Next Article in Journal
Application of Thermo-Malaxation Followed by Three-Phase Centrifugation to Enable the Biorefinery of Alperujo, the Main By-Product of Olive Oil
Previous Article in Journal
Carcass Yields and Meat Composition of Roosters of the Portuguese Autochthonous Poultry Breeds: “Branca”, “Amarela”, “Pedrês Portuguesa”, and “Preta Lusitânica”
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Characterization of the Toxigenic Potential of Bacillus cereus sensu lato Isolated from Raw Berries and Their Products

1
Department of Food Hygiene and Technology, University of León, 24071 León, Spain
2
Laboratório Associado, CBQF—Centro de Biotecnologia e Química Fina, Escola Superior de Biotecnologia, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Rua Diogo Botelho 1327, 4169-005 Porto, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2023, 12(21), 4021; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12214021
Submission received: 11 October 2023 / Revised: 29 October 2023 / Accepted: 30 October 2023 / Published: 3 November 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Food Microbiology)

Abstract

:
Bacillus cereus is estimated to be responsible for 1.4–12% of all food poisoning outbreaks worldwide. The objective of this study was to investigate the toxigenic potential of 181 isolates of B. cereus previously recovered from different types of berries and berry products (strawberries, raspberries, blackberries, and blueberries) by assessing the presence of enterotoxin genes (hblA, hblC, hblD, nheA, nheB, nheC, and cytK) and an emetic toxin cereulide synthetase gene (ces). The cytotoxic activity on Caco-2 cells was also evaluated for the two isolates containing the gene cytK. Twenty-three toxigenic profiles were found. The nheABC (91.7%) and hblACD (89.0%) complexes were the most prevalent among the isolates, while the cytK and ces genes were detected in low percentages, 1.1% and 3.3%, respectively. In addition, the nheABC/hblACD complex and ces genes were detected in isolates recovered throughout the production process of blackberries and strawberries. The cytotoxic activity on Caco-2 cells was also observed to be greater than 60% for isolates containing the cytK gene.

1. Introduction

Increased fruit and vegetable consumption is driven by factors like the growing awareness of their health benefits. Consequently, there has been a rise in foodborne illness cases and outbreaks linked to their consumption [1]. Fresh and frozen berries have attracted particular attention as a potential source of foodborne illness [2]. Although most incidents are associated with viruses and parasites, bacterial outbreaks have also been documented [3].
The Bacillus cereus group, also called B. cereus sensu lato (s.l.), is a group of genetically closely related species that includes pathogenic and non-pathogenic species [4]. As far as the authors know at the time of writing, the group comprises nine closely related bacterial species including, B. anthracis [5], B. cereus sensu stricto (s.s.), B. cytotoxicus [6], B. mycoides [7], B. pseudomycoides [8], B. thuringiensis, B. toyonensis [9], B. weihenstephanensis [7], and B. wiedmannii [10]. Their genetic similarity has been widely studied and is characterized by having significant implications for human health, agriculture, and food processing [11]. The main species recognized as human pathogens are B. cereus s.s., most commonly associated with food poisoning, B. anthracis, the causative agent of anthrax, and B. cytotoxicus, a thermotolerant species also associated with food poisoning [12].
In a shift towards a strain-based approach to characterization and risk assessment, a new taxonomic framework for B. cereus s.l. was proposed by Carroll et al. [13]. The aim was to provide a more accurate assessment of the pathogenic potential of B. cereus s.l. isolates while maintaining genomic species definitions. Within this updated framework, the previously known B. cereus s.l. species were reclassified into eight genomic species. In addition, three distinct biovars were created: Emeticus, Anthracis, and Thuringiensis, based on the presence of genes associated with specific characteristics. More recently, Zhang et al. [14] conducted a study that examined the species diversity of B. cereus strains and their phylogenetic relationships concerning virulence factors. The aim of the research was to systematically evaluate the distribution of virulence genes and analyze the structures and functions of virulence proteins. By assessing enterotoxicity through nheABC, hblACD, and cytK gene expression, the study classified the strains into three levels of toxicity. The results suggested that B. cereus strains have evolved into clusters characterized as non-toxic risk and toxic risk, further subdivided into medium-high-risk and medium-low-risk subclusters.
Strains of B. cereus are widespread in the environment and can be found in soil, raw fruits and vegetables, raw herbs, and dry and processed foods [15,16,17]. They are spore-forming bacteria and some strains are psychrotrophic and extremely resistant to various environmental and processing conditions, resulting in the contamination of various foods after processing [18,19].
Bacillus cereus gastrointestinal diseases are caused by a large number of virulence factors that are not yet fully understood. The level of expression of genes that play a role in its pathogenicity (e.g., genes encoding for toxins, such as hemolysins, enterotoxins, and emetic toxins, as well as enzymes involved in tissue degradation) determine the actual risk of food poisoning [4]. Two types of food poisoning are considered, either by ingestion of large numbers of bacterial cells and/or spores from contaminated food (diarrhoeal type) or by ingestion of food contaminated with a pre-formed toxin (emetic type) [20,21,22]. Diarrhoea is caused by enterotoxins released in the small intestine by cells that survive gastric passage or during vegetative growth after spore germination [23]; when pre-formed in foods, these enterotoxins most likely do not contribute to the disease, as they are considered sensitive towards heat, acids or proteases [24]. Diarrhoea is generally attributed to different enterotoxins, including non-hemolytic enterotoxin NHE [25], hemolysin BL (HBL) [25], and cytotoxin K (CytK) [26]. Emetic syndrome is associated with the ingestion of the dodecadepsipeptide cereulide, which is pre-formed in food before ingestion (as reviewed by Yang et al. [27]). Symptoms (vomiting and nausea) typically appear 30 min to 6 h after eating contaminated food. This symptomatology resembles that of staphylococcal poisoning [20]. Because of its resistance to heat, acids, and proteolysis, cereulide remains active even after exposure to heat treatment in contaminated food samples or the digestive environment of the stomach [27,28,29]. According to Park et al. [30] emetic B. cereus strains exposed to temperatures higher than their optimum growth temperature could potentially develop tolerance to disinfectants and become more virulent.
The true incidence of B. cereus food poisoning may be underestimated due to the misdiagnosis of the disease, which is symptomatically similar to other types of food poisoning, and the generally short duration of illness [31]. Still, according to data from 2021, B. cereus was reported as the fifth most common causative agent of foodborne outbreaks in the EU [2].
The level of B. cereus in fruits and fruit products in generally low [15]. It is generally understood that food products below 104 to 105 cells or spores per gram are not considered to pose a significant risk [32,33]. However, when used as ingredients, these products can potentially contaminate various foods, such as starchy meals, creating favourable conditions for B. cereus growth and toxin production.
Little information is available on the toxigenic profile of B. cereus present in fruits, particularly in raw berries and their products. To this regard, the objective of this work was to determine the presence of enterotoxin (hblA, hblC, hblD, nheA, nheB, nheC, and cytK) and the emetic toxin (ces) genes in 181 B. cereus isolates collected from berry samples, from raw berries to processed fruits.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Bacterial Isolates

The B. cereus s.l. isolates used in this study, hereafter referred to as B. cereus, were collected from the work of Oliveira et al. [15]. A total of 181 isolates (Table 1) (bacilli displaying typical growth for the B. cereus group, i.e., rough and dry colonies with violet pink background surrounding an egg yolk precipitation, and hemolysis on blood agar) were isolated from berry fruit samples (strawberries (n = 25), raspberries (n = 74), blackberries (n = 43) and blueberries (n = 39)) in three fruit flavour production steps (RM: raw material; IP: intermediate product; FP: final product). B. cereus NVH 0075-95 (nhe reference), B. cytotoxicus NVH 391-98 (cytK reference) [34], B. cereus DSMZ 4313 (hbl/nhe reference) [35], and B. cereus DSMZ 4312 (cereulide and nhe reference) [36] were used as reference strains.

2.2. DNA Extraction

All B. cereus isolates were grown by streaking on Tryptone Soy Agar (TSA, Biokar Diagnostics, Allonne, France) plates and incubating at 30 °C for 24 h. A single colony was then inoculated into Tryptone Soy Broth (TSB, Biokar Diagnostics) and incubated at 30 °C for 18 h. Subsequently, DNA of each isolate was extracted using the GRS Genomic DNA Kit (Grisp, Porto, Portugal) according to the manufacturer’s protocol for Gram-positive bacteria. The PCR screening was carried out to detect the presence of seven enterotoxigenic genes (hblA, hblC, hblD, nheA, nheB, nheC, and cytK), and one emetic gene (ces).

2.3. Primers and Multiplex PCR Reaction

Table 2 shows the sequences of the primer pairs used in this study to amplify the virulence factor genes of B. cereus. All primers used in this study have previously been used in multiplex PCR assays for the simultaneous detection of enterotoxigenic and emetic genes [37,38,39,40].
Multiplex PCR was performed in an automatic thermal cycler (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) under the following optimized cycling program (Table 3): an initial denaturation step of 3 min at 95 °C; 35 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s; annealing at 58 °C for 45 s; an extension at 72 °C for 1.5 min; and a final extension at 72 °C for 5 min. For each reaction tube, 25 ng of DNA was used. Ultrapure water was used for all negative control reactions and for the preparation of the PCR mixture. All mixtures for the amplification of sequences encoding toxins contained 2 μL of template DNA (25 ng), 10× Taq Buffer + KCl (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), 10 mM of each deoxynucleoside triphosphate (dNTPs) (Bioron, Römerberg, Germany), 25 mM of MgCl2 (ThermoFisher Scientific), 50 μM of each primer, and 1 U μL−1 of Taq DNA polymerase (ThermoFisher Scientific). Amplified fragments, GRS Ladder 100 bp (Grisp), and positive and negative controls were analyzed using electrophoresis on 1.5% agarose in 1× buffer (108 g Trisbase L−1, 55 g boric acid L−1 and 40 mL of 0.5 M EDTA, pH 8.0) at 80 V over 1.5 h.

2.4. Cytotoxic Activity

The cytotoxic activity of bacterial supernatants on the human colon adenocarcinoma cell line Caco-2 (American Type Culture Collection ECACC 86010202) was evaluated using the method described by Gdoura-Ben Amor et al. [41] with some modifications. Caco-2 cells were cultivated on 96-well microplates at 37 °C under 5% CO2 atmosphere for 3 days in Eagle’s minimal essential medium (Lonza, Verviers, Belgium) supplemented with 1% (v/v) of non-essential amino acids (Biosera, Boussens, France), 1% (v/v) of pyruvate (Lonza), and 20% (v/v) of fetal bovine serum (FBS; Biowest, Nuaillé, France). Of the 181 B. cereus isolates, only isolates that had the cytK gene were tested (B. cereus isolate profile II and XIX) and two different controls were used: negative control (BactoFlavor®ScarLet, Chr. Hansen A/S, Hoersholm, Denmark) and positive control (B. cytotoxicus NVH 391-98). These bacteria were grown for 18 h and 5 days at 30 °C in Brain Heart Infusion (BHI, Biokar Diagnostics, France) with additional 6 g L−1 of Yeast Extract (YE, Biokar, France), without agitation. Cell suspensions were centrifuged (10 min, 7000 rpm, 4 °C) and the supernatants were filtered through 0.22 μm sterile filter units (Sartorius, Göttingen, Germany). After removal of the culture medium, Caco-2 cells were washed 3 times with phosphate buffered saline (PBS, 0.1 M, pH 7.4; Sigma, Darmstadt, Germany), incubated over 3 h with 50 μL of each bacterial filtrate and then rinsed with PBS and fixed with 2% (v/v in PBS) formaldehyde (Sigma-Aldrich, Darmstadt, Germany) at 4 °C for 30 min. Formaldehyde was removed and the remaining cells were stained for 20 min at room temperature with 80 μL of 2% crystal violet solution (v/v in PBS) (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). Cells were rinsed three times with distilled water, the crystal violet solution was released from the cells by adding 200 μL of 50% (v/v) ethanol in water and shaking the microplates at room temperature for 45 min and, lastly, were transferred into new microplates and the optical density (OD) was measured at 630 nm. The cytotoxic activity was expressed as a percentage of inhibition compared with the negative control, calculated as follows:
C y t o t o x i c   a c t i v i t y   ( % ) = ( O D   c o n t r o l O D   i s o l a t e ) / ( O D   c o n t r o l ) × 100
B. cereus isolates were considered cytotoxic when the percentage of inhibition was higher than 50%. Tests and controls were carried out in triplicate on the same microplate.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Data analyses and plotting were carried out in R environment (http://www.r-project.org accessed on 15 June 2022). A barplot representing the prevalence of toxin profiles in each sample type was drawn with the function ‘geom_bar’ from the ‘ggplot2’ R package.
Data analysis for cytotoxic activity of B. cereus strains on Caco-2 cells was performed using IBM SPSS software (version 28.0). Statistical differences were analyzed for significance by one-way ANOVA using Tukey’s multiple range tests. Statistical significance was determined at the p < 0.05 levels.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Distribution of Virulence Genes among B. cereus Isolates

The virulence potential of B. cereus recovered from berries (strawberries, raspberries, blackberries, and blueberries) and berries products [15] was investigated by screening the presence of seven diarrhoeal toxin-encoding genes (hblACD, nheABC, cytK) and one emetic toxin-encoding gene (ces), as shown in Figure 1. It should be highlighted that, in some isolates, not all genes are always detected using PCR due to the presence of polymorphisms in the sequences of genes of the HBL and NHE complexes [38]. Remarkably, all 181 B. cereus isolates analysed in this study showed at least one of the toxin genes examined.
Twenty-three different toxin profiles were found among the B. cereus isolates and their prevalence and distribution are shown in Table 4 and Table 5 and in Figure 2. Consistent reports indicate the presence of multiple toxin profiles [14,42,43,44]; however, the most prevalent profile varies between studies. Enterotoxin genes were found more frequently in blackberry, raspberry, and strawberry samples than in blueberries. The complex nheABC/hblACD (toxin profile VI), causing diarrhoeal-type disease, showed the highest prevalence (44.2%; 80/181), followed by the toxin profile V (nheAB/hblACD) with a prevalence of 8.3% (Table 4); moreover, at least one gene of each complex was detected in a percentage of 91.7% (166/181) and 89.0% (161/181) for NHE and HBL, respectively (Table 5). These enterotoxin genes were detected almost always above 50%, with hblD, nheA, and nheB showing the highest prevalence (85.6, 85.1, and 81.8%, respectively) regardless of the fruit product. Additionally, genes hblA, hblC, and nheC were detected in 74.6, 61.9, and 49.2% of the isolates, respectively. Furthermore, a total of 8 (4.4%) and 22 (12%) out of 181 B. cereus isolates harboured all three genes encoding the enterotoxic NHE (ABC) and HBL (ACD) complexes, respectively. This finding is in agreement with other previous studies, which showed that most of the B. cereus strains isolated from food carried all three genes of the nhe operon [45,46,47,48,49]. Additionally, Sánchez-Chica et al. [49] detected 30 B. cereus isolates (57%) carrying the HBL (ACD) complex. Similar HBL (ACD) prevalences have been reported previously, showing results of about 50–70% [45,46,50,51]. Compared to our study, the prevalence of both NHE and HBL complete complexes reported in the aforementioned studies was much higher, highlighting the variability in the occurrence of these complexes, which can be ascribed to different food products and geographical distribution. By analyzing the hemolytic (HBLs) and nonhemolytic (NHEs) enterotoxins genes individually, our results showed higher prevalences than the corresponding complete complex, and at least one gene from the nhe and hbl operon was found, as in the previous studies by Ceuppens et al. [4] and Tewari et al. [52]. Guo et al. [46] reported higher prevalence rates of the nheA, nheB, and nheC genes in strains isolated from quick-frozen food (both processed and non-processed samples), at 100.0%, 100.0%, and 88.8%, respectively, compared to our present study’s findings (85.1%, 81.8%, and 49.2%). Additionally, hblA, hblC, and hblD were found in 65.2%, 86.2%, and 75.0% of the strains [46], contrasting with the rates in our study, which showed 74.6%, 61.9%, and 85.6%, respectively. Various authors have consistently reported that genes from the HBL complex are less prevalent than those from the NHE complex [41,52,53]. On the other extreme, a very low prevalence of the cytK gene was observed (1.1%; 2/181). This is a lower prevalence rate when comparing with other studies on different food products [38,46,52,54,55]. Studies in Europe and around the world have shown that the distribution of the enterotoxin gene cytK is around 40–70% in fresh vegetables [42], quick-frozen food [46], and flour products (including, wheat flour, spelt flour, rye flour, and flour mixes) [56]; however, this prevalence can be higher in other food products including cereals, ready-to-eat meals, spices, dairy products, and starches [57,58].
Regarding the gene encoding emetic toxin (ces), it was detected in 3.3% (6/181) of the isolates (Table 5). Despite being present in a low percentage of isolates, it should be highlighted that the ces gene was detected in isolates recovered from blackberry and strawberry final products (50%; 3/6; Figure 2). These results seem to be in agreement with previous studies on the virulence gene profiles of B. cereus, showing that the prevalence of strains producing emetic toxin is rather low [41,42,46]. The presence of the emetic toxin is usually related to starchy food products, including pasta, potatoes, and rice, but can also be found in soups, sauces, and other cooked food items [59,60,61].
Figure 2 represents the distribution of toxin profiles in berries samples at different stages of processing. The toxin profiles were mostly present in raw materials and intermediate products. In the case of blackberries and strawberries, two profiles were also detected in isolates recovered from final product samples. The enterotoxin gene cytK (toxin profiles II and XIX) was detected only in isolates from raw blueberry and raspberry samples, while the ces gene (toxin profile I) was found in isolates from the final products of strawberry and blackberry isolates. Noticeably, the eight toxin genes investigated were not detected in isolates from the final products of raspberry and blueberry samples.
Among all the fruits studied, blueberries showed the highest number of toxin profiles in raw materials followed by blackberries and raspberries. Regarding intermediate product samples, raspberries presented seven different toxin profiles, while a lower variation was observed in the other fruits.

3.2. Cytotoxic Activity of B. cereus Isolates

The evaluation of the cytotoxic activity on Caco-2 cells was performed only for the isolates carrying the cytK gene (two isolates, toxin profiles II and XIX; Table 4). After growing for 18 h and 5 days at 30 °C, the culture supernatants of these isolates showed cytotoxic activity on Caco-2 cells, with a percentage higher than 60% and no differences (p > 0.05) between them were observed (Table 6). Additionally, this cytotoxic activity was similar (p > 0.05) to the one observed by the strain used as a positive control, B. cereus subsp. cytotoxicus NVH 391-98. Similarly, Gdoura-Ben Amor et al. [41] reported 70.7% cytotoxic activity for the majority of the isolates tested after 18 h of incubation. On the other hand, the authors observed a decrease in cytotoxic activity after 5 days, probably due to the degradation of toxins and the death of the cells. Jan et al. [62] observed a cytotoxic activity of 55.1 and 67.9% after 18 h and 5 days at 30 °C, respectively. Although our results are representative of just two B. cereus isolates, this finding highlights the importance of controlling this pathogen from raw material to final products.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, the results from this study showed the importance of considering B. cereus, a health hazard present in raw berries and their products due to the high prevalence of enterotoxin genes widespread among the isolates. All the isolates analysed in this study showed at least one of the toxin genes examined. Despite the fact that the emetic toxin gene was found in only 3.3% of the isolates, it was present in some berry final products, converting it to a target that should be monitored along with enterotoxin-producing B. cereus isolates.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: M.O. and P.T.; Data curation: M.O. and M.C.; Formal analysis: M.O. and P.T.; Funding acquisition: P.T.; Investigation: M.O. and P.T.; Methodology: M.O., M.C. and P.T.; Project administration: P.T.; Resources: P.T.; Supervision: M.O. and P.T.; Writing—original draft: M.O. and M.C.; Writing—review and editing: M.O. and P.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors would like to thank the scientific collaboration under the Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT) project UIDP/00329/2020. The author M. Oliveira is in receipt of a Juan de la Cierva—Incorporación contract [IJC2018-035523 I] awarded by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033).

Data Availability Statement

The data used to support the findings of this study can be made available by the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Macieira, A.; Barbosa, J.; Teixeira, P. Food Safety in Local farming of fruits and vegetables. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 9733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. European Food Safety Authority; European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. The European Union One Health 2021 Zoonoses Report. EFSA J. 2022, 20, e07666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Palumbo, M.; Harris, L.J.; Danyluk, M.D. Outbreaks of foodborne illness associated with common berries, 1983 through May 2013. 2013. Available online: http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/fs232 (accessed on 27 February 2023).
  4. Ceuppens, S.; Rajkovic, A.; Heyndrickx, M.; Tsilia, V.; Van De Wiele, T.; Boon, N.; Uyttendaele, M. Regulation of toxin production by Bacillus cereus and its food safety implications. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 2011, 37, 188–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Logan, N.A.; Carman, J.A.; Melling, J.; Berkeley, R.C.W. Identification of Bacillus anthracis by API tests. J. Med. Microbiol. 1985, 20, 75–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Guinebretière, M.-H.; Auger, S.; Galleron, N.; Contzen, M.; De Sarrau, B.; De Buyser, M.-L.; Lamberet, G.; Fagerlund, A.; Granum, P.E.; Lereclus, D.; et al. Bacillus cytotoxicus sp. nov. is a novel thermotolerant species of the Bacillus cereus Group occasionally associated with food poisoning. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2013, 63, 31–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Lechner, S.; Mayr, R.; Francis, K.P.; Pruss, B.M.; Kaplan, T.; Wießner-Gunkel, E.; Stewart, G.S.A.B.; Scherer, S. Bacillus weihenstephanensis sp. nov. is a new psychrotolerant species of the Bacillus cereus group. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 1998, 48, 1373–1382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Nakamura, L.K. Bacillus pseudomycoides sp. nov. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 1998, 48, 1031–1035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Jiménez, G.; Urdiain, M.; Cifuentes, A.; López-López, A.; Blanch, A.R.; Tamames, J.; Kämpfer, P.; Kolstø, A.-B.; Ramón, D.; Martínez, J.F.; et al. Description of Bacillus toyonensis sp. nov., a novel species of the Bacillus cereus group, and pairwise genome comparisons of the species of the group by means of ANI calculations. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2013, 36, 383–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Miller, R.A.; Beno, S.M.; Kent, D.J.; Carroll, L.M.; Martin, N.H.; Boor, K.J.; Kovac, J. Bacillus wiedmannii sp. nov., a psychrotolerant and cytotoxic Bacillus cereus group species isolated from dairy foods and dairy environments. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2016, 66, 4744–4753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Rasko, D.A.; Altherr, M.R.; Han, C.S.; Ravel, J. Genomics of the Bacillus cereus group of organisms. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2005, 29, 303–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Amor, M.G.-B.; Siala, M.; Zayani, M.; Grosset, N.; Smaoui, S.; Messadi-Akrout, F.; Baron, F.; Jan, S.; Gautier, M.; Gdoura, R. Isolation, identification, prevalence, and genetic diversity of Bacillus cereus group bacteria from different foodstuffs in Tunisia. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Carroll, L.M.; Wiedmann, M.; Kovac, J. Proposal of a taxonomic nomenclature for the Bacillus cereus group which reconciles genomic definitions of bacterial species with clinical and industrial phenotypes. Mbio 2020, 11, e00034-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Zhang, M.; Liu, J.; Yin, Z.; Zhang, L. Phylogenetic and protein prediction analysis reveals the taxonomically diverse distribution of virulence factors in Bacillus cereus strains. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0262974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Oliveira, M.; Rodrigues, C.M.; Teixeira, P. Microbiological quality of raw berries and their products: A focus on foodborne pathogens. Heliyon 2019, 5, e02992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Park, K.M.; Jeong, M.; Park, K.J.; Koo, M. Prevalence, enterotoxin genes, and antibiotic resistance of Bacillus cereus isolated from raw vegetables in Korea. J. Food Prot. 2018, 81, 1590–1597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Tango, C.N.; Wei, S.; Khan, I.; Hussain, M.S.; Kounkeu, P.F.N.; Park, J.H.; Kim, S.; Oh, D.H. microbiological quality and safety of fresh fruits and vegetables at retail levels in Korea. J. Food Sci. 2018, 83, 386–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Faille, C.; Membre, J.M.; Kubaczka, M.; Gavini, F. Altered Ability of Bacillus cereus Spores to grow under unfavorable conditions (presence of nisin, low temperature, acidic ph, presence of nacl) following heat treatment during sporulation. J. Food Prot. 2002, 65, 1930–1936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kotiranta, A.; Lounatmaa, K.; Haapasalo, M. Epidemiology and pathogenesis of Bacillus cereus infections. Microbes Infect. 2000, 2, 189–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ehling-Schulz, M.; Fricker, M.; Scherer, S. Bacillus cereus, the causative agent of an emetic type of food-borne illness. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2004, 48, 479–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Schoeni, J.L.; Wong, A.C.L. Bacillus cereus food poisoning and its toxins. J. Food Prot. 2005, 68, 636–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Stenfors Arnesen, L.P.; Fagerlund, A.; Granum, P.E. From soil to gut: Bacillus cereus and its food poisoning toxins. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2008, 32, 579–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Wijnands, L.M.; Pielaat, A.; Dufrenne, J.B.; Zwietering, M.H.; van Leusden, F.M. Modelling the number of viable vegetative cells of Bacillus cereus passing through the stomach. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2009, 106, 258–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Dietrich, R.; Jessberger, N.; Ehling-Schulz, M.; Märtlbauer, E.; Granum, P.E. The food poisoning toxins of Bacillus cereus. Toxins 2021, 13, 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Ehling-Schulz, M.; Guinebretiere, M.-H.; Monthán, A.; Berge, O.; Fricker, M.; Svensson, B. Toxin gene profiling of enterotoxic and emetic Bacillus cereus. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2006, 260, 232–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Fagerlund, A.; Ween, O.; Lund, T.; Hardy, S.P.; Granum, P.E. Genetic and functional analysis of the cytK family of genes in Bacillus cereus. Microbiology 2004, 150, 2689–2697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yang, S.; Wang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Jia, K.; Zhang, Z.; Dong, Q. Cereulide and emetic Bacillus cereus: Characterizations, impacts and public precautions. Foods 2023, 12, 833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ehling-Schulz, M.; Vukov, N.; Schulz, A.; Shaheen, R.; Andersson, M.; Märtlbauer, E.; Scherer, S. identification and partial characterization of the nonribosomal peptide synthetase gene responsible for cereulide production in emetic Bacillus cereus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2005, 71, 105–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ehling-Schulz, M.; Frenzel, E.; Gohar, M. Food–bacteria interplay: Pathometabolism of emetic Bacillus cereus. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Park, K.M.; Kim, H.J.; Park, K.J.; Koo, M. Susceptibility of emetic and enterotoxigenic Bacillus cereus grown at high temperature to disinfectants. Heliyon 2023, 9, e16863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Bennett, S.D.; Walsh, K.A.; Gould, L.H. foodborne disease outbreaks caused by Bacillus cereus, Clostridium perfringens, and Staphylococcus aureus—United States, 1998–2008. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2013, 57, 425–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Beattie, S.H.; Williams, A.G. Detection of toxins. In Encyclopedia of Food Microbiology, 1st ed.; Robinson, R.K., Batt, C.A., Patel, P.D., Eds.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2000; pp. 141–158. [Google Scholar]
  33. Granum, P.E.; Lund, T. Bacillus cereus and its food poisoning toxins. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 1997, 157, 223–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Jeßberger, N.; Dietrich, R.; Bock, S.; Didier, A.; Märtlbauer, E. Bacillus cereus enterotoxins act as major virulence factors and exhibit distinct cytotoxicity to different human cell lines. Toxicon 2014, 77, 49–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Ehling-Schulz, M.; Svensson, B.; Guinebretiere, M.-H.; Lindbäck, T.; Andersson, M.; Schulz, A.; Fricker, M.; Christiansson, A.; Granum, P.E.; Märtlbauer, E.; et al. Emetic toxin formation of Bacillus cereus is restricted to a single evolutionary lineage of closely related strains. Microbiology 2005, 151, 183–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Cui, Y.; Liu, Y.; Liu, X.; Xia, X.; Ding, S.; Zhu, K. Evaluation of the Toxicity and Toxicokinetics of Cereulide from an Emetic Bacillus cereus Strain of Milk Origin. Toxins 2016, 8, 156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Forghani, F.; Kim, J.-B.; Oh, D.-H. Enterotoxigenic profiling of emetic toxin- and enterotoxin-producing Bacillus cereus, isolated from food, environmental, and clinical samples by Multiplex PCR. J. Food Sci. 2014, 79, M2288–M2293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Guinebretière, M.-H.; Broussolle, V.; Nguyen-The, C. Enterotoxigenic profiles of food-poisoning and food-borne Bacillus cereus strains. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2002, 40, 3053–3056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kim, J.-M.; Forghani, F.; Kim, J.-B.; Park, Y.-B.; Park, M.-S.; Wang, J.; Park, J.H.; Oh, D.-H. Improved multiplex PCR assay for simultaneous detection of Bacillus cereus emetic and enterotoxic strains. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2012, 21, 1439–1444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kim, M.-J.; Han, J.-K.; Park, J.-S.; Lee, J.-S.; Lee, S.-H.; Cho, J.-I.; Kim, K.-S. Various Enterotoxin and Other Virulence Factor Genes Widespread Among Bacillus cereus and Bacillus thuringiensis Strains. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2015, 25, 872–879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Amor, M.G.-B.; Jan, S.; Baron, F.; Grosset, N.; Culot, A.; Gdoura, R.; Gautier, M.; Techer, C. Toxigenic potential and antimicrobial susceptibility of Bacillus cereus group bacteria isolated from Tunisian foodstuffs. BMC Microbiol. 2019, 19, 196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Fiedler, G.; Schneider, C.; Igbinosa, E.O.; Kabisch, J.; Brinks, E.; Becker, B.; Stoll, D.A.; Cho, G.-S.; Huch, M.; Franz, C.M.A.P. Antibiotics resistance and toxin profiles of Bacillus cereus-group isolates from fresh vegetables from German retail markets. BMC Microbiol. 2019, 19, 250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Sánchez-Chica, J.; Correa, M.M.; Aceves-Diez, A.E.; Castañeda-Sandoval, L.M. Enterotoxin Gene Distribution and Genotypes of Bacillus cereus sensu lato Isolated from Cassava Starch. Toxins 2021, 13, 131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Rajalingam, N.; Jung, J.; Seo, S.-M.; Jin, H.-S.; Kim, B.-E.; Jeong, M.-I.; Kim, D.; Ryu, J.-G.; Ryu, K.-Y.; Oh, K.K. Prevalence, distribution, enterotoxin profiles, antimicrobial resistance, and genetic diversity of Bacillus cereus group isolates from lettuce farms in Korea. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 906040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Chaves, J.Q.; Pires, E.S.; Vivoni, A.M. Genetic diversity, antimicrobial resistance and toxigenic profiles of Bacillus cereus isolated from food in Brazil over three decades. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2011, 147, 12–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Guo, H.; Yu, P.; Yu, S.; Wang, J.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Liao, X.; Wu, S.; Ye, Q.; Yang, X.; et al. Incidence, toxin gene profiling, antimicrobial susceptibility, and genetic diversity of Bacillus cereus isolated from quick-frozen food in China. LWT 2021, 140, 110824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Kim, B.; Bang, J.; Kim, H.; Kim, Y.; Kim, B.-S.; Beuchat, L.R.; Ryu, J. Bacillus cereus and Bacillus thuringiensis spores in Korean rice: Prevalence and toxin production as affected by production area and degree of milling. Food Microbiol. 2014, 42, 89–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Ngamwongsatit, P.; Buasri, W.; Pianariyanon, P.; Pulsrikarn, C.; Ohba, M.; Assavanig, A.; Panbangred, W. Broad distribution of enterotoxin genes (hblCDA, nheABC, cytK, and entFM) among Bacillus thuringiensis and Bacillus cereus as shown by novel primers. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2008, 121, 352–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Sánchez-Chica, J.; Correa, M.M.; Aceves-Diez, A.E.; Castañeda-Sandoval, L.M. Genetic and toxigenic diversity of Bacillus cereus group isolated from powdered foods. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 58, 1892–1899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Hansen, B.M.; Hendriksen, N.B. Detection of Enterotoxic Bacillus cereus and Bacillus thuringiensis Strains by PCR Analysis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2001, 67, 185–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Thaenthanee, S.; Wong, A.C.L.; Panbangred, W. Phenotypic and genotypic comparisons reveal a broad distribution and heterogeneity of hemolysin BL genes among Bacillus cereus isolates. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2005, 105, 203–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Tewari, A.; Singh, S.P.; Singh, R. Incidence and enterotoxigenic profile of Bacillus cereus in meat and meat products of Uttarakhand, India. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 52, 1796–1801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Castiaux, V.; Laloux, L.; Schneider, Y.-J.; Mahillon, J. Screening of cytotoxic B. cereus on differentiated Caco-2 cells and in co-culture with mucus-secreting (HT29-MTX) cells. Toxins 2016, 8, 320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Lee, N.; Kim, M.-D.; Chang, H.-J.; Choi, S.-W.; Chun, H.S. Genetic diversity, antimicrobial resistance, toxin gene profiles, and toxin production ability of Bacillus cereus isolates from doenjang, a Korean fermented soybean paste. J. Food Saf. 2017, 37, e12363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Wang, P.; Zhao, X.; Qu, T.; Liang, L.; Ji, Q.; Chen, Y. Insight into Bacillus cereus associated with infant foods in Beijing. Foods 2022, 11, 719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Kindle, P.; Etter, D.; Stephan, R.; Johler, S. Population structure and toxin gene profiles of Bacillus cereus sensu lato isolated from flour products. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2019, 366, fnz240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Aragon-Alegro, L.C.; Palcich, G.; Lopes, G.V.; Ribeiro, V.B.; Landgraf, M.; Destro, M.T. Enterotoxigenic and genetic profiles of Bacillus cereus strains of food origin in Brazil. J. Food Prot. 2008, 71, 2115–2118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Chon, J.-W.; Kim, J.-H.; Lee, S.-J.; Hyeon, J.-Y.; Seo, K.-H. Toxin profile, antibiotic resistance, and phenotypic and molecular characterization of Bacillus cereus in Sunsik. Food Microbiol. 2012, 32, 217–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Agata, N.; Ohta, M.; Yokoyama, K. Production of Bacillus cereus emetic toxin (cereulide) in various foods. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2002, 73, 23–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. López, A.C.; Minnaard, J.; Pérez, P.F.; Alippi, A.M. A case of intoxication due to a highly cytotoxic Bacillus cereus strain isolated from cooked chicken. Food Microbiol. 2015, 46, 195–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Messelhäusser, U.; Frenzel, E.; Blöchinger, C.; Zucker, R.; Kämpf, P.; Ehling-Schulz, M. Emetic Bacillus cereus are more volatile than thought: Recent foodborne outbreaks and prevalence studies in Bavaria (2007–2013). BioMed Res. Int. 2014, 2014, 465603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Jan, S.; Brunet, N.; Techer, C.; Le Maréchal, C.; Koné, A.; Grosset, N.; Cochet, M.; Gillard, A.; Gautier, M.; Puterflam, J.; et al. Biodiversity of psychrotrophic bacteria of the Bacillus cereus group collected on farm and in egg product industry. Food Microbiol. 2011, 28, 261–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. PCR products of strains with different toxigenic potential after Multiplex PCR. Lane 1, strain NVH 0075/95 (nhe reference); lane 2, strain NVH 391-98 (cytK reference); lane 3, strain DSMZ 4312 (cereulide and nhe reference); lane 4, strain DSMZ 4313 (hbl/nhe reference); lanes 5–9, 10–14 = B. cereus isolates and lane 15, sterile water (negative control).
Figure 1. PCR products of strains with different toxigenic potential after Multiplex PCR. Lane 1, strain NVH 0075/95 (nhe reference); lane 2, strain NVH 391-98 (cytK reference); lane 3, strain DSMZ 4312 (cereulide and nhe reference); lane 4, strain DSMZ 4313 (hbl/nhe reference); lanes 5–9, 10–14 = B. cereus isolates and lane 15, sterile water (negative control).
Foods 12 04021 g001
Figure 2. Total distribution of the different toxin gene profiles among the four types of berries at different stages of processing (RM—Raw Material; IP—Intermediate fruit product; FP—Final Product).
Figure 2. Total distribution of the different toxin gene profiles among the four types of berries at different stages of processing (RM—Raw Material; IP—Intermediate fruit product; FP—Final Product).
Foods 12 04021 g002
Table 1. Number of B. cereus isolates recovered from berry fruit samples.
Table 1. Number of B. cereus isolates recovered from berry fruit samples.
StrawberriesBlueberriesRaspberriesBlackberries
RMIPFPRMIPFPRMIPFPRMIPFP
19513360373703364
RM: raw material; IP: intermediate product; FP: final product.
Table 2. Sequences of PCR primers targeting various virulent factor genes in this study.
Table 2. Sequences of PCR primers targeting various virulent factor genes in this study.
Target GenePrimerPrimer Sequence (5′-3′)Amplicon Size (bp)Reference
nheAnheA 344 STACGCTAAGGAGGGGCA480[26]
nheA 843 AGTTTTTATTGCTTCATCGGCT
nheBnheB 1500 SCTATCAGCACTTATGGCAG754[26]
nheB 2269 AACTCCTAGCGGTGTTCC
nheCnheC 2820 SCGGTAGTGATTGCTGGG564[26]
nheC 3401 ACAGCATTCGTACTTGCCAA
hblAHBLA1GTGCAGATGTTGATGCCGAT301[26]
HBLA2ATGCCACTGCGTGGACATAT
hblCL2AAATGGTCATCGGAACTCTAT731[26]
L2BCTCGCTGTTCTGCTGTTAAT
hblDL1AAATCAAGAGCTGTCACGAAT411[26]
L1BCACCAATTGACCATGCTAAT
cytKCK-F-1859ACAGATATCGG(GT)CAAAATGC809[38]
CK-R-2668TCCAACCCAGTT(AT)(GC)CAGTTC
cescesF1GGTGACACATTATCATATAAGGTG1271[35]
cesR2GTAAGCGAACCTGTCTGTAACAACA
Table 3. Multiplex PCR conditions used.
Table 3. Multiplex PCR conditions used.
Target GeneAmplification ConditionsExpected Fragment Length bp
CyclesConditions
hblA, hblC, hblD, nheA, nheB, nheC, cytK, ces1Start cycle: 95 °C for 3 minBetween 300 and 1270
35Denaturation: 94 °C for 30 s
Annealing: 58 °C for 45 s
Extension: 72 °C for 1.50 min
1Final extension: 72 °C for 5 min
Storage: 4 °C
Table 4. Toxin gene profiles of B. cereus isolated from berry samples.
Table 4. Toxin gene profiles of B. cereus isolated from berry samples.
Toxin Profile NumberVirulence GenesNumber of Isolates (%)
Ices nheA nheB6 (3.3)
IIcytK nheC nheA1 (0.6)
IIIhblD hblA7 (3.9)
IVnheA3 (1.7)
VnheB hblC nheA hblD hblA15 (8.3)
VInheB hblC nheC nheA hblD hblA80 (44.2)
VIInheB hblD hblA9 (5.0)
VIIInheB nheA9 (5.0)
IXnheB nheA hblD hblA12 (6.6)
XnheA hblD9 (5.0)
XInheB hblC nheC nheA5 (2.8)
XIInheB nheA hblD3 (1.7)
XIIIhblC nheA hblD hblA1 (0.6)
XIVnheA hblD hblA2 (1.1)
XVhlbD hblC hblA5 (2.8)
XVInheB hblC nheA hblD2 (1.1)
XVIIhblD2 (1.1)
XVIIInheB hblD2 (1.1)
XIXcytK1 (0.6)
XXnheB nheC nheA hblD hblA3 (1.7)
XXInheB hblC hblD hblA1 (0.6)
XXIInheB hblC nheA1 (0.6)
XXIIIhblC nheA hblD2 (1.1)
Table 5. Distribution of genes associated with pathogenesis in B. cereus isolated from different fruit matrices.
Table 5. Distribution of genes associated with pathogenesis in B. cereus isolated from different fruit matrices.
Virulence GenesNumber (%) of B. cereus
Total (n = 181)Blackberries (n = 43)Raspberries (n = 74)Strawberries (n = 25)Blueberries (n = 39)
ces6 (3.3)2 (4.6)04 (16)0
hblA135 (74.6)35 (81.4)67 (90.5)20 (80)13 (33.3)
hblC112 (61.9)25 (58.1)55 (74.3)18 (72)14 (35.9)
hblD155 (85.6)40 (93.0)72 (97.3)20 (80)23 (59)
nheA154 (85.1)34 (79.1)62 (83.8)24 (96)34 (87.2)
nheB148 (81.8)35 (81.4)63 (85.1)25 (100)25 (64.1)
nheC89 (49.2)17 (39.5)48 (64.9)13 (52)11 (28.2)
cytK2 (1.1)01 (1.3)01 (2.6)
Table 6. Cytotoxic activity of B. cereus isolates carrying the cytK gene on Caco-2 cells (%; mean ± standard deviation).
Table 6. Cytotoxic activity of B. cereus isolates carrying the cytK gene on Caco-2 cells (%; mean ± standard deviation).
Cytotoxic Activity (%) *
Bacteria Isolates18 h5 Days
Bacillus cereus subsp. cytotoxicus NVH 391-9864.4 ± 8.073.7 ± 12.0
BactoFlavor ScarLet8.5 ± 0.51.7 ± 0.3
B. cereus isolate profile II68.2 ± 11.266.4 ± 5.3
B. cereus isolate profile XIX64.5 ± 9.164.0 ± 2.3
* No significant differences were found between all bacteria tested in all timepoints tested.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Oliveira, M.; Carvalho, M.; Teixeira, P. Characterization of the Toxigenic Potential of Bacillus cereus sensu lato Isolated from Raw Berries and Their Products. Foods 2023, 12, 4021. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12214021

AMA Style

Oliveira M, Carvalho M, Teixeira P. Characterization of the Toxigenic Potential of Bacillus cereus sensu lato Isolated from Raw Berries and Their Products. Foods. 2023; 12(21):4021. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12214021

Chicago/Turabian Style

Oliveira, Márcia, Marta Carvalho, and Paula Teixeira. 2023. "Characterization of the Toxigenic Potential of Bacillus cereus sensu lato Isolated from Raw Berries and Their Products" Foods 12, no. 21: 4021. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12214021

APA Style

Oliveira, M., Carvalho, M., & Teixeira, P. (2023). Characterization of the Toxigenic Potential of Bacillus cereus sensu lato Isolated from Raw Berries and Their Products. Foods, 12(21), 4021. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12214021

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop