Next Article in Journal
Prenatal Mercury Exposure and Infant Weight Trajectories in a UK Observational Birth Cohort
Next Article in Special Issue
The Impact of Metal-Based Nanoparticles Produced by Different Types of Underwater Welding on Marine Microalgae
Previous Article in Journal
Discovering Novel Bioactivities of Controversial Food Additives by Means of Simple Zebrafish Embryotoxicity (ZET) Assays
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Evaluation of the Toxic Effect of Bauhinia purpurea Mediated Synthesized Silver Nanoparticles against In-vitro and In-vivo Models

by
Nagarajan Shobana
1,
Pandurangan Prakash
1,*,
Antony V. Samrot
2,*,
Subramanian Saigeetha
3,
Mahendran Sathiyasree
1,
Rajendran Thirugnanasambandam
4,
Sridevi Visvanathan
5,
Basanta Kumar Mohanty
6,
Gokul Shankar Sabesan
6,
Shanmugaboopathi Dhiva
7,
Rajan Renuka Remya
8,
Senthilkumar Pachiyappan
9 and
Samraj Wilson
10
1
Department of Biotechnology, School of Bio and Chemical Engineering, Sathyabama Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai 600119, Tamil Nadu, India
2
School of Bioscience, Faculty of Medicine, Bioscience and Nursing, MAHSA University, Jenjarom 42610, Selangor, Malaysia
3
Department of Biotechnology, School of Biosciences and Technology, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore 632014, Tamil Nadu, India
4
Centre for Ocean Research (DST—FIST Sponsored Centre), MoES—Earth Science & Technology Cell, Sathyabama Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai 600119, Tamil Nadu, India
5
Unit of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, AIMST University, Semeling, Bedong 08100, Kedah Darul Aman, Malaysia
6
Faculty of Medicine, Manipal University College Malaysia (MUCM), Jalan Padang Jambu, Bukit Baru 75150, Melaka, Malaysia
7
Department of Microbiology, Sree Narayana College, Alathur, Palakkad 678682, Kerala, India
8
Department of Biotechnology, Bharath Institute of Higher Education and Research, Bharath University, Chennai 600073, Tamil Nadu, India
9
Department of Chemical Engineering, Saveetha Engineering College, Thandalam, Chennai 602105, Tamil Nadu, India
10
Department of Botany, St. John’s College, Tirunelveli 627002, Tamil Nadu, India
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 11 October 2022 / Revised: 28 November 2022 / Accepted: 28 November 2022 / Published: 22 December 2022

Abstract

:
Metal nanoparticles, such as gold nanoparticles, silver nanoparticles, etc., have many benefits and have been in use for a very long time. Nevertheless, a number of concerns have been raised about the environmental impact and the possibility of exposure to various living systems at the moment. Thus, in this study, silver nanoparticles were synthesized by using plant gum from Bauhinia purpurea and characterization was done using UV—Visible Spectroscopy, Scanning Electron Microscopy, X—ray Diffraction, etc. To determine the accumulation and toxic effects caused by the nanoparticles, Eudrilus eugeniae, Danio rerio, and their embryos were exposed to the synthesized silver nanoparticles and evaluated using microscopic observation, histology, and Inductively Coupled Plasma Optical Emission Spectrometry (ICP—OES).

1. Introduction

Nanotechnology has emerged as one of the most promising technologies in a variety of fields. Metal nanoparticles have higher electrical conductivity, roughness, and can strengthen metals and alloys which can be used in fields such as medicinal, agricultural, environmental, and physiochemical [1,2]. The antiviral or antibacterial effect of nanoparticles is influenced by their size, capping agent, and composition [3]. The large surface area and smaller particle size of the nanoparticles allow them to be employed in the techniques used for detecting viral infection, such RT—PCR, ELISA, and RT—LAMP [4]. Chemical composition and reaction conditions (e.g., temperature and pH) can be adjusted to change the morphological features of the nanoparticles (such as size and shape) [5]. However, synthesized nanomaterials may encounter some challenges when applied to specific applications, such as stability in hostile environments, lack of understanding of fundamental mechanisms, bioaccumulation/toxicity, need for extensive analysis, need for skilled operators, problem sizing [6]. There have been numerous applications of silver nanoparticles, such as antibacterial, anticancer, anti—inflammatory, and wound—care [7,8,9,10,11]. Due to the remarkable reactivities of silver nanoparticles, as well as the greater surface—to—volume ratios, they have opened new areas in biomedical research [2,9].
The most common approach for synthesizing silver nanoparticles is chemical synthesis, which employs harsh and toxic chemicals to reduce silver ions and stabilize nanoparticles [12]. The biogenic synthesis approach has become more popular as the chemical method requires the usage of chemicals and reagents which are hazardous and can cause health and environmental problems [13,14]. Biogenic nanoparticles can be synthesized by using the by-products of an organism’s metabolism as a reducing and stabilizing agent, such as bacteria, fungi, and plants [15]. It helps in decreasing the toxicity, increases stability, and enhances physiochemical properties [16]. Polyoxometalates with mixed valence, polysaccharides, Tollen’s compounds, biological preparations, and irradiation methods are some of the green synthesis approaches. They differ from conventional methods of involving toxic chemicals [16]. Cost—effectiveness, environmental friendliness, and the potential to synthesize nanoparticles that are more compatible to pharmaceuticals, medicinal, agronomical, and environmental applications are all advantages of green nanoparticle synthesis over physical and chemical approach [17]. In this study, silver nanoparticles have been synthesized by using the plant gum of Bauhinia purpurea, commonly called purple orchid, butterfly tree, orchid tree, camel’s foot, etc., as the reducing agent [18]. The synthesized nanoparticles were characterized both spectrophotometrically and microscopically. The toxicity of the nanoparticles was checked against animal models such as earthworm, zebrafish, and its embryos. Since many of their genes and critical pathways are so similar to those of humans, they are recognized as important markers for toxicity. Earthworms are ideal and easily adjust to new surroundings and are good candidates for assessing metal toxicity due to the reduced cost, accessibility, epigenetics, and rapid reproduction. The entire genome of the zebrafish has been sequenced, making it a great resource for toxicity research [19].

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials Used

All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations. Crude gum of Bauhinia purpurea was collected in the summer from Bengaluru, India. An incision in the tree’s bark was created, and gum exudate was collected repeatedly. The gum was shade dried before being pulverized using a mortar and pestle and stored in an airtight container [20]. All the chemicals used in this study were of analytical grade.

2.2. Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticle using Bauhinia purpurea Gum

Bauhinia purpurea gum was chosen as the bio-reducing agent for the fabrication of silver nanoparticles. First, 0.5 g of powdered gum was dispersed in 100 mL of distilled water and heated at 60 °C for 3 to 4 h with constant stirring. The solution was cooled after being filtered through muslin fabric with a pore size of 2 mm. Then, 100 mL of the gum solution was mixed with 1 mM silver nitrate (AgNO3) and left undisturbed for 24 h in the dark. After 24 h, the obtained nanoparticles were centrifuged at 10,000 rpm, pellets were collected, washed thrice using distilled water, and then lyophilized [21].

2.3. Bio-Physical Characterization of Silver Nanoparticles

The silver nanoparticle formation was examined by UV–Vis spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, UV 3600 PLUS, Kyoto, Japan). The Fourier—Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FT—IR) measurements were done using Shimadzu, IRTRACER 100, Kyoto, Japan. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and elemental analysis was performed by using Zeiss Ultra Plus, Oberkochen, Germany. The shape of the nanoparticles was analyzed using transmission electron microscopy (TEM) (FEI, Titan Themis 300 kV, Hillsboro, OR, USA). The X—Ray powder Diffraction (XRD) spectra were recorded (PANalytical Corporation, X’Pert, Almelo, Netherlands) along with its stability via Zeta Potential analysis (ZETASIZER Nano Series ZSP; Malvern Instruments, Worcestershire, UK).

2.4. Collection, Maintenance, and Pre-Treatment of Earthworms and Zebrafishes

Eudrilus eugeniae were purchased from SS Vermicompost, Chennai. Acclimatization to laboratory conditions was done for 5 to 6 days prior to experiments. Cow dung (dried one) was given as a feed once a day and sprinkled with water each day. Four—month—old adult male zebrafishes (Danio rerio) were obtained from Tarun fish farm, Chennai and housed in glass aquariums with adequate aeration. Before the introduction of silver nanoparticles, they were given 3 to 4 days to adjust to the surroundings. It was fed twice a day with Daphnia eggs and Tubifex worms and had its water changed once a week [22].

2.5. Breeding, Spawning and Maintenance of Zebrafishes Embryos

Zebrafishes of both sexes were placed into a breeding tank and were allowed to mate at a ratio of 2:1 (male:female). Spawning and fertilization took place within 30 min and the fertilized eggs were collected, cleaned, and kept in E3 medium (sodium chloride, calcium chloride, magnesium chloride, potassium chloride; pH 7.2) which were then transferred to a 6-well plate containing the same medium (20 eggs/plate) using a Pasteur pipette [23].

2.6. Exposure to Silver Nanoparticles

Ten earthworms were transferred into large glass beakers, which contained silver nanoparticles (10 µg and 20 µg concentrations), which were dispersed in 10 mL of distilled water. After 1 h, the earthworms were transferred to their holding containers after interacting with silver nanoparticles. Similarly, 10 fishes were placed in glass tanks containing different concentrations of silver nanoparticles. Fishes were fed regularly as mentioned in the aforementioned section; the study lasted for 30 days. Two sets/treatment groups were maintained for each set of animals. Histology experiments were done on one set, while the population study for earthworms and adaptability studies for zebrafishes were done with the other set.
The toxicity study on zebrafish eggs was carried out as follows: Recovered zebrafish eggs were treated with different concentrations of silver nanoparticles and incubated at 28.5 °C in triplicates with the same concentrations of silver nanoparticles. The embryogenesis was observed using a Stereozoom Microscope (Leica M205A, Leica Microsystems, Stockach, Germany) starting at the time of nanoparticle exposure and was tracked over time [24].

2.7. Observation of Phenotypical Changes

For all the species, phenotypic changes such as color change, behavioral change, and death were observed, and cumulative data were recorded. On the embryos, apical observations and embryonic abnormalities, such as coagulation of embryos, absence of somite development, and lack of heartbeat, were perceived in addition to hatching.

2.8. Histopathological Studies and ICP–OES

On the 10th and 20th days after exposure, animals from each concentration were euthanized for histological investigations. Earthworm’s foreguts, midguts, and hindguts, as well as zebrafish eyes, gills, livers, and intestine were dissected and fixed in a 10% formaldehyde solution. After being embedded in wax, dehydrated with ethanol, and sectioned with a microtome, the tissues were sectioned and stained with Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E). A fully automated Inverted Microscope was used to examine the samples (Leica DMI6000 B, Leica Microsystems, Stockach, Germany). The fishes and earthworms were collected and dissolved into a solution containing 5 mL of conc. nitric acid (HNO₃) and then with 5 mL conc. hydrofluoric acid (HCl). The solution was subjected to microwaving. The metal deposition in the solution was measured by Inductively Coupled Plasma Atomic Emission Spectroscopy (ICP–OES) [12,25].

3. Results

3.1. Characterization of Synthesized Silver Nanoparticles

The absorption band at 450 nm indicated the formation of silver nanoparticles mediated by Bauhinia purpurea gum (Figure 1). Samrot et al. [13] produced silver nanoparticles using gum of Araucaria heterophylla, where the absorbance peaks of the silver nanoparticles were seen between 420 nm and 450 nm.
The biomolecules present in the gum solution help in capping and stabilizing the nanoparticles which were determined using Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) studies (Figure 2). O–H stretching in the alcohols and phenols were confirmed by the prominent peak at the wavelength position at 3000–3500 cm−1. Peaks at 2400 cm−1 indicated carbonyl bond group (O=C=O) stretching. The peak at 1636 cm−1 is the strong indicator of alkenes (C=C) stretching. The Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) image shows a dense population of spherical, or nearly spherical, shaped nanoparticles with sizes ranging from 13 to 20 nm (Figure 3a). As previously reported, the Energy Dispersive X-Ray (EDX) spectrum (Figure 3b) showed silver with a significant signal peak at ∼3 KeV [22,26]. The silver nanoparticles synthesized using the aqueous extracts of three different stages of ripened Capsicum annum (green, yellow, red) ranged between 30 and 80 nm, which was further confirmed by Atomic Force Microscopic images [9]. Further, the shape of the synthesized silver nanoparticles was analyzed using Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) analysis (Figure 4), which correlated with the SEM result. The surface morphology of silver nanoparticles synthesized using aqueous extract of fresh leaves of Pedalium murex showed even shape and spherical shaped nanoparticles [27]. X-Ray Diffraction (XRD) analysis showed the peaks of 2θ at 38°, 43°, 65°, and 78° matching the JCPDS (File no.: 89—3722), which denoted that it had FCC structure [27] (Figure 5). Silver nanoparticles prepared using ethanolic extract of fruits of Santalum album were crystalline and had a face centered cubic crystal structure [28]. The Zeta Potential analysis revealed that the nanoparticles were found to be negatively charged, which implied that the particles were stable (Figure 6) [27].

3.2. Toxicity Studies on Earthworm and Zebrafish

3.2.1. Phenotypical Changes

The earthworms showed change in color from being brownish black to brownish pink (Figure 7). But there were no noticeable changes in behavior and body mass (Table 1), unlike many other studies which have been reported on earthworms being slow, with sluggish movement, and with much morphological changes [29]. The exposure to silver nanoparticles affected its reproductive and death rate (Table 2). Samrot et al. [30] reported on the color changes in earthworms caused by nanoparticles and confirmed that nanoparticles can enter inside the epithelium easily. Silver nanoparticles tend to impart a negative effect on the rate of reproduction of earthworm [31]. The phenotypical changes of zebrafish exposed to silver nanoparticles are tabulated in Table 3 (Figure 8). Zebrafishes exposed to a lower concentration of 10 µg showed slight changes in appearance and behavior due to metal nanoparticle deposition. The gills and fins of fishes exposed to 20 µg of nanoparticles exhibited a yellowish tint. The fishes were found to be weak and slow, and their growth was inhibited. Based on the results of the experiments, silver nanoparticle exposure caused phenotypical and mortality changes that were concentration–dependent.

3.2.2. Inductively Coupled Plasma Optical Emission Spectroscopy (ICP–OES)

The silver deposition in earthworms and zebrafishes was investigated using ICP–OES analysis. The accumulation was observed to be greater at 20 µg concentrations due to the increased concentration of nanoparticles. Samrot et al. [22] reported that SPIONs accumulation increases with an increase in nanoparticle concentration in treated earthworms (Figure 9 and Figure 10).

3.2.3. Histology Studies

The toxicity of the synthesized Bauhinia purpurea gum mediated silver nanoparticles were examined through histological images of the earthworm and zebrafishes exposed to two different concentrations (Figure 11, Figure 12, Figure 13, Figure 14, Figure 15, Figure 16 and Figure 17).
Head, mid, and the tail region of the earthworm were observed for possible toxicity. In the head region, no changes at a lower concentration were noticed. At higher concentrations, the epidermis and the underlying circular muscles were eroded, and the gizzard region was found to be disintegrated. On 20th day, fibrosis in the circular muscles and lipofuscin—like granules were observed with epidermis deformation in the earthworm exposed to 20 µg. Samrot et al. [12] reported that increasing the concentration of silver nanoparticles caused fibrosis in the circular muscle. Exposure to silver nanoparticles tends to induce erosion and fibrosis in Lumbricus rubellus earthworms due to the concentration-dependent accumulation of nanoparticles in the gut region and tissue [32]. Bourdineaud et al. [33] imparted an increase in the level of MDA (Malondialdehyde) causing oxidative stress in earthworms on exposure to gold nanoparticles.
On exposure to nanoparticles, there was erosion in the sclera, the photoreceptors, and cornea of the zebrafishes treated with a lower concentration of silver nanoparticles (Figure 14b,e,h). At a higher concentration, the vitreous humor, lens, iris, and suspensory ligament were eroded completely (Figure 14c,f,i) compared to the control (Figure 17a,d,g). The gills of the fish were found to be damaged heavily and at a higher concentration, the gill rakers, arches, and filaments were also damaged (Figure 12). At a lower concentration, no damages in the intestine were seen. The deformation in the intestinal walls and erosion of goblet cells in the intestinal epithelium of fishes exposed to a higher concentration were observed (Figure 16). The degradation of the hepatocytes in the liver leading to the vascular degeneration in the fish exposed to silver nanoparticles were also observed (Figure 17), in addition to the erosion of sinusoids in the liver at a higher concentration of exposure. Charged gold nanoparticles have the ability to cause inflammatory and altered immune effects on zebrafish [34]. Griffitt et al. [35] reported that copper nanoparticles were found to be extremely toxic to zebrafishes, causing damage in the gill lamellae and skin. Modulation of cytokines caused by metal oxide nanoparticles by the generation of free radicals has also been reported [36]. The alteration in the genomic composition has been detected in fishes treated even with a lesser concentration [37]. Sheng et al. [38] reported on the suppression in the genes, such as p38, CRE, NGF, which has led to brain damage causing neurotoxicity.
The zebrafish embryos were treated with silver nanoparticles of two different concentrations—10 µg and 20 µg (Figure 18).
The embryos were found to be unaffected on exposure to nanoparticles at the 0th h. At 24 h post—fertilization (hpf), deformation in the chorion and cerebellum was seen at lower concentrations whereas at higher concentration, coagulated eggs with intransparent inclusions were observed (Table 4 and Table 5). At 48 hpf, hatching of embryos to form larvae was higher compared to exposure at a higher concentration, indicating that it had an impact on the hatching rate of the embryos and delayed the process of embryogenesis. The embryos were found to be underdeveloped and slightly deformed. According to Xia et al. [39], lower concentrations of silver nanoparticles had no effect on zebrafish embryos, however greater concentrations caused damage to the mesodermal and ectodermal tissues. TMAT–functionalized gold nanoparticles of 1.3 nm size caused improper eye development, including alterations in pigmentation and neuronal damage, as well as behavioral problems [40]. Pericardial oedema, bent tail malformation, spinal curvature, non-inflated swim bladder, and yolk–sac oedema are some of the most commonly found defects in zebrafish embryos [41,42]. Silver nanoparticles and silver nitrate were investigated for toxicity against the freshwater fish Oreochromis mossambicus. It has been shown that both induced telangiectasia and epithelial cell hyperplasia, as well as silver accumulation which caused ineffective oxidative stress and altered enzymatic and non-enzymatic parameters, resulting in cellular damages [43]. Exposure to chemically synthesized silver nanoparticles can affect the rate of DNA replication and the cellular senescence pathway. It can disrupt the mitochondrial respiratory chain and influence DNA replication, cellular senescence, and mitochondrial respiratory chain—related genes at the transcriptional level [44].

4. Conclusions

In this study, silver nanoparticles were synthesized using plant gum of Bauhinia purpurea as the reducing agent, and the toxicity of silver nanoparticles was investigated against earthworms, Danio rerio, and its embryos. The nanoparticles were crystalline and had sizes ranging between 13 and 20 nm. These biologically produced nanoparticles showed less impact on the rate of reproduction but showed increased mortality on earthworms as the concentration increased. It was found to be less toxic on embryos and various organs of Danio rerio. Thus, this work suggests that the silver nanoparticles synthesized using biogenic molecules are less toxic than the ones synthesized using a chemical method and needs to be disposed properly to minimize negative consequences to the environment.

Author Contributions

N.S.: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing—Original Draft, Editing, Visualization; P.P.: Writing—Original Draft, Editing; A.V.S.: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing—Original Draft, Editing, Visualization, Supervision; S.S.: Methodology, Editing, Visualization; M.S.: Methodology, Writing—Original Draft, Editing, Visualization; R.T.: Methodology, Editing, Visualization; S.V.: Writing—Original Draft, Editing; B.K.M.: Writing—Original Draft, Editing; G.S.S.: Writing—Original Draft, Editing; S.D.: Writing—Original Draft, Editing; R.R.R.: Writing—Original Draft, Editing; S.P.: Writing—Original Draft, Editing; S.W.: Writing—Original Draft, Editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data used to support the findings of this study are included in the article. Should further data or information be required, these are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank to Sathyabama Institute of Science and Technology, India and MAHSA University, Malaysia for providing facilities and support to complete this research work.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Singh, P.; Kim, Y.J.; Zhang, D.; Yang, D.C. Biological synthesis of nanoparticles from plants and microorganisms. Trends Biotechnol. 2016, 34, 588–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Hamouda, R.A.; Hussein, M.H.; Abo-Elmagd, R.A.; Bawazir, S.S. Synthesis and biological characterization of silver nanoparticles derived from the cyanobacterium Oscillatoria limnetica. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 1–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Selvamani, V.; Zareei, A.; Elkashif, A.; Maruthamuthu, M.K.; Chittiboyina, S.; Delisi, D.; Li, Z.; Cai, L.; Pol, V.G.; Seleem, M.N.; et al. Hierarchical micro/mesoporous copper structure with enhanced antimicrobial property via laser surface texturing. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 7, 1901890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Al-Ansari, M.M.; Al-Dahmash, N.D.; Ranjitsingh, A.J.A. Synthesis of silver nanoparticles using gum Arabic: Evaluation of its inhibitory action on Streptococcus mutans causing dental caries and endocarditis. J. Infect. Public Health 2021, 14, 324–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhang, X.F.; Liu, Z.G.; Shen, W.; Gurunathan, S. Silver nanoparticles: Synthesis, characterization, properties, applications, and therapeutic approaches. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 1534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Singh, J.; Dutta, T.; Kim, K.H.; Rawat, M.; Samddar, P.; Kumar, P. ‘Green’ synthesis of metals and their oxide nanoparticles: Applications for environmental remediation. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2018, 16, 84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Chinnasamy, G.; Chandrasekharan, S.; Koh, T.W.; Bhatnagar, S. Synthesis, characterization, antibacterial and wound healing efficacy of silver nanoparticles from Azadirachta indica. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 611560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Samrot, A.V.; Shobana, N.; Suresh Kumar, S.; Narendrakumar, G. Production, Optimization and Characterisation of Chitosanase of Bacillus sp. and its Applications in Nanotechnology. J. Clust. Sci. 2019, 30, 607–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Samrot, A.V.; Shobana, N.; Jenna, R. Antibacterial and antioxidant activity of different staged ripened fruit of Capsicum annuum and its green synthesized silver nanoparticles. BioNanoScience 2018, 8, 632–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ahamed, M.; AlSalhi, M.S.; Siddiqui, M.K.J. Silver nanoparticle applications and human health. Clin. Chim. Acta 2010, 411, 1841–1848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Paladini, F.; Pollini, M. Antimicrobial silver nanoparticles for wound healing application: Progress and future trends. Materials 2019, 12, 2540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Samrot, A.V.; Burman, U.S.P.; Yamini, P.; Rabel, A.M. A Study on Toxicity of Chemically Synthesised Silver Nanoparticle on Eudrilus eugeniae. Toxicol. Environ. Health Sci. 2018, 10, 162–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Samrot, A.V.; Angalene, J.; Roshini, S.M.; Raji, P.; Stefi, S.M.; Preethi, R.; Selvarani, A.J.; Madankumar, A. Bioactivity and heavy metal removal using plant gum mediated green synthesized silver nanoparticles. J. Clust. Sci. 2019, 30, 1599–1610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Guilger-Casagrande, M.; Lima, R.D. Synthesis of silver nanoparticles mediated by fungi: A review. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2019, 7, 287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Durán, N.; Marcato, P.D.; Durán, M.; Yadav, A.; Gade, A.; Rai, M. Mechanistic aspects in the biogenic synthesis of extracellular metal nanoparticles by peptides, bacteria, fungi, and plants. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2011, 90, 1609–1624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Iravani, S.; Korbekandi, H.; Mirmohammadi, S.V.; Zolfaghari, B. Synthesis of silver nanoparticles: Chemical, physical and biological methods. Res. Pharm. Sci. 2014, 9, 385. [Google Scholar]
  17. Messaoudi, O.; Bendahou, M. Biological synthesis of nanoparticles using endophytic microorganisms: Current development. In Nanotechnology and the Environment; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  18. Parida, S.; Mahalik, G. Green leafy vegetables used by seven tribes of Odisha, India. Plant Arch. 2020, 20, 1866–1871. [Google Scholar]
  19. PJ, J.C.; Saigeetha, S.; Samrot, A.V.; Ponniah, P.; Chakravarthi, S. Overview on toxicity of nanoparticles, it’s mechanism, models used in toxicity studies and disposal methods–A review. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2021, 36, 102117. [Google Scholar]
  20. Samrot, A.V.; Jie, L.S.; Abirami, S.; Renitta, R.E.; Dhiva, S.; Prakash, P.; Saigeetha, S.; Shobana, N. Bioactivity and Plant Growth Stimulation Studies using Mangifera indica L Gum. J. Pure Appl. Microbiol. 2021, 15, 2073–2085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Suriyakala, G.; Sathiyaraj, S.; Devanesan, S.; AlSalhi, M.S.; Rajasekar, A.; Maruthamuthu, M.K.; Babujanarthanam, R. Phytosynthesis of silver nanoparticles from Jatropha integerrima Jacq. flower extract and their possible applications as antibacterial and antioxidant agent. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2022, 29, 680–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Samrot, A.V.; SaiPriya, C.; Angalene, L.A.J.; Roshini, S.M.; Cypriyana, J.P.J.; Saigeetha, S.; Kumar, S. Evaluation of nanotoxicity of Araucaria heterophylla gum derived green synthesized silver nanoparticles on Eudrilus eugeniae and Danio rerio. J. Clust. Sci. 2019, 30, 1017–1024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Avdesh, A.; Chen, M.; Martin-Iverson, M.T.; Mondal, A.; Ong, D.; Rainey-Smith, S.; Taddei, K.; Lardelli, M.; Groth, D.M.; Verdile, G.; et al. Regular care and maintenance of a zebrafish (Danio rerio) laboratory: An introduction. J. Vis. Exp. 2012, 69, e4196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Bhoopathy, S.; Inbakandan, D.; Thirugnanasambandam, R.; Kumar, C.; Sampath, P.; Bethunaickan, R.; Raguraman, V.; Vijayakumar, G.K. A comparative study on chitosan nanoparticle synthesis methodologies for application in aquaculture through toxicity studies. IET Nanobiotechnol. 2021, 15, 418–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Samrot, A.V.; Bhavya, K.S.; Sahithya, C.S.; Sowmya, N. Evaluation of Toxicity of Chemically Synthesised Gold Nanoparticles Against Eudrilus eugeniae. J. Cluster Sci. 2018, 29, 1217–1225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Rautela, A.; Rani, J. Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles from Tectona grandis seeds extract: Characterization and mechanism of antimicrobial action on different microorganisms. J. Anal. Sci. Technol. 2019, 10(1), 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Anandalakshmi, K.; Venugobal, J.; Ramasamy, V. Characterization of silver nanoparticles by green synthesis method using Pedalium murex leaf extract and their antibacterial activity. Appl. Nanosci. 2016, 6, 399–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Mehta, B.K.; Chhajlani, M.; Shrivastava, B.D. 2017, April. Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles and their characterization by XRD. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2017, 836, 012050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Ezemonye, L.I.N.; Ogeleka, D.F.; Okeimen, F.E. Toxicity of Neatex (industrial detergent) and Norust CR 486 (corrosion inhibitors) to earthworms (Aporrectodea longa) in naturally spiked soil. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2006, 5, 1113–1117. [Google Scholar]
  30. Samrot, A.V.; Justin, C.; Padmanaban, S.; Burman, U. A study on the effect of chemically synthesized magnetite nanoparticles on earthworm: Eudrilus eugeniae. Appl. Nanosci. 2017, 7, 17–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Schlich, K.; Klawonn, T.; Terytze, K.; Hund-Rinke, K. Effects of silver nanoparticles and silver nitrate in the earthworm reproduction test. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2013, 32, 181–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. van der Ploeg, M.J.; Handy, R.D.; Waalewijn-Kool, P.L.; van den Berg, J.H.; Herrera Rivera, Z.E.; Bovenschen, J.; Molleman, B.; Baveco, J.M.; Tromp, P.; Peters, R.J.; et al. Effects of silver nanoparticles (NM-300K) on Lumbricus rubellus earthworms and particle characterization in relevant test matrices including soil. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2014, 33, 743–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Bourdineaud, J.P.; Štambuk, A.; Šrut, M.; Radić Brkanac, S.; Ivanković, D.; Lisjak, D.; Sauerborn Klobučar, R.; Dragun, Z.; Bačić, N.; Klobučar, G.I. Gold and silver nanoparticles effects to the earthworm Eisenia fetida–the importance of tissue over soil concentrations. Drug Chem. Toxicol. 2021, 44, 12–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Truong, L.; Tilton, S.C.; Zaikova, T.; Richman, E.; Waters, K.M.; Hutchison, J.E.; Tanguay, R.L. Surface functionalities of gold nanoparticles impact embryonic gene expression responses. Nanotoxicology 2013, 7, 192–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Griffitt, R.J.; Weil, R.; Hyndman, K.A.; Denslow, N.D.; Powers, K.; Taylor, D.; Barber, D.S. Exposure to copper nanoparticles causes gill injury and acute lethality in zebrafish (Danio rerio). Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007, 41, 8178–8186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Di Gioacchino, M.; Petrarca, C.; Lazzarin, F.; Di Giampaolo, L.; Sabbioni, E.; Boscolo, P.; Mariani-Costantini, R.; Bernardini, G. Immunotoxicity of nanoparticles. Int. J. Immunopathol. Pharmacol. 2011, 24 (Suppl. S1), 65S–71S. [Google Scholar]
  37. Geffroy, B.; Ladhar, C.; Cambier, S.; Treguer-Delapierre, M.; Brèthes, D.; Bourdineaud, J.P. Impact of dietary gold nanoparticles in zebrafish at very low contamination pressure: The role of size, concentration and exposure time. Nanotoxicology 2012, 6, 144–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Sheng, L.; Wang, L.; Su, M.; Zhao, X.; Hu, R.; Yu, X.; Hong, J.; Liu, D.; Xu, B.; Zhu, Y.; et al. Mechanism of TiO2 nanoparticle-induced neurotoxicity in zebrafish (Danio rerio). Environ. Toxicol. 2016, 31, 163–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Xia, G.; Liu, T.; Wang, Z.; Hou, Y.; Dong, L.; Zhu, J.; Qi, J. The effect of silver nanoparticles on zebrafish embryonic development and toxicology. Artif. Cells Nanomed. Biotechnol. 2016, 44, 1116–1121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kim, K.T.; Zaikova, T.; Hutchison, J.E.; Tanguay, R.L. Gold nanoparticles disrupt zebrafish eye development and pigmentation. Toxicol. Sci. 2013, 133, 275–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Rizzo, L.Y.; Golombek, S.K.; Mertens, M.E.; Pan, Y.; Laaf, D.; Broda, J.; Jayapaul, J.; Möckel, D.; Subr, V.; Hennink, W.E.; et al. In vivo nanotoxicity testing using the zebrafish embryo assay. J. Mater. Chem. B 2013, 1, 3918–3925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Samrot, A.V.; Shobana, N.; Sathiyasree, M.; Thirugnanasambandam, R.; Visvanathan, S.; Mohanty, B.K.; Sabesan, G.S.; Dhiva, S. Toxicity evaluation of SPIONs on Danio rerio embryonic development. Mater. Today Proc. 2022, 59, 1555–1560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Sibiya, A.; Gopi, N.; Jeyavani, J.; Mahboob, S.; Al-Ghanim, K.A.; Sultana, S.; Mustafa, A.; Govindarajan, M.; Vaseeharan, B. Comparative toxicity of silver nanoparticles and silver nitrate in freshwater fish Oreochromis mossambicus: A multi-biomarker approach. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part C Toxicol. 2022, 259, 109391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Lu, C.; Lv, Y.; Kou, G.; Liu, Y.; Liu, Y.; Chen, Y.; Wu, X.; Yang, F.; Luo, J.; Yang, X. Silver nanoparticles induce developmental toxicity via oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction in zebrafish (Danio rerio). Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2022, 243, 113993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. UV–Vis spectroscopy for the synthesized silver nanoparticles.
Figure 1. UV–Vis spectroscopy for the synthesized silver nanoparticles.
Toxics 11 00009 g001
Figure 2. FTIR spectroscopy for the synthesized silver nanoparticles.
Figure 2. FTIR spectroscopy for the synthesized silver nanoparticles.
Toxics 11 00009 g002
Figure 3. (a) SEM analysis, (b) EDX analysis for the synthesized silver nanoparticles.
Figure 3. (a) SEM analysis, (b) EDX analysis for the synthesized silver nanoparticles.
Toxics 11 00009 g003
Figure 4. TEM analysis for the synthesized silver nanoparticles.
Figure 4. TEM analysis for the synthesized silver nanoparticles.
Toxics 11 00009 g004
Figure 5. XRD analysis for the synthesized silver nanoparticles.
Figure 5. XRD analysis for the synthesized silver nanoparticles.
Toxics 11 00009 g005
Figure 6. Zeta Potential analysis for the synthesized silver nanoparticles.
Figure 6. Zeta Potential analysis for the synthesized silver nanoparticles.
Toxics 11 00009 g006
Figure 7. Phenotypic changes observed in earthworms exposed to silver nanoparticles. (a) control; (b) exposed to 10 µg; (c) exposed to 20 µg (Black arrow indicates the brownish pink changes).
Figure 7. Phenotypic changes observed in earthworms exposed to silver nanoparticles. (a) control; (b) exposed to 10 µg; (c) exposed to 20 µg (Black arrow indicates the brownish pink changes).
Toxics 11 00009 g007
Figure 8. Phenotypic changes observed in zebrafish exposed to silver nanoparticles. (a) control; (b) exposed to 10 µg; (c) exposed to 20 µg.
Figure 8. Phenotypic changes observed in zebrafish exposed to silver nanoparticles. (a) control; (b) exposed to 10 µg; (c) exposed to 20 µg.
Toxics 11 00009 g008
Figure 9. Silver nanoparticle accumulation study using ICP–OES in earthworms.
Figure 9. Silver nanoparticle accumulation study using ICP–OES in earthworms.
Toxics 11 00009 g009
Figure 10. Silver nanoparticle accumulation study using ICP–OES in zebrafishes.
Figure 10. Silver nanoparticle accumulation study using ICP–OES in zebrafishes.
Toxics 11 00009 g010
Figure 11. Histology images of foregut region of earthworm—Eudrilus eugeniae (10X Magnification) (a) 10th day control, (b) exposed to 10 µg at 10th day, (c) exposed to 20 µg at 10th day; (d) 20th day control, (e) exposed to 10 µg at 20th day, (f) exposed to 20 µg at 20th day; (g) 30th day control, (h) exposed to 10 µg at 30th day, (i) exposed to 20 µg at 30th day. G—Gut, E—Epidermis, LM—Longitudinal Muscle, CM—Circular Muscle. Black arrow denotes lipofuscin, red arrow denotes erosion of epidermis, blue arrow denotes interstitial space, yellow arrow denotes fibrosis of CM, green denotes arrow disruption of gut.
Figure 11. Histology images of foregut region of earthworm—Eudrilus eugeniae (10X Magnification) (a) 10th day control, (b) exposed to 10 µg at 10th day, (c) exposed to 20 µg at 10th day; (d) 20th day control, (e) exposed to 10 µg at 20th day, (f) exposed to 20 µg at 20th day; (g) 30th day control, (h) exposed to 10 µg at 30th day, (i) exposed to 20 µg at 30th day. G—Gut, E—Epidermis, LM—Longitudinal Muscle, CM—Circular Muscle. Black arrow denotes lipofuscin, red arrow denotes erosion of epidermis, blue arrow denotes interstitial space, yellow arrow denotes fibrosis of CM, green denotes arrow disruption of gut.
Toxics 11 00009 g011
Figure 12. Histology images of midgut region of earthworm—Eudrilus eugeniae (10X Magnification) (a) 10th day control, (b) exposed to 10 µg at 10th day, (c) exposed to 20 µg at 10th day; (d) 20th day control, (e) exposed to 10 µg at 20th day, (f) exposed to 20 µg at 20th day; (g) 30th day control, (h) exposed to 10 µg at 30th day, (i) exposed to 20 µg at 30th day. G—Gut, E—Epidermis, LM—Longitudinal Muscle, CM—Circular Muscle. Black arrow denotes lipofuscin, red arrow denotes erosion of epidermis, blue arrow denotes interstitial space, yellow arrow denotes fibrosis of CM, green denotes arrow disruption of gut.
Figure 12. Histology images of midgut region of earthworm—Eudrilus eugeniae (10X Magnification) (a) 10th day control, (b) exposed to 10 µg at 10th day, (c) exposed to 20 µg at 10th day; (d) 20th day control, (e) exposed to 10 µg at 20th day, (f) exposed to 20 µg at 20th day; (g) 30th day control, (h) exposed to 10 µg at 30th day, (i) exposed to 20 µg at 30th day. G—Gut, E—Epidermis, LM—Longitudinal Muscle, CM—Circular Muscle. Black arrow denotes lipofuscin, red arrow denotes erosion of epidermis, blue arrow denotes interstitial space, yellow arrow denotes fibrosis of CM, green denotes arrow disruption of gut.
Toxics 11 00009 g012
Figure 13. Histology images of hindgut region of earthworm—Eudrilus eugeniae (10X Magnification) (a) 10th day control, (b) exposed to 10 µg at 10th day, (c) exposed to 20 µg at 10th day; (d) 20th day control, (e) exposed to 10 µg at 20th day, (f) exposed to 20 µg at 20th day; (g) 30th day control, (h) exposed to 10 µg at 30th day, (i) exposed to 20 µg at 30th day. E—Epidermis, LM—Longitudinal Muscle, CM—Circular Muscle. Black arrow denotes lipofuscin, red arrow denotes erosion of epidermis, blue arrow denotes interstitial space, yellow arrow denotes fibrosis of CM.
Figure 13. Histology images of hindgut region of earthworm—Eudrilus eugeniae (10X Magnification) (a) 10th day control, (b) exposed to 10 µg at 10th day, (c) exposed to 20 µg at 10th day; (d) 20th day control, (e) exposed to 10 µg at 20th day, (f) exposed to 20 µg at 20th day; (g) 30th day control, (h) exposed to 10 µg at 30th day, (i) exposed to 20 µg at 30th day. E—Epidermis, LM—Longitudinal Muscle, CM—Circular Muscle. Black arrow denotes lipofuscin, red arrow denotes erosion of epidermis, blue arrow denotes interstitial space, yellow arrow denotes fibrosis of CM.
Toxics 11 00009 g013
Figure 14. Histology images of eyes of Zebrafish—Danio rerio (10X Magnification) (a) 10th day Control, (b) 20th day Control, (c) exposed to 10 µg at 20th day, (d) 30th day Control. L–Lens, V–Vitreous.
Figure 14. Histology images of eyes of Zebrafish—Danio rerio (10X Magnification) (a) 10th day Control, (b) 20th day Control, (c) exposed to 10 µg at 20th day, (d) 30th day Control. L–Lens, V–Vitreous.
Toxics 11 00009 g014
Figure 15. Histology images of gills of Zebrafish—Danio rerio (10X Magnification) (a) 10th day control, (b) exposed to 10 µg at 10th day, (c) exposed to 20 µg at 10th day; (d) 20th day control, (e) exposed to 10 µg at 20th day, (f) exposed to 20 µg at 20th day; (g) 30th day control, (h) exposed to 10 µg at 30th day, (i) exposed to 20 µg at 30th day.
Figure 15. Histology images of gills of Zebrafish—Danio rerio (10X Magnification) (a) 10th day control, (b) exposed to 10 µg at 10th day, (c) exposed to 20 µg at 10th day; (d) 20th day control, (e) exposed to 10 µg at 20th day, (f) exposed to 20 µg at 20th day; (g) 30th day control, (h) exposed to 10 µg at 30th day, (i) exposed to 20 µg at 30th day.
Toxics 11 00009 g015
Figure 16. Histology images of intestines of Zebrafish—Danio rerio (10X Magnification) (a) 10th day control, (b) exposed to 10 µg at 10th day, (c) exposed to 20 µg at 10th day; (d) 20th day control, (e) exposed to 10 µg at 20th day, (f) exposed to 20 µg at 20th day; (g) 30th day control, (h) exposed to 10 µg at 30th day, (i) exposed to 20 µg at 30th day.
Figure 16. Histology images of intestines of Zebrafish—Danio rerio (10X Magnification) (a) 10th day control, (b) exposed to 10 µg at 10th day, (c) exposed to 20 µg at 10th day; (d) 20th day control, (e) exposed to 10 µg at 20th day, (f) exposed to 20 µg at 20th day; (g) 30th day control, (h) exposed to 10 µg at 30th day, (i) exposed to 20 µg at 30th day.
Toxics 11 00009 g016
Figure 17. Histology images of liver of Zebrafish—Danio rerio (10X Magnification) (a) 10th day control, (b) exposed to 10 µg at 10th day, (c) exposed to 20 µg at 10th day; (d) 20th day control, (e) exposed to 10 µg at 20th day, (f) exposed to 20 µg at 20th day; (g) 30th day control, (h) exposed to 10 µg at 30th day, (i) exposed to 20 µg at 30th day.
Figure 17. Histology images of liver of Zebrafish—Danio rerio (10X Magnification) (a) 10th day control, (b) exposed to 10 µg at 10th day, (c) exposed to 20 µg at 10th day; (d) 20th day control, (e) exposed to 10 µg at 20th day, (f) exposed to 20 µg at 20th day; (g) 30th day control, (h) exposed to 10 µg at 30th day, (i) exposed to 20 µg at 30th day.
Toxics 11 00009 g017
Figure 18. Microscopic images of Zebrafish—Danio rerio embryos (a) control at 0th h, (b) exposed to 10 µg at 0th h, (c) exposed to 20 µg at 0th h, (d) control at 24 hpf, (e) exposed to 10 µg at 24 hpf, (f) exposed to 20 µg at 24 hpf, (g) control at 48 hpf, (h) exposed to 10 µg at 48 hpf, (i) exposed to 20 µg at 48 hpf. White arrow denotes dead embryos (coagulation); Yellow arrows denote undeveloped embryos.
Figure 18. Microscopic images of Zebrafish—Danio rerio embryos (a) control at 0th h, (b) exposed to 10 µg at 0th h, (c) exposed to 20 µg at 0th h, (d) control at 24 hpf, (e) exposed to 10 µg at 24 hpf, (f) exposed to 20 µg at 24 hpf, (g) control at 48 hpf, (h) exposed to 10 µg at 48 hpf, (i) exposed to 20 µg at 48 hpf. White arrow denotes dead embryos (coagulation); Yellow arrows denote undeveloped embryos.
Toxics 11 00009 g018
Table 1. Phenotypic changes observed in earthworms exposed to silver nanoparticles synthesized using Bauhinia purpurea gum.
Table 1. Phenotypic changes observed in earthworms exposed to silver nanoparticles synthesized using Bauhinia purpurea gum.
Parameter AnalyzedControl10 µg20 µg
BeforeAfterBeforeAfterBeforeAfter
Color changeBrownish blackBrownish blackBrownish blackBrownish pinkBrownish blackBrownish pink
Behavioral changeNilNilNilNilNilNil
Table 2. Total count of earthworms exposed to silver nanoparticles synthesized using Bauhinia purpurea gum.
Table 2. Total count of earthworms exposed to silver nanoparticles synthesized using Bauhinia purpurea gum.
Conc.Before10th day20th day30th day
Control10222751
10 µg10172214
20 µg1017139
Table 3. Phenotypic changes observed in zebrafish exposed to silver nanoparticles synthesized using Bauhinia purpurea gum.
Table 3. Phenotypic changes observed in zebrafish exposed to silver nanoparticles synthesized using Bauhinia purpurea gum.
Parameter AnalyzedControl10 µg20 µg
BeforeAfterBeforeAfterBeforeAfter
Color changeNilNilNilYellowish tint in the gills and finsNilYellowish tint in the gills and fins
Behavioral changeActiveActiveActiveWeak and slowActiveWeak and slow
GrowthNormalNormalNormalInhibition in growthNormalInhibition in growth
Table 4. Total count of zebrafishes exposed to silver nanoparticles synthesized using Bauhinia purpurea gum.
Table 4. Total count of zebrafishes exposed to silver nanoparticles synthesized using Bauhinia purpurea gum.
Conc.Before10th Day20th Day30th Day
Control10101010
10 µg101099
20 µg10988
Table 5. Apical observations observed for zebrafish embryos.
Table 5. Apical observations observed for zebrafish embryos.
Control10 µg20 µg
0th h24 hpf48 hpf0th h24 hpf48 hpf0th h24 hpf48 hpf
HatchingNANA+++NANA++NANA+
Coagulated embryos-+--+++-+++
Somite formation+++++++++
HeartbeatNANA++NANA++NANA+
NA—Non applicable, + denotes good, ++ denotes better, +++ denotes best, - denotes negative result.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shobana, N.; Prakash, P.; Samrot, A.V.; Saigeetha, S.; Sathiyasree, M.; Thirugnanasambandam, R.; Visvanathan, S.; Mohanty, B.K.; Sabesan, G.S.; Dhiva, S.; et al. Evaluation of the Toxic Effect of Bauhinia purpurea Mediated Synthesized Silver Nanoparticles against In-vitro and In-vivo Models. Toxics 2023, 11, 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics11010009

AMA Style

Shobana N, Prakash P, Samrot AV, Saigeetha S, Sathiyasree M, Thirugnanasambandam R, Visvanathan S, Mohanty BK, Sabesan GS, Dhiva S, et al. Evaluation of the Toxic Effect of Bauhinia purpurea Mediated Synthesized Silver Nanoparticles against In-vitro and In-vivo Models. Toxics. 2023; 11(1):9. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics11010009

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shobana, Nagarajan, Pandurangan Prakash, Antony V. Samrot, Subramanian Saigeetha, Mahendran Sathiyasree, Rajendran Thirugnanasambandam, Sridevi Visvanathan, Basanta Kumar Mohanty, Gokul Shankar Sabesan, Shanmugaboopathi Dhiva, and et al. 2023. "Evaluation of the Toxic Effect of Bauhinia purpurea Mediated Synthesized Silver Nanoparticles against In-vitro and In-vivo Models" Toxics 11, no. 1: 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics11010009

APA Style

Shobana, N., Prakash, P., Samrot, A. V., Saigeetha, S., Sathiyasree, M., Thirugnanasambandam, R., Visvanathan, S., Mohanty, B. K., Sabesan, G. S., Dhiva, S., Remya, R. R., Pachiyappan, S., & Wilson, S. (2023). Evaluation of the Toxic Effect of Bauhinia purpurea Mediated Synthesized Silver Nanoparticles against In-vitro and In-vivo Models. Toxics, 11(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics11010009

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop