Next Article in Journal
Fish Extract Fractionation by Solid Phase Extraction: Investigating Co-Occurring Ciguatoxins by LC-MS/MS and N2a-Bioassay
Previous Article in Journal
Chemical Composition and Biological Properties of Achillea cucullata Extracts from Leaves and Flowers
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Characterisation of the Volatile Compounds and Key Odourants in Japanese Mandarins by Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry and Gas Chromatography–Olfactometry

1
Department of Food Science and Technology, National University of Singapore, S14 Level 5, Science Drive 2, Singapore 117542, Singapore
2
Mane SEA Pte Ltd., 3 Biopolis Drive, #07-17/18/19 Synapse, Singapore 138623, Singapore
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Separations 2024, 11(8), 237; https://doi.org/10.3390/separations11080237
Submission received: 27 June 2024 / Revised: 19 July 2024 / Accepted: 31 July 2024 / Published: 1 August 2024

Abstract

:
Japanese mandarins are becoming increasingly popular due to their pleasant aroma. The volatiles in four varieties of Japanese mandarins (Iyokan, Ponkan, Shiranui, and Unshiu mikan) were extracted by headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME) and solvent extraction, then analysed by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Principal component analysis (PCA) of the GC-MS data demonstrated distinct segregation of all four Japanese mandarin varieties. Esters, such as neryl acetate, distinguished Iyokan. Methylthymol uniquely characterised Ponkan, valencene was exclusive to Shiranui, and acids like hexanoic acid and heptanoic acid differentiated Unshiu mikan from the other three varieties. Aroma extract dilution analysis (AEDA) revealed 131 key odourants across four Japanese mandarins, including myrcene (peppery, terpenic), perillyl alcohol (green, spicy, floral), trans-nerolidol (sweet, floral), and trans-farnesol (woody, floral, green). Finally, sensory evaluation was conducted on the four Japanese mandarin peel extracts to describe the distinct aroma profile of each variety of Japanese mandarin: Iyokan had higher floral and juicy notes, Ponkan showed higher sulphury notes, Shiranui was perceived to have more albedo notes, and Unshiu mikan exhibited higher peely, green, and woody notes.

1. Introduction

Owing to their economic importance and wide applications, Citrus flavours are among the most desirable natural flavours, explaining various reports on the composition of volatile compounds from various Citrus fruits [1,2]. Within Citrus, mandarin fruits are increasingly attracting attention because of their nutritional importance and enticing flavour [3]. Recently, there has been a growing global interest in Japanese mandarins, predominantly due to their immaculate fruits, attractive aroma, limited supply, and purported health benefits [4,5,6]. In contrast to mandarins produced in other regions [7,8], despite previous research on the volatile compounds of Japanese mandarins, there is a notable lack of systematic aroma analysis and comparative studies among the varieties of Japanese mandarin fruits [9,10,11]. This leaves a gap in understanding the unique characteristics that distinguish one variety from another, necessitating a systematic investigation into the aroma of Japanese mandarins.
The inherent complexity of Citrus matrix, along with the presence of potent volatile compounds at trace levels, presents a substantial challenge to the analysis of Citrus aroma [12]. To effectively navigate this complexity, thorough sample preparation is necessary, which includes the extraction and concentration of volatiles to detectable levels. Among the various sample preparation methods available, solvent extraction and headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME) have been commonly employed for capturing the aroma compounds of Citrus juices and peels due to their broad applicability and efficacy [13,14,15,16]. Despite their widespread utilisation, there is a lack of complementary analysis combining the benefits of HS-SPME and solvent extraction to characterise the volatile profiles of specific popular Japanese mandarins. HS-SPME provides a convenient and efficient method for analysing volatile compounds without altering their composition or introducing solvent-related biases. This technique requires minimal sample volume and enhances sensitivity while minimising matrix effects [17,18,19]. These advantages make HS-SPME highly suitable for analysing the volatile compounds of Citrus fruits. For example, Goh et al. [13] utilised HS-SPME to compare the volatile profiles of different parts (flower, leaf, peel and juice) of Malaysian pomelo. Hou et al. [14] explored the volatile composition changes in navel orange at different growth stages by HS-SPME. On the other hand, the solvent extraction technique is a widely employed and conventional method for extracting Citrus volatile compounds due to its simplicity, broad applicability, and cost-effectiveness [20]. Goh et al. [21] characterised the volatile profiles of several kinds of kumquat and calamansi peel oils extracted by solvent extraction with dichloromethane (DCM). Additionally, the solvent extraction technique is well-suited for capturing low-volatility and oil-soluble compounds in Citrus that might be overlooked by HS procedures [22]. The complementary extraction strategies underscore the importance of a combined approach in characterising the volatile profiles of popular Japanese mandarin varieties, thereby facilitating a better comparison among these varieties.
The diverse range of volatile compounds revealed in the extracts through HS-SPME and solvent extraction highlights the complexity of volatile composition in Citrus. While the unique aroma characteristic of each Citrus variety is the result of a specifically proportioned and complex mixture of volatiles [2], it is important to note that concentration does not necessarily equate to odour threshold [23]. To unravel the key odourants responsible for the distinctive aroma of Japanese mandarins, aroma extract dilution analysis (AEDA) coupled with gas chromatography–olfactometry (GC-O) offers a powerful approach. GC-O is a technique that combines the separation capabilities of gas chromatography with the sensitivity of the human nose as a detector [24]. AEDA, a well-known dilution analytical approaches, is one of the most sophisticated GC-O techniques that have been widely employed for identifying and ranking the contribution and potency of the odourant to the Citrus aroma [23,25]. AEDA applies a series of dilutions (n0, n1, n2, n3, etc.) to determine the flavour dilution (FD) factor of a compound at one dilution, in which none of the well-trained panellists could detect the smell of the compound in a glass sniffing port. The FD factor is one of the main parameters used to elucidate the role of each compound in Citrus aroma [20]. By leveraging AEDA through gas chromatography–olfactometry/mass spectrometry (GC-O/MS), this study aimed to bridge the knowledge gap in understanding the key odourants responsible for the characteristic aroma of Japanese mandarin varieties. In addition, sensory evaluation further enhances this understanding by systematically assessing aroma perception through human senses, combining subjective and objective characterization with instrumental analyses [26].
Therefore, the objective of this study was to understand the contribution of volatile compounds to the aroma of Japanese mandarins. This was achieved by investigating the volatile profile of juice and peel of four varieties of Japanese mandarins (Iyokan, Ponkan, Shiranui, and Unshiu mikan) using HS-SPME and analysed by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry/flame ionisation detector (GC-MS/FID). Additionally, the volatile extracts from mandarin peels obtained via solvent extraction were also analysed. Then, to interpret the differences among the four mandarin varieties, principal component analysis (PCA) was applied to the GC-MS data. The key aroma compounds of the four Japanese mandarin peel extracts were characterised using GC-O/MS, and a heatmap analysis was applied to interpret the resulting data sets. Finally, a sensory evaluation of the peel extracts was conducted to better understand their aroma profile.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Materials and Sample Preparation

This study benefited from collaborative expertise provided by Ehime Beverage Inc. (Ehime, Tokyo, Japan) and Mane SEA Pte Ltd. (Singapore). Following a preliminary sensory evaluation of several Japanese mandarins, four varieties of Iyokan, Ponkan, Shiranui, and Unshiu mikan were selected and analysed in this work. The Japanese mandarins were sourced from local orchards in Ehime and Wakayama prefectures in Japan and were harvested by professional fruit growers at their commercial maturity stage. Approximately 6 kg of each variety of mature fruits were carefully collected, with any blemished or defective fruits being excluded. The selected fruits underwent a careful washing, drying, and storage process in refrigerated conditions (4 °C) prior to use, and were extracted within one week of collection. The mandarin peel was manually separated from the flesh, with a 180 g portion randomly selected for each solvent extraction procedure. Additionally, a fraction of the peels was sliced into small fragments measuring approximately 1 cm × 1 cm for the HS-SPME procedure. Mandarin juice was extracted manually by squeezing the pulp after peel removal to prevent any contamination from the substances presented in the flavedo and albedo. The freshly extracted juice was utilised immediately.

2.2. Chemicals and Reagents

High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)-grade DCM and anhydrous sodium sulphate (Na2SO4) for solvent extraction were obtained from VWR (Radnor, PA, USA). The internal standard, 2-octanol, and the C7–C40 alkane standards were procured from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). The standards for GC-MS/FID analysis were supplied by Mane SEA Pte Ltd. (Singapore).

2.3. HS-SPME Procedure

The HS-SPME protocol was modified from Goh et al. [27]. A sample of 2.000 g of mandarin peel or mandarin juice was placed in a 20 mL vial, which was then sealed with a PTFE-coated silicone septum (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The sample was extracted using a Carboxen/Polydimethylsiloxane (CAR/PDMS) fibre from Supelco (Bellefonte, PA, USA) with the following conditions: temperature of 40 °C, agitation speed of 250 rpm, and extraction time of 30 min. The fibre was then thermally desorbed into the GC injector at 250 °C for 5 min. For both the mandarin peel and the mandarin juice, five replicates were conducted.

2.4. Solvent Extraction

Extensive studies on Citrus aroma analysis have demonstrated that 2-octanol is chemically stable and does not interfere with the volatile compounds of interest. Its retention time and peak do not overlap with those of the target compounds, ensuring accurate and reliable quantification. Therefore, 2-octanol was selected as the internal standard in this study [7,13,27]. A volume of 360.0 mL of DCM was combined with 2.0 μL of 2-octanol internal standard and added to the peel. The mixture was shaken at 250 rpm for 120 min using a Stuart SSL2 Reciprocating Shaker (Bibby Scientific Ltd., Stone, UK). Subsequently, 80.0 g of Na2SO4 was added to eliminate moisture. The mixture was then filtered through Whatman grade 1 qualitative filter paper (Cat No. 1001-150, 150 mm, Whatman, Kent, UK) to remove the Na2SO4 and spent peels. The resulting peel oil extract was concentrated using a Buchi rotary evaporator (Flawil, Switzerland) with the following settings: 150 rpm, water bath at 25 °C, condenser at 5 °C, and a vacuum pressure of 500 mbar. After 60 min, the concentrated peel oil extracts were transferred and stored at −18 °C for further analysis. Each extraction was subjected to three replicates, and all extracts were stored at 4 °C for subsequent analyses.

2.5. GC-MS/FID Analysis

The GC-MS/FID procedure was adapted from Goh et al. [13]. The analysis was performed using an Agilent 7890B GC system with a MS and FID (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Separation of compounds or standards was carried out on an Agilent HP-INNOWax column with specifications of 60 mm × 250 μm × 0.25 μm (Woodbridge, VA, USA). Semi-quantification of compounds using solvent extraction was achieved by comparing the FID peak area of each compound to that of the internal standard, with results expressed in ng/mL. All experiments were performed in triplicate (three repeated samplings with three different injections in GC), and the mean values along with standard deviations are presented.

2.6. GC-O/MS and AEDA Analysis

An Agilent 8890 GC coupled with an Agilent 5977B mass selective detector (MSD) system (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) was utilised in this protocol. The column used was the HP-INNOWax (30 m × 250 μm × 0.25 μm) (Agilent, Woodbridge, VA, USA), with helium serving as the carrier gas, maintained at a flow rate of 1.2 mL/min. The injector was operated in splitless mode with an injection volume of 1 μL, and the GC flow was split equally between the olfactory detection port (ODP3, Gerstel GmbH & Co., Mülheim an der Ruhr, Germany) and the MSD. The temperature gradient was optimised to minimise the coelution of odourants. The oven temperature program consisted of an initial 50 °C for 3.5 min, followed by a series of linear temperature ramps and increments (increased at 5 °C/min to 85 °C; at 7 °C/min to 120 °C; at 5 °C/min to 155 °C; at 7 °C/min to 190 °C; and at 10 °C/min to 240 °C) to reach a final temperature of 240 °C, held for 5 min (37.5 min). A continuous flow of moist air at 30 mL/min was maintained to prevent nasal membrane dehydration and to clear the eluted compounds from the sniffing port. C7–C30 alkane standards and individual compound standards were analysed under the same conditions to determine the linear retention indices (LRI) of the eluted compounds. It should be noted that the temperature ramping steps employed in this study could contribute to variability in experimental LRI values compared to the NIST library values [28]. AEDA for four Japanese mandarin peel oil extracts was conducted by five experienced flavourists (as panellists; 2 males and 3 females; aged 26–50), employing the stepwise 5-fold dilutions, starting from the lowest dilution factor (0) (a dilution factor of 0 corresponds to a FD value of 50 = 1; a dilution factor of 1 corresponds to a FD value of 51 = 5; and so forth). Each panellist recorded the time and descriptors of perceived compounds independently during the GC-O/MS run. The sniffed compounds were identified by matching their LRI with in-house standards and comparing the descriptors provided by the panellists with literature descriptions. The FD values were then assigned to each compound based on the highest dilution at which the panellists could detect them.

2.7. Sensory Profiling

The sensory evaluation method was modified from Goh et al. [21]. Four undiluted Japanese mandarin peel oil extracts were evaluated by seven experienced flavourists serving as panellists (2 males and 5 females; aged 26–50) and a total of seven aroma attributes (albedo, floral, green, juicy, peely, sulphury, woody) were assessed by all panellists.

2.8. Data Analysis

All experiments were conducted in at least triplicate and the results were presented as mean values ± standard deviations. GC-MS/FID data was processed using MSD Chemstation (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA, version F.01.03.2357) and then imported into Mass Profiler Professional (MPP) (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA, version 14.9.1). The MPP processing was adapted from Pua et al. [29]. The fold-change set at 10.0. The resulting filtered compounds were used to generate PCA scores and loadings plots with Origin 2022 SR1 (OriginLab, Northampton, MA, USA). Heatmap analysis was performed RStudio (Posit, Boston, MA, USA, version 2023.03.0+386 (R Core Team 4.3.0)) with the data.table and magrittr packages, then implemented circular visualisation with ComplexHeatmap and circlize packages.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Extraction of Volatile Compounds in Japanese Mandarin Juices and Peels by HS-SPME

In this study, four varieties of Japanese mandarins were selected: Iyokan (Citrus iyo hort. ex Tanaka) produced in Ehime, a typical edible Citrus fruit frequently consumed in Japan [30]; Ponkan (Citrus reticulata Blanco) produced in Ehime, widely used as a breeding parent for developing economically significant varieties in Japan [30,31]; Shiranui (also known as Dekopon, Citrus unshiu Marc. × Citrus sinensis Osbeck × Citrus reticulata Blanco) produced in Ehime, currently one of the most popular Japanese mandarin varieties internationally, especially in North America as a commercial product under the name of ‘Sumo Citrus’ [32,33]; and Unshiu mikan (Citrus unshiu Marc.) produced in Wakayama, a predominant variety of Citrus cultivated in Japan [34].
Among the techniques used for the extraction of aromas from fresh Citrus juice and peel, the pre-concentration of volatile compounds by HS-SPME is a sensitive and fast method that reduces the complex Citrus fruit matrix effects [17,18]. Here, HS-SPME was applied to extract the volatiles from both fresh Japanese mandarin juices and peels. Based on HS-SPME extraction, 83 compounds were identified in the four Japanese mandarin juices (Table 1). In general, the volatiles of these four mandarin juices could be categorised into terpenes, alcohols, aldehydes, esters, acids, ketones, phenols, and others. As expected of Citrus samples, across all four Japanese mandarin juices, terpenes were the most abundant volatile compounds, with limonene representing the bulk of mandarin juices. Other major terpenes, such as γ-terpinene, p-cymene, myrcene, and terpinolene, were consistent with the characterisation of mandarin (Citrus reticulata Blanco var. Willow Leaf) juice extracted using HS-SPME [35]. Aldehydes were found in relatively high abundance in the four Japanese mandarin juices, with acetaldehyde being the most abundant, which might contribute pungent and alcoholic notes [36]. All four mandarin juices contained similar alcohol compounds; however, the major alcohol present in each mandarin juice was different. Specifically, linalool was the predominant alcohol in Iyokan juice, whereas terpinen-4-ol was most prominent in Ponkan juice. In contrast, Shiranui juice was characterised by a high presence of cis-3-hexenol, and hexanol was the most notable alcohol in Unshiu mikan juice. Octanoic acid and nonanoic acid were common acids found in all juices, and three ketones (6-methyl-5-hepten-2-one, geranyl acetone, and β-ionone) were also detected.
Despite these similarities among the four Japanese mandarin juices, distinct characteristics existed in the volatile composition of each variety. For instance, although exhibiting the lowest abundance of total volatile content, Iyokan juice displayed a relatively high proportion of aldehydes and alcohols. Notably, trans-trans-2,4-nonadienal was exclusively detected in Iyokan juice, and linalool, the most abundant alcohol in Iyokan juice, demonstrated a significantly higher abundance as compared to the other three Japanese mandarin juices. The presence of trans-trans-2,4-nonadienal may contribute to floral, green, or fatty nuances for Iyokan juice [37]. As a terpene alcohol, linalool was previously identified as a potent volatile compound in Satsuma mandarin fruit with a distinctive sweet floral aroma [23]. Ponkan juice had the highest total volatile content, with leading abundances of terpenes, aldehydes, and volatile phenol. Thymol, the only volatile phenol detected in the four Japanese mandarin juices, was found in Ponkan and Unshiu mikan juices, and had been reported as the only odour-active phenol found in Ponkan mandarin juice in a previous study [1]. The presence of thymol and abundant terpenes might contribute spicy and fresh notes to the Ponkan mandarin juice profile [37,38]. Notably, Shiranui juice contained more types of sesquiterpenes with relatively higher abundances, such as δ-elemene, α-copaene, β-caryophyllene, valencene, and α-selinene, which potentially contribute a woody and spicy aroma to Shiranui juice with a hint of fresh notes [38]. Unshiu mikan juice contained the highest abundance of alcohols, ketones, and acids, with a relatively higher abundance of hexanol, cis-3-hexenol, 6-methyl-5-hepten-2-one, and hexanoic acid. These characteristics indicate a unique green and fresh profile in Unshiu mikan juice [23].
Table 1. Identification of volatile compounds in juices of four varieties of Japanese mandarin (Iyokan, Ponkan, Shiranui, and Unshiu mikan) extracted by HS-SPME (40 °C, 30 min).
Table 1. Identification of volatile compounds in juices of four varieties of Japanese mandarin (Iyokan, Ponkan, Shiranui, and Unshiu mikan) extracted by HS-SPME (40 °C, 30 min).
No.CompoundLRI ICAS NumberAbundance (FID Peak Area)Identification II
IyokanPonkanShiranuiUnshiu Mikan
1Acetaldehyde 1,267175-07-0355,475 ± 42,481 c1,481,261 ± 126,612 a1,189,841 ± 74,013 b1,263,030 ± 115,588 bLRI, MS, STD
2Ethyl acetate 1,3,4,5917141-78-6-2,463,085 ± 156,200 b9,149,139 ± 392,714 a480,006 ± 22,211 cLRI, MS, STD
3Methyl butanoate 21001623-42-7119,024 ± 8693Trace--LRI, MS, STD
4α-Pinene 1,2,3,4,5,6103880-56-8177,964 ± 15,502 c270,643 ± 16,738 b151,267 ± 5409 d415,268 ± 4364 aLRI, MS, STD
5α-Thujene 1,3,410422867-05-298,181 ± 2933 a43,115 ± 2641 b27,773 ± 1533 d32,976 ± 1827 cLRI, MS
6Ethyl butanoate 1,21049105-54-4-103,026 ± 6719 a83,154 ± 6541 b-LRI, MS, STD
7Hexanal 1,2,3,5109966-25-1330,073 ± 30,116 b606,791 ± 51,092 a319,481 ± 25,169 b163,403 ± 13,566 cLRI, MS, STD
8β-Pinene 1,3,4,5,61123127-91-398,609 ± 7584 b125,393 ± 14,584 a22,518 ± 479 c120,178 ± 5268 aLRI, MS, STD
9Sabinene 1,3,4,5,611353387-41-543,530 ± 4574 b120,328 ± 12,367 a-41,604 ± 2843 bLRI, MS, STD
101-Penten-3-ol 1,61165616-25-155,399 ± 3051 b--63,702 ± 3674 aLRI, MS
11Myrcene 1,2,3,4,5,61175123-35-3236,666 ± 25,932 c918,697 ± 14,419 b1,219,188 ± 84,847 a1,176,388 ± 93,611 aLRI, MS, STD
12α-Phellandrene 1,2,3,4118299-83-234,869 ± 3153 d300,799 ± 20,009 a150,857 ± 8420 b119,937 ± 1400 cLRI, MS, STD
13α-Terpinene 1,2,3,4119599-86-5115,489 ± 11,657 c1,296,352 ± 37,576 a364,443 ± 32,125 b417,156 ± 19,230 bLRI, MS
14Methyl hexanoate 21197106-70-775,220 ± 1034---LRI, MS, STD
15Heptanal 1,2,31198111-71-7-69,281 ± 4591 a43,456 ± 1875 b-LRI, MS, STD
16Limonene 1,2,3,4,5,61229138-86-314,758,307 ± 1,002,304 c118,087,550 ± 4,893,815 a65,070,290 ± 7,801,430 b59,520,248 ± 6,412,533 bLRI, MS, STD
17β-Phellandrene 1,3,4,5,61233555-10-298,257 ± 5297 c526,885 ± 26,504 a277,990 ± 10,190 b285,054 ± 16,632 bLRI, MS
18trans-2-Hexenal 1,2,312396728-26-344,549 ± 4045 b46,299 ± 3855 b261,696 ± 26,963 a245,374 ± 12,800 aLRI, MS, STD
19cis-β-Ocimene 1,3,4,512543338-55-446,912 ± 2888 b16,193 ± 1296 d76,751 ± 2538 a26,159 ± 2379 cLRI, MS, STD
20Pentanol 1,3125971-41-031,067 ± 2067 b--63,300 ± 6002 aLRI, MS, STD
21γ-Terpinene 1,2,3,4,5,6126599-85-4756,879 ± 37,299 c6,955,973 ± 270,481 a258,010 ± 26,985 d2,637,181 ± 250,490 bLRI, MS, STD
22trans-β-Ocimene 1,3,4,512673779-61-148,591 ± 4735 abTrace51,405 ± 3879 a43,507 ± 2693 bLRI, MS, STD
23p-Mentha-3,8-diene 11280586-67-4-34,763 ± 3335 a17,783 ± 1703 b-LRI, MS
24p-Cymene 1,2,3,4,5,6129499-87-6736,422 ± 54,143 c6,257,423 ± 238,852 a535,553 ± 15,422 c1,754,855 ± 187,714 bLRI, MS, STD
25Terpinolene 1,2,3,4,5,61304586-62-9196,568 ± 13,512 c2,205,629 ± 84,146 a737,783 ± 57,846 b808,365 ± 121,744 bLRI, MS, STD
26Acetoin 11305513-86-0---756,403 ± 65,559LRI, MS, STD
27Isoterpinolene 1,41310586-63-025,896 ± 1510 b-100,128 ± 9100 a-LRI, MS
28cis-2-Pentenol 1,613271576-95-019,815 ± 1482 b31,352 ± 2402 a--LRI, MS
29trans-2-Heptenal 1133118829-55-5-38,634 ± 3120--LRI, MS, STD
306-Methyl-5-hepten-2-one 1,3,41351110-93-028,623 ± 864 c33,268 ± 1843 b25,640 ± 1717 c64,389 ± 3462 aLRI, MS, STD
31Hexanol 1,2,3,5,61357111-27-3164,779 ± 12,132 b94,543 ± 4379 c47,972 ± 5501 c759,679 ± 66,784 aLRI, MS, STD
32cis-Alloocimene 1,4,51379673-84-716,464 ± 1658 b-20,509 ± 2266 a-LRI, MS, STD
33cis-3-Hexenol 1,3,5,61392928-96-1111,666 ± 2265 b44,045 ± 2834 d62,168 ± 2074 c261,090 ± 9818 aLRI, MS, STD
34Methyl octanoate 1,21395111-11-517,354 ± 1571---LRI, MS, STD
35Nonanal 1,2,3,4,5,61407124-19-6-38,026 ± 540 a-34,931 ± 459 bLRI, MS, STD
36trans-2-Hexenol 1,2,3,61410928-95-027,407 ± 2534 b-35,615 ± 2096 b125,055 ± 8855 aLRI, MS, STD
37p-Mentha-1,3,8-triene 1,3,4141318368-95-1-29,461 ± 922--LRI, MS
38trans-2-Octenal 114332548-87-0-80,771 ± 8385--LRI, MS, STD
39Ethyl octanoate 1,2,51438106-32-111,923 ± 1142---LRI, MS, STD
40p-Cymenene 314571195-32-054,839 ± 1755 d326,135 ± 15,218 a181,567 ± 4767 b106,258 ± 6924 cLRI, MS
41Heptanol 1,2,3,61460111-70-632,725 ± 2726 b50,075 ± 5515 a-53,777 ± 601 aLRI, MS, STD
42Acetic acid 1,3,4,5,6146564-19-7--21,066 ± 2144 b38,735 ± 2687 aLRI, MS, STD
43cis-Limonene oxide 1,3,4,6146813837-75-7-Trace--LRI, MS
44α-Cubebene 1,2,3,5147317699-14-8---24,606 ± 668LRI, MS
45trans-Limonene oxide 3,414814959-35-7-45,880 ± 2321--LRI, MS
46δ-Elemene 1,3,5,6148720307-84-018,083 ± 526 b-36,304 ± 2783 a-LRI, MS
472-Ethylhexanol 31500104-76-729,728 ± 3204 b35,732 ± 1743 a31,297 ± 2398 b-LRI, MS, STD
48α-Copaene 1,2,3,4,5,615133856-25-5--16,648 ± 1234-LRI, MS
49trans-2-Heptenol 1152033467-76-411,027 ± 740---LRI, MS
50Ethyl nonanoate 11544123-29-5---22,281 ± 2145LRI, MS, STD
51Linalool 1,2,3,4,5,6155278-70-6168,557 ± 9898 a66,715 ± 855 b32,790 ± 2499 c42,386 ± 2325 cLRI, MS, STD
52Octanol 1,2,3,4,5,61567111-87-530,638 ± 3224 b54,564 ± 1669 a56,588 ± 1463 a33,413 ± 530 bLRI, MS, STD
53Methylthymol 3,416021076-56-8-178,301 ± 5016--LRI, MS
54β-Elemene 1,3,4,5,61611515-13-9--29,338 ± 2679 b88,288 ± 5858 aLRI, MS
55Terpinen-4-ol 1,2,3,4,61618562-74-3-106,146 ± 5719 a35,464 ± 3323 b22,148 ± 2571 cLRI, MS, STD
56β-Caryophyllene 1,3,4,5162487-44-5--49,205 ± 4560-LRI, MS, STD
57p-Menth-1-en-9-al 3163529548-14-9-17,407 ± 2037--LRI, MS
58Nonanol 1,3,4,5,61662143-08-819,302 ± 1450 b34,318 ± 3526 a22,458 ± 2048 b35,654 ± 2020 aLRI, MS, STD
59Alloaromadendrene 3,4167125246-27-9--82,652 ± 8966 a32,436 ± 2132 bLRI, MS
60Citronellyl acetate 1,3,4,5,61671150-84-5--35,537 ± 3362-LRI, MS, STD
61α-Humulene 3,4,5,616996753-98-6--18,615 ± 1885 b34,186 ± 3438 aLRI, MS
62α-Terpineol 1,2,3,4,5,6171098-55-586,918 ± 2007 a29,838 ± 1710 b18,280 ± 1213 c-LRI, MS, STD
63trans-trans-2,4-Nonadienal 1,317185910-87-226,636 ± 1626---LRI, MS
64Dodecanal 3,41723112-54-925,070 ± 642---LRI, MS, STD
65β-Selinene 1,4,5,6172517066-67-0--75,720 ± 4007 a72,054 ± 5407 aLRI, MS
66Germacrene D 1,3,4,5,6173923986-74-5---16,146 ± 627LRI, MS, STD
67Neryl acetate 1,3,4,61741141-12-8 21,898 ± 1699--TraceLRI, MS, STD
68Valencene 1,2,3,417444630-07-3--1,814,673 ± 135,772 a816,674 ± 34,213 bLRI, MS, STD
69α-Selinene 1,51753473-13-2--90,580 ± 5318 a45,375 ± 4649 bLRI, MS
70α-Farnesene 1,3,4,5,61761502-61-4--25,118 ± 1716 a22,744 ± 1662 aLRI, MS, STD
71Decanol 3,41767112-30-1Trace24,327 ± 1835 b55,265 ± 4087 a-LRI, MS, STD
72Citronellol 1,2,3,4,5,61768106-22-9-15,891 ± 1034 b24,504 ± 2087 a-LRI, MS, STD
73δ-Cadinene 1,3,4,61780483-76-122,324 ± 1343 c-33,587 ± 822 a30,342 ± 991 bLRI, MS
74trans-trans-2,4-Decadienal 1,3,5,6183325152-84-510,661 ± 987 b13,234 ± 917 a--LRI, MS, STD
75Hexanoic acid 1,3,4,61855142-62-1---15,390 ± 989LRI, MS, STD
76Geranyl acetone 1,618713796-70-129,679 ± 2190 c45,827 ± 3877 b38,750 ± 1213 b65,161 ± 5630 aLRI, MS, STD
77Heptanoic acid 11964111-14-8---15,899 ± 406LRI, MS, STD
78β-Ionone 1,2,3196514901-07-613,113 ± 1145 b15,134 ± 1570 b-42,300 ± 2247 aLRI, MS, STD
79Dodecanol 31972112-53-8-8952 ± 455--LRI, MS, STD
80Octanoic acid 1,3,4,5,62064124-07-216,593 ± 252 d19,187 ± 532 c42,068 ± 2523 b82,148 ± 4344 aLRI, MS, STD
81Nonanoic acid 1,3,4,5,62171112-05-0TraceTrace26,792 ± 2109 b89,453 ± 7917 aLRI, MS, STD
82Thymol 3217789-83-8-11,779 ± 342-TraceLRI, MS, STD
83p-Menth-8-ene-1,2-diol 3,522881946-00-5Trace45,352 ± 1248TraceTraceLRI, MS
Total peak area 19,489,768 ± 1,099,266 c143,464,378 ± 5,751,127 a83,195,275 ± 7,855,946 b73,527,094 ± 7,195,905 b
‘-’ means that the compound was not detected. ‘Trace’ means that the FID peak area of the compound was unquantifiable, either due to matrix noise or a peak area < 8000. I LRI: Experimental linear retention index on an HP-INNOWax column relative to C7–C40 alkane standards. II Identification methods: “LRI”, comparison of experimental to reference retention indices; “MS”, comparison with mass spectrum of the compound in the NIST library version 2.2; and “STD”, comparison with authentic standards. a,b,c,d Within a row, different superscript letters indicate statistical significance difference at p < 0.05. Compounds reported in 1 Goh et al. [13]; 2 Sun et al. [39]; 3 Uehara and Baldovini [40]; 4 B’chir and Arnaud [41]; 5 Cheong et al. [42]; 6 Goh et al. [21].
Table 2 lists 131 volatile compounds identified in four varieties of Japanese mandarin peels extracted by HS-SPME. Similar to the result above, terpenes, mainly consisting of limonene, γ-terpinene, myrcene, and trans-β-ocimene, were the major volatile groups found in all four Japanese mandarin peels, but compared to juices, mandarin peels contained more varieties of sesquiterpenes. Compared to the alcohols identified in juices, the analysis of four Japanese mandarin peels found more kinds of alcohols and terpene alcohols with varying abundances. While several alcohol compounds or terpene alcohol derivatives were present in all four types of Japanese mandarin peels, a distinct variation in their abundance was observed. Notably, the esters composition among the peels was significantly different. Iyokan peel was characterised by the presence of several distinct esters, such as ethyl butanoate and ethyl hexanoate. In contrast, Unshiu mikan peel only contained three types of esters with minimal abundance. Three volatile phenols (thymol, eugenol, and carvacrol) were found in four mandarin peels. Indole was also present in all four Japanese mandarin peels.
The unique combination and abundance of volatile compounds in each mandarin variety resulted in distinct differences in their aroma profiles. There were significant differences in the volatile compositions of the four Japanese mandarin peels. Iyokan peel had the highest abundance of alcohols, and linalool was its most abundant alcohol. It contained the highest abundance of esters among the four Japanese mandarins with several terpene esters, such as hexyl hexanoate, neryl acetate, and perillyl acetate. The presence of these alcohols and esters in Iyokan peel has the potential to contribute a complex fragrance profile combining floral, citrusy, and sweet nuances [2,22]. Ponkan peel exhibited the highest abundance of aldehydes, especially β-sinensal and α-sinensal, which have been identified in mandarin oil and are known for their pleasant citrusy scent with green notes [2,22]. Additionally, Ponkan peel contained the highest abundance of terpenes, which could contribute to the woody and peely aroma profiles. Shiranui peel contained many sesquiterpenes with relatively higher abundances, such as valencene and α-farnesene. Its most abundant alcohol was decanol, which has been identified as a key odourant in many mandarin species [22,43]. In addition, nootkatone was only detected in Shiranui peel. The presence of these compounds could have resulted in the green, citrusy and peely impression of Shiranui peel. In comparison to the other three Japanese mandarin peels, notable differences in Unshiu mikan peel were demonstrated by the apparent absence of many kinds of aldehydes, alcohols, and esters, such as trans-2-decenol, benzyl alcohol, and octyl acetate. Particularly, the abundance of aldehydes in Unshiu mikan peel was significantly lower than that in other three Japanese mandarin peels, with a lack of trans-trans-2,4-decadienal and trans-cis-2,6-dodecadienal. Some aldehydes that have been recognised as important contributors to mandarin aroma, such as decanal, neral, β-sinensal, and α-sinensal, were present at only trace levels in Unshiu mikan peel [2,22]. Conversely, Unshiu mikan exhibited a remarkably high abundance of terpenes, which may impart a characteristic green and woody aroma to Unshiu mikan peel [2].
The volatile compounds extracted from Japanese mandarin juices and peels by HS-SPME showed distinct differences in terms of composition and abundance. While both juices and peels contained terpenes, aldehydes, alcohols, esters, ketones, and others, the peels exhibited a more diverse and abundant of volatile compounds. Therefore, a complementary solvent extraction method was subsequently chosen to extract volatiles from these four Japanese mandarin peels (Section 3.2). In general, the application of HS-SPME analysis revealed intricate volatile profiles in both Japanese mandarin juices and peels, elucidating the distinctive volatile compositions that enable the differentiation of these four Japanese mandarin varieties from other mandarin varieties.

3.2. Extraction of Volatile Compounds in Japanese Mandarin Peels by Solvent Extraction

A total of 164 volatile compounds were identified in the DCM extracts of the four Japanese mandarin peels (Table 3). In all four Japanese mandarin peel extracts, the most abundant compound was limonene, and terpenes represented the most common class of compounds identified in this study. Alcohols comprised the second most abundant volatile group with linalool found to be the main alcohol in all four Japanese mandarin peel extracts. As shown in Table 3, all four Japanese mandarin peel extracts demonstrated similar volatile compound compositions but differed in their quantitative profiles. For instance, Iyokan peel extract contained significantly higher concentrations of alcohols, esters, and acids, with distinct higher concentrations of linalool, geraniol, trans-nerolidol, neryl acetate, perillyl acetate, and octanoic acid. The main aldehydes were α-sinensal and β-sinensal, with a notable higher abundance than the other three Japanese mandarin peel extracts. Notably, neral was detected in all Japanese mandarin peel extracts except for Iyokan. The high abundances of these compounds could potentially characterise Iyokan with floral and sweet profiles [2]. Interestingly, Ponkan contained the highest amount of volatile phenols, with thymol and 4-vinylguaiacol found in significantly higher concentrations than the other three analysed Japanese mandarin peel extracts. The existence of these compounds imply that Ponkan could be distinguishable with spicy, phenolic, and woody aroma [44]. γ-Terpinene was the next most abundant terpene found in the other three peel extracts. In Shiranui, the second most abundant terpene was myrcene, followed by sabinene, α-farnesene, trans-β-ocimene, and valencene, which was generally consistent with the results of Umano et al. [33]. The higher amounts of these terpenes may impart herbal and citrusy characteristics to Shiranui [38]. In addition, Shiranui peel extract had the highest amount of nootkatone, which might contribute peely and citrusy profiles in Shiranui peel [45]. Unshiu mikan peel extract had the lowest amounts of volatiles, and in particular, it lacked common citrus aldehydes such as citronellal, cis-4-decenal, and trans-2-decenal. However, the proportions of alcohols were remarkably high, which may contribute to the distinct green and woody characteristic of Unshiu mikan peel extract [38].
While solvent extraction facilitates semi-quantitative analysis, the combination of HS-SPME and solvent extraction provided a complementary extraction of volatile compounds from four Japanese mandarin fruits in this study. For instance, acetaldehyde, ethyl acetate, and methyl butanoate were only extracted by HS-SPME. Butanoic acid, cis-carvyl acetate, trans-carvyl acetate, and carvone were only detected in the solvent extracts of the four Japanese mandarin varieties and might play a crucial role in shaping their distinctive green and spicy aroma profiles [45]. Additionally, nerol, geraniol, trans-trans-farnesol, and vanillin were also only detected in the solvent extracts and may impart sweet and floral characteristics to these Japanese mandarins [38]. Each variety displayed distinctive characteristics, including varying concentrations of specific compounds or the absence of certain compounds, highlighting the unique volatile profiles of the four Japanese mandarins. These results enhance our comprehension of the volatile composition of Japanese mandarin peels and offer valuable insights into their distinct aroma attributes.

3.3. PCA of Japanese Mandarin

PCA has become the leading unsupervised technique for reducing data dimensionality and identifying key volatile compounds that most effectively account for variations among Citrus samples [46,47]. Utilising the volatile composition data obtained, discrimination of the four Japanese mandarins was done by PCA, as depicted in Figure 1. The PCA scores plots revealed the clustering of the four Japanese mandarins extracted by HS-SPME (Figure 1a,c) and solvent extraction (Figure 1e), showing that both methods were sufficient to differentiate the Japanese mandarins.
For the Japanese mandarin juices extracted by HS-SPME, PC 1 and 2 accounted for 41.6% and 29.4% of the variation, respectively (Figure 1a). Regarding the loadings plot in Figure 1b and combining the data of Table 1, many esters that were only found or with significant higher abundances in Iyokan juice, such as methyl butanoate (3; numbering with reference to Table 1), methyl hexanoate (14), methyl octanoate (34), ethyl octanoate (39), and neryl acetate (67). These esters contributed to differentiate Iyokan from the other three Japanese mandarins, which is also consistent with the discussion in Section 3.1. Moreover, these compounds may also be responsible for imparting floral characteristics that distinguish Iyokan from the other three Japanese mandarins [2,17]. trans-2-Heptenal (29), trans-2-octenal (38), trans-limonene oxide (45), methylthymol (53), p-menth-1-en-9-al (57), and dodecanol (79) were only detected in Ponkan juice. The abundances of sabinene (9), thymol (82), and p-menth-8-ene-1,2-diol (83) in Ponkan juice were the highest. All of these compounds dominated the Ponkan juice’s position. Shiranui juice was marked by many types of sesquiterpenes with relatively high levels of δ-elemene (46), α-copaene (48), β-caryophyllene (56), and valencene (68). The abundance of ethyl acetate (2) was significantly higher than the other three mandarin juices, and citronellyl acetate (60) was only detected in Shiranui juice. All of these compounds contributed to the position of Shiranui juice in that quadrant. For Unshiu mikan juice, it was the only juice which contained germacrene D (66), hexanoic acid (75), and heptanoic acid (77). The abundance of trans-2-hexenol was significantly higher than other three juices. These compounds determined the scores on the positive area of PC 1 and the negative area of PC 2, and contributed to the Unshiu mikan juice’s position in that quadrant.
For the Japanese mandarin peels extracted by HS-SPME, PC 1 and 2 accounted for 55.3% and 29.6% of the variation, respectively (Figure 1c). With reference to the loadings plot in Figure 1d combined with the data from Table 2, similar to the juice results of the above-mentioned, many esters, including ethyl acetate (2; numbering with reference to Table 2), methyl butanoate (3), ethyl butanoate (6), ethyl hexanoate (17), hexyl butanoate (37), and geranyl acetate (89) were only found in Iyokan peel or with significantly higher abundances, contributed to the position of Iyokan peel and separated Iyokan from the other three Japanese mandarins. cis-4-Decenal (52) and trans-2-decenal (70) were only found in Ponkan peel. The highest abundances of terpinen-4-ol (64) and methyl N-methylanthranilate (119) in Ponkan peel were found to determine the scores on the negative area of PC 1 and the positive area of PC 2, and contribute to the position of Ponkan peel in that quadrant. In addition, these compounds might contribute woody, musty, and waxy notes to Ponkan [45]. Methyl decanoate (58) was only detected in Shiranui peel, and certain compounds such as hexanal (9), valencene (84), and nootkatone (131) with the highest abundances in Shiranui peel determined the scores on the negative area of PC 1 and 2, affecting the position of Shiranui peel in that quadrant. Unshiu mikan peel contained the highest abundance of acids, such as heptanoic acid (111), making it distinguishable from the other three Japanese mandarin peels.
For the Japanese mandarin peels extracted by solvent extraction, PC 1 and 2 accounted for 52.8% and 25.4% of the variation respectively (Figure 1e). As shown in the loadings plot in Figure 1f and combined with the data of Table 3, strong influences were visually observed in PC 2, among which the Iyokan peel extract showed significant discrimination. In addition to many esters similar to the above-mentioned results, cis-β-ocimene (14; numbering with reference to Table 3), γ-terpinene (16), p-cymene (19), butanoic acid (65), germacrene D (82), and β-sinensal (145) were found to determine the scores on the positive area of PC 1 and 2. Iyokan peel extract contained higher concentrations of these compounds, and thus dominated the positive axis of PC 1 and 2 in the scores plot. cis-Linalool oxide (36), linalyl acetate (54), isopulegol (56), and thymol (138) mainly impacted the Ponkan peel extract’s position in the negative area of PC 1 and 2 owing to their high concentration in Ponkan. trans-β-Ocimene (17), valencene (84), and citronellol (95) were found to contribute to the scores on the negative area of PC 1 and positive area of PC 2, thus influencing the position of Shiranui peel extract in the scores plot. Furthermore, these compounds might be responsible for the distinctive albedo scent of Shiranui [2,38]. In Unshiu mikan, α-terpinene (10), trans-linalool oxide (42), and 2-ethylhexanol (46) were exhibited in relatively higher concentration, which were found to dominate the position of Unshiu mikan peel extract in the scores plot.
These observations revealed that the compounds influencing scores in the loadings plots varied among four Japanese mandarin varieties. Notably, comparative analysis across plots identified specific compounds contributing to the differentiation of each variety from the others. For example, esters such as neryl acetate distinguished Iyokan from the other three Japanese mandarins, and these compounds likely contribute to the distinctive floral notes of Iyokan. In contrast, methylthymol uniquely characterised Ponkan, whereas valencene was exclusive to Shiranui. Acids like hexanoic acid and heptanoic acid differentiated Unshiu mikan from the other three varieties. These findings provide valuable insights into the unique characteristics of each variety, laying the groundwork for further aroma analysis.

3.4. Key Odourants of Japanese Mandarin Peel Extracts and Heatmap Analysis

Among the list of volatiles identified and quantified by GC-MS/FID, not all are odour-active and contribute to the aroma profile of each type of Japanese mandarin. Hence, GC-O/MS, involving the human nose as the detector, was employed to screen for the odour-active compounds. Coupled with AEDA, the potency and contribution of these compounds can be studied [48]. Referring to Table 4, 77, 63, 90, and 74 aroma-active volatiles with FD factors ranging from 1 to 3125 were detected in Iyokan, Ponkan, Shiranui, and Unshiu mikan, respectively.
Similar to the results of previous studies [22,52], mandarins of different varieties were observed to have different key odourants and/or FD factors. In Iyokan peel extract, 2,3-dihydrofarnesol (floral, fruity) exhibited the highest FD factor of 625. Moreover, Iyokan contained some unique odourants, such as cis-β-ocimene (herbal, floral), 2-methylbutanoic acid (acidic, fruity, cheesy), geranyl acetate (floral, green), hexadecanal (woody), 3-oxo-α-ionol (spicy), and some unknown compounds with sweet, floral, and albedo notes, which added intriguing complexity to its distinct fragrance. For Ponkan peel extract, perillyl alcohol (green, spicy, floral) had the highest FD factor of 3125. Additionally, Ponkan demonstrated significantly higher FD factors of the key odourants myrcene (peppery, terpenic), perillyl aldehyde (fresh, green, citrusy), trans-carveol (caraway, green, floral), trans-2-dodecenal (metallic, mandarin, waxy), and β-sinensal (fresh, citrusy, waxy). Complementing these, Ponkan also featured citronellol and α-sinensal (citrusy, powdery, sour). Additionally, Ponkan contained some special odourants, including trans-β-farnesene (woody, citrusy, sweet), valencene (sweet, fresh, oily), and some unknown compounds with spicy, sulphury, and terpenic notes. In Shiranui peel extract, myrcene, limonene, trans-cis-2,6-dodecadienal (waxy, green, mandarin), isoeugenol (spicy, woody, floral), and trans-trans-farnesol (fresh, sweet, floral) demonstrated the highest FD factors of 3125. Furthermore, Shiranui distinguished itself due to the presence of unique odourants, trans-β-ocimene (citrusy, green, woody), and undecanal (waxy, soapy, floral) with significantly higher FD factors. In Unshiu mikan, linalool (citrusy, floral, woody) had the highest FD factor of 3125 followed by limonene (citrusy, fresh, sweet), nonanal (fresh, floral, citrusy), and perillic acid (floral, sweet), which had the second highest FD factor of 625. Alongside these odourants, Unshiu mikan featured other key odourants including β-pinene (woody, pine, green), hexanol (fruity, sweet, green), terpinen-4-ol (woody, peppery, sweet), and cis-carveol (caraway, green, herbal). All these odourants might play a role in characterising the unique aroma of Unshiu mikan with woody, herbal, and floral profiles. Particularly, nerol (sweet, floral, citrusy) was identified as the key odourant only in Unshiu mikan.
Meanwhile, to get a deeper comprehension of the distinct qualitative variations in the key odourants across the four Japanese mandarins, as well as the individual odour activity of each odourant in these four species, heatmaps were generated to show the variations in the concentrations and FD factors of each key odourant in four different Japanese mandarin peel extracts (Figure 2). For the concentration, a colour code was devised based on the scale from red to blue, with their concentrations of compounds decreasing from high to low, which made it possible to make distinctions among the samples. For the FD factor of each key odourant, seven colour blocks were developed from red to blue, with the FD factors of the odourants decreasing from 3125 to the absence.
The heatmap analysis provided the opportunity to visualise the differences in the concentration of key odourants of each Japanese mandarin peel extract. In this section, the heatmap analysis combined the concentrations with FD factors of each odourant in four Japanese mandarins. In the context of aroma perception, the odour detection threshold refers to the minimum concentration required for a compound to be detectable by the human sense of smell [53]. This integrated approach enabled us to visualise the potential odour activity of each key odourant in four Japanese mandarins, by considering both concentrations and FD factors. The differences in the potential odour activity of each key odourant in four Japanese mandarins could also be visualised. Some compounds that were detected in relatively low amounts possessed relatively high FD factors in AEDA, and vice versa. For instance, cis-4-decenal was elucidated as a key odourant in Iyokan with a FD factor of 25 via AEDA despite being present at trace levels in Iyokan peel extract, indicating a significant contribution to the overall aroma, which was probably due to its low odour detection threshold [54]. Similarly, although 2-ethylhexanol was only present at trace levels in Ponkan peel extract, it was elucidated as a key odourant in Ponkan with a FD factor of 5 via AEDA. Interestingly, neryl acetate was not detected in Unshiu mikan GC-MS analysis, it was identified as a key odourant in Unshiu mikan with a FD factor of 5 via AEDA, highlighting the importance of considering both concentration and odour detection threshold in aroma profiling.

3.5. Sensory Evaluation of Japanese Mandarin Peel Extracts

With the added understanding from the above analyses, sensory evaluation was conducted on the four Japanese mandarin peel extracts to understand the overall aroma profiles and to compare variances in aroma attributes amongst the Japanese mandarins. The average rating of each attribute was computed and plotted on a spider web diagram shown in Figure 3.
Distinct sensory profiles were observed for each Japanese mandarin peel extract, reflecting the variability depicted in the PCA score plot in Figure 1e and the heatmaps in Figure 2. Iyokan peel extract was perceived to be predominantly floral (3.5) and juicy (3.0) compared to the other descriptors, probably due to its high FD factor of geraniol and 2,3-dihydrofarnesol compared to the other extracts, and contained some unique compounds, including cis-β-ocimene, geranyl acetate, and some exceptional unknown compounds with floral and juicy notes (Table 4). Ponkan peel extract was perceived to be the most sulphury (3.0) and peely (3.0). These profiles might be contributed by volatiles like myrcene, perillyl alcohol, trans-2-dodecenal, and β-sinensal, which could provide a spicy and herbal note with a hint of freshness. Moreover, the specific compounds responsible for the distinct sulphury odour remain to be determined due to the complexity of key odourants in Ponkan, and the presence of some unique unknown compounds with sulphury notes. Shiranui peel extract was the most albedo-like (3.0) of the four Japanese mandarins and was characterised as juicy (2.8). Aldehydes and alcohols including undecanal, trans-cis-2,6-dodecadienal, isoeugenol, and trans-trans-farnesol could account for the waxy, herbaceous, and citrusy notes. Unshiu mikan peel extract was mainly characterised by peely (3.1), green (3.0), woody (3.0), and floral (3.0), which could be related to alcohols and terpenes that could characterise woody, green, and herbal odour qualities, with nuances of floral notes, including limonene, β-pinene, linalool, terpinen-4-ol, hexanol, and cis-carveol. Overall, distinctions in sensory profiles amongst the Japanese mandarins were observed and could partially be explained by differences in their chemical compositions. The sensory data combined with the heatmap analysis also highlighted the likely presence of flavour interactions among the volatile compounds. Therefore, this study further illustrates the complicated nature of aroma perception and analysis in natural matrices like Japanese mandarins.

4. Conclusions

Volatile compounds in four varieties of Japanese mandarins (Iyokan, Ponkan, Shiranui, and Unshiu mikan) were extracted by HS-SPME and solvent extraction, and then identified by GC-MS/FID. Based on data obtained by GC-MS analysis, distinct segregation of the four Japanese mandarins by PCA was possible. Furthermore, key odourants of four Japanese mandarin peel extracts were identified using AEDA and combined with the heatmap analysis of these key odourants, allowing for further discrimination of the Japanese mandarins based on variations in their key odourants and FD factors. Finally, distinctions in sensory profiles among the four Japanese mandarin peel extracts were observed. Iyokan had higher floral and juicy ratings, and Unshiu mikan was perceived to be predominantly green, peely, and woody, which were contributed mainly by key odourants from the groups of alcohols, terpenes, and aldehydes. Ponkan had a higher sulphury rating, and Shiranui was the most albedo-like of the four Japanese mandarins. These findings contribute to advancing the understanding of the aroma profiles of the four Japanese mandarins and provide insightful information for further exploration of the key odourants in Japanese mandarins.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.L., S.Q.L. and B.Y.; methodology, L.L., R.M.V.G., Y.H., K.-H.E., A.P., D.T. and B.Y.; software, L.L.; validation, L.L., R.M.V.G., Y.H., A.P. and D.T.; formal analysis, L.L.; investigation, L.L., R.M.V.G., Y.H., K.-H.E., A.P., D.T. and S.Z.; resources, L.J., S.Q.L. and B.Y.; data curation, L.L., R.M.V.G., Y.H. and B.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, L.L.; writing—review and editing, L.L., R.M.V.G., Y.H., K.-H.E., A.P., S.Q.L. and B.Y.; visualization, L.L.; supervision, L.J., S.Q.L. and B.Y.; project administration, L.J., S.Q.L. and B.Y.; funding acquisition, L.J. and S.Q.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Mane SEA Pte Ltd. and Agilent Technologies Singapore (Sales) Pte Ltd. for providing technical assistance and funding for this study. The authors are thankful to Jenny Suwardi, Judith Leung, Martin Peleretegui, Midori Sakurai, Toshihide Kato, and Yoshitaka Okubo for their efforts and contributions to this project.

Conflicts of Interest

Author Rui Min Vivian Goh, Yunle Huang, Kim-Huey Ee, Aileen Pua, Daphne Tan, Lionel Jublot and Bin Yu were employed by the company Mane SEA Pte Ltd. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Cheng, Y.; Han, L.; Huang, L.; Tan, X.; Wu, H.; Li, G. Association between flavor composition and sensory profile in thermally processed mandarin juices by multidimensional gas chromatography and multivariate statistical analysis. Food Chem. 2023, 419, 136026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Wang, Y.; Wang, S.; Fabroni, S.; Feng, S.; Rapisarda, P.; Rouseff, R. Chemistry of citrus flavor. In The Genus Citrus; Talon, M., Caruso, M., Gmitter, F.G., Eds.; Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2020; pp. 447–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wang, L.; He, F.; Huang, Y.; He, J.; Yang, S.; Zeng, J.; Deng, C.; Jiang, X.; Fang, Y.; Wen, S.; et al. Genome of Wild Mandarin and Domestication History of Mandarin. Mol. Plant 2018, 11, 1024–1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Barry, G.H.; Caruso, M.; Gmitter, F.G. Commercial scion varieties. In The Genus Citrus; Talon, M., Caruso, M., Gmitter, F.G., Eds.; Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2020; pp. 83–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Eom, H.J.; Lee, D.; Lee, S.; Noh, H.J.; Hyun, J.W.; Yi, P.H.; Kang, K.S.; Kim, K.H. Flavonoids and a Limonoid from the Fruits of Citrus unshiu and Their Biological Activity. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2016, 64, 7171–7178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Goldenberg, L.; Yaniv, Y.; Porat, R.; Carmi, N. Mandarin fruit quality: A review. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2018, 98, 18–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Xiao, Z.; Wu, Q.; Niu, Y.; Wu, M.; Zhu, J.; Zhou, X.; Chen, X.; Wang, H.; Li, J.; Kong, J. Characterization of the Key Aroma Compounds in Five Varieties of Mandarins by Gas Chromatography-Olfactometry, Odor Activity Values, Aroma Recombination, and Omission Analysis. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2017, 65, 8392–8401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Yazici, K.; Balijagic, J.; Goksu, B.; Bilgin, O.F.; Ercisli, S. Comparison of Some Fruit Quality Parameters of Selected 12 Mandarin Genotypes from Black Sea Region in Turkey. ACS Omega 2023, 8, 19719–19727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Sawamura, M.; Thi Minh Tu, N.; Onishi, Y.; Ogawa, E.; Choi, H.S. Characteristic odor components of Citrus reticulata Blanco (ponkan) cold-pressed oil. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2004, 68, 1690–1697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Song, H.S.; Lan Phi, N.T.; Park, Y.-H.; Sawamura, M. Volatile Profiles in Cold-Pressed Peel Oil from Korean and Japanese Shiranui (Citrus unshiu Marcov. × C. sinensis Osbeck × C. reticulata Blanco). Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2006, 70, 737–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Sawamura, M. Citrus Essential Oils: Flavor and Fragrance; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Augusto, F.; Leite e Lopes, A.; Zini, C.A. Sampling and sample preparation for analysis of aromas and fragrances. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2003, 22, 160–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Goh, R.M.V.; Lau, H.; Liu, S.Q.; Lassabliere, B.; Guervilly, R.; Sun, J.; Bian, Y.; Yu, B. Comparative analysis of pomelo volatiles using headspace-solid phase micro-extraction and solvent assisted flavour evaporation. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 99, 328–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Hou, J.; Liang, L.; Wang, Y. Volatile composition changes in navel orange at different growth stages by HS-SPME–GC–MS. Food Res. Int. 2020, 136, 109333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Tomiyama, K.; Aoki, H.; Oikawa, T.; Sakurai, K.; Kasahara, Y.; Kawakami, Y. Characteristic volatile components of Japanese sour citrus fruits: Yuzu, Sudachi and Kabosu. Flavour Fragr. J. 2012, 27, 341–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Park, M.K.; Cha, J.Y.; Kang, M.C.; Jang, H.W.; Choi, Y.S. The effects of different extraction methods on essential oils from orange and tangor: From the peel to the essential oil. Food Sci. Nutr. 2024, 12, 804–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Barboni, T.; Luro, F.; Chiaramonti, N.; Desjobert, J.-M.; Muselli, A.; Costa, J. Volatile composition of hybrids Citrus juices by headspace solid-phase micro extraction/gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. Food Chem. 2009, 116, 382–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Cheong, M.W.; Liu, S.Q.; Zhou, W.; Curran, P.; Yu, B. Chemical composition and sensory profile of pomelo (Citrus grandis (L.) Osbeck) juice. Food Chem. 2012, 135, 2505–2513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Chaudhary, P.R.; Jayaprakasha, G.K.; Patil, B.S. Headspace and Solid-Phase Microextraction Methods for the Identification of Volatile Flavor Compounds in Citrus Fruits. In Instrumental Methods for the Analysis and Identification of Bioactive Molecules, ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, USA, 2014; Volume 1185, pp. 243–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bures, M.S.; Maslov Bandic, L.; Vlahovicek-Kahlina, K. Determination of Bioactive Components in Mandarin Fruits: A Review. Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem. 2023, 53, 1489–1514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Goh, R.M.V.; Pua, A.; Liu, S.Q.; Lassabliere, B.; Leong, K.-C.; Sun, J.; Tan, L.P.; Yu, B. Characterisation of Volatile Compounds in Kumquat and Calamansi Peel Oil Extracts. J. Essent. Oil Bear. Plants 2020, 23, 953–969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Tietel, Z.; Plotto, A.; Fallik, E.; Lewinsohn, E.; Porat, R. Taste and aroma of fresh and stored mandarins. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2011, 91, 14–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Feng, S.; Suh, J.H.; Gmitter, F.G.; Wang, Y. Differentiation between Flavors of Sweet Orange (Citrus sinensis) and Mandarin (Citrus reticulata). J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 203–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Song, H.; Liu, J. GC-O-MS technique and its applications in food flavor analysis. Food Res. Int. 2018, 114, 187–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Asikin, Y.; Kawahira, S.; Goki, M.; Hirose, N.; Kyoda, S.; Wada, K. Extended aroma extract dilution analysis profile of Shiikuwasha (Citrus depressa Hayata) pulp essential oil. J. Food Drug Anal. 2018, 26, 268–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Hu, Z.; Chen, M.; Zhu, K.; Liu, Y.; Wen, H.; Kong, J.; Chen, M.; Cao, L.; Ye, J.; Zhang, H.; et al. Multiomics integrated with sensory evaluations to identify characteristic aromas and key genes in a novel brown navel orange (Citrus sinensis). Food Chem. 2024, 444, 138613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Goh, R.M.V.; Pua, A.; Ee, K.H.; Huang, Y.; Liu, S.Q.; Lassabliere, B.; Yu, B. Investigation of changes in non-traditional indices of maturation in Navel orange peel and juice using GC-MS and LC-QTOF/MS. Food Res. Int. 2021, 148, 110607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Barnes, B.B.; Wilson, M.B.; Carr, P.W.; Vitha, M.F.; Broeckling, C.D.; Heuberger, A.L.; Prenni, J.; Janis, G.C.; Corcoran, H.; Snow, N.H.; et al. “Retention Projection” Enables Reliable Use of Shared Gas Chromatographic Retention Data Across Laboratories, Instruments, and Methods. Anal. Chem. 2013, 85, 11650–11657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Pua, A.; Lau, H.; Liu, S.Q.; Tan, L.P.; Goh, R.M.V.; Lassabliere, B.; Leong, K.C.; Sun, J.; Cornuz, M.; Yu, B. Improved detection of key odourants in Arabica coffee using gas chromatography-olfactometry in combination with low energy electron ionisation gas chromatography-quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Food Chem. 2020, 302, 125370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Ohata, M.; Zhou, L.; Ando, S.; Kaneko, S.; Osada, K.; Yada, Y. Application of integrative physiological approach to evaluate human physiological responses to the inhalation of essential oils of Japanese citrus fruits iyokan (Citrus iyo) and yuzu (Citrus junos). Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2021, 86, 109–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Omura, M.; Shimada, T. Citrus breeding, genetics and genomics in Japan. Breed. Sci. 2016, 66, 3–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Obenland, D.; Arpaia, M.L. Managing Postharvest Storage Issues in ‘Shiranui’ Mandarin. Horttechnology 2023, 33, 118–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Umano, K.; Hagi, Y.; Shibamoto, T. Volatile chemicals identified in extracts from newly hybrid citrus, dekopon (Shiranuhi mandarin Suppl. J.). J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002, 50, 5355–5359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Shimizu, T.; Tanizawa, Y.; Mochizuki, T.; Nagasaki, H.; Yoshioka, T.; Toyoda, A.; Fujiyama, A.; Kaminuma, E.; Nakamura, Y. Draft Sequencing of the Heterozygous Diploid Genome of Satsuma (Citrus unshiu Marc.) Using a Hybrid Assembly Approach. Front. Genet. 2017, 8, 180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Barboni, T.; Paolini, J.; Tomi, P.; Luro, F.; Muselli, A.; Costa, J. Characterization and Comparison of Volatile Constituents of Juice and Peel from Clementine, Mandarin and their Hybrids. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2011, 6, 1495–1498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Jia, X.; Ren, J.; Fan, G.; Reineccius, G.A.; Li, X.; Zhang, N.; An, Q.; Wang, Q.; Pan, S. Citrus juice off-flavor during different processing and storage: Review of odorants, formation pathways, and analytical techniques. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2022, 64, 3018–3043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Miyazaki, T.; Plotto, A.; Baldwin, E.A.; Reyes-De-Corcuera, J.I.; Gmitter, F.G., Jr. Aroma characterization of tangerine hybrids by gas-chromatography-olfactometry and sensory evaluation. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2012, 92, 727–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Choi, H.-S. Character Impact Odorants of Citrus Hallabong [(C. unshiu Marcov × C. sinensis Osbeck) × C. reticulata Blanco] Cold-Pressed Peel Oil. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2003, 51, 2687–2692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Sun, R.; Xing, R.; Zhang, J.; Wei, L.; Ge, Y.; Deng, T.; Zhang, W.; Chen, Y. Authentication and quality evaluation of not from concentrate and from concentrate orange juice by HS-SPME-GC-MS coupled with chemometrics. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 162, 113504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Uehara, A.; Baldovini, N. Volatile constituents of yuzu (Citrus junos Sieb. ex Tanaka) peel oil: A review. Flavour Fragr. J. 2021, 36, 292–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. B’Chir, F.; Arnaud, M.J. Chemical profile and extraction yield of essential oils from peel of Citrus limon, Citrus aurantium, and Citrus limetta: A review. In Studies in Natural Products Chemistry; Atta Ur, R., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2023; Volume 79, pp. 135–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Cheong, M.W.; Chong, Z.S.; Liu, S.Q.; Zhou, W.; Curran, P.; Bin, Y. Characterisation of calamansi (Citrus microcarpa). Part I: Volatiles, aromatic profiles and phenolic acids in the peel. Food Chem. 2012, 134, 686–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Miyazawa, N.; Fujita, A.; Kubota, K. Aroma character impact compounds in Kinokuni mandarin orange (Citrus kinokuni) compared with Satsuma mandarin orange (Citrus unshiu). Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2010, 74, 835–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Cheng, Y.; Li, G.; Wu, H.; Liang, G.; Wang, H. Flavor deterioration of Mandarin juice during storage by MDGC-MS/O and GC-MS/PFPD. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 159, 113132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Chisholm, M.G.; Jell, J.A.; Cass, D.M., Jr. Characterization of the major odorants found in the peel oil of Citrus reticulata Blanco cv. Clementine using gas chromatography–olfactometry. Flavour Fragr. J. 2003, 18, 275–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Dong, Y.; Shan, Y.; Li, P.; Jiang, L.; Liu, X. Nondestructive Characterization of Citrus Fruit by near-Infrared Diffuse Reflectance Spectroscopy (NIRDRS) with Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Fisher Linear Discriminant Analysis (FLDA). Anal. Lett. 2022, 55, 2554–2563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Lv, W.; Lin, T.; Ren, Z.; Jiang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Bi, F.; Gu, L.; Hou, H.; He, J. Rapid discrimination of Citrus reticulata ‘Chachi’ by headspace-gas chromatography-ion mobility spectrometry fingerprints combined with principal component analysis. Food Res. Int. 2020, 131, 108985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Delahunty, C.M.; Eyres, G.; Dufour, J.-P. Gas chromatography-olfactometry. J. Sep. Sci. 2006, 29, 2107–2125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Paraskevopoulou, A.; Chrysanthou, A.; Koutidou, M. Characterisation of volatile compounds of lupin protein isolate-enriched wheat flour bread. Food Res. Int. 2012, 48, 568–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ledauphin, J.; Saint-Clair, J.F.; Lablanquie, O.; Guichard, H.; Founier, N.; Guichard, E.; Barillier, D. Identification of trace volatile compounds in freshly distilled Calvados and Cognac using preparative separations coupled with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2004, 52, 5124–5134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Bélanger, A.; Collin, G.; Garneau, F.-X.; Gagnon, H.; Pichette, A. Aromas from Quebec. II. Composition of the Essential Oil of the Rhizomes and Roots of Asarum canadense L. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2010, 22, 164–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Choi, H.-S. Volatile constituents of satsuma mandarins growing in Korea. Flavour Fragr. J. 2004, 19, 406–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Mistry, B.S.; Reineccius, T.; Olson, L.K. Gas Chromatography–Olfactometry for the Determination of Key Odorants in Foods. In Techniques for Analyzing, 1st ed.; Marsili, R., Ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1997; pp. 265–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Tajima, K.; Tanaka, S.; Yamaguchi, T.; Fujita, M. Analysis of green and yellow yuzu peel oils (Citrus junos Tanaka). Novel aldehyde components with remarkably low odor thresholds. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1990, 38, 1544–1548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. PCA scores and loadings plots of volatile compounds in four varieties of Japanese Mandarin (Iyokan (), Ponkan (), Shiranui (), and Unshiu mikan ()): (a) Scores plot of volatiles in juices extracted by HS-SPME; (b) Loadings plot of volatiles in juices extracted by HS-SPME; (c) Scores plot of volatiles in peels extracted by HS-SPME; (d) Loadings plot of volatiles in peels extracted by HS-SPME; (e) Scores plot of volatiles in peels extracted by solvent extraction; (f) Loadings plot of volatiles in peels extracted by solvent extraction. The numbers denote the corresponding volatiles reported in Table 1 (juice HS-SPME plots), Table 2 (peel HS-SPME plots), and Table 3 (solvent extraction plots). The black squares indicate the contribution magnitude and direction of variables to the principal components, with their position reflecting the loading value.
Figure 1. PCA scores and loadings plots of volatile compounds in four varieties of Japanese Mandarin (Iyokan (), Ponkan (), Shiranui (), and Unshiu mikan ()): (a) Scores plot of volatiles in juices extracted by HS-SPME; (b) Loadings plot of volatiles in juices extracted by HS-SPME; (c) Scores plot of volatiles in peels extracted by HS-SPME; (d) Loadings plot of volatiles in peels extracted by HS-SPME; (e) Scores plot of volatiles in peels extracted by solvent extraction; (f) Loadings plot of volatiles in peels extracted by solvent extraction. The numbers denote the corresponding volatiles reported in Table 1 (juice HS-SPME plots), Table 2 (peel HS-SPME plots), and Table 3 (solvent extraction plots). The black squares indicate the contribution magnitude and direction of variables to the principal components, with their position reflecting the loading value.
Separations 11 00237 g001aSeparations 11 00237 g001bSeparations 11 00237 g001cSeparations 11 00237 g001d
Figure 2. Heatmap of the concentrations and FD factors of the key odourants of four Japanese mandarin peel extracts. “NA” means the odourant was not detected by AEDA via GC-O/MS. For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.
Figure 2. Heatmap of the concentrations and FD factors of the key odourants of four Japanese mandarin peel extracts. “NA” means the odourant was not detected by AEDA via GC-O/MS. For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.
Separations 11 00237 g002
Figure 3. Sensory profiles of four varieties of Japanese mandarin (Iyokan, Ponkan, Shiranui, and Unshiu mikan) peel extracts.
Figure 3. Sensory profiles of four varieties of Japanese mandarin (Iyokan, Ponkan, Shiranui, and Unshiu mikan) peel extracts.
Separations 11 00237 g003
Table 2. Identification of volatile compounds in four varieties of Japanese mandarin (Iyokan, Ponkan, Shiranui, and Unshiu mikan) peels extracted by HS-SPME (40 °C, 30 min).
Table 2. Identification of volatile compounds in four varieties of Japanese mandarin (Iyokan, Ponkan, Shiranui, and Unshiu mikan) peels extracted by HS-SPME (40 °C, 30 min).
No.CompoundLRI ICAS NumberAbundance (FID Peak Area)Identification II
IyokanPonkanShiranuiUnshiu Mikan
1Acetaldehyde 1,267175-07-03,021,814 ± 113,450 b2,379,431 ± 66,713 c8,209,625 ± 229,458 a-LRI, MS, STD
2Ethyl acetate 1,3,4,5917141-78-62,412,262 ± 223,644 aTraceTrace117,903 ± 10,373 bLRI, MS, STD
3Methyl butanoate 21001623-42-7494,504 ± 50,478TraceTrace-LRI, MS, STD
4α-Pinene 1,2,3,4,5,6103880-56-872,767,898 ± 3,542,614 b84,955,972 ± 2,536,220 a37,673,143 ± 1,839,905 c7,405,861 ± 254,832 dLRI, MS, STD
5α-Thujene 1,3,410422867-05-233,907,447 ± 2,516,927 b48,208,167 ± 933,902 a14,676,075 ± 534,126 c364,519 ± 22,485 dLRI, MS
6Ethyl butanoate 1,21049105-54-4403,512 ± 41,054---LRI, MS, STD
7Fenchene 1,41077471-84-1251,486 ± 24,760 a218,369 ± 9024 ab235,149 ± 22,513 a190,388 ± 10,381 bLRI, MS
8Camphene 1,3,4,5108279-92-51,118,843 ± 106,451 b1,311,309 ± 80,790 a253,555 ± 1996 c78,621 ± 6696 dLRI, MS, STD
9Hexanal 1,2,3,5109966-25-1TraceTrace90,117 ± 3010TraceLRI, MS, STD
10β-Pinene 1,3,4,5,61123127-91-348,161,195 ± 3,394,260 a28,873,180 ± 869,334 b1,742,254 ± 75,939 c3,046,957 ± 164,865 cLRI, MS, STD
11Sabinene 1,3,4,5,611353387-41-54,186,389 ± 29,334 c52,753,832 ± 4,187,512 a19,442,711 ± 346,792 b487,989 ± 23,800 cLRI, MS, STD
12Myrcene 1,2,3,4,5,61175123-35-3181,746,657 ± 3,133,756 b223,400,905 ± 7,438,213 a185,541,609 ± 6,318,947 b35,207,496 ± 755,294 cLRI, MS, STD
13α-Phellandrene 1,2,3,4118299-83-2971,304 ± 135,772 c234,917 ± 28,355 d2,463,630 ± 62,843 a1,265,627 ± 40,262 bLRI, MS, STD
14α-Terpinene 1,2,3,4119599-86-5425,859 ± 20,341 b274,139 ± 23,765 b477,566 ± 2719 b5,378,465 ± 320,862 aLRI, MS
15Limonene 1,2,3,4,5,61229138-86-37,794,558,186 ± 171,677,992 b9,003,005,342 ± 112,992,466 a8,066,891,387 ± 325,705,414 b1,135,791,679 ± 63,421,763 cLRI, MS, STD
16β-Phellandrene 1,3,4,5,61233555-10-213,226,859 ± 1,327,534 c18,751,198 ± 426,585 a15,970,718 ± 524,327 b3,848,447 ± 10,554 dLRI, MS
17Ethyl hexanoate 1,2,31246123-66-01,420,023 ± 161,014---LRI, MS, STD
18cis-β-Ocimene 1,3,4,512543338-55-41,501,939 ± 75,692 a1,208,799 ± 72,438 b674,214 ± 56,472 c214,089 ± 11,659 dLRI, MS, STD
19γ-Terpinene 1,2,3,4,5,6126599-85-4335,256,197 ± 27,081,641 b383,400,732 ± 8,802,941 a11,978,659 ± 292,078 d62,312,158 ± 604,708 cLRI, MS, STD
20trans-β-Ocimene 1,3,4,512673779-61-1226,416,538 ± 13,752,207 a138,154,783 ± 17,504,308 b13,259,873 ± 1,075,416 c3,220,802 ± 250,457 cLRI, MS, STD
21p-Mentha-3,8-diene 11280586-67-4202,373 ± 8356 b341,690 ± 13,408 a167,391 ± 12,674 c84,575 ± 5882 dLRI, MS
22Hexyl acetate 1,3,41288142-92-7357,655 ± 25,769 a--27,363 ± 523 bLRI, MS, STD
23p-Cymene 1,2,3,4,5,6129499-87-634,255,941 ± 1,493,829 a33,859,784 ± 1,941,883 a2,807,393 ± 212,707 c14,139,510 ± 1,068,535 bLRI, MS, STD
24Terpinolene 1,2,3,4,5,61304586-62-950,351,353 ± 2,521,776 b63,825,352 ± 2,750,559 a25,708,236 ± 1,030,117 c1,1878,259 ± 930,233 dLRI, MS, STD
25Octanal 1,2,3,4,5,61306124-13-0-282,649 ± 12,185 b391,863 ± 29,293 a-LRI, MS, STD
26Isoterpinolene 1,41310586-63-01,139,956 ± 71,812 b1,881,552 ± 179,005 a975,303 ± 80,256 b439,599 ± 48,054 cLRI, MS
27cis-2-Pentenol 1,613271576-95-059,984 ± 4403---LRI, MS
28cis-3-Hexenyl acetate 1,3,513283681-71-8724,286 ± 31,438 a--54,471 ± 2973 bLRI, MS, STD
296-Methyl-5-hepten-2-one 1,3,41351110-93-020,061 ± 1708 b-21,736 ± 2068 b33,168 ± 2662 aLRI, MS, STD
30Hexanol 1,2,3,5,61357111-27-31,141,555 ± 71,011 a176,255 ± 9873 c629,718 ± 14,528 b245,510 ± 30,423 cLRI, MS, STD
31cis-Alloocimene 1,4,51379673-84-71,674,019 ± 101,035 a846,605 ± 47,359 b498,268 ± 51,697 c232,381 ± 4693 dLRI, MS, STD
32cis-3-Hexenol 1,3,5,61392928-96-11,560,263 ± 109,543 a807,807 ± 75,632 b935,481 ± 11,045 b67,410 ± 4843 cLRI, MS, STD
33Methyl octanoate 1,21395111-11-5165,456 ± 15,096---LRI, MS, STD
34trans-Alloocimene 1140214947-20-7893,954 ± 40,097 a531,250 ± 58,378 b360,579 ± 34,087 c207,150 ± 19,239 dLRI, MS
35trans-2-Hexenol 1,2,3,61410928-95-0125,465 ± 5396---LRI, MS, STD
36p-Mentha-1,3,8-triene 1,3,4141318368-95-1210,801 ± 20,445 a195,113 ± 7165 a213,968 ± 20,664 a66,809 ± 9454 bLRI, MS
37Hexyl butanoate 1,2,314212639-63-61,107,410 ± 103,495---LRI, MS, STD
38Ethyl octanoate 1,2,51438106-32-1395,035 ± 43,480 a-24,480 ± 2627 b-LRI, MS, STD
39p-Mentha-1,5,8-triene 2144021195-59-5120,366 ± 9076 a110,244 ± 6032 ab98,940 ± 8028 b48,492 ± 4867 cLRI, MS
40p-Cymenene 314571195-32-02,948,285 ± 207,196 a3,097,667 ± 204,365 a1,338,095 ± 130,297 b1,631,156 ± 111,077 bLRI, MS
41cis-Limonene oxide 1,3,4,6146813837-75-7Trace118,353 ± 12,087 a95,713 ± 1556 bTraceLRI, MS
42cis-3-Hexenyl butanoate 1,3147116491-36-4437,567 ± 41,062---LRI, MS, STD
43α-Cubebene 1,2,3,5147317699-14-8901,160 ± 54,638 a127,939 ± 5198 c266,232 ± 8816 d361,791 ± 29,736 bLRI, MS
44trans-Limonene oxide 3,414814959-35-7132,628 ± 11,778 c1,524,017 ± 88,197 a1,343,757 ± 131,036 b54,539 ± 2665 cLRI, MS
45Octyl acetate 1,3,4,51483112-14-11,041,047 ± 48,326 a435,829 ± 12,954 b205,589 ± 13,573 c-LRI, MS, STD
46δ-Elemene 1,3,5,6148720307-84-014,570,016 ± 778,325 a1,377,078 ± 95,264 b698,139 ± 36,489 b1,149,042 ± 28,839 bLRI, MS
47Citronellal 1,3,41493106-23-0-183,173 ± 9278 a90,924 ± 6271 b-LRI, MS, STD
48α-Ylangene 3,6150314912-44-8618,142 ± 28,949 a91,961 ± 6194 b78,245 ± 6377 b82,568 ± 5267 bLRI, MS
49α-Copaene 1,2,3,4,5,615133856-25-53,402,465 ± 500,759 a-3,387,074 ± 254,593 b1,380,120 ± 151,456 bLRI, MS
50Decanal 1,2,3,4,5,61515112-31-21,251,121 ± 65,784 b7,168,137 ± 497,569 a1,236,357 ± 121,466 bTraceLRI, MS, STD
51Linalool 1,2,3,4,5,6155278-70-619,839,139 ± 1,716,833 a7,061,014 ± 611,543 b2,156,911 ± 237,030 c122,394 ± 5602 dLRI, MS, STD
52cis-4-Decenal 3155521662-09-9-66,948 ± 2022--LRI, MS, STD
53β-Cubebene 1,2,3155713744-15-5463,836 ± 22,840 a-115,995 ± 10,154 b103,283 ± 1237 bLRI, MS
54Linalyl acetate 3,41566115-95-748,017 ± 3747---LRI, MS, STD
55Octanol 1,2,3,4,5,61567111-87-5187,148 ± 10,299 c2,825,984 ± 268,182 a1,757,499 ± 186,038 b55,432 ± 5639 cLRI, MS, STD
56trans-α-Bergamotene 3,4157613474-59-4173,673 ± 5351 a130,315 ± 6438 b--LRI, MS
57Nonyl acetate 41584143-13-5135,996 ± 8557 a51,267 ± 1102 b33,249 ± 3525 c-LRI, MS, STD
58Methyl decanoate 11591110-42-9--32,015 ± 2545-LRI, MS
59β-Copaene 1,2,3,4159518252-44-3770,008 ± 73,148 a-140,828 ± 9270 b125,276 ± 3185 bLRI, MS
60Methylthymol 3,416021076-56-8-7,416,428 ± 577,654--LRI, MS
61β-Elemene 1,3,4,5,61611515-13-94,396,452 ± 417,605 b-876,753 ± 60,868 c4,979,190 ± 391,615 aLRI, MS
62Hexyl hexanoate 116156378-65-01,351,623 ± 100,303---LRI, MS, STD
63Undecanal 3,4,5,61617112-44-7-566,099 ± 27,765 a488,674 ± 45,944 b-LRI, MS, STD
64Terpinen-4-ol 1,2,3,4,61618562-74-3-418,702 ± 19,007 a-83,869 ± 6973 bLRI, MS, STD
65β-Caryophyllene 1,3,4,5162487-44-53,932,499 ± 207,687 a353,044 ± 35,252 d764,800 ± 6263 c2,024,648 ± 183,248 bLRI, MS, STD
66β-Gurjunene162517334-55-3---192,441 ± 17,451LRI, MS
67trans-Dihydrocarvone 2,316265948-04-9532,126 ± 75,746 a169,144 ± 5807 b116,528 ± 15,675 bc69,907 ± 4068 cLRI, MS
68γ-Elemene 1,3,4,5,6165629873-99-24,248,781 ± 146,454 a1,739,293 ± 95,084 b-329,240 ± 25,738 cLRI, MS
69cis-3-Hexenyl hexanoate 1165931501-11-8565,004 ± 29,440---LRI, MS, STD
70trans-2-Decenal 1,3,516613913-81-3-1,248,632 ± 123,764--LRI, MS, STD
71Nonanol 1,3,4,5,61662143-08-841,061 ± 2908 c332,089 ± 29,052 b659,399 ± 48,236 aTraceLRI, MS, STD
72Citronellyl acetate 1,3,4,5,61671150-84-5-705,591 ± 20,817 b1,353,091 ± 106,793 a-LRI, MS, STD
73trans-β-Farnesene 1,3,4,6167618794-84-84,342,285 ± 443,666 a2,665,085 ± 54,910 b347,988 ± 32,701 c134,819 ± 10,243 cLRI, MS
74Decyl acetate 3,4,5,61689112-17-4-763,481 ± 72,735 a415,566 ± 15,990 b-LRI, MS, STD
75γ-Muurolene 1,3,4,6169330021-74-04,273,643 ± 306,833 a123,575 ± 8632 b-235,926 ± 19,014 bLRI, MS
76α-Humulene 3,4,5,616996753-98-63,448,333 ± 286,530 a509,886 ± 30,877 c770,864 ± 47,609 c2,265,701 ± 232,056 bLRI, MS
77Neral 1,3,4,51704106-26-3232,615 ± 15,937 a70,784 ± 6092 b37,846 ± 1303 cTraceLRI, MS, STD
78α-Terpineol 1,2,3,4,5,6171098-55-5-1,510,068 ± 112,107 a893,486 ± 62,724 c972,896 ± 108,044 bLRI, MS, STD
79Dodecanal 3,41723112-54-9611,380 ± 15,376 b4,621,407 ± 273,589 a4,207,331 ± 331,690 a-LRI, MS, STD
80β-Selinene 1,4,5,6172517066-67-01,396,586 ± 167,426 b141,199 ± 16,442 c276,085 ± 24,848 c1,720,951 ± 131,977 aLRI, MS
81Germacrene D 1,3,4,5,6173923986-74-52,604,458 ± 215,011---LRI, MS, STD
82Neryl acetate 1,3,4,61741141-12-8 3,906,687 ± 322,516 a1,043,472 ± 120,990 b1,106,805 ± 63,115 b-LRI, MS, STD
83δ-Selinene 1174328624-23-92,923,547 ± 225,794 a472,730 ± 22,823 c1,110,507 ± 106,279 b999,774 ± 107,057 bLRI, MS
84Valencene 1,2,3,417444630-07-3946,351 ± 73,168 c-18,201,327 ± 1,406,097 a8,511,199 ± 755,215 bLRI, MS, STD
85α-Muurolene 1,3,4174710208-80-72,139,599 ± 87,154 a156,714 ± 6062 b--LRI, MS
86Geranial 1,3,4,5,61748141-27-568,557 ± 5015 b239,032 ± 33,071 aTrace2936 ± 147 cLRI, MS, STD
87α-Selinene 1,51753473-13-21,601,701 ± 80,894 b-1,222,031 ± 102,210 c2,854,491 ± 214,256 aLRI, MS
88α-Farnesene 1,3,4,5,61761502-61-43,682,771 ± 215,845 b2,027,817 ± 105,590 c18,592,435 ± 1,527,910 a3,379,537 ± 78,648 bcLRI, MS, STD
89Geranyl acetate 1,3,4,5,61765105-87-33,349,148 ± 188,570---LRI, MS, STD
90Decanol 3,41767112-30-12,145,521 ± 196,674 c4,573,607 ± 334,157 b6,191,909 ± 580,822 aTraceLRI, MS, STD
91Citronellol 1,2,3,4,5,61768106-22-9296,728 ± 24,666 c2,431,748 ± 247,414 a1,798,873 ± 182,943 bTraceLRI, MS, STD
92δ-Cadinene 1,3,4,61780483-76-17,045,004 ± 196,134 a835,474 ± 44,285 d1,542,340 ± 139,745 c1,940,735 ± 128,660 bLRI, MS
93γ-Cadinene 1,3,6178439029-41-92,394,928 ± 186,049 a347,242 ± 33,169 b-303,859 ± 26,715 bLRI, MS
94β-Sesquiphellandrene 3,4178920307-83-9257,824 ± 13,964 a202,586 ± 7225 b--LRI, MS
95cis-4-Decenol179957074-37-0-56,380 ± 3687 b61,942 ± 3662 a-LRI, MS
96Perillyl aldehyde 1,3,4,5,618182111-75-3Trace1,085,479 ± 100,983 a495,968 ± 34,962 b-LRI, MS, STD
97α-Cadinene 3182624406-05-11,467,487 ± 122,452 a--145,415 ± 13,270 bLRI, MS
98trans-2-Decenol 5,6183018409-18-2238,075 ± 15,624 a145,406 ± 13,141 b117,321 ± 11,457 c-LRI, MS
99trans-trans-2,4-Decadienal 1,3,5,6183325152-84-5290,521 ± 30,168 b542,977 ± 21,873 a108,927 ± 9438 c-LRI, MS, STD
100trans-Carveol 1,3,4,618481197-07-5-54,800 ± 3675 b109,216 ± 9358 a-LRI, MS, STD
101Calamenene 1,31850483-77-2795,574 ± 73,127 a101,296 ± 4162 c207,106 ± 11,690 d312,129 ± 24,238 bLRI, MS
102Undecanol 3,41852112-42-584,785 ± 3126 a61,928 ± 2808 b--LRI, MS
103cis-Carveol 1,3,4,618841197-06-4-250,251 ± 25,009 a157,451 ± 13,436 b-LRI, MS, STD
104trans-2-Dodecenal 1,3,5188520407-84-5142,673 ± 14,121 a34,987 ± 3199 bTrace-LRI, MS, STD
105Benzyl alcohol 1,3,4,61898100-51-677,059 ± 3097 a72,336 ± 6248 a71,040 ± 6005 a-LRI, MS, STD
106trans-cis-2,6-Dodecadienal 5191121662-13-593,919 ± 1358 b102,340 ± 1527 a31,910 ± 3351 c-LRI, MS, STD
107Perillyl acetate 1,3,4,5,6192515111-96-3362,777 ± 14,110 a27,093 ± 1526 b--LRI, MS
108Tetradecanal 3,41935124-25-4-201,756 ± 20,358--LRI, MS
109α-Calacorene 4195121391-99-1460,545 ± 14,248 a58,725 ± 5455 c75,623 ± 3759 b92,329 ± 6458 bLRI, MS
110p-Menth-1-en-9-ol 3,6195218479-68-0-71,104 ± 7850 a42,944 ± 3627 b-LRI, MS
111Heptanoic acid 11964111-14-8---26,743 ± 1102LRI, MS, STD
112Dodecanol 31972112-53-8-55,051 ± 5365 b147,603 ± 10,680 a-LRI, MS, STD
113cis-Nerolidol 32010142-50-7TraceTrace--LRI, MS, STD
114Perillyl alcohol 1,2,3,4,5,62012536-59-4291,604 ± 28,313 a185,643 ± 12,165 b112,364 ± 4774 c37,207 ± 3229 dLRI, MS, STD
115Methyleugenol 1202993-15-2288,659 ± 26,281 a-44,808 ± 3267 b-LRI, MS, STD
116trans-Nerolidol 3,5204440716-66-3132,973 ± 2854 a44,950 ± 4797 b--LRI, MS, STD
117Octanoic acid 1,3,4,5,62064124-07-2Trace38,430 ± 2295 b31,011 ± 3097 c55,451 ± 6204 aLRI, MS, STD
118Elemol 1,4,5,62098639-99-6129,980 ± 12,453 a-48,784 ± 1458 b-LRI, MS
119Methyl N-methylanthranilate 3,5210785-91-6Trace24,816 ± 2151Trace-LRI, MS, STD
120Globulol 3,42108489-41-855,438 ± 5066---LRI, MS
121Nonanoic acid 1,3,4,5,62171112-05-034,088 ± 2430 c13,818 ± 325 d38,801 ± 1404 b45,093 ± 3195 aLRI, MS, STD
122Thymol 3217789-83-852,858 ± 1832 b1,168,809 ± 44,593 a20,512 ± 1747 b26,514 ± 2400 bLRI, MS, STD
123Eugenol 3219497-53-0411,866 ± 17,797-Trace-LRI, MS, STD
124Carvacrol 3,42231499-75-237,632 ± 3220 b95,715 ± 8702 a14,500 ± 1335 c19,723 ± 1394 cLRI, MS, STD
125β-Sinensal 3225560066-88-8355,351 ± 4653 a243,727 ± 12,764 b19,655 ± 567 cTraceLRI, MS, STD
126Isospathulenol 6227288395-46-452,658 ± 2436---LRI, MS
127Decanoic acid 1,3,4,5,62277334-48-528,821 ± 1238TraceTraceTraceLRI, MS, STD
128p-Menth-8-ene-1,2-diol 3,522881946-00-5279,513 ± 26,598 b563,909 ± 48,359 a536,560 ± 24,663 a317,897 ± 19,309 bLRI, MS
129α-Sinensal 3236017909-77-2195,811 ± 7979 b293,104 ± 17,654 aTraceTraceLRI, MS, STD
130Indole 1,62488120-72-965,046 ± 3222TraceTraceTraceLRI, MS, STD
131Nootkatone 1,2,3,425804674-50-4--111,415 ± 8811-LRI, MS, STD
Total peak area 8,932,836,018 ± 176,904,541 b10,155,518,812 ± 121,237,952 a8,488,970,363 ± 326,245,173 c1,323,601,924 ± 65,326,925 d
‘-’ means that the compound was not detected. ‘Trace’ means that the FID peak area of the compound was unquantifiable, either due to matrix noise or a peak area < 8000. I LRI: Experimental linear retention index on an HP-INNOWax column relative to C7–C40 alkane standards. II Identification methods: “LRI”, comparison of experimental to reference retention indices; “MS”, comparison with mass spectrum of the compound in the NIST library version 2.2; and “STD”, comparison with authentic standards. a,b,c,d Within a row, different superscript letters indicate statistical significance difference at p < 0.05. Compounds reported in 1 Goh et al. [13]; 2 Sun et al. [39]; 3 Uehara and Baldovini [40]; 4 B’chir and Arnaud [41]; 5 Cheong et al. [42]; 6 Goh et al. [21].
Table 3. Identification of volatile compounds and their concentration (ng/mL) in four varieties of Japanese mandarin (Iyokan, Ponkan, Shiranui, and Unshiu mikan) peel extracts using solvent extraction.
Table 3. Identification of volatile compounds and their concentration (ng/mL) in four varieties of Japanese mandarin (Iyokan, Ponkan, Shiranui, and Unshiu mikan) peel extracts using solvent extraction.
No.CompoundLRI ICAS NumberIyokanPonkanShiranuiUnshiu MikanIdentification II
1α-Pinene 1,2,3,4,5,6103880-56-8 1546.03 ± 42.22 b1027.75 ± 19.21 c2847.14 ± 43.34 a352.98 ± 8.61 dLRI, MS, STD
2α-Thujene 1,3,410422867-05-2 2562.59 ± 27.55 b897.25 ± 34.33 c2721.30 ± 9.81 a135.32 ± 3.74 dLRI, MS
3Camphene 1,3,4,6108279-92-5 17.27 ± 0.39 a10.25 ± 0.58 b3.26 ± 0.29 d4.62 ± 0.12 cLRI, MS, STD
4Hexanal 1,2,3,6109966-25-1 21.36 ± 0.63 a11.69 ± 0.37 c18.77 ± 1.76 b19.04 ± 0.92 bLRI, MS, STD
5β-Pinene 1,3,4,5,61123127-91-3 1666.40 ± 4.81 a738.89 ± 30.38 b238.43 ± 4.22 c191.32 ± 7.29 dLRI, MS, STD
6Sabinene 1,3,4,5,611353387-41-5 1354.84 ± 12.66 c2416.02 ± 46.50 b12,553.31 ± 258.90 a77.80 ± 2.45 dLRI, MS, STD
71-Penten-3-ol 1,51165616-25-116.59 ± 0.43 b--20.11 ± 0.57 aLRI, MS
8Myrcene 1,2,3,4,5,61175123-35-38660.65 ± 69.73 b4064.46 ± 45.72 c13,831.64 ± 102.60 a926.11 ± 39.92 dLRI, MS, STD
9α-Phellandrene 1,2,3,4118299-83-215.88 ± 0.32 a3.88 ± 0.25 bTrace15.88 ± 0.64 aLRI, MS, STD
10α-Terpinene 1,2,3,4119599-86-5TraceTraceTrace72.49 ± 1.37LRI, MS
11Limonene 1,2,3,4,5,61229138-86-3 421,726.10 ± 2687.60 b194,306.44 ± 3782.63 c972,976.48 ± 8890.99 a44,510.21 ± 2182.40 dLRI, MS, STD
12β-Phellandrene 1,3,4,5,61233555-10-2 524.16 ± 1.01 b355.07 ± 6.98 c883.25 ± 65.27 a182.37 ± 7.03 dLRI, MS
13trans-2-Hexenal 1,2,312396728-26-3 ---7.75 ± 0.32LRI, MS, STD
14cis-β-Ocimene 1,3,4,612543338-55-4 89.24 ± 3.34 a13.33 ± 0.86 bTraceTraceLRI, MS, STD
15Pentanol 1,3125971-41-0---11.17 ± 0.31LRI, MS, STD
16γ-Terpinene 1,2,3,4,5,6126599-85-4 31,682.10 ± 197.90 a11,476.35 ± 326.57 b223.70 ± 2.26 d2789.72 ± 83.74 cLRI, MS, STD
17trans-β-Ocimene 1,3,4,612673779-61-1Trace14.03 ± 0.70 b5368.88 ± 54.14 aTraceLRI, MS, STD
18Hexyl acetate 1,3,41288142-92-713.26 ± 0.34---LRI, MS, STD
19p-Cymene 1,2,3,4,5,6129499-87-6 1219.77 ± 7.69 a358.64 ± 23.87 b32.93 ± 1.52 d132.26 ± 5.62 cLRI, MS, STD
20Terpinolene 1,2,3,4,5,61304586-62-9 1046.39 ± 120.46 a1053.84 ± 22.78 a311.17 ± 8.69 bTraceLRI, MS, STD
21Octanal 1,2,3,4,5,61306124-13-0 29.08 ± 2.05 c415.92 ± 45.24 a350.37 ± 20.03 b53.78 ± 1.83 cLRI, MS, STD
22cis-2-Pentenol 1,513271576-95-0 ---19.73 ± 0.95LRI, MS
23cis-3-Hexenyl acetate 1,3,613283681-71-8 13.18 ± 0.30---LRI, MS, STD
24Prenol 1,3,51328556-82-143.75 ± 1.79 a14.16 ± 0.91 c19.95 ± 2.09 b22.81 ± 1.05 bLRI, MS, STD
256-Methyl-5-hepten-2-one 1,3,41351110-93-0 8.04 ± 0.42 a2.67 ± 0.17 c-3.26 ± 0.05 bLRI, MS, STD
26Hexanol 1,2,3,5,61357111-27-3192.86 ± 1.30 a26.77 ± 0.99 c96.13 ± 2.04 d69.85 ± 1.13 bLRI, MS, STD
27cis-Alloocimene 1,4,61379673-84-7 23.17 ± 0.94 a7.15 ± 0.43 b--LRI, MS, STD
28cis-3-Hexenol 1,3,5,61392928-96-1172.16 ± 3.78 b33.25 ± 0.73 c344.19 ± 2.67 a175.24 ± 2.04 bLRI, MS, STD
29Methyl octanoate 1,21395111-11-5 2.44 ± 0.04---LRI, MS, STD
30Nonanal 1,2,3,4,5,61407124-19-6 46.67 ± 3.46 b38.19 ± 3.76 b259.41 ± 18.56 a11.69 ± 0.13 cLRI, MS, STD
31p-Mentha-1,3,8-triene 1,3,4141318368-95-1 18.02 ± 0.67 b20.45 ± 1.56 b23.88 ± 2.75 a11.74 ± 0.49 cLRI, MS
32Hexyl butanoate 1,2,314212639-63-6 19.49 ± 0.57---LRI, MS, STD
33p-Mentha-1,5,8-triene 2144021195-59-5 14.04 ± 0.22 a13.95 ± 0.40 a7.11 ± 0.28 c11.86 ± 0.96 bLRI, MS
34p-Cymenene 314571195-32-0 -22.13 ± 1.47 a-21.33 ± 0.91 aLRI, MS
35Heptanol 1,2,3,51460111-70-6 --33.46 ± 2.78 a15.43 ± 0.51 bLRI, MS, STD
36cis-Linalool oxide 1,314645989-33-3Trace91.27 ± 9.03TraceTraceLRI, MS, STD
37Acetic acid 1,3,4,5,6146564-19-7--52.73 ± 4.84 b67.73 ± 2.85 aLRI, MS, STD
38cis-Limonene oxide 1,3,4,5146813837-75-7 30.54 ± 0.50 b26.14 ± 1.44 c160.10 ± 1.23 a11.18 ± 0.54 dLRI, MS
39cis-3-Hexenyl butanoate 1,3147116491-36-4 6.86 ± 0.37---LRI, MS, STD
40trans-Sabinene hydrate 3,4147617699-16-0 176.89 ± 2.25 c693.19 ± 35.08 a429.44 ± 2.85 b199.96 ± 8.79 cLRI, MS
41trans-Limonene oxide 3,414814959-35-7 39.86 ± 1.87 d89.40 ± 2.13 b272.71 ± 2.32 a47.57 ± 1.56 cLRI, MS
42trans-Linalool oxide 1,3148234995-77-2 TraceTraceTrace44.67 ± 3.79LRI, MS, STD
43Octyl acetate 1,3,4,61483112-14-1 -21.48 ± 1.93 b43.52 ± 2.07 a-LRI, MS, STD
44δ-Elemene 1,3,5,6148720307-84-0 3610.47 ± 323.05 a176.09 ± 3.21 b104.63 ± 3.73 b262.67 ± 9.59 bLRI, MS
45Citronellal 1,3,41493106-23-0 8.23 ± 0.49 c85.57 ± 3.09 b1049.29 ± 8.39 a-LRI, MS, STD
462-Ethylhexanol 31500104-76-7 -Trace-12.60 ± 0.77LRI, MS, STD
47α-Ylangene 3,5150314912-44-8 21.67 ± 0.27---LRI, MS
48α-Copaene 1,2,3,4,5,615133856-25-5 322.48 ± 12.79 b26.50 ± 2.04 c2898.51 ± 132.15 a103.83 ± 1.33 cLRI, MS
49Decanal 1,2,3,4,5,61515112-31-2 335.47 ± 8.28 c583.00 ± 44.89 b1419.40 ± 128.08 a4.59 ± 0.26 dLRI, MS, STD
50Camphor 3,4,6153276-22-2 -6.35 ± 0.49--LRI, MS, STD
51Linalool 1,2,3,4,5,6155278-70-6 14,830.16 ± 89.11 a10,414.26 ± 251.76 b4571.26 ± 31.33 c3138.83 ± 151.14 dLRI, MS, STD
52cis-4-Decenal 3155521662-09-9 TraceTrace16.78 ± 1.77-LRI, MS, STD
53β-Cubebene 1,2,3155713744-15-588.60 ± 5.80 a-76.34 ± 9.02 b50.90 ± 0.71 cLRI, MS
54Linalyl acetate 3,41566115-95-73.56 ± 0.21 b163.55 ± 4.65 a-TraceLRI, MS, STD
55Octanol 1,2,3,4,5,61567111-87-5 134.70 ± 1.12 c637.51 ± 20.88 b764.67 ± 17.89 a126.74 ± 1.53 cLRI, MS, STD
56Isopulegol156889-79-2 -233.34 ± 15.78 a8.86 ± 0.88 b-LRI, MS, STD
57trans-α-Bergamotene 3,4157613474-59-4 23.94 ± 0.80 a7.09 ± 0.12 b--LRI, MS
58Nonyl acetate 41584143-13-5 27.21 ± 0.26 a--1.80 ± 0.18 bLRI, MS, STD
59β-Copaene 1,2,3,4159518252-44-3 260.38 ± 3.28 a21.37 ± 0.17 b15.81 ± 0.45 c23.75 ± 1.03 bLRI, MS
60Methylthymol 3,416021076-56-8 86.03 ± 2.76 b245.82 ± 16.28 a17.46 ± 0.55 cTraceLRI, MS
61β-Elemene 1,3,4,5,61611515-13-9 1081.83 ± 6.25 a47.80 ± 2.62 d249.55 ± 1.62 c826.68 ± 8.86 bLRI, MS
62Undecanal 3,4,5,61617112-44-7-25.52 ± 1.08 b232.09 ± 2.47 a-LRI, MS, STD
63Terpinen-4-ol 1,2,3,4,51618562-74-3 506.49 ± 11.96 a361.16 ± 10.69 b93.98 ± 2.38 d141.41 ± 2.38 cLRI, MS, STD
64β-Caryophyllene 1,3,4,6162487-44-5319.12 ± 17.49 a16.81 ± 1.46 d144.07 ± 0.83 b98.54 ± 1.39 cLRI, MS, STD
65Butanoic acid 1,31626107-92-6 170.96 ± 3.10Trace--LRI, MS, STD
66trans-p-Mentha-2,8-dien-1-ol 3,4,516407212-40-042.56 ± 2.56 c69.65 ± 4.11 b229.51 ± 2.49 a31.79 ± 0.99 dLRI, MS
67γ-Elemene 1,3,4,5,6165629873-99-2 1088.56 ± 6.51 a171.83 ± 1.46 b65.52 ± 1.18 c59.06 ± 0.76 cLRI, MS
68trans-2-Decenal 1,3,616613913-81-3 49.56 ± 3.24 b27.40 ± 0.50 c150.85 ± 4.72 a-LRI, MS, STD
69Nonanol 1,3,4,5,61662143-08-848.60 ± 3.24 b30.49 ± 1.73 c148.49 ± 1.87 a17.84 ± 0.99 dLRI, MS, STD
70Alloaromadendrene 3,4167125246-27-9--21.18 ± 0.42 a7.89 ± 0.31 bLRI, MS
71Citronellyl acetate 1,3,4,5,61671150-84-5 50.12 ± 1.70 b31.31 ± 2.63 c503.32 ± 26.13 a6.00 ± 0.22 cLRI, MS, STD
722-Methylbutanoic acid 31675116-53-0 13.22 ± 0.18 a6.58 ± 0.21 bTrace1.53 ± 0.08 cLRI, MS, STD
73trans-β-Farnesene 1,3,4,5167618794-84-8 647.95 ± 8.61 a210.45 ± 6.81 b-2.09 ± 0.03 cLRI, MS
74cis-p-Mentha-2,8-dien-1-ol 3,516863886-78-0 29.24 ± 0.94 c43.98 ± 1.26 b219.54 ± 2.62 a6.31 ± 0.10 dLRI, MS
75Decyl acetate 3,4,5,61689112-17-4 271.03 ± 2.20 a24.02 ± 0.62 c47.72 ± 1.43 b4.48 ± 0.07 dLRI, MS, STD
76γ-Muurolene 1,3,4,5169330021-74-0 --7.04 ± 0.58 a7.56 ± 0.34 aLRI, MS
77α-Humulene 3,4,5,616996753-98-6 233.95 ± 4.58 a15.04 ± 1.06 c88.20 ± 1.44 b91.18 ± 2.86 bLRI, MS
78Neral 1,3,4,61704106-26-3 -119.40 ± 3.18 a113.92 ± 1.66 b46.30 ± 2.14 cLRI, MS, STD
79α-Terpineol 1,2,3,4,5,6171098-55-5 1418.51 ± 8.53 c3096.50 ± 118.53 a1161.46 ± 6.29 d1735.62 ± 78.57 bLRI, MS, STD
80trans-trans-2,4-Nonadienal 1,317185910-87-2 58.59 ± 0.54 b69.32 ± 4.05 b422.66 ± 13.79 a3.57 ± 0.04 cLRI, MS
81Dodecanal 3,41723112-54-9 117.17 ± 1.08 b138.65 ± 8.09 b845.33 ± 27.57 a10.72 ± 0.11 cLRI, MS, STD
82Germacrene D 1,3,4,5,6173923986-74-5 2981.07 ± 22.58 a130.87 ± 4.58 c91.65 ± 12.29 d256.30 ± 4.09 bLRI, MS, STD
83Neryl acetate 1,3,4,51741141-12-8 585.07 ± 15.97 a46.35 ± 3.96 c519.50 ± 10.06 b-LRI, MS, STD
84Valencene 1,2,3,417444630-07-3 TraceTrace3189.66 ± 94.74 a433.32 ± 20.27 bLRI, MS, STD
85cis-Carvyl acetate 1,417461205-42-1 Trace--TraceLRI, MS, STD
86α-Muurolene 1,3,4174710208-80-7 34.42 ± 2.49 a3.75 ± 0.12 b--LRI, MS
87Geranial 1,3,4,5,61748141-27-5 24.27 ± 0.75 b37.33 ± 2.08 a7.47 ± 0.73 c0.46 ± 0.01 dLRI, MS, STD
88trans-Carvyl acetate 517501134-95-8 118.93 ± 3.69 a--9.92 ± 0.51 bLRI, MS, STD
89α-Selinene 1,61753473-13-2 --301.59 ± 15.00 a19.59 ± 0.74 bLRI, MS
90α-Farnesene 1,3,4,5,61761502-61-4 869.01 ± 19.08 b220.12 ± 12.40 c7344.18 ± 81.10 a854.32 ± 15.50 bLRI, MS, STD
91Bicyclogermacrene 3,4,6176324703-35-3207.10 ± 21.72 a22.81 ± 1.04 b--LRI, MS
92Carvone 1,3,4,5,6176499-49-013.96 ± 0.29 b10.76 ± 0.59 b287.92 ± 14.47 a5.04 ± 0.03 bLRI, MS, STD
93Geranyl acetate 1,3,4,5,61765105-87-3 639.92 ± 17.29 a--8.49 ± 0.13 bLRI, MS, STD
94Decanol 3,41767112-30-1 237.25 ± 4.88 b236.61 ± 13.02 b765.29 ± 18.08 a75.53 ± 0.51 cLRI, MS, STD
95Citronellol 1,2,3,4,5,61768106-22-9 42.72 ± 2.35 c356.28 ± 5.81 b1825.12 ± 12.90 aTraceLRI, MS, STD
96δ-Cadinene 1,3,4,51780483-76-1 364.00 ± 4.92 a21.87 ± 1.71 d185.70 ± 15.41 b95.85 ± 2.95 cLRI, MS
97trans-cis-2,4-Decadienal 1,5,6178425152-83-421.02 ± 0.75 a8.10 ± 0.60 b7.59 ± 0.64 b-LRI, MS
98β-Sesquiphellandrene 3,4178920307-83-9 100.14 ± 2.57 a28.71 ± 1.52 b--LRI, MS
99Nerol 1,3,4,51807106-25-2 127.81 ± 3.15 a77.23 ± 3.80 c106.79 ± 5.99 b52.84 ± 1.88 dLRI, MS, STD
100Perillyl aldehyde 1,3,4,5,618182111-75-3 Trace132.64 ± 1.59 b245.25 ± 24.98 a47.38 ± 0.22 cLRI, MS, STD
101Hexyl octanoate 318201117-55-1 241.35 ± 5.11---LRI, MS
102trans-2-Decenol 5,6183018409-18-2 43.72 ± 0.72 b20.23 ± 1.45 c68.05 ± 5.17 a-LRI, MS
103trans-trans-2,4-Decadienal 1,3,5,6183325152-84-5 41.99 ± 3.76 b28.21 ± 1.10 c83.79 ± 1.02 a0.96 ± 0.04 dLRI, MS, STD
104trans-Carveol 1,3,4,518481197-07-5 Trace101.32 ± 1.49 b256.05 ± 4.79 a81.54 ± 3.18 cLRI, MS, STD
105Undecanol 3,41852112-42-5 10.68 ± 0.85 b-26.66 ± 1.37 a-LRI, MS
106Hexanoic acid 1,3,4,51855142-62-11292.19 ± 11.72 aTrace5.26 ± 0.42 b4.79 ± 0.07 bLRI, MS, STD
107Geraniol 1,2,3,4,51858106-24-1 88.38 ± 5.03 a36.98 ± 0.90 b23.06 ± 1.87 c10.09 ± 0.20 dLRI, MS, STD
108Germacrene B 3,4,5,6186315423-57-1 106.39 ± 3.04---LRI, MS
109p-Cymen-8-ol 3,418671197-01-9 -26.07 ± 0.82 a14.24 ± 1.21 b10.87 ± 0.34 cLRI, MS
110Geranyl acetone 1,518713796-70-1 21.53 ± 1.81 a2.44 ± 0.10 b3.94 ± 0.18 b-LRI, MS, STD
111Isopiperitenone 3,5,61877529-01-1 4.72 ± 0.18 c136.22 ± 2.10 a124.74 ± 1.09 b2.66 ± 0.09 cLRI, MS
112cis-Carveol 1,3,4,518841197-06-4 28.87 ± 1.89 b32.73 ± 0.78 b127.55 ± 8.54 a10.65 ± 0.26 cLRI, MS, STD
113trans-2-Dodecenal 1,3,6188520407-84-5 17.22 ± 0.88 a12.32 ± 0.36 b--LRI, MS, STD
114Lauryl acetate 51893112-66-3 19.39 ± 0.54 a2.35 ± 0.06 c3.03 ± 0.29 b1.59 ± 0.02 dLRI, MS
115Benzyl alcohol 1,3,4,51898100-51-6 12.94 ± 0.29 a4.35 ± 0.14 b12.54 ± 0.94 a5.13 ± 0.75 bLRI, MS, STD
116trans-cis-2,6-Dodecadienal 6191121662-13-5 19.21 ± 0.12 b5.28 ± 0.44 c30.54 ± 0.07 a-LRI, MS, STD
117Perillyl acetate 1,3,4,5,6192515111-96-3 105.69 ± 0.85 a-6.53 ± 0.50 b5.89 ± 0.32 bLRI, MS
118Tetradecanal 3,41935124-25-4 13.14 ± 0.32 c33.67 ± 0.55 b38.95 ± 1.17 a1.41 ± 0.08 dLRI, MS
119p-Menth-1-en-9-ol 3,5195218479-68-0 27.65 ± 1.29 c35.15 ± 0.74 b53.80 ± 4.26 a19.47 ± 0.67 dLRI, MS
120Heptanoic acid 11960111-14-813.48 ± 0.60 a1.96 ± 0.18 d6.19 ± 0.06 b4.72 ± 0.15 cLRI, MS, STD
121Cubebol 3196423445-02-5 37.79 ± 0.40 b-52.90 ± 0.53 a8.62 ± 0.14 cLRI, MS
122β-Ionone 1,2,3196514901-07-69.29 ± 0.11 a2.46 ± 0.14 b1.64 ± 0.01 c0.91 ± 0.03 dLRI, MS, STD
123Dodecanol 31972112-53-846.43 ± 0.57 b41.85 ± 2.33 c63.29 ± 0.47 a11.83 ± 0.40 dLRI, MS, STD
124Caryophyllene oxide 1,420001139-30-6 -Trace8.52 ± 0.68TraceLRI, MS, STD
125trans-trans-2,4-Decadienol 5200518409-21-7 81.89 ± 3.48 b16.29 ± 0.76 c124.09 ± 5.34 a3.02 ± 0.22 dLRI, MS
126cis-Nerolidol 32010142-50-7 9.57 ± 0.07 a3.22 ± 0.06 c6.90 ± 0.06 bTraceLRI, MS, STD
127Perillyl alcohol 1,2,3,4,5,62012536-59-4 239.36 ± 1.75 a115.90 ± 2.03 c172.59 ± 1.43 b113.32 ± 3.94 cLRI, MS, STD
128Methyleugenol 1202993-15-2 42.23 ± 2.02---LRI, MS, STD
129trans-Nerolidol 3,6204440716-66-3 233.52 ± 1.06 a25.13 ± 1.04 c130.59 ± 8.90 bTraceLRI, MS, STD
130Octanoic acid 1,3,4,5,62064124-07-2 839.13 ± 5.04 a125.11 ± 4.79 c180.19 ± 4.60 b34.44 ± 1.62 dLRI, MS, STD
131Germacrene D-4-ol 3,4,52076198,991-79-674.18 ± 5.06 b10.44 ± 0.92 c89.44 ± 1.48 a14.71 ± 0.21 cLRI, MS
132Elemol 1,4,5,62098639-99-6 373.36 ± 29.69 a34.47 ± 2.25 c167.76 ± 2.48 b42.68 ± 1.29 cLRI, MS
133Methyl N-methylanthranilate 3,6210785-91-6 8.27 ± 0.60 a0.56 ± 0.02 b8.10 ± 0.25 a-LRI, MS, STD
134Globulol 3,42108489-41-814.32 ± 0.36 a-13.29 ± 0.89 b8.06 ± 0.17 cLRI, MS
135Cumin alcohol 32117536-60-7 9.61 ± 0.68 a4.36 ± 0.35 bTrace2.34 ± 0.22 cLRI, MS
136Hexadecanal 52148629-80-189.14 ± 1.10 a68.61 ± 1.97 b33.67 ± 0.82 c8.36 ± 0.18 dLRI, MS
137Nonanoic acid 1,3,4,5,62171112-05-0 19.75 ± 1.03 b22.01 ± 2.16 b69.78 ± 1.75 a15.75 ± 0.61 cLRI, MS, STD
138Thymol 3217789-83-8 13.83 ± 1.11 b260.88 ± 2.35 a7.48 ± 0.27 c8.05 ± 0.16 cLRI, MS, STD
139Eugenol 3219497-53-0 70.78 ± 2.75 a0.94 ± 0.01 bTrace-LRI, MS, STD
140Viridiflorol 3,42220552-02-3--Trace1.32 ± 0.02LRI, MS
141Methyl palmitate 1,3,52226112-39-0 10.09 ± 0.20 b43.66 ± 0.88 a-6.56 ± 0.05 cLRI, MS
142Carvacrol 3,42231499-75-2 19.63 ± 0.14 c52.40 ± 1.05 a21.20 ± 0.42 bTraceLRI, MS, STD
1434-Vinylguaiacol 1,422367786-61-0438.96 ± 4.15 b2041.59 ± 9.36 a383.24 ± 1.96 c200.05 ± 5.91 dLRI, MS, STD
144Citronellic acid2254502-47-6 14.12 ± 0.14 c36.58 ± 0.85 b91.26 ± 1.87 a10.86 ± 0.46 dLRI, MS
145β-Sinensal 3225560066-88-8 559.29 ± 5.18 a203.25 ± 16.71 bTraceTraceLRI, MS, STD
146Isospathulenol 5227288395-46-4 25.12 ± 1.90-Trace-LRI, MS
1472,3-Dihydrofarnesol227551411-24-6 21.38 ± 1.54 bTrace76.48 ± 6.84 a9.17 ± 0.58 cLRI, MS
148Decanoic acid 1,3,4,5,62277334-48-574.83 ± 5.39 c108.21 ± 0.86 b635.75 ± 5.00 a17.43 ± 0.65 dLRI, MS, STD
149p-Menth-8-ene-1,2-diol 3,622881946-00-564.54 ± 3.59 a16.48 ± 1.51 c40.69 ± 1.12 b8.71 ± 0.32 dLRI, MS
150trans-trans-Farnesol 12289502-67-0 30.59 ± 0.86 a1.55 ± 0.12 d21.47 ± 0.64 b8.07 ± 0.27 cLRI, MS
151trans-8-Hydroxylinalool 3231175991-61-6 1770.52 ± 86.59 a238.71 ± 6.94 c500.81 ± 13.63 b421.04 ± 19.21 bLRI, MS
152cis-trans-Farnesol 323333790-71-4 295.09 ± 14.43 a32.70 ± 0.95 d51.63 ± 1.82 c70.17 ± 3.20 bLRI, MS, STD
153α-Sinensal 3236017909-77-2 825.85 ± 7.70 a520.53 ± 7.31 b21.51 ± 0.90 c0.70 ± 0.02 dLRI, MS, STD
154trans-trans-Farnesol 52380106-28-5 481.36 ± 18.88 a32.53 ± 0.46 c402.77 ± 19.07 b1.59 ± 0.10 dLRI, MS, STD
155Isoeugenol 3,5238597-54-199.50 ± 3.54 a10.32 ± 0.37 b7.53 ± 0.51 b9.38 ± 0.10 bLRI, MS, STD
156Isoelemicin24165273-85-8 1.83 ± 0.17 b1.85 ± 0.10 b1.86 ± 0.07 b2.48 ± 0.06 aLRI, MS
157Indole 1,52488120-72-9174.90 ± 0.68 a17.79 ± 0.87 b-TraceLRI, MS, STD
158Lauric acid 1,52489143-07-7 175.75 ± 2.00 c329.07 ± 16.07 a241.77 ± 2.18 b28.93 ± 0.47 dLRI, MS, STD
159Nootkatone 1,2,3,425804674-50-4 --671.70 ± 16.03 a34.55 ± 0.87 bLRI, MS, STD
160Vanillin 3,52591121-33-5 43.56 ± 3.62 a16.29 ± 0.94 c36.53 ± 0.52 b11.42 ± 0.87 dLRI, MS, STD
161Perillic acid25947694-45-3324.83 ± 9.08 c446.45 ± 41.12 b617.22 ± 27.09 a68.24 ± 5.91 dLRI, MS
1623-Oxo-α-ionol267334318-21-3 31.83 ± 1.49 a23.51 ± 0.46 b7.80 ± 0.75 d10.31 ± 0.40 cLRI, MS
163Myristic acid 1,3,5,62708544-63-8 132.07 ± 3.05 a52.98 ± 4.25 c118.09 ± 2.31 b35.50 ± 0.93 dLRI, MS, STD
164Palmitic acid 1,3,4,5,6292157-10-3 1169.99 ± 6.73 a318.77 ± 29.03 c552.40 ± 14.57 b540.39 ± 14.60 bLRI, MS, STD
Total concentration 516,373.36 ± 3164.30 b242,460.52 ± 3667.19 c1,051,185.35 ± 8702.54 a60,849.01 ± 2289.68 d
‘-’ means that the compound was not detected. ‘Trace’ means that the FID peak area of the compound was unquantifiable. I LRI: Experimental linear retention index on an HP-Innowax column relative to C7–C40 alkane standards. II Identification methods: “LRI”, comparison of experimental to reference retention indices; “MS”, comparison with mass spectrum of the compound in the NIST library version 2.2; and “STD”, comparison with authentic standards. a,b,c,d Within a row, different superscript letters indicate statistical significance difference at p < 0.05. Compounds reported in 1 Goh et al. [13]; 2 Sun et al. [39]; 3 Uehara and Baldovini [40]; 4 B’chir and Arnaud [41]; 5 Goh et al. [21]; 6 Cheong et al. [42].
Table 4. Key odourants (flavour dilution factor ≥ 1) and their respective flavour dilution factors in four varieties of Japanese mandarin (Iyokan, Ponkan, Shiranui, and Unshiu mikan) peel extracts.
Table 4. Key odourants (flavour dilution factor ≥ 1) and their respective flavour dilution factors in four varieties of Japanese mandarin (Iyokan, Ponkan, Shiranui, and Unshiu mikan) peel extracts.
No.CompoundLRI aRef. LRI bOdour Quality cFlavour Dilution Factor d
IyokanPonkanShiranuiUnshiu Mikan
1α-Pinene10451028 Ipiney, green, fresh1251256255
2α-Thujene10621028 Iwoody, green, fresh51256255
3Camphene10881071 Iwoody, herbal, terpenic--6255
4Unknown1095-creamy, sweet, cooked1---
5Hexanal11051083 Ifresh, green, fatty252511
6β-Pinene11211112 Iwoody, pine, green25255125
7Myrcene11801161 Ipeppery, terpenic16253125125
8Unknown1189-floral, aldehydic, waxy 1-1625
9Limonene12181200 Icitrusy, fresh, sweet1251253125625
10β-Phellandrene12301211 Iminty, terpenic1625125-
11cis-β-Ocimene12491235 Iherbal, floral1---
12γ-Terpinene12591246 Ioily, woody, citrusy25125-1
13trans-β-Ocimene12661250 Icitrusy, green, woody--125-
14Unknown1279-indole, animalic, phenolic1---
15p-Cymene12841272 Iwoody, fresh, citrusy-1-1
16Terpinolene12961283 Ifresh, sweet, fruity-1-1
17Octanal13031289 Igreen, waxy, citrusy151251
18Unknown1316-fatty, metallic-1--
19Unknown1332-sweet, floral1---
20Prenol13371320 Ifruity, green, floral25--25
21Unknown 1343-juicy, sweet, terpenic-625--
22Unknown 1352-floral-5--
23Unknown 1355-buttery, creamy1---
24Hexanol13691355 Ifruity, sweet, green2555125
25cis-3-Hexenol13941382 Ifresh, green, herbal251255
26Unknown 1390-sulphury, tropical-25--
27Nonanal14041391 Ifresh, floral, citrusy55125625
28Unknown 1412-albedo, floral, green1---
29cis-Linalool oxide14521444 Ifloral, woody, sweet-5--
30cis-Limonene oxide14581452 Ifresh, citrusy55255
31trans-Limonene oxide14651462 Ifresh, citrusy-51251
32Unknown 1470-cooked, fermented, earthy5-1255
33Acetic acid14781449 Isharp, pungent, sour15--
34Citronellal14901478 Isweet, herbal, waxy-255-
35α-Copaene14991492 Iwoody, spicy-15-
36Decanal15081498 Ifloral, waxy, citrusy1125625125
372-Ethylhexanol15271491 Icitrusy, fresh, sweet-5-1
38β-Cubebene15421545 Icitrusy, fruity, radish25-55
39cis-4-Decenal15501544 Icitrusy, aldehydic, cardamom25-125-
40Linalool15671547 Icitrusy, floral, woody125125253125
41Octanol15721557 Igreen, citrusy, waxy55125-
42Unknown 1575-terpenic-5--
43β-Elemene15951591 Isweet, herbal, fresh-5125-
44Methylthymol16031590 Iwoody, smoky, burnt-5-5
45Terpinen-4-ol16141602 Iwoody, peppery, sweet-51125
46Unknown 1625-sulphury, grapefruit, woody--1-
47Undecanal16281604 Iwaxy, soapy, floral--125-
48Unknown 1636-woody, earthy1---
49Unknown 1650-floral-25--
50trans-2-Decenal16571644 Iwaxy, fatty, cilantro-55-
51Butanoic acid16601625 Isharp, acetic, cheese55--
52Nonanol16691660 Ifatty, floral, citrusy--15
53trans-β-Farnesene16801664 Iwoody, citrusy, sweet-5--
54Unknown 1695-juicy, sweet, vanilla-5-5
552-Methylbutanoic acid17021662 Iacidic, fruity, cheesy5---
56α-Terpineol17131697 Icitrusy, woody, floral531255125
57trans-trans-2,4-Nonadienal17141700 Ifatty, green, floral1-51
58Germacrene D17201710 Iwoody, spicy5-55
59Dodecanal17281711 Iwaxy, citrusy, floral5255-
60Valencene17301730 Isweet, fresh, oily-1--
61Neryl acetate17361724 Ifloral, soapy, citrusy5--5
62cis-Carvyl acetate17461731 Igreen, herbaceous1--1
63Carvone17511740 Iminty, spicy, caraway115-
64α-Farnesene17631746 Icitrusy, floral, green52551
65Unknown 1767-green, spicy, mango-125--
66Geranyl acetate 17721752 Ifloral, green1---
67Decanol17811760 Ifatty, waxy, citrusy--51
68Citronellol17871765 Ifloral, waxy, citrusy1125251
69Perillyl aldehyde17901793 Ifresh, green, cirtusy-62525-
70Nerol18151797 Isweet, floral, citrusy---5
71trans-trans-2,4-Decadienal18251811 Ialdehydic, citrusy1-11
72Unknown 1838-nutty, beany--5-
73trans-Carveol18461845 Icaraway, green, floral-6255-
74Geraniol18621847 Ifloral, waxy, citrusy2551-
75trans-2-Dodecenal18671867 Imetallic, mandarin, waxy-6251-
76Hexanoic acid18771846 Ifatty, fruity125525-
77cis-Carveol18821861 Icaraway, green, herbal125525125
78Benzyl alcohol18951870 Ifloral, phenolic-115
79Lauryl acetate18981892 Isweet, fresh, waxy-115
80trans-cis-2,6-Dodecadienal19061894 Iwaxy, green, mandarin-53125-
81Perillyl acetate19181902 Ispicy, phenolic, fruity5--5
82p-Menth-1-en-9-ol19401933 Ifruity, herbal15-5
83Unknown 1970-pith, sweet, floral1---
84Dodecanol19791966 Iearthy, soapy, waxy5255-
85Unknown 1992-fresh, juicy, floral5-1625
86trans-trans-2,4-Decadienol20021994 IIfatty, waxy, fruity-155
87Perillyl alcohol20442016 Igreen, spicy, floral 53125255
88trans-Nerolidol20532042 Isweet, floral2525-5
89Germacrene D-4-ol20552069 Icitrusy, sweet-51-
90Unknown 2067-floral, citrusy, albedo25-25-
91Unknown 2078-sulphury, spicy, grapefruit25255-
92Methyl N-methylanthranilate20912077 Isweet, musty, phenolic151-
93Octanoic acid20932060 Ifatty, waxy, cheesy-2525-
94Elemol20962080 Iwoody, spicy, floral55-5
95Unknown 2104-sweet, juicy, floral1-125-
96Cumin alcohol21162113 Icumin, spicy, leathery-25-1
97Unknown 2126-green, juicy, sweet55255
98Hexadecanal21582135 Iwoody25---
99Unknown 2160-sweet, mandarin, juicy-5-5
100Unknown 2191-spicy, peely-25--
101Thymol22132189 Iherbal, spicy, phenolic525--
1024-Vinylguaiacol22212188 Ispicy, clove, smoky-5-5
103Carvacrol22422236 Ispicy, woody, smoky55125-
104β-Sinensal22442238 Ifresh, citrusy, waxy5625--
105Unknown 2252-meaty, sulphury1---
106Isospathulenol22672227 Iwoody125-5-
107Unknown 2276-vanilla, spicy, phenolic-25--
1082,3-Dihydrofarnesol22832262 IIIfloral, fruity625512525
109Decanoic acid22942276 Isour, fatty, citrusy-251-
110Unknown 2307-sweet, phenolic, spicy-3125--
111trans-8-Hydroxylinalool23342284 Icitrusy, lemon, alcoholic15125
112α-Sinensal23452304 Icitrusy, powdery, sour1125-25
113Isoeugenol23582318 Ispicy, woody, floral-62531251
114trans-trans-Farnesol23742356 Iwoody, floral, green--3125-
115Isoelemicin23872389 IVspicy, floral51--
116Indole24602445 Ianimalic, floral11--
117Unknown 2472-green, floral, peely1-5-
118Unknown 2489-sweet, woody, powdery11255-
119Unknown 2529-peely, earthy, herbal-1--
120Nootkatone25482530 Igrapefruit, peely, floral--55
121Unknown 2551-woody, earthy, green51--
122Vanillin25812568 Isweet, vanilla, phenolic25-25125
123Unknown 2606-sweet, coumaric-25--
124Unknown 2612-green, sour-25--
125Perillic acid26492640 Ifloral, sweet1125-625
1263-Oxo-α-ionol26672639 Ispicy1---
127Unknown 2722-spicy, woody, clove-25-1
128Unknown 2737-phenolic, spicy, vanilla-12555
129Unknown 2824-woody, spicy, phenolic625-55
130Unknown 2901-spicy, clove, phenolic-62555
131Unknown 2922-green, woody, sweet253125-5
‘-’ refers to compound not detected. a LRI: Experimental linear retention index on an HP-INNOWax column relative to C7–C40 alkane standards. b Ref. LRI: Reference retention index values from literature: I NIST library version 2.2; II Paraskevopoulou et al. [49]; III Ledauphin et al. [50]; IV Bélanger et al. [51]. c Odour quality of compounds described by flavourists. d Flavour dilution factor refers to the highest dilution at which the compound can be detected by at least three flavourists.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, L.; Goh, R.M.V.; Huang, Y.; Ee, K.-H.; Pua, A.; Tan, D.; Zhang, S.; Jublot, L.; Liu, S.Q.; Yu, B. Characterisation of the Volatile Compounds and Key Odourants in Japanese Mandarins by Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry and Gas Chromatography–Olfactometry. Separations 2024, 11, 237. https://doi.org/10.3390/separations11080237

AMA Style

Li L, Goh RMV, Huang Y, Ee K-H, Pua A, Tan D, Zhang S, Jublot L, Liu SQ, Yu B. Characterisation of the Volatile Compounds and Key Odourants in Japanese Mandarins by Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry and Gas Chromatography–Olfactometry. Separations. 2024; 11(8):237. https://doi.org/10.3390/separations11080237

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Lingyi, Rui Min Vivian Goh, Yunle Huang, Kim-Huey Ee, Aileen Pua, Daphne Tan, Shanbo Zhang, Lionel Jublot, Shao Quan Liu, and Bin Yu. 2024. "Characterisation of the Volatile Compounds and Key Odourants in Japanese Mandarins by Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry and Gas Chromatography–Olfactometry" Separations 11, no. 8: 237. https://doi.org/10.3390/separations11080237

APA Style

Li, L., Goh, R. M. V., Huang, Y., Ee, K. -H., Pua, A., Tan, D., Zhang, S., Jublot, L., Liu, S. Q., & Yu, B. (2024). Characterisation of the Volatile Compounds and Key Odourants in Japanese Mandarins by Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry and Gas Chromatography–Olfactometry. Separations, 11(8), 237. https://doi.org/10.3390/separations11080237

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop