Next Article in Journal
Analysis of Flow Past a Double-Slanted Ahmed Body
Previous Article in Journal
Flow of Fluids with Pressure-Dependent Viscosity in Between Intersecting Planes
Previous Article in Special Issue
Investigating the Effects of Labeled Data on Parameterized Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Surrogate Modeling: Design Optimization for Drag Reduction over a Forward-Facing Step
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

AI-Driven Optimization of Breakwater Design: Predicting Wave Reflection and Structural Dimensions

by
Mohammed Loukili
1,
Soufiane El Moumni
2 and
Kamila Kotrasova
3,*
1
Institut de Recherche de l’Ecole Navale (EA 3634, IRENav), 29160 Brest, France
2
Digital Engineering for Leading Technology and Automation Laboratory (DELTA Lab), Hassan II University of Casablanca, Casablanca 20670, Morocco
3
Institute of Structural Engineering and Transportation Structures, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Technical University of Kosice, Vysokoskolska 4, 042 00 Kosice, Slovakia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Fluids 2025, 10(2), 34; https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids10020034
Submission received: 10 December 2024 / Revised: 22 January 2025 / Accepted: 27 January 2025 / Published: 30 January 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence in Fluid Mechanics)

Abstract

Coastal defense structures play a crucial role in mitigating wave impacts; yet, existing breakwater designs often face challenges in balancing wave reflection, energy dissipation, and structural stability. This study leverages machine learning (ML) to predict the optimal 2D dimensions of rectangular breakwaters in two configurations: submerged at the bottom of a wave tank and positioned at the free surface. Further, the objective is to achieve controlled wave reflection allowing a specific wave run-up and optimized energy dissipation, while ensuring maritime stability. Thus, we used an analytical equation modeling the reflection coefficient versus relative water depth (KH), for different immersion ratios of obstacle (h/H), and relative length (l/H). Two datasets of 32,000 data points were generated for underwater and free-surface breakwaters, with an additional 10,000 data points for validation, totaling 42,000 data points per case. Five ML algorithms—Random Forest, Support Vector Regression, Artificial Neural Network, Decision Tree, and Gaussian Process—were applied and evaluated. Results demonstrated that Random Forest and Decision Tree balanced accuracy with computational efficiency, while the Gaussian Process closely matched analytical results but demanded higher computational resources. These findings support ML as a powerful tool to optimize breakwater design, complementing traditional methods and contributing to more sustainable and resilient coastal defense systems.
Keywords: machine learning (ML); breakwater design; wave reflection; maritime engineering; coastal defense machine learning (ML); breakwater design; wave reflection; maritime engineering; coastal defense

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Loukili, M.; El Moumni, S.; Kotrasova, K. AI-Driven Optimization of Breakwater Design: Predicting Wave Reflection and Structural Dimensions. Fluids 2025, 10, 34. https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids10020034

AMA Style

Loukili M, El Moumni S, Kotrasova K. AI-Driven Optimization of Breakwater Design: Predicting Wave Reflection and Structural Dimensions. Fluids. 2025; 10(2):34. https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids10020034

Chicago/Turabian Style

Loukili, Mohammed, Soufiane El Moumni, and Kamila Kotrasova. 2025. "AI-Driven Optimization of Breakwater Design: Predicting Wave Reflection and Structural Dimensions" Fluids 10, no. 2: 34. https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids10020034

APA Style

Loukili, M., El Moumni, S., & Kotrasova, K. (2025). AI-Driven Optimization of Breakwater Design: Predicting Wave Reflection and Structural Dimensions. Fluids, 10(2), 34. https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids10020034

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop