Next Article in Journal
Exopolysaccharides from Lactiplantibacillus plantarum C7 Exhibited Antibacterial, Antioxidant, Anti-Enzymatic, and Prebiotic Activities
Previous Article in Journal
Pectinase Production from Cocoa Pod Husk in Submerged Fermentation and Its Application in the Clarification of Apple Juice
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effect of Different Salt Additions on the Flavor Profile of Fermented Ciba Pepper
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Biological Activity and Phenolic Content of Kombucha Beverages under the Influence of Different Tea Extract Substrates

by
Raluca A. Mihai
1,*,
Nelson S. Cubi-Insuaste
1 and
Rodica D. Catana
2
1
Army Scientific and Technological Research Center—CICTE, Department of Life Science and Agriculture, Universidad de Las Fuerzas Armadas—ESPE, Av. General Rumiñahui s/n y, Sangolqui 171103, Ecuador
2
Institute of Biology Bucharest of Romanian Academy, 296 Splaiul Independentei, 060031 Bucharest, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Fermentation 2024, 10(7), 338; https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation10070338
Submission received: 12 May 2024 / Revised: 19 June 2024 / Accepted: 19 June 2024 / Published: 28 June 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Flavor and Aroma in the Fermented Food)

Abstract

:
In this study, the influence of different tea extract substrates on the biological activities of kombucha beverages was investigated. The variations in bioactive compounds such as polyphenols and flavonoids and their potential health-promoting properties represented by antioxidant activity were analyzed. Our findings shed light on the diverse effects of tea substrates on the production of bioactive compounds and their subsequent impact on the biological activities of kombucha, providing valuable insights for optimizing kombucha production and its potential health benefits. The new tea substrate for kombucha, called horchata, an Ecuadorian tea, shows a similar trend but with a low content of phenolics (4.511 ± 0.111 mg gallic acid equivalent (GAE)/g dry weight (DW)) and flavonoids (1.902 ± 0.0455 mg quercetin equivalent (QE)/g DW), and antioxidant activity (DPPH—33.569 ± 1.377 µmol TROLOX/g DW, ABTS—20.898 ± 2.709 µmol TROLOX/g DW, FRAP—34.456 ± 2.0618 Fe2+ mM/100 g DW compared to black and green tea as substrates for kombucha. Through HPLC-DAD, several polyphenols were registered, and homovanillic acid showed the highest concentration (74.45 mg/100 g). Horchata kombucha scored the highest in sweetness and smell, reflecting its popularity among the tasters, making it a valuable candidate as a kombucha substrate.

1. Introduction

Functional beverages, a subset of the functional food industry and the most rapidly expanding segment of the functional food market, have gained popularity among health-conscious consumers for their perceived health advantages [1]. Beverages that contain ingredients recognized to provide specific health benefits, beyond basic nutrition, such as improved energy, enhanced hydration, or support for overall well-being, are known as functional beverages. Kombucha is an example of a functional beverage, known for its probiotic, antioxidant, and potential digestive health benefits. Typically, kombucha is made with tea (of various origins), sugar, and a symbiotic culture of acetic acid bacteria and yeast, fermented for 7–21 days [2].
The predominant bacterium in this symbiotic culture is Acetobacter xylinum, while the yeasts belong to the genera Zygo-saccharomyces, Schizosaccharomyces, Saccharomyces, Saccharomycodes, Candida, Pichia, Brettanomyces, and Torulopsis [3]. Under aerobic conditions, Kombucha symbiosis can convert the substrate (sucrose and tea), over 7–10 days, into a slightly carbonated, mildly sour, and refreshing beverage [4].
Due to the presence of bioactive compounds in kombucha beverages, they are recognized as having beneficial functions for humans, such as treatment and prevention of diabetes, lowering of cholesterol and triglyceride levels, and oxidative stress control [5]. The increased popularity of kombucha has recently led to a rise in research on its biological effects. The active compounds found in kombucha can originate from the tea used as substrate in its production, as well as from the metabolic processes of the microorganisms involved in the fermentation process [6]. Traditionally, teas from the Camellia sinensis plant, such as black and green tea, are used as substrates for kombucha [7]. Black tea sweetened with sucrose is considered to be the ideal substrate for kombucha beverage fermentation, and green tea is a popular alternative to black tea [8]. Recently, there has been a shift towards using a variety of raw materials as substrates for kombucha production, including herbs, fruits, and by-products from the food industry. Several studies have explored the use of these alternative ingredients to prepare kombucha, expanding the traditional use of Camellia sinensis teas [9]. The bioactive compounds in kombucha beverages made from non-Camelia sinensis teas could offer significant health benefits due to the high content of secondary metabolites characteristic of the chosen plant species.
Few studies have explored the factors that impact the levels of bioactive compounds in the final product. Therefore, this article focuses on the impact of different substrates that influence the production of these bioactive compounds and the antioxidant activity of kombucha, going beyond the traditional use of green and black teas.
In our study, horchata was used as a non-Camellia sinensis tea substrate. The term ‘horchata’ (a generic Spanish word) is used to describe a variety of sweet drinks that share similar production processes and different ingredients (different combinations of grains, ground nuts, spices, medicinal plants, etc.) depending on the country of origin [10]. In our case, horchata is a traditional beverage originating from Loja City in southern Ecuador. It is well known for having notable therapeutic and nutritional qualities. Historically known as “healing water due to its therapeutic benefits”, Loja’s horchata is crafted from flowers, fruits, and medicinal herbs. Among the plants used in horchata, the following stand out: Aerva sanguinolenta (L.) Blume (escancel), Aloysia triphylla Royle (cedron), Aloysia citrodora Paláu (lemon verbena), Ocimum basilicum L. (basil), Melissa officinalis L. (lemon balm), Mentha × piperita L. (mint), Borago officinalis L. (borage), Malva sylvestris L. (mallow flowers), Matricaria chamomilla (chamomile), plantain, Nasturtium officinale W.T. Aiton (watercress), Equisetum arvense L. (horsetail), Soliva sessilis Ruiz & Pav. (burweed), Sanguisorba minor (burnet), Linum usitatissimum L. (flaxseed), and Amaranthus quitensis Kunth (ataco), among others [10].
The medicinal herbs used in the preparation of horchata are organically grown in the northwestern parishes of the Loja canton, and due to its rich history and therapeutic qualities, this traditional beverage has become an integral part of the region’s cultural and gastronomic heritage.
The study novelty consists of investigating horchata tea as a kombucha substrate, even if horchata properties have been recognized since ancient times. Black tea, oolong tea, and green tea are the main teas used in Kombucha fermentation; bioactive compounds depend on the tea type [6]. Our study is a pilot study conducted to check if the content of bioactive compounds and antioxidant activity follow the same trend as the well-known substrates represented by black and green teas. Studying the bioactive compounds in kombucha based on horchata may be a valuable starting point for understanding their importance in antioxidant activity potentiation. Taking into account that nearly half of Camellia species are at risk of extinction in the wild, while tea (Camellia sinensis) itself is assessed as Data Deficient, due to a lack of available information [11], the use of other sources as a substrate for kombucha preparation can contribute to the sustainable use of plant resources, by reducing the impact on established species.
The current research aims to understand and develop new functional beverages that promote health and wellness. This involves cultivating kombucha on different substrates such as black, green, and horchata teas, and assessing their biological (antioxidant activity) and chemical characteristics. The goal is to evaluate the use of the biological activity and phenolic content of kombucha beverages under the influence of different tea extract substrates, to characterize horchata tea as a new substrate for a nutraceutical beverage like kombucha.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemicals

Ultrapure water was obtained from a Milli-Q water purification system (Millipore Corp., Bedford, MA, USA). ABTS (2,2-azinobis-3-ethyl-benzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid), DPPH (1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl), TPTZ (2,4,6-tris(2-pyridyl)-(S)-triazine), Folin–Ciocalteau’s reagent, and ferrous chloride were also purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA), as well as the Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS) grade solvents (ethanol, formic acid, and acetonitrile). All chemicals were of analytical and High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) grade and reagents were prepared according to standard analytical procedures.

2.2. Plant Material

Three types of tea were used in the kombucha production: two were based on Camellia sinensis (black and green tea), and the third was a non-Camellia sinensis tea substrate based on a mix of flowers, fruits, and medicinal herbs. The teas were obtained using tea bags from a tea shop located in Quito, Ecuador. The flowchart of the kombucha tea research methodology was presented in the Figure 1.

2.3. Kombucha Tea Preparation

Kombucha tea was prepared in a sterile environment, avoiding cross-contamination. Every surface (crystal vases) was sterilized in an autoclave at 121 °C for 15 min prior to working with Symbiotic Culture of Bacteria and Yeast (SCOBY) and tea extracts.
SCOBY film was obtained from store-bought kombucha SCOBY. Previous steps to fermentation were carried out, following the methodology proposed by Sevilla (2023) [12]. SCOBY film was propagated using a standard liquid culture broth that contained 2 L of water, 150 g/L of white cane sugar, and 10 g/L of black tea (from 3 tea bags). Three consecutive fermentations of 7 days each were carried out, producing a total of 6 SCOBY films. The experimental culture broth was then prepared for each batch, following the previous steps, using 10 g/L of black tea, 10 g/L of green tea, and 10 g/L of horchata tea. Crystal vases of 2 L of capacity were used for the experimental batches. Based on the methodology proposed by Greenwalt et al. (2000) [13], a SCOBY stabilization step was carried out to adapt it to the new substrate (based on a mix of escancel, lemon verbena, basil, lemon balm, mint, borage, mallow flowers, chamomile, congona, horsetail, violet, shullo, and ataco [14]) in the horchata infusion.
A test of five replicates was carried out with 100 mL of sugared horchata infusion, 50 mL of starter tea, and a thin biofilm of SCOBY covered with a cotton cloth, at room temperature for 10 days. When a 2 cm thick biofilm was obtained, the fermentation proceeded. The fermentation was carried out following the method described by Buzia et al. (2018) [15] by adding 850 mL of the three tea samples, in infusions, 50 g of sugar, 150 mL of the previously fermented infusion, and the SCOBY previously formed, under similar conditions to those described by González Tellez et al. (2018) [16] for 10 days at room temperature. Controlled sampling was conducted every 48 h, with caution, under strict sterile conditions, and avoiding exposing the vases to direct light. Each time, a sample of 50 mL was tested for pH until the beverages reached a pH of 3.5–4.0. No contamination was visible, and new SCOBY films grew in each batch. Kombucha involves two processes: fermentation, which takes place under anaerobic conditions, a process in which yeasts break down sugars into carbon dioxide and ethanol, and respiration, which takes place under aerobic conditions that convert sugars into carbon dioxide and water [17]; thus, after carbonation, the kombucha produced from the three types of tea was filtered with medium-pore filter paper to eliminate any remains of SCOBY, medicinal plants, or solids in suspension, to produce a translucent drink. SCOBY films were stored in the same broth that was prepared for the previous steps of experimental fermentation.

2.4. Extract Preparation

Dried material from the black, green, and horchata tea bags was macerated with ethanol 99.5% for 24 h at room temperature in triplets and gathered for further analysis.

2.5. Phytochemical Analysis

2.5.1. Quantification of Total Phenolic Content (TPC)

For TPC quantification, the method used was based on the methodology described by Thaweesang (2019) [18] with modifications. The Folin–Ciocalteu colorimetric method was used for the assay, whereby an aliquot of each extract was added to 1 mL of Folin–Ciocalteu reagent for 5 min for a reaction at room temperature, followed by the addition of 2 mL of a 100 g/L solution of Na2CO3 and 1.5 mL of water and kept at dark for 60 min. Absorbance at 765 nm was measured in a spectrophotometer against a blank, while a calibration curve was constructed using standard solutions within the range of 0–500 mg/L using gallic acid, obtaining a correlation coefficient of R2 = 0.9941 (y = 0.0061x + 0.1393, n = 7, p = 9.26504 × 10−7, detection limit (DL) = 7.9118 mg/L, quantitation limit (QL) = 26.3726 mg/L). The results were expressed in mg GAE/g DW.

2.5.2. Quantification of Total Flavonoid Content (TFC)

An aluminum chloride colorimetric method was used as described by Pękal and Pyrzynska (2014) [19] with modifications. A volume of 1 mL of the tea extracts was added to 0.3 mL of 10% (v/v) AlCl3 solution, 0.2 mL of 1 M sodium acetate, and 5.6 mL of distilled water for 40 min. The assay was carried out in triplets for each sample at room temperature (25 °C). A calibration curve was obtained using quercetin (QE) standard solutions at a range of 1–100 mg/L, with a coefficient of R2 = 0.9915 (y = 0.0149x + 0.0983, n = 8, p = 1.9012 × 10−7, DL = 0.3519 mg/L, QL = 1.1732 mg/L). The spectrophotometric measure was carried out at an absorbance of 435 nm. The TFC results were expressed as mg QE/g DW.

2.6. Antioxidant Analysis

2.6.1. Ferric Ion Reducing Antioxidant Power (FRAP) Assay

For the ferric ion reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) assay, the method used was described by Rajurkar and Hande (2012) [20]. The FRAP reagent was obtained by mixing acetate buffer (300 mM, pH 3.6), a solution of 10 mM of TPTZ in 40 mM of HCl, and 20 mM of FeCl3 at 10:1:1 (v/v/v). An aliquot of 1 mL of each extract was added to 3 mL of the FRAP reagent and left in the dark for 5 min at room temperature. Absorbance was measured at 593 nm. Ferric sulfate (Fe2SO3) standard solutions in the range of 0.10–1.00 mmol/L were used for the calibration curve (y = 0.5981x − 0.0082, n = 7, R2 = 0.9989, p = 1.3166 × 10−8, DL = 0.01546 mg/L, QL = 0.05153 mg/L).

2.6.2. Determination of ABTS Free Radical Scavenging Activity

For the determination of ABTS free radical scavenging activity, the method described by Kuskoski et al. (2005) [21] was used. The working solution was obtained by mixing ABTS (2 mM) and potassium persulfate (70 mM) and calibrated to an absorbance of 0.700 ± 0.005 at 734 nm by diluting the solution with 99.5% absolute ethanol. The assay was carried out in triplets by adding 100 μL of each tea sample to 2 mL of ABTS solution. TROLOX standard solutions within the range of 10.0–150.0 mM was used for the calibration curve, obtaining an R2 value of 0.9622 (y = 0.5981x − 0.0082, n = 7, p = 6.01 × 10−5, DL = 0.001681 mM, QL = 0.005604 mM). The absorbance was measured at 734 nm.

2.6.3. Determination of the 2,2-Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) Radical Scavenging Activity

To determine the 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging activity, the method described by Guo et al. (2008) [22] with modifications. An aliquot of 50 µL of each extract was added to 2 mL of fresh 0.15 mM DPPH solution diluted in ethanol for 30 min at dark at room temperature. The scavenging activity was calculated with the formula (A control − A sample/A control) × 100. For the calibration curve, TROLOX standard solutions within the range of 0–2.5 mM were used to obtain the regression equation y = 18.073x + 1.2252 with a correlation coefficient of R2 = 0.9788 (n = 7, p = 1.4045 × 10−5, DL = 0.004831 mM, QL = 0.01610 mM).

2.7. High-Performance Liquid Chromatography with Diode-Array Detection (HPLC-DAD)

High-performance liquid chromatography with diode-array detection (Agilent Technologies 1260, Santa Clara, CA, USA) accompanied by a C18 (150 × 4.6 mm, particle size of 5 μm) column was used for polyphenol detection in the horchata samples. The samples were frozen at −80 °C and lyophilized for 1 week. The samples and methanolic extract were made with methanol 80:20 with 1 g of sample. It was filtered and centrifuged to be able to be analyzed by HPLC. The mobile phase used for chromatographic analysis [23], consisted of a two-solvent system, used in gradient elution, using a linear gradient elution program for separation with trifluoroacetic acid (0.1% TCA, solvent A) and 5–100% acetonitrile (solvent B) for 40 min. The gradient elution schedule consisted of 5% B at the start of the process, followed by 15% B at 16.5 min, 33% B at 22.5 min, 100% B at 30.5 min, and 5% B every 35 to 40 min. The elution flow was set at 1 mL/min, the column temperature at 5 °C, and the injection volume at 30 μL. The diode array detection was set to collect data in the 200 ÷ 400 nm range. Calibration curves of the HPLC-DAD method were obtained by plotting the peak area (counts) against the concentration of standards 10, 50, 100, 200, and 400 μg/mL−1. The reference standards used (100 μg mL−1), were chosen based on their widespread representation in the plant world and strong antioxidant capacity. They were prepared from stock solutions by dissolving in a 30% ethanol–water solution, filtered through a 0.45 μm syringe filter, and stored at −18 °C in 2 mL vials. Identification and quantification were achieved by comparison with standard spectra at each retention time.

2.8. Sensory Evaluation

Three varieties of kombucha were evaluated: horchata, green tea, and black tea prepared with standardized procedures to ensure consistency in fermentation and flavor profile. A panel of 15 trained tasters rated the samples on five organoleptic attributes: appearance, color, odor, acidity, and sweetness, using a scale of 0 to 5. The scores were averaged and statistically analyzed using ANOVA to identify significant differences between samples, followed by Tukey’s test for multiple comparisons. The results are presented in a table for a clear comparison of the organoleptic profiles of the kombuchas (Table 1).

2.9. Statistical Analysis

Three replications were used; the results are expressed as means ± standard deviation (SD). Pearson’s correlations were used to determine the relationship between secondary metabolite content and antioxidant capacities. A nested ANOVA test was applied to determine the differences. The statistical analysis was performed with RStudio [24].

3. Results

3.1. Quantification of Total Phenolic (TPC) and Flavonoid Content (TFC) in Kombuchas with Different Tea Substrates

A similar trend was found for both assays, resulting in a higher value for green tea (TPC: 13.029 ± 0.627 mg GAE/g DW, 5.444 ± 0.257 mg QE/g DW), followed closely by black tea and horchata tea. The nested ANOVA showed significant differences (F5,12 = 214.6, p < 0.0001) in the content of total phenolic content as well as total flavonoid content (Figure 2).

3.2. Antioxidant Analysis

Antioxidant properties highlighted by ferric ion reducing antioxidant power (FRAP), ABTS free radical scavenging activity (ABTS), and DPPH• radical scavenging activity (DPPH) assays were evaluated in triplets. For the ABTS assay, green tea and black tea samples showed similar values, with green tea having the highest antioxidant activity, while horchata showed a lower value compared to the other samples. Regarding the DPPH, similar activities were found between green tea and horchata, while black tea showed the highest value. In the case of FRAP, similar trends were found to those described for the total phenolic content, with green tea having the highest score, followed by black tea and horchata with the lowest values. Regarding the kombucha tea sample analysis, the three beverages showed a similar antioxidant capacity in the DPPH scavenging assay, while for ABTS scavenging assay, a similar trend as for the tea samples was found. In the FRAP assay, the green tea kombucha showed a higher value than the other two kombucha types (Figure 3). The nested ANOVA test showed significant differences (p < 0.0001) between the three sample types.
Pearson coefficient correlation was carried out for the secondary metabolites and antioxidant capacity data. For total phenolic content (TPC), a high positive correlation was found for ABTS (r = 0.872) and FRAP (r = 0.903) for the general data, and for total flavonoid content (TFC), similar coefficient values were generated in ABTS (r = 0.880) and FRAP (r = 0.825) assays. The DPPH scavenging assay showed an opposite low negative correlation for both tested metabolites (Figure 4).

3.3. HPLC—DAD Analysis of Horchata Tea

Several polyphenols were registered in the horchata sample. Homovanillic acid showed the highest concentration (74.45 mg/100 g), followed by gallic acid (1.89 mg/100 g), 3,4 dimethoxyphenyl acetic acid (1.78 mg/100 g), vanillic acid (1.02 mg/100 g), trans-cinnamic acid (0.98 mg/100 g), and 2,5 dihydroxyphenyl acetic acid (0.92 mg/100 g), while the lowest (<0.78 mg/100 g) was for p-cumaric acid (Figure 5).

3.4. Sensory Evaluation

The sensory evaluation of the different varieties of kombucha revealed distinctive characteristics in terms of appearance, color, smell, acidity, and sweetness. Using a panel of tasters in a laboratory, it was determined that horchata kombucha was the most generally accepted due to its flavor, smell, and color, followed by green tea kombucha, and finally, black tea kombucha. To visualize these differences, the results of the comparative analysis are summarized in Table 1.
The results showed that horchata kombucha scored the highest in sweetness and smell, reflecting its popularity among the tasters. Green tea kombucha attracted attention in appearance and color, while black tea kombucha, although less preferred in flavor and smell, exhibited a balanced profile in acidity and sweetness.
In detail, the horchata kombucha presented a high sweetness with a score of 3.9 and a smell of 3.7, making it particularly attractive to the tasters. Green tea kombucha, on the other hand, received notable scores in appearance (4.0) and color (4.2), indicating its visual appeal. Black tea kombucha, although with lower scores in sweetness and smell (3.9 and 3.8 respectively), showed a moderate acidity profile (2.8), suggesting a more robust and distinctive flavor.

4. Discussion

This study discusses the biological activity and phenolic content of kombucha beverages under the influence of different tea extract substrates, represented by horchata and black and green teas. Kombucha is a fermented beverage that contains polyphenols and other compounds with antioxidant power and relevant biological activities that would help in chronic disease treatment caused by oxidative stress [25], and it has anti-microbial, anti-carcinogenic, and anti-diabetic properties [26]. Due to its scientifically proven properties, the interest in kombucha is growing in the world market. While numerous varieties of kombucha are produced using different types of tea, primarily derived from Camellia sinensis, particularly black tea, there is a growing availability of other kombucha varieties made from diverse tea types such as green, white, and red tea in the market [27]. Despite extensive research on the microbiological content and antibacterial properties of kombucha, there remains a scarcity of studies focusing on the distinct health benefits associated with various types of tea. Even though the chemical composition of the tea leaves was thoroughly studied, in the case of kombucha these data are few [2].
The high antioxidant activity of horchata was underlined previously [28,29,30]. The chemical composition of kombucha is influenced by various factors, with the type of tea used being a significant determinant [31]. The abundance of compounds in the tea substrate directly impacts the antioxidant activity of kombucha tea [32]. Our study highlights the potential of horchata as a unique tea substrate for kombucha, showcasing distinct phenolic and flavonoid profiles compared to traditional black and green teas. The lower phenolic and flavonoid content in horchata may impact the antioxidant activity of the resulting kombucha, as evidenced by reduced DPPH, ABTS, and FRAP values. These differences in bioactive compounds could contribute to variations in the health-promoting properties of the kombucha beverages produced from different tea substrates. Our findings align with those of Jakubczyk et al. (2020) [27], highlighting the high antioxidant capacity of green tea, which is associated with elevated levels of phenolic and flavonoid content. Specifically, our study revealed a higher reductive potential measured by the FRAP assay compared to other antioxidant capacity tests, indicating the presence of antioxidants in the sample. The FRAP assay is recognized as a suitable method for assessing total antioxidants in plants consumed by humans [33].
Kombucha fermentation can vary between 7 and 60 days, although experts recommend an optimal time of 15 days, as explained by Benítez & Pavone (2023) [34]. Increasing the fermentation time will result in the production of more antioxidants, but it can also increase the toxic level due to organic acids, with an unpleasant taste similar to vinegar; therefore, an optimal time of 10 days was established in our study to terminate the fermentation process in the three tea substrates and carry out antioxidant assays.
Likewise, a more acidic pH between 3 and 4 was taken into consideration to standardize the fermentation time, which is achieved thanks to the production of acids such as acetic acid, gluconic acid, and glucuronic acid [35]. Vildozo (2022) [36] indicates that in this acidic environment, a favorable condition is established for the growth of the organisms that make up the SCOBY (acid-tolerant yeasts such as Dekkera and Brettanomyces and acetic acid bacteria such as Komagataeibacter sp.), which contribute to the selection of microorganisms, preventing contamination of the beverage, as was achieved in the present study.
Fermentation substrates influence the variation in the production of bioactive components and the chemical composition of kombucha [37]. In recent years, new analogous fermentation substrates (fruits, vegetables, herbal infusions, etc.) have been studied. These substrates may require additional or specific steps in fermentation, which may achieve/potentiate additional health properties. In the case of herbal infusions (used for many years as health-promoting beverages), the chemical composition and bioactive properties promote various physiological effects and can be improved after the SCOBY fermentation process [38].
In Ecuador, the demand for tea consumption is low, although it has shown a slight growth due to greater recognition of its nutraceutical properties, which is why the market for products based on aromatic and medicinal herbs has grown in the country. Black tea and green tea in Ecuador can be obtained at a price that can reach 4.00 USD per 100 g, increasing the production cost of the drinks that are prepared from the infusions of these substrates [39,40]. Meanwhile, horchata in Ecuador is a traditional drink based on medicinal herbs, widely consumed in the Ecuadorian Highlands. Horchata can even replace the consumption of coffee and sugary drinks, with a cost that can reach a maximum of 2.00 USD [41], which has contributed to reducing the production costs of kombucha produced with horchata compared to those produced with black and green tea, despite sugar and water use being the same.
In our case, there is a lack of correlation between the TPC, TFC, and DPPH radical scavenging activities, which can be explained by the fact that the main phenolic acids show a weak anti-radical effect in experiments with the DPPH radical [42] or by the limitations of the Folin–Ciocalteu method caused by other reducing agents (carotenoids, chlorophyll, L-ascorbic acid, and sulfur dioxide) that are abundant in cells and can react with the Folin–Ciocalteu agent [43].
The current study utilized the HPLC-DAD method to identify important phenolic compounds and secondary metabolites. In Ecuador, “horchata” tea, characterized by a reddish color, is an infusion of several aromatic plants such as escancel, lemon verbena, mint, borage, mallow flowers, lemon balm, and chamomile, among others. This tea is known for its medicinal properties, including aiding digestion, and is considered energizing, diuretic, and hydrating [15]. Of all secondary metabolites identified in kombucha based on horchata tea, only gallic acid was found by others in horchata based on black and green teas [44]. Homovanillic acid has a good antioxidant and antiradical capacity [45], showing promising therapeutic potential for depression in combination with a mixed probiotic cocktail [46] and for autism spectrum disorders [47]. Gallic acid, one of the most abundant phenolic acids, used as a flavoring agent and food preservative, has numerous biological and pharmacological activities (antioxidant, antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, anticancer, cardioprotective, neuroprotective, and gastroprotective effects) [48]. Vanillic acid, also used as a flavoring agent, is characterized by anticancer, antidiabetic, anti-obesity, antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, and antioxidant effects [49]. Interestingly, horchata has been used as a medicinal tea and has a similar composition to green or black tea in terms of secondary metabolites. This suggests a potential overlap in their health-promoting properties and chemical constituents.

5. Conclusions

The chemical composition and biological activity of kombucha vary significantly depending on the type of tea used and its specific chemical composition. We found that the substrates used for kombucha, including horchata, black, and green tea, exhibited similar phenolic and flavonoid content and antioxidant activity, likely due to their comparable profiles of phenolic compounds. Furthermore, our analysis showed that the kombucha beverages obtained using these substrates maintained this trend, with even higher levels of total phenolics, flavonoids, and antioxidant capacity compared to the teas themselves. This suggests that complex phenolic compounds may undergo degradation to smaller molecules during fermentation. Our results support the potential use of horchata tea as a substrate for obtaining kombucha nutraceutical beverages to sustain the use of plant resources. Further studies are needed to discern possible synergistic or antagonistic interactions between the species used in horchata production.
Our HPLC-DAD analysis revealed a notable presence of polyphenols in kombucha prepared with horchata, with homovanillic acid emerging as a significant compound with a high concentration. This finding suggests that horchata-based kombucha may offer specific health benefits associated with homovanillic acid, known for its antioxidant and potential therapeutic properties in conditions like depression and autism spectrum disorders.
In addition, the cost-effectiveness of producing kombucha with horchata compared to black and green teas in Ecuador provides insights into the economic feasibility and accessibility of utilizing alternative tea substrates. The affordability and availability of horchata as a traditional medicinal tea could potentially influence the market competitiveness and consumer appeal of horchata-based kombucha products.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.A.M.; methodology, N.S.C.-I.; formal analysis, N.S.C.-I.; investigation, R.A.M.; writing—original draft preparation, R.A.M. and R.D.C.; writing—review and editing, R.D.C.; project administration, R.A.M.; funding acquisition, R.A.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Universidad de las Fuerzas Armadas—ESPE, grant number CV-GNP-0066-2020, and the Institute of Biology Bucharest, Romanian Academy, grant number RO1567-IBB08/2024. The APC was funded by Universidad de las Fuerzas Armadas-ESPE.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author due to privacy restrictions.

Acknowledgments

The authors express their gratitude to CICTE for the infrastructure support and to Universidad de las Fuerzas Armadas—ESPE for the financial backing.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Jahidul, I.; Kabir, Y. Effects and Mechanisms of Antioxidant-Rich Functional Beverages on Disease Prevention. In Functional and Medicinal Beverages; Grumezescu, A.M., Holban, A.M., Eds.; Academic Press: London, UK, 2019; pp. 157–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Dufresne, C.; Farnworth, E. Tea, Kombucha, and health: A review. Food Res. Internat 2000, 33, 409–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Teoh, A.L.; Heard, G.; Cox, J. Yeast ecology of Kombucha fermentation. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2004, 95, 119–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Malbaša, R.V.; Lončar, E.S.; Vitas, J.S.; Čanadanović-Brunet, J.M. Influence of starter cultures on the antioxidant activity of kombucha beverage. Food Chem. 2011, 127, 1727–1731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Cardoso, R.R.; Neto, R.O.; dos Santos D’Almeida, C.T.; do Nascimento, T.P.; Pressetec, C.G.; Azevedo, L.; Martino, H.S.D.; Camerone, L.C.; Ferreira, S.L.; Barros, F.A.R. Kombuchas from green and black teas have different phenolic profile, which impacts their antioxidant capacities, antibacterial and antiproliferative activities. Food Res. Int. 2020, 128, 108782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Antolak, H.; Piechota, D.; Kucharska, A. Kombucha Tea—A Double Power of Bioactive Compounds from Tea and Symbiotic Culture of Bacteria and Yeasts (SCOBY). Antioxidants 2021, 10, 1541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Cabrera, R.A.; Giménez, R.R. Beneficial effects of green tea—A review. J. Am. Coll. Nutr. 2006, 25, 79–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Dutta, H.; Sanjib, K.P. Kombucha Drink: Production, Quality, and Safety Aspects. In Production and Management of Beverages; Grumezescu, A.M., Holban, A.M., Eds.; Woodhead Publishing: Sawston, CA, USA, 2019; pp. 259–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Saimaiti, A.; Huang, S.-Y.; Xiong, R.-G.; Wu, S.-X.; Zhou, D.-D.; Yang, Z.-J.; Luo, M.; Gan, R.-Y.; Li, H.-B. Antioxidant Capacities and Polyphenol Contents of Kombucha Beverages Based on Vine Tea and Sweet Tea. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 1655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Rios, M.; Tinitana, F.; Jarrín, V.P.; Donoso, N.; Romero-Benavides, J.C. “Horchata” drink in southern Ecuador: Medicinal plants and people’s wellbeing. J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed. 2017, 13, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Available online: https://www.bgci.org/news-events/two-of-the-worlds-tea-species-extinct-in-the-wild/ (accessed on 28 May 2024).
  12. Sevilla, D.F. Elaboración de Una Bebida Probiótica Kombucha Empleando dos Endulzantes no Calóricos a Partir de Scoby (Coloniasimbiótica de Bacterias y Levaduras). Universidad Politécnica Salesiana. 2023. Available online: https://dspace.ups.edu.ec/bitstream/123456789/25405/1/TTQ1174.pdf (accessed on 10 February 2024).
  13. Greenwalt, C.J.; Steinkraus, K.H.; Ledford, R.A. Kombucha, the Fermented Tea: Microbiology, Composition, and Claimed Health Effects. J. Food Prot. 2000, 63, 976–981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Nicola, M.; Ismael, L.; Edgar, T.; Ruiz, G.; Artículo, A.S.A. Sensory analysis of horchatas based on Amazonian plants compared to industrialized horchata. Rev. Científica Agroind. Soc. Y Ambiente (A.S.A.) 2023, 1, 19–38. [Google Scholar]
  15. Buzia, O.D.; Fasie, V.; Mardare, N.; Diaconu, C.; Gurau, G.; Tatu, A.L. Formulation, preparation, physical-chemical analysis, microbiological peculiarities, and therapeutic challenges of extractive solution of Kombucha. Rev. Chim. 2018, 69, 720–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. González Tellez, S.; Olivares Vázquez, D.; Ruíz-Durán, R.; Gómez-Pliego, R. Bebidas fermentadas nutraceúticas elaboradas a partir del hongo Kombucha y su uso potencial en el tratamiento de Síndrome metabólico. Investig. Desarro. Cienc. Tecnol. Aliment. 2018, 3, 338–343. [Google Scholar]
  17. Llivisaca-Palomeque, P. Elaboración de Recetas de Cocina Experimental con Base en Kombucha de: Ajo Negro (Allium cepa), Cacao (Theobroma cacao), Hoja de Higo (Ficus carica) y Suero de Leche (2021) Universidad de Cuenca. Available online: https://dspace.ucuenca.edu.ec/bitstream/123456789/36325/1/Trabajo%20de%20Titulaci%C3%B3n.pdf (accessed on 15 February 2024).
  18. Thaweesang, S. Antioxidant activity and total phenolic compounds of fresh and blanching banana blossom (Musa ABB CV. Kluai “Namwa”) in Thailand. IOP Conf. Ser. Mat. Sci. Eng. 2019, 639, 012047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Pękal, A.; Pyrzynska, K. Evaluation of aluminium complexation reaction for flavonoid content assay. Food Anal. Methods 2014, 7, 1776–1782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Rajurkar, N.S.; Hande, S.M. Estimation of phytochemical content and antioxidant activity of some selected traditional Indian medicinal plants. Indian J. Pharm. Sci. 2011, 73, 146–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kuskoski, E.M.; Asuero, A.G.; Troncoso, A.M.; Mancini-Filho, J.; Fett, R. Aplicación de diversos métodos químicos para determinar actividad antioxidante en pulpa de frutos. Food Sci. Technol. 2005, 25, 726–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Guo, D.J.; Cheng, H.L.; Chan, S.W.; Yu, P.H.F. Antioxidative activities and the total phenolic contents of tonic Chinese medicinal herbs. Inflammopharmacology 2008, 16, 201–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Dimcheva, V.; Kaloyanov, N.; Karsheva, M.; Peycheva, M.F.; Stoilova, N. HPLC-DAD method for simultaneous determination of natural polyphenols. Open J. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2019, 3, 039–043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Muflihah, Y.M.; Gollavelli, G.; Ling, Y.-C. Correlation Study of Antioxidant Activity with Phenolic and Flavonoid Compounds in 12 Indonesian Indigenous Herbs. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 1530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Massoud, R.; Jafari-Dastjerdeh, R.; Naghavi, N.; Khosravi-Darani, K. All aspects of antioxidant properties of kombucha drink. Biointerface Res. Appl. Chem. 2022, 12, 4018–4027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kayisoglu, S.; Coskun, F. Determination of physical and chemical properties of kombucha teas prepared with different herbal teas. Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 41 (Suppl. S1), 393–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Jakubczyk, K.; Kałduńska, J.; Kochman, J.; Janda, K. Chemical Profile and Antioxidant Activity of the Kombucha Beverage Derived from White, Green, Black and Red Tea. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Tukun, A.B.; Shaheen, N.; Banu, C.P.; Mohiduzzaman, M.; Islam, S.; Begum, M. Antioxidant capacity and total phenolic contents in hydrophilic extracts of selected Bangladeshi medicinal plants. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Med. 2014, 7, S568–S573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Kim, Y.J.; Son, D.Y. Antioxidant effects of solvent extracts from the dried jujube (Zizyphus jujube) sarcocarp, seed, and leaf via sonication. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2011, 20, 167–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bailon-Moscoso, N.; Tinitana, F.; Martínez-Espinosa, R.; Jaramillo-Velez, A.; Palacio-Arpi, A.; Aguilar-Hernandez, J.; Romero-Benavides, J.C. Cytotoxic, antioxidative, genotoxic and antigenotoxic effects of Horchata, beverage of South Ecuador. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2017, 17, 539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Cardoso, R.R.; Moreira, L.P.D.; de Campos Costa, M.A.; Toledo, R.C.L.; Grancieri, M.; Nascimento, T.P.D.; Ferreira, M.S.L.; da Matta, S.L.P.; Eller, M.R.; Duarte Martino, H.S.; et al. Kombuchas from green and black teas reduce oxidative stress, liver steatosis and inflammation, and improve glucose metabolism in Wistar rats fed a high-fat high-fructose diet. Food Funct. 2021, 12, 10813–10827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Wang, X.; Wang, D.; Wang, H.; Jiao, S.; Wu, J.; Hou, Y.; Sun, J.; Yuan, J. Chemical Profile and Antioxidant Capacity of Kombucha Tea by the Pure Cultured Kombucha. LWT 2022, 168, 113931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Halvorsen, B.L.; Holte, K.; Myhrstad, M.C.W.; Barikmo, I.; Hvattum, E.; Remberg, S.F.; Wold, A.-B.; Haffner, K.; Baugerød, H.; Andersen, L.F.; et al. A systematic screening of total antioxidants in dietary plants. J. Nutr. 2002, 132, 461–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Benítez, P.; Pavone, D. Kombucha y SCOBY: Una Comunidad Microbiana al Servicio de tu Salud. In Eduvita. Available online: https://www.eduvitaweb.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Kombucha-y-Scoby.pdf (accessed on 2 February 2024).
  35. Chakravorty, S.; Bhattacharya, S.; Chatzinotas, A.; Chakraborty, W.; Bhattacharya, D.; Gachhui, R. Kombucha tea fermentation: Microbial and biochemical dynamics. Inter. J. Food Microbiol. 2016, 220, 63–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Vildozo, M. Evaluación de la Producción de Celulosa en el Sistema Kombucha. Aislamiento e Identificación de Microorganismos Productores del Polímero. Universidad Nacional Arturo Jauretche UNAJ. 2022. Available online: https://biblioarchivo.unaj.edu.ar/uploads/0c0c24ae7e23879d280b18c83a2a835219a2c0ea.pdf (accessed on 2 February 2024).
  37. Liu, Y.; Zheng, Y.; Yang, T.; Mac Regenstein, J.; Zhou, P. Functional properties and sensory characteristics of kombucha analogs prepared with alternative materials. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 129, 608–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. de Miranda, J.F.; Ruiz, L.F.; Silva, C.B.; Uekane, T.M.; Silva, K.A.; Gonzalez, A.G.M.; Fernandes, F.F.; Lima, A.R. Kombucha: A review of substrates, regulations, composition, and biological properties. J. Food Sci. 2022, 87, 503–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Carvajal, A. Plan de Negocio para la Comercialización de Una Bebida a Base de Infusiones Tipo té de Plantas Aromáticas y Medicinales Lista Para Consumir en la Provincia de Tungurahua. Universidad Técnica de Ambato. 2021. Available online: https://repositorio.uta.edu.ec/bitstream/123456789/32073/1/AL%20765.pdf (accessed on 14 February 2024).
  40. Molina, R. Plan. de Negocios Para la Producción y Comercialización de Bebidas Naturales Frías a Base del té de Matcha en la Ciudad. de Quito. 2019. Universidad de las Américas. Available online: https://dspace.udla.edu.ec/bitstream/33000/11476/1/UDLA-EC-TIC-2019-64.pdf (accessed on 15 February 2024).
  41. Marchillo, E.M.; Naranjo, D. Diseño de la Línea de Producción de una Bebida de Hierbas Denominada Horchata 2012. Escuela Superior Politécnica del Litoral. Available online: https://www.dspace.espol.edu.ec/retrieve/056e6337-dbc5-40d3-9bfd-d985bb8e57cf/D-79622.pdf (accessed on 15 February 2024).
  42. Djordjevic, T.M.; Šiler-Marinkovic, S.S.; Dimitrijevic-Brankovic, S.I. Antioxidant activity and total phenolic content in some cereals and legumes. Int. J. Food Prop. 2011, 14, 175–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Andriopoulos, V.; Gkioni, M.D.; Koutra, E.; Mastropetros, S.G.; Lamari, F.N.; Hatziantoniou, S.; Kornaros, M. Total Phenolic Content, Biomass Composition, and Antioxidant Activity of Selected Marine Microalgal Species with Potential as Aquaculture Feed. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 1320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Yuegang Zuo, Hao Chen, Yiwei Deng, Simultaneous determination of catechins, caffeine and gallicacids in green, Oolong, black and pu-erh teas using HPLC with a photodiode array detector. Talanta 2002, 57, 307–316. [CrossRef]
  45. Tuck, K.L.; Hayball, P.J.; Stupans, I. Structural characterization of the metabolites of hydroxytyrosol, the principal phenolic component in olive oil, in rats. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002, 50, 2404–2409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Zhao, M.; Ren, Z.; Zhao, A.; Tang, Y.; Kuang, J.; Li, M.; Chen, T.; Wang, S.; Wang, J.; Zhang, H.; et al. Gut bacteria-driven homovanillic acid alleviates depression by modulating synaptic integrity. Cell Metab. 2024, 36, 1000–1012.e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Gątarek, P.; Kałużna-Czaplińska, J. Effect of Supplementation on Levels of Homovanillic and Vanillylmandelic Acids in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders. Metabolites 2022, 12, 423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Choubey, S.; Varughese, L.; Kumar, V.; Beniwal, V. Medicinal importance of gallic acid and its ester derivatives: A patent review. Pharm. Pat. Anal. 2015, 4, 305–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Kaur, J.; Gulati, M.; Singh, S.K.; Kuppusamy, G.; Kapoor, B.; Mishra, V.; Gupta, S.; Arshad, M.F.; Porwal, O.; Jha, N.K.; et al. Discovering multifaceted role of vanillic acid beyond flavours: Nutraceutical and therapeutic potential. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 122, 187–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Flowchart of the kombucha tea research methodology.
Figure 1. Flowchart of the kombucha tea research methodology.
Fermentation 10 00338 g001
Figure 2. Total phenolic content (TPC) and total flavonoid content (TFC) in kombucha based on black, green, and horchata teas. Comparison between kombucha beverages (left) and regular tea beverages (right) is represented by bars, where the y-axis represents the total content for phenols and flavonoids expressed in mg GAE/g DW for TPC, and mg QE/g DW for TFC. Different letters above bars indicate significant differences.
Figure 2. Total phenolic content (TPC) and total flavonoid content (TFC) in kombucha based on black, green, and horchata teas. Comparison between kombucha beverages (left) and regular tea beverages (right) is represented by bars, where the y-axis represents the total content for phenols and flavonoids expressed in mg GAE/g DW for TPC, and mg QE/g DW for TFC. Different letters above bars indicate significant differences.
Fermentation 10 00338 g002
Figure 3. Antioxidant activity in kombuchas compared to teas. Kombucha beverages (left) show a similar antioxidant capacity to tea beverages (right), where the x-axis represents the type of tea used, and the y-axis represents antioxidant capacity expressed in µmol TEAC/g DW for ABTS and DPPH, and µmol Fe2+ for the FRAP assay. Different letters above bars indicate significant differences.
Figure 3. Antioxidant activity in kombuchas compared to teas. Kombucha beverages (left) show a similar antioxidant capacity to tea beverages (right), where the x-axis represents the type of tea used, and the y-axis represents antioxidant capacity expressed in µmol TEAC/g DW for ABTS and DPPH, and µmol Fe2+ for the FRAP assay. Different letters above bars indicate significant differences.
Fermentation 10 00338 g003
Figure 4. Correlogram matrix for kombucha and tea data. Two-dimensional density scatter plots for the current scores are represented under the main diagonal, revealing the relationship between the pair of tested datasets. A higher positive correlation is marked with ***.
Figure 4. Correlogram matrix for kombucha and tea data. Two-dimensional density scatter plots for the current scores are represented under the main diagonal, revealing the relationship between the pair of tested datasets. A higher positive correlation is marked with ***.
Fermentation 10 00338 g004
Figure 5. HPLC—DAD analysis of horchata tea.
Figure 5. HPLC—DAD analysis of horchata tea.
Fermentation 10 00338 g005
Table 1. Average scores obtained in the sensory evaluation of the organoleptic attributes of the three kombucha varieties.
Table 1. Average scores obtained in the sensory evaluation of the organoleptic attributes of the three kombucha varieties.
AttributeHorchata KombuchaGreen Tea KombuchaBlack Tea Kombucha
Appearance4.33.94.1
Color4.13.74.0
Odor4.54.03.8
Acidity3.74.24.3
Sweetness4.63.53.9
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mihai, R.A.; Cubi-Insuaste, N.S.; Catana, R.D. Biological Activity and Phenolic Content of Kombucha Beverages under the Influence of Different Tea Extract Substrates. Fermentation 2024, 10, 338. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation10070338

AMA Style

Mihai RA, Cubi-Insuaste NS, Catana RD. Biological Activity and Phenolic Content of Kombucha Beverages under the Influence of Different Tea Extract Substrates. Fermentation. 2024; 10(7):338. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation10070338

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mihai, Raluca A., Nelson S. Cubi-Insuaste, and Rodica D. Catana. 2024. "Biological Activity and Phenolic Content of Kombucha Beverages under the Influence of Different Tea Extract Substrates" Fermentation 10, no. 7: 338. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation10070338

APA Style

Mihai, R. A., Cubi-Insuaste, N. S., & Catana, R. D. (2024). Biological Activity and Phenolic Content of Kombucha Beverages under the Influence of Different Tea Extract Substrates. Fermentation, 10(7), 338. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation10070338

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop