Next Article in Journal
Fermented Fish Products: Balancing Tradition and Innovation for Improved Quality
Previous Article in Journal
Development of Zeolite Imidazole Framework-Based Adsorbent for Effective Microextraction and Preconcentration of Histamine in Food Samples
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Assessment of Changes in the Fat Profile of House Cricket Flour during 12 Months of Storage in Various Conditions

1
Department of Biotechnology and Food Analysis, Wroclaw University of Economics and Business, 53-345 Wroclaw, Poland
2
Department of Bioorganic Chemistry, Wroclaw University of Economics and Business, 53-345 Wroclaw, Poland
3
Department of Dietetics and Bromatology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2024, 13(16), 2566; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13162566
Submission received: 18 July 2024 / Revised: 11 August 2024 / Accepted: 14 August 2024 / Published: 16 August 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Food Physics and (Bio)Chemistry)

Abstract

:
Considering Acheta domecticus flour’s growing importance and utilization as an ingredient in many food products, research on its storage is essential. The objective of this study was to determine the chemical and nutritional fat profile of house cricket (Acheta domesticus) flour during storage for 12 months under different storage temperatures (−18 °C, +4 °C, and +20 °C in two variants, with and without access to light). Insect flour was studied using Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). The fatty acids content was determined, and dietary indicators were calculated. The acid value, peroxide value, and anisidine value were also determined, and differential scanning calorimetry was performed. The results obtained from spectroscopic analysis of Acheta domesticus flour were consistent with the biochemical data. During the 12-month period of flour storage, the storage temperature significantly influenced the percentage composition of identified groups of fatty acids and the values of all presented ratios and dietary indices. During storage at refrigerated temperatures (−18 °C and +4 °C), no changes were observed in the fatty acid content and dietary indices, indicating that refrigerated temperatures provide oxidative stability to flour during 12 months of storage. Samples stored at 20 °C had higher acid values (AV), peroxide values (PV), and anisidine values (p-AV) compared to samples stored at lower temperatures (4 °C and −18 °C). Simultaneously, an increase in SFA and MUFA, as well as a decrease in PUFA and UFA, was noted in samples stored at room temperature. Storing cricket flour at lower temperatures when the storage period will be more than 12 months is essential to restrict the occurrence of fat oxidation. Elevated temperatures and exposure to light have a notable effect in hastening oxidation mechanisms, reducing thermal resilience, and inducing more pronounced alterations in the quality of fats.

1. Introduction

Edible insects are well-known for their high nutrient content, including protein, fat, essential amino acids, polyunsaturated fatty acids, minerals (Fe, Ca, Zn), and vitamins (A, B6, B12) [1]. The growing interest in using insects as a nutritional source stems from two main concerns. Primarily, they have the potential to address malnutrition, particularly in developing countries. Secondly, they are recognized as an environmentally friendly protein alternative to meet global food requirements [2].
The land required (in square meters) per gram of protein production in livestock versus insect farming is estimated at 254 for cows, 63 for pigs, 51 for chicken, and 18 for insects. The amount of water (in liters) needed per gram of protein production is 112 for beef, 57 for pork, 34 for chickens, and 2 for crickets. In addition, the fossil energy input (in megajoules) per kilogram of protein output is 385 for beef, 340 for chicken, and 120 for crickets [3].
In 2021, the market value of edible insects was estimated to be 3.2 million U.S. dollars, and the market value of edible insects in the Asia-Pacific region, Latin America, Europe, North America, the Middle East, and Africa would reach, respectively, 476.9 million USD, 290.6 million USD, 261.5 million USD, 153.9 million USD, and 38.7 million USD by 2023. These estimated values are significantly higher than the market values of insects in 2018, which amounted to, respectively, 173.9 million USD for the Asia-Pacific region, 92.2 million USD for Latin America, 82.1 million USD for Europe, 44.1 million USD for North America, and 14.2 million USD for the Middle East and Africa. Consequently, insects could present numerous opportunities for the food industry and offer consumers readily available alternative protein sources [3].
Worldwide, the following numbers of edible insect species are recorded: 659 beetles, 362 caterpillars, 321 ants, bees, and wasps, 278 grasshoppers and locusts, 237 true bugs, 61 dragonflies, 59 termites, 37 cockroaches and flies, and 45 others [3]. Many nations and ethnic groups, especially in Australia, South America, Asia, and Africa, have an old tradition of eating insects [4,5,6,7,8]. In Western culture, insects are not commonly perceived as food [9,10,11]. Their consumption often elicits disgust and rejection [12,13]. However, if insects are introduced into other food products in powdered form, it is easier to persuade consumers to try them, especially if these are commonly consumed and liked products, such as bread, cakes, and pasta [14,15].
Recently, many studies have focused on designing products containing insects (mainly Acheta domesticus) and analyzing their properties. The most commonly enriched products include bread [16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23], pasta [24,25,26,27,28,29], pancakes [30,31], snacks [32,33], biscuits [34,35,36,37,38], and meat products [39,40,41].
Considering cricket flour’s growing importance and utilization as an ingredient in many food products, research on its storage is essential. So far, storage studies have yet to be the subject of scientific research. Therefore, it is essential to undertake such research to determine the optimal storage conditions to guarantee the appropriate quality of cricket flour, characterized by unchanged taste and aroma.
The stability of flour and its properties are influenced by temperature, humidity, packaging material, and storage time [40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50]. Wheat and rice flour can be stored for 12 to 16 months [51,52,53], while, e.g., potato and amaranth flour can be stored for about 6 months [54,55]. Flour is stored mainly in paper and plastic packaging made of polyethylene and polypropylene [56,57,58]. Plastic packaging provides better protection against moisture and microbial growth, leading to a longer flour shelf life while maintaining appropriate quality.
The loss of quality in wheat flour is mainly due to lipid oxidation [44]. Cricket flour, rich in fat and unsaturated fatty acids [59], is particularly susceptible to oxidation [60]. However, despite abundant research on insects, few studies focus on lipid oxidation during long-term storage [60,61,62].
Kamau et al., 2018 [60] investigated the oxidative stability of house cricket meals under different storage conditions and in different packaging materials. The samples were boiled, solar-dried, milled, and packaged into polypropylene (PP), plastic (PL), and polyethylene (PL) packages. The samples were then stored in refrigerated (4 C) and ambient conditions for six months. The study employed peroxide value (PV) and p-anisidine value (P-AV) as indicators of oxidation stability. An increase in PV and P-AV during storage indicated lipid oxidation and the formation of both primary and secondary oxidation products depending on the storage environment. The PV and the P-AV values showed a considerable rise under ambient and refrigerated conditions, indicating ongoing lipid oxidation. Refrigerated storage helped maintain the stability of fatty acids in the adult house cricket meal by slowing down oxidation processes, thereby preserving the quality of the product over time. The research highlighted that oxidation rates were directly related to storage temperature, with higher oxidation occurring under ambient conditions than refrigeration.
Singh et al., 2020 [61] investigated seven different killing methods for the house cricket (blanching, steaming, freezing, carbon dioxide injection, vacuum, plastic bags, and a combined method: carbon dioxide + blanching) on the oxidative stability of cricket powder during a 16-week storage period. As the authors expected, high-temperature thermal treatments produced the highest lipid oxidation, which increased with storage time. The authors emphasized that the killing method may not be a critical factor influencing the oxidation stability of cricket powder, possibly due to its inherent radical scavenging capacity.
Marzoli et al., 2023 [62] focused on the oxidation stability of Acheta domesticus powder produced using three different processes (medium-temperature drying (80 °C), high-temperature drying (120 °C), and lyophilization) during a one-year storage period at room temperature. This study monitored changes in peroxide values (PVs) and aldehyde contents to evaluate lipid oxidation. PVs and aldehydes increased during storage. The study found that different drying methods influenced oxidation levels, with oven-dried samples exhibiting higher peroxide values and aldehyde contents than lyophilized samples. However, the authors did not specify what “room temperature” means, which is a significant omission, as temperature significantly affects lipid changes.
There is a clear need for comprehensive research to better understand the long-term effects of storage on the oxidative stability of cricket flour. That is why this study aimed to determine the chemical and nutritional fat profile of house cricket flour (Acheta domesticus) stored for 12 months at different temperatures.
This study aimed to determine the acid value (AV), peroxide value (PV), and anisidine value (p-AV) and to perform differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). Additionally, the fatty acid profile and FTIR/ATR spectra were analyzed to allow for a more precise assessment of the fat composition and its changes under different storage conditions. Furthermore, the atherogenic index (AI), thrombogenic index (TI), and hypocholesterolemic/hypercholesterolemic ratio (h/H) were calculated based on the fatty acid profile. These indices are essential for evaluating the quality of dietary fats and their impact on cardiovascular risk. Higher AI and TI values are linked to an increased risk of cardiovascular and metabolic diseases, whereas a higher h/H ratio offers protective benefits [63,64].

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Research Material

The research material was Acheta domesticus flour (2 kg) purchased commercially in metalized paper packaging. The flour was divided into 12 plastic containers in 150 g portions. Tight containers made of high-density polyethylene (HDPE) with a push-in cork and cap with a capacity of 250 mL (Figure 1), recommended for storing granules and powders, were used. The containers have a wide neck, enabling convenient container filling.
The samples were stored for 12 months at controlled temperatures (at room temperature either +20 °C in two variants, with and without access to light, or in cold storage rooms at + 4 °C and −18 °C) (Table 1).
Temperature and humidity were measured using an electronic data logger with a probe on a cable and an LCD, allowing direct data readings from the device. Four devices were used in the study, with probes placed in the refrigerator, freezer, laboratory cabinet, and outside laboratory cabinet. The loggers continuously measured both temperature and humidity. Temperature and humidity data were regularly monitored throughout the entire 12-month storage period.
The determinations were made in the control sample immediately after purchase (storage time “0”) and in the flours (stored in four different conditions) after 12 months of storage.

2.2. Infrared Measurements

FTIR/ATR spectra were obtained in the 4000–400 cm−1 range with a Nicolet 6700 spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and a portable ATR set. The resolution of these measurements was set to 2 cm−1. Before analysis, all FTIR spectra were uniformly processed. In the first step, the spectra were compared and analyzed using commercial computer software (OriginPro 2024, OriginLab Corp., Northampton, MA, USA). This analysis included background subtraction and deconvolution of the experimental bands into the Lorentz components [65].

2.3. Fat Determination and Gas Chromatographic Analysis

The fat concentration was assessed according to the AOAC Official Method 991.36 (AOAC, 1990) [66]. Briefly, 3 g of a sample was weighed into a cellulose thimble and mixed with extractable-free sand before being placed in a Soxhlet extraction apparatus. Fat extraction was performed for 30 min with petroleum ether in a pre-weighed round-bottomed flask at a condensation rate of 5 drops/minute. After the evaporation of the solvent, the flask was dried and weighed, and the fat concentration in the sample was calculated. For the analysis of fatty acid (FA) profiles, the lipid samples underwent conversion into their corresponding methyl esters using the AOCS Official Method Ce 2-66 [67]. Subsequently, the FA methyl esters were analyzed via gas chromatography utilizing a Perkin Elmer Clarus 580 gas chromatograph (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA) equipped with a 105-m silica capillary column containing an Rtx2330 stationary phase (Restek Corporation, Bellefonte, PA, USA) and a flame-ionization detector (GC-FID) (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA). Hydrogen served as the carrier gas at a constant flow of 1.5 mL/min. The detector and injector were maintained at a temperature of 240 °C. The column temperature was initially set at 165 °C for 10 min, then increased to 220 °C at 2 °C/min. Fatty acids were represented as a percentage relative to the total amount of methyl esters. The values for saturated fatty acids, monounsaturated fatty acids, and polyunsaturated fatty acids were presented as weight percentages, representing the proportion of these fatty acids in the total fatty acid content.

2.4. Dietary Indicators

The atherogenic index (AI), thrombogenic index (TI) [68], and hypocholesterolemic/hypercholesterolemic ratio (h/H) [69,70] were determined using the following equations:
AI = (C12:0 + 4 × C14:0 + C16:0)/(MUFA + n − 6 + n − 3);
TI = (C14:0 + C16:0 + C18:0)/(0.5 × MUFA+ 0.5 × n − 6 + 3 × n − 3 + n − 3/n − 6);
h/H = (C18:1 c9 + C18:2 n − 6 + C18:3 n − 3 + C20:3 n − 6 + C20:4 n − 6 + C20:5 n − 3 + C22:5 n − 3)/(C12:0 + C14:0 + C16:0).
where MUFA is the acronym for “monounsaturated fatty acids”.

2.5. Oxidative Stability

The acid, peroxide, and p-anisidine values were determined using fat extracted from cricket flour in accordance with CEN ISO 660:2009 [71], CEN ISO 3960:2010 [72], and CEN ISO 6885:2008 [73], respectively. The accelerated oxidation tests of cricket flour were performed using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) at a constant heating rate of 10 °C/min. Testing was performed using a Perkin Elmer differential scanning calorimeter (Pyris 6) (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA), following the procedure detailed by Grajzer et al., 2015 [74].

2.6. Statistical Analysis

The data underwent statistical processing [75] by calculating arithmetic means and standard deviations. To assess the effect of different storage conditions on the lipid profile of insect flour, PCA was performed on the integral intensities of selected FTIR bands. All analyses were conducted in triplicate. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was employed to assess variances among the examined parameters. The mean values were further examined using Duncan’s multiple-range test after detecting a significant effect. Differences with a p-value < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

2.7. Ethical Statement

This study did not require ethical review as it was based on a commercially available food product.

3. Results and Discussion

This study utilized analytical methods to comprehensively assess the quality and stability of fats in cricket flour under various storage conditions. The authors examined FTIR/ATR spectra and fatty acid profiles to understand the fat composition of the flour and its alterations under different storage conditions. Moreover, the study calculated the atherogenic index, thrombogenic index, and hypocholesterolemic/hypercholesterolemic ratio based on the fatty acid profile. The degree of decomposition of the fat extracted from the cricket flour was assessed by commonly used quality parameters, including acid value (AV), peroxide value (PV), and p-anisidine value (p-AV). Each method provides specific information on fat oxidation and stability aspects, allowing for a comprehensive understanding of the changes occurring in stored fats. The acid value measures the amount of free fatty acids, which indicates hydrolytic and oxidative degradation of fats. The peroxide value measures primary oxidation products such as peroxides. The anisidine value assesses secondary oxidation products, including aldehydes. In addition, the susceptibility of the cricket flour to oxidation was assessed in accelerated oxidation conditions at temperatures ranging from 50 to 350 °C in an oxygen atmosphere using the DSC method. This test allowed us to monitor the oxidation process by determining the temperature during the oxidation’s induction, propagation, and termination phases.
Infrared analysis was performed to determine the effect of storage conditions on the content of main polymers in insect cells. FTIR spectra of the analyzed samples were recorded in the range of 4000 to 400 cm−1 (Figure 2).
Figure 3 shows the analyzed bands and Lorentzian components for which integral intensities were determined.
All of the integral intensities of the observed bands were standardized with the statistical R2 determination coefficient. For this purpose, several simulations of Lorentz deconvolution were performed using a wide and variable number of components. The best fit between the experimental and theoretical spectral contour was achieved when their statistical values’ R2 ranged between 0.98 and 1.0 and the convergence coefficient χ2 was 10−6.
Changes in fat content were determined by the analysis of differences in integral intensities (I) of bands at 3007 cm−1, 1745 cm−1, 1736 cm−1, 1237 cm−1, 1171 cm−1, 964 cm−1, and 716 cm−1 (Figure 4) [65,76,77,78,79,80].
Useful information can be obtained by comparing the integral intensities (I) of the bands observed at about 3007 cm−1 and 964 cm−1, which correspond to νas(=C-H) and δ(C-C=C) vibrations, respectively. The intensities of these bands fulfill the relation: IA > IE ≥ IB > IC ≈ ID. These data show that the amount of unsaturated fatty acids decreases during storage. The most significant decrease is noticeable in samples stored at 20 °C (samples C and D). This suggests higher levels of saturated fatty acids in the stored samples. However, the fatty acid chains are broken in samples C and D. This is evidenced by lower integral intensities of the bands at the wavenumber 716 cm−1. This band is characteristic of vibration γ(C-C-C).
FTIR spectra measured for the studied samples were also analyzed using the Principal Component Analysis (PCA) procedure to visualize the spectroscopic data’s main trends (Table 2).
The Principal Component Analysis results showed statistically significant differences among the samples stored under different conditions. Principal Component 1 (PC1) explained 83.46% of the variance for the integral intensities of the band at 3007 cm−1, while Principal Component 2 (PC2) explained 16.38%. For the band at 964 cm−1, PC1 and PC2 explained 83.26% and 16.40% of the variance, respectively, and for the band at 716 cm−1, they explained 83.32% and 16.40%, respectively. Together, these two components represented 99.84%, 99.66%, and 99.72% of the total variance for the respective bands, indicating that a significant explanation of the data variability can be constructed based on these two principal components.
The FTIR bands in the 1775–1725 cm−1 range may be helpful for the identification of the changes in the carboxylic group. The component at about 1745 cm−1 corresponds to the ν(C=O) vibrations of the ester groups. The integral intensity of this band fulfills the relation: IA > IB > IE > IC > ID, showing that samples A and B exhibit a greater content of the ester group in fats. When stored at 20 °C, fat decomposes into free fatty acids and glycerol. The band at 1736 cm−1 corresponds to the stretching vibration of the C=O bonds in free carboxyl groups, aldehydes, and ketones. The intensities of this band are higher for stored samples, suggesting the formation of new chemical components. PC1 accounted for 82.60% of the variance and PC2 for 16.41% of the band integral intensities at 1745 cm−1, while for the band at 1736 cm−1, PC1 accounted for 83.45% and PC2 for 16.39% of the variance (Table 2).
The band at 1171 cm−1 corresponds to ν(C−O−C) and ν(C−OH) vibrations. Comparing the integral intensities of this band for A, B, C, and D samples reveals the same relationships as in the 1745 cm−1 band. This confirms the previous conclusion that the number of ester bonds decreases during sample storage. The integral intensity of this band for sample E is high compared to the other samples. This is due to the creation of new chemical components with C-O-C and C-OH connections during storage. PC1 for the integral intensities of the band at 1171 cm−1 was 83.25%, while PC2 was 16.40% (Table 2).
Integral intensities of the Lorentzian component at 1237 cm−1 increase for samples B, C, D, and E compared with the control sample (A), suggesting the increase of hydrogen bond number in storage samples. The integral intensity of this band fulfills the relation: IA ≤ IE < IB < ID < IC. This is possible because new chemical compounds are formed in the studied samples, between which hydrogen interactions may occur. For this data, PC1 was 83.41%, and PC2 was 16.40% (Table 2).
The Principal Component Analysis results showed that the first principal component accounted for 82.60% to 83.46% of the total variance, while the second principal component explained an additional 16.38% to 16.41% (Table 2). These two components represented 99.01% to 99.84% of the total variance, indicating that a significant explanation of the data variability can be constructed based on these two principal components. The high percentage of the variance explained by PC1 in the bands associated with unsaturated fatty acids (3007 cm−1 and 964 cm−1) and saturated fatty acids (716 cm−1) indicates significant differences in fat stability resulting from storage conditions. These results suggest that storage at 20 °C, especially with light exposure, leads to the degradation of unsaturated fatty acids and the breakdown of fatty acid chains.
The bands corresponding to the stretching vibrations (νs—symmetric, νas—asymmetric) and deformation vibrations (δ) of methyl and methylene groups can be used as analytical bands to compare the content of lipids and fatty acids in the studied samples [81,82]. These bands are observed at the wavenumbers: 2958—νas(CH3), 2920—νas(CH2), 2875—νs(CH3), 2850—νs(CH2), 1456—δ(CH2), and 1390 cm−1—δ(CH3). The integral intensity ratios of the bands at 2920 and 2958, 2850 and 2875, and 1456 and 1390 cm−1 were calculated (Figure 5). For sample B, the number of saturated bonds -C-C—increases, which increases the CH2/CH3 ratio. For samples C and D, the fatty acid chains are broken and the number of methyl groups increases, which causes the CH2/CH3 ratio to decrease compared to the control sample (A).
The results obtained from spectroscopic analyses of the Acheta domesticus flour were consistent with the biochemical data.
In the fatty acid profile of insect flour (control sample), fatty acids ranging from C 14:0 to C 18:3 n-3 were identified (Table 3). It was demonstrated that unsaturated fatty acids (UFA—Unsaturated Fatty Acids) predominated. Their content totaled 63.82%, including monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFA), which accounted for 28.66%, and polyunsaturated fatty acids, which accounted for 35.16%. Saturated fatty acids accounted for 36.22% of the total content of all acids. Among saturated fatty acids, palmitic acid was predominant (25.57%), oleic acid (27.63%) predominated among the monounsaturated fats, and linoleic acid (33.27%) predominated among the polyunsaturated fats (Table 3). The determined fatty acid composition of Acheta domesticus flour is consistent with other authors’ research [83].
It was found that storage conditions influenced the content of fatty acids in insect flour. It has been demonstrated that in samples stored at refrigerated temperatures for 12 months, the fatty acid profile remained unchanged compared to the control sample. For flours stored at temperatures of −18 °C and +4 °C, no significant differences were observed in SFA, MUFA, PUFA, UFA, and PUFA/SFA content. Therefore, storing house cricket flour for 12 months under refrigerated conditions, both at −18 °C and +4 °C, ensured the oxidative stability of the fat, protecting the flour from oxidation and thus keeping the fatty acid profile of the samples unchanged.
It was noted that storing samples for 12 months at room temperature, both with and without access to light, promoted the oxidation of the fat contained in the flour. As a result, changes in the fatty acid profile were observed. Particularly unfavorable from a nutritional standpoint was the decrease in the percentage of PUFA (including linoleic and linolenic acid) and the increase in SFA content compared to the control sample. This relationship contradicts current scientific recommendations, which advocate for minimizing the intake of saturated fatty acids in the diet and simultaneously recommend shifting consumption from saturated fatty acids to polyunsaturated fatty acids [84].
After 12 months of storage, the percentage content of SFA increased by 11.78% and 17.17% in samples without and with access to light, respectively. The increase in saturated fatty acid content was mainly due to the rise in palmitic acid (C 16:0) and stearic acid (C 18:0). Storing samples at 20 °C without and with access to light resulted in a decrease in the overall content of polyunsaturated fatty acids by 12.88% and 20.82%, respectively. This decrease stemmed from a reduction in the content of linoleic acid (C 18:2 n-6) and linolenic acid (C 18:3 n-3) by 12.50% and 24.56% (for samples without access to light) and 22.06% and 25.43% (for samples stored at room temperature with access to light). The decrease in the percentage share of polyunsaturated fatty acids can be considered a reduction in the nutritional value of the flour’s fat.
Unsaturated fatty acids are particularly susceptible to degradation, with oxidation being one of the primary mechanisms of it. The degree of oxidation tends to increase with the number of double bonds in the fatty acid structures. Therefore, the most significant changes in the content of PUFA were observed among samples stored at room temperature, where various degradation processes, including oxidation, may have played a role. The findings indicate that fatty acids characterized by longer chains and greater degrees of unsaturation are more susceptible to deterioration, potentially due to oxidation [85,86,87].
The decrease in PUFA content and the increase in SFA content for samples stored at room temperature decreased the PUFA/SFA ratio by 23.71% (for samples without access to light) and 31.96% (for samples with access to light). Additionally, there was an increase in the ratio of the total polyunsaturated fatty acids from the n-6/n-3 family by 14.35% (samples without access to light) and 6.82% (samples with access to light).
After 12 months of storing the flour at temperatures of 4 °C and −18 °C, the fatty acid composition of the samples compared to those stored at room temperature was more favorable from a human nutrition perspective. This is because higher a PUFA content and PUFA/SFA ratio were demonstrated, along with a lower SFA content and PUFA n-6/n-3 ratio.
Among the most commonly used indicators for assessing the nutritional value of fat are the PUFA/SFA ratio and the PUFA n-6/n-3 ratio. To inhibit the development of cardiovascular diseases, it is recommended that the values of these indicators be respectively > 0.45 [88] and 4–5:1 [89]. However, it is essential to note that PUFA/SFA is a general indicator and is unsuitable for assessing food’s atherogenicity [63]. This is because specific SFA and PUFA have different metabolic effects [88]. They may either prevent or contribute to the development of cardiovascular diseases (such as atherosclerosis and coronary thrombosis). Therefore, atherogenicity (AI) and thrombogenicity (TI) indices have been developed [63,68], which indicate the direction of the effects of consumed lipids. The atherogenicity index relates to the ratio between saturated fatty acids (pro-atherogenic), which promote lipid deposition in blood vessel walls, and unsaturated fatty acids (anti-atherogenic), which reduce cholesterol levels and protect against coronary artery disease. Meanwhile, the thrombogenicity index indicates the tendency to form clots in blood vessels. It is known that among SFA, the most atherogenic and thrombogenic are the fatty acids C14:0 and C16:0, while C18:0 is considered neutral in terms of atherogenicity but thrombogenic [63]. Unsaturated fatty acids (including MUFA) exhibit anti-atherosclerotic and antithrombotic effects [68,90,91]. The lower the AI and TI values of a product, the higher its nutritional value, and its consumption may reduce the risk of coronary heart disease [63]. Conversely, the higher the hypocholesterolemic to hypercholesterolemic fatty acids ratio, the more suitable the fat is for human nutrition [70].
The significant differences in the fatty acid profiles resulting from different storage conditions led to notable discrepancies in the determined dietary indicators (Table 3). Specifically, the variations in saturated and unsaturated fatty acid levels under different storage conditions directly influenced key nutritional indices. After a 12-month storage period, the most favorable proportion of fatty acids with hypo- and hypercholesterolemic effects, as well as the weakest atherogenic and thrombogenic effects, were observed in samples stored at temperatures of −18 °C and +4 °C. The values of the AI, TI, and h/H indicators for these samples did not differ from the values determined in the control sample. The values of the atherogenicity (AI), thrombogenicity (TI), and h/H indicators were at similar levels, amounting to 0.43 and 0.45; 1.07 and 1.10; and 2.27 and 2.20, respectively, for flour stored at temperatures of −18 °C and +4 °C.
The assessment of the oxidative stability of cricket flour stored at different temperatures (Table 4) showed that 12 months of storage at 20 °C with exposure to light causes significant progress of fat hydrolysis (the highest AV = 6.178 mg KOH/g of fat), which is essential for the acceleration of the oxidation reaction [92]. The lowest acid value (0.15 mg KOH/g of fat) was observed in the control sample (Table 4), indicating the minimal degree of fat decomposition. The results for samples stored for 12 months at 4 °C and −18 °C were similar and lower than those stored at 20 °C (Table 4). Therefore, lower storage temperatures slow hydrolysis reactions, which are crucial to accelerating oxidation.
The lowest peroxide value (0.038 μEq O2/g of fat) and anisidine value (2.18) were observed in samples stored at −18 °C (Table 4). The highest values of these two parameters were found in samples stored at 20 °C with light exposure. Samples stored at 4 °C and 20 °C had higher PV values than the control sample (Table 4). On the other hand, anisidine values did not differ significantly between the control sample and those stored at 4 °C and 20 °C.
The lowest storage temperature also prevented the formation of hydroperoxides in fat from cricket flour, which was demonstrated by the very low peroxide value of the fat. The exposure to light resulted in a significant increase in lipid oxidation in samples stored at room temperature, possibly due to light-induced degradation of compounds present in the flour, such as retinol, with the formation of reactive species [93]. Light and non-reduced temperatures also formed the most significant secondary oxidation products in the fat extracted from the stored flour samples. In contrast, a lack of light and lower storage temperatures for 12 months did not accelerate the propagation of fat oxidation compared to fresh samples. This means that only a free radical chain reaction of oxidation took place in the lipids of these samples. Among the factors inhibiting the formation of secondary oxidation products in fat, the phospholipids could have played a potential role [94].
Accelerated oxidation tests using the DSC method showed the highest oxidative stability of non-stored flour, as indicated by the highest oxidation initiation temperature (225.59 °C). In contrast, higher susceptibility to elevated temperatures (from 50 to 350 °C) and oxygen levels was observed in each storage condition compared to the control (4 °C, 20 °C, 20 °C with light exposure, and −18 °C), with freezing the sample having the least effect (Table 4). These results indicate that the fats in these samples were more prone to oxidation due to the higher content of primary oxidation products involved in chain reactions during the propagation phase. However, the slightly lower oxidative stability of the sample stored at −18 °C could result from the partial degradation of antioxidants in flour during a prolonged period of storage [95].
The maximum oxidation temperatures (Tmax), indicating the end of the propagation phase and termination of fat oxidation, were similar across all samples (Table 4). Comparable values of the temperatures at which oxidation termination (Tmax) occurred for all samples stored and for the control sample may indicate the significant antioxidant activity of the Maillard reaction products forming in cricket flour samples at high temperatures [96].
The results of this study are consistent with those of other researchers, who have emphasized the importance of storage temperature for the oxidative stability of cricket flour [60,61,62], indicating that lower storage temperatures delay oxidation processes [60,62] as evidenced by lower acid values, peroxide values [60,61,62], and anisidine values [60], leading to the greater stability of fatty acids, which undergo fewer changes at lower storage temperatures [60].

Study Limitations

The insect flour was purchased commercially from an online store. Therefore, the conditions in which the insect flour was stored are unknown, which may affect its initial quality. Furthermore, the specific methods used for slaughtering and powdering the crickets and any dehydration, drying, or thermal processing techniques not disclosed on the product label could have directly influenced the flour’s lipid profile and related characteristics. The results apply only to house cricket (Acheta domesticus) flour and may not directly apply to other insect flours. Comparative studies with other edible insects may help generalize the results.

4. Conclusions

As the spectral data proved consistent with biochemical data on the composition of cricket flour, FTIR/ATR analyses can be used to analyze this food material. Storage temperature had a significant impact on changes occurring in fatty acids and the calculated dietary indicators based on them. Storage at room temperature, especially when exposed to light, negatively impacts the oxidative stability of cricket flour fat. Samples stored at 20 °C had higher acid values (AV), peroxide values (PV), and anisidine values (p-AV) compared to samples stored at lower temperatures (4 °C and −18 °C).
Storing cricket flour at lower temperatures is crucial to limiting fat degradation. Higher temperatures and the presence of light significantly accelerate oxidation processes, decrease thermal stability, and lead to more significant changes in fat quality. From a human nutrition perspective, it is more favorable to store insect flour in refrigerated conditions, because the nutritional value of the fat does not undergo adverse changes when the flour is refrigerated.
Based on the results, several recommendations can be formulated to help ensure good fat preservation during the storage of cricket flour. Amber containers or dark packaging materials are advised to prevent light-induced degradation. Additionally, maintaining controlled moisture levels and temperatures during transportation and storage is essential to preserving the quality of the fats in the insect flour.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.O.; methodology, A.O., L.D. and A.P.; investigation, A.O., L.D. and A.P.; data curation, A.O.; writing—original draft preparation, A.O. and L.D.; writing—review and editing, A.O.; supervision, A.O.; funding acquisition, A.O. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The project was financed by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education in Poland under the program “Regional Initiative of Excellence” 2019–2022, project number 015/RID/2018/19, total funding amount PLN 10 721 040,00.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Orkusz, A. Edible insects versus meat—Nutritional comparison: Knowledge of their composition is the key of good health. Nutrients 2021, 13, 1207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Van Huis, A.; Van Itterbeeck, J.; Klunder, H.; Merten, E.; Halloran, A.; Muir, G.; Vantomme, P. Edible Insects: Future Prospects for Food and Feed Security; Fao Forestry Papers 2013; Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO): Rome, Italy, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  3. Statista Edible Insects. Digital & Trends. 2018, pp. 1–25. Available online: https://www.statista.com/study/56817/edible-insects/ (accessed on 28 February 2022).
  4. Ramos-Elorduy, J.; Moreno, J.M.P.; Prado, E.E.; Perez, M.A.; Otero, J.L.; De Guevara, O.L. Nutritional value of edible in sects from the state of Oaxaca, Mexico. J. Food Compos. Anal. 1997, 10, 142–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Van Huis, A. Insects as food in sub-Saharan Africa. Insect Sci. Appl. 2003, 23, 163–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Nonaka, K. Feasting on insects. J. Entomol. Res. 2009, 39, 304–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Papastavropoulou, K.; Xiao, J.; Proestos, C. Edible insects: Tendency or necessity (a review). eFood 2022, 4, e58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hlongwane, Z.T.; Slotow, R.; Munyai, T.C. Indigenous Knowledge about Consumption of Edible Insects in South Africa. Insects 2021, 12, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Looy, H.; Dunkel, F.V.; Wood, J.R. How then shall we eat? Insect-eating attitudes and sustainable foodways. Agric. Hum. Values 2014, 31, 131–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Iriti, M.; Vallone, L.; Vitalini, S. Edible insects—A new trend in functional food science. Funct. Food Sci. 2022, 2, 157–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Orkusz, A.; Orkusz, M. Edible Insects in Slavic Culture: Between Tradition and Disgust. Insects 2024, 15, 306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Chan, E.Y. Mindfulness and willingness to try insects as food: The role of disgust. Food Qual. Prefer. 2019, 71, 375–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Jensen, N.H.; Lieberoth, A. We will eat disgusting foods together—Evidence of the normative basis of Western entomophagy-disgust from an insect tasting. Food. Qual. Prefer. 2019, 72, 109–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Orkusz, A.; Wolańska, W.; Harasym, J.; Piwowar, A.; Kapelko, M. Consumers’ Attitudes Facing Entomophagy: Polish Case Perspectives. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 2427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Carpentieri, S.; Orkusz, A.; Ferrari, S.; Harasym, S. Effect of replacing durum wheat semolina with Tenebrio molitor larvae powder on the techno-functional properties of the binary blends. Curr. Res. Food Sci. 2024, 8, 100672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Gaglio, R.; Barbera, M.; Tesoriere, L.; Osimani, A.; Busetta, G.; Matraxia, M.; Attanzio, A.; Restivo, I.; Aquilanti, L.; Settanni, L. Sourdough “ciabatta” bread enriched with powdered insects: Physicochemical, microbiological, and simulated intestinal digesta functional properties. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2021, 72, 102755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Khuenpet, K.; Pakasap, C.; Vatthanakul, S.; Kitthawee, S. Effect of larval-stage mealworm (Tenebrio molitor) powder on qualities of bread. Int. J. Agric. Technol. 2020, 16, 283–296. [Google Scholar]
  18. Kowalczewski, P.Ł.; Gumienna, M.; Rybicka, I.; Górna, B.; Sarbak, P.; Dziedzic, K.; Kmiecik, D. Nutritional Value and Biological Activity of Gluten-Free Bread Enriched with Cricket Powder. Molecules 2021, 26, 1184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kowalski, S.; Mikulec, A.; Mickowska, B.; Skotnicka, M.; Mazurek, A. Wheat bread supplementation with various edible insect flours. Influence of chemical composition on nutritional and technological aspects. LWT 2022, 159, 113220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Osimani, A.; Milanović, V.; Cardinali, F.; Roncolini, A.; Garofalo, C.; Clementi, F.; Pasquini, M.; Mozzon, M.; Foligni, R.; Raffaelli, N.; et al. Bread enriched with cricket powder (Acheta domesticus): A technological, microbiological and nutritional evaluation. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2018, 48, 150–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Roncolini, A.; Milanović, V.; Cardinali, F.; Osimani, A.; Garofalo, C.; Sabbatini, R.; Clementi, F.; Pasquini, M.; Mozzon, M.; Foligni, R.; et al. Protein fortification with mealworm (Tenebrio molitor L.) powder: Effect on textural, microbiological, nutritional and sensory features of bread. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0211747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Bartkiene, E.; Zokaityte, E.; Starkute, V.; Zokaityte, G.; Kaminskaite, A.; Mockus, E.; Klupsaite, D.; Cernauskas, D.; Rocha, J.M.; Özogul, F.; et al. Crickets (Acheta domesticus) as Wheat Bread Ingredient: Influence on Bread Quality and Safety Characteristics. Foods 2023, 12, 325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Cappelli, A.; Oliva, N.; Bonaccorsi, G.; Lorini, C.; Cini, E. Assessment of the rheological properties and bread characteristics obtained by innovative protein sources (Cicer arietinum, Acheta domesticus, Tenebrio molitor): Novel food or potential improvers for wheat flour? LWT 2020, 118, 108867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Biró, B.; Fodor, R.; Szedljak, I.; Pásztor-Huszár, K.; Gere, A. Buckwheat-pasta enriched with silkworm powder: Technological analysis and sensory evaluation. LWT 2019, 116, 108542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Çabuk, B.; Yılmaz, B. Fortification of traditional egg pasta (eriște) with edible insects: Nutritional quality, cooking properties and sensory characteristics evaluation. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 57, 2750–2757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Carcea, M. Quality and Nutritional/Textural Properties of Durum Wheat Pasta Enriched with Cricket Powder. Editorial. Foods 2020, 9, 1298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Duda, A.; Adamczak, J.; Chełmińska, P.; Juszkiewicz, J.; Kowalczewski, P. Quality and Nutritional/Textural Properties of Durum Wheat Pasta Enriched with Cricket Powder. Foods 2019, 8, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Pasini, G.; Cullere, M.; Vegro, M.; Simonato, B.; Dalle Zotte, A. Potentiality of protein fractions from the house cricket (Acheta domesticus) and yellow mealworm (Tenebrio molitor) for pasta formulation. LWT 2022, 164, 113638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ho, I.; Peterson, A.; Madden, J.; Huang, E.; Amin, S.; Lammert, A. Will It Cricket? Product Development and Evaluation of Cricket (Acheta domesticus) Powder Replacement in Sausage, Pasta, and Brownies. Foods 2022, 11, 3128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Mazurek, A.; Palka, A.; Skotnicka, M.; Kowalski, S. Consumer Attitudes and Acceptability of Wheat Pancakes with the Addition of Edible Insects: Mealworm (Tenebrio molitor), Buffalo Worm (Alphitobius diaperinus), and Cricket (Acheta domesticus). Foods 2023, 12, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Skotnicka, M.; Mazurek, A.; Karwowska, K.; Folwarski, M. Satiety of Edible Insect-Based Food Products as a Component of Body Weight Control. Nutrients 2022, 14, 2147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ruszkowska, M.; Tańska, M.; Kowalczewski, P.Ł. Extruded Corn Snacks with Cricket Powder: Impact on Physical Parameters and Consumer Acceptance. Sustainability 2022, 14, 16578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Igual, M.; García-Segovia, P.; Martínez-Monz, J. Effect of Acheta domesticus (house cricket) addition on protein content, colour, texture, and extrusion parameters of extruded products. J. Food Eng. 2020, 282, 110032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Smarzyński, K.; Sarbak, P.; Kowalczewski, P.Ł.; Różańska, M.B.; Rybicka, I.; Polanowska, K.; Fedko, M.; Kmiecik, D.; Masewicz, Ł.; Nowicki, M.; et al. Low-Field NMR Study of Shortcake Biscuits with Cricket Powder, and Their Nutritional and Physical Characteristics. Molecules 2021, 26, 5417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Bas, A.; Ei, S.N. Nutritional evaluation of biscuits enriched with cricket flour (Acheta domesticus). Int. J. Gastron. Food Sci. 2022, 29, 500183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Adámek, M.; Adámková, A.; Mlcek, J.; Borkovcová, M.; Bednárová, M. Acceptability and sensory evaluation of energy bars and protein bars enriched with edible insect. Potravin. Slovak J. Food Sci. 2018, 12, 431–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Cicatiello, C.; Vitali, A.; Lacetera, N. How does it taste? Appreciation of insect-based snacks and its determinants. Int. J. Gastron. Food Sci. 2020, 21, 100211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Gurdian, C.E.; Torrico, D.D.; Li, B.; Tuuri, G.; Prinyawiwatkul, W.; Guinard, J.-X. Effect of Informed Conditions on Sensory Expectations and Actual Perceptions: A Case of Chocolate Brownies Containing Edible-Cricket Protein. Foods 2021, 10, 1480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Megido, R.C.; Gierts, C.; Blecker, C.; Brostaux, Y.; Haubruge, É.; Alabi, T.; Francis, F. Consumer acceptance of insect-based alternative meat products in Western countries. Food Qual. Prefer. 2016, 52, 237–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Choi, Y.-S.; Kim, T.-K.; Choi, H.-D.; Park, J.-D.; Sung, J.-M.; Jeon, K.-H.; Paik, H.-D.; Kim, Y.-B. Optimization of Replacing Pork Meat with Yellow Worm (Tenebrio molitor L.) for Frankfurters. Korean J. Food Sci. Anim. Resour. 2017, 37, 617–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Lammers, P.; Ullmann, L.M.; Fiebelkorn, F. Acceptance of insects as food in Germany: Is it about sensation seeking, sustainability consciousness, or food disgust? Food Qual. Prefer. 2019, 77, 78–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Warwick, M.J.; Farrington, W.H.H.; Shearer, G. Changes in total fatty acids and individual lipid classes on prolonged storage of wheat flour. J. Sci. Food Agric. 1979, 30, 1131–1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Wang, L.; Flores, R.A. The effects of storage on flour quality and baking performance. Food Rev. Int. 1999, 15, 215–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Lancelot, E.; Fontaine, J.; Grua-Prior, E.; Le-Bail, A. Effect of long-term storage conditions on wheat flour and bread baking properties. Food Chem. 2021, 346, 128902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Hruškova, M.A.R.I.E.; Machová, D. Changes of wheat flour properties during short term storage. Czech J. Food Sci. 2002, 20, 125–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Yadav, D.N.; Anand, T.; Kaur, J.; Singh, A.K. Improved storage stability of pearl millet flour through microwave treatment. Agric. Res. 2012, 1, 399–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ahmed, M.S.H. Effect of storage temperature and periods on some characteristics of wheat flour quality. Food Nutr. Sci. 2015, 6, 1148–1159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Beigh, M.A.; Hussain, S.Z.; Naseer, B.; Rouf, A.; Ahmad Raja, T. Storage studies of water chestnut flour. J. Food Process. Pres. 2020, 44, e14321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zhang, Y.; Truzzi, F.; D’Amen, E.; Dinelli, G. Effect of storage conditions and time on the polyphenol content of wheat flours. Processes 2021, 9, 248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Akullo, J.O.; Kiage-Mokua, B.N.; Nakimbugwe, D.; Ng’Ang’A, J.; Kinyuru, J. Color, pH, microbiological, and sensory quality of crickets (Gryllus bimaculatus) flour preserved with ginger and garlic extracts. Food Sci. Nutr. 2023, 11, 2838–2851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Zhou Zhong Kai, Z.Z.; Robards, K.; Helliwell, S.; Blanchard, C. Effect of rice storage on pasting properties of rice flour. Food Res. Int. 2003, 36, 625–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Salman, H.; Copeland, L. Effect of storage on fat acidity and pasting characteristics of wheat flour. Cereal Chem. 2007, 84, 600–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Nakamura, C.; Seguchi, M. Improving Effects of Stored Wheat Flour on Pancake Texture. Food Sci. Technol. Res. 2007, 13, 221–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Anupama Misra, A.M.; Kalpana Kulshrestha, K.K. Effect of storage on microbial safety of potato flour. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2002, 39, 517–519. [Google Scholar]
  55. Nidhi, B.; Indira, V. Effect of storage on nutritional and sensory qualities of grain amaranth (Amaranthus hypochondriacus) flour. Asian J. Dairy. Foods Res. 2012, 31, 297–300. [Google Scholar]
  56. Vanhanen, L.; Savage, G. The use of peroxide value as a measure of quality for walnut flour stored at five different temperatures using three different types of packaging. Food Chem. 2006, 99, 64–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Opara, U.; Caleb, O.; Uchechukwu-Agua, A. Evaluating the Impacts of Selected Packaging Materials on the Quality Attributes of Cassava Flour (cvs. TME 419 and UMUCASS 36). J. Food Sci. 2016, 81, C324–C331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Fasoyiro, S.; Gourama, H.; Cutter, C. Stability and safety of maize–legume-fortified flours stored in various packaging materials. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2017, 243, 1861–1868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Orkusz, A.; Dymińska, L.; Banaś, K.; Harasym, J. Chemical and Nutritional Fat Profile of Acheta domesticus, Gryllus bimaculatus, Tenebrio molitor and Rhynchophorus ferrugineus. Foods 2024, 13, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Kamau, E.; Mutungi, C.; Kinyuru, J.; Imathiu, S.; Tanga, C.; Affognon, H.; Ekesi, S.; Nakimbugwe, D.; Fiaboe, K.K.M. Moisture adsorption properties and shelf-life estimation of dried and pulverised edible house cricket Acheta domesticus (L.) and black soldier fly larvae Hermetia illucens (L.). Food Res. Int. 2018, 106, 420–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Singh, Y.; Cullere, M.; Kovitvadhi, A.; Chundang, P.; Dalle Zotte, A. Effect of different killing methods on physicochemical traits, nutritional characteristics, in vitro human digestibility and oxidative stability during storage of the house cricket (Acheta domesticus L.). Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2020, 65, 102444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Marzoli, F.; Tata, A.; Zacometti, C.; Malabusini, S.; Jucker, C.; Piro, R.; Ricci, A.; Belluco, S. Microbial and chemical stability of Acheta domesticus powder during one year storage period at room temperature. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2023, 7, 1179088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Chen, J.; Liu, H. Nutritional Indices for Assessing Fatty Acids: A Mini-Review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 5695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Moussavi Javardi, M.S.; Madani, Z.; Movahedi, A.; Karandish, M.; Abbasi, B. The correlation between dietary fat quality indices and lipid profile with Atherogenic index of plasma in obese and non-obese volunteers: A cross-sectional descriptive-analytic case-control study. Lipids Health Dis. 2020, 19, 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Dymińska, L.; Calik, M.; Albegar, A.M.M.; Zając, A.; Kostyń, K.; Lorenc, J.; Hanuza, J. Quantitative Determination of the Iodine Values of Unsaturated Plant Oils Using Infrared and Raman Spectroscopy Methods. Int. J. Food Prop. 2017, 20, 2003–2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Horwitz, W. Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International. In Agricultural Chemicals, Contaminants; William, H., Ed.; AOAC International: Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 2010; Volume I, ISBN 0-935584-67-6. [Google Scholar]
  67. AOCS. Official Methods and Recommended Practices of the American Oil Chemistry Society, 2nd ed.; American Oil Chemistry Society: Champaign, IL, USA, 1997; pp. 1–2. [Google Scholar]
  68. Ulbricht, T.L.V.; Southgate, D.A.T. Coronary disease seven dietary factors. Lancet 1991, 338, 985–992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Fernandez, M.; Ordonez, J.A.; Cambero, I.; Santos, C.; Pin, C.; De la Hoz, L. Fatty acid compositions of selected varieties of Spanish dry ham related to their nutritional implications. Food Chem. 2007, 101, 107–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Santos-Silva, J.; Bessa, R.J.B.; Santos-Silva, F. Effect of genotype, feeding system and slaughter weight on the quality of light lambs II. Fatty acid composition of meat. Livest. Prod. Sci. 2002, 77, 187–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. ISO 660:2009; Determination of Acidic Value and Acidity. PKN Press: Warsaw, Poland, 2009.
  72. ISO 3960:2007; Determination of Peroxide Value–Iodometric (Visual) Endpoint Determination (Corrected Version 2009-05-15). PKN Press: Warsaw, Poland, 2010.
  73. ISO 6885:2008 E; Determination of Anisidine Value. PKN Press: Warsaw, Poland, 2008.
  74. Grajzer, M.; Prescha, A.; Korzonek, K.; Wojakowska, A.; Dziadas, M.; Kulma, A.; Grajeta, H. Characteristics of rose hip (Rosa canina L.) cold-pressed oil and its oxidative stability studied by the differential scanning calorimetry method. Food Chem. 2015, 188, 459–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. StatSoft, Inc. Statistica Software Program, version 13.0; StatSoft, Inc.: Tulsa, OK, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  76. Durak, R.; Ciak, B.; Durak, T. Highly Efficient Use of Infrared Spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR) to Identify Aphid Species. Biology 2022, 11, 1232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Karunathilaka, S.R.; Mossoba, M.M.; Chung, J.K.; Haile, E.A.; Srigley, C.T. Rapid Prediction of Fatty Acid Content in Marine Oil Omega 3 Dietary Supplements Using a Portable Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) Device and Partial Least-Squares Regression (PLSR) Analysis. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2017, 65, 224–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Liu, Z.; Rady, A.; Wijewardane, N.K.; Shan, Q.; Chen, H.; Yang, S.; Li, J.; Li, M. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and machine learning to predict fatty acid content of nine commercial insects. J. Food Meas. Charact. 2021, 15, 953–960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Réjasse, A.; Waeytensb, J.; Deniset-Besseauc, A.; Crapartd, N.; Nielsen-Lerouxa, C.; Sandt, C. Plastic biodegradation: Do Galleria mellonella larvae–bio-assimilate polyethylene? A spectral histology approach using isotopic labelling and infrared microspectroscopy. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022, 56, 525–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Zhong, J.; Yu, W.; Tang, Y.; Zhou, X. Synchrotron Radiation FTIR Micro spectroscopy Study of Biomolecular Alterations in Vincristine-Treated WRL68 Cells at the Single-Cell Level. ACS Omega 2022, 7, 47274–47284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Bel’skaya, L.V.; Sarf, E.A.; Kosenok, V.K. Analysis of Saliva Lipids in Breast and Prostate Cancer by IR Spectroscopy. Diagnostics 2021, 11, 1325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Kaneko, F.; Katagiri, C.; Sazaki, G.; Nagashima, K. ATR FTIR Spectroscopic Study on Insect Body Surface Lipids Rich in Methylene-Interrupted Diene. J. Phys. Chem. 2018, 122, 12322–12330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Messina, C.M.; Gaglio, R.; Morghese, M.; Arena, R.; Moschetti, G.; Santulli, A.; Tolone, M.; Francesca, N.; Settanni, L. Microbiological Profile and Bioactive Properties of Insect Powders Used in Food and Feed Formulations. Foods 2019, 8, 400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. World Health Organization. Saturated Fatty Acids and Trans-Fatty Acid Intake for Adults and Children: WHO Guideline Summary. Geneva. 2023. Available online: https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/375034/9789240083592-eng.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y (accessed on 10 August 2024).
  85. Oehrl, L.L.; Hansen, A.P.; Rohrer, C.A.; Fenner, G.P.; Boyd, L.C. Oxidation of phytosterols in a test of food system. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 2001, 78, 1073–1078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Gutiérrez, F.; Villafranca, M.J.; Castellano, J.M. Changes in the main components and quality indices of virgin olive oil during oxidation. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 2002, 79, 669–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Kim, H.; Kim, S.G.; Choi, Y.; Jeong, H.S.; Lee, J. Changes in tocopherols, tocotrienols, and fatty acid contents in grape seed oils during oxidation. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 2008, 85, 487–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Simopoulos, A.P. The Importance of the Ratio of Omega-6/Omega-3 Essential Fatty Acids. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2002, 56, 365–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Geldenhuys, G.; Hoffman, L.C.; Muller, N. Aspects of the nutritional value of cooked Egyptian goose (Alopochen aegyptiacus) meat compared with other well-known fowl species. Poultry Sci. 2013, 92, 3050–3059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Omri, B.; Chalghoumi, R.; Izzo, L.; Ritieni, A.; Lucarini, M.; Durazzo, A.; Abdouli, H.; Santini, A. Effect of Dietary Incorporation of Linseed Alone or Together with Tomato-Red Pepper Mix on Laying Hens’ Egg Yolk Fatty Acids Profile and Health Lipid Indexes. Nutrients 2019, 11, 813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Monteiro, M.; Matos, E.; Ramos, R.; Campos, I.; Valente, L.M.P. A Blend of Land Animal Fats Can Replace up to 75% Fish Oil without Affecting Growth and Nutrient Utilization of European Seabass. Aquaculture 2018, 487, 22–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Choe, E.; Min, D.B. Mechanisms and Factors for Edible Oil Oxidation. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2006, 5, 169–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Fu, P.P.; Xia, Q.; Yin, J.J.; Cherng, S.-H.; Yan, J.; Mei, N.; Chen, T.; Boudreau, M.D.; Howard, P.C.; Wamer, W.G. Photodecomposition of Vitamin A and Photobiological Implications for the Skin. Photochem. Photobiol. 2007, 83, 409–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Lin, D.; Sun, L.; Huo, W.; Zhang, L.; Chen, Y.; Miao, S.; Cao, M. Improved functionality and safety of peptides by the formation of peptide-polyphenol complexes. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2023, 141, 104193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Fadiji, T.; Ashtiani, S.M.; Onwude, D.I.; Li, Z.; Opara, U.L. Finite Element Method for Freezing and Thawing Industrial Food Processes. Foods 2021, 10, 869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Ferrero, C. Hydrocolloids in wheat breadmaking: A concise review. Food Hydrocoll. 2017, 68, 15–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Plastic container (HDPE) with a capacity of 250 mL used for storing flour.
Figure 1. Plastic container (HDPE) with a capacity of 250 mL used for storing flour.
Foods 13 02566 g001
Figure 2. FTIR spectra of the studied samples: A (Control sample), B (4 °C), C (20 °C), D (20 °C + light), and E (−18 °C).
Figure 2. FTIR spectra of the studied samples: A (Control sample), B (4 °C), C (20 °C), D (20 °C + light), and E (−18 °C).
Foods 13 02566 g002
Figure 3. FTIR spectra for the control sample (storage time “0”) in the ranges: 3700–2700 cm−1 (1), 1800–1475 cm−1 (2), 1480–1100 cm−1 (3), and 1150–450 cm−1 (4).
Figure 3. FTIR spectra for the control sample (storage time “0”) in the ranges: 3700–2700 cm−1 (1), 1800–1475 cm−1 (2), 1480–1100 cm−1 (3), and 1150–450 cm−1 (4).
Foods 13 02566 g003aFoods 13 02566 g003b
Figure 4. Differences in the integral intensities of the bands at 3007, 1745, 1736, 1237, 1171, 964, and 716 cm−1 for samples: A (control sample), B (4 °C), C (20 °C), D (20 °C + light), and E (−18 °C).
Figure 4. Differences in the integral intensities of the bands at 3007, 1745, 1736, 1237, 1171, 964, and 716 cm−1 for samples: A (control sample), B (4 °C), C (20 °C), D (20 °C + light), and E (−18 °C).
Foods 13 02566 g004
Figure 5. Differences in the integral intensity ratios of the bands at 2920 and 2958 cm−1 (1), 2850 and 2875 cm−1 (2), 1456 and 1390 cm−1 (3). A (control sample), B (4 °C), C (20 °C), D (20 °C + light), and E (−18 °C).
Figure 5. Differences in the integral intensity ratios of the bands at 2920 and 2958 cm−1 (1), 2850 and 2875 cm−1 (2), 1456 and 1390 cm−1 (3). A (control sample), B (4 °C), C (20 °C), D (20 °C + light), and E (−18 °C).
Foods 13 02566 g005
Table 1. Storage conditions.
Table 1. Storage conditions.
Storage LocationTemperatureAccess to LightHumidity [%]
Refrigerator4 °CNo access55
Freezer−18 °CNo access20
In the laboratory cabinet20 °CNo access45
Outside the laboratory Cabinet20 °CWith access
(illumination intensity 500 lx)
45
Table 2. Principal Component Analysis results for FTIR band intensities in insect flour stored under different conditions.
Table 2. Principal Component Analysis results for FTIR band intensities in insect flour stored under different conditions.
Wavenumber (cm−1)PC1 (%)PC2 (%)Total Variance (%)
300783.4616.3899.84
96483.2616.4099.66
71683.3216.4099.72
174582.616.4199.01
173683.4516.3999.84
117183.2516.4099.65
123783.4116.4099.81
PC1—principal component 1, PC2—principal component 2.
Table 3. Fatty acid content and dietary indicators in insect flour during 12 months of storage in different conditions [%].
Table 3. Fatty acid content and dietary indicators in insect flour during 12 months of storage in different conditions [%].
Fatty Acids and Dietary IndicatorsA
(Control Sample)
B
(4 °C)
C
(20 °C)
D
(20 °C + Light)
E
(−18 °C)
SFA36.22 a ± 1.8438.40 ab ± 1.2340.49 bc ± 1.0642.44 c ± 1.0037.28 a ± 1.70
C 12:0 -
C 14:00.47 a ± 0.020.62 b ± 0.000.76 c ± 0.001.10 d ± 0.030.45 a ± 0.02
C 16:025.57 a ± 1.3025.23 a ± 0.8126.81 ab ± 0.7027.59 b ± 0.6525.03 a ± 1.13
C 17:00.2 ± 0.01 -
C 18:08.98 a ± 0.4611.15 bc ± 0.3611.38 bc ± 0.3011.63 cd ± 0.2710.70 b ± 0.48
C 20:00.63 a ± 0.030.87 b ± 0.030.84 b ± 0.020.85 b ± 0.020.61 a ± 0.02
C 22:00.2 ± 0.01 0.22 b ± 0.01
MUFA28.66 a ± 1.4627.86 a ± 0.8028.88 a ± 0.7629.63 a ± 0.7028.23 a ± 1.30
C 16:10.63 a ± 0.030.62 a ± 0.020.69 c ± 0.020.76 d ± 0.020.57 b ± 0.03
C 18:127.63 a ± 1.2525.84 b ± 0.6627.65 a ± 0.6527.76 a ± 0.5924.29 b ± 1.10
C 24:1 0.42 ± 0.01-
PUFA35.16 a ± 1.7933.70 a ± 1.1730.63 b ± 1.0627.84 c ± 0.6634.50 a ± 1.55
C 18:2 n-633.27 a ± 1.6932.32 a ± 1.1129.11 b ± 1.0126.15 c ± 0.6232.82 a ± 1.50
C 18:3 n-31.14 a ± 0.060.75 c ± 0.020.86 b ± 0.030.85 b ± 0.000.87 b ± 0.03
UFA63.82 a ± 3.2461.56 ab ± 1.9859.51 ab ± 1.8257.56 b ± 1.3662.72 a ± 2.85
PUFA/SFA0.97 a ± 0.000.91 b ± 0.000.74 d ± 0.020.66 e ± 0.000.92 b ± 0.00
PUFA n-31.38 a ± 0.071.11 b ± 0.041.07 b ± 0.031.02 b ± 0.021.10 b ± 0.05
PUFA n-633.30 a ± 1.6932.40 a ± 1.1229.56 b ± 1.0126.32 c ± 0.6232.91 a ± 1.50
PUFA n-6/PUFA n-324.18 a ± 0.0029.64 b ± 0.0527.65 c ± 0.1725.83 d ± 0.1029.92 b ± 0.00
AI0.43 a ± 0.000.45 a ± 0.000.50 c ± 0.000.56 d ± 0.000.43 a ± 0.00
TI1.00 a ± 0.001.10 b ± 0.001.20 c ± 0.001.30 d ± 0.001.07 b ± 0.00
h/H2.38 a ± 0.012.20 b ± 0.002.09 c ± 0.011.91 d ± 0.002.27 b ± 0.00
Means with different letters in the same row differ at p ˂ 0.05. SFA—saturated fatty acid, MUFA—monounsaturated fatty acids, PUFA—polyunsaturated fatty acid, UFA—unsaturated fatty acid, AI—atherogenic index, TI—thrombogenic index, h/H—hypocholesterolemic/hypercholesterolemic ratio.
Table 4. Impact of Different Storage Conditions on Fat Oxidation and Stability Indicators.
Table 4. Impact of Different Storage Conditions on Fat Oxidation and Stability Indicators.
IndicatorsA
(Control Sample)
B
(4 °C)
C
(20 °C)
D
(20 °C + Light)
E
(−18 °C)
AV (mg KOH/g of fat)0.15 a ± 0.000.611 a ± 0.001.704 b ± 0.226.178 c ± 0.410.596 a ± 0.04
PV (μEq O2/g of fat)0.82 a ± 0.083.20 b ± 0.333.71 b ± 0.366.03 c ± 0.270.038 d ± 0.02
p-AV 2.53 a ± 0.142.23 a ± 0.162.35 a ± 0.126.63 b ± 0.022.18 a ± 0.16
DSC Ton (°C)225.59 a ± 8.59188.91 b ± 0.61194.45 b ± 4.27185.56 b ± 0.63212.46 c ± 3.04
DSC Tmax (°C)319.03 ± 1.18318.17 ± 1.89317.15 ± 2.21321.26 ± 0.18318.78 ± 0.34
Means with different letters in the same row differ at p ˂ 0.05. AV—acid value, PV—peroxide value, p-AV—para anisidin value, DSC Ton—temperature of the oxidation induction measured by DSC, DSC Tmax—temperature of the oxidation termination measured by DSC.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Orkusz, A.; Dymińska, L.; Prescha, A. Assessment of Changes in the Fat Profile of House Cricket Flour during 12 Months of Storage in Various Conditions. Foods 2024, 13, 2566. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13162566

AMA Style

Orkusz A, Dymińska L, Prescha A. Assessment of Changes in the Fat Profile of House Cricket Flour during 12 Months of Storage in Various Conditions. Foods. 2024; 13(16):2566. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13162566

Chicago/Turabian Style

Orkusz, Agnieszka, Lucyna Dymińska, and Anna Prescha. 2024. "Assessment of Changes in the Fat Profile of House Cricket Flour during 12 Months of Storage in Various Conditions" Foods 13, no. 16: 2566. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13162566

APA Style

Orkusz, A., Dymińska, L., & Prescha, A. (2024). Assessment of Changes in the Fat Profile of House Cricket Flour during 12 Months of Storage in Various Conditions. Foods, 13(16), 2566. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13162566

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop