Next Article in Journal
A Comprehensive Analysis of Chinese, Japanese, Korean, US-PIMA Indian, and Trinidadian Screening Scores for Diabetes Risk Assessment and Prediction
Next Article in Special Issue
Advanced Study on the Delay Differential Equation y′(t) = ay(t) + by(ct)
Previous Article in Journal
On a Lyapunov-Type Inequality for Control of a ψ-Model Thermostat and the Existence of Its Solutions
Previous Article in Special Issue
On Some Characterizations for Uniform Dichotomy of Evolution Operators in Banach Spaces
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Notes on Convergence Results for Parabolic Equations with Riemann–Liouville Derivatives

by
Long Le Dinh
1,*,† and
O’regan Donal
2,†
1
Division of Applied Mathematics, Thu Dau Mot University, Thu Dau Mot City 75000, Binh Duong Province, Vietnam
2
School of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, University of Galway, H91 TK33 Galway, Ireland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Mathematics 2022, 10(21), 4026; https://doi.org/10.3390/math10214026
Submission received: 11 October 2022 / Revised: 26 October 2022 / Accepted: 27 October 2022 / Published: 30 October 2022

Abstract

:
Fractional diffusion equations have applications in various fields and in this paper we consider a fractional diffusion equation with a Riemann–Liouville derivative. The main objective is to investigate the convergence of solutions of the problem when the fractional order tends to 1 . Under some suitable conditions on the Cauchy data, we prove the convergence results in a reasonable sense.

1. Introduction

Fractional differential equations arise in models in many fields such as economics, biology, mechanics, geology, and heat transfer, and usually there are two types of derivatives that are of interest, namely the Caputo and the Riemman–Liouville derivatives. Both of these derivatives are defined by non-local integrals. Note that the Riemann–Liouville derivative of a constant is not zero and if an arbitrary function is constant at the origin, then its fractional derivative has a singularity at the origin, for example, exponential and Mittag–Leffler functions. However, if we study the initial value problem with the Caputo derivative, we often treat the initial values as normal functions, just like the initial value problem with the classical derivative. However, when considering a problem with the Riemman–Liouville derivative its initial value condition usually involves a fractional integral or a fractional derivative (see [1]). In this paper, we examine:
D 0 + α u u x x = G ( x , t ) , ( x , t ) ( 0 , π ) × ( 0 , T ) , u ( 0 , t ) = u ( π , t ) = 0 , 0 < t < T , t 1 α u | t = 0 = f ( x ) ,
where D 0 + α v is called the Riemann–Liouville fractional derivative of v with order α , 0 < α 1 and it is defined by
D 0 + α v ( t ) = d d t 1 Γ ( 1 α ) 0 t ( t r ) α v ( r ) d r ,
and D 0 + α v ( t ) = : d d t v ( t ) if α = 1 . The diffusion equation arises from many diffusion phenomena that occur in nature (e.g., phase transitions, biochemistry) and equations of time fractional reactions occur in describing “memory” in physics, for example plasma turbulence [2], fractal geometry [3,4], and single-molecular protein dynamics [5] (we also refer the reader to Refs. [6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22]).
In Ref. [23], the authors focused on:
D 0 + α u = F ( t , u ( t ) ) , ( x , t ) ( 0 , π ) × ( 0 , T ) , t 1 α u | t = 0 = λ 0 T u ( t ) d t + h , h R ,
where λ 0 and in [24] the following non-local problem was studied:
D 0 + α u + F ( t , v ( t ) ) = a , t ( 0 , T ) , D 0 + β v + F ( t , u ( t ) ) = b , t ( 0 , T ) , u ( 0 ) = 0 , u ( T ) = 0 T ϕ ( t ) u ( t ) d t , v ( 0 ) = 0 , v ( T ) = 0 T ϕ ( t ) v ( t ) d t ,
where 1 < α , β < 2 . In Ref. [25], the authors studied the existence and continuation of solutions, and several global existence results were given to a general fractional differential equation (FDE) with a Riemann–Liouville derivative.
Recently, the authors in Ref. [26] investigated the following nonlinear diffusion equation with the Riemann–Liouville derivative
D 0 + α u u x x = F ( x , t , u ) ,
and obtained the existence and regularity of mild solutions using the Banach fixed point theorem. In Ref. [27], Luc studied the fractional diffusion equation with the Riemann–Liouville derivative in the form
D 0 + α u u x x = F ( x , t ) ,
and under some assumptions on the input data, he obtained the wellposedness of problem (5).
Returning to Problem (1) we see that if f H s ( Ω ) for any s 0 , Problem (1) has a unique solution. The solution to the problem depends on the fractional order α and we denote the solution as u α . The main goal of this paper is to see what happens to u α when α 1 , and this question is inherently difficult.
In this paper, we prove for the first time that the solution u α to our problem converges to the solution of the problem with a classical derivative. Theorem 1 gives a result concerning this convergence in the homogeneous case and Theorem 2 is a convergent result for the linear inhomogeneous case. The main technique of the paper is to use a Lemma in Ref. [28] combined with the evaluation in Hilbert scale spaces.

2. Preliminaries

With Ω = ( 0 , π ) , note the spectral problem
Δ e j ( x ) = λ j e j ( x ) , x Ω , e j ( x ) = 0 , x Ω ,
with the eigenvalues
0 < λ 1 λ 2 λ j with λ j for j
and the corresponding eigenfunctions e j H 0 1 ( Ω ) .
Definition 1.
The Mittag–Leffler function, which is defined by
E α , β ( z ) = n = 0 z n Γ ( n α + β ) , ( z C ) ,
for α > 0 and β R . When β = 1 , it is abbreviated as E α ( z ) = E α , 1 ( z ) .
We note following lemmas (see for example Ref. [2]).
Lemma 1
(see Ref. [28]). Let 3 4 α < 1 and α β 1 . Then there exists a constant C which is independent of α , β , z such that, for any z < 0 ,
| E α , β ( z ) e z | C 1 + | z | ( 1 α ) .
The proof can be found in Ref. [28].
Lemma 2
(see Ref. [29]). Let 0 < α < 1 . Then the function z E α , α ( z ) has no negative root. Moreover, there exists a constant C ¯ α such that
0 E α , α ( z ) C ¯ α 1 + z , z > 0 .
For a positive number r 0 , we define the Hilbert scale space
H r ( 0 , π ) = f L 2 ( 0 , π ) : j = 1 j 2 r f , 2 π sin ( j x ) 2 < + ,
with the following norm u H r ( 0 , π ) = j = 1 j 2 r f , 2 π sin ( j x ) 2 1 2 ·
Theorem 1.
Let the Cauchy data f H s 2 β ( Ω ) H s 2 θ ( Ω ) H s + 2 ε ( Ω ) any 0 < ε < 1 , s 0 , 0 < β , θ < 1 , 3 4 α < 1 , β , θ s 2 and θ < α . Let u α be the mild solution to Problem (1) and u * be the mild solution to Problem (1) with α = 1 , i.e.,
u t * u x x * = 0 , ( x , t ) ( 0 , π ) × ( 0 , T ) , u * ( 0 , t ) = u * ( π , t ) = 0 , t × ( 0 , T ) , u * ( x , 0 ) = f ( x ) ,
Then we get
u α u * L 1 ( 0 , T ; H s ( Ω ) ) C Γ ( α ) T α α β α α β ( 1 α ) f H s 2 β ( Ω ) + C ( θ , μ , T ) ( 1 α ) μ + ( T * ) 1 α 1 f H s 2 θ ( Ω ) + T 1 β 1 β | Γ ( α ) 1 | f H s 2 β ( Ω ) + ( 1 α ) α ε 2 + ( T * ) 1 α 1 ε f H s + 2 ε ( Ω ) ,
where T * = max ( T , 1 ) .
Proof. 
From the paper Ref. [27], we obtain the representation of the mild solution u α
Ω u α ( x , t ) e j ( x ) d x = Γ ( α ) t α 1 E α , α j 2 t α Ω f ( x ) e j ( x ) d x .
The mild solution of the classical problem is defined by
Ω u * ( x , t ) e j ( x ) d x = exp j 2 t Ω f ( x ) e j ( x ) d x .
Subtracting both sides of the two equations above we get
Ω u α ( x , t ) u * ( x , t ) e j ( x ) d x = Γ ( α ) t α 1 E α , α j 2 t α exp j 2 t Ω f ( x ) e j ( x ) d x + Γ ( α ) t α 1 exp j 2 t α exp j 2 t Ω f ( x ) e j ( x ) d x + Γ ( α ) t α 1 1 exp j 2 t Ω f ( x ) e j ( x ) d x + Γ ( α ) 1 exp j 2 t Ω f ( x ) e j ( x ) d x .
Thus, we get
u α ( x , t ) u * ( x , t ) = j Γ ( α ) t α 1 E α , α j 2 t α exp j 2 t Ω f ( x ) e j ( x ) d x e j ( x ) + j Γ ( α ) t α 1 1 exp j 2 t Ω f ( x ) e j ( x ) d x e j ( x ) + j Γ ( α ) 1 exp j 2 t Ω f ( x ) e j ( x ) d x e j ( x ) + j Γ ( α ) t α 1 exp j 2 t α exp j 2 t Ω f ( x ) e j ( x ) d x e j ( x ) = J 1 ( x , t ) + J 2 ( x , t ) + J 3 ( x , t ) + J 4 ( x , t ) .
Step 1. Estimate of J 1 . In view of the inequality in Lemma 1, we have for z > 0 that
| E α , α ( z ) exp ( z ) | C 1 + | z | ( 1 α ) ,
and we find that
| E α , α j 2 t α exp j 2 t α | C 1 + j 2 t α ( 1 α ) .
From 0 < β < 1 , we get
C 1 + j 2 t α C ( 1 + j 2 t α ) β C j 2 β t α β .
Hence, we obtain the following estimate for 0 < β < 1 ,
| E α , α j 2 t α exp j 2 t α | C j 2 β t α β ( 1 α ) .
This implies that
J 1 ( . , t ) H s ( Ω ) 2 = j j 2 s | Γ ( α ) | 2 t 2 α 2 E α , α j 2 t α exp j 2 t 2 Ω f ( x ) e j ( x ) d x 2 C 2 | Γ ( α ) | 2 t 2 α 2 2 α β ( 1 α ) 2 j j 2 s 4 β Ω f ( x ) e j ( x ) d x 2 .
Using Parseval’s equality, we have for any 0 < β < 1 that
J 1 ( . , t ) H s ( Ω ) C Γ ( α ) t α 1 α β ( 1 α ) f H s 2 β ( Ω ) .
Thus
J 1 L 1 ( 0 , T ; H s ( Ω ) ) = 0 T J 1 ( . , t ) H s ( Ω ) d t C Γ ( α ) ( 1 α ) f H s 2 β ( Ω ) 0 T t α 1 α β d t .
Note the integral 0 T t α 1 α β d t is convergent and
0 T t α 1 α β d t = T α α β α α β ·
Hence, we get that
J 1 L 1 ( 0 , T ; H s ( Ω ) ) C Γ ( α ) T α α β α α β ( 1 α ) f H s 2 β ( Ω ) .
Step 2. Estimate of J 2 . In this step (at the end) since θ < α we choose 0 < μ < 1 so that μ + θ < α . Note
J 2 ( . , t ) H s ( Ω ) 2 = j j 2 s t α 1 1 2 exp 2 j 2 t Ω f ( x ) e j ( x ) d x 2 .
We now consider the term | t α 1 1 | . If 0 < t 1 , then we use the inequality 1 e z C μ z μ , 0 < μ < 1 to obtain
| t α 1 1 | = t α 1 1 t 1 α = t α 1 1 exp ( ( 1 α ) log ( 1 / t ) ) t α 1 C μ ( 1 α ) μ log ( 1 t ) μ .
In view of the inequality log ( z ) z for any z 1 , we have that
log ( 1 t ) μ t μ .
Therefore, we obtain for the case 0 < t 1 that
t α 1 1 C μ ( 1 α ) μ t α μ 1 .
For the case t > 1 , we see that
| t α 1 1 | = t α 1 t 1 α 1 t α 1 ( T * ) 1 α 1 ,
where T * = max ( T , 1 ) . From (24) and (25), we have that
| t α 1 1 | t α 1 C μ ( 1 α ) μ t μ + ( T * ) 1 α 1 ,
for any 0 < μ < 1 . In view of the inequality e z C θ z θ , 0 < θ < 1 , one has the following inequality
exp 2 j 2 t C θ 2 t 2 θ j 4 θ .
Combining (22), (26), and (27), we deduce that
J 2 ( . , t ) H s ( Ω ) 2 C ( θ , μ ) t 2 α 2 2 θ C μ ( 1 α ) μ t μ + ( T * ) 1 α 1 2 j j 2 s 4 θ Ω f ( x ) e j ( x ) d x 2 = C ( θ , μ ) t 2 α 2 2 θ C μ ( 1 α ) μ t μ + ( T * ) 1 α 1 2 f H s 2 θ ( Ω ) 2 .
Thus
J 2 ( . , t ) H s ( Ω ) C ( θ , μ ) t α 1 θ ( 1 α ) μ t μ + ( T * ) 1 α 1 f H s 2 θ ( Ω ) ,
where C ( θ , μ ) represents a constant that depends on μ , θ . Therefore, we have
J 2 L 1 ( 0 , T ; H s ( Ω ) ) = 0 T J 2 ( . , t ) H s ( Ω ) d t C ( θ , μ ) ( 1 α ) μ f H s 2 θ ( Ω ) 0 T t α 1 θ μ d t + C ( θ , μ ) ( T * ) 1 α 1 f H s 2 θ ( Ω ) 0 T t α 1 θ d t .
Note (with μ chosen so that θ + μ < α )
0 T t α 1 θ μ d t = T α θ μ α θ μ ,
and
0 T t α 1 θ d t = T α θ α θ ·
The above imply that
J 2 L 1 ( 0 , T ; H s ( Ω ) ) C ( θ , μ , T ) ( 1 α ) μ + ( T * ) 1 α 1 f H s 2 θ ( Ω ) .
Step 3. Estimate of J 3 . Using Parseval’s equality, we have
J 3 ( . , t ) H s ( Ω ) 2 = Γ ( α ) 1 2 j j 2 s exp 2 j 2 t Ω f ( x ) e j ( x ) d x 2 .
In view of the inequality e z C β z β , we have
exp 2 j 2 t C β 2 j 4 β t 2 β .
This inequality together with (32) gives
J 3 ( . , t ) H s ( Ω ) | Γ ( α ) 1 | t β f H s 2 β ( Ω ) .
Thus
J 3 L 1 ( 0 , T ; H s ( Ω ) ) = 0 T J 3 ( . , t ) H s ( Ω ) d t | Γ ( α ) 1 | f H s 2 β ( Ω ) 0 T t β d t .
Since 0 < β < 1 , then the proper integral 0 T t β d t is convergent and
0 T t β d t = T 1 β 1 β ·
Combining (34) and (35), we obtain
J 3 L 1 ( 0 , T ; H s ( Ω ) ) T 1 β 1 β | Γ ( α ) 1 | f H s 2 β ( Ω ) .
Step 4. Estimate of J 4 . We will choose μ = α 2 below. In view of Parseval’s equality, we get
J 4 ( . , t ) H s ( Ω ) 2 = Γ ( α ) 2 t 2 α 2 j j 2 s exp j 2 t α exp j 2 t 2 Ω f ( x ) e j ( x ) d x 2 .
Using the inequality | e a e b | C ε | a b | ε , see Refs. [30,31] page 12–13, for any a , b > 0 , 0 < ε < 1 , we get
| exp j 2 t α exp j 2 t | C ε j 2 ε | t α t | ε .
From (26), we obtain the following inequality
| t α t | = t | t α 1 1 | t α C μ ( 1 α ) μ t μ + ( T * ) 1 α 1 C μ ( 1 α ) μ t α μ + ( T * ) 1 α 1 t α ,
for any 0 < μ < 1 . Thus, we obtain that
| t α t | 2 ε C ( μ , ε ) ( 1 α ) 2 ε μ t 2 ε α 2 ε μ + ( T * ) 1 α 1 2 ε t 2 ε α .
From some previous observations, we have
t 2 α 2 j j 2 s exp j 2 t α exp j 2 t 2 Ω f ( x ) e j ( x ) d x 2 C ( μ , ε ) ( 1 α ) 2 ε μ t 2 ε α 2 ε μ + 2 α 2 j j 2 s + 4 ε Ω f ( x ) e j ( x ) d x 2 + C ( μ , ε ) ( T * ) 1 α 1 2 ε t 2 ε α + 2 α 2 j j 2 s + 4 ε Ω f ( x ) e j ( x ) d x 2 .
We now choose μ = α 2 . Using the inequality a + b a + b for any a , b 0 , we have
J 4 ( . , t ) H s ( Ω ) Γ ( α ) C ( α , ε ) ( 1 α ) α ε 2 t ε α 2 + α 1 f H s + 2 ε ( Ω ) + Γ ( α ) C ( α , ε ) ( T * ) 1 α 1 ε t ε α + α 1 f H s + 2 ε ( Ω ) .
The latter estimate implies that
J 4 L 1 ( 0 , T ; H s ( Ω ) ) = 0 T J 4 ( . , t ) H s ( Ω ) d t Γ ( α ) C ( α , ε ) ( 1 α ) α ε 2 f H s + 2 ε ( Ω ) 0 T t ε α 2 + α 1 d t + Γ ( α ) C ( α , ε ) ( T * ) 1 α 1 ε f H s + 2 ε ( Ω ) 0 T t ε α + α 1 d t .
We note that the two integrals 0 T t ε α 2 + α 1 d t and 0 T t ε α + α 1 d t are convergent. Thus, it follows from (43) that
J 4 L 1 ( 0 , T ; H s ( Ω ) ) ( 1 α ) α ε 2 + ( T * ) 1 α 1 ε f H s + 2 ε ( Ω ) ,
where the hidden constant depends on α , ε . □
Remark 1.
Note that the right hand side of (10) goes to 0 when α 1 .

3. Inhomogeneous Case

In this section, we consider the following diffusion equation with the inhomogeneous term
D 0 + α u u x x = G ( x , t ) , ( x , t ) ( 0 , π ) × ( 0 , T ) , u = 0 , ( x , t ) Ω × ( 0 , T ) , t 1 α u | t = 0 = f ( x ) .
In order to reduce the calculation duplication process, we take the function f = 0 . The goal of this section is to prove the convergence of the mild solution to problem (45) when α 1 .
Theorem 2.
Let G L ( 0 , T ; H s + 2 ε ( Ω ) ) L ( 0 , T ; H s 2 β ( Ω ) ) L ( 0 , T ; H s θ ( Ω ) ) , for any ε > 0 , s 0 , 0 < β , θ < 1 , 3 4 α < 1 , β , θ s 2 , β < 1 2 and θ < α . Let u α be the mild solution of Problem (45) and let u * be the mild solution to the classical problem, i.e.,
u t * u x x * = G ( x , t ) , ( x , t ) ( 0 , π ) × ( 0 , T ) , u * = 0 , ( x , t ) Ω × ( 0 , T ) , u * ( x , 0 ) = f ( x ) , x Ω .
Then we have the following estimate
u α ( . , t ) u * ( . , t ) H s ( Ω ) ( 1 α ) G L ( 0 , T ; H s 2 β ( Ω ) ) + ( 1 α ) α ε 2 + ( T * ) 1 α 1 ε G L ( 0 , T ; H s + 2 ε ( Ω ) ) + C α T α 2 ( 1 α ) α 2 + T α α ( T * ) 1 α 1 G L ( 0 , T ; H s θ ( Ω ) ) .
Proof. 
The mild solution u α of Problem (45) is defined by (see Ref. [26])
Ω u α ( x , t ) e j ( x ) d x = 0 t ( t r ) α 1 E α , α j 2 ( t r ) α Ω G ( x , r ) e j ( x ) d x d r .
The mild solution to the classical problem is given by
Ω u * ( x , t ) e j ( x ) d x = 0 t exp ( j 2 ( t r ) ) Ω G ( x , r ) e j ( x ) d x d r .
From two above equalities, we get that
u α ( x , t ) u * ( x , t ) = j = 1 0 t ( t r ) α 1 E α , α j 2 ( t r ) α exp ( j 2 ( t r ) ) Ω G ( x , r ) e j ( x ) d x d r e j ( x ) + j = 1 0 t ( t r ) α 1 exp ( j 2 ( t r ) α ) exp ( j 2 ( t r ) ) Ω G ( x , r ) e j ( x ) d x d r e j ( x ) + j = 1 0 t ( t r ) α 1 1 exp ( j 2 ( t r ) ) Ω G ( x , r ) e j ( x ) d x d r e j ( x ) = H 1 ( x , t ) + H 2 ( x , t ) + H 3 ( x , t ) .
Step 1. Estimate of H 1 . In order to estimate H 1 , we use the bound (17) and obtain
| E α , α j 2 ( t r ) α exp ( j 2 ( t r ) α ) | C j 2 β ( t r ) α β ( 1 α ) .
The term H 1 is bounded by
H 1 H s ( Ω ) 2 = j = 1 j 2 s 0 t ( t r ) α 1 E α , α j 2 ( t r ) α exp ( j 2 ( t r ) ) Ω G ( x , r ) e j ( x ) d x d r 2 j = 1 j 2 s 0 t ( t r ) α 1 d r [ 0 t ( t r ) α 1 E α , α j 2 ( t r ) α exp ( j 2 ( t r ) ) 2 Ω G ( x , r ) e j ( x ) d x 2 d r ,
where we have used the Hölder inequality. In view of (51), we obtain
H 1 H s ( Ω ) 2 ( 1 α ) 2 j = 1 j 2 s 4 β 0 t ( t r ) α 1 2 α β Ω G ( x , r ) e j ( x ) d x 2 d r = ( 1 α ) 2 0 t ( t r ) α 1 2 α β G ( . , r ) | H s 2 β ( Ω ) 2 d r ( 1 α ) 2 G L ( 0 , T ; H s 2 β ( Ω ) ) 2 0 t ( t r ) α 1 2 α β d r .
Note
0 t ( t r ) α 1 2 α β d r = t α 2 α β α 2 α β ,
and we recall that β < 1 2 . Thus, we can deduce that
H 1 H s ( Ω ) ( 1 α ) G L ( 0 , T ; H s 2 β ( Ω ) ) .
Step 2. Estimate of H 2 .
We will choose μ = α 2 below. Using Hölder’s inequality, the term H 2 is bounded by
H 2 H s ( Ω ) 2 = j = 1 j 2 s 0 t ( t r ) α 1 exp j 2 ( t r ) α exp ( j 2 ( t r ) ) Ω G ( x , r ) e j ( x ) d x d r 2 j = 1 j 2 s 0 t ( t r ) α 1 d r [ 0 t ( t r ) α 1 exp j 2 ( t r ) α exp ( j 2 ( t r ) ) 2 Ω G ( x , r ) e j ( x ) d x 2 d r .
Using (38) and (40) and the inequality ( a + b ) ε C ε ( a ε + b ε ) for any a , b 0 , ϵ > 0 , we find for any 0 r t that
| exp j 2 ( t r ) α exp j 2 ( t r ) | C ε j 2 ε | ( t r ) α ( t r ) | ε j 2 ε ( 1 α ) μ ε ( t r ) ( α μ ) ε + ( T * ) 1 α 1 ε ( t r ) α ε .
Now choose μ = α 2 . Thus, we see
| exp j 2 ( t r ) α exp j 2 ( t r ) | 2 j 4 ε ( 1 α ) 2 μ ε ( t r ) α ε + j 4 ε ( T * ) 1 α 1 2 ε ( t r ) 2 α ε .
This implies that
The right hand side of ( 55 ) ( 1 α ) α ε j = 1 j 2 s + 4 ε 0 t ( t r ) α 1 + α ε Ω G ( x , r ) e j ( x ) d x 2 d r + ( T * ) 1 α 1 2 ε j = 1 j 2 s + 4 ε 0 t ( t r ) α 1 + 2 α ε Ω G ( x , r ) e j ( x ) d x 2 d r .
Hence, we obtain that
H 2 H s ( Ω ) 2 ( 1 α ) α ε 0 t ( t r ) α 1 + α ε G ( . , r ) H s + 2 ε ( Ω ) 2 d r + ( T * ) 1 α 1 2 ε 0 t ( t r ) α 1 + 2 α ε G ( . , r ) H s + 2 ε ( Ω ) 2 d r .
Note the convergence of the two proper integrals 0 t ( t r ) α 1 + α ε d r and 0 t ( t r ) α 1 + 2 α ε d r , and we have the following estimate
H 2 H s ( Ω ) 2 ( 1 α ) α ε + ( T * ) 1 α 1 2 ε G L ( 0 , T ; H s + 2 ε ( Ω ) ) 2 .
Thus, we deduce that
H 2 H s ( Ω ) ( 1 α ) α ε 2 + ( T * ) 1 α 1 ε G L ( 0 , T ; H s + 2 ε ( Ω ) ) .
Step 3. Estimate of H 3 .
We will choose μ = α 2 below and recall θ < α . By Parseval’s equality, we obtain that
H 3 H s ( Ω ) 2 = j = 1 j 2 s 0 t ( t r ) α 1 1 exp ( j 2 ( t r ) ) Ω G ( x , r ) e j ( x ) d x d r 2 0 t | ( t r ) α 1 1 | d r j = 1 j 2 s 0 t | ( t r ) α 1 1 | exp ( 2 j 2 ( t r ) ) Ω G ( x , r ) e j ( x ) d x 2 d r .
In view of (26) (and choosing μ = α 2 ) we have for 0 r t that
| ( t r ) α 1 1 | C α ( t r ) α 2 1 ( 1 α ) α 2 + ( T * ) 1 α 1 ( t r ) α 1 ,
where C α indicates a constant which depends on α . The inequality (62) implies that
0 t | ( t r ) α 1 1 | d r C α ( 1 α ) α 2 0 t ( t r ) α 2 1 d r + ( T * ) 1 α 1 0 t ( t r ) α 1 d r .
Note
0 t ( t r ) α 2 1 d r = 2 α t α 2 , 0 t ( t r ) α 1 d r = 1 α t α .
Thus, it follows from (63) that
0 t | ( t r ) α 1 1 | d r C α T α 2 ( 1 α ) α 2 + T α α ( T * ) 1 α 1 .
By applying the inequality e j 2 ( t r ) C θ j θ ( t r ) θ for any θ > 0 , we get the following estimate:
j = 1 j 2 s [ 0 t | ( t r ) α 1 1 | exp ( 2 j 2 ( t r ) ) Ω G ( x , r ) e j ( x ) d x 2 d r 0 t | ( t r ) α 1 1 | ( t r ) θ j = 1 j 2 s 2 θ Ω G ( x , r ) e j ( x ) d x 2 d r G L ( 0 , T ; H s θ ( Ω ) ) 2 0 t ( t r ) α 1 θ d r + 0 t ( t r ) θ d r ,
where we have used the triangle inequality. Then (recall θ < α ) from the convergence of the two proper integrals above, we deduce
H 3 H s ( Ω ) 2 C α T α 2 ( 1 α ) α 2 + T α α ( T * ) 1 α 1 G L ( 0 , T ; H s θ ( Ω ) ) 2 .
Combining (54), (61), and (66), we get
u α ( . , t ) u * ( . , t ) H s ( Ω ) H 1 H s ( Ω ) + H 2 H s ( Ω ) + H 3 H s ( Ω ) ( 1 α ) G L ( 0 , T ; H s 2 β ( Ω ) ) + ( 1 α ) α ε 2 + ( T * ) 1 α 1 ε G L ( 0 , T ; H s + 2 ε ( Ω ) ) + C α T α 2 ( 1 α ) α 2 + T α α ( T * ) 1 α 1 G L ( 0 , T ; H s θ ( Ω ) ) .
Remark 2.
Note the right hand side of (47) tends to zero when α 1 .

4. Conclusions

In this work, the main objective was to investigate the convergence of solutions to the problem when the fractional order tends to 1 with the Riemann–Liouville derivative. In the future, we hope to investigate the convergence towards 1 with the Caputo derivative, the Atangana Baleanu Caputo derivative, and some other non-integer order derivatives.

Author Contributions

Writing—original draft, review, editing, L.L.D., O.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Li, C.; Qian, D.; Chen, Y.Q. On Riemann-Liouville and Caputo Derivatives. Discret. Dyn. Nat. Soc. 2011, 2011, 562494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Podlubny, I. Fractional Differential Equations; Academic Press: London, UK, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  3. Nigmatullin, R.R. The realization of the generalized transfer equation in a medium with fractal geometry. Physica Status Solidi B 1986, 133, 425–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Tuan, N.H.; Caraballo, T. On initial and terminal value problems for fractional nonclassical diffusion equations. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 2021, 149, 143–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kou, S. Stochastic modeling in nanoscale biophysics: Subdiffusion within proteins. Ann. Appl. Stat. 2008, 2, 501–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhao, C.; Caraballo, T.; Łukaszewicz, G. Statistical solution and Liouville type theorem for the Klein-Gordon-Schrödinger equations. J. Differ. Equ. 2021, 281, 1–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zhao, C.; Wang, J.; Caraballo, T. Invariant sample measures and random Liouville type theorem for the two-dimensional stochastic Navier-Stokes equations. J. Differ. Equ. 2022, 317, 474–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Tuan, N.H.; Nguyen, A.T.; Yang, C. Global well-posedness for fractional Sobolev-Galpern type equations. Discret. Contin. Dyn. Syst. 2022, 42, 2637–2665. [Google Scholar]
  9. Tuan, N.A.; Tuan, N.H.; Yang, C. On Cauchy problem for fractional parabolic-elliptic Keller-Segel model. Adv. Nonlinear Anal. 2023, 12, 97–116. [Google Scholar]
  10. Tuan, N.H.; Au, V.V.; Nguyen, A.T. Mild solutions to a time-fractional Cauchy problem with nonlocal nonlinearity in Besov spaces. Arch. Math. 2022, 118, 305–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Tuan, N.H.; Foondun, M.; Thach, T.N.; Wang, R. On backward problems for stochastic fractional reaction equations with standard and fractional Brownian motion. Bull. Sci. Math. 2022, 179, 103158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Tuan, N.A.; Caraballo, T.; Tuan, N.H. On the initial value problem for a class of nonlinear biharmonic equation with time-fractional derivative. Proc. R. Soc. Edinb. Sect. A 2022, 152, 989–1031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Caraballo, T.; Mchiri, L.; Rhaima, M. Ulam–Hyers–Rassias stability of neutral stochastic functional differential equations. Stochastics 2022, 94, 959–971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Xu, J.; Zhang, Z.; Caraballo, T. Mild Solutions to Time Fractional Stochastic 2D-Stokes Equations with Bounded and Unbounded Delay. J. Dyn. Differ. Equ. 2022, 34, 583–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Caraballo, T.; Guo, B.; Tuan, N.H.; Wang, R. Asymptotically autonomous robustness of random attractors for a class of weakly dissipative stochastic wave equations on unbounded domains. Proc. R. Soc. Edinb. Sect. A 2021, 151, 1700–1730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Bao, N.T.; Caraballo, T.; Tuan, N.H.; Zhou, Y. Existence and regularity results for terminal value problem for nonlinear fractional wave equations. Nonlinearity 2021, 34, 1448–1503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Xu, J.; Zhang, Z.; Caraballo, T. Non-autonomous nonlocal partial differential equations with delay and memory. J. Differ. Equ. 2021, 270, 505–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Caraballo, T.; Ezzine, F.; Hammami, M.A.; Mchiri, L. Practical stability with respect to a part of variables of stochastic differential equations. Stochastics 2021, 93, 647–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhao, C.; Li, Y.; Caraballo, T. Trajectory statistical solutions and Liouville type equations for evolution equations: Abstract results and applications. J. Differ. Equ. 2020, 269, 467–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Nguyen, D.P.; Luu, V.C.H.; Erdal, K.; Jagdev, S.; Ho, D.B.; Nguyen, H.C. Fractional order continuity of a time semi-linear fractional diffusion-wave system. Alex. Eng. J. 2020, 59, 4959–4968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Nguyen, H.L.; Le, N.H.; Dumitru, B.; Nguyen, H.C. Identifying the space source term problem for a generalization of the fractional diffusion equation with hyper-Bessel operator. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2020, 2020, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Tuan, N.H.; Phuong, N.D.; Thach, T.N. New well-posedness results for stochastic delay Rayleigh-Stokes equations. Discret. Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. B 2023, 28, 347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wanga, X.; Wanga, L.; Zeng, Q. Fractional differential equations with integral boundary conditions. J. Nonlinear Sci. Appl. 2015, 8, 309–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhai, C.; Jiang, R. Unique solutions for a new coupled system of fractional differential equations. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2018, 2018, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Kou, C.; Zhou, H.; Li, C. Existence and continuation theorems of Riemann-Liouville type fractional differential equations. Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos Appl. Sci. Engrgy 2012, 22, 1250077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ngoc, T.B.; Zhou, Y.; O’Regan, D.; Tuan, N.H. On a terminal value problem for pseudoparabolic equations involving Riemann-Liouville fractional derivatives. Appl. Math. Lett. 2020, 106, 106373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Luc, N.H. Remarks on a 1-D nonlocal in time fractional diffusion equation with inhomogeneous sources. Bull. Math. Anal. Appl. 2021, 13, 1–12. Available online: http://www.bmathaa.org (accessed on 30 September 2022).
  28. Chen, H.; Stynes, M. Blow-up of error estimates in time-fractional initial-boundary value problems. IMA J. Numer. Anal. 2021, 41, 974–997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Tuan, N.H.; Huynh, L.N.; Ngoc, T.B.; Zhou, Y. On a backward problem for nonlinear fractional diffusion equations. Appl. Math. Lett. 2019, 92, 76–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Nguyen, H.T.; Vo, V.A.; Xu, R.; Renhai, W. On the initial and terminal value problem for a class of semilinear strongly material damped plate equations. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2020, 492, 124481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Sakamoto, K.; Yamamoto, M. Initial value/boudary value problems for fractional diffusion- wave equations and applications to some inverse problems. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2011, 382, 426–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Le Dinh, L.; Donal, O. Notes on Convergence Results for Parabolic Equations with Riemann–Liouville Derivatives. Mathematics 2022, 10, 4026. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10214026

AMA Style

Le Dinh L, Donal O. Notes on Convergence Results for Parabolic Equations with Riemann–Liouville Derivatives. Mathematics. 2022; 10(21):4026. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10214026

Chicago/Turabian Style

Le Dinh, Long, and O’regan Donal. 2022. "Notes on Convergence Results for Parabolic Equations with Riemann–Liouville Derivatives" Mathematics 10, no. 21: 4026. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10214026

APA Style

Le Dinh, L., & Donal, O. (2022). Notes on Convergence Results for Parabolic Equations with Riemann–Liouville Derivatives. Mathematics, 10(21), 4026. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10214026

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop