Figure 1.
Classification of pore types. (
Figure 1: The International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry, abbreviated as “IUPAC”, is an internationally recognized standard for pore size classification proposed by the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry [
6]. The “Hodot” classification method was a coal pore size classification scheme proposed by the Soviet scholar Khodot (Xoдoт, B.B.) in 1966 [
6]).
Figure 1.
Classification of pore types. (
Figure 1: The International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry, abbreviated as “IUPAC”, is an internationally recognized standard for pore size classification proposed by the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry [
6]. The “Hodot” classification method was a coal pore size classification scheme proposed by the Soviet scholar Khodot (Xoдoт, B.B.) in 1966 [
6]).
Figure 2.
Pore structure determination method.
Figure 2.
Pore structure determination method.
Figure 3.
Scored screen allowance and cumulative screen allowance of machine-made sand.
Figure 3.
Scored screen allowance and cumulative screen allowance of machine-made sand.
Figure 4.
Diagram of particle size cumulative distribution.
Figure 4.
Diagram of particle size cumulative distribution.
Figure 5.
Particle size distribution.
Figure 5.
Particle size distribution.
Figure 6.
HPSCC experimental samples’ preparation process.
Figure 6.
HPSCC experimental samples’ preparation process.
Figure 7.
HPSCC-A adsorption/desorption isotherms. In the area of relatively low pressure (
0.45), the curve rises slowly, and the adsorption and desorption curves coincide, indicating that the concrete is mainly composed of cylindrical pores and wedge-shaped pores. As the relative pressure increases, when 0.45, the adsorption–desorption curve shows a separation, forming a large hysteresis loop, indicating that within this pressure range, the adsorbate mainly exists in the form of “ink-bottle” or “impermeable” pores. At the end of the curve, the adsorption–desorption curves tend to coincide, which indicates that the internal structure of the cementitious material has a “crack-pore” or “interstices” or “slit-like” particles formed in the plate. The adsorption capacity of the sample at the maximum relative pressure area is 0.3 mL/g.
Figure 7.
HPSCC-A adsorption/desorption isotherms. In the area of relatively low pressure (
0.45), the curve rises slowly, and the adsorption and desorption curves coincide, indicating that the concrete is mainly composed of cylindrical pores and wedge-shaped pores. As the relative pressure increases, when 0.45, the adsorption–desorption curve shows a separation, forming a large hysteresis loop, indicating that within this pressure range, the adsorbate mainly exists in the form of “ink-bottle” or “impermeable” pores. At the end of the curve, the adsorption–desorption curves tend to coincide, which indicates that the internal structure of the cementitious material has a “crack-pore” or “interstices” or “slit-like” particles formed in the plate. The adsorption capacity of the sample at the maximum relative pressure area is 0.3 mL/g.
Figure 8.
HPSCC-B adsorption/desorption isotherms. In the area of
0.93, the curve rises slowly, and the adsorption and desorption curve are separated. This shows that the adsorbent in concrete does not completely dissociate; therefore, its pore shape is mainly “ink-bottle” and “spherical” air-tight pores. In the area of 0.93 1, the adsorption and desorption curves tend to coincide, suggesting that the sample has a “slit-like” structure formed by cracks or “interstices” particles inside.
Figure 8.
HPSCC-B adsorption/desorption isotherms. In the area of
0.93, the curve rises slowly, and the adsorption and desorption curve are separated. This shows that the adsorbent in concrete does not completely dissociate; therefore, its pore shape is mainly “ink-bottle” and “spherical” air-tight pores. In the area of 0.93 1, the adsorption and desorption curves tend to coincide, suggesting that the sample has a “slit-like” structure formed by cracks or “interstices” particles inside.
Figure 9.
HPSCC-C Adsorption/desorption isotherms. The adsorption-desorption isotherms are similar to
Figure 8. In the area of
0.93, the sample is mainly composed of “ink-bottle” and “spherical” air-tight pores. At a relative pressure of 0.93
1, the sample has a “slit-like” structure formed by cracks or “interstices” particles inside.
Figure 9.
HPSCC-C Adsorption/desorption isotherms. The adsorption-desorption isotherms are similar to
Figure 8. In the area of
0.93, the sample is mainly composed of “ink-bottle” and “spherical” air-tight pores. At a relative pressure of 0.93
1, the sample has a “slit-like” structure formed by cracks or “interstices” particles inside.
Figure 10.
HPSCC-D adsorption/desorption isotherms. The adsorption–desorption isotherms are similar to
Figure 11. Therefore, the pore structure is similar to that of HPSCC-A. The maximum adsorption capacity is 0.3 mL/g.
Figure 10.
HPSCC-D adsorption/desorption isotherms. The adsorption–desorption isotherms are similar to
Figure 11. Therefore, the pore structure is similar to that of HPSCC-A. The maximum adsorption capacity is 0.3 mL/g.
Figure 11.
HPSCC-E adsorption/desorption isotherms. In the area of relatively low pressure (
0.42), the experimental results only show the adsorption curve, indicating that within this pressure range, the adsorbate did not desorb and remained completely inside the pores. As the relative pressure increases, when 0.42 0.8, the adsorption–desorption curve shows a separation, and the adsorption pores mainly exists in the form of “ink-bottle” or “impermeable” pores. At the end of the curve (0.8 1), the adsorption–desorption curves tend to coincide, which indicates that the internal structure of the cementitious material has a “crack-pore” or “interstices” or “slit-like” particles formed in the plate.
Figure 11.
HPSCC-E adsorption/desorption isotherms. In the area of relatively low pressure (
0.42), the experimental results only show the adsorption curve, indicating that within this pressure range, the adsorbate did not desorb and remained completely inside the pores. As the relative pressure increases, when 0.42 0.8, the adsorption–desorption curve shows a separation, and the adsorption pores mainly exists in the form of “ink-bottle” or “impermeable” pores. At the end of the curve (0.8 1), the adsorption–desorption curves tend to coincide, which indicates that the internal structure of the cementitious material has a “crack-pore” or “interstices” or “slit-like” particles formed in the plate.
Figure 12.
BJH (desorption) pore area and pore size curve and morphology.
Figure 12.
BJH (desorption) pore area and pore size curve and morphology.
Figure 13.
HPSCC-B BJH (desorption) pore area and pore size curve and Morphology.
Figure 13.
HPSCC-B BJH (desorption) pore area and pore size curve and Morphology.
Figure 14.
HPSCC-C BJH (desorption) pore area and pore size curve and morphology.
Figure 14.
HPSCC-C BJH (desorption) pore area and pore size curve and morphology.
Figure 15.
HPSCC-D BJH (desorption) pore area and pore size curve and morphology.
Figure 15.
HPSCC-D BJH (desorption) pore area and pore size curve and morphology.
Figure 16.
HPSCC-E BJH (desorption) pore area and pore size curve and morphology.
Figure 16.
HPSCC-E BJH (desorption) pore area and pore size curve and morphology.
Figure 17.
Low-temperature liquid nitrogen adsorption volume fractal dimension fitting diagram of HPSCC-A. The fitting equation is K = −0.55, the correlation coefficient R2 is 0.95, and the fitting curve has a good correlation with the experimental curve. The fractal dimension D is 2.45.
Figure 17.
Low-temperature liquid nitrogen adsorption volume fractal dimension fitting diagram of HPSCC-A. The fitting equation is K = −0.55, the correlation coefficient R2 is 0.95, and the fitting curve has a good correlation with the experimental curve. The fractal dimension D is 2.45.
Figure 18.
Low-temperature liquid nitrogen adsorption volume fractal dimension fitting diagram of HPSCC-B. The fitting equation is K = −0.63. Because the experimental curve fluctuates greatly, the correlation coefficient R2 is 0.88. The fitting curve deviates from the experimental curve. The correlation coefficient R is a statistical index used to reflect the close degree of correlation between variables. It is generally considered that when , the correlation between the two curves is good, and the fitting curve is acceptable. The fractal dimension D was calculated to be 2.37.
Figure 18.
Low-temperature liquid nitrogen adsorption volume fractal dimension fitting diagram of HPSCC-B. The fitting equation is K = −0.63. Because the experimental curve fluctuates greatly, the correlation coefficient R2 is 0.88. The fitting curve deviates from the experimental curve. The correlation coefficient R is a statistical index used to reflect the close degree of correlation between variables. It is generally considered that when , the correlation between the two curves is good, and the fitting curve is acceptable. The fractal dimension D was calculated to be 2.37.
Figure 19.
Low-temperature liquid nitrogen adsorption volume fractal dimension fitting diagram of HPSCC-C. The fitting equation is K = −0.65, the correlation coefficient R2 is 0.87, and the fractal dimension D is 2.35.
Figure 19.
Low-temperature liquid nitrogen adsorption volume fractal dimension fitting diagram of HPSCC-C. The fitting equation is K = −0.65, the correlation coefficient R2 is 0.87, and the fractal dimension D is 2.35.
Figure 20.
Low-temperature liquid nitrogen adsorption volume fractal dimension fitting diagram of HPSCC-D. The fitting equation is K = −0.67, the correlation coefficient R2 is 0.93, and the fitting curve has a good correlation with the experimental curve. The fractal dimension D is 2.33.
Figure 20.
Low-temperature liquid nitrogen adsorption volume fractal dimension fitting diagram of HPSCC-D. The fitting equation is K = −0.67, the correlation coefficient R2 is 0.93, and the fitting curve has a good correlation with the experimental curve. The fractal dimension D is 2.33.
Figure 21.
Low-temperature liquid nitrogen adsorption volume fractal dimension fitting diagram of HPSCC-E. The fitting equation is K = −0.70, the correlation coefficient R2 is 0.977, and the fitting curve has a good correlation with the experimental curve. The fractal dimension D is 2.30.
Figure 21.
Low-temperature liquid nitrogen adsorption volume fractal dimension fitting diagram of HPSCC-E. The fitting equation is K = −0.70, the correlation coefficient R2 is 0.977, and the fitting curve has a good correlation with the experimental curve. The fractal dimension D is 2.30.
Figure 22.
Relation between W/C and compressive strength.
Figure 22.
Relation between W/C and compressive strength.
Figure 23.
Relationship between W/C and BJH average pore size.
Figure 23.
Relationship between W/C and BJH average pore size.
Figure 24.
Relational curve between W/C and fractal dimension.
Figure 24.
Relational curve between W/C and fractal dimension.
Figure 25.
The relational curve between compressive strength and fractal dimension.
Figure 25.
The relational curve between compressive strength and fractal dimension.
Table 1.
Mineral composition and content of cement.
Table 1.
Mineral composition and content of cement.
Test Items | SO3 | SiO2 | Fe2O3 | Al2O3 | CaO | MgO | CL− | K2O | Na2O | P2O5 |
---|
Test results | 2.5% | 18.2% | 4.3% | 6.2% | 62.2% | 1.5% | NO | 1.01% | 0.31% | 0.2% |
Table 2.
Record of gravel quality inspection.
Table 2.
Record of gravel quality inspection.
Test Items | Particle Size Distribution | Average Mud Content | Average Needle-Like Particles | Average Value of Crushing Index | The Average Content of Soil | Average Compressive Strength of Carbonate Parent Rock |
---|
Small diameter “Guarnite” | Nominal diameter (mm) of sieve pore | 2.5 | 5.0 | 10.0 | 0.6% | 1.5% | 7.6% | 0.2% | 75.8 MPa |
Score remaining% | 17.2 | 76.9 | 3.9 |
Cumulative screen surplus% | 98.0 | 80.8 | 3.9 |
Large diameter “Gravel” | Nominal diameter of sieve pore (mm) | 5 | 10 | 16 | 0.7% | 1.8% | 7.7% | 0.2% | 71.5 MPa |
Score remaining% | 4.9 | 92.3 | 1.9 |
Cumulative screen surplus% | 99.1 | 94.2 | 1.9 |
Table 3.
Testing results of hazardous substances in large diameter “crushed stone”.
Table 3.
Testing results of hazardous substances in large diameter “crushed stone”.
Test Items | Technical Requirements | Technical Requirements | Test Results | Conclusions |
---|
Chloride ion content | ≤0.06% | 0.01% | Meets the requirements |
Harmful substances | Sulphide and sulfate content (converted to SO3 by mass) | ≤1.0% | 0.2% | Meet the requirements |
Organic matter content in pebbles (colorimetric test) | The color should not be darker than the standard color. Otherwise, strength comparison tests should be conducted according to the method for cement mortar strength tests, and the compressive strength ratio should not be less than 0.95. | Qualified |
Table 4.
“Machine-made sand” testing results.
Table 4.
“Machine-made sand” testing results.
Test Items | Technical Requirements | Test Results | Conclusions |
---|
Chloride ion content | ≤0.06% | 0.01% | Meets the requirements |
Harmful substances | Sulphide and sulfate content (converted to SO3 by mass) | ≤1.0% | 0.2% | Meet the requirements |
Organic matter content (tested by colorimetry) | Color should not be darker than standard color. Otherwise, a strength contrast test should be carried out according to the cement mortar strength test method, and the compressive strength ratio should not be less than 0.95. | Qualified |
Mica content | ≤2% | 0.1% |
Light substance content | ≤1% | 0.3% |
Table 5.
“Machine-made sand” test record.
Table 5.
“Machine-made sand” test record.
Test Items | Modulus of Fineness | Moisture Content | The Average Content of Soil | Stone Powder Content MB Average (g·kg−1) | Crushing Index |
---|
Test results | 3.0 | 2.2% | 0.3% | 7.7% | 14% |
Table 6.
Mineral composition and content of slag powder.
Table 6.
Mineral composition and content of slag powder.
Test Items | SO3 | SiO2 | Fe2O3 | Al2O3 | CaO | MgO | CL− | K2O | Na2O | P2O5 |
---|
Slag powder | 2.7% | 24.2% | 3.2% | 16.7% | 37.8% | 7.5% | No | 1.2% | No | 0.2% |
Silica fume | 0.7% | 92.1% | 0.2% | 0.8% | 0.2% | 0.5% | No | 0.3% | No | 0.04% |
Microspheres | 0.4% | 64.4% | 5.4% | 10.2% | 10.0% | 1.1% | No | 2.6% | 0.7 | 0.7% |
Table 7.
Ingredients and contents of admixtures.
Table 7.
Ingredients and contents of admixtures.
Test Items | Chloride Ion Content | Alkali Content | Solid Content | Density | PH | Na2SO4 |
---|
Test results | No | 0.35% | 24.9% | 1.04% | 5.6% | 0.1% |
Table 8.
C80 HPSCC mix design (kg/m3).
Table 8.
C80 HPSCC mix design (kg/m3).
| Sand Rate | W/C | Machine-Made Sand/kg | Total Amount of Cementitious Material | Gravel/kg | Crushed Stone/kg | Polycarboxylic Admixture |
---|
Cement/kg | Microspheres/kg | Slag Powder/kg | Silica Fume/kg | Expansive Agent/kg |
---|
HPSCC-A | 0.47 | 0.19 | 620 | 380 | 62 | 76 | 70 | 32 | 367 | 551 | 2.8% of cementitious material |
HPSCC-B | 0.47 | 0.20 | 620 | 380 | 62 | 76 | 70 | 32 | 367 | 551 |
HPSCC-C | 0.47 | 0.21 | 620 | 380 | 62 | 76 | 70 | 32 | 367 | 551 |
HPSCC-D | 0.47 | 0.22 | 620 | 380 | 62 | 76 | 70 | 32 | 367 | 551 |
HPSCC-E | 0.47 | 0.23 | 620 | 380 | 62 | 76 | 70 | 32 | 367 | 551 |
Table 9.
Compressive strength test results of HPSCC samples.
Table 9.
Compressive strength test results of HPSCC samples.
Sample Number | W/C | Compressive Strength of the Sample (MPa) | Samples with a Range Greater than 30% (MPa) | Standard Compressive Strength Value (MPa) [28] |
---|
HPSCC-A | 0.19 | 98.3, 116.8, 108.2, 114.6, 78.9 | 78.9 | 104.00 |
HPSCC-B | 0.20 | 119.9, 125.7, 98.1, 89.4, 101.3 | 89.4 | 105.08 |
HPSCC-C | 0.21 | 101.4, 114.2, 71.6, 115.6, 118.6 | 71.6 | 106.82 |
HPSCC-D | 0.22 | 102.3, 120.1, 97.6, 121.6, 120.1 | NO | 106.72 |
HPSCC-E | 0.23 | 113.2, 110.7, 100.1, 111.9, 126.9 | NO | 106.93 |
Table 10.
Summary of HPSCC experimental results.
Table 10.
Summary of HPSCC experimental results.
Sample Number | W/C | Compressive Strength (MPa) | BJH Cumulative Pore Volume (mL/g) | BJH Average Pore Diameter (nm) | Cumulative Pore Area (m2/g) | K | D | R |
---|
HPSCC-A | 0.19 | 104.00 | 0.0004 | 14.9115 | 0.1073 | −0.55 | 2.45 | 0.95 |
HPSCC-B | 0.20 | 105.08 | 0.0034 | 11.8498 | 1.1477 | −0.63 | 2.37 | 0.88 |
HPSCC-C | 0.21 | 106.82 | 0.0051 | 11.1603 | 1.8279 | −0.65 | 2.35 | 0.86 |
HPSCC-D | 0.22 | 106.72 | 0.0142 | 13.3688 | 4.2487 | −0.67 | 2.33 | 0.93 |
HPSCC-E | 0.23 | 106.93 | 0.0312 | 17.9827 | 6.9400 | −0.70 | 2.30 | 0.98 |