Next Article in Journal
Preparation and Comprehensive Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Chlorantraniliprole Nanosuspension
Previous Article in Journal
Association between Ambient Particulate Air Pollution and Soluble Biomarkers of Endothelial Function: A Meta-Analysis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Photocatalytic Removal of Metronidazole Antibiotics from Water Using Novel Ag-N-SnO2 Nanohybrid Material
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Biogenic Punica granatum Flower Extract Assisted ZnFe2O4 and ZnFe2O4-Cu Composites for Excellent Photocatalytic Degradation of RhB Dye

1
Chemistry Department, Faculty of Science, King Abdulaziz University, P.O. Box 80203, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
2
Chemistry Department, Faculty of Sciences and Arts in Baljurashi, Albaha University, Albaha 65779, Saudi Arabia
3
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Sciences, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi 110025, India
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Toxics 2024, 12(1), 77; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics12010077
Submission received: 13 November 2023 / Revised: 24 December 2023 / Accepted: 30 December 2023 / Published: 16 January 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Photocatalytic Degradation of Emerging Contaminants)

Abstract

:
Globally, the textile industry contributes to pollution through accidental discharges or discharge of contaminated wastewater into waterways, significantly affecting water quality. These pollutants, including dye molecules, are environmental hazards for aquatic and terrestrial life. The field of visible light-mediated photocatalysis has experienced rapid growth, driven by the utilization of photocatalysts that can absorb low-energy visible light and effectively degrade dyes. In the present study, we report a simple method to controllably synthesize Fe2O3, ZnO, and ZnFe2O4 using the one-pot synthesis method. In the subsequent step, copper (Cu) was deposited on the surface of ZnFe2O4 (forming ZnFe2O4-Cu) using a facile, green, and cost-effective method. The synthesized samples were characterized using various techniques, including XRD, UV-Vis DRS, FT-IR, SEM-EDX, HR-TEM, XPS, PL, and BET analysis. These techniques were employed to investigate the composition, morphology, structure, and photophysical properties of as-prepared samples. The ZnFe2O4-Cu nanocomposite demonstrated efficient photocatalytic activity for degrading RhB dye pollutants under visible light. The photocatalyst was successfully reused for three consecutive cycles without significantly decreasing performance. Furthermore, during the study, the radical scavenging test emphasized the role of different radicals in the degradation of dye pollutants. This research has the potential to enable the efficient production of high-performance photocatalysts that can rapidly eliminate ecologically harmful dyes from aqueous solutions.

1. Introduction

Water is a critical resource for the existence of life on Earth and human survival. With increasing economic growth, there is an increase in the level of undesired pollution, such as organic dyes, heavy metals [1], and pharmaceuticals [2] in water bodies, which endanger people’s health and the ecosystem. Photocatalysts, the substrate that absorbs light and acts as catalysts, are widely used in organic dye degradation. They are characterized by low toxicity, low cost, and high stability [3]. Photocatalysis has many limitations, like stability and reusability of catalyst, recombination between hole and electron, and band gap [4]. Metal oxide nanoparticles MONPs are significantly attractive in dye degradation as a photocatalyst due to their flexible properties [5,6,7,8]. MONPs can be classified into different types based on the number of metals: monometallic (which contains only one metal), bimetallic (which contains two types of metals), and trimetallic (which contains three types of metals) [9,10]. Trimetallic NPs have attracted attention, where it was found that they have a promising synergistic effect of catalytic activity, which outweighs the properties of mono and bi-metallic NPs acting as antimicrobials [11,12,13,14,15]. For example, AuFeAg hybrid NPs and FeAgPt alloy [16] exhibited better catalytic activity when compared to mono and bi-metallic NPs [17,18]. MONPs can be synthesized through three approaches: physically (consuming a lot of energy and producing waste), chemically (which requires a lot of hazardous chemicals), and greenly (which uses biomolecules to minimize the toxicity of the MONPs process) [17,18,19]. Green synthesis of MONPs has recently gained popularity due to their environmental advantages and affordable cost [20,21,22,23]. The biomolecules, including bio-polymers [24], ascorbic acid [25], citric acid [15], flavonoids [26], nucleic acids, and proteins [27] derived from natural sources such as plant parts, fungi, and bacteria, play important roles in the capping and reduction of NPs [28]. Among them, plants are considered the most simple, facile, and cost-effective bio-sources, and they can work as a capping/stabilizing and reducing agent [29]. In order to reduce photogenerated electron and hole recombination and increase the range of light absorption, MONPs can be doped with metallic or non-metallic ions [30]. The different types of dopants have different effects on interactions with electrons and/or holes because of their different locations within the host lattice [30,31].
In general, photocatalysts should be cost-effective, non-toxic, and activated by visible/solar light properties [32]. Among other MONPs, ZnO, CuO, and Fe2O3 have attracted interest because of their versatile applicability and physiochemical characteristics. ZnO is an n-type semiconductor with fantastic properties such as safety, abundant natural availability, high surface area, high catalytic activity, and high stability against photo-corrosion [32,33,34]. However, it has a band gap of around 3.4 eV, which means it is not efficient in visible light [32,35,36]. Fe2O3 NPs are the most stable form of iron oxide and possess desirable characteristics such as excellent corrosion resistance, cost-effectiveness, biocompatibility, environmental friendliness, and non-toxicity [37]. Additionally, when doped onto ZnO NPs, Fe2O3 can reduce electron recombination and shift the absorbance to a higher wavelength [38]. Zinc ferrite (ZnFe2O4) is an iron-based semiconducting oxide that has a spinal structure and received significant interest because of its excellent magnetic properties with a low band gap of around 1.9 eV, which makes it a promising material to use as a photocatalyst [39]. However, it suffers from some drawbacks, such as a high rate of agglomeration and rapid recombination of the electron-hole pairs [39]. One of the most effective strategies to overcome these drawbacks is depositing by metallic NPs. Depositing copper (Cu) nanoparticles holds significant interest as a non-toxic additive material. Additionally, it is more cost-effective compared to noble metals. It serves as a trap for charge carriers, interfering with interfacial transfer and reducing electron-hole recombination [40,41,42]. ZnFe2O4 NPs are typically prepared using various methods, including sol-gel [43], co-precipitation [6], hydrothermal [44], microwave [45], microemulsion techniques [46], and biosynthesis [47]. These different methods offer flexibility in tailoring the properties of synthesized materials ZnFe2O4 NPs.
The pomegranate plant (Punica granatum L.) is abundantly available in the Middle East, and its cultivation has spread to various regions across the world [48]. Punica granatum plant extract possesses many metabolites, such as organic acids, sugars, flavonoids, polyphenols, fatty acids, anthocyanins, and vitamins [49], which can work as capping and reducing agents in the preparation of ZnFe2O4 NPs. Ascorbic acid is also a cost-effective and eco-friendly mild reducing agent and can also work as a capping/stabilizing agent [50]. Some research used sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) as a capping agent to improve NPs properties [51,52]. This work aims to prepare a low-toxic and cost-effective semiconductive photocatalysis of ZnO, Fe2O3, and ZnFe2O4 by the co-precipitation method by using Punica granatum extract as a reducing and capping agent instead of using toxic chemicals. After that, ZnFe2O4 will be deposited with Cu to enhance the dye degradation’s photocatalytic activity.

2. Experimental

2.1. Materials

Punica granatum flowers were purchased from the Saudi market in Jeddah. Metal precursor salts of Iron (II) chloride tetrahydrate (FeCl2⋅4H2O, purity 99.0%), iron (III) chloride hexahydrate (FeCl3⋅ 6H2O, purity 99.0%), zinc acetate-2-hydrate (C4H6O4Zn⋅2H2O, purity 99.5%), and copper(II) nitrate trihydrate (Cu(NO3)2⋅3H2O, purity > 99.5%) were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich, MO, USA. Other reagents, sodium dodecyl sulfate (C12H25OSO3Na, purity 99%), sodium hydroxide (NaOH, pellets), ascorbic acid (C6H8O6, purity 99%), and Rhodamine B dye (C28H31ClN2O3, purity ≥ 95%) were also purchased from Sigma-Aldrich USA. The chemical reagents were utilized in their original state without undergoing any additional purifying processes. The preparation of all solutions was done using deionized water.

2.2. Preparation of Fe2O3, ZnO, ZnFe2O4 and ZnFe2O4-Cu

In order to prepare the extract of Punica granatum flowers, the flowers underwent a series of washes using distilled water, with an additional wash using deionized water to remove any contaminants. The flowers were then dried and finely powdered. Following this, 10 g of the powder was added to 200 mL of deionized water. The mixture was then heated at 80 °C for two hours while being stirred magnetically. Subsequently, it was allowed to rest overnight before undergoing filtration and immediate utilization in the synthesis of nanoparticles.
The preparation of Fe2O3 and ZnO nanoparticles was carried out by a green co-precipitation method. Initially, equimolar aqueous solutions of FeCl2 (2M, 25 mL) and FeCl3 (2M, 25 mL) (1:1 ratio) were mixed under constant stirring. To this reaction mixture, 50 mL of freshly prepared aqueous extract of Punica granatum was added and stirred for 30 min at 70 °C, followed by the dropwise addition of 2 molar NaOH solution until the pH reached between 11 and 12. The reaction mixture turned to a dark brown precipitate. Similarly, 50 mL of 2M zinc acetate was mixed with 50 mL of freshly prepared aqueous extract of Punica granatum. In this reaction mixture, NaOH (2M) solution was added dropwise under vigorous stirring at 60 °C until the pH reached 12, and the light yellowish precipitate formation was observed. The precipitate of both reactions was collected by centrifugation and washed several times with deionized water and ethanol until pH 7 was attained. The acquired materials were collected and dried at 80 °C for 24 h, followed by the calcination at 500 °C for 4 h. For the preparation of ZnFe2O4, FeCl2 (2M, 25 mL) and FeCl3 (2M, 25 mL) (1:1 ratio) were mixed with 25 mL of 2M zinc acetate solution under vigorous stirring at 70 °C. To this reaction mixture, 100 mL of Punica granatum aqueous extract was added and stirred continuously for 30 min. A 2M NaOH solution was added to this reaction mixture to attain a pH of 12, and a deep brown precipitate was formed immediately. The precipitate was centrifuged, and the acquired solid material was washed multiple times with distilled water, followed by ethanol until the pH reached 7. The as-prepared samples were dried at 80 °C for 24 h, followed by the calcination for 4 h at 500 °C.
ZnFe2O4-Cu nanoparticles were synthesized by dispersing 1 g of ZnFe2O4 NPs in 50 mL of deionized water using an ultrasonic bath for 10 min before being stirred. Then 5 mL of 0.1 M SDS and 10 mL of 0.1 M Cu(NO3)2 solution were added to dispersed ZnFe2O4 NPs suspension under continuous vigorous stirring. Then, 10 mL of 0.1 M ascorbic acid was added to complete the reduction process of Cu on the surface of the ZnFe2O4 NPs. After that, samples were dried and then calcined for three hours at 350 °C after being rinsed three times with distilled water and once with 99.9% ethanol. The complete synthesis of Fe2O3, ZnO, ZnFe2O4, and ZnFe2O4-Cu NPs is schematically shown in Figure 1.

2.3. Characterization

The as-prepared nanomaterials were characterized using spectroscopic and microscopic techniques to determine their surface morphology, purity, and physicochemical properties. In order to confirm the NPs structure, XRD patterns were collected using an X-ray diffractometer (D8, Advance, Bruker, Germany), utilizing Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.5406 Å) over a range 5–80 2θ degrees. A Debye-Scherer equation was used to calculate the average crystallite size [53,54].
D = K λ β   C o s θ
Here, D = crystallites size (nm), K = shape factor, λ = wavelength of the X-ray sources, β = FWHM (radians), and θ = Peak position (radians). FT-IR was carried out for as-prepared NPs to determine the function group on the surface of NPs and to confirm the presence of M-O bonds. FT-IR was carried out by using FTIR spectrophotometer (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA) using KBr in the range of 4000–400 cm−1. The UV-Vis diffused reflectance spectroscopy (UV-Vis DRS) spectra were conducted using a spectrophotometer manufactured by Shimadzu in Kyoto, Japan, to determine the band gap from the absorbance spectrum by using Tauc’s equation [55].
(αhν)γ = A (Eg)
Here, α is the absorption coefficient, h is the Plank’s constant, ν is the frequency of photons, A is a proportionality constant, γ denotes the nature of the electronic transition, and Eg is a band gap energy. The X-ray photoelectron spectra (XPS) were measured using an X-ray photoelectron spectrometer model k Alpha manufactured by (Thermofisher, Waltham, MA, USA) with LAB 6 ion source to determine the coordination number of elements. Surface morphology and elemental compositions of as-prepared NPs were examined using the energy dispersive spectroscope (EDS) manufactured by Bruker, Berlin, Germany, coupled to the scanning electron microscope (FESEM model Nova Nano SEM 350 manufactured by FEI, Eindhoven, The Netherlands). The specimen holder utilized was made from aluminum. The sizes and shapes of the particles were determined using a transmission electron microscope (HR-TEM) model Technai 200 manufactured by FEI, Pleasanton, CA, USA. Photoluminescence spectra (PL) were obtained utilizing a fluorescence spectrophotometer manufactured by Perkin Elmer. Surface area, pore size, and pore volume, which are crucial properties of heterogeneous catalysts, were determined utilizing N2 adsorption-desorption using a Quantachrome Instrument v11.05 manufacturing by Anton Paar, Boynton Beach, FL, USA, Boynton Beach (USA) and Quantachrome Novawin ©1994–2018 software.

2.4. Photocatalytic Activity of ZnFe2O4-Cu

The photocatalytic reactivity of the as-prepared ZnFe2O4-Cu to visible light at room temperature was measured using the hetero-polyaromatic rhodamine B (RhB) dye as a probe molecule. Photodegradation of RhB dye was carried out using distilled water for the preparation of stock solution (100 mg/L) until completely dissolved, then kept at room temperature in a dark place. Every solution used in this study was prepared by diluting the stock solution of RhB dye. A UV-Vis spectrophotometer manufacturing by Thermo-Scientific evolution, Waltham, MA, USA, was used to measure the concentration of RhB dye. The suspension was then exposed to light from a 300 W Hg lamp with a cutoff filter (420 nm), with the lamp placed roughly 10 cm from the beaker. In the first, the photocatalytic degradation of RhB dye without ZnFe2O4-Cu was studied. After that, to test the performance of ZnFe2O4-Cu on RhB degradation, 2.0 g/L of ZnFe2O4-Cu NPs was added into 10 mL of 20 mg L−1 RhB solution. An aqueous suspension of RhB and ZnFe2O4-Cu photocatalyst was constantly agitated in the dark for 30 min to achieve adsorption-desorption equilibrium before being exposed to light. At intervals of specific time, 5 mL of the suspension was collected and centrifuged for 20 min at 5000 rpm. The initial pH of the samples was controlled by adding dilute solutions of HCl (1 M) and NaOH (1 M), and the pH was measured using a pH meter. The UV-visible absorption spectra of the supernatant were subsequently recorded using a Thermo-Scientific evolution UV-visible spectrophotometer.
The percentage of RhB dye degradation was calculated using the formula below.
%   D y e   d e g r a d a t i o n = C o C t   C o × 100
Here, Co is the initial absorbance of RhB dye solution at t = 0, and Ct is the absorbance at irradiation time ‘t’.
Different parameters, such as catalyst dosage, RhB dye concentration, and the effect of pH on dye degradation, were studied to optimize the photocatalytic efficiency of ZnFe2O4-Cu NPs. Additionally, the reusability of the ZnFe2O4-Cu NPs was investigated at optimum experimental conditions, which consisted of 2.0 g/L of ZnFe2O4-Cu nanocomposite and 20 mg/L RhB dye aqueous solution at pH 10. The recycling test of ZnFe2O4-Cu for RhB dye degradation was done by separation of photocatalyst after every cycle of exposure by centrifuge to retrieve the catalyst. After that, the collected catalyst was washed using absolute alcohol, followed by deionized water. The catalyst was then left to dry overnight at a temperature of 70 °C in the oven. After that, the collected nanocatalyst was introduced into a freshly prepared RhB dye reaction solution, initiating the subsequent cycle of the experiment.
The most active species responsible for the photocatalytic degradation of RhB dye using ZnFe2O4-Cu were investigated under optimal experimental conditions. This was accomplished by introducing benzoquinone (BQ) (1.0 mM) to quench (O2•−), isopropyl alcohol (IPA) (1.0 mM) to quench (OH), and Ammonium oxalate (AO) (1.0 mM) to quench (h+).

3. Results and Discussions

3.1. X-ray Diffraction Analysis

The phase purities, structure, and crystallite size of all samples were assessed using X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) analysis. XRD patterns were obtained by scanning at 2θ angles ranging from 10° to 80°, with a scan rate of 1°/per minute. Figure 2 shows the XRD patterns of as-prepared Fe2O3, ZnO, ZnFe2O4, and ZnFe2O4-Cu nanomaterials. The major XRD patterns of Fe2O3 exhibited the characteristic hematite (ICDD card no. 33-0664) pattern at 2θ = 24.40°, 33.39°, 35.83°, 40.99°,49.81°, 54.54°, 57.58°, 62.90°, and 64.11° that are related to Miller indices (012), (104), (110), (113), (024), (116), (122), (214), and (300) planes respectively and it is possible to index the observed peaks in accordance with the expected rhombohedral structure of α-Fe2O3 [56,57,58,59]. The other peaks are related to cubic magnetite NPs magnetite (Fe3O4). The X-ray diffraction pattern of ZnO nanoparticles exhibited characteristic peaks at specific 2θ values, namely 31.65°, 34.39°, 36.32°, 47.56°, 56.52°, 62.84°, 66.35°, 67.92°, 69.07°, 72.59°, and 76.97°. These peaks correspond to the crystallographic planes (100), (002), (101), (102), (110), (103), (200), (112), (201), (004), and (203), respectively. The observed peak positions are in good agreement with the reference JCPDS, File No. 036-1451 [60]. The XRD pattern of ZnFe2O4 nanoparticles recorded at room temperature in the 2θ ranges from 10–80° shown in Figure 2. The synthesized nanoparticles exhibited diffraction peaks at specific 2θ values, namely 18.23°, 30.0°, 35.35°, 36.75°, 42.73°, 53.08°, 56.70°, 62.23°, 70.56°, 73.55°, and 74.51°. These peaks corresponded to the (111), (220), (311), (222), (400), (422), (511), (440), (620), (533), and (444) Miller index planes of the synthesized zinc ferrite (ZnFe2O4) nanomaterials. This confirmed the cubic structure of ZnFe2O4 nanoparticles according to the JCPDS card No. 82-1042 [61]. There is not any impurity peak observed in the XRD pattern of ZnFe2O4, which indicates the purity and the high crystallinity of the prepared sample. During the synthesis of ZnFe2O4 nanoparticles, a decrease in the peak intensity (101) associated with ZnO was observed upon the introduction of Fe3+ ions, indicating a partial quenching effect. This phenomenon can be elucidated by the creation of ZnFe2O4, where the absence of Fe3+ incorporation results in a shift of signals towards higher angles. This shift can be attributed to the larger ionic radius of Zn2+ (0.074 nm) compared to that of Fe3+ (0.064 nm) [62]. Furthermore, it is evident that the two peaks at 42.73° and 73.55° overlap with the (111) and (220) crystallographic planes of copper (Cu). The observed peaks in the X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern can be attributed also to a face-centered cubic (FCC) crystal structure of copper (Cu), as shown by the JCPDS reference number 71-4610 [63]. The Debye-Scherrer equation was used to determine the crystallite sizes of various nanoparticles. The computed sizes were found to be 14.90 nm for Fe2O3, 14.95 nm for ZnO, 9.00 nm for ZnFe2O4, and 9.57 nm for ZnFe2O4-Cu NPs. The observed alterations in the crystal phases can be elucidated as follows: upon heating to a temperature of 350 °C, the ZnFe2O4-Cu constituents underwent decomposition, resulting in the production of carbon dioxide and water. Additionally, the Fe, Zn, and Cu metal constituents reacted with the oxygen present in the surrounding atmosphere, leading to the formation of the ZnFe2O4-Cu nanocomposite. Additionally, despite these chemical changes, the nanocomposites morphology, particularly, the high specific surface area. Furthermore, in the samples pyrolyzed at 350 °C, the small ZnFe2O4-Cu nanocomposite particles gradually grew and became more crystalline [64,65].

3.2. FT-IR Analysis

The formation of nanomaterials and metal–oxygen bond formation was further confirmed by functional group analysis, FT-IR spectroscopy. The FT-IR spectra shown in Figure 3 were recorded for the prepared samples in the range of 4000 and 400 cm−1, and the vibrational signals were analyzed. A broad band at 3100–3700 cm−1 can be returned to the stretching and bending vibrations of the hydroxyl groups or the surface-adsorbed water molecules [66]. The sharp absorption band at around 1618 and 1385 cm−1 could assigned to C=O stretching frequency and bending vibrations of the hydroxide (OH) group of water molecules absorbed at the surface of samples [67]. On the other hand, the peaks at 1114 cm−1 and 2929 cm−1 are attributed to the presence of C–O and C–H vibration modes [68]. These observed peaks are related to different phytochemicals present in the Punica granatum flower extract, which act as reducing and stabilizing agents in the solution to prevent nanoparticle aggregation. These results agree with the previously reported literature [69,70]. Subsequently, the observation of two distinct spectral bands with frequencies of 621 cm−1 and 476 cm−1 was made, which can be ascribed to the vibrational mode of Fe–O within the rhombohedral crystal structure of hematite (Fe2O3), as reported in a previous study [71]. The stretching vibrations of the Zn–O bond in the tetrahedral site of ZnO can be attributed to the two absorption bands observed at 564 cm−1 and 453 cm−1 [72]. The primary source of metal−O stretching is the variations in distances that lead to Fe3+−O2− when the metal ion occupies both octahedral and tetrahedral sites. The Zn–O bond (tetrahedral Zn ion) exhibits a characteristic vibrational peak at 619 cm−1, whereas Fe−O in octahedral configuration exhibits another peak at 475 cm−1. The current findings are supported by the observation of two characteristic bands, one at a lower frequency peak (450 cm−1–400 cm−1) indicating the octahedral sites and one at a higher frequency (600 cm−1–550 cm−1) corresponding to tetrahedral sites [73,74,75]. ZnFe2O4-Cu composite shows bands at 554 cm−1 and 423 cm−1, this shift can be related to the deposition of Cu nanoparticle on ZnFe2O4 [76]. Furthermore, the peak shifts attained due to bending and stretching vibration modes, observed in spectra of ZnFe2O4-Cu further assured the green synthesis of this nanocomposite.

3.3. UV-Vis DRS Study

With the purpose of optimizing light irradiation, a semiconductor with high optical absorbance in the visible range is required for good photocatalytic activity [77]. The optical properties of synthesized nanocomposites have been evaluated using UV-Vis DRS. The UV–Vis spectra of Fe2O3, ZnO, ZnFe2O4, and ZnFe2O4-Cu NPs are illustrated in Figure 4a. Because of the narrow band gap of Fe2O3, the pure Fe2O3 particles exhibit high absorption in both the ultraviolet and visible light spectrums. There is an observable light absorption within the wavelength range of 360–555 nm. This absorption is attributed to the electronic transition from the O-2p energy level to the Fe-3d energy level, as shown in references [78,79]. The material ZnO exhibited a broad absorption spectrum ranging from 250 nm to 331 nm. Consistent with expectations, the ZnO nanoparticles exhibited the distinctive spectrum of ZnO, featuring a well-defined fundamental absorption edge that emerged prominently at a wavelength of 331 nm. The UV-Visible spectra of the ZnFe2O4 sample exhibit significant light absorption within the wavelength range of 355–530 nm, as depicted in Figure 4a. This observation indicates that the heterostructure is responsible for the heightened light absorption characteristic within the UV-visible spectrum. The significant augmentation of light absorption has the potential to impact photocatalytic efficacy through the amplification of photo-generated electrons and holes. When Cu nanoparticles were deposited on ZnFe2O4, the absorption intensity in the visible region at around 600 nm undergoes a shift towards higher wavelengths (as shown in Figure 4a). This deposition of Cu nanoparticles onto the ZnFe2O4 heterostructure leads to a significant increase in visible light absorption, particularly at higher wavelengths which can be returned to the charge-transfer transition occurring between the d electrons of the Cu and either the conduction band (CB) or valence band (VB) of ZnFe2O4 [30]. This finding suggests that the presence of Cu effectively enhances the absorption of visible light. The bandgap energy was estimated using the application of the DRS Tauc method, which involves the utilization of the equation (αhν)γ = A (hνEg). In this equation, α is the absorption coefficient, h is the Plank’s constant, ν is the frequency of photons, A is a proportionality constant, γ equal to 2 ( direct allowed transitions), and Eg is a band gap energy [80,81]. The bandgap energy is intercepted by extrapolating the horizontal y-axis (photon energy, hv) against the x-axis, as shown in Figure 4b–e. The direct bandgap energy was determined to be 1.65 eV for Fe2O3, 3.03 eV for ZnO, 1.79 eV for ZnFe2O4, and 1.63 eV for ZnFe4O4-Cu by extrapolating (αhv)2 against the photon energy (eV), as shown in Figure 4b–e. The results reveal that the bandgap energy for ZnFe2O4-Cu decreases, which assists the hot electron injection from Cu NPs to the conduction band (CB).

3.4. X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) Analysis

The coordination number and various species present in the ZnFe2O4-Cu nanocomposites analysis using XPS are shown in Figure 5a–e. Figure 5a shows a high-resolution XPS spectrum of the ZnFe2O4-Cu nanocomposites, which exhibit signals of different elements (Zn, Fe, Cu, and O). The occurrence of the C 1s peak at around 285.6 eV can be returned to the presence of carbon and adsorbed CO2 on the surface of the ZnFe2O4-Cu NPs [82]. Figure 5b–e are the narrow scan XPS spectra for 1s-O, 2p-Fe, 2p-Zn, and 2p-Cu elements, respectively. In the high-resolution Zn 2p spectrum, there are two distinct peaks at 1019.9 and 1043.1 eV, representing the binding energies of Zn 2p3/2 and Zn Zn 2p1/2, respectively [83]. The XPS spectrum of Fe 2p exhibited two prominent peaks. The peak at approximately 710.3 eV corresponds to Fe 2p3/2, while the peak at around 724.10 eV corresponds to Fe 2p1/2. These peaks indicate that Fe is predominantly present in a Fe+3 [84,85]. The XPS peaks of Cu 2p revealed two prominent peaks at 932.02 eV and 952.02 eV, which are characteristic of reduced copper Cu0 phase. Furthermore, the satellite peaks around 938.88 and 941.56 eV can be returned to the presence of Cu+2, which can be returned to the incomplete reduction of Cu or may be due to the fact that the Cu can be easily oxidized [86,87]. The peak of O 1s at around 528.5 eV indicates the presence of oxygen in the lattice and oxygen adsorbed on the surface of ZnFe2O4-Cu NPs [88,89,90]. These results are analogous to earlier reports and confirm the formation of ZnFe2O4-Cu nanocomposites.

3.5. SEM and EDS Analysis

The surface morphology of the Fe2O3, ZnO, ZnFe2O4, and ZnFe2O4-Cu nanomaterials was analyzed by SEM analysis. Figure 6a–d shows the SEM micrograph of the Fe2O3, ZnO, ZnFe2O4, and ZnFe2O4-Cu nanomaterials prepared by the green synthesis method. SEM images for all samples demonstrate that the particles exhibit a porous structure composed of small particle grains when observed at a magnification scale of 500 nm. In Figure 6a, the irregular-shaped particles of the Fe2O3 nanoparticles are observed. In addition, surface morphology analysis shows the agglomeration of numerous nanoparticles that can be returned to Van der Waals force and magnetic interactions between the nanoparticles [91]. ZnO nanoparticles, on the other hand, show irregular spherical shapes, as shown in Figure 6b. Moreover, the nanoparticles in the ZnO NPs sample have agglomerated and remain closely packed due to their ultrafine composition. It is clear from Figure 6, images c and d of ZnFe2O4 and ZnFe2O4-Cu that after adding the Cu, the agglomeration is decreased. One possible explanation is that pure zinc ferrite exhibits a higher degree of magnetism, leading to significant agglomeration in the SEM image. However, in ZnFe2O4-Cu, the presence of Cu NPs reduces overall magnetism to a certain extent. This reduction allows for a decreased agglomeration [92].
The EDX spectrum of the Fe3O4 sample in Figure 7a, the prominent peaks corresponding to Fe and O are observed, with a small peak of Cl, possibly indicating a trace amount of chlorides. They can be returned to the metal salt used in the preparation. Similarly, the ZnO sample in Figure 7b exhibits only two distinct peaks attributed to Zn and O. The EDX spectrum of the ZnFe2O4 nanocomposite sample in Figure 7c reveals Fe, Zn, and O peaks, confirming its successful preparation. Interestingly, a new peak associated with the Cu element is observed in addition to the peaks for Fe, Zn, and O elements in the EDX spectrum in Figure 7d of the ZnFe2O4-Cu nanocomposites, further confirming the successful preparation of these composite materials. This also confirms the high purity of prepared samples.
To conduct a more in-depth investigation of the EDX output, elemental mapping analysis was carried out for Fe2O3, ZnO, ZnFe2O4, and ZnFe2O4-Cu nanomaterials, as shown in Figure S1a–d. In detail, the images with pink and green dots represent the presence of O and Fe elements in the same region surveyed for Fe2O3 NPs. On the other hand, the elemental analysis mapping images of EDX of ZnO showed green and yellow spots, which were attributed to O and Zn, respectively. ZnFe2O4 images exhibited pink, green, and yellow spots, which returned to O, Fe, and Zn elements. These images confirm the homogeneous coexistence of Zn, Fe, and O elements. Moreover, the elemental mapping image of ZnFe2O4-Cu showed aqua color spots of Cu, uniformly distributed throughout ZnFe2O4 nanocomposites. This further confirms the successful preparation of ZnFe2O4-Cu nanocomposites.

3.6. TEM Analysis

TEM micrographs for Fe2O3, ZnO, ZnFe2O4, And ZnFe2O4-Cu NPs are shown in Figure 8a–d. The TEM image of Fe2O3 NPs clearly exhibits spherical, nearly spherical, and rod-like-shaped nanocrystalline phases with an average particle size equal to 15.5 nm, close to the crystallite size obtained by the XRD result. In the case of ZnO NPs, the TEM image demonstrates nearly spherical and hexagonal particle shapes with an average particle size of 29.7 nm. Almost ZnFe2O4 and ZnFe2O4-Cu exhibited spherical and nearly spherical nanocomposite shapes. Moreover, careful observation of the TEM image of ZnFe2O4-Cu nanocomposites unveiled that Cu NPs were deposited on the surface of ZnFe2O4 in an unsymmetrical manner, where the black spot is Cu NPs while the gray is ZnFe2O4 nanocomposites. This unsymmetrical deposition led to a long aggregation of ZnFe2O4-Cu nanocomposites. The average particle size for both ZnFe2O4 and ZnFe2O4-Cu nanocomposites were 19.1 and 16.8 nm, respectively, which is slightly bigger than the crystallite size obtained by Scherrer’s formula using XRD data. These results confirm that the ZnFe2O4 nanocomposites retained their morphology, particularly the high specific surface area. Furthermore, when the samples were calcined at 350 °C for 3 h, the small ZnFe2O4-Cu nanocomposite particles gradually grew and became more crystalline. This result is also in agreement with that obtained by SEM and BET analyses.

3.7. Photoluminescence (PL) Study

The utilization of the photoluminescence (PL) emission spectrum is a prevalent method for the identification of the recombination process of excited charge carriers on a semiconductor material. It is widely recognized that a decrease in the PL signal corresponds to an increased likelihood of separating photogenerated electron-hole (e-h+) pairs. This indicates a reduced rate of recombination for the charge carriers, leading to enhanced photocatalytic efficiency. Figure 9 illustrates the PL spectra of both pure ZnFe2O4 and ZnFe2O4-Cu nanocomposites. These spectra were obtained by measuring the samples at room temperature using an excitation wavelength of 325 nm. The PL intensity of ZnFe2O4-Cu nanocomposites exhibits a significant decrease compared to that of pure ZnFe2O4. This observation suggests that the process of separating photoinduced electron-hole pairs is more effective in ZnFe2O4-Cu nanocomposites than in pure ZnFe2O4, owing to the alignment of their band potentials. The observed phenomenon can perhaps be attributed to the creation of vacancies at intermediate energy levels by the introduction of copper doping. Additionally, this phenomenon leads to a decrease in charge carrier recombination.

3.8. Nitrogen Gas Physisorption Studies

The N2 physisorption isotherms of Fe2O3, ZnO, ZnFe2O4, and ZnFe2O4-Cu NPs are presented in Figure 10a–d. All samples’ curves showed a typical IV isotherm curve based on the IUPAC classification with an evident hysteresis loop at relative pressure. This confirms the mesoporous properties of as-prepared samples [93]. Figure 10a–d also shows DFT pore size distribution curves, which further demonstrate the formation of mesoporous materials for all prepared samples. Moreover, in all curves, there was a monomodal pore size distribution, one of the most essential characteristics of heterogeneous catalysts. As a result, reactants can reach the active sites more easily. The BET surface area, pore size, and pore volume of the as-prepared samples are given in Table 1. The presence of two different metal ions in ZnFe2O4 nanoparticles (NPs) in a spinel structure significantly enhanced the surface area, pore size, and pore volume compared to monometallic oxides. Moreover, the surface area of ZnFe2O4 was increased from 68.814 to 84.866 m2/g after doping by Cu, as shown in Table 1. This result is accomplished with the results obtained by SEM and TEM analyses. This can be returned to decrease the agglomeration of particles as a result of reduced magnetic properties of ZnFe2O4-Cu NPs. Furthermore, the further calcination at 350 °C enhanced the removal of organic compounds and then increased the surface area.

3.9. ZnFe2O4-Cu Nanocomposite as a Photocatalyst for RhB Dye Degradation

The efficiency of ZnFe2O4-Cu nanocomposites in photodegrading RhB dye molecules was investigated under visible light irradiation. Heteronanocomposites-based metal oxides have been widely used to enhance the photocatalytic degradation of dyes, and these nanocomposites are also employed in other environmental remediations [94,95,96]. The photocatalytic activity of biogenic nanoparticles is generally associated with the recombination of electron-hole pairs in the reaction medium, while other factors such as size, surface area, and radiation source also influence their performance [97,98,99,100].
The presence of heterostructures in ZnFe2O4-Cu nanocomposites can help to overcome drawbacks associated with photocatalytic performance. For example, ZnO nanoparticles have a relatively high band gap energy, typically around 3.2 eV. This means that they require higher energy photons, typically in the ultraviolet (UV) range, to excite electrons from the valence band to the conduction band and generate electron-hole pairs [101,102]. Additionally, ZnFe2O4 nanoparticles exhibit high electron-hole recombination rates [103,104].
Therefore, ZnFe2O4-Cu nanocomposites can be considered as a novel heterogeneous catalyst under visible light radiation. In this study, a visible light supply using a 300 W Hg lamp with a cutoff filter (420 nm) was employed to generate a continuous light spectrum between 400 and 800 nm for photocatalysis experiments. The photodegradation of RhB molecules was observed through color changes (from pink to colorless) and a continuous decrease in peak intensity at λmax = 554 nm over time. The maximum degradation percentage of RhB dye molecules (98.1%) was achieved after 140 min of exposure, as indicated by the minimum or constant peak intensity. The percentage degradation over time at different intervals was calculated and presented in Figure 11a. The enhanced efficiency of ZnFe2O4-Cu nano-catalysts for RhB dye degradation can be attributed to the Schottky barrier effect. In ZnFe2O4 nanoparticles, the recombination of electron-hole pairs occurs rapidly, limiting the photocatalytic efficiency. However, deposition of Cu on the surface of ZnFe2O4 reduces the recombination of electron-hole pairs and enhances the photocatalytic efficacy [105]. In photolytic reactions with reactive oxidative species (ROS), surface traps increase, and electrons are captured and utilized via Cu-supported ZnFe2O4 NPs in the degradation of RhB dye molecules [106].

3.9.1. Effect of Photocatalyst Dosage

The photocatalytic properties of ZnFe2O4-Cu nanocomposites were investigated to degrade Rhodamine B (RhB) dye under visible light irradiation. Different dosages of photocatalysts ranging from 0.5 to 2 g/L were studied in a solution containing 20 mg/L of RhB molecules, and maintained for 140 min. Typically, the photodegradation of dye molecules is detected by observing a color change or the disappearance of color when exposed to visible light. This process involves the conversion of RhB dye molecules into less harmful and biodegradable chemical species, such as superoxide ions (O2−), carbon dioxide (CO2), or water (H2O) molecules [107]. Further, to comprehend the photocatalysis of RhB molecules, we adopted the Hinshelwood kinetic model [108,109]. Accordingly, Figure 11b illustrates the representation of the photodegradation kinetics by plotting ln (Ao/At) on the x-axis and time (min) on the y-axis. The experimental results clearly demonstrate that in the absence of ZnFe2O4-Cu nanocomposites, the degradation of RhB dye was negligible. Furthermore, the catalytic performance improves as the catalyst dose increases from 0.05 to 2.0 g/L. This can be returned to the active sites that were increased as the catalyst dose increased, resulting in higher catalytic efficiency with rate constant k1 = 0.02864 min−1.
The improved catalytic properties of ZnFe2O4-Cu nanocomposites can be attributed to their unique characteristics that have been demonstrated through characterization techniques. These characteristics include their optical absorption capability, high surface-to-volume ratio with mesopore size, and the decrease in the recombination between electrons and holes. Attained suitable surface-to-volume ratio, applicable in range small band gap as an effective photo-generated precursor for generation of charge carrier are the prime important factors contributing to photodegradation when ZnFe2O4-Cu nanocomposites are used as photocatalyst for degradation of RhB dye molecules. Notably, during the investigation, it was observed that a catalytic dose of 2.0 g/L yielded the most favorable results, as shown also in Figure S2a and Table S1. This dosage facilitated enhanced mobility and maximum generation of photo-induced charge carriers, facilitating RhB dye adsorption onto ZnFe2O4-Cu nanomaterials. Consequently, this led to significantly higher catalytic efficiency in the degradation of RhB molecules.

3.9.2. Effect of RhB Dye Concentration

The relationship between the initial RhB dye concentration and the optimum photocatalytic degradation efficiency was investigated using ZnFe2O4-Cu nanomaterials as a photocatalyst, employing the Langmuir-Hinshelwood kinetic pseudo-first-order model. A plot of ln (Ao/At) against time (min) was generated, with a constant catalytic dose of 2.0 g/L and varying dye concentrations ranging from 20 mg/L to 50 mg/L while maintaining a pH of 8 for a 140-min irradiation period, as shown in Figure 11c. Moreover, the experimental data were utilized to calculate the degradation (%) for different RhB dye concentrations at a constant catalytic dose, as shown in Figure S2b. The results revealed that the maximum photodegradation of RhB dye molecules occurred at a concentration of 20 mg/L. However, when maintaining a constant catalytic concentration of 2.0 g/L and varying the RhB concentration within the range of 20 mg/L to 50 mg/L, the degradation efficiency of ZnFe2O4-Cu nanocomposites gradually decreased. This can be attributed to the fact that at lower dye concentrations, a larger proportion of the available active sites on the catalyst surface are occupied. As a result, there is a higher number of dye molecules interacting with the catalyst, leading to an increase in the degradation efficiency. Conversely, increasing the dye concentration leads to an inhibition effect due to catalytic poisoning and sedimentation. Therefore, this study established that the optimum concentration for RhB dye was 20 mg/L when using a catalytic dose of 2.0 g/L.

3.9.3. Role of pH on RhB Photodegradation

The effect of pH on the photodegradation of RhB molecules utilizing ZnFe2O4-Cu nanoparticles as catalysts was evaluated in a range from pH 2 to pH 10. As shown in Figure 11d, the obtained data were presented by plotting the At/Ao versus the time (min) graph. The experiment was performed in the presence of visible light, with the RhB dye concentration optimized at 20 mg/L and the photocatalyst (ZnFe2O4-Cu nanocomposite) dose optimized at 2.0 g/L. As a result of the study, a maximum (%) degradation efficiency of RhB molecules was obtained at pH 10, in addition to a minimum degradation of dye at acidic pH 2. This study observed that the effect of pH on the photodegradation of RhB dye molecules via ZnFe2O4-Cu nanomaterials followed the order of pH 10 > pH 8 > pH 6 > pH 4 > pH 2, respectively. The pH dependence is generally correlated with the surface characteristics of the nanocatalyst. Hence, the efficacy of RhB dye molecule degradation using ZnFe2O4-Cu is constrained when pH values are altered, which is contingent upon the active surface charge characteristics of these catalysts. The augmentation of pH values leads to an amplification in the net negative charge on the surface of ZnFe2O4-Cu nanomaterials and then the electrostatic forces of attraction. This is attributed to the adsorption of hydroxide ions (OH) and results in an intensified generation of hydroxyl radicals. On the other hand, at lower pH values, the catalyst surface becomes positively charged, which is unfavorable for this photodegradation reaction [110].

3.9.4. Recyclability Tests

A recyclability test of the synthesized ZnFe2O4-Cu nanocomposites was performed to evaluate their stability and reusability in the photodegradation of RhB dye. This feature is one of the most critical issues regarding the feasibility of using the heterogeneous catalyst on an industrial scale. The objective was to determine if the ZnFe2O4-Cu nanocomposites could maintain their catalytic activity over four consecutive cycles under visible light. As a result of the test, it was observed that the photocatalytic degradation of RhB molecules was successfully achieved. Remarkably, complete degradation of the dye molecules was attained within a 140-min exposure time for each cycle, indicating the sustained efficacy of the ZnFe2O4-Cu nanomaterials as a heterogeneous catalyst.
Figure 12 illustrates how, during four successive cycles, RhB dye molecules were found to degrade by 98–90% in the presence of visible light at total exposure times of 560 min when ZnFe2O4-Cu nanomaterials were used as nanocatalysts. The results obtained regarding the recyclability of ZnFe2O4-Cu highlight its potential as a nanocatalyst in the photodegradation process of RhB dye molecules. The negligible decline in the efficiency of ZnFe2O4-Cu as a nanocatalyst after four consecutive cycles can be attributed to the loss of the ZnFe2O4-Cu nanomaterial sample during each cycle’s collection and centrifugation procedure.
In general, these results demonstrate that ZnFe2O4-Cu nanoparticles exhibit recyclability and hold promise as catalysts for the photodegradation of RhB molecules. Additionally, these nanomaterials feature a photocatalytic window that can be effectively employed for the degradation of additional dye molecules. Furthermore, a comparative analysis was conducted by juxtaposing our findings with those of earlier studies, as illustrated in Table 2.

3.9.5. Effect of Addition of Scavengers

In general, reactive oxygen species play an essential role in photocatalysis, including superoxide radical anion ( O 2 ) hydroxyl radical (OH), and holes (h+). To evaluate the role of active species in the photodegradation process, suitable scavengers were added to suspensions of RhB dye degradation in the presence of ZnFe2O4-Cu. Benzoquinone (BQ), isopropyl alcohol (IPA), and ammonium oxalate (AO) were added to capture ( O 2 ), (OH), and (h+) respectively, as shown in Figure 13. The RhB dye degradation dropped to 48% and 54% when (IPA) and (AO) were added, whereas the presence of (BQ) resulted in greater RhB dye degradation (85%). Hence, the major species involved in RhB dye degradation by ZnFe2O4-Cu composite during photodegradation were (OH), followed by (h+), and then ( O 2 ).

3.9.6. Mechanism of Photodegradation of RhB by ZnFe2O4-Cu Nanomaterials

Photo-assisted degradation of RhB dye molecules was expected to take place when reactive oxidative species are generated, such as superoxide radical anion ( O 2 ) hydroxyl radical (OH), electron (e), and holes (h+) in a photolytic reaction as depicted in Figure 14. Light-induced photocatalysis occurs in the presence of visible light radiations, where electrons on VB of ZnFe2O4 nanomaterials are excited to CB, leaving behind holes in VB. Excited electrons of CB carry out reduction reactions on the catalyst surface, while holes of VB are responsible for oxidation reactions. Additionally, Cu NPs cause a surface plasmon resonance effect that transfers free electrons to the conduction band of ZnFe2O4 when their energies exceed the potential of the conduction band. As a result of Schottky energy barriers, hot electrons transferred to ZnFe2O4 cannot return to Cu NPs. The injection of hot electrons into ZnFe2O4 causes thermal holes to remain on Cu particles, which causes oxidation [122,123,124,125]. The RhB dye photodegradation involves both reduction and oxidation reactions.
Herewith, the possible stepwise reactions involved in the photodegradation mechanism are represented after the photodegradation of RhB molecules via ZnFe2O4-Cu nanocomposites. As a result, the Cu-supported semiconductor photocatalyst (ZnFe2O4-Cu nanomaterials) is expected to be excited by visible light at a lower energy than zinc ferrite’s bandgap. Excitation occurs when electrons excite from VB to CB, leaving a h+ in VB. During this study, the nano-catalyst (ZnFe2O4-Cu nanomaterials) generated the e in their CB and the h+ in their VB of ZnFe2O4, as a result of visible light irradiation, as per Equation (4). After that, the as-generated e- in CB was reacted with oxygen molecule forms ( O 2 ), followed by reaction between this photo-generated ( O 2 ) and H2O in the mixed reaction medium and is converted into H O 2 as per Equations (5) and (7). Furthermore, the leaving behind (h+) of VB is also adsorbed onto the water molecules, generating the corresponding (OH), radicals, as illustrated in Equation (6). Overall, the photo-generated reaction oxidative species (ROS) are behind the photodegradation of RhB molecules via ZnFe2O4-Cu nanomaterials, and as a stepwise manner demonstrates such the photocatalytic reduction process from Equations (4)–(9), respectively.
Z n F e 2 O 4 C u + h v Z n F e 2 O 4 C u ( e C B + h V B + )
Z n F e 2 O 4 C u ( e C B ) + O 2 Z n F e 2 O 4 C u + O 2
Z n F e 2 O 4 C u h V B + + H 2 O Z n F e 2 O 4 C u + O H
O 2 + H + H O 2
O H , O 2 , H O 2 + R h B R h B + + H 2 O
O H , O 2 , H O 2 + R h B + R h B   d e r i v . +   H 2 O + C O 2

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, Fe2O3, ZnO, and ZnFe2O4 nanocomposites were prepared successfully by the green co-precipitation synthesis method using Punica granatum flower extract, followed by Cu deposition on the surface of ZnFe2O4, which exhibited excellent photocatalysis activity. The Punica granatum flower extract contains polyphenol compounds acting as reducing and capping/stabilizing agents during nanomaterials synthesis. Different techniques were used to investigate the physicochemical properties of as-prepared samples. It was found that the deposition of Cu enhanced the absorption of visible light, decreased the (e) and (h+) recombination, and increased the surface area compared to ZnFe2O4. This emphasizes the applicability of using ZnFe2O4-Cu nanocomposite as a photocatalyst in the degradation of dye molecules. ZnFe2O4-Cu nanocomposite exhibited high photocatalytic activity, which can be returned to the existence of Schottky energy barriers in ZnFe2O4-Cu, which inhibited photocarrier recombination. In addition, the increased surface area and mesopore size facilitated the accessibility of RhB dye molecules to the active sites of the photocatalyst. Different parameters, including irradiation time, catalyst mass, dye concentration, and pH, were investigated to determine the optimal conditions for the degradation of RhB dye using ZnFe2O4-Cu nanocomposite. It was found that under optimal conditions, 98% of the RhB dye was degraded within 140 min. These optimal conditions were achieved with a photocatalyst mass of 2.0 g/L, a RhB dye concentration of 20 mg/L, and a pH of 10. Moreover, the catalyst was used for four consecutive cycles without any significant loss in its performance. The effect of reactive species in this reaction was studied, and it was found that the most effective species in the degradation processes were (OH), followed by (h+). Overall, the data support ZnFe2O4-Cu nanocomposites as potential dye photodegradation targets.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/toxics12010077/s1, Figure S1: SEM-EDX elemental mapping analysis of (a) Fe2O3, (b) ZnO, (c) ZnFe2O4, and (d) ZnFe2O4-Cu NPs. Figure S2: (a) Photocatalytic degradation rate (%) of RhB dye with various catalyst dosages. (b) Photocatalytic degradation rate (%) of RhB dye with different dye concentrations. Table S1: Langmuir–Hinshelwood kinetic rate constant of different parameters for RhB dye degradation.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.A.M. and L.A.; methodology, M.A.M., A.A.W. and L.A.; software, A.A. and A.A.W.; validation, M.A.M., L.A. and A.A.W.; formal analysis, A.A. and A.A.W.; investigation, A.A.; resources, M.A.M. and L.A.; data curation, L.A. and A.A.; writing—original draft preparation, M.A.M. and A.A.; writing—review and editing, M.A.M., A.A. and A.A.W.; visualization, M.A.M. and L.A.; supervision, M.A.M. and L.A.; project administration, L.A.; funding acquisition, L.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Deanship of Scientific Research (DSR), King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, grant number (KEP-PhD: 97-247-1443).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data can be found in both the article and the Supplementary Materials.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their gratitude to the Deanship of Scientific Research (DSR), King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, for providing financial support for this project under grant no. (KEP-PhD: 97-247-1443).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. DalCorso, G.; Fasani, E.; Manara, A.; Visioli, G.; Furini, A. Heavy Metal Pollutions: State of the Art and Innovation in Phytoremediation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wilkinson, J.L.; Boxall, A.B.A.; Kolpin, D.W.; Leung, K.M.Y.; Lai, R.W.S.; Wong, D.; Ntchantcho, R.; Pizarro, J.; Mart, J.; Echeverr, S.; et al. Pharmaceutical Pollution of the World’s Rivers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2022, 119, e2113947119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Rafiq, A.; Ikram, M.; Ali, S.; Niaz, F.; Khan, M.; Khan, Q.; Maqbool, M. Photocatalytic Degradation of Dyes Using Semiconductor Photocatalysts to Clean Industrial Water Pollution. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2021, 97, 111–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Neaţu, Ş.; Maciá-Agulló, J.A.; Garcia, H. Solar Light Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction: General Considerations and Selected Bench-Mark Photocatalysts. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15, 5246–5262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Gola, D.; Kriti, A.; Bhatt, N.; Bajpai, M.; Singh, A.; Arya, A.; Chauhan, N.; Srivastava, S.K.; Tyagi, P.K.; Agrawal, Y. Silver Nanoparticles for Enhanced Dye Degradation. Curr. Res. Green Sustain. Chem. 2021, 4, 100132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Mittal, S.; Roy, A. Fungus and Plant-Mediated Synthesis of Metallic Nanoparticles and Their Application in degradation of dyes. In Photocatalytic Degradation of Dyes; Shah, M., Dave, S., Das, J., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2021; pp. 287–308. [Google Scholar]
  7. Dave, S.; Khan, A.M.; Purohit, S.D.; Suthar, D.L. Application of Green Synthesized Metal Nanoparticles in the Photocatalytic Degradation of Dyes and Its Mathematical Modelling Using the Caputo-Fabrizio Fractional Derivative without the Singular Kernel. J. Math. 2021, 2021, 9948422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Mehta, M.; Sharma, M.; Pathania, K.; Jena, P.K.; Bhushan, I. Degradation of Synthetic Dyes Using Nanoparticles: A Mini Review. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 49434–49446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sharma, G.; Kumar, A.; Sharma, S.; Naushad, M.; Prakash Dwivedi, R.; ALOthman, Z.A.; Mola, G.T. Novel Development of Nanoparticles to Bimetallic Nanoparticles and Their Composites: A Review. J. King Saud Univ. Sci. 2019, 31, 257–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Paszkiewicz, M.; Gołąbiewska, A.; Rajski, Ł.; Kowal, E.; Sajdak, A.; Zaleska-Medynska, A. Synthesis and Characterization of Monometallic (Ag, Cu) and Bimetallic Ag-Cu Particles for Antibacterial and Antifungal Applications. J. Nanomater. 2016, 2016, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Crawley, J.W.M.; Gow, I.E.; Lawes, N.; Kowalec, I.; Kabalan, L.; Catlow, C.R.A.; Logsdail, A.J.; Taylor, S.H.; Dummer, N.F.; Hutchings, G.J. Heterogeneous Trimetallic Nanoparticles as Catalysts. Chem. Rev. 2022, 122, 6795–6849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Moradnia, F.; Taghavi Fardood, S.; Ramazani, A.; Gupta, V.K. Green Synthesis of Recyclable MgFeCrO4 Spinel Nanoparticles for Rapid Photodegradation of Direct Black 122 Dye. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2020, 392, 4–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Nasrollahzadeh, M.; Sajjadi, M.; Iravani, S.; Varma, R.S. Trimetallic Nanoparticles: Greener Synthesis and Their Applications. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 1784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Thi, T.T.H.; Suys, E.J.A.; Lee, J.S.; Nguyen, D.H.; Park, K.D.; Truong, N.P. Lipid-Based Nanoparticles in the Clinic and Clinical Trials: From Cancer Nanomedicine to COVID-19 Vaccines. Vaccines 2021, 9, 359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Basavegowda, N.; Baek, K.H. Multimetallic Nanoparticles as Alternative Antimicrobial Agents: Challenges and Perspectives. Molecules 2021, 26, 912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Basavegowda, N.; Mishra, K.; Lee, Y.R. Trimetallic FeAgPt Alloy as a Nanocatalyst for the Reduction of 4-Nitroaniline and Decolorization of Rhodamine B: A Comparative Study. J. Alloys Compd. 2017, 701, 456–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Venkatesh, N. Metallic Nanoparticle: A Review. Biomed. J. Sci. Tech. Res. 2018, 4, 3765–3775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ghiuță, I.; Cristea, D.; Munteanu, D. Synthesis Methods of Metallic Nanoparticles-an Overview. Bull. Transilv. Univ. Braşov 2017, 10, 133–140. [Google Scholar]
  19. Marinescu, L.; Fica, D.; Oprea, O.; Marin, A.; Ficai, A.; Andronescu, E.; Holban, A.-M. Optimized Synthesis Approaches of Metal Nanoparticles with Antimicrobial Applications. J. Nanomater. 2020, 2020, 6651207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ying, S.; Guan, Z.; Ofoegbu, P.C.; Clubb, P.; Rico, C.; He, F.; Hong, J. Green Synthesis of Nanoparticles: Current Developments and Limitations. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2022, 26, 102336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Singh, J.; Dutta, T.; Kim, K.H.; Rawat, M.; Samddar, P.; Kumar, P. “Green” Synthesis of Metals and Their Oxide Nanoparticles: Applications for Environmental Remediation. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2018, 16, 84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Verma, V.; Al-Dossari, M.; Singh, J.; Rawat, M.; Kordy, M.G.M.; Shaban, M. A Review on Green Synthesis of TiO2 NPs: Synthesis and Applications in Photocatalysis and Antimicrobial. Polymers 2022, 14, 1444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Poudel, D.K.; Niraula, P.; Aryal, H.; Budhathoki, B.; Phuyal, S.; Marahatha, R.; Subedi, K. Plant-Mediated Green Synthesis of Ag NPs and Their Possible Applications: A Critical Review. J. Nanotechnol. 2022, 2022, 2779237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Vasudevan, M.; Perumal, V.; Karuppanan, S.; Ovinis, M.; Bothi Raja, P.; Gopinath, S.C.B.; Immanuel Edison, T.N.J. A Comprehensive Review on Biopolymer Mediated Nanomaterial Composites and Their Applications in Electrochemical Sensors. Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem. 2022, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Kulkarni, S.R.; Saptale, S.P.; Borse, D.B.; Agarwal, A.D. Green Synthesis of Ag Nanoparticles Using Vitamin C (Ascorbic Acid) in a Batch Process. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Nanoscience, Engineering and Technology (ICONSET 2011), Chennai, India, 28–30 November 2011; pp. 88–90. [Google Scholar]
  26. Sathishkumar, P.; Gu, F.L.; Zhan, Q.; Palvannan, T.; Mohd Yusoff, A.R. Flavonoids Mediated ‘Green’ Nanomaterials: A Novel Nanomedicine System to Treat Various Diseases—Current Trends and Future Perspective. Mater. Lett. 2018, 210, 26–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lahiri, D.; Nag, M.; Sheikh, H.I.; Sarkar, T.; Edinur, H.A.; Pati, S.; Ray, R.R. Microbiologically-Synthesized Nanoparticles and Their Role in Silencing the Biofilm Signaling Cascade. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 636588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Adeyemi, J.O.; Oriola, A.O.; Onwudiwe, D.C.; Oyedeji, A.O. Plant Extracts Mediated Metal-Based Nanoparticles: Synthesis and Biological Applications. Biomolecules 2022, 12, 627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. El Shafey, A.M. Green Synthesis of Metal and Metal Oxide Nanoparticles from Plant Leaf Extracts and Their Applications: A Review. Green Process. Synth. 2020, 9, 304–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zangeneh, H.; Zinatizadeh, A.A.L.; Habibi, M.; Akia, M.; Hasnain Isa, M. Photocatalytic Oxidation of Organic Dyes and Pollutants in Wastewater Using Different Modified Titanium Dioxides: A Comparative Review. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2015, 26, 1–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Huang, F.; Yan, A.; Zhao, H. Influences of Doping on Photocatalytic Properties of TiO2 Photocatalyst. In Semiconductor Photocatalysis—Materials, Mechanisms and Applications; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2016; pp. 31–80. [Google Scholar]
  32. Folawewo, A.D.; Bala, M.D. Nanocomposite Zinc Oxide-Based Photocatalysts: Recent Developments in Their Use for the Treatment of Dye-Polluted Wastewater. Water 2022, 14, 3899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Harinee, S.; Muthukumar, K.; James, R.A.; Arulmozhi, M.; Dahms, H.U.; Ashok, M. Bio-Approach ZnO/Ag Nano-Flowers: Enhanced Photocatalytic and Photoexcited Anti-Microbial Activities towards Pathogenic Bacteria. Mater. Today Sustain. 2022, 18, 100133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ong, C.B.; Ng, L.Y.; Mohammad, A.W. A Review of ZnO Nanoparticles as Solar Photocatalysts: Synthesis, Mechanisms and Applications. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 81, 536–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Abebe, B.; Murthy, H.C.A.; Amare, E. Enhancing the Photocatalytic Efficiency of ZnO: Defects, Heterojunction, and Optimization. Environ. Nanotechnology, Monit. Manag. 2020, 14, 100336. [Google Scholar]
  36. Mochane, M.J.; Motloung, M.T.; Mokhena, T.C.; Mofokeng, T.G. Morphology and Photocatalytic Activity of Zinc Oxide Reinforced Polymer Composites: A Mini Review. Catalysts 2022, 12, 1439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Tadic, M.; Panjan, M.; Damnjanovic, V.; Milosevic, I. Magnetic Properties of Hematite (α-Fe2O3) Nanoparticles Prepared by Hydrothermal Synthesis Method. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2014, 320, 183–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Elshypany, R.; Selim, H.; Zakaria, K.; Moustafa, A.H.; Sadeek, S.A.; Sharaa, S.I.; Raynaud, P.; Nada, A.A. Elaboration of Fe3O4/ZnO Nanocomposite with Highly Performance Photocatalytic Activity for Degradation Methylene Blue under Visible Light Irradiation. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2021, 23, 101710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Sharma, S.; Dutta, V.; Raizada, P.; Hosseini-bandegharaei, A. An Overview of Heterojunctioned ZnFe2O4 Photocatalyst for Enhanced Oxidative Water Purification. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 105812. [Google Scholar]
  40. Jeyarani, W.J.; Tenkyong, T.; Bachan, N.; Kumar, D.A.; Shyla, J.M. An Investigation on the Tuning Effect of Glucose-Capping on the Size and Bandgap of CuO Nanoparticles. Adv. Powder Technol. 2016, 27, 338–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ahmadi, M.; Seyed Dorraji, M.S.; Hajimiri, I.; Rasoulifard, M.H. The Main Role of CuO Loading against Electron-Hole Recombination of SrTiO3: Improvement and Investigation of Photocatalytic Activity, Modeling and Optimization by Response Surface Methodology. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2021, 404, 112886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Chopra, H.; Bibi, S.; Islam, F.; Ahmad, S.U.; Olawale, O.A.; Alhumaydhi, F.A.; Marzouki, R.; Baig, A.A.; Emran, T.B. Emerging Trends in the Delivery of Resveratrol by Nanostructures: Applications of Nanotechnology in Life Sciences. J. Nanomater. 2022, 2022, 1–17. [Google Scholar]
  43. Guo, Y.; Guo, Y.; Tang, D.; Liu, Y.; Wang, X.; Li, P.; Wang, G. Sol-Gel Synthesis of New ZnFe2O4/Na-Bentonite Composites for Simultaneous Oxidation of RhB and Reduction of Cr(VI) under Visible Light Irradiation. J. Alloys Compd. 2019, 781, 1101–1109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Wang, W.; Guo, S.; Zhang, D.; Yang, Z. One-Pot Hydrothermal Synthesis of Reduced Graphene Oxide/Zinc Ferrite Nanohybrids and Its Catalytic Activity on the Thermal Decomposition of Ammonium Perchlorate. J. Saudi Chem. Soc. 2019, 23, 133–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Renukadevi, S.; Pricilla Jeyakumari, A. Rational Design of ZnFe2O4/g-C3N4 Heterostructures Composites for High Efficient Visible-Light Photocatalysis for Degradation of Aqueous Organic Pollutants. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2020, 118, 108047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Zhao, H.; Liu, R.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, Q. Effect of Surfactant Amount on the Morphology and Magnetic Properties of Monodisperse ZnFe2O4 Nanoparticles. Mater. Res. Bull. 2016, 75, 172–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Surendra, B.S.; Nagaswarupa, H.P.; Hemashree, M.U.; Khanum, J. Jatropha Extract Mediated Synthesis of ZnFe2O4 Nanopowder: Excellent Performance as an Electrochemical Sensor, UV Photocatalyst, and Antibacterial Activity. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2020, 739, 136980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Melgarejo-Sánchez, P.; Núñez-Gómez, D.; Martínez-Nicolás, J.J.; Hernández, F.; Legua, P.; Melgarejo, P. Pomegranate Variety and Pomegranate Plant Part, Relevance from Bioactive Point of View: A Review. Bioresour. Bioprocess. 2021, 8, 1–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Shaygannia, E.; Bahmani, M.; Zamanzad, B.; Rafieian-Kopaei, M. A Review Study on Punica granatum L. J. Evid.-Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2016, 21, 221–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kurutas, E.B. The Importance of Antioxidants Which Play the Role in Cellular Response against Oxidative/Nitrosative Stress: Current State. Nutr. J. 2016, 15, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Lungulescu, E.M.; Setnescu, R.; Pătroi, E.A.; Lungu, M.V.; Pătroi, D.; Ion, I.; Fierăscu, R.C.; Șomoghi, R.; Stan, M.; Nicula, N.O. High-Efficiency Biocidal Solution Based on Radiochemically Synthesized Cu-Au Alloy Nanoparticles. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 3388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Muhamad, M.S.; Salim, M.R.; Lau, W.-J. Surface Modification of SiO2 Nanoparticles and Its Impact on the Properties of PES-Based Hollow Fiber Membrane. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 58644–58654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Thomas, S.; Kalarikkal, N.; Abraham, A.R. (Eds.) Design, Fabrication, and Characterization of Multifunctional Nanomaterials. In Micro and Nano Technologies; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2022; pp. 543–556. [Google Scholar]
  54. Mohan, R.; Ghosh, M.P.; Mukherjee, S. Large Exchange Bias Effect in NiFe2O4/CoO Nanocomposites. Mater. Res. Express 2018, 5, 035029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Makuła, P.; Pacia, M.; Macyk, W. How To Correctly Determine the Band Gap Energy of Modified Semiconductor Photocatalysts Based on UV-Vis Spectra. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2018, 9, 6814–6817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Wang, F.; Qin, X.F.; Meng, Y.F.; Guo, Z.L.; Yang, L.X.; Ming, Y.F. Hydrothermal Synthesis and Characterization of α-Fe2O3 Nanoparticles. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 2013, 16, 802–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Lassoued, A.; Dkhil, B.; Gadri, A.; Ammar, S. Control of the Shape and Size of Iron Oxide (α-Fe2O3) Nanoparticles Synthesized through the Chemical Precipitation Method. Results Phys. 2017, 7, 3007–3015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Almeida, T.P.; Fay, M.; Zhu, Y.; Brown, P.D. Process Map for the Hydrothermal Synthesis of R-Fe2O3 Nanorods. J. Phys. Chem. C 2009, 113, 18689–18698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Németh, Z.; Szekeres, G.P.; Schabikowski, M.; Schrantz, K.; Traber, J.; Pronk, W.; Hernádi, K.; Graule, T. Enhanced Virus Filtration in Hybrid Membranes with MWCNT Nanocomposite. R. Soc. Open Sci. 2019, 6, 181294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Ghanbarnezhad, S.; Baghshahi, S.; Nemati, A.; Mahmoodi, M. Preparation, Magnetic Properties, and Photocatalytic Performance under Natural Daylight Irradiation of Fe3O4-ZnO Core/Shell Nanoparticles Designed on Reduced GO Platelet. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 2017, 72, 85–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Xu, Y.; Liang, Y.; Jiang, L.; Wu, H.; Zhao, H.; Xue, D. Preparation and Magnetic Properties of ZnFe2O4 Nanotubes. J. Nanomater. 2011, 2011, 12274–12278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Huerta-Aguilar, C.A.; Diaz-Puerto, Z.J.; Tecuapa-Flores, E.D.; Thangarasu, P. Crystal Plane Impact of ZnFe2O4-Ag Nanoparticles Influencing Photocatalytical and Antibacterial Properties: Experimental and Theoretical Studies. ACS Omega 2022, 7, 33985–34001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Abd Elkodous, M.; Kawamura, G.; Tan, W.K.; Matsuda, A. Facile One-Pot Preparation of Cu/CuO/Cu2O Heterojunction for Photocatalytic Applications. Mater. Lett. 2022, 323, 132606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Jiang, X.; Ren, X.; Chen, R.; Ma, F.; He, W.; Zhang, T.; Wen, Y.; Shi, L.; Ren, L.; Liu, H.; et al. Cobalt(II)-Complex Modified Ag Electrode for Efficient and Selective Electrochemical Reduction of CO2 to CO. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2023, 949, 117860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Andrade, A.B.; Ferreira, N.S.; Valerio, M.E.G. Particle Size Effects on Structural and Optical Properties of BaF2 Nanoparticles. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 26839–26848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Bezrodna, T.; Puchkovska, G.; Shymanovska, V.; Baran, J.; Ratajczak, H. IR-Analysis of H-Bonded H2O on the Pure TiO2 Surface. J. Mol. Struct. 2004, 700, 175–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Aji Udhaya, P.; Bessy, T.C.; Meena, M. Antibacterial Activity of Nickel and Magnesium Substituted Ferrite Nanoparticles Synthesized via Self-Combustion Method. Mater. Today Proc. 2019, 8, 169–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Anbuvannan, M.; Ramesh, M.; Viruthagiri, G.; Shanmugam, N.; Kannadasan, N. Synthesis, Characterization and Photocatalytic Activity of ZnO Nanoparticles Prepared by Biological Method. Spectrochim. Acta—Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2015, 143, 304–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Sharif, M.; Ansari, F.; Malik, A.; Ali, Q.; Hasan, Z.; Khan, N.U.H. Fourier-Transform Infrared Spectroscopy, Antioxidant, Phytochemical and Antibacterial Screening of N-Hexane Extracts of Punica granatum, A Medicinal Plant. Genet. Mol. Res. 2018, 19, gmr16039989. [Google Scholar]
  70. Suja Pandian, R.; Yuvaranjani, V. Fourier Transform-Infrared Spectroscopic Studies on Edible Punica granatum Flowers. Indo Am. J. Pharm. Res. 2018, 8, 557–560. [Google Scholar]
  71. Jain, S.; Shah, J.; Negi, N.S.; Sharma, C.; Kotnala, R.K. Significance of Interface Barrier at Electrode of Hematite Hydroelectric Cell for Generating Ecopower by Water Splitting. Int. J. Energy Res. 2019, 43, 4743–4755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Khan, S.H.; Suriyaprabha, R.; Pathak, B.; Fulekar, M.H. Photocatalytic Degradation of Organophosphate Pesticides (Chlorpyrifos) Using Synthesized Zinc Oxide Nanoparticle by Membrane Filtration Reactor under UV Irradiation. Front. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2015, 1, 23–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Sarala, E.; Madhukara Naik, M.; Vinuth, M.; Rami Reddy, Y.V.; Sujatha, H.R. Green Synthesis of Lawsonia Inermis-Mediated Zinc Ferrite Nanoparticles for Magnetic Studies and Anticancer Activity against Breast Cancer (MCF-7) Cell Lines. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2020, 31, 8589–8596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Matloubi Moghaddam, F.; Doulabi, M.; Saeidian, H. Controlled Microwave-Assisted Synthesis of ZnFe2O4 Nanoparticles and Their Catalytic Activity for O-Acylation of Alcohol and Phenol in Acetic Anhydride. Sci. Iran. 2012, 19, 1597–1600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Kumar, S.; Ohlan, A.; Kumar, P.; Verma, V. Improved Electromagnetic Interference Shielding Response of Polyaniline Containing Magnetic Nano-Ferrites. J. Supercond. Nov. Magn. 2020, 33, 1187–1198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Shafiey Dehaj, M.; Zamani Mohiabadi, M. Experimental Study of Water-Based CuO Nanofluid Flow in Heat Pipe Solar Collector. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2019, 137, 2061–2072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Saeed, M.; Muneer, M.; Haq, A.; Akram, N. Photocatalysis: An Effective Tool for Photodegradation of Dyes—A Review. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 293–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Suresh, R.; Vijayaraj, A.; Giribabu, K.; Manigandan, R.; Prabu, R.; Stephen, A.; Thirumal, E.; Narayanan, V. Fabrication of Iron Oxide Nanoparticles: Magnetic and Electrochemical Sensing Property. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2013, 24, 1256–1263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Suresh, R.; Sandoval, C.; Ramírez, E.; Álvarez, Á.; Mansilla, H.D.; Mangalaraja, R.V.; Yáñez, J. Solid-State Synthesis and Characterization of α-Fe2O3@ZnO Nanocomposites with Enhanced Visible Light Driven Photocatalytic Activity. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2018, 29, 20347–20355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Shams, S.; Sheibanizadeh, Z.; Khalaj, Z. Ternary Nanocomposite of ZnFe2O4/α-Fe2O3/ZnO.; Synthesis via Coprecipitation Method and Physical Properties Characterization. Appl. Phys. A Mater. Sci. Process. 2021, 127, 2–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Behera, A.; Kandi, D.; Majhi, S.M.; Martha, S.; Parida, K. Facile Synthesis of ZnFe2O4 Photocatalysts for Decolourization of Organic Dyes under Solar Irradiation. Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2018, 9, 436–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Zhang, R.; Yang, X.; Zhang, D.; Qiu, H.; Fu, Q.; Na, H.; Guo, Z.; Du, F.; Chen, G.; Wei, Y. Water Soluble Styrene Butadiene Rubber and Sodium Carboxyl Methyl Cellulose Binder for ZnFe2O4 Anode Electrodes in Lithium Ion Batteries. J. Power Sources 2015, 285, 227–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Hou, Y.; Li, X.Y.; Zhao, Q.D.; Quan, X.; Chen, G.H. Electrochemical Method for Synthesis of a ZnFe2O4/TiO2 Composite Nanotube Array Modified Electrode with Enhanced Photoelectrochemical Activity. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2010, 20, 2165–2174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Chen, Z.P.; Fang, W.Q.; Zhang, B.; Yang, H.G. High-Yield Synthesis and Magnetic Properties of ZnFe2O4 Single Crystal Nanocubes in Aqueous Solution. J. Alloys Compd. 2013, 550, 348–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Doiphode, V.; Vairale, P.; Sharma, V.; Waghmare, A.; Punde, A.; Shinde, P.; Shah, S.; Pandharkar, S.; Hase, Y.; Aher, R.; et al. Solution-Processed Electrochemical Synthesis of ZnFe2O4 Photoanode for Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting. J. Solid State Electrochem. 2021, 25, 1835–1846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Mondal, P.; Sinha, A.; Salam, N.; Roy, A.S.; Jana, N.R.; Islam, S.M. Enhanced Catalytic Performance by Copper Nanoparticle-Graphene Based Composite. RSC Adv. 2013, 3, 5615–5623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. de Sousa, P.V.F.; de Oliveira, A.F.; da Silva, A.A.; Lopes, R.P. Environmental Remediation Processes by Zero Valence Copper: Reaction Mechanisms. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26, 14883–14903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Sharma, Y.; Sharma, N.; Rao, G.V.S.; Chowdari, B.V.R. Li-Storage and Cyclability of Urea Combustion Derived ZnFe2O4 as Anode for Li-Ion Batteries. Electrochim. Acta 2008, 53, 2380–2385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Marco, J.F.; Gancedo, J.R.; Gracia, M.; Gautier, J.L.; Ríos, E.; Berry, F.J. Characterization of the Nickel Cobaltite, NiCo2O4, Prepared by Several Methods: An XRD, XANES, EXAFS, and XPS Study. J. Solid State Chem. 2000, 153, 74–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Tovar, M.; Reehuis, M.; Stüßer, N.; Schorr, S. XPS and Voltammetric Studies on Ni1−xCuxCo2O4 Spinel Oxide Electrodes. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A Found. Adv. 1998, 449, 91–100. [Google Scholar]
  91. Raja, K.; Jaculine, M.M.; Jose, M.; Verma, S.; Prince, A.A.M.; Ilangovan, K.; Sethusankar, K.; Das, S.J. Sol–Gel Synthesis and Characterization of α-Fe2O3 Nanoparticles. Superlattices Microstruct. 2015, 86, 306–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Baamer, D.F.; Abd El Maksod, I.H. Surface Modification of Zinc Ferrite with Titanium to Be a Photo-Active Catalyst in Commercial LED Light. Catalysts 2023, 13, 1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Matli, P.R.; Zhou, X.; Shiyu, D.; Huang, Q. Fabrication, Characterization, and Magnetic Behavior of Porous ZnFe2O4 Hollow Microspheres. Int. Nano Lett. 2015, 5, 53–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Balayeva, N.O.; Fleisch, M.; Bahnemann, D.W. Surface-Grafted WO3/TiO2 Photocatalysts: Enhanced Visible-Light Activity towards Indoor Air Purification. Catal. Today 2018, 313, 63–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Balayeva, N.O.; Mamiyev, Z. Integrated Processes Involving Adsorption, Photolysis, and Photocatalysis. In Hybrid and Combined Processes for Air Pollution Control; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2022; pp. 117–153. [Google Scholar]
  96. Maruthupandy, M.; Muneeswaran, T.; Vennila, T.; Anand, M.; Cho, W.S.; Quero, F. Development of Chitosan Decorated Fe3O4 Nanospheres for Potential Enhancement of Photocatalytic Degradation of Congo Red Dye Molecules. Spectrochim. Acta—Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2022, 267, 120511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Shubha, J.P.; Kavalli, K.; Adil, S.F.; Assal, M.E.; Hatshan, M.R.; Dubasi, N. Facile Green Synthesis of Semiconductive ZnO Nanoparticles for Photocatalytic Degradation of Dyes from the Textile Industry: A Kinetic Approach. J. King Saud Univ.—Sci. 2022, 34, 102047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Lal, M.; Sharma, P.; Singh, L.; Ram, C. Photocatalytic Degradation of Hazardous Rhodamine B Dye Using Sol-Gel Mediated Ultrasonic Hydrothermal Synthesized of ZnO Nanoparticles. Results Eng. 2023, 17, 100890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Tadjarodi, A.; Imani, M.; Rad, M. Preparation of CdO Rhombus-Like Nanostructure and Its Photocatalytic Degradation of Azo Dyes from Aqueous Solution. Namomater. Nanotechnol. 2014, 4, 4–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Varadavenkatesan, T.; Lyubchik, E.; Pai, S.; Pugazhendhi, A.; Vinayagam, R.; Selvaraj, R. Photocatalytic Degradation of Rhodamine B by Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles Synthesized Using the Leaf Extract of Cyanometra Ramiflora. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 2019, 199, 111621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Mohammed, M.K.A. Carbon Nanotubes Loaded ZnO/Ag Ternary Nanohybrid with Improved Visible Light Photocatalytic Activity and Stability. Optik 2020, 217, 164867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Agarwal, S.; Jangir, L.K.; Rathore, K.S.; Kumar, M.; Awasthi, K. Morphology-Dependent Structural and Optical Properties of ZnO Nanostructures. Appl. Phys. A Mater. Sci. Process. 2019, 125, 553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Fernandes, R.J.C.; Magalhães, C.A.B.; Amorim, C.O.; Amaral, V.S.; Almeida, B.G.; Castanheira, E.M.S.; Coutinho, P.J.G. Magnetic Nanoparticles of Zinc/Calcium Ferrite Decorated with Silver for Photodegradation of Dyes. Materials 2019, 12, 3582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Ma, H.; Liu, C. A Mini-Review of Ferrites-Based Photocatalyst on Application of Hydrogen Production. Front. Energy 2021, 15, 621–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Zhang, S.; Gong, X.; Shi, Q.; Ping, G.; Xu, H.; Waleed, A.; Li, G. CuO Nanoparticle-Decorated TiO2-Nanotube Heterojunctions for Direct Synthesis of Methyl Formate via Photo-Oxidation of Methanol. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 15942–15948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Alotaibi, A.M.; Williamson, B.A.D.; Sathasivam, S.; Kafizas, A.; Alqahtani, M.; Sotelo-Vazquez, C.; Buckeridge, J.; Wu, J.; Nair, S.P.; Scanlon, D.O.; et al. Enhanced Photocatalytic and Antibacterial Ability of Cu-Doped Anatase TiO2 Thin Films: Theory and Experiment. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 15348–15361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Lee, S.Y.; Kang, D.; Jeong, S.; Do, H.T.; Kim, J.H. Photocatalytic Degradation of Rhodamine B Dye by TiO2 and Gold Nanoparticles Supported on a Floating Porous Polydimethylsiloxane Sponge under Ultraviolet and Visible Light Irradiation. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 4233–4241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Siddiqui, V.U.; Ansari, A.; Ansari, M.T.; Akram, M.K.; Siddiqi, W.A. Fabrication of a Zinc Oxide/Alginate (ZnO/Alg) Bionanocomposite for Enhanced Dye Degradation and Its Optimization Study. RSC Adv. 2022, 12, 7210–7228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. González-Crisostomo, J.C.; López-Juárez, R.; Petranovskii, V. Photocatalytic Degradation of Rhodamine B Dye in Aqueous Suspension by ZnO and M-ZnO (M = La3+, Ce3+, Pr3+ and Nd3+) Nanoparticles in the Presence of UV/H2O2 José. Processes 2021, 9, 1736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Phattepur, H.; Gowrishankar, B.S.; Nagaraju, G. Synthesis of Gadolinium-Doped TiO2 Thin Films by Sol–Gel Spin Coating Technique and Its Application in Degradation of Rhodamine-B. Indian Chem. Eng. 2019, 61, 167–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Oliveira, T.P.; Marques, G.N.; Macedo Castro, M.A.; Viana Costa, R.C.; Rangel, J.H.G.; Rodrigues, S.F.; dos Santos, C.C.; Oliveira, M.M. Synthesis and Photocatalytic Investigation of ZnFe2O4 in the Degradation of Organic Dyes under Visible Light. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2020, 9, 15001–15015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Zhang, Y.; He, T.; Ding, S.; Li, H.; Song, W.; Ding, J.; Lu, J. Photo-Fenton Degradation of RhB via Transition Metal Oxides Composite Catalyst Fe3O4/CuO under Visible Light Optimized Using Response Surface Methodology. Mater. Technol. 2022, 37, 2347–2359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Bayahia, H. High Activity of ZnFe2O4 Nanoparticles for Photodegradation of Crystal Violet Dye Solution in the Presence of Sunlight. J. Taibah Univ. Sci. 2022, 16, 988–1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Bekru, A.G.; Tufa, L.T.; Zelekew, O.A.; Goddati, M.; Lee, J.; Sabir, F.K. Green Synthesis of a CuO-ZnO Nanocomposite for Efficient Photodegradation of Methylene Blue and Reduction of 4-Nitrophenol. ACS Omega 2022, 7, 30908–30919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Li, Z.; Chen, H.; Liu, W. Full-Spectrum Photocatalytic Activity of ZnO/CuO/ZnFe2O4 Nanocomposite as a PhotoFenton-Like Catalyst. Catalysts 2018, 8, 557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Taufik, A.; Saleh, R. Synthesis of Iron (II,III) Oxide/Zinc Oxide/Copper (II) Oxide (Fe3O4/ZnO/CuO) Nanocomposites and Their Photosonocatalytic Property for Organic Dye Removal. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2017, 491, 27–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Susanto, I.K.; Taufik, A.; Saleh, R. The Influence of ZnO Components on the Photocatalytic Activity of Fe3O4-CuO-ZnO Nanocomposites. Adv. Mater. Res. 2015, 1123, 227–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Paraguay-Delgado, F.; Hermida-Montero, L.A.; Morales-Mendoza, J.E.; Durán-Barradas, Z.; Mtz-Enriquez, A.I.; Pariona, N. Photocatalytic Properties of Cu-Containing ZnO Nanoparticles and Their Antifungal Activity against Agriculture-Pathogenic Fungus. RSC Adv. 2022, 12, 9898–9908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Shekoohiyan, S.; Rahmania, A.; Chamack, M.; Moussavi, G.; Rahmanian, O.; Alipour, V.; Giannakis, S. A Novel CuO/Fe2O3/ZnO Composite for Visible-Light Assisted Photocatalytic Oxidation of Bisphenol A: Kinetics, Degradation Pathways, and Toxicity Elimination. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2020, 242, 2020–2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Shanmugam, P.; Ngullie, R.C.; Meejoo Smith, S.; Boonyuen, S.; Boddula, R.; Pothu, R. Visible-Light Induced Photocatalytic Removal of Methylene Blue Dye by Copper Oxide Decorated Zinc Oxide Nanorods. Mater. Sci. Energy Technol. 2023, 6, 359–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Khalid, A.; Ahmad, P.; Khan, A.; Muhammad, S.; Khandaker, M.U.; Alam, M.M.; Asim, M.; Din, I.U.; Chaudhary, R.G.; Kumar, D.; et al. Effect of Cu Doping on ZnO Nanoparticles as a Photocatalyst for the Removal of Organic Wastewater. Bioinorg. Chem. Appl. 2022, 2022, 9459886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Bai, S.; Jiang, J.; Zhang, Q.; Xiong, Y. Steering Charge Kinetics in Photocatalysis: Intersection of Materials Syntheses, Characterization Techniques and Theoretical Simulations. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 2893–2939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Chen, Q.; Wang, K.; Gao, G.; Ren, J.; Duan, R.; Fang, Y.; Hu, X. Singlet Oxygen Generation Boosted by Ag–Pt Nanoalloy Combined with Disordered Surface Layer over TiO2 Nanosheet for Improving the Photocatalytic Activity. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2021, 538, 147944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Wang, H.; Zhang, L.; Chen, Z.; Hu, J.; Li, S.; Wang, Z.; Liu, J.; Wang, X. Semiconductor Heterojunction Photocatalysts: Design, Construction, and Photocatalytic Performances. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 5234–5244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Zhang, Z.; Yates, J.T. Band Bending in Semiconductors: Chemical and Physical Consequences at Surfaces and Interfaces. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 5520–5551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the synthesis of Fe3O4, ZnO, ZnFe2O4, and ZnFe2O4-Cu.
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the synthesis of Fe3O4, ZnO, ZnFe2O4, and ZnFe2O4-Cu.
Toxics 12 00077 g001
Figure 2. XRD patterns of Fe2O3, ZnO, ZnFe2O4 and ZnFe2O4-Cu NPs.
Figure 2. XRD patterns of Fe2O3, ZnO, ZnFe2O4 and ZnFe2O4-Cu NPs.
Toxics 12 00077 g002
Figure 3. FT-IR analysis of Fe2O3, ZnO, ZnFe2O4, and ZnFe2O4-Cu NPs.
Figure 3. FT-IR analysis of Fe2O3, ZnO, ZnFe2O4, and ZnFe2O4-Cu NPs.
Toxics 12 00077 g003
Figure 4. (a) UV-Vis diffuse reflectance spectra of Fe2O3, ZnO, ZnFe2O4, and ZnFe2O4-Cu NPs and (be) band gap plots of Fe2O3, ZnO, ZnFe2O4, and ZnFe2O4-Cu NPs.
Figure 4. (a) UV-Vis diffuse reflectance spectra of Fe2O3, ZnO, ZnFe2O4, and ZnFe2O4-Cu NPs and (be) band gap plots of Fe2O3, ZnO, ZnFe2O4, and ZnFe2O4-Cu NPs.
Toxics 12 00077 g004aToxics 12 00077 g004b
Figure 5. (a) Full scan XPS spectrum of ZnFe2O4-Cu nanocomposites and core level scan of (b) Zn 2p, (c) Fe 2p, (d) Cu 2p, and (e) O1s.
Figure 5. (a) Full scan XPS spectrum of ZnFe2O4-Cu nanocomposites and core level scan of (b) Zn 2p, (c) Fe 2p, (d) Cu 2p, and (e) O1s.
Toxics 12 00077 g005
Figure 6. SEM images of (a) Fe2O3, (b) ZnO, (c) ZnFe2O4, and (d) ZnFe2O4-Cu NPs.
Figure 6. SEM images of (a) Fe2O3, (b) ZnO, (c) ZnFe2O4, and (d) ZnFe2O4-Cu NPs.
Toxics 12 00077 g006
Figure 7. EDX spectra of (a) Fe2O3, (b) ZnO, (c) ZnFe2O4, and (d) ZnFe2O4-Cu NPs.
Figure 7. EDX spectra of (a) Fe2O3, (b) ZnO, (c) ZnFe2O4, and (d) ZnFe2O4-Cu NPs.
Toxics 12 00077 g007
Figure 8. TEM images of (a) Fe2O3, (b) ZnO, (c) ZnFe2O4, and (d) ZnFe2O4-Cu NPs.
Figure 8. TEM images of (a) Fe2O3, (b) ZnO, (c) ZnFe2O4, and (d) ZnFe2O4-Cu NPs.
Toxics 12 00077 g008
Figure 9. Photoluminescence (PL) spectra of ZnFe2O4 and ZnFe2O4-Cu nanocomposites.
Figure 9. Photoluminescence (PL) spectra of ZnFe2O4 and ZnFe2O4-Cu nanocomposites.
Toxics 12 00077 g009
Figure 10. BET adsorption–desorption isotherm of (a) Fe2O3, (b) ZnO, (c) ZnFe2O4, and (d) ZnFe2O4-Cu NPs (inset DFT pore size distribution pattern).
Figure 10. BET adsorption–desorption isotherm of (a) Fe2O3, (b) ZnO, (c) ZnFe2O4, and (d) ZnFe2O4-Cu NPs (inset DFT pore size distribution pattern).
Toxics 12 00077 g010
Figure 11. (a) Percentage degradation of RhB molecules via ZnFe2O4-Cu, (b) Langmuir–Hinshelwood kinetic model of photocatalytic degradation of RhB dye with various catalyst dosages, (c) Langmuir–Hinshelwood kinetic model of photocatalytic degradation of RhB dye with different dye concentrations, and (d) effect of pH on RhB dye photodegradation.
Figure 11. (a) Percentage degradation of RhB molecules via ZnFe2O4-Cu, (b) Langmuir–Hinshelwood kinetic model of photocatalytic degradation of RhB dye with various catalyst dosages, (c) Langmuir–Hinshelwood kinetic model of photocatalytic degradation of RhB dye with different dye concentrations, and (d) effect of pH on RhB dye photodegradation.
Toxics 12 00077 g011
Figure 12. Reusability of photocatalyst after four cycles of reuse.
Figure 12. Reusability of photocatalyst after four cycles of reuse.
Toxics 12 00077 g012
Figure 13. Role of scavengers on photocatalytic degradation of RhB.
Figure 13. Role of scavengers on photocatalytic degradation of RhB.
Toxics 12 00077 g013
Figure 14. Proposed mechanism of photocatalytic degradation of RhB in presence of ZnFe2O4-Cu.
Figure 14. Proposed mechanism of photocatalytic degradation of RhB in presence of ZnFe2O4-Cu.
Toxics 12 00077 g014
Table 1. BET surface area, pore diameter, and pore volumes of Fe2O3, ZnO, ZnFe2O4, and ZnFe2O4-Cu NPs.
Table 1. BET surface area, pore diameter, and pore volumes of Fe2O3, ZnO, ZnFe2O4, and ZnFe2O4-Cu NPs.
CatalystSBET (m2/g)Pore Diameter (nm)Pore Volume (cc/g)
Fe2O335.2778.7640.252
ZnO25.1662.7830.081
ZnFe2O468.81415.8210.281
ZnFe2O4-Cu84.86615.2280.294
Table 2. Literature survey concerned ZnFe2O4-Cu nanomaterials in photodegradation of organic dyes.
Table 2. Literature survey concerned ZnFe2O4-Cu nanomaterials in photodegradation of organic dyes.
PhotocatalystDyeLight SourceDegradation (%) or Rate Constant of the Reaction (min−1)Ref.
ZnFe2O4Malachite greenVisible light0.96 (min−1)[111]
Rhodamine B0.31 (min−1)
Fe3O4/CuORhodamine BH2O2/Visible light98.9% within 60 min[112]
ZnFe2O4Crystal violetSunlight1296 (min−1)[113]
CuO-ZnOMethylene BlueNaBH4/Visible light0.017 min−1[114]
ZnO0.0027 min−1
ZnO/CuO/ZnFe2O4Methyl orangeH2O2/Visible light67.8% within 360 min[115]
Fe3O4/ZnO/CuOMethylene BlueVisible light0.015 min−1[116]
UV light0.009 min−1
Fe3O4:CuO:5ZnOMethylene BlueUV light0.0068 min−1[117]
ZnO/Cu2% NPsRhodamine BVisible light90.0% within 100 min[118]
CuO/Fe2O3/ZnOBisphenol AVisible light0.0227 min−1[119]
CuO/ZnOMethylene BlueVisible light98.5% within 150 min[120]
Cu-ZnOMethylene BlueUV light94% within 120 min[121]
ZnFe2O4−AgRhodamine BH2O2/Visible light0.005 min−1[62]
ZnFe2O4-CuRhodamine BVisible light98% within 140 min
0.02864 min−1
This work
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Alshehri, A.; Alharbi, L.; Wani, A.A.; Malik, M.A. Biogenic Punica granatum Flower Extract Assisted ZnFe2O4 and ZnFe2O4-Cu Composites for Excellent Photocatalytic Degradation of RhB Dye. Toxics 2024, 12, 77. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics12010077

AMA Style

Alshehri A, Alharbi L, Wani AA, Malik MA. Biogenic Punica granatum Flower Extract Assisted ZnFe2O4 and ZnFe2O4-Cu Composites for Excellent Photocatalytic Degradation of RhB Dye. Toxics. 2024; 12(1):77. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics12010077

Chicago/Turabian Style

Alshehri, Amal, Laila Alharbi, Aiyaz Ahmad Wani, and Maqsood Ahmad Malik. 2024. "Biogenic Punica granatum Flower Extract Assisted ZnFe2O4 and ZnFe2O4-Cu Composites for Excellent Photocatalytic Degradation of RhB Dye" Toxics 12, no. 1: 77. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics12010077

APA Style

Alshehri, A., Alharbi, L., Wani, A. A., & Malik, M. A. (2024). Biogenic Punica granatum Flower Extract Assisted ZnFe2O4 and ZnFe2O4-Cu Composites for Excellent Photocatalytic Degradation of RhB Dye. Toxics, 12(1), 77. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics12010077

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop