Next Article in Journal
Prognostic Value of the Selected Polymorphisms in the CD36 Gene in the Domain-Encoding Lipid-Binding Region at a 10-Year Follow-Up for Early-Onset CAD Patients
Next Article in Special Issue
State-of-the-Art Cancer Biology, Biodiagnostics and Therapeutics in Japan
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluation of the Autologous Genetically Enriched Leucoconcentrate on the Lumbar Spinal Cord Morpho-Functional Recovery in a Mini Pig with Thoracic Spine Contusion Injury
Previous Article in Special Issue
Initial Myeloid Cell Status Is Associated with Clinical Outcomes of Renal Cell Carcinoma
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biomedicines
Volume 11
Issue 5
10.3390/biomedicines11051330
biomedicines-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Hemoglobin β Expression Is Associated with Poor Prognosis in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

by
Yuta Kurota
1,
Yuji Takeda
2,*,
Osamu Ichiyanagi
1,
Shinichi Saitoh
2,
Hiromi Ito
1,
Sei Naito
1,
Hironobu Asao
2 and
Norihiko Tsuchiya
1
1
Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Yamagata University, 2-2-2, Iida-Nishi, Yamagata 990-9585, Japan
2
Department of Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, Yamagata University, 2-2-2, Iida-Nishi, Yamagata 990-9585, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomedicines 2023, 11(5), 1330; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11051330
Submission received: 27 March 2023 / Revised: 24 April 2023 / Accepted: 28 April 2023 / Published: 30 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue State-of-the-Art Cancer Biology, Biodiagnostics and Therapeutics in Japan)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Background: The regulation of the redox balance in the tumor microenvironment is thought to be an adaptive response of tumor cells to hypoxic environments. In recent years, it has been reported that the hemoglobin β-chain (HBB), which is involved in scavenging reactive oxygen species (ROS), is expressed in several carcinomas. However, the relationship between HBB expression and the prognosis of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) remains unclear. Methods: HBB expression was immunohistochemically analyzed in 203 nonmetastatic clear cell RCC (ccRCC) cases. Cell proliferation, invasion, and ROS production were measured in ccRCC cell lines treated with HBB-specific siRNA. Results: The prognosis of HBB-positive patients was worse than that of HBB-negative patients. Cell proliferation and invasion were inhibited, and ROS production was increased by treatment with HBB-specific siRNA. Oxidative stress increased HBB expression in cells exposed to H2O2. Conclusions: HBB expression in ccRCC contributes to cancer cell proliferation by suppressing ROS production under hypoxic conditions. Taken together with clinical results and in vitro experiments, HBB expression may serve as a new prognostic biomarker for RCC in the future.

1. Introduction

The identification of malignant tumor factors is important for enhancing therapeutic responsiveness and discovering new therapeutic targets. Recently, it has been demonstrated that the malignant transformation of cancer is triggered by hypoxic conditions in the tumor microenvironment [1]. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) production increases under hypoxic conditions owing to a decline in mitochondrial function, and the malignant transformation of tumor cells requires adaptation to ROS [2,3]. Increased expression levels of various scavengers as an adaptive strategy against increasing ROS levels have been reported. Among these molecules, hemoglobin β (HBB) is a protein with ROS-scavenging functions [4,5].
The red blood cells of vertebrates, including humans, and some invertebrates contain the protein hemoglobin. The main function of hemoglobin is to transport oxygen from the lungs or gills to various tissues. Normal hemoglobin is a tetramer comprising two α-globin chains and two β-globin chains (hemoglobin β, HBB), and each chain contains a heme-binding site for oxygen transport. Recently, HBB was found to be expressed in tissues other than erythrocytes, such as alveolar epithelial cells [6,7,8], retinal pigment epithelial cells [9], mesangial cells [10], hepatocytes [11], nerve cells [12,13,14], and cervical epithelial cells [4]. These reports suggest that the physiological functions of HBB include promoting intracellular oxygen uptake and protecting cells from oxidative damage.
HBB is also expressed in cancer cells, such as breast and lung cancer cells [15,16]. However, studies on the relationship between HBB expression and prognosis have been limited to DNA microarray data analysis from published databases [15,16]. Furthermore, the involvement of HBB expression in the malignant transformation of cancer remains unclear.
The most common malignant kidney tumor is renal cell carcinoma (RCC), and the clear cell (cc) type accounts for 80% of histological types [17,18]. RCC incidence and mortality rates are rising worldwide, including in Japan [17,18]. Approximately 20–30% of patients with RCC present with metastatic disease at the time of initial diagnosis, and up to 30% of the patients who undergo curative surgery for clinical-confined RCC suffer from disease recurrence [17,18,19]. Although the survival rate of patients with metastatic RCC has greatly improved with the advent of molecularly targeted drugs and immune checkpoint inhibitors [20], the 5-year survival rate of patients with advanced RCC (T3-4, N+, M+) is less than half [17]. As with other carcinomas, the discovery of prognostic indicators and the elucidation of molecular mechanisms that can serve as new therapeutic targets are critical.
In this study, we investigated the relevance of HBB expression in RCC clinical outcomes. Furthermore, we examined the function of HBB in RCC cell lines to validate the potential of HBB expression as a prognostic biomarker.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Patients

This study was approved by the Yamagata University Faculty of Medicine Ethics Committee (No. H29-15). Informed consent was obtained from each patient, in compliance with the ethical standards of the Declaration of Helsinki. We retrospectively explored the medical archives of consecutive patients who underwent curative surgery for non-metastatic (M0) ccRCC at Yamagata University Hospital between 2000 and 2010. The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) pathologic diagnosis of ccRCC using resected specimens obtained via radical or partial nephrectomy, and (2) availability of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded specimens. The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) genetic disorders that increase the risk of ccRCC, such as von Hippel–Lindau disease; (2) synchronous bilateral ccRCC; and (3) administration of molecular-targeted drugs for neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant therapy. Two hundred and three Japanese patients with non-metastatic ccRCC were eligible, and clinical and pathological data were collected from the patients’ medical records. The tumors were fixed in 10% buffered formalin, embedded in paraffin, and the samples were coded. Paraffin sections were routinely stained with hematoxylin and eosin, and a pathological diagnosis was made as previously described [21]. Pathological evaluation was performed according to the 2016 World Health Organization classification [22] and the 2017 American Joint Committee on Cancer Tumor-Node Metastasis staging system.

2.2. Cell Lines

Four ccRCC cell lines (A498, Caki1, 769-P, and 786-O) were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA, USA). The cells were cultured in RPMI1640 medium (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) containing 50 μg/mL kanamycin and 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) under 5% CO2 at 37 °C in high humidity conditions using a CO2 incubator.

2.3. Immunohistochemical Observation

The formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissue was sliced into 3 μm thick slices. After removing the paraffin by xylene immersion, samples were hydrated from 100% ethanol to pure water. Antigen retrieval was performed by soaking in 10 mM citrate buffer (pH 6.0) and autoclaving at 120 °C for 20 min. Inhibition of endogenous peroxidase was performed by immersion in methanol containing 3% hydrogen peroxide for 15 min. Blocking for non-specific antibody reactions was performed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; 8 mM Na2HPO4, 1.4 mM KH2PO4, 136 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, pH 7.4) containing 1% bovine serum albumin for 30 min. To detect HBB expression, horseradish peroxidase-labeled mouse anti-human HBB antibody (1:1200, sc-21757 HRP, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA) was added at 20–25 °C for 60 min. After washing with PBS, Histofine Simple Stain (MAX-PO[M]; Nichirei, Tokyo, Japan) was used to amplify the antibody reaction (20–25 °C for 30 min). To develop color, diaminobenzidine (D5905, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was added for 1 min. Nuclear staining was performed using hematoxylin. Erythrocytes from the normal renal glomeruli were used as positive controls.
When blood vessel-derived red blood cell invasion into tumor tissue was excluded from the HBB-positive area and the area of HBB expression (brown-colored area) in tumor tissues was 5% or more, it was defined as an HBB-positive case. The diagnosis of HBB-positive cases was made by YK, who was blinded to the patient data.

2.4. Measurement of HBB Expression Using Flow Cytometry

Cultured cells were detached from plastic dishes using a Trypsin-EDTA solution (T4049, Sigma-Aldrich) and fixed with PBS containing 1% formalin for 15 min at 20–25 °C. After fixation, the cell membrane was permeabilized using PBS containing 0.1% TritonX-100 for 5 min at 4 °C. After washing with 1% FCS-containing PBS, FITC-conjugated mouse anti-human HBB antibodies (sc-21757 FITC, Santa Cruz Biotechnology) were applied for 30 min at 4 °C. The cells were washed with PBS followed by suspension in PBS containing 1% formalin until measurement with a flow cytometer (FACSCanto II; BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). Data were analyzed using FlowJo software version 6.5.7 (TreeStar, Ashland, OR, USA). For negative control staining, FITC-conjugated mouse IgG1 antibody (MOPC-21, BD Biosciences) was used as the isotype control antibody.

2.5. HBB mRNA Measurement by Quantitative Real-Time Reverse Transcript (RT) Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)

RNA was purified using TRIzol Reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), and cDNA was synthesized using the ReverTra Ace qPCR RT Master Mix with a gDNA Remover kit (Toyobo, Osaka, Japan). cDNA was amplified by PCR using the TB Green Fast qPCR Mix (Takara Bio Inc., Tokyo, Japan) and quantified using a CFX96 Touch real-time PCR analysis system (BioRad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA). PCR conditions were as follows: initial denaturation at 95 °C for 2 min, denaturation at 95 °C for 10 s, and 45 cycles of annealing/extension at 58 °C for 30 s. The expression levels were quantified using the comparative Ct method as previously described [23]. Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) was used as an endogenous control. The HBB primer pair sequences were 5′-GTG CTC GGT GCC TTT AGT GA-3′ and 5′-AGC GAG CTT AGT GAT ACT TGT GG-3′. The GAPDH primer pair sequences were 5′-GCA CCG TCA AGG CTG AGA AC-3′ and 5′-TGG TGA AGA CGC CAG TGG A-3′.

2.6. Suppression of HBB Expression by Short Interfering RNA (siRNA)

siRNA was obtained from Integrated DNA Technologies (Coralville, IA, USA). The siRNA sequences were as follows: siHBB-1, 5′-GUG AAU UCU UUG CCA AAG UGA UGG GCC-3′; siHBB-2, 5′-AGU UUA GUA GUU GGA CUU AGG GAA CAA-3′. For the mock treatment, a non-specific control siRNA (siCont; Negative Control DsiRNA, Integrated DNA Technologies) was used. Transfection of siRNA into cells was performed using Lipofectamine RNAiMAX (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, as previously described [23].

2.7. Cell Proliferation Assay

A498 cells were seeded at 2 × 105/well in 96-well plates and incubated for 16 h at 37 °C. After incubation, cells were transfected with siRNA. Next, cells were incubated for 24, 48, 72, or 96 h at 37 °C and stained with CellTiter 96 Aqueous One Solution Cell Proliferation Assay (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) for 1 h according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The optical density of each well was measured at 490 nm using a microplate reader (iMark; Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, California, USA).

2.8. Cell Invasion Assay

Forty-eight hours after siRNA transfection, cells (1 × 105 cells/chamber) were suspended in serum-free RPMI1640 and transferred to the upper chamber of a Corning BioCoat Matrigel Invasion Chamber (# 354480; Corning International, Corning, NY, USA). The lower chamber was filled with RPMI1640 containing 10% FBS. After 24 h in a CO2 incubator, the cells that passed through the membrane to the lower chamber were fixed and stained with a crystal violet solution (0.05% crystal violet, 30% neutral formalin, 10% ethanol). The cells were counted by microscopic observation at 100× magnification. The average number of counted cells was calculated from three fields per chamber. The invasion ratio (% invasion) was calculated using the following formula: % invasion = number of cells that passed through the Matrigel chamber/number of cells that passed through the control insert membrane. The invasion index was determined using the following formula: Invasion index = % invasion of HBB expression-suppressed cells treated with siHBB-1 or siHBB-2/% invasion of mock-treated cells transfected with siCont.

2.9. ROS Measurement

Forty-eight hours after siRNA transfection, cells were incubated with 5 µM CellRox Green (ThermoFisher Scientific) at 37 °C for 30 min. Next, cells were washed thrice with PBS and collected using a cell detachment agent. After fixation with PBS containing 2.5% formalin, the fluorescence intensity of the cells was measured using a flow cytometer (FACSCantoII) and analyzed using FlowJo software version 6.5.7. The rate of increase in intracellular ROS was calculated using the following formula: Increase (%) of ROS = 100 × [(fluorescence intensity of HBB suppressed cells treated with siHBB-1 or siHBB-2) − (fluorescence intensity of mock-treated cells transfected with siCont)]/(fluorescence intensity of mock-treated cells transfected with siCont).

2.10. Statistical Analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using EZR version 1.35 (Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, Saitama, Japan) or GraphPad Prism version 5.03 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA). EZR is a graphical interface for R software (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) and is a modified version of R Commander version 2.3 [24]. The statistical processing methods are described in the figure legends. p-values ≤ 0.05 were considered statistically significant. The statistical methods used for the analyses are described in the tables and figure legends.

3. Results

3.1. HBB Expression in ccRCC Is Associated with Prognosis

To examine the clinical significance of HBB protein expression, immunohistochemical staining was performed on samples from 203 patients with non-metastatic ccRCC. Four cases of typical HBB-negative staining and four cases of typical HBB-positive staining are shown in Figure 1a,b, respectively. HBB expression was mainly detected in the cytoplasm of ccRCC cells but was not abundant in vessels or interstitial tissues.
Table 1 shows the relationship between HBB expression and clinicopathological patient characteristics. The median postoperative follow-up period was 8.12 years. A total of 121 radical and 82 partial nephrectomies were performed. Open surgery was performed in 110 patients and laparoscopic surgery was performed in 93 patients. HBB positivity or negativity was significantly associated with the T stage, N stage, grade, microvascular invasion, and infiltration type. HBB-positive patients had a significantly higher recurrence rate (p < 0.001) and significantly shorter cancer-specific survival (p = 0.00476) and overall survival (p = 0.015) than HBB-negative patients.
In the Kaplan–Meier survival analysis, HBB-positive cases had significantly shorter recurrence-free (p = 0.000288, Figure 2a) and cancer-specific survival periods (p = 0.00381, Figure 2b) than those for HBB-negative cases. These results indicated that HBB expression in ccRCC is associated with prognosis.

3.2. Several ccRCC Cell Lines Express HBB

HBB protein expression in ccRCC cell lines A498, Caki1, 769-P, and 786-O was examined using flow cytometry. HBB expression was not detected on the cell surface of any cell line (Figure 3a); however, HBB expression was detected in each cell line using the intracellular staining method (Figure 3b). A summary of the measurements with intracellular staining suggests that the four ccRCC cell lines expressed HBB (Figure 3c). Furthermore, mRNA expression of HBB was detected in the four cell lines using RT-PCR (Figure 4). These results indicated that these cell lines expressed HBB under normal culture conditions.

3.3. Suppression of HBB in ccRCC Cells Inhibits Both Cell Proliferation and Invasion

To verify the function of HBB in ccRCC cells, we suppressed HBB expression in A498 cells using HBB-specific siRNAs. As shown in Figure 5a, when we used siRNAs (siHBB-1 or siHBB-2), the expression of HBB mRNA was significantly suppressed after 24 h compared with that of the control siRNA (siCont).
Cell proliferation ability was measured when HBB expression was suppressed using the conditions above. The cell proliferation ability of cells treated with siHBB-1 or siHBB-2 decreased significantly compared to that of cells treated with siCont (Figure 5b). These results suggest that HBB expression contributes to the enhancement of cell proliferation.
We also confirmed the effect of HBB expression on cell invasion. In the absence of Matrigel, many cells passed through the membrane even after transfection with siHBB-1 or siHBB-2. In contrast, in the presence of Matrigel, the number of cells that passed through the membrane was significantly reduced after treatment with siHBB-1 or siHBB-2 (Figure 5c). The summary of cell invasion assay data showed that the cell invasion ability of the cells transfected with siHBB-1 or siHBB-2 was significantly decreased compared to that of the cells treated with siCont (Figure 5d). Taken together, these results indicated that HBB expression in ccRCC cells augmented both cell proliferation and invasion.

3.4. HBB Expression in ccRCC Cells Is Involved in Oxidative Adaptation

To clarify whether HBB expression in ccRCC cells is involved in the adaptation to oxidative stress, we investigated the relationship between ROS and HBB expression. First, we examined whether HBB expression levels were altered by oxidative stress. H2O2 was added to the culture medium of A498 cells to induce oxidative stress, and N-acetylcysteine (NAC) was used as an ROS scavenger. HBB expression levels were measured using flow cytometry 24 h after the addition of H2O2 and/or NAC. HBB expression levels were significantly augmented by the addition of H2O2, and the HBB expression levels were not changed by the combination of H2O2 and NAC (Figure 6a). These results suggest that oxidative stress augmented HBB expression levels in ccRCC cells.
Next, we measured whether HBB expression levels altered the ROS levels. The level of ROS increased in cells treated with siHBB-1 or siHBB-2 compared to that in cells treated with siCont (Figure 6b). These results suggest that HBB expression levels in ccRCC cells reduce ROS levels.

4. Discussion

This study revealed that HBB-positive ccRCC cases have a poor prognosis compared to that of HBB-negative cases. This is the first study to report the relationship between HBB and cancer prognosis using immunohistochemistry.
Hemoglobin is a protein present in erythrocytes, and its constituent, HBB, was thought to be expressed only in erythroid cells. However, in recent years, HBB expression has been detected in non-erythroid tissues such as neuronal cells [13], retinal epithelial cells [9], endometrial cells [25], cervical epithelial cells [4], type II alveolar epithelial cells [6,8], mesangial cells [10], hepatocytes [11], and tumor tissues [4,15,16,26,27]. These reports suggest that HBB functions as an ROS scavenger. Moreover, it has been reported that hemoglobin can remove ROS more efficiently than glutathione peroxidase, which is a known antioxidant [28].
ROS are produced as byproducts of aerobic metabolism in the mitochondria. Low levels of ROS act as signaling agents in cell proliferation and survival, moderate levels of ROS induce DNA mutations [29], and high levels of ROS cause cell death [30]. All cells regulate oxidative stress by producing antioxidants such as glutathione peroxidase. Tumor cells are exposed to higher levels of ROS than normal cells because of their highly proliferative and anchorage-independent growth [31]. The therapeutic effects of radiotherapy and certain anticancer drugs are mediated by the generation of ROS. These studies suggest that oxidative stress resistance mechanisms are essential for tumor cell survival, proliferation, and metastasis [16,32,33,34].
The relationship between tumors and HBB has been reported in several studies. In thyroid cancer [27] and neuroblastoma [26], HBB has been reported to have an inhibitory effect on tumors. In contrast, HBB has been reported to increase tumor activity in breast cancer [15,16], lung cancer [16], prostate cancer [16], and cervical cancer [4]. Thus, the effect of HBB on malignant tumor transformation has not been elucidated.
The molecular mechanism by which HBB is involved in tumor progression remains unknown. One potential molecular mechanism is the stabilization of transcription factor BACH1 via redox balance. Previously, the upregulation of BACH1 has been found to be associated with worsening prognoses in both lung and renal cancers [35,36,37]. In lung cancer, the upregulation of BACH1 is mediated by the inhibition of free heme via heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1) [35,37]. In contrast, HBB binds stably to heme [38], and therefore may also suppress free heme and increase BACH1 expression. However, in ccRCC, BACH1 expression regulates HO-1 expression, as in a feedback mechanism [36]. Further research is needed to determine how HBB is involved in the HO-1-mediated regulation of free heme and BACH1 in ccRCC.
ROS can both promote and suppress metastasis, suggesting that the mechanism by which ROS affect cancers is dependent on multiple observational conditions [39]. Thus, to determine whether HBB is a factor in cancer exacerbation, various molecular groups related to tumor exacerbation (Bcl-2 family and cadherins) should be examined as described previously [40]. Additionally, it is necessary to reconstruct clinical results using animal experiments to reach comprehensive conclusions on HBB function. However, because HBB reduction suppresses cell proliferation, it is assumed that a genetic control mechanism that can turn HBB expression on or off in vivo after transplantation of cell lines will be required to establish animal experiments. In the future, we aim to elucidate the function of HBB using the on or off toggle system of HBB expression.
Some points still need to be clarified to control HBB expression and apply it to tumor therapy. First, the mechanism by which HBB enhances cell proliferation and invasion remains unclear. It is thought that the reduction of ROS by HBB prevents the functional deterioration of proteins involved in cell proliferation and invasion; however, the changes in the signaling pathways involved in proliferation and invasion remain unclear. In particular, the relationship between HIF1α, which is induced by hypoxic responses and has a key role in tumor malignancy, and HBB is not well understood. Second, it is unclear whether HBB exists as a monomer or multimer with heme and other globin chains. To the best of our knowledge, there are no reports describing the multimerization of HBB in tumor tissues. Third, the transcriptional mechanisms of HBB in tumor cells remain unclear. For example, in alveolar epithelial cells, such as erythroid cells, transcription of the HBB gene is regulated by GATA-1 [7], but this is not the case in cervical cancer [4]. Kruppel-like factor 4 (KLF4) and NF-E2-related factor 2 (NRF2) are also involved in the transcriptional regulation of HBB [16,41]. KLF4 regulates HBB transcription in circulating tumor cells, and constitutively active mutations in NRF2 have been reported in various carcinomas, including RCC [42]. Further studies are needed to determine the mechanisms by which KLF4 and NRF2 regulate HBB transcription in RCC cells. Finally, for prognostic purposes, the relationship between mRCC and HBB expression should be investigated.
Herein, we measured the decrease in the HBB protein level by flow cytometry after siHBB treatment. However, a stable decrease in HBB expression was not observed in the harvested cells (data not shown) [43]. One reason as to why HBB down-expression was not observed may be related to the fact that HBB down-expression reduces cell proliferation, thus reducing the proportion of down-expressed HBB cells. Alternatively, HBB stability might last longer when HBB production is reduced for cell survival. Because the binding between heme and HBB is stable [38], cancer cells that constitutively produce free heme may require constant HBB synthesis for heme binding. In the future, it will be necessary to investigate the turnover of free heme and HBB.
In this study, patients with HBB-positive ccRCC were found to have a poorer prognosis compared to HBB-negative patients. HBB is believed to enhance ccRCC activity by functioning as an ROS scavenger. As with other carcinomas, investigating the expression of HBB in ccRCC would help in the discovery of new prognostic factors.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.K. and O.I.; methodology, Y.K., S.S. and H.I.; validation, S.N., Y.T. and H.A.; formal analysis, Y.K. and O.I.; investigation, Y.K. and H.I.; data curation, Y.K., O.I., S.N. and N.T.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.K. and Y.T.; writing—review and editing, Y.K., Y.T. and H.A.; visualization, Y.K. and Y.T.; supervision, H.A. and N.T.; project administration, Y.K. and Y.T.; funding acquisition, Y.T., H.A. and N.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (KAKENHI) (C) (Grant number: No. 20K09554).

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee of Yamagata University (No. H29-15).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all participants involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, Y.T., upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

All authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the study design; collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; writing of the manuscript; or decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Manuelli, V.; Pecorari, C.; Filomeni, G.; Zito, E. Regulation of Redox Signaling in HIF-1-Dependent Tumor Angiogenesis. FEBS J. 2022, 289, 5413–5425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Gorrini, C.; Harris, I.S.; Mak, T.W. Modulation of Oxidative Stress as an Anticancer Strategy. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2013, 12, 931–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Schieber, M.; Chandel, N.S. ROS Function in Redox Signaling and Oxidative Stress. Curr. Biol. 2014, 24, R453–R462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Li, X.; Wu, Z.; Wang, Y.; Mei, Q.; Fu, X.; Han, W. Characterization of Adult α- and β-Globin Elevated by Hydrogen Peroxide in Cervical Cancer Cells that Play a Cytoprotective Role against Oxidative Insults. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e54342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Saha, D.; Patgaonkar, M.; Shroff, A.; Ayyar, K.; Bashir, T.; Reddy, K.V. Hemoglobin Expression in Nonerythroid Cells: Novel or Ubiquitous? Int. J. Inflam. 2014, 2014, 803237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bhaskaran, M.; Chen, H.; Chen, Z.; Liu, L. Hemoglobin is Expressed in Alveolar Epithelial Type II Cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2005, 333, 1348–1352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Grek, C.L.; Newton, D.A.; Spyropoulos, D.D.; Baatz, J.E. Hypoxia Up-Regulates Expression of Hemoglobin in Alveolar Epithelial Cells. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 2011, 44, 439–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Newton, D.A.; Rao, K.M.; Dluhy, R.A.; Baatz, J.E. Hemoglobin is Expressed by Alveolar Epithelial Cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 5668–5676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tezel, T.H.; Geng, L.; Lato, E.B.; Schaal, S.; Liu, Y.; Dean, D.; Klein, J.B.; Kaplan, H.J. Synthesis and Secretion of Hemoglobin by Retinal Pigment Epithelium. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2009, 50, 1911–1919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Nishi, H.; Inagi, R.; Kato, H.; Tanemoto, M.; Kojima, I.; Son, D.; Fujita, T.; Nangaku, M. Hemoglobin is Expressed by Mesangial Cells and Reduces Oxidant Stress. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2008, 19, 1500–1508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Liu, W.; Baker, S.S.; Baker, R.D.; Nowak, N.J.; Zhu, L. Upregulation of Hemoglobin Expression by Oxidative Stress in Hepatocytes and Its Implication in Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e24363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Biagioli, M.; Pinto, M.; Cesselli, D.; Zaninello, M.; Lazarevic, D.; Roncaglia, P.; Simone, R.; Vlachouli, C.; Plessy, C.; Bertin, N.; et al. Unexpected Expression of Alpha- and Beta-Globin in Mesencephalic Dopaminergic Neurons and Glial Cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 15454–15459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Russo, R.; Zucchelli, S.; Codrich, M.; Marcuzzi, F.; Verde, C.; Gustincich, S. Hemoglobin is Present as a Canonical α2β2 Tetramer in Dopaminergic Neurons. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2013, 1834, 1939–1943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Schelshorn, D.W.; Schneider, A.; Kuschinsky, W.; Weber, D.; Kruger, C.; Dittgen, T.; Burgers, H.F.; Sabouri, F.; Gassler, N.; Bach, A.; et al. Expression of Hemoglobin in Rodent Neurons. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2009, 29, 585–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Ponzetti, M.; Capulli, M.; Angelucci, A.; Ventura, L.; Monache, S.D.; Mercurio, C.; Calgani, A.; Sanita, P.; Teti, A.; Rucci, N. Non-Conventional role of Haemoglobin Beta in Breast Malignancy. Br. J. Cancer 2017, 117, 994–1006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Zheng, Y.; Miyamoto, D.T.; Wittner, B.S.; Sullivan, J.P.; Aceto, N.; Jordan, N.V.; Yu, M.; Karabacak, N.M.; Comaills, V.; Morris, R.; et al. Expression of β-Globin by Cancer Cells Promotes Cell Survival During Blood-Borne Dissemination. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 14344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Gupta, K.; Miller, J.D.; Li, J.Z.; Russell, M.W.; Charbonneau, C. Epidemiologic and Socioeconomic Burden of Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (mRCC): A Literature Review. Cancer Treat. Rev. 2008, 34, 193–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kanayama, H.O.; Fukumori, T.; Fujimoto, H.; Nakanishi, H.; Ohyama, C.; Suzuki, K.; Nishiyama, H.; Eto, M.; Miki, T.; Kamoi, K.; et al. Clinicopathological Characteristics and Oncological Outcomes in Patients with Renal Cell Carcinoma Registered in 2007: The First Large-Scale Multicenter Study from the Cancer Registration Committee of the Japanese Urological Association. Int. J. Urol. 2015, 22, S1–S7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Stewart, S.B.; Thompson, R.H.; Psutka, S.P.; Cheville, J.C.; Lohse, C.M.; Boorjian, S.A.; Leibovich, B.C. Evaluation of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network and American Urological Association Renal Cell Carcinoma Surveillance Guidelines. J. Clin. Oncol. 2014, 32, 4059–4065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Calvo, E.; Schmidinger, M.; Heng, D.Y.; Grunwald, V.; Escudier, B. Improvement in Survival End Points of Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma through Sequential Targeted Therapy. Cancer Treat. Rev. 2016, 50, 109–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kanno, H.; Naito, S.; Obara, Y.; Ito, H.; Ichiyanagi, O.; Narisawa, T.; Kato, T.; Nagaoka, A.; Tsuchiya, N. Effect of Extracellular Signal-Regulated Protein Kinase 5 Inhibition in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 8448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Moch, H.; Cubilla, A.L.; Humphrey, P.A.; Reuter, V.E.; Ulbright, T.M. The 2016 WHO Classification of Tumours of the Urinary System and Male Genital Organs-Part A: Renal, Penile, and Testicular Tumours. Eur. Urol. 2016, 70, 93–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Ichiyanagi, O.; Ito, H.; Naito, S.; Kabasawa, T.; Kanno, H.; Narisawa, T.; Ushijima, M.; Kurota, Y.; Ozawa, M.; Sakurai, T.; et al. Impact of eIF4E Phosphorylation at Ser209 via MNK2a on Tumour Recurrence after Curative Surgery in Localized Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma. Oncotarget 2019, 10, 4053–4068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Kanda, Y. Investigation of the Freely Available Easy-To-Use Software ‘EZR’ for Medical Statistics. Bone Marrow Transpl. 2013, 48, 452–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Dassen, H.; Kamps, R.; Punyadeera, C.; Dijcks, F.; de Goeij, A.; Ederveen, A.; Dunselman, G.; Groothuis, P. Haemoglobin Expression in Human Endometrium. Hum. Reprod. 2008, 23, 635–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Maman, S.; Sagi-Assif, O.; Yuan, W.; Ginat, R.; Meshel, T.; Zubrilov, I.; Keisari, Y.; Lu, W.; Witz, I.P. The Beta Subunit of Hemoglobin (HBB2/HBB) Suppresses Neuroblastoma Growth and Metastasis. Cancer Res. 2017, 77, 14–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Onda, M.; Akaishi, J.; Asaka, S.; Okamoto, J.; Miyamoto, S.; Mizutani, K.; Yoshida, A.; Ito, K.; Emi, M. Decreased Expression of Haemoglobin Beta (HBB) Gene in Anaplastic Thyroid Cancer and Recovery of Its Expression Inhibits Cell Growth. Br. J. Cancer 2005, 92, 2216–2224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Masuoka, N.; Kodama, H.; Abe, T.; Wang, D.H.; Nakano, T. Characterization of Hydrogen Peroxide Removal Reaction by Hemoglobin in the Presence of Reduced Pyridine Nucleotides. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2003, 1637, 46–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Finkel, T. Signal Transduction by Reactive Oxygen Species. J. Cell Biol. 2011, 194, 7–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Trachootham, D.; Alexandre, J.; Huang, P. Targeting Cancer Cells by ROS-Mediated Mechanisms: A Radical Therapeutic Approach? Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2009, 8, 579–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Schafer, Z.T.; Grassian, A.R.; Song, L.; Jiang, Z.; Gerhart-Hines, Z.; Irie, H.Y.; Gao, S.; Puigserver, P.; Brugge, J.S. Antioxidant and Oncogene Rescue of Metabolic Defects Caused by Loss of Matrix Attachment. Nature 2009, 461, 109–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Harris, I.S.; Treloar, A.E.; Inoue, S.; Sasaki, M.; Gorrini, C.; Lee, K.C.; Yung, K.Y.; Brenner, D.; Knobbe-Thomsen, C.B.; Cox, M.A.; et al. Glutathione and Thioredoxin Antioxidant Pathways Synergize to Drive Cancer Initiation and Progression. Cancer Cell 2015, 27, 211–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Piskounova, E.; Agathocleous, M.; Murphy, M.M.; Hu, Z.; Huddlestun, S.E.; Zhao, Z.; Leitch, A.M.; Johnson, T.M.; DeBerardinis, R.J.; Morrison, S.J. Oxidative Stress Inhibits Distant Metastasis by Human Melanoma Cells. Nature 2015, 527, 186–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Takahashi, N.; Chen, H.Y.; Harris, I.S.; Stover, D.G.; Selfors, L.M.; Bronson, R.T.; Deraedt, T.; Cichowski, K.; Welm, A.L.; Mori, Y.; et al. Cancer Cells Co-opt the Neuronal Redox-Sensing Channel TRPA1 to Promote Oxidative-Stress Tolerance. Cancer Cell 2018, 33, 985–1003.e7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lignitto, L.; LeBoeuf, S.E.; Homer, H.; Jiang, S.; Askenazi, M.; Karakousi, T.R.; Pass, H.I.; Bhutkar, A.J.; Tsirigos, A.; Ueberheide, B.; et al. Nrf2 Activation Promotes Lung Cancer Metastasis by Inhibiting the Degradation of Bach1. Cell 2019, 178, 316–329 e18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Takemoto, K.; Kobatake, K.; Miura, K.; Fukushima, T.; Babasaki, T.; Miyamoto, S.; Sekino, Y.; Kitano, H.; Goto, K.; Ikeda, K.; et al. BACH1 promotes clear cell renal cell carcinoma progression by upregulating oxidative stress-related tumorigenicity. Cancer Sci. 2023, 114, 436–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wiel, C.; Le Gal, K.; Ibrahim, M.X.; Jahangir, C.A.; Kashif, M.; Yao, H.; Ziegler, D.V.; Xu, X.; Ghosh, T.; Mondal, T.; et al. BACH1 Stabilization by Antioxidants Stimulates Lung Cancer Metastasis. Cell 2019, 178, 330–345.e22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Gattoni, M.; Boffi, A.; Sarti, P.; Chiancone, E. Stability of the heme-globin linkage in alphabeta dimers and isolated chains of human hemoglobin. A study of the heme transfer reaction from the immobilized proteins to albumin. J. Biol. Chem. 1996, 271, 10130–10136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Cheung, E.C.; Vousden, K.H. The role of ROS in tumour development and progression. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2022, 22, 280–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ding, Y.; Xiong, S.; Chen, X.; Pan, Q.; Fan, J.; Guo, J. HAPLN3 inhibits apoptosis and promotes EMT of clear cell renal cell carcinoma via ERK and Bcl-2 signal pathways. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 2023, 149, 79–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Moi, P.; Chan, K.; Asunis, I.; Cao, A.; Kan, Y.W. Isolation of NF-E2-Related Factor 2 (Nrf2), a NF-E2-Like Basic Leucine Zipper Transcriptional Activator That Binds to the Tandem NF-E2/AP1 Repeat of the Beta-Globin Locus Control Region. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1994, 91, 9926–9930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Sato, Y.; Yoshizato, T.; Shiraishi, Y.; Maekawa, S.; Okuno, Y.; Kamura, T.; Shimamura, T.; Sato-Otsubo, A.; Nagae, G.; Suzuki, H.; et al. Integrated Molecular Analysis of Clear-Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma. Nat. Genet. 2013, 45, 860–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Kurota, Y.; Department of Urology, Yamagata University Faculty of Medicine, Yamagata, Japan; Takeda, Y.; Department of Immunology, Yamagata University Faculty of Medicine, Yamagata Japan. Personal communication, 2023.
Biomedicines 11 01330 g001 550
Figure 1. Immunohistochemical observation of hemoglobin β (HBB) expression in non-metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) tissue. Typical HBB-negative ((a); Cases 1–4) and HBB-positive ((b); Cases 5–8) tissues are shown. Bar, 100 μm.
Figure 1. Immunohistochemical observation of hemoglobin β (HBB) expression in non-metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) tissue. Typical HBB-negative ((a); Cases 1–4) and HBB-positive ((b); Cases 5–8) tissues are shown. Bar, 100 μm.
Biomedicines 11 01330 g001
Biomedicines 11 01330 g002 550
Figure 2. Prognosis and hemoglobin β (HBB) expression in non-metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). Kaplan–Meier analyses were performed on the recurrence-free rate (a) and cancer-specific survival rate (b) in 203 cases of non-metastatic ccRCC. Black lines indicate HBB-negative cases and red lines indicate HBB-positive cases. p values were calculated using the long-rank test.
Figure 2. Prognosis and hemoglobin β (HBB) expression in non-metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). Kaplan–Meier analyses were performed on the recurrence-free rate (a) and cancer-specific survival rate (b) in 203 cases of non-metastatic ccRCC. Black lines indicate HBB-negative cases and red lines indicate HBB-positive cases. p values were calculated using the long-rank test.
Biomedicines 11 01330 g002
Biomedicines 11 01330 g003 550
Figure 3. Measurement of hemoglobin β (HBB) expression in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) cell lines using flow cytometry. Four ccRCC cell lines, A498, Caki1, 769-P, and 786-O, were used for the flow cytometric measurements. The cells were stained with FITC-conjugated antibodies before (a) or after (b) cell membrane permeabilization. Red line histograms indicate the results of staining with isotype-matched control antibodies, and blue line histograms show the results of staining with anti-HBB antibodies. A summary of the results is shown in (c). The vertical axis indicates the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of each antibody reaction, and the horizontal axis indicates the measured cell lines. Open columns indicate the reaction with the control antibody, and closed columns are the result of the anti-HBB antibody reaction. Data represent the mean ± standard error from three or more independent measurements. p values were determined by a paired student t-test (two-tailed). * p < 0.05.
Figure 3. Measurement of hemoglobin β (HBB) expression in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) cell lines using flow cytometry. Four ccRCC cell lines, A498, Caki1, 769-P, and 786-O, were used for the flow cytometric measurements. The cells were stained with FITC-conjugated antibodies before (a) or after (b) cell membrane permeabilization. Red line histograms indicate the results of staining with isotype-matched control antibodies, and blue line histograms show the results of staining with anti-HBB antibodies. A summary of the results is shown in (c). The vertical axis indicates the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of each antibody reaction, and the horizontal axis indicates the measured cell lines. Open columns indicate the reaction with the control antibody, and closed columns are the result of the anti-HBB antibody reaction. Data represent the mean ± standard error from three or more independent measurements. p values were determined by a paired student t-test (two-tailed). * p < 0.05.
Biomedicines 11 01330 g003
Biomedicines 11 01330 g004 550
Figure 4. Detection of hemoglobin β (HBB) mRNA expression in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) cell lines by RT-PCR. Total RNAs were purified from four ccRCC cell lines (A498, Caki1, 769-P, and 786-O) and used in a reverse transcription reaction to synthesize cDNA. H2O was used as a control to show the background amplification. The HBB PCR products (250 bp) and the glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) PCR products (138 bp) are shown. A representative result from two independent experiments is shown.
Figure 4. Detection of hemoglobin β (HBB) mRNA expression in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) cell lines by RT-PCR. Total RNAs were purified from four ccRCC cell lines (A498, Caki1, 769-P, and 786-O) and used in a reverse transcription reaction to synthesize cDNA. H2O was used as a control to show the background amplification. The HBB PCR products (250 bp) and the glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) PCR products (138 bp) are shown. A representative result from two independent experiments is shown.
Biomedicines 11 01330 g004
Biomedicines 11 01330 g005 550
Figure 5. Contribution of hemoglobin β (HBB) expression to the malignant transformation of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) cells. (a) Suppression of HBB mRNA expression by siRNA transfection. siHBB-1 or siHBB-2 was transfected into A498 cells, and control siRNA (siCont) was transfected as a mock treatment. The HBB mRNA expression levels in the treated cells with transfected siRNA were measured by quantitative real-time RT-PCR. Relative HBB mRNA expression was calculated based on glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) mRNA expression. Data represent the mean ± standard deviation from five independent experiments. p values were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with a post hoc test using Dunnett and compared to the cells transfected with siCont. (b) Cell proliferation assay of A498 cells transfected with siRNA. After the siRNA transfection, the cells were incubated for 24–96 h. Data represent the mean ± standard deviation from three independent experiments. p values were analyzed using one-way ANOVA with a post hoc test using Holm and compared to the siCont-transfected cells at each incubation time. (c) Representative photographs of transmigrated A498 cells passed through the membrane after the cell invasion assay. Upper panels are control chamber membranes, shown as Matrigel (−). Bottom panels indicate the Matrigel chamber, shown as Matrigel (+). Left-side panels are the cells transfected with siCont, middle panels are transfected with siHBB-1, and right-side panels are transfected with siHBB-2 (magnification, ×200). A summary of the invasion indexes is shown in (d). Data are the mean ± standard deviation from three independent experiments. p values were analyzed using one-way ANOVA with a post hoc test using Dunnett and compared to the siCont-transfected cells. * p < 0.05.
Figure 5. Contribution of hemoglobin β (HBB) expression to the malignant transformation of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) cells. (a) Suppression of HBB mRNA expression by siRNA transfection. siHBB-1 or siHBB-2 was transfected into A498 cells, and control siRNA (siCont) was transfected as a mock treatment. The HBB mRNA expression levels in the treated cells with transfected siRNA were measured by quantitative real-time RT-PCR. Relative HBB mRNA expression was calculated based on glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) mRNA expression. Data represent the mean ± standard deviation from five independent experiments. p values were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with a post hoc test using Dunnett and compared to the cells transfected with siCont. (b) Cell proliferation assay of A498 cells transfected with siRNA. After the siRNA transfection, the cells were incubated for 24–96 h. Data represent the mean ± standard deviation from three independent experiments. p values were analyzed using one-way ANOVA with a post hoc test using Holm and compared to the siCont-transfected cells at each incubation time. (c) Representative photographs of transmigrated A498 cells passed through the membrane after the cell invasion assay. Upper panels are control chamber membranes, shown as Matrigel (−). Bottom panels indicate the Matrigel chamber, shown as Matrigel (+). Left-side panels are the cells transfected with siCont, middle panels are transfected with siHBB-1, and right-side panels are transfected with siHBB-2 (magnification, ×200). A summary of the invasion indexes is shown in (d). Data are the mean ± standard deviation from three independent experiments. p values were analyzed using one-way ANOVA with a post hoc test using Dunnett and compared to the siCont-transfected cells. * p < 0.05.
Biomedicines 11 01330 g005
Biomedicines 11 01330 g006 550
Figure 6. Interaction between hemoglobin β (HBB) expression and oxidative stress. (a) HBB expression due to oxidative stress. A498 cells were incubated with (+) or without (−) H2O2 (2 mM) and/or N-acetyl cysteine (NAC; 10 mM) for 24 h. The level of HBB expression was measured via flow cytometry, as described in Figure 3b. Data show the mean ± standard deviation from four independent experiments. p values were analyzed via one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with a post hoc test using Bonferroni, * p < 0.05. (b) A498 cells were transfected with siRNA (siCont, open circle; siHBB-1, closed diamond; siHBB-2, closed circle) and incubated for 48 h. After the incubation, the amount of ROS in the cells was measured with CellRox green staining. Dot plots and the means from six independent experiments are shown as bars. p values were calculated using non-parametric one-way ANOVA (Friedman tests) with a post hoc test with Dunn, compared to the treatment with siCont. ** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05.
Figure 6. Interaction between hemoglobin β (HBB) expression and oxidative stress. (a) HBB expression due to oxidative stress. A498 cells were incubated with (+) or without (−) H2O2 (2 mM) and/or N-acetyl cysteine (NAC; 10 mM) for 24 h. The level of HBB expression was measured via flow cytometry, as described in Figure 3b. Data show the mean ± standard deviation from four independent experiments. p values were analyzed via one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with a post hoc test using Bonferroni, * p < 0.05. (b) A498 cells were transfected with siRNA (siCont, open circle; siHBB-1, closed diamond; siHBB-2, closed circle) and incubated for 48 h. After the incubation, the amount of ROS in the cells was measured with CellRox green staining. Dot plots and the means from six independent experiments are shown as bars. p values were calculated using non-parametric one-way ANOVA (Friedman tests) with a post hoc test with Dunn, compared to the treatment with siCont. ** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05.
Biomedicines 11 01330 g006
Table
Table 1. Clinicopathological backgrounds of study patients, and associations with HBB expression.
Table 1. Clinicopathological backgrounds of study patients, and associations with HBB expression.
FactorAll PatientsHBB
NegativePositivep Value
Number of patients20313568
Age at surgeryMean ± SD63.51 ± 11.5863.2 ± 11.764.1 ± 11.40.61 b
Range28–8528–8236–85
SexMale12586 (68.8)39 (31.2)0.468 a
Female7849 (62.8)29 (37.2)
Tumor lateralityLeft9564 (67.4)31 (32.6)0.923 a
Right10871 (65.7)37 (34.3)
Pathological T stagepT1a124100 (74.1)24 (35.3)<0.001 a
pT1b4019 (14.1)21 (30.9)
pT2a82 (1.5)6 (8.8)
pT2b64 (3.0)2 (2.9)
pT3a157 (5.2)8 (11.8)
pT3b72 (1.5)5 (7.4)
pT3c10 (0.0)1 (1.5)
pT421 (0.7)1 (1.5)
Pathological N stagepN0/pNX199 (98.0)134 (99.3)65 (86.8)0.0021 a
pN14 (2.0)1 (0.7)3 (4.4)
GradeG19680 (59.3)16 (23.5)<0.001 a
G28248 (35.6)34 (50.0)
G3204 (3.0)16 (23.5)
G453 (2.2)2 (2.9)
Microvascular invasionNegative180 (88.6)127 (70.6)53 (29.4)0.00143 a
Positive23 (11.4)8 (34.8)15 (65.2)
INFINFa171 (84.2)121 (89.6)50 (73.5)0.00566 a
INFb32 (15.8)14 (10.4)18 (26.5)
Event
RecurrenceNo181128 (70.7)53 (29.3)<0.001 a
Yes227 (31.8)15 (68.2)
Cancer specific survivalAlive189131 (69.3)58 (30.7)0.00476 a
Deceased144 (28.6)10 (71.4)
Overall survivalAlive169119 (70.4)50 (29.6)0.015 a
Deceased3416 (47.1)18 (52.9)
Follow-up YearsMedian8.128.068.240.797 c
(IQR)(6.56–10.72)(6.52–10.79)(6.69–10.69)
Abbreviations: HBB, hemoglobin; β INF, infiltration type; SD, standard distribution; IQR, interquartile range, Note: a, Chi-square test; b, Student’s t-test; c, Mann–Whitney U test. Number in parentheses indicate % unless otherwise specified.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kurota, Y.; Takeda, Y.; Ichiyanagi, O.; Saitoh, S.; Ito, H.; Naito, S.; Asao, H.; Tsuchiya, N. Hemoglobin β Expression Is Associated with Poor Prognosis in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma. Biomedicines 2023, 11, 1330. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11051330

AMA Style

Kurota Y, Takeda Y, Ichiyanagi O, Saitoh S, Ito H, Naito S, Asao H, Tsuchiya N. Hemoglobin β Expression Is Associated with Poor Prognosis in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma. Biomedicines. 2023; 11(5):1330. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11051330

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kurota, Yuta, Yuji Takeda, Osamu Ichiyanagi, Shinichi Saitoh, Hiromi Ito, Sei Naito, Hironobu Asao, and Norihiko Tsuchiya. 2023. "Hemoglobin β Expression Is Associated with Poor Prognosis in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma" Biomedicines 11, no. 5: 1330. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11051330

APA Style

Kurota, Y., Takeda, Y., Ichiyanagi, O., Saitoh, S., Ito, H., Naito, S., Asao, H., & Tsuchiya, N. (2023). Hemoglobin β Expression Is Associated with Poor Prognosis in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma. Biomedicines, 11(5), 1330. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11051330

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop