Next Article in Journal
Screening of Antibacterial Activity of Some Resupinate Fungi, Reveal Gloeocystidiellum lojanense sp. nov. (Russulales) against E. coli from Ecuador
Next Article in Special Issue
Antifungal Activity and Biocontrol Potential of Simplicillium lamellicola JC-1 against Multiple Fungal Pathogens of Oilseed Rape
Previous Article in Journal
Detoxication of Citrinin with Kojic Acid by the Formation of the Citrinin-Kojic Acid Adduct, and the Enhancement of Kojic Acid Production by Citrinin via Oxidative Stress in Aspergillus parasiticus
Previous Article in Special Issue
Metagenomics Next Generation Sequencing (mNGS): An Exciting Tool for Early and Accurate Diagnostic of Fungal Pathogens in Plants
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JoF
Volume 9
Issue 1
10.3390/jof9010052
jof-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Lignin and Its Pathway-Associated Phytoalexins Modulate Plant Defense against Fungi

by
Vincent Ninkuu
1,
Jianpei Yan
1,
Zenchao Fu
1,
Tengfeng Yang
1,
James Ziemah
2,
Matthias S. Ullrich
2,
Nikolai Kuhnert
2 and
Hongmei Zeng
1,*
1
State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS), Beijing 100193, China
2
Department of Life Sciences and Chemistry, Jacobs University, College Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Fungi 2023, 9(1), 52; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9010052
Submission received: 17 December 2022 / Revised: 26 December 2022 / Accepted: 27 December 2022 / Published: 29 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Role of Fungi in Plant Defense Mechanisms)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Fungi infections cause approximately 60–70% yield loss through diseases such as rice blast, powdery mildew, Fusarium rot, downy mildew, etc. Plants naturally respond to these infections by eliciting an array of protective metabolites to confer physical or chemical protection. Among plant metabolites, lignin, a phenolic compound, thickens the middle lamella and the secondary cell walls of plants to curtail fungi infection. The biosynthesis of monolignols (lignin monomers) is regulated by genes whose transcript abundance significantly improves plant defense against fungi. The catalytic activities of lignin biosynthetic enzymes also contribute to the accumulation of other defense compounds. Recent advances focus on modifying the lignin pathway to enhance plant growth and defense against pathogens. This review presents an overview of monolignol regulatory genes and their contributions to fungi immunity, as reported over the last five years. This review expands the frontiers in lignin pathway engineering to enhance plant defense.

1. Introduction

Plants are relentlessly exposed to pest and pathogen attacks. However, their sessile nature is naturally compensated for by synthesizing stress-responsive metabolites to overcome these attacks. Whereas many ribosome-inactivating proteins are reported to render pathogens proteins inactive to confer immunity in plants [1,2], the cell wall’s dynamic and intricate nature provides the first line of defense and environmental cues [3,4]. Several metabolites, including lignin, cellulose, and pectin, contribute to cell wall integrity (CWI) [5]. Lignification, as an integral component of CWI, crucially enhances the two layers of plant innate immunity: pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs)-triggered immunity (PTI) and effector-triggered immunity (ETI) [6]. While PTI uses pattern recognition receptors to monitor PAMPs on the cellular surface, ETI relies on nucleotide-binding domain leucine-rich repeat receptors to recognize pathogen effectors inside the cell [7].
The phenylpropanoid pathway is the metabolic hub of plants and produces approximately 8000 metabolites that enhance robust antagonistic and informative interactions between plants and their environments [8]. Recent insights underscore molecular factors regulating phenylpropanoids’ metabolism orchestrated by a network of enzyme cascades, including; ligases, oxygenases, transferases, and oxidoreductases [9,10,11]. These enzymes influence the chemical modification of metabolic skeletons through glycosylation, acylation, hydroxylation, and methylation. Therefore, the diversity of phenylpropanoid-derived metabolites depends on them [12].
Lignin production is an off-shoot of the phenylpropanoid pathway. PHENYLALANINE (PAL) is synthesized via the chorismate pathway in plastids and released into the cytosol. It then catalyzes the first of three steps in the general phenylpropanoids pathway. Other regulators of monolignol biosynthesis include C4H, 4CL, the soluble C3H, HCT, CCoAOMTs, COMTs, F5H, CAD, and CCR. Peroxidases and laccases (PRX/LACs) encode monolignol polymerization into intracellular spaces of the cell wall [13,14,15,16]. Knowledge of the regulatory mechanism of monolignol biosynthesis continues to expand. Previously, p-hydroxyphenyl (H), guaiacyl (G), and syringyl (S) lignin were the only known lignin monomers. Recent studies have reported that catechyl (C) and 5-Hydroxy-guaiacyl (5H) monomers contribute to lignin polymerization in some plant species [17,18,19,20]. A total of 11 lignin family enzymes and 24 metabolites are currently associated with the lignin pathway [17,18,19,20]. However, these metabolites are often credited for their direct involvement in plant defense, whereas the enzymes regulating their accumulation remain in the shadows.
Studies have shown that mutant phenotypes of lignin regulators either shut down or severely impair the molecular switches for lignin and other metabolite accumulation. Compromised lignin metabolism affects plant defense against fungi and overall yield output. Therefore, exploiting the potential contribution of lignin and pathway-related metabolites could contribute to plant growth and yield. Over the last five years, many insightful reports have been published regarding lignin biosynthesis and plant defense. Although reviews on phenylpropanoid biosynthesis have recently been published, none has focused on the individual enzymes that regulate lignin formation and their roles in fungal defense. This review provides an overview of lignin pathway enzymes’ contributions to defense lignification and other pathway-associated metabolic accumulation.

2. A Brief Overview of Monolignols Biosynthesis and Lignification

Even though phenylalanine is not a primary precursor to lignin biosynthesis, it initiates the first of three reaction steps to pave the way for lignin production [18,21]. Research advances have discovered eleven enzymes involved in monolignol production and polymerization (Figure 1) [22]. The functions of each enzyme in the lignin pathway and its defense mechanisms are discussed in this review. In addition, adenosine and cytosine (AC element) enrich DNA motifs to promote lignin synthesis. MYELOBLASTOSIS (MYB) viral oncogene homolog transcription factors possess a rich AC motif that regulates lignin pathway genes, although they do not actively participate in the biosynthesis process. For example, MYB46 and its MYB83 homolog regulate phenylpropanoids and lignin biosynthesis [23,24]. In Arabidopsis thaliana, MYB15 activates PAL, C4H, 4CL, HCT, C3H, COMT, and CAD to enhance lignin accumulation during defense against Pseudomonas syringae DC3000 (AvrRpm1) [25].
Uncompromised pathogens penetrate the apoplast or cytosol through the intercellular voids within the cell wall. Lignification is an essential process that resists the entrance of these pathogens by lignin deposition in the voids via Golgi-mediated vesicles in the cell membrane, as recently proposed [26]. Lignification promotes the chemical alteration of pathogen-secreted cell-wall-degrading enzymes to boost toxin diffusion resistance [6]. Some reports suggest lignification disrupts these pathogen-degrading enzymes and restricts pathogens’ mobility in infected cells from infecting new cells [6]. Lignin and callose deposition are also reported to block fungi haustoria from the cell wall [27].

2.1. PHENYLALANINE AMMONIA-LYASE (PAL)

PAL initiates the general phenylpropanoid pathway reaction by catalyzing the deamination of L-phenylalanine to trans-cinnamic acid and ammonium [16,28]. This process paves the way for several enzymatic activities to produce an enormous array of secondary metabolites, such as lignin, lignan, chlorogenic acid, SA, and stilbene [29]. PAL accumulation is linked to defense mediation against pathogens and pests, even though the mechanism by which they execute these activities is elusive. For example, overexpression (OE) and RNA interference (RNAi) enhanced the expression of soybean GmPAL2.1 against Phytophthora sojae infection. The highly expressed PAL induced the accumulation of daidzein, glyceollin, genistein, and salicylic acid (SA) to mediate defense against P. sojae [30]. The rice genome has nine PAL genes. Eight induce resistance against Magnaporthe oryzae infection. In addition, Rhizoctonia solani stimulates quantitative trait loci for resistance in seven OsPAL genes [31].
The Brachypodium distachyon (purple false brome), PAL1, was also identified to induce lignin, SA, cinnamic acid, and fatty acid accumulation in defense against the panicum mosaic virus. However, RNAi-mediated knockdown of BdPAL1 enhances panicum mosaic virus pathogenicity [32]. PAL is also reported to induce lignin and cinnamaldehyde accumulation against P. capsici infection in black pepper and trans-cinnamic acid defense against Xoo [33]. The PAL gene family encodes the production of defense metabolites irrespective of the reaction direction (forward or reverse) and, therefore, are candidate genes for genetic engineering. However, their substratum specificity, catalytic, and protein-wide mechanisms remain elusive, hindering their engineering potential. Table 1 summarizes the current reported role of lignin regulatory genes in fungi immunity in plants.

2.2. CINNAMATE 4-HYDROXYLASE (C4H)

The C4H is a member of the CYP73A class of P450-associated monooxygenase family proteins that encodes the hydroxylation of p-coumaric acid from cinnamic acid. C4H activities promote cell wall lignification and biosynthesis of other plant defense metabolites [34,35,36]. The soybean C4H1 gene is highly responsive to pathogens and encodes defense lignification against P. sojae. Whereas the gmc4h1-mutant plants are highly susceptible to P. sojae, the OE-GmC4H1 lines in N. benthamiana significantly accumulated lignin for immunity induction [34]. C4H1, C4H2, and C4H3 expression vary from tissue to tissue in Pyrus bretschneideri (pear plant) [35]. Transcripts of C4H1 and C4H3 defensively accumulate lignin and robust cell walls in Arabidopsis plants overexpressing these genes [35]. A related study reports that OsC4H complements pathogenesis and antioxidant-related genes to activate defense against pests [36]. Pathway perturbations can also externally or internally influence biological functions, such as metabolic changes [37]. A reprogrammed phenylpropanoid pathway by piperonylic acid (PA)-mediated inhibition of C4H triggers systematic resistance against a broad spectrum of pathogens [38]. The C4H-inhibited Solanum lycopersicum (tomato) increased flavonoid production with enhanced immune signaling, cell wall modification, phenolic compounds, and SA accumulation [38]. Elicitor proteins and transcription factors have also been reported to activate C4H defense against fungi (Table 1).

2.3. 4-COUMARATE-COA –COENZYME A LIGASE (4CL)

The 4CL protein distributes the flux among different metabolic pathways. It is the precursor for downstream biosynthesis of other metabolites, such as stilbenes and flavonoids, and also encodes the esterification of p-coumaroyl CoA to p-coumaric acid for lignin production [9]. A Fraxinus mandshurica OE-4CL2 in tobacco plants enhanced lignin accumulation but inhibited hemicellulose production. This resulted in a 250 % increase in coniferyl alcohol levels, fortifying cell wall and xylem cell layer thickness. Overexpression lines in soybean significantly induced resistance against P. sojae by accumulating daidzein, genistein, and glyceollins. The Fm4CL2 ortholog from Dryopteris fragrans (Df4CL2), transformed into tobacco via an Agrobacterium tumefacient-mediated system, increased lignin and flavonoids concentration, further suggesting 4CL could play a crucial role in cell-wall-mediated defense [39,40,41].
Transcription factors activate the expression of phenylpropanoid genes. The peach WRKY70 activates 4CL and PAL promoters to elevate total phenolics, flavonoids, and lignin biosynthesis against a rot initiation fungus, Rhizopus stolonifer [42]. WRKY, MYB, and bHLH transcription factors can also switch on lignin biosynthetic genes (4CL, PAL) in Pinus strobus (eastern white pine) after perceiving nematode (Bursaphelencus xylophilus)-inflicted injuries [43]. The high expression of 4CL and PAL induces stilbenoids, pinosylvin monomethyl, and monoethyl ethers elicitation to mediate plant defense [43]. In related findings involving Botrytis cinerea (gray mold) infection in blueberry fruits, methyl jasmonate (MeJA) treatment restrained the decaying success of gray mold in the fruits through 4CL-, C4H-, and PAL-induced production of NO, H2O2, phenolic, and flavonoid [44].
Table
Table 1. Contrition of monolignol biosynthetic regulators to fungal defense.
Table 1. Contrition of monolignol biosynthetic regulators to fungal defense.
No.Gene/ProteinPlantResearch StrategyResults ObtainedMetabolitesReferences
1MdMRLK2Malus mellanaOverexpression MdMRLK2 cucurbitsSuppressed PAL, β-1,3- glucanase, chitinaseInhibited polyphenol synthesis[45]
2AtERF114A. thalianaRNAseq, overexpression, knockoutERF114 activates PAL1 to mediate P. syringae pv tomato (Pst) defenseLignin and SA [46]
3PAL1, 4CL5, MYB308Prunus persicaOverexpression MYB308PAL1 and 4CL5 enhanced expression-induced resistance against R. stoloniferChlorogenic, gallic acid, and rutin[47]
4POX, PALZea mays Inoculated maize genotypes (P1630H, AG3700, SCS156 Colorado and 30K75Y) with Bipolaris maydis POX, PAL transcript abundance conferred resistance to B. maydis in AG3700 phenolic and flavonoids[48]
5PAL, POD Nicotiana tobaccum Thiamine (vitamin B1, VB1) treatmentIncreased PAL, POD, H2O2 accumulation, and catalase and peroxidase activities conferred resistance against Phytophthora nicotianae -[49]
6WRKY1Ocimum sanctum, A. thalianaOverexpression and VIGS OF WRKY1WRKY1 regulates PAL and C4H resistance to P. syringae pv. tomato Pst DC3000 -[50]
7PALPhoenix dactyliferaAlginate extract from Bifurcaria bifurcata was tested agaisnt F. oxysporumAlginate treatment triggered PAL expression against F. oxysporum f. sp. Albedinis-[51]
8 C4H , CAD, PODPrunus persica RNAseq, transient overexpression of PpMYB306 P. guilliermondii inhibits PpMYB306 repressed lignin genes in peach after R. stolonifer infection. Inhibited lignin content[52]
9C4H, COMT, BAK1, WRKY5Olea europaea Analysis of defense mechanism of tolerant and susceptible olive cultivars to V. dahliaeV. dahlia-tolerant cultivar significantly accumulated root lignin after V. dahlia inoculationLignin[53]
10PALs, Cl4Cls, CYP73A, CCR ClHCTsCitrullus lanatusRNA-Seq of resistant ZXG1755 and susceptible ZXG1996 lines inoculated with powdery mildew during the early seedling stageHormonal, lignin and peroxidase transcripts were significantly expressedLignin and phytohormone biosynthesis[54]
11 ScAPD1- like Syntrichia caninervis Overexpression of ScAPD1-like in Arabidopsis and S. caninervisDefense against V. dahliae, decreased ROS synthesis, improved ROS scavenging activity, enhanced lignin (PAL, C4H) transcripts High lignin accumulation [55]
12Hrip1Oryza sativaRNAseq and metabolic analysis of Hrip1-treated rice leavesHrip1 mediates defense against rice blast fungi by activating PAL, C4H, 4CL, HCT, C3H, COMT, CAD, PRX, diterpene synthases (CPS2, -4, KSL4, 5, -6, -7, 10, cytochromes (CYP71Z, CYP7M, momilactone synthases), benzoxazinoids biosynthetic genes (BX1-BX7)Lignin, diterpenoids [56]
13 WRKY , PAL, CHI Vigna angularies Transcriptome and histological analysis of Vigna angularies against Uromyces vignae PRRs recognize U. vignae invasion and activities PAL, WRKY, CHI defense -[57]
14CAD35, CAD45, CAD43G. hirsutumVIGS and overexpression of GhCAD35, GhCAD45, or GhCAD43VIGS of CAD genes inhibited S-lignin production, ultimately affecting the syringyl/guaiacyl (S/G) ratio, while OE-lines enhanced V. dahliae defenseLignin, SA[58]
15 PAL , 4CL, COMT ,
CAD POX		Panax notoginsengTranscriptomic and proteomic technologiesAlternaria panax inoculation activated PAL, 4CL, COMT, CAD, POX expressionLignin[59]
16 PAL Cajanus cajan Metabolic analysisFusarium udum induced the expression of lignin-related transcripts and enzyme activities for lignin and phenolic acids accumulation Phenolics, lignin [60]
17COMT, PRX, CAD, HCT Malus domestica Comparative RNA-seq analysis Malus domestica inoculated with Fpmd MR5 induced the expression of several lignin genes,
antimicrobial and antioxidants genes		-[61]
18 COMT1 Triticum aestivumTranscription profiling of genes involved in Triticum aestivum- Puccinia striiformis interaction COMT1 was highly expressed in response to Puccinia striiformis inoculation -[62]
19GhODO1
Gh4CL1,
GhCAD3		G. hirsutumGhODO1-GFP transient expression in onion, qPCR, lignin quantification GhODO1 binds to Gh4CL1 and GhCAD3 promoters to activate lignin-enhanced resistance to V. dahliae Lignin, JA[63]
20 LCC24 , ROMT, LCC24, Elaeis guineensis Analysis of oil palm defense against Ganoderma boninense inoculation, qPCR, and metabolic analysis oil palm cultivar, C08 exhibited high resistance by activating Ganoderma boninenseSA, lignin[64]
21Xylogen-like arabinogalactan protein1 and -2Capsicum annuumGenome-wide studies, phylogenetics, and VIGS analysis Enhanced expression of lignin genes and lignin accumulation in pepper stem.Lignin[65]
22Ammonia-lysases (ALs)B. distachylonProteomics, RNAi knockdown, metabolic analysisAmmonia-lysases performed a central role in carbon allocation for lignin accumulation and shikimate ester does not contribute to lignin synthesis in B. distachylonLignin[66]
A virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS) of 4CL30 in cotton compromised lignin and flavonoid accumulation but increased caffeic and ferulic acid levels to confer immunity against Verticilia dahlia [67]. The central position of flux distribution showed that 4CL is an essential enzyme in downstream defense modulation (Table 1) and could play a critical role in lignin pathway engineering.

2.4. HYDROXYCINNAMOYL TRANSFERASE (HCT)

The HCT distributes the mass flux among C-, G-, 5H, and S-lignin. It also forms p-coumaroyl shikimic acid from p-coumaroyl CoA and then reversely encodes caffeoyl shikimate conversion to caffeoyl CoA [68,69]. However, the latter process is being questioned for possible redundancy. In O. sativa, the negative regulation of cell death elicitation mediated by the APIP5 transcriptional factor that binds to OsPHCT4 is mitigated by APIP5-RNAi [70]. This process frees up the activation of tryptamine HCTs (OsTBT1 and OsTBT2) and tyramine HCTs (OsTHT1 and OsTHT2) to enhance immunity against M. oryzae through lignin and phenolamide accumulation [70]. Populus trichocarpa WRKY transcription factor regulates HCT2 to mediate defense against Sphaerulina musiva [71], while MYB15 turns on monolignol synthetic genes, including HCT, for lignin-mediated ETI [25]. Populus tomentosa Carr PtoHCT1 also relies on caffeoyl-CoA and shikimic acid substrates to synthesize caffeoyl shikimate. PoptrHCT1 and -2 from Populus trichocarpa, a close relative of P. tomentosa, contribute to plant defense [20]. Similar investigations involving HCT defense against fungi have been reported (Table 1).

2.5. CAFFEOYL SHIKIMATE ESTERASE (CSE)

CSE catalyzes the direct conversion of caffeoyl shikimate to caffeate acid. The reverse catalytic activity of HCT in converting caffeoyl shikimate to caffeoyl-CoA has raised controversy upon CSE discovery [72], suggesting this process could be redundant in the lignin pathway. Even though there is no established consensus, available reports suggest CSE could be more efficient than HCT in lignin biosynthesis [73]. A few recent reports have elucidated the function of CSE in lignin production. However, no distinct bioassay demonstrating the defense function of this enzyme in vitro via the higher lignin content has been reported in the last five years. CSE from a hybrid Populus significantly encodes lignin accumulation [74]. Moreover, its OE-PbCSE1 lines in pea fruits increased lignin content in the stem [75], while its mutant lines decreased lignin production [76].

2.6. CAFFEOYL-COENZYME A 3-O-METHYLTRANSFERASE (CCoAOMTs) and CAFFEIC ACID 3-O-METHYLTRANSFERASE (COMTs)

CCoAOMTs and COMTs catalyze the hydroxyl-methylations in the phenylpropanoids pathway [77,78], making them integral members of monolignol, coumarins, caffeic, and sinapic acids biosynthesis with amplified roles in plant defense [13,14,15,16]. For example, the OE-CCoAOMT lines in Paeonia ostii (tree peony) and Camellia sinensis (tea plant) induce lignin production [13,14,15,16] for potential defense roles besides ROS scavenging and drought tolerance. Activated LrCCoAOMT from Lilium regale (royal lily) is highly responsive to B. cinerea and induces SA signaling. The OE-LrCCoAOMT in Arabidopsis accumulates more lignin in the vascular tissue against B. cinerea [79]. Similarly, Triticum aestivum TaCOMT-3D participates in defense against Rhizoctonia cerealis (Sharp eyespot) infection [80], and its mutants are susceptible to sharp eyespot fungi infection, while OE-TaCOMT-3D lines significantly induce defense lignification [80]. A cloned neem NCOMT in Withania somnifera and Ocimum species robustly catalyzed ferulic formation from caffeic acids. Ferulic acid confers additional cell wall rigidity and is a precursor to coniferyl alcohols, sinapic, and curcumin. Therefore, NCOMT involvement in these processes could be significant for metabolic engineering against fungi [81].
Sugar cane ShMYB78 regulates suberin accumulation by activating COMT and ketoacyl-CoA synthase (ShKCS20) [82]. Suberin is a vital metabolite that provides a physical barrier against pathogens, water loss, and wound healing and could spike interest in possible engineering attempts [82]. CRISPR-Cas9-mediated editing of StCCoAOMT in Russet Burbank potato induces suberin and lignin elicitation to resist P. infestans [83]. In addition, the bread wheat plant lignin-induced cell wall thickening was enhanced by TaCCoAOMT for Fusarium head blight resistance [84].

2.7. FERULATE 5-HYDROXYLASE (F5H)

The F5H is the third P450-dependent protein that regulates lignin biosynthesis. It catalyzes S-monolignol from G-monolignol through 5-hydroxylation of coniferaldehyde and coniferyl alcohols [85,86]. The role of F5H in lignin production is proposed to be thwarted by microRNA from Bacopa monnieri (Bm-miR172c-5p) which cleaves F5H and interferes with lignin elicitation [87]. Seedlings of OE-Bm-miR172c-5p rendered lignin-induced secondary cell wall thickening redundant under drought-stress conditions, but overexpressing the mimic target, eTMs, restored lignification and secondary cell wall thickening [87]. Hence, Bm-miR172c-5p maintains B. monnieri native phenotype under different environmental conditions. The OE-PtoF5H lines in P. tomenta mediate the proportional enhancement of S-monolignol [85].
Monolignol ratio is also reported to influence biomass recalcitrance and plant disease resistance. A CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knockout of four F5H (ko-7) genes from Brassica napus (oilseed rape) reduced the syringyl:guaiacyl monolignol ratio (S: G). The ko-7 mutant developed resistance against pathogenic Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (stem rot) through cell wall fortification [86]. F5H also confers immunity against parasitic plants. Striga hermonthica (purple witchweed) infects rice, maize, and sugar cane in Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa. Striga-resistant Nipponbare and susceptible Koshihikari cultivars preferentially accumulate lignin monomers [88]. The co-expression of F5H and C3H induced a high stack of H-, G-, and S-lignin to induce rice immunity to S. hermonthica [88].

2.8. CINNAMOYL COA REDUCTASE (CCR)

CCR encodes the formation of hydroxycinnamaldehydes from hydroxycinnamoyl-CoA, the first committed step in monolignol production. Loss of CCR function in angiosperm inhibits lignin accumulation and increases susceptibility to pathogens [89]. B. nepus CCR1 gene participates in H- and G-lignin synthesis and vascular systems formation, while the BnCCR2 encodes S-lignin production. OE-BnCCR (1 and 2) phenotypes delayed flowering time and resulted in poor leaf and vascular system development [89]. BnCCR1 and BnCCR2 increased glucosinolate (GLSs) concentration [89], which could remedy chemical defense against fungi diseases through hormone signaling and pathogen perception [90,91,92].

2.9. CINNAMYL ALCOHOL DEHYDROGENASE (CAD)

CAD encodes the NADPH-dependent reduction of various hydroxy-cinnamaldehydes to their respective monolignol alcohols [93]. Rice CAD2 transcript abundantly accumulates in young seedlings and confers cell-wall-mediated immunity against Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae (Xoo) [93]. Cell wall fortification has been explored to control Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. BnCAD5 and F5H induce rapid accumulation of S-lignin against S. sclerotiorum infection [26]. A comparative transcriptional analysis in Manduca sexta (stem-boring herbivore), Trichobaris mucorea (stem borer)-attacked, and healthy wild tobacco Nicotiana attenuata implicated CAD activity for enhanced lignin deposition in parenchymal cells and pith of the insect-attacked plants. However, cad mutants restored the stem-boring ability of the herbivores without inhibiting growth. Ethylene and jasmonate were subsequently identified to signal pith lignification [94].
Trichoderma harzianum is a plant fungicide used for foliar application, seeds, and soil treatment to control fungi pathogens. The commercial fungicide 3Tac is developed from T. harzianum to control Botrytis, Fusarium, and Penicillium spp. Studies have shown that T. harzianum induces immunity in S. lycopersicum L (tomato) against RKN, Meloidogyne incognita through increased expression of CAD, PAL, C4H, and CCOMT for lignin, flavonoids, and phenols accumulation against M. incognita [95]. The transformation of another CAD2 gene from Pyrus pyrifolia (pear) into a tomato plant via an Agrobacterium-mediated system defensibly accumulated lignin in leaves, stems, and fruits [96].

2.10. PEROXIDASES and LACCASES (PRX and LACs)

Plant cell wall lignification is catalyzed by class III peroxidase (PRX) and laccase (LACs) enzymes [97,98] for defense modulation and breakdown of hydrogen peroxides in the cytosol and chloroplast [99]. An apoplast CsPRX25 protein in Citrus sinensis induces cell wall lignification to mediate defense against pathogens [100]. Blossom-end rot also induces ROS, H2O2, and lignin accumulation. According to Reitz & Mitcham, enhanced expression of PRXs in blossom-end rot-infected tomatoes participates in defense lignification [101]. In addition, two PRX genes (VlPRX21 and VlPRX35) in the grapevine are involved in trans-resveratrol conversion to δ-vinifera and could be essential genes for δ-viniferin engineering for enhanced fungal defense in plants [102]. Histochemical analysis showed the localization of lignin in the xylem cell wall was linked to DcPRX30, DcPRX32, and DcPRX62 activities in the taproot epidermal zones of carrots, leading defense lignification [103].
A VIGS talac4 mutant in QTL-Fhb1 of wheat NILs increases the plant susceptibility to F. graminearum infection with low lignin elicitation compared with the wild type [104]. In addition to lignin, coniferin, coumarins (isopimpinellin), and 5,6,7-trimethoxycoumarin defensibly accumulated against F. graminearum. Docosanoic acid and 1-O-Vanilloyl-beta-D-glucose also provided complimentary protection against F. graminearum [104]. PRXs also induce defense accumulation of NADPH oxidases and apoplastic ROS. For instance, Arabidopsis PRX33 and PX34 knockdown mutants reduced H2O2 content in response to PAMP treatments and PAMP-induced protein expression [105].

3. Phytoalexins Associated with the Lignin Pathway Enzymes

Apart from lignin being the final product and most crucial metabolite in this pathway, other antifungal defense metabolites accumulate along the same path (Figure 2). Current advances link coumarin accumulation to the catalytic activities leading to p-coumaryl CoA formation. Therefore, PAL, 4CL, and HCT play a role in coumarin biosynthesis. The feruloyl-CoA formation from the p-coumaryl CoA precursor forms the committed step for coumarin accumulation with the involvement of the CCoAOMT enzyme. Moreover, iron-assisted hydroxylation of cinnamate, p-coumarate, caffeate, and ferulate also accumulates simple coumarins. Umbelliferone, esculetin, and scopoletin are simple coumarins whose biosynthesis follows this route [106,107,108]. Coumarins have generally been reported as plant microbiome regulators, principally regulating three crucial activities: nutrient improvement, pathogen inhibition, and abiotic stress tolerance [107,109,110].
Stilbenes are also phenolic phytoalexins whose accumulation is also associated with the lignin pathway regulators. They are unique for their C6-C2-C6 carbon skeleton [111]. PAL, C4H, and 4CL activities in the phenylpropanoid pathway leading to p-coumaroyl-CoA formation, as elaborated in Figure 1 and Figure 2, generate an active intermediate for trans-resveratrol production. Finally, stilbene synthase (STS) catalyzes the conversion of p-coumaryl-CoA to the stilbene skeleton by initially converting p-coumaroyl-CoA and a three-unit malonyl-CoA to trans-resveratrol. STS also converts cinnamoyl-CoA to trans-pinosylvin. Moreover, resveratrol-O-methyl transferase is enhanced by VvMYB14 and VvMYB15 for stilbene production [112,113,114]. The defense involvement of stilbene against fungi and viral diseases are recently reported [115,116,117].
Furthermore, caffeic acid is the precursor to ferulic acid. Both share the same route from the phenylalanine precursor through the 4-hydroxycinnamic acid precursor leading to the formation of caffeic acid. Caffeic acid subsequently becomes the precursor to ferulic acid biosynthesis in plants, regulated by COMT enzymes in the lignin pathway. As well as lignin and lignan biosynthesis intermediates, caffeic, ferulic, and dihydro ferulic acids are lignocellulose compounds. They induce cell wall stiffness by crosslinking with lignin and other polysaccharides [118,119]. PAL, C4H, and 4CL chronologically catalyze the formation of the coumaroyl CoA precursor for downstream biosynthesis of daidzein and genistein through the initial enzymatic activities of chalcone synthase (CHS). Daidzein and genistein accumulation is induced by fungi, bacterial, and viral infections [120,121].
Lignans are vital physiological, developmental, and ecological plant metabolites. They are formed by coupling reactions of monolignols and defend against herbivores and pathogens [122]. Plants’ dirigent protein crucially regulates the initial coupling reactions that form lignans. PINORESINOL-LARICIRESINOL REDUCTASES (PLR) then encode successive reduction reactions to form lariciresinol and secoisolariciresinol from pinoresinol. A soybean dirigent protein (GmDIR22) was identified to regulate coniferyl alcohol coupling into lignan (+)-pinoresinol to restrict P. sojae hyphal growth. An enhanced concentration of yatein was detected in the roots and leaves of mycorrhizal plants in conferring resistance against B. cinerea infections [123]. The chemical structures of lignin pathway-associated phytoalexins shown in Figure 3.

4. Missing Links in the Lignin Research, Prospects, and Conclusions

The lignin pathway is a crucial vehicle for plant information and communication interactions with their environment and a source of bioactive compounds for plant defense. As a result, a thorough understanding of the pathway enzymes and their interactions will contribute significantly to the beneficial exploits of fungi defense tradeoffs. Enormous literature on key genes regulating lignin biosynthesis and their activities abound. This review dissected a plethora of them, including some defense metabolites that accumulate along the lignin pathway. Engineering these candidate genes in food crops could promote disease resistance to enhance crop yield. However, there are several unanswered questions on lignin metabolism that could facilitate its engineering processes. The shikimate pathway involves seven enzymatic steps to form folates and aromatic amino acids in plants, including phenylalanine. This process exclusively occurs in the plastid, and shikimate provides the required substrate for phenylalanine formation. The mechanism involved in shikimate transition into the cytosol for lignin biosynthesis is currently unknown. In addition, CSE directly converts caffeoyl shikimate to caffeic acid, a shorter route to monolignol biosynthesis. It is also unclear if this process renders the HCT role in reverse reaction redundant. Further identifying the most efficient route between the two could enhance lignin genetic manipulations to address pathogen defense. More lignin monomers are identified in some plant species. Intriguingly, current reports only focused on the dimerization and polymerization reactions that form lignan and lignin, respectively, but the key functions of the individual monolignols relative to plant defense are unknown. In a nutshell, addressing these gaps will improve the attempts of lignin pathway engineering to enhance plant defense against fungi.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: H.Z. and V.N. Literature search: V.N., J.Y., Z.F. and T.Y. Figures: V.N. and J.Z. Revision: H.Z., N.K. and M.S.U. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China, grant number: 2017YFD0200900.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

Vincent Ninkuu expresses his appreciation to the China Scholarship Council (China–Africa friendship program) for a full doctoral scholarship award during his study period.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest in the preparation of this manuscript.

References

  1. Citores, L.; Iglesias, R.; Gay, C.; Ferreras, J.M. Antifungal activity of the ribosome-inactivating protein BE27 from sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) against the green mould Penicillium digitatum. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2016, 17, 261–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Landi, N.; Ragucci, S.; Citores, L.; Clemente, A.; Hussain, H.Z.F.; Iglesias, R.; Ferreras, J.M.; Di Maro, A. Isolation, Characterization and Biological Action of Type-1 Ribosome-Inactivating Proteins from Tissues of Salsola soda L. Toxins 2022, 14, 566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Molina, A.; Miedes, E.; Bacete, L.; Rodríguez, T.; Mélida, H.; Denancé, N.; Sánchez-Vallet, A.; Rivière, M.-P.; López, G.; Freydier, A.; et al. Arabidopsis cell wall composition determines disease resistance specificity and fitness. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2021, 118, e2010243118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Silva-Sanzana, C.; Estevez, J.M.; Blanco-Herrera, F. Influence of cell wall polymers and their modifying enzymes during plant–aphid interactions. J. Exp. Bot. 2019, 71, 3854–3864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Vaahtera, L.; Schulz, J.; Hamann, T. Cell wall integrity maintenance during plant development and interaction with the environment. Nat. Plants 2019, 5, 924–932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Wan, J.; He, M.; Hou, Q.; Zou, L.; Yang, Y.; Wei, Y.; Chen, X. Cell wall associated immunity in plants. Stress Biol. 2021, 1, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Pruitt, R.N.; Gust, A.A.; Nürnberger, T. Plant immunity unified. Nat. Plants 2021, 7, 382–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Dong, N.-Q.L.; Lin, H.-X. Contribution of phenylpropanoid metabolism to plant development and plant-environment interactions. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2021, 63, 180–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lavhale, S.G.; Kalunke, R.M.; Giri, A.P. Structural, functional and evolutionary diversity of 4-coumarate-CoA ligase in plants. Planta 2018, 248, 1063–1078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Dos Santos, A.C.; Ximenes, E.; Kim, Y.; Ladisch, M.R. Lignin-Enzyme Interactions in the Hydrolysis of Lignocellulosic Biomass. Trends Biotechnol. 2019, 37, 518–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kiselev, K.V.; Dubrovina, A.S. Overexpression of stilbene synthase genes to modulate the properties of plants and plant cell cultures. Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. 2021, 68, 13–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Wang, J.P.; Matthews, M.L.; Naik, P.P.; Williams, C.M.; Ducoste, J.J.; Sederoff, R.R.; Chiang, V.L. Flux modeling for monolignol biosynthesis. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2019, 56, 187–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Zhao, D.; Luan, Y.; Shi, W.; Zhang, X.; Meng, J.; Tao, J. A Paeonia ostii caffeoyl-CoA O-methyltransferase confers drought stress tolerance by promoting lignin synthesis and ROS scavenging. Plant Sci. 2021, 303, 110765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Lin, S.J.; Yang, Y.Z.; Teng, R.M.; Liu, H.; Li, H.; Zhuang, J. Identification and expression analysis of caffeoyl-coenzyme A O-methyltransferase family genes related to lignin biosynthesis in tea plant (Camellia sinensis). Protoplasma 2021, 258, 115–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Barros, J.; Temple, S.; Dixon, R.A. Development and commercialization of reduced lignin alfalfa. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2019, 56, 48–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Barros, J.; Dixon, R.A. Plant phenylalanine/tyrosine ammonia-lyases. Trends Plant Sci. 2020, 25, 66–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Vanholme, R.; De Meester, B.; Ralph, J.; Boerjan, W. Lignin biosynthesis and its integration into metabolism. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2019, 56, 230–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Quan, M.; Du, Q.; Xiao, L.; Lu, W.; Wang, L.; Xie, J.; Song, Y.; Xu, B.; Zhang, D. Genetic architecture underlying the lignin biosynthesis pathway involves noncoding RNAs and transcription factors for growth and wood properties in Populus. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2019, 17, 302–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Zhong, R.; Cui, D.; Ye, Z.-H. Secondary cell wall biosynthesis. New Phytol. 2019, 221, 1703–1723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Chao, N.; Qi, Q.; Li, S.; Ruan, B.; Jiang, X.; Gai, Y. Characterization and functional analysis of the Hydroxycinnamoyl-CoA: Shikimate hydroxycinnamoyl transferase (HCT) gene family in poplar. PeerJ 2021, 9, e10741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Barros, J.; Escamilla-Trevino, L.; Song, L.; Rao, X.; Serrani-Yarce, J.C.; Palacios, M.D.; Engle, N.; Choudhury, F.K.; Tschaplinski, T.J.; Venables, B.J.; et al. 4-Coumarate 3-hydroxylase in the lignin biosynthesis pathway is a cytosolic ascorbate peroxidase. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 1994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Anderson, E.M.; Stone, M.L.; Katahira, R.; Reed, M.; Muchero, W.; Ramirez, K.J.; Beckham, G.T.; Román-Leshkov, Y. Differences in S/G ratio in natural poplar variants do not predict catalytic depolymerization monomer yields. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 2033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Chen, L.; Wu, F.; Zhang, J. NAC and MYB Families and Lignin Biosynthesis-Related Members Identification and Expression Analysis in Melilotus albus. Plants 2021, 10, 303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Yadav, V.; Wang, Z.; Wei, C.; Amo, A.; Ahmed, B.; Yang, X.; Zhang, X. Phenylpropanoid Pathway Engineering: An Emerging Approach towards Plant Defense. Pathogens 2020, 9, 312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Kim, S.H.; Lam, P.Y.; Lee, M.-H.; Jeon, H.S.; Tobimatsu, Y.; Park, O.K. The Arabidopsis R2R3 MYB Transcription Factor MYB15 Is a Key Regulator of Lignin Biosynthesis in Effector-Triggered Immunity. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 583153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. von Tiedemann, A.; Koopmann, B.; Hoech, K. Lignin composition and timing of cell wall lignification are involved in Brassica napus resistance to Sclerotinia sclerotiorum stem rot. Phytopathology® 2021, 111, 1438–1448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Saur, I.M.L.; Hückelhoven, R. Recognition and defence of plant-infecting fungal pathogens. J. Plant Physiol. 2021, 256, 153324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Heldt, H.-W.P.; Piechulla, B. Chapter 18—Phenylpropanoids Comprise a Multitude of Plant-Specialized Metabolites and Cell Wall Components. In Plant Biochemistry, 5th ed.; Heldt, H.-W., Piechulla, B., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Trivedi, V.D.; Chappell, T.C.; Krishna, N.B.; Anuj, S.; Sigamani, G.G.; Mohan, K.; Ramesh, A.; Pravin, K.R.; Nair, N.U. In-depth sequence-function characterization reveals multiple paths to enhance phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL) activity. ACS Catal. 2022, 12, 2381–2396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhang, C.; Wang, X.; Zhang, F.; Dong, L.; Wu, J.; Cheng, Q.; Qi, D.; Yan, X.; Jiang, L.; Fan, S.; et al. Phenylalanine ammonia-lyase2.1 contributes to the soybean response towards Phytophthora sojae infection. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 7242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wang, R.; Wang, G.-L.; Ning, Y. PALs: Emerging key players in broad-spectrum disease resistance. Trends Plant Sci. 2019, 24, 785–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Pant Shankar, R.; Irigoyen, S.; Liu, J.; Bedre, R.; Christensen Shawn, A.; Schmelz Eric, A.; Sedbrook John, C.; Scholthof Karen-Beth, G.; Mandadi Kranthi, K.; Ausubel Frederick, M. Brachypodium Phenylalanine Ammonia Lyase (PAL) Promotes Antiviral Defenses against Panicum mosaic virus and Its Satellites. mBio 2021, 12, e03518–e03520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Li, Y.; Yu, T.; Wu, T.; Wang, R.; Wang, H.; Du, H.; Xu, X.; Xie, D.; Xu, X. The dynamic transcriptome of pepper (Capsicum annuum) whole roots reveals an important role for the phenylpropanoid biosynthesis pathway in root resistance to Phytophthora capsici. Gene 2020, 728, 144288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Yan, Q.; Si, J.; Cui, X.; Peng, H.; Chen, X.; Xing, H.; Dou, D. The soybean cinnamate 4-hydroxylase gene GmC4H1 contributes positively to plant defense via increasing lignin content. Plant Growth Regul. 2019, 88, 139–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Li, G.; Liu, X.; Zhang, Y.; Muhammad, A.; Han, W.; Li, D.; Cheng, X.; Cai, Y. Cloning and functional characterization of two cinnamate 4-hydroxylase genes from Pyrus bretschneideri. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2020, 156, 135–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Jannoey, P.; Channei, D.; Kotcharerk, J.; Pongprasert, W.; Nomura, M. Expression Analysis of Genes Related to Rice Resistance Against Brown Planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens. Rice Sci. 2017, 24, 163–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wang, R.-S. Perturbation. In Encyclopedia of Systems Biology; Dubitzky, W., Wolkenhauer, O., Cho, K.-H., Yokota, H., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Desmedt, W.; Jonckheere, W.; Nguyen, V.H.; Ameye, M.; De Zutter, N.; De Kock, K.; Debode, J.; Van Leeuwen, T.; Audenaert, K.; Vanholme, B.; et al. The phenylpropanoid pathway inhibitor piperonylic acid induces broad-spectrum pest and disease resistance in plants. Plant Cell Environ. 2021, 44, 3122–3139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Chen, X.; Su, W.; Zhang, H.; Zhan, Y.; Zeng, F. Fraxinus mandshurica 4-coumarate-CoA ligase 2 enhances drought and osmotic stress tolerance of tobacco by increasing coniferyl alcohol content. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2020, 155, 697–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Li, S.-S.; Chang, Y.; Li, B.; Shao, S.-L. Functional analysis of 4-coumarate: CoA ligase from Dryopteris fragrans in transgenic tobacco enhances lignin and flavonoids. Genet. Mol. Biol. 2020, 43, e20180355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Awasthi, P.; Mahajan, V.; Jamwal, V.L.; Chouhan, R.; Kapoor, N.; Bedi, Y.S.; Gandhi, S.G. Characterization of the gene encoding 4-coumarate:CoA ligase in Coleus forskohlii. J. Plant Biochem. Biotechnol. 2019, 28, 203–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ji, N.; Wang, J.; Li, Y.; Li, M.; Jin, P.; Zheng, Y. Involvement of PpWRKY70 in the methyl jasmonate primed disease resistance against Rhizopus stolonifer of peaches via activating phenylpropanoid pathway. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2021, 174, 111466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Hwang, H.-S.; Han, J.Y.; Choi, Y.E. Enhanced accumulation of pinosylvin stilbenes and related gene expression in Pinus strobus after infection of pine wood nematode. Tree Physiol. 2021, 41, 1972–1987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Wang, H.; Kou, X.; Wu, C.; Fan, G.; Li, T. Methyl jasmonate induces the resistance of postharvest blueberry to gray mold caused by Botrytis cinerea. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2020, 100, 4272–4281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Jing, Y.; Zhan, M.; Li, C.; Pei, T.; Wang, Q.; Li, P.; Ma, F.; Liu, C. The apple FERONIA receptor-like kinase MdMRLK2 negatively regulates Valsa canker resistance by suppressing defence responses and hypersensitive reaction. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2022, 23, 1170–1186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Li, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Ren, J.; Jia, F.; Zeng, H.; Li, G.; Yang, X. Ethylene-responsive factor ERF114 mediates fungal pathogen effector PevD1-induced disease resistance in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2022, 23, 819–831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Li, Y.; Ji, N.; Zuo, X.; Hou, Y.; Zhang, J.; Zou, Y.; Jin, P.; Zheng, Y. PpMYB308 is involved in Pichia guilliermondii-induced disease resistance against Rhizopus rot by activating the phenylpropanoid pathway in peach fruit. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2023, 195, 112115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Schauffler, G.P.; dos Anjos Verzutti Fonseca, J.; Di Piero, R.M. Defense mechanisms involved in the resistance of maize cultivars to Bipolaris maydis. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2022, 163, 269–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Suohui, T.; Yanping, C.; Shuhui, Z.; Zhihua, L.; Honggang, J.; Jun, L.; Tao, L. Thiamine induces resistance in tobacco against black shank. Australas. Plant Pathol. 2022, 51, 231–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Joshi, A.; Jeena, G.S.; Shikha; Kumar, R.S.; Pandey, A.; Shukla, R.K. Ocimum sanctum, OscWRKY1, regulates phenylpropanoid pathway genes and promotes resistance to pathogen infection in Arabidopsis. Plant Mol. Biol. 2022, 110, 235–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Bouissil, S.; Guérin, C.; Roche, J.; Dubessay, P.; El Alaoui-Talibi, Z.; Pierre, G.; Michaud, P.; Mouzeyar, S.; Delattre, C.; El Modafar, C. Induction of Defense Gene Expression and the Resistance of Date Palm to Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. Albedinis in Response to Alginate Extracted from Bifurcaria bifurcata. Mar. Drugs 2022, 20, 88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Li, Y.; Ji, N.; Zuo, X.; Zhang, J.; Zou, Y.; Ru, X.; Wang, K.; Jin, P.; Zheng, Y. Involvement of PpMYB306 in Pichia guilliermondii-induced peach fruit resistance against Rhizopus stolonifer. Biol. Control 2023, 177, 105130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Cardoni, M.; Gómez-Lama Cabanás, C.; Valverde-Corredor, A.; Villar, R.; Mercado-Blanco, J. Unveiling Differences in Root Defense Mechanisms Between Tolerant and Susceptible Olive Cultivars to Verticillium dahliae. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 1052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Yadav, V.; Wang, Z.; Guo, Y.; Zhang, X. Comparative transcriptome profiling reveals the role of phytohormones and phenylpropanoid pathway in early-stage resistance against powdery mildew in watermelon (Citrullus lanatus L.). Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 1016822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Li, X.; Yang, R.; Liang, Y.; Gao, B.; Li, S.; Bai, W.; Oliver, M.J.; Zhang, D. The ScAPD1-like gene from the desert moss Syntrichia caninervis enhances resistance to Verticillium dahliae via phenylpropanoid gene regulation. Plant J. 2022, in press. [CrossRef]
  56. Ninkuu, V.; Yan, J.; Zhang, L.; Fu, Z.; Yang, T.; Li, S.; Li, B.; Duan, J.; Ren, J.; Li, G. Hrip1 mediates rice cell wall fortification and phytoalexins elicitation to confer immunity against Magnaporthe oryzae. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 980821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Ke, X.; Wang, J.; Xu, X.; Guo, Y.; Zuo, Y.; Yin, L. Histological and molecular responses of Vigna angularis to Uromyces vignae infection. BMC Plant Biol. 2022, 22, 489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Li, H.; Zhang, S.; Zhao, Y.; Zhao, X.; Xie, W.; Guo, Y.; Wang, Y.; Li, K.; Guo, J.; Zhu, Q.-H. Identification and Characterization of Cinnamyl Alcohol Dehydrogenase Encoding Genes Involved in Lignin Biosynthesis and Resistance to Verticillium dahliae in Upland Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 840397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Yang, Q.; Li, J.; Sun, J.; Cui, X. Comparative transcriptomic and proteomic analyses to determine the lignin synthesis pathway involved in the fungal stress response in Panax notoginseng. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2022, 119, 101814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Hussain, K.; Jaweed, T.H.; Kamble, A.C. Modulation of phenylpropanoid and lignin biosynthetic pathway is crucial for conferring resistance in pigeon pea against Fusarium wilt. Gene 2023, 851, 146994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Duan, Y.; Ma, S.; Chen, X.; Shen, X.; Yin, C.; Mao, Z. Transcriptome changes associated with apple (Malus domestica) root defense response after Fusarium proliferatum f. sp. malus domestica infection. BMC Genom. 2022, 23, 484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Lata, C.; Prasad, P.; Gangwar, O.P.; Adhikari, S.; Thakur, R.K.; Savadi, S.; Kumar, K.; Kumar, S.; Singh, G.P.; Bhardwaj, S.C. Temporal behavior of wheat—Puccinia striiformis interaction prompted defense-responsive genes. J. Plant Interact. 2022, 17, 674–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Zhu, Y.; Hu, X.; Wang, P.; Wang, H.; Ge, X.; Li, F.; Hou, Y. GhODO1, an R2R3-type MYB transcription factor, positively regulates cotton resistance to Verticillium dahliae via the lignin biosynthesis and jasmonic acid signaling pathway. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 201, 580–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Faizah, R.; Putranto, R.A.; Raharti, V.R.; Supena, N.; Sukma, D.; Budiani, A.; Wening, S.; Sudarsono, S. Defense response changes in roots of oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.) seedlings after internal symptoms of Ganoderma boninense Pat. infection. BMC Plant Biol. 2022, 22, 139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Zhang, M.; Zhang, Q.; Cheng, L.; Li, Q.; He, X.; Wang, K.; Liu, J.; Li, F.; Deng, Y. Pepper (Capsicum annuum) xylogen-like arabinogalactan protein (XYLP) 1 and XYLP2 promote synthesis of lignin during stem development to cope with stresses. Veg. Res. 2022, 2, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Barros, J.; Shrestha, H.K.; Serrani-Yarce, J.C.; Engle, N.L.; Abraham, P.E.; Tschaplinski, T.J.; Hettich, R.L.; Dixon, R.A. Proteomic and metabolic disturbances in lignin-modified Brachypodium distachyon. Plant Cell 2022, 34, 3339–3363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Xiong, X.-P.; Sun, S.-C.; Zhu, Q.-H.; Zhang, X.-Y.; Li, Y.-J.; Liu, F.; Xue, F.; Sun, J. The Cotton Lignin Biosynthetic Gene Gh4CL30 Regulates Lignification and Phenolic Content and Contributes to Verticillium Wilt Resistance. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2021, 34, 240–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Serrani-Yarce, J.C.; Escamilla-Trevino, L.; Barros, J.; Gallego-Giraldo, L.; Pu, Y.; Ragauskas, A.; Dixon, R.A. Targeting hydroxycinnamoyl CoA: Shikimate hydroxycinnamoyl transferase for lignin modification in Brachypodium distachyon. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2021, 14, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Kriegshauser, L.; Knosp, S.; Grienenberger, E.; Tatsumi, K.; Gütle, D.D.; Sørensen, I.; Herrgott, L.; Zumsteg, J.; Rose, J.K.C.; Reski, R.; et al. Function of the Hydroxycinnamoyl-Coa:Shikimate Hydroxycinnamoyl Transferase is evolutionarily conserved in embryophytes. Plant Cell 2021, 33, 1472–1491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Fang, H.; Zhang, F.; Zhang, C.; Wang, D.; Shen, S.; He, F.; Tao, H.; Wang, R.; Wang, M.; Wang, D.; et al. Function of hydroxycinnamoyl transferases for the biosynthesis of phenolamides in rice resistance to Magnaporthe oryzae. J. Genet. Genom. 2022, 49, 776–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Zhang, J.; Yang, Y.; Zheng, K.; Xie, M.; Feng, K.; Jawdy, S.S.; Gunter, L.E.; Ranjan, P.; Singan, V.R.; Engle, N.; et al. Genome-wide association studies and expression-based quantitative trait loci analyses reveal roles of HCT2 in caffeoylquinic acid biosynthesis and its regulation by defense-responsive transcription factors in Populus. New Phytol. 2018, 220, 502–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Wang, X.; Chao, N.; Zhang, M.; Jiang, X.; Gai, Y. Functional Characteristics of Caffeoyl Shikimate Esterase in Larix Kaempferi and Monolignol Biosynthesis in Gymnosperms. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 6071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Li, J.; Huang, X.; Huang, H.; Huo, H.; Nguyen, C.D.; Pian, R.; Li, H.; Ouyang, K.; Chen, X. Cloning and characterization of the lignin biosynthesis genes NcCSE and NcHCT from Neolamarckia cadamba. AMB Express 2019, 9, 152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Saleme, M.d.L.S.; Cesarino, I.; Vargas, L.; Kim, H.; Vanholme, R.; Goeminne, G.; Van Acker, R.; Fonseca, F.C.d.A.; Pallidis, A.; Voorend, W.; et al. Silencing CAFFEOYL SHIKIMATE ESTERASE Affects Lignification and Improves Saccharification in Poplar. Plant Physiol. 2017, 175, 1040–1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Xu, J.; Tao, X.; Xie, Z.; Gong, X.; Qi, K.; Zhang, S.; Shiratake, K.; Tao, S. PbCSE1 promotes lignification during stone cell development in pear (Pyrus bretschneideri) fruit. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 9450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. de Vries, S.; Fürst-Jansen, J.M.R.; Irisarri, I.; Dhabalia Ashok, A.; Ischebeck, T.; Feussner, K.; Abreu, I.N.; Petersen, M.; Feussner, I.; de Vries, J. The evolution of the phenylpropanoid pathway entailed pronounced radiations and divergences of enzyme families. Plant J. 2021, 107, 975–1002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Hafeez, A.; Gě, Q.; Zhāng, Q.; Lǐ, J.; Gōng, J.; Liú, R.; Shí, Y.; Shāng, H.; Liú, À.; Iqbal, M.S.; et al. Multi-responses of O-methyltransferase genes to salt stress and fiber development of Gossypium species. BMC Plant Biol. 2021, 21, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Parizotto, A.V.; Ferro, A.P.; Marchiosi, R.; Finger-Teixeira, A.; Bevilaqua, J.M.; dos Santos, W.D.; Seixas, F.A.V.; Ferrarese-Filho, O. Inhibition of Maize Caffeate 3-O-Methyltransferase by Nitecapone as a Possible Approach to Reduce Lignocellulosic Biomass Recalcitrance. Plant Mol. Biol. Report. 2021, 39, 179–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Fu, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Yang, W.; Xu, W.; Li, Q.; Chen, M.; Yang, L. Isolation and functional identification of a Botrytis cinerea-responsive caffeoyl-CoA O-methyltransferase gene from Lilium regale wilson. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2020, 157, 379–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Wang, M.; Zhu, X.; Wang, K.; Lu, C.; Luo, M.; Shan, T.; Zhang, Z. A wheat caffeic acid 3-O-methyltransferase TaCOMT-3D positively contributes to both resistance to sharp eyespot disease and stem mechanical strength. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 6543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Narnoliya, L.K.; Sangwan, N.; Jadaun, J.S.; Bansal, S.; Sangwan, R.S. Defining the role of a caffeic acid 3-O-methyltransferase from Azadirachta indica fruits in the biosynthesis of ferulic acid through heterologous over-expression in Ocimum species and Withania somnifera. Planta 2021, 253, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Figueiredo, R.; Portilla Llerena, J.P.; Kiyota, E.; Ferreira, S.S.; Cardeli, B.R.; de Souza, S.C.R.; Dos Santos Brito, M.; Sodek, L.; Cesarino, I.; Mazzafera, P. The sugarcane ShMYB78 transcription factor activates suberin biosynthesis in Nicotiana benthamiana. Plant Mol. Biol. 2020, 104, 411–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Hegde, N.; Joshi, S.; Soni, N.; Kushalappa, A.C. The caffeoyl-CoA O-methyltransferase gene SNP replacement in Russet Burbank potato variety enhances late blight resistance through cell wall reinforcement. Plant Cell Rep. 2021, 40, 237–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Yang, G.; Pan, W.; Zhang, R.; Pan, Y.; Guo, Q.; Song, W.; Zheng, W.; Nie, X. Genome-wide identification and characterization of caffeoyl-coenzyme A O-methyltransferase genes related to the Fusarium head blight response in wheat. BMC Genom. 2021, 22, 504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Jiang, W.; Zeng, Q.; Jiang, Y.; Gai, Y.; Jiang, X. Molecular and functional characterization of ferulate-5-hydroxylase in Populus tomentosa. J. Plant Biochem. Biotechnol. 2021, 30, 92–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Cao, Y.; Yan, X.; Ran, S.; Ralph, J.; Smith, R.; Chen, X.; Qu, C.; Li, J.; Liu, L. Knockout of the lignin pathway gene BnF5H decreases the S/G lignin composition ratio and improves S. sclerotiorum resistance in B. napus. Plant Cell Environ. 2022, 45, 248–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Jeena, G.S.; Joshi, A.; Shukla, R.K. Bm-miR172c-5p regulates lignin biosynthesis and secondary xylem thickness by altering Ferulate 5 hydroxylase gene in Bacopa monnieri. Plant Cell Physiol. 2021, 62, 894–912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Mutuku, J.M.; Cui, S.; Hori, C.; Takeda, Y.; Tobimatsu, Y.; Nakabayashi, R.; Mori, T.; Saito, K.; Demura, T.; Umezawa, T.; et al. The Structural Integrity of Lignin Is Crucial for Resistance against Striga hermonthica Parasitism in Rice. Plant Physiol. 2019, 179, 1796–1809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Yin, N.; Li, B.; Liu, X.; Liang, Y.; Lian, J.; Xue, Y.; Qu, C.; Lu, K.; Wei, L.; Wang, R.; et al. Cinnamoyl-CoA Reductase 1 (CCR1) and CCR2 Function Divergently in Tissue Lignification, Flux Control and Cross-talk with Glucosinolate Pathway in Brassica napus. bioRxiv 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Sugiyama, R.; Hirai, M.Y. Atypical Myrosinase as a Mediator of Glucosinolate Functions in Plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Ting, H.-M.; Cheah, B.H.; Chen, Y.-C.; Yeh, P.-M.; Cheng, C.-P.; Yeo, F.K.S.; Vie, A.K.; Rohloff, J.; Winge, P.; Bones, A.M.; et al. The Role of a Glucosinolate-Derived Nitrile in Plant Immune Responses. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Madloo, P.; Lema, M.; Francisco, M.; Soengas, P. Role of Major Glucosinolates in the Defense of Kale Against Sclerotinia sclerotiorum and Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris. Phytopathology® 2019, 109, 1246–1256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Park, H.L.; Kim, T.L.; Bhoo, S.H.; Lee, T.H.; Lee, S.W.; Cho, M.H. Biochemical Characterization of the Rice Cinnamyl Alcohol Dehydrogenase Gene Family. Molecules 2018, 23, 2659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  94. Joo, Y.; Kim, H.; Kang, M.; Lee, G.; Choung, S.; Kaur, H.; Oh, S.; Choi, J.W.; Ralph, J.; Baldwin, I.T.; et al. Pith-specific lignification in Nicotiana attenuata as a defense against a stem-boring herbivore. New Phytol. 2021, 232, 332–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Yan, Y.; Mao, Q.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, J.; Fu, Y.; Yang, Z.; Peng, X.; Zhang, M.; Bai, B.; Liu, A.; et al. Trichoderma harzianum induces resistance to root-knot nematodes by increasing secondary metabolite synthesis and defense-related enzyme activity in Solanum lycopersicum L. Biol. Control 2021, 158, 104609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Li, M.; Cheng, C.; Zhang, X.; Zhou, S.; Li, L.; Yang, S. Overexpression of Pear (Pyrus pyrifolia) CAD2 in Tomato Affects Lignin Content. Molecules 2019, 24, 2595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  97. Kashyap, A.; Planas-Marquès, M.; Capellades, M.; Valls, M.; Coll, N.S. Blocking intruders: Inducible physico-chemical barriers against plant vascular wilt pathogens. J. Exp. Bot. 2020, 72, 184–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Xie, T.; Liu, Z.; Wang, G. Structural basis for monolignol oxidation by a maize laccase. Nat. Plants 2020, 6, 231–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Kidwai, M.; Ahmad, I.Z.; Chakrabarty, D. Class III peroxidase: An indispensable enzyme for biotic/abiotic stress tolerance and a potent candidate for crop improvement. Plant Cell Rep. 2020, 39, 1381–1393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Li, Q.; Qin, X.; Qi, J.; Dou, W.; Dunand, C.; Chen, S.; He, Y. CsPrx25, a class III peroxidase in Citrus sinensis, confers resistance to citrus bacterial canker through the maintenance of ROS homeostasis and cell wall lignification. Hortic. Res. 2020, 7, 192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Reitz, N.F.; Mitcham, E.J. Lignification of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) pericarp tissue during blossom-end rot development. Sci. Hortic. 2021, 276, 109759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Park, S.-C.; Pyun, J.W.; Jeong, Y.J.; Park, S.H.; Kim, S.; Kim, Y.-H.; Lee, J.R.; Kim, C.Y.; Jeong, J.C. Overexpression of VlPRX21 and VlPRX35 genes in Arabidopsis plants leads to bioconversion of trans-resveratrol to δ-viniferin. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2021, 162, 556–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Meng, G.; Fan, W.; Rasmussen, S.K. Characterisation of the class III peroxidase gene family in carrot taproots and its role in anthocyanin and lignin accumulation. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2021, 167, 245–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Soni, N.; Hegde, N.; Dhariwal, A.; Kushalappa, A.C. Role of laccase gene in wheat NILs differing at QTL-Fhb1 for resistance against Fusarium head blight. Plant Sci. 2020, 298, 110574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Bleau, J.R.; Spoel, S.H. Selective redox signaling shapes plant-pathogen interactions. Plant Physiol. 2021, 186, 53–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Robe, K.; Izquierdo, E.; Vignols, F.; Rouached, H.; Dubos, C. The Coumarins: Secondary Metabolites Playing a Primary Role in Plant Nutrition and Health. Trends Plant Sci. 2021, 26, 248–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Stassen, M.J.J.; Hsu, S.-H.; Pieterse, C.M.J.; Stringlis, I.A. Coumarin Communication Along the Microbiome–Root–Shoot Axis. Trends Plant Sci. 2021, 26, 169–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Perkowska, I.; Siwinska, J.; Olry, A.; Grosjean, J.; Hehn, A.; Bourgaud, F.; Lojkowska, E.; Ihnatowicz, A. Identification and Quantification of Coumarins by UHPLC-MS in Arabidopsis thaliana Natural Populations. Molecules 2021, 26, 1804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Jacoby, R.P.; Koprivova, A.; Kopriva, S. Pinpointing secondary metabolites that shape the composition and function of the plant microbiome. J. Exp. Bot. 2021, 72, 57–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Suksungworn, R.; Roytrakul, S.; Gomes, N.G.M.; Duangsrisai, S. A shotgun proteomic approach reveals protein expression in morphological changes and programmed cell death in Mimosa pigra seedlings after treatment with coumarins. South Afr. J. Bot. 2021, 142, 370–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Gabaston, J.; Valls Fonayet, J.; Franc, C.; Waffo-Teguo, P.; de Revel, G.; Hilbert, G.; Gomès, E.; Richard, T.; Mérillon, J.-M. Characterization of Stilbene Composition in Grape Berries from Wild Vitis Species in Year-To-Year Harvest. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2020, 68, 13408–13417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Wang, D.; Jiang, C.; Liu, W.; Wang, Y. The WRKY53 transcription factor enhances stilbene synthesis and disease resistance by interacting with MYB14 and MYB15 in Chinese wild grape. J. Exp. Bot. 2020, 71, 3211–3226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Ziegler, T. Identification and Characterization of Genes Involved in Stilbene Biosynthesis and Modification in Vitis Vinifera; 2021. Available online: https://archiv.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/volltextserver/30000/ (accessed on 16 December 2022).
  114. Valletta, A.; Iozia, L.M.; Leonelli, F. Impact of Environmental Factors on Stilbene Biosynthesis. Plants 2021, 10, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. El Khawand, T.; Gabaston, J.; Taillis, D.; Iglesias, M.-L.; Pedrot, É.; Pinto, A.P.; Fonayet, J.V.; Merillon, J.M.; Decendit, A.; Cluzet, S.A. dimeric stilbene extract produced by oxidative coupling of resveratrol active against Plasmopara viticola and Botrytis cinerea for vine treatments. OENO One 2020, 54, 157–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  116. Song, P.; Yu, X.; Yang, W.; Wang, Q. Natural phytoalexin stilbene compound resveratrol and its derivatives as anti-tobacco mosaic virus and anti-phytopathogenic fungus agents. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 16509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Bezhuashvili, M.; Tskhvedadze, L.; Surguladze, M.; Shoshiashvili, G.; Elanidze, L.; Vashakidze, P. Change of phytoalexins-stilbenoids of vine leave Tsitska variety (Vitis vinifera L.) in condition Downy mildew. EurAsian J. BioSci. 2020, 14, 167–171. [Google Scholar]
  118. Marchiosi, R.; dos Santos, W.D.; Constantin, R.P.; de Lima, R.B.; Soares, A.R.; Finger-Teixeira, A.; Mota, T.R.; de Oliveira, D.M.; Foletto-Felipe, M.d.P.; Abrahao, J. Biosynthesis and metabolic actions of simple phenolic acids in plants. Phytochem. Rev. 2020, 19, 865–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Valanciene, E.; Jonuskiene, I.; Syrpas, M.; Augustiniene, E.; Matulis, P.; Simonavicius, A.; Malys, N. Advances and Prospects of Phenolic Acids Production, Biorefinery and Analysis. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Křížová, L.; Dadáková, K.; Kašparovská, J.; Kašparovský, T. Isoflavones. Molecules 2019, 24, 1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  121. Anguraj Vadivel, A.K.; Renaud, J.; Kagale, S.; Dhaubhadel, S. GmMYB176 Regulates Multiple Steps in Isoflavonoid Biosynthesis in Soybean. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  122. Hano, C.F.; Dinkova-Kostova, A.T.; Davin, L.B.; Cort, J.R.; Lewis, N.G. Editorial: Lignans: Insights Into Their Biosynthesis, Metabolic Engineering, Analytical Methods and Health Benefits. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 11, 630327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Markulin, L.; Corbin, C.; Renouard, S.; Drouet, S.; Gutierrez, L.; Mateljak, I.; Auguin, D.; Hano, C.; Fuss, E.; Lainé, E. Pinoresinol–lariciresinol reductases, key to the lignan synthesis in plants. Planta 2019, 249, 1695–1714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Jof 09 00052 g001 550
Figure 1. Monolignols biosynthesis and polymerization. The various enzymes leading to monolignol formation are based on current understanding: traditional monolignols (black) and recently discovered monolignols in some plant species (blue). Stage 1: Phenylalanine escapes from the chorismate pathway in the plastid into the cytosol. Stage 2: Enzymatic activities that occur prior to monolignol formation. Stage 3: Monolignols are transported into the apoplast. Stage 4: PRX/LAC encodes monolignol polymerization into lignin. Lignin fills up intercellular voids to enhance cell wall rigidity. Proposed mechanism of monolignol transport: (a) ABC transporters mediate active trafficking of monolignols. (b) Trans-membrane diffusion of monolignols/channels-facilitated membrane transport. (c) ABC transporters channel monolignol glycoside into vacuoles for release at cell death.
Figure 1. Monolignols biosynthesis and polymerization. The various enzymes leading to monolignol formation are based on current understanding: traditional monolignols (black) and recently discovered monolignols in some plant species (blue). Stage 1: Phenylalanine escapes from the chorismate pathway in the plastid into the cytosol. Stage 2: Enzymatic activities that occur prior to monolignol formation. Stage 3: Monolignols are transported into the apoplast. Stage 4: PRX/LAC encodes monolignol polymerization into lignin. Lignin fills up intercellular voids to enhance cell wall rigidity. Proposed mechanism of monolignol transport: (a) ABC transporters mediate active trafficking of monolignols. (b) Trans-membrane diffusion of monolignols/channels-facilitated membrane transport. (c) ABC transporters channel monolignol glycoside into vacuoles for release at cell death.
Jof 09 00052 g001
Jof 09 00052 g002 550
Figure 2. Defense metabolites associated with the lignin pathway and encoded by the pathway enzymes Defense metabolites are illustrated in orange, highlighting their biosynthesis routes in the pathway. The distribution of the metabolites is based on the current knowledge of their biosynthesis. Steps 1, 2, 3, and 4 are the same as in Figure 1. The proposed monolignol transport mechanisms (a–c) are also the same as in Figure 1.
Figure 2. Defense metabolites associated with the lignin pathway and encoded by the pathway enzymes Defense metabolites are illustrated in orange, highlighting their biosynthesis routes in the pathway. The distribution of the metabolites is based on the current knowledge of their biosynthesis. Steps 1, 2, 3, and 4 are the same as in Figure 1. The proposed monolignol transport mechanisms (a–c) are also the same as in Figure 1.
Jof 09 00052 g002
Jof 09 00052 g003 550
Figure 3. Non-lignin defense metabolites associated with the lignin biosynthetic pathway. This Figure was created using ChemDraw Professional, version 20.0.41, and the structures were analyzed and confirmed using https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ structure inquiry (accessed on 16 December 2022).
Figure 3. Non-lignin defense metabolites associated with the lignin biosynthetic pathway. This Figure was created using ChemDraw Professional, version 20.0.41, and the structures were analyzed and confirmed using https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ structure inquiry (accessed on 16 December 2022).
Jof 09 00052 g003
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ninkuu, V.; Yan, J.; Fu, Z.; Yang, T.; Ziemah, J.; Ullrich, M.S.; Kuhnert, N.; Zeng, H. Lignin and Its Pathway-Associated Phytoalexins Modulate Plant Defense against Fungi. J. Fungi 2023, 9, 52. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9010052

AMA Style

Ninkuu V, Yan J, Fu Z, Yang T, Ziemah J, Ullrich MS, Kuhnert N, Zeng H. Lignin and Its Pathway-Associated Phytoalexins Modulate Plant Defense against Fungi. Journal of Fungi. 2023; 9(1):52. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9010052

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ninkuu, Vincent, Jianpei Yan, Zenchao Fu, Tengfeng Yang, James Ziemah, Matthias S. Ullrich, Nikolai Kuhnert, and Hongmei Zeng. 2023. "Lignin and Its Pathway-Associated Phytoalexins Modulate Plant Defense against Fungi" Journal of Fungi 9, no. 1: 52. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9010052

APA Style

Ninkuu, V., Yan, J., Fu, Z., Yang, T., Ziemah, J., Ullrich, M. S., Kuhnert, N., & Zeng, H. (2023). Lignin and Its Pathway-Associated Phytoalexins Modulate Plant Defense against Fungi. Journal of Fungi, 9(1), 52. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9010052

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop