Next Article in Journal
Group-Graded By-Product Construction and Group Double Centralizer Properties
Next Article in Special Issue
Boundary Value Problem of Space-Time Fractional Advection Diffusion Equation
Previous Article in Journal
Multi-Objective Robust Optimization for the Sustainable Location-Inventory-Routing Problem of Auto Parts Supply Logistics
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Mathematical Model for Analyzing the Dynamics of Tungro Virus Disease in Rice: A Systematic Literature Review

1
Doctoral Program of Mathematics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang 45363, Indonesia
2
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang 45363, Indonesia
3
Department of Plant Pests and Diseases, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang 45363, Indonesia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Mathematics 2022, 10(16), 2944; https://doi.org/10.3390/math10162944
Submission received: 14 July 2022 / Revised: 30 July 2022 / Accepted: 8 August 2022 / Published: 15 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Dynamical Systems and Optimal Control, 2nd Edition)

Abstract

:
One of the main obstacles in rice cultivation is the tungro virus disease caused by Rice tungro spherical virus (RTSV) and Rice tungro bacilliform virus (RTBV). These viruses are transmitted by green leafhopper (Nephotettix virescens) vector, semi-persistently after sucking infected plants. Subsequently, the vectors migrate and suck susceptible plants, but they can be controlled chemically and biologically. Mathematical modeling is one of the tools that can be used to analyze the spread of disease in plants. A literature review was conducted regarding the mathematical model of the spread of tungro virus disease in rice plants with the data sourced from scholarly references available in the dimension database, Google Scholar, and Scopus in 2012–2021. The steps followed include conducting a literature analysis and examining the mathematical model of the transmission of tungro virus disease in rice plants to identify gaps for future research. The results show that since 2016, few studies have analyzed mathematical models of the spread of tungro virus disease in rice plants. This is evident from the data search results, which show that only four articles were acquired through the option of duplication and visualization using VOSviewer software.

1. Introduction

Rice (Oryza sativa L.) is one of the food crops that has a crucial position in the economy of Indonesia. It can provide jobs, increase income, and reduce poverty, in addition to playing a crucial role in enhancing food security. However, the challenges experienced by the agricultural sector are very complex, including fluctuating production with very low productivity.
The low productivity is caused by various factors, such as the problem of pests and plant diseases [1,2]. These problems can be caused by bacteria, viruses, fungi, protozoa, and insect pathogens, spread through wind, water, soil, and other disease-carrying vectors [3].
Farmers often encounter Tungro virus disease when cultivating rice. The disease is caused by Rice tungro spherical virus (RTSV) and Rice tungro baciilliform virus (RTBV). Both viruses can be spread through a green leafhopper (Nephotettix virescens) vector semi-persistently after sucking infected plants. They migrate and suck susceptible plants without going through a latency period in the vector body [4,5,6,7]. Symptoms can be seen from changes in leaf color, especially on young leaves, which appear yellow-orange starting from the tips, then they become slightly curled, the number of tillers is reduced, and plant growth is stunted. These symptoms usually appear 6–15 days after infection [8,9,10,11].
Mathematical modeling is one of the tools used to analyze the spread of disease in plants. Several previous findings have developed many models for the spread of plant diseases. This includes, previous findings have developed many models for the spread of plant diseases, including the among them modeling of vector-borne diseases with direct transmission [12] and one-time delay [13]. In addition, optimal control was sought from the application of roguing, replanting, curative, and preventive treatments [14], as well as the use of botanical fungicides to reduce the number of infected hosts [15,16].
Other mathematical models, such as the spread of fungal diseases, have been carried out by Castle and Giligan [17], who modeled the spread of fungal diseases causing fungicide-dependent spoilage, protection, and infection rates. Meanwhile, Kumar understood the role of fungicide application in fungal diseases with the help of fractional derivatives consisting of memory effect [18].
Anggriani also created a vector-borne model of rice tungro disease by applying insecticide to infected plants [19]. It was then redeveloped by analyzing the effect of using predators to reduce the number of infected plants [20]. Meanwhile, Blas et al. [21] and Blas and David [22] created a model of tungro disease in rice plants by considering the type and characteristics of the virus.
Other research on plant disease models has been conducted, namely a mathematical model of yellow virus diseases in chili that considers the growth phase and the application of entomopathogenic fungus, Verticillium lecanii (V. lecanii), to control vectors of the diseases [23] and then looked for control of the usage of V. lecanii as a factor in determining the dose to be applied [24].
From the previous description, mathematical modeling is essential in controlling the spread of various plant diseases, especially tungro virus in rice plants. However, there are variations between the different models that have been developed previously. This is due to the different assumptions regarding to show the uniqueness of the models. Therefore, reviewing the literature on the mathematical model of the spread of tungro disease proves to be an interesting topic to discuss. The literature review is expected to identify gaps for the development of models and research methods regarding the spread of tungro virus disease in rice plants.

2. Methods

2.1. Data Search Strategy

The literature review focuses on mathematical modeling of the spread of tungro virus disease in rice plants. The data are sourced from scholarly references in the dimension database, Google Scholar, and Scopus in 2012–2021. The keywords used in searching can be seen in Table 1.

2.2. Selection of Relevant Articles

From the results of Table 1, it can be seen that when using the keywords “(“Stability analysis” OR “Mathematical model” OR “Mathematical modeling” OR “Dynamical Analysis” OR “Dynamical System”) AND (“Optimal Control”) AND (“Plant disease”) AND (“Tungro”)”, data were obtained for 35 articles, five from the Scopus database, 16 from the Google Scholar database, and 14 from the Dimension database. Therefore, 20 articles were screened, after duplication. The next step is to filter articles relevant to the research topic. Thirteen papers are suitable based on the relevancy of their titles and abstracts. Meanwhile, seven were excluded as their titles and abstracts did not corresponding to the research topic. All relevant articles in the previous step were screened based on the availability of full papers, but after studying them in detail, only three matched the expected focus of the topic.
From the three articles studied, a backward and forwarding process was carried out by collecting relevant articles. This process was repeated and stopped when the article obtained was from the most recent year, and there are no more citing articles. From this process, four articles were obtained that were relevant to the research topic [19,20,21,22], and were used as study material, as seen in Table 2. The screening process was carried out using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) flow chart, as shown in Figure 1.
These keywords are used as the research is limited to developing a mathematical model of tungro virus disease in rice plants, which is dynamically analyzed and uses optimal control theory as a tool to determine the most optimal control that practitioners should carry out.

2.3. Data Analysis

Data analysis consisted of four stages, namely:
  • Reviewing the mathematical model of the spread of tungro virus disease in rice plants. This is necessary to determine the extent to which previous findings have developed the model. Each paper used as a reference is discussed starting with what was analyzed, what assumptions were used, how the model was formed, and what kind of control was carried out;
  • Reviewing the results that have been previously achieved. The results obtained in each paper used as a reference are presented at this stage;
  • Determining the research gap regarding the mathematical model of the spread of tungro virus disease. Each model and analysis carried out in each paper is discussed to obtain a gap that can be used in the development of research models and methods regarding the spread of tungro virus disease in rice plants;
  • Perform statistical analysis to see the development of the model for the spread of tungro virus disease. The development of a model of the spread of tungro virus disease is seen based on how many studies on modeling have been published, since the modeling was carried out, and how it was developed;
  • Performing bibliometric analysis to analyze the novelty, obsolescence, and scientific reference distribution. Mapping the model for the spread of tungro virus disease in rice plants with the help of VOSViewer software so that we can see how far the model for the spread of tungro virus disease in rice plants has been developed.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Overview of Previous Models

From the results of selecting articles using the keywords “(“Stability analysis” OR “Mathematical model” OR “Mathematical modelling” OR “Dynamical Analysis” OR “Dynamical System”) AND (“Optimal Control”) AND (“Plant disease”) AND (“Tungro”)”, there were 20 selected based on the results of duplication plus one article from the backward and forwarding process. The summary can be seen in Table 2.
After screening, four relevant articles out of the twenty-one are used as reference material. The results show that a dynamic system model for the spread of tungro disease in rice plants developed from the Vector-Borne model has been conducted since 2016 [19,20,21,22], as seen in Table 3.
The model developed by Blas et al. in 2016 [21] consisted of eight compartments, equally divided between plant populations, and vector populations. The four compartments of each population were the healthy population, infected with RTSV only, infected with RTBV only, and infected with both (RTSV and RTBV). The infected compartment was distinguished as RTSV alone did not show definite symptoms. In contrast to RTBV-infected plants, they showed dwarfism and moderate discoloration. However, rice plants infected with RTBV and RTSV experienced severe stunting and yellowing [4,36,37].
Rice tungro virus is transmitted exclusively (in a semi-persistent manner and without a latency period) by green leafhoppers, with Nephotettix virescens as the primary vector [38]. A vector can feed on plants infected with RTSV to capture and transmit the virus. However, when the planthopper sucks food from rice plants infected with RTBV only, it cannot acquire or transmit the virus. The planthopper can transmit both viruses by sucking the RTSV-infected and RTBV-infected plant [39,40].
The assumptions used by Blas et al. [21], in line with Zang and Holt’s [41] research, show that the rate of rice cultivation depends on the maximum capacity r ( K N p ) , where r is the rate of planting, N p is the total crop and K is the maximum capacity for planting rice. Illustrations for possible virus transitions and Blas modeling can be seen in Figure 2 and Figure 3.
Figure 2 shows that the population of susceptible plants increased due to the recruitment of plants by r ( K N p ) and decreased due to the transition from susceptible plants to plants infected with RTSV, RTBV, and both. This is due to the infected vectors (both infected with RTSV, RTBV, or both) sucking up susceptible plants at rates of α ,     β ,     γ ,     σ , and τ . In addition, the population of susceptible plants decreased due to harvesting at a rate of q 0 . Meanwhile, the process of possible transition can be seen in Figure 3. The figure explains that the susceptible plant population interacts with only RTSV-infected vectors so that the susceptible plants undergo a transition to only RTSV-infected plants. On the other hand, a description of each variable and parameter can be seen in Table 4.
Blas and David [22] developed the previous model [21] to analyze the efficiency of the roguing process on land infected with rice tungro disease. The distribution process in a study conducted in 2017 can be seen in Figure 4 with a roguing effect ρ (representing the percentage of diseased plants removed from the field represented by the green arrow in Figure 4), where 0 ρ   1 .
The following study was conducted by Anggriani et al. in 2017 [19] to analyze the spread of tungro disease based on the SIR (Susceptible–Infected–Recovered) host-vector model [42,43]. Some assumptions used are: plant population is not constant, and growth and death rates are not the same. In addition, new plants are considered healthy, disease transmission occurs as vector insects carry the virus from infected plants, infected plants cannot be cured, and tungro disease can cause death. Insecticide-treated plants are immune to reinfection, regardless of environmental, climate, or weather conditions. The schematic diagram of the spread of tungro disease can be seen in Figure 5, where S H is a susceptible host plant, I H is an infected host plant, S V is a susceptible vector, I V is an infected vector, N H is the number of plant populations, N V is the number of vector populations, π is the rate of plant recruitment, η is the rate of vector recruitment, μ H is the rate of plant death, μ V is the mortality vector, β H is the probability from vector to plant, β V is the probability from plant to vector, b is the vector suction rate, d is the per capita plant mortality rate, and p is the level of insecticide application.
Previous research on mathematical modeling for the spread of tungro disease was conducted by Suryaningrat et al. in 2020 [20]. The model created in a previous study [19] was developed by adding predator–prey interactions between vectors and biological agents. The rice plant population into healthy ( S H ) and infected ( I H ) plants, susceptible ( S V ) and infected ( I V ) vector populations, and predatory populations ( P ) , where r is the predator birth rate, c p is the predator death rate due to insecticides, c v is the rate of vector death due to insecticides, and α is the rate of predation. The schematic diagram and description of each parameter can be seen in Figure 6.
A “phylogenetic tree” diagram is drawn to represent the relationships between the articles used, as shown in Figure 7. Each branch reflects the model’s main characteristics developed in a previous study. For example, the mathematical model of the spread of tungro disease in rice plants is divided into two categories. This includes models for the characteristics of the virus and the similarity between every viral infection.

3.2. Results That Have Been Achieved in Previous Studies

From models 1 and 2, the plant population is divided into susceptible plants and those infected with tungro disease. The green leafhopper vector population consists of susceptible and infected vectors. Control is conducted by giving insecticides to infected plants (Model 1) and applying predators and insecticides (Model 2). The two models are solved dynamically, starting from finding the equilibrium point, basic reproduction number, and local stability analysis. In addition, optimal control is also sought using the Pontryagin Maximum Principle.
A model for the spread of tungro disease in rice by considering the characteristics of RTSV and RTBV (Model 3) and the effect of rouging control (Model 4) has also been carried out, but the last two models were analyzed only numerically. Meanwhile, sensitivity and stability analysis should be performed to identify the very influential parameters and determine the stability of the developed model.

3.3. Research Gaps That Might Be Developed

Previous studies have made mathematical models by considering control through rouging, insecticides, and using predators as natural enemies.
The use of insecticides has a quicker capacity to control the spread of tungro disease. However, this application can cause pest and disease resistance, is not environmentally friendly, the price is not economical and can kill natural enemies.
The employment of natural enemies is considered more environmentally beneficial, and the price is relatively affordable, as it is sufficient to plant refugia plants. However, the control process using natural enemies is quite long, hence, when the green leafhopper has exceeded the threshold, further control is needed, such as applying pesticides. This kind of control follows the recommended Integrated Pest Management (IPM) concept, where the application of pesticides is given after reaching the threshold.
Possible development of Models 1 to 4 includes the use of refugia plants and parasitoids, which are considered more environmentally friendly and more economical so that these two controls can be used as consideration for developing a model for the spread of tungro virus disease in rice plants.
The parameters used to model the spread of tungro virus disease in rice plants when performing numerical simulations are only based on assumptions. This is due to the inaccessibility or incompleteness of the required data. Therefore, conducting a sensitivity analysis is essential to identify the parameters that are very influential on the developed model. This is consistent with research the conducted by:
  • Chitnis et al. [44] and Muryawi et al. [45] have analyzed local sensitivity by using partial derivation techniques to determine the parameters of the model influencing disease transmission and prevalence;
  • Blower and Dowlatabadi [46] have performed a sensitivity analysis using Partial Rank Correlation Coefficient (PRCC);
  • Wu et al. [47] conducted a sensitivity analysis using Scatter plots, Sobol Method, Morris Method, Partial Rank Correlation Coefficient (PRCC), and sensitivity heat map method; and
  • Hurint et al. [48] and Rois et al. [49] carried out a sensitivity analysis locally by analyzing the effect of changes in parameter values on the basic reproduction ratio ( 0 ) .
The previous works primarily studied the stability analysis of the model around the equilibrium point. Therefore, it is also necessary to conduct a global stability analysis of the mathematical model of plant disease spread, such as building the Lyapunov function [12,45,50,51] or using the Volterra–Lyapunov matrix method [52].

3.4. Statistical Analysis

From the keywords used in the data search, 21 articles were obtained, as described in Table 2. After grouping based on the research object, only 19% did modeling on tungro disease, and the other 81% discussed different problems (see Figure 8).
Figure 9 shows that since 2016, several publications have analyzed mathematical models of the spread of tungro virus disease in rice plants. The most publications occurred in 2017, with as many as two publications. Unfortunately, no articles were published in the next two years, and publications will be available again in 2020. This indicates that research on tungro disease models in rice is scarce.

3.5. Bibliometric Analysis

About 20 articles were relevant to the keywords used as described in Section 2.2 and Section 3.1. They were obtained from the duplication selection results and one article was selected based on reference relevance. The results of the visualization of the bibliometric network using the VOSviewer software can be seen in Figure 8.
From Figure 10, it can be seen that there are several nodes with different sizes and distances. The size of the node indicates the number of words discussed. The larger the node, the more terms are available in the database. At the same time, the distance from one node to another indicates the strength of the relationship between one word and another. The tungro virus node looks small, and the distance between the “tungro virus” node and the “model” node is quite far. This shows that analysis of the mathematical model of the spread of tungro disease is still rarely conducted.
Figure 11 shows no correlation between the node distribution model of the tungro virus and refugia plants, parasitoid utilization, sensitivity analysis, global stability analysis, and software design to predict spread. This means that there is no research on modeling tungro virus disease by considering refugia plants and the use of parasitoids. In addition, the analysis of the mathematical model of the spread of tungro disease has not applied sensitivity analysis, global stability analysis, and software design to predict the spread. However, this analysis is also essential. Therefore, this is an opportunity for further research to develop a model for spreading the tungro virus in rice plants.
While Figure 12 shows that mathematical modeling of the spread of the tungro virus has been carried out since 2016, it is still rarely conducted, and this can be seen from the node’s color and the node’s small size. In addition, the four articles used as references were also mapped to visualize the relationship between the two, as shown in Figure 13. The figure shows that the control carried out only considers the use of insecticides, biological agents, and rouging. So that control by considering the planting of refugia plants and the use of parasitoids becomes an opportunity for developing models for spreading tungro virus disease in rice plants.

4. Discussion

Research on mathematical modeling of the spread of tungro virus disease in rice plants has been carried out since 2016, but few researchers have conducted such research. This can be seen from the data obtained from the results of a literature study on the dimension database, Google Scholar, and Scopus in 2012–2021, which show there are only four papers available after analysis using the PRISMA method. Of the four papers, the control considered in modeling is limited to using insecticides, rouging, and biological agents. Farmers often carry out control by utilizing the refugia plants and parasitoid, which are considered more environmentally friendly and more economical so that these two controls can be used as consideration for developing a model for the spread of tungro virus disease in rice plants. In addition, the analysis is only limited to finding the equilibrium point, basic reproduction number, local stability analysis, and optimal control, even though other studies, such as sensitivity and global stability analysis, need to be carried out. Furthermore, the model made by previous researchers is continuous, even though rice plants are not continuous, so making a discrete model for the spread of tungro virus disease in rice plants can be considered by future researchers.

5. Conclusions

Mathematical modeling of the spread of the tungro virus in rice plants is rarely conducted. This can be seen from the results of a literature study on the mathematical model of the spread of tungro virus disease in rice plants with data sourced from scholarly references available in the dimension database, Google Scholar, and Scopus in 2012–2021, which were analyzed using PRISMA methods and bibliometric visualization. The results showed that there were only four articles on mathematical modeling of the spread of the tungro virus. Furthermore, the controls carried out by the previous researchers considered rouging, insecticide treatment, and the use of predators as natural enemies in their modeling. Therefore, the use of refugia plants and parasitoids can be considered in future studies to develop a model for spreading the tungro virus in rice plants. In addition, discrete models for the spread of tungro virus disease, global stability, and sensitivity analysis can be used to develop mathematical models for the spread of tungro virus disease in rice plants that future researchers can use.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.A. and N.I.; methodology, R.A.; software, R.A.; validation, N.A. and A.K.S.; formal analysis, R.A.; investigation, N.I.; data curation, N.I.; writing—original draft preparation, R.A.; writing—review and editing, N.A.; visualization, A.K.S.; supervision, A.K.S.; project administration, N.A.; funding acquisition, N.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research is funded by Universitas Padjadjaran with contract number 2064/UN6.3.1/PT.00/2022.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

Thanks to RISTEKDIKTI 2021 through the Doctoral Dissertation Research Grant.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Soelaiman, V.; Ernawati, A. Pertumbuhan dan Perkembangan Cabai Keriting (Capsicum annuum L.) secara In Vitro pada beberapa Konsentrasi BAP dan IAA. Bul. Agrohorti 2013, 1, 62–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Sebayang, L. Teknik Pengendalian Penyakit Kuning pada Tanaman Cabai; BPTP: Medan, Indonesia, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  3. Agrios, G.N. Plant Pathology, 5th ed.; Department of Plant Pathology University of Florida; Elsivier Academic Press: Gainesville, FL, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  4. Azzam, O.; Chancellor, T.C.B. The Biology, Epidemiology, and Management of Rice Tungro Disease in Asia. Plant Dis. 2002, 86, 88–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Azzam, O.; Cabunagan, R.C.; Chancellor, T. Methods for Evaluating Resistance to Rice Tungro Disease; International Rice Research Institute (IRRI): Los Baños, Philippines, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  6. Bunawan, H.; Dusik, L.; Bunawan, S.N.; Amin, N.M. Rice Tungro Disease: From Identification to Disease Control. World Appl. Sci. J. 2014, 31, 1221–1226. [Google Scholar]
  7. Shim, J.; Torollo, G.; Angeles-Shim, R.B.; Cabunagan, R.C.; Choi, I.-R.; Yeo, U.-S.; Ha, W.-G. Rice tungro spherical virus resistance into photoperiod-insensitive japonica rice by marker-assisted selection. Breed. Sci. 2015, 65, 345–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Bigirimana, V.d.P.; Hua, G.K.H.; Nyamangyoku, O.I.; Höfte, M. Rice Sheath Rot: An Emerging Ubiquitous Destructive Disease Complex. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 1066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Dasgupta, I.; Hull, R.; Eastop, S.; Poggi-Pollini, C.; Blakebrough, M.; Boulton, M.I.; Davies, J.W. Rice tungro bacilliform virus DNA independently infects rice after Agrobacterium-mediated transfer. J. Gen. Virol. 1991, 72, 1215–1221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Udaa, M.N.A.; Hasfalinaa, C.M.; Samsuzanaa, A.A.; Faridahc, S.; Zamric, I.; Siti Norainic, B.; Nur Sabrinac, W.; Hashimd, U. Comparison Study of Two Different Isolation and Purification Method for Rice Tungro Bacilliform Virus (RTBV). Agric. Agric. Sci. Procedia 2014, 2, 107–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Srilatha, P.; Yousuf, F.; Methre, R.; Vishnukiran, T.; Agarwal, S.; Poli, Y.; Reddy, M.R.; Vidyasagar, B.; Shanker, C.; Krishnaveni, D.; et al. Physical interaction of RTBV ORFI with D1 protein of Oryza sativa and Fe/Zn homeostasis play a key role in symptoms development during rice tungro disease to facilitate the insect mediated virus transmission. Virology 2019, 526, 117–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Lashari, A.A.; Zaman, G. Global dynamics of vector-borne diseases with horizontal transmission in host population. Comput. Math. Appl. 2011, 61, 745–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Lashari, A.A.; Hattaf, K.; Zaman, G. A delay differetial equation model of a vector borne disease with direct transmission. IJEES 2012, 27, 25–35. [Google Scholar]
  14. Anggriani, N.; Amelia, R.; Istifadah, N.; Arumi, D. Optimal control of plant disease model with roguing, replanting, curative, and preventive treatment. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2020, 1657, 012050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Anggriani, N.; Mardiyah, M.; Istifadah, N.; Supriatna, A.K. Optimal control issues in plant disease with host demographic factor and botanical fungicides. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2018, 332, 012036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Amelia, R.; Mardiyah, M.; Nahar, J.; Anggriani, N.; Supriatna, A.K. Optimal control for the use of botanical fungicides in the spread of plant diseases. IOP Conf. Ser. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2019, 1315, 012054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Castle, M.D.; Giligan, C.A. An Epidemiological Framework for Modelling Fungicide Dynamics and Control. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e40941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kumar, P.; Erturk, V.S.; Govindaraj, V.; Kumar, S. A fractional mathematical modeling of protectant and curative fungicide application. Chaos Solitons Fractal X 2022, 8, 100071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Anggriani, N.; Yusuf, M.; Supriatna, A.K. The Effect of Insecticide on the Vector of Rice Tungro Disease: Insight from a Mathematical Model. Int. Interdiscip. J. 2017, 20, 6197–6206. [Google Scholar]
  20. Suryaningrat, W.; Anggriani, N.; Supriatna, A.K.; Istifadah, N. The Optimal Control of Rice Tungro Disease with Insecticide and Biological Agent. AIP Conf. Proc. 2020, 2264, 040002. [Google Scholar]
  21. Blas, N.T.; Addawe, J.M.; David, G. A Mathematical Model of Transmission of Rice Tungro Disease by Nephotettix Virescens. Am. Inst. Phys. 2016, 1787, 080015-1–080015-7. [Google Scholar]
  22. Blas, N.; David, G. Dynamical roguing model for controlling the spread of tungro virus via Nephotettix Virescens in a rice field. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2017, 893, 012018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Amelia, R.; Anggriani, N.; Istifadah, N.; Supriatna, A.K. Stability analysis for yellow virus disease mathematical model of red chili plants. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2021, 1722, 012043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Amelia, R.; Anggriani, N.; Supriatna, A.K. Optimal Control Model of Verticillium lecanii Application in the Spread of Yellow Red Chili Virus. Wseas Trans. Math. 2019, 18, 351–358. [Google Scholar]
  25. Atallah, S.S.; Gomez, M.I.; Conrad, J.M.; Nyrop, J.P. An agent-based model of plant disease diffusion and control: Grapevine leafroll disease. In Proceedings of the Agricultural and Applied Economics Association (AAEA) Conferences, 2012 Annual Meeting, Seattle, DC, USA, 12–14 August 2012. [Google Scholar]
  26. Bousset, L.; Chèvre, A.-M. Controlling Cyclic Epidemics on the Crops of the Agroecosystems: Articulate all the Dimensions in the Formalization, but Look for a Local Solution. J. Bot. 2012, 2012, 938218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Papaïx, J.; Rimbaud, L.; Burdon, J.J.; Zhan, J.; Thrall, P.H. Differential impact of landscape-scale strategies for crop cultivar deployment on disease dynamics, resistance durability and long-term evolutionary control. Evol. Appl. 2018, 11, 705–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Jeger, M.J.; Madden, L.V.; Van Den Bosch, F. Plant virus epidemiology: Applications and prospects for mathematical modeling and analysis to improve understanding and disease control. Plant Dis. 2018, 102, 837–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Rimbaud, L.; Papaix, J.; Rey, J.-F.; Barrett, L.G.; Thrall, P.H. Assessing the durability and efficiency of landscape-based strategies to deploy plant resistance to pathogens. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2018, 14, e1006067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Al-Basir, F.; Roy, P.K.; Ray, S. Impact of roguing and insecticide spraying on mosaic disease in Jatropha curcas. Control. Cybern. 2017, 46, 325–344. [Google Scholar]
  31. Jeger, M.J. The epidemiology of plant virus disease: Towards a new synthesis. Plants 2020, 9, 1768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. El-Sayed, A.M.A.; Rida, S.Z.; Gaber, Y.A. Dynamical of curative and preventive treatments in a two-stage plant disease model of fractional order. Chaos Solitons Fractals 2020, 137, 109879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Sabir, Z.; Umar, M.; Shah, G.M.; Wahab, H.A.; Sánchez, Y.G. Competency of Neural Networks for the Numerical Treatment of Nonlinear Host-Vector-Predator Model. Comput. Math. Methods Med. 2021, 2021, 2536720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Suryaningrat, W.; Anggriani, N.; Supriatna, A.K. On application of differential transformation method to solve host-vector-predator system. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2021, 1722, 012040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Rimbaud, L.; Fabre, F.; Papaix, J.; Moury, B.; Lannou, C.; Barrett, L.G.; Thrall, P.H. Models of Plant Resistance Deployment. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2021, 59, 125–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Dahal, G.; Hibino, H.; dan Cabunagan, R. Changes in Cultivar Reactions to Tungro Due to Changes in “Virulence” of the Leafhopper Vector. Phytopathol. Am. Phytopathol. Soc. 1990, 80, 659–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ling, K. Rice Virus Diseases; International Rice Research Institute Los Baños: Laguna, Philippines, 1979. [Google Scholar]
  38. Satapathy, M.; Anjaneyulu, A. Rice Tungro Disease Epidemic: An Analysis; Discovery Publishing: Daryaganj, New Delhi, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  39. Hibino, H. Transmission of Two Rice Tungro-Associated Viruses and Rice Waika Virus from Doubly or Singly Infected Source Plants by Leafhopper Vectors. Plant Dis. Am. Phytopathol. Soc. 1983, 67, 774–777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Hibino, H.; Saleh, N.; Roechan, M. Transmission of Two Kinds of Rice Tungro-Associated Vuruses by Insect Vectors. Phytopathol. Am. Phytopathol. Soc. 1979, 69, 1266–1268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zhang, X.S.; Holt, J.; Colvin, J. Mathematical Models of Host Plant Infectionby Helper-Dependent Virus Complexes: Why Are Helper Viruses Always Avirulent? Anal. Theor. Plant Pathol. 2000, 90, 85–93. [Google Scholar]
  42. Kermack, W.O.; Mckendrick, A.G. A combination to the mathematical theory of epidemics. Proceed. R. Soc. Lond. 1927, 115, 700–721. [Google Scholar]
  43. Brauer, F.; Castillo-Chavez, C. Mathematicals Models in Population Biology and Epidemology; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  44. Chitnis, N.; Hyman, J.M.; Cushing, J.M. Determining Important Parameters in the Spread of Malaria Through the Sensitivity Analysis of a Mathematical Model. Bull. Math. Biol. 2008, 70, 1272–1296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Murwayi, A.L.M.; Onyango, T.; Owour, B. Stimated Numerical Results and Simulation of the Plant Disease Model Incorporating Wind Strength and Insect Vector at Equilibrium. J. Adv. Math. Comput. Sci. 2017, 25, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Blower, S.M.; Dowlatabadi, H. Sensitivity and uncertainly analysis of complex models of disease transmission: An HIV model, as an example. Int. Stat. Rev. 1994, 62, 229–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Wu, J.; Dhingra, R.; Gambhir, M.; Remais, J.V. Sensitivity analysis of infectious disease models: Methods, advances and their application. J. R. Soc. Interface 2013, 10, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Hurint, R.U.; Ndii, M.Z.; Lobo, M. Sensitivity Analysis of Seir Epidemic Model. Online J. Nat. Sci. 2017, 6, 22–28. [Google Scholar]
  49. Rois, M.A.; Habibah, U. Local Sensitivity Analysis of COVID-19 Epidemic with Quarantine and Isolation using Normalized Index. Telematika 2021, 14, 13–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Safi, M.A.; Garba, S.M. Global Stability Analysis of SEIR Model with Holling Type II Incidence Function. Comput. Math. Methods Med. 2012, 2012, 826052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Shi, R.; Zhao, H.; Tang, S. Global Dynamic Analysis of a Vector-borne Plant Disease Model. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2014, 2014, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Masoumnezhad, M.; Rajabi, M.; Chapnevis, A.; Dorofeev, A.; Shateyi, S.; Kargar, N.S.; Nik, H.S. An Approach for the Global Stability of Mathematical Model of an Infectious Disease. Symmetry 2020, 12, 1778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Prisma diagram based on the keywords used.
Figure 1. Prisma diagram based on the keywords used.
Mathematics 10 02944 g001
Figure 2. Schematic diagram of the model for the spread of tungro virus disease in rice plants carried out by Blas in 2016 [21].
Figure 2. Schematic diagram of the model for the spread of tungro virus disease in rice plants carried out by Blas in 2016 [21].
Mathematics 10 02944 g002
Figure 3. Diagram of possible transitions of plant and vector infections [21].
Figure 3. Diagram of possible transitions of plant and vector infections [21].
Mathematics 10 02944 g003
Figure 4. Schematic diagram of the model for the spread of tungro virus disease in rice plants carried out by Blas in 2017 [22].
Figure 4. Schematic diagram of the model for the spread of tungro virus disease in rice plants carried out by Blas in 2017 [22].
Mathematics 10 02944 g004
Figure 5. Compartment diagram and flow of disease transmission [19].
Figure 5. Compartment diagram and flow of disease transmission [19].
Mathematics 10 02944 g005
Figure 6. Schematic diagram of the spread of tungro disease in rice plants conducted by Suryaningrat et al. [20].
Figure 6. Schematic diagram of the spread of tungro disease in rice plants conducted by Suryaningrat et al. [20].
Mathematics 10 02944 g006
Figure 7. Phylogenetic Tree Diagram Mathematical Model of Tungro Disease Spread in Rice Plants [19,20,21,22].
Figure 7. Phylogenetic Tree Diagram Mathematical Model of Tungro Disease Spread in Rice Plants [19,20,21,22].
Mathematics 10 02944 g007
Figure 8. Mathematical modeling percentages on plant diseases.
Figure 8. Mathematical modeling percentages on plant diseases.
Mathematics 10 02944 g008
Figure 9. Data on publication of mathematical models of tungro disease.
Figure 9. Data on publication of mathematical models of tungro disease.
Mathematics 10 02944 g009
Figure 10. Mapping the topic of the spread of tungro disease in rice plants.
Figure 10. Mapping the topic of the spread of tungro disease in rice plants.
Mathematics 10 02944 g010
Figure 11. Mapping a mathematical model of the spread of tungro virus in rice plants.
Figure 11. Mapping a mathematical model of the spread of tungro virus in rice plants.
Mathematics 10 02944 g011
Figure 12. Research mapping on the mathematical model of the spread of tungro virus disease in rice plants.
Figure 12. Research mapping on the mathematical model of the spread of tungro virus disease in rice plants.
Mathematics 10 02944 g012
Figure 13. Visualization of linkage of reference articles.
Figure 13. Visualization of linkage of reference articles.
Mathematics 10 02944 g013
Table 1. Search results through the database.
Table 1. Search results through the database.
KeywordAmount of Data From
DimensionGoogle ScholarScopus
(“Stability analysis” OR “Mathematical model” OR “Mathematical modelling” OR “Dynamical Analysis” OR “Dynamical System” OR “Optimal Control”)1,586,30418,000723,128
(“Stability analysis” OR “Mathematical model” OR “Mathematical modelling” OR “Dynamical Analysis” OR “Dynamical System” OR “Optimal Control”) AND (“Plant disease”)3885375034,717
(“Stability analysis” OR “Mathematical model” OR “Mathematical modelling” OR “Dynamical Analysis” OR “Dynamical System” OR “Optimal Control”) AND (“Plant disease”) AND (“Tungro”)3843105
(“Stability analysis” OR “Mathematical model” OR “Mathematical modelling” OR “Dynamical Analysis” OR “Dynamical System”) AND (“Optimal Control”) AND (“Plant disease”) AND (“Tungro”)14165
Table 2. Summary of relevant articles.
Table 2. Summary of relevant articles.
NoAuthorPurpose and ObjectivesMethod/ModelObject/DescriptionRef.
1.Castle and GiliganMake mathematical modeling to consider fungicide dynamics that affect plant pathogens’ invasion and persistence.
(1)
Model A (Susceptible-Infected) is a conventional model (permanently uses a protector).
(2)
Model B (Susceptible-Infected-Protected) is an explicit model (allows for spoilage, protection, and fungicide-dependent infection rates).
Fungal disease/full paper is not suitable.[17]
2Atallah et al.Models the dynamic spatial diffusion of disease in vineyards, evaluates nonspatial and spatial control strategies and ranks them based on expected net present values.Bioeconomic models, agent-based models, dynamic spatial processes, disease control.Leaf roll disease/inappropriate title.[25]
3.Bousset et al.Consider the interactions between plants, pathogens, the environment, and human actions in space and time to formalize cyclic epidemics.-Review article/title irrelevant.[26]
4.Blas et al.Analyze the equilibrium solution, and solve numerically for susceptible rice varieties.Make a mathematical model of the spread of tungro disease by considering the characteristics of RTSV and RTBV and analyze the model numerically.Tungro disease in rice plants/paper added and used as a reference paper.[21]
5.Papaïx et al.Study the impact of landscape organization (defined by the proportion of cultivated fields with resistant cultivars and their spatial aggregation) and life-history traits of major pathogens on three disease control steps.Model:
Susceptible-Exposed-Infectious-Removed (SEIR)
Method:
Statistical analysis.
Epidemiological control/inappropriate title.[27]
6.Anggriani et al.Examine the effect of using insecticides on plants infected with tungro disease in rice plants. Make   the   S H I H S V I V model and use Pontryagin’s maximum principle in finding optimal control.Tungro disease in rice plants/reference paper.[19]
7.Blas and DavidAnalyze the efficiency of the roguing process on land infected with rice tungro disease and pay attention to the types and characteristics of the virus.Created a rice plant model based on a system of ordinary differential equations to simulate the effect of roguing in controlling the spread of the Tungro virus.Tungro disease in rice plants/reference paper.[22]
8.Jeger et al.Improve understanding and control of disease through mathematical modeling and analysis.Modeling Analysis.Plants in general/full paper are not suitable.[28]
9.Rimbaud et al.Develop stochastic models to assess epidemiological and evolutionary outcomesStochasticThe pathogen/title is not appropriate.[29]
10.Anggriani et al.Seek optimal control of the use of botanical fungicides.Create a SIRXP model taking into account:
(1)
Control of infected plants is carried out by preventive treatment to reduce infected plants.
(2)
Control of infected plants is carried out by preventive treatment to reduce infected plants.
Plant diseases in general/full paper are not suitable.[15]
11.Al-Basir et al.Develop a dynamic model of mosaic disease by considering roguing and insecticides.Model:
x y u v
Method:
Stability analysis
Bifurcation Analysis
Using the Pontryagin Maximum Principle.
Mosaic virus on Jatropha plants/full paper is not suitable.[30]
12.Amelia et al.Determining optimal control of the use of Verticillium lecaniiUsing the Pontryagin Maximum Principle.Yellow virus disease in red chili plants/whole paper is not suitable.[24]
13.Amelia et al.Seek optimal control of the use of botanical fungicidesChanging the birth rate following a logistic function as the model developed by Anggriani et al. [15]Plant diseases in general/full paper are not suitable.[16]
14.Suryaningrat et al.Looking for optimal control of the use of insecticides and biological agents in controlling the spread of tungro virus disease
(1)
Developed the previous model ( S H I H S V I V ) by adding a predator as a green leafhopper controller ( S H I H S V I V P )
(2)
Consider predators and insecticides.
(3)
Determine optimal control using Pontryagin’s Maximum Principle.
Tungro disease in rice plants/reference paper.[19]
15.Anggriani et al.Determine the optimal control of the roguing and replanting plant disease model that considers curative treatment, preventive treatment, and the combination of curative and preventive treatment.Using the Pontryagin Maximum Principle.Plant diseases in general/full paper are not suitable.[14]
16.Jeger et al.Review: Epidemiology of Plant Viral Diseases.Review mathematical models.Plant virus/inappropriate title.[31]
17.El-Sayed et al.Creating a fractional model for plant disease in two-stage infectionModel:
S P E I R
Method:
Determine disease-free stability and endemic balance and perform numerical simulations using the fractional Euler method (FEM).
Plants in general/full paper are not suitable.[32]
18.Sabir et al.Introducing a stochastic solver based on Levenberg-Marquardt backpropagation Neural Networks (LMBNNs) for nonlinear host-vector-predator models.The model used: nonlinear host-vector-predator
S h I h S v I v P
Method:
Mean Square Error (MSE), Error Histograms (EHs), and regression/correlation.
Plants in general/irrelevant title.[33]
19.Amelia et al.Analyzes a mathematical model of plant disease that considers the plant growth phase and the application of Verticillium lecanii Performs   dynamic   analysis   on   the   model   that   has   been   created   ( S v I v S g I g S B T I B T ).Yellow virus disease in red chili plants/whole paper is not suitable.[23]
20.Suryaningrat et al.Completed the host-vector predator system.Using the DTM and Runge–Kutta methods.Host-vector- predators/full papers are not suitable.[34]
21.Rimbaud et al.They analyzed 69 modeling studies considering the specific model structure, underlying assumptions, and evaluation criteria.Review of 69 modeling studiesThe review paper/title is not appropriate.[35]
Table 3. Previous Tungro Disease Spread Model.
Table 3. Previous Tungro Disease Spread Model.
Formed Models
Model 1 [19] d S H d t = π β H b N H S H I V μ H S H
d I H d t = β H b N H S H I V μ H I H d I H
d S V d t = η β V b N V S V I H μ V S V p S V
d I V d t = β V b N V S V I H μ V I V p I V
Model 2 [20] d S H d t = π β H b N H S H I V μ H S H
d I H d t = β H b N H S H I V μ H I H d I H
d S V d t = η β V b N V S V I H μ V S V c V S V u α P S V
d I V d t = β V b N V S V I H μ V I V c V I V u α P I V
d P d t = r P ( 1 P N P ) + α P ( S V + I V ) P c P u
Model 3 [21] d P 0 d t = r ( K N P ) α P 0 V 3 N P γ P 0 V 3 N P τ P 0 V 3 N P β P 0 V 1 N P σ P 0 V 2 N P q 0 P 0
d P 1 d t = β P 0 V 1 N P + γ P 0 V 3 N P λ P 1 V 3 N P q 1 P 1
d P 2 d t = τ P 0 V 3 N P + σ P 0 V 2 N P δ P 2 V 3 N P q 2 P 2
d P 3 d t = α P 0 V 3 N P + λ P 1 V 3 N P + δ P 2 V 3 N P q 3 P 3
d V 0 d t = B N V ( 1 N V V ) α P 3 V 0 N P b P 1 V 0 N P + f V 2 μ V 0
d V 1 d t = b P 1 V 0 N P g P 2 V 1 N P μ V 1
d V 2 d t = c V 3 f V 2 μ V 2
d V 3 d t = α P 3 V 0 N P + g P 2 V 1 N P c V 3 μ V 3
Model 4 [22] d P 0 d t = r ( K N P ) α P 0 V 3 N P γ P 0 V 3 N P τ P 0 V 3 N P β P 0 V 1 N P σ P 0 V 2 N P q 0 P 0
d P 1 d t = β ( 1 ρ ) P 0 V 1 N P + γ ( 1 ρ ) P 0 V 3 N P λ ( 1 ρ ) P 1 V 3 N P q 1 ( 1 ρ ) P 1 ρ P 1
d P 2 d t = τ ( 1 ρ ) P 0 V 3 N P + σ ( 1 ρ ) P 0 V 2 N P δ ( 1 ρ ) P 2 V 3 N P q 2 ( 1 ρ ) P 2 ρ P 2
d P 3 d t = α ( 1 ρ ) P 0 V 3 N P + λ ( 1 ρ ) P 1 V 3 N P + δ ( 1 ρ ) P 2 V 3 N P q 3 ( 1 ρ ) P 3 ρ P 3
d V 0 d t = B N V ( 1 N V V ) α P 3 V 0 N P b P 1 V 0 N P + f V 2 μ V 0
d V 1 d t = b P 1 V 0 N P g P 2 V 1 N P μ V 1
d V 2 d t = c V 3 f V 2 μ V 2
d V 3 d t = α P 3 V 0 N P + g P 2 V 1 N P c V 3 μ V 3
Table 4. Description of variables [21].
Table 4. Description of variables [21].
Variable/ParameterDescription
V 0 Healthy Vector Population
V 1 RTSV Infected Vector Population
V 2 RTBV Infected Vector Population
V 3 RTSV + RTBV Infected Vector Population
P 0 Healthy Plants Population
P 1 RTSV Infected Plants Population
P 2 RTBV Infected Plants Population
P 3 RTSV + RTBV Infected Plants Population
α RTSV + RTBV transmission rate by RTSV + RTBV infected vector in susceptible plants
β RTSV transmission rate by RTSV Infected vector in susceptible plants
γ RTSV transmission rate by RTSV + RTBV infected vector in susceptible plants
σ RTBV transmission rate by RTBV infected vector in susceptible plants
τ RTBV transmission rate by RTSV + RTBV infected vector in susceptible plants
λ RTSV + RTBV transmission rate by RTSV + RTBV infected vector in RTSV + RTBV infected plants
δ RTSV + RTBV transmission rate by RTSV + RTBV infected vector in RTBV infected plants
a The rate of acquisition of RTSV + RTBV infected plants by susceptible vectors to RTSV + RTBV infected vectors
b The rate of acquisition of RTSV infected plants by susceptible vectors to RTSV infected vectors
g The rate of acquisition of RTBV infected plants by RTSV infected vectors to RTSV + RTBV infected vectors
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Amelia, R.; Anggriani, N.; Supriatna, A.K.; Istifadah, N. Mathematical Model for Analyzing the Dynamics of Tungro Virus Disease in Rice: A Systematic Literature Review. Mathematics 2022, 10, 2944. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10162944

AMA Style

Amelia R, Anggriani N, Supriatna AK, Istifadah N. Mathematical Model for Analyzing the Dynamics of Tungro Virus Disease in Rice: A Systematic Literature Review. Mathematics. 2022; 10(16):2944. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10162944

Chicago/Turabian Style

Amelia, Rika, Nursanti Anggriani, Asep K. Supriatna, and Noor Istifadah. 2022. "Mathematical Model for Analyzing the Dynamics of Tungro Virus Disease in Rice: A Systematic Literature Review" Mathematics 10, no. 16: 2944. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10162944

APA Style

Amelia, R., Anggriani, N., Supriatna, A. K., & Istifadah, N. (2022). Mathematical Model for Analyzing the Dynamics of Tungro Virus Disease in Rice: A Systematic Literature Review. Mathematics, 10(16), 2944. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10162944

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop