Next Article in Journal
Towards a Farmer-Centric Approach to Advise Provision
Previous Article in Journal
How to Nudge a Modern Consumer towards Healthier Food Choices
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Abstract

Micronutrient Content of Plant-Based Meat Alternatives Available in the UK and Ireland: Product Audits (2021 and 2023) †

1
Centre for Public Health, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast BT12 6BJ, UK
2
School of Biological Sciences, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast BT9 5DL, UK
3
School of Agriculture, Food Science and Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, D04 V1W8 Dublin, Ireland
4
Department of Biological Sciences, Munster Technological University, T12 P928 Cork, Ireland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 14th European Nutrition Conference FENS 2023, Belgrade, Serbia, 14–17 November 2023.
Proceedings 2023, 91(1), 256; https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2023091256
Published: 5 February 2024
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 14th European Nutrition Conference FENS 2023)

Abstract

:
Knowledge of micronutrient content of commercial plant-based meat alternatives (PBMAs) is limited. This study aimed to identify changes in micronutrient content of PBMAs over time, as well as how micronutrient levels of PBMAs compare to similar meat products using product audit data. An online audit of PBMAs in Tesco and Sainsbury’s was conducted in 2021 and 2023. On-pack information was extracted and inputted into Excel. Products were categorised, with categories containing on-pack micronutrient content for ≥2 products compared with similar meat products using data from Nutritics software and descriptive statistics applied. Nutrient claim thresholds were used to determine how many PBMAs were eligible to make a ‘source of’ or ‘high in’ claim for vitamin B12 (≥0.38 μg and ≥0.75 μg/100 g, respectively) and iron (≥2.1 mg and ≥4.2 mg/100 g, respectively). Results: Around 7% of products (n = 23/351 in 2021 and n = 22/324 in 2023) reported vitamin B12 content on-pack and 8% of products reported iron content on-pack (n = 28/351 for 2021 and n = 25/324 for 2023). All products contained levels adequate to make a ‘source of’ claim, with around 22% (2021) and 41% (2023) of these products eligible to make a ‘high in vitamin B12’ claim and 14% (2021) and 28% (2023) eligible to make a ‘high in iron’ claim. Median vitamin B12 and iron content/100 g was higher in 2023 products for 5/6 and 4/5 categories, respectively, with no change in the other category. For 2023 data, PBMAs had lower mean vitamin B12 contents/100 g in 4/6 categories compared to meat products (0.6–1.8 μg for PBMAs vs. 0.0–3.0 μg for meat products). For all six categories (burgers, mince, beef, pork, chicken, and lamb), PBMAs had higher mean iron contents/100 g than comparable meat categories (2.8–6.8 mg for PBMAs vs. 0.4–2.7 mg for meat products). Magnesium, zinc, calcium, vitamin A, and folic acid contents were listed on ≤1 product per category. Discussion: Vitamin B12 and iron contents of the PBMAs included in these audits appear to be increasing over time, however, levels of vitamin B12 need to increase to equate to those of red meat. Further fortification represents an option for improving the micronutrient profile of PBMAs to reflect levels in comparable meat products.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.L., A.P.N. and J.V.W.; methodology, L.L.; formal analysis, L.L. and H.V.; data curation, H.V., N.C. and H.F.; writing—original draft preparation, L.L.; writing—review and editing, J.V.W., A.P.N., J.W. and L.L.; visualisation, L.L.; supervision, J.V.W., A.P.N. and L.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was conducted as part of Leona Lindberg’s PhD project which is funded by Northern Ireland’s Department of Agriculture, Environment and Rural Affairs (DAERA) [2019R546].

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lindberg, L.; Woodside, J.V.; Vogan, H.; Campbell, N.; Fitzgerald, H.; Walton, J.; Nugent, A.P. Micronutrient Content of Plant-Based Meat Alternatives Available in the UK and Ireland: Product Audits (2021 and 2023). Proceedings 2023, 91, 256. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2023091256

AMA Style

Lindberg L, Woodside JV, Vogan H, Campbell N, Fitzgerald H, Walton J, Nugent AP. Micronutrient Content of Plant-Based Meat Alternatives Available in the UK and Ireland: Product Audits (2021 and 2023). Proceedings. 2023; 91(1):256. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2023091256

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lindberg, Leona, Jayne V. Woodside, Hannah Vogan, Niamh Campbell, Hannah Fitzgerald, Janette Walton, and Anne P. Nugent. 2023. "Micronutrient Content of Plant-Based Meat Alternatives Available in the UK and Ireland: Product Audits (2021 and 2023)" Proceedings 91, no. 1: 256. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2023091256

APA Style

Lindberg, L., Woodside, J. V., Vogan, H., Campbell, N., Fitzgerald, H., Walton, J., & Nugent, A. P. (2023). Micronutrient Content of Plant-Based Meat Alternatives Available in the UK and Ireland: Product Audits (2021 and 2023). Proceedings, 91(1), 256. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2023091256

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop