Next Article in Journal
Correction: Mu et al. Effect of Inoculation with Lacticaseibacillus casei and Staphylococcus carnosus on the Quality of Squid (Dosidicus gigas) Surimi Sausage. Fermentation 2023, 9, 794
Next Article in Special Issue
Illumina Sequencing and Metabolomic Analysis Explored the Effects of the Mixed Silage of Rice Straw and Chinese Cabbage Waste on Fecal Microorganisms and Metabolites in Hu Sheep
Previous Article in Journal
Transcriptional Analysis of Mixed-Culture Fermentation of Lachancea thermotolerans and Saccharomyces cerevisiae for Natural Fruity Sour Beer
Previous Article in Special Issue
Prokaryote Composition and Structure of Rumen Fluid before and after In Vitro Rumen Fermentation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Biotechnological Processing of Sugarcane Bagasse through Solid-State Fermentation with White Rot Fungi into Nutritionally Rich and Digestible Ruminant Feed

1
Key Laboratory for Agro-Ecological Processes in Subtropical Region, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changsha 410125, China
2
Department of Animal Nutrition, The University of Agriculture, Peshawar 25130, Pakistan
3
Department of Livestock and Poultry Production, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan 60800, Pakistan
4
Inner Mongolia Engineering Research Center of Development and Utilization of Microbial Research in Silage, Inner Mongolia Academy of Agricultural and Animal Husbandry Sciences, Hohhot 010031, China
5
Institute of Ensiling and Processing of Grass, College of Agro-Grassland Science, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
6
College of Advanced Agricultural Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Fermentation 2024, 10(4), 181; https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation10040181
Submission received: 7 February 2024 / Revised: 28 February 2024 / Accepted: 11 March 2024 / Published: 26 March 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Application of Fermentation Technology in Animal Nutrition)

Abstract

:
Sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum) bagasse (SCB) is one of the most widely produced lignocellulosic biomasses and has great potential to be recycled for sustainable food production as ruminant animal feed. However, due to severe lignification, i.e., lignin-(hemi)-cellulose complexes, ruminants can only ferment a minor fraction of the polysaccharides trapped in such recalcitrant lignocellulosic biomasses. This study was therefore designed to systematically evaluate the improvement in nutritional value, the in vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD), and the rate and extent of in vitro total gas (IVGP) and methane (CH4) production during the 72 h in vitro ruminal fermentation of SCB, bioprocessed with Agaricus bisporus, Pleurotus djamor, Calocybe indica and Pleurotus ostreatus under solid-state fermentation (SSF) for 0, 21 and 56 days. The contents of neutral detergent fiber, lignin, hemicellulose and CH4 production (% of IVGP) decreased (p < 0.05), whereas crude protein (CP), IVDMD and total IVGP increased (p < 0.05) after the treatment of SCB for 21 and 56 days with all white-rot fungi (WRF) species. The greatest (p < 0.05) improvement in CP (104.1%), IVDMD (38.8%) and IVGP (49.24%) and the greatest (p < 0.05) reduction in lignin (49.3%) and CH4 (23.2%) fractions in total IVGP were recorded for SCB treated with C. indica for 56 days. Notably, C. indica degraded more than (p < 0.05) lignin and caused greater (p < 0.05) improvement in IVDMD than those recorded for other WRF species after 56 days. The increase in IVGP was strongly associated with lignin degradation (R2 = 0.72) and a decrease in the lignin-to-cellulose ratio (R2 = 0.95) during the bioprocessing of SCB. Our results demonstrated that treatment of SCB with (selective) lignin-degrading WRF can improve the nutritional value and digestibility of SCB, and C. indica presents excellent prospects for the rapid, selective and more extensive degradation of lignin and, as such, for the improvement in nutritional value and digestibility of SCB for ruminant nutrition.

1. Introduction

The efficient utilization of agriculture crop residues and the fiber-rich co-products of agro-based industries as an economical and sustainable feed or biofuel stock has become a major research challenge in recent decades [1,2]. In ruminant nutrition, the optimal utilization of lignocellulosic biomass (LCB) could mitigate the growing food–feed competition, reduce feed costs and ensure the more complete utilization and recycling of nutrients in agriculture production systems [3,4]. Sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum) is among the most widely produced crops with annual productions of 2026 million tons [5], representing 21% of world’s crop production. Likewise, sugarcane bagasse (SCB) is one of the most generated agro-industrial residues with a global production of 700 million tons [6], and has the potential to be recycled for sustainable food production via feeding to ruminant animals [7]. However, the utilization of SCB as ruminant feed is limited due to its low crude protein (CP) content (<3%) and large contents of highly recalcitrant lignin (>10%) and structural polysaccharides (>85%), cellulose and hemicellulose [8,9]. Ruminant animals have the ability to extract energy from cellulose and hemicellulose through symbiosis with rumen microbes. However, the lignin molecule is highly recalcitrant to microbial degradation, particularly in the low-oxygen environment of rumen. Moreover, lignin forms complexes with (hemi)cellulose, which are tightly bound together via direct (covalent) or indirect (ester or ether) linkages [2,10]. These physical and chemical complexes with lignin make the whole structure extremely dense, recalcitrant and mostly inaccessible for microbial degradation in the rumen [2,11]. Therefore, despite a very specialized digestive system, ruminants can ferment only a minor fraction of the polysaccharides embedded in the very dense recalcitrant structures of LCB such as SCB.
In recent decades, several chemical, physical, physicochemical and biotechnological pretreatment methods have been developed to degrade lignin and/or breakdown lignin–polysaccharide complexes to loosen the rigid structures of LCB and increase the accessibility of cellulose and hemicellulose for microbial fermentation in the rumen [12]. The chemical, physical and physicochemical methods are, however, expensive, require high energy input and specialized equipment and are often implicated in terms of safety issues and the production of toxic waste. In recent years, the biotechnological treatment of LCB with a wood-decaying basidiomycete white-rot fungi (WRF) in their natural growing and solid-state fermentation (SSF) conditions has emerged as a preferable treatment method [3,12]. The ecological nature, low energy requirements and greater potential for delignification compared to the other treatment methods are key features of the enormous scope of this biotechnology. This background provides a strong impetus to fully exploit this biotechnology for the optimum utilization of SCB in ruminant nutrition.
The physical structure and chemical composition of the biomass, WRF species and the SSF period are the most important factors influencing the efficiency of fungal treatment [11,13,14]. For instance, Lentinula edodes degraded lignin only by 4.8% in corn stover while the same fungus caused 65.4% and 65.0% delignification in rice straw and oil palm fronds, respectively [15]. This further demonstrates that the WRF species and substate combination is important for improving the nutritional value of the biomass through fungal treatment. During the biotechnological processing of biomass under SSF, the WRF not only degrade lignin but also consume cell wall polysaccharides as an energy source. Fungal species that degrade maximum lignin and minimum cellulose during the mycelial colonization stage result in maximum improvement in the nutritional value of the biomass for ruminant nutrition [16,17,18]. It is also evident from recent studies that the degradation of lignin during fungal treatment is strongly correlated with the rate and extent of the ruminal fermentation of the treated biomass [11,15,19]. Moreover, the extent of lignin degradation and improvement in nutritional value and fermentability of the fungal-treated biomass is positively associated with the lignin content of the untreated biomass [17]. Owing to the high lignin content (>10%) of SCB [8,9,15] compared to the commonly treated LCB, such as wheat straw (6.1–9.1%) [14], corn stover (4.95%) and rice straw (3.93%) [15], it is hypothesized that SCB has greater potential for delignification and improvement in its nutritional worth, if bioprocessed with potential WRF species. Four WRF species, i.e., Agaricus bisporus, Pleurotus djamor, Calocybe indica and Pleurotus ostreatus, were selected for this study. Pleurotus species were selected due to their better colonization and delignification potential [14,20]. C. indica was selected as the fungus requires a low spawning rate [21] and substrate moisture level [22] and was thus expected to have greater rate and extent of substrate colonization and delignification. A. bisporus was selected due to its higher Mn peroxidases production potential [23], which plays a key role in lignin degradation and the early formation of mycelia [24]. Overall, the species selected for this study have been tested for treatment of cereal straws [11,25,26]. However, to our knowledge, the potential of these WRF species and treatment periods for delignification and the improvement in nutritional value and ruminal fermentation of SCB has not been evaluated.
This study was therefore designed to systematically evaluate the nutrient losses and changes in the chemical composition, the in vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD), and the rate and extent of in vitro total gas (IVGP) and CH4 production during the 72 h in vitro ruminal fermentation of SCB, bioprocessed with A. bisporus, P. djamor, C. indica and P. ostreatus under SSF for 0, 21 and 56 days. The overall aim was to identify the most promising WRF species and SSF period in terms of improvement in the availability of nutrients in treated SCB for ruminant nutrition.

2. Materials and Methods

The biotechnological treatment of SCB under SSF with four WRF species was carried out at the University of Agriculture, Peshawar, Pakistan, and chemical analysis and in vitro experiments were carried out at the rumen laboratory, Department of Animal Science, Southern Illinois University, Illinois, USA. The animals used in this study were handled and cared for according to the guidelines of the ethical committee of the Southern Illinois University and the National Research Council. A brief description of the methods is given below.

2.1. White-Rot Fungi Species and Grain Spawn Preparation

The spores of Basidiomycete WRF, A. bisporus, P. djamor, C. indica and P. ostreatus were procured from the Department of Plant Pathology, University of Agriculture, (Peshawar, Pakistan). The spores of each fungal species were aseptically cultured on a pre-sterilized (121 °C for 20 min in autoclave) malt agar extract (pH = 5.6) plate. The agar culture contained 20.0 g/L malt extract, 0.5 g/L KH2PO4, 0.5 g/L MgSO4·7H2O and 0.5 g/L Ca (NO3)2·4H2O. After inoculation, the culture of each fungal species was incubated at 24 °C, until the mycelia had fully colonized the agar plate. The fully mycelial colonized agar plates were preserved in a refrigerator at 4 °C for grain spawn preparation.
For grain spawn production, wheat grains were first rinsed with water and then boiled in water for 20 min. The water was drained using a mesh strainer, and the moist grains were loaded into spawn mycobags (20 (w) × 60 (L) cm) until three-quarters full and subsequently autoclaved (121 °C for 60 min). The sterilized grains in mycobags were allowed to cool to room temperature (24 °C), then aseptically inoculated with 15 pieces of the mycelium-coated agar (1 cm2) and sealed. The grains in mycobags were thoroughly mixed to homogenously distribute mycelium in the grains. For each fungal species, 3 separate spawn bags were prepared. All bags were then kept in an incubator (IMC18, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) at 24 °C until the mycelium completely colonized the grains. The prepared spawns were kept in a refrigerator at 4 °C until used for the inoculation of SCB.

2.2. Substrate Preparation, Pasteurization and Mycobag Processing

Sugarcane bagasse was collected from three consecutive batches (100 kg from each batch) from Khazan Sugar Mill Peshawar (Haryana Payan, Khazana, Pakistan). The bagasse was thoroughly mixed, and 50 kg representative biomass was collected and chopped to 2 cm particle size. The chopped biomass was submerged (using netted bags) in cold water for 24 h, to allow the maximum penetration of water into the biomass. The excess water was drained, and the moist bagasse was pasteurized using steam (90 °C for 2 h). After steaming, the bagasse was taken out and allowed to cool to room temperature and dry out to a moisture content of 75%. The pasteurized bagasse (500 ± 5 g) was aseptically transferred into 64 mycobags (20 (w) × 60 (L) cm), which were further divided into four subgroups, and each subgroup (n = 16 bags per fungal species) was aseptically inoculated with grain spawn (3% on DM basis) of A. bisporus, P. djamor, C. indica or P. ostreatus. Four day-0 (control) bags, inoculated but not incubated, of each fungal species were immediately transferred to the laboratory. Subsequently, samples were collected for the analysis of dry matter (DM) content, and the remaining bagasse of each replicate day-0 bag was air dried in hot air oven at 70 °C to stop the growth of mycelium. The other inoculated bags (n = 8) of each fungal species were incubated for 21 and 56 days under the SSF conditions in a climate-controlled chamber at 24 °C with a relative humidity of 75–85%. Before the placement of the bags, 15 holes (about 0.5 cm diameter) were aseptically made in each bag for aeration and plugged with sterile cotton. At the end of each incubation period, the bags were removed and subsamples were collected for fresh DM content. The remaining bagasse of each replicate bag was air-dried in a hot air oven and processed for chemical analysis and in vitro digestibility studies.

2.3. Chemical Analysis

The DM content of the fresh day-0 and fungal-treated bagasse was determined by oven drying the samples at 70 °C overnight and then at 103 °C until they reached a constant weight (International Organization for Standardization (ISO), method 6496). For chemical analysis and in vitro studies, samples were air dried at 70 °C for 72 h and ground in a Thomas-Wiley Laboratory Mill (Model 4, Thomas Co., Philadelphia, PA, USA) using a 1 mm sieve. The air-dried samples were analyzed for DM content by oven drying at 103 °C until reaching a constant weight (ISO, method 6496). The CP (N × 6.25) content was analyzed with a Kjeltec 2400 autoanalyzer (Foss Analytical A/S, Hillerød, Denmark), using the Kjeldahl method (ISO, method 5983). The content of ash was determined after the complete incineration of samples in a muffle furnace at 550 °C (ISO method 5984). The ANKOM 200 Fiber Analyzer (ANKOM Technology Corps., Macedon, NY, USA) was used to analyze the contents of neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and acid detergent fiber (ADF) according to Van Soest et al. [27] methods. The lignin content was determined by the 3 h extraction of the ADF residues with 72% sulfuric acid. The NDF, ADF and lignin contents were sequentially analyzed on an ash-free basis, and the values of cellulose (ADF-lignin) and hemicellulose (NDF-ADF) were computed. The aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) rapid test kit (RingBio, Beijing, China) was used to screen the bioprocessed bagasse for AFB1 using the method described by Zhang et al. [28] for validation. The limit of detection of the kit was 5 μg/kg. The nutrient loss after 21- and 56-day treatment period with respect to the respective control was computed using the following equation:
N u t r i e n t   l o s s % = 100 ( 100 D M L × P N P ] P N C
where DML is the percent DM loss, PNP is the percentage of nutrient after the treatment period and PNC is the percentage of nutrient in control.

2.4. In Vitro Dry Matter Digestibility

One day prior to the IVDMD trial, a fermentation buffer solution was prepared in demineralized water containing 3.72 g L−1 NaHPO4, 9.82 g L−1 NaHCO3, 0.47 g L−1 NaCl, 0.57 g L−1 KCl, 0.15 g L−1 CH4N2O, 0.12 g L−1 MgSO4·7H2O and 1 mL L−1 CaCl2. The reducing solution was prepared by dissolving 320 mg NaOH and 1200 mg Na2S·9H2O in 200 mL of demineralized water under carbon dioxide (CO2) flux. The fermentation buffer and reducing solutions were stored overnight at room temperature (24 °C) in Woulff bottles. One hour prior to the collection of rumen fluid, the buffer solution was placed in a Daisy jar assembly (SKU: D2) at 39 °C. For each run of in vitro incubation, about 500 mL of rumen fluid was obtained from each rumen-cannulated Holstein heifer (n = 4), before morning feeding in hot (39 °C) thermos bottles, pre-flushed with CO2. A roughage-based total mixed ratio containing 35% SCB, 25% alfalfa hay, 10% wheat straw and 30% concentrate mixture was fed to the animals with overall chemical composition as 7.9% ash, 12.2% CP, 1.25 Mcal/kg metabolizable energy and 52.5% neutral detergent fiber (NDF) on a DM basis. The rumen fluid was transported to the rumen laboratory, composited for four donor heifers, homogenized in a laboratory blender (LB20ES, Shanghai Prime Science Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) for 30 s, filtered through double layers of muslin cloth and mixed (1:2 v/v) with the pre-warmed buffer solution in Daisy jars. The air-dried ground day-0 and pretreated bagasse samples (1 ± 0.03 g) were placed into Dacron bags (5 cm × 10 cm) with an average pore size of 50 μm in prewarmed buffered rumen fluid in Daisy jars. The jars were flushed immediately with CO2 to ensure an anaerobic environment. The reducing agent was added to the buffered rumen fluid to determine the establishment of anerobic conditions. The change in color from blue to pink and finally to almost colorless indicated the absence of oxygen. Bagasse samples from each mycobag were incubated with buffered rumen fluid in duplicate bottles in two replicate runs in the Daisy incubator (Model: D200, ANKOM Technology Corps., Macedon, NY, USA). At the end of incubation period, the Dacron bags were removed from the incubator and rinsed with deionized water until the water was transparent. After washing, all bags were dried (at 65 °C) in oven until they reached a constant weight. The IVDMD was calculated by differences in dry weight of bagasse before and after incubation. The values were corrected for blanks.

2.5. In Vitro Gas Production

A fully automatic wireless system of ANKOM gas production modules (Model: RFS, ANKOM Technology Corps., Macedon, NY, USA) was used to measure IVGP, CH4 and CO2 production, according to the procedure described by Günal et al. [29]. Briefly, samples (ca. 3 g) were weighed and placed in ANKOM bottles (SKU: 7056, 250 mL). Then, 60 mL of fresh rumen fluid and 120 mL of buffer solution (prewarmed at 39 °C) was added to each bottle and subsequently flushed with CO2. Each sample was incubated in duplicate bottles with the buffered rumen fluid in two replicate runs. All bottles, including four blanks containing only rumen fluid and buffer solution, were fitted in the ANKOM modules (SKU: RF1) equipped with a pressure/gas sensor, radio frequency sender and a microchip. The bottles fitted in the modules were incubated at 39 °C in a water bath, and manually shaken for 2 min after every 2 h. The IVGP was automatically recorded by a computer with a radio frequency receiver attached, for up to 72 h of fermentation. For CH4 and CO2 gas production, a small aliquot of gas (10 μL) was sampled from the top of each bottle using a gas-tight syringe (Hamilton 1701 N, point style 5 needles, 51 mm; Hamilton, Bonaduz, Switzerland). The CH4 and CO2 contents in the gas samples were analyzed using Shimadzu GC-2030 gas chromatograph system (Shimadzu Scientific Instruments AOC-20i Plus, Columbia, MD, USA), equipped with a 100 m Rt-2560 column (0.32 mm × 0.20 μm column; Restek, Bellefonte, PA, USA). The results of IVGP were corrected for blanks in which only buffer solution and rumen liquor were incubated without feed samples.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

Data on the effects of fungal species, treatment period and interactions with the changes in chemical composition, DML, nutrient losses, IVDMD, IVGP, CH4, CO2 and AFB1 were analyzed using the PROC MIXED procedure at SAS (SAS Inst., Inc., Cary, NC, USA). The fungal species, treatment period and their interactions were fixed effects, and replications were considered random effects.
Y i j k = μ + F S i + P P j + F S i × P P j + ω i j k
where Yijk is the observation j in treatment i; µ is the overall mean; FSi is the fixed effect of fungal species i (A. bisporus, P. djamor, C. indica and P. ostreatus); PPj is the fixed effect of treatment period j (0, 21 and 56 days); FSi × PPj is the fixed effect of interaction between fungal species i and treatment period j; and ωijk is the random error. For parameters which showed an overall significant effect (p < 0.05), post hoc analyses were carried out on the least squares means adjusted for multiple comparisons using the Tukey–Kramer test to determine significant differences between the means.

3. Results

3.1. Changes in Chemical Composition of Sugarcane Bagasse Bioprocessed with WRF Species for Different Treatment Periods

Table 1 summarizes the data on the effect of WRF species and treatment periods on the changes in the chemical composition of SCB. Except for DM, ADF and cellulose, a significant (p < 0.01) interaction effect of fungal species and treatment period was observed for the contents of all measured chemical components. The contents of ash and CP increased (p < 0.05), while the contents of NDF, lignin and hemicellulose decreased (p < 0.05) with the SCB treatment for 21 and 56 days for all WRF species. The further comparison of the interaction data revealed that the greatest increase (p < 0.05) in CP content and the greatest decrease (p < 0.05) in NDF and lignin contents were observed for the treatment of SCB with C. indica for 56 days. Notably, SCB treated with C. indica for 21 days had lower (p < 0.05) lignin content (8.40%) than the value (9.30%) recorded for A. bisporus after 56 days, whereas the lignin contents SCB treated with P. djamor (8.33%) and P. ostreatus (8.27%) for 56 days were comparable (p > 0.05) to those of C. indica after 21 days. On the other hand, the CP content in SCB after 21 days of treatment with C. indica was comparable (p > 0.05) to the CP content recorded after 56 days of treatment with SCB for A. bisporus, P. djamor and P. ostreatus.
Among the fungal species, on average, the highest (p < 0.05) content of CP and lowest (p < 0.05) contents of NDF and lignin were recorded for C. indica, whereas the lowest (p < 0.05) content of CP and highest (p < 0.05) contents of NDF, ADF, lignin and hemicellulose were recorded for A. bisporus. The mean content of ash and CP consistently increased (p < 0.05) with increases in treatment period (0 to 56 days), whereas the mean contents of NDF, ADF, lignin, cellulose and hemicellulose consistently decreased (p < 0.05) with increases in the treatment period.

3.2. Dry Matter and Nutrient Losses during Bioprocessing of Sugarcane Bagasse with Four WRF Species

Data on DM and nutrient losses after 21 and 56 days of the bioprocessing of SCB under SSF with the four WRF species, in comparison to the respective controls, are summarized in Table 2. Significant (p < 0.01) interaction effects of fungal species and treatment periods were observed for the losses of DM and all measured chemical components. The losses (degradation) of lignin increased (p < 0.05) with increases in treatment period from 21 to 56 days, irrespective of the fungal species, whereas the ash and CP content improved (p < 0.05) with increases in treatment period. The negative values of CP and ash indicated a relative increase in their contents (Table 2). The maximum (p < 0.05) improvement in CP (104.1%) and maximum losses of lignin (49.3%), NDF (33.6%) and cellulose (25.6%) were recorded for SCB treated with C. indica for 56 days. Further comparisons show that C. indica caused more (p < 0.05) losses of lignin (38.2%) during 21 days of treatment than those caused by A. bisporus (28.8%) and P. djamor (34.2%) after 56 days.
The overall mean of fungal species revealed maximum (p < 0.05) improvement in CP content (90.9%) and maximum losses (p < 0.05) of lignin (43.8%), NDF (29.3%) and ADF (26.3%) for C. indica. The overall losses of DM, NDF, ADF, lignin, cellulose and hemicellulose increased (p < 0.05) with the increase in treatment period from 21 to 56 days. In contrast, ash and CP contents improved (p < 0.05) with increases in treatment period.

3.3. Effect of Bioprocessing of Sugarcane Bagasse with Different WRF Species on In Vitro Dry Matter Digestibility, In Vitro Total Gas and CH4 Production

Data on the changes in IVDMD, IVGP and CH4 production of SCB bioprocessed with the four WRF species under SSF for 0, 21 and 56 days are summarized in Table 3. Except for CH4 (mL/g organic matter (OM)), significant (p < 0.05) interaction effects of fungal species and treatment period were observed for all measured in vitro fermentation parameters (Table 3). The IVDMD and total IVGP increased (p < 0.05) with the treatment of SCB for 21 and 56 days with all WRF species.
Whereas CH4 production (% of IVGP) decreased (p < 0.05). Further comparison of the interaction data revealed that the greatest (p < 0.05) increase in IVDMD and IVGP and greatest (p < 0.05) decrease in CH4 (% of IVGP) were achieved through the bioprocessing of SCB for 56 days with C. indica. The lowest increase in IVGP and IVDMD and the lowest decrease in CH4 (% of IVGP) after 21 and 56 days of treatment were observed for A. bisporus. Notably, SCB pretreated with C. indica for 21 days had greater (p < 0.05) IVGP (203.7 vs. 188.3 mL/g OM) and IVDMD (64.6 vs. 59.2%) values than those recorded for A. bisporus after 56 days. On the other hand, the decrease in CH4 (% of IVGP) after 21 days of SCB treatment with C. indica was lower than the value recorded for A. bisporus after 56 days.
The overall mean of fungal species revealed the greatest (p < 0.05) IVDMD (58.3%) and IVGP (200 mL/g OM) and lowest (p < 0.05) CH4 production (12.2% of IVGP) for SCB treated with C. indica. With the increase in treatment period from 0 to 56 days, the mean values of IVDMD (45.0 to 61.0%), IVGP (157.4 to 212.3 mL/g OM) and CH4 production (22.7 to 25.9 mL/g OM) increased, whereas the proportion of CH4 in total IVGP decreased (14.4 to 12.3%; p < 0.05) with the increase in the treatment period from 0 to 56 days (Table 3). The content of AFB1 after 0, 21 and 56 days treated with SCB was less than 5 µg kg−1 for all WRF species (Table 3).
Figure 1 shows the rate and extent of IVGP (mL/g OM) during 72 h of incubation in buffered-rumen fluid of SCB bioprocessed with A. bisporus (Panel A), P. ostreatus (Panel B), C. indica (Panel C) and P. djamor (Panel D) for 0, 21 and 56 days. Irrespective of the fungal species, the rate and extent of IVGP increased with the pre-treatment of SCB for 21 and 56 days.
Figure 2 clearly shows that the degradation of lignin during the bioprocessing of SCB was strongly associated with the increase in IVDMD (R2 = 0.72; Panel A) and IVGP (R2 = 0.93; Panel B). Moreover, the decrease in lignin-to-cellulose ratio (LCR) during the bioprocessing of SCB was strongly associated with the increase in IVDMD (R2 = 0.71; Figure 3A) and IVGP (R2 = 0.95; Figure 3B).

4. Discussion

As in nature, during the mycelial colonization phase, WRF preferentially produces a complex mixture of oxidative ligninolytic enzymes and small radicals [30,31] to degrade lignin and increase the availability of polysaccharides for fruit body production. The fungal treatment is stopped before fruit body production, ideally at the stage when most of the lignin is degraded, and the maximum accessibility of cellulose is achieved for microbial fermentation in the rumen [13,14]. Lignin degradation during fungal treatment is the primary index for the improvement of the ruminal degradability of the recalcitrant structures of LCB. Nevertheless, a variable fraction of hemicellulose and cellulose is also degraded by WRF as an energy and growth substrate for mycelial colonization. Recent research has shown that the efficiency of fungal treatment of LCB not only depends on the delignification and the consequent increase in ruminal degradability but also on the availability of polysaccharides as an energy source for microbial fermentation [11,13,15]. When more polysaccharides are degraded, then the delignification process may not improve the fermentable energy supply for ruminant nutrition [20]. Therefore, the extent of lignin and polysaccharides degradation, as reflected by the changes in LCR, is a major determinant for the availability of fermentable energy and the overall efficiency of the fungal treatment of LCB [11,14].
The losses of structural components during the treatment of SCB for 21 and 56 days in current study could be related to the natural ability of WRF to mineralize fractions of lignin, hemicellulose and cellulose into CO2 and H2O [13,32]. Our results are consistent with the findings of previous studies, which were conducted on the other substrates [11,17,19]. Overall, lignin degradation in the present study ranged from 18.1 to 49.3%, with the greatest value being observed for C. indica after 56 days, followed by P. ostreatus, P. djamor and A. bisporus. On the other hand, cellulose degradation ranged from 10.0 to 25.6%, with the greatest values being observed for C. indica followed by P. ostreatus, A. bisporus and P. djamor (Table 2). Overall, cellulose degradation was lower than the lignin degradation for all WRF species tested in this study. As discussed earlier, the balance of polysaccharides in the treated biomass is very important, and as such, maximum lignin degradation with minimal cellulose degradation in the residual biomass is desirable for ruminant nutrition [11,33]. In the current study, the lowest degradation of cellulose was recorded for P. djamor compared to other WRF species. However, the comparison of the relative degradation of lignin and cellulose as expressed by LCR (calculated from Table 1) revealed that C. indica had lowest LCR (0.18) as compared to other WRF species (LCR ranged from 0.20 to 0.28). Next, in terms of the extent and selectivity for lignin degradation, C. indica also degraded lignin more quickly. In the present study, C. indica degraded more lignin after 21 days than those degraded by other WRF species after 56 days. Speed, selectivity and extensive delignification are the perquisites for fungal treatments of greater efficiency [34,35]. Nayan et al. [25] reported that Ceriporiopsis subvermispora strains degraded lignin more rapidly and selectively during the treatment of wheat straw, resulting in the greater improvement in cellulose availability and IVGP as compared to other fungal species. Datta et al. [36] reported the faster mycelial colonization of C. indica on SCB, as reflected by the earliest formation of pinheads (end of vegetative growth; at day 24), as compared to the other substrates (ranging from day 28 to 40). These findings highlight the potential of C. indica for the greater and more robust synthesis of mycelia when grown on SCB. The rapid colonization of mycelium in the substrate is a prerequisite for an effective fungal treatment. Fungi degrade lignin by releasing extracellular enzymes that have very limited ability to diffuse through the dense lignocellulosic structure. Therefore, the rate and extent of mycelial colonization and the subsequent penetration deep into the cell wall matrix are closely associated with the rate and extent of lignin degradation and the efficiency of the fungal treatment [25,37,38]. Moreover, greater biological efficiency for mushroom production has been reported for C. indica when grown on SCB [36], which indirectly support our findings. The greater extent of lignin degradation and lower LCR demonstrated that C. indica is a new potential candidate for the bioprocessing of SCB.
Notably, all WRF species consistently degraded lignin in SCB during the 56-day treatment period. However, the greater degradation of lignin was recorded during the initial phase (0–21 days) as compared to the later phase (22–56 days). In agreement with our findings, Mao et al. [39] and Van Kuijk et al. [35] reported greater lignin degradation during the initial phase (0–28 days) of the treatment of wheat straw with C. subvermispora as compared to the later phase (28–56 days). The substantially higher losses of hemicellulose were also observed during the initial phase (25.5%) as compared to the final phase (7.4%), which demonstrates that the fungal mycelia consumed the easily fermentable carbohydrates for its initial growth. The initial robust growth of fungal mycelia is a prerequisite to ensure desirable fermentation in the substrate and to inhibit the growth of contamination-causing microbes [39]. Such patterns of hemicellulose consumption by WRF have also been reported in recent studies [11,40].
The marked increase in the CP content was observed after 21 and 56 days of treatment of SCB for all WRF species. During fungal treatment, the CP content of the substrate (indirectly) increases due to the degradation of cell wall components into CO2 and H2O, which causes significant losses of OM, while N remains intact, increasing the concentration of CP in the residual mass. WRF assimilate nitrogenous compounds from the degraded substrate [41], which reduces losses and contributes to the increase in the CP content of the treated substrate. The greater increase in the CP contents of SCB pretreated with C. indica (104.1%) can be related to the greater degradation of lignin and structural polysaccharides by C. indica as compared to the other WRF species. In addition to the indirect proportional increase, higher increases in CP contents by C. indica may also be attributed to the greater mycelial growth and laccase activity of this fungus as compared to other fungal species [42,43], which contributes to a higher CP content in the residual mass of SCB.
In the current study, all tested WRF species exhibited markedly increased IVDMD and IVGP after 21 and 56 days of treatment of SCB under SSF. The increase in IVDMD and IVGP with the fungal treatment could be related to the decrease in lignin and fiber contents and to the faster and more extensive degradation of the treated biomass. During fungal treatment, the soluble, easily degradable, non-fiber carbohydrate fractions increased, whereas the recalcitrant lignin and least degradable fiber fractions decreased, resulting in the greater degradability of treated biomass [3,33]. Moreover, fungal treatment changes the physical structure of the biomass in such a way that it becomes more brittle, causing a more rapid reduction in particle size and ruminal degradability. Finally, the improvement in the CP content of the treated biomass is also expected to increase the IVDMD and IVGP of treated biomass [20]. In agreement with our findings, earlier studies have reported similar increases in IVDMD and IVGP for different LCB after fungal treatment [11,16,35].
Irrespective of WRF species and treatment periods, the increase in IVDMD and IVGP was strongly associated with the degradation of lignin during the fungal treatment of SCB (Figure 2). Notably, the increase in IVGP was strongly related to the decrease in LCR during the treatment of SCB, irrespective of fungal species and treatment periods (Figure 3). It may be noted that IVDMD represents the solubility of SCB, whereas IVGP represents the ruminal fermentation of OM in SCB, which could explain the stronger relationship between LCR and IVGP. It is possible that some of the fungal-degraded products, such as the small monomers of lignin, may not be fermentable in the rumen. Therefore, IVGP truly represents the fermentation of the substrate in the rumen and the supply of fermentable organic matter to ruminant animals [14]. This further demonstrates that in addition to lignin degradation, other factors, such as the availability of cell wall polysaccharides, also contribute to the increase in fermentable OM supply for the animals. LCR and IVGP appear to be the most important indices for the efficiency of fungal treatment.
Of the fungal species, the greatest improvements in IVDMD and IVGP were through C. indica, which may be related to the greatest lignin degradation and the greatest decrease in LCR caused by the same fungus. Such a relationship between ruminal degradation characteristics and lignin contents for WRF-treated wheat straw, rice straw and corncobs has been demonstrated in previous studies [11,33,37]. Moreover, a persistent increase in IVGP from 21 to 56 days of treatment was observed with C. indica as compared to the other fungal species, which may be due to the more selective and persistent lignin degradation by this species, as discussed previously. On the other hand, after 21-day treatment, P. djamor was the most efficient in terms of increase in IVGP per unit of DM loss (for each gram of DM loss, values were 58 mL and 38.9 mL for day 21 and day 56, respectively), as compared to the other fungal species (14.3 to 26.3 mL/g DM loss) (calculated in Table 1 and Table 2). The greater increase in IVGP with smaller losses of lignin after 21-days treatment of SCB with P. djamor is a question for further research. Details on the production of extracellular enzymes and changes in lignin–cellulose complexes and the physical structures of SCB and their influences on rumen microbes and ecosystems could explain the underlying mechanisms involved.
A significant outcome of this study is the decrease in the CH4 fraction of total IVGP after the treatment of SCB by all fungi, and this reduction in CH4 was more pronounced for C. indica. The obvious reason for the reduction in CH4 production was the decrease in cellulose and hemicellulose contents and the greater rate and extent of the ruminal fermentation of the treated SCB in this study. Sun et al. [44], in a comprehensive review, demonstrated that the fermentation capability of methanogenic microbes in the rumen is higher for β-1,4-linked structural polysaccharides when compared to non-structural polysaccharides. In agreement with this study, Huyen et al. [45] also reported a decrease of 11.4% in CH4 production, after 24 h of in vitro incubation, in SCB treated with P. eryngii for 4 weeks.
Sugarcane bagasse naturally contains a very minute amount of AFB1 (1.55 µg kg−1 DM) [45] which was not detected in the screening test in this study. Moreover, some WRF degrades the AFB1 by a range of 40 to 94.7% [46,47]. Therefore, in the present study, WRF were less likely to have detectable levels of AFB1 in treated SCB regardless of the type of fungi, and it is inferred that SCB treated with all fungi used in this study was safe to feed to ruminant animals.
A significant interaction between the WRF species and treatment period for an improvement in the nutritional value and ruminal fermentation characteristics of SCB demonstrates the scope for the optimization of this biotechnology to achieve a more desirable nutritional upgradation in less time. For example, C. indica can be used to fast-track the delignification process during fungal treatment. In the present study, the 21-day treatment with C. indica was more or comparably effective than the 56-day treatment with the other fungal species in terms of the delignification and improvement of the nutritional value and ruminal fermentability of the treated SCB. Further studies are suggested with more treatment periods (like obtaining data on a weekly basis) and involving other factors like increasing the amount of inoculum, optimizing the chop size of the substrate and supplementing essential nutrients for a more precise optimization for the treatment period and the nutritional upgradation of SCB using WRF. The extraction and application of bacterial and fungal ligninolytic enzymes can also be used to improve the degradability of LCB [48,49].
Despite the promising results of fungal treatment on lignin-rich biomass for ruminant feeding at the laboratory level in this and previous studies [11,16,17], there are questions regarding the practical feasibility of this technique at a farm or commercial level. To replicate the technique at a larger scale, it is important to consider certain challenging aspects, which include the large-scale disinfection of the substrate and inoculation process, the shortening of the treatment period and the drying of mass quantities of fungal treated biomass to stop the fermentation process and for storage. In one of our recent studies [3], we addressed the issue of mass-scales and the feasible disinfection of the substrate for fungal treatment. In another study on the feeding of fungal-treated biomass to dairy cows [50], which is in the process of publication, we demonstrated that DM intake and milk production in cows was increased when they were fed WRF-treated biomass.

5. Conclusions

This study revealed that selective lignin-degrading WRF species, namely A. bisporus, P. ostreatus, C. indica and P. djamor, can be used to degrade lignin and improve the nutritional value and digestibility of SCB for ruminants. Of the fungi, C. indica not only caused the highest degradation of lignin but also resulted in the smallest lignin-to-cellulose ratio in the treated SCB—therefore sparing more cellulose for ruminal microbial fermentation, which is evident by the highest in vitro digestibility and gas production of SCB treated with C. indica. Except for A. bisporus, all fungi reduced in vitro CH4 production with the highest reduction caused by C. indica. The increase in gas production was strongly associated with lignin degradation (R2 = 0.72), and the decrease in the lignin-to-cellulose ratio (R2 = 0.95) during the bioprocessing of SCB. C. indica presents great prospects for the rapid, selective and more extensive degradation of lignin and, as such, for the improvement in nutritional value and digestibility of SCB for ruminant nutrition.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, N.A.K., Z.T. and S.T.; methodology, M.K., A.S. (Abubakar Sufyan) and A.S. (Ashmal Saeed); software, N.A.K.; formal analysis, N.A.K., A.S. and M.N.; Investigation, M.K., A.S. (Abubakar Sufyan) and A.S. (Ashmal Saeed); writing—original draft preparation, M.K. and M.N.; writing—review and editing N.A.K., A.S. (Abubakar Sufyan), L.S., S.W. and Y.L.; visualization, Z.T. and S.T.; supervision, N.A.K.; project administration, N.A.K., Z.T. and S.T.; Financial support, Z.T., Y.L. and S.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The experimental trial was financially supported by Chinese Academy of Sciences President’s International Fellowship for Postdoctoral Studies (2021BP0045), the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (grant No. XDA28020400), and the Rural Revitalization Project of Chinese Academy of Sciences (KFJ-XCZX-202303). The financial support from the Higher Education Commission of Pakistan (grant IDs 2AV3-017 and IRSIP-44-Agri-01) to carry out laboratory work at Southern Illinois University (SIU), Carbondale, USA, is highly appreciated.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data available on reasonable demand from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The technical guidance and support from Amer AbuGhazaleh and Mohamed Galal Embaby (PhD scholar) at SIU is acknowledged and greatly appreciated.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Liang, J.; Nabi, M.; Zhang, P.; Zhang, G.; Cai, Y.; Wang, Q.; Zhou, Z.; Ding, Y. Promising biological conversion of lignocellulosic biomass to renewable energy with rumen microorganisms: A comprehensive review. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 2020, 134, 110335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kainthola, J.; Podder, A.; Fechner, M.; Goel, R. An overview of fungal pretreatment processes for anaerobic digestion: Applications, bottlenecks and future needs. Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 321, 124397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Sufyan, A.; Khan, N.A.; AbuGhazaleh, A.; Ahmad, N.; Tang, S.; Tan, Z. Novel techniques for the mass production of nutritionally improved fungus-treated lignocellulosic biomass for ruminant nutrition. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2024, 104, 2215–2224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Van Zanten, H.H.E.; Van Ittersum, M.K.; De Boer, I.J.M. The role of farm animals in a circular food system. Glob. Food Secur. 2019, 21, 18–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. FAOSTAT. Crops and Livestock Products. Food and Agricluture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. Available online: https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL (accessed on 24 February 2024).
  6. Ungureanu, N.; Vladut, V.; Biris, S.S. Sustainable valorization of waste and by-products from sugarcane processing. Sustainability 2022, 14, 11089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Parameswaran, B. Sugarcane bagasse. In Biotechnology for Agro-Industrial Residues Utilisation: Utilisation of Agro-Residues; Nigam, P.S., Pandey, A., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2009; pp. 239–252. [Google Scholar]
  8. da Costa, D.A.; de Souza, C.L.; Saliba, E.; Carneiro, J. By-products of sugar cane industry in ruminant nutrition. Int. J. Adv. Agric. Res. 2015, 3, 1–95. [Google Scholar]
  9. Gunun, N.; Wanapat, M.; Gunun, P.; Cherdthong, A.; Khejornsart, P.; Kang, S. Effect of treating sugarcane bagasse with urea and calcium hydroxide on feed intake, digestibility, and rumen fermentation in beef cattle. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2016, 48, 1123–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ding, G.; Chang, Y.; Zhou, Z.; Ren, L.; Meng, Q. Effect of Saccharomyces cerevisiae on rumen fermentation characteristics, nutrient degradation and cellulase activity of steers fed diets with different concentrate to forage ratios. World J. Agric. Res. 2014, 2, 303–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sufyan, A.; Ahmad, N.; Shahzad, F.; Embaby, M.G.; AbuGhazaleh, A.; Khan, N.A. Improving the nutritional value and digestibility of wheat straw, rice straw and corn cob through solid state fermentation using different Pleurotus species. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2022, 102, 2445–2453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Van Kuijk, S.; Sonnenberg, A.; Baars, J.; Hendriks, W.; Cone, J. Fungal treated lignocellulosic biomass as ruminant feed ingredient: A review. Biotechnol. Adv. 2015, 33, 191–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Van Kuijk, S.J.A.; Sonnenberg, A.S.M.; Baars, J.J.P.; Hendriks, W.H.; Cone, J.W. Fungal treatment of lignocellulosic biomass: Importance of fungal species, colonization and time on chemical composition and in vitro rumen degradability. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2015, 209, 40–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Nayan, N.; Sonnenberg, A.S.; Hendriks, W.H.; Cone, J.W. Prospects and feasibility of fungal pretreatment of agricultural biomass for ruminant feeding. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2020, 268, 114577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Tuyen, D.V.; Phuong, H.N.; Cone, J.W.; Baars, J.J.; Sonnenberg, A.S.; Hendriks, W.H. Effect of fungal treatments of fibrous agricultural by-products on chemical composition and in vitro rumen fermentation and methane production. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 129, 256–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Khan, N.A.; Hussain, S.; Ahmad, N.; Alam, S.; Bezabhi, M.; Hendriks, W.H.; Yu, P.; Cone, J.W. Improving the feeding value of straws with Pleurotus ostreatus. Anim. Prod. Sci. 2015, 55, 241–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Nayan, N.; van Erven, G.; Kabel, M.A.; Sonnenberg, A.S.; Hendriks, W.H.; Cone, J.W. Improving ruminal digestibility of various wheat straw types by white-rot fungi. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2019, 99, 957–965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Niu, D.; Zuo, S.; Ren, J.; Li, C.; Zheng, M.; Jiang, D.; Xu, C. Effect of wheat straw types on biological delignification and in vitro rumen degradability of wheat straws during treatment with Irpex lacteus. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2020, 267, 114558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Datsomor, O.; Yan, Q.; Wang, K.; Mohamed, S.; Opoku-Mensah, L.; Zhao, G.; Miao, L. Effect of ammoniated and/or basidiomycete white-rot fungi treatment on rice straw proximate composition, cell wall component, and in vitro rumen fermentation characteristics. Fermentation 2022, 8, 228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Khan, N.A.; Sufyan, A.; Nazar, M.; Yu, P.; Tang, S.; Liu, Y.; Tan, Z. Promising biological conversion of lignocellulosic biomass to digestible ruminant feed with white rot fungi: A comprehensive review. Biotech. Advan. 2024; in press. [Google Scholar]
  21. Subbiah, K.A.; Balan, V. A comprehensive review of tropical milky white mushroom (Calocybe indica P&C). Mycobiology 2015, 43, 184–194. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  22. Khalkho, S.; Koreti, D.; Kosre, A.; Jadhav, S.; Chandrawanshi, N.K. Review on production technique and nutritional status of Calocybe indica (P&C). NewBioWorld 2021, 3, 184–194. [Google Scholar]
  23. Janusz, G.; Pawlik, A.; Sulej, J.; Świderska-Burek, U.; Jarosz-Wilkołazka, A.; Paszczyński, A. Lignin degradation: Microorganisms, enzymes involved, genomes analysis and evolution. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2017, 41, 941–962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Cohen, R.; Persky, L.; Hadar, Y. Biotechnological applications and potential of wood-degrading mushrooms of the genus Pleurotus. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2002, 58, 582–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Nayan, N.; Sonnenberg, A.S.M.; Hendriks, W.H.; Cone, J.W. Screening of white-rot fungi for bioprocessing of wheat straw into ruminant feed. Appl. Microbiol. 2018, 125, 468–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Khonkhaeng, B.; Cherdthong, A. Improving nutritive value of purple field corn residue and rice straw by culturing with white-rot fungi. J. Fungi 2020, 6, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Van Soest, P.; Robertson, J.; Lewis, B. Symposium: Carbohydrate methodology, metabolism, and nutritional implications in dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 1991, 74, 3583–3597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Zhang, W.; Tang, S.; Jin, Y.; Yang, C.; He, L.; Wang, J.; Chen, Y. Multiplex SERS-based lateral flow immunosensor for the detection of major mycotoxins in maize utilizing dual Raman labels and triple test lines. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 393, 122348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Günal, M.; Pinski, B.; AbuGhazaleh, A.A. Evaluating the effects of essential oils on methane production and fermentation under in vitro conditions. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 2017, 16, 500–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hatakka, A.; Hammel, K.E. Fungal biodegradation of lignocelluloses. In Industrial Applications; Hofrichter, M., Ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2011; pp. 319–340. [Google Scholar]
  31. Pollegioni, L.; Tonin, F.; Rosini, E. Lignin-degrading enzymes. FEBS J. 2015, 282, 1190–1213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Wan, C.; Li, Y. Fungal pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass. Biotechnol. Adv. 2012, 30, 1447–1457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Tuyen, V.D.; Cone, J.W.; Baars, J.J.; Sonnenberg, A.S.; Hendriks, W.H. Fungal strain and incubation period affect chemical composition and nutrient availability of wheat straw for rumen fermentation. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 111, 336–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Van Kuijk, S.J.; Sonnenberg, A.S.; Baars, J.J.; Hendriks, W.H.; Cone, J.W. The effect of particle size and amount of inoculum on fungal treatment of wheat straw and wood chips. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 2016, 7, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Van Kuijk, S.J.A.; José, C.; Rencoret, J.; Gutiérrez, A.; Sonnenberg, A.S.; Baars, J.J.; Hendriks, W.H.; Cone, J.W. Selective ligninolysis of wheat straw and wood chips by the white-rot fungus Lentinula edodes and its influence on in vitro rumen degradability. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 2016, 7, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Datta, S.; Banerjee, G.; Mitra, A.K. Effect of different agricultural waste substrates on the biological efficiency and therapeutic value of Calocybe Indica. Int. J. Pharm. Biol. Sci. 2019, 9, 1157–1168. [Google Scholar]
  37. Nayan, N.; van Erven, G.; Kabel, M.A.; Sonnenberg, A.S.; Hendriks, W.H.; Cone, J.W. Evaluation of fungal degradation of wheat straw cell wall using different analytical methods from ruminant nutrition perspective. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2019, 99, 4054–4062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Van Kuijk, S.J.A.; Sonnenberg, A.S.M.; Baars, J.J.P.; Hendriks, W.H.; del Río, J.C.; Rencoret, J.; Gutiérrez, A.; de Ruijter, N.C.A.; Cone, J.W. Chemical changes and increased degradability of wheat straw and oak wood chips treated with the white rot fungi Ceriporiopsis subvermispora and Lentinula edodes. Biomass Bioenergy 2017, 105, 381–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Mao, L.; van Arkel, J.; Hendriks, W.H.; Cone, J.W.; de Vos, R.C.; Sonnenberg, A.S. Assessing the nutritional quality of fungal treated wheat straw: Compounds formed after treatment with Ceriporiopsis subvermispora and Lentinula edodes. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2021, 276, 114924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Tirado-González, D.N.; Jáuregui-Rincón, J.; Tirado-Estrada, G.G.; Martínez-Hernández, P.A.; Guevara-Lara, F.; Miranda-Romero, L.A. Production of cellulases and xylanases by white-rot fungi cultured in corn stover media for ruminant feed applications. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2016, 221, 147–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Davis, M.A.; Wong, K.H. Nitrogen metabolism in filamentous fungi. In Cellular and Molecular Biology of Filamentous Fungi; Borkovich, K.A., Ebbole, D.J., Eds.; American Society for Microbiology Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2010; pp. 325–338. [Google Scholar]
  42. Periasamy, K.; Natarajan, K. Role of lignocellulosic enzymes during basidiomata production by Pleurotus djamor var. roseus. Indian J. Biotechnol. 2004, 3, 577–583. [Google Scholar]
  43. Kaur, M.; Sharma, S.; Sodhi, H. White rot fungus Calocybe indica: Incredulous factory of lignocellulolytic enzymes and their potential applicability for mushroom cultivation. Acta Aliment. 2022, 51, 424–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Sun, X.; Cheng, L.; Jonker, A.; Munidasa, S.; Pacheco, D. A review: Plant carbohydrate types—The potential impact on ruminant methane emissions. Front. Vet. Sci. 2022, 9, 880115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Huyen, N.T.; Le, N.T.T.; Tuan, B.Q. Fermented sugarcane bagasse with the fungus Pleurotus eryngii reduced in vitro methane production. Livest. Res. Rural Dev. 2021, 33, 156–157. [Google Scholar]
  46. Alberts, J.F.; Gelderblom, W.; Botha, A.; Van Zyl, W. Degradation of aflatoxin B1 by fungal laccase enzymes. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2009, 135, 47–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Wang, L.; Huang, W.; Shen, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Wu, D.; Yin, H.; Yang, S.; Yuan, Q.; Liang, W.; Wang, J. Enhancing the degradation of Aflatoxin B1 by co-cultivation of two fungi strains with the improved production of detoxifying enzymes. Food Chem. 2022, 371, 131092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Nazar, M.; Xu, Q.; Ullah, M.W.; Khan, N.A.; Iqbal, B.; Zhu, D. Integrated laccase delignification with improved lignocellulose recalcitrance for enhancing enzymatic saccharification of ensiled rice straw. Ind. Crops Prod. 2023, 202, 116987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Liu, E.Y.; Wang, S.; Wang, S.; Khan, N.A.; Zhou, X.; Tang, S.; Zhou, C.; Tan, Z.; Liu, Y. Bacterial inoculants and enzymes based silage cocktails boost the ensiling quality of biomasses from reed, corn and rice straw. Chem. Biolog. Technol. Agricult. 2024, 11, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Sufyan, A.; Khan, N.A.; Akbar, A.; Tang, S.; Tan, Z. Scaling-up fungal pretreatment of lignocellulose biomass: Impact on nutritional value, ruminal degradability, methane production, and performance of lactating dairy cows. Livest. Sci. 2024; in press. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. In vitro total gas production (IVGP; mL/g organic matter (OM)) for 72 h of incubation in buffered-rumen fluid of sugarcane bagasse treated with Panel (A) Agaricus bisporus (A. bisporus), Panel (B) Pleurotus ostreatus (P. ostreatus), Panel (C) Calocybe indica (C. indica) and Panel (D) Pleurotus djamor (P. djamor) for 0 (control; T0), 21 (T21) and 56 (T56) days.
Figure 1. In vitro total gas production (IVGP; mL/g organic matter (OM)) for 72 h of incubation in buffered-rumen fluid of sugarcane bagasse treated with Panel (A) Agaricus bisporus (A. bisporus), Panel (B) Pleurotus ostreatus (P. ostreatus), Panel (C) Calocybe indica (C. indica) and Panel (D) Pleurotus djamor (P. djamor) for 0 (control; T0), 21 (T21) and 56 (T56) days.
Fermentation 10 00181 g001
Figure 2. Relationship between lignin content and in vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD; Panel (A)) and in vitro total gas production (IVGP mL/g organic matter (OM); Panel (B)) of sugarcane bagasse pretreated with Agaricus bisporus, Pleurotus ostreatus, Calocybe indica and Pleurotus djamor for 0, 21 and 56 days.
Figure 2. Relationship between lignin content and in vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD; Panel (A)) and in vitro total gas production (IVGP mL/g organic matter (OM); Panel (B)) of sugarcane bagasse pretreated with Agaricus bisporus, Pleurotus ostreatus, Calocybe indica and Pleurotus djamor for 0, 21 and 56 days.
Fermentation 10 00181 g002
Figure 3. Relationship between lignin-to-cellulose ratio and in vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD; Panel (A)) and in vitro total gas production (IVGP; Panel (B)) of sugarcane bagasse pretreated with Agaricus bisporus, Pleurotus ostreatus, Calocybe indica and Pleurotus djamor for 0, 21 and 56 days.
Figure 3. Relationship between lignin-to-cellulose ratio and in vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD; Panel (A)) and in vitro total gas production (IVGP; Panel (B)) of sugarcane bagasse pretreated with Agaricus bisporus, Pleurotus ostreatus, Calocybe indica and Pleurotus djamor for 0, 21 and 56 days.
Fermentation 10 00181 g003
Table 1. Changes in chemical composition of sugarcane bagasse bioprocessed with four white-rot fungi (WRF) species under solid-state fermentation for 0, 21 and 56 days.
Table 1. Changes in chemical composition of sugarcane bagasse bioprocessed with four white-rot fungi (WRF) species under solid-state fermentation for 0, 21 and 56 days.
Treatment
Period (Days)
WRF
Species
DM
(% FM)
Concentration (% DM)
AshCPNDFADFLigninHCCEL
0A. bisporus24.95.09 a1.99 a86.3 g58.512.9 e27.8 c46.5
P. djamor25.45.04 a2.02 a85.1 g57.312.0 e27.8 c45.3
C. indica25.85.08 a2.08 a85.6 g57.812.1 e27.8 c45.8
P. ostreatus25.25.09 a1.98 a86.5 g58.412.0 e28.0 c46.4
21A. bisporus23.26.23 b2.86 b79.4 f53.810.5 d25.6 bc43.3
P. djamor24.66.27 b3.60 c73.7 d52.210.0 cd21.5 a42.2
C. indica22.96.34 b4.17 d72.0 c50.78.40 b21.6 a42.3
P. ostreatus22.96.73 bc3.77 c73.9 d53.010.1 cd20.9 a42.8
56A. bisporus22.87.11 cd3.98 d75.6 e50.79.30 c24.9 b41.4
P. djamor24.17.75 e4.24 d69.1 b49.08.33 b20.1 a40.7
C. indica21.87.45 de5.02 e67.2 a47.57.23 a19.7 a40.3
P. ostreatus21.47.39 de4.30 d69.6 b50.48.27 b19.2 a42.1
SEM0.480.190.0770.850.530.170.510.50
Overall mean fungal species
  A. bisporus23.6 a6.142.94 a80.4 a54.3 c10.6 c26.1 b43.7 b
  P. djamor24.7 b6.353.28 b76.0 c52.8 ab10.1 b23.1 a42.7 a
  C. indica23.5 a6.293.76 c75.1 d52.0 a9.20 a23.0 a42.8 a
  P. ostreatus23.2 a6.403.35 b76.9 b53.9 bc10.1 b22.7 a43.8 b
  SEM 0.380.160.0440.410.310.090.300.29
Overall mean treatment period
  0 days 25.3 c5.07 a2.02 a85.9 c58.0 c12.0 c27.9 c46.0 c
  21 days 23.4 b6.39 b3.60 b74.8 b52.4 b9.77 b22.4 b42.7 b
  56 days 22.5 a7.43 c4.39 c70.4 a49.4 a8.28 a21.0 a41.1 a
  SEM 0.380.0520.0380.130.260.0830.260.25
Significance
  WRF species***NS****************
  Treatment periods***********************
  WRF species × incubation timeNS********NS******NS
Values with different superscripts in columns for treatment periods × fungal species, overall means of fungal species or overall means of treatment periods are significantly (p < 0.05) different. DM, dry matter; FM, fresh matter; CP, crude protein; NDF, neutral detergent fiber; ADF, acid detergent fiber; HC, hemicellulose; CEL, cellulose; A. bisporus, Agaricus bisporus; P. ostreatus, Pleurotus ostreatus; C. indica, Calocybe indica; P. djamor, Pleurotus djamor; SEM, standard error of the mean; NS, non-significant (p > 0.05); *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001.
Table 2. Dry matter (DM) and nutrient losses during bioprocessing of sugarcane bagasse with four white-rot fungi (WRF) species under solid-state fermentation conditions for 21 and 45 days, in comparison to day-0 (inoculated but not incubated) bagasse.
Table 2. Dry matter (DM) and nutrient losses during bioprocessing of sugarcane bagasse with four white-rot fungi (WRF) species under solid-state fermentation conditions for 21 and 45 days, in comparison to day-0 (inoculated but not incubated) bagasse.
Treatment Period (Days)WRF
Species
Percentage Losses of Nutrients in Comparison to Day 0
DMAshCPNDFADFLigninHCCEL
21A. bisporus6.69 abc−14.3 cd−33.0 d14.2 a14.1 ab18.1 a14.2 a13.1 ab
P. djamor3.27 a−20.5 bcd−72.4 c16.2 b11.9 a19.0 a25.0 bc10.0 a
C. indica11.2 d−10.9 d−77.9 bc25.0 e22.2 cd38.2 e30.8 c17.9 bc
P. ostreatus9.11 cd−20.2 bcd−72.9 bc22.3 d17.6 bc22.9 b32.1 cd16.1 ab
56A. bisporus8.4 bcd−27.9 b−83.6 bc19.7 c20.5 c28.8 c18.1 ab18.4 bc
P. djamor5.4 ab−45.7 a−98.9 bc23.2 de19.1 bc34.2 d31.7 cd15.1 ab
C. indica15.5 e−24.0 bc−104.1 a33.6 g30.5 e49.3 f40.0 de25.6 d
P. ostreatus15.1 e−23.3 bcd−84.3 b31.7 f26.5 d41.5 e41.8 e23.0 cd
SEM0.742.582.410.391.060.711.671.03
Overall mean fungal species
  A. bisporus7.56 b−21.1 b−58.2 c17.0 a17.3 a23.5 a16.1 a15.8 a
  P. djamor4.31 a−33.1 a−85.6 a19.8 b15.5 a26.6 b28.3 b12.5 a
  C. indica13.4 c−17.4 c−90.9 a29.3 d26.3 c43.8 d35.4 c21.7 b
  P. ostreatus12.1 c−21.7 b−78.6 b27.0 c22.2 b32.2 c36.9 c19.8 b
  SEM 0.521.831.700.280.780.501.230.89
Overall mean treatment period
  21 days 7.58 a−16.5 b−64.3 b19.4 a16.4 a24.6 a25.5 a21.0 a
  56 days 11.1 b−30.2 a−92.7 a27.1 b24.2 b38.5 b32.9 b49.1 b
  SEM 0.371.291.200.210.750.700.870.63
Significance
  WRF species************************
  Treatment periods************************
  WRF species × treatment period******************
Values with different superscripts in columns for treatment periods × fungal species, overall means of fungal species or overall mean of treatment periods are significantly (p < 0.05) different. DM, dry matter; CP, crude protein; NDF, neutral detergent fiber; ADF, acid detergent fiber; HC, hemicellulose; CEL, cellulose; A. bisporus, Agaricus bisporus; P. ostreatus, Pleurotus ostreatus; C. indica, Calocybe indica; P. djamor, Pleurotus djamor; SEM, standard error of the mean; *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001.
Table 3. Changes in in vitro dry matter degradation (IVDMD), in vitro gas production (IVGP), methane (CH4) emission and aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) content sugarcane bagasse bioprocessed with different WRF species for different treatment periods.
Table 3. Changes in in vitro dry matter degradation (IVDMD), in vitro gas production (IVGP), methane (CH4) emission and aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) content sugarcane bagasse bioprocessed with different WRF species for different treatment periods.
Treatment Period (Days)Fungal
Species
IVDMD
(g/100 g)
IVGP (mL/g OM)CH4
(% IVGP)
AFB1, µg kg−1
TotalCO2CH4
0A. bisporus46.0 a156.3 a130.5 a22.8 ab14.6 ef<5.0
P. djamor46.8 a159.0 a133.7 a22.4 a14.1 ef<5.0
C. indica46.9 a159.0 a132.2 a22.6 a14.2 ef<5.0
P. ostreatus46.1 a155.3 a130.2 a22.9 ab14.7 f<5.0
21A. bisporus53.8 c176.0 e148.2 e24.4 bcdef13.4 bcd<5.0
P. djamor53.4 c190.0 d165.1 d23.8 cdef12.6 de<5.0
C. indica64.6 a203.7 c177.2 c23.7 def11.6 ef<5.0
P. ostreatus55.7 bc193.3 d165.9 d24.6 bcde12.7 cde<5.0
56A. bisporus59.2 c188.3 c160.2 c25.2 cdef13.1 cd<5.0
P. djamor57.9 c208.0 de180.5 e25.7 def12.4 bc<5.0
C. indica65.1 d237.3 f205.9 f25.9 ef10.9 a<5.0
P. ostreatus60.5 c215.7 e185.8 e26.8 f12.4 bc<5.0
SEM1.981.821.900.400.25
Overall mean of WRF species
  A. bisporus53.2 ab173.6 a148.2 a24.1b13.9 c<5.0
  P. djamor51.3 a185.7 b158.3 b24.0b13.0 b<5.0
  C. indica58.3 c200.0 c174.2 d24.0b12.2 a<5.0
  P. ostreatus54.2 ab188.1 b161.1 c24.8a13.2 b<5.0
  SEM 1.050.230.350.140.21
Overall mean treatment period
  0 days 45.0 a157.4 a132.1 a22.7 a14.4 c<5.0
  21 days 56.6 b190.8 b164.3 b24.1 b12.7 b<5.0
  56 days 61.0 c212.3 c186.4 c25.9 c12.3 a<5.0
  SEM 1.290.910.880.200.12
Significance
  WRF species*******NS***
  Treatment period***************
  WRF species × treatment period*****NS*
Values with different superscripts in columns for treatment periods × fungal species, overall means of fungal species or overall mean of treatment periods are significantly (p < 0.05) different. OM, organic matter; CH4, methane; CO2, carbon dioxide; AFB1, aflatoxin B1. NS, non-significant (p > 0.05); *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Khan, N.A.; Khan, M.; Sufyan, A.; Saeed, A.; Sun, L.; Wang, S.; Nazar, M.; Tan, Z.; Liu, Y.; Tang, S. Biotechnological Processing of Sugarcane Bagasse through Solid-State Fermentation with White Rot Fungi into Nutritionally Rich and Digestible Ruminant Feed. Fermentation 2024, 10, 181. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation10040181

AMA Style

Khan NA, Khan M, Sufyan A, Saeed A, Sun L, Wang S, Nazar M, Tan Z, Liu Y, Tang S. Biotechnological Processing of Sugarcane Bagasse through Solid-State Fermentation with White Rot Fungi into Nutritionally Rich and Digestible Ruminant Feed. Fermentation. 2024; 10(4):181. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation10040181

Chicago/Turabian Style

Khan, Nazir Ahmad, Mussayyab Khan, Abubakar Sufyan, Ashmal Saeed, Lin Sun, Siran Wang, Mudasir Nazar, Zhiliang Tan, Yong Liu, and Shaoxun Tang. 2024. "Biotechnological Processing of Sugarcane Bagasse through Solid-State Fermentation with White Rot Fungi into Nutritionally Rich and Digestible Ruminant Feed" Fermentation 10, no. 4: 181. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation10040181

APA Style

Khan, N. A., Khan, M., Sufyan, A., Saeed, A., Sun, L., Wang, S., Nazar, M., Tan, Z., Liu, Y., & Tang, S. (2024). Biotechnological Processing of Sugarcane Bagasse through Solid-State Fermentation with White Rot Fungi into Nutritionally Rich and Digestible Ruminant Feed. Fermentation, 10(4), 181. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation10040181

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop