Next Article in Journal
CK2 and the Hallmarks of Cancer
Next Article in Special Issue
Sinapic Acid Attenuate Liver Injury by Modulating Antioxidant Activity and Inflammatory Cytokines in Thioacetamide-Induced Liver Cirrhosis in Rats
Previous Article in Journal
Immunomodulatory Role of Neuropeptides in the Cornea
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Potential Gonado-Protective Effect of Cichorium endivia and Its Major Phenolic Acids against Methotrexate-Induced Testicular Injury in Mice

1
Department of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Suez Canal University, Ismailia 41522, Egypt
2
Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Menoufia University, Shebin El-Koum 32511, Egypt
3
Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Suez Canal University, Ismailia 41522, Egypt
4
Department of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Sinai University, El-Arish 45518, Egypt
5
Division of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Department of Continuous Medical Education, General Authority of Healthcare, Ismailia 41522, Egypt
6
Department of Pharmacognosy, College of Pharmacy, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj 11942, Saudi Arabia
7
Department of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Alexandria University, Alexandria 21215, Egypt
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomedicines 2022, 10(8), 1986; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10081986
Submission received: 21 June 2022 / Revised: 23 July 2022 / Accepted: 12 August 2022 / Published: 16 August 2022

Abstract

:
Cichorium endivia L. (Asteraceae) is a wide edible plant that grows in the Mediterranean region. In this study, a phytochemical investigation of C. endivia L. ethanolic extract led to the isolation of stigmasterol (1), ursolic acid (2), β-amyrin (3), azelaic acid (4), vanillic acid (5), (6S, 7E)-6-hydroxy-4,7-megastigmadien-3,9-dione (S(+)-dehydrovomifoliol) (6), 4-hydroxy phenyl acetic acid (7), vomifoliol (8), ferulic acid (9), protocatechuic acid (10), kaempferol (11), p. coumaric acid (12), and luteolin (13). In addition, the total phenolic content as well as the in vitro antioxidant activity of C. endivia L. extract were estimated. Moreover, we inspected the potential gonado-protective effect of C. endivia crude extract, its phenolic fraction, and the isolated coumaric, vanillic, and ferulic acids against methotrexate (MTX)-induced testicular injury in mice. There were seven groups: normal control, MTX control, MTX + C. endivia crude extract, MTX + C. endivia phenolic fraction, MTX + isolated coumaric acid, MTX + isolated vanillic acid, and MTX + isolated ferulic acid. MTX was given by i.p. injection of a 20 mg/kg single dose. The crude extract and phenolic fraction were given with a dose of 100 mg/kg/day, whereas the compounds were given at a dose of 10 mg/kg/day. A histopathological examination was done. The testosterone level was detected in serum together with the testicular content of malondialdehyde (MDA), catalase (CAT), superoxide dismutase (SOD), interleukin 1β (IL-1β), IL-6, tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB), B-cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl-2), Bcl-2 associated x protein (Bax), p53, and miR-29a. C. endivia crude extract, the phenolic fraction, and the isolated compounds showed significant elevation in their levels of testosterone, CAT, SOD, Bcl-2 with a significant decrease in their levels of MDA, TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, NF-κB, Bax, P53, and miR-29a compared to those of the MTX control group. In conclusion, C. endivia mitigated MTX-induced germ cell toxicity via anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and antiapoptotic effects.

1. Introduction

Cichorium endivia L. subsp. pumilum jacq. (commonly known as chicory) is one of the wild plants that grow in Egypt; it is a wild edible plant distributed in the Mediterranean region and belongs to the family Asteraceae [1,2]. It is also a popular vegetable and nutritionally valuable, with a high content of vitamin C, minerals, and dietary fibers [3]. It is famous among Egyptian farmers and is preferred to be eaten with cheese as a common Egyptian meal [2,4]. Its roots were used traditionally for reducing the symptoms associated with mild digestive disorders including slow digestion, feeling of abdominal fullness, flatulence, and loss of appetite [2], while leaves decoctions were used for poisoning, bacterial infection, rheumatism [5], and diabetes [6].
C. endivia L. contains a wide range of medicinally important compounds such as sesquiterpenes and their glycosides [7,8,9,10], flavonoids [11,12,13,14,15], coumarins [16], phenolic acids [8,9,14,17,18,19], and nitrogenous compounds [12,20,21].
These valuable contents, besides C. endivia L. traditional uses, have encouraged scientists to estimate its biological effects; it has been reported that C. endivia L. root’s methanolic extract shows antimicrobial activity especially against Gram-positive bacteria [1]. C. endivia L. extract also possesses a powerful in vitro hepatoprotective effect in the HepG2 cell line, where in vivo studies using a t-BHP-induced acute liver injury model in mice confirmed these findings [12]. Moreover, it can improve probiotic growth and prevent liver fibrosis caused by (TNBS)-induced intestinal inflammation in rats [22]. The aqueous suspension of C. endivia L. leaves powder has shown a protective effect similar to that of the diabetic drug glibenclamide in a streptozotocin-induced diabetic rat model [23]. Moreover, C. endivia L. exert a significant induction of apoptosis and the inhibition of proliferation of a human colorectal cancer HCT-8 cell line [24]. The plant root extract has shown a significant cytotoxic effect on breast cancer MCF7cell [25]. In addition, C. endivia L. can act as a photosensitizing agent in vivo against a drug-induced benign breast tumor model in rats [26]. Moreover, C. endivia L. extract has a high antioxidant potency, which is attributed to the high phenolic content of this plant [6,16,19]. Furthermore, C. endivia L. extracts may have a sun-protective ability so that they can be used as sunscreens, as the ethanolic extract of C. endivia L. roots can absorb radiation in the UVB spectrum and prohibits a UVB-induced erythema in human’s skin. Moreover, the extract can partly inhibit cell death, IL-6 mRNA expression, and pyrimidine dimer formation in the human keratinocyte cell line subsequent to UVB irradiation [27].
Methotrexate (MTX) is a competitive inhibitor for dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR), and it is used as an anticancer and anti-autoimmune chemotherapeutic agent. MTX has fetal side effects on different organs including the testes [28]. The exact mechanisms by which MTX induces testicular toxicity remain unclear, but several studies have suggested the induction of oxidative stress, inflammation, and apoptosis to be the main culprit in this toxicity [29].
Our present study aims to isolate and identify the chemical structures of the major active ingredients of the plant and to evaluate its antioxidant activity. In addition, the work seeks to investigate the potential gonado-protective effect of C. endivia crude extract, its phenolic fraction, the isolated coumaric, vanillic, and ferulic acids against MTX-induced testicular injury in experimental mice through the examination of the antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and anti-apoptotic effect.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Instruments and Chemicals

The 1H (400 MHz), 13C (100 MHz)-NMR and 2D-NMR spectra were monitored by a JEOL (Freising, Germany) spectrometer while CD3OD (Sigma Aldrich®, a subsidiary of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) and CDCl3 (Sigma Aldrich®, a subsidiary of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) were used as solvents and tetramethylsilane (TMS) was used as an internal standard. Normal-phase silica gel 60 Å, (70–230 mesh, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany), silica gel 60 Å, (230–400 mesh, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) and Sephadex LH-20 (Sigma Aldrich®, a subsidiary of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) were utilized for column chromatography. Pre-coated aluminum sheets (silica gel 60 F254, 0.25 mm, 20 cm × 20 cm) (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) were utilized for analytical thin-layer chromatography. SIL G-25 unmodified standard silica-layer glass plates with 2 mm thickness (Macherey-Nagel®, Düren, Germany) were utilized for preparative TLC. The visualization of TLC was performed using UV light and an anisaldehyde-sulfuric acid spraying reagent.

2.2. Plant Material Collection and Extraction

A Cichorium endivia L. subsp. pumilum jacq. (Asteraceae) whole plant was gathered from the north of the Sinai Peninsula (Egypt). The plant was authenticated by Prof. Dr. Elsayeda M. Gamal El-Din (Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt). A voucher specimen of C. endivia L. (registration number CE-2018) was stored in the herbarium of the Pharmacognosy Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Suez Canal University. The drying of the collected plant was accomplished in the shade at room temperature for two weeks, then powdered. Three and half kilograms of the whole plant of C. endivia L. powder was extracted three times by cold maceration at room temperature with 70% ethanol (35 L, 3 days). The combined extracts were filtered using Whatman’s No.1 filter paper then dried under vacuum at 40 °C to give 360 g of C. endivia crude ethanolic extract.

2.3. Determination of Total Phenolic Content “(TPC) Assay”

The quantification of the total phenolic content (TPC) of C. endivia L. extract was determined spectrophotometrically via the Folin–Ciocalteu colorimetric method [30,31]. A volume of 3 mL of Folin–Ciocalteau (10%) was mixed with 5 µL (0.05 mL) of C. endivia L. crude extract and 0.8 mL of (7.5%) sodium bicarbonate. At room temperature, the reaction solution was incubated for 30 min. Using Milton Roy (Spectronic 1201) spectrophotometer, the mixture’s absorbance was monitored at 765 nm. The TPC result was obtained as mg gallic acid equivalents (GAE)/g extract.

2.4. Evaluation of Antioxidant Activity

2.4.1. DPPH Radical-Scavenging Activity

The free radical-scavenging activity of C. endivia L. crude extract was estimated with the method reported in [32,33]. Briefly, a 0.004% w/v methanolic solution of freshly prepared 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical was stored in the dark at 10 °C. A 40 uL of the resultant methanolic solution was added to 3 mL of DPPH solution. The absorbance measurements were monitored immediately via a Milton Roy UV–vis spectrophotometer (Spectronic 1201). The decrease in absorbance at 515 nm was recorded continuously, with the determination of data at 1 min intervals until the stabilization of absorbance (16 min). Without antioxidant control, the absorbances of the DPPH radical and the reference compound, ascorbic acid, were measured. All the recordings were determined in three repetitions then averaged. The inhibition percentage (PI) of the DPPH radical was evaluated according to the formula:
PI = [{(AC − AT)/AC} × 100]
where AC refers to the control’s absorbance at t = 0 min and AT refers to the sample’s absorbance + DPPH at t = 16 min.
The 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) was evaluated from the dose–response curve’s graphic plots using Graphpad Prism software (San Diego, CA, USA).

2.4.2. Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Power (FRAP) Assay

C. endivia L. crude extract’s reducing power was evaluated using a method previously reported [34,35]. That method is based on the reduction of ferricyanide corresponding to different concentrations of the extract sample, as the reduction of ferric ion Fe3+ to ferrous Fe2+ by the extract refers to the antioxidant potential. The extract samples were prepared in 1 mL of methanol then mixed with 2.5 mL of 0.2 M sodium phosphate buffer (at pH 6.6) and 2.5 mL of 1% w/v potassium ferricyanide [K3Fe (CN)6] then incubated at 50 °C for 20 min. The reaction mixture was acidified with 2.5 mL of 10% w/v trichloroacetic acid then centrifuged for 10 min at 1000× g. Then, 2.5 mL of deionized water was used for the dilution of 2.5 mL of the supernatant solution then mixed with 0.5 mL of freshly prepared 0.1% w/v ferric chloride FeCl3. The absorbance of the resultant solution was monitored at 700 nm versus a blank using a Milton Roy spectrophotometer (Spectronic 1201). Ascorbic acid was utilized as the reference standard. The reducing capability percentage was calculated according to a formula previously reported in [36].
Reducing   capability   ( % ) = 100 ( A o A s A o × 100 )
where Ao refers to the control solution absorbance and As refers to sample absorbance.

2.4.3. Total Antioxidant Capacity (TAC) Assay

The total antioxidant capacity (TAC) of C. endivia L. extract was investigated by the phosphomolybdate complex method proposed by [37], which is based on the reduction of Mo (VI) ion to Mo (V) ion by the extract sample producing a green phosphate/Mo (V) complex at acidic pH. A portion of 0.2 mL of methanolic extract solution was mixed with 0.1 mL of the reagent solution (28 mM sodium phosphate, 0.6 M sulfuric acid, and 4 mM ammonium molybdate). This mixture was incubated in a thermal block for 90 min at 95 °C. The sample was cooled then the absorbance was monitored at 695 nm. The TAC result was measured as milligrams of gallic acid equivalents per gram of extract using the standard gallic graph.

2.5. Fractionation of C. endivia L. Extract and Isolation of Phytochemical Constituents

To isolate the major phytoconstituents of C. endivia, the plant’s crude extract was subjected to a detailed phytochemical investigation applying different preparative chromatographic techniques. About 300 g of C. endivia crude extract were first fractionated using VLC with normal-phase silica gel as the stationary phase and using gradient elution with (n-hexane/ethyl acetate/methanol) to give 9 fractions (F1–F9) with eluting systems of 100% n-hexane (2 L), 75:25 (n-hexane/ethyl acetate) (2 L), 50:50 (n-hexane/ethyl acetate) (2 L), 25:75 (n-hexane/ethyl acetate) (2 L), 100% (EtOAc) (3 L), 75:25 (ethyl acetate/methanol) (3 L), 50:50 (ethyl acetate/methanol) (2 L), 25:75 (ethyl acetate/methanol) and 100% methanol (2 L), respectively. The resulted fractions were dried under reduced pressure. The fractions F3, F4, and F5 showed reasonable yields and promising patterns on TLC. The three fractions were subjected to further chromatographic purifications as follows:
F3: About 6 g was first chromatographed with gradient elution on a normal-phase silica gel column using (n-hexane/ethyl acetate/MeOH). The eluate was collected in successive fractions of 20 mL which were monitored by TLC. Finally, the subfractions A1–A9 were given.
Subfraction A1: About 1.5 g which was eluted by the system of 90:10 (n-hexane/ethyl acetate) was rechromatographed with gradient elution on normal-phase flash silica gel column using (n-hexane/ethyl acetate/MeOH). The eluate was collected in successive fractions of 5 mL. Subfractions with similar TLC patterns were combined resulting in the isolation of compound 1 (13 mg, white amorphous powder).
Subfraction A3: About 0.46 g which was eluted by the system of 75:25 (n-hexane/ethyl acetate) was rechromatographed on normal-phase silica gel column using gradients of (n-hexane/ethyl acetate/MeOH). The eluate was collected in successive fractions of 3 mL. Subfractions with similar TLC patterns were pooled together to give 3 subfractions (A7-S1 to A7-S3). Subfraction A7-S2 (100 mg) was further separated by silica gel column chromatography using isocratic elution with 70:30 (n-hexane/ethyl acetate). The eluate was collected in successive fractions of 1 mL. Based on the TLC analysis, similar subfractions were pooled together to obtain two almost-pure substances A7-S2-1 (19 mg) and A7-S1-2 (14 mg). These two substances were finally purified by Sephadex LH-20 using DCM/MeOH (1:1) as the solvent system. The eluate was collected in successive fractions of 0.5 mL to afford two amorphous powders compound 2 (15 mg) and compound 3 (10 mg).
F4: About 7 g was first chromatographed with gradient elution on a normal-phase silica gel column using (n-hexane/ethyl acetate/MeOH). The eluate was collected in successive fractions of 20 mL. Subfractions with similar TLC pattern were combined to give 9 sub-fractions (B1–B9).
Subfraction B7: About 4 g which was eluted with the system of 65:35 (n-hexane/ethyl acetate) was rechromatographed with gradient elution on a normal-phase flash silica gel column using (n-hexane/ethyl acetate/MeOH) The eluate was collected in successive fractions of 10 mL, which were analyzed by TLC giving 9 sub-fractions (B7-S1 to B7-S9). Subfraction B7-S3 (200 mg), eluted with the (70:30) n-hexane/EtOAc solvent system, was subjected to a Sephadex LH-20 column using (1:1) chloroform/MeOH as a mobile phase. The eluate was collected in successive fractions of 1.5 mL, which were analyzed by TLC to yield compound 4 (12 mg, off-white amorphous powder) and compound 5 (60.4 mg, white amorphous powder). The subfraction (B7-S5) (70 mg), eluted with the (60:40) n-hexane/EtOAc solvent system was subjected to Sephadex LH-20 column using 100% methanol as a mobile phase. The eluate was collected in successive fractions of 0.5 mL. Fractions with similar TLC pattern were pooled together to give compound 6 (8 mg, white amorphous powder) and compound 7 (15 mg, yellow to orange needles).
F5: About 5.7 g was chromatographed on normal-phase silica gel with gradient elution using chloroform/MeOH gradients. The eluate was collected in successive fractions of 20 mL. The subfractions (C1–C8) were given based on the TLC analysis.
Subfraction C1 (430 mg), eluted by 100% CHCl3, was further fractionated on a silica gel column utilizing isocratic elution by CHCl3. The eluate was collected in successive fractions of 3 mL. Subfractions with similar TLC patterns were pooled together to afford 3 subfractions (C1-S1 to C1-S3). Subfraction C1-S3 (80 mg) was further purified using normal-phase PTLC and 5% MeOH in CHCl3 as a mobile phase to obtain compound 8 (7 mg, off-white to yellow needles).
Subfraction C2 (960 mg), eluted by the system of 95:5 (CHCl3/MeOH), was rechromatographed on a normal-phase flash silica gel column with gradient elution using (CHCl3/MeOH) commencing by 100% CHCl3 until 15% MeOH in CHCl3. The eluate was collected in successive fractions of 5 mL. The subfractions C2-S1 to C2-S5 were obtained (on the basis of the TLC analysis). Subfraction C2-S2 (115 mg) was chromatographed on a Sephadex LH-20 column using 50% MeOH in CHCl3. The eluate was collected in successive fractions of 0.5 mL, which were monitored by TLC. Finally, compound 9 (52.3 mg, white amorphous powder) and compound 10 (6 mg, white amorphous powder) were obtained. Subfraction C2-S3 (140 mg) was further purified utilizing a Sephadex LH-20 gel filtration column and 50% MeOH in CHCl3 (1:1) as a mobile phase. The eluate was collected in successive fractions of 0.5 mL to obtain compound 11 (8.8 mg, yellow powder) and compound 12 (68.2 mg, white amorphous powder). Subfraction C2-S4 (50 mg) was purified by normal-phase PTLC and a solvent mixture of CHCl3/MeOH/HCOOH by a ratio of 85:14:1 as a developer to isolate compound 13 as yellow powder (4.5 mg).

2.6. Preparation of the Phenolic Fraction of C. endivia L. Extract

A phenolic portion was prepared by suspending 40 g of C. endivia crude extract in 5% aqueous solution of Na2CO3 followed by solvent portioning with CHCl3. The remaining aqueous fraction was neutralized by HCl then fractionated successively between chloroform, ethyl acetate and n-butanol. The three extracts were pooled together and concentrated under vacuum [38] to obtain the phenolic fraction of C. endivia (27 g).

2.7. In Vivo Study

2.7.1. Animals

Male albino mice, weighing 30–35 g, were purchased from The Egyptian Organization for Biological Products and Vaccines (Vacsera, Cairo, Egypt). They were placed in rodent cages supplied with water and food ad libitum and they were subjected to a normal day/night cycle. The mice were left to accommodate for two weeks before the experiments. The study protocol was approved by the ethical committee of the Faculty of Pharmacy at Suez Canal University (approval number: 201803PhDA3).

2.7.2. Induction of Testicular Injury

Testicular injury was induced in mice by i.p. injection of a single dose of 20 mg/kg of MTX in the fifth day of the experiment duration [29].

2.7.3. Study Design

Seventy male albino mice were divided randomly into seven different groups each with ten mice. The groups were normal control, MTX control, MTX + Cichorium endivia crude extract, MTX + C. endivia L. phenolic fraction, MTX + coumaric acid, MTX + vanillic acid, and MTX + ferulic acid. The normal control group received normal saline. The crude extract and phenolic fraction were given at a dosage of 100 mg/kg/day, whereas the coumaric, vanillic, and ferulic acids were given at a dosage of 10 mg/kg/day. The extracts in addition to the three isolated acids were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO)/water (1:2) and the protective duration was continued for 10 days.

2.7.4. Collection of the Samples

Under halothane anesthesia, the mice were sacrificed on the 10th day. The blood samples were gathered in suitable vacutainers to separate the sera by centrifugation. The testicular tissues were removed, washed, and divided into two portions. The first portion was for the determination of the biological parameters and was kept at −80 °C. The second portion was maintained for histopathological examination in 10% formalin.

2.7.5. Histopathological Examination

The testes samples were fixed in paraffin, and then, 3–5 µm sections were stained using hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and investigated by a pathologist. Images were captured by an Olympus microscope (Japan) supplied with a digital camera. Johnsen’s scoring was used for the grading of the seminiferous tubules based on the presence/absence of the spermatogenic cells and each was given a score from 1–10; a score of 1 represented a poor testicular structure with no seminiferous epithelium, while a score of 10 represented full spermatogenesis [39].

2.7.6. Determination of Biochemical Parameters

Determination of Testosterone

The testosterone level was determined in the serum using commercial mouse ELISA kit purchased from MyBioSource (USA, Cat No. MBS777000) according to the supplier’s instructions.

Determination of Oxidative Stress Biomarkers

The levels of catalase (CAT), malondialdehyde (MDA), and superoxide dismutase (SOD) were determined in the homogenate of the testicular tissue according to the instructions of the commercial mouse ELISA kit purchased from MyBioSource (San Diego, CA, USA, Cat No. MBS764641, MBS704962, and MBS849290, respectively).

Determination of Inflammatory Markers and Apoptosis-Related Proteins

The levels of interleukin 1β (IL-1β), IL-6, Bax, and Bcl-2 were determined by using a mouse ELISA kit purchased from MyBioSource (San Diego, CA, USA, Cat No. MBS701092, MBS590056, MBS763832, and MBS164593, respectively).

Determination of Testicular Levels of NF-κB, TNF-α, p53, and miR-29a by Quantitative Real-Time PCR

Total RNA, which includes miRNA, was extracted from testicular tissues by an RNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen, Germany, Cat No. 217004). The expressions of the target genes were established using the GoTaq® 1-Step RT-qPCR System (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). β-actin was used as a reference gene for NF-κB, TNF-α, and p53, while U6B small nuclear RNA (RNU6B) was used for miR-29a (Table 1). The cycling conditions were 15 min at 37 °C for the reverse transcription, 10 min at 95 °C for the inactivation of reverse transcriptase enzyme, followed by 40 cycles of: denaturation at 95 °C for 10 s, annealing for 30 s, and extension at 72 °C for 30 s. The reactions were carried out in a StepOnePlus™ Real-Time PCR thermal cycler (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA). ΔΔCt and fold change were calculated, then the results were expressed as mean fold change with respect to the normal control group.

2.7.7. Statistical Analysis

Data were analyzed with the Statistical Package for Social Sciences, SPSS (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA), version 21.0 software. The results were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). A one-way analysis of variance, ANOVA, then a Bonferroni’s post hoc test were used for the statistical analysis. A p < 0.05 was considered significant statistically.

3. Results

3.1. Total Phenolic Content (TPC)

Phenolic compounds are phytochemicals which are widely dispersed throughout the plant kingdom. They can be classified into flavonoids and nonflavonoids (such as phenolic acids, coumarins, lignans, etc.). The interest in phenolic compounds has recently increased due to their biological activities and promising therapeutic effects [40]. Thus, the determination of the phenolic content in the extract was necessary to evaluate the potential antioxidant capacity of C. endivia L. crude extract. The total phenolic content (TPC) of C. endivia L. crude extract was 26.41 ± 2.35 mg GAE/g of plant extract, and it was evaluated spectrophotometrically using the Folin–Ciocalteu colorimetric method.

3.2. Evaluation of In Vitro Antioxidant Activity of C. endivia L. Extract

In this study, three tests (DPPH, FRAP, TAC) were performed to evaluate the antioxidant potential of C. endivia L. crude extract. Figure 1a,b shows that C. endivia L. crude extract had definite scavenging activities with DPPH and FRAP assays displaying a dose-dependent scavenging rate. In Figure 2a, C. endivia L. crude extract with an IC50 value of 105.66 ± 4.98 µg/mL exhibited a marked activity in the DPPH radical scavenging assay compared to that of the ascorbic acid reference standard with IC50 = 10.64 ± 0.82 µg/mL. Figure 2b shows the FRAP assay results and demonstrates the reduction potential of C. endivia L. with IC50 = 125.71 ± 5.27 µg/mL in comparison to ascorbic acid reference standard with IC50 = 18.7 ± 1.26 µg/mL. Figure 2c shows the total antioxidant capacity (TAC) of C. endivia L. extract with a remarkable antioxidant potential of 27.43 ± 2.09 mg GAE/g in comparison with ascorbic acid as a reference standard antioxidant with the antioxidant potential of 67.48 ± 3.14 mg GAE/g, and it was evaluated using a phosphomolybdate complex method.

3.3. Chemical Identification of the Isolated Compounds

The phytochemical investigation of C. endivia L. yielded thirteen compounds (Figure 3). The chemical identification of the isolated compounds 1, 410, and 12 was accomplished by the comparison of their 1H-NMR and 13C-NMR spectral data with those previously published in literature. All the NMR spectral data of these compounds were in agreement with the published results. Hence, their chemical structures were assigned to be: stigmasterol (1), azelaic acid (4), vanillic acid (5), (6S, 7E)-6-hydroxy-4,7-megastigmadien-3,9-dione (S(+)-dehydrovomifoliol) (6), 4-hydroxy phenyl acetic acid (7), vomifoliol (8), ferulic acid (9), protocatechuic acid (10), kaempferol (11), p-coumaric acid (12), and luteolin (13). The other compounds 2, 3, 11 and 13 were identified as ursolic acid, β-amyrin, kaempferol, and luteolin, respectively, by cochromatography with authentic samples.
NMR spectral data of the isolated compounds:
Stigmasterol (1), (Figures S1 and S2):
1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ, 5.37 (d, J = 4.9 Hz, 1H), 5.17 (dd, J = 8.6, 8.6Hz, 1H), 5.04 (dd, J = 8.6, 8.6 Hz, 1H), 3.54 (m, 1H), 2.29 (m, 2H), 1.05 (s, 3H), 1.03 (s, 3H), 0.86 (d, J = 6.1 Hz, 3H), 0.82 (s, 1H), 0.81 (s, 3H), 0.72 (s, 3H).
13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 140.77 (C-5), 138.24 (C-22), 129.19 (C-23), 121.50 (C-6), 71.32 (C-3), 56.79 (C-14), 55.88 (C-17), 51.17 (C-24), 50.09 (C-9), 42.13 (C-4), 41.85 (C-13), 40.41 (C-20), 39.61 (C-12), 37.18 (C-1), 36.44 (C-10),32.33 (C-25), 31.82 (C-7), 31.80 (C-8), 31.17 (C-2), 28.83 (C-16), 25.31 (C-28), 24.26 (C-15), 21.08 (C-27), 20.98 (C-21), 20.94 (C-11), 19.24 (C-19), 18.84 (C-26), 12.09 (C-18), 11.73 (C-29) [41].
Ursolic acid (2): identified by cochromatography (Rf = 0.71; mobile phase: 3% methanol in CHCl3) [42].
β-amyrin (3): Identified by cochromatography (Rf = 0.39; mobile phase: 25% EtOAc in hexane) [42].
Azelaic acid (4), (Figures S3 and S4):
1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD) δ 2.30 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 4H), 1.62 (p, J = 7.0 Hz, 4H), 1.30–1.41 (m, 6H), which is first isolated from C. endivia L.
13C NMR (100 MHz, CD3OD) δ 176.44 (C-1, 9), 33.60 (C-2, 8), 28.66 (C-3, 7), 24.65 (C-4, 5,6) [43].
Vanillic acid (5), (Figures S5–S7):
1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD) δ 7.58 (dd, J = 6.8, 2.0 Hz, 1H), 7.57 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 1H), 6.86 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 1H), 3.89 (s, 3H).
13C NMR (100 MHz, CD3OD) δ 168.73 (C=O), 151.22 (C-3), 147.24 (C-4), 123.91 (C-1), 121.63 (C-6), 114.46 (C-2), 112.39 (C-5), 55.02 (OCH3) [44].
(6S, 7E)-6-hydroxy-4,7-megastigmadien-3,9-dione (S (+)-dehydrovomifoliol) (6), (Figures S8–S12):
1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD) δ 7.01 (d, J = 15.8 Hz, 1H), 6.46 (d, J = 15.8 Hz, 1H), 5.96 (t like, 1H), 2.61 (d, J = 17.2 Hz, 1Hb), 2.33 (s, 1H), 2.30 (d, J = 17.2 Hz, 1Ha), 1.92 (d, J = 1.2 Hz, 1H), 1.08 (s, 1H), 1.04 (s, 1H).
13C NMR (101 MHz, CD3OD) δ 199.13 (C-3/C-9), 163.31 (C-5), 147.00 (C-7), 130.32 (C-8), 126.64 (C-4), 78.60 (C-6), 49.13 (C-2), 41.26 (C-1), 29.37 (C-10), 23.32 (C-11), 22.06 (C-12), 17.78 (C-13) [45].
4-Hydroxy phenyl acetic acid (7), (Figures S13–S15):
1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD) δ 7.11 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 6.75 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 3.50 (s, 2H).
13C NMR (100 MHz, CD3OD) δ 175.10 (C=O), 155.94 (C-4), 129.95 (C2, 6), 125.55 (C-1), 114.84 (3, 5), 39.90 (C-7) [16].
Vomifoliol (8), (Figures S16–S20):
1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD) δ 5.90 (t, J = 1.4 Hz, 1H), 5.82–5.81 (m, 1H), 5.81–5.79 (m, 1H), 4.34 (qd, J = 6.4, 3.8 Hz, 1H), 2.53 (d, J = 16.9 Hz, 1Hb), 2.18 (d, J = 16.8 Hz, 1Ha), 1.94 (d, J = 1.6 Hz, 3H), 1.26 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 3H), 1.06 (s, 3H), 1.03 (s, 3H).
13C NMR (100 MHz, CD3OD) δ 199.90 (C-3), 166.14 (C-5), 135.52 (C-8), 128.69 (C-7), 125.70 (C-4), 78.57 (C-6), 67.33 (C-9), 49.35 (C-2), 41.05 (C-1), 23.10 (C-12), 22.45 (C-10), 22.09 (C-11), 18.21 (C-13) [46,47], which is first isolated from C. endivia L.
Ferulic acid (9), (Figures S21–S23):
1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD) δ 7.61 (d, J = 15.9 Hz, 1H), 7.19 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 1H), 7.08 (dd, J = 8.2, 2.0 Hz, 1H), 6.84 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 6.33 (d, J = 15.9 Hz, 1H), 3.91 (s, 3H).
13C NMR (100 MHz, CD3OD) δ 169.68 (C=O), 149.04 (C-4), 147.97 (C-3), 145.55 (C-7), 126.41 (C-1), 122.59 (C-6), 115.09 (C-8), 114.52 (C-5), 110.32 (C-2), 55.08 (OCH3) [48].
Protocatechuic acid (10), (Figures S24–S28):
1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD) δ 7.46 (d, J = 2.1 Hz, 1H), 7.44 (dd, J = 8.5, 2.1 Hz, 1H), 6.82 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H).
13C NMR (100 MHz, CD3OD) δ 169.28 (C-7), 149.95 (C-4), 144.59 (C-3), 122.48 (C-6), 122.23 (C-1), 116.38 (C-5), 114.38 (C-2) [44].
Kaempferol (11): identified by cochromatography (Rf = 0.26; mobile phase: toluene/ethyl acetate/formic acid 7:3:0.1 [49].
p-Coumaric acid (12), (Figures S29–S31):
1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD) δ 7.62 (d, J = 15.8 Hz, 1H), 7.45 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H), 6.82 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H), 6.29 (d, J = 15.8 Hz, 1H).
13C NMR (100 MHz, CD3OD) δ 169.73 (C=O), 159.69 (C-4), 145.35 (C-7), 129.72 (C-2/C-6), 125.86 (C-1), 115.45 (C-8), 114.18 (C-3/C-5) [48].
Luteolin (13): identified by cochromatography (Rf = 0.32; mobile phase: toluene/ether/acetic acid (6:4:1)) [50].

3.4. In Vivo Study

3.4.1. Histopathological Finding

Figure 4A shows that the normal control group exhibited full spermatogenesis up to the level of spermatozoa. In contrast, the MTX group revealed some hyalinized tubules, while other tubules showed a significant reduction in spermatogenesis and only a few spermatocytes (Figure 4B), since MTX is widely used to induce testicular injury owing to its toxicity on germ cells. The pretreatment with C. endivia L. crude extract showed few spermatocytes (Figure 4C), whereas the phenolic fraction showed many spermatocytes (Figure 4D). The pretreatment with the coumaric acid exhibited reduced germinal cells in about 30% of the tubules with few spermatocytes with hyalinized lumen, and other tubules showed full spermatogenesis as shown in Figure 4E. The vanillic acid pretreated group exhibited full spermatogenesis, up to the level of spermatids, despite the disturbed lining epithelium and the hyalinized tubal lumens (Figure 4F). In the same manner, the ferulic acid pretreated group showed full spermatogenesis up to the level of spermatozoa (Figure 4G).
Figure 4H shows the statistical analysis of Johnsen’s scoring in the studied groups. The MTX group (score 2) showed a significant decrease in the score compared to the normal control group. All of the groups pretreated with the C. endivia L. crude extract, phenolic fraction, and isolated acids showed significant increases in Johnsen’s scoring of the testes in comparison with the MTX control group. The best improvement in testicular architecture was revealed by ferulic acid (score 10).

3.4.2. Effect on Biochemical Parameters

The induction of testicular injury by MTX significantly reduced the serum level of testosterone compared to that of the normal control. The pretreatment with C. endivia L. crude extract, phenolic fraction, and the isolated coumaric, vanillic, and ferulic acids showed a significant elevation of the serum level of testosterone relatively to the MTX control group as shown in Figure 5.
Regarding the effect on the oxidative stress biomarkers, MTX exhibited a significant increase in the testicular content of MDA with a significant decrease in the testicular CAT and SOD comparable to those of the normal control group. The pretreatment with C. endivia L. crude extract, phenolic fraction, and the three acids demonstrated a significant decline in the concentration of MDA with a significant increase in the concentration of CAT and SOD compared to those of the MTX control group as presented in Figure 6.
Comparing with the normal group, the testicular injury control group showed a significant upregulation of NF-κB and TNF-α, with a significant increase in the levels of the inflammatory markers IL-1β and IL-6. On the contrary, giving the mice the crude extract, the phenolic fraction, and coumaric, vanillic, and ferulic acids significantly downregulated those biomarkers relative to those of the testicular injury control as shown in Figure 7.
Concerning apoptosis regulatory proteins, the MTX group significantly increased p53 expression and Bax protein levels with a significant decrease in Bcl-2 levels in comparison with the normal group. The pretreatment with the crude extract, the phenolic fraction, and the isolated acids showed a significant decline in p53 expression and Bax levels together with a significant elevation in Bcl-2 levels compared to those of the MTX group. MTX significantly upregulated miR-29a compared to the normal group, whereas the extract, the phenolic fraction, and the isolated acids significantly downregulated miR-29a compared to the MTX control group (Figure 8).
It is worth mentioning that the superior pharmacological activity regarding antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and antiapoptotic activities was expressed by the ferulic acid pretreated group. Consequently, the testosterone level in this group was significantly elevated with a Johnsen’s scoring of the testes of 10.

4. Discussion

C. endivia is a cheap edible plant with a high nutritional value [3] used traditionally as a digestive aid [2], as well as for the treatment of chronic diseases such as rheumatism [5] and diabetes [6]. The plant is known to accumulate terpenoids [7,8,9,10], phenolics [8,9,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19], and nitrogenous compounds [12,20,21]. In addition, several reports have shown evidence of C. endivia’s diverse bioactivities [1,6,12,16,19,22,23,24,25,26,27]. However, the protective effect of this plant or/and its phytochemicals against chemotherapy-triggered organ toxicities has not been studied yet. Motivated by the above-mentioned considerations, the current study was designed to investigate the protective effect of C. endivia crude extract as well as its major chemical constituents against methotrexate-associated gonadal toxicity in male mice Therefore, the crude extract of C. endivia was subjected to extensive chromatographic investigation in a pursuit to isolate its major components. As a consequent, thirteen known compounds were isolated. They were the triterpenes: stigmasterol, β-amyrin, and ursolic acid; the megastigmane-type norisoprenoid: (6S, 7E)-6-hydroxy-4,7-megastigmadien-3,9-dione (S (+)-dehydrovomifoliol) and vomifoliol; the phenolic acids: ferulic, p-coumaric, protocatechuic, vanillic, and 4-hydroxy phenyl acetic acids; the flavonoids: kaempferol and luteolin; and the dicarboxylic acid: azelaic acid. All the isolated compounds were reported previously in the plant [12,13,14,15,16,18,45] except azelaic acid and vomifoliol, which are isolated for the first time from C. endivia.
Most of the isolated compounds were phenolics, which reflected that C. endivia is a rich source of such compounds. Therefore, the total phenolic content (TPC) of C. endivia L. crude extract was quantified spectrophotometrically using the Folin–Ciocalteu (FC) colorimetric assay. This method fundamentally is based on SET for the oxidation of phenol compounds in alkaline medium with a molybdotungstophosphate hetero-polyanion reagent (3H2O-P2O5-13WO3-5MoO3-10H2O), where the molybdenum center in the complex reagent is reduced from Mo (VI) to Mo(V) yielding a blue-colored product [51]. This conventional FC assay is suitable for only the estimation of hydrophilic antioxidants such as polyphenolic compounds since this test is chiefly performed in an aqueous phase that makes it inapplicable for the determination of lipophilic ones [51,52,53].
The obtained results demonstrated that the TPC of C. endivia crude extract had a value of 26.41 ± 2.35 mg GAE/g, which is compatible with what was reported by Khalil and Kamel [16]. It is noteworthy to mention that the TPC of C. endivia crude extract was greater than that of C. intybus leaves (wild chicory): 25.93 ± 0.20 mg/g GAE for the methanolic extract and 21.01 ± 0.47 mg/g GAE for the ethanolic extract. Meanwhile, the TPC of the cultivated variety of C. intybus was 19.21 ± 0.60 mg/g GAE for the methanolic extract and 16.98 ± 0.45 mg/g GAE for the ethanolic leaf [54]
There is a wide array of oxidants in the human body, comprising free radicals, reactive oxygen species (ROS), and reactive nitrogen species (NRS). Plant extracts or phytochemicals with a strong activity of those oxidants would be beneficial and of promising application potential.
Phenolic compounds are the most recognizable plant-derived antioxidants. They exert their antioxidant activity via electron or hydrogen donation and metal reduction [55,56]. Such activity is attributed to their hydroxylation pattern [40]. Due the complexity of natural products [56] and their different reaction modes as antioxidants whether by SET, HAT, or transition-metal chelation [53,57], we estimated the in vitro antioxidant activity of C. endivia crude extract by applying three different antioxidant assays DPPH, FRAP, and phosphomolybdenum tests. The DPPH is a remarkable stable radical due to its delocalization in the aromatic rings. The antioxidant species neutralizes this radical by SET or HAT converting it into a reduced form (DPPH or DPPH-H) [53,58] resulting in its discoloration from intense purple to pale yellow. The DPPH assay is only applicable to lipophilic antioxidants [51,52,53]. On the one hand, the FRAP assay involves the reduction potential of transition metals, namely iron (Fe+3), and depends mainly on the SET mode [52,53], but occasionally could act through metal chelation [53]. The FRAP assay is suitable for hydrophilic and lipophilic samples [53], while the phosphomolybdenum assay for the estimation of TAC relies on the HAT or SET mechanism, where the antioxidant species reduces molybdenum (VI) to molybdenum (V) producing a greenish-blue complex. This greenish-blue color is formed as a consequence of ammonium molybdate reduction into an oxide [H3PO4(MoO3)12] known as the Keggin ion in acidic pH. Then, in the presence of an antioxidant compound, this Keggin ion is reduced into [H4PMo8VIMo4VO40]3− [53]. A phosphomolybdenum assay has a wide range of screening since it is suitable for both fat-soluble and water-soluble antioxidants [53,59,60] and involves SET and HAT mechanisms. Moreover, this method is a reliable, optimized, and reproducible method to evaluate the total antioxidant capacity of many plant extracts and can be an alternative to HPLC methods [37].
Our results represented in Figure 2A–C demonstrated that C. endivia L. crude extract possessed notable DPPH radical scavenging activity with an IC50 value of 105.66 ± 4.98 µg/mL compared to the ascorbic acid reference standard with IC50 = 10.64 ± 0.82 µg/mL. Furthermore, the extract displayed its greatest scavenging activity at 1.28 mg/mL representing 92.34 ± 1.28% compared to 98.91 ± 0.74% for ascorbic acid at the same concentration. These findings are in agreement with Marzouk et al. [61]. Regarding the FRAP and phosphomolybdenum TAC assays, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first time those tests have been employed to determine the antioxidant activity of C. endivia. Our findings revealed that C. endivia crude extract displayed promising ferric ion reducing potential with IC50 = 125.71 ± 5.27 µg/mL in comparison to ascorbic acid (IC50 = 18.7 ± 1.26 µg/mL), indicating the electron-donating ability and linked to a lower generation of oxidant species; this is thought to be a key mechanism of phenolic compounds as antioxidant species [62,63]. Finally, the TAC assay indicated that C. endivia had a remarkable antioxidant potential with a value of 27.43 ± 2.09 mg GAE/g comparable to that of the reference standard, ascorbic acid (67.48 ± 3.14 mg GAE/g). Interestingly, the TPC value of C. endivia crude extract (26.41 ± 2.35 mg GAE/g) approached that of TAC (27.43 ± 2.09 mg GAE/g), suggesting that the antioxidant capacity of C. endivia is attributed mainly to its phenolic compounds constituting the major phytochemicals of the plant (evidenced by the detailed chromatographic investigation) rather than other chemical entities belonging to different chemical classes.
Among the isolated compounds, the phenolic compounds vanillic, ferulic, and p-coumaric acids were the major phytoconstituents of C. endivia, which were obtained in a considerable amount, sufficient for our in vivo study, as these compounds have been proved to have diverse activities and can be used as chemoprotective, anti-inflammatory, and antioxidant agents [64,65].
Encouraged by the aforesaid findings, we decided to prepare the phenolic fraction of C. endivia to be inspected for its gonado-protective effect along with the plant crude extract and the isolated acids, to confirm the medicinal value of C. endivia as well as of the isolated phenolic acid as economic, natural, safe, available, and applicable protective agents. The matter which opens a new horizon in overcoming the side effects associated with chemotherapy.
The chemotherapeutic MTX negatively affects the male reproductive system and can lead to sterility with long-term use. Several studies have revealed this gonadal toxicity in human and indicated oligospermia, an increased count of immature germinal cells, immobilization of sperms, and other alterations in semen parameters [66,67,68]. In this context, MTX is commonly used to induce testicular injury in animal models to investigate the potential gonado-protective agents [29]. Our results revealed that the MTX control group showed a significant reduction in testosterone, CAT, SOD, and Bcl-2, with a significant increase in MDA, NF-κB, TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, miR-29a, p53, and Bax compared to the normal control group. The reduced serum testosterone is due to MTX toxicity on the testes, and this was evidenced by the histopathological examination and the Johnsen score, which was 2 for this group.
Oxidative stress plays an essential role in MTX-induced gonadal injury by overwhelming the antioxidant capacity of the cells, which is reflected in the drop in the antioxidant enzymes CAT and SOD, and this makes the testicular cells more vulnerable to the released reactive oxygen species (ROS) and lipid peroxidation products such as MDA. This unfavorable highly oxidative environment can lead to male infertility and sterility with reduced semen parameters, and this also explains the reduced testosterone level in the MTX group [69]. Moreover, the inflammatory reactions play a crucial part in the pathogenesis of testicular injury caused by MTX and this was indicated by the increased level of inflammatory biomarkers [29]. The released ROS can trigger such an inflammatory response due to the accumulation of the immune cells at the site of injury leading to the upregulation of proinflammatory cytokine [70]. The upregulation of TNF-α stimulates multiple pathways that eventually activate NF-κB [71], which is a key regulator in the initiation of the inflammatory response, and which in turn upregulates the inflammatory markers including IL-1β and IL-6 [72]. Our current results are in agreement with other studies which have reported the oxidative and inflammatory mechanisms by which MTX induces gonadal toxicity [29,69,70,71,72,73].
Apoptosis is a programmed cell death, which is regulated by a group of proteins that can be proapoptotic, such as Bax, or antiapoptotic, such as Bcl-2, with a significant role of the tumor suppressor protein p53 [74]. MTX is a competitive inhibitor for dihydrofolate reductase resulting in the disruption of several metabolic pathways including nucleic acid synthesis and therefore can lead to the induction of apoptosis and cell death. In addition, the ROS-releasing property of MTX is also a main mechanism by which apoptosis can be induced [28]. A study reported that p53 was an essential transcription factor for MTX-induced apoptosis [75]. Our present findings are consistent with others that reported the ability of MTX to upregulate p53 and Bax and downregulate Bcl-2 to induce apoptosis [28,29,70].
Among the miR-29 family, miR-29a has a proapoptotic activity. Some researchers reported that the miR-29a apoptotic effect was mediated through the PTEN/PI3K/Akt/GSK3β signaling pathway [76,77]. Another study figured out its apoptosis-inducing activity was p53-dependent [78]. Our results are in agreement with those of others who concluded that doxorubicin [79] and estradiol benzoate [80] induced gonadal apoptosis through the upregulation of miR-29a, and with another study that also used MTX to induce testicular injury and found that miR-29a had an apoptotic activity [29].
Since oxidative stress, inflammation, and apoptosis are the main mechanisms by which MTX induces toxicity and causes the loss of spermatocytes, as well as the atrophy of seminiferous tubules [70], agents that have antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and antiapoptotic effects would be beneficial to ameliorate such germ cell toxicity. Many plants are the main sources for bioactive compounds that can be used to relieve diseases [81]. For instance, phytomedicine and plant-derived antioxidants are considered a prosperous strategy for alleviating chemotherapy-induced organ toxicities [28,82,83,84,85]. As a result, we aimed to evaluate the possible testiculo-protective effect of C. endivia L. crude extract, phenolic fraction, and isolated coumaric, vanillic, and ferulic acids against MTX-induced testicular injury in mice. A pretreatment with C. endivia L. and the isolated compounds restored the disorganized architecture of the testes to nearly normal, as indicated by the histopathology and Johnsen score and thereby significantly elevated the serum level of testosterone compared to MTX alone. Our results are in agreement with those of others who suggested the useful use of Cichorium intybus, another species of the same family as C. endivia L., in testicular injury [86,87] and with others who examined the protective effect of coumaric [88], vanillic [89,90], and ferulic acids [89,90,91] against testicular damage.
The antioxidant activity of C. endivia L. was revealed by the increased level of CAT and SOD with the decreased level of MDA. This could be attributed to the phenolic compounds that represent the major antioxidants because of their hydrogen-donating character and their ability to prohibit membrane lipid peroxidation, thereby causing membrane stabilization and limiting the passage of the free radicals [87]. Our findings are in agreement with another study that investigated the antioxidative action of C. endivia L. extract against hepatotoxicity induced by tert-butyl hydroperoxide in vitro and in vivo [12]. Moreover, other studies documented the improved oxidative status of male reproductive organs by C. intybus [86,87]. Coumaric [92], vanillic [89,90,93,94], and ferulic acids [89,91,95,96] are phenolic compounds which are widely dispersed in numerous plants and have been extensively investigated for their antioxidant property. In the same manner, C. endivia L. crude extract and the phenolic fraction demonstrated an anti-inflammatory action by decreasing NF-κB, IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α. Our results are in agreement with clinical trials that used C. intybus extract and proved its anti-inflammatory effect against different inflammatory conditions [97,98] and in an experimental model for diabetes [99]. The presence of phenolic compounds may also be responsible for that anti-inflammatory effect, as indicated by previous studies [100,101]. Coumaric acid demonstrated its anti-inflammatory activity by lowering the proinflammatory cytokines and decreasing the expression of NF-κB, and this is compatible with results from Sabitha et al. [102] and Abdel-Moneim et al. [103]. Vanillic acid also demonstrated an anti-inflammatory effect, which is in agreement with other studies indicating the same results [94,104,105]. Hu et al. [104], Hassanein et al. [91], and Kassab et al. [95] reported the anti-inflammatory action of ferulic acid and this supports our results.
The gonado-protective effect of C. endivia L. was also mediated through antiapoptotic mechanism, which was reflected by the suppressed testicular proapoptotic Bax, as well as the tumor suppressor p53 with an increase in the antiapoptotic Bcl-2 level. This is in agreement with Elmasry et al. [106] and Erkec et al. [107], who revealed the antiapoptotic action of C. intybus extract. The antiapoptotic effect of the phenolic fraction is consistent with other earlier studies that reported the antiapoptotic effect of phenolic compounds [108,109]. Regarding the effect of the isolated compounds, our findings are supported by others that demonstrated the antiapoptotic effect of coumaric [102,103], vanillic [90,110], and ferulic [90,95] acids in different experimental animal models.
It has been suggested that the lipid peroxidation, oxidative stress, and reduced antioxidant capacity are associated with the upregulation of miR-29a [111]. miR-29a is also strongly linked to the inflammatory response through several mechanisms including the increased phosphorylation of P65, serine/threonine kinase 1 (Akt1), and NF-κB signaling pathways [112]. Additionally, the upregulated miR-29a can increase the production of IL-1β and IL-6 through triggering NF-κB [112]. Therefore, agents that possess antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects can downregulate miR-29a. C. endivia L. crude extract, the phenolic fraction, and the isolated compounds successfully downregulated testicular miR-29a and thereby enhanced MTX-induced gonadal injury. Our results are in line with other studies indicating the inhibitory effect of various natural products against different miRNAs [29,113,114].

5. Conclusions

Herein, a phytochemical investigation of Cichorium endivia L. led to the isolation of 13 compounds: stigmasterol, ursolic acid, β-amyrin, azelaic acid, vanillic acid, (6S, 7E)-6-hydroxy-4,7-megastigmadien-3,9-dione (S(+)-dehydrovomifoliol), 4-hydroxy phenyl acetic acid, vomifoliol, ferulic acid, protocatechuic acid, kaempferol, p-coumaric acid and luteolin. The total extract was enriched with phenolic contents as shown with the TPC assay and it exhibited a marked antioxidant activity via DPPH, FRAP, and TAC assays. C. endivia L. crude extract, its phenolic fraction, and the isolated coumaric, vanillic, and ferulic acids exhibited a protective effect against MTX-induced germ cell toxicity through anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and antiapoptotic effects. These beneficial outcomes suggest C. endivia L. can be used in further studies to investigate more molecular mechanisms underlying its pharmacological activity.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/biomedicines10081986/s1, Figures S1 and S2: 1H NMR,13C NMR spectra of compound 1, Figures S3 and S4: 1H NMR,13C NMR spectra of compound 4, Figures S5–S7: 1H NMR,13C NMR, and 13C NMR APT spectra of compound 5, Figures S8–S12: 1H NMR,13C NMR, 13C NMR APT, HSBC, and HMBC spectra of compound 6, Figures S13–S15: 1H NMR,13C NMR, and 13C NMR APT spectra of compound 7, Figures S16–S20: 1H NMR,13C NMR, 13C NMR APT, HSBC, and HMBC spectra of compound 8, Figures S21–S23: 1H NMR,13C NMR, and 13C NMR APT spectra of compound 9, Figures S24–S28: 1H NMR,13C NMR, 13C NMR APT, HSBC, and HMBC spectra of compound 10, Figures S29–S31: 1H NMR,13C NMR, and 13C NMR APT spectra of compound 12.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.M.B., A.K.I., E.T.M. and M.S.A.-K.; methodology, E.E.E., E.T.M., S.M.M., B.M.A. and M.S.G.; data curation, E.E.E., E.M.M., B.M.A., J.M.B. and M.S.G.; original draft preparation, E.E.E.; E.M.M., E.T.M., B.M.A. and M.S.G.; writing, review, and editing, all authors. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study protocol was approved by the ethical committee of the Faculty of Pharmacy at Suez Canal University (approval number: 201803PhDA3).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available within the article and Supplementary Materials.

Acknowledgments

This publication was supported by the Deanship of Scientific Research at Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj, Saudi Arabia, as well as Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Amer, A.M. Antimicrobial effects of Egyptian local chicory, Cichorium endivia subsp. pumilum. Int. J. Microbiol. 2018, 2018, 6475072. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  2. Masoud, M.; Zayed, M.A.; Gad, D.; Elhaak, M.A. Effect of gamma irradiation on some active constituents and metabolites of Cichorium pumilum Jacq. Egypt. J. Exp. Biol. 2018, 14, 153–159. [Google Scholar]
  3. Koudela, M.; Petříková, K. Nutritional composition and yield of endive cultivars–Cichorium endivia L. Hortic. Sci. 2007, 34, 6–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Abou-Zeid, N.A. Utilization of the weed Cichorium pumilum Jacq. as vegetable protease enzymes for whey protein hydrolysate production. Int. J. Res. Stud. Biosci. 2015, 3, 44–53. [Google Scholar]
  5. Azaizeh, H.; Saad, B.; Khalil, K.; Said, O. The state of the art of traditional Arab herbal medicine in the Eastern region of the Mediterranean: A review. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. 2006, 3, 229–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Al Khateeb, W.; Hussein, E.; Qouta, L.; Alu’datt, M.; Al-Shara, B.; Abu-Zaiton, A. In vitro propagation and characterization of phenolic content along with antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of Cichorium pumilum Jacq. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2012, 110, 103–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Seto, M.; Miyase, T.; Umehara, K.; Ueno, A.; Hirano, Y.; Otani, N. Sesquiterpene lactones from Cichorium endivia L. and C. intybus L. and cytotoxic activity. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1988, 36, 2423–2429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kisiel, W.; Michalska, K. Root constituents of Cichorium pumilum and rearrangements of some lactucin-like guaianolides. Z. Naturforsch. C 2003, 58, 789–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kisiel, W.; Michalska, K. Sesquiterpenoids and phenolics from roots of Cichorium endivia var. crispum. Fitoterapia 2006, 77, 354–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Warashina, T.; Miyase, T. Sesquiterpenes from the Roots of Cichorium endivia. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2008, 56, 1445–1451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Saleh, M.R.; Metwally, A.M.; Amer, M.M. Isolation of a flavonoidal substance from Cichorium pumilum jacq. Pharmazie 1975, 30, 404. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  12. Chen, C.J.; Deng, A.J.; Liu, C.; Shi, R.; Qin, H.L.; Wang, A.P. Hepatoprotective activity of Cichorium endivia L. extract and its chemical constituents. Molecules 2011, 16, 9049–9066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. El-Shafey, N.M.; AbdElgawad, H. Luteolin, a bioactive flavone compound extracted from Cichorium endivia L. subsp. divaricatum alleviates the harmful effect of salinity on maize. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2012, 34, 2165–2177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Mascherpa, D.; Carazzone, C.; Marrubini, G.; Gazzani, G.; Papetti, A. Identification of phenolic constituents in Cichorium endivia var. crispum and var. latifolium salads by high-performance liquid chromatography with diode array detection and electrospray ioniziation tandem mass spectrometry. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2012, 60, 12142–12150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Hegazy, A.; Ezzat, S.; Qasem, I.; Ali-Shtayeh, M.; Basalah, M.; Ali, H.; Hatamleh, A. Diversity of active constituents in Cichorium endivia and Cynara cornigera extracts. Acta Biol. Hung. 2015, 66, 103–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Khalil, H.E.; Kamel, M.S. Phytochemical and biological studies of Cichorium endivia L. leaves. J. Pharm. Sci. 2015, 7, 509–513. [Google Scholar]
  17. Papetti, A.; Daglia, M.; Aceti, C.; Sordelli, B.; Spini, V.; Carazzone, C.; Gazzani, G. Hydroxycinnamic acid derivatives occurring in Cichorium endivia vegetables. J. Pharm. Biomed. 2008, 48, 472–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Singab, A.B.; Ayoub, N.A.; Noaman, E.; Ayoub, I.M. Phytochemical constituents, antioxidant and hepatoprotective activities of Egyptian Cichorium pumilum Jacq. Bull. Fac. Pharm. Cairo Univ. 2010, 48, 13. [Google Scholar]
  19. Mikropoulou, E.V.; Vougogiannopoulou, K.; Kalpoutzakis, E.; Sklirou, A.D.; Skaperda, Z.; Houriet, J.; Wolfender, J.L.; Trougakos, I.P.; Kouretas, D.; Halabalaki, M.; et al. Phytochemical composition of the decoctions of Greek edible greens (chórta) and evaluation of antioxidant and cytotoxic properties. Molecules 2018, 23, 1541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, F.X.; Deng, A.J.; Wei, J.F.; Qin, H.L.; Wang, A.P. 1H and 13C NMR Assignments of Cytotoxic 3S-1,2,3,4-Tetrahydro-β-carboline-3-carboxylic Acid from the Leaves of Cichorium endivia. J. Anal. Methods Chem. 2012, 2012, 254391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Aisa, H.A.; Xin, X.L.; Tang, D. Chemical constituents and their pharmacological activities of plants from Cichorium genus. Chin. Herb. Med. 2020, 12, 224–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Han, C.; Wu, X.; Zou, N.; Zhang, Y.; Yuan, J.; Gao, Y.; Chen, W.; Yao, J.; Li, C.; Hou, J.; et al. Cichorium pumilum Jacq Extract Inhibits LPS-Induced Inflammation via MAPK Signaling Pathway and Protects Rats from Hepatic Fibrosis Caused by Abnormalities in the Gut-Liver Axis. Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 12, 683613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Kamel, Z.H.; Daw, I.; Marzouk, M. Effect of Cichorium endivia leaves on some biochemical parameters in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. Aust. J. Basic Appl. Sci. 2011, 5, 387–396. [Google Scholar]
  24. Wang, F.X.; Deng, A.J.; Li, M.; Wei, J.F.; Qin, H.L.; Wang, A.P. (3S)-1,2,3,4-Tetrahydro-β-carboline-3-carboxylic acid from Cichorium endivia. L induces apoptosis of human colorectal cancer HCT-8 cells. Molecules 2012, 18, 418–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Alshehri, A.; Elsayed, H.E. Molecular and biochemical evaluation of anti-proliferative effect of (Cichorium endivia, L.) phenolic extracts on breast cancer cell line: MCF7. E3 J. Biotechnol. Pharm. Res. 2012, 3, 74–82. [Google Scholar]
  26. Al-Akhras, M.A.H.; Aljarrah, K.; Al-Khateeb, H.; Jaradat, A.; Al-Omari, A.; Al-Nasser, A.; Masadeh, M.M.; Amin, A.; Hamza, A.; Mohammed, K.; et al. Introducing Cichorium pumilum as a potential therapeutical agent against drug-induced benign breast tumor in rats. Electromagn. Biol. Med. 2012, 31, 299–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Enk, C.D.; Hochberg, M.; Torres, A.; Lev, O.; Dor, I.; Srebnik, M.; Dembitsky, V.M. Photoprotection by Cichorium endivia extracts: Prevention of UVB-induced erythema, pyrimidine dimer formation and IL-6 expression. Skin Pharmacol. Physiol. 2004, 17, 42–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Fu, J.; Liu, Y.; Wang, C.; Zhang, H.; Yu, B.; Wang, Y.; Zhu, H. Persistent follicular granulosa cell senescence and apoptosis induced by methotrexate leading to oocyte dysfunction and aberrant embryo development. Clin. Transl. Sci. 2021, 14, 2043–2054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sherif, I.O.; Al-Mutabagani, L.A.; Sarhan, O.M. Ginkgo biloba extract attenuates methotrexate-induced testicular injury in rats: Cross-talk between oxidative stress, inflammation, apoptosis, and miRNA-29a expression. Integr. Cancer Ther. 2020, 19, 1534735420969814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Elhady, S.S.; Abdelhameed, R.F.A.; Mehanna, E.T.; Wahba, A.S.; Elfaky, M.A.; Koshak, A.E.; Noor, A.O.; Bogari, H.A.; Malatani, R.T.; Goda, M.S. Metabolic Profiling, Chemical Composition, Antioxidant Capacity, and In Vivo Hepato- and Nephroprotective Effects of Sonchus cornutus in Mice Exposed to Cisplatin. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Singleton, V.L.; Orthofer, R.; Lamuela-Raventos, R.M. Analysis of total phenols and other oxidation substrates and antioxidants by means of Folin–Ciocalteau reagent. Methods Enzymol. 1999, 299, 152–178. [Google Scholar]
  32. Yen, G.C.; Duh, P.D. Scavenging effect of methanolic extracts of peanut hulls on free radical and active oxygen species. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1994, 42, 629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Gomha, S.M.; Muhammad, Z.A.; Abdel-Aziz, M.R.; Abdel-Aziz, H.M.; Gaber, H.M.; Elaasser, M.M. One-pot synthesis of new thiadiazolyl-pyridines as anticancer and antioxidant agents. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 2018, 55, 530–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Oyaizu, M. Studies on products of browning reaction: Antioxidative activities of products of browning reaction prepared from glucosamine. Jpn. J. Nutr. 1986, 44, 307–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ferreira, I.C.F.R.; Baptista, P.; Vilas-Boas, M.; Barros, L. Free-radical scavenging capacity and reducing power of wild edible mushrooms from northeast Portugal: Individual cap and stipe activity. Food Chem. 2007, 100, 1511–1516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Canabady-Rochelle, L.L.; Harscoat-Schiavo, C.; Kessler, V.; Aymes, A.; Fournier, F.; Girardet, J.M. Determination of reducing power and metal chelating ability of antioxidant peptides: Revisited methods. Food Chem. 2015, 183, 129–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Prieto, P.; Pineda, M.; Aguilar, M. Spectrophotometric quantitation of antioxidant capacity through the formation of a phosphomolybdenum complex: Specific application to the determination of vitamin E. Anal. Biochem. 1999, 269, 337–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Vijayalakshmi, A.; Kumar, P.R.; Priyadarsini, S.S.; Meenaxshi, C. In vitro antioxidant and anticancer activity of flavonoid fraction from the aerial parts of Cissus quadrangularis Linn. against human breast carcinoma cell lines. J. Chem. 2013, 2013, 150675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Johnsen, S.G. Testicular biopsy score count–a method for registration of spermatogenesis in human testes: Normal values and results in 335 hypogonadal males. Horm. Res. Paediatr. 1970, 1, 2–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Cosme, P.; Rodríguez, A.B.; Espino, J.; Garrido, M. Plant phenolics: Bioavailability as a key determinant of their potential health-promoting applications. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 1263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ghosh, T.; Maity, T.K.; Singh, J. Evaluation of antitumor activity of stigmasterol, a constituent isolated from Bacopa monnieri Linn aerial parts against Ehrlich Ascites Carcinoma in mice. Orient. Pharm. Exp. Med. 2011, 11, 41–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Parvez, M.K.; Alam, P.; Arbab, A.H.; Al-Dosari, M.S.; Alhowiriny, T.A.; Alqasoumi, S.I. Analysis of antioxidative and antiviral biomarkers β-amyrin, β-sitosterol, lupeol, ursolic acid in Guiera senegalensis leaves extract by validated HPTLC methods. Saudi Pharm. J. 2018, 26, 685–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. He, Y.; Guo, Y.J.; Gao, Y.Y. Studies on chemical constituents of root of Cichorium intybus. China J. Chin. Mater. Med. 2002, 27, 209–210. [Google Scholar]
  44. Chang, S.W.; Kim, K.H.; Lee, I.K.; Choi, S.U.; Ryu, S.Y.; Lee, K.R. Phytochemical constituents of Bistorta manshuriensis. Nat. Prod. Sci. 2009, 15, 234–240. [Google Scholar]
  45. Kisiel, W.; Michalska, K.; Szneler, E. Norisoprenoids from aerial parts of Cichorium pumilum. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 2004, 32, 343–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Hammami, S.; Jannet, H.B.; Bergaoui, A.; Ciavatta, L.; Cimino, G.; Mighri, Z. Isolation and structure elucidation of a flavanone, a flavanone glycoside and vomifoliol from Echiochilon fruticosum growing in Tunisia. Molecules 2004, 9, 602–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Huynh, N.V.; Nguyen, T.H.T.; Nguyen, K.P.P.; Hansen, P.E. Structural studies of the chemical constituents of Tithonia tagetiflora Desv. (Asteraceae). Magn. Reson. Chem. 2013, 51, 439–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Al-Madhagy, S.; Mostafa, N.M.; Youssef, F.S.; Awad, G.; Eldahshan, O.A.; Singab, A.N.B. Isolation and structure elucidation of compounds from Coccinia grandis leaves extract. Egypt. J. Chem. 2019, 62, 1869–1877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Altemimi, A.B.; Mohammed, M.J.; Yi-Chen, L.; Watson, D.G.; Lakhssassi, N.; Cacciola, F.; Ibrahim, S.A. Optimization of Ultrasonicated Kaempferol Extraction from Ocimum basilicum Using a Box–Behnken Design and Its Densitometric Validation. Foods 2020, 9, 1379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Jesionek, W.; Majer-Dziedzic, B.; Choma, I.M. Separation, identification, and investigation of antioxidant ability of plant extract components using TLC, LC–MS, and TLC–DPPH. J. Liq. Chromatogr. Relat. Technol. 2015, 38, 1147–1153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Berker, K.I.; Olgun, F.A.O.; Ozyurt, D.; Demirata, B.; Apak, R. Modified Folin–Ciocalteu antioxidant capacity assay for measuring lipophilic antioxidants. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013, 61, 4783–4791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Munteanu, I.G.; Apetrei, C. Analytical Methods Used in Determining Antioxidant Activity: A Review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 3380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Bibi Sadeer, N.; Montesano, D.; Albrizio, S.; Zengin, G.; Mahomoodally, M.F. The Versatility of Antioxidant Assays in Food Science and Safety—Chemistry, Applications, Strengths, and Limitations. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Malik, B.; Pirzadah, T.B.; Tahir, I.; Rehman, R.U. Chemo-profiling, Antioxidant potential and Ionomic analysis of Cichorium intybus L. Pharmacogn. J. 2017, 9, 917–928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Rice-Evans, C.; Miller, N.; Paganga, G. Antioxidant properties of phenolic compounds. Trends Plant Sci. 1997, 2, 152–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Eltamany, E.E.; Elhady, S.S.; Ahmed, H.A.; Badr, J.M.; Noor, A.O.; Ahmed, S.A.; Nafie, M.S. Chemical Profiling, Antioxidant, Cytotoxic Activities and Molecular Docking Simulation of Carrichtera annua DC. (Cruciferae). Antioxidants 2020, 9, 1286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Elhusseiny, S.M.; El-Mahdy, T.S.; Awad, M.F.; Elleboudy, N.S.; Farag, M.M.S.; Yassein, M.A.; Aboshanab, K.M. Proteome Analysis and In Vitro Antiviral, Anticancer and Antioxidant Capacities of the Aqueous Extracts of Lentinula edodes and Pleurotus ostreatus Edible Mushrooms. Molecules 2021, 26, 4623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Apak, R.; Özyürek, M.; Güçlü, K.; Çapanoğlu, E. Antioxidant Activity/Capacity Measurement. 2. Hydrogen Atom Transfer (HAT)-Based, Mixed-Mode (Electron Transfer (ET)/HAT), and Lipid Peroxidation Assays. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2016, 64, 1028–1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Uddin, N.; Mitra, K.; Haque, Z. Comparative Bio-Active Compounds Determination and In Vitro Antioxidant Properties of Newly Developed Soy Mixed Wheat Flour and Traditional Wheat Flour. Int. J. Food Prop. 2015, 19, 2113–2126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Diwan, R.; Shinde, A.; Malpathak, N. Phytochemical Composition and Antioxidant Potential of Ruta graveolens L. In Vitro Culture Lines. J. Bot. 2012, 2012, 685427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Marzouk, M.; Sayed, A.; Soliman, A. Hepatoprotective and antioxidant effects of Cichorium endivia L. leaves extract against acetaminophen toxicity on rats. J. Med. Med. Sci. 2011, 2, 1273–1279. [Google Scholar]
  62. Lfitat, A.; Zejli, H.; Bousraf, F.Z.; Bousselham, A.; El Atki, Y.; Gourch, A.; Lyoussi, B.; Abdellaoui, A. Comparative Assessment of Total Phenolics Content and in Vitro Antioxidant Capacity Variations of Macerated Leaf Extracts of Olea Europaea L. and Argania spinosa (L.) Skeels. Mater. Today Proc. 2021, 45, 7271–7277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Hinneburg, I.; Dorman, H.J.D.; Hiltunen, R. Antioxidant Activities of Extracts from Selected Culinary Herbs and Spices. Food Chem. 2006, 97, 122–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Rosa, L.D.S.; Jordão, N.A.; Soares, N.D.C.P.; Mesquita, J.F.D.; Monteiro, M.; Teodoro, A.J. Pharmacokinetic, antiproliferative and apoptotic effects of phenolic acids in human colon adenocarcinoma cells using in vitro and in silico approaches. Molecules 2018, 23, 2569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Kagambega, W.; Belem, H.; Meda, R.N.T.; Koama, B.K.; Drabo, A.F.; Kabore, J.; Traore, A.; Ouédraogo, G.A.; Benedec, D.; Hanganu, D.; et al. Polyphenolic Profile, Anti-Inflammatory and Anti-Nociceptive Activities of Some African Medicinal Plants. Plants 2022, 11, 1377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Shafik, A. Intratunical injection of methotrexate for the treatment of seminoma of the testicle. Anticancer Drugs 1993, 4, 193–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Sussman, A.; Leonard, J.M. Psoriasis, methotrexate, and oligospermia. Arch. Dermatol. 1980, 116, 215–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Van Scott, E.J.; Reinertson, R.P. Morphologic and physiologic effects of chemotherapeutic agents in psoriasis. J. Investig. Dermatol. 1959, 33, 357–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Pınar, N.; Çakırca, G.; Özgür, T.; Kaplan, M. The protective effects of alpha lipoic acid on methotrexate induced testis injury in rats. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2018, 97, 1486–1492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Abdelzaher, W.Y.; Khalaf, H.M.; El-Hussieny, M.; Bayoumi, A.M.A.; Shehata, S.; Refaie, M.M.M. Role of nitric oxide donor in methotrexate-induced testicular injury via modulation of pro-inflammatory mediators, eNOS and P-glycoprotein. Hum. Exp. Toxicol. 2020, 39, 1700–1709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Bouwmeester, T.; Bauch, A.; Ruffner, H.; Angrand, P.O.; Bergamini, G.; Croughton, K.; Cruciat, C.; Eberhard, D.; Gagneur, J.; Ghidelli, S.; et al. A physical and functional map of the human TNF-α/NF-κB signal transduction pathway. Nat. Cell Biol. 2004, 6, 97–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Wang, Y.; Zhao, T.T.; Zhao, H.Y.; Wang, H. Melatonin protects methotrexate-induced testicular injury in rats. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2018, 22, 7517–7525. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  73. Owumi, S.E.; Ochaoga, S.E.; Odunola, O.A.; Farombi, E.O. Protocatechuic acid inhibits testicular and epididymal toxicity associated with methotrexate in rats. Andrologia 2019, 51, e13350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Samani, S.M.; Bojnordi, T.E.; Zarghampour, M.; Merat, S.; Fouladi, D.F. Expression of p53, Bcl-2 and Bax in endometrial carcinoma, endometrial hyperplasia and normal endometrium: A histopathological study. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2018, 38, 999–1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Li, C.; Sun, H.; Wei, W.; Liu, Q.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Lian, F.; Liu, F.; Li, C.; Ying, K.; et al. Mitoxantrone triggers immunogenic prostate cancer cell death via p53-dependent PERK expression. Cell. Oncol. 2020, 43, 1099–1116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Han, X.; Zheng, J.; Wang, Y.; Gao, Z. miRNA-29a inhibits colon cancer growth by regulation of the PTEN/Akt/GSK3β and Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathways. Oncol. Lett. 2018, 16, 2638–2644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Li, R.; Liu, J.; Li, Q.; Chen, G.; Yu, X. miR-29a suppresses growth and metastasis in papillary thyroid carcinoma by targeting AKT3. Tumor Biol. 2016, 37, 3987–3996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Park, S.Y.; Lee, J.H.; Ha, M.; Nam, J.W.; Kim, V.N. miR-29 miRNAs activate p53 by targeting p85α and CDC42. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2009, 16, 23–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Akinjo, O.O.; Gant, T.W.; Marczylo, E.L. Perturbation of epigenetic processes by doxorubicin in the mouse testis. Toxicol. Res. 2016, 5, 1229–1243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Meunier, L.; Siddeek, B.; Vega, A.; Lakhdari, N.; Inoubli, L.; Bellon, R.P.; Lemaire, G.; Mauduit, C.; Benahmed, M. Perinatal programming of adult rat germ cell death after exposure to xenoestrogens: Role of microRNA miR-29 family in the downregulation of DNA methyltransferases and Mcl-1. Endocrinology 2012, 153, 1936–1947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Eltamany, E.E.; Elhady, S.S.; Nafie, M.S.; Ahmed, H.A.; Abo-Elmatty, D.M.; Ahmed, S.A.; Badr, J.M.; Abdel-Hamed, A.R. The Antioxidant Carrichtera annua DC. Ethanolic Extract Counteracts Cisplatin Triggered Hepatic and Renal Toxicities. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Kim, J.S.; Kim, K.S.; Son, J.Y.; Kim, H.R.; Park, J.H.; Lee, S.H.; Lee, D.E.; Kim, I.S.; Lee, K.Y.; Lee, B.M.; et al. Protective effects of Dendropanax morbifera against cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity without altering chemotherapeutic efficacy. Antioxidants 2019, 8, 256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Soliman, A.M.; Desouky, S.; Marzouk, M.; Sayed, A.A. Origanum majorana attenuates nephrotoxicity of cisplatin anticancer drug through ameliorating oxidative stress. Nutrients 2016, 8, 264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Heidari-Soreshjani, S.; Asadi-Samani, M.; Yang, Q.; Saeedi-Boroujeni, A. Phytotherapy of nephrotoxicity-induced by cancer drugs: An updated review. J. Nephropathol. 2017, 6, 254–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Ilyas, S.; Tabasum, R.; Iftikhar, A.; Nazir, M.; Hussain, A.; Hussain, A.; Ali, M.S.; Saleem, F.; Saleem, U.; Froeyen, M.; et al. Effect of Berberis vulgaris L. root extract on ifosfamide-induced in vivo toxicity and in vitro cytotoxicity. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 1708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Dorostghoal, M.; Seyyednejad, S.M.; Nejad, M.N.T. Cichorium intybus L. extract ameliorates testicular oxidative stress induced by lead acetate in male rats. Clin. Exp. Reprod. Med. 2020, 47, 161–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Dorostghoal, M.; Seyyednejad, S.M.; Nejad, M.N.T. Beneficial effects of Cichorium intybus L. extract on oxidative status and reproductive parameters in male Wistar rats: An experimental study. Int. J. Reprod. Biomed. 2019, 17, 425–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Nishi, K.; Ramakrishnan, S.; Gunasekaran, V.P.; Parkash, K.; Ramakrishnan, A.; Vijayakumar, N.; Ganeshan, M. Protective effects of p-coumaric acid on ethanol induced male reproductive toxicity. Life Sci. 2018, 209, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Zahra, Z.; Khan, M.R.; Majid, M.; Maryam, S.; Sajid, M. Gonadoprotective ability of Vincetoxicum arnottianum extract against bisphenol A-induced testicular toxicity and hormonal imbalance in male Sprague Dawley rats. Andrologia 2020, 52, e13590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Abd El Tawab, A.M.; Shahin, N.N.; AbdelMohsen, M.M. Protective effect of Satureja montana extract on cyclophosphamide-induced testicular injury in rats. Chem. Biol. Interact. 2014, 224, 196–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Hassanein, E.H.; Abdel-Wahab, B.A.; Ali, F.E.; El-Ghafar, A.; Omnia, A.M.; Kozman, M.R.; Sharkawi, S.M. Trans-ferulic acid ameliorates cisplatin-induced testicular damage via suppression of TLR4, P38-MAPK, and ERK1/2 signaling pathways. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 41948–41964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Roychoudhury, S.; Sinha, B.; Choudhury, B.P.; Jha, N.K.; Palit, P.; Kundu, S.; Mandal, S.C.; Kolesarova, A.; Yousef, M.I.; Ruokolainen, J.; et al. Scavenging properties of plant-derived natural biomolecule para-coumaric acid in the prevention of oxidative stress-induced diseases. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 1205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Saad, A.B.; Rjeibi, I.; Brahmi, N.; Elaloui, E.; Zouari, N. Nicotine-induced oxidative stress, testis injury, AChE inhibition and brain damage alleviated by Mentha spicata. Inflammopharmacology 2020, 28, 939–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Sindhu, G.; Nishanthi, E.; Sharmila, R. Nephroprotective effect of vanillic acid against cisplatin induced nephrotoxicity in wistar rats: A biochemical and molecular study. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2015, 39, 392–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Kassab, R.B.; Lokman, M.S.; Daabo, H.M.; Gaber, D.A.; Habotta, O.A.; Hafez, M.M.; Zhery, A.S.; Moneim, A.E.A.; Fouda, M.S. Ferulic acid influences Nrf2 activation to restore testicular tissue from cadmium-induced oxidative challenge, inflammation, and apoptosis in rats. J. Food Biochem. 2020, 44, e13505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Hasanein, P.; Fazeli, F.; Parviz, M.; Roghani, M. Ferulic acid prevents lead-induced testicular oxidative stress and suppressed spermatogenesis in rats. Andrologia 2018, 50, e12798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Chandra, K.; Jain, V.; Jabin, A.; Dwivedi, S.; Joshi, S.; Ahmad, S.; Jain, S.K. Effect of Cichorium intybus seeds supplementation on the markers of glycemic control, oxidative stress, inflammation, and lipid profile in type 2 diabetes mellitus: A randomized, double-blind placebo study. Phytother. Res. 2020, 34, 1609–1618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Olsen, N.J.; Branch, V.K.; Jonnala, G.; Seskar, M.; Cooper, M. Phase 1, placebo-controlled, dose escalation trial of chicory root extract in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 2010, 11, 156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Ghamarian, A.; Abdollahi, M.; Su, X.; Amiri, A.; Ahadi, A.; Nowrouzi, A. Effect of chicory seed extract on glucose tolerance test (GTT) and metabolic profile in early and late stage diabetic rats. DARU J. Pharm. Sci. 2012, 20, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Hsu, C.L.; Fang, S.C.; Yen, G.C. Anti-inflammatory effects of phenolic compounds isolated from the flowers of Nymphaea mexicana Zucc. Food Funct. 2013, 4, 1216–1222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Fang, S.C.; Hsu, C.L.; Yen, G.C. Anti-inflammatory effects of phenolic compounds isolated from the fruits of Artocarpus heterophyllus. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2008, 56, 4463–4468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Sabitha, R.; Nishi, K.; Gunasekaran, V.P.; Annamalai, G.; Agilan, B.; Ganeshan, M. p-Coumaric acid ameliorates ethanol–induced kidney injury by inhibiting inflammatory cytokine production and NF–κB signaling in rats. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Biomed. 2019, 9, 188–195. [Google Scholar]
  103. Abdel-Moneim, A.; Yousef, A.I.; El-Twab, A.; Sanaa, M.; Abdel Reheim, E.S.; Ashour, M.B. Gallic acid and p-coumaric acid attenuate type 2 diabetes-induced neurodegeneration in rats. Metab. Brain Dis. 2017, 32, 1279–1286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Hu, R.; Wu, S.; Li, B.; Tan, J.; Yan, J.; Wang, Y.; Tang, Z.; Liu, M.; Fu, C.; Zhang, H.; et al. Dietary ferulic acid and vanillic acid on inflammation, gut barrier function and growth performance in lipopolysaccharide-challenged piglets. Anim. Nutr. 2022, 8, 144–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Ziadlou, R.; Barbero, A.; Martin, I.; Wang, X.; Qin, L.; Alini, M.; Grad, S. Anti-inflammatory and chondroprotective effects of vanillic acid and epimedin C in human osteoarthritic chondrocytes. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. El-Masry, T.; Altwaijry, N.; Alotaibi, B.; Tousson, E.; Alboghdadly, A.; Saleh, A. Chicory (Cichorium intybus L.) extract ameliorates hydroxyapatite nanoparticles induced kidney damage in rats. Pak. J. Pharm. Sci. 2020, 33, 1251–1260. [Google Scholar]
  107. Erkec, O.E.; Arihan, O.; Colcimen, N.; Kara, M.; Karatas, E.; Demir, H.; Ragbetli, M.C. Effects of Cichorium intybus on serum oxidative stress, liver and kidney volume, and cyclin B1 and Bcl-2 levels in the brains of rats with ethanol induced damage. Cell. Mol. Biol. 2018, 64, 30–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Parvez, M.K.; Al-Dosari, M.S.; Tabish Rehman, M.; Alajmi, M.F.; Alqahtani, A.S.; AlSaid, M.S. New terpenic and phenolic compounds from Suaeda monoica reverse oxidative and apoptotic damages in human endothelial cells. Saudi Pharm. J. 2021, 29, 1102–1111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Jazvinšćak Jembrek, M.; Oršolić, N.; Mandić, L.; Sadžak, A.; Šegota, S. Anti-Oxidative, Anti-Inflammatory and Anti-Apoptotic Effects of Flavonols: Targeting Nrf2, NF-κB and p53 Pathways in Neurodegeneration. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 1628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Prince, P.; Dhanasekar, K.; Rajakumar, S. Preventive effects of vanillic acid on lipids, bax, bcl-2 and myocardial infarct size on isoproterenol-induced myocardial infarcted rats: A biochemical and in vitro study. Cardiovasc. Toxicol. 2011, 11, 58–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Ding, S.; Liu, D.; Wang, L.; Wang, G.; Zhu, Y. Inhibiting microRNA-29a protects myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury by targeting SIRT1 and suppressing oxidative stress and NLRP3-mediated pyroptosis pathway. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2020, 372, 128–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Tang, B.; Li, X.; Ren, Y.; Wang, J.; Xu, D.; Hang, Y.; Zhou, T.; Wang, L. MicroRNA-29a regulates lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced inflammatory responses in murine macrophages through the Akt1/NF-κB pathway. Exp. Cell Res. 2017, 360, 74–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Lin, Q.; Ma, L.; Liu, Z.; Yang, Z.; Wang, J.; Liu, J.; Jiang, G. Targeting microRNAs: A new action mechanism of natural compounds. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 15961–15970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Biersack, B. Current state of phenolic and terpenoidal dietary factors and natural products as non-coding RNA/microRNA modulators for improved cancer therapy and prevention. Non-Coding RNA Res. 2016, 1, 12–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. (a) The scavenging rate (%) of DPPH and (b) the scavenging rate (%) of FRAP by C. endivia L. crude extract. All values in the figure are expressed as means (%) and SD of triplicated experiments.
Figure 1. (a) The scavenging rate (%) of DPPH and (b) the scavenging rate (%) of FRAP by C. endivia L. crude extract. All values in the figure are expressed as means (%) and SD of triplicated experiments.
Biomedicines 10 01986 g001
Figure 2. Antioxidant activity of C. endivia L. crude extract: (a) the IC50 value of DPPH radical scavenging assay; (b) the IC50 value of FRAP scavenging assay; and (c) total antioxidant capacity (TAC) assay. Results are expressed as mean ± SD and compared by Student t test. * Significantly different compared to C. endivia crude extract at p < 0.05.
Figure 2. Antioxidant activity of C. endivia L. crude extract: (a) the IC50 value of DPPH radical scavenging assay; (b) the IC50 value of FRAP scavenging assay; and (c) total antioxidant capacity (TAC) assay. Results are expressed as mean ± SD and compared by Student t test. * Significantly different compared to C. endivia crude extract at p < 0.05.
Biomedicines 10 01986 g002
Figure 3. Chemical structure of the isolated compounds.
Figure 3. Chemical structure of the isolated compounds.
Biomedicines 10 01986 g003
Figure 4. Histopathological examination of the effects of C. endivia L. crude extract, phenolic fraction, and its isolated compounds (coumaric, vanillic, and ferulic acids) on the testicular tissue in the experimental mice (40×). (A) Normal control group, (B) MTX control group, (C) C. endivia L. crude-extract-treated group, (D) C. endivia L. phenolic-extract-treated group, (E) coumaric acid treated group, (F) vanillic acid treated group, (G) ferulic acid treated group, and (H) bar charts representing Johnsen’s scoring for the testes in the studied groups. Black arrows refer to spermatogenesis. Data are expressed as the mean ± SD. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA then Bonferroni’s post hoc test. * Significant against normal control group, # significant against MTX control group. Values were considered significantly different at p < 0.05.
Figure 4. Histopathological examination of the effects of C. endivia L. crude extract, phenolic fraction, and its isolated compounds (coumaric, vanillic, and ferulic acids) on the testicular tissue in the experimental mice (40×). (A) Normal control group, (B) MTX control group, (C) C. endivia L. crude-extract-treated group, (D) C. endivia L. phenolic-extract-treated group, (E) coumaric acid treated group, (F) vanillic acid treated group, (G) ferulic acid treated group, and (H) bar charts representing Johnsen’s scoring for the testes in the studied groups. Black arrows refer to spermatogenesis. Data are expressed as the mean ± SD. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA then Bonferroni’s post hoc test. * Significant against normal control group, # significant against MTX control group. Values were considered significantly different at p < 0.05.
Biomedicines 10 01986 g004
Figure 5. Effects of C. endivia L. crude extract, phenolic fraction, and its isolated compounds (coumaric, vanillic, and ferulic acids) on the serum level of testosterone in the experimental mice. Data are expressed as the mean ± SD. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s post hoc test. * Significant against normal control group, # significant against MTX control group. Values were considered significantly different at p < 0.05.
Figure 5. Effects of C. endivia L. crude extract, phenolic fraction, and its isolated compounds (coumaric, vanillic, and ferulic acids) on the serum level of testosterone in the experimental mice. Data are expressed as the mean ± SD. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s post hoc test. * Significant against normal control group, # significant against MTX control group. Values were considered significantly different at p < 0.05.
Biomedicines 10 01986 g005
Figure 6. Effects of C. endivia L. crude extract, phenolic fraction, and its isolated compounds (coumaric, vanillic, and ferulic acids) on the testicular oxidative stress biomarkers in the experimental mice. (A) MDA, (B) CAT, and (C) SOD. Data are expressed as the mean ± SD. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA then Bonferroni’s post hoc test. * Significant against normal control group, # significant against MTX control group. Values were considered different significantly at p < 0.05. MDA: malondialdehyde, CAT: catalase, SOD: superoxide dismutase.
Figure 6. Effects of C. endivia L. crude extract, phenolic fraction, and its isolated compounds (coumaric, vanillic, and ferulic acids) on the testicular oxidative stress biomarkers in the experimental mice. (A) MDA, (B) CAT, and (C) SOD. Data are expressed as the mean ± SD. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA then Bonferroni’s post hoc test. * Significant against normal control group, # significant against MTX control group. Values were considered different significantly at p < 0.05. MDA: malondialdehyde, CAT: catalase, SOD: superoxide dismutase.
Biomedicines 10 01986 g006
Figure 7. Effects of C. endivia L. crude extract, phenolic fraction, and its isolated compounds (coumaric, vanillic, and ferulic acids) on the testicular inflammatory biomarkers in the experimental mice. (A) NF-κB expression, (B) TNF-α expression, (C) IL-1β levels, and (D) IL-6 levels. Data are expressed as the mean ± SD. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA then Bonferroni’s post hoc test. * Significant against normal control group, # significant against MTX control group. Values were considered different significantly at p < 0.05. NF-κB: nuclear factor-kappa B, TNF-α: tumor necrosis factor-alpha, IL-1β: interleukin 1β, IL-6: interleukin 6.
Figure 7. Effects of C. endivia L. crude extract, phenolic fraction, and its isolated compounds (coumaric, vanillic, and ferulic acids) on the testicular inflammatory biomarkers in the experimental mice. (A) NF-κB expression, (B) TNF-α expression, (C) IL-1β levels, and (D) IL-6 levels. Data are expressed as the mean ± SD. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA then Bonferroni’s post hoc test. * Significant against normal control group, # significant against MTX control group. Values were considered different significantly at p < 0.05. NF-κB: nuclear factor-kappa B, TNF-α: tumor necrosis factor-alpha, IL-1β: interleukin 1β, IL-6: interleukin 6.
Biomedicines 10 01986 g007
Figure 8. Effects of C. endivia L. crude extract, phenolic fraction, and its isolated compounds (coumaric, vanillic, and ferulic acids) on the testicular apoptosis biomarkers in the experimental mice. (A) p53 expression, (B) Bax levels, (C) Bcl-2 levels, and (D) miR-29a expression. Data are expressed as the mean ± SD. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s post hoc test. * Significant against normal control group, # significant against MTX control group. Values were considered different significantly at p < 0.05. Bax: Bcl-2-associated X protein, Bcl-2: B-cell lymphoma.
Figure 8. Effects of C. endivia L. crude extract, phenolic fraction, and its isolated compounds (coumaric, vanillic, and ferulic acids) on the testicular apoptosis biomarkers in the experimental mice. (A) p53 expression, (B) Bax levels, (C) Bcl-2 levels, and (D) miR-29a expression. Data are expressed as the mean ± SD. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s post hoc test. * Significant against normal control group, # significant against MTX control group. Values were considered different significantly at p < 0.05. Bax: Bcl-2-associated X protein, Bcl-2: B-cell lymphoma.
Biomedicines 10 01986 g008
Table 1. Primer sequences and annealing temperatures for the measured genes.
Table 1. Primer sequences and annealing temperatures for the measured genes.
Forward PrimerReverse PrimerAnnealing Temperature
NF-κb 5′-CAATGGCTACACAGGACCA-3′5′-CACTGTCACCTGGAACCAGA-3′52 °C
TNF-α5′-TCTACTGAACTTCGGGGTGATCG-3′5′-TGATCTGAGTGTGAGGGTCTGGG-3′56 °C
p535′-ACCGCCGACCTATCCTTACC-3′5′-TCTTCTGTACGGCGGTCTCTC-3′56 °C
β-actin5′-ACGGCCAGGTCATCACTATTG-3′5′-CAAGAAGGAAGGCTGGAAAAGA-3′52 °C
miR-29a5′-GCGCACTGATTTCTTTTGGTGTTCAG-3′5′-GCGAGCACAGAATTAATACGAC-3′51 °C
RNU6B5′-CTCGCTTCGGCAGCACATA-3′5′-CGCTTCACGAATTTGCGTG-3′53 °C
NF-κB: nuclear factor kappa B; TNF-α: tumor necrosis factor alpha; RNU6B: U6B small nuclear RNA.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Eltamany, E.E.; Mosalam, E.M.; Mehanna, E.T.; Awad, B.M.; Mosaad, S.M.; Abdel-Kader, M.S.; Ibrahim, A.K.; Badr, J.M.; Goda, M.S. Potential Gonado-Protective Effect of Cichorium endivia and Its Major Phenolic Acids against Methotrexate-Induced Testicular Injury in Mice. Biomedicines 2022, 10, 1986. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10081986

AMA Style

Eltamany EE, Mosalam EM, Mehanna ET, Awad BM, Mosaad SM, Abdel-Kader MS, Ibrahim AK, Badr JM, Goda MS. Potential Gonado-Protective Effect of Cichorium endivia and Its Major Phenolic Acids against Methotrexate-Induced Testicular Injury in Mice. Biomedicines. 2022; 10(8):1986. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10081986

Chicago/Turabian Style

Eltamany, Enas E., Esraa M. Mosalam, Eman T. Mehanna, Basma M. Awad, Sarah M. Mosaad, Maged S. Abdel-Kader, Amany K. Ibrahim, Jihan M. Badr, and Marwa S. Goda. 2022. "Potential Gonado-Protective Effect of Cichorium endivia and Its Major Phenolic Acids against Methotrexate-Induced Testicular Injury in Mice" Biomedicines 10, no. 8: 1986. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10081986

APA Style

Eltamany, E. E., Mosalam, E. M., Mehanna, E. T., Awad, B. M., Mosaad, S. M., Abdel-Kader, M. S., Ibrahim, A. K., Badr, J. M., & Goda, M. S. (2022). Potential Gonado-Protective Effect of Cichorium endivia and Its Major Phenolic Acids against Methotrexate-Induced Testicular Injury in Mice. Biomedicines, 10(8), 1986. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10081986

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop