Next Article in Journal
Effect of Mineral Element Imbalance on Neutrophil Respiratory Burst Function and Inflammatory and Antioxidant Responses in Sheep
Previous Article in Journal
Host PTX3 Protein and Bacterial Capsule Coordinately Regulate the Inflammatory Response during Streptococcus suis Infection
Previous Article in Special Issue
Characterization of Biofilm Producing Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci Isolated from Bulk Tank Milk
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Special Issue—Resistant Staphylococci in Animals

Section of Veterinary Pathobiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, Belfield, D04 W6F6 Dublin, Ireland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Vet. Sci. 2023, 10(4), 240; https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci10040240
Submission received: 15 March 2023 / Accepted: 21 March 2023 / Published: 23 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Resistant Staphylococci in Animals)
Staphylococci figure prominently among those bacteria demonstrating antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and are thus responsible for significant problems concerning the treatment of the animals and humans that they infect. In particular, livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (LA-MRSA) and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius (MRSP) are of growing concern. Staphylococcus schleiferi and coagulase-negative staphylococci occur as commensals of the skin and mucous membranes of animals. However, they have been implicated in a variety of infections and are frequently resistant to one or more antimicrobial classes. This Special Issue assembles a collection of original articles that shed further light on these fascinating bacteria and their potential impacts on both veterinary medicine and public health.
The review by Lynch and Helbig [1] provides a timely update of our knowledge regarding Staphylococcus pseudintermedius, the most common pathogen isolated from skin disease samples (particularly pyoderma) from dogs [2]. The high prevalence of methicillin-resistance and associated resistance to many other antimicrobials in isolates of S. pseudintermedius constitutes a growing concern. A range of novel potential treatments including vaccination and phage therapy are discussed.
Chanayat et al. [3] investigated the staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) type and the antimicrobial susceptibility of staphylococci isolated from superficial pyoderma infections affecting dogs in Thailand. SCCmec type V was found in S. aureus, the S. intermedius group, S. lentus, S. xylosus, and S. arlettae, and although the authors do not state whether the coagulase-negative species were considered the primary bacterial pathogens in the cases from which they were isolated, the need to reduce environmental contamination and educate veterinary personnel and clients about the potential for the transmission to and from dogs of all resistant staphylococci is emphasized. The need for hygiene is supported by the results of another recent longitudinal study of MRSP-infected dogs conducted by Frosini et al. [4], in which it was reported that 45% of households were contaminated with MRSP. The data presented by Chanayat et al. [3], includes two S. pseudintermedius isolates that showed MICs < 2 µg/ml, an interesting finding in light of the publication by Wegener et al. [5] suggesting that such isolates showing low-level resistance may be susceptible to treatment with higher doses of beta-lactams or more frequent administration.
As well as characterizing S. pseudintermedius isolates causing superficial pyoderma in Taiwanese dogs, Lai et al. [6] also examined the risk factors that might lead to owners acquiring S. pseudintermedius from their pets. Although no significant association was found, high odds ratios were obtained for “keeping three or more dogs” and “dogs can lick the owner’s face”, suggesting support for recent publications describing the potential for S. pseudintermedius infections in human hosts [7,8].
Certain foods and food production systems may present a pathway for the transmission of MRSA to humans. Benrabia et al. [9] detected MRSA in 30% of poultry farms in Algeria and provided a reasonable argument for conducting interventions to reduce spread between farms and mitigate the contamination of the food chain. The lack of the molecular typing of isolates was a limitation of this study, as it largely precluded source attribution and comparison with MRSA isolates reported worldwide. Nevertheless, the documentation of MRSA isolation rates in food-producing animal species in different geographical regions is essential to obtain a comprehensive understanding of this public health challenge.
Staphylococcus aureus is still the leading cause of bovine mastitis in many countries. Rusenova et al. [10] compared phenotypic and genotypic methods in their evaluation of AMR among bovine mastitis isolates of S. aureus in Bulgaria. The discrepancies detected for some isolates are concerning and, as recommended by the authors, highlight the need for isolates to be thoroughly characterized.
Biofilm production is considered an important virulence factor for S. aureus [11] and coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS), which both cause bovine mastitis. Lee and Lee [12] showed that the prevalence of multi-drug resistance (MDR) was significantly higher in strong or moderate biofilm-producing CoNS than in those that were weak or non-formers in samples isolated from normal bulk tank milk in Korea. As biofilm production is associated with persistence of infection and antimicrobial therapy may not eliminate infection, the authors advise effective monitoring and sanitation programs to prevent the contamination of equipment with environmental CoNS, thus limiting the opportunities for cows to be infected with these organisms.
The diverse articles contained in this Special Issue constitute a valuable contribution to our understanding of staphylococcal infection in both farm and companion animals.

Author Contributions

B.K.M. and F.C.L. wrote and reviewed the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lynch, S.A.; Helbig, K.J. The complex diseases of Staphylococcus pseudintermedius in canines: Where to next? Vet. Sci. 2021, 8, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Loeffler, A.; Lloyd, D.H. What has changed in canine pyodema? A narrative review. Vet. J. 2018, 235, 73–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Chanayat, Y.; Akatvipat, A.; Bender, J.; Punyaapornwithaya, V.; Meeyam, T.; Anukool, U.; Pichpol, D. The SCCmec Types and antimicrobial resistance among methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus species isolated from dogs with superficial pyoderma. Vet. Sci. 2021, 8, 85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Frosini, S.M.; Bond, R.; King, R.; Feudi, C.; Schwarz, S.; Loeffler, A. Effect of topical antimicrobial therapy and household cleaning on meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius carriage in dogs. Vet. Rec. 2022, 190, e937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Wegener, A.; Damborg, P.; Guardabassi, L.; Moodley, A.; Mughini-Gras, L.; Duim, B.; Wagenaar, J.A.; Broens, E.M. Specific staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) types and clonal complexes are associated with low-level amoxicillin/clavulanic acid and cefalotin resistance in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2020, 75, 508–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Lai, C.-H.; Ma, Y.C.; Shia, W.-Y.; Heieh, Y.-L.; Wang, C.-M. Risk factors for antimicrobial resistance of Staphylococcus species isolated from dogs with superficial pyoderma and their owners. Vet. Sci. 2022, 9, 306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Somayaji, R.; Priyantha, M.A.; Rubin, J.E.; Church, D. Human infections due to Staphylococcus pseudintermedius, an emerging zoonosis of canine origin: Report of 24 cases. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2016, 85, 471–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ference, E.H.; Danielian, A.; Kim, H.W.; Yoo, F.; Kuan, E.C.; Suh, J.D. Zoonotic Staphylococcus pseudintermedius sinonasal infections: Risk factors and resistance patterns. Int. Forum. Allergy Rhinol. 2019, 9, 724–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Benrabia, I.; Hamdi, T.; Shehata, A.; Neubaurer, H.; Wareth, G. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in poultry species in Algeria: Long term study of prevalence and antimicrobial resistance. Vet. Sci. 2020, 7, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Rusenova, N.; Vasilev, N.; Rusenov, A.; Milanova, A.; Sirakov, I. Comparison between some phenotypic and genotypic methods for assessment of antimicrobial resistance trend of bovine mastitis Staphylococcus aureus isolates from Bulgaria. Vet. Sci. 2022, 9, 401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Campos, B.; Pickering, A.C.; Rocha, L.S.; Aguilar, A.P.; Fabres-Klein, M.H.; de Oliveira Mendes, T.A.; Fitzgerald, J.R.; de Oliveira Barros Ribon, A. Diversity and pathogenesis of Staphylococcus aureus from bovine mastitis: Current understanding and future perspectives. BMC Vet. Res. 2022, 18, 115. [Google Scholar]
  12. Lee, Y.J.; Lee, Y.J. Characterization of biofilm producing coagulase-negative staphylococci isolated from bult tank milk. Vet. Sci. 2022, 9, 430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Markey, B.K.; Leonard, F.C. Special Issue—Resistant Staphylococci in Animals. Vet. Sci. 2023, 10, 240. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci10040240

AMA Style

Markey BK, Leonard FC. Special Issue—Resistant Staphylococci in Animals. Veterinary Sciences. 2023; 10(4):240. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci10040240

Chicago/Turabian Style

Markey, Bryan K., and Finola C. Leonard. 2023. "Special Issue—Resistant Staphylococci in Animals" Veterinary Sciences 10, no. 4: 240. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci10040240

APA Style

Markey, B. K., & Leonard, F. C. (2023). Special Issue—Resistant Staphylococci in Animals. Veterinary Sciences, 10(4), 240. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci10040240

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop