Next Article in Journal
Modeling Transient Flow in CO2 Injection Wells by Considering the Phase Change
Next Article in Special Issue
Pyrolysis and Volatile Evolution Behaviors of Cold-Rolling Oily Sludge
Previous Article in Journal
Numerical Simulation of Dyeing Process of Cotton with Natural Dye
Previous Article in Special Issue
Modeling CO2, H2S, COS, and CH3SH Simultaneous Removal Using Aqueous Sulfolane–MDEA Solution
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Processes
Volume 9
Issue 12
10.3390/pr9122163
Review Report
processes-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Article
Peer-Review Record

Enhanced Separation of Oil and Solids in Oily Sludge by Froth Flotation at Normal Temperature

Processes 2021, 9(12), 2163; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9122163
by Wenying Li 1, Hongyang Lin 1, Yang Yang 1, Zhenxiao Shang 2, Qiuhong Li 3, Yanfei Ma 2,*, Aiju Liu 2,* and Man Jiang 2
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Processes 2021, 9(12), 2163; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9122163
Submission received: 28 October 2021 / Revised: 25 November 2021 / Accepted: 26 November 2021 / Published: 1 December 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Resource Recovery and Harmless Treatment Processes for Industrial Organic Pollutants)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The manuscript entitled "Enhanced separation of oil and solids in oily sludge by froth  flotation at normal temperature"  investigated the optimum conditions for the usage of sodium silicate as a flotation reagent for oily sludge.  The researchers investigated the effects of different parameters such as flotation reagent type, flotation time ,flotation temperature and impeller speed.  The organization of paper is quite good and the usage of English is sufficient for making a good presentation of results. I think the paper can be acceptable in its present form but it will be better if the discussion quality of results is improved which then increase the novelty of paper.  

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.doc

Reviewer 2 Report

I just have to congratulate the authors for their excellent work.

Author Response

Point 1: Moderate English changes required.

Response 1: The English language and style of the whole manuscript were checked and revised.

Back to TopTop