1. Introduction and Preliminaries
Let
and
be linear spaces. A function
is called a Jensen function if
It is well known that a continuous Jensen function
is of the form
for some real constants
(see for example [
1], Theorem 1.52).
For a given function
, we define the function
by
A function
is said to be a bi-Jensen function if
for all
. It is clear that
for every function
. It is obvious that a function
is bi-Jensen if and only if
for all
.
Bae and Park [
2] obtained the general solution of the bi-Jensen functional equation. Indeed, they showed a function
is bi-Jensen if and only if there exist a bi-additive function
and two additive functions
such that
For the case , it is easy to see that the function given by is a bi-Jensen function. Of course, we will see that every continuous bi-Jensen function has this form.
Generally speaking, a functional equation is called stable in a class of functions
if any function from
, satisfying the functional equation approximately (in some sense), then it is near to an exact solution of the functional equation. It should be noted that the stability problem of functional equations appeared from a question of Ulam [
3] about the stability of group homomorphisms.
Bae and Park [
2] investigated the generalized Hyers–Ulam stability of (
1). Some stability results associated with the bi-Jensen functional equation can be found in [
2,
4,
5,
6,
7].
In this paper, we deal with the bi-Jensen functional equation
where
is the unknown function. We give the general continuous solutions of (
2) when
. We use a Hamel basis of
over
(the field of rational numbers) in constructing a function
, which is a solution of (
2) and is not continuous. We investigate the Hyers–Ulam stability and hyperstability of (
2). Moreover, we investigate the Hyers–Ulam stability of the bi-Jensen functional equation on some restricted unbounded domains. This enables us to study some of interesting asymptotic behaviors of bi-Jensen functions.
In the past decades and recent years, various types of stability problems for different functional equations have been studied by many mathematicians (cf. e.g., [
2,
8,
9,
10,
11,
12,
13,
14,
15] and the bibliography quoted there).
2. Some Properties of Bi-Jensen Functions
In this section, some properties of bi-Jensen functions are presented.
Proposition 1. Let and denote linear spaces and be a bi-Jensen function. Then, for all .
Proof. Since
and
, we have
for all
. Letting
and
in (
4), we obtain
for all
. Applying (
5) in (
4), one gets
Hence we get the desired result (
3). □
Proposition 2. Let and be normed linear spaces and be a bi-Jensen function. Take . Then, f is continuous at if and only if f is continuous at .
Proof. Let
and
be sequences in
such that
as
. By Proposition 1, we have
This proves the proposition. □
Proposition 3. Let be a continuous bi-Jensen function. Then, where are real constants.
Proof. Since
f is bi-Jensen,
f satisfies (
4) for all
. Then, for each fixed
, the mappings
and
are continuous Jensen. Hence, there exist real constants
and a function
such that
Therefore,
for all
. It is clear that
is continuous. We show that
is Jensen. By (
4), we obtain
On the other hand, we have
By Equations (
7) and (
8), one concludes
is Jensen. So,
for some
. Then,
□
In the following, we use Hamel bases in constructing a bi-Jensen function
f, which is not of the form (
6), and so is not continuous. First, we construct the most general bi-Jensen function. Then, we show the existence of a bi-Jensen function, which is not of the form (
6).
Theorem 1. Let be a Hamel basis of over the field of rational numbers , and be defined arbitrarily on . Then, there exists a bi-Jensen function such that and Proof. All real numbers
x and
y can be represented uniquely as a rational linear combination
Let
. Then,
, and
where
may be zero for some
. We define
We show that
f is bi-Jensen. Let
be represented as follows
It is clear that
. If
, we have
and
. So, by the definition of
f, we get
□
Corollary 1. There is a bi-Jensen function , which is not of the form (6). Proof. Let
be a Hamel basis of
over
and
with
. Define
by
and
for all
. By Theorem (1), there exists a bi-Jensen function
with
and
for all
. If
for some real numbers
, then
This yields . So, , which is a contradiction. □
3. Hyers-Ulam Stability
In this section, the stability problem is treated for the bi-Jensen function in the sense of Hyers–Ulam. Some basic properties of a bi-Jensen function were established by Jun et al. [
4].
The following lemma extends the results of ([
4], Lemma 1).
Lemma 1. Let and be linear spaces and . Then, for all and all , we have Proof. Let
and
. Then,
This proves (
9). Similarly, (
10) is also obtained. To prove (
11), we have
Now, using equalities (
9) and (
10), we obtain (
11). This completes the proof. □
Corollary 2. Let and be linear spaces and be a bi-Jensen function. Then,
;
;
;
,
for all and all .
Let , be a linear space and a linear normed space. A function is said to be - bi-Jensen if for all .
Lemma 2. Let be a linear space, a normed linear space and be an ε-bi-Jensen function. Then, , and are Cauchy sequences for each .
Proof. Since
f is
-bi-Jensen, we infer that
and similarly,
for all
and integers
. Therefore,
and
are Cauchy sequences.
We now prove that
is Cauchy. First, we have
For
and
, we set
Hence, is a Cauchy sequence. Because and are Cauchy sequences, we infer that is Cauchy. □
In the following theorem we investigate the Hyers–Ulam stability of a bi-Jensen function.
Theorem 2. Let be a Banach space and be an ε-bi-Jensen function. Then there is a unique bi-Jensen function such that Proof. By Lemma 2, we can define the functions
and
by
Putting
and taking
in (
12), (
13) and (
15), we obtain
Adding these inequalities, we get
This means (
16), where
.
It is clear that
. Now, we show that
g is bi-Jensen. It is easy to see that
for all
. To prove the uniqueness of
g, let
be another bi-Jensen function satisfying (
16). By Corollary 2
, we have
for all
and
. Then,
for all
and
. Letting
, we infer that
for all
. □
4. Hyperstability
We start with the following lemmas.
Lemma 3. Let and be linear spaces and satisfying Then, f is Jensen on .
Proof. Letting
in (
17), we get
Letting
and
in (
17), respectively, we obtain
Adding equations in (
19) and using (
18), we conclude
By (
20), one infers that (
17) holds for all
. This completes the proof. □
Lemma 4. Let and be linear spaces and satisfying Then, f is bi-Jensen on .
Proof. Letting
in (
21), we get
Letting
and
in (
21), we get
Putting
in (
21) and applying (
23), we obtain
So, (
22) holds for all
and
. Let
and define
by
. Then,
g is Jensen on
. By Lemma 3, we get
g is Jensen on
. This means (
22) holds for all
. Similarly, one can show that
Therefore f is bi-Jensen on . □
Theorem 3. Let and be normed spaces, and be a nonempty set. Take and let be real numbers with and . Assume that for each there exists a positive integer such that for all with . Then, every function satisfying the inequality is bi-Jensen on , that is Proof. Without loss of generality, we may assume that
. Let
with
. By this assumption, there exists a positive integer
m such that
for all
. Then, (
24) yields
Letting
in the above inequalities, we get
Therefore,
for all
with
. Similarly, one can show
This ends the proof. □
Theorem 4. Suppose and be real numbers with and . Let and be normed linear spaces and be a function satisfying Then, f is bi-Jensen on .
Proof. It is clear that (
26) is also true for
. By the same argument presented in the proof of Theorem 3, we conclude
On the other hand, (
25) yields
for all
. Letting
in the above inequalities, we get
Therefore, for all . By Lemma 4, we infer that f is bi-Jensen on . □
5. Hyers–Ulam Stability on Restricted Domains
In this section, the Hyers–Ulam stability of the bi-Jensen functional equation on some restricted domains is presented. We apply the obtained results to the study of an interesting asymptotic behavior of bi-Jensen functions.
Theorem 5. Let and are normed linear spaces and . Suppose that is a function satisfying for all with . Then, f is a -bi-Jensen function.
Proof. Let
be arbitrary. Choose
such that
Adding (
29) and (
30), we get
Adding (
31) and (
32), we get
By (
28), we obtain
This means
Multiplying (
33) and (
34) by
and then adding the resultant inequalities to (
35), we obtain
On the other hand, by (
28), we have
Adding (
36), (
37), (
38), (
39), (
40) and (
41), we obtain
for all
. Replacing
by
and
by
in (
42), we obtain
for all
. Then, (
43) yields
for all
. Multiplying (
43)–(
46) by
, and then adding the resultant inequalities to (
42), one concludes
for all
. So,
f is
-bi-Jensen. □
Corollary 3. Suppose that is a function satisfying for all with . Then, f is -bi-Jensen.
Theorem 6. Let and be normed linear spaces and let . Suppose that is a function satisfying (28) for all with . Then f is -bi-Jensen. Proof. Let
be arbitrary and let
such that
It follows from (
28) that
The rest of the proof is similar to the proof of Theorem 5. □
Theorem 7. Let be a linear normed space and be a Banach space. Take and . Suppose that is a function satisfying one of the following conditions:
;
;
.
Then there exists a unique bi-Jensen function such that Proof. By Theorems 5 and 6, we infer that f is -bi-Jensen function. Then, by Theorem 2, we get the desired result. □
Corollary 4. Let and be normed linear spaces. Take and suppose that and are functions such that for all . Then, f is -bi-Jensen function if one of the following conditions holds:
;
;
.
Corollary 5. Let and be normed linear spaces. A function is bi-Jensen if one of the following conditions holds:
;
;
.
6. Conclusions
We studied some properties of the bi-Jensen functional equation
and obtained the form of continuous bi-Jensen functions
. We constructed a function
, which is bi-Jensen and is not continuous. The Hyers–Ulam stability and hyperstability of the bi-Jensen functional equation have been investigated. Additionally, we investigated the Hyers–Ulam stability of the bi-Jensen functional equation on some restricted unbounded domains and used the obtained results to study some of interesting asymptotic behaviors of bi-Jensen functions.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, J.-H.B., M.A.T. and A.N. methodology, J.-H.B., M.A.T. and A.N.; software, J.-H.B., M.A.T. and A.N.; validation, J.-H.B., M.A.T. and A.N.; formal analysis, J.-H.B., M.A.T. and A.N.; investigation, J.-H.B., M.A.T. and A.N.; resources, J.-H.B., M.A.T. and A.N.; data curation, J.-H.B., M.A.T. and A.N.; writing—original draft preparation, M.A.T. and A.N.; project administration, M.A.T. and A.N.; funding acquisition, J.-H.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Kannappan, P.L. Functional Equations and Inequalities with Applications; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Bae, J.-H.; Park, W.-G. On the solution of a bi-Jensen functional equation and its stability. Bull. Korean Math. Soc. 2006, 43, 499–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ulam, S.M. Problem in Modern Mathematics, 2nd ed.; John Wiley Sons, Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 1964. [Google Scholar]
- Jun, K.-W.; Lee, Y.-H.; Oh, J.-H. On the Rassias stability of a bi-Jensen functional equation. J. Math. Inequal. 2008, 2, 363–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Jun, K.-W.; Han, M.-H.; Lee, Y.-H. On the Hyers-Ulam-Rassias stability of the bi-Jensen functional equation. Kyungpook Math. J. 2008, 48, 705–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jun, K.-W.; Jung, I.-S.; Lee, Y.-H. Stability of a bi-Jensen functional equation II. J. Inequal. Appl. 2009, 2009, 976284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kim, G.H.; Lee, Y.-H. Hyers-Ulam stability of a bi-Jensen functional equation on a punctured domain. J. Inequal. Appl. 2010, 2010, 476249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hyers, D.H.; Isac, G.; Rassias, T.M. Stability of Functional Equations in Several Variables; Birkhäuser: Basel, Switzerland, 1998. [Google Scholar]
- Jung, S.-M. Hyers-Ulam-Rassias Stability of Functional Equations in Mathematical Analysis; Hadronic Press: Palm Harbor, FL, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
- Selvan, A.P.; Najati, A. Hyers-Ulam stability and hyperstability of a Jensen-type functional equation on 2-Banach spaces. J. Inequal. Appl. 2022, 32, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Forti, G.L. Hyers-Ulam stability of functional equations in several variables. Aequationes Math. 1995, 150, 143–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Najati, A.; Tareeghee, M.A. Drygas functional inequality on restricted domains. Acta Math. Hungar. 2022, 166, 115–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Noori, B.; Moghimi, M.B.; Najati, A.; Park, C.; Lee, J.R. On superstability of exponential functional equations. J. Inequal. Appl. 2021, 76, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prager, W.; Schwaiger, J. Stability of the bi-Jensen equation. Bull. Korean Math. Soc. 2008, 45, 133–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Czerwik, S. Functional Equations and Inequalities in Several Variables; World Scientific: Hackensack, NJ, USA; London, UK; Singapore; Hong Kong, 2002. [Google Scholar]
| Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).