Next Article in Journal
Satellite-Based Crop Typology Mapping with Google Earth Engine
Previous Article in Journal
The Optimal Condition-Based Maintenance Strategies for a Self-Repairable Component under Fixed-Interval Detection
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Recent Advances in Lithium Extraction †

by
Arbee Chrystel Alera
1,
Juan Paulo Benitez
1,
Richard Joseph Fernandez
1,
Carl Khleann Pascual
1,
Faith Policarpio
1 and
Edgar Clyde Repato Lopez
2,3,*
1
Chemical Engineering Department, Adamson University, 900 San Marcelino St., Ermita, Manila 1000, Philippines
2
Nanotechnology Research Laboratory, Department of Chemical Engineering, University of the Philippines Diliman, Quezon City 1100, Philippines
3
Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Santo Tomas, España Blvd., Sampaloc, Manila 1015, Philippines
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 3rd International Electronic Conference on Processes—Green and Sustainable Process Engineering and Process Systems Engineering (ECP 2024), 29–31 May 2024; Available online: https://sciforum.net/event/ECP2024.
Eng. Proc. 2024, 67(1), 52; https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024067052
Published: 24 September 2024
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 3rd International Electronic Conference on Processes)

Abstract

:
The increasing global demand for lithium, driven by its critical role in battery technology and nuclear applications, necessitates efficient and sustainable extraction methods. Lithium, primarily sourced from brine pools, igneous rocks, and low-grade ores, is extracted through various techniques including ion exchange, precipitation, electrolysis, and adsorption. This paper reviews the current state of lithium extraction, focusing on the diverse methodologies employed to meet the burgeoning demand. Extraction methods exploit the solubilities of salts in brine water, employing techniques like liquid–liquid extraction. Despite the effectiveness, challenges arise from the similar characteristics of lithium and other constituents. Adsorption methods utilize lithium-selective adsorbents, requiring stability and adaptability under varying conditions. Membrane processes, such as electrodialysis and nanofiltration, offer the potential for energy-efficient, continuous lithium recovery. Electrochemical processes facilitate lithium intercalation and deintercalation, emphasizing the need for electrode optimization. The review further delves into emerging technologies, like electrosorption and ionic pumps, highlighting their roles in lithium recovery. Challenges such as temperature dependency, impurity influence, and initial concentration are discussed, underscoring their impact on lithium recovery efficiency. Finally, this paper identifies research gaps and future directions, emphasizing the need for cost-effective, high-performance electrode materials and systems. It concludes that enhancing lithium recovery and separation techniques, particularly in electrochemical Li extraction, is crucial for sustainable lithium production in response to global demand.

1. Introduction

Earth materials are naturally occurring substances found within the geosphere, each serving a variety of functions and purposes across different industries. These materials can exist in various forms, either derived from complex extraction processes or occurring in their natural, pure state [1]. One such material is lithium, a widely abundant metal extracted from sources like brine pools, igneous rocks, and low-grade ores. The industrial demand for lithium initially surged due to its use in batteries, which capitalize on its excellent electrochemical properties and high energy density. This early application set the stage for further exploration into lithium’s potential, including its promising applications in nuclear technology [2]. As industries continue to recognize and harness the value of lithium, its significance in advancing both everyday technology and emerging fields remains substantial.
Lithium, often referred to as “white gold”, has emerged as a critical resource in the 21st century due to its essential role in energy storage technologies, particularly in lithium-ion batteries. These batteries power a wide range of devices, from portable electronics and electric vehicles to large-scale energy storage systems. As the demand for clean energy solutions grows and the use of lithium-ion batteries proliferates, efficient and sustainable lithium extraction methods have become increasingly important. Recent advancements in lithium extraction technology are addressing these demands by improving efficiency, reducing environmental impact, and unlocking new sources of this vital element.
The growing demand for lithium, driven by its extensive applications, has prompted detailed market analyses. These studies have confirmed that lithium resources are finite and are expected to last for at least a century [3]. Forecasts from 2015 to 2080 indicate a significant increase in lithium demand, emphasizing the need for efficient resource management. Since lithium does not occur naturally in its pure form, various extraction methods are employed to isolate it from other substances. Lithium used across different industries is extracted from a range of sources, including mineral ores and salt brines. Chile is known to have the largest reserves of lithium, making it a key player in the global supply chain [4]. To meet the escalating demand, it is crucial to continue exploring and optimizing extraction techniques to ensure a steady supply of this vital resource.
Historically, lithium was extracted primarily from mineral ores, such as spodumene, or from lithium-rich brines. The traditional methods of extraction have involved either hard rock mining or the evaporation of brine solutions, both of which have significant environmental and economic implications. For instance, the evaporation of brine from salt flats, while effective, requires vast amounts of water and can lead to ecological damage. On the other hand, hard rock mining, while more direct, is energy-intensive and involves extensive land disruption.
Lithium’s broad range of applications is driving a significant increase in its demand. It is used in the manufacture of specialty glasses and ceramics, crucial electronic and electrical components, lubricating greases, and fluxes for welding and soldering [5]. Given these diverse uses, the need for lithium is growing rapidly. To keep up with this escalating demand, it is essential to boost lithium production through multiple approaches. This involves optimizing and expanding existing extraction and processing techniques, developing new methods, and increasing the efficiency of current technologies. By enhancing production capacity and exploring innovative solutions, the industry can meet the rising need for lithium across various sectors and applications.
Lithium extraction from brine typically involves methods like evaporative concentration and refining. In the evaporative concentration process, brine is collected in large reservoirs where it is left to evaporate under the sun’s heat throughout the year. This process causes the water to evaporate, leaving behind concentrated brine from which sodium, potassium, and magnesium chlorides crystallize. These salts are then separated, allowing the lithium to be isolated [6].
Another method for extracting lithium is through adsorption, which uses lithium-selective ion exchange sorbents. In this technique, lithium is extracted from saline water by passing it through materials specifically designed to attract and hold lithium ions. For the process to be effective, the lithium must remain in contact with these sorbents for an extended period. However, this method can be expensive due to the high cost of the sorbents and the substantial energy required to maintain the process [7].
Membrane technologies offer alternative approaches for lithium extraction. Techniques such as electrodialysis, nanofiltration, and bipolar membranes have been developed to reduce energy consumption and improve system modularity. In saline treatment, membranes can suffer from scale-shaped inorganic fouling, which can hinder their performance. To combat this, advanced membranes are designed with low thermal conductivity, high chemical resistance, low mass transfer resistance, and excellent thermal stability. These properties help to enhance membrane distillation efficiency, minimize precipitation issues, and reduce contamination [8].
The electrochemical method of lithium extraction involves the movement of lithium ions between electrodes and an electrolyte during charging and discharging cycles. In this method, lithium ions are reduced from the electrolyte and inserted into the cathode material of the electrode during discharge. Conversely, during charging, lithium ions are released from the cathode material back into the electrolyte [9].
Additionally, reaction-coupled separation technology has emerged as a promising method for separating magnesium from lithium. This technology is notable for its efficiency in achieving high levels of separation between magnesium and lithium while simultaneously allowing for the production of valuable magnesium-based functional materials from magnesium resources [10]. To address the growing demand for lithium, it is essential to increase overall productivity, develop lithium products with a higher market value, enhance engineering technologies, and improve the comprehensive utilization of available resources.

2. Methods of Lithium Recovery

2.1. Extraction Method

The extraction process (Figure 1) used to obtain lithium from brine water leverages the solubility differences of the salts present in the solution. This method, often referred to as liquid–liquid extraction, relies on the varying solubility properties of the different salts to isolate lithium. Despite its effectiveness, this technique can encounter challenges when the desired chemical, lithium, shares similar solubility characteristics with other salts present in the solution [11].
The extraction process typically involves separating the solution into two distinct phases: an aqueous phase and an organic phase. During this process, impurities remain in the aqueous phase while the lithium ions move into the organic phase. To isolate the lithium, the organic phase is treated to separate out the lithium ions, which are then transferred back into a new aqueous phase through a process of back-extraction. Following this, evaporation is used to remove any remaining contaminants.
For the separation of solid particles, precipitation is used to convert dissolved substances into solid forms. Finally, pure lithium is obtained by adding sodium carbonate, which reacts with the lithium to form a precipitate that can be collected [12]. This comprehensive approach ensures the effective extraction and purification of lithium from brine sources.

2.2. Adsorption Process

The adsorption method (Figure 2) is designed to extract lithium from brine solutions using a specialized adsorbent that selectively captures lithium ions. This process involves several key criteria for the adsorbent used. Firstly, the adsorbent must be stable enough to maintain its structural integrity when introduced into the solution. It should also be resilient to changes in temperature and pressure within the system to ensure consistent performance. Moreover, the adsorbent needs to exhibit high selectivity for lithium, which is crucial for achieving a higher recovery rate of lithium from the solution. Commonly employed adsorbents in this method include aluminum salt adsorbents and lithium-ion sieve adsorbents. These materials are chosen for their effectiveness in selectively capturing lithium ions from brine solutions [13,14]. By meeting the necessary stability, adaptability, and selectivity requirements, these adsorbents facilitate the efficient extraction and recovery of lithium.

2.3. Membrane Process

Membrane techniques (Figure 3) present a promising approach for recovering lithium from salt-lake brine, offering notable advantages in terms of energy efficiency and continuous operation. These techniques are categorized based on their driving mechanisms: electrodialysis, which relies on electrical potential, and nanofiltration, which operates under pressure. Bipolar membranes and membrane capacitive deionization systems have garnered significant interest because they provide several benefits compared to traditional electrodialysis methods. These advanced membrane systems can effectively handle the extraction and separation of lithium from brines that have high ratios of magnesium to lithium (Mg/Li). To achieve successful industrial applications, membrane materials must exhibit high selectivity for lithium, low energy consumption, and robust cycling performance [15]. This ensures efficient, cost-effective, and reliable lithium recovery processes.

2.4. Electrochemical Process

The electrochemical process utilized for Li+ intercalation and deintercalation in lithium-ion batteries uses the working electrode as an ion sieve to catch Li+ from brine and release it into the recovered solution. This method enables the avoidance of acid elution during the dissolution of an ion sieve. In electrochemical systems, the ion sieve’s cycling performance must be increased. The working electrode also needs to be energy-efficient, have a high lithium capacity, be stable over time, and be very selective. In the study of aluminum-based composites for brine decomposition and lithium precipitation, Al−Ca and Al−Fe alloys were compared under controlled conditions: 70% aluminum content, 70 °C reaction temperature, 1 g/L of initial lithium concentration, and 3 h of reaction time. The Al−Ca alloy produced LiCl·Al(OH)3·xH2O, indicating effective brine decomposition, while the Al−Fe alloy yielded mainly Al and Al13Fe4, showing poor reactivity. The Al−Ca alloy demonstrated a high lithium precipitation rate of 93.6% compared to 23.8% with Al−Fe, making it the preferred choice. Further experiments revealed that increasing the mole ratio of Al to Li improved precipitation efficiency, peaking at 93.8% with a ratio of 3.5:1. Ca content in the Al−Ca alloy also influenced the precipitation rate; up to 35% Ca enhanced the rate to 94.7%, but higher levels decreased it due to Ca(OH)2 formation, which inhibited the reaction. Initial lithium concentrations and reaction temperatures also affected the outcome; higher lithium concentrations and temperatures up to 70 °C improved precipitation, though temperatures above 70 °C decreased the rate due to the decomposition of the lithium compound. Reaction time had a minimal impact, with 1 h sufficient for achieving a 94.6% precipitation rate [14].

2.5. Reaction-Coupled Separation Technology

Reaction-coupled separation technology is a sophisticated method that combines simultaneous chemical reactions with physical separation processes to enhance lithium extraction. This technology offers several key advantages. Firstly, it separates out substances that could hinder product collection during the reaction itself, which improves the overall yield of lithium. Secondly, it removes undesirable constituents during the reaction, preventing them from affecting the reaction rate and ensuring that the process continues efficiently. Additionally, the heat generated by the reaction plays a beneficial role by aiding in the separation of components and reducing the overall energy consumption. Finally, by integrating the reaction and separation into a single process, this technology lowers the costs associated with lithium extraction, minimizing the need for additional separation steps and thereby reducing overall expenses [16].

2.6. Electrosorption Technology

Electrosorption technology (EST), also known as Capacitive Deionization (CDI), is a method that leverages the adsorption of ions and charged particles onto the surface of a charged electrode to concentrate dissolved salts or other charged substances. This technology is particularly effective for water purification and desalination. According to the parallel capacitor hypothesis, when the two electrodes are charged, positively charged cations and other particles migrate toward the cathode, forming electric double layers and adhering to the electrode surface. Similarly, anions are attracted to the anode surface.
When a voltage of the opposite polarity is applied or if the circuit is left open, the existing electric fields either reverse or vanish. This change causes the previously adsorbed ions or particles to desorb, making way for a new cycle of adsorption and desorption. Leveraging this principle, a high-efficiency battery system has been developed for extracting lithium from brine with a high sodium-to-lithium ratio. In this system, silver electrodes are employed to capture chloride ions, while LiFePO4 electrodes are used to capture lithium ions [17]. This approach enhances the efficiency of lithium extraction by utilizing the selective adsorption capabilities of the electrodes.

2.7. Ionic Pump

The electrochemical lithium ionic pump is an innovative device designed to extract lithium ions from liquid solutions using an ion exchange membrane. When a voltage is applied to the system, lithium ions and their counter-ions are separated and captured by the positive and negative electrodes, respectively. When an inverse voltage is applied, the previously captured lithium ions and counter-ions are released back into the electrolyte, allowing the electrodes to be refreshed and ready for another extraction cycle [17].
As technology advances, the demand for lithium has increased significantly due to its critical role in rechargeable batteries used in a wide range of electric devices, including appliances, power tools, and vehicles. Additionally, lithium is used in industries such as aluminum refining, glass production, and ceramics manufacturing. This growing demand has spurred substantial research into effective lithium extraction and separation methods. Many of these studies involve enhancing lithium recovery by applying external electric fields [18].
Various techniques and technologies have been developed to improve lithium recovery, including precipitation, electrochemical batteries, solvent extraction, ion sieves, and membrane-based methods [19]. Among the latest methods, Direct Lithium Extraction (DLE) has gained prominence. DLE encompasses three primary techniques: adsorption, ion exchange, and solvent extraction.
The rising interest from researchers in optimizing lithium extraction has led to numerous studies exploring different methods to maximize recovery. Traditionally, lithium production has relied on brine evaporation, a process that is both time-consuming and water-intensive. This has led to an increased search for more efficient alternative extraction methods [16].

3. Factors Influencing Lithium Recovery

3.1. Initial Concentration

Azimi and Liu (2020) [20] conducted a study that highlighted several crucial factors influencing lithium recovery and its physicochemical properties, including temperature, salt concentration, feeding rate, and seeding. Their research revealed that lithium recovery is directly proportional to the initial concentration of salt in the solution. Specifically, they achieved a 70% recovery of lithium with an initial salt concentration of 2.0 mol/L. The study noted that recovery rates increased with the presence of Li2CO3 solids in the solution, which could be extracted, and the initial amount of Li2CO3 in the feed that was solubilized. Additionally, they observed that higher salt concentrations resulted in a steeper recovery curve over time compared to lower concentrations. This behavior aligns with collision theory, which suggests that a greater number of ions in the solution enhances the likelihood of collisions, thus improving recovery rates.

3.2. Temperature

The impact of temperature on lithium recovery has been thoroughly examined under various conditions. In the research conducted by Azimi and Liu (2020) [20], the study analyzed lithium recovery at temperatures ranging from 25 °C to 85 °C, with a constant initial concentration of 2 mol/L and an agitation rate set at 300 rpm. Their findings indicated a direct relationship between temperature and lithium recovery, meaning that as the temperature increased, so did the recovery rate. This behavior is attributed to the solubility characteristics of Li2CO3, which exhibit a negative slope or decrease at extreme temperatures. As the temperature rises, the kinetic energy of ions in the solution increases, which enhances their likelihood of forming isolated crystalline structures. Additionally, higher temperatures lead to an increased rate of collisions among particles, reducing particle agglomeration and improving recovery.

3.3. Impurities Present

Azimi and Liu (2020) [20] explored how impurities affect the quality of lithium products, particularly after acid leaching of Li2SO4, which often results in some residual impurities. These impurities, introduced as dopants into the Li2SO4 solution at varying concentrations, were found to impact recovery efficiency. Specifically, the addition of Na2SO4 was observed to decrease the recovery efficiency of lithium. This reduction is attributed to the increased solubility of Li2CO3 in the presence of Na2SO4, which can be explained by the inert ion effect. This effect arises because the bond energies between ions decrease as bond lengths increase, resulting in reduced effectiveness of the Li2CO3 precipitation process. Further analysis of the mixed solutions revealed that Li+ ions were positioned close to SO42− ions, while CO32− ions were associated with Na+ ions. This spatial arrangement decreases the likelihood of CO32− and Li+ ions pairing and precipitating together, as the presence of inert ions interferes with their interaction. Additionally, the solubility constant plays a significant role in lithium precipitation and recovery. As the solubility product constant (Ksp) of the unwanted byproducts increases relative to that of Li2CO3, Ca2+ ions tend to precipitate more readily, leaving a higher concentration of Li+ ions in the solution. This dynamic further influences the efficiency of lithium recovery.

4. General Process of Lithium Extraction from Brine

The growing demand for lithium has spotlighted the need to increase the production of brine and bittern, driving more attention to research in this area. Recent studies focusing on lithium extraction from seawater, brines, and bitterns are gaining traction as the field evolves (Figure 4). The economic advantages of extracting lithium from brine are notable, with production costs being 30% to 50% lower compared to traditional ore mining. The conventional method for producing lithium carbonate from brine involves evaporative concentration and refining. Initially, brine is concentrated using solar evaporation in large ponds, which allows for the crystallization of sodium, potassium, and magnesium chlorides. Subsequently, the brine undergoes refinement: calcium carbonate is roasted and then added to the lithium chloride solution to precipitate out magnesium hydroxide. This process is summarized in an overall flowsheet for lithium carbonate production from brine water. Various techniques are employed to separate mineral products such as potassium, magnesium, sodium, calcium, and lithium from saltwater. These methods include sorption, ion exchange, solvent extraction, and flotation using anionic collectors. However, the traditional evaporation method for recovering lithium from brine lakes is both inefficient and time-consuming. It also poses environmental challenges, including waste production and high water usage, which adds significant strain on natural resources.

5. Electrochemical Lithium-Recovery System

Electrochemical processes (Figure 5) are considered sustainable alternatives for lithium extraction due to their reliance on electrons as reactants. Unlike traditional evaporation methods, which are energy-intensive and involve significant water loss and chemical use, electrochemical techniques like electrolysis and electrodialysis offer a more efficient and environmentally friendly solution. These methods minimize waste production and reduce water consumption.
To enhance lithium extraction through electrochemical means, various advanced systems have been developed. These include hybrid supercapacitor systems, which combine high power density with energy storage capabilities; asymmetric battery systems, which use different electrode materials to optimize performance; and water splitting systems, which separate water into hydrogen and oxygen and can be adapted for lithium extraction. These innovations reflect the ongoing advancements in technology aimed at improving the efficiency and sustainability of lithium recovery processes.

6. Research Gaps

Despite significant advancements in lithium extraction technologies, several research gaps remain that hinder the optimization and scalability of these processes. Addressing these gaps is crucial for improving the efficiency, environmental sustainability, and economic viability of lithium extraction. The following discussion outlines key areas where further research is needed.
One major research gap lies in the optimization of extraction efficiency and selectivity. While traditional methods such as evaporation and ion exchange have been effective, they often suffer from low recovery rates and long processing times. Direct Lithium Extraction (DLE) methods, including adsorption, ion exchange, and solvent extraction, offer potential improvements but require further refinement. Research is needed to enhance the selectivity of these methods to ensure higher lithium recovery rates while minimizing the co-extraction of other ions. Advanced materials, such as lithium-selective sorbents and high-performance ion exchange resins, need to be developed and tested for their efficiency and durability in various brine compositions.
The environmental impact of lithium extraction is another significant research gap. Traditional methods often involve high water consumption and environmental degradation. Although newer technologies, such as electrochemical processes and membrane-based methods, promise improved sustainability, their long-term environmental impacts remain underexplored. Research is needed to assess the lifecycle environmental impacts of these technologies, including energy consumption, waste generation, and potential effects on local ecosystems. Additionally, there is a need for more sustainable practices in brine management, such as minimizing the impact on freshwater resources and improving the treatment and disposal of waste by-products.
Cost-effectiveness is a critical factor in the adoption of new lithium extraction technologies. Many advanced methods, including electrochemical processes and reaction-coupled separation technologies, have high capital and operational costs. Research is needed to reduce these costs by improving the efficiency of these technologies, optimizing process conditions, and developing more affordable materials and equipment. Additionally, there is a need to explore ways to integrate new technologies into existing infrastructure to reduce the overall cost of transitioning to advanced methods.
Scaling up laboratory-scale processes to industrial-scale operations presents significant challenges. Research is needed to address issues related to process scalability, including the adaptation of technologies to handle large volumes of brine, the development of robust and reliable equipment, and the integration of new methods into existing production systems. Additionally, process integration studies are required to optimize the combination of different extraction technologies to achieve the best overall performance and cost-effectiveness.
In electrochemical lithium extraction methods, the performance of electrode materials is a critical factor. Research is needed to develop and optimize electrode materials with high lithium capture and release capacities, stability, and resistance to corrosion. Advances in material science, such as the development of novel electrode materials and coatings, could significantly improve the efficiency and longevity of electrochemical systems. Additionally, understanding the interaction of these materials with brine and seawater will help in designing more effective and durable electrodes.
The presence of impurities and contaminants in brine can adversely affect the efficiency of lithium extraction processes. Research is needed to develop methods for effectively managing and removing these impurities, such as magnesium, calcium, and sodium ions, which can interfere with the extraction of lithium. Improved techniques for impurity removal and methods for handling complex brine compositions are essential for enhancing the overall efficiency and purity of lithium recovery.
As the demand for lithium grows, recycling and resource utilization become increasingly important. Research is needed to develop efficient methods for recycling lithium from spent batteries and other waste products. Additionally, there is a need to explore new sources of lithium, such as geothermal brines and lithium-rich clays, to supplement traditional extraction methods. Enhancing the recovery and recycling of lithium will reduce the reliance on primary extraction and contribute to a more sustainable supply chain.
The long-term performance and stability of extraction technologies are crucial for their practical application. Research is needed to evaluate the durability and reliability of new technologies over extended periods of operation. This includes studying the impact of operational conditions on the performance of extraction systems, the effects of cyclic loading on electrode materials, and the long-term stability of membranes and sorbents.
The development of advanced analytical techniques is essential for monitoring and optimizing lithium extraction processes. Research is needed to improve methods for real-time analysis of brine composition, monitoring of extraction efficiency, and detection of impurities. Advanced sensors and analytical tools will help in better understanding and controlling the extraction process, leading to improved performance and efficiency.
Finally, socioeconomic and policy considerations play a role in the development of lithium extraction technologies. Research is needed to assess the social and economic impacts of new extraction methods, including their effects on local communities, job creation, and resource management. Additionally, there is a need to explore policy frameworks and regulatory measures that can support the development and adoption of sustainable lithium extraction technologies.
In summary, addressing these research gaps is crucial for advancing lithium extraction technologies and meeting the growing demand for lithium in a sustainable and cost-effective manner. By focusing on improving efficiency, reducing environmental impact, optimizing economic viability, and developing innovative technologies, the lithium extraction industry can make significant progress toward a more sustainable and resilient future.

7. Future Outlook

As the world continues to transition towards renewable energy sources and electric vehicles, the demand for lithium is expected to grow significantly. This increased demand necessitates a comprehensive and forward-thinking approach to lithium extraction, encompassing advancements in technology, environmental considerations, and economic viability. The future outlook in lithium extraction involves several key areas of development and innovation.
Firstly, technological advancements will play a pivotal role in shaping the future of lithium extraction. Traditional methods, such as evaporation ponds and hard rock mining, have served well in the past but come with limitations, including high water consumption, long extraction times, and environmental impacts. Emerging technologies, such as Direct Lithium Extraction (DLE), are promising alternatives that offer more efficient and environmentally friendly options. DLE techniques, which include adsorption, ion exchange, and solvent extraction, are designed to selectively extract lithium from brine with greater precision and reduced environmental footprint. Among these, hybrid systems combining multiple extraction methods are gaining traction due to their enhanced efficiency and adaptability.
Another promising area is the development of advanced electrochemical technologies. Electrochemical lithium extraction methods, such as electrosorption technology (EST) and electrochemical lithium-ion pumps, leverage the principles of electrolysis and electrodialysis. These methods are advantageous due to their lower energy consumption and minimal chemical usage compared to traditional methods. Future advancements in electrode materials, such as high-capacity and corrosion-resistant electrodes, will be crucial for improving the efficiency and stability of these electrochemical processes. Additionally, optimizing the work efficiency (WE) and capacity (CE) of these systems will be key to maximizing lithium recovery and minimizing operational costs.
Membrane technologies also hold significant promise for the future of lithium extraction. Techniques such as electrodialysis, nanofiltration, and membrane capacitive deionization (CDI) are being refined to enhance their performance and energy efficiency. These technologies use selective membranes to separate lithium from other ions in brine, offering a more sustainable and cost-effective solution compared to conventional methods. The development of membranes with high selectivity, durability, and resistance to fouling will be essential for improving the overall efficiency and longevity of these systems.
The integration of reaction-coupled separation technologies represents another innovative approach in lithium extraction. This method combines chemical reactions with physical separation processes, allowing for the simultaneous removal of impurities and recovery of lithium. The advantages of this approach include increased yield, reduced energy consumption, and lower overall costs. Future research in this area will focus on optimizing reaction conditions and developing new materials to enhance the performance and scalability of these technologies.
Environmental and economic considerations will be crucial in shaping the future of lithium extraction. As the demand for lithium grows, there is a pressing need to balance extraction efficiency with environmental stewardship. The impact of traditional extraction methods on water resources, ecosystems, and local communities must be addressed through sustainable practices and technologies. Innovations in recycling and resource management, such as the recovery of lithium from spent batteries and industrial waste, will be important for reducing the reliance on primary extraction and minimizing environmental impact.
Economic factors will also play a significant role in determining the future landscape of lithium extraction. The cost of extraction technologies, along with market fluctuations and regulatory policies, will influence the feasibility and competitiveness of various methods. Advances in technology are expected to reduce the costs of extraction and improve the overall economic viability of lithium production. Additionally, the development of more efficient and scalable technologies will be critical in meeting the growing demand for lithium while ensuring profitability.
In conclusion, the future of lithium extraction is poised for significant advancements driven by technological innovation, environmental considerations, and economic factors. The transition from traditional methods to more efficient and sustainable technologies will be essential in meeting the increasing demand for lithium. By focusing on advancements in extraction techniques, improving environmental sustainability, and optimizing economic factors, the lithium extraction industry can ensure a reliable and responsible supply of this critical resource for the coming decades.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.C.R.L.; writing—original draft preparation, A.C.A., J.P.B., R.J.F., C.K.P., F.P. and E.C.R.L.; writing—review and editing, E.C.R.L.; supervision, E.C.R.L.; project administration, E.C.R.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Hefferan, K.; O’Brien, J. Earth Materials; John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  2. Meshram, P.; Pandey, B.D.; Mankhand, T.R. Extraction of lithium from primary and secondary sources by pre-treatment, leaching and separation: A comprehensive review. Hydrometallurgy 2014, 150, 192–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kesler, S.E.; Gruber, P.W.; Medina, P.A.; Keoleian, G.A.; Everson, M.P.; Wallington, T.J. Global lithium resources: Relative importance of pegmatite, brine and other deposits. Ore Geol. Rev. 2012, 48, 55–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Yang, S.; Zhang, F.; Ding, H.; He, P.; Zhou, H. Lithium metal extraction from seawater. Joule 2018, 2, 1648–1651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Samadiy, M.; Deng, T. Lithium Recovery from Water Resources by Ion Exchange and Sorption Method. J. Chem. Soc. Pak. 2021, 43, 406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Murodjon, S.; Yu, X.; Li, M.; Duo, J.; Deng, T. Lithium Recovery from Brines Including Seawater, Salt Lake Brine, Underground Water and Geothermal Water. In Thermodynamics and Energy Engineering; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ma, J.; Wang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Xiang, X. Highly Efficient Lithium Extraction from Brine with a High Sodium Content by Adsorption-Coupled Electrochemical Technology. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 11022–11031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wang, Y.; Zhang, G.; Dong, G.; Zheng, H. Research Progress of Working Electrode in Electrochemical Extraction of Lithium from Brine. Batteries 2022, 8, 225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Romero, V.C.E.; Llano, K.; Calvo, E.J. Electrochemical extraction of lithium by ion insertion from natural brine using a flow-by reactor: Possibilities and limitations. Electrochem. Commun. 2021, 125, 106980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sun, Y.; Wang, Q.; Wang, Y.; Yun, R.; Xiang, X. Recent advances in magnesium/lithium separation and lithium extraction technologies from salt lake brine. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2021, 256, 117807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Abuabdou, S.M.A.; Ahmad, W.; Aun, N.C.; Bashir, M.J.K. A review of anaerobic membrane bioreactors (AnMBR) for the treatment of highly contaminated landfill leachate and biogas production: Effectiveness, limitations and future perspectives. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 255, 120215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Novikova, S.; Yaroslavtsev, S.; Rusakov, V.; Chekannikov, A.; Kulova, T.; Skundin, A.; Yaroslavtsev, A. Behavior of LiFe1−yMnyPO4/C cathode materials upon electrochemical lithium intercalation/deintercalation. J. Power Sources 2015, 300, 444–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Gong, L.; Ouyang, W.; Li, Z.; Han, J. Direct numerical simulation of continuous lithium extraction from high Mg2+/Li+ ratio brines using microfluidic channels with ion concentration polarization. J. Membr. Sci. 2018, 556, 34–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Li, Y.-h.; Zhao, Z.-w.; Liu, X.-h.; Chen, X.-y.; Zhong, M.-l. Extraction of lithium from salt lake brine by aluminum-based alloys. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 2015, 25, 3484–3489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhao, K.; Tong, B.; Yu, X.; Guo, Y.; Xie, Y.; Deng, T. Synthesis of porous fiber-supported lithium ion-sieve adsorbent for lithium recovery from geothermal water. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 430, 131423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kentish, S. Innovations in separations technology for the recycling and re-use of liquid waste streams. Chem. Eng. J. 2001, 84, 149–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Baudino, L.; Santos, C.; Pirri, C.F.; La Mantia, F.; Lamberti, A. Recent advances in the lithium recovery from water resources: From passive to electrochemical methods. Adv. Sci. 2022, 9, 2201380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Zhang, Y.; Sun, W.; Xu, R.; Wang, L.; Tang, H. Lithium extraction from water lithium resources through green electrochemical-battery approaches: A comprehensive review. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 285, 124905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ryu, T.; Lee, D.-H.; Ryu, J.C.; Shin, J.; Chung, K.-S.; Kim, Y.H. Lithium recovery system using electrostatic field assistance. Hydrometallurgy 2015, 151, 78–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Liu, H.; Azimi, G. Process analysis and study of factors affecting the lithium carbonate crystallization from sulfate media during lithium extraction. Hydrometallurgy 2020, 199, 105532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Extraction process of lithium. Reprinted with permission from [10]. Copyright 2021 Elsevier.
Figure 1. Extraction process of lithium. Reprinted with permission from [10]. Copyright 2021 Elsevier.
Engproc 67 00052 g001
Figure 2. Adsorption process of lithium recovery. Reprinted with permission from [10]. Copyright 2021 Elsevier.
Figure 2. Adsorption process of lithium recovery. Reprinted with permission from [10]. Copyright 2021 Elsevier.
Engproc 67 00052 g002
Figure 3. Membrane process (electrodialysis) for lithium recovery. Reprinted with permission from [10]. Copyright 2021 Elsevier.
Figure 3. Membrane process (electrodialysis) for lithium recovery. Reprinted with permission from [10]. Copyright 2021 Elsevier.
Engproc 67 00052 g003
Figure 4. Process flow diagram of lithium extraction from brine. Reprinted with permission from [2]. Copyright 2021 Elsevier.
Figure 4. Process flow diagram of lithium extraction from brine. Reprinted with permission from [2]. Copyright 2021 Elsevier.
Engproc 67 00052 g004
Figure 5. Electrochemical lithium recovery system. Reprinted with permission from [18]. Copyright 2021 Elsevier.
Figure 5. Electrochemical lithium recovery system. Reprinted with permission from [18]. Copyright 2021 Elsevier.
Engproc 67 00052 g005
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Alera, A.C.; Benitez, J.P.; Fernandez, R.J.; Pascual, C.K.; Policarpio, F.; Lopez, E.C.R. Recent Advances in Lithium Extraction. Eng. Proc. 2024, 67, 52. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024067052

AMA Style

Alera AC, Benitez JP, Fernandez RJ, Pascual CK, Policarpio F, Lopez ECR. Recent Advances in Lithium Extraction. Engineering Proceedings. 2024; 67(1):52. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024067052

Chicago/Turabian Style

Alera, Arbee Chrystel, Juan Paulo Benitez, Richard Joseph Fernandez, Carl Khleann Pascual, Faith Policarpio, and Edgar Clyde Repato Lopez. 2024. "Recent Advances in Lithium Extraction" Engineering Proceedings 67, no. 1: 52. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024067052

APA Style

Alera, A. C., Benitez, J. P., Fernandez, R. J., Pascual, C. K., Policarpio, F., & Lopez, E. C. R. (2024). Recent Advances in Lithium Extraction. Engineering Proceedings, 67(1), 52. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024067052

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop