Next Article in Journal
Optimizing the Schedule of PARP Inhibitors in Combination with 177Lu-DOTATATE: A Dosimetry Rationale
Previous Article in Journal
Generation of Functional Cardiomyocytes from Human Gastric Fibroblast-Derived Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells
Previous Article in Special Issue
Salmonella-Based Targeted Cancer Therapy: Updates on A Promising and Innovative Tumor Immunotherapeutic Strategy
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biomedicines
Volume 9
Issue 11
10.3390/biomedicines9111566
biomedicines-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Highlights of Immunomodulation in Salmonella-Based Cancer Therapy

by
Christian R. Pangilinan
1 and
Che-Hsin Lee
1,2,3,4,*
1
Department of Biological Sciences, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung 80424, Taiwan
2
Department of Medical Research, China Medical University Hospital, China Medical University, Taichung 40402, Taiwan
3
Department of Medical Laboratory Science and Biotechnology, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan
4
International PhD Program for Science, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung 80424, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomedicines 2021, 9(11), 1566; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9111566
Submission received: 22 September 2021 / Revised: 22 October 2021 / Accepted: 27 October 2021 / Published: 29 October 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bacterial Cancer Therapy 2.0)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Bacteria-mediated cancer therapy (BMCT) is an emerging tool that may advance potential approaches in cancer immunotherapy, whereby tumors are eradicated by the hosts’ immune system upon recruitment and activation by bacteria such as Salmonella. This paper provides an emphasis on the immunomodulatory effects that encompasses both the innate and adaptive immune responses inherently triggered by Salmonella. Furthermore, modifications of Salmonella-based treatment in the attempt to improve tumor-specific immune responses including cytokine therapy, gene therapy, and DNA vaccine delivery are likewise discussed. The majority of the findings described herein incorporate cell-based experiments and murine model studies, and only a few accounts describe clinical trials. Salmonella-based cancer therapy is still under development; nonetheless, the pre-clinical research and early-phase clinical trials that have been completed so far have shown promising and convincing results. Certainly, the continuous development of, and innovation on, Salmonella-based therapy could pave the way for its eventual emergence as one of the mainstream therapeutic interventions addressing various types of cancer.

1. Introduction

Cancer, though not necessarily hereditary, is a genetic disease characterized by an impaired control of cell cycle resulting in an unregulated cellular growth and proliferation. Despite the growth of decades-worth of findings on the nature, causes, and pathogenesis of cancer, it nevertheless retains its status as one of the leading causes of death worldwide. Today, the development of therapeutic strategies that involve directing a patient’s own immune system towards eradicating cancer offers a new hope to prolong survival of patients compared with conventional or standard care, i.e., chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery [1]. The concept of using the immune system in cancer treatment can be traced back to the 19th century when Dr. William Coley developed a cocktail of heat-killed bacteria that became known as “Coley’s toxin” to cure a number of inoperable tumors [2]. The idea emerged when Dr. Coley found an old medical record where a patient suffering from an inoperable sarcoma was documented to have tumor regression following recovery from erysipelas infection (Streptococcus pyogenes); he soon found out that the patient was disease-free [2]. There were variable outcomes among all patients treated with Coley’s toxin at that time, nonetheless, some of the results were promising as some patients had complete clearance of the primary tumor while others were even declared disease-free [3]. Dr. Coley’s treatment strategy was not without issues, such as side effects, clearance of the bacterial infection, and the mechanisms on how the therapy specifically worked; consequently, this treatment strategy was not entirely recognized at that time and ultimately forgotten decades thereafter [2,3]. In recent years, however, advances in cancer immunobiology research paved the way to the further development of bacteria-mediated cancer therapy (BMCT) using different bacterial species such as Streptococcus, Bacillus, Bifidobacterium, E. coli, Clostridium, and Salmonella, among others [4].
In this review, we provide emphasis on the interplay between tumor and tumor-associated immune cells in the tumor microenvironment in the presence of BMCT intervention, particularly using Salmonella species. Salmonella are Gram negative, facultatively anaerobic, nonspore-forming rod-shaped enterobacteria studded with multiple flagella [5]. This species is preferred for this purpose because of its natural ability to address various types of cancer [6]. Immune modulation is of primary interest in this type of intervention since Salmonella is a microorganism that, upon successfully gaining access into a host, can trigger a cascade of immune responses. Salmonella-triggered immune responses with antitumor actions are of utmost importance in eliminating cancerous growth and preventing metastasis resulting in longer patient survival [1].

2. Salmonella as a Viable Option for Bacteria-Mediated Cancer Therapy

As scientists and clinicians continue to race in search for more effective and efficient treatments and therapeutic strategies against cancers, a growing interest on the use of Salmonella in this regard has emerged as one of the focal points in cancer research. One practical and interesting characteristic behavior of this bacteria is its capacity to selectively penetrate, favorably invade, and preferentially grow within tumors; a behavior that is made possible by chemotaxis, as they are attracted to the compounds and niche-specific conditions produced in the tumor microenvironment [7,8]. Furthermore, the facultatively anaerobic nature of Salmonella is advantageous, as they can tolerate the oxygen-depleted zone (i.e., about 10 to 30 mmHg concentration) of solid tumors. This ability is indispensable for successful dispersion of Salmonella to evenly exert its oncolytic and other anti-tumor progression effects via multiple mechanisms [9]. It is also noteworthy to mention that the dispersion of systemically administered Salmonella has a ratio of only 1000–10,000 to 1 tumor-to-normal tissue [10]. The ability of Salmonella to efficiently infect tumor cells is accounted for by its use of a type three secretion system (TTSS), since mutant Salmonella with defective TTSS exhibited substantial loss of tumor cell-penetrating potential [11]. Certain Salmonella strains have also been intentionally mutated to improve their tumor cell penetrating ability also via TTSS [12]. For these reasons, Salmonella species have been investigated for their potential use as vehicle for the direct delivery of drugs, RNA interferences, and cancer therapeutic genes into tumors and their innate potential to trigger various antitumor responses [13]. Apart from being an efficient tumor-targeting bacteria, when Salmonella infects tumor cells, it interferes with the tumor-intrinsic signaling cascade and modifies the overall pattern of gene expression, which, in turn, impacts cellular behavior leading to decreased migrative potential, decreased tumor survival, and stimulated antitumor immune responses [14]. The following sections will discuss further how Salmonella-based treatment modulates immune response against cancer.

3. Breaking the Immunosuppressive Nature of Tumor Microenvironment

The tumor microenvironment (TME) harbors both cellular (immune infiltrates, fibroblasts, and endothelial cells) and non-cellular components (extracellular matrix or ECM, soluble molecules) that are present in the immediate surroundings of the tumor tissue [15,16], all of which interact to facilitate tumor growth and survival, and progression to metastasis. It has been suggested that the stromal composition in the TME may vary depending on the particular type and stage of tumor. Changes in the TME may affect the proliferative and metastatic potential of tumors, thus restricting or enabling progression [13]. Reports suggest that an immunosuppressive TME accounts for poor prognosis or clinical outcome among cancer patients [17,18,19]. Therefore, targeting the TME, particularly the priming of the immune cellular components inclined toward antitumor responses will be advantageous in eliminating cancer. Figure 1 illustrates a summary of the mechanisms involved in Salmonella-mediated modulation of immune responses in the TME.
Tumor molecular heterogeneity and tumor-intrinsic dysregulated signaling pathways contribute to the shaping of an inflammatory and immunosuppressive TME. For instance, Wnt/β-catenin activation in tumor cells from clinical samples mediates exclusion of tumor-specific T-cells from the TME [20]. Likewise, the activation of STAT3 signaling in tumor-implant models significantly decreased the expression of tumor-secretory proinflammatory mediators [21]. Another clinically relevant pathway that negatively impacts immune responses is the PI3K/PTEN/AKT pathway. PIK3CA activating mutations or PTEN loss-of-function mutations activate PI3K/AKT signaling that often results in an increase of immunosuppressive tumor-associated macrophage (TAM) infiltrates [22]. This signaling axis is also often involved in the regulation of tryptophan-degrading enzyme indoleamine-2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) in cancer and surrounding stroma [23,24]. High IDO activity deprives effector immune cells of available tryptophan and, in particular, T-cells undergo cell cycle arrest at the G1 phase due to depleted tryptophan [25,26]. Tryptophan deprivation can be sensed by T cells, thus triggering the kinase general control non-depressible 2 (GCN2) to undergo proliferative arrest, thereby increasing the Treg population [27,28]. Moreover, the byproduct of tryptophan catabolism, i.e., kynurenine, can induce T cell apoptosis [26]. Aberrant and high expression of immunosuppressive IDO has been determined to be a prognostic factor for poor clinical outcome [29,30] while the therapeutic inhibition of IDO may result in a favorable outcome. Interestingly, Salmonella-based treatment using Salmonella enterica serovar Choleraesuis significantly reduced IDO expression and activity by suppressing AKT signaling, specifically the AKT/mTOR/p70S6K axis [23]. Suppression of AKT/mTOR signaling by Salmonella was also found to downregulate the expression of tumor-intrinsic immune tolerance mediator, that is, programmed death-ligand1 (PD-L1) [31]—a transmembrane protein acting as a ligand for the immune checkpoint receptor PD-1, one of the gatekeepers of immune response, along with CTLA4, LAG3, TIM3, TIGIT and BTLA [32]. Effector T cell activation, TCR-mediated proliferation as well as cytokine production were expected to be suppressed with high expression of surface PD-L1 in tumors upon interaction with T cell PD-1 [33], which were reversed by Salmonella treatment [31]. In an earlier study, it was found that Salmonella-mediated tumor regression induced the phenotypic and functional activation of intratumoral myeloid cells, but not that of splenic CD11b+ cells, making them significantly less immunosuppressive in the TME; this observation was attributed to the significant reduction of IL-4-IL-13/ARG1 axis, a prototypical marker for immunosuppressive tumor-associated macrophages [34]. In another study, Flagellin from Salmonella was demonstrated to facilitate the breaking of immunosuppression in the TME by decreasing the population of CD4+CD25+ Treg cells in TME via TLR5 signaling [35].

4. Directing Immune Infiltrates toward Antitumor Responses

The immune cellular components of the TME are perceived to be critical in controlling tumorigenesis and progression to metastasis. While it is true that TME may harbor both tumor-promoting and tumor-suppressing innate and adaptive immune cells, the prevalence and ratio of these components predict clinical prognosis [20,36]. In most cases of cancer, the number of effector immune cells is overwhelmed by suppressive cells; however, these cells are not only suppressive, but they also provide the necessary element to support survival of tumors as well as progression to metastasis by mediating epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), angiogenic sprouting, and extracellular matrix (ECM) remodeling [37,38]. As such, it is indeed feasible to set tumor-associated immune infiltrates as targets for cancer therapy. Strategizing on how to increase the antitumor immune activity was proven efficient against various cancer types including breast cancer [23], lung cancer [31,39], and melanoma [31], among others.

4.1. Adaptive Immunity

The antitumor capacity of Salmonella is not solely reliant on its own ability to induce tumor cell death as it can also promote a collaborative effort with effector cells recruited and activated within the TME. Our previous report suggested that systemic administration of Salmonella enterica serovar Choleraesuis exerts antitumor activity by stimulating T cell type 1 immune response as revealed by an increased interferon-γ (IFN-γ)-mediated response in wild type and CD8+ T cell-deficient mice as compared with CD4+ T cell-deficient mice [39]. Furthermore, we also found that S. enterica serovar Choleraesuis significantly up-regulated the production of IFN-γ, IFN-inducible chemokines CXCL9 (MIG), and CXCL10 (IP-10) in C3H/HeN wildtype, but not in C3H/HeJ TLR4-deficient mice, suggesting that TLR4 is involved in the stimulation of CD4+ and CD8+ T cell-dependent antitumor immune response [40]. Interestingly, another group showed that the accumulation of Salmonella-infected tumor cells undergoing tumor lysis may enable further stimulation of tumor-specific T cell responses, involving both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, at a later time point post-treatment [11]. Cross-presentation of tumor-derived antigens from cellular debris is likely to cause the stimulation of naïve T cells [11]. Two other strains of Salmonella, namely LVR01 and 7207, were shown to induce recruitment of activated CD8+ T cells or cytotoxic T cells (CTL) accompanied by substantial increase in apoptotic and necrotic tumor cells [41,42]. Likewise, another strain of Salmonella, namely SalpNG.1, efficiently increased tumor-infiltrating CD8+ T cells and NK cells [43]. Another group suggested the involvement of Salmonella lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in the activation and recruitment of immune cells and the subsequent production of TNF-α resulting in tumor retardation [44]. Previously, we have explained a mechanism by which Salmonella increases activated tumor-specific T cells, which is by reducing tumor-intrinsic IDO expression (Figure 1) [23]. As mentioned, IDO depletes available tryptophan causing T cell arrest and increases kynurenine which is toxic to T cells [25]. The substantial downmodulation of IDO was caused, in part, by suppressing AKT/mTOR activity [23]. Furthermore, it has been shown that Salmonella may decrease IDO via another mechanism, i.e., by upregulating Cx43 [28], although the main role of Cx43 in inhibiting IDO expression remains unclear. Nevertheless, both suppression of the AKT/mTOR cascade and upregulation of Cx43 demonstrated a possible link among downmodulation of IDO, an increase in T cell infiltrates, and T cell-induced tumor apoptosis, particularly by CD8+ T cells. In a recent study from our group, we provided additional mechanisms to explain the increased reactivated tumor-specific T cell population (Figure 1). In particular, we showed that Salmonella-mediated downregulation of tumor PD-L1 contributes to the reactivation of tumor-specific T cells [31]. To evaluate the involvement of PD-L1 downregulation in increasing T cell activity, a coculture experiment was performed. Findings suggested that activated CD8+ T cell population was substantially increased while the number of T cells undergoing apoptosis was decreased; the outcome of the experiments were corroborated using tumor-bearing murine models [31]. A different Salmonella vaccine strain, namely Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium vaccine (RASV), also demonstrated a CD8+ T cell-dependent antitumor activity after intratumoral injection; however, the disparity in tumor volume between CD8+ T cell-depleted mice group with and without Salmonella treatment indicates other key players in the antitumor responses [45]. Although it was found that RASV treatment significantly increased CD11b(+)Gr-1(+) myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC), a significant proportion of the these account for TNF-α-secreting Ly6-G(high) antitumor subsets [45]. A more recent study from another group demonstrated that the flagella of Salmonella VNP20009 strain can induce activation of Flagellin/TLR5/NF-κB signaling in splenic and intratumoral immune infiltrates and that flagella-deficient Salmonella did not elicit substantial antitumor response [46]. Results of their experiments also revealed that T cells from tumors receiving wild-type Salmonella enhanced RNA expression of key inflammatory cytokines (i.e., IL-4, IL-5, IL-13, IL-17, IL-21, IL-22 and IFN-γ), compared with T cells from tumors treated with flagellum-deficient strains [46].

4.2. Innate Immunity

Immune cells of the innate lineage also form part of the inflammatory TME. Since the prevalent immunosuppressive phenotype in tumor-associated macrophages is associated with poor clinical prognosis relating to cancer progression, inducing phenotypic reprogramming may help improve prognosis [47,48]. We already mentioned that Salmonella-based treatment plays an essential role in modulating antitumor immune response. Interestingly, this Salmonella-mediated immune response not only increases antitumor T cell activity but also entices the participation of macrophages, neutrophils, dendritic, and NK cells [11,40,41].
Our group is interested in deciphering how Salmonella reprograms host immunity toward becoming more tumoricidal. In particular, we recently found that Salmonella can reprogram tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) toward an antitumor phenotype [49]. TAMs originate from the myeloid lineage and exist in two forms in the TME, namely, M1 and M2 macrophages, whose subpopulation ratio and prevalence may determine patient outcome [50]. The presence of more M1-like macrophages in a tumor may indicate better clinical outcome. TAMs may be resident macrophages or those that are recruited into the tumor tissue from the bone marrow; these cells normally differentiate from monocytes [51]. The accumulation and phenotype switching of macrophages in the tumor in order to polarize into either M1-like or M2-like phenotype depends on the cytokines and chemokines produced and secreted either by the tumor or stromal cells. Classical activation of TAMs, as stimulated by LPS, IFN-γ, TNF-α, and HMGB1, generates M1-like phenotypes regarded as antitumor macrophages due to their potential to undermine tumor growth and progression; these macrophages are aggressive in nature and highly phagocytic, and can promote Th1 responses [52,53,54]. On the other hand, the M2-like phenotype is the outcome of alternative activation of TAMs; these cells positively influence the tumor, as they are involved in promoting immunosuppression, angiogenesis, and extracellular matrix (ECM) remodeling [52,53,55]. In our study, we found that Salmonella treatment polarizes TAMs toward an M1-like phenotype by increasing tumor secretion of HMGB1 (Figure 1) [49]. The role of HMGB1 in proinflammatory M1-like reprogramming has already been reported, and that this late inflammatory cytokine influences TAMs polarization possibly via multiple pathways such as TLR2, TLR4, and RAGE/NF-κB signaling cascades [56,57]. Polarized M1-like macrophages in the TME, following Salmonella treatment, produce significant amounts of proinflammatory cytokine Interleukin-1β (IL-1β), and that increase in IL-1β corresponds to tumor regression [49,58]. An earlier study also revealed that the direct interaction between Salmonella and bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDM) positively influenced production of inflammasome-related proteins such as NLRP3, IPAF and caspase-1 p10, and a high-level secretion of IL-1β [59]. Although IL-1β appears to be involved in tumor invasion and angiogenesis, its role in the context of cancer treatment has also been reported [60,61,62]. IL-1β inhibits tumor growth by promoting tumor cell death; this is accomplished by priming CD8+ T cells or stimulating CD4+ T cells toward Th1 response [58].

5. Antitumor Immune Modulation via Salmonella Delivery System

Early attempts in Salmonella-based cancer treatment for phase 1 clinical trials using the VNP20009 strain failed in inducing significant tumor regression along with documented side effects at high dosage, and resulted in the research being discontinued [63]; nevertheless, the observed increase of circulating inflammation-related cytokines (TNF-α, IL-6, IL-1β, and IL-12) and tumor colonization noted from biopsies of some patients in the trial [63] prompted scientists and clinicians to improve Salmonella-based treatment. Owing to its tumor-targeting, innate oncolytic ability, and immune modulation, Salmonella is now considered a viable tool as a vehicle for the delivery of antitumor compounds, RNAi, therapeutic genes, and vaccines via gene-editing or engineering techniques [64,65,66]. The summary of the immunomodulatory effects of Salmonella carrying various therapeutic agents are listed in Table 1. Prior accounts utilizing Salmonella as a delivery vector for RNA interference targeting the expression of oncogenic products, including STAT3 [67], Bcl-2 [68], P-glycoprotein [69], and HIF-1 [70], has been demonstrated to promote significant tumor regression and increased survival in murine models. This may be explained, in part, by the participation of tumor-secretory cytokines and chemokines that are inhibited by STAT3, which then promotes dendritic cell maturation and T cell activation [21]. This context, however, needs further confirmation. Salmonella was also used to deliver shRNA to target the immunosuppressive factor IDO; the IDO blockade turned out to cause significant tumor cell death that is associated with a substantial increase of infiltrating reactive oxygen species (ROS)-producing polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMN) [71]. Further, several reports suggested that orally delivered cytokine gene therapy using Salmonella as the vector—carrying expression vectors encoding IL-12, GM-CSF, and IL-4 or IL-18 genes—significantly increased cytotoxic T cell activity and prolonged mice survival [72,73]. Intravenous administration of Salmonella encoding cytokine LIGHT (a member of TNF ligand superfamily) markedly increased CD19+ B cells, CD4+ T cells, and CD8+ T cells in tumors [74]. In another study, treatment with the Salmonella encoding IL-2 gene demonstrated a reduced osteosarcoma pulmonary metastasis associated with considerable increase of pulmonary NK cell population [75]. Oral administration of the Salmonella encoding IL-2 gene has been subjected to phase 1 clinical study for canine osteosarcoma [76]. Surprisingly, a recent phase 1 clinical trial using Salmonella encoding human IL-2 gene was conducted for patients suffering from metastatic gastrointestinal cancer [77]. Findings from this dose-escalation study included an increase in circulating NK cells and NK-T cells compared with the pre-study period, while no toxicity or adverse events were observed during the study period [77]. It was previously mentioned that IFN-γ and IFN-inducible chemokines are also mediators that stimulate antitumor immune response [39,40]. Yoon et al. [78] demonstrated that S. typhimurium encoding SipB160/IFN-γ elicited tumor regression in an NK cell-dependent manner with no observable adverse reactions. An engineered Salmonella generated to secrete heterologous flagellin B (FlaB) from Vibrio vulnificus was shown to incite immune infiltration via TLR4 signaling, leading to the subsequent reprogramming of macrophages, via TLR5 signaling, toward an M1-like antitumor phenotype [79].

6. Salmonella as Tool for Anticancer Vaccine

Advances in studying Salmonella-based therapy sparked innovation in the development of a therapeutic vaccine for various types of cancer. Primarily, the goal of therapeutic vaccines is to coax lasting antitumor memory apart from eradicating an already established tumor mass [87]. Enhanced infiltration and activation of T cell subsets is essential for an efficacious vaccine. In fact, significant tumor regression was observed in T cell-deficient models following intravenous infusion with tumor-sensitized splenic T cells from immune donors [88,89,90]. Recently, Fan et al. [91] developed a Salmonella strain, namely S. typhimurium RE88 by H2O2 inactivation to serve as carrier platform for cancer vaccines. Findings from the study indicated that subcutaneous vaccination with H2O2-inactivated Salmonella enhanced splenic T cell activation and increased CD4+ and CD8+ T cell infiltration into the tumor tissue. In a bacteria-based vaccine platform, cytotoxic T cells are the primary effectors of tumor-specific immune response, while both the CD4+ and CD8+ T cells mediated the memory phase thereafter [92]. Salmonella relies on its TTSS to deliver heterologous antigens into the cytosol of affected cells—usually, antigen presenting cells or APCs for optimal immunogenicity [93]. APCs are vital in promoting adaptive immune responses via antigen processing and presentation that is then recognized by T cells [94]. Several DNA vaccines or tumor-associated antigens (TAA) reliant on Salmonella-mediated delivery have been studied so far (Table 2), some of which have been approved for early-phase clinical trials. A list of previous and ongoing clinical trials is presented in Table 3. Niethammer et al. [95] reported a double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation phase I trial of oral DNA vaccine VXM01 (against VEGF receptor 2) carried by S. typhi Ty21a for locally advanced and stage IV pancreatic cancer. An early-phase trial revealed that VEGFR2 specific effector T cells, but not Treg responses, were substantially increased among vaccinated patients; this correlates with a reduction of tumor perfusion, an increased serum biomarker for antiangiogenic activity, and increased collagen IV at the 38th day post-vaccination with no recorded dose-limiting toxicities [95,96]. A phase 1 trial extension for up to six monthly boost vaccinations or placebo further demonstrated a pronounced increase in VEGFR2-specific T cell response [97]. Another candidate vaccine generated from a TAA known as Survivin using Salmonella as a vector, designated as CVD908ssb-TXSVN, is on its recruiting status for a multiple myeloma phase I clinical trial [98]. More recently, a phase I clinical trial of an oral DNA vaccine using S. enterica carrying neuroblastoma-associated antigens in combination with intramuscular injection of DNA-polyethylenimine conjugate is likewise on its recruiting stage [99]. Taken together, these Salmonella-based vaccines provide a state-of-the-art therapeutic intervention for cancer treatment and prevention of cancer recurrence and metastasis.

7. In Tandem Therapy

The concept of combinatorial treatment has been promoted in the attempt to address documented treatment drawbacks—relating to poor targeting, treatment resistance, and low response among patients—in conventional treatment modalities including chemotherapy, radiation therapy, cytokine therapy, and mAbs. Salmonella therapy in combination with radiation therapy such as X-ray provided an additive effect in suppressing tumor growth and prolonging survival in mice bearing B16F10 or Cloudman S91 melanomas [117] and CT26 colon tumors [118]. Furthermore, γ-radiation-inducible ROS expression and H2AX phosphorylation mediated by Salmonella infection substantially increased apoptosis in melanoma [119]. These combinatorial therapies have shown eradication of tumors which may be an outcome of activating radiation-induced tumor cell death. The role of tumor-specific immunity in this context may be investigated further, as a report suggests that the ionizing radiation contributes to immunogenic tumor cell death [120]. Therapeutic combinations with other existing treatment approaches or interventions have also been reported to enhance the effect of Salmonella-based treatment in modulating tumor-specific immune responses [120]. For instance, we previously reported that Salmonella treatment did enhance tumor chemosensitivity to cisplatin via Cx43 upregulation [121]. The Salmonella + cisplatin synergistic effect resulted in a significant tumor regression that is accounted for, in part, by the increased infiltrating neutrophils and CD8+ T cells compared with either Salmonella or cisplatin alone [121,122]. Doxorubicin is another chemotherapeutic drug investigated for combination therapy with S. typhimurium DSLpNG in the autochthonous model of breast cancer demonstrating significant CD8+ T cell infiltration, but not the Treg population [123]. In another study, S. typhimurium LVR01 combined with CHOP chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone/steroid combination) enhanced NK cell-mediated cytotoxic activity along with greater intratumoral CD8+ T cell and neutrophil infiltrations compared with non-combinatorial treatments, revealing the participation of systemic lymphoma-specific humoral immune responses [124]. In contrast, triptolide and Salmonella VNP20009 combination relied on enhanced Salmonella-mediated direct tumor lysis as triptolide substantially inhibited neutrophil infiltration along with reduced production of proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines (IL-6, IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-12p70, IL-17, IL-13, G-CSF, GM-CSF, MIP-1α, MIP-1β, KC, and eotaxin) in the TME [125]. Meanwhile, another group combined the Salmonella-based treatment with adoptive T cell therapy, which, as expected improved the regression of tumors; the observed outcome was found to be mediated by an increased neutrophil and decreased monocyte population, and secondarily rescued dysfunctional endogenous tumor-specific T cells within the TME [126].

8. Conclusions

Salmonella-based cancer therapy is indeed a potential and promising approach owing to its innate potential to influence the destruction of cancer cells, and its versatility to act as a vehicle for the delivery of therapeutic genes, drugs, and vaccines. Findings from various research groups, as described herein, suggested that Salmonella-based treatments employ the active participation of both the innate and adaptive immune responses. It has been shown that Salmonella taps a multilayer of molecular and cellular mechanisms in modulating the immune responses. In particular, Salmonella deters the immunosuppressive nature of the TME by altering tumor-intrinsic signaling cascades and the overall gene expression pattern. This is coupled with enhanced infiltration and activation of tumor-specific immune cells, including macrophages, neutrophils, NK cells, CD4+, and CD8+ T cells, and/or the reactivation of dysfunctional effector cells. It is also noteworthy to mention that Salmonella can serve as an efficient platform for gene therapy, RNAi, cytokine therapy and vaccine delivery, to address not only an already established tumor but also to prevent disease recurrence and metastasis. The growing plethora of evidence has shown that this innovative strategy for the treatment of cancer holds a potential for routine clinical application that overcomes the limitations of conventional therapies.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.R.P. and C.-H.L.; writing of the original draft, C.R.P.; review and editing, C.-H.L. Both authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

No external funding received.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

4-1BBLTNF ligand superfamily member 9
AIDA-1Adhesin involved in diffuse adherence
AktProtein kinase B
APCAntigen-presenting cells
ARG1Arginase 1
BMCTBacteria-mediated cancer therapy
CCLChemokine (C-C motif) ligand
CDCluster of differentiation
CTLCytotoxic T cells
Cx43Connexin 43
CXCLChemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand
CXCRChemokine receptor
DCsDendritic cells
ECMExtracellular matrix
FlaBFlagellin B
FLK1Fetal Liver Kinase-1
HMGB1High mobility group box 1 protein
HPV16 E7Human papillomavirus type 16 protein E7
IDOIndoleamine-2,3-dioxygenase
IFN-γInterferon-gamma
ILInterleukins
iNOSInducible nitric oxide synthase
LIGHTLymphotoxin-like inducible protein that competes with glycoprotein D for herpes virus entry on T cells
KOKnockout
LPSLipopolysaccharide
mTORMammalian target of rapamycin
MYCNMYCN protooncogene
MyD88Myeloid differentiation primary response 88
NKNatural killer
NY-ESO-1New York esophageal squamous cell carcinoma 1
PD-1Programmed Death-1
PD-L1Programmed Death-Ligand 1
PNPPurine nucleoside phosphorylase
PMNsPolymorphonuclear leukocytes
shRNAShort hairpin ribonucleic acid
TAATumor-associated antigens
TAMsTumor-associated macrophages
TLRToll-like receptor
TNF-αTumor necrosis factor-alpha
TMETumor microenvironment
TregRegulatory T cells
TTSSType three secretion system
VEGFVascular endothelial growth factor

References

  1. Esfahani, K.; Roudaia, L.; Buhlaiga, N.; del Rincon, S.V.; Papneja, N.; Miller, W.H. A Review of Cancer Immunotherapy: From the Past, to the Present, to the Future. Curr. Oncol. 2020, 27, 87–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Bickels, J.; Kollender, Y.; Meller, I. Coley’s Toxin: Historical Perspective. IMAJ 2002, 6, 471–472. [Google Scholar]
  3. McCarthy, E.F. The Toxins of William B. Coley and the Treatment of Bone and Soft-Tissue Sarcomas. Iowa Orthop. J. 2006, 26, 154–158. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  4. Sedighi, M.; Zahedi Bialvaei, A.; Hamblin, M.R.; Ohadi, E.; Asadi, A.; Halajzadeh, M.; Lohrasbi, V.; Mohammadzadeh, N.; Amiriani, T.; Krutova, M.; et al. Therapeutic Bacteria to Combat Cancer; Current Advances, Challenges, and Opportunities. Cancer Med. 2019, 8, 3167–3181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Popoff, M.Y.; le Minor, L.E. Salmonella. In Bergey’s Manual of Systematics of Archaea and Bacteria; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  6. Pangilinan, C.R.; Lee, C.-H. Salmonella-Based Targeted Cancer Therapy: Updates on A Promising and Innovative Tumor Immunotherapeutic Strategy. Biomedicines 2019, 7, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Kasinskas, R.W.; Forbes, N.S. Salmonella typhimurium Specifically Chemotax and Proliferate in Heterogeneous Tumor Tissue in Vitro. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2006, 94, 710–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Silva-Valenzuela, C.A.; Desai, P.T.; Molina-Quiroz, R.C.; Pezoa, D.; Zhang, Y.; Porwollik, S.; Zhao, M.; Hoffman, R.M.; Contreras, I.; Santiviago, C.A.; et al. Solid Tumors Provide Niche-Specific Conditions That Lead to Preferential Growth of Salmonella. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 35169–35180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Wei, M.Q.; Ellem, K.A.O.; Dunn, P.; West, M.J.; Bai, C.X.; Vogelstein, B. Facultative or Obligate Anaerobic Bacteria Have the Potential for Multimodality Therapy of Solid Tumours. Eur. J. Cancer 2007, 43, 490–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Pawelek, J.M.; Low, K.B.; Bermudes, D. Tumor-Targeted Salmonella as a Novel Anticancer Vector. Cancer Res. 1997, 57, 4537–4544. [Google Scholar]
  11. Avogadri, F.; Martinoli, C.; Petrovska, L.; Chiodoni, C.; Transidico, P.; Bronte, V.; Longhi, R.; Colombo, M.P.; Dougan, G.; Rescigno, M. Cancer Immunotherapy Based on Killing of Salmonella -Infected Tumor Cells. Cancer Res. 2005, 65, 3920–3927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Gao, S.; Jung, J.-H.; Lin, S.-M.; Jang, A.-Y.; Zhi, Y.; Bum Ahn, K.; Ji, H.-J.; Hyang Lim, J.; Guo, H.; Choy, H.E.; et al. Development of Oxytolerant Salmonella typhimurium Using Radiation Mutation Technology (RMT) for Cancer Therapy. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Badie, F.; Ghandali, M.; Tabatabaei, S.A.; Safari, M.; Khorshidi, A.; Shayestehpour, M.; Mahjoubin-Tehran, M.; Morshedi, K.; Jalili, A.; Tajiknia, V.; et al. Use of Salmonella Bacteria in Cancer Therapy: Direct, Drug Delivery and Combination Approaches. Front. Oncol. 2021, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Chang, W.-W.; Lee, C.-H. Salmonella as an Innovative Therapeutic Antitumor Agent. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15, 14546–14554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Yang, L.; Li, A.; Lei, Q.; Zhang, Y. Tumor-Intrinsic Signaling Pathways: Key Roles in the Regulation of the Immunosuppressive Tumor Microenvironment. J. Hematol. Oncol. 2019, 12, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Damsky, W.E.; Theodosakis, N.; Bosenberg, M. Melanoma Metastasis: New Concepts and Evolving Paradigms. Oncogene 2014, 33, 2413–2422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Jorge, N.A.N.; Cruz, J.G.V.; Pretti, M.A.M.; Bonamino, M.H.; Possik, P.A.; Boroni, M. Poor Clinical Outcome in Metastatic Melanoma Is Associated with a MicroRNA-Modulated Immunosuppressive Tumor Microenvironment. J. Transl. Med. 2020, 18, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Labani-Motlagh, A.; Ashja-Mahdavi, M.; Loskog, A. The Tumor Microenvironment: A Milieu Hindering and Obstructing Antitumor Immune Responses. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Giraldo, N.A.; Sanchez-Salas, R.; Peske, J.D.; Vano, Y.; Becht, E.; Petitprez, F.; Validire, P.; Ingels, A.; Cathelineau, X.; Fridman, W.H.; et al. The Clinical Role of the TME in Solid Cancer. Br. J. Cancer 2019, 120, 45–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Spranger, S.; Bao, R.; Gajewski, T.F. Melanoma-Intrinsic β-Catenin Signalling Prevents Anti-Tumour Immunity. Nature 2015, 523, 231–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wang, T.; Niu, G.; Kortylewski, M.; Burdelya, L.; Shain, K.; Zhang, S.; Bhattacharya, R.; Gabrilovich, D.; Heller, R.; Coppola, D.; et al. Regulation of the Innate and Adaptive Immune Responses by Stat-3 Signaling in Tumor Cells. Nat. Med. 2004, 10, 48–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Schmid, M.C.; Avraamides, C.J.; Dippold, H.C.; Franco, I.; Foubert, P.; Ellies, L.G.; Acevedo, L.M.; Manglicmot, J.R.E.; Song, X.; Wrasidlo, W.; et al. Receptor Tyrosine Kinases and TLR/IL1Rs Unexpectedly Activate Myeloid Cell PI3Kγ, A Single Convergent Point Promoting Tumor Inflammation and Progression. Cancer Cell 2011, 19, 715–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Kuan, Y.-D.; Lee, C.-H. Salmonella Overcomes Tumor Immune Tolerance by Inhibition of Tumor Indoleamine 2, 3-Dioxygenase 1 Expression. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 374–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Bishnupuri, K.S.; Alvarado, D.M.; Khouri, A.N.; Shabsovich, M.; Chen, B.; Dieckgraefe, B.K.; Ciorba, M.A. IDO1 and Kynurenine Pathway Metabolites Activate PI3K-Akt Signaling in the Neoplastic Colon Epithelium to Promote Cancer Cell Proliferation and Inhibit Apoptosis. Cancer Res. 2019, 79, 1138–1150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Mbongue, J.; Nicholas, D.; Torrez, T.; Kim, N.-S.; Firek, A.; Langridge, W. The Role of Indoleamine 2, 3-Dioxygenase in Immune Suppression and Autoimmunity. Vaccines 2015, 3, 703–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Munn, D.H.; Mellor, A.L. IDO in the Tumor Microenvironment: Inflammation, Counter-Regulation, and Tolerance. Trends Immunol. 2016, 37, 193–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Munn, D.H.; Sharma, M.D.; Baban, B.; Harding, H.P.; Zhang, Y.; Ron, D.; Mellor, A.L. GCN2 Kinase in T Cells Mediates Proliferative Arrest and Anergy Induction in Response to Indoleamine 2,3-Dioxygenase. Immunity 2005, 22, 633–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Lin, H.-C.; Yang, C.-J.; Kuan, Y.-D.; Wang, W.-K.; Chang, W.-W.; Lee, C.-H. The Inhibition of Indoleamine 2, 3-Dioxygenase 1 by Connexin 43. Int. J. Med Sci. 2017, 14, 1181–1188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Liu, H.; Shen, Z.; Wang, Z.; Wang, X.; Zhang, H.; Qin, J.; Qin, X.; Xu, J.; Sun, Y. Increased Expression of IDO Associates with Poor Postoperative Clinical Outcome of Patients with Gastric Adenocarcinoma. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 21319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Wang, S.; Wu, J.; Shen, H.; Wang, J. The Prognostic Value of IDO Expression in Solid Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. BMC Cancer 2020, 20, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Chen, M.-C.; Pangilinan, C.R.; Lee, C.-H. Salmonella Breaks Tumor Immune Tolerance by Downregulating Tumor Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Expression. Cancers 2019, 12, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. He, X.; Xu, C. Immune Checkpoint Signaling and Cancer Immunotherapy. Cell Res. 2020, 30, 660–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Blank, C.; Gajewski, T.F.; Mackensen, A. Interaction of PD-L1 on Tumor Cells with PD-1 on Tumor-Specific T Cells as a Mechanism of Immune Evasion: Implications for Tumor Immunotherapy. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 2005, 54, 307–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Kaimala, S.; Mohamed, Y.A.; Nader, N.; Issac, J.; Elkord, E.; Chouaib, S.; Fernandez-Cabezudo, M.J.; al-Ramadi, B.K. Salmonella-Mediated Tumor Regression Involves Targeting of Tumor Myeloid Suppressor Cells Causing a Shift to M1-like Phenotype and Reduction in Suppressive Capacity. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 2014, 63, 587–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Cai, Z.; Sanchez, A.; Shi, Z.; Zhang, T.; Liu, M.; Zhang, D. Activation of Toll-like Receptor 5 on Breast Cancer Cells by Flagellin Suppresses Cell Proliferation and Tumor Growth. Cancer Res. 2011, 71, 2466–2475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Fridman, W.H.; Zitvogel, L.; Sautès–Fridman, C.; Kroemer, G. The Immune Contexture in Cancer Prognosis and Treatment. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2017, 14, 717–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Condeelis, J.; Pollard, J.W. Macrophages: Obligate Partners for Tumor Cell Migration, Invasion, and Metastasis. Cell 2006, 124, 263–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Zhang, S.; Yang, X.; Wang, L.; Zhang, C. Interplay between Inflammatory Tumor Microenvironment and Cancer Stem Cells (Review). Oncol. Lett. 2018, 16, 679–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Lee, C.-H.; Hsieh, J.-L.; Wu, C.-L.; Hsu, P.-Y.; Shiau, A.-L. T Cell Augments the Antitumor Activity of Tumor-Targeting Salmonella. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2011, 90, 1381–1388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Lee, C.-H.; Wu, C.-L.; Shiau, A.-L. Toll-like Receptor 4 Mediates an Antitumor Host Response Induced by Salmonella Choleraesuis. Clin. Cancer Res. 2008, 14, 1905–1912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Grille, S.; Moreno, M.; Bascuas, T.; Marqués, J.M.; Muñoz, N.; Lens, D.; Chabalgoity, J.A. Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium Immunotherapy for B-Cell Lymphoma Induces Broad Anti-Tumour Immunity with Therapeutic Effect. Immunology 2014, 143, 428–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Xiao, Y.; Wang, Y.; Liu, C. Salmonella Promote T Cell-Mediated Anti-Tumor Immuno-Therapy. J. Immunol. 2016, 196. [Google Scholar]
  43. Drees, J.; Mertensotto, M.; Liu, G.; Panyam, J.; Leonard, A.; Agustin, L.; Schottel, J.; Saltzman, D. Attenuated Salmonella enterica Typhimurium Reduces Tumor Burden in an Autochthonous Breast Cancer Model. Anticancer Res. 2015, 35, 843–850. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  44. Kocijancic, D.; Leschner, S.; Felgner, S.; Komoll, R.-M.; Frahm, M.; Pawar, V.; Weiss, S. Therapeutic Benefit of Salmonella Attributed to LPS and TNF-α Is Exhaustible and Dictated by Tumor Susceptibility. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 36492–36508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Hong, E.-H.; Chang, S.-Y.; Lee, B.-R.; Pyun, A.-R.; Kim, J.-W.; Kweon, M.-N.; Ko, H.-J. Intratumoral Injection of Attenuated Salmonella Vaccine Can Induce Tumor Microenvironmental Shift from Immune Suppressive to Immunogenic. Vaccine 2013, 31, 1377–1384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Chen, J.; Qiao, Y.; Chen, G.; Chang, C.; Dong, H.; Tang, B.; Cheng, X.; Liu, X.; Hua, Z. Salmonella Flagella Confer Anti-Tumor Immunological Effect via Activating Flagellin/TLR5 Signalling within Tumor Microenvironment. Acta Pharm. Sin. B 2021, 11, 3165–3177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ma, J.; Liu, L.; Che, G.; Yu, N.; Dai, F.; You, Z. The M1 Form of Tumor-Associated Macrophages in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer is Positively Associated with Survival Time. BMC Cancer 2010, 10, 112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Yuan, R.; Li, S.; Geng, H.; Wang, X.; Guan, Q.; Li, X.; Ren, C.; Yuan, X. Reversing the Polarization of Tumor-Associated Macrophages Inhibits Tumor Metastasis. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2017, 49, 30–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Pangilinan, C.R.; Wu, L.-H.; Lee, C.-H. Salmonella Impacts Tumor-Induced Macrophage Polarization, and Inhibits SNAI1-Mediated Metastasis in Melanoma. Cancers 2021, 13, 2894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Jayasingam, S.D.; Citartan, M.; Thang, T.H.; Mat Zin, A.A.; Ang, K.C.; Ch’ng, E.S. Evaluating the Polarization of Tumor-Associated Macrophages Into M1 and M2 Phenotypes in Human Cancer Tissue: Technicalities and Challenges in Routine Clinical Practice. Front. Oncol. 2020, 9, 1512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Weagel, E.; Smith, C.; Liu, P.G.; Robison, R.; O’Neill, K. Macrophage Polarization and Its Role in Cancer. J. Clin. Cell. Immunol. 2015, 6, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Murray, P.J. Macrophage Polarization. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 2017, 79, 541–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Porta, C.; Riboldi, E.; Ippolito, A.; Sica, A. Molecular and Epigenetic Basis of Macrophage Polarized Activation. Semin. Immunol. 2015, 27, 237–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Guerriero, J.L.; Ditsworth, D.; Catanzaro, J.M.; Sabino, G.; Furie, M.B.; Kew, R.R.; Crawford, H.C.; Zong, W.-X. DNA Alkylating Therapy Induces Tumor Regression through an HMGB1-Mediated Activation of Innate Immunity. J. Immunol. 2011, 186, 3517–3526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Falleni, M.; Savi, F.; Tosi, D.; Agape, E.; Cerri, A.; Moneghini, L.; Bulfamante, G.P. M1 and M2 Macrophages’ Clinicopathological Significance in Cutaneous Melanoma. Melanoma Res. 2017, 27, 200–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Su, Z.; Zhang, P.; Yu, Y.; Lu, H.; Liu, Y.; Ni, P.; Su, X.; Wang, D.; Liu, Y.; Wang, J.; et al. HMGB1 Facilitated Macrophage Reprogramming towards a Proinflammatory M1-like Phenotype in Experimental Autoimmune Myocarditis Development. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 21884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Wang, J.; Li, R.; Peng, Z.; Hu, B.; Rao, X.; Li, J. HMGB1 Participates in LPS-induced Acute Lung Injury By Activating the AIM2 Inflammasome in Macrophages and Inducing Polarization of M1 Macrophages via TLR2, TLR4, and RAGE/NF-κB Signaling Pathways. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2019, 45, 61–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Kim, J.-E.; Phan, T.X.; Nguyen, V.H.; Dinh-Vu, H.-V.; Zheng, J.H.; Yun, M.; Park, S.-G.; Hong, Y.; Choy, H.E.; Szardenings, M.; et al. Salmonella typhimurium Suppresses Tumor Growth via the Pro-Inflammatory Cytokine Interleukin-1β. Theranostics 2015, 5, 1328–1342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Phan, T.X.; Nguyen, V.H.; Duong, M.T.-Q.; Hong, Y.; Choy, H.E.; Min, J.-J. Activation of Inflammasome by Attenuated Salmonella typhimurium in Bacteria-Mediated Cancer Therapy. Microbiol. Immunol. 2015, 59, 664–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  60. Ghiringhelli, F.; Apetoh, L.; Tesniere, A.; Aymeric, L.; Ma, Y.; Ortiz, C.; Vermaelen, K.; Panaretakis, T.; Mignot, G.; Ullrich, E.; et al. Activation of the NLRP3 Inflammasome in Dendritic Cells Induces IL-1β–Dependent Adaptive Immunity against Tumors. Nat. Med. 2009, 15, 1170–1178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Bent, R.; Moll, L.; Grabbe, S.; Bros, M. Interleukin-1 Beta—A Friend or Foe in Malignancies? Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 2155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Lee, P.-H.; Yamamoto, T.N.; Gurusamy, D.; Sukumar, M.; Yu, Z.; Hu-Li, J.; Kawabe, T.; Gangaplara, A.; Kishton, R.J.; Henning, A.N.; et al. Host Conditioning with IL-1β Improves the Antitumor Function of Adoptively Transferred T Cells. J. Exp. Med. 2019, 216, 2619–2634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Toso, J.F.; Gill, V.J.; Hwu, P.; Marincola, F.M.; Restifo, N.P.; Schwartzentruber, D.J.; Sherry, R.M.; Topalian, S.L.; Yang, J.C.; Stock, F.; et al. Phase I Study of the Intravenous Administration of Attenuated Salmonella typhimurium to Patients With Metastatic Melanoma. J. Clin. Oncol. 2002, 20, 142–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Liang, K.; Liu, Q.; Li, P.; Luo, H.; Wang, H.; Kong, Q. Genetically Engineered Salmonella typhimurium: Recent Advances in Cancer Therapy. Cancer Lett. 2019, 448, 168–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Lee, C.-H. Engineering Bacteria toward Tumor Targeting for Cancer Treatment: Current State and Perspectives. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2012, 93, 517–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Lee, C.-H. Employment of Salmonella in Cancer Gene Therapy. In Bacterial Therapy of Cancer: Methods and Protocols; Humana Press: New York, NY, USA, 2016; Volume 1409, pp. 79–83. [Google Scholar]
  67. Zhang, L.; Gao, L.; Li, Y.; Lin, G.; Shao, Y.; Ji, K.; Yu, H.; Hu, J.; Kalvakolanu, D.V.; Kopecko, D.J.; et al. Effects of Plasmid-Based Stat3-Specific Short Hairpin RNA and GRIM-19 on PC-3M Tumor Cell Growth. Clin. Cancer Res. 2008, 14, 559–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Yang, N.; Zhu, X.; Chen, L.; Li, S.; Ren, D. Oral Administration of Attenuated S. typhimurium Carrying ShRNA-Expressing Vectors as a Cancer Therapeutic. Cancer Biol. Ther. 2008, 7, 145–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Deng, J.; Guo, Y.; Jiang, Z.; Yang, M.; Li, H.; Wang, J. Enhancement of Ovarian Cancer Chemotherapy by Delivery of Multidrug-Resistance Gene Small Interfering RNA Using Tumor Targeting Salmonella. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res. 2015, 41, 615–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Gu, J.; Li, Y.; Zeng, J.; Wang, B.; Ji, K.; Tang, Y.; Sun, Q. Knockdown of HIF-1α by SiRNA-Expressing Plasmid Delivered by Attenuated Salmonella Enhances the Antitumor Effects of Cisplatin on Prostate Cancer. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Blache, C.A.; Manuel, E.R.; Kaltcheva, T.I.; Wong, A.N.; Ellenhorn, J.D.I.; Blazar, B.R.; Diamond, D.J. Systemic Delivery of Salmonella typhimurium Transformed with IDO ShRNA Enhances Intratumoral Vector Colonization and Suppresses Tumor Growth. Cancer Res. 2012, 72, 6447–6456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Agorio, C.; Schreiber, F.; Sheppard, M.; Mastroeni, P.; Fernandez, M.; Martinez, M.A.; Chabalgoity, J.A. Live Attenuated Salmonella as a Vector for Oral Cytokine Gene Therapy in Melanoma. J. Gene Med. 2007, 9, 416–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Yuhua, L.; Kunyuan, G.; Hui, C.; Yongmei, X.; Chaoyang, S.; Xun, T.; Daming, R. Oral Cytokine Gene Therapy against Murine Tumor Using Attenuated Salmonella typhimurium. Int. J. Cancer 2001, 94, 438–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Loeffler, M.; Le’Negrate, G.; Krajewska, M.; Reed, J.C. Attenuated Salmonella Engineered to Produce Human Cytokine LIGHT Inhibit Tumor Growth. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 12879–12883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Sorenson, B.S.; Banton, K.L.; Frykman, N.L.; Leonard, A.S.; Saltzman, D.A. Attenuated Salmonella typhimurium with IL-2 Gene Reduces Pulmonary Metastases in Murine Osteosarcoma. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2008, 466, 1285–1291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Fritz, S.E.; Henson, M.S.; Greengard, E.; Winter, A.L.; Stuebner, K.M.; Yoon, U.; Wilk, V.L.; Borgatti, A.; Augustin, L.B.; Modiano, J.F.; et al. A Phase I Clinical Study to Evaluate Safety of Orally Administered, Genetically Engineered Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium for Canine Osteosarcoma. Vet. Med. Sci. 2016, 2, 179–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Gniadek, T.J.; Augustin, L.; Schottel, J.; Leonard, A.; Saltzman, D.; Greeno, E.; Batist, G. A Phase I, Dose Escalation, Single Dose Trial of Oral Attenuated Salmonella typhimurium Containing Human IL-2 in Patients with Metastatic Gastrointestinal Cancers. J. Immunother. 2020, 43, 217–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Yoon, W.; Park, Y.C.; Kim, J.; Chae, Y.S.; Byeon, J.H.; Min, S.-H.; Park, S.; Yoo, Y.; Park, Y.K.; Kim, B.M. Application of Genetically Engineered Salmonella typhimurium for Interferon-Gamma–Induced Therapy against Melanoma. Eur. J. Cancer 2017, 70, 48–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Zheng, J.H.; Nguyen, V.H.; Jiang, S.-N.; Park, S.-H.; Tan, W.; Hong, S.H.; Shin, M.G.; Chung, I.-J.; Hong, Y.; Bom, H.-S.; et al. Two-Step Enhanced Cancer Immunotherapy with Engineered Salmonella typhimurium Secreting Heterologous Flagellin. Sci. Transl. Med. 2017, 9, eaak9537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Loeffler, M.; Le’Negrate, G.; Krajewska, M.; Reed, J.C. Inhibition of Tumor Growth Using Salmonella Expressing Fas Ligand. JNCI J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2008, 100, 1113–1116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  81. Loeffler, M.; Le’Negrate, G.; Krajewska, M.; Reed, J.C. IL-18-Producing Salmonella Inhibit Tumor Growth. Cancer Gene Ther. 2008, 15, 787–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  82. Loeffler, M.; Le’Negrate, G.; Krajewska, M.; Reed, J.C. Salmonella typhimurium Engineered to Produce CCL21 Inhibit Tumor Growth. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 2009, 58, 769–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Chen, G.; Tang, B.; Yang, B.-Y.; Chen, J.-X.; Zhou, J.-H.; Li, J.-H.; Hua, Z.-C. Tumor-Targeting Salmonella typhimurium, a Natural Tool for Activation of Prodrug 6MePdR and Their Combination Therapy in Murine Melanoma Model. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013, 97, 4393–4401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Yoon, W.; Choi, J.H.; Kim, S.; Park, Y.K. Engineered Salmonella typhimurium Expressing E7 Fusion Protein, Derived from Human Papillomavirus, Inhibits Tumor Growth in Cervical Tumor-Bearing Mice. Biotechnol. Lett. 2014, 36, 349–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. al-Ramadi, B.K.; Fernandez-Cabezudo, M.J.; El-Hasasna, H.; Al-Salam, S.; Bashir, G.; Chouaib, S. Potent Anti-Tumor Activity of Systemically-Administered IL2-Expressing Salmonella Correlates with Decreased Angiogenesis and Enhanced Tumor Apoptosis. Clin. Immunol. 2009, 130, 89–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. al-Ramadi, B.K.; Al-Dhaheri, M.H.; Mustafa, N.; AbouHaidar, M.; Xu, D.; Liew, F.Y.; Lukic, M.L.; Fernandez-Cabezudo, M.J. Influence of Vector-Encoded Cytokines on Anti- Salmonella Immunity: Divergent Effects of Interleukin-2 and Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha. Infect. Immun. 2001, 69, 3980–3988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Saxena, M.; van der Burg, S.H.; Melief, C.J.M.; Bhardwaj, N. Therapeutic Cancer Vaccines. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2021, 21, 360–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Berendt, M.J.; North, R.J. T-Cell-Mediated Suppression of Anti-Tumor Immunity. An Explanation for Progressive Growth of an Immunogenic Tumor. J. Exp. Med. 1980, 151, 69–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Dye, E.S.; North, R.J. Specificity of the T Cells That Mediate and Suppress Adoptive Immunotherapy of Established Tumors. J. Leukoc. Biol. 1984, 36, 27–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Farashi-Bonab, S.; Khansari, N. Salmonella-Based Anticancer Vaccines and Their Efficacy. Vaccin. Res. 2019, 1, 65–71. [Google Scholar]
  91. Fan, Y.; Bai, T.; Tian, Y.; Zhou, B.; Wang, Y.; Yang, L. H2O2-Inactivated Salmonella typhimurium RE88 Strain as a New Cancer Vaccine Carrier: Evaluation in a Mouse Model of Cancer. Drug Des. Dev. Ther. 2021, 15, 209–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Stern, C.; Kasnitz, N.; Kocijancic, D.; Trittel, S.; Riese, P.; Guzman, C.A.; Leschner, S.; Weiss, S. Induction of CD4 + and CD8 + Anti-Tumor Effector T Cell Responses by Bacteria Mediated Tumor Therapy. Int. J. Cancer 2015, 137, 2019–2028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Nishikawa, H. In Vivo Antigen Delivery by A Salmonella typhimurium Type III Secretion System for Therapeutic Cancer Vaccines. J. Clin. Investig. 2006, 116, 1946–1954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  94. Goyvaerts, C.; Breckpot, K. Pros and Cons of Antigen-Presenting Cell Targeted Tumor Vaccines. J. Immunol. Res. 2015, 2015, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  95. Niethammer, A.G.; Lubenau, H.; Mikus, G.; Knebel, P.; Hohmann, N.; Leowardi, C.; Beckhove, P.; Akhisaroglu, M.; Ge, Y.; Springer, M.; et al. Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled First in Human Study to Investigate an Oral Vaccine Aimed to Elicit an Immune Reaction against the VEGF-Receptor 2 in Patients with Stage IV and Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer. BMC Cancer 2012, 12, 361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  96. Schmitz-Winnenthal, F.H.; Hohmann, N.; Niethammer, A.G.; Friedrich, T.; Lubenau, H.; Springer, M.; Breiner, K.M.; Mikus, G.; Weitz, J.; Ulrich, A.; et al. Anti-Angiogenic Activity of VXM01, an Oral T-Cell Vaccine against VEGF Receptor 2, in Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 1 Trial. OncoImmunology 2015, 4, e1001217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  97. Schmitz-Winnenthal, F.H.; Hohmann, N.; Schmidt, T.; Podola, L.; Friedrich, T.; Lubenau, H.; Springer, M.; Wieckowski, S.; Breiner, K.M.; Mikus, G.; et al. A Phase 1 Trial Extension to Assess Immunologic Efficacy and Safety of Prime-Boost Vaccination with VXM01, an Oral T Cell Vaccine against VEGFR2, in Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Cancer. OncoImmunology 2018, 7, e1303584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. U.S. National Institutes of Health. Clinicaltrials.gov Multiple Myeloma Trial of Orally Administered Salmonella Based Survivin Vaccine (MAPSS). Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03762291 (accessed on 13 September 2021).
  99. U.S. National Institutes of Health. Clinicaltrials.gov DNA Vaccination against Neuroblastoma. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04049864 (accessed on 13 September 2021).
  100. Chou, C.-K.; Hung, J.-Y.; Liu, J.-C.; Chen, C.-T.; Hung, M.-C. An Attenuated Salmonella Oral DNA Vaccine Prevents the Growth of Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Colon Cancer That Express α-Fetoprotein. Cancer Gene Ther. 2006, 13, 746–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Lewēn, S.; Zhou, H.; Hu, H.; Cheng, T.; Markowitz, D.; Reisfeld, R.A.; Xiang, R.; Luo, Y. A Legumain-Based Minigene Vaccine Targets the Tumor Stroma and Suppresses Breast Cancer Growth and Angiogenesis. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 2008, 57, 507–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Zuo, S.G.; Chen, Y.; Wu, Z.P.; Liu, X.; Liu, C.; Zhou, Y.C.; Wu, C.L.; Jin, C.G.; Gu, Y.L.; Li, J.; et al. Orally Administered DNA Vaccine Delivery by Attenuated Salmonella typhimurium Targeting Fetal Liver Kinase 1 Inhibits Murine Lewis Lung Carcinoma Growth and Metastasis. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2010, 33, 174–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  103. Xiong, G.; Husseiny, M.I.; Song, L.; Erdreich-Epstein, A.; Shackleford, G.M.; Seeger, R.C.; Jäckel, D.; Hensel, M.; Metelitsa, L.S. Novel Cancer Vaccine Based on Genes of Salmonella Pathogenicity Island 2. Int. J. Cancer 2009, 126, 2622–2634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  104. Xu, X.; Hegazy, W.A.H.; Guo, L.; Gao, X.; Courtney, A.N.; Kurbanov, S.; Liu, D.; Tian, G.; Manuel, E.R.; Diamond, D.J.; et al. Effective Cancer Vaccine Platform Based on Attenuated Salmonella and a Type III Secretion System. Cancer Res. 2014, 74, 6260–6270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  105. Xu, X.; Kurbanov, S.; Guo, L.; Gao, X.; Galen, J.E.; Metelitsa, L.S. 217. Development of an Effective Cancer Vaccine Platform Using Attenuated Salmonella to Deliver Recombinant Tumor-Associated Antigens. Mol. Ther. 2015, 23, S85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Ahmad, S.; Casey, G.; Cronin, M.; Rajendran, S.; Sweeney, P.; Tangney, M.; O’Sullivan, G.C. Induction of Effective Antitumor Response After Mucosal Bacterial Vector Mediated DNA Vaccination with Endogenous Prostate Cancer Specific Antigen. J. Urol. 2011, 186, 687–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Berger, E.; Soldati, R.; Huebener, N.; Hohn, O.; Stermann, A.; Durmus, T.; Lobitz, S.; Zenclussen, A.C.; Christiansen, H.; Lode, H.N.; et al. Salmonella SL7207 Application Is the Most Effective DNA Vaccine Delivery Method for Successful Tumor Eradication in a Murine Model for Neuroblastoma. Cancer Lett. 2013, 331, 167–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Ye, J.; Li, L.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Ren, D.; Chen, W. Recombinant Salmonella-Based 4-1BBL Vaccine Enhances T Cell Immunity and Inhibits the Development of Colorectal Cancer in Rats: In Vivo Effects of Vaccine Containing 4-1BBL. J. Biomed. Sci. 2013, 20, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Binder, D.C.; Engels, B.; Arina, A.; Yu, P.; Slauch, J.M.; Fu, Y.-X.; Karrison, T.; Burnette, B.; Idel, C.; Zhao, M.; et al. Antigen-Specific Bacterial Vaccine Combined with Anti-PD-L1 Rescues Dysfunctional Endogenous T Cells to Reject Long-Established Cancer. Cancer Immunol. Res. 2013, 1, 123–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  110. Mei, Y.; Zhao, L.; Liu, Y.; Gong, H.; Song, Y.; Lei, L.; Zhu, Y.; Jin, Z.; Ma, S.; Hu, B.; et al. Combining DNA Vaccine and AIDA-1 in Attenuated Salmonella Activates Tumor-Specific CD4 + and CD8 + T-Cell Responses. Cancer Immunol. Res. 2017, 5, 503–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. U.S. National Institutes of Health. Clinicaltrials.gov Treatment of Patients with Cancer with Genetically Modified Salmonella typhimurium Bacteria. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/results/NCT00004988?view=results (accessed on 22 October 2021).
  112. U.S. National Institutes of Health. Clinicaltrials.gov VNP20009 in Treating Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors. Available online: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00006254 (accessed on 22 October 2021).
  113. U.S. National Institutes of Health. Clinicaltrials.gov VNP20009 in Treating Patients with Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors That Have Not Responded to Previous Therapy. Available online: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00004216 (accessed on 22 October 2021).
  114. U.S. National Institutes of Health. Clinicaltrials.gov IL-2 Expressing, Attenuated Salmonella typhimurium in Unresectable Hepatic Spread. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01099631 (accessed on 22 October 2021).
  115. U.S. National Institutes of Health. Clinicaltrials.gov VXM01 Phase I Dose Escalation Study in Patients with Locally Advanced, Inoperable and Stage IV Pancreatic Cancer. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01486329 (accessed on 22 October 2021).
  116. Platt, J.; Sodi, S.; Kelley, M.; Rockwell, S.; Bermudes, D.; Low, K.B.; Pawelek, J. Antitumour Effects of Genetically Engineered Salmonella in Combination with Radiation. Eur. J. Cancer 2000, 36, 2397–2402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Liu, X.; Jiang, S.; Piao, L.; Yuan, F. Radiotherapy Combined with an Engineered Salmonella typhimurium Inhibits Tumor Growth in a Mouse Model of Colon Cancer. Exp. Anim. 2016, 65, 413–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  118. Yoon, W.S.; Kim, S.; Seo, S.; Park, Y. Salmonella typhimurium with γ-Radiation Induced H2AX Phosphorylation and Apoptosis in Melanoma. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2014, 78, 1082–1085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  119. Beauford, S.S.; Kumari, A.; Garnett-Benson, C. Ionizing Radiation Modulates the Phenotype and Function of Human CD4+ Induced Regulatory T Cells. BMC Immunol. 2020, 21, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  120. Al-Saafeen, B.H.; Fernandez-Cabezudo, M.J.; al-Ramadi, B.K. Integration of Salmonella into Combination Cancer Therapy. Cancers 2021, 13, 3228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Chang, W.-W.; Lai, C.-H.; Chen, M.-C.; Liu, C.-F.; Kuan, Y.-D.; Lin, S.-T.; Lee, C.-H. Salmonella Enhance Chemosensitivity in Tumor through Connexin 43 Upregulation. Int. J. Cancer 2013, 133, 1926–1935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Lee, C.-H.; Wu, C.-L.; Tai, Y.-S.; Shiau, A.-L. Systemic Administration of Attenuated Salmonella choleraesuis in Combination with Cisplatin for Cancer Therapy. Mol. Ther. 2005, 11, 707–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Saltzman, D.; Augustin, L.; Leonard, A.; Mertensotto, M.; Schottel, J. Low Dose Chemotherapy Combined with Attenuated Salmonella Decreases Tumor Burden and Is Less Toxic than High Dose Chemotherapy in an Autochthonous Murine Model of Breast Cancer. Surgery 2018, 163, 509–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Bascuas, T.; Moreno, M.; Grille, S.; Chabalgoity, J.A. Salmonella Immunotherapy Improves the Outcome of CHOP Chemotherapy in Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma-Bearing Mice. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  125. Chen, J.; Qiao, Y.; Tang, B.; Chen, G.; Liu, X.; Yang, B.; Wei, J.; Zhang, X.; Cheng, X.; Du, P.; et al. Modulation of Salmonella Tumor-Colonization and Intratumoral Anti-Angiogenesis by Triptolide and Its Mechanism. Theranostics 2017, 7, 2250–2260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  126. Binder, D.C.; Arina, A.; Wen, F.; Tu, T.; Zhao, M.; Hoffman, R.M.; Wainwright, D.A.; Schreiber, H. Tumor Relapse Prevented by Combining Adoptive T Cell Therapy with Salmonella typhimurium. OncoImmunology 2016, 5, e1130207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Biomedicines 09 01566 g001 550
Figure 1. An overview of Salmonella-mediated modulation of tumor-specific immune responses in the tumor microenvironment. Salmonella overcomes the immunosuppressive TME by downregulating tumor-intrinsic IDO and PD-L1, leading to the reactivation and increase in the population of effector T cells. Further, Salmonella directs reprogramming of macrophages toward an antitumor phenotype upon stimulation by extracellular HMGB1. The symbol “X” shown in red means prevention/inhibition of the activity.
Figure 1. An overview of Salmonella-mediated modulation of tumor-specific immune responses in the tumor microenvironment. Salmonella overcomes the immunosuppressive TME by downregulating tumor-intrinsic IDO and PD-L1, leading to the reactivation and increase in the population of effector T cells. Further, Salmonella directs reprogramming of macrophages toward an antitumor phenotype upon stimulation by extracellular HMGB1. The symbol “X” shown in red means prevention/inhibition of the activity.
Biomedicines 09 01566 g001
Table
Table 1. Salmonella as a delivery vehicle for cancer immunotherapy.
Table 1. Salmonella as a delivery vehicle for cancer immunotherapy.
StrainsCargoImmune Modulation EffectsCell LinesMouse
Models		Ref.
S. typhimuriumLIGHTIncreased splenic CD11c + CD205+ DCs; CXCR3-mediated increase of tumor infiltration with T cells CT-26 colon carcinoma cells; Lewis lung carcinoma cellsBALB/c;
C57BL/6 mice 		[74]
S. typhimuriumFas ligand (FasL) Neutrophil-dependent antitumor activityCT-26 colon carcinoma cells; D2F2 breast cancer; B16F10 melanomaBALB/c;
C57BL/6 mice 		[80]
S. typhimuriumIL-18Increased cytokine secretion by tumors; enhanced infiltration and accumulation of T cells, NK cells, and granulocytesCT-26 colon carcinoma cells; D2F2 breast cancer; Lewis lung carcinoma cellsBALB/c;
C57BL/6 mice 		[81]
S. typhimurium SalpIL2IL-2Increased NK cell population in both spleen and metastatic tumor massOsteosarcoma cellsBALB/c mice [75]
S. typhimurium
(pur-/msb-) 		CCL21Elevated CXCL9, CXCL10, and IFN-γ in the TME; abundant mononuclear and polynuclear cell tumor infiltratesCT-26 colon carcinoma and B16F10 melanoma cells BALB/c;
C57BL/6 mice 		[82]
S. typhimuriumIDO shRNARecruits ROS-producing PMNsB16F10 melanoma cellsC57BL/6, IDO-KO;
Rag1-KO mice 		[71]
S. typhimurium VNP20009PNPEnhances CD8(+) T-cell infiltrationB16F10 melanoma cellsC57BL/6J mice[83]
S. typhimurium BRD509HPV16 E7Increased serum IFN-γ and TNF-α; enhanced CTL activityTC-1 cervical cancer cellsC57BL/6J mice[84]
S. typhimurium SHJ2037 FlaBTLR5-dependent infiltration, and activation of immune cells thereafterMC38; B16F10 cells; TLR5–negative colon cancer cellsTLR4−/−, TLR5−/−, and MyD88−/− KO mice (C57BL/6 genetic background)[79]
S. typhimurium
BRD509		IFN-γEnhanced IFN-γ-mediated NK cell activityB16F10 and A375SM human melanoma cellsC57BL/6 mice; RAG0.γc0 lacking NK cells (C57BL/6 background)[78]
S. typhimurium BRD509IL-2NK and cytotoxic T cell-mediated tumor apoptosisB16F10 melanoma cellsC57BL/6J mice[85,86]
Table
Table 2. Salmonella-based cancer vaccine platforms.
Table 2. Salmonella-based cancer vaccine platforms.
SpeciesRouteCargoMurine Cancer TypeRef.
S. typhimurium-luxOralMouse α-fetoprotein geneColon carcinoma; Hepatoma[100]
S. typhimurium
(ΔphoP ΔphoQ)		Oral;
Intratumoral		NY-ESO-1 tumor antigenSarcoma[93]
S. typhimurium
(Dam−; AroA−) 		OralLegumainBreast cancer [101]
S. typhimurium SL3261 OralVEGFR-2/FLK1Lung carcinoma[102]
S. typhimurium MvP728 (purD/htrA)OralSurvivin; MYCN oncoproteinsColon carcinoma;
Glioblastoma;
B cell lymphoma		[103,104,105]
S. typhimurium SL7207OralMouse prostate stem cell antigenTRAMPC1
prostate carcinoma		[106]
S. typhimurium SL7207OralSurvivinNeuroblastoma[107]
Salmonella SL3261Oral4-1BBLColorectal cancer[108]
S. typhimurium A1-RIntravenousTumor-specific antigen ovalbumin (OVA)Melanoma[109]
S. typhimurium SL7207IntranasalAIDA-1 autotransporter and
DNA vaccine elements		Melanoma[110]
Table
Table 3. Previous and ongoing clinical trials for Salmonella-based cancer therapy.
Table 3. Previous and ongoing clinical trials for Salmonella-based cancer therapy.
StrainsCargoRouteCancer TypePhase and StatusNo. of Enrolled
Patients		NCT NumberRef.
VNP20009 n/aIntratumoral Neoplasm, metastatic Phase I, completed45NCT00004988 [111]
VNP20009 n/aIntratumoral Metastatic melanoma and renal cancerPhase I, completed45NCT00006254 [112]
VNP20009 n/aIntratumoral Unspecified adult solid tumors (advanced/metastatic)Phase I, completed40NCT00004216[113]
S. typhimurium SalpIL2human
IL-2		OralSolid tumors
(unresectable hepatic spread)		Phase I, completed22NCT01099631 [114]
S. typhimurium Ty21a
(VXM01 vaccine)		VEGFR2OralAdvanced pancreatic cancerPhase I, completed72NCT01486329 [115]
Salmonella CVD908ssb (TXSVN vaccine)SurvivinOralMultiple myelomaPhase I, recruiting24 (est.)NCT03762291 [98]
S. typhimurium SS2017 Tumor-associated antigensOralNeuroblastomaEarly phase I, recruiting12 (est.)NCT04049864 [99]
S. typhimurium Saltikvahuman
IL-2		OralMetastatic pancreatic cancerPhase II, recruiting60 (est.)NCT045892[116]
Note: n/a, not applicable; est., estimated.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pangilinan, C.R.; Lee, C.-H. Highlights of Immunomodulation in Salmonella-Based Cancer Therapy. Biomedicines 2021, 9, 1566. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9111566

AMA Style

Pangilinan CR, Lee C-H. Highlights of Immunomodulation in Salmonella-Based Cancer Therapy. Biomedicines. 2021; 9(11):1566. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9111566

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pangilinan, Christian R., and Che-Hsin Lee. 2021. "Highlights of Immunomodulation in Salmonella-Based Cancer Therapy" Biomedicines 9, no. 11: 1566. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9111566

APA Style

Pangilinan, C. R., & Lee, C. -H. (2021). Highlights of Immunomodulation in Salmonella-Based Cancer Therapy. Biomedicines, 9(11), 1566. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9111566

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop