Next Article in Journal
Development of Probiotic-Fermented Black Mulberry (Morus nigra L.) Juice and Its Antioxidant Activity in C2C12 Cells
Previous Article in Journal
Xylitol Production from Pineapple Cores (Ananas comosus (L.) Merr) by Enzymatic and Acid Hydrolysis Using Microorganisms Debaryomyces hansenii and Candida tropicalis
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Fermentation
Volume 8
Issue 12
10.3390/fermentation8120695
fermentation-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Growth and Influence of White-Rot Fungi on the Chemical Composition of Wheat Straw Inoculated under Varying Pre-Conditions

by
Siriwan D. Martens
1,*,
Vicki Wildner
1,2,
Jörg M. Greef
3,
Annette Zeyner
2 and
Olaf Steinhöfel
1,2
1
Department of Animal Husbandry, Saxon State Office for Environment, Agriculture and Geology (LfULG), 04886 Köllitsch, Germany
2
Professorship of Animal Nutrition, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, 06120 Halle, Germany
3
Institute for Crop and Soil Science, Julius Kühn Institut (JKI), 38116 Braunschweig, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Fermentation 2022, 8(12), 695; https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation8120695
Submission received: 20 October 2022 / Revised: 21 November 2022 / Accepted: 29 November 2022 / Published: 30 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Microbial Metabolism, Physiology & Genetics)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Solid-state fermentation with white-rot fungi is an interesting alternative to chemical straw treatment for ruminant nutrition. However, for practical implementation on farms, feasible handling and its effect on nutritional characteristics have to be tested beforehand. Chopped wheat straw was either soaked and drained or just remoistened to about 24% dry matter without subsequent sterilization. Moist straw was inoculated with Pleurotus ostreatus, Ceriporiopsis subvermispora, or Volvariella volvacea. Fermentation lasted up to 42 d with weekly or shorter sampling intervals. Fiber fractions, minerals and elements, and non-starch polysaccharides were analyzed, and microflora was plate counted. Lactic acid bacteria of selected samples were identified by MALDI-TOF. All inoculated fungi grew well under the selected conditions expressed by the visible mycelium and specific smell. P. ostreatus developed fruiting bodies in the given time. Initial numbers of lactic acid bacteria were >8.0 log cfu/g. In the beginning, Weissella confusa/cibaria dominated. However, neither decrease in lignin nor cellulose concentration was observed during the period in either of the treatments, thus seeming to be inappropriate for ruminant nutrition purposes. Some elements and minerals peaked, especially towards the second and third week (Na, Cl, Mg, Fe, and Mn). Growth conditions for mushrooms were optimized by remoistening the straw with a defined amount of water.

1. Introduction

In general, straw is a by-product that is abundantly available worldwide. For 2020 the global production of cereal straw was estimated at around 760 Mio t for rice and 610 Mio t for wheat [1]. Straw serves different purposes. Some examples are working straw into the soil for rotting and enhancing organic soil matter [2] or power generation [3]. It is suitable to cultivate certain edible mushrooms [4]. In animal farming, it often serves as bedding [5] and in the swine sector as manipulable material [6]. In ruminant nutrition, straw is mostly used as a fiber component for dietetic reasons and to dilute the energy concentration of the ration [7].
Its low content of metabolic energy, even for ruminants (around 3.4 MJ ME/kg dry matter (DM)), is mainly due to its lignocellulosic complex [8]. However, especially in times of roughage scarcity, solutions have been investigated to improve straw digestibility by detaching lignocellulosic structures.
In this context, biological straw treatment is one approach to improve ruminal digestibility by fungal lignin degradation. Cereal straw is a suitable growth substrate for white-rot fungi, and its chemical and possibly structural composition will be changed by their colonization.
Since the 1990s, various studies have proved that some fungi species and strains are able to degrade lignin under certain conditions [9,10,11,12]. White-rot fungi are one type of wood decay fungi [13] and degrade lignin more efficiently than other microorganisms [14]. This is due to their enzymatic activity, namely xylanase, laccase, and manganese peroxidase [15,16,17].
In this study, three white-rot fungi species and a total of four strains, which were publicly available with the principal ability to degrade lignin, were used. Two defined strains have been described in other investigations before. Pleurotus ostreatus (P.o.), order of Agaricales, is an edible mushroom. It belongs to the oyster mushrooms, which are the second most cultivated mushrooms worldwide [18]. The species has been included in several trials studying its impact on the straw composition [9,19,20]. The strain CBS 411.71 has been used by, e.g., Salvachua et al. [21], as pretreatment for ethanol generation from straw, and another strain from a commercial provider for home mushroom growing was chosen as an additional representative of the species. Ceriporiopsis subvermispora (C.s.) CBS 347.63, an order of Polyporales, a non-edible crust fungus, has been proven effective in depolymerizing lignin in several studies [12,22]. Volvariella volvacea (V.v.), order of Agaricales, also known as paddy straw mushroom, is a typical representative of edible white-rot fungi, especially in tropical regions. It was studied, e.g., on banana leaves for fiber decomposition [23]. Although V.v. provided genetic evidence for laccase, it seems to lack an efficient ligninolytic enzyme system [24].
Despite several promising studies on a laboratory scale, to date, to our knowledge, no or at least few practical implementations of SSF targeting animal nutrition have taken place on a larger scale on farms. One of the reasons is the pretreatment, which in most of the scientific studies consist of autoclaving (e.g., [12,21,25]). According to a review [11], timing is a very important factor in fungal treatment to optimize the nutritional value, which can also be an obstacle to practical implementation.
The aim of our study was to evaluate (a) the pretreatment of wheat straw on the development of fungal mycelium of selected strains of Pleurotus ostreatus, Ceriporiopsis subvermispora, and Volvariella volvacea; and (b) its effect on the degree of lignification, mineral status, cell wall polysaccharides of the straw and the accompanying microflora at different points in time during solid-state fermentation.

2. Materials and Methods

Winter wheat straw was harvested in July 2018 in Köllitsch, Northern Saxony, Germany, in excellent sensory quality because of preceding dry weather conditions and stored as square bales in a dry ambient. It was chopped to 7–10 cm before the treatments.
An overview of the biological treatments is given in Table 1 and visualized in a flowchart (Figure S1).

2.1. Preparation of the Inoculum

Grain Spawn

For Trial 1 (soaked and drained straw), pure cultures of Ceriporiopsis subvermispora (CBS 347.63) [12], Pleurotus ostreatus, strain CBS 411.71 (Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute, Utrecht, Netherlands) [11,21] and strain PO93 (Pilzhof & Edelpilzzucht Breck GbR, Malschwitz, Germany) were grown on malt extract agar (MEA) (malt extract 20 g/L, K2HPO4 0.5 g/L, MgSO4∙7H2O 0.5 g/L, Ca(NO3)2∙4H2O 0.5 g/L; [12]) for 7 d at 24 °C. For the grain substrate, an adaptation to Breck [26] followed: 195 g wheat grains, 5 g chopped wheat straw, 10 g lime (for litter), and 300 mL tap water were autoclaved in a Weck® jar each (850 mL; J. Weck GmbH u. Co. KG, Wehr-Öflingen, Germany) at 121 °C for 20 min. After cooling down, the content of a jar was mixed and divided into two jars each and autoclaved again. The jars were opened on a clean bench and evaporated for 1 h while cooling down.
A piece of malt extract agar (0.5 × 0.5 cm) with mycelium was placed in the middle of the grain surface. The loosely closed jar was incubated at 24 °C. After 8 d, the grains with the grown mycelium were shaken well in the jar and a second time after 11 d. After 14 d, grains were overgrown with mycelium and used for straw inoculation.
In the second and third trial, the inoculum was prepared accordingly. Depending on the temperature requirements of the strains and the velocity of growth, the conditions were slightly varied.
Trial 2 (remoistened straw and V.v.): Volvariella volvacea (DSM 6190) on MEA for 10 d at 24 °C, incubation on wheat grain at 30 °C for 5 d and “control” with only autoclaved wheat grains as described above (grain substrate).
Trial 3 (remoistened straw and C.s./P.o.): Ceriporiopsis subvermispora (CBS 347.63) and Pleurotus ostreatus (PO93) on MEA for 7 d at 24 °C, incubation on wheat grain at 24 °C for 8–9 d.

2.2. Solid State Fermentation of Wheat Straw

2.2.1. Trial 1—Soaked and Drained Straw

Straw was filled in nylon bags (24 cm × 33 cm, ~400 g dry straw/bag) and soaked in abundant tap water for 20–24 h; afterward, it was drained for 2–3 h.
Twenty g of the spawn was mixed in 1230 g of moist straw each. This relation was adapted from Breck and Breck [27]. The straw was then packed relatively densely in a perforated plastic bag (cast polypropylene, flame perforated) (30 cm × 40 cm) together with a data logger for temperature (Tinytag Transit 2, TG-4080; Gemini Data Loggers Ltd., Chichester, UK) to give around 1200 g moist straw/bag. This bag was placed in another plastic bag (37 cm × 58 cm) on a disc of polystyrene (Ø 15.5 cm; 3 cm thick) to prevent possible standing in water. A triangle (~10.8 cm²) was cut both in the front and the back of the outer plastic bag to allow for air circulation. After one day, the upper opening of the outer bag was closed with a rubber. The storage room was dark and had a constant temperature, and relative humidity was recorded. The pH value was determined at day 0 and when removed for analysis. The straw was visually examined. Samples were frozen at −20 °C for further analysis.
Trial 1: Ambient temperature was around 21 °C.
There were three passes in total, with one fungus each, delayed by one week. Eighteen bags per fungus were prepared to allow for a weekly sampling of three replicates for a total of six weeks.

2.2.2. Trial 2 and 3—Remoistened Straw

Straw was filled in plastic tubs. Tap water (2.68 L/kg air dry straw) was added to the straw to give around 250 g DM/kg. It was mixed after 6 and 22 h to allow for even soaking. Before inoculation, it was homogenized in a concrete mixer (120 L, 550 W, 230 V; CM120L, HORNBACH Baumarkt AG, Bornheim, Germany).
Straw inoculation and packing were then performed as described for Trial 1 (soaked and drained straw). The storage room was dark and had a constant temperature of around 23–24 °C, and relative humidity was recorded.
In Trial 2 (with V.v.), twenty bags per fungus were prepared to allow for a weekly sampling of four replicates for a total of 4 weeks, including day 0. In trial 3 (with C.s./P.o.), the quadruplicates were sampled after 0, 5, 7, 10, and 14 d. The pH value was determined at day 0 and when removed for analysis. Selected samples underwent microbial colony counting. The straw was visually examined. Samples were frozen at −20 °C for further analysis.

2.3. Microbial Analysis

From selected samples from the biological treatments, colonies of microbial groups were counted [28]. Aerobic mesophilic bacteria comprising yellow-pigmented bacteria and the genera of Pseudomonas, Enterobacteriaceae, Bacillus, Staphylococcus, Micrococcus, Streptomyces, and others were plate counted on tryptose medium (with triphenyl tetrazolium chloride (TTC)). Yeasts and molds comprising all types of yeasts, the genera of Demateaceae, Verticillium, Acremonium, Fusarium, Aureobasidium, Aspergillus, Penicillium, Scopulariopsis, Wallemia, and others were counted on Rose Bengal Chloramphenicol Agar (with Tergitol NP 10) and Dichloran Glycerol (DG 18) Agar. Lactic acid bacteria were counted on MRS agar (pH 5.7) (de Man, Rogosa, Sharpe). Likewise, single lactic acid bacteria colonies (103) from Trial 2 and 3 (with remoistened straw) were isolated from 28 straw samples stored for 0, 7, and 14 d, grown on MRS medium at 30 °C for 72 h (MRS agar, pH 5.7, Art. HP65.1, Carl Roth GmbH + Co. KG, Karlsruhe, Germany) at the BfUL (State-owned company for environment and agriculture, Nossen, Germany). They were identified by Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry (MALDI-TOF-MS) at the RIPAC-LABOR GmbH in Potsdam.

2.4. Chemical Analysis

Samples of untreated and treated straw were analyzed for DM, crude ash, neutral detergent fiber assayed with a heat stable amylase and expressed exclusive of residual ash (aNDFom), acid detergent fiber expressed exclusive of residual ash (ADFom), acid detergent lignin (ADL), crude protein (CP) (all parameters according to VDLUFA [29]), non-fiber carbohydrates (NFC) = (1000 − (aNDFom + CP + EE + ash)), cellulose = (ADFom-ADL), and hemicellulose = (aNDFom-ADFom) (aNDFom and ADFom values see Tables S1 and S2).
Monomers of non-starch polysaccharides (NSP) were analyzed by the Julius Kühn-Institut in Braunschweig [30]. After starch degradation, acid hydrolysis, and derivatization, the samples were analyzed by gas chromatography (SP-2380 capillary column, 30 m × 0.53 mm × 0.2 μm film thickness, Cat. No. 25319 Supelco, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany; HP Agilent 6890 GC, Santa Clara, CA, USA).
The BfUL determined minerals and trace elements using X-ray fluorescence (S8 Tiger apparatus, Bruker, Karlsruhe, Germany). Ergosterol from the biological treatments was analyzed according to the following procedure: the air-dry sample (2 mm particle size) was saponified in ethanolic potassium hydroxide solution overnight at ambient temperature. An aliquot of the solution was diluted with a solution of sodium ascorbate. From this solution, ergosterol was extracted and purified by solid phase extraction using a CHROMABONDTM XTR column eluting with cyclohexane (Macherey-Nagel GmbH & Co. KG, Düren, Germany). An aliquot of the eluate was evaporated, dissolved in methanol, and separated on a HyPURITYTM C18 column (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) via isocratic HPLC. The extinction was measured at 282 nm and quantified by an external calibration using an ergosterol standard (CAS 57-87-4, Sigma-Aldrich, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany).

2.5. Statistical Analysis

For the biological treatments, the following effects on chemical composition were tested:
First trial (soaked and drained straw):
Yijk = µ + Fungusi + Timej + Fungus × Timeij + εij
where µ = general mean, i = 1, 2, 3 (C. subvermispora, P. ostreatus (2 strains)), j = 1, 2, 3, …, 7 (0 d, 7 d, 14 d, 21 d, 28 d, 35 d, 42 d fermentation time), and εijk = residual error.
Second and third trial (remoistened straw):
Yijk = µ + Fungusi + Timej + Fungus × Timeij + εij
where µ = general mean, i = 1, 2, 3, 4 (control, V. volvacea, C. subvermispora, P. ostreatus PO93), j = 1, 2, 3, …, 5 (0 d, (5 d,) 7 d, (10 d), 14 d, (21 d, 28 d) fermentation time), and εijk = residual error.
Variance analysis using the procedures univariate and multivariate was performed for the treatments after the respective storage time, and the Tukey test was applied post hoc where indicated. The software IBM® SPSS® Statistics (Version 19, SPSS, Inc., IBM Company©, Chicago, IL, USA) was used.

3. Results

3.1. Temperature Development

No temperature increase ≥ 2.0 K above ambient was observed with drained samples. However, with remoistened straw and V. volvacea as an inoculant, there was a clear temperature development (Figure 1). The maximum of +11 K above ambient was achieved within the first 7 h and declined thereafter, staying 2 K above ambient even after 4 weeks of storage.

3.2. Fungal Growth and pH Development

The ergosterol content as an indicator of fungal growth is presented in Figure 2a,b. Fungal strain, as well as storage duration and their interaction, had a significant effect on the ergosterol content (Tables S3 and S4). C. subvermispora showed the highest ergosterol production in the treatments, both drained and remoistened (Figure 2a,b). Only the uninoculated straw with mold growth seemed to achieve similar values (Figure 2b). Overall, the content increased more rapidly in the remoistened samples compared to the drained ones (gradient m = 32.2 or 88.0 for PO93 in the drained or remoistened treatment resp.). After 14 d C. subvermispora had produced 291 mg/kg DM more ergosterol in the remoistened straw, and P. ostreatus PO 93 266 mg/kg DM more than during the same time in the drained straw, i.e., 2.7 or 3.9 times more, respectively.
This was also reflected in the growth of the mycelium in the straw. A particular observation in C. subvermispora-biodegraded straw was the appearance of yellowish-white droplets after 14 d (also in the remoistened straw) to 28 d, which later on turned to dark, hard granules.
Another difference between the drained and the remoistened straw was the pH development, which was also significantly affected by fungal strain and storage duration (Tables S3 and S4). While P. ostreatus developed towards an acid pH in the drained straw and C. subvermispora was only slightly alkaline, all strains increased rapidly towards an alkaline pH in the remoistened straw (Trials 2 and 3) (Figure 2c,d).

3.3. Accompanying Microflora

In the drained straw, the yeast population presented around 105 cfu/g FM on day 7 (Figure 3a). In C. subvermispora-biodegraded straw, it declined towards day 14 and increased steeply to >106 cfu/g FM yeasts at day 21 (Figure 3a). Yeast numbers declined only after 42 d to <104 cfu/g FM. The yeast population of P. ostreatus-biodegraded straw was >104 log cfu/g FM from day 21 onwards (Figure 3a). Thus, there was a statistical trend of an effect of interaction between fungal strain and storage duration (Table S3). Treatments in remoistened straw presented higher yeast numbers of >106 cfu/g FM at day 7 and declined thereafter (Figure 3b). However, there was no statistical effect of either fungal 241 strain or storage duration on yeast numbers (Table S2). Yeast numbers of the 242 uninoculated straw remained at a lower level. The mold population in the drained 243 straw was at >105 cfu/g FM at day 7 with P. ostreatus (Figure 3c), while it was at almost 107 cfu/g FM in the remoistened treatment (Figure 3d). Total molds in the P. ostreatus treatments declined to <105 cfu/g FM in the drained straw (Figure 3c), while it was >107 cfu/g FM in the remoistened treatment (Figure 3d). C. subvermispora straw remained at a high level of >106 cfu/g molds from day 21 on in the drained straw (Figure 3c). Thus, only in the remoistened treatments was there a significant effect of storage duration on mold numbers (Table S2).
In the drained straw, the amount of aerobic mesophilic bacteria remained stable at a high level of >108 cfu/g FM when C. subvermispora was the inoculant (Figure 4a). The aerobic bacteria leveled at >106 cfu/g FM with both strains of P. ostreatus (Figure 4a). Still, the slight decline resulted in a significant effect of time (Table S3). In these two latter treatments, the number of lactic acid bacteria rapidly declined after day 14 from initially 108 cfu/g FM to finally <104 cfu/g FM, while C. subvermispora-biodegraded straw remained more or less around 107 log cfu/g FM throughout the 6 weeks (Figure 4c). The interaction of time x strain was also highly significant (Table S3). In the remoistened straw, the number of aerobic mesophilic bacteria peaked on day 7 with all three fungi (Figure 4b) (P. ostreatus, C. subvermispora, V. volvacea) at >109 cfu/g FM and seemed to decline slightly afterward whereby Trials 2 and 3 stopped after 28 and 14 d (Figure 4b). It was similar in the uninoculated treatment, thus showing only an effect of time (Table S4). The number of lactic acid bacteria was similar for the fungal treatments in the remoistened straw, with slightly higher values for V. volvacea, while the uninoculated treatment showed a sharp increase within the first week (Figure 4d). It was only influenced by the inoculant (Table S4).
Single LAB colonies were picked randomly from MRS plates of Trials 2 and 3 (remoistened straw) and identified by MALDI-TOF (Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time Of Flight Mass Spectrometry). The numbers of identified genera and species are listed in Table 2, and the relative abundance of genera is shown in the appendix (Figure S2). In the remoistened straw, almost half of the identified colonies belonged to the genus Weissella and species cibaria/confusa, respectively. This proportion even increased to around 60 % in the C. subvermispora-biodegraded straw after 7 and 14 d. The uninoculated treatment with the epiphytic microflora showed a proportion of 43 % Weissella. On the contrary, P. ostreatus inoculation decreased the Weissella population to <10% of the identified genera after 7 and 14 d. Instead, a dominance of Pedioccus followed by Lactococcus was seen after 7 d, whereas Enterococcus was most abundant after 14 d. In C. subvermispora-biodegraded straw, Pediococcus was the only other genus that was identified besides Weissella on day 14.

3.4. Changes in the Chemical Composition

3.4.1. Fiber Fractions

During the first week, in the drained treatments, there was a general trend of increasing cellulose and decreasing hemicellulose contents with all three strains (Figure 5a,b). This effect of time, also in interaction with fungal strain, was significant (Table S3). Hemicellulose content was significantly lower after 42 d (mean of 291 g/kg DM) compared to the beginning (364 g/kg DM) (Figure 5b). However, ADL decreased numerically only with C. subvermispora after 7d (56.0 g/kg DM), which increased from then on almost linearly to 89.5 g/kg DM after 42 d (Figure 5c), which was significantly higher than at day 0. With the two P. ostreatus strains, ADL content was more oscillating (Figure 5c). There was a significant effect of inoculant, time, and their interaction on the ADL content (Table S3).
In the remoistened straw, there were no significant differences between the strains concerning cellulose, hemicellulose, and ADL contents (Figure 5d–f). Only in the uninoculated treatment, the hemicellulose concentration decreased from 311 g/kg DM to <240 g/kg DM after 14 d (not shown). Generally, hemicellulose concentration was initially lower than in the drained treatments (Figure 5e). There was a linear increase in ADL with V. volvacea from initially 52.9 to 87.2 g/kg DM after 28 d (Figure 5f). Thus, there was only an effect of time on the fiber components here (Table S4).

3.4.2. Non-Fiber Carbohydrates

Soaking and draining alone led to a halving of the NFC content compared to remoistening only (0 d) (Table 3). In the drained straw treatments, it increased again towards day 21 as hemicellulose decreased. In both the drained and remoistened straw fungi, time and their interaction had an effect on NFC content (Tables S3 and S4).

3.4.3. Non-Starch Polysaccharides

In the original straw, 545 g/kg DM NSP was found. More than half of the monomers were cell wall glucose, followed by xylose, and far behind arabinose, galactose, and, last, mannose (Table 4). After 28–42 d, total NSP had reduced by about 8.8 % in DM with all mushrooms in the drained straw (figures not shown). C. subvermispora-biodegraded straw presented the highest relative increase in mannose by more than doubling, while the absolutely highest loss was in glucose with 47 g/kg DM. With both Pleurotus strains, mannose also increased, however, to a lesser extent (~40% after 42 d), and glucose reduced by 33 g/kg DM. A significant effect of time and its interaction with the inoculant on glucose and mannose content was found (Table S1). The ratio of xylose:arabinose increased significantly by time with C. subvermispora towards 11.4 (i.e., a factor of 1.6 compared to the original straw, Table 4) during the weeks 3–6 of fermentation, while with both P. ostreatus strains there was only a trend towards a higher ratio with increasing fermentation duration (p < 0.1).

3.4.4. Minerals and Trace Elements

Generally, the crude ash content increased over time: from 56.7 g/kg DM in the drained control to 70.0 g/kg DM in straw with C. subvermispora (almost linearly) and 66.0 g/kg DM with P. ostreatus PO 93 (oscillating) and 59.0 g/kg DM in P. ostreatus CBS 411.71 after 42 d (oscillating) (Trial 1). During the shorter storage period of Trial 3 (and Trial 2), the increase from initially 85.1 g/kg DM in the remoistened straw to a mean of 92.1 g/kg DM after 14 d was not significant (Table S4).
Drained straw with both P. ostreatus strains increased significantly in Ca and Si while decreasing in K (Trial 1, Figure 6a,b). Thereby Si rose most with PO 93 from 15.3 to 21.5 g/kg DM by more than one-third within 42 d (Figure 6a). C. subvermispora showed the same general behavior; only the K content remained similar to the control over time (Figure 7c).
In the drained straw, S did not change over time with P. ostreatus strains, while it increased steadily with C. subvermispora from 0.71 to 1.10 g/kg DM after 42 d (Trial 1, Figure 7d–f). There was no significant effect of time on P content in PO 93 straw and only a slight peak in the second P. ostreatus strain CBS 411.71 after 14 d (Figure 6d,e). In contrast, drained C. subvermispora-biodegraded straw more than doubled in P from 0.426 to 0.911 g/kg DM within 42 d (Figure 6f). Cl content was the highest (0.966 g/kg DM) after 14 d in straw with P. ostreatus CBS 411.71 (Figure 6b) and declined thereafter. Peaks in Mg, Na, and Fe were also observed at that time. The highest sodium content (0.606 g/kg DM) was noticed in PO 93 straw after 21 d (Figure 6d). Moreover, there was a noteworthy multiplication (>7fold) of Fe towards day 14 in the same treatment. Slight changes occurred in the content of the trace elements Cu and Zn over time in all three treatments, while Mn concentrations showed a more pronounced behavior in PO 93 after 14 d, increasing by 165% (Figure 6g–i). Effects of strain, time, and their interaction were most significant in the drained straw except for Ca (Table S3).
In contrast to the drained treatments, the K content was more than three times higher in the remoistened straw and even increased during incubation (Figure 7a–c). Likewise, S content was about double that of the drained treatments (Figure 7d–f). Even Mn started at a higher level (Figure 7g–i). However, in contrast to the drained treatments, the effect of the interaction of time x strain was limited to K, Cl, Mg, Na, Fe, and Zn (Table S4).
In the remoistened uninoculated control straw, no significant change occurred in the analyzed contents of K, Ca, P, Na, Fe, Mn, Zn, and Cu during the incubation time of 28 d (values not shown).

4. Discussion

4.1. Fungal Growth

Mycelial growth was enhanced in remoistened straw treatments. It was at least one week ahead of the drained treatments. This could also be seen in the granules, which appeared earlier in the remoistened straw inoculated with C. subvermispora. These “droplets” were interpreted as secreted enzymes by Thomsen et al. [31]. V. volvacea growth increased during the first two weeks of fermentation, then stagnated towards day 21 and further decreased. This might be explained by the cellulose/lignin ratio, which was highest during the first 7 days and declined afterward. It is reported to be correlated to mycelial growth rates [32]. Furthermore, the study confirms the lower conversion efficiency of the substrate to fruiting bodies compared to P. ostreatus [24]. In our trials, a high pH, which occurred in the remoistened treatments, was no indication of poor fungal growth, as assumed earlier by Nayan [12]. Some authors recommend stabilizing the pH with CaCO3, both in grain spawn production and in the SSF with straw and other substrates [26,33]. A ruminal pH of 6 to 7.5 was optimal for the adhesion of cellulolytic microorganisms to plant cell walls [34]. For P. ostreatus, Fernandez-Fueyo et al. [35] found that most of the nine genes of ligninolytic peroxidases worked well at pH 6, while two genes for Mn peroxidase upregulated at pH 8. The best conditions for the production of laccase or Mn peroxidase were at pH 4.8 for different white-rot fungi [36]. For C. subvermispora it was at pH 4.5 under laboratory conditions [37]. In general, fungal laccases work well in an acidic pH range [38]. This might be a reason why no lignin degradation was observed in the presented trials, although pH decreased with P. ostreatus in the drained treatments.
Enhanced growth may be explained by the availability of NFC, which had about twice the concentration in the remoistened straw. This might also be a reason for the initial heat production from 21 to 32 °C in Trial 2 (remoistened) with V. volvacea. Excessive heating was mentioned as one of the main obstacles in upscaling solid-state fermentation [39], while optimal temperature conditions vary according to species [33], and a certain rise in temperature also increased organic matter and partly lignin decomposition [9]. In many trials, P. ostreatus and C. subvermispora were grown between 24 and 26 °C [40,41,42,43]. For V. volvacea, the storage temperature differences were more pronounced, between 24 °C [43] and 35 °C [23].

4.2. Fibre and Minerals

Either of the treatments compared to day 0 significantly reduced neither ADL nor cellulose concentration. Van Aken and Agathos [44] stated that nutrient limitation is necessary to induce the ligninolytic system. However, even the drained treatments after 6 weeks of fermentation did not present any ligninolysis in our experiment. This is in contrast to decreasing lignin values found for P. ostreatus CBS 411.71 by Salvachua et al. [21] and also for C. subvermispora CBS 347.63 by Nayan et al. [12] and Srebotnik and Messner [26]. On the other hand, even alkaline treatment with a clear effect on digestibility did not reveal any variation in lignin structures by 13C spectra [27].
Van Kuijk et al. [22] explained the delignification process of C. subvermispora and L. edodes fungi as follows: there are two phases: in the first phase, easily fermentable carbohydrates (starch, pectin, and part of hemicelluloses) are degraded; thus in vitro gas production (IVGP) will be decreased, and no significant lignin degradation occurs. The second phase is the delignification phase, which started measurably after 3 weeks with C. subvermispora and L. edodes and resulted in increasing IVGP in their experiments. Following this sequence, a group of authors found out with wood that some fungi have a high initial selectivity for lignin, while they, later on, change to cellulose degradation [45,46,47,48]. On the other hand, the highest laccase activity was measured already after 6 d with the saprophyte Coprinopsis cinerea, reducing rapidly thereafter [49]. For V. volvacea, laccase is described to dominate during sporophore development [32]. An explanation of the apparently lacking decrease in lignin concentration might be that the accompanying microflora used up the carbohydrates, which were released by the fungi and were more easily metabolized.
A general increase in the concentration of minerals and elements (crude ash) can be explained by losses of organic matter. However, varying changes in the content of single minerals are more complex to interpret. They must be related to the inoculum, as those changes did not happen in the uninoculated straw. It was a relatively closed system, except for the condensed water, where the mycelium was included in the substrate analysis. Only in the case of PO 93, fruiting bodies, which started to appear from day 28 on in Trial 1, were excluded from the analysis. Minerals play varying roles in the metabolism of wood-decaying fungi. Mn, for example, is essential for the glycoprotein manganese peroxidase found in C. subvermispora, which allows the oxidation of phenolic substrates such as phenolic lignin compounds and involves Fe in its catalytic reaction [50]. Additional Mn also enhanced lignin degradation in cotton stalks by P. ostreatus [51]. In our case, Mn content increased temporarily in straw inoculated with PO 93. Copper atoms form the catalytic center of laccases [38]. Time and fungal strain had a significant effect on copper contents in our study. A high sulfur content limits the lignin utilization by fungi [52]. This might be another explanation for why lignin was not degraded. However, it is no reason for the increase in S content in C. subvermispora-biodegraded straw. The temporary increase in Mg in the P. ostreatus treatments may point to the adhesion of bacteria to the plant cell wall [53], the same as Ca [54]. The higher level of K, S, and Mn in the remoistened treatments point to their water solubility in the substrate, a reason why they were washed out with soaking and draining. For K, the same effect of leaching was observed by Jenkins et al. [39].

4.3. Sterilization of Substrate

In the attempt to open up the option for on-farm upscaling, the straw was not autoclaved in the presented experiments (see [9]) nor finely milled, and higher volumes were handled in contrast to many laboratory studies on biological fiber treatment (e.g., [41,55,56]). In a manual for hobby cultivation of mushrooms, it was stated that usually competing fungi will be overgrown by the inoculated ones [27], whereas Milenkovic [57] recommended intensive washing to hygienize the straw. In a comparison between the soaked and drained straw and the remoistened straw in the presented trials, the plate count of the accompanying microflora actually showed lower numbers in the former. However, none of the inoculated treatments showed any signs of deterioration by bacteria or molds in the optical and sensory evaluation. Look and smell were completely dominated by the inoculated mushroom. This is also supported by the observations of Wan and Li [58] and Zhang et al. [49].
On the other hand, the effect of autoclaving is not only in sterilization. It changes both the physical [49] and chemical characteristics [43]. Zhang et al. [49] found that mycelial growth was enhanced by preceding autoclaving.
Another option to sterilize the straw was discussed by Akhtar et al. [59] and Thomsen et al. [31]. They suggested chemical disinfection with sodium bisulfite (or meta-bisulfite or hydrosulfite), while 15 s of atmospheric steaming were also sufficient to outcompete epiphytic bacteria and fungi. Handling and economic viability have to be considered for the on-farm application.

4.4. Accompanying Microflora

High numbers of aerobic bacteria, yeasts, and molds were counted, especially in the remoistened treatments. However, this did not affect the sensory quality of the straw, which developed a typical smell of mushroom in the case of P. ostreatus and V. volvacea and a characteristic smell with C. subvermispora. In no case it smelled moldy. The basidiomycetes dominated the process, and there might have been bacterial-fungal interactions of mutual control and support [60,61]. Blanchette et al. [60] found that some bacteria and yeasts accelerated the decay of wood in combination with white-rot fungi. On the other hand, the accompanying microflora might have used up the easily accessible nutrients which were released by the basidiomycetes, as mentioned before.

4.5. Lactic Acid Bacteria

Independent of the different pH, which developed under “drained” and “remoistened” conditions, a high number of LAB was observed within the first 14 d under humid but aerobic conditions. In the second and third trial some of the colonies which had grown culture dependently could be identified. Although it was not a quantitative analysis, it may be assumed that the colonies randomly picked from the culture medium represented a certain predominance in the original material. Thus, a shift throughout the storage time and depending on the inoculated fungus could be observed. Weissella cibaria/confusa was mainly observed directly after remoistening and in the C. subvermispora treatment. Zotta et al. [62] found that under aerobic conditions, the growth of Weissella improved without acidification. It showed activity up to pH 10 and grew rapidly up to pH 9 in MRS broth [63]. The second most prevalent genus was Pediococcus after 14 d in C. subvermispora-biodegraded straw and after 7 d in PO 93 straw. This LAB is facultative anaerobic [64]. Enterococcus dominated in the uninoculated control after 7 d and was also present after 14 d in PO 93 straw. Wahyudi et al. [65] found that Enterococcus casseliflavus/gallinarum could degrade lignocellulolytic substances [66], which would explain its occurrence in straw. From the P. ostreatus-biodegraded straw, Leuconostoc was identified. In particular, Leuconostoc citreum is an aerobic LAB that can act in a wide pH range [67]. Some isolates could not be identified.

5. Conclusions

Growth conditions for mushrooms were optimized by remoistening the straw with a defined amount of water instead of soaking and draining as classically recommended. On the other hand, lignin degradation was not observed with either of the treatments, which might have been related to suboptimal pH conditions or microflora competing for nutrients. The interaction of the different microbial groups during SSF is a field for further studies. For feeding purposes, feasible sterilization options other than autoclaving should be evaluated. Compared to Pleurotus, Volvariella is a rather demanding fungus less suitable for lignin degradation. If SSF with edible mushrooms such as P.o. is practiced for the dual purpose of food and feed, the tested pretreatment of remoistening with a defined volume of water might be a feasible approach for farmers.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information (appendix) can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/fermentation8120695/s1, Figure S1: Flowchart of the experiments carried out in the study; Figure S2: Distribution of LAB genera (in % of isolates) isolated from the remoistened straw inoculated with different fungi after 0, 7, and 14 d of incubation; Table S1: Neutral-detergent fiber content (g/kg DM) in the different fungal treatments after varying storage time (d); Table S2: Acid-detergent fiber content (g/kg DM) in the different fungal treatments after varying storage time (d); Table S3: Significance of effects on chemical parameters and microbial counts in drained inoculated straw (Trial 1); Table S4: Significance of effects on chemical parameters and microbial counts in remoistened inoculated straw (Trials 2 and 3).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.D.M.; methodology, S.D.M. and J.M.G.; formal analysis, S.D.M.; investigation, S.D.M. and V.W.; writing—original draft preparation, S.D.M.; writing—review and editing, A.Z. and O.S.; visualization, S.D.M.; supervision, O.S. and A.Z.; project administration, O.S. and S.D.M.; funding acquisition, O.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the SAXONY MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT, CLIMATE (Intraplan 140048), AND AGRICULTURE as part of the project “Environmentally sound dairy cattle nutrition”.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data supporting reported results can be requested from S.D.M.

Acknowledgments

Special thanks go to Jens Schönherr with the laboratory team at the state-owned company for environment and agriculture (BfUL), especially for the determination of ergosterol and for the microbial analysis led by Henriette Mietke-Hofmann. Further thanks go to Dirk Hillegeist of the Julius Kühn Institut Braunschweig for the analysis of non-starch polysaccharides and to our technical assistant Frank Püschel (LfULG).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. FAO. Crops Primary 2020. In FAOSTAT. 2022. Available online: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL] (accessed on 19 October 2022).
  2. Chivenge, P.; Rubianes, F.; Chin, D.V.; Thach, T.V.; Khang, V.T.; Romasanta, R.R.; Hung, N.V.; Trinh, M.V. Rice straw incorporation influences nutrient cycling and soil organic matter. In Sustainable Rice Straw Management; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 131–144. [Google Scholar]
  3. Logeswaran, J.; Shamsuddin, A.H.; Silitonga, A.S.; Mahlia, T.M.I. Prospect of using rice straw for power generation: A review. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 25956–25969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Zhang, R.; Li, X.; Fadel, J.G. Oyster mushroom cultivation with rice and wheat straw. Bioresour. Technol. 2002, 82, 277–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Norring, M.; Manninen, E.; de Passille, A.M.; Rushen, J.; Munksgaard, L.; Saloniemi, H. Effects of Sand and Straw Bedding on the Lying Behavior, Cleanliness, and Hoof and Hock Injuries of Dairy Cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2008, 91, 570–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Lahrmann, H.P.; Oxholm, L.C.; Steinmetz, H.; Nielsen, M.B.F.; D’Eath, R.B. The effect of long or chopped straw on pig behaviour. Animal 2015, 9, 862–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Su, H.; Akins, M.S.; Esser, N.M.; Ogden, R.; Coblentz, W.K.; Kalscheur, K.F.; Hatfield, R. Effects of feeding alfalfa stemlage or wheat straw for dietary energy dilution on nutrient intake and digestibility, growth performance, and feeding behavior of Holstein dairy heifers. J. Dairy Sci. 2017, 100, 7106–7115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lee, H.V.; Hamid, S.B.A.; Zain, S.K. Conversion of Lignocellulosic Biomass to Nanocellulose: Structure and Chemical Process. Sci. World J. 2014, 2014, 631013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Zadrazil, F.; Kamra, D.N.; Isikhuemhen, O.S.; Schuchardt, F.; Flachowsky, G. Bioconversion of Lignocellulose into Ruminant Feed with White Rot Fungi—Review of Work Done at the FAL, Braunschweig. J. Appl. Anim. Res. 1996, 10, 105–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Mahesh, M.; Mohini, M. Biological treatment of crop residues for ruminant feeding: A review. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2013, 12, 4221–4231. [Google Scholar]
  11. Van Kuijk, S.J.A.; Sonnenberg, A.S.M.; Baars, J.J.P.; Hendriks, W.H.; Cone, J.W. Fungal treated lignocellulosic biomass as ruminant feed ingredient: A review. Biotechnol. Adv. 2015, 33, 191–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Nayan, N.; Sonnenberg, A.S.M.; Hendriks, W.H.; Cone, J.W. Screening of white-rot fungi for bioprocessing of wheat straw into ruminant feed. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2018, 125, 468–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Srivastava, D.; Kumar, R.; Singh, V. Wood Decaying Fungi; LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing: Saarbrücken, Germany, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  14. Shrivastava, B.; Thakur, S.; Khasa, Y.P.; Gupte, A.; Puniya, A.K.; Kuhad, R.C. White-rot fungal conversion of wheat straw to energy rich cattle feed. Biodegradation 2011, 22, 823–831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Amirta, R.; Tanabe, T.; Watanabe, T.; Honda, Y.; Kuwahara, M.; Watanabe, T. Methane fermentation of Japanese cedar wood pretreated with a white rot fungus, Ceriporiopsis subvermispora. J. Biotechnol. 2006, 123, 71–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Aguiar, A.; Ferraz, A. Relevance of extractives and wood transformation products on the biodegradation of Pinus taeda by Ceriporiopsis subvermispora. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2008, 61, 182–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Buswell, J.A.; Cai, Y.J.; Chang, S.T.; Peberdy, J.F.; Fu, S.Y.; Yu, H.-S. Lignocellulolytic enzyme profiles of edible mushroom fungi. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1996, 12, 537–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Royse, D.J.; Baars, J.; Tan, Q. Current Overview of Mushroom Production in the World. In Edible and Medicinal Mushrooms; John Wiley & Sons Ltd.: Chichester, UK, 2017; pp. 5–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Streeter, C.L.; Conway, K.E.; Horn, G.W.; Mader, T.L. Nutritional evaluation of wheat straw incubated with the edible mushroom, Pleurotus ostreatus. J. Anim. Sci. 1982, 54, 183–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Valmaseda, M.; Martinez, M.J.; Martinez, A.T. Kinetics of wheat straw solid-state fermentation with Trametes versicolor and Pleurotus ostreatus: Lignin and polysaccharide alteration and production of related enzymatic activities. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1991, 35, 817–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Salvachua, D.; Prieto, A.; Lopez-Abelairas, M.; Lu-Chau, T.; Martinez, A.T.; Martinez, M.J. Fungal pretreatment: An alternative in second-generation ethanol from wheat straw. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102, 7500–7506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Van Kuijk, S.J.A.; Sonnenberg, A.S.M.; Baars, J.J.P.; Hendriks, W.H.; del Río, J.C.; Rencoret, J.; Gutiérrez, A.; de Ruijter, N.C.A.; Cone, J.W. Characterization of wheat straw and oak wood chips treated with the white rot fungi Ceriporiopsis subvermispora and Lentinula edodes. In Fungal Treatment of Lignocellulosic Biomass; Wageningen University: Wageningen, The Netherlands, 2016; pp. 88–110. [Google Scholar]
  23. Belewu, M.A.; Belewu, K.Y. Cultivation of mushroom (Volvariella volvacea) on banana leaves. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2005, 4, 1401–1403. [Google Scholar]
  24. Bao, D.; Gong, M.; Zheng, H.; Chen, M.; Zhang, L.; Wang, H.; Jiang, J.; Wu, L.; Zhu, Y.; Zhu, G.; et al. Sequencing and Comparative Analysis of the Straw Mushroom (Volvariella volvacea) Genome. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e58294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Niu, D.; Zuo, S.; Jiang, D.; Tian, P.; Zheng, M.; Xu, C. Treatment using white rot fungi changed the chemical composition of wheat straw and enhanced digestion by rumen microbiota in vitro. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2018, 237, 46–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Breck, H. Erzeugung von Körner Pilzbrut [Production of Grain Spawn]. 2021. Available online: www.pilzmaennchen.de (accessed on 5 April 2019).
  27. Breck, A.; Breck, H. Pilzzuchtanleitung auf Stroh [Manual for Mushroom Cultivation on Straw]. 2021. Available online: www.pilzmaennchen.de (accessed on 5 April 2019).
  28. VDLUFA. Mikrobiologische Verfahren [Microbiological Procedures]. In VDLUFA Book of Methods, Volume III—The Chemical Analysis of Feedstuff (1976). Supplement 8 as of 2012, 3rd ed.; VDLUFA-Verlag: Darmstadt, Germany, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  29. VDLUFA. VDLUFA Book of Methods, Volume III—The Chemical Analysis of Feedstuff, 3rd ed.; VDLUFA-Verlag: Darmstadt, Germany, 1976. [Google Scholar]
  30. AOAC. AOAC Official Method 994.13: Total Dietary Fiber. In Official Methods of Analysis, 17th ed.; Horwitz, W., Ed.; AOAC International: Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 2000; pp. 84–88. [Google Scholar]
  31. Thomsen, S.T.; Londono, J.E.G.; Ambye-Jensen, M.; Heiske, S.; Kadar, Z.; Meyer, A.S. Combination of ensiling and fungal delignification as effective wheat straw pretreatment. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2016, 9, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Umor, N.A.; Abdullah, S.; Mohamad, A.; Ismail, S.; Ismail, S.I.; Misran, A. Challenges and Current State-of-Art of the Volvariella volvacea Cultivation Using Agriculture Waste: A Brief Review. In Advances in Waste Processing Technology; Yaser, A.Z., Ed.; Springer: Singapore, 2020; pp. 145–156. [Google Scholar]
  33. Zervakis, G.; Philippoussis, A.; Ioannidou, S.; Diamantopoulou, P. Mycelium growth kinetics and optimal temperature conditions for the cultivation of edible mushroom species on lignocellulosic substrates. Folia Microbiolog. 2001, 46, 231–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Flachowsky, G. Stroh und andere faserreiche Futtermittel [Straw and other feed stuff rich in fiber]. In Futtermittelkunde; Jeroch, H., Flachowsky, G., Weissbach, F., Eds.; Jena: Stuttgart, Germany, 1993; pp. 155–191. [Google Scholar]
  35. Fernandez-Fueyo, E.; Castanera, R.; Ruiz-Duenas, F.J.; Lopez-Lucendo, M.F.; Ramirez, L.; Pisabarro, A.G.; Martinez, A.T. Ligninolytic peroxidase gene expression by Pleurotus ostreatus: Differential regulation in lignocellulose medium and effect of temperature and pH. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2014, 72, 150–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Cui, Y.H.; Zhang, H.T.; Meng, Q.H.; Wang, Y.R. Studies on Production Conditions and Properties of Ligninolytic Enzymes from White Rot Fungi. J. Jilin Agric. Sci. 2008, 2. Available online: https://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTotal-JLNK200802015.htm (accessed on 19 October 2022).
  37. Tapia, J.; Vicuna, R. Synthetic Lignin Mineralization by Ceriporiopsis subvermispora Is Inhibited by an Increase in the pH of the Cultures Resulting from Fungal Growth. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1995, 61, 2476–2481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Babu, P.R.; Pinnamaneni, R.; Koona, S. Occurrences, Physical and Biochemical Properties of Laccase. Univers. J. Environ. Res. Technol. 2012, 2, 1–13. [Google Scholar]
  39. Soccol, C.R.; da Costa, E.S.F.; Letti, L.A.J.; Karp, S.G.; Woiciechowski, A.L.; de Souza Vandenberghe, L.P. Recent developments and innovations in solid state fermentation. Biotechnol. Res. Innov. 2017, 1, 52–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Belal, E.B.; Khalafalla, M.M.E. Biodegradation of Panicum repens residues by Pleurotus ostreatus for its use as a non conventional feedstuff in diets of Oreochromis niloticus. ID. Afr. J. Microb. Res. 2011, 5, 3038–3050. [Google Scholar]
  41. Mukherjee, R.; Nandi, B. Improvement of in vitro digestibility through biological treatment of water hyacinth biomass by two Pleurotus species. Intern. Biodeter. Biodegrad. 2004, 53, 7–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Nayan, N.; van Erven, G.; Kabel, M.A.; Sonnenberg, A.S.; Hendriks, W.H.; Cone, J.W. Improving ruminal digestibility of various wheat straw types by white-rot fungi. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2019, 99, 957–965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Tuyen, V.D.; Cone, J.W.; Baars, J.J.P.; Sonnenberg, A.S.M.; Hendriks, W.H. Fungal strain and incubation period affect chemical composition and nutrient availability of wheat straw for rumen fermentation. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 111, 336–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Van Aken, B.; Agathos, S.N. Biodegradation of nitro-substituted explosives by white-rot fungi: A mechanistic approach. In Advances in Applied Microbiology, 48th ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2001; pp. 1–77. [Google Scholar]
  45. Otjen, L.; Blanchette, R.; Effland, M.; Leatham, G. Assessment of 30 White Rot Basidiomycetes for Selective Lignin Degradation. Holzforschung 1987, 41, 343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Otjen, L.; Blanchette, R.A. Selective Delignification of Birch Wood (Betula papyrifera) by Hirschioporus pargamenus in the Field and Laboratory. Holzforschung 1986, 40, 183–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Otjen, L.; Blanchette, R.A. A discussion of microstructural changes in wood during decomposition by white rot basidiomycetes. Can. J. Bot. 1986, 64, 905–911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Otjen, L.; Blanchette, R.A. Xylobolus frustulatus Decay of Oak: Patterns of Selective Delignification and Subsequent Cellulose Removal. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1984, 47, 670–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Zhang, W.; Wu, S.; Cai, L.; Liu, X.; Wu, H.; Xin, F.; Zhang, M.; Jiang, M. Improved Treatment and Utilization of Rice Straw by Coprinopsis cinerea. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2018, 184, 616–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Abdel-Hamid, A.M.; Solbiati, J.O.; Cann, I.K.O. Chapter One—Insights into Lignin Degradation and its Potential Industrial Applications. In Advances in Applied Microbiology, 82nd ed.; Sariaslani, S., Gadd, G.M., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2013; pp. 1–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Kerem, Z.; Hadar, Y. Effect of manganese on preferential degradation of lignin by Pleurotus ostreatus during solid-state fermentation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1995, 61, 3057–3062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Tyagi, S.; Lee, K.J.; Mulla, S.I.; Garg, N.; Chae, J.C. Chapter 2—Production of Bioethanol From Sugarcane Bagasse: Current Approaches and Perspectives. In Applied Microbiology and Bioengineering; Shukla, P., Ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2019; pp. 21–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Flachowsky, G.; Grün, M. Influence of type of diet and incubation time on major elements release in sacco from Italian ryegrass, untreated and ammonia-treated wheat straw. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 1992, 36, 239–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Van Soest, P.J.; Sniffen, C.J. Nitrogen Fractions in NDF and ADF. In Proceedings of the Distillers Feed Conference, Cincinnati, OH, USA, 1984; pp. 73–81. [Google Scholar]
  55. Okano, K.; Ohkoshi, N.; Nishiyama, A.; Usagawa, T.; Kitagawa, M. Improving the nutritive value of madake bamboo, Phyllostachys bambusoides, for ruminants by culturing with the white-rot fungus Ceriporiopsis subvermispora. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2009, 152, 278–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Baker, P.W.; Charlton, A.; Hale, M.D.C. Fibre degradation of wheat straw by Pleurotus erygnii under low moisture conditions during solid-state fermentation. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2019, 68, 182–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Milenkovic, I.; Mllosvljevic, I. (Eds.) Mushroom Cultivation Manual for the Small Mushroom Entrepreneur; Ekofungi: Belgrade, Serbia, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  58. Wan, C.; Li, Y. Fungal pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass. Biotechnol. Adv. 2012, 30, 1447–1457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Akhtar, M.; Blanchette, R.A.; Myers, G.; Kirk, T. An overview of biomechanical pulping research. In Environmentally Friendly Technologies for the Pulp and Paper Industry; Young, R.A., Akhtar, M., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1998; pp. 309–340. [Google Scholar]
  60. Blanchette, R.A.; Shaw, C.G.; Cohen, A.L. SEM study of the effects of bacteria and yeasts on wood decay by brown and white-rot fungi. [Enterobacter, Cryptococcus Pichia, and Saccharomyces]. Scanning Electron. Microsc. 1978, 2, 61–68. [Google Scholar]
  61. Frey-Klett, P.; Burlinson, P.; Deveau, A.; Barret, M.; Tarkka, M.; Sarniguet, A. Bacterial-Fungal Interactions: Hyphens between Agricultural, Clinical, Environmental, and Food Microbiologists. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2011, 75, 583–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Zotta, T.; Ricciardi, A.; Ianniello, R.G.; Storti, L.V.; Glibota, N.A.; Parente, E. Aerobic and respirative growth of heterofermentative lactic acid bacteria: A screening study. Food Microbiol. 2018, 76, 117–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Kaur, R.; Kumar Tiwari, S. Optimization of culture conditions for bacteriocin production by soil isolates Pediococcus pentosaceus LB44 and Weissella confusa LM85. Int. J. Infect. 2017, 4, e15842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Dobrogosz, W.J.; Stone, R.W. Oxidative metabolism in Pediococcus pentosaceus. II. Factors controlling the formation of oxidative activities. J. Bacteriol. 1962, 84, 724–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Wahyudi, A.; Cahyanto, M.N.; Soejono, M.; Bachruddin, Z. Potency of lignocellulose degrading bacteria isolated from buffalo and horse gastrointestinal tract and elephant dung for feed fiber degradation. J. Indones. Tropic. Anim. Agric. 2010, 35, 34–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Sharma, A.; Kumar, R.; Rathi, M.; Bhatia, D.; Malik, D.K. Lignocellulose biodegradation: An advance technology for sustainable environment. Biosci. Biotechnol. Res. Commun. 2018, 11, 634–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Quan, L.H.; Piao, J.Y.; Min, J.W.; Yang, D.U.; Lee, H.N.; Yang, D.C. Bioconversion of ginsenoside Rb1 into compound K by Leuconostoc citreum LH1 isolated from kimchi. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2011, 42, 1227–1237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Fermentation 08 00695 g001 550
Figure 1. Temperature development in straw inoculated with V. volvacea for 28 d.
Figure 1. Temperature development in straw inoculated with V. volvacea for 28 d.
Fermentation 08 00695 g001
Fermentation 08 00695 g002 550
Figure 2. Ergosterol content and pH development in the straw treated with different fungi up to 42 d: ergosterol in (a) drained, (b) remoistened straw; pH in (c) drained, (d) remoistened straw. The text attached to the arrows describes the visual appearance and development of the fungi in the straw at the respective time. P.o.—Pleurotus ostreatus; C.s.—Ceriporiopsis subvermispora; V.v.—Volvariella volvacea. Error bars indicate the standard deviation (SD).
Figure 2. Ergosterol content and pH development in the straw treated with different fungi up to 42 d: ergosterol in (a) drained, (b) remoistened straw; pH in (c) drained, (d) remoistened straw. The text attached to the arrows describes the visual appearance and development of the fungi in the straw at the respective time. P.o.—Pleurotus ostreatus; C.s.—Ceriporiopsis subvermispora; V.v.—Volvariella volvacea. Error bars indicate the standard deviation (SD).
Fermentation 08 00695 g002
Fermentation 08 00695 g003 550
Figure 3. Number of yeasts and molds found on the straw treatments during incubation. Yeasts in (a) drained, (b) remoistened straw. Molds in (c) drained, (d) remoistened straw. P.o.—Pleurotus ostreatus; C.s.—Ceriporiopsis subvermispora; V.v.—Volvariella volvacea. Error bars indicate the standard deviation (SD).
Figure 3. Number of yeasts and molds found on the straw treatments during incubation. Yeasts in (a) drained, (b) remoistened straw. Molds in (c) drained, (d) remoistened straw. P.o.—Pleurotus ostreatus; C.s.—Ceriporiopsis subvermispora; V.v.—Volvariella volvacea. Error bars indicate the standard deviation (SD).
Fermentation 08 00695 g003
Fermentation 08 00695 g004 550
Figure 4. Numbers of aerobic mesophilic bacteria and lactic acid bacteria (LAB) found on straw treatments. Aerobic mesophilic bacteria on (a) drained, (b) remoistened straw. LAB on (c) drained, (d) remoistened straw. P.o.—Pleurotus ostreatus; C.s.—Ceriporiopsis subvermispora; V.v.—Volvariella volvacea. Error bars indicate the standard deviation (SD).
Figure 4. Numbers of aerobic mesophilic bacteria and lactic acid bacteria (LAB) found on straw treatments. Aerobic mesophilic bacteria on (a) drained, (b) remoistened straw. LAB on (c) drained, (d) remoistened straw. P.o.—Pleurotus ostreatus; C.s.—Ceriporiopsis subvermispora; V.v.—Volvariella volvacea. Error bars indicate the standard deviation (SD).
Fermentation 08 00695 g004
Fermentation 08 00695 g005 550
Figure 5. Cellulose, hemicellulose, and ADL concentrations in drained (a–c) and remoistened (d–f) straw treatments. P.o.—Pleurotus ostreatus; C.s.—Ceriporiopsis subvermispora; V.v.—Volvariella volvacea. Error bars indicate the standard deviation (SD).
Figure 5. Cellulose, hemicellulose, and ADL concentrations in drained (a–c) and remoistened (d–f) straw treatments. P.o.—Pleurotus ostreatus; C.s.—Ceriporiopsis subvermispora; V.v.—Volvariella volvacea. Error bars indicate the standard deviation (SD).
Fermentation 08 00695 g005
Fermentation 08 00695 g006 550
Figure 6. Macro and trace elements in fungi treated drained straw during 42 d of incubation. Left (a,d,g): inoculated with Pleurotus ostreatus (P.o.) PO93, center (b,e,h): with Pleurotus ostreatus (P.o.) CBS 411.71, right (c,f,i): with Ceriporiopsis subvermispora (C.s.) CBS 347.63. First row (a–c): macro elements, second row (d–f): elements up to 2 g/kg DM, third row (g–i): trace elements. Error bars indicate the standard deviation (SD).
Figure 6. Macro and trace elements in fungi treated drained straw during 42 d of incubation. Left (a,d,g): inoculated with Pleurotus ostreatus (P.o.) PO93, center (b,e,h): with Pleurotus ostreatus (P.o.) CBS 411.71, right (c,f,i): with Ceriporiopsis subvermispora (C.s.) CBS 347.63. First row (a–c): macro elements, second row (d–f): elements up to 2 g/kg DM, third row (g–i): trace elements. Error bars indicate the standard deviation (SD).
Fermentation 08 00695 g006
Fermentation 08 00695 g007 550
Figure 7. Macro and trace elements in fungi treated remoistened straw during up to 28 d of incubation. Left (a,d,g): inoculated with Pleurotus ostreatus (P.o.) PO93, center (b,e,h): with Volvariella volvacea (V.v.), right (c,f,i): with Ceriporiopsis subvermispora (C.s.) CBS 347.63. First row (a–c): macro elements, second row (d–f): elements up to 2 g/kg DM, third row (g–i): trace elements. Error bars indicate the standard deviation (SD).
Figure 7. Macro and trace elements in fungi treated remoistened straw during up to 28 d of incubation. Left (a,d,g): inoculated with Pleurotus ostreatus (P.o.) PO93, center (b,e,h): with Volvariella volvacea (V.v.), right (c,f,i): with Ceriporiopsis subvermispora (C.s.) CBS 347.63. First row (a–c): macro elements, second row (d–f): elements up to 2 g/kg DM, third row (g–i): trace elements. Error bars indicate the standard deviation (SD).
Fermentation 08 00695 g007
Table
Table 1. Biological treatments in the different trials.
Table 1. Biological treatments in the different trials.
Trial 1—Soak and DrainTrial 2—Remoisten and V.v.Trial 3—Remoisten and C.s./P.o.
InoculantStrainsC. subvermispora CBS 347.63, P. ostreatus CBS 411.71 and PO93V. volvacea DSM 6190, uninoculated controlC. subvermispora CBS 347.63, P. ostreatus CBS 411.71
Growth mediumWheat grainsWheat grainsWheat grains
StrawSoakingAbundant H2O2.7 L H2O/kg straw
(25% target DM)		2.7 L H2O/kg straw
(25% target DM)
DrainingYesNoNo
StorageAmbient °C21 °C24 °C23 °C
SamplingAfter d0, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 420, 7, 14, 21, 280, 5, 7, 10, 14
C.s.—Ceriporiopsis subvermispora; P.o.—Pleurotus ostreatus; V.v.—Volvariella volvacea.
Table
Table 2. Lactic acid bacteria species identified by MALDI-TOF and number of their isolates from remoistened straw at different incubation times.
Table 2. Lactic acid bacteria species identified by MALDI-TOF and number of their isolates from remoistened straw at different incubation times.
Storage Duration (d)TreatmentIsolates (n)Genus (n)Species (n)
0Remoistened for 24 h49Enterococcus (2)durans
mundtii
Lactobacillus (12)curvatus (6)
pentosus/paraplantarum/plantarum (6)
Pediococcus (8)pentosaceus
Weissella (24)cibaria/confusa
unidentified (3)(3)
7C. subvermispora8Enterococcus (1)casseliflavus
Pediococcus (1)pentosaceus
Weissella (5)cibaria/confusa
unidentified (1)
P. ostreatus PO9311Lactobacillus (1)pentosus/paraplantarum/plantarum
Lactococcus (3)lactis
Leuconostoc (1)sp.
Pediococcus (4)pentosaceus
Weissella (1)cibaria/confusa
unidentified (1)
epiphytic microflora14Enterococcus (5)casseliflavus (1)
(uninoculated) faecium (1)
mundtii (3)
Pediococcus (1)pentosaceus
Weissella (6)cibaria/confusa
unidentified (2)(2)
14C. subvermispora5Pediococcus (2)pentosaceus
Weissella (3)cibaria/confusa
P. ostreatus PO9316Enterococcus (4)casseliflavus(2)
gallinarum (2)
Lactobacillus (1)pentosus/paraplantarum/plantarum
Lactococcus (1)lactis
Leuconostoc (2)citreum
Pediococcus (1)pentosaceus
Weissella (1)cibaria/confusa
unidentified (6)(4), (1), (1)
Table
Table 3. Non-fiber carbohydrates (g/kg DM) in the different fungal treatments after varying storage time (d).
Table 3. Non-fiber carbohydrates (g/kg DM) in the different fungal treatments after varying storage time (d).
StrainP.o. PO 93P.o. PO 93P.o. 411C.s. 347C.s. 347V.v.
drainedremoisteneddraineddrainedremoistenedremoistened
Trial131132
0 d54.912754.954.9106106
5 d 109 82.2
7 d53.311352.741.378.3123
10 d 112 79.6
14 d43.712865.365.781.8127
21 d89.3 92.077.7 81.4
28 d95.3 10151.3 79.0
35 d99.0 80.071.3
42 d78.7 98.075.0
mean76.611881.664.385.6103
SEM1.903.091.901.903.093.09
P.o.—Pleurotus ostreatus; C.s.—Ceriporiopsis subvermispora; V.v.—Volvariella volvacea. SEM standard error of the means.
Table
Table 4. Content and proportion of polysaccharide monomers in untreated wheat straw.
Table 4. Content and proportion of polysaccharide monomers in untreated wheat straw.
Monomersg/kg DM% of NSP
Arabinose28.225.17
Xylose220.3540.4
Mannose1.980.36
Galactose6.901.27
Glucose287.9652.8
Xylose/ArabinoseRatio 7.01
NSP Non-starch polysaccharides.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Martens, S.D.; Wildner, V.; Greef, J.M.; Zeyner, A.; Steinhöfel, O. Growth and Influence of White-Rot Fungi on the Chemical Composition of Wheat Straw Inoculated under Varying Pre-Conditions. Fermentation 2022, 8, 695. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation8120695

AMA Style

Martens SD, Wildner V, Greef JM, Zeyner A, Steinhöfel O. Growth and Influence of White-Rot Fungi on the Chemical Composition of Wheat Straw Inoculated under Varying Pre-Conditions. Fermentation. 2022; 8(12):695. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation8120695

Chicago/Turabian Style

Martens, Siriwan D., Vicki Wildner, Jörg M. Greef, Annette Zeyner, and Olaf Steinhöfel. 2022. "Growth and Influence of White-Rot Fungi on the Chemical Composition of Wheat Straw Inoculated under Varying Pre-Conditions" Fermentation 8, no. 12: 695. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation8120695

APA Style

Martens, S. D., Wildner, V., Greef, J. M., Zeyner, A., & Steinhöfel, O. (2022). Growth and Influence of White-Rot Fungi on the Chemical Composition of Wheat Straw Inoculated under Varying Pre-Conditions. Fermentation, 8(12), 695. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation8120695

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop