1. Introduction
The Tile Calorimeter (TileCal) [
1,
2] is the central hadronic calorimeter of the ATLAS experiment [
3] in the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) [
4] at CERN. TileCal contributes to the measurement and reconstruction of hadrons, jets,
-leptons hadronic decays, and missing transverse momentum. It also assists in muon identification and provides inputs to the Level 1 calorimeter trigger system. TileCal is a sampling calorimeter consisting of staggered steel plates and plastic scintillating tiles that are oriented perpendicular to the beam. TileCal is divided into a long barrel, consisting of two central barrels and two extended barrels (cf
Figure 1a). It covers the pseudo-rapidity range
. Each barrel is segmented into 64 wedges (modules) in
corresponding to
granularity in
. Each module is further segmented in the radial direction into three layers. The granularity in
in the two innermost layers is
, and it is
in the outermost layer. The segmentation in the
,
, and radial directions define the cell structure of the TileCal. In total, there are 5182 cells in 256 TileCal modules. A schematic with the TileCal module is depicted in
Figure 1b. Charged particles produce light in scintillators, which is collected by wavelength shifting (WLS) fibers from two sides of each plastic tile and that then transport it to the photomultiplier tubes (PMTs). Each TileCal cell is read-out by two PMTs to provide signal redundancy and to improve the energy resolution.
In the present system, the PMT signals are digitized at a frequency of 40 MHz. The digital samples are stored in on-detector pipeline memories. At the same time, the trigger analog boards sum the PMT pulses into pseudo-projective in – space trigger towers and send them to the Level-1 calorimeter trigger system. Once the event is accepted by the hardware-based Level-1 trigger system, it is extracted from pipelines and sent for further processing. The Level-1 trigger system processes events at the maximal rate of 100 kHz. The software-based High-Level Trigger system (HLT) refines the events selected at the Level 1 trigger and transfers them to local storage at about a 1 kHz rate.
The datasets collected by the LHC experiments during the Run-1 and Run-2 operations allowed for testing the Standard Model (SM) of particle physics with remarkable precision up to unprecedented energy scales in the sectors of strong and electroweak interactions, heavy flavor physics, and Higgs boson production. The High-Luminosity upgrade of the LHC (HL-LHC) [
5] will provide an instantaneous luminosity that is five times larger than the nominal LHC one, with a goal to collect 4000 fb
−1 integrated luminosity by the end of the HL-LHC data taking. This dataset manifests a new precision frontier in the Higgs sector, opens up unique opportunities to study rare production processes and offers a chance to probe for Beyond the Standard Model physics with unprecedented sensitivity. Among most important are the measurements of the Higgs boson couplings to a percent accuracy and its self-coupling, studies of the di-Higgs production, and decays in Higgs boson couplings to invisible states, as well as the production of three massive vector bosons, searches for lepton flavor violation, and measurements of four top-quarks production mechanisms.
Such an ambitious physics program implies a high event rate and requires excellent read-out capabilities of the sub-detectors, supreme selectivity and functionality of the trigger system, and ultimate performance of the data-acquisition system (DAQ). The high-luminosity conditions impose significant challenges for the detector, trigger, and data-acquisition systems. Approximately 200 simultaneous proton–proton collisions will be produced in every bunch crossing on average, leading to a significant increase in the particle flux in the detector. TileCal on-detector electronics will receive up to about 160 Gy of total ionizing dose (TID) during the full HL-LHC data taking, which is an order of magnitude larger than one in Run-2. The HL-LHC Tile Calorimeter must satisfy the broad physics program goals and withstand extremely challenging conditions during a decade-long data taking.
In the HL-LHC system, the digitized PMT signals are sent to the off-detector electronics, where the energy reconstruction is performed for every TileCal cell. Trigger objects of different granularity, i.e.,
and
in
–
space trigger towers and individual cells with energy depositions above a certain threshold (e.g., cells compatible with minimum ionizing particle energy losses for muon triggering), are built and sent to the L0/L1 Calo, L0Muon, and Global trigger systems for further processing [
6]. Therefore, the full readout system has to be replaced in order to handle the increase in the data rate, to enhance radiation tolerance of the on-detector electronics, and to be compatible with the fully digital ATLAS trigger and data-acquisition system for the HL-LHC.
In addition, 10% of the most exposed PMTs will be replaced by new PMTs, while the remaining optics will be retained. The higher radiation levels also require the redesign of the low-voltage (LV) and high-voltage (HV) power distribution and regulation systems.
The HL-LHC will start the proton–proton collisions in 2029. The ATLAS experiment has started the design and construction of the upgraded detector [
7,
8] to fully exploit the physics potential of the HL-LHC dataset.
This contribution presents the Tile Calorimeter upgrade program [
9] and discusses its current status. It is organized as follows. In
Section 2, the new design of the TileCal mechanical structure is described, and the problem of optical components aging is addressed in
Section 3. The upgrades of both the on-detector and off-detector electronics are discussed in
Section 4.
Section 5 and
Section 6 describe the low-voltage and high-voltage power supply systems, respectively. Finally, the measurements of the hadron response performed in test-beam studies using the upgraded electronics are presented in
Section 7. The results are summarized in
Section 8.
2. Mechanical Structure of TileCal
TileCal is organized into three cylindrical volumes (barrels), one Long Barrel (LB), consisting of two central barrels, and two Extended Barrels (EB), centered along the beam axis. Each barrel consists of 64 identical modules.
An EB module is read-out by 32 PMTs housed in a super-drawer (SD) together with the associated electronics. Super-drawers are located at the outer radius of the calorimeter. An LB module is read out by PMTs that are placed into two super-drawers together with related on-detector electronics. The total number of PMTs is 9852, and almost all calorimeter cells are read-out by two PMTs for redundancy, while only a few cells are read-out using the single-PMT scheme.
The SDs are constructed of mechanically linked Mini-Drawers (MD). They hold the PMTs and on-detector electronics. Each MD can hold up to 12 PMTs and is electrically independent from the adjacent MDs. Four MDs are linked to create one LB super-drawer, while only three MDs are required to build one EB super-drawer. In EB super-drawers, two additional micro-drawers hold PMTs in the right position. The micro-drawers do not hold digital electronics. This modular design was chosen to facilitate handling during the installation and maintenance. The MDs are produced from aluminum and high-density, fire-retardant polyethylene. Cooling of the electronics is ensured via a cooling bridge and a water channel inside the aluminum frame. Following extensive prototyping and tests in beam at CERN, the design has been finalized, and the production will be completed by the end of 2022.
3. Aging of the Optics and Long-Term Robustness Tests of New PMTs
Most of the optics elements in the TileCal cells cannot be replaced without dismounting the entire ATLAS detector and a complete disassembling of the TileCal. Dedicated analysis of the TileCal performance and aging during the Run-1 and Run-2 data-taking periods [
9] indicate that the aging of these elements will not significantly impact the TileCal’s performance throughout the full HL-LHC data taking. Therefore, neither scintillating tiles nor the WLS fibers will be replaced towards the HL-LHC upgrade.
The PMT response varies over time during data taking because it is affected by variations in the photo-cathode quantum efficiency and dynode multiplication gain due to the integrated anode charge over the running period. To ensure excellent detector performance during the physics collisions, the PMT response is monitored every 2–3 days with the Laser calibration system, sending laser light pulses to all the PMTs. Using the Laser calibration system, the PMT response variation during Run-1 and Run-2 was studied in great detail [
10,
11]. The PMT response is characterized by down-drifts and up-drifts (response recovery). The down-drifts coincide with the collision periods, while the recoveries occur during the technical stops. The observed down-drifts mostly affect the PMTs that are reading out the TileCal’s innermost layer [
12]. The estimated maximum integrated anode change at the end of the HL-LHC data taking is around 600 C for most exposed TileCal cells.
Since the degradation in the PMT response depends on the amount of integrated anode charge, the study of the PMT response variation as a function of the integrated anode charge is performed to understand the PMT’s performance in the HL-LHC’s conditions. In this study, PMTs are excited using the laser light, while a light-emitting diode (LED) is used to generate a charge that is integrated by the PMTs. All PMTs are equipped with high-voltage active dividers to ensure the PMTs’ linearity over a wide range of anode currents. The results of the study are shown in
Figure 2. Red triangular points represent the average response of PMTs model Hamamatsu R7877 dismounted from TileCal detector in February 2017. After being dismounted, these PMTs already integrated up to 40 C in previous laboratory tests. Black circular points represent the average response of PMTs model Hamamatsu R11187, an evolution of model Hamamatsu R7877. Over time, the number of PMTs in a given data bin can vary, due to the different charge integrated by a given PMT. Missing data points correspond to a period of time in Fall 2021, when many interruptions in data taking had taken place with interrupting the charge integration.
With more than 400 C (several PMTs are already at 500 C) of integrated anode charge, all but a single PMT show excellent performance, retaining full response [
12,
13]. Both tested PMT models match the Tile Calorimeter performance requirements through the HL-LHC’s data taking. Based on the detailed studies, approximately 10% of all PMTs, corresponding to the most exposed cells, will be replaced within the HL-LHC upgrade program.
5. Low1
A three-stage, low-voltage system is presented in
Figure 5. Low-voltage power supplies (LVPS) are placed on-detector to convert 200 VDC to 10 VDC as required for the on-detector electronics. The LVPS design is based on the COTS components. However, due to their position in a MD, the LVPS are the TileCal components most exposed to radiation. Following a series of extensive irradiation test campaigns, radiation hard components were identified.
The monitoring and control functions of the LVPS were separated to improve robustness. The monitoring functions are ensured by the radiation hard version of the Embedded Local Monitor Board (ELMB). The new ELMB2 board is functionally equivalent to the legacy ELMB.
The on-detector part of the ON/OFF/ENABLE control of each low-voltage converter is built using a passive system implemented on a so-called ELMB-motherboard. It uses a tri-state voltage levels to minimize the necessary cabling. The control system allows for individual control of a single MD LVPS. In addition, each Main Board and Daughter Board half-board is powered by a separate power converter to minimize the impact of a single component failure on the system’s performance. The ELMB-motherboard also routes power to the ELMB2. The production of the ELMB-motherboard will be completed in Summer 2022.
Point-of-load regulators located directly on the Main Board and the Daughter Board make up the third stage of the LV system. A full vertical slice of the LV system was built and tested at CERN in the period from 2019 to 2022. It demonstrated the required functionalities and robustness of all three stages of the LV system [
19]. The LVPS boards will go into pre-production in Fall 2022.
6. High-Voltage Distribution and Regulation
The High-Voltage (HV) TileCal HL-LHC upgrade system consists of HV-remote boards and HV-supplies boards, located far from the detector in custom-designed HV-crates, connected to the on-detector components by ∼100 m long HV-cables [
20]. Inside the detector, the passive HV-bus boards are used to bring the HV individually to each PMT located inside a mini-drawer. The HV-remote boards separately regulate each HV channel using a dedicated regulation loop. This regulation loop is a simplified version of the legacy one [
21]. As in the HL-LHC, this board is located off-detector and is not affected by the radiation damage. The regulation scheme controls the high voltage in each channel to within 0.5 V. The total number of HV-remote boards is 256.
The main functional improvement in the HL-LHC HV system compared to the legacy one is an addition of ON/OFF control for each group of four channels complemented by a jumper for each individual channel.
A single input HV, either V or V, is provided for every group of 24 channels, while the voltage of each channel is regulated individually in a range of 360 V. The primary HV is provided by the Hamamatsu C12446-12 modules mounted on the HV-supply boards, and two primary HV inputs are used to provide HV for 48 (32) channels in a Long (Extended) Barrel module.
The HV-bus board is the only component of the HV distribution system that is installed on the detector. These boards are fully passive and have four layers to ensure the protection of the tracks with high-voltage in the inner layers of the board. The TileCal HL-LHC upgrade HV distribution system is shown in
Figure 6.
The latest prototypes of the full HV system components were successfully used in the TileCal test-beam campaign of June 2022.
7. Test-Beam
Several test-beam campaigns were carried out at CERN with the HL-LHC TileCal upgrade electronics. Three Tile Calorimeter modules, two LBs and one EB, were exposed to hadron (pion, kaon and proton) beams with energies,
, ranging from 16 to 30 GeV [
22].
The MDs were equipped with FENICS cards, Main-Boards and Daughter Boards. The on-detector electronics were powered with the pre-production version of the LVPS, and the latest prototypes of the HV system were used to operate the PMTs. The on-detector electronics were configured through the upgrade version of the TileCal PreProcessor, which was also used to take both physics and calibration data. In addition, one module was equipped with a combination of the upgrade and legacy electronics. The aim was to study the performance of the different versions of upgrade electronics and to obtain a direct comparison with the legacy system. The good performance of the new electronics was demonstrated during these test beam campaigns.
In addition to the tests of the latest electronics prototypes, the test-beam campaigns are used to study the TileCal response to hadrons with different energies. The hadron identification is performed using a system of Cerenkov counters [
22]. The energy deposited by an incident particle,
, is reconstructed as a sum of energy depositions in all calorimeter cells with energies twice as large as the noise threshold,
. The noise is determined in events collected between beam bursts using a random trigger, typically
MeV. The energy response is defined as a ratio of the mean deposited energy to the beam energy,
. The measurements of the Tile Calorimeter response to positive pions, kaons and protons as a function of beam energy are presented in
Figure 7. The measurements are also compared to the predictions obtained with the Geant4-based [
23,
24] ATLAS simulation toolkit [
25] of the TileCal test-beam experimental setup.
The energy response results for pions, kaons and protons determined in data and in simulated events agree within the uncertainties. On average, the differences between the data and Monte Carlo simulations of the energy response was found to be 1.1% with an average total uncertainty in the energy response determination of 1.4%.