Next Article in Journal
Interocular Timing Differences in Horizontal Saccades of Ball Game Players
Next Article in Special Issue
Developmental Eye Movement (DEM) Test in Adults: Age-Related Changes and Italian Normative Data
Previous Article in Journal
Syndromic Retinitis Pigmentosa: A Narrative Review
Previous Article in Special Issue
Dynamic Visual Acuity, Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex, and Visual Field in National Football League (NFL) Officiating: Physiology and Visualization Engineering for 3D Virtual On-Field Training
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Ball-Flight Viewing Duration and Estimates of Passing Height in Baseball

by
Emily Benson
,
Andrew J. Toole
and
Nick Fogt
*
College of Optometry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 17 October 2024 / Revised: 16 January 2025 / Accepted: 17 January 2025 / Published: 25 January 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Eye and Head Movements in Visuomotor Tasks)

Abstract

Predictions of the vertical location of a pitched ball (termed the passing height) when the ball arrives at an observer may be based on internal models of ball trajectory and situational cues, kinematic cues from the pitcher’s motion, and visual ball-flight cues. The informational content of ball-flight cues for judgments of vertical passing height when the ball’s launch angle is small and when situational and kinematic cues are limited is unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine whether passing heights can be judged adequately from ball-flight cues and whether judgments of passing height improve as viewing time increases under the aforementioned conditions. Twenty subjects stood 40 feet (12.19 m) from a pneumatic pitching machine that propelled tennis balls toward them at three speeds (from 53 mph (85 kph) to 77 mph (124 kph)). The ball’s launch angle was constant. The subject’s vision was blocked at 100 ms or 250 ms after pitch release. Subjects indicated the height at which they expected the ball to arrive. In the absence of explicit situational cues or kinematic cues and in the presence of a small and constant launch angle, the longer viewing time of ball-flight cues improved passing height estimates but did not result in accurate responses for the slower speeds.
Keywords: sports vision; ball-flight cues; passing height estimates; situational cues; kinematic cues; cue integration sports vision; ball-flight cues; passing height estimates; situational cues; kinematic cues; cue integration

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Benson, E.; Toole, A.J.; Fogt, N. Ball-Flight Viewing Duration and Estimates of Passing Height in Baseball. Vision 2025, 9, 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/vision9010008

AMA Style

Benson E, Toole AJ, Fogt N. Ball-Flight Viewing Duration and Estimates of Passing Height in Baseball. Vision. 2025; 9(1):8. https://doi.org/10.3390/vision9010008

Chicago/Turabian Style

Benson, Emily, Andrew J. Toole, and Nick Fogt. 2025. "Ball-Flight Viewing Duration and Estimates of Passing Height in Baseball" Vision 9, no. 1: 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/vision9010008

APA Style

Benson, E., Toole, A. J., & Fogt, N. (2025). Ball-Flight Viewing Duration and Estimates of Passing Height in Baseball. Vision, 9(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/vision9010008

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop