Next Article in Journal
Genetic Characterization and Chemical Identification of Moroccan Cannabis sativa (L.) Seeds: Extraction, and In Vitro and In Silico Biological Evaluation
Next Article in Special Issue
Modeling the Effects of Temperature and Limiting Nutrients on the Competition of an Invasive Floating Plant, Pontederia crassipes, with Submersed Vegetation in a Shallow Lake
Previous Article in Journal
Enhancing Maize Yield and Quality with Metal-Based Nanoparticles without Translocation Risks: A Brief Field Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Does the Invasive Heracleum mantegazzianum Influence Other Species by Allelopathy?
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 13
Issue 14
10.3390/plants13141937
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Morphological and Anatomical Differentiation of Potamogeton gramineus in Relation to the Presence of Invasive Species Elodea nuttallii: A Case Study from Vlasina Lake, Serbia

by
Danijela Nikolić
1,*,
Dragana Jenačković Gocić
1,
Irena Raca
1,
Miodrag Đorđević
2,
Ana Savić
1 and
Marina Jušković
1
1
Department of Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Sciences and Mathematics, University of Niš, Višegradska 33, 18000 Niš, Serbia
2
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Sciences and Mathematics, University of Niš, Višegradska 33, 18000 Niš, Serbia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2024, 13(14), 1937; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13141937
Submission received: 29 May 2024 / Revised: 9 July 2024 / Accepted: 11 July 2024 / Published: 14 July 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Plant Invasions across Scales)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Elodea nuttallii represents non-native and highly invasive species in Europe that significantly influence freshwater plant communities by decreasing the diversity of native species. This study aimed to determine whether the morphological and anatomical features of Potamogeton gramineus, a native species in Vlasina Lake, differ between sites where it coexists with E. nuttallii and those where E. nuttallii is not present. Environmental variables such as water depth, temperature, pH, conductivity, saturation, and O2 concentration were included in the analysis. Analyses were conducted on 32 morphological and anatomical features of P. gramineus collected from six sites within Vlasina Lake, comprising three sites where E. nuttallii was present and three sites where it was absent. The datasets containing morphometric and environmental variables underwent analysis using standard univariate techniques (Descriptive, ANOVA), Tukey’s Honest Significant Difference (HSD) test, Student’s t-test, and the Mann–Whitney U test, as well as multivariate statistical methods such as Canonical Discriminant Analysis (CDA). The results show the presence of morphological differentiation among P. gramineus individuals across the analyzed sites. These findings suggest that morphological and anatomical features, such as epidermis, mesophyll, palisade, and aerenchyma tissue thickness in floating leaves, number, length, width, and the surface area of stomata, as well as the width of submersed leaves and stem aerenchyma tissue thickness, effectively differentiate individuals that coexist with E. nuttallii and individuals that growth without its presence. Moreover, they indicate that P. gramineus exhibits a notable ability to modify its morphological traits in response to invasion.

1. Introduction

The impact of invasive species on native species can be diverse, often leading to predominantly negative effects [1]. This can result in reductions in population sizes and increased competitive dominance among native species, and in some cases, it may even lead to the local extinction of native species [2,3]. When an invasive species affects a native species, it often leads to alterations in four primary areas of the native’s biology: behavior, morphology, physiology, and traits associated with its life cycle [4].
The alterations in morphological traits of native species influenced by invasive species are extensively documented and confirmed across various animal species, such as native mollusk Mya arenaria L. [5], the Australian black snake—Pseudechis porphyriacus (Shaw) [6]—the lizard Sceloporus undulates (Bosc and Daudin) [7], and the bivalve Anadara trapezia Deshayes [8], as well as numerous plant species such as Achillea millefolium L., Agropyron spicatum (Pursh) A. Lӧve, Agrostis capillaries L., Campanula rotundifolia L., Impatiens noli-tangere L., and others [9,10]. Two particularly intriguing examples include the increase in shell breadth observed in the native bivalve Anadara trapezia (Deshayes) in response to altered water conditions caused by the introduced seaweed Caulerpa taxifolia (M. Vahl) C. Agardh [8] and the morphological changes in hind limb length noted lizards as a response to attacks by invasive fire ants [7]. In his review paper, Oduor [10] analyzed 53 studies of interactions between 20 native plant species and 10 distinct invasive plant species. The aim was to identify the ecological processes and genetic changes involved in the evolutionary responses of native species to invasion. There are two types of native species according to the history of interaction with invasive plant species: “naïve” native species, which have no known history of interactions with invasive species, and “experienced” natives [4,10,11,12]. According to Oduor [10], “experienced” native species express higher levels of growth and reproductive traits compared with “naïve”. Habitat parameters such as nutrients, light, temperature, and moisture play a crucial role in the response of native species to invasive species [13]. Daehler [14] revealed that the most prevalent growing conditions favoring native species over invaders were environments characterized by low resource availability, including nutrients, water, or light. Invasive species often compete with native species for resources such as sunlight, nutrients, and space. Native species can respond by altering their morphological characteristics to access resources more efficiently, such as adjusting root growth, leaf area, or height to enhance sunlight capture [14]. The native grass Festuca novae-zelandiae (Hack.) Cockayne, commonly known as hard Tusock, exhibited root growth advantages over invasive Hieracium spp. (hawkweeds) in specific low-fertility soils [15]. The comparative studies conducted by Marler et al. [16] and D’Antonio and Mahall [17] provided insight into the differences in root architecture between invasive and native plant species. Marler et al. [16] examined the fine-root densities of invasive Centaurea maculosa Lam. (spotted knapweed) and native Agropyron spicatum (Pursh) Scribn. and Sm. (blue bunch wheatgrass). Their findings revealed that there was no significant difference in fine-root densities when averaged across depths. However, the spotted knapweed tended to exhibit deeper roots, while blue bunch wheatgrass had denser fine roots at shallower depths. Depending on environmental conditions, either rooting strategy could be advantageous. On the other hand, the opposite rooting trend was observed in the invasive ice plant Carpobrotus edulis (L.) N.E.Br., with denser fine roots near the surface, whereas the native species Haplopappus spp. had deeper roots [17]. The comparative analysis of total leaf area and tissue construction costs between invasive and native plant species, as presented in the review paper by Daehler [14], unveils significant trends indicative of divergent ecological strategies. Invasive species tend to exhibit higher leaf area coupled with lower construction costs in comparison to their native counterparts [18].
Elodea nuttallii (Planch.) H. St. John (Nuttall’s waterweed) is a non-native and highly invasive submersed plant species in Europe, added to the list of invasive alien species of European Union concern [19]. Elodea nuttallii was first recorded in Serbia in 2006, and in Vlasina Lake specifically in 2009 [20,21,22,23]. Currently, this species dominates a substantial portion of the lake area and is actively expanding, forming a monodominant community. The negative effects of Elodea species on freshwater ecosystems and native species are evident in the decrease in overall macrophytes richness [24,25] and native seed banks [26], as well as alterations in plant community composition [24,27]. Experimental studies confirmed that both the spatial pattern and developmental stage of an indigenous species may influence the outcome of competition with potential invaders such as E. nuttallii [28]. Nutrient conditions also play an important role; when nutrient levels are high, floating species such as Salvinia natans (L.) All. and Lemna gibba L. out-compete E. nuttallii due to their superior ability to compete for light [29,30]. Conversely, under low nutrient concentrations, E. nuttallii can significantly inhibit the growth of L. gibba [30].
Potamogeton gramineus L. is a freshwater aquatic species with a native distribution across the Northern Hemisphere [31]. This species inhabits ponds, lakes, slow-moving rivers, and other aquatic habitats tolerating various water depths and nutrient levels. Potamogeton gramineus is an indicator of oligo-mesotrophic waters [32] and plays a significant role in aquatic ecosystems by providing habitat and food for various aquatic organisms. Potamogeton gramineus exhibits heterophily, a phenomenon attributed to distinct environmental conditions. The floating leaves are characterized by an ovate-lanceolate or elliptical shape, nearly round at the base or tapering into a lengthy petiole, occasionally absent. These floating leaves can reach a length of up to 7 cm and a width of up to 3 cm [33]. Submersed leaves, on the other hand, are linear-lanceolate, with tapered ends, sessile, and occasionally pointed at the apex. The length of submersed leaves ranges from 4 to 6 cm, rarely reaching up to 10 cm, with a width of up to 8 mm [33]. The margins of submersed leaves are minutely or obscurely denticulate, and the apex is mucronate, featuring 5–7 main nerves. The stems of P. gramineus are approximately 1.2 m in length, exhibiting branching and a rounded shape.
The present study is based on the hypothesis that the presence of the invasive species E. nuttallii in Vlasina Lake influences the morphological and anatomical traits of the native species P. gramineus, either directly or indirectly through alterations in environmental conditions. Therefore, the main aim of this investigation was to establish the nature of the morphological variability of P. gramineus by analyzing the morphological and anatomical features of P. gramineus from sites both with and without the presence of E. nuttallii.

2. Results

2.1. The Morphological and Anatomical Variability of Stem, Floating, and Submersed Leaves of Potamogeton gramineus

Results of descriptive statistics for 32 morphological and anatomical features of P. gramineus individuals from six sites were presented in Table S1A,B (Supplementary Materials).
The floating leaves of P. gramineus typically exhibited an ovate to elliptical shape, with either a rounded or pointed apex and a rounded base. Each leaf is attached to a petiole usually slightly longer than the blade. In a cross-section (see Figure 1), beneath the cuticle, the adaxial epidermis consisted of a single layer composed of large cells, with stomata present. Beneath the adaxial epidermis lies a multilayered mesophyll tissue composed of palisade and spongy parenchyma. The spongy tissue is characterized by large cavities forming aerenchyma, bordered by single-layer cells.
The minimal length of the floating leaf (Flo1) varied from 2.48 to 3.97 cm, while the maximum length ranged from 5.30 to 7.06 cm (Table S1A). Similarly, the minimal width of the floating leaf (Flo2) ranged from 1.06 to 1.84 cm, while the maximum ones fell between 2.23 and 3.30 cm. The largest floating leaves, according to mean values of length, width, and surface area of lamina were noticed at site I, while the smallest floating leaves were recorded at site III (Table S1A). The thickest palisade tissue (Flo7) and aerenchyma (Flo8) were observed in individuals from site I, whereas the thinnest mesophyll (Flo6) and aerenchyma were in individuals from site VI. Individuals from site III were characterized by the largest number and size of stomata (Flo10, Flo11), while those from site VI had the smallest stomata (Table S1A). The submersed leaves of P. gramineus typically exhibited a narrowly elliptic shape, pointed at the tip, and were usually sessile, although they may occasionally be found on a stalk. The mesophyll of the submerged leaves is underdeveloped, consisting of only a few layers with no differentiation between palisade and spongy tissues. Typically, only one leaf vein passes through the center of the leaf. Vascular bundles were encased by a single layer of cells, forming a vascular bundle sheath (refer to Figure 1).
The minimum length of a submersed leaf (Sub1) ranged from 2.67 to 4.5 cm, with a maximum length varying from 5.19 to 9.72 cm. Furthermore, the minimum width of a submersed leaf (Sub2) ranged from 0.26 to 0.61 cm, while the maximum width varied from 0.62 to 1.17 cm. The largest submersed leaves were observed at site VI, while the smallest were found at site III (Table S1B).
The largest diameter of the stem (Stem5) was noticed at site II, whereas the smallest was found at site III. Additionally, the widest aerenchyma tissue (Ste3) was observed in individuals from site VI, while the narrowest width of aerenchyma tissue was recorded in individuals from site III. Furthermore, individuals from site I exhibited the thickest epidermis (Ste1), and both individuals from sites I and IV showed the thickest pseudohypodermis (Ste2) among the sampled populations of P. gramineus.
Considering the coefficient of variability, the investigated characteristics displayed moderate-to-low degrees of variability. All morphological and anatomical features of submersed leaves and stems have shown moderate degrees of variability (10 < CV% < 50), except for the features Sub3 and Ste4, which demonstrated a very high coefficient of variability (CV > 50%) (Table S1B).
Among the morphological and anatomical features of floating leaves, three different patterns of variability were noted. The first group of characteristics (Flo1, Flo3, Flo5, Flo6, Flo7, Flo8, and Flo10) exhibited moderate coefficient of variability (10 < CV% < 50) across all sites (Table S1A). The second group consisted of characteristics with mixed variability: low (CV% < 10) in sites with E. nuttallii and moderate variability (10 < CV% < 50) in sites without E. nuttallii (Flo2 and Flo4). On the other hand, the characteristic Flo17 showed low variability in sites with E. nuttallii and moderate variability in sites without it. The third group included characteristics that demonstrated low variability across all six sites (Flo9, Flo15), in five sites (Flo12, Flo13, Flo14), and in four sites (Flo11, Flo16), irrespective of the presence or absence of E. nuttallii (Table S1A).
A one-way ANOVA was conducted to assess the impact of sample sites on morphological and anatomical features. The results reveal that all morphological and anatomical features of floating leaves, except the width of the floating leaf (Flo2), demonstrated significantly different mean values across the analyzed sites (p < 0.05) (Table S2, Supplementary Materials). Among submersed leaves, the statistically significant morphological and anatomical features included: their length (Sub1), width (Sub2), surface (Sub3), thickness of the mesophyll in the central part (Sub4), and diameter of the vascular bundle (Sub6). Similarly, the statistically significant morphological and anatomical features of stems were the thickness of the stem aerenchyma (Ste3) and stem diameter (Ste5). The results of the Tukey HSD post hoc test are presented in Table S2 (Supplementary Materials). The largest differences in morphological and anatomical features of floating leaves were noted between sites I and III for features Flo1, Flo3, Flo4, and Flo9 (Table S2). Individuals from site I were characterized by the largest length, surface area, thickness of the epidermis, and diameter of the vascular bundle of the floating leaves, while the individuals from site III demonstrated the smallest values of these features. Significant differences were also observed between sites I and VI for features Flo6, Flo7, Flo8, Flo9, and Flo11. As in the previous case, individuals from site I had the largest thickness of the mesophyll, palisade, aerenchyma, diameter of the vascular bundle, and surface of stomata compared with individuals from site VI. Considering the morphological and anatomical features of the submersed leaves, the largest difference was noted between sites III and VI for features Sub1, Sub 2, and Sub3. Individuals of P. gramineus from site I demonstrated the smallest submersed leaves, while individuals from site VI, where E. nuttallii was present, are characterized by the largest submersed leaves. The largest thickness of mesophyll (Sub4) was noted in site V, while the smallest thickness of mesophyll was observed in site III. Considering features Sub6, the largest differences in mean values were noted between sites III and I. The Tukey HSD post hoc test showed that the largest differences in stem features such as the thickness of aerenchyma (Ste3) were present between individuals from site III and both sites V and VI. Considering the diameter of the stem (Ste5), the individuals from site III were characterized with the smallest diameter, while individuals from sites IV, V, and VI demonstrated the largest stem diameters (Table S2).

2.2. The Morphological and Anatomical Differentiation within the Analyzed Samples of Potamogeton gramineus Population

According to the results of the Student’s t-test, statistically significant differences were noted in the following anatomical features of the floating leaves: Flo5, Flo6, Flo7, Flo8, Flo9, Flo10, Flo11, Flo12, Flo13, Flo14, Flo15, Flo16, and Flo17 (Table S3, Supplementary Materials). Higher values for these features were observed at sites without E. nuttallii compared with sites with E. nuttallii. Regarding morphological and anatomical features of submersed leaves and stems, only features Sub2 and Ste3 showed statistically significant differences, with higher values noted at sites with E. nuttallii (Table S3).
Canonical Discriminant Analyses (CDA) resulted in two distinct morphological groups, delineated by the first CDA axis (Root1), which explained 38.35% of the total differentiation (Figure 2A). Individuals from sites IV, V, and VI clustered in the positive part of the first CDA axis, while those from sites I, II, and III were positioned in the negative part. Site I notably stood out in the negative part, clearly differentiated from all other sites, along the second CDA axis (Root2), which explained 31.75% of the total differentiation (Figure 2A). When considering the scatter plot defined by the first and third CDA (Root3) axes (15.94% of total differentiation), two discernible groups emerged: one comprising individuals from sites IV, V, and VI and the other including individuals from sites I, II, and III. Along the third CDA axis, differentiation was observed primarily between sites IV and VI (Figure 2B).
The results of the Mann–Whitney U test reveal that temperature and pH values were the most significant environmental variables responsible for differentiating sites where E. nuttallii was present from those where it was absent (Table S4, Supplementary Materials). Higher temperature values were observed at sites without E. nuttallii, whereas higher pH values were found at sites where E. nuttallii was present (Table S4).

3. Discussion

Aquatic plant habitats face numerous threats, including eutrophication, rising water temperatures, and the introduction of exotic invasive species [34]. One response of aquatic plants to these variable conditions is extensive morphological variability observed in many species from the genus Potamogeton [35,36,37]. On the other hand, there are some species from the genus Potamogeton (P. perfoliatus L. and P. nodosus Poir.) that cannot tolerate a drought period longer than 5 days [38].
Potamogeton gramineus has been the subject of several investigations regarding its morphological response to different environmental variables. Spencer and Ksander [35] investigated the influence of planting depth on morphology and growth, concluding that P. gramineus thrived when planted in shallow depths; however, when winter buds were planted at a depth of 20 cm, they showed a lower growth rate. Additionally, Spencer and Ksander [36] examined the effects of temperature and light on the early growth of P. gramineus, revealing that temperature and light strongly influenced elongation rate and biomass production, although their influence was not linear. Specifically, at very low light levels, increasing temperature led to decreased dry weight, while at higher light levels, increasing temperature resulted in higher rates of dry weight increase [36]. In contrast, Bayindir and Ikinci [39], in their study on the role of environmental factors in the distribution of Potamogeton species, reported that P. gramineus was positively correlated with pH and water temperature and negatively correlated with electroconductivity. Furthermore, Sondergaard et al. [40], in their research on submerged macrophytes as indicators of the ecological quality of lakes, noted that P. gramineus is an indicator of nutrient-poor conditions.
The anatomical features of floating and submersed leaves and stems have not been previously investigated in the referenced studies, rendering direct comparisons with our findings impractical. However, we can juxtapose our measurements of floating and submersed leaves of P. gramineus with data reported in established botanical references such as the Flora of Serbia [33], Flora Europaea [41], and Floras of neighboring countries like Bulgaria [42], Romania [43], and Hungary [44]. These sources provide valuable insights into the typical dimensions of P. gramineus leaves. The most frequently reported dimensions for floating leaves were 7cm in length and 3cm in width [33,41,42,43]. A study by Soó [44] presented a range for floating leaf length (2.5–7cm) and width (0.8–2cm) aligning closely with our results. Conversely, our study revealed slight discrepancies in the dimensions of submersed leaves compared with previous research. While Janković and Topa [33,43] reported lengths ranging from 4 to 6 cm (10) and widths up to 8 mm, our measurements indicate lengths varying from 2.67 to 9.71 cm and widths from 0.26 to 1.17 cm. Furthermore, publications by Yordanov [42], Topa [43], and Soó [44] delineated several varieties of P. gramineus including P. gramineus var. lacustris Fr., P. gramineus var. fluviatilis Fr., P. gramineus var. heterofilus (Schreb.) Fr., P. gramineus var. stagnalis Fr., P. gramineus var. platyphylus Rchb., P. gramineus var. amphibious Fr., P. gramineus var. riparius Fr., and P. gramineus var. terestris Schltdl. These varietal descriptions underscore the considerable morphological variability inherent in this species.
Our study revealed significant variability in the morphological and anatomical features of leaves and stems across sampling sites. Nearly all morphological and anatomical features of floating leaves significantly distinguished individuals of P. gramineus at sites where E. nuttallii was present from those collected at sites where E. nuttallii was absent. The individuals from sites without E. nuttallii were characterized by the smallest floating leaves, thickest mesophyll, palisade, aerenchyma, and epidermal layers, accompanied by the highest number of largest stomata (Table S3). Statistically significant differences in temperature values were noted among the sampled sites with and without E. nuttallii, with higher values recorded at sites without E. nuttallii (Table S4). These environmental variables likely contributed to the reduction in floating leaf area, potentially optimizing photosynthetic efficiency in response to elevated temperatures while simultaneously decreasing transpiration rates [45]. It is well known that photosynthesis is a chemical reaction catalyzed by enzymes, and its rate is dependent on leaf temperature [46]. The rate of photosynthesis increases with rising temperatures up to an optimum point [47]. Beyond this optimal temperature, the photosynthetic rate declines. Leaf size plays a crucial role in regulating temperature. An increase in leaf area thickens the boundary layer, a stagnant air layer surrounding the leaf [48]. This thickening increases resistance to water and CO2 diffusion [48], resulting in slower evaporation rates and reduced CO2 exchange between the leaf and the atmosphere [45,49]. Okajima et al. [45] investigated the influence of leaf size, temperature, and wind speed on photosynthetic rate and confirmed that at warmer temperatures, the increase in leaf temperature does not lead to an increase in photosynthetic rates. Therefore, a smaller leaf size seems more advantageous for efficient photosynthesis. Bayindir and Ikinci [39] found that P. gramineus has high temperature tolerance (4.95 °C), with an optimum temperature of 26.5 °C, and low tolerance for pH (0.15), preferring a higher pH optimum of 8.24. Additionally, P. gramineus occurred in waters with the lowest EC optima (271 μS/cm−1) [39].
Szabo et al., [29] confirmed that the presence of Elodea increases pH values in water and under lower nutrient conditions, strongly reduces the growth of the floating plant L. gibba. Our study demonstrated significant differences in pH values between sites with and without E. nuttallii, with higher pH values noted at sites where E. nuttallii was present (Table S4). Elodea nuttallii is very resilient to the immense shading caused by floating plants [50], which is advantageous in the case of the presence of P. gramineus floating leaves above E. nuttallii individuals. At sites where E. nuttallii was present, individuals of P. gramineus were characterized by the broadest submersed leaves, and thickest stem aerenchyma (Table S3). These characteristics indicate the tolerance strategy of P. gramineus in the presence of the invasive species E. nuttallii, primarily by maximizing leaf size and aerenchyma thickness, as also reported by Puijalon et al. [51]. The increased size of the submersed leaves in P. gramineus, caused by the dense stands of E. nuttallii, is a response to decreased light availability. The reduction in the total number of leaves while maximizing surface area for light capture is also observed in shade-inhabiting species such as Polygonum caespitosum Blume [52]. On the other hand, dense macrophyte growth of E. nuttallii can decrease oxygen levels due to the accumulation of organic detritus and fine sediment, as stated by Kaenel et al. [53]. The lower oxygen concentration in the presence of E. nuttallii might contribute to the thickened aerenchyma tissue in the submersed leaves of P. gramineus individuals. This adaptation is similar to what is observed in species like Pontederia azurea (Sw.) Kunth and P. crassipes Mart., which grow in temporary ponds with low dissolved oxygen concentration [54]. It is evident that morphological and anatomical differentiations of P. gramineus exist in Vlasina Lake (Figure 2A,B), but the reasons for these variations are still unknown.
Individuals of P. gramineus in sites where E. nuttallii was present are characterized by thinner floating leaves with the lowest surface area of stomata and by the broadest submersed leaves. Stem aerenchyma is larger in individuals of P. gramineus from sites where E. nuttallii was present compared with individuals from sites where it was absent.
This suggests that the morphological and anatomical characteristics used in this study are effective in distinguishing between the individuals of P. gramineus from different sites and that the presence or absence of E. nuttallii may reflect these changes. However, the influence of environmental variables such as light and nutrients on the morphology of this species cannot be ignored, and future experimental studies in controlled conditions are needed.

4. Material and Methods

4.1. Study Area

Vlasina Lake is an artificial water body located within a protected area known as the Natural Asset of Exceptional Importance and a Ramsar site. It ranks as the second-largest man-made lake in the southeastern region of the Republic of Serbia [55]. At an altitude of 1213 m a.s.l., this lake represents the highest-altitude lake in the Republic of Serbia. It stretches 9 km in length, with an average width of 1.8 km (maximum 3.5 km), a depth of up to 35 m, and an indented shore spanning 132.5 km. The surface area of Vlasina Lake covers approximately 16 km2 [56]. According to a recent investigation of water quality using the Serbian Water Quality Index, based on parameters including oxygen saturation (OS), biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), ammonium (NH4-N), pH, total nitrogen oxides (TNO), orthophosphate (PO43−), suspended solids (SS), temperature (T), conductivity, and coliform bacteria (CB), this lake is characterized by good-to-excellent water quality. It represents clean water suitable for tourism and recreation [55]. Simić et al. [57] classified Vlasina Lake as an oligotrophic lake according to Carlson’s Trophic State Index (TSI) based on chlorophyll a (Chl a) concentrations.

4.2. Environmental Variables

The temperature, pH, conductivity, dissolved oxygen, and oxygen saturation were measured in the field using a WTW® Multi 340i probe, while depth was measured using an Arhus tape measure. The water depth varied across sites, but all physical and chemical parameters were measured at the same depth using sensors or electrodes of the WTW multi 340i multimeter, positioned close to the surface of the water. Detailed information about sampling localities and measured physical and chemical parameters are presented in Table 1.

4.3. Plant Material

On 18 September 2020, six samples comprising a total of 79 individuals from 6 subpopulations of P. gramineus were collected from Vlasina Lake (Figures S1 and S2, Supplementary Materials). The presence of the invasive species, E. nuttallii, was taken into consideration during the collection of plant material. In sites I, II, and III, the invasive species E. nuttallii was absent, while in sites IV, V, and VI, it was present in varying amounts quantified as dry biomass per m2 (Table 1). The plant material was preserved in 50% ethanol for morphological and anatomical study. All sites were located on the same side of the lake, with distances of approximately 100 m between them.
To determine the dry biomass of E. nuttallii and P. gramineus, individuals of both species were sampled in the littoral area of the lake near the shore along six transects. Sampling was conducted using 0.25 m2 quadrats spaced at 5 m intervals. The plant material was placed into a nylon bag and then transferred to the laboratory. Three subsamples of P. gramineus and E. nuttallii taken from one transect were combined into one representative sample. The plant material was dried at 60 °C for 24 h in an oven until it reached a constant mass and then weighed to estimate the dry biomass [58].
The identification of the plant material was performed according to the Flora of Serbia, volume VII [33], and Flora Europaea, volume 5 [41]. The plant material is deposited under its original voucher numbers (HMN18344; HMN18622) in the Herbarium Moesiacum Niš (HMN), University of Niš, Faculty of Sciences and Mathematics, Serbia.

4.4. Morphological and Anatomical Analysis

Morphological and anatomical analysis was conducted on floating and submerged leaves, as well as stems belonging to 79 different individuals (32 quantitative morphological and anatomical features) (Table 2).
Morphological features of floating and submersed leaves referring to shape and size (length, width, and surface) were measured (Table 2). For this purpose, leaves were placed and pressed on paper, photographed, and then measured using ImageJ software version 1.46 (Figure S3, Supplementary Materials) [59]. For the investigation of the anatomical features of leaves and stems, cross-sections of the middle region of leaves and stems were made using manual microtome [60]. Epidermal structure and stomata were investigated on the leaf cuts, which were treated with a solution consisting of hydrogen peroxide and potassium hydroxide for three to six days to elucidate the tissue [61,62]. Temporary slides were photographed using the Leica DFC490 camera configured on the Leica DM 1000 fluorescence microscope (DM1000-FL-HI, Leica Microsystems©, Wetzlar, Germany) and examined. The anatomical features were measured using ImageJ software, version 1.46 [59]. The list of measured morphological and anatomical features is presented in Table 2.

4.5. Statistical Analyses

Descriptive statistics, including minimum, maximum, mean, standard deviation, and coefficient of variability were calculated for all 32 quantitative morphological and anatomical features. The coefficient of variability was used to describe the morphological variability of features. Highly morphologically variable features had CV% > 50, and moderately variable features fell within the range of 10 < CV% < 50, while stable features had a coefficient of variation below 10%. After confirming the normality of the data sets for measured features, one-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was used to test the significance of differences in morphological and anatomical traits between different sites. Tukey’s Honest Significant Difference (HSD) test was performed to assess the significance of differences between pairs of group means.
To compare the morphological and anatomical features of individuals from sites where E. nuttallii was present and those where it was absent, we used an independent sample Student’s t-test.
Canonical Discriminant Analysis (CDA) was performed on the 32 morphological and anatomical quantitative features to determine the morphological and anatomical differentiation among sites. Canonical scores for each case were calculated with the aim of measuring the distances between individuals, and a scatter plot of canonical scores was generated to visualize the relationships between samples.
To assess significant statistical differences between sites with the presence of E. nuttallii and those without it in terms of environmental variables, the Mann–Whitney U test was performed due to the non-normal distribution of data (with only 3 data points per group).
The descriptive statistics, ANOVA, Tukey’s Honest Significant Difference (HSD) test, and CDA statistical analyses were computed using STATISTICA 7.0 software [63]. Student’s t-test and the Mann–Whitney U test were conducted using SPSS software (IBM, Version 19) [64].

5. Conclusions

Correlating the morphological and anatomical features of P. gramineus with the presence of the invasive species E. nuttallii provides valuable insights into the adaptive strategies of P. gramineus and its interactions with its surroundings. For a better understanding of the nature of morphological and anatomical variability in P. gramineus, the future investigations should include a larger number of sites and incorporate more environmental variables. The ability of P. gramineus to successfully coexist with E. nuttallii suggests the possibility of using this species in the restoration of invaded freshwater ecosystems.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/plants13141937/s1, Figure S1. Potamogeton gramienus stands in Vlasina Lake. Figure S2. Elodea nuttallii stands in Vlasina Lake. Figure S3. The floating and submersed leaves of Potamogeton gramineus. Table S1A. Results of descriptive analysis for the dataset comprising morphological and anatomical features of the floating leaves of Potamogeton gramineus. Table S1B. Results of descriptive analysis for the dataset comprising morphological and anatomical features of the submersed leaves and stems of Potamogeton gramineus. Table S2. The results of ANOVA test and Tukey HSD test for the dataset comprising morphological and anatomical features of the floating, submersed leaves, and stems. Table S3. The results of independent samples Studens´s t-test for the dataset comprising all measured morphological and anatomical features of Potamogeton gramineus, Table S4. The results of Mann Whitney U test comprising the environmental variables measured at sites with and without present Elodea nuttaliii.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.N.; methodology, D.N., I.R., M.J., M.Đ., D.J.G. and A.S; validation, D.N.; formal analysis, D.N. and M.Đ.; investigation, D.N., A.S., M.J. and M.Đ; data curation, D.N., A.S. and M.J.; writing—original draft preparation, D.N.; writing—review and editing, D.N., D.J.G., M.J., A.S., M.Đ. and I.R; visualization, D.N., D.J.G., M.Đ. and I.R.; supervision, D.J.G., M.J. and A.S.; project administration, D.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the Ministry of Science, Technological Development, and Innovation of the Republic of Serbia [evidence numbers: 451-03-65/2024-03/200124 and 451-03-66/2024-03/200124].

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article and Supplementary Materials.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and improvement of this manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Rodriguez, L.F. Can invasive species facilitate native species? Evidence of how, when, and why these impacts occur. Biol. Invasions 2006, 8, 927–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. D’Antonio, C.M.; Meyerson, L.A. Exotic plant species as problems and solutions in ecological restoration: A synthesis. Restor. Ecol. 2002, 10, 703–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Sax, D.F.; Stachowicz, J.J.; Brown, J.H.; Bruno, J.F.; Dawson, M.N.; Gaines, S.D.; Grosberg, R.K.; Hastings, A.; Holt, R.D.; Mayfield, M.M.; et al. Ecological and evolutionary insights from species invasions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2007, 22, 466–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Strauss, S.Y.; Lau, J.A.; Carroll, S.P. Evolutionary responses of natives to introduced species: What do introductions tell us about natural communities? Ecol. Lett. 2006, 9, 357–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Freeman, A.S.; Byers, J.E. Divergent induced responses to an invasive predator in marine mussel populations. Science 2006, 313, 831–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Phillips, B.L.; Shine, R. An invasive species induces rapid adaptive change in a native predator: Cane toads and blacksnakes in Australia. Proc. R. Soc. B. Biol. Sci. 2006, 273, 1545–1550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Langkilde, T. Invasive fire ants alter behaviour and morphology of native lizards. Ecology 2009, 90, 208–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Wright, J.T.; Gribben, P.E.; Byers, J.E.; Monro, K. Invasive ecosystem engineer selects for different phenotypes of an associated native species. Ecology 2012, 93, 1262–1268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Berthon, K. How do native species respond to invaders? Mechanistic and trait-based perspectives. Biol. Invasions 2015, 17, 2199–2211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Oduor, A.M. Evolutionary responses of native plant species to invasive plants: A review. New Phytol. 2013, 200, 986–992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Callaway, R.M.; Ridenour, W.M.; Laboski, T.; Weir, T.; Vivanco, J.M. Natural selection for resistance to the allelopathic effects of invasive plants. J. Ecol. 2005, 93, 576–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Rowe, C.L.J.; Leger, E.A. Competitive seedlings and inherited traits: A test of rapid evolution of Elymus multisetus (big squirrel tail) in response to cheat grass invasion. Evol. Appl. 2011, 4, 485–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Leger, E.A.; Espeland, E.K. Coevolution between native and invasive plant competitors: Implications for invasive species management. Evol. Appl. 2010, 3, 169–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Daehler, C.C. Performance Comparisons of Co-Occurring Native and Alien Invasive Plants: Implications for Conservation and Restoration. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2003, 34, 183–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Fan, J.; Harris, W. Effects of soil fertility level and cutting frequency on interference among Hieracium pilosella, H. praealtum, Rumex acetosella, and Festuca novae-zelandiae. N. Z. J. Agric. Res. 1996, 39, 1–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Marler, M.J.; Zabinski, C.A.; Callaway, R.M. Mycorrhizae Indirectly Enhance Competitive Effects of an Invasive Forb on a Native Bunchgrass. Ecology 1999, 80, 1180–1186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. D’Antonio, C.M.; Mahall, B.E. Root profiles and competition between the invasive, exotic perennial, Carpobrotus edulis, and two native shrub species in California coastal scrub. Am. J. Bot. 1991, 78, 885–894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Baruch, Z.; Goldstein, G. Leaf construction cost, nutrient concentration, and net CO2 assimilation of native and invasive species in Hawaii. Oecologia 1999, 121, 183–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. EU. Regulation (EU) No 1143/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Prevention and Management of the Introduction and Spread of Invasive Alien Species; OJEU L 317/35; EU: Luxembourg, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  20. Vukov, D.; Igić, R.; Boža, P.; Anačkov, G.; Janauer, G.A. Habitat and Plant Species Diversity along the River Danube in Serbia. In Proceedings 36th International Conference of IAD; Austrian Committee Danube Research, Ed.; IAD: Vienna, Austria, 2006; pp. 127–131. [Google Scholar]
  21. Laketić, D.L. Fitocenološka Klasifikacija Vegetacije Jezerskog Tipa u Srbiji. Ph.D. Thesis, Univerzitet u Beogradu, Beograd, Srbija, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  22. Anđelković, A.A.; Živković, M.M.; Cvijanović, D.L.; Novković, M.Z.; Marisavljević, D.P.; Pavlović, D.M.; Radulović, S.B. The contemporary records of aquatic plants invasion through the Danubian floodplain corridor in Serbia. Aquat. Invasions 2016, 11, 381–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Cvijanović, D.L.; Lakušić, D.V.; Živković, M.M.; Novković, M.Z.; Anđelković, A.A.; Pavlović, D.M.; Vukov, D.M.; Radulović, S.B. An overview of aquatic vegetation in Serbia. Tuexenia 2018, 38, 269–286. [Google Scholar]
  24. Howard-Williams, C. Processes of aquatic weed invasions: The New Zealand example. J. Aquat. Plant Manag. 1993, 31, 17–23. [Google Scholar]
  25. Mjelde, M.; Lombardo, P.; Berge, D.; Johansen, S.W. Mass invasion of non-native Elodea canadensis Michx. in a large, clear-water, species-rich Norwegian lake—Impact on macrophyte biodiversity. Ann. Limnol. Int. J. Lim. 2012, 48, 225–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. De Winton, D.M.; Clayton, S.J. The impact of invasive submerged weed species on seed banks in lake sediments. Aquat. Bot. 1996, 53, 31–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. O’Hare, M.T.; Gunn, D.M.I.; Chapman, S.D.; Dudley, J.B.; Purse, V.B. Impacts of space, local environment and habitat connectivity on macrophyte communities in conservation lakes. Divers. Distrib. 2012, 18, 603–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Barrat-Segretain, M.H. Competition between invasive and indigenous species: Impact of spatial pattern and developmental stage. Plant Ecol. 2005, 180, 153–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Szabo, S.; Scheffer, M.; Roijackers, R.; Waluto, B.; Braun, M.; Nagy, P.T.; Borics, G.; Zambrano, L. Strong growth limitation of a floating plant (Lemna gibba) by the submerged macrophyte (Elodea nuttallii) under laboratory conditions. Freshw. Biol. 2010, 55, 681–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Netten, J.J.; Arts, G.H.; Gylstra, R.; van Nes, E.H.; Scheffer, M.; Roijackers, R.M. Effect of temperature and nutrients on the competition between free-floating Salvinia natans and submerged Elodea nuttallii in mesocosms. Fund. Appl. Limnol. 2010, 177, 125–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wieglet, G.; Kaplan, Z. An account of the species of Potamogeton L. (Potamogetonaceae). Folia Geobot. 1998, 33, 241–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kozelková, Z.; Prausová, R.; Tomasova, Z.; Safarova, L. Differences in Potamogeton praelongus morphology and habitats in Europe. Acta Soc. Bot. Pol. 2021, 90, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Janković, M. Rod Potamogeton L. In Flora SR Srbije; Josifović, M., Ed.; SANU: Beograd, Srbija, 1975; Volume 5, pp. 480–488. (In Serbian) [Google Scholar]
  34. Sala, O.E.; Chapin, F.S., III; Armesto, J.; Berlow, E.; Bloomfield, J.; Dirzo, R.; Huber-Sanwald, E.; Huenneke, L.F.; Jackson, R.B.; Kinzig, A.; et al. Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science 2000, 287, 1770–1774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Spencer, F.D.; Ksander, G.G. Influence of planting depth on Potamogeton gramineus L. Aquat. Bot. 1990, 36, 343–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Spencer, F.D.; Ksander, G.G. Influence of Temperature and Light on Early Growth of Potamogeton gramineus L. J. Freshw. Ecol. 1991, 6, 227–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kaplan, Z. Phenotypic plasticity in Potamogeton (Potamogetonaceae). Folia Geobot. 2002, 37, 141–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Daumal, M.M.; Oosterhuis, D.; Verhofsstad, M.J.J.M.; Erkens, R.H.J.; Peters, E.T.H.M. The impact of drought duration on two Potamogeton species with different growth forms. Aquat. Sci. 2024, 86, 72–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Bayindir, N.; Ikinci, N. The role of environmental variables on distribution of Potamogetonaceae species. Wetlands 2020, 40, 125–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Søndergaard, M.; Johansson, L.S.; Lauridsen, T.L.; Jørgensen, T.B.; Liboriussen, L.; Jeppesen, E. Submerged macrophytes as indicators of the ecological quality of lakes. Freshw. Biol. 2010, 55, 893–908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Dandy, J.E. Potamogeton L. In Flora Europaea, V; Tutin, T.G., Heywood, V.H., Burges, N.A., Moore, D.M., Valentine, D.H., Walters, S.M., Webb, D.A., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1980; pp. 7–11. [Google Scholar]
  42. Yordanov, D. Potamogeton gramineus L. In Flora na NR Bulgaria, Sofia; Yordanov, D., Ed.; Publishing House Bulgarian Academy of Sciences: Sofia, Bulgaria, 1963; Volume 1, pp. 196–199. (In Bulgarian) [Google Scholar]
  43. Topa, E. Potamogeton L. In Flora of Socialistic Republic of Romania; Nyaradi, E., Ed.; Academiei Republicii Socialiste Romania: Bukurest, Romania, 1966; Volume 11, pp. 55–82. (In Romanian) [Google Scholar]
  44. Soó, R. Synopsis Systematico-Geobotanica Florae Vegetationsque Hungariae; Akadémiai Kiadó: Budapest, Hungary, 1968; Volume 3, p. 655. (In Hungarian) [Google Scholar]
  45. Okajima, Y.; Taneda, H.; Noguchi, K.; Terashima, I. Optimum leaf size predicted by a novel leaf energy balance model incorporating dependencies of photosynthesis on light and temperature. Ecol. Res. 2011, 27, 333–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Oguchi, R.; Onoda, Y.; Terashima, I.; Tholen, D. Leaf Anatomy and Function. In The Leaf: A Platform for Performing Photosynthesis. Advances in Photosynthesis and Respiration; Adams, W., III, Terashima, I., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; Volume 44, pp. 97–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Lambers, H.; Chapin, F.S., III; Pons, T.L. Plant Physiological Ecology, 2nd ed.; Springer: New York, USA, 1998; p. 623. [Google Scholar]
  48. Nobel, P.S. Physicochemical and Environmental Plant Physiology, 5th ed.; Academic Press: London, UK, 2020; p. 654. [Google Scholar]
  49. Parkhurst, D.F.; Loucks, O.L. Optimal leaf size in relation to environment. J. Ecol. 1972, 60, 505–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Den Hartog, C.; Van Der Velde, G. Structural aspects of aquatic plant communities. In Vegetation of Inland Waters: Handbook of Vegetation Science; Symoens, J.J., Ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1988; Volume 15, pp. 113–153. [Google Scholar]
  51. Puijalon, S.; Bouma, T.J.; Douady, C.J.; van Groenendael, J.; Anten, N.P.; Martel, E.; Bornette, G. Plant resistance to mechanical stress: Evidence of an avoidance–tolerance trade-off. New Phytol. 2011, 191, 1141–1149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Sultan, S.E. Phenotypic plasticity in plants: A case study in ecological development. Evol. Dev. 2003, 5, 25–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Kaenel, B.R.; Buehrer, H.; Uehlinger, U. Effects of aquatic plant management on stream metabolism and oxygen balance in streams. Freshw. Biol. 2000, 45, 85–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Leandro, T.D.; Holsback, Z.D.R.; Scremin-Dias, E. The aquatic species Pontederia azurea and P. crassipes (Pontederiaceae) in the Pantanal, Brazil: Evidence of how plant structure can simultaneously reflect phylogeny and ecology. Acta Bot. Bras. 2021, 35, 79–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Milanović Pešić, A.; Jojić Glavonjić, T.; Denda, S.; Jakovljević, D. Sustainable Tourism Development and Ramsar Sites in Serbia: Exploring Residents’ Attitudes and Water Quality Assessment in the Vlasina Protected Area. Sustainability 2023, 15, 15391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Stanković, S.M. Jezera Srbije: Limnološka Monografija [Lakes of Serbia: Limnological Monograph]; Center for Textbooks and Teaching Aids: Belgrade, Serbia, 2005. (In Serbian) [Google Scholar]
  57. Simić, V.; Simić, S.; Pešić, V. Ecological Sustainability of Fish Resources of Inland Waters of the Western Balkans. In Freshwater Fish Stocks, Sustainable Use and Conservation; Springer Nature Switzerland AG: Cham, Switzerland, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  58. Cattaneo, A.; Galanti, G.; Gentinetta, S.; Susana, A. Epiphytic algae and macroinvertebrates on submerged and floating-leaved macrophytes in an Italian lake. Freshw. Biol. 1998, 39, 725–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Schneider, C.A.; Rasband, W.S.; Eliceiri, K.W. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat. Methods 2012, 9, 671–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Gligorijević, S.; Pejčinović, D. Contribution to the methodology of anatomical sections preparation. Acta Biol. Et Med. Exp. 1983, 8, 43–45. [Google Scholar]
  61. Blaženčić, J. Praktikum iz Anatomije Biljaka sa Osnovama Mikroskopske Tehnike [Practicum in Plant Anatomy with the Basics of Microscopic Technique]; Naučna knjiga: Beograd, Serbia, 1979. (In Serbian) [Google Scholar]
  62. Ruzin, E.S. Plant Microtechnique and Microscopy. In Biological Imaging Facility; University of California: Berkeley, CA, USA; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA; Oxford, UK, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  63. StatSoft, Inc. STATISTICA (Data Analysis Software System), Version 7. 2004. Available online: www.statsoft.com (accessed on 19 January 2022).
  64. IBM Corp. Released IBM SPSS, Statistics for Windows, Version 19.0; IBM Corp: Armonk, NY, USA, 2010.
Plants 13 01937 g001
Figure 1. Cross-sections taken in the midrib area of the floating, submersed leaves, and stems of P. graminues from six sites in Vlasina Lake. In sites I, II, and III, the invasive species E. nuttallii was absent, while in sites IV, V, and VI, it was present.
Figure 1. Cross-sections taken in the midrib area of the floating, submersed leaves, and stems of P. graminues from six sites in Vlasina Lake. In sites I, II, and III, the invasive species E. nuttallii was absent, while in sites IV, V, and VI, it was present.
Plants 13 01937 g001
Plants 13 01937 g002
Figure 2. Results of Canonical Discriminant Analysis (CDA) based on all morphological and anatomical features of Potamogeton gramineus population: (A) scatterplots with canonical scores for each individual in a space defined by the first and second CDA axes; (B) scatterplots with canonical scores for each individual in a space defined by the first and third CDA axes.
Figure 2. Results of Canonical Discriminant Analysis (CDA) based on all morphological and anatomical features of Potamogeton gramineus population: (A) scatterplots with canonical scores for each individual in a space defined by the first and second CDA axes; (B) scatterplots with canonical scores for each individual in a space defined by the first and third CDA axes.
Plants 13 01937 g002
Table 1. List of sites with physical and chemical parameters of water where samples from the population of Potamogeton gramineus were collected, along with the dry biomass of analyzed species.
Table 1. List of sites with physical and chemical parameters of water where samples from the population of Potamogeton gramineus were collected, along with the dry biomass of analyzed species.
SitesCoordinatesDepth (cm)Теmperature
(°C)		pHOxygen Saturation (%)Conductivity
(µS/cm)		Oxygen
Concentration
(O2 mg/L)		Dry Biomass
P. gramineus/E. nuttallii (g/m2) 		Number of Individuals
I42°44′37″ N
22°20′13″ E		5622.26.1121.584.88.8242.66/013
II42°44′09″ N
22°20′27″ E		6423.55.9145.882.511.6132.13/012
III42°44′15″ N
22°20′21″ E		34265.9813283.38.5211.6/016
IV *42°44′31″ N
22°20′07″ E		4821.86.51137.284.811126.4/2014
V *42°44′12″ N
22°20′45″ E		7820.86.5108.885.58.42187.33/35.312
VI *42°44′02″ N
22°20′38″ E		5720.66.6117.485.88.9867.2/133.0612
* The list of sites where the Elodea nuttallii was present.
Table 2. List of measured morphological and anatomical features of Potamogeton gramineus along with their corresponding codes and units.
Table 2. List of measured morphological and anatomical features of Potamogeton gramineus along with their corresponding codes and units.
CodeMorphological and Anatomical FeaturesUnits
Flo1Length of the floating leaf laminacm
Flo2Width of the floating leaf laminacm
Flo3Surface area of the floating leaf laminacm2
Flo4Thickness of the adaxial epidermis of the floating leafµm
Flo5Thickness of the abaxial epidermis of the floating leafµm
Flo6Thickness of the mesophyll tissue of the floating leafµm
Flo7Thickness of the palisade tissue of the floating leafµm
Flo8Thickness of the aerenchyma tissue of the floating leafµm
Flo9Diameter of the vascular bundle of the floating leafµm
Flo10Number of stomata on the adaxial side of the floating leaf/
Flo11Surface area of stomata on the adaxial side of floating leafµm2
Flo12Length of stomata of the adaxial side of the floating leafµm
Flo13Width of stomata of the adaxial side of the floating leafµm
Flo14Surface area of the epidermal cells on the adaxial side of the floating leafµm2
Flo15Surface area of the epidermal cells on the abaxial side of the floating leafµm2
Flo16Length of the epidermal cells on the adaxial side of the floating leafµm
Flo17Length of the epidermal cells on the abaxial side of the floating leafµm
Sub1Length of the submerged leaf laminacm
Sub2Width of the submerged leaf laminacm
Sub3Surface area of the submerged leaf laminacm2
Sub4Thickness of the mesophyll in the central part of the submerged leafµm
Sub5Thickness of the mesophyll in the lateral part of the submerged leafµm
Sub6Diameter of the vascular bundle of the submerged leafµm
Sub7Surface area of the epidermal cells of the submersed leafµm2
Sub8Length of the epidermal cells of the submersed leafµm
Sub9Width of the epidermal cells of the submersed leafµm
Ste1Thickness of the stem epidermisµm
Ste2Thickness of the stem pseudo-hypodermisµm
Ste3Thickness of the stem aerenchymaµm
Ste4Thickness of the stem endodermisµm
Ste5Diameter of the stemµm
Ste6Diameter of the stem steleµm
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nikolić, D.; Jenačković Gocić, D.; Raca, I.; Đorđević, M.; Savić, A.; Jušković, M. Morphological and Anatomical Differentiation of Potamogeton gramineus in Relation to the Presence of Invasive Species Elodea nuttallii: A Case Study from Vlasina Lake, Serbia. Plants 2024, 13, 1937. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13141937

AMA Style

Nikolić D, Jenačković Gocić D, Raca I, Đorđević M, Savić A, Jušković M. Morphological and Anatomical Differentiation of Potamogeton gramineus in Relation to the Presence of Invasive Species Elodea nuttallii: A Case Study from Vlasina Lake, Serbia. Plants. 2024; 13(14):1937. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13141937

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nikolić, Danijela, Dragana Jenačković Gocić, Irena Raca, Miodrag Đorđević, Ana Savić, and Marina Jušković. 2024. "Morphological and Anatomical Differentiation of Potamogeton gramineus in Relation to the Presence of Invasive Species Elodea nuttallii: A Case Study from Vlasina Lake, Serbia" Plants 13, no. 14: 1937. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13141937

APA Style

Nikolić, D., Jenačković Gocić, D., Raca, I., Đorđević, M., Savić, A., & Jušković, M. (2024). Morphological and Anatomical Differentiation of Potamogeton gramineus in Relation to the Presence of Invasive Species Elodea nuttallii: A Case Study from Vlasina Lake, Serbia. Plants, 13(14), 1937. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13141937

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop