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13121682

Chicago/Turabian Style

Benelli, Carla, Waed Tarraf, Tolga İzgü, Monica Anichini, Cecilia Faraloni, Maria Cristina Salvatici, Nourhene Jouini, Maria Antonietta Germanà, Roberto Danti, and Maurizio Lambardi. 2024. "Long-Term Conservation for the Safeguard of Abies nebrodensis: An Endemic and Endangered Species of Sicily" Plants 13, no. 12: 1682. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13121682

APA Style

Benelli, C., Tarraf, W., İzgü, T., Anichini, M., Faraloni, C., Salvatici, M. C., Jouini, N., Germanà, M. A., Danti, R., & Lambardi, M. (2024). Long-Term Conservation for the Safeguard of Abies nebrodensis: An Endemic and Endangered Species of Sicily. Plants, 13(12), 1682. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13121682

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop