Insights of Value Co-creation in Public Sector

A special issue of Administrative Sciences (ISSN 2076-3387).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 April 2021) | Viewed by 51267

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Economics and Business, University of Alcala, 28802 Madrid, Spain
Interests: services; innovation; internationalization; industrial policy

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Service Management, University of Edinburgh Business School, 29 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9JS, UK
Interests: co-production & co-creation; public management; public services reform; services management; the third sector

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of People and Technology, Roskilde University, 4000 Roskilde, Denmark
Interests: Theoretically and practically schooled in service innovation and service design with an explicit focus on value co-creation and user-based innovation.

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Inland School of Business and Social Sciences, Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences, 2418 Elverum, Norway
Interests: qualitative analysis; participant observation; ethnography

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Laboratoire Territoires, Villes, Environnement et Société (TVES), Lille 59800, Université de Lille, France
Interests: innovation; creativity; third places (coworking, fablabs); digital transition; new workplace

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,  

Value creation for service users, communities, and society should be the focus of all public services (Alford, 2016). However, over the past four decades, there has been a sustained emphasis on measuring economic aspects of value and under the pre-eminence of new public management, the focus has been largely on the efficacy of internal business processes rather than the effectiveness of services in meeting needs.  More recently, the concept of co-creation has become of increasing interest to academics, policymakers, and practitioners alike. Co-creation has been used to refer both to the collaborations of various actors to innovate public services to solve a shared problem (Torfing et al, 2016) but also, based on the service management literature, has referred to the process through which value accrues for public service users during and following service delivery (Hardyman et al, 2019). This Special Issue will seek, primarily, to shed light on and develop the second issue. It will present papers which explore the various interactions occurring in the public sector which may enable, constrain, or co-create value for service users, communities, and society. 

From a public service logic perspective, the locus of value creation moves from intra-organizational efficacy towards a dynamic set of interactions within a complex service ecosystem, but which stem primarily from the service interaction, where the processes of production and consumption interconnect (Strokosch and Osborne 2019). Various actors, including public service users, organisations from across sectors and policymakers are thus understood as interacting in a relational process of value co-creation. However, the actuality, intricacies, and interconnections between actors and the processes through which value is created, enabled, or constrained have not been sufficiently understood and developed. Indeed, although a comprehensive research exists on co-production as a participative process through which citizens might be engaged in the transformation of public services, far less is known about how value is co-created during and following service delivery, whether that be face to face or digital encounters (Hardyman et al, 2019) or within a service user’s own life context.  Furthermore, little is known about how novel approaches enable co-creation, such as contemporary service design and co-design methodologies (Wetter-Edman et al, 2014) or Living Labs (Gascó 2017) impact value outcomes for public service users or society. 

This Special Issue calls for papers which offer insight into different processes of value co-creation occurring within public service ecosystems, including both those that are intrinsic to service delivery but also those that involve extrinsic forms of participation, such as co-production, co-design and also inter-organisational relationships.  Importantly, papers should seek to reflect upon the value creation processes which might lead to value creation/destruction or which might be enabled/constrained in the interaction between actors on public service ecosystems.  Within this context, this Special Issue is interested in papers presenting new evidence on value co-creation in public services preferably through case studies or related research designs, although other theoretical or empirical papers are welcome too.

The focus of this Special Issue is three-fold:

  1. Investigate the value co-creation processes taking place within public service ecosystems and their implications for how services are designed and delivered in practice. 
  2. Explore the extent to which value, in its different dimensions, is co-created through these collaborative processes.
  3. Explore the challenges and opportunities around the capacity for co-creation to drive innovation in the design, delivery, content and outcomes achieved by public services. 

We call for research on co-creations from different public service settings, with a particular focus on:

  • case studies on value co-creation during service delivery
  • digital transformation
  • service design
  • public living labs
  • collaborations of public, private, and third sector organizations

Around these or other co-creation areas, research may deal with the following issues:

  • Public value and new evidence on co-creation
  • Idea/design/decision process
  • Co-creation processes and phases
  • Drivers/facilitators/incentives systems and the role of users
  • Capabilities and skills for co-creation
  • Methods and techniques for user or citizen participation
  • Barriers and obstacles, scalability issues
  • Impacts and outcomes
  • Spatial dimensions (national, regional, local level) and their articulation

These lists are not exclusive; other examples and areas of value co-creation are also welcome. Papers with managerial or policy implications are of particular interest too.

References

Alford, J (2016) ‘Co-production, interdependence and publicness: extending public service dominant logic’, Public Management Review, 18(5): 673-691. doi:10.1080/14719037.2015.1111659

Gascó, Mila. (2017). “Living labs: Implementing open innovation in the public sector”. Government Information Quarterly 34, no. 1: 90-98. doi:10.1016/j.giq.

Hardyman, W., Kitchener, M. and Daunt, K.L. (2019) ‘What matters to me! User conceptions of value in specialist cancer care’, Public Management Review, 21(11):1687-1706. doi:10.1080/14719037.2019.1619808

Strokosch, K. and Osborne, S.P. (2020) ‘Co-experience, co-production and co-governance: an ecosystem approach to the analysis of value creation, Policy & Politics, vol xx, no xx: 1–18. doi: 10.1332/030557320X15857337955214

Torfing, J., Sørensen, E., and A. Røiseland (2016) ‘Transforming the public sector into an arena for co-creation: Barriers, drivers, benefits, and ways forward’, Administration and Society 51(5): 795-825. doi:10.1177/0095399716680057

Wetter-Edman, K., Sangiorgi, D., Edvardsson, B., Holmlid, S., Grönroos, C., & Mattelmäki, T. (2014) ’Design for Value Co-Creation: Exploring Synergies Between Design for Service and Service Logic’, Service Science, 6(2):106-121, doi:10.1287/serv.2014.0068

Prof. Dr. Luis Rubalcaba
Dr. Kirsty Strokosch
Dr. Anne Vorre Hansen
Dr. Maria Røhnebæk
Dr. Christine Liefooghe
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Administrative Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • public value 
  • co-creation 
  • best practice 
  • living labs 
  • service design 
  • digital transformation 
  • innovation networks

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (8 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Editorial

Jump to: Research, Review

6 pages, 219 KiB  
Editorial
Insights on Value Co-Creation, Living Labs and Innovation in the Public Sector
by Luis Rubalcaba, Kirsty Strokosch, Anne Vorre Hansen, Maria Røhnebæk and Christine Liefooghe
Adm. Sci. 2022, 12(1), 42; https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci12010042 - 19 Mar 2022
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 5214
Abstract
Citizen participation in the planning, design, and delivery of public services has been of central interest for public administration and management scholars since the 1970s at least (Osborne and Strokosch 2021, 2022) [...] Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Insights of Value Co-creation in Public Sector)

Research

Jump to: Editorial, Review

22 pages, 659 KiB  
Article
Public Value Co-Creation in Living Labs—Results from Three Case Studies
by Nathalie Haug and Ines Mergel
Adm. Sci. 2021, 11(3), 74; https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci11030074 - 23 Jul 2021
Cited by 12 | Viewed by 5368
Abstract
Living Labs—innovation units established to introduce new methods and approaches into public sector organizations—have received a lot of attention as methods for experimentation and open innovation practices in public sector organizations. However, little is known so far about how they co-create public value [...] Read more.
Living Labs—innovation units established to introduce new methods and approaches into public sector organizations—have received a lot of attention as methods for experimentation and open innovation practices in public sector organizations. However, little is known so far about how they co-create public value and which conditions influence these co-creation practices. Therefore, the research questions are: which organizational factors influence the process of public value co-creation and which outcomes and values are produced as a result? The research questions were answered by employing a qualitative research approach conducting semi-structured interviews with employees and participants of three living labs in Germany and Austria. The results show top-level support and lab leadership as the most important context factors. Living labs produce tangible and intangible outcomes. The tangible outcomes are the products developed within the lab, and the intangible outcomes are created by the interaction between the lab’s participants. The main contributions are twofold: first, context factors are identified that lead to the success of co-creation processes within living labs. Second, the study contributes to the literature on public value because it is shown that participation in living labs itself leads to added value in addition to the tangible and intangible outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Insights of Value Co-creation in Public Sector)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 321 KiB  
Article
Public Service Logic: An Appropriate Recipe for Improving Serviceness in the Public Sector?
by Mette Sønderskov and Rolf Rønning
Adm. Sci. 2021, 11(3), 64; https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci11030064 - 29 Jun 2021
Cited by 17 | Viewed by 6632
Abstract
Researchers have made efforts to combine service management theory with public administration theory to develop an enhanced model of public service logic and help the public sector to develop services through co-creation with service users. This study considered the appropriateness of public service [...] Read more.
Researchers have made efforts to combine service management theory with public administration theory to develop an enhanced model of public service logic and help the public sector to develop services through co-creation with service users. This study considered the appropriateness of public service logic for improving serviceness in the public sector, examining the question through a literature review regarding the main elements of service management in which public service logic is anchored. We found no correspondences between this approach and theories on street-level bureaucracy, despite both perspectives aiming to understand the interactions between users and public service providers, and we wanted to explore this gap. We argue that public sector logic neglects important contextual factors, such as the role of public value and politics. Moreover, street-level bureaucrats have a legitimate responsibility not only to provide user-friendly services (creating value for users) but also, occasionally, to overrule citizens’ wishes and needs (following political decisions). We conclude that public service logic does not support the development of more serviceness in the public sector context, because it needs to consider the justification for having a public sector. Further research should consider users as collective citizens rather than individuals. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Insights of Value Co-creation in Public Sector)
20 pages, 633 KiB  
Article
Value Co-Creation between Public Service Organizations and the Private Sector: An Organizational Capabilities Perspective
by Jonathan Rösler, Tobias Söll, Louise Hancock and Thomas Friedli
Adm. Sci. 2021, 11(2), 55; https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci11020055 - 26 May 2021
Cited by 17 | Viewed by 6578
Abstract
Theoretically based on public service logic (PSL), this paper explores the barriers and capabilities surrounding public sector value co-creation with private sector organizations in the context of digital transformation. Specifically, value co-creation efforts at a large public transport and rail infrastructure provider are [...] Read more.
Theoretically based on public service logic (PSL), this paper explores the barriers and capabilities surrounding public sector value co-creation with private sector organizations in the context of digital transformation. Specifically, value co-creation efforts at a large public transport and rail infrastructure provider are examined from multiple perspectives using an exploratory case study approach. Based on qualitative interview data, six barriers that hinder value co-creation in public service ecosystems and five corresponding organizational capabilities required to overcome them are identified. The study contributes to the field of public management research by shedding light on the concept of value co-creation in public-private sector digitalization collaborations. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Insights of Value Co-creation in Public Sector)
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 372 KiB  
Article
Co-Production of Digital Public Services in Austrian Public Administrations
by Noella Edelmann and Ines Mergel
Adm. Sci. 2021, 11(1), 22; https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci11010022 - 27 Feb 2021
Cited by 31 | Viewed by 6561
Abstract
In the digital transformation of public administrations, objectives are no longer simply the implementation of new technology, but the involvement of all stakeholders into the process of digitalization. The Digital Roadmap of the Austrian government emphasizes the need of co-production of public services [...] Read more.
In the digital transformation of public administrations, objectives are no longer simply the implementation of new technology, but the involvement of all stakeholders into the process of digitalization. The Digital Roadmap of the Austrian government emphasizes the need of co-production of public services as a key element to public service delivery and, subsequently, innovation of the public sector. To understand how co-production in digital service delivery is implemented in Austria, we conducted interviews with 41 experts from public administrations in order to understand who is involved in such processes, how they are involved, and what outcomes are to be achieved. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Insights of Value Co-creation in Public Sector)
17 pages, 326 KiB  
Article
Creating or Destructing Value in Use? Handling Cognitive Impairments in Co-Creation with Serious and Chronically Ill Users
by Jim Broch Skarli
Adm. Sci. 2021, 11(1), 16; https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci11010016 - 15 Feb 2021
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 5257
Abstract
Theoretically based on public service logic (PSL), this article addresses how users’ cognitive impairments can affect co-creation processes and value outcomes in a public sector environment, and how the service providers can handle this issue. It directs attention to value creation in the [...] Read more.
Theoretically based on public service logic (PSL), this article addresses how users’ cognitive impairments can affect co-creation processes and value outcomes in a public sector environment, and how the service providers can handle this issue. It directs attention to value creation in the context of vulnerable and unwilling service users and contributes to understanding how cognitive gaps between public health care services and users inhibit value co-creation. Based on qualitative interview data, findings substantiate that cognitive impairments reduce the users’ health literacy and therefore affect both their ability and willingness to participate in co-creation. The study recognizes that there is a built-in asymmetry between the involved actors and that failing to reduce this asymmetry through adequate facilitation by the service providers, can result in co-destruction of value in use. It is acknowledged that the users might not be cognitively able to determine whether they actually come better or worse off in the end. Therefore, it is suggested that the service provider might need to play a larger role in determining what is positive or negative value in use. Hence, this article adds to PSL by clearly emphasizing the key role played by public service organizations (PSOs) in facilitating the value creation process, which takes place during service delivery. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Insights of Value Co-creation in Public Sector)

Review

Jump to: Editorial, Research

19 pages, 798 KiB  
Review
Living Labs for Public Sector Innovation: An Integrative Literature Review
by Lars Fuglsang, Anne Vorre Hansen, Ines Mergel and Maria Taivalsaari Røhnebæk
Adm. Sci. 2021, 11(2), 58; https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci11020058 - 8 Jun 2021
Cited by 27 | Viewed by 8746
Abstract
The public administration literature and adjacent fields have devoted increasing attention to living labs as environments and structures enabling the co-creation of public sector innovation. However, living labs remain a somewhat elusive concept and phenomenon, and there is a lack of understanding of [...] Read more.
The public administration literature and adjacent fields have devoted increasing attention to living labs as environments and structures enabling the co-creation of public sector innovation. However, living labs remain a somewhat elusive concept and phenomenon, and there is a lack of understanding of its versatile nature. To gain a deeper understanding of the multiple dimensions of living labs, this article provides a review assessing how the environments, methods and outcomes of living labs are addressed in the extant research literature. The findings are drawn together in a model synthesizing how living labs link to public sector innovation, followed by an outline of knowledge gaps and future research avenues. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Insights of Value Co-creation in Public Sector)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 296 KiB  
Review
Understandings of Social Innovation within the Danish Public Sector: A Literature Review
by Ada Scupola, Lars Fuglsang, Faiz Gallouj and Anne Vorre Hansen
Adm. Sci. 2021, 11(2), 49; https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci11020049 - 1 May 2021
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 3675
Abstract
Social innovation is an emerging theme within innovation theory, and so is the concept of public service innovation networks for social innovation (PSINSIs). The purpose of this article is to explore how social innovation in Danish public services is conceptualised and enacted through [...] Read more.
Social innovation is an emerging theme within innovation theory, and so is the concept of public service innovation networks for social innovation (PSINSIs). The purpose of this article is to explore how social innovation in Danish public services is conceptualised and enacted through the lenses of public service innovation networks for social innovation. To do this, a thorough integrative review of the literature dealing with the Danish context is conducted. The Danish context is interesting in order to investigate these network arrangements, firstly because they are not well understood in the context of the Nordic welfare states, which Denmark is part of, and then because municipalities and civil society have historically had a mutually dependent relationship in Denmark. The article highlights that social innovation is framed in several ways in the Danish public sector. In particular, the results show that the literature can be grouped according to four themes: (1) samskabelse (co-creation), (2) collaboration with civil society, (3) social entrepreneurs and social innovation and (4) public–private innovation partnerships. Moreover, the article presents and discusses a number of Danish empirical projects that may be understood through the lens of the PSINSI framework. Hence, the paper contributes with new theoretical perspectives, in addition to contributing to practice. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Insights of Value Co-creation in Public Sector)
Back to TopTop